Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2479 OCEAN ST; ; CB000257; Permit
(Al.- 06/27/2000 City of Carlsbad Residential Permit Permit No:CB000257 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title: Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 2479 OCEAN ST CBAD RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Status: 2030210400 Lot #: 0 Applied: $491,551.39 Construction Type: NEW Entered By: Reference #: Plan Approved: 1 Structure Type: SFD Issued: 4 Bathrooms: 6 Inspect Area: SF DETACH 5587.89/GAR 991.67 Orig PC#: DEMO EXISTING HOUSE 2460SF GAR 402 DECK 308 Plan Check#: ISSUED 01/27/2000 GMF 04/28/2000 06/27/2000 Applicant: DAY FAMILY TRUST 05-12-87 Owner: DAY FAMILY TRUST 05-12-87 :\9VV1r- 9-F-A 10429 REXFORD CT 10429 REXFOR CYPRESS CA 90630 CRESS CA9 1362 06/27/00 0001 01 XN C-PRMT 6018.88 Total Fees: $7,31438 ,/caI PrnefSDate: 2955O BáIce Due: $6,018.88 Building Permit Add'I Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'I Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'I Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'I Pot. Water Con. Fee Red. Water Con. Fee czD /$i,bä 9 $0 $1,295 Tax NJ $OMO LFMZ Transportation'F $ôoó' Li ($aIk'Fee 7 $0:00 PLUMB JNG-TOTAL $0.00ELECTRICAL TOTAL $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $0.00 Housing Impact Fee Housing InLieu Fee $0.00 Master Drainage Fee: $0.00 Sewer Fee: TOTAL PERMIT FEES LWJ $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $224.00 $110.00 $81.00 $2,925.00 $0.00 $636.64 $0.00 $7,314.38 FINAL APP? / a OVAL Inspec4ort ______ Date: ___Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the 'Imposition' of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as 'fees/exactions.' You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 *PERMIT APPLICATION • CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave.,.Carlsbad, CA 92008 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO.O'2S'3 EST.VAL. Aq1551.3 9 Plan Ck. Deposit t .O Validated By Date tfrr(oo Addressclude Bldg/S it #) Business Na (at this in address) 1 c4' P. f'i%Ah.f r1.e2..— Legal Description - Lot No. Subdivision Nme/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units — 2.J —.,4- i tct. / ,.. _ ' I C-PR, 129550 Description of Work S . E.T. #of Seci # of Bedrooms kof Bathrooms "1J / 6r/. Name Address City Name Address - City State/Zip Telephone # '7 I_-1• _ £ - Name Address tity State/Zip Telephone # 7. (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior toits issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($5001). .w&_ c'I6li&,cr,ni 5(417 Y14A1c cii. 92ct' 760 - q3'/. Name . Address City State/Zip• Telephone # State License # 3O License Class I9 / City Business License # 120 Designer Name Addreès City State/Zip Telephone State License # L :J Workers'CornpjnsationDeclaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. 19 I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: - - - - Insurance Company 9747 F/OI (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HLNDREDDOLLARS-111111061 OR LESS) CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subjectto the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. - - WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($- - eOOQirj,dijief the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, Interest and attorney's fees. lrNAfi - 110 '#]' I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: I, as owner of the property or myemployees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale- (Sec. 7044. Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an- owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). - - I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed Contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): - - I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to prOvide the work indicated (include name / address I phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505. 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO - -. - Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO - - IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. - - - - I8TTCO NSTRUCTION LENDINGAGENCY T z___________ I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 3097(i) Civil Code) LENDER'S NAME - _- LENDER'S ADDRESS_______________________________________________________ [1LCAJ ATJQ! TT . -. — :--- : I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. - I hereby authorize representatives of the Citt of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE. INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0 deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued the b Idi -- Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not Co menc 1180 days from the da such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is Corn nce rio of d Se o 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE - -. DATE •• / • 2.-7 Z-1 - WHITE. File YELLOW.. Applicant PINK. Finance - City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 11/06/2001 Permit# CB000257 Inspector Assignment: JC Title: SF DETACH 5587.89/GAR 991.67 Description: 2460SF GAR 402 DECK 308 W!TEMP POWER Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: 'SFD Job Address: 2479 OCEAN ST Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT DAY FAMILY TRUST 05-12-87 Owner: DAY FAMILY TRUST 05-12-87 Remarks: Total Time: CD Description Act 19 Final Structural 14 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical I 49 Final Mechanical Phone: 7608052420 lnspecto/, Requested By: MARK Entered By: ROBIN Associated PCRs PCROO199 ISSUED Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 09/24/2001 89 Final Combo CO JC SEE LIST ATTACHED 05/03/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CO JC NEED PLAN CHECK 04/30/2001 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP JC 04/19/2001 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP JC 04/18/2001 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall PA JC 04/13/2001 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP JC 04/13/2001 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall NR JC 04/13/2001 23 Gas/Test/Repairs AP JC 04/05/2001 32 Const. Service/Agricultural AP JC TEMP POWER RELEASE 04/05/2001 34 Rough Electric WC JC 04/02/2001 16 Insulation AP JC 03/30/2001 . 16 Insulation NR JC 03/26/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP JC 03/2312001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding NS JC 03/21/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding NR GG 03/13/2001 24 Rough/Topbut AP JC City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 04/05/2001 Permit# CB000257 Inspector Assignment: JC Title: SF DETACH 5587.89/GAR 991.67 Description: 2460SF GAR 402 DECK 308 WITEMP POWER Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Job Address: 2479 OCEAN ST Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT DAY FAMILY TRUST 05-12-87 Owner: DAY FAMILY TRUST 05-12-87 Remarks: T.S.P.B Total Time: Phone: 7604346104 Inspector: Requested By: TURNER CONST Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description Act Comments 34 Rough Electric U). (2- ri f'E'2. 4f6 -7/P SA-7 Associated PCRs PCROOI99 ISSUED Inspection History Date Description 04/02/2001 16 Insulation 03/30/2001 16 Insulation 03/26/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 03/23/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 03/21/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 03/1312001 24 Rough/Topout 03/13/2001 34 Rough Electric 03/13/2001 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 03/12/2001 24 Rough/Topout 02/26/2001 21 Underground/Under Floor 02/26/2001 22 Sewer/Water Service 02/23/2001 22 Sewer/Water Service 01/30/2001 12 Steel/Bond Beam 01/30/2001 13 Shear Panels/HD's 01/30/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 01/08/2001 62 Steel/Bond Beam 01/05/2001 15 Roof/Reroof 01/05/2001 63 Walls 12/11/2000 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 12/11/2000 12 Steel/Bond Beam 12/11/2000 61 Footing 12/08/2000 32 Const. Service/Agricultural Act lnsp Comments AP JC NR JC AP JC NS JC NR GG AP JC AP JC AP JC NR JC AP JC AP JC NS JC RAIN WC JC AP JC AP JC AP JC AP SR CO SR VERTICAL STEEL NOT AS PER PLAN AP TL OK TO POUR GARAGE SLABS WC TL AP TL OK TO POUR FTGS @ N/WALL AP TL 1.qT 4 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 12/11/2000 Permit# CB000257 Title: SF DETACH 5587.89/GAR 991.67 Description: 2460SF GAR 402 DECK 308 W/TEMP POWER Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Job Address: 2479 OCEAN ST Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT DAY FAMILY TRUST 05-12-87 Owner: DAY FAMILY TRUST 05-12-87 Remarks: Total Time: Inspector Assignment: TL Phone: 7604346104 Inspector: Requested By: TURNER CONST Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description Act 12 Steel/Bond Beam 61 Footing Comments Associated PCRs PCROOI99 ISSUED Inspection History Date Description Act Insp 11/17/2000 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP TL 11/16/2000 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers CA TL 10/12/2000 21 Underground/Under Floor AP TL 9/5/2000 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers CA PS 9/1/2000 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP TL 8/25/2000 21 Underground/Under Floor AP TL 8/17/2000 63 Walls AP TL 8/15/2000 63 Walls CO TL 8/11/2000 61 Footing AP TL 8/11/2000, 62 Steel/Bond Beam AP TL 8/3/2000 62 Steel/Bond Beam AP TL 7/18/2000 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PA TL 7/17/2000 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers NR TL 7/5/2000 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP TL. 7/3/2000 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers CA TL 7/3/2000 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers CA TL Comments FTGS @ BOTH GARAGES OK TO POUR 2ND STORY SEWER, INSPECTION PUMP TO SEWER APPROVED ON 9/1 SLABS @ LOWER FLOOR OK TO POUR TENNECO FOAM & DRAINS ARE IN PLACE @ WEST END NAIL OK TO POUR @ S/W CORNER OK TO POUR 2ND LIFT @ ALL PERIMETER WALLS INT. WALL W/ALT © DETAIL #5 SDI OK TO POUR PERIMETER STEM WALLS ONLY STEM WALL OK W/ STEEL PER PLAN MELCHIOR LAND SURVEYING INC. may 8, 2000 1N2012 Turner Construction AWL Mark Turner 3197 James Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: flay Residence —Pad Certification Dear Mark: This letter is to inform you that on May 5, 2000, Melchior Land Surveying, Inc. Field Surveyed the Rough Grading on the above referenced prqJect and has found it to be in substantial conformance with the approved Grading Plan (Drawing No. 385-3A). The pads are generally +1- 010 foot ofPad Grade (Please we attached sketch). If you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, MELCHIOR LAND SURVEYING, INC. Dale A. Davis, P.L.S. Associate Surveyor MAINUFPIOi% LIL 1 Ub C.W. LA MONTE CO. Soil and Foundation Engineering 4350 Palm Avenue, Suite 25 La Mesa, Ca. 91941 Phone (619),462--9861, Fax (619) 462-9859 December 8, 2000 Job No. 98'2611 CITY OF CARLSBAD Engineering Department 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, Ca. 92009 SUBJECT: Foundation Inspection - North. Retaining Wall Day Residence 2749 Ocean Street Carlsbad, CA. Dear Sirs: Our firm has inspected the foundation excavations for the retaining wall at the above subject site. Based on our inspection it is our professional opinion the excavations are in substantial conformance with the building and foundation plan by: DAVIS GROUP and in substantial conformance with our" REPORT OF SOILS INVESTIGATION" for Day Residence Site dated January 4, 1999. As always if you have any questions concerning this letter feel free to contact our office. Respectfully submitted, C.W. LAMONTE CO. C1iffo(. LaMonte.RCE 25241, GE 495 QbocEss,o Ca No. 495 )J rn UNSCHEDULED BUILDING INSPECTION /07D DATE ell-7 INSPECTOR PERMIT #(9O07 PLAN CHECK#_________ JOB ADDRESS 2779 r DESCRIPTION CODE DESCRIPTION ACT • COitMINTS A-P GRADE PER PLANS APPROVED COMPACTED SAC.KFILL RETAINING PMALL PER PLANS. V4ATESPROOF V4/MEMBRANE V4ATERPROOFING SYSTEM EQUAL TO "MIRADRI 350 MEMSRANE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE VITH MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS PRAINIAGE FILTER MAT EQUAL TO "MIRAPR.AIN 6200'. INSTALL PER MFRS. INSTRUCTIONS FILTER FABRIC, I.MRAP MIN. 447 PERFORATED DRAINAGE PIPE - SEE SITE PLAN FOR DISCHARGE ROUTING V4ALL MATERFSOOFIN&/ FDN. DRAIN SCALE 3/4 - 1-0" 110 1 Df 1 71(Wro REVISION TO DETAIL lO/Di RON & MARY DAY RESIDENCE EXP. C-6795 C;W;. LA. MONTECO. Soil- and Foundation. Engineering 4350:Palm:Avenue,. Suite 25 -La -Mesa- Ca. .9194-1 Phone;619) 461-98612 Fax (419.):46M859 November43;2000 Job-No. 98-2611 CITY OF CARLSBAD Engineering Department 2075--Las Palmas: Drive Carlsbad, C& 92009 SUBJECT:. Foundation. Inspection Day- Residence 2149 Ocean Street Carlsbad, CA. Dear Sirs: Our field-soils engineer has. visually inspectecLand.reviewed.photos.of the installation:of the "French" drains in front and down the sides-of thè-proposed--structure atthe-above: subject site. Based. on.our. inspection it is-our profossiOnalopinionthe"French"drains- tal1d:on the property are-in substantial conformance-with the building and- foundation plans-by DAVIS GROUP. and. insubstantial -conformance .withprudenLengineering practice. and-our " REPORT OF SOILS INVESTIGATION!' for Day Residence-Site dated-January 4,1999. As always. if you have any questions-concerning this-letter-feel-free to contact- our office. Respectfully- submitted, C.W.-LAMON-TE.CO. ( Cliffoc(w. La--Monte RCE 25-241 GE 495 z. C.W. LA MONTE Co. Soil and Foundation Engineering 4350 Palm Avenue, Suite 25 La Mesa, Ca. 91941 Phone (619) 462-9861, Fax (619) 462-9859 November 13,2000 CITY OF CARLSBAD Engineering Department 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, Ca. 92009 SUBJECT: Foundation Inspection Day Residence 2749 Ocean Street Carlsbad, CA. Dear Sirs: Job No. 98-2611 Our firm has inspected the foundation excavations for the garages at the above subject site. Based on our inspection it is our professional opinion the excavations are in substantial conformance with the building and foundation plan by DAVIS GROUP and in substantial, conformance with our" REPORT OF SOILS INVESTIGATION" for Day Residence Site dated January 4, 1999. As always if you have any questions concerning this letter feel free to contact our office. Respectfully submitted, C.W. LAMONTE CO. ç C1iffé&wLaMonte RCE 25241, GE 495 %OFESS/ö 01 ((ca No0252A1 fa.3-o - JJ*A TURNER CONSTRUCTION U. 360399 3191 James Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008 P (760) 434-6104 F (760 729-0538 TRANSMITTAL LETTER City of Carlsbad Building Dept 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlabad, CA 92008.7314 Ref: The Day Residence 2479 Ocean Street Carlsbad, CA. 92008 Attn: Tom Lopez Dear Toni, Enclosed are copies of the compaction report and pad certification that you requested for the Day residence. If all is in order I would appreciate it if you could come by the job site on Wednesday morning to sign off on the inspection card so I can schedule concrete as soon as possible. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, I X/V C r - /-,O~ Mark Turner TURNER CONSTRUCTION Mt/mb City of Carlsbad Final Build! Dept: Building cEiiiiëiiiig INSPeCtiON iiiiiiQ (CMWDT' St Lite Fire Plan. Check #: Date: 09/24/2001 Permit #: CB000257 Permit Type: RESDNTL Project Name: SF DETACH 5587.89/GAR 991.67 Sub Type: SFD 2460SF GAR 402 DECK 308 W/TEMP POWER Address: 2479 OCEAN ST Lot: 0 Contact Person: TURNER CONST Phone: 7604346104 Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: Comments: 4 .2 CIty 01 Carlsbad Final BuiIIllN actioN Dept: Building Engineeri g CPiiiV) CMWD St Lite Fire Plan Check #: Date: 09/24/2001 Permit #: CB000257 Permit Type: RESDNTL Project Name: SF DETACH 5587.89/GAR 991.67 Sub Type: SF0 2460SF GAR 402 DECK 308 W/TEMP POWER Address: 2479 OCEAN ST Lot: 0 Contact Person: TURNER CONST Phone: 7604346104 Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA Inspected Date By: VVV. Inspected: Approved: V Disapproved: Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: ______ Disapproved: Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: Comments: EsGil Corporation In !Partners/lip with Government for!Building Safety DATE: April 07, 2000 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-257 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2479 Ocean Street PROJECT NAME: Day Residence- SET: III U APPb ANT JURIS. U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. O The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed checklist and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The checklist transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. O The applicant's copy of the checklist is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the checklist has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Tony Embuido Enclosures: Esgil Corporation [--I GA 0MB DEJ DPC LOG trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for Wui&uing Safety DATE: March 27, 2000 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-257 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2479 Ocean Street PROJECT NAME: Day Residence- El APP ANT JURIS. O PLAN REVIEWER O FILE SET: II The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed checklist and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The checklist transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the checklist is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the checklist has been sent to: Wayne Davis 343 Fourth Avenue, Ste. #204, San Diego, CA 92101 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Wayne Davis Telephone #: 619-232-5990 Date contacted:3)Z3/.)? (by:c4 Fax #: 619-232-5992 MaiR...—TeIephone Fax,' In Person Iii REMARKS: By: Tony Embuido Enclosures: Esgil Corporation DGA JMB DEJ 17-1 PC 03/16/00 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, california 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax(858)560-1576 Carlsbad 00-257 II March 27, 2000 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-257 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2479 Ocean Street SET: II DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: ESGIL CORPORATION: 03/16/00 March 27, 2000 REVIEWED BY: Tony Embuido FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? IYes LINo Carlsbad 00-257 II March 27, 2000 PLANS Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports- directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation & the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 1. Final set of plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 10. In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor. Identify this value in the soils report and note on foundation plan. Section 1629.4.2. 12. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents. (Required by the soil report). FRAMING 15. Show in the calculations how the redundancy was determined, per Section 1630.1.1. Expand design showing how each factors were derived. Additional corrections to follow upon submittal. a) How was floor area (A8) derived? Carlsbad 00-257 II March 27, 2000 18. Show on the plans all structural requirements developed in the structural calculations. Section 106.3.3. It 11ii appears the design caic's. are incomplete. Please prove otherwise. How was 40' of tributary area derived for rear-wall at Vt story? It would appear to be at least 50'. Please prove otherwise. I) What about the outside exterior bearing walls? Where are they going? d) Indicate the length (width) of shear panels per design for sidewalls. i.e., 10'& 25' lengths on page 13 of the caic's. This has been okay per our discussion at Esgil, but due to the fact you have additional corrections, provide shear wall symbols on shear wall schedule showing stucco and gypsum drywall being used for lateral at exterior and interior locations. Shear wall schedule will have symbols for stucco & drywall for future projects. Indicate stucco shear symbol just inside of retaining wall for 25' panel on foundation/floor framing plan. See sheet S2. Provide stucco shear symbol at shear panel schedule shown on detail B/SDI. None provided. e) Expand on resisting moment caic's. for rear garage shear walls at 2' floor. It would appear holdowns are required for shear walls. ii) Where's 7'-6" shear panel per design on 2" floor framing plan? f) How is 277 plf per design, being transferred from the floor diaphragm to retaining wall? I) Provide details showing required connections per design. Per applicant response, where are plate and ledger anchors per details F through I? None provided. What happened to all the retaining wall details per design? g) Provide lettered details shown on details and specified in the calc's. and make it a part of the plans. Additional corrections may follow. h) How does one verify the rebars for both (horizontal & vertical) used for all designed retaining walls are adequate? Provide user's manual showing how output was generated from the input values. MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 21. . Show source of combustion air to furnace, per Chapter 7, UMC. Show the location and size of the combustion air openings. a) Clarify location of duct vents for combustion air on floor plan. It would appear to be venting to the inside of the house. Please clarify. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Tony Embuido at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation 1n !Partners/lip with Government for Building Safety DATE: 02/14/00 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-257 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2479 Ocean Street PROJECT NAME: Day Residence- El AP R= I JURIS. E P AN REVIEWER El FILE SET:I The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed checklist and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The checklist transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the checklist is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. - The applicant's copy of the checklist has been sent to: Wayne Davis 343 Fourth Avenue, Ste. #204, San Diego, CA 92101 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person LI REMARKS: By: Tony Embuido Enclosures: Esgil Corporation DGA rJMB flEJ flPC 01/31/00 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax(858)560-1576 & a Carlsbad 00-257 02/14/00 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-257 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2479 Ocean Street FLOOR AREA: 5588-R3 992-Ui REMARKS: Balconies/Decks-878 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 01/27/00 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 02/14/00 STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: -37' DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 01/31/00 PLAN REVIEWER: Tony Embuido FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 00-257 02/14/00 . PLANS Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation & the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. Final set of plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). 2. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2. REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION STRUCTURAL CONCRETE OVER 2500 PSI STRUCTURAL MASONRY DESIGNER-SPECIFIED Carlsbad 00-257 02/14/00 Special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. . FIRE PROTECTION Show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup: a) In rooms adjacent to hallways serving bedrooms, when such rooms have a ceiling height 24 inches or more above the ceiling height in the hallway. See entryway/foyer on sheet A9 at upper level floor. . GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS Glazing in the following locations Should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): Specify tempered glass. a) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. See window adjacent to exterior door of Y bathroom at lower floor plan. . ROOFING Where eave vents are installed, insulation shall not block the free flow of air. A minimum of 1" of air space shall be provided between the insulation and the roof sheathing. To accommodate the thickness of insulation plus the required 1" clearance, member sizes may have to be increased for rafter-ceiling joists. Section 1505.3. . GARAGE Garage requires one-hour fire protection on the garage side of walls and ceiling common to the dwelling. Table 3-13, Section 302.4. See garage #2 and specify keynote #32 where applicable. Show a self-closing door, either 1-3/8" solid core or a listed 20-minute assembly, for openings between garage and dwelling. Section 302.4. See garage #2 and specify keynote #33 where applicable. . CONCRETE AND MASONRY Provide fireplace construction details or note construction to be per attached fireplace standard drawing. Chapter 31. Carlsbad 00-257 02/14/00 . FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 10. In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor. Identify this value in the soils report and note on foundation plan. Section 1629.4.2. II. The soil's engineer recommends that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (Required by the soil report). FRAMING Show or note that nailing will be in compliance with Table 23-Il-B-I. See framing notes on sheet S2 & S3 and correct. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on roof framing plans. a) City of Carlsbad does .!1.q.t allow deferred submittal. Show in the calculations how the redundancy was determined, per Section 1630.1.1. Expand design showing how each factors were derived. Additional corrections to follow upon submittal. In Seismic Zone 4, aspect ratios are limited to 2:1 for wood shear panels. Table 23-11-G. Dimension the 4' shear walls per design at 2d story sidewalls. In Seismic Zones 3 and 4, where allowable shear values exceed 350 plf in wood structural panel shear walls, foundation sill plates and all framing members receiving edge nailing from abutting panels shall not be less than a single 3" nominal member. In shear walls where the total wall design shear does not exceed 600 plf, a single 2" nominal sill plate may be used, provided the anchor bolts are designed for a load capacity of 50% or less of the allowable capacity. Table 23-I1-I-I, footnote 3. Carlsbad 00-257 02/14/00 18. Show on the plans all structural requirements developed in the structural calculations. Section 106.3.3. a) It appears the design calc's. are incomplete. Please prove otherwise. b) How was 40' of tributary area derived for rear-wall at Vt story? It would appear to be at least 50'. Please prove otherwise. c) Redo the math on rear shear wall and verify how 734 plf was derived for both floors. d) Indicate the length (width) of shear panels per design for sidewalls. i.e., 10'& 25' lengths on page 13 of the calc's. Indicate stucco shear symbol just inside of retaining wall for 25' panel on foundation/floor framing plan. See sheet S2. Provide stucco shear symbol at shear panel schedule shown on detail B/SDI. None provided. e) Expand on resisting moment calc's. for rear garage shear walls at 2 floor. It would appear holdowns are required for shear walls. i) Structural observation maybe required if no holdowns are provided. Note on the plans that "Structural observation by the engineer/ architect shall be performed. A statement in writing shall be given to the building official, stating that the site visits have been made and whether or not any observed deficiencies have been corrected to conform to the approved plans and specifications." f) How is 277 plf per design, being transferred from the floor diaphragm to retaining wall? i) Provide details showing required connections per design at detail 9ISD1. g) Provide lettered details shown on details and specified in the calc's. and make it a part of the plans. Additional corrections may follow. See sheet SD1. h) How does one verify the rebars for both (horizontal & vertical) used for all designed retaining walls are adequate? Provide user's manual showing how output was generated from the input values. i) Indicate in the design calc's, the sizes of rebars used for all retaining walls shown on structural plans. i) It would appear the length of shear panels derived at 2' story-rear wall is inconsistent with the structural plans. Please prove otherwise. j) Correct size of floor joists [FJI] to show TJI/PRO 550 per design in lieu of TJI/PRO 250 shown on framing keynotes. k) Engineer of record to verify consistency of the calc's. with the foundation and framing plans, as well as details. 19. Provide design calc's. and show stud size and spacing. Maximum allowable stud heights: Bearing wall: 2 x 4 & 2 x 6 max. 10'; Non-bearing: 2 x 4 max. 14', 2 x 6 max. 20'. Table 23-IV-B. a) See wall studs showing height of at least 12'-14' on sections & elevations. Carlsbad 00-257 02/14/00 . MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) Show the location of all heating and cooling appliances or systems. See keynote [40] and specify on floor plans for 2nd F.A.U. i.e., garage adjacent to bedroom 2. Show source of combustion air to furnace, per Chapter 7, UMC. Show the location and size of the combustion air openings. Note on the plans that approved spark arrestors shall be installed on all chimneys. UBC, Section 3102.3.8. Provide makeup air in laundry room. A minimum opening of 100 square inches for makeup air shall be provided in the door or by other approved means. UMC, Section 908.2. . CARLSBAD REQUIREMENTS Overflow roof drains shall terminate in an area where they will be readily visible and will not cause damage to the building. If the roof drain terminates through a wall, the overflow drain shall terminate 12" minimum above the roof drain. Policy 84-35. No wiring is permitted on the roof of a building and wiring on the exterior of a building requires approval by the Building Official. (City Policy) New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. Note "two roof jacks must be installed" where the water heater is in the one story garage and directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No. 8093). Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093). All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (City Policy). . MISCELLANEOUS Specify G.F.I. C. outlet at all kitchen counter locations and wet bar sink counter. See sheet A9. Provide a note on the plans stating; "All new glazing (fenestrations) will be installed with a certifying label attached, showing the U-value." Carlsbad 00-257 02/14/00 31. Dimension all setbacks from retaining walls, exterior walls, etc. to property lines on site plan. See sheet Al. (Sides and front setbacks) To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes El No U The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Tony Embuido at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 00-257 02/14/00 SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PLAN CHECK NUMBER: OWNER'S NAME: I, as the owner, oragent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify that I, or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special inspector(s) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 for the construction project located at the site listed above. UBC Section 106.3.5. Signed I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at the site listed above. Engineera1Arcfliles Seal & Signature Here Signed 1. List of work requiring special inspection: Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection 0 Field Welding Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI EJ High Strength Bolting O Prestressed Concrete E1 Expansion/Epoxy Anchors O Structural Masonry Sprayed-On Fireproofing 0 Designer Specified Ej Other 2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above: 3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above: Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site. Carlsbad 00-257 02/14/00 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-257 PREPARED BY: Tony Embuido DATE: 02/14/00 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2479 Ocean Street BUILDING OCCUPANCY R-3/U-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION VALUE (ft. 2) MULTIPLIER 1 ($) Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 491,551 (PER CITY) 199 UBC Building Permit Fee E Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 1993.08 199 UBC Plan Check Fee Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 1295.50 Type of Review: • Complete Review Structural Only Ej Hourly Repetitive Fee Applicable Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 1036.40 Comments: Sheet I of I macvalue.doc 5196 of Carlsbad BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE: /b7rn PLANCHECKNO.: CB Dc2S'7 BUILDING ADDRESS: LI 71 (X2.a:t. $kfr PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: Q 3 - ô2 / - EST. VALUE: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. tA Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: DENIAL Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked wit R. Make necessary corrections to plans or specifrcatidps for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. Date: Date: Date:__ ENGII1EERlNG AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: By: - . Date: ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON 0 Dedication Application 0 Dedication Checklist. El Improvement Application 0 Improvement Checklist Future Improvement Agreement 0 Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist O Right-of-Way Permit Application O Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet El Sewer Fee Information Sheet Name: JOANNE JUCHNIEWICZ City ofCarlsbad 1635 4 Address: Carlsbad, CA 92009 Phone: CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: A-4 CA 92009-1576 . (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 41Y69 cj BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 1ST2 2ND/ 3RDI U U 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North Arrow D. Property Lines Existing & Proposed Structures E. . Easements Existing Street Improvements F: Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets ftlfM, G. Drivewa widths ct,pii ve.( y .1. .. -. 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns ( - Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 12. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography U 3. Include on title sheet: Site address Assessor's Parcel Number Legal Description For commercial/industrial, buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE Project does, not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No.,- - All conditions are, in compliance. Date: HW0R00OCSCHKLS1BU0dinO Pandeck Cidsi SF0001 Form JJ.dec 2 Rev. 12120108 1. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DFIATION REQUIREMENTS ST./ KNDV'\3 / )5.. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm / drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $_/0 Obc , pursuant to Carlsbad (j)Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. bV)ItPDedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description, together with an 8 Y2" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 13 0 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $' 3tj 61V1) , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. f f - I '~tO6 D- q IrsvAl Improvement Plans signed by: Date: 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $_,2gO so - we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. . This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: H:WORDDOCStCHKI.STBIJdiflO Plantheck Cktst BP000I Form JJ.doc 3 Rev. 12l28R6 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST st/ nd/ 3rd/ LI LI 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: LI LI LI 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adiacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. A] 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). LI 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. ') 35.5' —3,4 , L&)cXL Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: xx7c Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) 00 U U LI;Id. No Grading Permit required. U LI LI 7e.lf grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS )<',)4 U 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST H:WORDOCHKISTBuiIdiflg Plantheck CISISt BP000I Form JJ.doc. 4 Rev. 12120196 ired fees are attached J No fees required 2 n 3rdl El 0 Lu Ui A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. 4 Rev. 12120196 H:WORO1DOCSCHKLST4BU1ifl0 Plandledi Cidat BP000I Farm JJ.dac 5 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET. 4cs Jsti,nate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. Q'CaIcuIation.bsed on building plancheck plan submittal. Address: L( 7? &L&*— cS - Bldg. Permit No.. B Op o Prepared by: TV Date: Checked by.- Date:_________ EDU CALCULATIONS. List types and square footages for all uses. Types of.Use - Sq.FtJUnits: ... ;'.-_/ ,..... Types of Use: .. Sq. ftlUnits: __.. . . . . ..........-...... ADT CALCULATIONS: List-1,063 andsquare.footageou, alluses. . . ..-. ..- - Types of Use: ___ Si. IFL/U04s: •s• :.. Types of Use. Sq Ft IUnits: - ADT's: FEES RFQUIRED; -. :: ..• - . - : .... ', :jJrfl4IN'C: DYES mo bridgá& thorOuáhfai. fee in District 11 cod. na impact•F 3.. 1.PARK-IN-UEUFEE .• PARK AREA &t -- .. . : . ..... - —FEEIUNIT:_-. . X NO. UNITS:_._ . •.... . - Ef'. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE . .-. ;... ,.. ..- -. ADT91UNIT5r X .. FEEIADT: _- 3. BRIDIE"ANDTHOROUGHFARE FEE. IDIST. #1 ..IST. f _) ADVsIUNITS -. X. FEEIADT:_-• :. = $__________ 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT-FEE, ZONE:._. UNIT!SO.FT.: X FEEISO.FTJUNIT:. 5. SEWER FEE . PERMIT No EDUs X. FEE/EDU:_____ BENEFIT AREA: DRAINAGE BASIN:_____ EDIIs: X FEEIEDU: = $___________ 6. SEWER LATERAL a$2,500) . . DRAINAGE FEES PLDA_: HIG4VlLOW_____ ACRES: ..23_. X FEE/AC: TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $ 713.gif *NOTE: This calculation sheet Is a complete rest of d fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. 05/30/2000 10:34 FAX 760 438 4178 ENG. INSPECTIONS 901 Exhibit 3-27 CITY OF CARLSBAD GRADING INSPECTION CHECKLIST FOR PARTIAL SITE RELEASE PROJECT INSPECTOR:I)4Lc t hut K- DATE: f4i so,$ 20a* PROJECT ID I)? 19-04 GRADING PERMIT NO. C00600 LOTS REQUESTED FOR RELEASE F t CVAY (I N/A = NOT APPLICABLE 'I = COMPLETE I Or unacceptable Site access to riquested tots adequate and logically grouped SIte erosion conbot measures adequate. Overall site adequate for health, safety and welfare of public. Letter of request for partial release submitted 8W x 1? site plan (attachment) showing requested lots submitted. Compaction report from soils engineer submitted. Engineer of work certifloatlon of work done and pad elevations. Geologic engineer's letter If unusual geologic Or subsurface conditions exist. Project conditions of approval diedwd far conflicts Fire hydrants within 500 feet of building Combustibles and all weather roads ass to site. I artlal release of grading for the above stated lots Is approved for the purpose of building permit issuance. Issuance of building permits is still subject to all normal City requirements required pursuant to the building permit process. Partial release of the site is denied for the following reasons: .JOiMiq' 2.600 Inspector Date Senor Inspector Date - PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST 'Th IAI fl, A A LL Plan Check No. CB '"' Address 'l ri t}U(ik1I\ t'/T Planner (fi194-4&81161, extension*1717- 5EiKf&AL0A0 APN: ' Type of Pr9ject & Use: 'R Net Project Density:DU/AC Zoning:_ General Plan:_'RVk Facilities Management Zone: CFD Iin/niitl #Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres:______ Circle One (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: gend: Item Complete (Z~Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: YES NO TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions. or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval:____________________________________________________ CK F~ 7 Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES)( NO CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES____ NO____ If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES _X NO____ If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: O t Of Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. >. 0' 0 C 0' 0. XE E Inclusiônary Housing Fee required: YES NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES ___ NO___ (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#. toolbar, Screens. Housing Fees, Construct Housing YIN, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) * . . ... - ,. .. • ... S Site Plan: . . Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines. Provide legal description of property and, assessor's parcel number. ION Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Required '2-0 " Shown Required 1-'. 5" Shown Required JVP1_- Shown (cIA— Required 11,' Shown "71 2. Accessory structure setbacks: Front: Required Shown . Interior Side: Required Shown Street Side: Required Shown Rear: Required Shown Structure separation: Req.iired Shown E1 3. Lot Coverage: Required ' (f2O/ Shown '+1% Height: Required <.i/ Shown ?3" ro Parking: Spaces Required .c'x 2'ZiShown 2.0 'x ZO' Guest Spaces Required Shown Additional Conments_______________________________________________________ OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE? Carlsbad Fire Department 000020 2560 Orion Way Fire Prevention Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 931-2176 Plan Review Requirements Category: Building Plan Date of Report: 02/02/2000 Reviewed by: Name: Davis Group Address: 343 Fourth Ave. #204 City, State: San Diego CA 92101 CWsidence _____________________ Job #: ce Bldg#: 249OeanSt Ste. or Bldg. No. Plan Checker Job Name: Job Address: 000020 CB000257 Approved The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. O Approved The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the Subject to attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Incomplete The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and / or specifications to this office for review and approval. Review 1st 2nd 3rd Other Agency ID FD Job # 000020 ED File # OCiVLOFES esto * 01 C.W. LA MONTE. CO. Soil and Foundation Engineering 4350 Palm Avenue, Suite 25 La Mesa, Ca. 91941 Phone (619) 462-9861, Fax (619) 462-9859 December 11,2000 CITY OF CARLSBAD Engineering Department 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, Ca. 92009 / SUBJECT: Foundation Plan, Review Day Residence 2749 Ocean Street Carlsbad, CA. Dear Sirs: Job No. 98-2611 Our firm has reviewed the above subject building and foundation plan by DAVIS GROUP and found the plans to be in substantial conformance with our " REPORT OF SOILS INVESTIGATION' for Day Residence Site dated January 4, 1999. As always if you have any questions concerning this letter feel free to contact our office. Respectfully submitted, C.W. LAMONTE CO. /fo 4j CliI w. La Monte RCE 25241, GE 495 c WT Lal.Me Cbj p i y Soil and Foundation Engineers 4350 PALM A VENUE, SUITE 25 LA MESA, California 91941 Phone: (619) 462-9861 Fax: 462-9859 March 29, 2000 Job No. 98-2611 TO: The Davis Group. 343 Fourth Avenue, Suite 204 San Diego, California 92101 Attn: Mr. Wayne Davis SUBJECT: Addendum to "Report of Soils Investigation and Geologic Reconnaissance, Day Residence Site, 2749 Ocean Street, Carlsbad California", dated January 4, 1999 Gentlemen; In accordance with your request, we are providing an addendum to the above referenced report. If you should have any questions after reviewing this report, please do not hesitate to contact our office. This addendum updates the siesmicity of the site to include design information relative to the 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code. The following design factors are based on site conditions and location. Seismic Zone Factor (Z) - Table 16-I The Seismic Zone Factor (Z) is derived 'from Seismic Zone Map, Figure 16-2. The project is located in Zone 4. Z=O.40 Soil Profile Type - Table 16-J The materials encountered at the subject site fall into the Sd Soil Profile Type. Seismic Coefficient Ca - Table 16-Q The Seismic Coefficient is determined from the above table using the Soil Profile Type and the Seismic Zone Factor. Ca = 0.44 Na Seismic Coefficient Cv - Table 16-R The Seismic Coefficient is determined from the above table using the Soil Profile Type and the Seismic Zone Factor. Cv = 0.64 Nv Near Source Factor (Na 1) - Table 16-S The near source factor is based on the Seismic Source Type and fault distance. Near Source Factor Nal = 1.0 Near Source Factor (Nv1) - Table 16-T The near source factor is based on the Seismic Source Type and fault distance. Near Source Factor Nv I = 1.2 Seismic Source Type - Table 16-U The seismic source type is listed in the below table. Seismic Source Distance Maximum Moment Slip rate, SR (mm/yr) Type Magnitude (M) B 3.5 km M<7.0 SR<2 This addendum should be placed with the original report and become an integral part of that report. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, C.W. La Monte Company ( 017 \\ No.025.241 ' ,2. Cli a Monte, R.C.E. 25241, G.E. 0495 - Report of Field Observation and Relative Compaction Tests Results Day Residence 2749 Ocean Street Carlsbad, California JOB NO. 98-2611-FC May 24, 2000 Prepared for: Turner Construction Co. Inc. Prepared by: C. W. LA MONTE COMPANY 4350 Palm Avenue, Suite 25 La Mesa, California 92141 C WL' L Mwite Cbi mij pi y Soil and Foundation Engineers 4350 PALM A VENUE, SUITE 25 Phone: (619) 462-9861 May 24, 2000 TO: Turner Construction Co. Inc. 3197 James Drive Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Attn: Mr. Mark Turner LA MESA, CALIFORNIA 91941 Fax: 462-9859 Job No. 98-2611-FC SUBJECT: Report of Field Observation and Relative Compaction Tests Results Day Residence Site 2479 Ocean Street Carlsbad, California Reference: "Report of Soil Investigation, Day Residence Site 2479 Ocean Street Carlsbad, California" by C.W. La Monte Company, dated January 4, 1999. Gentlemen; In accordance with your request, this report has been prepared to present the results of the field observations and relative compaction tests performed at the subject site by C.W. La Monte Company. These services were performed between April 28 to May 5, 2000 and included observation and testing during grading of the structure building pads. Proposed Construction It is our understanding that the site is being developed to receive a three level single family residence. The structure will be of wood-frame construction and will be founded on conventional shallow foundations with raised wooden and concrete slab-on-grade floors. Exterior improvements will include concrete paved parking and driveways and a pool. Site Description The project site consists of a somewhat, rectangular shaped parcel of land, approximately 0.23 acres in area, and is located at 2749 Ocean Street. in the Carlsbad area of the County of San Diego. The property is bounded on the east by Ocean Street and the west by the Pacific Ocean. A description of the property is Assessors parcel No. 203-021-04. Refer to the attached Plot Plan (Figure 1) for a layout of the site and location of proposed improvements. Job No. 98-2611 FC May 24, 2000 Page 2 Available Plans To assist in determining the location and elevations of our field density tests and to define the general extent of the site grading for this phase of work, we reviewed Building Plans prepared by THE DAVIS GROUP, ARCHITECTS Site Preparation Prior to grading, the existing residential building was removed from the site. Prior to the placement of fill, all loose topsoil was removed from the building area to expose firm natural ground. The maximum depth of removal was on the order of 2 feet below the original ground surface. "The excavations were prepared to receive fill by scarifying to a depth of approximately 6 inches, moisture conditioning, and recompacting the soils to at least 90 percent of their maximum dry densities The fill material, was obtained from on-site excavation, and consisted primarily of non- expansive, fine to medium sands. The fill was placed in approximate eight inch layers, watered to above optimum moisture contents, and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction by means of track rolling with heavy construction equipment. Refer to the attached plot plan for the location of placed slopes and fill materials. Field Observation and Testing Observations and field density tests were performed by a representative of C.W. La Monte Company during the grading operation. The density tests were taken according to A.S.T.M. Test 1556-90 guidelines and the results of these tests are shown on the attached figures. The accuracy of the in-situ density test locations and elevations is a function of the accuracy of the survey control provided by other than C.W. La Monte Company representatives. Unless otherwise noted, their locations and elevations were determined by pacing methods and should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. As used herein, the term "observation" implies only that we observed the progress of work we agreed to be involved with, and performed tests, on which, together, we based our opinion as to whether the work essentially compiles with the job requirements, local grading ordinances and the Uniform Building Code. Laboratory Tests Maximum dry density determinations were performed on representative samples of the soils used in the compacted fills according to A.S.T.M. Test 1557-91, Method A. guidelines Method A specifies that a four (4) inch diameter cylindrical mold of 1/30 cubic foot volume be used and that the soil tested be placed in five (5) equal layers with each layer compacted by twenty-five (25) blows of a 10-pound hammer within 18-inch drop. The results of these tests, as presented on Plate Number 11, were used in conjunction with the field density tests to determine the degree of relative compaction of the compacted fill. Additional Work Additional grading and backfill operations will be required at the site for utility trench Job No. 98-261 1FC May 24, 2000 Page 3 backfill, and the preparation of subgrade material in the parking and driveway areas. It is recommended that in-place density tests and field observations be performed by a representative of this office during each of these operations to verify that they are performed in accordance with job requirements. Conclusions and Recommendations Based on field observation and the density test results, it is the opinion of C.W. La Monte Company that the grading was performed basically in accordance with the City of Carlsbad Grading Ordinance and the recommendations contained in the referenced Geotechnical Report, and the recommendations contained therein do apply to the subject site. In addition to the references' recommendations the below items require consideration: Foundations Dimensions and Embedment Conventional shallow foundations may be utilized in the support of the proposed structures. All new foundations shall extend through all topsoil's and be embedded into compacted fill or formational sands. Two story structures should have a minimum foundation depth of 15 inches below lowest adjacent finished grade and a 15-inch minimum width, per the Uniform Building Code. Single story structures require a 12 inch deep foundation. Soil Bearing Value A bearing capacity of 2000 psf may be assumed for said footings when founded a minimum of 12 inches into the existing compacted fill and/or formational materials. This bearing capacity may be increased by one-third, when considering wind and/or seismic loading. Foundation Reinforcement It is recommended that new continuous footings be reinforced with at least two No.5 steel bars; one reinforcing bar shall be located near the top of the foundation, and one bar near the bottom. The steel reinforcement will help prevent damage due to normal, post construction settlement, resulting from variations in the subsurface soil conditions. This recommendation does not supersede reinforcement required for structural considerations. Anticipated Settlements Based on our experience with the soil types on the subject site, the soils should experience settlement in the magnitude of less than 0.75 inch under a structural load of 2,000 pounds per square foot on a compacted fill mat. It should be recognized that minor hairline cracks normally occur in concrete slabs and foundations due to shrinkage during curing and/or redistribution of stresses and some cracks may be anticipated. Such cracks are not necessarily an indication of excessive vertical movements. Foundation Excavation Observation In order to minimize any work delays at the subject site during site development, this firm should be contacted 48 hours prior to any need for inspection of footing excavations or to perform grading observation or field density testing of compacted fill soils. If possible, placement of forms, templates and steel reinforcement in footing excavations Job No. 98-261 1FC May 24, 2000 Page 4 should not occur prior to our inspection of the excavations. Sometimes foundation excavation observation reveals the need to deepen, redesign or otherwise mitigate unanticipated or adverse conditions. Therefore, prior observation would eliminate the need to remove any formwork or steel reinforcement in the affected footing excavation in order to correct the observed problem. Concrete Slabs-on-grade General Concrete floor slabs, if used shall be a minimum thickness of four inches and shall be underlain by two inches of clean, washed sand overlying 6 mil visqueen, overlying an additional two inches of clean sand. Slab Reinforcement The slab should be reinforced #3 reinforcing bars placed at 18 inch centers, each way or with 6x6-6/6 steel wire mesh. The reinforcement should be placed on concrete "chairs" or spacers, to within the middle third of the slab. Theoretically, the above-recommended rebar and wire mesh options provide similar reinforcement strength. However, based on our past experience, we have found that the wire mesh is often and is more easily pushed to the bottom of the slab during the finishing process, thus significantly reducing its intended reinforcing, function. The rebar grid, if properly supported, is less likely to be dislodged during the finishing process. Thus, unless the concrete finisher is diligent in this regard, the rebar option is the preferred method of slab reinforcement. Interior Slab Curing Time Following placement of concrete floor slabs, sufficient drying time must be allowed prior to placement of floor coverings. Premature placement of floor coverings may result in degradation of adhesive materials and loosening of the finish floor materials. Prior to installation, standardized testing can be performed to determine if the slab moisture emissions are within the limits recommended by the manufacturer of the specified floor-covering product. Design Parameters for Earth Retaining Structures Active Pressure The active earth pressure to be used in the design of retaining walls, shall be based on an Equivalent Fluid Weight of 30 pcf (pounds per cubic foot) at any depth. This active pressure value is for level backfill and assumes an unrestrained condition, and that proper drainage is provided behind the wall. This pressure value assumes the wall is backfilled with on-site excavated sands. Lateral Pressure The passive earth pressure of the encountered natural-ground soils and any recompacted fill soils (to be used for design of building foundations and footings to resist the lateral forces) shall be based on an Equivalent Fluid Weight of 300 pcf (pounds per cubic foot). This passive earth pressure shall only be considered valid for design if the ground adjacent to the foundation structure is essentially level for a distance of at least three times the total depth of Job No. 98-261 1FC May 24, 2000 Page 5 the foundation. We recommend that the upper 1-foot of soil not protected by pavement or concrete slabs be neglected when calculating passive resistance. A Coefficient of Friction of 0.4 times the dead load may be used between the bearing soils and concrete wall foundations or structure foundations and floor slabs founded on formational or similar materials. When combining frictional and passive resistance, the former should be reduced by one-third. Waterproofing and Subdrain Observation The geotechnical engineer should be requested to verify that waterproofing has been applied and that subdrains are properly installed behind the walls. However, unless specifically asked to do so, we will not verify proper application of the waterproofing. Retaining walls that are not waterproofed and properly drained are potentially subject to cosmetic staining (such as efflorescence), surficial spalling and decomposition and excessive moisture emissions (and resulting problems) into the interior space. Backfill All backfill soils should be compacted to at least 90% relative compaction. Expansive or clayey soils should not be used for backfill material. The wall should not be backfihled until the masonry has reached an adequate strength. Factor of Safety The above values, with the exception of the allowable soil bearing pressure, do not include a factor of safety. Appropriate factors of safety should be incorporated into the design to prevent the walls from overturning and sliding. Foundation Plan Review The foundation plans for the proposed structure may be submitted to this office for review to ascertain that the recommendations provided in this report have been followed and that the assumptions utilized in its preparation are still valid Slope Stability It is our opinion that cut and or fill slopes constructed at 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) inclination will possess an adequate factor-or-safety to heights of at least ten feet. UNIFORM BUILDING CODE DESIGN INFORMATION The following design factors were obtained from the 1997 addition of the Uniform Building Code and are based on site conditions and location. Seismic Zone Factor (Z) - Table 164 The Seismic Zone Factor (Z) is determined from Seismic Zone Map, Figure 16-2. The project is located in Zone 4. Z = 0.40 Job No. 98-2611 FC May 24, 2000 Page 6 Soil Profile Type - Table 16-J The materials encountered at the subject site fall into the Sd Soil Profile Type. Seismic Coefficient Ca - Table 16-Q The Seismic Coefficient is determined from the above table using the Soil Profile Type and the Seismic Zone Factor. Ca = 0.44 Na Seismic Coefficient Cv - Table 16-R The Seismic Coefficient is determined from the above table using the Soil Profile Type and the Seismic Zone Factor. Cv = 0.64 Nv Near Source Factor (Na 1) - Table 16-S The near source factor is based on the Seismic Source Type and fault distance. Na! = 1.0 Near Source Factor (Nv 1) - Table 16-T The near source factor is based on the Seismic Source Type and fault distance. Nv1 = 1.2 Seismic Source Type - Table 16-U The seismic source types are listed in the below table, as determined from Table 16-U. Seismic Source Distance Maximum Moment Slip rate, SR (mm/yr) Type Magnitude (M) [11 3.5 km M<7.0 SR<2 Site Draina2e Considerations Adequate measures shall be taken to properly finish-grade the site after the additions and other improvements are in place. Drainage waters from this site and adjacent properties are to be directed away from foundations, floor slabs and footings, onto the natural drainage direction for this area or into properly designed and approved drainage facilities. Proper subsurface and surface drainage will ensure drainage that no waters will seek the level of the bearing soils under the foundations, footings and floor slabs. Failure to observe this recommendation could result in uplift or undermining and differential settlement of the structure or other improvements on the site. In addition, appropriate erosion-control measures shall be taken at all times during construction to prevent surface runoff waters from entering footing excavations, ponding on finished building pad or pavement areas, or running uncontrolled over the tops of newly- constructed cut or ifil slopes. Planter areas and planter boxes shall be sloped to drain away from the foundations, footings, and floor slabs. Planter boxes shall be constructed with a subsurface drain, installed in gravel, with the direction of subsurface and surface flow away from the Job No. 98-261 1FC May 24, 2000 Page 7 Foundations, footings, and floor slabs, to an adequate drainage facility. Structure retaining walls shall be properly water proofed and provided with a subdrain system. Our firm prior to implementation should review the water proofing system and drainage design. LABORATORY TESTS AND SOIL INFORMATION The expansion potential of clayey soils is determined utilizing the UBC Expansion Index Test. Expansive soils are classified as follows:• Expansion Index Potential Expansion 0-20 Very Low (or considered "Non-expansive") 21-50 Low 51-90 Medium 91-130 High 130-Above Very High Foundations located within 7 feet of the top of fill slopes should be deepened so that the outside, bottom edge of the footing is at least 7 feet from "daylight" in the slope face. The foundation soils at the subject site are indicated to possess a very low expansion potential using the UBC classification system. Therefore foundations recommendations detailed in the referenced geotechnical report are appropriate for the as-graded site condition. This report covers only the services performed between April 28 to May 5, 2000. As limited by the scope of the services which we agreed to perform, our opinion presented herein are based on our observations and the relative compaction test results. Our service was performed in accordance with the currently accepted standard of practice and in such a manner as to provide a reasonable measure of the compliance of the grading operations with the job requirements. No warranty, express or implied, is given or intended with respect to the services which we have performed, and neither the performance of those services nor the submittal of this report should be construed as relieving the grading contractor of his responsibility to conform with the job requirements. If you should have any questions after reviewing this report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Job No. 98-2611 FC May 24, 2000 Page 8 This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, ,FESSI, C.W. La Monte Company d4e;-- k- La nte, R.C.E. 25241, G.E. 0495 II 0241 PWPoro Pelt ROTC—Tor or EXISTIM6 BEA riu PACIFIC RAL ON IXOT. GZA 1NALL \OCEAN M81INS STORE SEA MALL-1 EXISTIMS SELP-CLOS-INIS EACH SAW LEVEL SEA MALL as: kl. 7. _.T_ - " X_ 74.q j LARODCAPE AREA -- . •iO ,;d _7 I>s '• ,R4coHGr,e 12M SPA I!Xlg 6^2280 0% - : g"mmoo POOLreo ! - ' OPW ?1MTVW . r' PRO \ •T,ie!,IeTlNs, I • — 1OYe6I%ADe OALCoNp • • - - • •: Att 11,10LIA081. tIN6-LINE _____________ • —. ..-.-- STRUGTKU41 PLANICK STAIR PROM DALCOmr. I rireylNe DAMA6!D 610H 1k J n*U.9ANP8flPP I yoeeel4ovWlit IL irr" -t 71 i exisylmd, G.P.O. / I• h Nj - I• PIflSYIIG SfD.TO PP *IMO!O On OPP4OUPNPD - I ! T. •L — —'c Of I J telenN& 1e. COIA%. T!r TO REMAIN II •:... _L I • ____ ,,,, ,• vv 16 CIM3 - iC DNNPIiAV Pow _•L.____========L t,ne,i,'e I1AtP* l4PT!l . I PROTECT PO,4 DAMACP (b b • L popp$ tiAT!R14!T!A a Ii RELOCATE — -. — OCEAN STREET Jr 1, g COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Test Date Location Depth Fill Moisture % Field Density Soil Type Relative Compaction 1 4/28/00 SEE SITE PLAN 2' 8.7 116.0 I 90.6 2 1 5/l/00 " " " 2' 99 1169 I 912 3 5/5/00 " " " F G 8.7 119.3 I 93.2 4 5/5/00 " " F G 8.7 117.1 I 91.5 5 5/5/00 " " " F.G. 8.7 117.6 I 92.1 SOIL TYPES Type Description Optimum Moisture _% Maximum Dry Density I BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND 10.7 128.0 pcf Figure No.: II Job No.: 98-2611-FC Ill liulll Ii UIIIIHII II 11IIlJ Ii lull I I 111111 mur ii IflilIIlull II1IllI 1111 lull I I liii a 1111111 ii MIR IF1IIIWII i DM1111 gill IIIiilU1IHIlIIHOhlIUll in niui uiuuwiiu.miiiuuuo In mum uuuoimuaumur n ui iiiiiii iiiio lIIIlii1lHHIII in niiimiiuu llfilhliiHlllllll m 140 130 LABORATORY SOIL DATA SUMMARY ASSUI%EIi SIlENt DATA 1 ArrAnEtit coUtioU (pet) 250 ArrAncNr FflIC1I0U AUOL( 300 KiE 120 0 0 • 0 0 G.im d,.imsl.q. mm 2.70 -2.6 0 )- SPECIFIC GRAVITY EcI'i1'-ZERO AIR VOIDS CURVES 10 20 30 10 LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST SOIL TYPE SOIL CLASSIFICATION uaiiio NO. TREtICIl 110. DEPTh 1 BROWN FINE TO MEDIUM SAND SWELL TEST DATA IlililAl. Dfl'r DEUSITT Ipcf) ItilTtAL. WATEfl CO1ITENT 1'i0 LOAD fps 11 PE10EUT SWELL JOR NO 98-2611 ru;urlE 110 III WET WEATHER MAINTENANCE AT RESIDENTIAL SITES* Southern Californians, unlike other residents of the nation, are unaccustomed to heavy rainfall. Whenever unusually wet weather occurs, San Diegans, particularly those living on slopes of filled land, become concerned (often unduly) about the conditions of their building site. They should not be, generally. The grading codes of the County of San Diego, and the various incorporated cites in the County, concerning filled land, excavation, terracing, and slope construction, are among the most stringent in the state, and adequate to meet almost any natural occurrence. This is the opinion of the San Diego Chapter of the California Council of Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors, whose members help prepare and review the codes. In 1967, the local Chapter of the California Council of Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors compiled a list of some precautions that homeowners can take to maintain their building sites. This updated pamphlet reiterates those precautions. Everyone is accustomed to maintaining his house. Everyone realizes that periodic termite inspections are a reasonable precaution, and that homes require a coat of paint from time to time. Homeowners are well used to checking and replacing wiring and plumbing, particularly in older homes. Roofs require occasional care. However, the general public regards the natural ground as inviolate. They ought to realize that Nature is haphazard in her creation of all land, some of which becomes building sites. Nature's imperfections have been largely compensated through careful engineering design and construction and enforcement of rigorous building and lot development ordinances. It is only reasonable to assume that an improved building site requires the approximate same care that the building itself does. In most instances, lot and site care are elementary steps that can be taken by the homeowner at considerably less cost that building maintenance. As a public service, engineers in private practice of the San Diego Chapter of the California Council of Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors have compiled this pamphlet of pertinent Do's and Don'ts as a guide to homeowners. The CCCELS respectfully advises that, in offering these guides, it accepts no responsibility for the actual performances of home sites or structures located thereon. * Pamphlet prepared by the San Diego Chapter California Council of Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors. 4350 Palm Ave.. SulLe 25. La Mesa. CA 91941 - (619) 462-9661 DO'S Do clear surface and terrace drains with a shovel, if necessary, and check them frequently during the rainy season. Ask your neighbors to do likewise. Do be sure that alidrains have open outlets. Under the right conditions, this can be tested simply on a dry day with a hose. If blockage is evident, you may have to clear the drain mechanically. Do check roof drains, gutters and down spouts to be sure they are clear. Depending on your location, if you do not have roof gutters and down spouts, you may wish to install them because roofs and their wide, flat space will shed tremendous quantities of water. Without gutters or other adequate drainage, water falling from the eaves ponds against foundation and basement walls. 4.. Do check all outlets at the top of slopes to be sure that they are clear and that water will not overflow the slope itself, causing erosion. Do keel) drain openings (weep-holes) clear of debris and other material that could block them in a storm. Do check for loose fill above and below your property if you live on a slope or terrace. Do watch hoses and sprinklers. During the rainy season, little, is any, irrigation is required. Over-saturation of the ground is not only unnecessary and expensive, but can cause subsurface damage. Do watch for backup in interior drains and toilets during a rainy season, this may indicate drain or sewer blockage. Do exercise ordinary precaution. Your house and building site were constructed to meet certain standards that should protect against any natural occurrences, if you do your part In maintaining them. - 4350 Palm Ave.. Suite 25. La Mess. CA 91941 - (619) 462-9561 DON'TS Don't block terrace drains and brow ditches on slopes or at the tops of cut slopes on sloping ground. These are designed to carry away runoff to a place where it can be safely distributed. Generally, a little shovel work will remove any accumulation of dirt and other debris that clogs the drain. If several homes are located on the same terrace, It is a good idea to check with your neighbors. Water backed up on their property may eventually reach you. Water backed up in surface drains will tend to overflow and seep into•the terraces, creating less stable slopes. Don't permit water to gather above or on the edges of slopes (potiding). Water gathering here will Lend to either seep into the ground, loosening liii or natural ground, or will overflow on the slope and begin erosion. Once erosion is started, it is difficult to control and severe damage may result rather quickly. Don't connect roof drains and roof gutters and down spouts to subdrains. Rather, arrange them so that they will flow out onto a paved driveway or the street where the water may be dissipated over a wide surface. Subdrains are constructed to take care of ordinary subsurface water and cannot handle the overload from roofs during a heavy rain. Overloading the subdrains Lends to weaken the foundations. Don't spill water over slopes, even where this may seem a good way to prevent ponding. This tends to cause erosion and, in the case of fill, can eat away carefully engineered and compacted land. Don't drop loose (ill slopes. It is not compacted to the same strength as (lie slop itself and will tend to slide with heavy moisture. The sliding may clog terrace drains below, or may cause additional damage by weakening the slope. If you live below a slope, try to be sure that no loose fill is dumped above your property. Don't discharge water into French drains close to slopes. French drains are sometimes used to get rid of excess water when other way of disposing water are not readily available. Overloading these drains saturates the ground and, if the drains are located close to slopes, may cause slope failure in their vicinity. Don't discharge surface water into septic tanks (leaching fields). Not only are septic tanks constructed for a different purpose, but they will tend, because of their size, to naturally accumulate additional water from the ground during a heavy rain. Overloading them articilially during the rainy season is bad for the 4350 Palm Ave.. Suite 25, La Meøa, CA 91941 - (619) 462-9561 same reason as subdrains and French drains, and is doubly dangerous because their overflow can pose a serious health hazard. B. Don't over-irrigate slopes. Naturally, ground cover of ice plant and other vegetation will require some moisture during the hot summer months, but during the wet season, irrigation can cause ice plant and other heavy ground cover to pull loose, which not only destroys the cover, but also starts serious erosion. Planted slopes acquire sufficient moisture when it rains. Don't let water gather against foundations, retaining walls, and basement walls. These walls are build to withstand ordinary moisture in the ground. and are, where necessary, accompanied by subdrains to carry oil excess. If water is permitted to pond against them, it may seep through them, causing dampness and leakage inside the basement, more important, the water pressure can cause heavy structural damage to walls. Don't try to compact backfill behind walls near slopes by flooding. Not only is flooding the least efficient way of Compacting fine-grained soil, but will also undermine or tip the wall. Don't leave a hose and sprinkler remaining on or near a slope, particularly during the rainy season. This will enhance ground saturation and may cause damage. Don't block swales that have been graded around your house or the lot pad. These shallow ditches have been put (here for the purpose of quickly removing water toward (lie driveway, street or other positive outlet. By all means, do not let water become ponded above by blocked swales. 4,350 Palm Ave., Suite 25. La Me9a, CA 91941 - (619) 462-9861 REPORT OF SOILS INVESTIGATION and GEOLOGIC RECONNAISSANCE DAY RESIDENCE SITE 2479 Ocean Street Carlsbad, California Job No 98-2611 January 4,1999 Prepared For: Davis Group, Architecture & Planning Preprd By: C.W. LAMONTE Co. 4350 Palm Avenue, Suite 25 La Mesa, CA. 91941 C.W. LA MONTE Co. Soil and Foundalion Engneers Phone: 619) 4U2-9861 Fax: 4624859 January 4, 1999 Job No. 98-2611 TO: The Davis Group, Architecture & Planning 344 Seventh. Avenue San Diego, Ca. 92101 Attn: Mr. Wayne Davis SUBJECT: Report of Soils Investigation and Geologic Reconnaissance Day Residence Site 2479 Ocean Street Carlsbad, CA Dear Mr. Davis: In accordance with your request, in conjunction with M.W. Hart, RG, CEG, we have performed a soils investigation and, geologic reconnaissance for your proposed residential project. We are presenting herein our findings and recommendations. In general, we found the site suitable for the proposed project provided that the recommendations contained herein are adhered to. Minor items of concern when developing the project include the . presence of loose topsoil ranging up to 2 feet in thickness overlying the medium dense to dense terrace deposits. Therefore penetration with proposed foundations or a removal and re-compaction grading operation will be required to mitigate this condition. If you should have any questions after reviewing this report, please do not hesitate to contact our office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, C. LA MONTE CO eU' CLIFRD W. LA MONTE RCE 2524 1., GE 495 -44 Job No. 98-2611 January 4, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE OF WORK AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...............................................................................1 FINDINGS................................................................................................................................................ 1 SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 FIELDINVESTIGATION ....................................................................................................................2 DESCRIPTIONOF SOILS .................................................................................................................... 2 GROUNDWATER...............................................................................................................................2 TECTONIC SETTING .......................................................................................................................... 3 GEOLOGICHAZARDS ........................................................................................................................ 3 GENERAL........................................................................................................................................3 GROUND SHAKING ........................................................................................................................ 3 LANDSLIDES..................................................................................................................................4 LIQUEFACTION.............................................................................................................................. 4 FLOODING......................................................................................................................................4 TSUNAMIS......................................................................................................................................4 SEICHES.......................................................................................................................................... 4 LABORATORY TESTS AND SOIL INFORMATION ............................................................................. 4 RECOMMENDATIONS...........................................................................................................................5 GENERAL SITE DEVELOPMENT......................................................................................................5 EARTH WORK AND GRADING.........................................................................................................5 Fill Suitability .................................................................................................................................... 6 EarthWork ....................................................................................................................................... ExcavationCharacteristics ................................................................................................................. 6 FOUNDATIONS................................................................................................................................... 6 Dimensionsand Embedment ............................................................................................................. 6 SoilBearing Value ............................................................................................................................ 6 Foundation Reinforcement ................................................................................................................. 6 Foundations Near Tops of Slopes.......................................................................................................7 AnticipatedSettlements.....................................................................................................................7 Foundation Excavation Observation ................................................................................................... 7 Concrete Slabs-on-grade .................................................................................................................... .7 Expansive Characteristics..................................................................................................................8 DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURES ................................................. 8 ActivePressure .................................................................................................................................. 8 LateralPressure.................................................................................................................................8 Waterproofing and Subdrain Observation..........................................................................................8 Backfill..............................................................................................................................................8 Factorof Safety..................................................................................................................................9 FOUNDATION AND GRADING PLANS REVIEW.............................................................................9 SLOPESTABILITY .............................................................................................................................9 SITEDRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................................................... 9 GRADING NOTES...................................................................................................................................9 LIMITATIONS....................................................................................................................................... 10 FIGURES Figure No. I - Plot Plan Figure No. 2 Site Plan Figure No. 3a through 3d Test Excavation Logs Figure No. 4 Laboratory Test Results Figure No. 5 Slope Setbacks Appendix "A" Geologic Reconnaissance - M. W. Hart, RG., CEG. S.' 4350 Palm Avenue, Suite25, La Mesa, Ca, 91941 REPORT OF SOILS INVESTIGATION and GEOLOGIC RECONNAISSANCE Day Family Residence 2479 Ocean Street Carlsbad, CA The following report presents the findings and recommendations of the C.W. La Monte Company and M. W. Hart, Engineering Geologist for the subject project. SCOPE OF WORK AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION It is our understanding that the site is being developed to receive a new single family residence. The proposed two-story structure will be of wood-frame construction and founded on conventional shallow stepped continuous foundations, concrete with wood framed diaphragm and concrete slab-ongrade floors. The structures will be constructed near the existing grade utilizing moderate sized retaining walls. A swimming pool will be placed in the area of the existing stone gazebo. With the above in mind our scope of work consisted of the following: Identify and classify the surface and subsurface soils to depths, in conformance with the Unified Soil Classification System (refer to Appendix A). Determine the allowable presumptive bearing pressures for the natural ground and any soils to be used in compacted fill, based on their assumed shear-strength characteristics. Recommend treatment for any expansive soils and/or uncompacted fill or compressible alluvial soils that, if left in place and unmodified, could result in structure and cosmetic damages to the structure and proposed additions. Predict the settlement potential of re-compacted fill soils under the proposed structural loads. Recommend active and passive earth pressures to be utilized in design of any proposed retaining walls and foundation structures. Preparation of this report and appropriate graphics, presenting our findings, conclusions and recommendations. It was not within our scope of work to evaluate the site for hazardous materials contamination. 4350 Palm Avenue, Suite25, La Mesa, Ca, 91941 Job No. 98-2611 January 4, 1999 Page 2 FINDINGS SITE DESCRIPTION The project site consists of a rectangular shaped parcel of land with an existing wood frame and block residential structure, approximately 0.23 acres in size. The site is located on the southwest side of Ocean Street near the intersection with Rue Des Chateaux in the city of Carlsbad. The site is further, bounded on the easterly and westerly sides with existing single family residences . A description of the property is Assessor's Parcel Number 2030210400**. Refer to the attached Plot Plan (Figure 1) for a layout of the site and location of proposed improvements. The property is moderately steep and appears to drain, by sheet flow, to the southwest towards the pacific ocean. Vegetation consists of lawn grass, shrubs and ice plant . A rock and mortar seawall approximately 8 feet in maximum height is located near the southwest property line. Elevations on-site range from approximately 6 feet at the southwest .end .of the site .to .26 .feet .at .the.northeast .end. FIELD INVESTIGATION Four hand augured test borings were placed on the site, specifically in areas where representative soil conditions were expected and where the proposed structure will be located. Our investigation also included a geologic site reconnaissance included as Appendix "A". The excavations were visually inspected and logged by our field geologist, and samples were taken of the predominant soils throughout the field operation. Test boring logs have been prepared on the basis of our inspection and the results have been summarized on Figure 3, a through d. The predominant soils have been classified in conformance with the Unified Soil Classification System (refer to Appendix A). DESCRIPTION OF SOILS The site is underlain with terrace deposits and associated, surficial topsoil. These soils and subsurface conditions are described individually below, also refer to the attached Test Boring Logs for more detailed information on the encountered soil conditions. Bay Point Terrace Formation: The site is underlain by the Pleistocene-aged Bay Point formation. The Bay Point Formation on the site consists of moderately well cemented, massively bedded, brown, fine, silty sands. (See Geologic Reconaissance App. "A"). Topsoil: The Bay Point formation is overlain with approximately I to 3 feet of natural ground topsoil. The topsoil's consists primarily of loose to medium dense, dark brown, silty medium sands. (See Geologic Reconaissance App. "A"). 4350 Palm Avenue, Suite25, La Mesa, Ca, 91941 Job No. 98-2611 January 4, 1999 Page 3 ta GROUND WATER No ground water was encountered during the course of our investigation, however, it should be kept in mind, that any required grading operations may change surface drainage patterns and/or reduce permeability due to the densification of compacted soils. Such changes of surface and subsurface hydrologic conditions, plus irrigation of landscaping or significant increases in rainfall, may result in the appearance of minor amounts of surface or near-surface water at locations where none existed previously. The damage from such water is expected to be minor and cosmetic in nature, if good positive drainage is implemented at the completion of construction. Corrective action should be taken on a site-specific basis if, and when, it becomes necessary. TECTONIC SETTING No major faults are known to traverse the subject site but it should be noted that much of Southern California, including the San .Diego County area is characterized by a series of Quaternary-age fault zones which typically consist of several individual, en echelon faults that generally strike in a northerly to north-westerly direction. Some of these fault zones (and the individual faults within the zones) are classified as active while others are classified as only potentially active, accordmg to the criteria of the California Division of Mines and Geology. Active fault zones are those which have shown conclusive evidence of faulting during the Holocene Epoch (the most recent 11,000 years) while potentially active fault zones have demonstrated movement during the Pleistocene Epoch (11,000 to 2 million years before the, present) but no movement during Holocene time. Refer to the Geologic Reconnaissance by M. W. Hart for a description of the Geologic and Seismic setting. SEISMIC SAFETY STUDY As part of our investigation, we have reviewed the current City of Encinitas Seismic Safety Study. This study is the result of a comprehensive investigation of the city and surrounding areas, which identifies any potential geotechnical hazards and/or describes geomorphic conditions. (See Geologic Reconnaissance Appendix "A") GEOLOGIC HAZARDS GENERAL No geologic hazards of sufficient magnitude to preclude development of the site as we presently contemplate it are known to exist. In our professional opinion and to the best of our knowledge, the site is suitable for the proposed development. GROUND SHAKING A likely geologic hazard to affect the site is ground shaking as result of movement along one of the major active fault zones mentioned above. Probable ground shaking levels at the site could range from slight to moderate, depending on such factors as the magnitude of the seismic event and the distance to the epicenter. It is likely that the site will 4350 Palm Avenue, Suite25, La Mesa, Ca, 91941 Job No. 98-2611 January 4, 1999 Page 4 experience the effects of at least one moderate to large earthquake during the life of the proposed structure. (See Geologic Reconnaissance Appendix "A"). LANDSLIDES Geologic Maps indicate there are no landslides on this site. (See Geologic Reconnaissance Appendix "A"). LIQUEFACTION The materials at the site are not subject to liquefaction due to such factors as soil density, grain-size distribution, and groundwater conditions. FLOODING Flooding is not expected to present a hazard to the proposed development, assuming structures are constructed at elevations above the design historical flood. TSUNAMIS Tsunamis are great sea waves produced by a submarine earthquake or volcanic eruption. The highest historical waves to affect the San Diego coastal area has been slightly over six feet. There is a possibility that the site could be subject to tsunami-related hazards in the event of a large earthquake along one of the offshore fault zones. SEICHES Seiches are periodic oscillations in large bodies of standing water such as lakes, harbors, bays, or reservoirs. There is a possibility that the site could be subject to seiche-related hazards in the event of a large earthquake. LABORATORY TESTS AND SOIL INFORMATION Tests were performed on the disturbed and undisturbed soil samples in order to determine their physical and mechanical properties and their ability to support the proposed structure. Laboratory test results are presented on the attached Figure No. 8. The following tests were conducted on the sampled soils: Moisture Content (A.S.T.M. D2216-71) Density Determinations Mechanical Analysis (A.S.T.M. D422) Expansion Index Tests (UBC 18-i) 4350 Palm Avenue, Suite25, La Mesa, Ca, 91941 Job No. 98-2611 January 4, 1999 Page 5 The relationship between the moisture and density of undisturbed and remolded soil samples give qualitative information regarding the soil strength characteristics and soil conditions to be anticipated during any future grading operation. The mechanical analysis was used to aid in the classification of the soils according to the Unified Soil Classification System. The expansion potential of clayey soils was determined utilizing the UBC Expansion Index Test. Expansive soils are classified as follows: Expansion Index Potential Expansion 0-20 Very Low (or considered "Non-expansive") 21-50 Low 51-90 Medium 91-130 High 130-Above Very High RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL SITE DEVELOPMENT The major consideration when re-developing the site is the presence of loose topsoil subject to possible creep overlying the site. The thickness of these materials ranges to approximately I to 3 feet below the existing ground surface. These materials are unsuitable in there present condition to support the proposed structures. In order to mitigate this potentially adverse conditions we recommend the complete penetration with continuous foundations or removal and re-compaction the loose material. The loose topsoil shall be removed to an approximate depth of 3.0 feet. Loose topsoils will require recompacting or penetration and/or removal due to there present condition. Any excavation/recompaction should extend laterally a minimum distance of ten feet outside the building perimeters or to a distance equal to the depth of removal below footings (whichever is greater). Lateral constraints (due to existing utilities, structures etc.) may prevent the recommended lateral removals and therefore, specialized foundation design may be required in these areas. Prior to receiving fill, the bottoms of the excavations (as prepared above) should be scarified to a depth of approximately 8 inches, moisture conditioned to slightly over optimum moisture content, and then recompacting the soils to at least 90 percent of their maximum dry density. Excavated and/or imported soils should then be placed back in the excavation in thin compacted layers at slightly over optimum moisture contents to the proposed finish grade. EARTH WORK AND GRADING 4350 Palm Avenue, Suite25, La Mesa, Ca, 91941 Job No. 98-2611 January 4, 1999 Page 6 Fill Suitability On-site excavated materials may be used as compacted fill material or backfill. This fill should be placed in compacted layers not exceeding eight inches in thickness at slightly over optimum moisture content and at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density. The on-site materials, typically, posses a low to non expansive expansion potential. Any imported soil materials shall posses an expansion index of less than 30 and be obtained from an approved borrow pit or stockpile. Earth Work All earthwork and grading contemplated for site preparation should be accomplished in accordance with the attached Recommended Grading Specifications and Special provisions. All special site preparation recommendations presented in the sections above will supersede those in the standard Recommended Grading Specifications. All embankments, structural fill and fill should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction at or slightly over optimum moisture content. Utility trench backfill within five feet of the proposed structures and beneath asphalt pavements should be compacted to at least 90 percent of its maximum dry density. The upper twelve inches of subgrade beneath paved areas should be compacted to 95 percent of its maximum dry density. This compaction should be obtained by the paving contractor just prior to placing the aggregate base material and should not be part of mass grading requirements. The maximum dry density of each soil type should be determined in accordance with ASTM Test D-1557-91, Method A or C guidelines. Excavation Characteristics The on-site material should be excavated with easy to moderate effort. FOUNDATIONS Dimensions and Embedment Conventional shallow foundations may be utilized in the support of the proposed structure and retaining walls (assuming loose fills and colluvial soils are removed and recompacted). Continuous footings should have a minimum depth of 15 inches below lowest adjacent finished grade for the proposed two-story structure. Two story structures require a 15-inch minimum foundation width per the Uniform Building Code. Soil Bearing Value A bearing capacity of 2000 psf may be assumed for said footings when founded a minimum of 18 inches into properly compacted fill or firm formational ground. This bearing capacity may be increased by one-third, when considering wind and/or seismic loading. Foundation Reinforcement It is recommended that continuous footings be reinforced with at least two No.5 steel bars; one reinforcing bar shall be located near the top of the foundation, and one bar near the bottom. The steel reinforcement will help prevent damage due to normal, post construction settlement, resulting from variations in the subsurface soil conditions. This recommendation does not supersede reinforcement required for structural considerations. 4350 Palm Avenue, Suite25, La Mesa, Ca, 91941 11 Job No. 98-2611 Januaiy 4, 1999 Page 7 Foundations Near Tops of Slopes Foundations and footings of proposed structures, walls, et cetera, when located five feet and further away from the top of compacted fill slopes, may be of standard design in conformance with the recommended soil bearing value. If proposed foundations and footings are located closer than five feet from the top of slopes, they shall be deepened at least one foot below an imaginary plain projected from a point five feet horizontally inside the top of the fill slope and parallel to the face of the fill slope. Anticipated Settlements Based on our experience with the soil types on the subject site, the soils should experience settlement in the magnitude of less than 0.75 inch under a structural load of 2,000 pounds per square foot on a compacted fill mat. It should be recognized that minor hairline cracks normal!y occur in concrete slabs and foundations due to shrinkage during curing and/or redistribution of stresses and some cracks may be anticipated. Such cracks are not necessarily an indication of excessive vertical movements. Foundation Excavation Observation In order to minimize any work delays at the subject site during site development, this firm should be contacted 24 hours prior to any need for inspection of footing excavations or to perform grading observation or field density testing of compacted fill soils. If possible, placement of forms, templates and steel reinforcement in footing excavations should not occur prior to our inspection of the excavations. Sometimes foundation excavation observation reveals the need to deepen, redesign or otherwise mitigate unanticipated or adverse conditions. Therefore, prior observation would eliminate the need to remove any form work or steel reinforcement in the affected footing excavation in order to correct the observed problem. Concrete Slabs-on-grade Concrete floor slabs, if used shall be a minimum thickness of four inches and shall be underlain by two inches of clean sand overlying 6 mil visqueen, overlying an additional two inches of clean sand. Four inches of clean sand overlying 6 mil visqueen may be substituted if extreme care is taken not to puncture the visqueen vapor barrier during installation The slab should be reinforced #3 reinforcing bars placed at 18 inch centers, each way or with 6x6-6/6 steel wire mesh. The reinforcement should be placed on concrete "chairs" or spacers, to within the middle third of the slab. Theoretically, the above-recommended rebar and wire mesh options provide similar reinforcement strength. However, based on our past experience, we have found that the wire mesh is often and is more easily pushed to the bottom of the slab during the finishing process, thus significantly reducing its intended reinforcing, function. The rebar grid, if properly supported, is less likely to be dislodged during the finishing process. Thus, unless the concrete finisher is diligent in this regard, the rebar option is the preferred method of slab reinforcement. 4350 Palm Avenue, Suite25, La Mesa, Ca, 91941 Job No. 98-2611 January 4, 1999 Page 8 Following placement of concrete floor slabs, sufficient drying time must be allowed prior to placement of floor coverings. Premature placement of floor coverings may result in degradation of adhesive materials and loosening of the finish floor materials. Prior to installation, standardized testing can be performed to determine if the slab moisture emissions are within the limits recommended by the manufacturer of the specified floor-covering product. Expansive Characteristics The recommendations of this report reflect from topsoil and formational materials. a non to low expansive condition resulting DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURES Active Pressure The active earth pressure to be used in the design of retaining walls, shall be based on an Equivalent Fluid Weight of 30 pcf (pounds per cubic foot) at any depth. This active pressure is for level backfill and assumes an unrestrained condition, using select backfill and that proper drainage is provided behind the wall. For a restrained condition an active pressure of 8 H shall be used over the depth of the wall. Lateral Pressure The passive earth pressure of the encountered natural-ground soils and any recompacted fill soils (to be used for design of building foundations and footings to resist the lateral forces) shall be based on an Equivalent Fluid Weight of 300 pcf (pounds per cubic foot). This passive earth pressure shall only be considered valid for design if the ground adjacent to the foundation structure is essentially level for a distance of at least three times the total depth of the foundation. We recommend that the upper 1-foot of soil not protected by pavement or concrete slabs be neglected when calculating passive resistance. A Coefficient of Friction of 0.4 times the dead load may be used between the bearing soils and concrete wall foundations or structure foundations and floor slabs founded on formational or similar materials. When combining frictional and passive resistance, the former should be reduced by one-third. Waterproofing and Subdrain Observation The geotechnical engineer should be requested to verify that waterproofing has been applied and that subdrains are properly installed. However, unless specifically asked to do so, we will not verify proper application of the waterproofing. Backfill All backfill soils should be compacted to at least 90% relative compaction. Expansive or clayey soils should not be used for backfill material. The wall should not be backfilled until 4350 Palm Avenue, Suite25, La Mesa, Ca, 91941 V. Job No. 98-2611 January 4, 1999 Page 9 the masonry has reached an adequate strength. Pea gravel or equivalent if utilized as backfill will not require testing for relative compaction. Factor of Safety The above values, with the exception of the allowable soil bearing pressure, do not include a factor of safety. Appropriate factors of safety should be incorporated into the design to prevent the walls from overturning and sliding. FOUNDATION AND GRADING PLANS REVIEW The foundation and grading plans should be submitted to this office for review to ascertain that the recommendations provided in this report have been followed and that the assumptions utilized in its preparation are still valid SLOPE STABILITY Although no major slopes are anticipated, it is our opinion that cut and or fill slopes constructed at 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) inclination will possess an adequate factor-or-safety to heights of at least fifteen feet. SITE DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS Adequate measures shall be taken to properly finish-grade the site after the structures and other improvements are in place. Drainage waters from this site and adjacent properties which already show indications of potential problems, are to be directed away from foundations, floor slabs and footings, onto the natural drainage direction for this area or into properly designed and approved drainage facilities. Proper subsurface and surface drainage will ensure drainage that no waters will seek the level of the bearing soils under the foundations, footings and floor slabs. Failure to observe this recommendation could result in uplift or undermining and differential settlement of the structure or other improvements on the site. In addition, appropriate erosion-control measures shall be taken at all times during construction to prevent surface runoff waters from entering footing excavations, ponding on finished building pad or pavement areas, or running uncontrolled over the tops of newly-constructed cut or fill slopes. Planter areas and planter boxes shall be sloped to drain away from the foundations, footings, and floor slabs. Planter boxes shall .be constructed with a subsurface drain, installed in gravel, with the direction of subsurface and surface flow away from the foundations, footings, and floor slabs, to an adequate drainage facility. Structure retaining walls shall be properly water proofed and provided with a subdrain system. Our firm prior to implementation should review the water proofing System and drainage design. V 4350 Palm Avenue, Suite25, La Mesa, Ca, 91941 Job No. 98-2611 January 4, 1999 Page 10 GRADING NOTES Any required grading operations shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of local Grading Ordinances, under the observation of a qualified Soils Engineer or supervised Field Soils Technician. It is the responsibility of the Owner and/or Developer to ensure that the recommendations summarized in this report are carried out in the field operations. This firm does not practice or consult in the field of safety engineering. We do not direct the Contractor's operations, and we cannot be responsible for the safety of personnel other than our own on the site; the safety of other is the responsibility of the Contractor. The Contractor should notify the Owner if he considers any of the recommended actions presented herein to be unsafe. LIMiTATIONS Our conclusions and recommendations have been based on all available data obtained from our field investigation and laboratory analysis, as well as our experience with the soils and formational materials located in the area. Of necessity, we must assume a certain degree of continuity between exploratory excavations and/or natural exposures. It is, therefore, necessary that all observations, conclusions, and recommendations be verified at the time grading operations begin or when footing excavations are placed. In the event discrepancies are noted, additional recommendations may be issued, if required. The work performed and recommendations presented herein are the result of an investigation and analysis, which meets the contemporary standard of care in our profession. No other warranty is expressed or implied. This report should be considered valid for a period of three (3) years, and is subject to review by our firm following that time. If significant modifications are made to the building and/or grading plans, especially with respect to the height and location of any cut and fill slopes, and the height and location of any proposed structures, this report must be presented to us for immediate review and possible revision. The firm of C.W. La Monte Co. shall not be held responsible for changes to the physical condition of the property, such as addition of fill soils or changing drainage patters, which occur subsequent to the issuance of this report. Once again, should any questions arise concerning this report, please dc contact us. Respectfully submitted, C.W. La Monte Company ' not hesitate to ... Clifford. La Monte, R.C.E. 25241, G.E. 0495 14 4350 Palm Avenue, Suite25, La Mesa, Ca, 91941 2t NOTE: This Site Plan is not to be used for legal purposes. Locations and dimensions are approx- imate. Actual property dimensions and locations of utilities may be obtained from the Approved Building Plans or the "As Built" Grading Plans. N b I I LII . - t 661 ..":.'4flfff :-IIIII[1IJIIII.: •_.... ••B-.4 - A I ! :• z I - t -- : __________ ____ _____ th• L.IL t ' 0 %. PP\J . •L______ WWUL______i i• . -• . log AT Ii I I I Figure LEGEND: f3 -1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF TEST BORING PLOT PLAN JOB NO. 98-2611 FIGURE NO. I Z ONIflDH 119Z-860N HOf MVTEd ELLIS a 90 PYS V 85ed '900Z6 'peqspe JS UeeOQ 61frZ - - _________ - 1 - - EQUIPMENT DIMENSION & TYPE OF EXCAVATION DATE LOGGED Hand Auger .5' x 6' 12/10/98 SURFACE ELEVATION GROUNDWATER DEPTH LOGGED BY. Not Avialable Not Encountered NH FIELD DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION $ ' w • ,. a 3W 31 I, DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS ICONSISTINCI, ,, z ft KZ Z Mal MOISTURE, COLON, GRAIN $IZI) u.s.c.s. - .. 4W o10 4 o o o a,,. we .0 si Loose, brown, moist silty fine sand sw 1 - - Medium dense,brown,damp,medium to coarse sand ( cemented) -SP 2- 3 x Terrace Deposit 7.4 8.8 117.: 4- 5: 6 --- -- __ Bottom of Boring 7 8 - 9- 10 - 2 13- 408 NAME DAY RESIDENCE V WATER TABLE SITE LOCATION 2479 Ocean Street Carlsbad, CA. LOOSE BAG SAMPLE jj IN PLACE SAMPLE JOB NUMBER REVIEWED BY LOG. NO. 98-2611 DRIVE SAMPLE cl B - 1 FIGURE NUMBER 3-a EQUIPMENT DIMENSION S TYPE OF EXCAVATION DATE LOGGED Hand Auger .5' x 6' 12/10/98 SURFACE ELEVATION GROUNDWATER DEPTH LOGGED BY. Not Available Not Encountered MH 1 FIELD DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION - S d - • -; - 1 -' . 2 i DESCRIPTION AND REMAAIIS CONSISTINCI, 2 Q 2 2 2 NOISTUNI, COLON, GRAIN lilt) u.s.c... W S.0 4w U. wo u .jo .0 02 20 o_. Vary Loose, brown, moist, fine sand SF Fill and Topsoil - * 2--- / Medium dense,brown, moist to wet, medium sand SF 3 - 4-/- 5-slight color change 6 - refusal on cobbles Bottom of Boring 7- 8- 9- 10 11 - 12 13- JOB NAME -- - DAY RESIDENCE 7 WATER TABLE' SITE LOCATION 2479 Ocean Street Carlsbad, CA. LOOSE BAG SAMPLE JOB NUMBER REVIEWED BY LOG. NO. IN PLACE SAMPLE 98-2611 DRIVE SAMPLE ci B - 2 FIGURE NUMBER 3-b EQUIPMENT DIMENSION S TYPE OF EXCAVATION DATE LOGGED Hand Auger .5' x 6' 12/10/98 SURFACE ELEVATION GROUNDWATER DEPTH LOGGED BY. Not Available Not Encountered MH FIELD DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION I - '• — , 0 0 L 0 Ci•i -& 2 2 2 DESCRIPTION AND REMAAKS (CONSISTENCY, MOISTURE, COLOR, GRAIN 3I21 u.sc.a. 2 w !o .0 *2 4 Z1 w £2 o o _iø 2 02 20 ..wu u / Loose, brown, dry, silty sand - 1• - ________________ Medium dense, brown, dry, silty __ — __ - - __ - / medium sand (lightly cemented) 2 / (Terrace Deposit) 3 ./ . _-_-_--_- Medium dense to dense, light brown, ': / dry, medium sand (moderately cemented) 5 / (Terrace Deposit) 6-. Bottom of Boring 7- 8 - 9- 10 - 11 2 3. JOB NAME DAY RESIDENCE 7 WATER TABLE SITE LOCATION 2479 Ocean Street Carlsbad, CA. LOOSE BAG SAMPLE IN PLACE SAMPLE JOB NUMBER REVIEWED BY LOG. NO. 98-2611 DRIVE SAMPLE ci B - 3 FIGURE NUMBER 3 -c EQUIPMENT DIMENSION I TYPE OF EXCAVATION DATE LOGGED Hand Auger .5' x 6' 12/10/98 SURFACE ELEVATION GROUNDWATER DEPTH LOGGED BY. Not Available Not Encountered MH FIELD DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION L! 0 -j -I- . ____ w S t — , MI 1;0 ,. 2 DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS ICONSISTINCI, ,, , Z . j 45 Z0 -J 46 2 i 2 MOISTUNI, COLON, GRAIN 1121, u.uc... 4W 4 W. C0 o J0 4 02 20 0... uiau 511 Loose, brown,moist, silty fine sand 1' C Topsoil) 2- 3.—. / Medium dense, brown, moist, medium — / sand (Terrace Deposit ) - Bottom of B IT? 7. 8 9. 10 11 - 12 13- JOB NAME -- — DAY RESIDENCE 7 WATER TABLE SITE LOCATION 2479 Ocean Street Carlsbad, CA. LOOSE BAG SAMPLE IN PLACE SAMPLE JOB NUMBER REVIEWED BY LOG. NO. 98-2611 DRIVE SAMPLE ci B — 4 FIGURE NUMBER 3-d 140 (30 (20 '0 DATA ON ('rL 300 ,14 APIOLE 300 rm _III[.th__1 iiiuuu,iiiiipiIuiI uiuiiimi h1I1UE1l1lIIIIIIU11I I 11110111 IFlIIIIIIIURIIlIIIIllI 1111111 II Hinn 11111111H11111101 IIthIE1 Igo WHIIIIII1HI1IIIII' I1flThFI1UUiIII1IIHllllhIlllNI 1!11rnLU1NuhIIIuuil1lu11IllhI 1FIIPJIUUIIIIIIlNIllUhIIlNi iiiiiiiuiiiiioiuoouuiiirn IRI. G.su. diamelr. n.m -SPECIFIC GRAVITY ZERO AIR VOIDS CURVES 0 10 20 30 40 LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST SOIL TYPE SOIL CLASSIFICATION BQUUG NO. TRENCH NO. DEPTh 1 BROWN MEDIUM TO COARSE SAND u 1 3' SWELL TEST DATA Il(ITIAL. Dfl'( 0E14S11Y (pet) INITIAL WATETI CONTENT ("/) LOAD III si) PERCENT SWELL. Jon NO 98-2611 rIr,un no FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS NEAR SLOPES PROPOSED STRUCTURE CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB TOP OF COMPACTED FILl. SLOPE (LOOSE OVERBURDEN SOIL IS IGNORED) COMPACTED FILL SLOP! WITH MAXIMUM INCLINATION AS PER SOILS REPORT -. I. TOTAL DEPTH OF FOOTING MEASURED REINFORCEMENT OF • I FOUNDATIONS AND FLOOR - SLABS FOLLOWING THE .. RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE - - . -. - . -" FROM FINISH SOIL ENGINEER - COMPACTED P11. — — •—••—• — — :1 liZ - ARCHITECT OR STRUCTURAL -. -. SUB—GRADE CONCRETE FOUNDATION ._-t- OUTER MOST FACE FOOTING -. 12" MINIMUM OR AS DEEP AS REQUIRED FOR LATERAL TYPICAL SECTION STABILITY (SHOWING PROPOSED FOUNDATION LOCATED WITHIN 5 FEET OF TOP OF SLOPE) 120 FOOTING / 5' SETBACK TOTAL DEPTH OF FOOTING 1.5:1.0 SLOPe 1 2.0:1.0 SLOPE 0 520 42 V .45 ft 3s" 2' 340 30 3 0 26m 24 200 18 120 12 # when applicable FIGURE NUMBER 5 JOB NUMBER 98-2611 MICHAEL W. HART, ENGINEERING GEoLoGIsT GEOLOGIC RECONNAISSANCE DAY RESIDENCE SITE 2479 OCEAN STREET CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA FOR DAVIS GROUP, ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA JANUARY, 1999 MICHAEL W. HART ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST File No. 367-99 January 4, 1999 Davis Group, Architecture and Planning 344 Seventh Avenue San Diego, California 92101 Attention: W. Wayne Davis Subject: Day Residence Site 2479 Ocean Street Carlsbad, California GEOLOGIC RECONNAISSANCE Gentlemen: In accordance with your request I have completed a geologic reconnaissance of the subject site. It is concluded that erosion and bluff retreat potential at the site can be classified as low. The potential for further erosion has been reduced by construction of a sea-wall. Accordingly, it is concluded that if the sea-wall is properly maintained, the proposed residence should have a useable life span of at least 75 years. Detailed geologic conditions of the site and the potential for bluff retreat is discussed in the following report. Very truly t1W ,J cETIF::D Mi . Hart 1t,(', GEOLQC:31 CEG 706 P.O. Box 261227 • SAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA 92196. (619) 578.4672 Day Residence Site 2479 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, CA File No. 367-98 GEOLOGIC RECONNAISSANCE DAY RESIDENCE SiTE 2479 OCEAN STREET CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Purpose and Scope: This report presents the findings of a engineering geologic reconnaissance of the residential site located at 2479 Ocean Street in Carlsbad, California. The purpose of this study is to: 1) describe the general geologic characteristics of the site; and 2) to address the potential for the property to be impacted by erosion and sea-bluff retreat. The scope of work included a site inspection, observation of soil test pits excavated for the Soil Investigation performed by the C.W. La Monte Company, review of aerial photographs and published geologic reports; and preparation of this written report summarizing findings and recommendations; Site Description: The site consists of an approximately rectangular residential lot located on a low sea-bluff west of Ocean Street in Carlsbad, California (Figure 1). The lot has a frontage of approximately 75 feet along Ocean Street and extends 135 feet westerly to a point on the beach near an approximately eight feet high stone sea-wall. it is my understanding the existing residential structure is to be removed and will be replaced with a new residence of wood-frame and stucco construction. The sea bluff west of the existing residence is moderately steep and covered with ice-plant. The building pad appears to drain primarily by sheet flow to the west towards the ocean. Vegetation consists of grass, shrubs and ice-plant. Elevations on site range from approximately 6 feet at the southeast end of the site to 26 feet at the northeast property line. MICHAEL W. HART, ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST Day Residence Site 2479 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, CA File No. 367-98 General Geology and Geologic Structure: The site is underlain by a late Pleistocene marine terrace deposit which constitutes the underlying bedrock, and thin surficial deposits consisting of shallow topsoils and fill. The marine terrace deposits are comprised of massive sandstones that may be correlatable with the Bay Point Formation whose type area is located near Mission Bay in San Diego. Weber (1982) maps these same deposits as unnamed "younger coastal terrace deposits" of Pleistocene age. Mapping by Weber also indicates that no faults are present on or adjacent to the site. The presence of the sea- wall on the property as well as other similar sea-walls on adjacent, properties to the north and south precludes geologic observations at the extreme west edge of the site near the beach. Based on observations of shallow borings placed in this area by The C.W. LaMonte Company for the soils investigation, it is likely that the terrace deposits extend in depth to at least beach level in this area. The closest outcrop of densely cemented Eocene-aged bedrock lies approximately one mile to the south (Weber, 1982). Shallow fill soils are present as backfill behind the sea-wall and topsoils consisting of loose to medium dense, dark brown, silty, medium-grained sands extending to depths of approximately two to three feet are present over most of the remainder of the property. Groundwater: No groundwater was encountered during the course to the soils investigation and no seepage was observed on the face of the sea-wall. It may be expected however, that the ground water level in the proposed building area lies at, or slightly above, mean sea-level. Coastal Erosion The coastal zone in the Ocean Street area of north Carlsbad is somewhat atypical of the San Diego County coastline. The coast is not typified by a high sea-cliff being eroded into a flat-topped ancient marine terrace. In this location, the backshore zone, prior to construction of the sea-wall was characterized by a broad, low slope that terminated near the west side of Ocean Street. The particular coastal segment on which the site is located is characterized by a "fine-grained sand and cobble beach backed by (gentle to moderate) 30 to 60 feet high cliffs comprised of the 80,000 to 120,000 yr. old Bay Point Formation. In this area, the Bay Point forms fairly stable slopes, with little evidence of sliding, but is I MICHAEL W. HART, ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST Day Residence Site 2479 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, CA - File No. 367-98 susceptible to extensive erosional ruling" (Shoreline Erosion Assessment and Atlas of the San Diego Region, Vol. II ,1994). Such ruling is not now occurring at the site due to a well-developed ground cover of iceplant and the presence of the seawall. A comparison of vertical aerial photographs taken in 1928 and 1953, with current bluff conditions indicate that coastal recession rates in this area have been slow compared to other sites in nearby Leucadia and Encinitas. According to the U.S. Corps of Engineers Reconnaissance Report (1996) on the Encinitas coastline several miles south of the site, the rate of horizontal bluff-top recession in that area varies from 0.15 to 1.0 feet per year. The average rate in that area is probably on the order of 0.1 to 0.2 feet per year. Unprotected areas of the Carlsbad coastline likely have similar erosion rates. The above-referenced recession rates apply to sections of the coast that are not protected from erosion by sea-walls or rock-revetment. In areas where such walls exist, erosion of the back beach slopes is essentially halted as long as the sea-wall is properly maintained. One of the factors controlling erosion of the beach bluffs and to a degree, the life-span and maintenance requirements of the sea-wall is the condition of the beach and whether the beaches are being narrowed by loss of sand or whether the beaches are widening by artificial sand nourishment. The Corps of Engineers report (1996) indicates that the beaches in the northern part of Encinitas, and presumably Carlsbad as well, have been accreting due to the downcoast propagation of recently placed fill from lagoon dredging operations. Dredging operations in Oceanside harbor during the period from 1963 to 1984 resulted in the placement of 2,400,000 cubic yards of sand on the beach in that area that due to littoral drift, eventually is redeposited along the coast to the south. Much of this sand has migrated into deeper water as a result of recent storms. Currently, the beach in front of the sea-wall is characterized by a high cobble berm that is providing temporary protection from bluff toe erosion. Faulting. Local and Regional Published geologic maps (Weber, 1982) indicate that the closest faults inland of the site are minor inactive faults that cut Eocene-aged bedrock. Similar faults cutting the Eocene bedrock but not the overlying terrace deposits are exposed in the sea-bluffs south of the site in the Leucadia area. The closest active fault is the Rose Canyon fault that lies MICHAEL W. HART, ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST Day Residence Site 2479 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, CA File No. 367-98 approximately two miles off-shore. Recent studies have shown that the Rose Canyon fault is capable of producing an M 6.5 earthquake. Such an event on this fault or other regional active faults in the southern California area could subject the site to moderate to severe seismic shaking. Landsliding The results of the geologic mapping for this report and review of aerial photographs indicates that the site is not located on or adjacent to areas that have been subject to landsliding. In addition, the topography and geologic conditions at the site are such that future landsliding is not likely. Secondary Effects of Faulting Secondary effects of faulting include lateral spreading, liquefaction, and seismically induced settlement. Since the foundations of the proposed structure will be extend through loose surficial soils and into medium-dense terrace deposits, it will not likely be subject to secondary effects of faulting or seismic shaking. Tsunamis: Tsunamis are long period ocean surface waves that are generated by large submarine earthquakes that displace the seafloor over large areas. Tsunamis may also be caused by large submarine landslides. Measurable tsunamis generated by remote earthquakes strike the southern California coast on average about once every 4 to 5 years (Zeiser-Kling Consultants, 1994). Few locally generated tsunamis have been observed in the San Diego coastal area during the brief historical record over the last 200 years. Because of the strike slip nature of offshore faults, this area is unlikely to experience significant locally generated tsunamis in the future. According to Agnew (1979) San Diego has experienced only one tsunami caused by a local earthquake. It was associated with the earthquake of May 27, 1862 which caused intense shaking in the San Diego area. This tsunami resulted in a beach run-up of about 3 to 4 feet. According to the report for the city of Encinitas by Zeiser-Kling consultants, (1994), the run-up value for coastal inundation due to tsunami (in the past) are comparable to values for 4 MICHAEL. W. HART, ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST Day Residence Site 2479 Ocean.Street, Carlsbad, CA File No. 367-98 extreme waves during storm surges. Since the site is located at an elevation of approximately 26 feet, it is considered unlikely that it will be subject to inundation due to tsunamis during the life of the structure. Conclusions and Recommendations The results of this study indicate that the site is underlain by loose surficial soils and medium-dense terrace deposits consisting of medium-dense, horizontally-bedded, medium- grained sands of the Bay Point Formation. It is concluded that long term bluff recession has been arrested or significantly reduced by installation of a sea-wall. It is further concluded that if the sea-wall is properly maintained throughout the project life, that the residence should have a usable life-span of at least 75 years. In addition, it is concluded that the proposed development will have no adverse effect on the stability of the coastal slope west of the building site. Based on the findings of this report it is concluded that the project can be designed so that it will neither be subject to, nor contribute to, significant geologic instability. Poor surface drainage can be a significant factor in erosion of coastal slopes. Therefore, it is recommended that all surface and roof water be directed via swales or subsurface drains that direct water to properly engineered outlets. MICHAEL. W. HART, ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST Day Residence Site 2479 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, CA File No. 367-98 References Agnew, D.C., 1979, Tsunami history of San Diego, jj...Earthquakes and other perils, San Diego region, eds., Abbott, P.L., and Elliott, W.J., Geological Soc. America Guidebook, p. 117-122. Kuhn, G.G. and Shepard, F.P., 1984, Sea Cliffs, Beaches, and Coastal Valleys of San Diego County, Univ. California Press, p. 193. Shoreline Erosion Assessment and Atlas of the San 'Diego Region, vol. II, 1994, ed., Reinhard E. Flick, pub. by Calif. Dept. Boating and Waterways, Map 12b. U. S. Corps of Engineers, 1996, Reconnaissance Report, Encinitas Shoreline, U.S. Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District. Weber, H.F., 1982, Recent slope failures, ancient landslides and related geology of the north-central coastal area, San Diego County, California, Calif. Div. Mines and Geology Open File Report 82-12 LA. Wilson, K., 1972, Eoôene and related geology of a portion of the San Luis Rey and Encinitas Quadrangles, San Diego County, California, unpub. M.A. thesis, Univ. of California, Riverside. Aerial Photographs U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1953, 14M 19 & 20 San Diego County, 1928, Fit. # 22A, 3 & 4. 6 MICHAEL W. HART, ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST PCPOBW BeN. NOT!. TOP o ,cisws !!A rAu PACIFIC AL ON !XIBT. SEA )AL OCEAN lB APPOJOMAT!1..Y 0 ABOVE B!AG14 BAND L!V!.. ZXISTW6 STONE SEA n^" rl o STOW ANA h 5i2•O74.q7 J : r X , I.*NDecAp!A*!A I \ :1 . •' , .09" • !IO9T!4 6A7.!ao TO BE R!NOV!p I! PIT/ . LT -0 !!AIINO •\ . - .-:. -rç !,a3TlN6 GONG!T! GAZEBO OV.SPA / syoimmisrom % \ \ PPOB!DT!*TU*!D'/ I GWXTZ r^Tto , - v PL.ANT!* I P*0POV!DABOV! ' SY*JNG4JN! !XI5Ti • I ._i &*AD! BAI.GONY — _- ABQy Ft~A 5Al.G0N5 I - - - - . '•. • • • • 1 ________ STRUGTItuptl - 1 Sol jF*1 .• . P%ANT! BTAIPROMBAI.GONY. - -_.- r :. • :, • YIALL.SANDST!PB I . TO BE memovep Ill9ir,1r. I I / - _____L 64-6 S. / • I • / !iasTiwo 1 - • !CISTIN& B.P.D. TO BE !MOV!P OR DeMOLISHeD 1 .TE -ç •r • N!IM V It V4000 PENCE AND OAT! 74.47- rD CURB is. prru. APRON - !OSTINO MAT!* M!Tf Peft GITY 5TANDADS ! PROTECT FROM DAMAG! b • L pqu —. _________ • — — OCEAN STREET -• ________•_______ ______ WET WEATHER MAINTENANCE AT RESIDENTIAL SITES* Southern Californians, unlike other residents of the nation, are unaccustomed to heavy rainfall. Whenever unusually wet weather occurs, San Diegans, particularly those living on slopes of filled land, become concerned (often unduly) about the conditions of their building site. They should not be, generally. The grading codes of the County of San Diego, and the various incorporated cites in the County, concerning filled land, excavation, terracing, and slope construction, are among the most stringent in (lie state, and adequate to meet almost any natural occurrence. This is the opinion of the San Diego Chapter of the California Council of Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors, whose members help prepare and review the codes. In 1967, the local Chapter of (lie California Council of Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors compiled a list of some precautions that homeowners can take to maintain their building sites. This updated pamphlet reiterates those precautions. Everyone is accustomed to maintaining his house. Everyone realizes that periodic termite inspections are a reasonable precaution, and that homes require a coat of paint from time to time. Homeowners are well used to checking and replacing wiring and plumbing, particularly in older homes. Roofs require occasional care. However, the general public regards the natural ground as inviolate. They ought to realize that Nature is haphazard in her creation of all land, some of which becomes building sites. Nature's imperfections have been largely compensated through careful engineering design and construction and enforcement of rigorous building and lot development ordinances. It is only reasonable to assume that an improved building site requires the approximate same care that the building itself does. In most instances, lot and site care are elementary steps that can be taken by the homeowner at considerably less cost that building maintenance. As a public service, engineers in private practice of the San Diego Chapter of the California Council of Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors have compiled this pamphlet of pertinent Do's and Don'ts as a guide to homeowners. The CCCELS respectfully advises that, in offering these guides, it accepts no responsibility for the actual performances of home sites or structures located thereon. * Pamphlet prepared by the San Diego Chapter California Council of Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors. 4350 Palm Ave.. Suite 25, La Mega, CA 91941 - (619) 462-9861 DO'S Do clear surface and terrace drains with a shovel, if necessary, and check them frequently during the rainy season. Ask your neighbors to do likewise. Do be sure that all drains have open outlets. Under the right conditions, this can be tested simply on a dry day with a hose. If blockage is evident, you may have to clear the drain mechanically. Do check roof drains, gutters and down spouts, to be sure they are dear. Depending on your location, if you do not have roof gutters and down spouts, you may wish to install them because roofs and their wide, flat space will shed tremendous quantities of water. Without gutters or other adequate drainage, water falling frorii the eaves ponds against Foundation and basement walls. Do check all outlets at the top of slopes to be sure that they are clear and that water will not overflow the slope itself, causing erosion. Do keep drain openings (weep-holes) clear of debris and other material that could block them in a storm. Do check for loose fill above and below your property if you live on a slope or terrace. Do watch hoses and sprinklers. During the rainy season, little, is any, irrigation is required. Over-saturation of the ground is not only unnecessary and expensive, but can cause subsurface damage. Do watch for backup in interior drains and toilets during a rainy season, this may indicate drain or sewer blockage. Do exercise ordinary precaution. Your house and building site were constructed to meet certain standards that should protect against any natural occurrences, if you do your part in maintaining them. a 4350 Palm Ave.. Suite 25, La Me8a, CA 91941 - (6)9)462-9861 DON'TS Don't block terrace drains and brow ditches on slopes or at the tops of cut slopes on sloping ground. These are designed to carry away runoff to a place where it can be safely distributed. Generally, a little shovel work will remove any accumulation of dirt and other debris that clogs the drain. If several homes are located on the same terrace, it is a good idea to check with your neighbors. Water backed up on their property may eventually reach you. Water backed up in surface drains will tend to overflow and seep into the terraces, creating less stable slopes. Don't permit water to gather above or on the edges of slopes (ponding). Water gathering here will tend to either seep into the ground, loosening 1111 or natural ground, or will overflow on the slope and begin erosion. Once erosion is started, it is difficult to control and severe damage may result rather quickly. Don't connect roof drains and roof gutters and down spouts to subdrains. Rather, arrange them so that they will flow out onto a paved driveway or (lie street where the water may be dissipated over a wide surface. Subdrai,is are constructed to take care of ordinary subsurface water and cannot handle the overload From roofs during a heavy rain. Overloading the subdiains tends to weaken (lie foundations. Don't spill water over slopes, even where this may seem a good way to prevent ponding. This tends to cause erosion and, in the case of fill, can eat away carefully engineered and compacted land. S. Don't drop loose fill slopes. It is not compacted to the same sti-ength as (lie slop itself and will tend to slide with heavy moisture. The sliding may clog terrace drains below, or may cause additional damage by weakening the slope. If you live below a slope, try to be sure that no loose (ill is dumped above your property. Don't discharge water into French drains close to slopes. French drains are sometimes used to get rid of excess water when other way of disposing water are not readily available. Overloading these drains saturates the ground and, if the drains are located close to slopes, may cause slope failure in their vicinity. Don't discharge surface water into septic tanks (leaching fields). Not only are septic tanks constructed for a different purpose, but they will tend, because of their size, to naturally accumulate additional water from the ground during a heavy rain. Overloading them articifially during the rainy season is bad for the 4350 Palm Ave.. SuIte 25. La Mesa. CA 91941 - (619) 462-9861 same reason as subdrains and French drains, and is doubly dangerous because their overflow can pose a serious health hazard. Don't over-irrigate slopes. Naturally, ground cover of ice plant and other vegetation will require some moisture during the hot summer months, but during the wet season, irrigation can cause ice plant and other heavy ground cover to l)Llll loose, which not only destroys the cover, but also stalls serious erosion. Planted slopes acquire sufficient moisture when it rains. Don't let water gather against foundations, retaining walls, and basement walls. These walls are build to withstand ordinary moisture in the ground and are, where necessary, accompanied by subdrains to carry oil excess. If water is permitted to pond against them, it may seep through them, causing dampness and leakage inside the basement, more important, the water pressure can cause heavy structural damage to walls. Do,i't try to compact backfill behind walls near slopes by flooding. Not only is flooding the least efficient way of compacting line-grained soil, but will also undermine or tip the wall. Don't leave a hose and sprinkler remaining on or near a slope, particularly during the rainy season. This will enhance ground saturation and may cause damage. Don't block swales that have been graded around your house or the lot pad. These shallow ditches have been put there for the purpose of quickly removing water toward the driveway, street or other positive outlet. By all means, do not let water become ponded above by blocked swales. 4350 Paliti Ave.. Suite 25. La Mesa. CA 91941 - (619) 462-9861 - c:q Carlsbad CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: Building Permit , Plan Check Number: Project Address: A.P.N.: Project Applicant (Owner Name): Project Description: Building Type: 2LL?cI. C.- . -2 -. 62,1- 04-c:k 2., too 0 L& c1 cr7 k (e4 Z, i( Residential: Number of New Dwelling Units Square Feet of Living, Area in New Dwelling_ S I Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in' SDU Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area Commercial/Industrial: Square Feet Floor Area City Certification of Applicant Information: SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad Unified School District San Marcos Unified School District 801 Pine Ave. 215 Mata Way Carlsbad CA 92009 (729-9291) San.Marcos, CA 92069 (736-2200) Encinitas Union School District San Dieguito Union High School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300) Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration (DOwner") certifies under penalty of peijury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling, units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found. to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign onZbhOf of he Owner. Signature: Date: 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2700 • FAX (760) 602-8560 Revised 4/20/00 801 P"Ino Pvcnue 2'2P77e29/) )C. C,93O.ó.3 a4'--L SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits-for this project. M SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER FAX TO: NAME: FAX PHONE:______ NO. OF PAGES: DATE:______ City of Carlsbad Plumbing - Electrical - Mechanical Worksheet Project Address _ 47 1 OA (J !9 VA65'r Permit No. t- -z 5-7 Questions below refer to work being done for this permit only. Plumbing '1 Yes jVNo Number of new or relocated fixtures, traps, or floor drains New building sewer line? Number of roof drains? Install/alter water line? Number of water heaters? Number of hose bibs? Gas piping system - Number of new or relocated gas outlets New water meter - Electrical Number of new panels or subpanels? Yes A,-"-No Install ...j"epair No. of Size Potable Irrigation Size of of New Service Single Phase 0 Size - Three Phase [3 Three Phase --480-* Remodel (relocate existing outlets/switches or add outlets/switches Mechanical Number of furnaces, A/C, or heat pumps? Number of fireplaces? - Number of exhaust fans? Number of exhaust hoods? Number of boilers or compressors? or relocated duct work? - Number of amperes rofampe Number of amperes Yes _____No --- -- - Number of HP? YesNo BEFORE THE PERMIT CAN BE FEE'D OUT THIS FORM NEEDS TO BE RETURNED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT - FAX NUMBER (760)438-0894 Jtt: <ON' rirw'j UAj UD B&c 4mxss I - OC:R1 stcc'. cs Su13 epL A . ?ri4t- A— cL E 7-00 . 1 25 0O RMP I I PIMP I I 3-500 Nt(tl Cu 3" 3/o CU I-9coP I(cu ouic Co. c_U - cu Rouwc rco CVIC ff0 CL) uF/COLD 0 CD N L 41 L I- L E PROJECT NAME: DAY RESIDENCE PROJECT ADDRESS: OCEAN STREET, CARLSBAD 400 AMP MAIN PANEL LOAD CALCULATIONS WATTS 200-2 #3/0 cu sub panel A 5588 Sq Ft X 3 16,764 100-2 #2 cu sub panel B Appliance 3 X 1500 4,500 20-1 #12 cu garage plugs-GEl Laundry 1,500 15-1 #14 cu garage openers Microwave (2) 3,000 .15-1 #14 cu garage lights Dishwasher 1,200 15-1 #14 cu smoke detectors Disposals (2) 1,740 Trash Compactor 1,200 Sub Zero 1,800 Oven 12,000 Dryer 5,000 PREPARED BY: Central Vac 1,680 BARTON ELECTRIC Garage Door Openers 1,560 P.O. BOX 1929 V Exterior Lighting 3,000 FALLBROOK, CA 92088 Pool Equipment and Spa 16,000 (760)712-1651 Sub Total 70,944 CA LlC #359647 A/C units 18,800 First 10kw@100% . 10,000 Remainder at 40% 60,944 24,378 A/C load 18,800 TOTAL WATTS 53,178 Amp+wattslvolts (53,178/240 221.58AM PS -I LI, -I 0 0 0 Cu L IL CE ( 1c : Plan Check Revision Fee —. r(r) '\c7) $218.00 - LtL ' \ ORPORAI 1952 1 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 12/08/2000 Plan Check Revision Permit No:PCROO199 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 2479 OCEAN ST CBAD Permit Type: PCR Status: ISSUED Parcel No: 2030210400 Lot #: 0 Applied: 11/15/2000 Valuation: $0.00 Construction Type: NEW Entered By: MOP Reference #: Plan Approved: 12/08/2000 Issued: 12/08/2000 Project Title: DAY RESIDENCE Inspect Area: REVISE SHEAR PANEL DETAIL Applicant: DAVIS WAYNE 619 232-5990 Owner: DAY-FAMILY TRUST 05-1247160 12/08/00 0002 01 ((— ,/\ COP 1029 REXFORD Cr CYPRESS CA 90630 J /7 -zz----- \ - 02 218.00 Total Fees: $21800 \. Total Pàimehts Td, Date: $0.00 N Balnce'Due $218.00 / / I \ FINAL APPROVAL Inspector: Date: Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the imposition' of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as 'fees/exactions.' You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest ard any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PERMIT APPLICATION • CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO.P-ct-ce' \tç EST. VAL. - Plan Ck. Deposit / Validated By_________________________ Date Address (include Bldg/Suite #) Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Assessor's Parcel # Existing Use Proposed Use Description If Work SQ. FT. \ #of Stories . # of Be 0 m # of Bathrooms 2. CO ACT PERSON (It dIfferent from applicant) V. - Lfj( Ce7 2-3Z_5~' f'k' Name ' - Address City State/Zip APPLICANT 0 Contractor 0 Agent for Contractor :0 Owner DAent for Owner : Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # PROPERTY OWNER Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # - CONTRACTOR - COMPANY NAME (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500)). Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # State License # License Class City Business License # Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License # WORKERS' COMPENSATION Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date___________________ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$1001 OR LESS) CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE 7. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044. Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number I contractors license number): I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address I phone number I contractors license number): I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): -- - PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES. A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. - CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY V •V* V. V - I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS. COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0 deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance EsGil Corporation 2n Partnership with Government for Bui[iing Safety DATE: 12/8/00 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-257 (peroo-199) SET: rev 1 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2479 Ocean Street PROJECT NAME: Day Residence, Structural Revision U APPLICANT U JURIS. U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed checklist and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The checklist transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the checklist is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the checklist has been sent to: R Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Wayne Daveis, Architect Telephone #: In person Date contacted: 12/8/00 (by: CM) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: This approval applies Qfl!Y to the revised braces on the 2nd floor. The clouded details shown on the owners set of plans must be made to the city set of plans. The attached details must be made a part of the plans. By: Chuck Mendenhall Enclosures: Esgil Corporation DGA LJMB DEJ DPC WALK IN trnsmtl.dot EsGil Corporation 1n Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE: November 30, 2000 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-257 (PCROO-199) SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2479 Ocean Street 0,&RELICANT JURI U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE PROJECT NAME: Structural Revisions-2nd Floor Exterior Shear Walls at Rear The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed checklist and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The checklist transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans-are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the checklist is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the checklist has been sent to: Wayne Davis, AlA 343 Seventh Avenue, Ste. #204, San Diego, CA 92101 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Wayne Davis Telephone #: 619-232-5990 Date contacted: 1/130 /°O(by:- ) Fax #: 619-232-5992 Mail ielphoneL.— Fax'.-' In Person D REMARKS: By: Tony Embuido Enclosures: Esgil Corporation DGA E] MB DEJ PC LOG tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 00-257 (PCROO-199) November 30, 2000 GENERAL PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2479 Ocean Street I DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: LOG REVIEWED BY: Tony Embuido PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-257 (PCROO-199) DATE REVIEW COMPLETED: November 30, 2000 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes C3 No Carlsbad 00-257 (PCROO-199) November 30, 2000 . STRUCTURAL Please check compression brace using the B (beta) reduction per Section 2213.8.2.2. 2. Design the connections to include the omega factor per Section 2213.8.3.1. 3: Why reduce overturning by 1/2 per design calc's? See sheet I of I and clarify. Should the uplift force be - 10 kips in lieu of 5 kips? 4. How will uplift be resisted/transferred to existing studs, etc. See left end of cross section on detail X-2/SD-1. (Referencing detail X3? or X5? sheet SD-I). The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Tony Embuido at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. 18/2000 15:41 6192325992 DAVIS GROUPP PAGE 06 /P27 .&fl. cCE '2- 112 I?'-1MR. 12VP5 / DIVTi 4 I Carlsba4 00-257 (PCROO-199) Novmber 30, 2000 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-257 (PCROO-199) PREPARED BY: Tony Embuido DATE: November 30, 2000 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2479 Ocean Street BUILDING OCCUPANCY: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code 1GB : I 1994 UBC Building Permit Fee V 1994 UBC Plan Check Fee v Type of Review: 0 Complete Review 0 Structural Only O Repetitive Fee I IRepeats O Other Hourly f 21 Esgil Plan Review Fee I 174.301 Comments: Sheet I of I macvalue.doc II ih1flfl JYV /2 Y. - 1V 14, /rM 4'k I' • II 41, Fo?. .j44 4,cv-V4c. ,• fc4TM A -% 4m • ,ri" A FiFe COL19. By!v~— DECO820 TL1 7gAc7 City CARLSBAD BUIL01kPT. wX.,L \ IVIC M,TM A'S(, CO" 1-5 IM'? o LP ee,L 112 pIr L-E 4L(L 1A 1 14 - *ot rot. c4Mrsct4 % I4 aEJ rA44pD A3O? tMc Frj (Mt c4tIvJ,oRQ. 14UTh III / ri;4 Thic.< LcV1-I IG4i' toe IJ!I!I1! _-( b I ( PFPk J/t-{.- r- I t- ?L?4 (M/c.) AvvEiP *rL, VPict ñ2!' tifl- 'AR U)( 12 $144 1D? 4- !o'T A44LI'' eT2 E?_WML t'17O 4'oLIp 'L-L4 EETZ, r- pc4 4.' 4io -F?cS kR spi'c.1 (i4ic) Ac'917'1-- JOL4p 0kk ipi-t-1- e'F APP 7 iLt 'P-1 P-AM 11FczE,kpV 12c7s 41 7V-i¼-GP j!4 +?CLV> C.RLPPL.E ) t'' Lot4cq 'LI 4,j4I4EL (AT A7C.)PR (i'5o'4 24 511AP CR j0z4T t5-rwr4 CPPL 4 ;- Fr6-r j P'T rt'P. -ft,e 04 /C.) tLL4T.6 4 - ce9M EL', () A o Frj4L oFFrt ep-D PER- FLd1(4/c.) 11 FFM w/ (4) 5IMON 5P'V4-- S Fs. EXP -2 '2o O(I '\ ----/) CIV-4d - p... SI S S... • S... S..... S S... 5ISS• S. S.. •• S .... 0 64 4"'s • . .1 •5 . . ./ S ..1 . S I.• S 5 .1.. S..... f S S 555 SI S p'. fot4 ?-Pk az LI' r- CP- V. I I4kL ?L44 'n- Vt2#cCt -04 PIP ett fl(2jI LfrL1 EAR U)( I A044 L' eT2 j - 4-a V#dL CLi tJe&rio4 4dOL-I2 'L-'J4' EEiz, r '4 • S... I • S... I ••IIs• S SIll ISS.. 4 -0 0-0 I•I S IS .00:: S • . S II I S S S • IS.... I ... S I I wt•in+ 4,Th. gc F¼ME (4-) 1/:4 -rh2EAt7V J2G$ Pz c-.I 17I7-,.¼-GP FR&M -e4r1 1?;,M ?LAI4 c7M+k-P tTa 2R e ApPeD Cgi r ir c22-01 'kL- w/ ii1CI& (A'?Q) *TlFF4G12S p5j, 4i)AftM . SIDE-:: of= F9-ML T'i'P.TOP L (t4/ 0 ?p.-P/& oiI12 r6172 Q41 Md- ?W14 &fl-, VF#CP C.OL.) b-Y2i'/4 L157S J42WML ca1O LI 'L-4' EE1Z,, r. c4 4' 419 Ot4 kR spdvc4fc.) vau_ -rye TDP . FvaA%40 c#* Cji-) i/4r -nF(2¼QEQ 12c9s FOR __ 7FEP fZJ1 CtW1CA'3) -P&t4L £.i4'-W,1 ) j&— t-. (;) f Ac3(o) TIFF1Z' w/(4$M?5O -' SCFQ65 i 'ffl g - • • ••.. - I -r.. 4 /P 1kLt4-4O1tf4,4 I ONAt6p / vr_ 44 I / ( I4TEO 'T p&J pi-Pcr J j I I/f LOZY 14 II j'i9Xo Cqr4F4 Vi? ____ - -- ----. r- -----i r- T 4- Vie L ::-:----- '1t( 1TtPI*I$ 'IC k' —_J -. , •; / Appsp 4)j (t J—APthT pg::;) / 7aj 2-e-i4evice 2jiq Aei S. Crrt4 bAd, CA tAV(', 2z12,iP JOHLNICITA 12-6-00 ENGINEERING & CODE CONSULTING 9757 WYMAN WAY SPRING VALLEY, CA 91977-3447 (619)463-7718, FAX: (619)463-4964 A c 17 E-t-I 0W4 17 9 SHEET 9 1 of I CALIV oy R1 FtW4 -r0 PP-F/. -WkU- r.earwi1 per rht.VZ 4ea(k4te1 i-i;-co) S2,,'1 (9o) i - qjid'j1 4ørCi)Frg*s1e- • i C1:: 7 1L2.( cYJ' • ••.. •..• • I 1 ('2. / 4 I.E Pet) .S I 9 . S... : :: __________________ /4m. T(l) *tu6 t LUI jg.coo(L.1) Trib L . • • . •... :1 '4lô= c. fr. . • . .. SS... .....: M. (per 5ec . 1A6. : • M 4i&(6 ) cP- p'tjp.,.A I4*'c Ln I4oU.1) ) • "'- TO AV.31 n' L1 " Ltbod R. MDtT.vr c4f*'I ae- 4 rt- 4, r4$• 36t 51624 &CAUPPL419 • 4ppZ JD SML j3s