The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2505 OCEAN ST; ; 84-230; PermitI USE BALL POINT PEN ONLY R. PRESS HARD APPLICANT Tfl FILL IN INFORMATION WIThIN I1AflFfl ARFA ANn flFCLARATlONS O I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to nell-insure. or a certificate 01 Workers' Compensation Insurance, or a certified COPy thereof (Sec 3800. Labor Code) Z POLICY NO - COMPANY 0 Copy is tiled with the city Certified copy is hereby furnished 0 CERTIFICATL OF EXEMPTION FROM WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE (This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars 131001 or less) 39 Ile 0 I lenity that in the performance of the wOrk br which this permit is issued. I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become SubjeCt 10 the Workers' Compensation Laws of California - 4,\. NOTICE TO APPLICANT Ii, alter making this Cell,, ticate 01 Eeemption, you should become subject t') the Workers' Compensation Provisions of the Labor Code, you must forthwith Comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked 0 I hereby affirm that there is a construction l 'ending agency lof the per4ormance of the mo's to, la whiCh this permit is issued (Sec 3097. Civil CoCci Lu Lenders Name L Lender's Address CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION & PERMIT 1200 Elm, Carlsbad, California 92008-1989 (619) 438-5525 .208 ADDRESS AV. ST. RD. NEAREST CROSS ST. DATE OF APPLICATIONI NUMBER __ASSESSOR CONTRACTORS PHONE ZONELOT BUSINESS LICENSE]*1 PERMIT BLQCK 5u80lvl PARCEL NO. CONTRACTOR 7L9/7/9 OWNER'S NAME : a OWNER'S PHONE F~, Pt AN I fl. I RI.00 USE CODE ,441 $' 729 RACTOR'S ADDRESS LICENSE NO. 9f~rz-srT OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS 2a.r' DESIGNER I 11:1-Nsf e 5TANr1ARD PLAN I AIIIIRINGSO FOOTAGE g-'eV4 (0• oCSCflIf'TiON or WOrIK ________ _________ _________ DESIGNER'S ADDRESS DESIGNER'S PHONE ' '6/ I //L JI44 fbi 1 - - — I-/I' I-LHELEV.l I NO occ GP I EDU I STORIES YO NO CENSUS TRACT GP LAND USE PARKING SPACE RES UNITS GRADING PERMIT ISSUED . I REDEVELOPMENT I I TYPE 0CC LOAD I FIRE SPR f J IAREA I ICON5T I - — , 0 0 N 0 I V o NO YD ND Not Valid Unless Machine Certified — QTY. PLUMBING PERMIT. ISSUE If QTY. MECHANICAL PERMIT - ISSUE 5 ,_.... SUMMARY/ACCOUNT NUMBER EACH FIXTURE TRAP INSTALL FURN. DUCTS UP TO 100,000 BTU BUILDING PERMIT 01-00-00-8220 EACH BUILDING SEWER-.". OVER 100.000 BTU - - SIGN PERMIT - - - 01-00-00-8221 EACH WATER HEATER ANDiOR VENT . . BOILER/COMPRESSOR UP TO 3 HP , PLAN CHECK 01-00-00-8806 -- / - EACH GAS SYSTEM I TO 4 OUTLETS , BOILER/COMPRESSOR 3-15 HP TOTAL PLUMBING 01-00-00-8222 - EACH GAS SYSTEM SDRMORE. . ETAL FIREPLACE L__00`_ ELECTRICAL . 01-00-00-8223 EACH INSTAl,., ALTER. REPAIR WATER PIPE - VENT FA , MECHANICAL MOBILEHOME 01-00'OQ'8225 01-00-00-8224 EACHVACUUMBREAKER MECH _HAUST - HOOD/DUCTS WATER SOFTNER IONOFEAFURNACEIHEATER MOBILEHOMEPARKINSP EACH ROOF DRAIN (INSIDE) __________________________________________ ______________ SOLAR 01;OD:0D8226_ - TOTAL MECHANICAL I — - STRONG MOTION --80-92-33'0519 iiiiIIiIIIIiS'j TOTAL PLUMBING FIRE SPRINKLERS 01-00-00-8227 QTY. ELECTRICAL PERMIT- ISSUE . OTY SOLAR-ISSUE PUBLIC _FACILITIES _FEE 32-00-00-89 BRIDGEFEE NEW CONST EA AMP/SW1BKR COLLECTORS SCHOOLFEE - DISTRICT 1 PH 3 PH - - - STORAGE TANKS . Carlsbad 80-92-21-0519 " - ROCK STORAGE ' Encinitas 80-92-22-0519 icUlT PUMP - SanDieguito 80-92-23-0519 - iST_EAlAMP/SW,1%KR PLAN CHECK FEE - ' San Marcos 80-92-24-051 • f R_ MODE L'AiJ _ TMPPOLE2MPS.- -. - -. - 0_'___A9S LIC94SE TAX 0100 i37I TEMP OCCUPANCY (30DAYS) , - . MFF 80.92-57.0519 CREDIT DEPOSIT TOTAL ELECTRICAL TOTAL SOLAR - TOTAL FEES _ = I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED --APPLICATION AND PERMIT' AND DO HEREBY Expiration. Every permit issued bythe Building Official under the provisions ottnis *AN OSHA PERMT ISREQUIRED FOR EXCAVATIONSOVER CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT All. INFORMATION HFRFON lN(l tIDING THE I Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void If the building or work 50" DEEP AND DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION OF I autnorizeo by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of Such DECLARATIONS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT AND t FURTHER CERTIFY AND AGREE IF A PERMIT l I permit, or it the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or RUCTURES OVER STORIES IN HEIGHT ISSUED: TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY. COUNTY AND STATE LAWS GOVERNING BUILDING CON. I_abandonedatanytimeaftertheworkiscommencedforaperiod01180days. STRUCTION. WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE OWNER 0 KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND CONTRACTOF e APP EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY INCONSEOUENCEOF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. PHONE 0 ?'_BY 0 I hereby affirm that I am licensed under /5 provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with '— I Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, and my license is in ac I full force and effect. ,_ Lic No __________________ Class --7- 0 UI—. -. I1he.re.fty affirm that I am exempt from the Centrac-for's License Law for the following reason (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Cede: Any city or county which re-quires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any vtrs,clure, prior to its issuance also requires the ap- plicant for such permit In tile a sipned statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Centtuctsr's License Law (Chapter 9 commencing with Section 7000 of Division 301 the Business and Professions Cods) or that is cx- l.i,pf ftd,ifiti0,lf arid tile busts fIji Illo .11logeu exeinpsnn, Ally violation of Section 7031.5 by an applicant for a permit sub-jects the applicant to a Civil penalty of not more than tine hun- dred dollars ($500). tJ I. as owner of the prspurty, or my employees with wages - as their sole compensation. will do the work, and the stiuc' turn ic not intended or oltored for sole (Gee. 7044, 0uaiei.s and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law dens not apply to an owner of property who builds of inipioves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intend-ed or offered for sale, ill. however, the building or improve- ment is snttt within one year of Completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or im- prove for the purpose 01 sale). - - I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed Contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044. Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law dens not apply to an owner of property who builds or im-proves thereon, and who contracts for each projects with a contractor(s) license pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). As a homeowner lam improving my home, and the follow-ing conditions exist: The work is being performed prior to sale. f - have lined in my home for twelve months prinr to completion of this work. I have not claimed this exemption during the last three years. lam exempt under Soc. .8 & P.C. for this reason TYPE . DATE INSPECTOR BUILDING FOUNDATION REINFORCED STEEL MASONRY GUNITE OR GROUT FLOOR & CEILIJ SUB SHEATHING ROf!):J SHEAR FRAME & EXTERIOR LATH INSULATION I - INTERIOR LATH & DRYWALL PLUMBING SEWER AND BLICO DIPLICO UNDERGROUND 0 WASTE 0 WATER TOP OUT DWASTE DW+TER TUB AND SHOWER PAN GAS TEST WATER HEATER 0 SOLAR WATER ELECTRICAL ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND 0 I4FFER ROUGH ELECTRIC i O ELECTRIC SERVICE 0 TEMPOFARY O BONDING 0 POOL MECHANICAL O DUCT & PLEM., 0 REF. PIPIN3 HEAT - AIR COND. SYSTEMS VENTILATING SYSTEMS l • - I 'I CALL FOR FINAL INSPECTION WHEN ALL APPROPRIATE ITEMS ABOVE HAVE BEEN APPROVED. PLUMBING ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL GAS BUILDING SPECIAL CONDITIONS : FIELD INSPECTION RECORD REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS INSPECTORS NOTES - - INSPECTION CHECKED INSPECTORS APPROVAL DATE -. SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSP - - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE OVER 2000 PSI PRESTRESSED CONCRETE POST TENSIONED CONCRETE FIELD WELDING HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS SPECIAL MASONRY PILES CAISSONS .- 11 4S. r_., SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AN D T E S T I N G , I N C . 6280 RIVEROALE ST. SAN DIEGO. CALIF. 92120 • TELE 2504321 • P.O. BOX 20627 SAN DIEGO, CALIF. 92120 74531 VELIE WAY PALM DESERT , C A L I F . 9 2 2 6 0 • T E L E 3461075 610 ENTERPRISE ST. ESCONDIDO, C A L I F . 9 2 0 2 5 • T E L E 746-4544 June 18, 1984 Bee Cee Remodeling Company SCS&T 15044 3095 State Street Report No. 2 Carlsbad, California 92008 SUBJECT: Footing Excavation Observation, Army Navy Recreation Ha l l A d d i t i o n , Carlsbad Boulevard, Carlsbad, California. Gentlemen: This letter has been prepared to confirm that we have observed t h e a l t e r n a t e 1/3 footing excavation on the west side of the subject project. Our o b s e r - vation indicated that: - a) The soil conditions encountered do not differ from the conditions anticipated in.the preparation of our Soil Investigation Report dated March22, 1984. The footing excavations comply with the recommendations contained in our Soil Investigation Report and all footings will be founded on a suitable bearing strata. All footings will be foundëdon firm natural ground or fill. Ask SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TE S T I N G , 1 N C . SCS&T 15044 June 18, 1984 Page two .d) The recommendations presented in our Soil Investigation Report have been complied with. If you have any questions after reviewing our report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. *This opportunity to be of professional service.is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL .& TESTING, INC. Robert R. Russell, R.C.E. #32142 RRR/DAP/nr cc: (5) Submitted (1) Army & Navy Academy SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING. INC. Co. June 19, 1984 City of Carlsbad Bldg. & Inspection Dept. 1200 Elm Ave. Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 Dear Sirs: The following changes to the construction of the Army-Navy Academy addition at 2505 Ocean St. have been reviewed and approved by me: Holdown connections to the existing foundation can be accomplished by connecting the holdown bolt with "Por-Rok" epoxy, or equal. Bolt should be imbedded 12" into the foundation, and have a mm. of 3/8" coverage around with epoxy. The cantilevered balcony deck at the south end of the addition will have 2x8 joists at 12" O.C. framed back into the bldg. a minimum of 8 feet. These joists will intersect (4) 2x8 joists for support, and will be connected with "Simpson" U25 hangers, or equal. Edmund erstel S.E. 957 P.O. Box 253 San Clemente, Ca. 92672 cc: Bee Cee Remodeling 309 State St. Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 ATTN: Tom Chase v, EE:'IIIJND C FOEF.:STEL 172:31 E. Railroad St.. Citq of I ridustr'9 Auciu.s't. 3, 1084 Cit!l of Carlsbad Bldg and InsPection DePt. 1200 Elm Ave. Carlsbad,. Ca. 92008 Subject.: .Additioñ for Naval School Dear Sir' The following items met with the aPProval of this Office SimPson MST 37 st.raPs in .single shear maq be substituted for HD2 hold downs. Two (2) SirriF'so'ri FIST 48 straPs maq be used in lieu of HDG Hold Downs. The existing. 1" rJ i a9ora 1 'sheathing rria be used in lieu, of the 3/3" P 1 u...'oc'd sheathinS indicated or the Plans. Please le this office know if we maq be of fu,t.her service to ou • regard in this matter. Ver' Tru 1 i Yours Edmund C. Foerste 1 ECF"h' ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 122 (619) SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 60-146S 2 5 8 r C / iz2 Z/5i71'77 ,eE57o /2 ?iu) 7 06) /Z CO'U 7O)7 • c1 7 t1 /S2)G 'afl7'7' 'cJ437rJ- 7 ,ZL7 GCt7O77 " /9n_• ''iz) 7 ,z&?97ui,J4r a /Zk'1P •. C-cVW 41_7 . / ,- (,;,74_ ,nAJ • / /9717 f7VThA2I Aws 0 P7& 2 Co'jP ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR. SUITE 122 SAN DIEGO, CA 92128 (819) 60-1468 2 so - O31ij S7- __7_- j?'-/;7t)- cJ3S77V77i9L(7l t1U2 C El APPLICANT COPY JV CITY COPY 0 PLAN CHECKER COPY Mi 5/4;fJ U ( /2'1O& J6?Z c, ___ -- .5 7D S I,o )L7L / J7I Cc ( -- vQjL'6-''7 CAZIOArl oI ,74c/i94? #97Z& ___ '4 97327 (f:;-z. 33/2'C)). -47.i - c ___ /-x1/dri4 /37n COrm) i ida1#14 '95 A/. (/_0) (g) sm&' / Me'. Z.9-77 7 c.') ___ 'T*D 41.-3 nbAyScpith. ( ___ L11 ? g,:—,;i 'j$ J JJ7) /Mc? (777'•/( 2.4). (ii) (i ji m'ti x-77za41,- — /c'frfl- ___ (/ i4 , ; 73 0j1i4 C.1177 TQS. *s gi947ne, be A-tO) /viz. 40 — ma yaw QCitp of QCarIbab ® . JURISDICTION: DATE 4'a/eI,I PROJECT ADDRESS: /421'1'/!'/7L1r /i'77fr/4f TO: / d. oSS-'/9T .S7 C?72LS&90 C4 PLAN CORRECTION SHEET Plan Check No. - r'.it' plans received by jurisdiction______________ )ate plans received by plan checker ,4/oM S17 Data initial plan check completed /Z by i1 FOREWORD: PLEASE READ Plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the handicapped. The plan check is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The items circled below need clarification, modification or change. All circled items have tc be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (C). 1979 Uniform Building Code. the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. PLANS I. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction. tG:BL6. 227" J? 2. To facilitate rechecking, please identify. next to each circled item, the sheet of ( the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this ( check sheet with the revised plans. ____•________'••_•••%• Date z_41//S4L JurisdictionLTf2d9j2 Prepared byt Bldg. Dept. VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE Esgil PLAN CHECK NO._8V-3O2 BUILDING ADDRESS 5 4 792U APPLICANT/CONTACT 7"Z1 cb.e PHONE NO. 7Z BUILDING OCCUPANCY J?-3 DESIGNER PHONE___________ TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR PHONE___________ BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE Air Conditioning - Commercial 2.80 Residential 2.40 Res. or Comm. Fire Sprinklers 1.50 Total Value Fee Adjusted To Reflect 0 Energy Regulations (F e X 1.1) QHandicapped Regulation Fee x 1.065) Buildin*6 Permit Fee $ Plan Check Fee $ COM tIE NTS: 8/4/82 NAME: LOCATION:______________ PROJECT: State of California, George Deukmejian, Governor California Coastal Commission 2- 3 SAN DIEGO COAST DISTRICT 6154 Mission Gorge Road, Suite 220 San Diego, CA 92120 2 gZ' C (714) 280-6992 DATE: Cl 1523 This is to .certify that this proposed project has been reviewed by the Executive Director and the staff of the San Diego Coast District Office. Under the provisions of Coastal Act Section 30624.7, the proposed development is found to be a de minimus project and. consistent with all applicable Chapter 3 policies. The coastal development permit requirements are hereby waived by the Executive Director and the proposed development may proceed withbut additional Coastal Commission approvals. This waiver will not become effective until reported to the Commission at their - ;.'( .1991 , meeting. Sincerely, Chuck Danin District Manager 4A,tP)IWIttitL cJ / g '1 . I AAJd PLAN CHECK NUMBER9 ADDRESS DATE____________ PLANNING: TYPE OF STRUCTURE Ri sr E i LU LU LLJ LLJ SCHOOL FEES: SAN DIEGUITO___________________ IAlI % COVERAGE BUILDING HE FENCES/WALL TWO CAR GARAGE COMMENTS: ENCINITAS_____________________ SAN MARCOS ImAly 4 184 REQU I R FRON SIDE REAR REDEVELOPMENT APPROVAL REQUIRED:_______________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I-LU cr CD w LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS:__________________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIRED: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: OK TO ISSUE:-'U\ -DATE:('/(a7 OK TO FINAL: DATE:_____________ ***************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ENGINEERING LEGAL DESCRIPTION VERIFIED?____ A.P.N. CHE C K E D ? _ _ _ _ _ P.F.F. PARK IN LIEU R.O.W: IMPROVEMENTS: E.D.U: SEWER: __-J--- LATERAL: X'Sf DRIVEWAY: ui GRADING PERMIT: uj uj uj -cc DRAINAGE: V E EASEMENTS: /tfr7'/ ,f7'i4?t-''?%4' ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: uj Cy OK TO ISSUE: DATE:___________________________ * ENGINEERING INSPIN REQUIRED:_____________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR: FINAL OK: DATE: * IF THIS ITEM IS NOT CHECKED, BUILDING DEPARTMENT WILL M A K E A L L I N S P E C T I O N S (DRIVEWAYS, CURB CUT, DRAINAGE, ETC.) 70- 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008.1989 TELEPHONE (619) 438-5523 ARCHITECT Citp of Car1tiab FIRE DEPARTMENT ADDRESS PAGE 1 OF J_ APPROVED DISAPPROVED PLAN CHECK# 8' '/3O PHONE PLAN CHECK REPORT PROJECT 9,-v,9 AEC &D ADDRESS 2S05 d c°m OWNER _______________________________ ADDRESS PHONE ,OCCUPANCY R3 CONST. __________ TOTAL SQ. FT. iVOf STORIES SPRINKLERED XTENANT IMP. 2 1,O,9ZV APPROVAL OF PLANS IS PREDICATED ON CONFORMING TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND/OR MAKING THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS: PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND PERMITS Provide one copy of: floor plan(s); site plan; sheets Provide two site plans showing the location of all existing fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project. Provide specifications for the following: Permits are required for the installation of all fire protection systems (sprinklers, stand pipes, dry chemical, halon, CO2, alarms, hydrants). Plan must be approved by the fire department prior to installation. The business owner shall complete a building information letter and return it to the fire department. FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT 6. The following fire protection systems are required: O Automatic fire sprinklers (Design Criteria: Dry Chemical, Halon, CO2 (Location: O Stand Pipes (Type: - O Fire Alarm (Type/Location: 7. Fire Extinguisher Requirements: One 2A rated ABC extinguisher for each _________ sq. ft. or portion thereof with a travel distance to the nearest extinguisher not to exceed 75 feet of travel. An extinguisher with a minimum rating of ________ to be located: El Other: Additional fire hydrant(s) shall be provided EXITS Exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. A sign stating, "This door to remain unlocked during business hours" shall be placed above the main exitaiTd 1 - .,.. 11. EXIT signs (6" x 3/4" letters) shall be placed over all required exists and directional signs located as necessary to clearly indicate the location of exit doors. GENERAL Storage, dispensing or use of any flammable or combustible liquids, flammable liquids, flammable gases and hazardous chemicals shall comply with Uniform Fire Code. Building(s) not approved for high piled combustible stock. Storage in closely packed piles shall not exceed 15 feet in height, 12 feet on pallets or in racks and 6 feet for tires, plastics and some flammable liquids. If high stock pil- ing is to be done, comply with Uniform Fire Code, Article 81. 14. Additional Requirements. t'' P'f0' ñW (5. .57,04 5//.4 /3' ' ""' all ,i,v'c ,' 5 7Z OA'4Y' 4 C/4/,9slfJ X 4 7r1/M5 - P6P/C4, _15. Comply with regulations on attached sheej(s. Plan ExamIner - Date Report mailed to architect _______ Met with __________________________________ _____ Attach to Plans EDMUND C. FOERSTEL. Structural Engineer /7. _-.. / SHEET OF 17231 East Railroad St.. . '' 'LC JOB NO LZ C P.O. Box 318 • ____________________________________ '-1 City of 964 CObI CUf.. 9 DATE /24 BY ::.1. : •.1:,.,,;....•_____: ••.. •: - , — -. _v •- --, -4- •__Jt - - __J 4.. :. lorib; '- -0 '-- . • - -.4 ._!V ,_.,_ .... -•- I 1 4? __ I.(. •:d • ... Jh_1 .. - - -, - - - it 44 L3 C - - .L_ - — L • - —v- -: - -. - eo 7 9 /O /U.ø. - t.•4 C 94 t) C4PP ') io ..vc4 1~zr e l c 4A-%r ç /C4-it /s "00 • 2 ,.3 7.0 4r AlY 40 ,c.7 57 ' 41d14, 4 'Y : . . i • . u rJt/.i / Lj' ,c1a" . •.itJZ (00.5 Y,. -:.. F to, Z, - v r d, " 0, 6 0 :- • • . • d•- :• 7 :i1vc.?c. :•'. ,;ivc#o /L'j / /4V ?;c):/ 41! £1J61i4, 7: 60. &"i,eø H-bA t CAAw 1Vt fl,v')4Y+ )ycitr y• •- EDMUND C. FOERSTEL Structural Engineer 17231 East Railroad St. P.O. Box 3138 City of Industry, Calif. 964-0014 - SHEET OF - JOB NO 5"P f/ DATE"4(DBY CAri EDlvND C. FOERSTEL Structural Engineer 17231 East Railroad St. P.O. Box 3138 City of Industry, Calif. 964-0014 SHEET____OF JOB NO c 0 OATE4 BY CfLL i<jucj,/f1... ft _____ . /-&• i.Rr . - . . AL / ' r VC 7,-cr -' y1w Y -ey bzv 3#C •1. '7 fl2 rri ; $ 5 . .. .1 pr/tAJ • .•..•. •... ••. (v ••, 5 -i' LI' CI ' •. /',' dYj .rr . . • L'i.- 1 /' ..•. '- C,- 1) :• .. 70 16 vo JbJDcLyi q a k) J4j) 7i. / . . . • 1 1 t3 (—.doov . ,r'.ocr • jJ4vD J, EDMUND C. FOERSTEL Structural Engineer 17231 East Railroad St. P.O. Box 3138 City of Industry, Calif. 964-0014 I J5 —c& SHEET OF JOB NO c91f 0 DATE BY '' 47iW . . •. .•• ' '7 • 7tcfi'i7t /' . - -. -.----- -I C 1 .12 -. . •' '7 .• 4AfrI— ZO z-.Pa 4•• c, 21L •.• 7O'1O 'I 7 co-, /____,'•P-ro• :..(23C 773sa • >ç ,/P6 )('/t)( z-cT- t&,:CL4C 1rc-' iS ro• • . •.• . zz • :. y•o,cij •,J' Jr r.. EDMUND C. FOERSTEL Structural Engineer 1723 East Railroad St. SHEET oF. P.O. Box 3138 City of Industry, Calif. -. JOB No 964.00 4 (lJ DATE BY / , Ad- ry CA.ai4 1' r 0.3 Q • • • 7.(1 dy _-_t- • • • I ••• @ .15i0r 'IA- '4't j; i S'o Ad 'o r f;•-. •• •. ••• • • • — I - 69 ii .. .i;c__________•_ .- _7 (/ • LS -j • • . • it J.3 v o doL . '.' t-i . '-'zov, jc •j1.r• f,LjZ rLY evc Z_ *rAy.A f /d /tt(!L 4."L rj,ic /0 C. c1, "X'A'711 //d (1 0 .zf EDMUND C.FOERSTEL . . 15tructura1 Engineer . . ,'c 7231 East Railroad St. A4 UC P.-O. Box 3138 City of Industry, Calif. it) ,4c4g 964-00 4 . . . SHEET OF JOB NO DATE/'? BY —7.1- GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ARMY-NAVY ACADEMY RECREATION HALL ADDITION CARLSBAD BOULEVARD CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR: Bee Cee Remodeling Company 3095 State Street Carlsbad, California 92008 PREPARED BY: Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc. Post Office Box 20627 6280 Riverdale Street San Diego, California 92120 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTINO. INC. 6250 RIVERDALE ST. SAN DIEGO, CALIF. 92120 • TELE 2804321 P.O. BOX 20627 SAN DIEGO, CALIF. 92120 74831 V E L I E WAY PALM DESERT, CALIF. 92260 • T E L E 846-1075 6 7 B ENTERPRISE ST. ESCONDIDO, CALIF. 92025 • TELE 746-4544 March 22, 1984 Bee Cee Remodeling Company SCS&T 15044 3095 State Street Report No. 1 Carlsbad, California 92008 SUBJECT: Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Recreation Hall Addition, Army-Navy Academy, Carlsbad Boulevard, Carlsbad, California. Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, we have completed a geotechnical investi- gation for the proposed project. We are presenting herewith our findings and recommendations. The findings of this study indicate that the site is suitable for the proposed development provided the recommendations presented in the at- tached report are complied with. If you have any questions after reviewing the findings and recommendations contained in'the attached report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. ~.us sell,R..E1 #32142 RRR:CRB:JRH:flTW cc: (6) Submitted (1) Army-Navy Academy (IZ? -//,te2xr, tY R.-Hi gh, Vroj'ect(jAologi Curtis R. Burdett, C.E.G. #1090 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I ntroduction and Project Description...... ..... .... ............. .........1 P roject Scope..... .. .... . ........ ....... ... . .... .. .......... .. ..... F indings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 Site Description.... ........ ..................................... ....2 General Geology and Subsurface Conditions..... .. .. . . . ... .. . .. . . . . ....3 Geologic Setting and Soil Description........................... Tectonic Setting.... ..... . ... . . . . .. ... . . .. ......... .... . . ... ...3 Geologic Hazards.....................................................3 Tsunamis........ . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 Groundwater.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 R ecommendations and Conclusions...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Limitations.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Review, Observation and Testing...... . ...... . . . ..... ... . . . .. . . . . . Uniformity of Conditions ......................................... ....6 Change in Scope...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 Time Limitations ........ ..................................... . ..... ..7 Professional Standard ................................................ 7 Client's Responsibility .............................................. 7 Field Explorations ....................................................... 8 Laboratory Testing.... ...................................................8 ATTACHMENTS Plate 1 Plot Plan Plate 2 Unified Soil Classification Chart Plate 3 Trench Logs Plate 4 Direct Shear Results Maximum Density and Optimum Moisture Content APPENDIX Recommended Grading Specifications and Special Provisions 4, S__ C C-r SDUTHERN CALIFDRNIA SDIL AND TESTING, INC. 6280 RIVERDALE ST. SAN DIEGO, CALIF. 92120 • TELE 200-4321 • P.O. BOX 20627 SAN DIEGO, CALIF. 92120 74-331 V E L I E WAY PALM DESERT, CALIF. 92260 TE.LE 346-1073 679 ENTERPRISE ST. ESCONDIDD, CALIF. 92025 T E L E 746-4544 GEOTECHNI CAL INVESTIGATION RECREATION HALL ADDITION ARMY-NAVY ACADEMY CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for a proposed addition to the existing recreation hail located at the Army-Navy Academy in Carlsbad, California. It is our understanding that a second story addition is planned for this site. It is further understood that no grading will be necessary to develop the site. This information was obtained from conversations with the contrac- tor. The site configuration and exploration locations are shown on Plate Number 1 of this report. PROJECT SCOPE This investigation consisted of surface reconnaissance; subsurface explo- ration; obtaining representative disturbed and undisturbed samples; labor- atory testing; analysis of the field and laboratory data;. research of available geological literature pertaining to the site; and preparation of this report. Specifically, the intent of this analysis was to: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING. INC. SCS&T 15044 March 22, 1984 Page 2 Explore the subsurface conditions to the depths influenced by the proposed construction. Evaluate, by laboratory tests, the pertinent engineering proper- ties of the various strata which will influence the development, including their bearing capacities, expansive characteristics and settlement potential. Define the general geology at the site including possible geo- logic hazards which could have an effect on the site development. Develop soil engineering criteria for site grading. Determine potential construction difficulties and provide recom- mendations concerning these problems. Recommend an appropriate foundation system for the type of struc- tures anticipated and develop preliminary soil engineering design criteria for the recommended foundation design. FINDINGS SITE DESCRIPTION The project site is located on the coastal bluffs and is a portion of the Army-Navy Academy in Carlsbad. The specific site is occupied by a one story, wood frame building which is attached to a 2 story building that bounds the project site on the north and the east. Also the site is bound- ed on the west by the coastal bluffs and the beach and on the south by the Academy Chapel. A slope which is approximately 4 feet in height is lo- cated at the southwest corner of the existing building. Vegetation con- sists of lawn grasses and iceplant west of the building. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING. INC. SCS&T 15044 March 22, 1984 Page 3 GENERAL GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS GEOLOGIC SETTING AND SOIL DESCRIPTION: The subject site is located in the Coastal Plains Physiographic province of San Diego County and is underlain by Quaternary aged terrace deposits and artificial fill. The artificial fill is located under the building on the southwest corner. Also at least 3 feet of loose fill was observed at the northeast corner of the project site. The fill consists of humid to moist, loose, reddish brown, silty sand. The terrace deposits consists of moist, medium dense to dense, reddish brown, silty sands. TECTONIC SETTING: A review of available geologic maps indicates the subject site is located approximately 5 miles east of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone. The Rose Canyon Fault Zone is a series of northwest trending faults of Quaternary age that is currently classified as potentially active rather than active. This classification is based on the lack of conclusive evidence to verify Holocene movement along this fault zone. No fault traces have been mapped through, or immediately adjacent to, the subject site, and our hand dug exploration pits and a surface reconnais- sance yielded no evidence of faulting at the site. It should be recognized that much of the Southern California is character- ized by major, active fault zones that could possibly affect the subject site. The nearest of these are the Elsinore Fault Zone, located approxi- mately 24 miles to the northeast, and the San Jacinto Fault Zone, located approximately 46 miles to the northeast. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS The most likely geologic hazards to affect the site is groundshaking as a result of movement along one of the major, active fault zones mentioned above. Based on a maximum probable earthquake of 7.3 magnitude on the SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING. INC. SCS&T 15044 March 22, 1984 Page 4 Elsinore Fault Zone, maximum ground acceleration at the site could be as high as 0.21 g. Construction in accordance with the minimum standards of the most recent edition of the Uniform Building Code should minimize potential damage due to seismic activity. Other potential geologic hazards such as tusnamis, seiches, liquefaction, or landsliding should be considered to be negligible or nonexistent. TSUNAMIS: Historically, the San Diego area has been free of tsunami related hazards, and tsunamis reaching San Diego have generally been well within the normal tidal range. It is thought that .the wide continental margin off the coast acts to diffuse and reflect the wave energy of re- motely generated tsunamis. The largest tsunami to reach San Diego's coast was 4.6 feet, generated by the 1960 earthquake in south Chile. No locally generated tsunamis are known to have occurred in the San Diego area. However, it is speculated that a major earthquake along one of the major offshore faults would have the potential of generating a tsunami capable of inflicting damage to the San Diego coastal region. A lack of knowledge about the offshore fault systems makes it difficult to assess the risk due to locally generated tsunamis. Considering the fact that a major tsunami has not occurred in 170 years of recorded history, the risk of such an event occurring in the near future appears nominal. GROUNDWATER: No groundwater was encountered during our subsurface explo- ration and we do not anticipate any major groundwater-related problems, either during or after construction. However, it should be recognized that minor groundwater seepage problems may, occur after development. These are usually minor phenomena and often the result of an alteration of the permeability characteristics of the soil, an alteration in drainage patterns and an increase in irrigation water. Based on the permeability SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING. INC. C SCS&T 15044 1March 22, 1984 Page 5 characteristics of the soil and the anticipated usage of the development, it is our opinion that any seepage problems which may occur will be minor in extent. It is further our opinion that these problems can be most effectively corrected on an individual basis if and when they develop. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings of this study, it appears that a portion of the existing structure is underlain by artificial fill. This fill' is gener- ally situated in the southwest corner of this building and appears to attain a maximum thickness on the order of 4 feet. We also determined that the existing interior posts are not supported by footings but bear directly onto the concrete slab. In view of these observations and test results, it is our opinion that the existing footings are not suitable to support the new structural loads where underlain by artificial fill. In these areas, new footings will be required to extend through the loose fill and be founded at least six inches into firm native soil. As an alternative, the existing footings may be underpinned such that the new footing would extend at least six inches into firm undisturbed soil. This underpinning should be accom- plished in sections not greater than eight feet in length. New continuous footings founded in proper material may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2000 psf. All continuous footings should also be reinforced with at least one No. 4 bar top and bottom. We further recom- mend that all footing excavations be examined by a representative of this office prior to steel and concrete placement. LIMITATIONS REVIEW, OBSERVATION AND TESTING The recommendations presented in this report are contingent upon our review of final plans and specifications. The soil engineer and engineer- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING. INC. SCS&T 15044 March 22, 1984 Page 6 ing geologist should review and verify the compliance of the final grading plan with this report and with Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code. It is recommended that Southern California Soil & Testing, Inc., be re- tained to provide continuous soil engineering services during the earth- work operations. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to start of construction. UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS The recommendations and opinions expressed in this report reflect our best estimate of the project requirements based on an evaluation of the subsur- face' soil conditions encountered at the subsurface exploration locations and the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate appreciably from those encountered. It should be recognized that the performance of the foundations and/or cut and fill slopes may be influenced by undis- closed or unforeseen variations in the soil conditions that may occur in the intermediate and unexplored areas. Any unusual conditions not covered in this report that may be encountered during site development should be brought to the attention of the soils engineer so that he may make modifi- cations if necessary. CHANGE IN SCOPE This office should be advised of any changes in the project scope or proposed site grading so that it may be determined if the recommendations contained herein are appropriate. This should be verified in writing or modified by a written addendum. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING. INC. SCS&T 15044 March 22, 1984 Page 7 TIME LIMITATIONS The findings of this., report are valid as of this date. Changes in the condition of a property can, however,, occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the work .of..man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in the State-of-the-Art and/or Government Codes may occur. Due to such changes, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or in part by changes beyond our control. Therefore, this report should not be relied upon after a period of two years without a review by us verifying the suitability of the conclusions and recommendations. PROFESSIONAL STANDARD In the performance of our professional services, we comply with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of our profession 'cur- rently practicing under similar conditions and in the same locality. The client recognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those encoun- tered at the locations where our borings, surveys, and explorations are made, and that our data,' interpretations, and recommendations are based solely on the information obtained by us. We will be responsible for those data, interpretations, and recommendations, but shall not be res- ponsible for the interpretations by others of the information developed. Our services consist of professional consultation and observation only, and no warranty of any kind whatsoever, express or implied, is made or intended in connection with the work performed or to be performed by us, or by our proposal for consulting or. other services, or by our furnishing of oral or written reports or findings. CLIENT'S RESPONSIBILITY It is the responsibility of Bee Cee Redodeling Company, or their repre- sentative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained 71 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING. INC. SCS&T 15044 March 22, 1984 Page 8 herein are brought to the attention of the engineer and architect for the project and incorporated into the project's plans and specifications. It is further their responsibility to take the necessary measures to ensure that the contractor and their subcontractors carry out such recommenda- tions during construction. FIELD EXPLORATIONS Four subsurface explorations were made at the locations indicated onthe attached Plate Number 1 on March 8, 1984. These explorations consisted of trenches dug by hand. The field work was conducted under the observation of our engineering geology personnel. The exploration was carefully logged when made. The log is presented on the following Plate Number 3. The soils are described in accordance with the Unified Soils Classification System as illustrated on the attached simplified chart, Plate Number 2. In addition, a verbal textural descrip- tion, the wet color, the apparent moisture and the density or consistency are presented. The density of granular soils is given as either very loose, loose, medium dense, dense or very dense. Disturbed and undisturbed sampes of typical and representative soils were obtained and returned to the laboratory for testing. In addition the in-place density of the prevailing soils was determined during our field investigation by means of the Sand-Cone Test Method, A.S.T.M. 1556. The results of these tests are summarized on the trench logs. LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed in accordance with the generally accepted American Society for Testing and Materials (A.S.T.M.) test methods or suggested procedures. A brief descriptions of the tests performed is presented below: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING. INC. SCS&T 15044 March 22, 1984 Page 9 CLASSIFICATION: Field classifications were verified in the laboratory by visual examination. The final soil classifica- tions are in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. DIRECT SHEAR TESTS: Direct shear tests were performed to deter- mine the failure envelope based on yield shear strength'. The shear box was designed to accomodate a sample having diameters of 2.375 inches or 2.50 inches and a height of 1.0 inch. Samples were tested at different vertical loads and at saturated moisture content. The shear stress was applied at a constant rate of strain of approximately 0.05 inches per minute. The results of these tests are presented on attached Plate Number 4. COMPACTION TEST: The maximum dry density and optimum- moisture content of typical soils were determined in the laboratory in accordance with A.S.T.M. Standard Test D-1557-78, Method A. The results of these tests are presented on the attached Plate Number 4. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING. INC. 9-O . . - 2 5 awxe -" sa / 2",r 2' . . p ,-' '44 •. : • . .:. .• i; D I'cl I I .. .. . I I • 2. . - - -, I . .. . • 3 . U -4- I, ' N %c',.. ..< .•. .. . . :. • I /+lj' -.---•-.--- CA ro ___________________ • 73/" -- ••.••- •: •• NO SCALE LEGEND: R TRENCH LOCATION SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LEGEND UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART Liquid Limit CM greater than 50 OH HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT TYPICAL NAMES Well graded gravels, gravel- sand mixtures, little or no fines. Poorly graded gravels, gravel sand mixtures, little or no fines. Silty gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand-silt mixtures. Clayey gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand, clay mixtures. Well graded sand;gavelly sands, little or no fines. Poorly graded sands,gravelly sands, little or no fines. Silty sands, poorly graded sand and silt mixtures. Clayey sands, poorly graded sand and clay mixtures. Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, sandy silt or clayey-silt-sand mixtures with slight plast- icity Inorganic clays of law to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays,si].ty clays, lean clays. Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity . Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or silty soils, elastic silts. Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays. Organic clays of medium to high plasticity. Peat and other highly organic soils. SOIL DESCRIPTION GROUP SYMBOL 1. COARSE GRAINED, More than half of material is larger than No. 200 sieve size. GRAVELS CLEAN GRAVELS GW More than half of coarse fraction is larger than No. 4 GP sieve size but smaller than 3". GRAVELS WITH FINES GM (Appreciable amount of fines) CC SANDS CLEAN SANDS SW More than half of coarse fraction is SP smaller than No. 4 sieve size. SANDS WITH FINES SM (Appreciable amount of fines) SC 11. FINE GRAINED, More than half of material is smaller than No. 200 sieve size. SILTS AND CLAYS ML Liquid Limit CL less than SO OL SILTS AND CLAYS MB - Water level at time of excavation or as indicated US - Undisturbed, driven ring sample or tube sample CI( - Undisturbed chunk sample BG - Bulk sample . SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. ERBO RIVERDAL.E STREET BAN DIEGO CALIFORNIA BEIRO RRR 1OATE 3-22-84 NO. 15044 1 Plate No. 2 'U z 0 TRENCH NUMBER 1 '— w — z = )- z ui IUcfl aZ z w2 > x 3 ELEVATION Q 0. U, 'U w Q. U,co U, ,- 3 _J. U, U) .) DESCRIPTION 0 C 0- — SM DARK BROWN, SILTY SAND (FILL HUMID-TO LOOSE — - MflIST 1- — 2_ 101.8 8.5 79 - SM LIGHT BROWN, SILTY SAND 107.7 8.5 83 JFILL) 0 1 2 TRENCH NUMBER 2 SM REDDISH BROWN, SILTY SAND (TERRACE DEPOSIT) MOIST MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE 116,2.1 10.7 TRENCH NUMBER 3 0 SM REDDISH BROWN, SILTY SAND HUMID LOOSE (FILL) 1 2 0 1 TRENCH NUMBER 4 REDDISH BROWN, SILTY SAND (TERRACE DEPOSIT) HUMID MEDIUM DENSE 117.5 I 4.2 91 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LOG SOIL & TESTING,INC. LOGGED BY JH DATE LOGGED: 3-08-84 JOB NUMBER: 15044 J Plate No. 3 DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS SAMPLE DESCRIPTION angle of Internal friction (°) cohesion intercept (psf) 1-2 @ Remolded,to 90% 36 100 MAXIMUM DENSITY and OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT ASTM _1557-78 METHOD _A SAMPLE DESCRIPTION maximum density (pcf) optimum moisture content (%) 1-2 @ Reddish Brown Silty Sand 129.0 9.3 . SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING INC. ..o RIVUMDAL• STREET SAN DI•D• CALIFORNIA ..I.O - BY RRR JOB NO. 15044 DATE 3-21-84 Plate No. 4