The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2489 OCEAN ST; ; CB881222; Permit'2 1. 0 ihórsbyaffIim that I am licensed under ol_pcgwislone of Chapter 9 (commencing with S.tion 7000) of Division 3 of-the Business 4. I' and Professions Code, and my license is in L full force and effect. (Jr I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contrac-tor's License Law for the following reason (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Cede: Any city or County wllicr, re quires a permit to censtruci, alter, improve, demolish, or - repair any structure. prior to its issuance also requires the ap phicant for such permit to tile a signed statement the. ho is licensed pursuant to the -provisions 01 the Contractors License Law (Chapter 9 commencing with Section 7000 of Division 301 the Business and Professions Code) or that is en- enuW llueretuunu and ike oasis for ituo 4llegeo enemplian. Any - violation of Section 7031.5 by an applicant for a permit sob'. jects the applicant to a civil penalty 01001 more than live hun- dred dollars ($500). .- ' I I. as owner of the property. or my employees with wages as their sole eompnnsation. will do the work, and the strut tory is not intended or offered for univ ISec 7044. Ravinvsn and PrnlgSsions Code: The. Cent rectors License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves - thereon and who done coch work himcelt or through his Own employees, provided that such improvements are not intend ed or uttered for sale. If. however, the building or improve- ment is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving -that he did not build or im- prove for the purpose 01 sale). It I, as owner of the property. -am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors 10 construct the project (Sec. 7044. Business and Professions Cede: The Contractor's License Caw does net apply loan owner 01 property who builds or im- proves, thereon, and who contracts for each projects with a contractor(s) license pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). fl As a homeowner lam improving my home, and the 10110w- - 'I ing conditions exist: .1. The work is being performed prior to sole. I have lived in my home ter twelve months prior 16 completion 01 this work. I have not claimed this exemption during the'-last three years. 0 lam exempt coder Sec. ___________________ . B & P.C. for this reason O thereby affirm that .1 have a certificate of c00505l to sell-mourn, or a certificate 01 Workers' Compensation In.. - surance. or a certified copy thereof (Sec. 3800. Labor Code) POLICY NO. -' COMPANY, -- D-Copy Is tiled with the ci1y. certified copy is hereby furnished - - CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM - - WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE (This,00ction need not be completed it the permit is for one hundred dollars (Stool or less) - I tcenity that in the performance of the work for which this permit in issued. I shall not employ any person In any manner no an to become subject to the Workers' Compen' nation Laws 01 California. NOTICE TO APPLICANT: Ii.'alter making Ihik Certificate 01 Esemplion, you should become subject to the WOrkern' Compensation provisions of the Labor Code, you must, -forthwith comply with-such provisiono or this permit shall - be deemed revoked. I" 0 I hereby affirm that there in a construction lending agency tot the perlorniance orson work iot which 11510 per. 0 mit is issued (Sec. 3097. Civil Code) MI Lender's Name. .- Lender's Address - to lICE RAil PflIIdT PEN flNIV A PR HARD APPLICANT TO FILL IN INFORMATION WITHIN SHADED AREA AND DECLARATIONS. CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009-1915 (619) 438-1161 APPLICATION & 'PERMIT JOB ADORCSS AV. D. THOMAS BROS NO, FA I ON BUSINESS LICENSE C 1 La BLOCK CONTRACTORS PHONE C - . I 71 IZ 79'ONTRACTOR CTOR'S AODACSS STATE LICENSE NO. fr I . OWNER'S MAILING AOORB8 R DESIGNER'S PHONE - -- I DESCRIPTION dF WORK — -R'S ADDRESS STATE LICENSE NO. OS NAME I OWNE B'S PMOM PUE-10 A4 f/p FLRELEV.NO 0CC GP i ALUATION PERMIT NUMBER -________________ Zola BUILDING SO. FOOTAGE 9687 09/11/89 0001 01 02STORIES C-PRMT109..0- Not Valid Unless Machine Certified TRACT PARKING SPACE RES UNITS GRADING PERM REDEVELOPMENT CONSTCENSUS vii NI] — AREA YO NO FIRE SPR Y 0 TYPE I 0CC LOAD I vJ NO QTY. PLUMBING PERMIT,- ISSUE ' 7 Si) OTY. MECHANICAL PERMIT - ISSUE OO - SUMMARY/ACCOUNT NUMBER — - EACH FIXTURE TRAP . — INSTALL FURN. DUCTS UP TO 100,000 BTU BUILDING PERMIT 001'810-00'00'8220 if) EACH BUILDING SEWER , - OVER 100,000 BTU , SIGN PERMIT 001'810'00'00'8221 F EACH WATER HEATER ANDiOR VENT , - BOILER/COMPRESSOR UP TO 3 HP - PLAN CHECK 001-810-00-00-8891 — EACH GAS SYSTEM 110 4 OUTLETS , — BOILER/COMPRESSOR 3.15 HP ' , ' TOTAL PLUMBING 001'810-00'00'8222 — EACH GAS SYSTEMS OR MORE , METAL FIREPLACE , ELECTRICAL 001,81,O:00008223 — EACH INSTAL., ALTER, REPAIR WATER PIPE , — VENT FAN SINGLE DUCT . MECHANICAL 001'810-00'00'8224 — EACH VACUUM BREAKER - , — MECH EXHAUST H000'DUCTS , MOBILEHOME 001'810'00-00-8225 - - WATER SOFTNER , ' - RELOCATION OF EA FURNACE/HEATER . - - SOLAR 001-810'00'00'8226 — EACH ROOF DRAIN IlNSIDEI . - DRYER VENT ' STRONGMOTION 880-519-92-33 -' TOTAL MECHANICAL 1 . FIRESPRINKLERS 001-810-00-00-8227 TOIALPLUMBING I . PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE 320-810-00'00'8740 QTY. ELECTRICAL PERMIT - ISSUE , •"9 OTY. MOBILE HOME SETUP BRIDGE FEE 360-810-00-00-8740 PARK-IN'LIEU (AREA ). . - NEW CONSTEAAMP'SWlSKA CAR PORT . TIF 312-810-00-00-8835 — IPH 3PH - , AWNING --, LA COSTA hF - 311-810-00-00-8835 - EXIST BLDG EAAMPISWT'BKR GARAGE - . - . FMF 1 PH 3 PH. . - LICENSE TAX 001-810-00-00-8162 REMODEL'ALTER PER CIRCUIT . ' . . MFF 880-519-92-57 — TEMPPOLE200AMPS — OVER 200AMPS - tEMP OCCUPANCY (30DAYS) CREDIT DEPOSIT JE - TOTALELECTRICAL I_- - - TOTAL ' TOTAL FEES PAYA J,,g-71/0_q I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED "APPLICATION AND PEMlT" AND DO HEREBY I Expiration. Every permit issued bythe Building Official under the provisions Ofthis *ANOS!jPt'RM:TISREQUIEO FOR EXCAVATIGNS OVER ('.FRTIFY tINDER PENALTY OF PFR.tI tRY THAT All. INFORMATION HEREON INCLUDING THE Code shaft expire by limitation and become null and void, tithe building or work 510 EP AND DEMdX.rrION 000 CONSTRUCTION OF , author lzedbyou'Pu_eiiiiit _6notcommencedwithin180 ddyhfrUiuithedateofOuch s iu TORIES IN HEIGHT DECLARATIONS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT AND I FURTHER CRTIFY AND AGREE If A PERMIT lb permit, or - ho building or work authorized by such permit in suspended or ISSUED: TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY, COUNTY AND STATE LAWS GOVERNING BUILDING CON' abondo_timea_tarfheworkinCommencedfora _nodof100days DRES OVER 3 STOR______ -D)/11/ STRUCTION, Wl'bETI-lR SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND OWNE\CONTRACTOR APP ?b BIN KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES. JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND APP BY PHONE 173 EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE ," GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT..-. -. TYPE DATE INSPECTOR BUILDING FOUNDATION REINFORCED STEEL MASONRY GUNITE OR GROUT SUB FRAME 0 FLOOR 0 CEILING SHEATHING 0 ROOF 0 SHEA FRAME EXTERIOR LATH INSULATION INTERIOR LATH & DRYWALL PLUMBING SEWER AND BL!CO 0 PLICQ UNDERGROUND 0 WASTE 0 WP'TER TOP OUT 0 WASTE 0 WATER TUB AND SHOWER PAN GAS TEST O WATER HEATER 0 SOLAR WATER ELECTRICAL ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND 0 UFFER ROUGH ELECTRIC ELECTRIC SERVICE 0 TEMPOR4RY O BONDING 0 POOL MECHANICAL DUCT & PLEM., 0 REF. PIPING HEAT - AIR COND. SYSTEMS VENTILATING SYSTEMS . CALL FOR FINAL INSPECTION WHEN ALL APPROPRIATE ITEMS ABOVE HAVE BEEN APPROVED FINAL PLUMBING ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL - GS :\ BUILPAHG SPECIAL CONDITIONS \ \. \ I ... -' - FIELD INSPECTION RECORD r REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS INSPECTORS NOTES REQ. IF INSPECTORS INSPECTION CHECKED APPROVAL DATE f SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSP STRUCTURAL CONCRETE OVER 2000 PSI PRESTRESSED CONCRETE POST TENSIONED CONCRETE FIELD WELDING HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS SPECIAL MASONRY PILES CAISSONS 87 ' .:...c. T-7 DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859. (619)438-1161 MISCELLANEOUS FEE RECEIPT Applicant Please Print And Fill In Shaded Area Only JOB ADDRESS4_T PLAN ID. NO.' j - Q 2 1— 09 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL PARCEL NO.26)'5 ) ALS ?AYLE OWNER 1877 MUM 0001 01 05 OWNER'S MAILING 6?9 if.. re,z ADDRESS ' Misc 70.00 . VALIDATI9N AREA CITY S'COTT~' L)/'LE ZIP 7T.2,,cI TEL.2-9..q5 - CONTRACTOR ESTMATED VALUATION 001-810-00-00-8821 7o CONTRACTOR'S MAILING ADDRESS PLAN CHECK FEE IF THE APPLICANT TAKES NO ACTION WITHIN 180 DAYS, PLAN CHECK FEES CITY ZIP TEL. WILL BE FORFEITED. STATE BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LICENSE NO. 5ç SUBDIVISION LOT(S) LEGAL DESCRIPTION L1..,1_- .7P17 .. CHECK IF SUBMITTED: o 2 ENERGY CALCS El 2 1987 ENERGY CALCS FOR NON RESIDENTIAL BLDGS DESCRIPTION OF WORK o 2 STRUCTURAL CALCS i-41P1-ovE £ET,4ift//,U4 t4j-L.. ox ,1354-c" 0 2 SOILS REPORTS 0 2 SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPES DATE GIVEN! DATE , SENT TO APPLICANT /4,2Is rL' CONTACT PERSON WE I T H g T L. E LA COSTA LETTER ADDRESS Z/? q/L) ST SCHOOL FEE FORM (412L . VYOTEL.')a P & E CORRECTIONS LIST CITY ZIP CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE / - DATE White- File YellowS Applicant Pink - Finance Gold - Assessor d 2- 2- ~Wvnu 41* . If LD EPORT. 'To / DATE I / PROJECT NO. 99. / PRO2 1 LOc CONTRACTOR OWNER - WEATHER TEMP. PRESENT AT SITE SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: 1) v Alt- lcxwr3a~~ 'J 4;7 2 hrer 2 - € 1- , 41 ?1rv'/' • .. RECOMMENDATIONS: 4) % 4j e4f '4 4. ZZ i4A7 a j7 HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. 'BJIGNATURE 42.i44. d SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING ENGINEERING GEOLOGY • HYDROGEOLOGY (619) 931-1917 COPIES TO: " 1 5245 Avenida Encinas, Suite G. - Carlsbad. California 92008 ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 5601468 DATE: JURISDICTION: _________________ PLAN CHECK NO: V2i2...2.. SET: PROJECT ADDRESS:Z4 O0-ea S-- PROJECT NAME:________________________________ R APPLICANT JURISDICTION PLAN. CHECKER []FILE COPY DUPS []DESIGNER E The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected. where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified 'ce'arncks br-tovi are resolved and checked by building department staff. .The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected ...plans are submitted for recheck. IJ The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to. the applicantcoñtact person.' The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. 0 Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted:_______________________ Date contacted: In REMARKS:______ By&j1jjj( I VQ.,.C40-4. ESGIL CORPORATION 0 GA . 0 AA 0 vw 0DM Telphone #________________ -covn *Ae S, 0i ery1c, ce V ( e ,u am '.cs a.rvic( +\'le' acs-y -yv lJv\ LS .So nclosures: ... ESG1L CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 DATE: PT Q'Z ArrJ: JURISDICTION: C.ii-.., op FL50 PLAN CHECK NO: 1212. SET: PROJECT ADDRESS: 124- Oc&i PROJECT NAME: t>eAVJLL .PPLICANT JURISDICTION Li PLAN CHECKER OFILE COPY !-,UPS ODESIGNER G The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building-codes when minor deficien- cies identified 00MTAC4E.D - AL30 EEELO) are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. E) The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. 0 The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff didnot advise the applicant conta4on/at plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan che has been completed. Person contacted: 5aa ReL. N--, _______________________ Date contacted: Telephone *________________ REMARKS: CART :_M.AP.TLE _CALLC_)-4 _LD AEDIFW COULD_1ri'.'I %.Ar' _IJDtC..aTED 30 IL- CE PJC,Q..Ui I'LL P_I.D LEc _I TEM _CD*)(7E ATrAxAF-io) t, TPAT 4S wo Ila,_OTE_To_C.0VE2.. IrSLA By: I _Th ESGIL COORATION ---- ., WI.% 10 kETORJJ PLAi5 To os.'4i AlT ,1L3WA. _rI-AT_OP A PcsoJ OJLDL1)<ETO A:5r. ACCOLfIrE; CITY OF CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO. 88-1222 2489 OCEAN ST. SEAWALL SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 Footings do not extend 3 ft. into bedrock as required by the soils investigation report. Provide a letter from the soils engineer stating that he has reviewed the plans to confirm conformance with the recommendations of the soils report. Note on plans that: "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the Building Official in writing that the foundation excavation, forming and reinforcement comply with the soils report and the approved plans. Please make any changes on tracings and submit two new sets of prints to Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Dr., Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123 If you have any questions, please:-.contact Gene Meier of Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 DATE: SE.Fr iq , JURISDICTION: Crr',' OF CIRLAD PLAN CHECK NO: 1222 SET: - PROJECT ADDRESS: EIL) ST. PROJECT NAME: SEAAJALL FILE COPY UPS DESIGNER ON E The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction .to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: RLE TL1 24 OCeA-.) T. CA, ILS&c 0 200r 0 Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: 1 I-fAiL Date contacted: Telephone #________________ 0 REMARKS: / By: Enclosures: ESGIL CORPORATION I Footings soils / ea Provi CITY OF CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO. 88-1222 2489 OCEAN ST. EAWALL £SEPTEMBER 19, 1988 / I b'not extei3/3 into bedrock as required by the stigation 0 b_ etter from the soils engineer stating that he has revi we t e lans to confirm conformance with the recommendations of t soi report. Note on p1 ns that: "Pr6 ontractor requesting a Building Department foundation nspection, the soils engineer shall advise the Building ficial in writing that the foundation excavation, forming and ei rcement comply with the soils report and the approv . Please make any changes on tracings and submit two new sets of prints to Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Dr., Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123 If you have any questions, pleasecontact Gene Meier of Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. Datei Prepared byi Jurisdiction LAc - o Bldg. Dept. VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE D Esgil * di PLAN CHECK NO._IM -I2.2- BUILDING ADDRESS -4- Oc&, &r. APPLICANT/CONTACT CI-&RLE.-, 1&cL PHONE NO. &lq 72' (0544 BUILDING OCCUPANCY DESIGNER PHONE____________ TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR PHONE___________ BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION MULTIPLIER 140uL : 2HR5 '-1,25 Air Conditionine Commercial - Residential Res. or Comm. Sprinklers -Fire Total Value Building Permit Fee $_ S Plan Check Fee S $ CON I1CNTS Ec.IL.. SHEET OF 12/87 BUILDING PLANCHECK ENGINEERING CHECKLIST DATE: 8/21/89 PLAN CHECK NO. 6,9/22Z PROJECT ADDRESS: 25/9? O 5r LEGEND ITEM COMPLETE ITEM INCOMPLETE - NEEDS YOUR ACTION N/A - NOT APPLICABLE PROJECT NAME: _qgy 5EMaLL.. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS Site Plan 0 0 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: north arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width and dimensioned setbacks. U 2. Show •on site plan: Finish floor elevations, pad elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and proposed slopes, driveway with percent (%) grade and drainage patterns. 0 0 U 3. Provide legal description and Assessors Parcel Number. Discretionary Approval Compliance No discretionary approvals were required. Project complies with all Engineering Conditions of Approval for Project No.___________________ Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of Approval for Project No. Conditions complied with. by: Date:_________ Field Review Field review completed. No issues raised. Field review completed. The following issues or discrepancies with the site plan were found: Site lacks adequate public improvements. Existing drainage improvements not shown or in cbnflict with site plan. Site is served by overhead power lines (Future Improvement Agreement required). Grading is required to access site, create pad or provide for ultimate Street improvement. Site access visibility problems exist. Provide onsite turnaround or engineered solution to problem. Other:_______ Dedication Requirements No dedication required. Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8-1/2" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report and the required processing fee. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. The description of the dedication is as follows: Dedication completed, Date: By:________________ Improvement Requirements No public improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City inspector prior to occupancy. Public improvements required. This project requires construction of public improvements pursuant to Section 18.40 of the City Code. Please have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit for separate plan check process through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. The required improvements are: Improvement plans signed, Date: By: Improvements are required. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred in accordance with Section 18.40 of the City Code. Please submit a recent title report on the property so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. The Future Improvement Agreement must be signed, notorized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Future Improvement Agreement completed, Date: By:____________ Grading Requirements 13a. Inadequate information available on site plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Please provide more detailed proposed and existing elevations and contours. Include accurate estimates of the grading quantities (cut, fill, import, export). 14. No grading required as determined by the information provided on the site plan. ____ 15. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by Pe2 Be. a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted for separate plan check and approval through the Engineering Department. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and grading ,i substantially complete and found acceptable to the City I Inspector prior to issuance of Building Permits. Grading Inspector sign off. Date: By:_____________ Miscellaneous Permits Right-of-Way Permit not required. Right-of-Way Permit required. A separate Right-of-Way Permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following:____________________________________________________________ Sewer Permit is not required. - 19. Sewer Permit is required. A Sewer Permit is required concurrent with Building Permit issuance. The fee required is noted below in the fees section. _____ 20. Industrial Waste Permit is not required. 21. Industrial Waste Permit is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. Permits must be issued prior to occupancy. Industrial Waste Permit accepted - Date: By:___________ Fees Required t3i4 22. Park-in-Lieu Fee Quadrant:-..---. Fee Per Unit: - Total Fee:__________ 23. Traffic Impact Fee Fee Per Unit: - Total Fee:__________ I' 24. Bridge and Thoroughfare Fee Fee Per Unit: - Total Fee:'Xd4, ____ 25. Public Facilities Fee required. 44 26. Facilities Management Fee Zone: Fee: ____ 27. Sewer Fees Permit No. EDU's: 4t7,g Fee:______ 'Ik 28. Sew~;~ Fee: ral required:_________________________ ____ REMARKS: A)01 ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE PERMIT BY: Date:_______ / / nish floor elevations, elevations of finish ng, existing topographical lines, existing veway and percent (%) grade and drainage ENGINEERING CHECKLIST a, LEGEND Date: 9 27S8 Item Complete Plan Check No. 813/22Z Project Address: 211 91 t%elqla dr. Item Incomplete - Needs Project Name: 5ienv Your Action Number in circle 1,2,3 Field Check Date: indicates plancheck By: number that deficiency was identified LEGAL REQUIREMENTS Site Plan a, 1. Provide a fully dimensioned te plan drawn to scale. Show: North F1 arrow, property Iinea easements, existing and proposed structures, streets , tfflg street improvements, right-of-way width and dimensioned socks. Show on Site Plan: grade adjacent to b and proposed slopes patterns. b ,' Provide legal descp Provide assessortrcnmv i PERMITS REQUIRED Ii 1 Grading pJrequired. (Separate submittal to Engineering Department -duted for Grading Permit). Grading plans in plan check PE 2.83? Need the following completed prior to building permit issuance: Grading plans signed. Grading permit issued. Grading completed. Certification letter and compaction reports submitted. Grading inspected and permit signed off by City Inspector. Right-of-Way Permit required for work in public right-of-way (e.g., driveway approach, sidewalk, connection to water main, etc). Grading S. uPr 0 0 9. Industrial Waste Permit application required. To be filled out completely and returned to Development Processing. FEES REQUIRED 10. Park-in-Lieu fees required. Quadrant: -, Fee Per Unit: Al Total Fee:______ D 0 11. Traffic impact fee required. Fee Per Unit: , Total Fee: _____ '/ 0 0 12 Bridge and Thoroughfare fee required. Fee Per Unit: -._--, Total Fee: - 11 REMARKS: O.K. to issue: Date: If you have any questions about any of the above items identified on this plan check, please call the Development Processing Department at 438-1161. Vil We- Public facilities fee required. V00 Facilities management fee required. Fee:__________ IS. Additional EDU's required: _ 'permitn0 Sewer connection fee: S zD .D 16. Sewer lateral required: #4) Plan Check No. A5/222, Address ZVB? Qa' C;>-7- Type of Project and Use 5JCLL.L Zone R- 3 Use Allowed? YES ( NO Setback: Front 0$. Side 61c Rear Facilities Management Zone I School District: San Dieguito Encinitas Carlsbad IX San Marcos Discretionary Action Required YES NO Type Environmental Required YES NO Landscape Plan Required YES NO Comments Coastal Permit Required YES NO Additional Comments Ix r.i m 1: $ U U U o_ (L o UR PLANNING CHECKLIST OK TO ISSUE DATE Plan Check No. APN: PLANNING CHECKLIST Address Z-,y 67 odd'*4 ¶11- Planner TZ.( C- /tl UNOJE Phone 438-1161 (Name) Type of Project and Use Zone 3 Facilities lbnagement Zone 'S "S Legend Sd Item Complete Item Incomplete - Needs your action 1, 2, 3 Number in circle indicates plancheck number that deficiency was identified Environmental Review Required: YES NO _____ TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: NO LI, /5' J Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval Discretionary Action Required: YES NO TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE: PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: fl Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval Landscape: YES NOf DATE OF A.0?ROV.L: O 0 0 Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval 1•1.1 Coastal: YES NO ____ DATE OF APPROVAL: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval Show on Site Plan: Finish floor elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographi:çal lines, existing and proposed slopes and driveway. Provide legal description of property. Provide assessor's parcel number. Setbacks: Front: Required Shown I nt. Side: Required Shown Street Side: Required Shown Rear: Required Shown Lot coverage: Required Shown Height: Required Shown Parking: Spaces Required Shown Guest Spaces Required Shown Additional comments and remarks have been made on the building plans. These marked-up plans may be picked up at the Building Department. These marked-up plans must be resubmitted with the revised plans for this project. Have plans been marked up? YES N Additional Comments K TO ISSUE DATE PLNCK. FRM Site Plan: 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street. improvements, right-of-way width and dimensioned setbacks. STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SAN DIEGO COAST DISTRICT 1333 CAMINO DEL RIO SOUTH, SUITE 125 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-3520 (619) 297-9740 Mr. C. E. Bartley 2489 Ocean St. Carlsbad, CA 92008 NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE Date: August 17, 1989 Applicant: Charles E. Bartley Document or Plans: Revised seawall building plans, including approved stairway design Submitted in compliance with Special Condition(s) No(s). of Coastal Development Permit No. 6-89-45 Material submitted in compliance with said Special Condition(s) of your development permit has been reviewed by the District Director and found to fulfill the requirements of said condition(s). Your submitted material and a copy of this letter have been made a part of the permanent file. Sincerely, Charles Damm Di-strict Director By: Paul B. Webb (1 802 N) HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS C. E. Bartley August 4, 1989 2489 Ocean Street Proj. No. 249.1 Carlsbad, California 92008 SUBJECr: Revised Foundation Depth Proposed Seawall 2489 Ocean Street Carlsbad, California REFERENCE: "Shore Protection Design Recawnendations, 2489 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, California", by Hetherington Thgjneerjng, Inc., dated August 1, 1988. Dear Chuck: Based on review of the referenced report and recent observations of exposed bedrock in the innediate vicinity of the proposed seawall, it appears that a depth of embedment into bedrock of two feet will be adequate for the proposed wall foundation. The foundation excavation should be inspected by the geotechnical engineer prior to the placement of reinforcing steel and if any potentially erodible materials are present in the seawall foundation excavation which could result in scour, then deepening of the foundation will be necessary. Very truly yours, (both expire 3/31/92) MKH: cb 5245 AVENIDA ENCINAS 9 SUITE G • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 9 (619) 931-1917 SEPTEMBER 14, 1988 HELEN AND CHARLES BARTLEY 2489 OCEAN ST,CARLSBAD,CA DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING DIVISION 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE, CITY OF CARLSBAD ATIN :CARTER DARNELL--BLDG DEPT StJBJECr: IMPROVEMENT OF RETAINING WALL ON BEACH PROPEWIY- "BAR'JLEY SEAWALL" ATTACHED IS A COPY OF A LIrrK SUBMITTED TO THE GRADING DEPT DESCRIBING THE SUBJECT WALL FOR WHICH WE DESIRE TO OBTAIN A PERMIT TO BUILD AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO PRCYTECT THE PROPERTY BEFORE THE WINTER STORMS COME. WE UNDERSTAND THAT SOME OF THE SUBMITTALS WE LISTED SHOULD BE SUBMITTED To THE BUILDING DEPT: TWO SOILS REPORTS TWO ENGINEER'S DESIGN CALCULATIONS TWO BLUELINE PRINTS WE NOW SUBMIT THE ABOVE DIRECTLY To YOU ALONG WITH THE PLAN CHECK FEE OF $70. AN IM- PORTANT FACT THAT WAS MENTIONED TO JIM MURRAY IS THAT WE ARE AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS ONLY To ABOUT OCTOBER 5th AND THAT OUR PERMANENT ADDRESS IS AT 6520 E. EXETER BLVD., SaYrPSDALE, AZ 85251 TEL (602)946-4558. OUR BROTHER, KEITH HARTLEY, HOWEVER, WILL BE AT THE CARLSBAD ADDRESS AND CAN TAKE MESSAGES FOR US (TEL 729-6544). IT IS IMPORTANT TO CONTACT DIRECTLY IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO REACH OUR BROTHER OR PERTINENT ENGINEERS;SO CALL US COLLECT IN ARIZONA IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE DELAYS. HOPEFULLY, MOST OF THE IN- FORMATION YOU NEED CAN BE PROVIDED AND THE PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED BEFORE WE LEAVE THE STATE. IF AT ANY TIME YOU WISH TO CALL THE ENGINEERS AND DON 'T GET TEEN IMMEDIATELY, PLEASE CALL X7 . 0 EXPEDITE MATTERS BECAUSE I FOUND LIJRING TEE DEVELOPMENT OF TEE PLANS THEY WY FROM THE PHONES MUCH OF THE TIME. VERY TRULY YOURS, 9.. SEPTEMBER 14, 1988 DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 AT1'N:JIM MURRAY HELEN AND CHARLES BARTIEI 2489 OCEAN ST., CRLSBAD, CA 92008 SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENT OF RETAINING WALL ON BEACH PROPERTY -"BARI!LE! SPAWALL" DURING THE JANUARY 1988 STORMSo, THE SEASIDE BANK OF OUR PROPERTY WAS SEVERELY ERODED, AND IT IS URGENT 10 PROTECT IT FROM FUIVRE DAMAGE. SHORTLY AFTER THE STORMS, WE ATENFI'ED ¶10 PROCESS A DESIGN WE HAD COMPLETED IN 1983, BUT IT WASN'T ACCEPTABLE BY YOUR OFFICE DUE TO TECHNICALITIES SUCH AS NON-STANDARD DRAFTING PAPER SIZE. WE ODNTACTED THE GFfiLOGIST/C[VIL ENGINEER WHO DID THE ORIGINAL WORK TO UPGRADE TO CARLSBAD 'S PRESENT STANDARDS, BUT, UNFORTUNATELY, HE SAID HE WAS NO LONGER IN THE BUSINESS. BEING UNABLE TO LOCATE A COMBINATION STRUC1JRAL/GEXYTEO1NICAL RcE,, WE HIRED SUITABLE SEPARATE TALENTS EARLY IN THE SUMMER, BUT THEIR OTHER COMMITTMENTS DURING THE JANUARY STORM, OUR ROCK/CENENT BEACH WAIL WAS NOT DAMAGED, BUT IT WAS NOT HIGH ENOUGH 10 PREVENT APPROXIMATELY SEVEN ir OF ICEPLANT COVERED BANK BEHIND THE WALL 10 BE WASHED AWAY. WE UNDERSTAND THAT CUR THREE ir HIGH BY 'IWO FEET THICK WAIL WAS CONSTRUCTED ON BEDROCK SANDSTONE ABCXYI' FIFTY YEARS AOO, AND UNTIL THE JANUARY 510PM IT HAD ALWAYS BEEN COMPLETELY WVixw WITH SAND DURING OUR OCCUPANCY SINCE 1967. THE WALL STILL IS WELL BONDED TOGETHER WITH AB(XII' TWO ir BEING EXPOSED. OUR NEIGHBOR (N THE SOUTH ORIGINALLY BUILT THIS WAIL AND ALSO BUILT A SIMILAR O11NECTING ONE FOR HIS PROPERTY, EXCEPT THAT HIS WAIL IS FIVE I?r HIGH AND IS NOT IN LINE BUT ABOUT SEVEN FEET CLOSER 70 THE OCEAN. THE DAMAGE 10 THE BANK BEHIND HIS WAIL WAS NOT SUBSTANTIAL. THE NEIGHBORS 10 HIS SOUTH WERE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED BY A STONE REVgTHENI' TEN ir HIGHER THAN OUR WALL AND EXTENDING ABOUT THIRTY j?r CLOSER '10 THE OCEAN. OUR TWO NEIGHBORS DIRECTLY 10 THE NORTH ALSO HAVE WAILS ODNSTRUCTED SIMILAR '10 OURS AND OF ABOUT THE SAME AGE, BUT THOSE WAILS ARE ABCXYP SEVEN imr HIGHER, AND THEIR BANKS SUFFERED NO DAMAGE. OUR THIRD NEIGHBOR TO THE NORTH HAS A (XNCRETE WAIL TEN FEET HIGHER THAN OURS AND IT HAS EXTENSIVE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING A SWIMMING POOL BEHIND IT. THAT PROPERTY SUFFERED NO DAMAGE. WE PROPOSE TO (INSTRUCT A OONCRE7FE WAIL INTRRAL WITH OUR PRESENT WAIL,I0 THE HEIGHT OF OUR NEIGHBORING WALLS TO THE NORTH AND '10 REPLACE THE BANK WHICH WAS WASHED AWAY BEHIND IT. THE PLANS HAVE BEEN CERTIFIED BY LICENSED GEXYI'ECHNICAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERS AND ARE SUBMITTED HEREWITH WITH WHAT WE SUPPOSE 10 BE THE NECESSARY FORMS, BLUEPRINTS, AND PERMIT FEES • WE (INSIDER IT URGENT TO OBTAIN PROITION FROM THE POTENTIAL FORTHCC}IING WINTER STORMS; SO WOULD APPRECIATE YOUR PROMPT ATTENTION TO PROCESS THE PERMIT. WE UNDERSTAND THAT THE PERMIT IS NECESSARY FROM YOU WE PROCEED TO OBTAIN AN ADDITIONAL PERMIT FROM THE COASTAL COMMISSION. VERY TRULY YOURS, SUBMITTALS: (1) GRADING PERMIT FORM. (2 )THREE BLUELINE PRINTS (3) TWO COPIES OF SOILS REPORT (4) TWO 'COPIES OF DESIGN CALCULATIONS (5) TWO COPIES OF ESTIMATED GRADING QUANTITIES (6) CERTIFI(TIONS OF SOILS ENGINEER, DESIGN ENGINEER, AND ONNER (7) COMPIMM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (REF. $175 RECEIPT #81787, DATED 3-10- 88)-(8) $25 GRADING PLAN CHECK FEE ( UNDER 100 cu. yds. . )- (9) PLAN CHECK (BASED ON A 10' NICE BY 75' LONG WAIL). . HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS September 23, 1988 Project No. 249.1 C.E. Bartley 2489 Ocean Street Carlsbad, California 92008 SUBJECT: SEAWALL PLAN REVIEW 2489 Ocean Street Carlsbad, California REFERENCE: Shore Protection Design Recommendations, 2489 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, California, dated August 1, 1988, by Hetherington Engineering, Inc. Dear Mr. Bartley: In accordance with your request we have reviewed the plans dated September 1, 1988, for a proposed seawall to be constructed at the subject site. Based on Our review, the plans appear to have been prepared in accordance with the pertinent geotechnical recommendations included in the referenced report. If you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours, HETHERINGTO GI EERING, INC. %OESSIO !!!m 30488 No. 397 7 rn 5245 AVENIDA ENCINAS • SUITE G 9 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 • (619) 931-1917 ,BA RTLEY YE A k/L.L S pit. RJERV&'r SHORE PROTECTION DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 2489 Ocean Street Carlsbad, California HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS August 1, 1988 Project No. 249.1 C.E. Bartley 2489 Ocean Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: SHORE PROTECTION DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 2489 Ocean Street Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Bartley: In accordance with your request, we are providing preliminary design recommendations for shore protection to be constructed at the toe of slope at the rear of the subject property. The shore protection will consist of either a seawall or a stone revetment. The purpose of the shore protection is to protect the existing slope against erosion by wave action. Our work has consisted of review of pertinent coastal design criteria and geotechnical maps and reports for the site and vicinity (see References), subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis and the preparation of this report. We were provided with a Topographic Map, undated, prepared by Sidney Hale, which served as the base map for our Plot plan, Figure 1. Elevations used in our analysis were extrapolated from the Topographic Map using a hand level and should be confirmed by a future topographic survey. SITE DESCRIPTION The site consists of one, residential, rectangularly shaped lot (75 feet x 135 feet) . Site improvements include an attached, wood- frame, living area and garage structure. Site topography at the rear of the lot descends to the beach to the southwest at a slope ratio of approximately 4:1 (horizontal to vertical) . The lower portion of the slope has been eroded by wave action to near vertical. Slope vegetation consists generally of ice plant. An approximately 3 feet high stone seawall was reportedly constructed along the rear property boundary about 35 years ago. An approximately 10 feet high stone seawall has been constructed along the rear boundary of the property to the north and an approximately 5 feet high wall to the south.. The approximate layout of the site is shown on the attached Plot plan, Figure 1. 5245 AVENIDA ENCINAS • SUITE G • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 9 (619) 931-1917 SHORE PROTECTION DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Project No. 249.1 August 1, 1988 Page 2 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS Geotechnical conditions were determined by review of Reference 3, excavation of two test pits at the toe of slope and geologic mapping of the slope. The approximate locations of the test pits are shown on the plot plan, Figure 1. The geotechnical conditions at the site are shown on Cross Section A-A', Figure 2. The Test Pit Logs are included on Figure 3. LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory testing was performed on samples obtained from the test pits. Laboratory testing consisted of the following: Dry Density and Moisture Content (ASTM: D 1188 and ASTM: D 2216) 0 Direct Shear (ASTM: D 3080) Material Finer than the No. 200 Sieve (ASTM: D 1140) Results of the dry density and moisture content determinations are shown on the Test Pit Logs, Figure 3. The remaining laboratory test results are shown on Figure 4. COASTAL DESIGN CRITERIA The following coastal design criteria for the subject site are based on 1983 storm data for the San Diego coastal area (References 2, 4, and 5) and calculations have been performed in accordance with the Shore Protection Manual (Reference 1) Still Water Elevation - San Diego Harbor = +8.3 ft. MSL Scour Elevation - bedrock contact = +2.0 ft. MSL Design Wave Period = 22 sec. Elevation of Breaking Wave = +11.5 ft. MSL Run-up Elevation = +16.0 ft. MSL HETHERINGTO! ENGINEERING INC. SHORE PROTECTION DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Project No. 249.1 August 1,, 1988 Page '3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General The construction of a seawall or stone revetment at the toe of slope to provide protection against slope erosion from wave action is feasible. Design and construction should take into account the appropriate geotechnical and coastal features of the site. Seawall A seawall may consist of a cantilever, vertical, retaining wall founded in the underlying bedrock. The wall should extend to a crest elevation of +16 feet MSL with some overtopping expected. The wall should be constructed in line with the walls to the north and south. Some flanking should be anticipated if the adjacent walls do not extend to elevation +16 feet MSL. Foundations bearing at a minimum depth of 3 feet into bedrock may be designed for a dead plus live load bearing value of 4000 pounds per square foot. This value may be increased by one- third for loads due to seismic forces. A lateral bearing value of 400 pounds per square foot per foot of depth into bedrock and a coefficient of friction between bedrock and concrete of 0.4 may be assumed. These values assume that foundations will be poured neat against bedrock. Footing excavations should be inspected by the Geotechnical Engineer to insure that they are founded as recommended. Seawalls should be designed to resist lateral soil pressures applied above the bedrock contact (approximate elevation +5 feet MSL) of 80 pounds per cubic foot, equivalent fluid pressure. Walls should also be designed to resist wave forces. A gravel drain wrapped in filter cloth is recommended directly behind the face of the wall with weep holes constructed through the wall face. This is to reduce the hydrostatic pressure directly behind the wall. Wall backfill should consist of clean sand or gravel compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (ASTM: D 1557) Wall backfill should be properly benched into bedrock/terrace deposits. Wall backfill should be tested and inspected by the - -. Geotechnical Engineer. Type V cement should be used for concrete in a marine environment. HETHEPINCTON ENGINEERING INC. SHORE PROTECTION DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Project No. 249.1 August 1, 1988 Page 4 Stone Revetment A -stone revetment should. be constructed in line with the adjacent seawalls to the north and south. Prior to construction of a stone revetment, existing vegetation and miscellaneous debris should be removed and the existing slope should be regraded to a 1-1/2:1 (horizontal to vertical) slope by either placing fill at the toe or by cutting back. Any fill placed should be properly keyed and benched into bedrock/terrace deposits and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. To prevent scour, the base of the revetmént should be founded in bedrock requiring excavation of a 3 feet deep key at the toe of slope which should be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to the placement of rock. The stone revetment should extend to a crest elevation of +16 feet MSL with some overtopping expected. Some flanking should be anticipated if the adjacent walls do not extend to elevation +16 feet MSL. Remaining recommendations are shown on the attached Shore Protection Stone Revetment (Typical Detail) , Figure 5. Construction of the revetment should be periodically observed by the Geotechnica]. Engineer. Review of plans Plans for the seawall or stone revetment should be reviewed by the Geotechnical Engineer to confirm conformance with the recommendations included in this report and to provide modification as necessary. If you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours HETHERINGTON ,il1XN1 ERING, INC. 'MAI,O. HE,RINGTON Civi'L inedr 30488 Geotec n cal Engineer 397 (bat expire 3/31/92) MDH/ss -' Attachments cc: 3-Addressee H far No. 397 1xp. Dalc.........._ ) % rr c HETHERINGTON ENGINE INC.- REFERENCES Shore Protection Manual, U.S. Army Coastal Engineering Research Center, 1975. Coastal Storm Damage, Winter 1983, A Task Force Report, prepared by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District and the.State of California, April 1984. Retaining Wall Design, 2489 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, California, by Claude B. Parker, May 5, 1983. Preliminary Engineering Study, Beach and River Protective Devices, Del Mar, California, by R.M. Noble & Associates, July 22, 1983.. Coastal Engineering, 1984 Proceeding, Chapter one hundred eighty-nine, Coastal Design Criteria in Southern California, by Walker, Nathan, Seymour and Strange Construction and Geotechnical Methods in Foundation Engineering, by Robert M. Koerner, 1984. . Coastal Flood Plain Development, Orange County Coastline, prepared by Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers, January 1985. HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING . OCEAN STREET EXISTING I EXISTING RESIDENCE RESIDENCE TOP OF ERODED BANK EXISTING SEAWALL :iuuluiIisIIus 16' HIG .T.W. ELEV. 91* I...II.IIIu TP-1 LEGEND APPROXIMATE LOCATION TP-2 OF TEST PIT A At CROSS SECTION A If SCALE: 1"= 20' PLOT PLAN KETKERUGTOI LIG IERIiG BARTLEY RESIDENCE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT NO. 249.1 FIGURE NO. 1 A' .55E 40 EXISTING STRUCTURE 30 ERODED AREA OF BAN 20 SLOPEWASH BEDROCK MEAN SEA LEVEL 0 -10 CROSS SECTION A - A' HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING BARTLEY RESIDENCE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT NO. 249.1 IFIGURE NO. 2 BACKHOE COMPANY: Earthworks BUCKET SIZE: Hand-excavated DATE: 7/5/88 >. Ui .. Ix z c6 I° TEST PIT NO. i. ELEVATION +6 NSL ZW0ZQ " !z - Ui.- a a 0 SOIL DESCRIPTION BEACH SAND: Black and gray silty sand, wet, loose - SIl becomes cobbly @ 1½' water @ 2' BEDROCK: Brown-gray silty sandstone, moist, dense, slightly cemented 15 Total Depth 2½' 110 TEST PIT NO. 2 ELEVATION +9 MSL 0 SLOPEWASH: Brown sand, et, loose becomes cobbly @ 1½' bottom of existing wall @ 3' Brown-red cobbly sand, wet, loose - BEDROCK: Gray silty sandstone, moist, very dense, cemented Total Depth 4½' LOG OF TESTPITS KETKERI I'M TOI Ba:ri].ey Residence GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT No. 249.1 FIGURE NO. 3 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS DIRECT SHEAR (ASTM: D 3080) Sample Angle of Internal Cohesion Location Friction ( ) (psf) TP-2 @ 4' 26 700 MATERIAL FINER THAN THE NO. 200 SIEVE (ASTM: D 1140) Sample Passing No. 40 Passing.No. 200 Location Sieve (%) Sieve () TP-2 @ 4' 65.9 13.5 Project No. 249.1 Figure No. 4 APPROXIMATE JGRADE L30 a A.-20 20- E FILTER FABRIC DEPOSITS 1~7 10- TERRC O l -10 12" TO 16" 5 - 20 # STONE 0 I 1 I I fO 10 20 30 40 50 60 NOTES: ELEVATION OF BEDROCK CONTACT WILL VARY WITHIN SITE FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PHILLIPS SUPAC 12NP OR EQUIVALENT SHORE PROTECTION STONE REVETMENT (TYPICAL DETAIL) KETHERINGTON Wt;iRPEG BARTLEY RECIDE.NCE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT NO. 249.1 FIGURE NO. 6