The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2501 EL CAMINO REAL; ; PCR14092; PermitCity of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad; CA 92008 09-03-,2014 Plan Check Revision Permit No:PCR14092 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Reference #: PC#: Project Title: Applicant: Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 2501 EL CAMINO REAL CBAD PCR Lot#: 0 1563020800 $0.00 CB132181 Construction Type: 5B WESTFIELD REVISlbNS TO SHELL Owner: ,· CMF PCR LL C Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: · Inspect Area: ISSUED 05/21/2014 JMA 09/03/2014 09/03/2014 GREGG STOUDER STE 180 39300 W 12 MILE RD FARMINGTON HILLS Ml 48331-2989 248-539-6235 C/O WESTFIELD PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 130940 DEPT WFLD CARLSBAD, CA 92013 Plan Check Revision Fee Fire Expedited Plan Review Additional Fees $435.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Fees: $435.00 Total Payments To Date: $435.00 Balance Due: Inspector: -----,..---- FINAL APPROVAL Date: ---------Clearance: $0.00 NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them,·you must follow the protest procedures sei-torth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protes! and any other required information with the City Manager for· processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal·Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the. specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning,.zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which vou have oreviouslv been niven a NOTICE similar to this or as to which the statute of limitations has nreviouslv otherwise exoired. & ~ CITY OF -CARLSBAD PLAN CH-ECK -REVISION APPLICATION B-15 Development Services Building Division 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2719 www.carlsbadca.gov · Plan Check Revision No. -V-C=-=--f2.___._l t.{----\-'-_-__,Qq~_,,z__:c...___Original Plan Check No. _c..._f-;:>_l ?_2_l _bo_\ __ ProjectAddress :2..C30l a. GA.\Y\ll\lO \2-~L--Date~1Effi....,,.v/4_.:2.._\_/J~\~-H--- Contac~V:c,c;, S:rrup~ Ph Z Lt:f> .. "584 ..-VJ 23S Fax ______ _ t¼.V2-WJJ(\1a-()}J Eman 0stou4er' (j J f '('~•GO W1 ContactAddress z,tq'2>co W,Twa.uF-\'/\LU::\ ii" tto City r\\ 6LS Zip General Scope of Work t'"1.0bl~CA7IOK) 10 WO~L. lN PlAGf? Original plans prepared by an architect or engineer, revisions must be signed & stamped by that person. 1. Elements revised: ~ Plans D Calculations D Soils D Energy D Other __________ _ 2. 3. 4. Describe revisions in detail List page(s) where List revised sheets each revision is that replace shown existinq sheets --, ~OVA.L Or es:.e V \=..ZAl-S\Yl~-(. L.';;, .. .3 \...S--'> ~\0.-, A.\ C .1 ~\ti.a Dfos..Mf>\::y.2._S-. \~ P\J c-rs M'b.O L M3,o/ C.0~ tJ 'E:..GTI t\ M \-OUJ~ -_ L~VEL- Tn -~ N. ,. . 5. Does this revision, in any way, alter the exterior of the project? 0 Yes ~No 6. Does this revision add ANY new floor area(s)? D Yes ~ No 7 ~ Does this revision affect any fire related issues? ~ Yes D No 8. ------·"'"' ___ s '¢' No 163 Ph: 760-602-2719 Fax: 760-602-8558 Email: building@carlsbadca.gov www.carlsbadca.gov ~ DATE: ~' 2014 EsGil Corporation In <Partnersnip witn qovernment for <BuiCaing Safety D APPLICANT D JURIS. JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD D PLAN REVIEWER . D FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 13-2181 (RE~. #2) -NEW PCR #14-092 _ SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2501 EL CAMINO REAL PROJECT NAME: 3 STORY MALL ADD & REMODEL) ~ The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. PLEASE SEE BELOW D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Michael Sheller 2049 Century Park East 41 st floor, Century City, CA 90067 D EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Mike Telephone#: 310-575-5909 Date contacted: (by: ) Email: msheller@westfield.com Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person ~ REMARKS: Elimination of SFD dampers at bottom of first level shafts that are installed dedicated and complete through the roof. *[ By: Eric Jensen EsGil Corporation D GA D EJ D PC Enclosures: 1/23 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 [DO NOT PAY -THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD #2) -NEW PCR # 14-092 PLAN CHECK NO.: 13-2181 (REV. PREPARED BY: Eric Jensen ~ DATE: ¢'2, 2014 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2501 EL CAMINO REAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY: M/ A2/B TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: 11-B/SPR. BUILDING PORTION light gage metal framing plans & calc's. deferred package Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code CB Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance ·Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: D Repetitive Fee 3 Repeats * Based on hourly rate Comments: D AREA Valuation Reg. VALUE ($) ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Mod. By Ordinance ~, $435.001 Complete Review o Structural Only o Other 0 Hourly . ~----2"""11 Hrs. @ * EsGil Fee _ $116.00 $348.001 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc + · .. • I «~ ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DIVISION BUILDING PLAN CHECK APP.ROYAL p ... 29 Development Services : ·:.: .: .. Planning Division . ;. .; 1635 Faraday Avenue . :; .. , (760) 602-4610 .: . ~: www.carlsbadca.r;iov .. ·': : t. ' J Li..------------------------------------- DATE: 05/22/2014 PROJECT NAME: 24 Hour Fitness PROJECT Ii>: EIR 09--02/SDP 09-04 PLAN CHECK NO: PCR14092 SET#: 1 ADDRESS: 2S01 El Camino Real APN: 156-302-08 :~ This plan check review is complete and has been APPR~VED by the Planning Division. By: Jason Goff tf'.h-- A Final Inspection by the Planning Division is required O Yes 18] No :.'. . l. . : ::~ : ... ~-~ . . . , · .. _ .. . •, .. ~~ ........... { .... :.1.- You may also Have cortectlon~ from one or more of the divisions listed below. Approvar-.. 'l: from these divisions may be required prior to the Issuance of a building permit. · : .. n . T Resubmitted plans should include cQrrections from all divisions. .,. ,\ · :.[ :' ::! ... ; .:1 .r D This plan check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed o"n'··:l? the attached checkrist. Please resubmit. amended plans as required. .. .. ,~.:~] '. . . Plan Check APPROVAL has been sent to: : ' For questions or clarlflcatlons on the attached checklist please contact the following reviewer as marked: ,l~~-t';', · D Chris Sexton 76o-602-4624 Cnrls.Sexton@carlsbadca.gov D Kathleen Lawrence D Greg Ryan 76o-602-27 41 760-602-4663 Kathleen.Lawrence@carlsbadca.goy Gregory.Ryan~carlsbadca.gov _, D Gina Ruiz D Linda Ontiveros D Cindy Wong 760-602-4675 760-602-2773 76o-602-4662 . Glr1a.Rulz@carlsbadca,gQ,x Llrida.Ohtlveros@carlsbadca.gov Cynthia.Wong@oarJsbadca.gov 1-----------------t-----------~~---+------------------l. 1:~· " ~ Jason Goff ~- 1so-602-4s4a (/\V' D D · : Jason.goff@carlsbadca.gov Dominic Fieri i' i;, -~ . t)· 760-602-4664 .-\): i Jt Dominlc.Flerl@carlsbadca.gov . ·. ·:·:,w ,; 1 --~---------~----.-~---------------~-----',. : l Remarks: None ; . & PLAN CHECK REVIEW ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD TRANSMITTAL~ . .. ~ Community & Economic Development Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 www.carlsbadca.gov DATE: 06/04/14 PROJECT NAME: robmay shell -solatube duct PLAN CHECK NO: pcr14092 SET#: II ADDRESS: APN: ""'· A g~ ~~JECTID: C oA>J> cg] This plan check review is complete and has been APPROVED by the fire Division. By: cwong A Final Inspection by the Division is required !ZI Yes D No D This plan ·check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended plans as required. Plan Check Comments have been sent to: You may also have corrections from one or more of the divisions listed below. Approval from these divisions may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Resubmitted plans should include corrections from all divisions. For questions or clarifications on the attached checklist please contact the following reviewer as marked: .. .. ~ -. " .· PLANNtNCa' ENGINEERING FIRE PREVENTION · . 78CMIOI 48SO 760-60~-~750 · . . ?60;60~-466_5 · . ' ' .. . -. . ~ '. -'" . --.. D Chris Sexton D Kathleen Lawrence D Greg Ryan 760-602-4624 760-602-2741 760-602-4663 Chris.Sexton@carlsbadca.gov Kathleen.Lawrence@carlsbadca.gov Gregory.Ryan@carlsbadca.gov D Gina Ruiz D Linda Ontiveros [Z] Cindy Wong 760-602-4675 760-602-2773 760-602-4662 Gina.Ruiz@cartsbad~a.gQv Linda.Ontiveros@carlsbadca.gov Cynthia.Wong@carlsbadca.gov D D D Dominic Fieri 760-602-4664 Dominic.Fieri@carlsbadca.gov Remarks: ** APPROVED: TIDS PROJECT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR THE PURPOSES OF ISSUEANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. Page 1 of2 TIDS APPROVAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTIONS, ANY REQUIRED TESTS, FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTATIONS, CONDITIONS IN CORRESPONDENCE AND COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS. THIS APPROVAL SHALL NOT BE HELD TO PERMIT OR APPROVE ANY VIOLATION OF THE LAW. Page2 of2 \ Carlsbad Fire Department Plan Review Requirements Category: PCR , Date of Report: 06-04-2014 Name: Address: Permit#: PCR14092 GREGG STOUDER STE 180 39300 W 12 MILE RD FARMINGTON HILLS MI 48331-2989 Job Name: WESTFIELD REVISIONS TO SHELL Job Address: 2501 EL CAMINO REAL CBAD INCO Conditions: Cond: CON0007335 [MET] ** APPROVED: / THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR THE PURPOSES OF ISSUEANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. THIS APPROVAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTIONS, ANY REQUIRED TESTS, FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTATIONS, CONDITIONS IN CORRESPONDENCE AND COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS. THIS APPROVAL SHALL NOT BE HELD TO PERMIT OR APPROVE ANY VIOLATION OF THE LAW. Entry: 06/04/2014 By: cwong Action: AP May 19, 2014 Mr. Gregg Stouder JPRA Architects 39300 West 12 Mile Road, Suite 180 Farmington Hills, Ml 48331 RECEIVED MAY 21 2014 CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DIVISION RE: WESTFIELD CARLSBAD PHASE I: FITNESS TENANT SHAFT PROTECTION CLARIFICATION CCI PROJECT NO. 120544.00.000 Dear Mr. Stouder: CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. 2043 Woodland Pkwy Suite 300 St. Louis, Missouri 63146-4235 314-991-2633 phone 314-991-4614 fax The Fire Protection and Life Safety Experts • Code Consultation • Fire and Egress Modeling • Accessibility Consultation • Fire Alarm Design • Fire Sprinkler Design The purpose of this letter is to clarify the anticipated protection of a shaft serving the new Fitness Tenant at Westfield Carlsbad Mall located in Carlsbad, California. A shaft enclosure will serve the new Fitness Tenant at Level 1 and will extend from the Level 2 floor slab and terminate at the roof. The shaft will not extend below the Level 2 floor slab. This shaft serves only the Fitness Tenant and will be enclosed in 2-hour fire resistance rated construction; except as described below. The shaft will not be protected at the bottom, as permitted by California Building Code (CBC) Section 708.11, Exception 3. This exception permits protection to be eliminated provided there are no combustibles in the shaft and there are no openings or other penetrations through the shaft enclosure to the building. As a matter of clarification, this shaft will c,ontain a duct used for the movement of air (no combustibles) and the only opening will be at the bottom where serving the Fitness Tenant. This Code section has been included iri the Appendix for reference. The IBC Commentary explains that the area and volume of the shaft can be considered part of the story in which the bottom of the shaft terminates. The conditions of the exception are based on the fact that the shaft contents will not contribute to the fuel load and that the shaft serves and connects only one story - the story in which it terminates. As a matter of clarification, fire dampers are not required at the Level 2 floor line since CBC Section 708.11, Exception 3 permits the bottom of the shaft to be unprotected. We hope this provides you with the necessary information at this time. If you have any questions or desire any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us at your convenience. Sincerely, ~.· Erin Crowley Project Consultant cc: John Rock, JPRA /clb /1205/120544/00/Letters/120544.00.000 Carlsbad Phase I Shaft Protection Letter 2014-05-19.docx ST. LOUIS • NEW YORK Perl \L.l-&/Z. C8(3-2J0I • Appendix The Fire Protection and Life Safety Experts CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. • . Fl~E ~NQ SMOKE PROTECTION FEATURES 703,.? Joints. Joints ina shaft eticlosw:e sbaU comply with Sec'-be 1;1sed for any other purpose and shall be enclosed in tion 714. accordance with Section 708.4. Openings into the shaft, including those from access rooms and termination 708,10 Dqcts and ~ transfer openings. Penetrations of a. roolUS, shall be protected in accordance with this section sb.aftenclosure by ducts and·airtransferopenings shall comply and Section 715. Openings into chutes shall not be with Section 716. located in corrid'Ors. Doors shall be self-or auto- . 708~11 Enclosure at the bottom. Shafts that do not extend to matic-closing upon the actuation of a smoke detector in the bottomof the building or structure.shall comply witll one of accordance w1th Section 715 .4.8.3, except that heat-acti- the following: vated closing devices shall be permitted between the shaft and the termination room. 1. They shall be enclosed at theiowestlevel with construc- tion of thesamefire-re~istance rating as the lowestfloor 708.13,2 Materials; A shaft enclosure. containing a refuse through. which the $haft p!\&ses, but.not.less than the rat-or 1aundry chute shall be construc.tecl of materials as permit- ingrequired for the shaft enclosure. ted by the building type of construction. 2. They shalltenninate'in a room having a use.related to the 708.13.3 Refuse ~d laundry chute access rooms. Access purpose of the shaft. The. room shicill be i;eplll."ated from openings for refuse and laundry chutes shall be located in t:heretnainfierofthebuildingbyfirel;,arrierscoµstruc;ted rooms or compl;rl:ments enclosed by not less than I-hour m accordance with Section 707 or horizontal assemblies fire barriers constructed in accordance with Section 707 or constructed in accordance with Section 712, or both. The horizontal assemblies constructed in accordance with Sec- .fire-resistance rating and opening protectives. sMll be at tion 712, or both. Openings into the access rooms shall be least equal to the protection required fo! tbe:shaft enclo-protected by opening protectives having a fire protection sQre. rating of not less than% hour. Doors shall be self-or auto- 3. They shall be protected by approved fire dampers matic-closing qpon the detection of smoke in accordance ir!stalled in accord~ce with theu-Usting at tlle lowest with Section 715.4.8.3 . . floor level withintbe s}J.aft enclosure. 708~13.4 T~rtnination room. Refuse and laundry chutes Exceptions: shall discharge iJito an enc:losed room separated from the remainder of ~he building by 1;1ot less than I-hour.fire barri- 1, Tile fire-resis~ance-rated room separation is not ers constructed in accordance with Section 707 or horizon- required, provided there are no openings in or pene-tal assemblies constructed in accordance with Section 712, tratio.p.s of the shaft enclosure: to the interior of the or both. Openings into the termination room shall be pro- building except at the bottofn. The bottomof the,shaft tected by opening protectives having afire protection rat- shall be closed off at(;mnd the penetrating items with ing of not less than J/4 hour. Doors shall be self-or materials permitted by Section 717 ·3 · 1 for automatic-closing upon the detection of smoke in accor- draftstopping, or the room shall be provided witb an dance with Section 715.4.8.3. Refuse chutes shall not ter- approv,ed automatic flre suppression system. minate in an incinerator room. Refuse and laundry rooms 2. Ashaftenclosurecontainingarefusechuteorlaundry that are Mt provided with chutes need only comply with chute.shallnot be used for any,ptherpurpose and shall 'table 508.2.5. terminateinarooin protected in accordance with Sec-708,13~5 Incinerator room. Incinerator rooms shall com-tion 708.13.4. ply with Table 508.2.5. 3. The fire-resistance-rated room separation and the protection at the bottom of the shaft are not required 708.13.6 Automatic sprinkler system. An approved auto- provj.deg there are no co;mbui;tibfos iti t:J,:ie shaft and matic sprinkler system shall be installed in accordance with there are rtq· openings ot'. other penetrations throµgh Section. 9Q32. l l .2. the shaft enclosure to the interior of the building. 708.1,4 Elevatot, duml;,waiter and other hoistways. Elevator, ~7!!!Pftl,11!!1l!flll.!illn~_c•o~s~ur~e~atlfllfl~e~o!!p•. Ps~· IP!le!lnc!'I-!!los!!!lu!l!re!l-!1!'!a!'!'t'!!llo!II-. es~n~o!'!'t_. dqqibwaiter ~d other hoistway enclosures shall be con- extend to the uncJerstde of the-roof sh~thjng, dee~ or i;1ab of the structed in accordance with Section 708 and Chapter 30. building shall be enclosed at the-top with conSb:uction of the 708.14.1 Elevator lobby. An enclosed elevator lobby shall samejire-resistan,ce rating as the topmostfloor penetrated by be provided at each floor where an elevator shaft enclosure the shaft, but not less than.thefire-resistance rating required for c9nnects more than two stories in Group A, E, H, I, L, R-1, the shaft enclosure. R-2 andR.,2.i occupancies, high-rise buildings, and other 708.13 Refuse and laundry chutes. Refuse and laundry applications listed in Section 1.11 reg1,tlated by the Office of chutes, access anci termination rooms, and incinerator rooms the State Fire Marshal, and more than three stories for all shall meet the requirements of Sections 708.13.1 through other occup~ncies. The lobby enclosure shall separate the 708.13,6. · elevator shaft enclosure doors fron;i each floor by fire parti- tions. In adqition to the requirements in Section 709 for fire Exception: Chutes serving and contained within a single partitions, doors protecting openings in the elevator lobby dwelling unit. enclosure walls shall also comply with Section 715.4.3 as 708.13.1 Refuse and Iau11dry chute enclos1n·es .. A shaft required for corridor walls and penetrations of the elevator encfosure Mntairting a refuse or laundry chute shall not lobby eµclosure by ducts and air transfer openings shall be 182 JANllARY 1, 2011 ERRATA 2010 CALIFORNIA BUILP!NG COPE •. , \ :, • Qlosed as in Method 1i theref9re, a room. is permitted at the bottom of the $haft, but the function of the room must be related to the purpose of the shaft. Two com~ rn.on examples of this situatlon are either mechanical rooms, which have vents from the room to the roof or refuse chutes, which terminate at a room at the.bottom , for collection. ExGeptions 1 and 2 to this sectroh relate to this metnod. Method 3 has no illustration. This method is similar to .. Method 1, bu~ allows a fire damper to be provided at the. bottom of the enclosure. Please note that this method predates the requirement for both smoke and fire dampers in ducts penetrating shaft walls (see Sec- tion 716.5.3). There must be compliance with both code sections, therefore, both fire and smoke damp- ers must be provided with this method unless the $make damper is exempted by Section 716.5.3. Exceptic:ms: 1. The fire-resistance-rated room separation is not required, provided there are no openings in or penetrations of the shaft enclosure to tfle inferior of the. building except at the bottom: The bottom of the shaft shall be closed off around the penetrating items with materials p~rmitted by 8ection 717.3.1 for draftstop- pmg, or the room shall be provided with an approved automatic fire suppression-system. 2. A shaft enclosure containing a refuse chute or laundry chute shall not be used for any other purpose. anj.i shall terminate in a room pro- tected in accordance with Section 708.13.4. I .. 3. The . fire-resistance-rated room separation and the protection at the bottom of the shaft APPLIANCE. ---...i FIRE AND SMOKE PROTECTION FEATURES are not required provided there are no com- bustibles in the shaft and there are no open- ings or other penetrations through the shaft enclosure to the interior of the building. Exception 1 is illustrated by both Figures 708.11 (3) and 708.11(4). This is an exception to Method 2 and eliminates the need for the room to be separated. This is rarely used. With this exception, there cannot be any openings or penetrations into the shaft enclo- sures anywhere except at the bottom and top. A gas- fired appliance flue is a good example. Exception 2 is also an exception to Method 2. This exception will allow the refuse and linen chute termi- nation rooms to be enclosed in only 1-hour fire-resis- tance-rated construction, regardless of the fact that the shaft enclosure may have to be 2-hour fire-resis- tance rated and, thus Method 2 would require a 2-hour room separation. This _exc_eption is specific to laundry Exception 3 is illustrated by Figure 708.11(5). This is an exception to the entire section and an exception to all three methods. While the figure illustrates a very small light well in a three-story building, this exception is not limited to three stories and the size of the shaft is not limited. The area and volume of the shaft can be considered as part of the story in which the bottom of the shaft terminates. The conditions of the exception are based on the fact that the shaft contents will not contribute to the fuel load and that the shaft serves and connects to only one story-the story in which it terminates. This is similar to an atrium with no open- ings except in the first story. Unlike an atrium, which is exempted from shaft enclosures, this actually is a shaft with shaft wall construction on all stories except the first. Figµre 708.11 (3) VERTICAL SHAFTS-BOTTOM. ENCLOSURE ROOM METHOD 2-EXCEPTION 1 20Q!f l~TERNATIONAL SUILDINGCODE® COMMENTARY 7-57 FIRE AND SMOKE PROTE¢TiON FEATURES 7-58 1-HOUR SHAFT (NO PENETRATI~ NONRATED ENCLOSURE WALLS . . . . . . Figure 708,11(4) VERTICAL SHAFTS:.._BOTTOM ENCLOSURE WITH SPRINKLERS-METHOD 2-EXCEPTION 1 I , . A SKYLIGHT ~~:::::;?~=:R=~=;.:===;~~=x=~=I 1-HOUR SHAFT-------• (NO PENETRATIONS· OR COMBUSTIBLES IN SHAFT). LIGHT WELL SHAFT -- PARKING LEVEL . . f:.igure 708.11(5) VERTICAL SHAFTS;._BOTTOM ENCLOSURE EXCEPTION 3 2009 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE® COMMENTARY t i i { 1 j ; ' i I I l 9~ JPRA ARCHITECTS planning architecture interiors environmental graphics April 29, 2014 REFERENCE: PROJECT NO: BULLETIN NO. 6 INTENT Westfield Carlsbad RECEIVED MAY 21 2_014 CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DIVISION Phase 1 -May Building Repurpose Carlsbad, CA 1739 This Bulletin has been issued to modify and/or clarify the Contract Documents, including the drawings and specifications. Unless otherwise instructed, the information contained within this Bulletin shall take precedence over the original Contract Documents as well as previous Bulletins and Addenda, and shall be hereinafter a part of the Contract Documents. CONTENTS: Content of Bulletin #6 removes fire/smoke dampers installed under Addendum #7. These dampers were added in ducts that extend from the lower level to the roof, without penetration of the vertical 2 hour fire barriers. Per CBC 708.11, Exception 3, protection of the bottom of the shaft or ducts are not required if this shaft has no penetrations of the shaft to the building and there are no combustibles in the shaft. Both conditions are met. Refer to cited CBC section and associated IBC commentary contained on the drawings. DRAWINGS ISSUED: (All dated 4/10/14) 1. LS-3, A10.07 & M-3.01, all dated 4/22/14. END OF BULLETIN NO. 6 Westfield Carlsbad -Phase 1 -May Building Repurpose Submitted by Gregg R. Stouder, AIA on behalf of William J. Beitz. Principal, JPRA Architects 39300 westTwelve Mile Road, Suite 180 Farmington Hills Ml 48331 0313· 21&1