The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2475 GARFIELD ST; ; CB061728; Permit$0.00 $160.00 $4,313.00 $0.00 $7,623.69 \ $7,037.25 $0.00 $0.00 $521.70 $588.30 $0.00 $259.00 j $60.00 $100.50 $0.00 $4,515.00 $0.00 $365.31 $1,047.00 $179.00 $33,006.21 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No: CB061728 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 i,, 01-02-2007 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: - Project Title: 2475 GARFIELD ST CBAD RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD 2030220500 Lot #: 0 $418,884.00 Construction Type: VN Reference #: I Structure Type: SFD 4 Bathrooms: 4 REFOLD RES- NEW 3875 SF LIVING 537 SF GARAGE, 124 SF PATIO, 609SF DECKS Status: ISSUED Applied: 06/15/2006 Entered By: LSM Plan Approved: 01/02/2007 Issued: 01/02/2007 Inspect Area: Orig PC#: Plan Check#: Applicant: Owner: CRAIG LEWIS . REFOLD JAY&DEBRA P 0 BOX 968 - 132 N EL CAMINO REAL #295 CARDIFF 92007 ENCINITAS CA 92024 . 619 890 1600 . / •', /: - / 7 xt , N . t-.-. t r.• I' t .•. '. 1$1,529.08 Meter Size $0.00 Add'I Red. Fee. .,, s993:90.., Meter Fee..,.' / $0.001, ,SDCWAe $0.00 I CFD Payoff Fee \, ' $41.89 .- - - PFF(3105540) - $0.00. PFF(4305540),.,—'/ $0.00'..LicenseTax(3104193) 1 $0.00 Liàensé Tax (4304193) - - $0.00 Trffl. Impact Fee (3105541) $0.00 Traffic Impa6t Fee (4305541) ---' / ,$0.00'. -SidewalkFée .--. - " '- •' N $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL- $0.00. ELECTRICAL1TOTA ./ / $0.00 MECHAMCALTOTAL, -, pu.uu , nuuuiiy ullupdL.t $282.59 1,.Housing - lnLieu Fee $3,188.00'Housing Credit Fee / D5/8 Master Drainage Fee $201.00"SévrFee- $0.00 Additional Fees • r .-TOTAL PERMIT-FEES - . N J-1 ' Total Fees: $33,006.21 Total Payments To Dat: $ I 3300621 Balance Due: Building Permit / Add'I Building Permit Fee/ Plan Check J ' Add'I Plan Check Fee / c Plan Check Discount ' Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee ' •J- .-• Park Fee LFM Fee - Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD#2Fee BTD#3Fee Renewal Fee Add'I Reñéwal Fee Other Building Fee HMP Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'I Pot. Water Con. Fee,, Red. Water Con. Fee \ $0.00 K=:~ FINAL4P,QVAJ Inspector:. . bate: 1 -' (' / Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the imposition of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any .. . •• •• :0616601-2 0019 0615/2006 Out 33 - PERMIT APPLICATION PLAN CHECK NO 26O I 7c-3' EST ¶T A BUILDING g DEPART 1635 Faraday Avilb.-,'Ca~r1sbad,CA MENT Plan Ck.' Deposit 08 Validated 13~ Date________________________ PJECYJNj,QRMATION o2P?5 &Q -piej - •. Ad ress include BId /Suite #) .. - Business,Narneg(atthjs address). 1ifi4ra#wiffe P -4o1 k&i,gi - V4fl LoT I Legal D Sc iptuon Lot No Subdivision Name/Number Unit No Phase No Total # of units o1-o-'--- —05 . •-..:.: -?7c- - Asses r's Parcel # Existing Use . Pro ed Use J .. - Description of WorkJ . ---SQ. FT .. .............#of Stories. ' .—¼1 ( # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms ../ PAT)o:- tppjjntj , arne . .. . . Address . . City - State/Zip Telephone # Fax # ( PLlC 1'acir 7 _ '•' Pc.c Name ,J . . - . Address . . .. - City 'State/Zip ......Telephone # TRO . PERWb NER 3(OM(o7 Name Address . . . . - City .. . . State/Zip Telephone.# (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County, which requires a permit to construct, alter,.improve, demolish or repair, ny structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License, Law [Chapter. 9,, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt theefrom, and the basis for the. alleged exempt io . Any violation of S, ct n 7031.5 by ny applicant fo a permit subjects he appli toa,civil penalty of not more than V e hunre dollars l500J). -W1Iov Ui °ec '- . --4rL.- fo/'10 Name . --. . . . Address . . • • . • City • State/Zip State License '# 93l.(_j 'f . ' -- • License Class ' . • . A/.t.!( -- • -- 'r- - Designer Name Address . :.. .. . • City. • State/ZiØ. Telephone.......... State License # •.• • • .- .- . . . • . • . . . -rt'--- '.•. -;c--. Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury. one of the following declarations: . o I haveand will maintain a certificate of consent-to self-insure for wokérs compensation as provided by Section .3700-of the Labor Code, for.the performance. of the work for which this permit is issued. . • . -I have and will-maintain workers' compensation, as required-by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's comp ti n ins u ance ca ier and policy number are: • .. . .• •........... Insurance Company e ,. Policy No. , . Expiration Date /1_SI (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1001 OR LESS) - • ' . E] CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which thispermit is issued! I hall not'emloy any person in any manner, so as -, to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. - . . . . . • WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100, I ddition to the cost pf comp nsation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Lalor cod ,interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE ...- • . DATE________ 04 — I hereby affirm that I am e t om the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: - • - . • - • . • ....... C3 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of. property whobuilds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build-or improve for the purpose of sale); - - - - -- 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed, contractors to construct the'project (Sac. -7044, Busines and Professions Code: The ' Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). - • - . . -. • • - - 0 I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason:. • , - •- , • . - , - , •- . - - - 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials.for construction of the proposed, property.improvementD YES ONO ,........ 2 I (have'/ have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work .3. .l have contracted with the following person (firm)to provide the proposed construction .'(include name / address / phone number/ contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I havehired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide-'the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): - - 5. (will provide some of the work, but I have.contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name/address / phone number /type of work):--. . - - - - ' - - • - - . - - PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE • _._-- DATE - ____-_• _-._,. _ --_• - • * " - Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk rranagernent and prevention - program under Sections-25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? - 0 YES : NO'' . : - ..., - - Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO Is the facility to be constructed within-1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site?- 0 YES 0- NO. - - - - - - - - -----. IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THEAPPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE - - - - REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. -. - - - - -- - - - " '' 'j"' - - I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i C I Co - - -, - - - LENDER'S NAME - - - - - - LENER'S ADDRESS - -- . - - - - -- " '' __ - — - I certify that I have read the application-and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all - - - City ordinances and State laws- relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives. of -the Cit'of -Carlsbad to enter upon'the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. ' OSHA An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall- xpire by limitation and become null and void-if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commence thin 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned -at any time after the work is commenced) iod of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). - - - - . -- -- - - APPLICANT S SIGNATURE DATE j5/Oc2, - -- .: - WHITE: File-S YELLOWS Applicant - PINK: Finance----------------- Inspection List Permit#: C13061728 Type: RESDNTL SFD REFOLD RES- NEW 3875 SF LIVING 537 SF GARAGE, 124 SF PATIO, 609SF DE Date Inspection Item Inspector Act Comments 07/26/2007 69 Final Combo - RI 07/26/2007 89 Final Combo PY AP NEED ALL DEPTS. 06/25/2007 22 Sewer/Water Service PY AP 04/23/2007 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PC AP 04/23/2007 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall PC AP 04/16/2007 16 Insulation PC AP 04/16/2007 23 Gas/Test/Repairs PC AP 04/10/2007 84 Rough Combo PD PA NOTICE -OK TO INSULATE 03/19/200713 Shear Panels/HD's PY AP 03/19/2007 15 Roof/Reroof P.Y AP 01/23/2007 11 • Ftg/Foundation/Piers PY AP 01/23/2007 32 Const. Service/Agricultural PY PA TPPB 01/23/2007 34 Rough Electric PY • WC 01/18/2007 21 Underground/Under Floor PY AP 01/18/200798 BMP Inspection PY AP Friday, July 27, 2007 • Page 1 of 1 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 07/26/2007 Permit# C6061728 Inspector Assignment: PY Title: REFOLD RES- NEW 3875 SF LIVING Description: 537 SF GARAGE, 124 SF PATIO, 609SF DECKS Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Phone: 6198901600 Job Address: 2475 GARFIELD ST Suite: Lot: 0 Inspector: Location: OWNER REFOLD JAY&DEBRA Owner: Remarks: Total Time: Requested By: GREG Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description Act Comme ts -& I 19 Final Structural ifl\clf2 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Comments/Notices/Holds Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC# Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 06/25/2007 22 Sewer/Water Service AP PY 04/23/2007 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP PC 04/23/2007 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP PC 04/16/2007 16 Insulation AP PC 04/16/2007 23 Gas/Test/Repairs AP PC 04/10/2007 84 Rough Combo PA PD NOTICE - OK TO INSULATE 03/19/2007 13 Shear Panels/HD's AP PY 03/19/2007 15 Roof/Reroof AP PY 01/23/2007 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PY 01/23/2007 32 Const. Service/Agricultural PA PY TPPB 01/23/2007 34 Rough Electric WC PY 01/18/2007 21 Underground/Under Floor AP PY 01/18/2907 98 BMP Inspection AP PY 2 75 4,eA-zj /71g S . ) Baker Land Surveys, Inc. 4213 Sunnyhill Drive Carlsbad, CA. 92008 (760) 729-6676 Fax 729-7803 Slab /Foundation Footing Forms Certification Letter Date: January 19,2007 From: John Douglas Baker To: City of Carlsbad Engineering and Building Department Subject: Footing forms certification for the construction of the slab/foundation for the Garfield House located at 2475 Garfield Street, Carlsbad, CA. City of Carlsbad Building Permit # CB061728. This letter is to inform you that I, John Douglas Baker, Licensed Surveyor 6287, peiformd a field survey on 1/09/07 to provide Willowen Builders with building line stakes per approved plans. A boundary survey was performed to establish property lines and said building line staking was in relation to the boundary. survey. I again visited said site on 1/18/07 to verify building line stakes were used to construct slab- footing forms. Slab footing forms were found to be constructed per approved plans. 9John ince re D. Baker EXP. 9/30/08 No, 687 ,1::! H GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC. SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING GROUNDWATER ENGINEERING GEOLOGY . FIELD REPORT ON OBSERVATION OF FOUNDATIONS ' DATE:' _1/17/'7 TIME " c?4.-1 CLIENT.: .flFl . . JOB NO: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS: O 7I 7F/? 0 S, T C4/L(,, The footing excavations listed below we're bottomed on material for which the bearing values 1' recommended in the foundation report are applicable. . The cast-in-place drilled friction piles listed below penetrated material for 'which the allowable supporting capacities recommended in the foundation report are applicable. The Riles were excavated to diameters at least as large as specified and the excavations extended at least to the depths indicated on the Foundation Plans:' The excavations for the cast-in-place belied piers listed' below were bottomed on material for which the bearing values recommended in the foundation report are applicable. The excavations were at least as large as specified on the Foundation Plans. The driven piles listed below were observed-t6 be driven., to the' specified lengths and/or El driving resistances to obtain the supporting capacities recorn;mended in the foundation report. . - Based upon observations, it is our opinion that the foundation recommendations preseitedin the report of the foundation investigation, Job No. oç- 4'0 ,ç , dated 10 c()/(are not) plicable to, the conditions Observed. Foundation Plans by Aczf dated" ( ,/'./'. were used as 'a reference for our observations. Fcu7,N ( OGsr?tVr, "ivor Qf(Oi(t ii"i'o' -' t QI"lt'J(,( uAJF)j 'AJ l'1#.-7 co'cf !0 UI pt, I cncc,'(r) f(1 NOTE: . The observations reported, above do not constitute an approval of foundation location, footing size or depth, reinforcement, or foundation design. Loose, soft, p disturbed. soils must be removed prior to placement of reinforcement or concrete. ' The opinions and recommendations presented in this report were based upon our observa- tions and are presented in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practice. We make no other warranty, either express or implied. BY:/ 7420 Trade St. San Diëgo,.Ca. 92121 •(858):549-7?22 f. FAX: (858) 549-1604 GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC. SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING* GROUNDWATER* ENGINEERING GEOLOGY Job Nam _Job# 06 -ci*(- 3r Daft 111911117 PioJectLocahon: So.OF iq.ç .P '(LC) cr cic Summary of Observations: -. - ci &-c • c ,,y ctr r-o D'*'1.? C 1 t• e)J 1-17Lo I &4owL-f- Co &A P4-flF' P166i M 13 QA/ s,rW tec0 .gce'f? ft C-% 13A-Cr. FIC4. CoAoffOAr,7" FLF$,rJC.. 1.EN(s 'S •rz-o.e v-ic.*r TK-EMA4 )rP1)k P-- tc' *-re'z. Recommendation: By: - Received by: 7420 Trade St. San Dieao, CA 92121 • 1858 4..7979 • FA)( 1RR\ c4&1nA ap,il .-.-. O 3E8 139 009t6898 0091 L0ø//TO Mar. 16. 2007 3:03PM 0. S. I. Structural No. 5861 P. 2/2 O-17L. - - DUNN S*V0B k45. TiSYUN* £N$ES - . . • . •• , .• 50$ S. DLfvtL.ND 5?. ' Daw..ir. CA. 91054- TRU C'S0) 9$53R$FM •wt7IO1545.5250 - • -. t To: Craig Lewis • From: RHETTM. SAVOIE • of •W1UDWenIUUdBT • -. Email: thettsurfdsicxm Fax: 858-756-1573 • Pages: 1 indu*ng cover sheet -' Phone 619190-1600 mobile - lte: Friday, March 16, 2007 Re: Gwfteld Residence • CC: I(ip McBane @760-757-5152 0 Urgent M For Review OPlease Comment 0 Please Reply El Please Recycle RE: Structural Observation Report bed on site visit March. 16, 2W7 The purpose of this report is to document my satisfaction with the structural framing construction at the above referenced project Specifically, I am satisfied that the framing and connections comply with the intent of our permitted construction documents dated July 20, 2006 (delta 2 plan check response), subsequent revisions delta 3,4 & 5, faxed clarifications and the 2003 California Building Code (CBC). This Is based on telephone contact with the owner rep/contractor and my site visit on March 16, 2007. - .-•' • In lummary, I am satisfied with the structural'framing and connections at the Garfield Residence. Please give 'a copy of this report to the field Inspector. . • Pleas Vks, uidlI1ons. ______ • Than 23 Rheft - - - . .. • P CM. - . • _l• EsGil Corporation In (Partnership with Government for Bui(ding Safety DATE: November 27, 2006 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 06-1728 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2475 Garfield St. PROJECT NAME: SFD for Jay Refold SET: III tJ 2i1\NT URI. U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE Lii The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where -necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply.with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for thé jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. El Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted (by: ) Fax #: 858-756-1573 Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: Applicant stated that the Building Official requested the plans to be sent back to the City. According to the applicant's statement the City will review and approved the corrections included in the check list dated October 19, 2006. By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation LIGA LIMB L]EJ LJPC LOG tmsmti dot 7- EsGil Corporation - In (Partners/lip with çovernment for Bui(ding Safety DATE: October 19, 2006 U}PLICANT 4LJi RIS. JURISDICTION: Carlsbad L3 PLAN REVIEWER U FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 06-1728 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 2475 Garfield St. PROJECT NAME: SFD for Jay Refold V LI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith. will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. Lii The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. rq The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Craig Lewis P.O. Box 968, Cardiff, CA 92007 Lii Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: )Crpi,g Lewis Date contacted: 1b/tt (by:s7) VV Mail elephone Fax—'in Person REMARKS: Telephone #: (619) 890-1600 'Fax #: 858-756-1573 By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation LIGA LIMB LIEJ LJPC 10/12 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 06-1728 October 19, 2006 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2475 Garfield St. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 10/12 REVIEWED BY: Sergio Azuela FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 06-1728 SET: III DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: October 19, 2006 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? LJYes UNo Carlsbad 06-1728 October 19, 2006 1.. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). Sheets A-i 0 to A-I 3 are missing the required signature. e A10 mezzanine is an intermediate floor and may not have a floor area exceeding 33 1/3 ercent of the total floor area in the room below. The mezzanine floor must have a clear eight of 7 feet, above and below, and must have the long side open to the room below except for posts and protective walls or railings not exceeding 44" in height. Section 507. a) The mezzanine you show does not comply as a mezzanine floor because the floor area exceeds the 33 1/3 percent of the floor area in the room below and is, by Uniform Building Code definition, a story. Section 507. The floor area of the Deck shall be included within the floor area of the mezzanine to justify the "Mezzanine Definition". The mezzanine is a third floor. Original correction is still applicable. The applicant responded by the following statement: "Carlsbad Building Department has said that they will allow roof deck with separate 2nd exit shown on AO, Al, A2, A3, A4, A5 and A6". The applicant shall provide evidence from the building department approval for this specific exits correction; or show compliance on the plans. . SEE NEXT PAGE FOR ADDITIONAL REMAINING CORRECTIONS. Carlsbad 06-1728 October 19, 2006 11. Floors, above the second story shall have not less than 2 exits. Section 1004.2.3.2. \ xctions: 1. Occupied roofs may have one exit if such occupied areas are less than 0ø' square feet and located no higher than immediately above the second story. 2. U' )(hen the third floor within a unit does not exceed 500 sq. ft., only one exit need be 'J provided. Please provide tow exits from the "Mezzanine". Additional corrections may follow. The floor area of the Deck shall be included within the floor area of the mezzanine to justify the "Mezzanine Definition". The mezzanine is a third floor. Original correction is still applicable. The applicant responded by the following statement: "Carlsbad Building Department has said that they will allow roof deck with separate 2nd exit shown on AO, Al, A2, A3, A4, A5 and A6". The applicant shall provide evidence from the building department approval for this specific exits correction; or show compliance on the plans. CARLSBAD SPECIAL CODE REQUIREMENTS If special inspection is required, the designer shall complete the attached Special Inspection Notice. Special Inspection is required for "SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION". The correction response for this correction reads: "FORM ATTACHED", however, the required form was not attached. Original correction is still applicable. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 06-1728 October 19, 2006 C44( City S C arlsbad o1 !uiIdin9 Department BUILDING NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION Do Not Remove From Plans Plan Check No. 06-1728 Job Address or Legal Description 2475 Garfield St. Owner Address You are hereby notified that in addition to the inspection of construction provided by the Building Department, an approved Registered Special Inspector is required to provide continuous inspection during the performance of the phases of construction indicated on the reverse side of this sheet. The Registered Special Inspector shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Building Department prior to the issuance of the building permit. Special Inspectors having a current certification from the City of San Diego, Los Angeles, or ICBO are approved as Special Inspectors for the type of construction for which they are certified. The inspections by a Special Inspector do not change the requirements for inspections by personnel of the City of Carlsbad building department. The inspections by a Special Inspector are in addition to the inspections normally required by the County Building Code. The Special Inspector is not authorized to inspect and approve any work other than that for which he/she is specifically assigned to inspect. The Special Inspector is not authorized to accept alternate materials, structural changes, or any requests for plan changes. The Special Inspector is required to submit written reports to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that he/she inspected and approved. The final inspection approval will not be given until all Special Inspection reports have been received and approved by the City of Carlsbad building department. Please submit the names of the inspectors who will perform the special inspections on each of the items indicated on the reverse side of this sheet. (over) Casrisbad 06-1728 October 19, 2006 SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PLAN CHECK NUMBER: OWNER'S NAME: I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify that I, or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing.the special inspector(s) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 for the construction project located at the site listed above. UBC Section 106.3.5. Signed I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at the site listed above. Engineer's/Architect's Seal & Signature Here Signed 1. List of work requiring special inspection: LI Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection LI Field Welding LII Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI LI High Strength Bolting LI Prestressed Concrete El Expansion/Epoxy Anchors El Structural Masonry El Sprayed-On Fireproofing LI Designer Specified LII Other 2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above: 3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above: Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site. EsGil Corporation In (Partnership with government for 8ui(ding Safety DATE: August 14, 2006 U_AP-P-UCNT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 06-1728 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2475 Garfield St. PROJECT NAME: SFD for Jay Refold The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. Z The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Craig Lewis P.O. Box 968, Cardiff, CA 92007 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Cra Lewis Date contacted: Mail Telephone v4ax Person IIJ• REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Esgil Corporation El GA LIMB LIEJ []Pc 8/7 Telephone #: (619) 890-1600 Fax #: 1d— 15( - /5r73 Enclosures: trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 06-1728 August 14, 2006 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2475 Garfield St. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 8/7 REVIEWED BY: Sergio Azuela FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 06-1728 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: August 14, 2006 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? ]Yes UNo Carlsbad 06-1728 August 14, 2006 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). A mezzanine is an intermediate floor and may not have a floor area exceeding 33 1/3 percent of the total floor area in the room below. The mezzanine floor must have a clear height of 7 feet, above and below, and must have the long side open to the room below except for posts and protective walls or railings not exceeding 44" in height. Section 507. a) The mezzanine you show does not comply as a mezzanine floor because the floor area exceeds the 33 1/3 percent of the floor area in the room below and is, by Uniform Building Code definition, a story. Section 507. The floor area of the Deck shall be included within the floor area of the mezzanine to justify the "Mezzanine Definition". The mezzanine is a third floor. Original correction is still applicable. Floors above the second story shall have not less than 2 exits. Section 1004.2.3.2. Exceptions: 1. Occupied roofs may have one exit if such occupied areas are less than 500 square feet and located no higher than immediately above the second story. 2. When the third floor within a unit does not exceed 500 sq. ft., only one exit need be provided. Please provide tow exits from the "Mezzanine". Additional corrections may follow. The floor area of the Deck shall be included within the floor area of the mezzanine to justify the "Mezzanine Definition". The mezzanine is a third floor. Oriainal correction is still applicable. . SEE NEXT PAGE FOR ADDITIONAL REMAINING CORRECTIONS. Carlsbad 06-1728 August 14, 2006 12. Guardrails (Section 509.1): Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-13. Clearly show it on plans for the cable guardrail and also for the glass guardrail. Please include construction details, with the size and spacing of all supporting posts, and also the construction details for the connections between the supporting posts and the floor framing. Additional corrections may follow. Openings between railings shall be less than 4". The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a guardrail at a stair shall be less than 6". Please note that since the cable railing is made of flexible members (cables are flexible), then the spacing between the cables is reduced (by some designers) to 3 1/2" o.c., instead of 4" o.c. to guarantee that the spacing will be maintained. This solution has been accepted in the past. Please provide all required details on the plans and also provide cross- reference from details to plans. CARLSBAD SPECIAL CODE REQUIREMENTS 40. If special inspection is required, the designer shall complete the attached Special Inspection Notice. Special Inspection is required for "SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION". The correction response for this correction reads: "FORM ATTACHED", however, the required form was not attached. Original correction is still applicable. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. V p EsGil Corporation In PartnersIiip with çovernmentforBui(iing Safety DATE: June 29, 2006 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 06-1728 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2475 Garfield St. PROJECT NAME: SFD for Jay Refold SET:I U AEEIJNT 11,1 JURIS. U PL IEWER U FILE The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. LI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. Lii The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Craig Lewis P.O. Box 968, Cardiff, CA 92007 LII Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Craig Lewis (-q .—i) Telephone #: (619) 890-1600 Date contacted:'1I.('Oco (by: Fax #: MaiL-Telephone'./ Fax In Person LI REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation fl GA ii MB fl EJ LI PC 6/19 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 06-1728 June 29, 2006 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 06-1728 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2475 Garfield St. FLOOR AREA: Dwelling 3,705 SF Garage 540 SF, Patio Coy. 125 SF Decks 606 SF REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: June 29, 2006 STORIES: 3 HEIGHT: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 6/19 PLAN REVIEWER: Sergio Azuela FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 2000 UPC, 2000 UMC and 2002 NEC. The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. - The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc.. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 06-1728 June 29, 2006 . PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets-of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). Specify on the Title Sheet of the plans the gross floor area of each element of this project, including deck. Section 106.3.3. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans stating that this project shall comply with the 2001 editions of the California Building/Plumbing/Mechanical Codes and the 2004 edition of the California Electrical Code, which adopt the 1997 UBC, 2000 UMC, 2000 UPC and the 2002 NEC. a) Please include the underlined part of the correction above under the applicable codes information provided at the CODE ANALYSIS on sheet C-I. . FIRE PROTECTION Show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup: Inside each bedroom. Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms. On each story. When sleeping rooms are upstairs, at the upper level in close proximity to the stair. In rooms adjacent to hallways serving bedrooms, when such rooms have a ceiling height 24 inches or more above the ceiling height in the hallway. NOTE: Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in all sleeping areas of the unit. Section 310.9.1. Carlsbad 06-1728 June 29, 2006 . GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS 6. Sleeping rooms shall have a window or exterior door for emergency escape. Sill height shall not exceed 44" above the floor. Windows must have an openable area of at least 5.7 square feet with the minimum openable width 20" and the minimum openable height 24". The emergency door or window shall be openable from the inside to provide a full, clear opening without the use of separate tools. Section 310.4. a) Please clearly show which window will provide the emergency escape for Bedrooms 3 and 4 and clearly show the net opening dimensions at these particular windows. Also please revise the plans to show V1 instead of V2 at the Bedroom #4, since V1 is the one included within the Window Schedule. Provide mechanical ventilation capable of providing five air changes per hour in bathrooms and water closet compartments if required openable windows are not provided. Section 1203.3. Note that the discharge point for exhaust air will be at least 3 feet from any opening which allows air entry into occupied portions of the building. Section 1203.3. Dimension on the plans 30" clear width for water closet compartments and 24" clearance in front of water closet. Section 2904. A mezzanine is an intermediate floor and may not have a floor area exceeding 33 1/3 percent of the total floor area in the room below. The mezzanine floor must have a clear height of 7 feet, above and below, and must have the long side open to the room below except for posts and protective walls or railings not exceeding 44" in height. Section 507. a) The mezzanine you show does not comply as -a mezzanine floor because the floor area exceeds the 33 1/3 percent of the floor area in the room below and is, by Uniform Building Code definition, a story. Section 507. EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS Floors above the second story shall have not less than 2 exits. Section 1004.2.3.2. Exceptions: 1. Occupied roofs may have one exit if such occupied areas are less than 500 square feet and located no higher than immediately above the second story. 2. When the third floor within a unit does not exceed 500 sq. ft., only one exit need be provided. Please provide tow exits from the "Mezzanine". Additional corrections may follow. Carlsbad 06-1728 June 29, 2006 12. Guardrails (Section 509.1): a) Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-B. Clearly show it on plans for the cable guardrail and also for the glass guardrail. Please include construction details, with the size and spacing of all supporting posts, and also the construction details for the connections between the supporting posts and the floor framing. Additional corrections may follow. b) Openings between railings shall be less than 4". The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a guardrail at a stair shall be less than 6". Please note that since the cable railing is made of flexible members (cables are flexible), then the spacing between the cables is reduced (by some designers) to 3 1/2" o.c., instead of 4" o.c. to guarantee that the spacing will be maintained. This solution has been accepted in the past. 13. Provide stairway and landing details. Sections 1003.3.3. Maximum rise is 7" and minimum run is 11". When the stairs serves less than 10 occupants, or serves an unoccupied roof, rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum. Clearly show it on plans for the stairway fm the second floor to the Mezzanine. Minimum headroom is 6'-8". Clearly show it on plans for the stairway fm the second floor to the Mezzanine. Minimum width is 36". Clearly show on plans the inside dimension from wall to wall or from wall to railing for all stairs. 14. Handrails (Section 1003.3.3.6): Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and be continuous. The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends. 15. The walls and soffits of the enclosed usable space under interior stairs shall be protected on the enclosed side as required for one hour fire-resistive construction. Section 1003.3.3.9. GARAGE AND CARPORTS 16. Doors may open into the arae only if the floor or landing in the garage is not more than one inch lower:-than-the door threshold. Section 1003.3.1.6. Please show it on plans for Door 14. Carlsbad 06-1728 June 29, 2006 . MASONRY 17. Show anchored veneer support and connections attached to wood in Seismic Zones 3 and 4, comply with Section 1403. Show ties, #9 wire in horizontal joints, etc. . FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 18. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in Seismic Zones 3 and 4. This does not apply to detached, single- story dwellings. Section 1804.5 19. Note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and note the allowable bearing value. Section 106.3.3. 20. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 21. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (required by the soil report - page 21). 22. Show distance ;from foundation to edge of cut or fill slopes ("distance-to- daylight') and show slope and heights of cuts and fills. Chapter 18. 23. Note on plans that surface water will drain away from building and show drainage pattern. Section 1804.7. 24. Specify size, I.C.B.O. number and manufacturer of power driven pins, expansion anchors or epoxy anchors. Show edge and end distances and spacing. Section 106.3.3. Please show it on Detail 3/S-2. FRAMING 25. Please provide evidence that the engineer-of-record (or architect) has reviewed the truss calculation package prepared by others (i.e., a "review" stamp on the truss calculations or a letter). Section 106.3.4.1. Carlsbad 06-1728 June 29, 2006 26. Show location of attic access with a minimum size of 22"00", unless the maximum vertical headroom height in the attic is less than 30". Access must be provided to each separated attic area, shall be located in a hallway or other readily accessible location and 30" headroom clearance is required above the opening. Section 1505.1. . MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 27. Show the location, type and size (BTU's) of all heating and cooling appliances or systems. 28. Show minimum 30" deep unobstructed working space in front of furnace. UMC Section 903. 29. Show source of combustion air to furnace, per Chapter 7, UMC. Specify the• location and sizes of both of the combustion air openings. 30. Specify on the plans the following information for the fireplace(s), per Section 106.3.3: ICBO approval number, or equal. Show height of chimney above roof per I.C.B.O. approval or UBC Table 31-B. Note on the plans that approved spark arrestors shall be installed on all chimneys. UBC, Section 3102.3.8. 31. Note on plan: Gas vents and noncombustible piping in walls, passing through three floors or less, shall be effectively draft stopped at each floor or ceiling. UBC, Section 711.3. 32. Detail the dryer exhaust duct design from the dryer to the exterior. The maximum length is 14 feet with (two) 900 elbows. UMC Section 504.2.2. . ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 33. Show on the plans that the location of the service panel shall be readily accessible (outside). PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 34. Show water heater size (1st hour rating), type, and location on plans. UPC, Section 501.0. 35. Note on the plans that "Combustion air for fuel burning water heaters will be provided in accordance with UPC Section 507 and Table 5-1". 36. Show T and P valve on water heater and show route of discharge line to exterior. UPC, Section 608.5. Carlsbad 06-1728 June 29, 2006 . ENERGY CONSERVATION 37. The regulations require a properly completed and properly signed Form CF-1 R (4 pages) to be either imprinted on the plans, taped to the plans or "sticky backed" on the plans, to allow the building inspector to readily compare the actual construction with the requirements of the approved energy design. Owner's signature is missing. 38. Show on the plans compliance with the residential energy lighting requirements (Mandatory requirement): In the kitchen at least one-half of the wattage rating of the fixtures must be high efficacy with non-high efficacy fixtures switched separately. Note: Approximately 3/4 of the fixtures will be required to be of the high efficacy variety. In bathrooms, garages, laundry rooms, and utility rooms all fixtures must be high efficacy style or be controlled by a manually-on occupancy sensor. All other rooms require any installed fixtures to be high efficacy or be controlled by a manually-on occupancy sensor or dimmer. (Closets under 70 square feet are exempt). Outdoor lighting fixtures are required to be high efficacy or controlled by a combination photocontrol/motion sensor. Note: Generally a high efficacy style of fixture is fluorescent complete with electronic ballasts. Regular incandescent, quartz halogen and halogen MR lamps do not comply. 39. Show the make, model, type and efficiency of the space heating (or cooling) system. . CARLSBAD SPECIAL CODE REQUIREMENTS 40. If special inspection is required, the designer shall complete the attached Special Inspection Notice. Special Inspection is required for "SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION". 41. Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093). 42. All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (City Policy). Carlsbad 06-1728 June 29, 2006 To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: YesO No U The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 06-1728 June 29, 2006 t of C 107 BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION Do Not Remove From Plans Plan Check No. 06-1728 Job Address or Legal Description 2475 Garfield St. Owner_____________ Address I You are hereby notified that in addition to the inspection of construction provided by the Building Department, an approved Registered Special Inspector is required to provide continuous inspection during the performance of the phases of construction indicated on the reverse side of this sheet. The Registered Special Inspector shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Building Department prior to the issuance of the building permit. Special Inspectors having a current certification from the City of San Diego, Los Angeles, or ICBO are approved as Special Inspectors for the type of construction for which they are certified. The inspections by a Special Inspector do not change the requirements for inspections by personnel of the City of Carlsbad building department. The inspections by a Special Inspector are in addition to the inspections normally required by the County Building Code. The Special Inspector is not authorized to inspect and approve any work other than that for which he/she is specifically assigned to inspect. The Special Inspector is not authorized to accept alternate materials, structural changes, or any requests for plan changes. The Special Inspector is required to submit written reports to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that he/she inspected and approved. The final inspection approval will not be given until all Special Inspection reports have been received and approved by the City of Carlsbad building department. Please submit the names of the inspectors who will perform the special inspections on each of the items indicated on the reverse side of this sheet. (over) 01'Cl CL19L8SB simal 2iej3 d1j:.o 90 90 InC (TI ;o ot 5v) Li Carlsbad 06-1728 June 29, 2006 SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: GAO 0A S't(Z PLAN CHECK NUMBER: C1 'c/SOWNER'S NAME: ____________ I, as the owner, orjLof the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify that I, or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special inspector(s) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 for the. construction project located 1-e site listed above. UBC Section 106.3.5. Signed I, as the engiherfch,Jtct of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as reqidyAJBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction pr te ite listed above. •A&d I 10 re Hm Signed 2L- 11 o 1. List ~reqquiring special inspection: Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection fl Field Welding Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI High Strength Bolting Prestressed Concrete Expansion/Epoxy Anchors Eli Structural Masonry [I] Sprayed-On Fireproofing [Ii Designer Specified [I] Other 2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above: Gr7-0'1C4- 1---?c P nvr.,-' jQ(. 3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above: A. P,k-CfI &4JA11r Dta • •c)(/ Co(Z•,%.1A_C- t,'14 4 tAc S / 12 t:p.14- ( ( /,vi(4 ( '1.'i_•'.. 1-3 C. Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site. ivd ELI99L89 stmei 21e JJ di:,0 90 90 IC Carlsbad 06-1728 June 29, 2006 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 06-1728 PREPARED BY: Sergio Azuela DATE: June 29, 2006 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2475 Garfield St. SFD for Jay Refold BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3 & U-i TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Dwelling 3705 101.99 377,873 Garage 540 26.61 14,369 Decks 606 14.41 8,732 Patio Cover 125 8.87 1,109 Air Conditioning 3649 3.88 14,158 Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 416,242 Jurisdiction Code 1cb I By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance I $1 ,522.921 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance I $989.901 Type of Review: EII Complete Review LI Structural Only El Other LI Repetitive Fee Repeats Hourly Hour * Esgil Plan Review Fee I $852.841 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvaluedoc - 672 -C EST. VALUE: K NO.: CB C - f72 ciP o( /8 Citv of Carlsbad., Works - Engineering BUILDING DATE: BUILDING AD6RESS( PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL The item you have submitted for review has been PleaseP sto ttached report of deficiencies approved. The, approval is based on plans, marked necessary corrections to plans io information' and/or specifications provided in your or spe or compliance with applicable submittal; therefore any changes to these items after codes a . Submit corrected plans and/or this date, ' including field modifications, must be specific s o review. Only the reviewed by this office to insure continued applicable sheets e been s t. conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. By. Date: construction of the following improvements: El A Right-of-Way permit is reqired prior to By ' Date: By. Date: By: ' FOR O7AL USE LY ISSUEEr E.ERING AUTHORIZATION TO BUILDING PERMIT:. Date: ATTACHMENTS ENGINEERING DEPT. COJTACT PERSON Name: ' KATHLEEN M. FARMER El Dedication Application LI Dedication Checklist " ".' City of Carlsbad LI Improvement Application Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 LI Improvement Checklist Phone: '(760) 602-2741 LI Neighborhood Improvement Agreement NOTE: If there are retaining walls LI Grading Permit Application associated with your project, please check LI Grading Submittal Checklist with the Building Department if these walls need, to be pulled by separate RETAINING LI Right-of-Way Permit Application .' WALL PERMIT. LI Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet A-4 CA 92008-7314 . (760)602-2720 0 FAX (760) 60862 T BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 3RD 0 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: (11:111 'North Arrow F. ight-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets Property Lines (show all dime on'i. ?ting or proposed water service /77. sting or proposed sewer lateral Easements 7 , >/Existin or proposed irrigation service 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography C. Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. D. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. El 3. Include on title sheet: Site address Assessor's Parcel Number Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION Show all existing use of SF and new proposed use of SF. Example: Tenant Improvement for 3500 SF of warehouse to 3500 SF of office. F:\FornierKathyMASTERS\BuiIding Plancheck Ckls Form (Generic).doc 2 Rev. 7/14/00 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD/ DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. €? }t12. (,-L) ), t14Z' /' C / P 4 6,r-k, Cet El El El 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: DEDICATIONREQUIREMENTS El El El 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ 17,000 , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 %" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications willnot be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENTREQUIREMENTS El El El 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ 82,000 , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the F:Farmer(ATH'ASTERS\Bung Plancheck Ckt Form (G000IIC).doC 3 Rev. 1114/00 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD El 0 0 checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit., Improvement Plans 'signed by: Date: 0 0 0 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $_40000 s 6 we may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. . - Future public improvements required as follows: LI 0 6c. Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: 0, 0 J 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adiacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Sction 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. 0 0 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities in cubic yards (cut, fill import, export and remedial). This information must be included on the plans. 0 0 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: 0 0 0 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) F:Fanner'XATH'YWASTERS\Buing Pancheck Cklst Form (Geneflc).doc , 4 Rev. 7/14/00 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD LI LI LI No Grading Permit required. LI LI LI If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS LI LI LI 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: LI LI LI 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension.7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: NPDES PERMIT . LI LI LI 10a. Storm Water Requirements Applicability Checklist Completed. I LI LI LI lOb. Priority Determination and compliance: D Priority Project D Subject to Standard Permanent Storm Water BMP's Exempt ) iuidfees:re attached required C3 No fees WATER METER REVIEW LI LI LI 12a. Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. Plantheck Ckt Form (Generlc).doc 5 - 4 Rev. 7/14/00 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calóulations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter. If a developer is proposing .a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand. (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the Street). El U 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm maybe listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should look like: STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: Hydraulic grade line Elevation at pointof connection (POC) Pressure at P00 in pounds per square inch (PSI) Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection 3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water r:\FanenXaIhy\MASTERS\Bojkjjng Poncheck CkIsI Form (Genenc).doc 6 Rev. 7/14100 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. D E 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the V applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. V Li Li EJ 13. Additional Comments: F:Farne.M(athy'MASTERS\BIidI,g Pancheck Ck8t Form (Generic).doc 7 - Roy. 7114100 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. Calculation based on building ncheck plan submittal. Address: S Bldg. Permit No. 06 Prepared by: Date: ( hecked by: Date: EDUCALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: Si b Sq. Ft./Units: ED U's: /_- Types of Use: - Sq. Ft./Units: EDUs:.- ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages. for all uses. Types of Use: ci Sq. t./Units: ADTs: / Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: ADTs: FEES REQUIRED:. WITHIN CFD: 0 YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) 01\10 1. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA & #: FEE/UNIT: X NO. UNITS:. $______________ 2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT's/UNITS: / X FEE/ADT: /6)? L = $41.7 3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 DIST. #2 01ST. #3 ADTs/UNITS:. . X FEE/ADT: =$ 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE:_________ UNIT/SQ.FT.: X FEE/SQ. FT. /UNIT: = $ _ 5. SEWER FEE EDUs: . X FEE/EDU: ) . = $ZI) BENEFIT AREA: EDU's: X FEE/EDU: $_____________ 6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) = $______________ 7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA __: HIGH Ow _______ ACRES X 34= s 36S,3/ 0 8. POTABLE WATER FEES UNITS ODE CONNECTION FEE METE FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION 1 1 ..:. .lof2 WordiDocs\MlsformsiFee Calculation Worksheet RPV 7/14/flfl PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST 4) Plan Check No. CB C457 - 1 '7 2 Address-.9 1 ('(W1 Qtd Planner Chris Sexton Phone (760) 602-4624 APN: — D -Ob Type of Project & Use: Net Project Density:Ii .5 DU/AC f Zoning: R3 General Plan: RM N Facilities Management Zone: I CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres:_______ )r411 (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this Circle One permit:______________________________________________________ / Legend: - Item Complete 0 Item Incomplete - Needs your action ?I 0 • 0 Environmental Review Required: YES ____ NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: YES I NO -TYPE APPROVAURESO. NO. DATE z. PROJECT NO. erp . . OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditi?np oçapproval? If noA state qonditions which require action. Conditions of Approval:%\) 1i C. Lt5ty *) c'Ym 0 0 Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES V NO____ CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES____ NO____ If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at.— 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): 121' 0 0 Habitat Management Plan Data Entry Completed? YES NO V If property has Habitat Type identified in Table 11 of HMPcomplete HMP Permit application and assess fees in Permits Plus . (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, HMP Fees, Entr Acrésof Habitat Type impacted/taken, UPDATE!) . 0 0 0 Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES ____ NO (Effective date of lnclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES ____ NO (AJP/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) H:ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst .. - Rev 3/06 Site Plan: 'D D Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, qsements,' existing' and proposed structures, streets, existing 'street improvements, right-of-vay width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear ya1 slopes). Provide legal description of property and assessors parcel number. Policy 44— Neighborhood Architectura) Design Guidelines 1. Applicability: YES NO V ' EJ iJ EJ 2 Project complies YES NO________ ,. Zoning: '(0 1. Setbacks: ' 7 -' Front: ' Required 0 Shown. b Interior Side: Required __ Shown Street Side: Required Shown Rear: ' Required 0 Shown t b , • Top of slope: - Required Shown 0 0 2. Accessory structure setbacks: Front i ., \ \ Required ShownSv Interior Side: ) Rquired ' Shown Street Side: Required V Shown Rear:. ' • Required i' Shown Structure separation: Required ,-' Shown 3 Lot Coverage: RequId Shown (00W 0/0 0 4. Height: '• Required 3 l Shown 30 ' 5. Parking: - - Spaces Required 1.. Shown (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTE DATE toO ____ H:AOMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChkist Rev 3/06 REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Garfield Residence South of 2465 Garfield Street Carlsbad, California - JOB NO. 05-9065 - 19 October 2005 Prepared for: Mr. Bruce Henry Henry Contracting mil I 'I GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC. SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING • GROUNDWATER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY 19 October 2005 Mr. Bruce Henry HENRY CONTRACTING 449 Santa Fe Drive, #406 Encinitas, CA 92024 Job No. 05-9065 Subject: Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Garfield Residence South of 2465 Garfield Street Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Henry: In accordance with your request and our proposal dated September 13, 2005, Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. has performed an investigation of the geotechnical and general geologic conditions at the location of the subject site. The field work was performed on September 14, 2005. In our opinion, if the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are implemented during site preparation, the site will be suited for the proposed structure and improvements. - This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Should you have any questions concerning the following report, please do not hesitate to contact us. Reference to our Job No. 05-9065 will expedite a response to your inquiries. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC. ? i:F :!S ~-~/O~ Jaime A. Cerros, P R.C.E. 34422/G.E. 2007 ( (( No. QQ2)7) ; Senior Geotechnical Engineer EXP tCHW C, 7420 TRADE STREET • SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 • (858) 549-7222 • FAX: (858) 549-1604 • E-MAIL: geotech@lxpres.com TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. PROJECT SUMMARY S 1 II. SITE DESCRIPTION 2 III. FIELD INVESTIGATION 3 IV. LABORATORY TESTS AND SOIL INFORMATION 3 V. SOIL & GENERAL GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION 5 VI. GROUNDWATER 6 VII. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 VIII. GRADING NOTES 20 IX. LIMITATIONS 21 FIGURES Vicinity Map Plot Plan lIla-b. Exploratory Excavation Logs IV. Laboratory Test Results APPENDIX A. Unified Soil Classification System I!LAJ1J REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Garfield Residence South of 2465 Garfield Street Carlsbad, California JOB NO. 05-9065 The following report presents the findings and recommendations of Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. for the subject project. I. PROJECT SUMMARY It is our understanding, based on a conversation with Mr. Bruce Henry of Henry Contracting, that the vacant lot is being developed to receive a new single-family residential structure with an attached garage and associated improvements. The proposed structure is to be a maximum of two stories in height and will be constructed of standard-type building materials utilizing conventional foundations with a concrete slab-on-grade floor. Construction plans for development of the site have not been provided to us during the preparation of this report, however, when completed they should be made available for our review. The scope of work we performed is briefly outlined as follows: Identify and classify the surface and subsurface soils in the area of the proposed construction, in conformance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Recommend site soil preparation procedures. Recommend the allowable bearing pressures for the existing dense formational terrace soils and properly compacted fills. r -p7j-1Ii JLAJ2J Proposed Garfield Residence Job No. 05-9065 Carlsbad, California Page 2 Evaluate the settlement potential of the existing formational soils or proposed properly compacted fills under the proposed new structural loads. Recommend, preliminary foundation design information, including active and passive earth pressures to be utilized in design of retaining walls and foundation structures. Our subsurface investigation revealed that the site is underlain by medium dense slightly silty sand formational terrace materials with a surficial covering of approximately 1 foot of dry, variable density topsoil consisting of silty sand with some roots. These surficial topsoils will not provide a stable soil base for the proposed structure and associated improvements. As such, we recommend that the topsoils be removed and recompacted as part of site preparation prior to the addition of any new fill or structural improvements. All foundations for the proposed new structure, and improvement foundations, shall be founded into the underlying medium dense formational materials or properly compacted fill soils. In proposed improvement areas, the existing loose sur19cia1 soils will require removal and recompaction prior to placement of new fill or improvements. II. SITE DESCRIPTION The property is known as: Assessor's Parcel No. 203-022-05, Lot 18, according to Recorded Map No. 1782, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California. The rectangular-shaped site, consisting of approximately 4,550 square feet, is located south of the property addressed as 2465 Garfield Street in the City of Carlsbad. Refer to Figure No. I. The property is bordered on the north, south and Proposed Garfield Residence Job No. 05-9065 Carlsbad, California . . Page 3 west by similar residential properties at the approximate same elevation and on the east by Garfield Street. (For site plan, refer to Figure No. II.) I No structures, except a work shed, currently exist on the site. Vegetation on the V site consists primarily of a few trees, shrubbery, and native weeds. The site consists of a relatively level building pad on a gentle, westerly-sloping lot. The building pad is at an approximate elevation of 50 feet above mean sea level (MSL). Mapped survey information concerning approximate elevations across the site was not available at the time of our investigation. III. FIELD INVESTIGATION Two exploratory handpits were placed on the proposed building pad area of the site in order to obtain representative soil samples to define the soil profile (for exploratory excavation locations, see Figure No. II). The handpits were observed and logged by our field representative, and samples were taken of the predominant soil types. Excavation logs have been prepared on the basis of our observations and laboratory test results and are presented as Figure No. III. The soils encountered in the excavations have been classified in conformance with the Unified Soil Classification System (refer to Appendix A). IV. LABORATORY TESTS AND SOIL INFORMATION Laboratory tests were performed on disturbed and relatively undisturbed soil samples in order to evaluate their physical and mechanical properties and their ability to support the proposed residential structure and improvements. Test results are presented on Figure Nos. III and IV. The following tests were conducted on the sampled soils: Proposed Garfield Residence - Carlsbad, California Job No. 05-9065 Page 4 Moisture Content (ASTM D2216-98) Laboratory Compaction Characteristics (ASTM D1557-98) Determination of Percentage of Particles Smaller than No. 200 Sieve (ASTM D1140) The moisture content of a soil sample is a measure of the water content, expressed as a percentage of the dry weight of the sample. Laboratory compaction values establish the Optimum Moisture content and the laboratory Maximum Dry Density of the tested soils. The relationship between the moisture and density of remolded soil samples gives qualitative information regarding soil compaction conditions to be anticipated during any future grading operation. The -200 sieve size analysis helps to more precisely classify the tested soils based on their fine material content, and to provide qualitative information related to engineering characteristics such as expansion potential, permeability, and shear strength. The expansion potential of the tested on-site soils is determined, when necessary, utilizing the Uniform Building Code Test Method for Expansive Soils (UBC Standard No. 29-2). In accordance with the UBC (Table 18-1-B), potentially expansive soils are classified as follows: EXPANSION INDEX EXPANSION POTENTIAL 0 to 20 Very low 21 to 50 Low 51 to 90 Medium 91 to 130 F__Above High 130 Very high JLA12J Proposed Garfield Residence Job No. 05-9065 Carlsbad, California Page 5 Based on our particle-size test results, our visual classification, and our experience with similar soils, it is our opinion that the on-site topsoils and formational materials have a very low expansion potential, with an expansion index of less than 20. Based on the laboratory test data, our observations of the primary soil types on the site, and our previous experience with laboratory testing of similar soils, our Geotechnical Engineer has assigned values for the angle of internal friction and cohesion to those soils that will provide significant lateral support or load bearing on the project. These values have been utilized in assigning the recommended bearing value as well as active and passive earth pressure design criteria for foundations and retaining walls. V. SOIL AND GENERAL GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION Our investigation and review of pertinent geologic maps and reports indicate that medium dense formational terrace material (Qt) underlies the entire site. The encountered soil profile includes approximately 1 foot of topsoil overlying this unit. Topsoils: The building pad area is overlain by approximately 1 foot of topsoil. The encountered topsoil consists of tan-brown, silty, fine- to medium-grained sand with some roots. The topsoils are generally dry, of variable density, of low expansion potential, and are not suitable in their current condition for support of loads from structures or additional fill. Refer to Figure Nos. III and IV for details. Terrace Deposits (Qt): The topsoils are underlain by Quaternary-age Terrace Deposits (Weber, 1982) The encountered formational terrace materials consist of medium dense, moderately cemented, red-brown, slightly silty, fine- to medium- grained sand. The formational terrace materials were encountered at a depth of Proposed Garfield Residence Job No. 05-9065 Carlsbad, California Page 6 approximately 1 foot and have excellent bearing strength characteristics. Refer to Figure Nos. III and IV for details. - VI. GROUNDWATER No groundwater was encountered during the course of our field investigation and we do not anticipate significant groundwater problems to develop in the future, if the property is developed as proposed and proper drainage is implemented and maintained. It should be kept in mind that any required grading operations will change surface drainage patterns and/or reduce permeabilities due to the densification of compacted soils. Such changes of surface and subsurface hydrologic conditions, plus irrigation of landscaping or significant increases in rainfall, may result in the appearance of surface or near-surface water at locations where none existed previously. The damage from such water is expected to be localized and cosmetic in nature, if good positive drainage is implemented, as recommended in this report, during and at the completion of construction. On properties such as the subject site where dense, low permeability soils and/or formational materials exist at relatively shallow depths, even normal landscape irrigation practices or periods of extended rainfall can result in shallow "perched" water conditions. The perching (shallow depth) accumulation of water on a low permeability surface can result in areas of persistent wetting and drowning of lawns, plants and trees. Resolution of such conditions, should they occur, may require site-specific design and construction of subdrain and shallow "wick" drain dewatering systems. Proposed Garfield Residence Job No. 05-9065 Carlsbad, California Page 7 It must be understood that unless discovered during initial site exploration or encountered during site grading operations, it is extremely difficult to predict if or where perched or true groundwater conditions may appear in the future. When site fill or formational ..soils are fine-grained and of low permeability, water problems may not become apparent for extended periods of time. Water conditions, where suspected or encountered during grading operations, should be evaluated and remedied by the project civil and geotechnical consultants. The project developer and property owner, however, must realize that post- construction appearances of groundwater may have to be dealt with on a site- specific basis. Proper surface drainage will help reduce the potential for water- related problems. VII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS I The following conclusions and recommendations are based upon the practical field investigation conducted by our firm, and resulting laboratory tests, in conjunction with our knowledge and experience with similar soils in the Carlsbad area. Our investigation revealed that the site is underlain by medium dense, silty sand formational terrace materials at relatively shallow depth, with some overlying, variable-density topsoil materials. In their present condition, the topsoils will not provide a stable base for structures and improvements. As such, we recommend that the topsoils be removed as part of site preparation prior to the addition of any new fill or structural improvements. All foundations for the proposed new structure, and improvement foundations, shall be founded into the underlying medium dense formational materials or properly compacted fill soils. In proposed improvement areas, the existing loose surficial soils will require removal and recompaction prior to placement of new fill or improvements. JLLJ2 'Proposed Garfield Residence Job No. 05-9065 Carlsbad, California Page 8 As indicated previously, construction plans were not yet available for our review at the time of report preparation. When plans become available we should be provided with the opportunity to review the project plans to see that our recommendations are adequately incorporated in the plans. A. Preparation of Soils for Site Development Clearing and Striøping: The existing vegetation observed on the site should be removed prior to the preparation of the building pad and areas of associated improvements. This includes any roots from existing trees and shrubbery. Holes resulting from the removal of root systems or other buried obstructions that extend below the planned grades should be cleared and backfilled with properly compacted fill. Treatment of Existing Topsoils: In order to provide suitable foundation support for the proposed residence and associated improvements, we recommend that all existing topsoils that remain after the necessary site excavations have been made be removed and recompacted. The recompaction work should consist of (a) removing all existing topsoil down to the native formational terrace deposit materials; (b) scarifying, moisture conditioning, and compacting the exposed natural subgrade soils; and (c) cleaning and replacing the topsoil material as compacted structural fill. The areal extent and depth required to remove the fills is anticipated to be approximately 1 foot, but should be confirmed by our representatives during the excavation work based on their examination of the soils being exposed. The lateral extent of the excavation should be at least 5 feet beyond the edge of the perimeter foundations and any areas to receive exterior improvements. Proposed Garfield Residence Job No. 05-9065 Carlsbad, California Page 9 Where the organic/root content of the topsoil materials precludes their use as compacted structural fills, imported soils may be required. Imported soils should have similar strength characteristics as on-site soils and should be approved byour firm prior to importation. Any unsuitable materials (such as oversize rubble, clayey soils, and/or organic matter) should be selectively removed as indicated by our representative and disposed of off-site. Any rigid improvements founded on the existing loose surface soils can be expected to undergo movement and possible damage.' Geotechnical Exploration, Inc takes no responsibility for the performance of any improvements built on loose natural soils or inadequately compacted fills. Any exterior area to receive concrete improvements should be verified for compaction and moisture within 48 hours prior to concrete placement or during the fill placement if the thickness of fill exceeds 1 foot. Subgrade Preparation: After the site has been cleared, stripped, and the required excavations made, the exposed subgrade soils in areas to receive fill and/or building improvements should be scarified to a depth of 6 inches,, moisture conditioned, and compacted to the requirements for structural fill. Expansive Soil Conditions: We do not anticipate that significant quantities of medium or highly expansive clay soils will be encountered during grading. ,Should such soils be encountered and used as fill, however, they should be moisture conditioned to at least 5 percent above optimum moisture content, compacted to 88 to 92 percent, and placed outside building areas. Soils of medium or greater expansion potential should not be used as retaining wall backfill soils. Proposed Garfield Residence Job No. 05-9065 Carlsbad, California Page 1.0 Material for Fill: All existing on-site soils with an organic content of less than 3 percent by volume are, in general, suitable for use as fill. Any required imported fill material should be a low-expansion potential (Expansion Index of 50 or les per ASTM D4829-95). In addition, both imported and existing on-site materials for use as fill should not contain rocks or lumps more than 6 inches in greatest dimension if the fill soils are compacted with heavy compaction equipment (or 3 inches in greatest dimension if compacted with lightweight equipment). All materials for use as fill should be approved by our representative prior to importing to the site. Fill Compaction: All structural fill should be compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent based upon ASTM D1557-98. Fill material should be spread and compacted in uniform horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches in uncompacted thickness. Before compaction begins, the fill should be brought to a water content that will permit proper compaction by either: (1) aerating the fill if it is too wet, or (2) moistening the fill with water if it is too dry. Each lift should be thoroughly mixed before compaction to ensure a uniform distribution of moisture. For low expansive soils, the moisture content should be within 2 percent of optimum. For medium to highly expansive soils, the moisture content should be at least 5 percent over optimum. No uncontrolled fill soils should remain on the site after completion of the site work. In the event that temporary ramps or pads are constructed of uncontrolled fill soils, the loose fill soils should be removed and/or recompacted prior to completion of the grading operation. Trench and Retaining Wall Backfill: All backfill soils placed in utility trenches or behind retaining walls should be compacted to at least 90 percent of JLAJ1J Proposed Garfield Residence Job No. 05-9065 Carlsbad, California Page 11 Maximum Dry Density. Our experience has shown that even shallow, narrow trenches (such as for irrigation and electrical lines) that are not properly compacted, can result in problems, particularly with respect to shallow groundwater accumulation and migration. Backfill soils placed behind 4 retaining walls should be installed as early as the retaining walls are capable of supporting lateral loads. Backfill soils should be low expansive, with an Expansion Index equal to or lower than 50. B. Design Parameters for ProDosed Foundations Footings: We recommend that the proposed residence be supported on conventional, individual-spread and/or continuous footing foundations bearing on undisturbed formational materials and/or well-compacted fill material. All footings should be founded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finished grade. Footings located adjacent to utility trenches should have their bearing surfaces situated below an imaginary 1.5:1.0 plane projected upward from the bottom edge of the adjacent utility trench. Bearing Pressures: At the recommended depths, footings may be designed for allowable bearing pressures of 2,500 pounds per square foot (psf) for combined dead and live loads and 3,300 psf for all loads, including wind or seismic. The footings should, however, have a minimum width of 12 inches. Footing Reinforcement: All continuous footings should contain top and bottom reinforcement to provide structural continuity and to permit spanning of local irregularities. We recommend that a minimum of two No. 4 top and two No. 4 bottom reinforcing bars be provided in the footings. Aminimüm clearance of 3 inches should be maintained between steel reinforcement and the bottom or sides of the footing. Isolated square footings should contain, Proposed Garfield Residence Job No. 05-9065 Carlsbad, California Page 12 as a minimum, a grid of three No. 4 steel bars on 12-inch centers, both ways. In order for us to offer an opinion as to whether the footings are founded on soils of sufficient load bearing capacity, it is essential that our representatiye inspect the footing excavations prior to the placement of reinforcing steel or concrete. NOTE: The project Civil/Structural Engineer should review all reinforcing schedules. The reinforcing minimums recommended herein are not to be construed as structural designs, but merely as minimum reinforcement to reduce the potential for cracking and separations. Seismic Design Criteria: Site-specific seismic design criteria to calculate the base shear needed for the design of the residential structure are presented in the following table. The design criteria was obtained from the California Building Code (2001 edition) and is based on the distance to the closest active fault and soil profile classification. The nearest active fault is approximately 4.5 miles from the site. Parameter Value Reference Seismic Zone Factor, Z 0.40 Table 16-I Soil Profile Type Sc Table 16-3 Seismic Coefficient, Ca 0.40% Table 16-Q Seismic Coefficient, Cv 0.56Nv Table 16-R Near-Source Factor, Na 1.0 Table 16-S Near-Source Factor, Nv 1.11 Table 16-T Seismic Source Type B Table 16-U Lateral Loads: Lateral load resistance for the structure supported on footing foundations may be developed in friction between the foundation bottoms and the supporting subgrade. An allowable friction coefficient of 0.40 is Proposed Garfield Residence Job No. 05-9065 Carlsbad, California Page 13 considered applicable. An additional allowable passive resistance equal to an equivalent fluid weight of 300 pounds per cubic foot acting against the foundations may be used in design provided the footings are poured neat against the, adjacent undisturbed formational terrace materials and/or compacted fill materials. These lateral resistance values assume a level surface in front of the footing for a minimum distance of three times the embedment depth of the footing. Settlement: Settlements under building loads are expected to be within tolerable limits for the proposed residence. For footings designed in accordance with the recommendations presented in the preceding paragraphs, we anticipate that total settlements should not exceed 1 inch and that post-construction differential angular rotation should be less than 1/240. C. Concrete Slab-on-grade Criteria Minimum Floor Slab Reinforcement: Based on our experience, we have found that, for various reasons, floor slabs occasionally crack, causing brittle surfaces such as ceramic tiles, to become damaged. Therefore, we recommend that all slabs-on-grade contain at least a minimum amount of reinforcing steel to reduce the separation of cracks, should they occur. 14.1 Interior floor slabs should be a minimum of 4 inches actual thickness and be reinforced with No. 3 bars on 18-inch centers, both ways, placed at midheight in the slab. The slabs should be underlain by a 2- inch-thick layer of clean sand (S.E. = 30 or greater) overlying a moisture retardant membrane over 2 inches of sand. Slab subgrade soil should be verified by a Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. Proposed Garfield Residence Job No. 05-9065 Carlsbad, California . Page 1.4 representative to have the proper moisture content within 48 hours prior to placement of the vapor barrier and pouring of concrete. 14.2 Followjng placement of any concrete floor slabs, sufficient drying time must be allowed prior to placement of floor coverings. Premature placement of floor coverings may result in degradation of adhesive materials and loosening of the finish floor materials. Concrete Isolation Joints: We recommend the project Civil/Structural Engineer incorporate isolation joints and sawcuts to at least one-fourth the thickness of the slab in any floor designs. The joints and cuts, if properly placed, should reduce the potential for and help control floor slab cracking. We recommend that concrete shrinkage joints be spaced no farther than approximately 20 feet apart, and also at re-entrant corners. However, due to a number of reasons (such as base preparation, construction techniques, curing procedures, and normal shrinkage of concrete), some cracking of slabs can be expected. Slab Moisture Emission: Soil moisture vapor can result in damage to moisture-sensitive floors, some floor sealers, or sensitive equipment in direct contact with the floor, in addition to mold and staining on slabs, walls and carpets. The common practice in Southern California is to place vapor retarders made of PVC, or of polyethylene. PVC retarders are made in thickness ranging from 10- to 60-mil. Polyethylene retarders, called visqueen, range from 5- to 10-mil in thickness. The thicker the plastic, the stronger the resistance will be against puncturing. a Proposed Garfield Residence Job No. 05-9065 Carlsbad, California Page 15 Although polyethylene (visqueen) products are commonly used, products such as Vaporshield possess higher tensile strength and are more specifically designed for and intended to retard moisture transmission into concrete slabs. The çise of Vaporshield or equivalent is highly recommended when a structure is intended for moisture-sensitive floor coverings or uses. 16.1 Vapor retarder joints must be lapped and sealed with mastic or the manufacturer's recommended tape. To provide protection of the moisture retarder, a layer of at least 2 inches of clean sand on top and 2 inches at the bottom should also be provided. No heavy equipment, stakes or other puncturing instruments should be used on top of the liner before or during concrete placement. In actual practice, stakes are often driven through the retarder material, equipment is dragged or rolled across the retarder, overlapping or jointing is not properly implemented, etc. All these construction deficiencies reduce the retarder's effectiveness. 16.2 The vapor retarders are not waterproof. They are intended to help prevent or reduce vapor transmission and capillary migration through the soil into the pores of concrete slabs. Waterproofing systems must supplement vapor retarders if full waterproofing is desired. The owner should be consulted to determine the specific level of protection required. 17. Exterior Slab Reinforcement: As a minimum for protection of on-site improvements, we recommend that all nonstructural concrete slabs (such as patios, sidewalks, etc.), be at least 4 inches in actual thickness, founded on properly compacted and tested fill or dense native formation and underlain by no more than 3 inches of clean leveling sand, with No. 3 bars at 18-inch Proposed Garfield Residence Job No. 05-9065 Carlsbad, California Page 16 centers, both ways, at the center of the slab, and contain adequate isolation and control joints. The performance of on-site improvements can be greatly affected by soil base preparation and the quality of construction. It is therefore important that all improvements are properly designed and constructed for the existing soil conditions. The improvements should not be built on loose soils or fills placed without our observation and testing. For exterior slabs with the minimum shrinkage reinforcement, control joints should be placed at spaces no farther than 15 feet apart or the width of the slab, whichever is less, and also at 're-entrant corners. Control joints in exterior slabs should be sealed with elastomeric joint sealant. The sealant should be inspected every 6 months and be properly maintained. Concrete Pavement: Driveway pavement, consisting of Portland cement concrete at least 51/2 inches in thickness, may be placed on properly compacted subgrade soils. The concrete should be at least 3,500 psi compressive strength, with control joints no farther than 15 feet apart. Pavement joints should be properly sealed with permanent joint sealant, as required in sections 201.3.6 through 201.3.8 of the Standard Specifications for Public Work Construction, 2003 Edition. Subgrade soil for the driveway should be compacted to at least 90 percent of Maximum Dry Density. D. Slopes Temporary Slopes: A representative of Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. must observe any steep temporary slopes during construction. In the event that soils and formational material comprising a slope are not 'as anticipated, any required slope design changes would be presented at that time. Temporary cut slopes can be made at slope ratios of 0.5:1.0 1JLAJ2J Proposed Garfield Residence Job No. 05-9065 Carlsbad, California Page 17 (horizontal to vertical) but they may not be surcharged within 10 feet of the slope top. Where not superseded by specific recommendations presented in this report, trenches, excavations and temporary slopes at the subject site should be constructed in accordance with Title 8, Construction Safety Orders, issued by Cal-OSHA. E. Retaining Wall Design Criteria Design Parameters - Unrestrained: The active earth pressure (to be utilized in the design of any cantilever retaining walls, utilizing on-site or imported very low- to low-expansive soils [El less than 50] as backfill) should be based on an Equivalent Fluid Weight of 38 pounds per cubic foot (for level backfill only). In the event that a retaining wall is surcharged by sloping backfill, the design active earth pressure should be based on the appropriate Equivalent Fluid Weight presented in the following table. *To determine design active earth pressures for ratios intermediate to those presented, interpolate between the stated values. Design Parameters - Restrained: Retaining walls designed for a restrained condition should utilize a uniform pressure equal to 9xH (nine times the total height of retained soil, considered in pounds per square foot) considered as acting everywhere on the back of the wall in addition to the design flp7T.1i Proposed Garfield Residence Job No. 05-9065 Carlsbad, California . Page 18 Equivalent Fluid Weight. The soil pressure produced by any footings, improvements, or any other surcharge placed within a horizontal distance equal to the height of the retaining portion of the wall should be included in the wall design pressure. The recommended lateral soil pressures are based on the assumption that no loose soils or soil wedges will be retained by the retaining wall. Backfill soils should consist of low-expansive soils with El less than 50, and should be placed from the heel of the foundation to the ground surface within the wedge formed by a plane at 300 from vertical, and passing by the heel of the foundation and the back face of the retaining wall. Surcharge Loads: Any loads placed on the active wedge behind a cantilever wall should be included in the design by multiplying the load weight by a factor of 0.32. For a restrained wall, the lateral factor should be 0.52. Wall Drainage: Proper subdrains and free-draining backwall material or board drains (such as 3-drain or Miradrain) should be installed behind all retaining walls (in addition to proper waterproofing) on the subject project. Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. will assume no liability for damage to structures or improvements that is attributable to poor drainage. The architectural plans should clearly indicate that subdrains for any lower-level walls be placed at an elevation at least 1 foot below the bottom of the lower- level slabs. At least 0.5-percent gradient should be provided to the subdrain. The subdrain should be placed in an envelope of crushed rock gravel up to 1 inch in maximum diameter, and be wrapped with Mirafi 140N filter or equivalent. Proposed Garfield Residence Job No. 05-9065 Carlsbad, California Page 1.9 F. Site Drainage Considerations Surface Drainage: Adequate measures should be taken to properly finish- grade the 19t after the residence and other improvements are in place. Drainage waters from this site and adjacent properties should be directed away from footings, floor slabs, and slopes, onto the natural drainage direction for this area or into properly designed and approved drainage facilities provided by the project civil engineer. Roof gutters and downspouts should be installed on the residence, with the runoff directed away from the foundations via closed drainage lines. Proper subsurface and surface drainage will help minimize the potential for waters to seek the level of the bearing soils under the footings and floor slabs. Failure to observe this recommendation could result in undermining and possible differential settlement of the structure or other improvements on the site or cause other moisture-related problems. Currently, the Uniform Building Code requires a minimum 2-percent surface gradient for proper drainage of building pads unless waived by the building official. Concrete pavement may have a minimum gradient of 0.5-percent. Erosion Control: In addition, appropriate erosion control measures should be taken at all times during and after construction to prevent surface runoff waters from entering footing excavations or ponding on finished building pad areas. Planter Drainage: Planter areas, flower beds and planter boxes should be sloped to drain away from the footings and floor slabs at a gradient of at least 5 percent within 5 feet from the perimeter walls. Any planter areas adjacent to the residence or surrounded by concrete improvements should be provided with sufficient area drains to help with rapid runoff disposal. No Proposed Garfield Residence Job No. 05-9065 Carlsbad, California Page 20 water should be allowed to pond adjacent to the residence or other improvements or anywhere on the site. G. General Recommendations 27. Project Start Up Notification: In order to reduce any work delays during site development, this firm should be contacted at least 24 hours and preferably 48 hours prior to any need for observation of footing excavations or field density testing of compacted fill soils. If possible, placement of formwork and steel reinforcement in footing excavations should not occur prior to observing the excavations; in the event that our observations reveal the need for deepening or redesigning foundation structures at any locations, any formwork or steel reinforcement in the affected footing excavation areas would have to be removed prior to correction of the observed problem (i.e., deepening the footing excavation, recompacting soil in the bottom of the excavation, etc.) VIII. GRADING NOTES Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. recommends that we be retained to verify the actual soil conditions revealed during site grading work and footing excavation to be as anticipated in this Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation" for the project. In addition, the compaction of any fill soils placed during site grading work must be observed and tested by the soil engineer. It is the responsibility of the grading contractor to comply with the requirements on the grading plans and the local grading ordinance. All retaining wall and trench backfill should be properly compacted. Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. will assume no liability for damage occurring due to improperly or uncompacted backfill placed without our observations and testing. Proposed Garfield Residence Job No. 05-9065 Carlsbad, California Page 21 IX. LIMITATIONS Our conclusions and recommendations have been based on available data obtained from our field invetigation and laboratory analysis, as well as our experience with similar soils and formational materials located in this area of Carlsbad. Of necessity, we must assume a certain degree of continuity between exploratory excavations and/or natural exposures. It is, therefore, necessary that all observations, conclusions, and recommendations be verified at the time grading operations begin or when footing excavations are placed. In the event discrepancies are noted, additional recommendations may be issued, if required. The work performed and recommendations presented herein are the result of an investigation and analysis that , meet the contemporary standard of care in our profession within the County of San Diego. No warranty is provided. This report should be considered valid for a period of two (2) years, and is subject to review by our firm following that time. If significant modifications are made to the building plans, especially with respect to the height and location of any proposed structures, this report must be presented to us for immediate review and possible revision. It is the responsibility of the owner and/or developer to ensure that the recommendations summarized in this report are carried out in the field operations and that our recommendations for design of this project are incorporated in the structural plans. We should be retained to review the project plans once they are available, to see that our recommendations are adequately incorporated in the plans. This firm does not practice or consult in the field of safety engineering. We do,, not direct the contractor's operations, and we cannot be responsible for the safety of personnel other than our own on the site; the safety of others is the responsibility of the contractor. The contractor should notify the owner if he considers any of the Proposed Garfield Residence Job No. 05-9065 Carlsbad, California Page 22 recommended actions presented herein to be unsafe. The firm of Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. shall not be held responsible for changes to the physical condition of the property, such as addition of fill soils or changing drainage patterns, which occur subsequent to issuance of this report and the changes are made without our observations, testing, and approval. Once again, should any questions arise concerning this report, please feel free to contact the undersigned. Reference to our Job No. 05-9065 will expedite a reply to your inquiries. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC. e., )4y$. Keiser Sèiiior Project Geologist 9;~= e - Jaime A. Cerros, P.E. R.C.E. 34422/G.E. 2007 Senior Geotechnical Engineer LF±1 LIAGE 09 A S BO HADIONDA DV £RICADS ES IA I SCO ,LFORNI4OS Till ARMY S SEE \'VA/ H3 1 VIA DIEGO 2 VIA JUDY 3 VIA ROBERTO 4 VIA BOCAS 5 VIA SABINAS B VIA VERA 7 VIA CARDEI. B VIA DENISE 9 VIA MERDE 10 VIA TONALA 11 CL HACIENDA 12 VIA CAJITA Thomas Bros. Guide San Diego County pg. 1106 VICINITY MAP Garfield Residence South of 2465 Garfield Street Carlsbad, CA. Figure No. I Job No. 05-9065 'EQUIPMENT DIMENSION & TYPE OF EXCAVATION DATE LOGGED Hand Tools 2'X 2'X 3 Handpit 9-14-05 SURFACE ELEVATION GROUNDWATER/ SEEPAGE DEPTH LOGGED BY ± 50' Mean Sea Level Not Encountered JKH FIELD DESCRIPTION - AND • CLASSIFICATION LT LL -J ca Ui a En )Q +j AND REMARKS -DESCRIPTION El] (Grain size, Density, Moisture, Color) cn SQ 9 SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, with SM - some roots. Loose to medium dense. Dry. Tan-brown. - TOPSOIL SAND, fine- to medium-grained with slight silt. SM Medium dense. Damp. Red-brown. - H - - TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt) 2 = - - Bottom @ 3 4- 5- WATER TABLE JOB NAME Garfield Residence LOOSE BAG SAMPLE SITE LOCATION [ii IN-PLACE SAMPLE South of 2465 Garfield Street, Carlsbad, CA JOB NUMBER REVIEWED BY JAC LOG No. DRIVE SAMPLE Fs-1 FIELD DENSITY TEST 09065 FIGURE NUMBER I HP-1 Exploration, Inc. jP STANDARD PENETROMETER lila I EQUIPMENT DIMENSION & TYPE OF EXCAVATION DATE LOGGED Hand Tools 2'X 2'X 3' Handpit 9-14-05 SURFACE ELEVATION GROUNDWATER! SEEPAGE DEPTH LOGGED BY ± 50 Mean Sea Level Not Encountered JKH FIELD DESCRIPTION AND .>- • CLASSIFICATION -J W CL Q +. -j ) w DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS iEh (Grain size,Densily, Moisture,Color) U, - SILTY SAND, fine- to medium-grained, with SM some roots. Loose to medium dense. Dry. -. Tan-brown. -; TOPSOIL SAND, fine- to medium-grained with slight silt. SM - ft' Medium dense. Damp. Red-brown. - TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt) - 1I... 2- 3 — Bottom 3' - a La WATER TABLE JOB NAME Garfield Residence LOOSE BAG SAMPLE SITE LOCATION Eli IN-PLACE SAMPLE South of 2465 Garfield Street, Carlsbad, CA JOB NUMBER REVIEWED BY JAC LOG No. DRIVE SAMPLE [] 0 1 FIELD DENSITY TEST 05-9065 HP-2 P,O,O1), Inc. STANDARD PENETROMETER FIGURE NUMBER IlIb DIRECT SHEAR TEST 1 * 2 3 DATA APPARENT COHESION (psf) 100 APPARENT FRICTION ANGLE 320 * Assigned Value I SAND I RN I I GRAVE I MM I l ' U.S. I standard I sieve 51ZC3 * 100 80 60 40 20 0 140 130 120 GRAIN DIAMETER (mm) LABORATORY SOIL DATA SUMMARY 90 MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY 1 2 3 (pcf) 127 OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (%) 9.0 __ I H II III 80 I I I I I I I 0 10 20 30 LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST 2.70 -2.t SPECIFIC GRAVITY 2.ZERO AIR VOIDS CURVES 40 SOIL TYPE SOIL COMPACTION BORING No. HANDPff No. DEPTH 1 SILTY SAND. Tan-brown. HP-1 1' 2 3 SWELL TEST DATA 1 2 3 INITIAL DRY DENSITY (pci) - INITIAL WATER CONTENT (%) - LOAD (psf) - PERCa1TSWB.L El= (50 Figure No. I V Job No. 05-9065 frF Geotechnkal C Exploration, Inc. _ APPENDIX A UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART SOIL DESCRIPTION Coarse-grained (More-than half of material is larger than a No. 200 sieve) GRAVELS, CLEAN GRAVELS GW Well-graded gravels, gravel and sand mixtures, little (More than half of coarse fraction or no fines. is larger than No. 4 sieve size, but smaller than 3") GP Poorly graded gravels, gravel and sand mixtures, little or no fines. GRAVELS WITH FINES (Appreciable amount) SANDS, CLEAN SANDS (More than half of coarse fraction is smaller than a No. 4 sieve) SANDS WITH FINES (Appreciable amount) GC Clay gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand-silt mixtures SW Well-graded sand, gravelly sands, little or no fines SP Poorly graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines. SM Silty sands, poorly graded sand and silty mixtures. SC Clayey sands, poorly graded sand and clay mixtures. Fine-grained (More than half of material is smaller than a No. 200 sieve) SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid Limit Less than 50 ML Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, sandy silt and clayey-silt sand mixtures with a slight plasticity CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, silty clays, clean clays. OL Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity. Liquid Limit Greater than 50 MH Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or silty soils, elastic silts. CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays. OH Organic clays of medium to high plasticity. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Peat and other highly organic soils (rev. 6/05) flAJJ 9.0 [1 - PLOT PLAN rLEGEND Garfield Residence Li South of 2485 Garfield Sweet Fl I ASSUMED PROPERTY BOUNDARY . .. .. EXISTING s .• .. . dbed,CA . . Figure No II Job No. O5-9O65 . HP-2 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY HAN DPif _Geatechnical EpJOtOI Inc. i..: •• . •. . .. • . • . . . •. ••. •....... ,. . •,. ••• Octobet 2005 11 o CAdkr F 09L CitV of Carlsbad. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: Building Permit Plan Check Number: Project Address: A.P.N.: b)L- 95 00 Project N ame): OkrfoLY Project Description: fl9 Z 1.3 tciq 6 Building Type: Residential: Number of New Dwelling Units Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SDU Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area Commercial/Industrial: Square Feet Floor Area City Certification of var Applicant Information: 21 WJ' I Now'JiVA up PY'Now, 01 P ZED Carlsbad Unified School District Vista Unified School District 6225 El Camino Real '\ 1234 Arcadia Drive Carlsbad CA 92009 (331-5000) ) Vista CA 92083 (726-2170) San Dieguito Union High School -Encinitas Union School District District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300 ext 166) Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) San Marcos Unified School District 215 Mata Way San Marcos, CA 92069 (290-2649) Contact: Nancy Dolce (By ADOt. Or Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf ofjlie Owner. Signature: Date: Iv(1(ot 1635 Fard'y Avenue • Carlsbad, CA. 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2700 Revised 3/30/2006 Building Counter • (760) 602-2719 • FAX (760) 602-8558 '-F -F- Ii- -' SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. - a - a . 9• - S. F - - - • : . SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL 11 DISTRICT OFFICIAL a- .• -- (,(J tj7,XJ2J\ fj1A7) a WALTER FREEMAN TITLE . • •'. . ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT:•: NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT — 6225 ELCAMINO REAL c&RLSBAD,&. 92009 ..: DATE " o 7 PHONE NUMBER S o 33 i- 5O a - -. '- --• -' . a .4 . ' . a- - • - -, - a - - . - - --a . .• , V - - $ 4. , a .- • - - 1 - F , a - - - F- a-•- - - •' - -- - -. -.• - , - F • - -. . 9 a. ' 0 - ( ,;F - . . . a-.. -. •- t -#- -.-- I - .' a-. a. - . F •, F • -• • •• I • •-F F-, • • - - L • a S - • F • a • IS"' -• a - - - k • - - ,a• ' .----$ . a Revised 3/30/2006 . - . • I - a F • • - - 'a - . - 4. - C13061728 2475 GARFIELD ST REFOLD RES- NEW 3875 SF LIVING 537 SF GARAGE, 124 SF PATIO, 609SF DECKS - RESDNffL S CRAIGFD Lot#: LEWIS 2J / 5Jc%, TD C. I 66(71(- / o ILS,-rt.&ss, c/iø/o cz.4tJ F 7,t177 'we -e cyab /Q /o Fd - J q-Jt S&)L 1UNV ii r /(' AL - i4 (2Jf/Ot AJee-c co/1 7Qcr ' 6c.t6 Aft IL ri PLANNiNG I Z.JO T ENGINEERING FIRE APPR/FORM HEALTH DEPT HAZMAT /AIR QUAI.. OTHER SEWER DISTR TO FROM SCHOOL FRC( cFO—Jó' P E & M WORKSHEET4 BLDG FEES COMPLETE PLAN CORR ENG CORR ESGIL CORR FIRE CORR