The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2574 MUIRFIELDS DR; ; CB122663; PermitCity of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 03-01-2013 Residential Permit Permit No: CB122663 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 2574 MUIRFIELDS DR CBAD Permit Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Status: ISSUED Parcel No: 2132501300 Lot #: 0 Applied: 12/12/2012 Valuation: $77,198.00 Constuction Type: 5B Entered By: LSM Occupancy Group: Reference #: Plan Approved: 03/01/2013 # Dwelling Units: 0 Structure Type: Issued: 03/01/2013 Bedrooms: . 0 Bathrooms: 0 Inspect Area: Orig PC #: Plan Check #: Project Title: THORNTON RES- BUILD NEW DETACHED 276 SF ENCLOSED CABANA W/564 SF ATTACHED PATIO COVER. 276 SF UNDERGROUND WINE CELLAR /70 SF UNDERGROUND TUNNEL / 520 SF UNDERGROUND SHELTER / GAS & ELECT TO BBQ & OUTLETS Applicant: ARLEN ROPER 1617 PRINCE ST FALLBROOK CA 92028 760-522-3997 Owner: THORNTON TRUST 2574 MUIRFIELDS DR CARLSBAD CA 92009 Building Permit $587.82 Meter Size Add'I Building Permit Fee $0.00 Add'I Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Plan Check $411.47 Meter Fee $0.00 Add'I Plan Check Fee $0.00 SDCWA Fee $0.00 Plan Check Discount $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $0.00 Strong Motion Fee $7.72 PFF (3105540) $0.00 Park in Lieu Fee $0.00 PFF (4305540) $0.00 Park Fee $0.00 License Tax (3104193) $0.00 LFM Fee $0.00 License Tax (4304193) $0.00 Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee (3105541) $0.00 Other Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee (4305541) $0.00 BTD #2 Fee $0.00 Sidewalk Fee $0.00 BTD #3 Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $144.00 Renewal Fee $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $44.00 Add'I Renewal Fee $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $60.30 Other Building Fee $0.00 Housing Impact Fee $0.00 HMP Fee $0.00 Housing InLieu Fee $0.00 Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Housing Credit Fee $0.00 Meter Size Master Drainage Fee $0.00 Add'I Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Sewer Fee $0.00 Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Additional Fees $0.00 Green Bldg Stands (SB1473) Fee $1.00 Fire Sprinkler Fees $0.00 Green Bldg Stands Plan Chk Fee $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES $1,256.31 Total Fees: $1,256.31 Total Payments to Date: $1,256.31 Balance Due: $0.00 FINAL APPRO VAL- Inspector: A-' Date: / A IJ Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the"Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as fees/exactions. You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. City of Carlsbad. 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Permit 02-13-2013 Permit No:SW120537 Job Address: 2574 MUIRFIELDS DR CBAD Permit Type: SWPPP . . Status: PENDING Parcel No: 2132501300 Lot #: 0 Applied: 12/12/2012 Reference #: GR 12-32 Entered By: LSM CB#: CB122663 Issued: Inspect Area: Project Title: THORNTON RES- NEW CABANA. . Tier: 2 PATIO COVER, WINE CELLAR, TUNNEL. SHELTER -DETACHED Priority: M Applicant: : . . Owner: ARLEN ROPER MAGNOLIA PARTNERS L L C 1617 PRINCE ST . . 1094 CUDAHY PL #212 FALLBROOK CA 92028 . SAN DIEGO CA 92110 760-522-3997 Emergency Contact: . . . . TODD THORNTON 2574 MUIRFIELDS DR . CAR LSBAD C A 92009 . . 619-818-4143 . SWPPP Plan Check $337.00 SWPPP Inspections $821.00 Additional Fees $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES $1,158.00 Total Fees: $1,158.00 Total Payments To Date: $0.00 Balance Due: $1,158.00 F UN A PROVAL DATELTV1S>..Aj SIGNA fURL/L' ITHE FOLLOWING APPROVALS REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE: [PLANNING EERING 2151JILDING EJFIRE EJHEALTH DHAZMAT!APCD Building Permit Application Plan Check No. t . 3 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Est. Value L) I, f3 71, Ij ' CITY OF Ph: 760-602-2719 Fax: 760-602-8558 CARLSBAD email: building@carlsbadca.gov Plan Ck. Deposit 547. 50 Date t.)IL2_1 i . Iswppp IaoSf7J www.carlsbadca.gov JOB ADDRESS vci4 SUITE#/SPACE#/UNrT. APN - 13 - CT/PROJECT 0 LOT A PHASE 0 71 0 OF UNITS A BEDROOMS U BAThROOMS TENANT BUSINESS NAME CONSTR. TYPE I 0CC. GROUP DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Include Square Feet of Affected Area(s) (j,4c!ØthP--1-70 4J WA) /?Doc ,*1/pA./ 4rJ4 —. L~w ill 6W I1O)AAQL o,JpsrIe —t.q' Ctt€i 9arc 1 1eMeNr/rn17!441-7olJ af- _ Do <ryw ) i"• PATIOSDECKS i EXISTING USE PROPOSED USE GARAGE (SF) (SF) FIREPLACE lAIRc0ND1T1ONING [FIRE SPRINKLERS NO YES DNO U I YES J NOIJ APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT NAME (Secondary Contact) ADDRESS )'i1 prl-,Aie ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP A_ C PHONEE 11,o c2z. FAX ___ PHONE EMAIL ,J EMAIL PROPERTY OWNER NAME irlvg/ I CONTRACTOR BUS. NAME ? i ADDRESS 2-574 rW111ZP6to9 Orav - ADDRESS 4c3 LtIJQA V( CITY STATE ,4_ ZIP , Q t4p GIN, CITY STATE ZIP PHONE FAX . PHONE ca FAX I 13I-22.66 EMAIL ______ EMAIL F45I i..O CL c'(J.fCOc ARCH/DSIGE i & ADDRASS I STATE LIC 0 I i-------15M STATE LiC.# 4. ZC I .1 I CSS icily BUS LiC.# I (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuante,Jlso requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law IChapter 9, commending with Section 'ioeo of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500)). W9084 ®)OI?O®1J Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: Il i have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My workers' compensation insurance carder and policy number are: Insurance Co. _1(T E()L.O Policy No. I 1i' I?— Expiration Date R section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars ($100) or less. Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of lifomia. WARNING: Failure tzamBft— 'overage Is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars (8.100,000), In addition to the cost of compensa ection 3706 of the Labor code, Interest and attorney's fees. CONTRACTOR SIGNATUR 0 AGENT DATE , ®00000110017) ®((? ' I hereby affirm that! am exempt from Contractor's Ucen wforthe following reason: [] I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. [:]Yes [—]No I (have! have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name address/phone! contractors' license number): 4.1 plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name! address! phone /contractors' license number): 5.1 will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name! address! phone! type of work): .PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE •. []AGENT DATE ______O3 301?O®() (®I 0(1()0(10 003 09 Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505,25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Yes No Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Yes No Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Yes No IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. ®(?O®) Q)O(1 (S7 I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work this permit is issued (Sec. 3097 (i) Civil Code). Lender's Name Lender's Address OCli O(O1O®l Ice,tJ5jtJlatI have read the application and state thatthe above Infennatlon Is conectand thatthe inibimatlon on the plans is accurate. I agree to complywith all Cftyoidinances and State laws relating to buildingconstiuctlon. I hereby authorize representative of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID Cmt' IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over VV deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stones in height EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and became null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not cemmenosdwithin l8o days from the date ofsuch permit orif the building or work authorized by such permits suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). ..'APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE #%A......_.._... DATE STOP: THIS SECTION NOT REQUIRED FOR BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE. Complete the following .ONLY if a Certificate of Occupancy will be requested at final inspection. CE rppUM' .ITIFJ Fax (760) 602-8560, Email building@carlsbadca.gov or Mail the completed form to City of Carlsbad, Building Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. CO#: (Office Use Only) CONTACT NAME OCCUPANT NAME ADDRESS BUILDING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP Carlsbad CA PHONE FAX EMAIL OCCUPANT'S BUS. LIC. No. DELIVERY OPTIONS PICK UP: CONTACT (Listed above) OCCUPANT (Listed above) CONTRACTOR (On Pg. 1) ASSOCIATED CB# MAIL TO: CONTACT (Listed above) OCCUPANT (Listed above) CONTRACTOR (On Pg. 1) NO CHANGE IN USE / NO CONSTRUCTION MAIL/ FAX TO OTHER: CHANGE OF USE / NO CONSTRUCTION APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE I nspection List. Permit#: CB122663 Type: .RESDNTL RAD THORNTON RES- BUILD NEW DETACHED 276 SF ENCLOSED CABANA Date Inspection Item Inspector Act • Comments 01/12/2015 89 Final Combo PD AP 01/12/2015 89 Final Combo . - RI 01/09/2015 89 Final Combo - . RI FIRST AM APPT PLEASE 01/09/2015 89 Final Combo MC CA PER CONTRACTOR 10/16/2014 89 Final Combo . PY NR 06/11/2014 27 Shower Pan/Roman Tubs PD AP 03/18/2014 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PD AP 03/18/2014 23 Gas/Test/Repairs PD AP 03/18/2014 23 Gas/Test/Repairs PD AP 03/14/2014 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PD • AP 03/11/2014 84 Rough Combo PD AP 02/27/2014 84 Rough Combo PD CO 01/09/2014 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PD AP 10/31/2013 13 Shear Panels/HD's PD . AP 10/30/2013 84 Rough Combo PD NR 10/16/2013 15 Roof/Reroof PD AP 09/19/2013 31 Underground/Conduit-Wrin PD AP 09/16/2013 15 Roof/Reroof MC CO NO APPROVED TRUSS CALCS 09/09/2013 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PD AP 08/19/2013 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PD . AP 07/31/2013 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PD AP 07/23/2013 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PD AP 07/19/2013 66 Grout PD AP. 07/18/2013 66 Grout PD CO 07/11/201366 Grout PD AP 07/10/2013 66 Grout PD . CO 06/28/2013 66 Grout MC PA 1ST LIFT, 12 IN CMU 06/21/2013 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PD AP 06/14/2013 65 Retaining Walls MC AP CMU WATER PROOFING AT BUNKER • 06/05/201366 Grout PD AP 05/30/2013 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PD AP 05/30/2013 22 Sewer/Water Service PD AP 05/23/2013 22 Sewer/Water Service PD AP Wednesday, January 142015 . Page 1 of City of Carlsbad ING o1v1s1oSTING SERVICES 3030 Main Street & San Diego, CA 92113 tsi-sandiego.com INSPECTION, INC. (619) 234-9904 fax (619) 234-4931 "A Quality Assurance Finn" tsi92113@yahoo.com REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS Project Name: POOL CABANA / WINE CELLAR Project Address: 2574 MUIRFIELD DR. CARLSBAD, CA 92009 Permit Number: CBI 22663 Architect: ROPER DESIGN I Engineer: PALOS VERDE ENG. File Number: N/A Contractor: FASSINO / COPPER CONSTRUCTION I Job Number: N/A I. To Be Billed To: FASSINO CONSTRUCTION I Other: Sample Data Report of crou Slurry Mortar Concrete Other: Supplier ROBERTSON'S Placement Date 7-22-13 Time: 8:00 AM Mix Description 2500 PSI GROUT Ticket No./Load No. 8828254/ #1/TRUCK #1281 Mix Number 560E2500 Time in Mixer 60 MINUTES Design Strength Admixture N/A Type Cement Air Content N/A Concrete Temp. 75°F Unit Weight N/A Slump 9" Location of Placement: 3"° GROUT LIFT AT WINE CELLAR 8" CMU Special Test Instruction or Remarks 1 AT 7 DAYS, 2 AT 28 DAYS, 1 HOLD ASTM Test (s) Performed lEl SAMPLING FRESHLY MIXED CONCRETE (C172) CEISLUMP (C143) (El TEMPERATURE (C1064) (EJMAKING & CURING CONCRETE IN FIELD (C31) fl AIR CONTENT BY PRESSURE METHOD (C231) fl AIR CONTENT BY VOLUMETRIC METHOD (C173) El UNIT WEIGHT. YIELD. & AIR CONTENT (C13 Required Strength (?c) 2000 PSI PSI at 28 DAYS Samples Made by WILLIAM WITKOWSKI Date Received in Lab Laboratory Data Age Field Lab Control Date Dimensions Test Area Max Load Compressive ASTM Identity Number Tested Inches Square Inches Pounds Strength PSI C39 7 DAYS 13-051 7-29-13 3 x 3 x 6 9 2 17240 1920 N/A 28 DAYS 13-051 8-19-13 3 x 3 x 6 9 in 2 33510 3720 N/A 28 DAYS 13-051 8-19-13 3 x 3 x 6 9 in 2 38080 4230 N/A HOLD 13-051 3x3x6 9in' Lab Use TESTS PERFORMED UNDER THE RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF RCE #C26676 DENNIS ZIMMERMAN • 4 CONFORMS ()DOES NOT CONFORM A B C D E Cone Cone & Cone Shear Columnar Split Shear ()FOR INFORMATION ONLY Sketches of Types of Fractures per ASTM C39 TESTING SERVICE$ ity of CarIsd 30 Main Street ego, CA 92113 tsi-sandiego.com INSPECTION, INC. AUG 2 1 2013 (619) 234-9904 fax (619) 234-4931 "A Quality Assurance Fin§UILDING DIVIINl3@yahoo.com Project Name: POOL CABANA! WINE CELLAR Project Address: 2574 MUIRFIELD DR. CARLSBAD, CA 92009 Permit Number: CB122663 Architect: AROPER Engineer: HTK ENGINEERING File Number: N/A Contractor: FASSINO / COPPER CONSTRUCTION I Job Number: N/A To Be Billed To: FASSINO CONSTRUCTION . Other: Sample Data Report of Slurry Mortar Concrete Other: Supplier SUPERIOR READY MIX Placement Date 7-12-13 Time: 7:00 AM Mix Description 3/8" ROCK 2,500 PSI Ticket No/Load No. 8725232/ #1ITRUCK #1292 Mix Number 560E Time in Mixer - Design Strength 2,000 PSI Admixture N/A Type Cement II Air Content N/A Concrete Temp. 71°F Unit Weight N/A Slump 8 /" Location of Placement: - 2ND LIFE - Special Test Instruction or Remarks I AT 7 DAYS, 2 AT 28 DAYS,! HOLD ASTM Test (s) Performed SAMPLING FRESHLY MIXED CONCRETE (C172) ESISLUMP (C143) 151 TEMPERATURE (C1064) ISIMAXING & UR1NG CONCRETE IN FIELD (C31) [] AIR CONTENT BY PRESSURE METHOD (C231) [1 AIR CONTENT BY VOLUMETRIC METHOD (C173) El UNIT WEIGHT, YIELD, & AIR CONTENT (C13 Required Strength (f'c) 2,000 PSI PSI at 28 DAYS Samples Made by WILLIAM WITKOWSKI Date Received in Lab Laboratory Data Age Field Lab Control Date Dimensions Test Area Max Load Compressive ASTM Identity Number Tested Inches Square Inches Pounds Strength PSI C39 7 DAYS 13-050 7-19-13 3 X 3 9 in 2 17,230 11910 N/A 28 DAYS 13-050 8-9-13 3 X 3 9 in2 32,020 3,560 N/A 28 DAYS 13-050 8-9-13 3 X 3 9 in2 30,240 3,360 N/A HOLD 13-050 3X3 9in2 Lab Use TESTS PERFORMED UNDER THE RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF RCE #26676 DENNIS ZIMMERMAN \l CONFORMS ()DOES NOT CONFORM A B C D E Cone Cone & Cone Shear Columnar Split Shear ()FOR INFORMATION ONLY - Sketches of Types of Fractures per ASTM C39 City of Carlsbad CONCRETE/MASONRY AU6 06Z013 Testing & Inspection Report BUILDING DIVISION JOB NUMBER Dfr(, 5 /tjj3 T I w I 1 7-7 S 4LibJ, omi BUILO QSMSA DSA-FILE# / OSHPD Inc A1R ui i C 53 A GEN 7T i Ef SUBC A REQUIREMENTS: Limit atone job number, one permit number per sheet. Identify all work by type and SPECIFIC location. Non-compliant work must be specifically identified. Communication (RFI, Sketch, etc.) voiding previous non-compliant items must be listed, record conversations and communications with project designers, building and permit granting authority officials. HOURS REGULAR 1.5X 2X F TIME IN TIME OUT MEAL PERIOD* (lime) L * If no meal, complete 0 Mileage 0 Expenses appropriate section below. El Reinforcement El Concrete Placement 0 Masonry Prestress Post Ten Batch Plant Q Fireproofing Quality Control El Drilled-In-Anchors f Other DESCRIPTION OF WORK INSPECTED O5eveb IMWeTDLAsr /1J -so'/-gyvl._For&-, 7tftr(A21i tit _ISTftLLF'c1!1O1_A_3DL-Ts EThXI R -r _wcrs_E_i,ieeth,mr _)7JJ' 49ri C4EiA)foog) _ffi-it--F!T_-tLLE Jp . lLpyyp,. 9fJ!QfJT_cLERFJIA)/ iO! 0SH_4LDt,iJOUT_ -rNt _pce'_iJp'tu _rU1 _GtMo3_%T-P11C J2 :CC-9? 177. wAS ACCgPfftB rReason for I'No Meal': I Approved! Authorized by: (Project Supervisor) MIX USED DESIGN SLUMP ADMIXTURE DESIGN PSI CUBIC YARDS SPECIMENS CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE accordance with the The WORK Ewas proved documents(ffD_--A.S D. City of L.A., etc.). requirements of the The WRi 0 did not meet the requirements of the 7 pproved document Additional Page (Page #) CM wa1 not *N/4A1performed in (DSA. OSHP accordance with L-' MATERIAL SAM11IFs4 ,___________________________ All inspections based on minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours - ours minimum. If inspector is called to a project and no work is p orm hour minimum charge will be applied. Approved/Authorized by:C( Name Representing Submitted by: Inspector's Signature Inspector's ID / Lic. 4=_______________________ This report will be distributed to the architect, engineer, client, and governing jurisdiction (e.g. DSA) as required by apphcaole coaes and project documents. V4 Pa l os Verdes Engineering Corporation Consulting IFA trücturaI Engineers SHEET NO I OF I CALCULATED BY CHECKED DATE 1,111/13 663 Valley Avenue., Suite 101 Solana Beach, CA 92075 CHECKED BY DATE_______ Telephone (858) 509-8505 • Fax (858) 509-8515 SCALE____________________________________ THbTOP%J REsItEuC L74 11uULL4MQs CAQLcw1 CA 'tt4 E.., Pox'i 30LT3 LOç FOR (TENS NOT NOTED SEE B.N. ' '14ik4 \ '— JOIST PER PLAN WI HGR. TIJCC- 'Ix P.T.P.F. WI ' 0 C)S flf'3oN -oxf tU/iIW. S" EtB 1771 - SPEOAL 1MW Mo /k\ 12131/13 1* \i or City of Carlsbad Economic TESTING SERVICES 3030 Main Street )epartment & San Diego, CA 92113 tsi-sandiego.com INSPECTION, INC. (619) 234-9904 fax (619) 234-4931 "A Quality Assurance Finn" tsi92113@yahoo.com VISUAL INSPECTION REPORT Project Name: Pool Cabana! Wine Cellar Project Address: 2574 Muirfield Drive Carlsbad, Ca 92009 Permit Number: CB122663 Architect: A Roper I Engineer: HTK Engineering File Number: General Contractor: Fassino Construction I Job Number: Contractor Doing Reported Work: Copper Concrete Qt"r: Lab. Receiving & Testing Constr. Mat'l Samples: N/A Other: INSPECTION - MAT'L SAMPLING QTY - MAT'L DESCRIPTION - INSPECTION CHECK LIST - * Field Shop - Concrete Cylinders * Reinforcing Steel * Plan/Specs - Concrete - Mortar Samples - Conc. Mix.PSi * Clearances - Structural Steel * Grout Samples (4) - Conc. Mix/PSI * Positions * Masonry - Masonry Prisms - All Thread Bolts Sizes - Fireproofing - Masonry Block * Grout Mix/PSI 2500 psi * Laps - Pile Driving - Reinforcing Steel - Mortar Type/PSI ' Consolidation - Roofing - Fireproofing - H.S. Bolts - Torque Applied - Specialty G - Asphalt Concrete Electrode - Tension Applied - Soils Technician - Roofing - Steel - Epoxy - Bolt Pull-Out - Steel - Fireproof - Drilled Holes - Prestress Concrete - High Strength Bolts - Units Block . - Corrective Action - Waterproofing - Other - Unit Brick - — OSHPD - Other - Metal Deck - - OSA - - Other - Reinf. Tendons - Corrections Complete - Mechanical - Other - Epoxy - Electrical - Other - Other Batch Plant - - I Other Other Date: 7/12/13 Inspected placement and consolidation of 5 cubic yards of Robertson's 3/8" rock 2500psi grout mix design mix # 560E22500 at grout lift 8" CMU walls at wine cellar and stair well. Referenced details 9/SDI.0 & 19/SD 1.0. All block is of medium grade. All mortar is Type "S" spec mix (city of Los Angeles RR#25454). All mortar joints and beds are 5/8" or less. All mortar extrusions are removed. All ce!!s are clean arid free of debris. All cells were grouted solid and consolidated with mechanical vibrators. Grout was stopped I ¼" below top of block. All laps bends and clearances of reinforcing steel were maintained. #6 @ 16"o.c. (V) and #4@ 16" 0-c. (H) with #6 (V) trim bars at corners. The following test and (4) 2"x6" grout samples were taken from Robertson's truck # 1292, ticket # 8725232, mix design # 560E22500: Slump 8 ¼" Temp 7SF CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the reported work, unless otherwise noted, complies with approved plans, specifications and applicabl ections of the building codes. This report only covers the locations of the work inspected and does not constitute engineering opinion or project control. INSPECTOR NAME: William Witkowski . INSPECT - 'S SIG RE CERTIFICATE NUMBER: S.D.#I I04/ICC#8035652 . NOTE: Inspections based on a 4-hour minimum; actual time after 4 hours; 2 hour show up minimum for job cancellations. Overtime effective on Saturdays, double time on Sunday SUBMITTED TO: FASSINO CONSTRUCTION/CITY OF CALSBAD BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT TESTING SERVICES & INSPECTION, INC. "A Quality Assurance Firm" 3030 Main Street San Diego, CA 92113 tsi-sandiego.com (619) 234-9904 fax (619) 234-4931 tsi92113@yahoo.com VISUAL INSPECTION REPORT Project Name: Pool Cabana! Wine Cellar Project Address: 2574 Muirfield Drive Carlsbad, Ca 92009 Permit Number: CB122663 Architect: A Roper I Engineer: HTK Engineering File Number: General Contractor: Fassino Construction Job Number: Contractor Doing Reported Work: Copper Concrete Other: Lab. Receiving & Testing Constr. Mat'l Samples: N/A . Other: - INSPECTION - MAT'L SAMPLING QTY - MAT'L DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECK LIST - * Field Shop - Concrete Cylinders * Reinforcing Steel - Plan/Specs - Concrete - Mortar Samples - Conc. Mix/PSI - Clearances - Structural Steel - Grout Samples - Conc. Mix/PSI Positions • Masonry - Masonry Prisms - All Thread Bolts - Sizes - Fireproofing Masonry Block - Grout Mix/PSI - Laps - Pile Driving - Reinforcing Steel - Mortar Type/PSI - Consolidation - Roofing - Fireproofing - H.S. Bolts - Torque Applied - Specialty GPR - Asphalt Concrete - Electrode - Tension Applied - Soils Technician - Roofing - Steel - Epoxy - Bolt Pull-Out - Steel - Fireproof - Drilled Holes .Prestress Concrete - High Strength Bolts - Units Block - Corrective Action - Waterproofing - Other - Unit Brick - OSHPD - Other - Metal Deck - OSA - Other - Reinf. Tendons - Corrections Complete - Mechanical - Other - Epoxy - Electrical - Other - Other - Batch Plant - Other I- Other Date: 7/19/13 Scheduled 7:00am grout inspection arrived on Site 6:30 am no one present from Cooper Concrete or Fassino construction, 6:50 called Fassino construction. Was informed by Brian Fassino that Carlsbad building official had not inspected work. Inspection was rescheduled for Monday 7/22/13. Two hour show up time charged. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the reported work, unless otherwise noted, complies with approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the building codes. This report only covers the locations of the work inspected and does not constitute engineering opinion or project control. INSPECTOR NAME: William Witkowski CERTIFICATE NUMBER: INSPECTO-K IGN NOTE: Inspections based on a 4-hour minimum; actual time after 4 hours; 2 hour show up minimum for job cancellations. Overtime effective on Saturdays, double time on Sunday SUBMITTED TO: FASSINO CONSTRUCTION/CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT TESTING SERVICES & INSPECTION, INC. "A Quality Assurance Firm" 3030 Main Street San Diego, CA 92113 tsi-sandiego.com (619) 234-9904 fax (619) 234-4931 tsi92113@yahoo.com VISUAL INSPECTION REPORT Project Name: Pool Cabana! Wine Cellar Project Address: 2574 Muirfield Drive Carlsbad, Ca 92009 Permit Number: CB122663 Architect: A Roper I Engineer: HTK Engineering File Number: General Contractor: Fassino Construction Job Number: Contractor Doing Reported Work: Copper Concrete Other: Lab. Receiving & Testing Constr. Mat'l Samples: N/A Other: INSPECTION - MAT'L SAMPLING QTY - MAT'L DESCRIPTION - INSPECTION CHECK LIST - Field Shop - Concrete Cylinders • Reinforcing Steel * Plan/Specs Concrete - Mortar Samples - Conc. Mix/PSI * Clearances - Structural Steel * Grout Samples (4) - Conc. Mix/PSI Positions * Masonry - Masonry Prisms - All Thread Bolts Sizes - Fireproofing - Masonry Block * Grout Mix/PSI 2500 psi * Laps - Pile Driving - Reinforcing Steel - Mortar Type/PSI * Consolidation - Roofing - Fireproofing - H.S. Bolts - Torque Applied - Specialty G - Asphalt Concrete - Electrode - Tension Applied - Soils Technician - Roofing - Steel - Epoxy - Bolt Pull-Out - Steel - Fireproof - Drilled Holes - Prestress Concrete - High Strength Bolts - Units Block - Corrective Action - Waterproofing - Other - Unit Brick - OSHPD - Other - Metal Deck - OSA - Other - Reinf. Tendons - Corrections Complete - Mechanical - Other - Epoxy - Electrical - Other - Other Batch Plant Other - Other Date: 7/22/13 Inspected reinforcing steel ,embedment's & observed & sampled grouting & consolidation of 3 cubic yards of Robertson's 2500psi grout mix design # 560E2500 2 3d lift of 8' CMU walls at wine cellar and pool cabana. 8' CMU block is medium grade. Mortar is spec mix type S (city of Los Angeles RR#2 5454). Mortar beds and joints are 5/8" or less. All cells are clean and free of debris. Reinforcing steel #4(H) & #6(V) @ 16"o.c. All laps, bends and clearances of reinforcing steel are to plans and specs. Embedment's of STB bolts for holdowns, anchor bolts for Strong Walls and Anchor bolts are to plans and specs with proper clearances, spacing and embedment. All cells were filled solid and consolidated with mechanical vibrators. All work is referenced details 9/SD. 1 and 19/SD. I The following test and (4) grout samples were cast and taken from Robertson's truck # 1289, ticket # 882825 2500psi grout mix # 560E2500: Slump 9" Temp 75F CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the reported work, unless otherwise noted, complies with approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the bui14j4c0de5. This report only covers the locations of the work inspected and does not constitute engineering opinion or project control. INSPECTOR NAME: William Witkowski CERTIFICATE NUMBER: S.D.#1104/ICC#8035652 INSPECTOR'S SIGNATUIE'7 -ep& ~Jll NOTE: Inspections based on a 4-hour minimum; actual time after 4 hours; 2 hour show up minimum for job cancellations. Overtime effective on Saturdays, double time on Sunday - SUBMYFTEDTO: FASSINO CONSTRUCTION/CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT TESTING SERVICES 3030 Main Street & San Diego, CA 92113 tsi-sandiego.com INSPECTION, INC. (619) 234-9904 fax (619) 234-4931 "A Quality Assurance Firm" tsi92113@yahoo.com REPORT OF COMPRESSION TESTS Project Name: POOL CABANA /WINE CELLAR Project Address: 2574 MUIRFIELD DR. CARLSBAD, CA 92009 Permit Number: CB122663 Architect: AROPER Engineer: HTK ENGINEERING File Number: N/A Contractor: FASSINO / COPPER CONSTRUCTION I Job Number: N/A To Be Billed To: FASSINO CONSTRUCTION I Other: Sample Data Report of 4:Z Grout Slurry Mortar Concrete Other: Supplier SUPERIOR READY MIX Placement Date 6-6-13 Time: 8:58 AM Mix Description 3/8" ROCK 2,500 PSI Ticket No./Load No. 240203/ #1/TRUCK #203 Mix Number 8665P Time in Mixer 50 MINUTES Design Strength 2,000 PSI Admixture N/A Type Cement II Air Content N/A Concrete Temp. 75°F Unit Weight N/A Slump 7.5" Location of Placement: PT LIFT AT TUNNEL UNDER WINE CELLAR Special Test Instruction or Remarks I AT 7 DAYS, 2 AT 28 DAYS, 1 HOLD ASTM Test (s) Performed EEl SAMPLING FRESHLY MIXED CONCRETE (C172) (SISLUMP (C143) (El TEMPERATURE (C1064) ISIMAKING & CURING CONCRETE IN FIELD (C31) M AIR CONTENT BY PRESSURE METHOD (C231) [1 AIR CONTENT BY VOLUMETRIC METHOD (C173) El UNIT WEIGHT, YIELD, & AIR CONTENT (C13 Required Strength (f'c) 2,000 PSI PSI at 28 DAYS Samples Made by WILLIAM WITKOWSKI Date Received in Lab Laboratory Data Age Field Lab Control Date Dimensions Test Area Max Load Compressive ASTM Identity Number Tested Inches Square Inches Pounds Strength PSI C39 7 DAYS 13-039 6-13-13 3 X 3 9 in 2 32,460 3,605 N/A 28 DAYS 13-039 74-13 3 X 3 9 in 2 36,560 4,060 N/A 28 DAYS 13-039 74-13 3 X 3 9 in' 37,310 4,145 N/A HOLD 13-039 3X3 9in' Lab Use TESTS PERFORMED UNDER THE RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF RCE #C26676 DENNIS ZIMMERMAN E , lii [] E liii I CONFORMS ()DOES NOT CONFORM A B C D E Cone Cone & Cone Shear Columnar Split Shear ()FOR INFORMATION ONLY Sketches of Types of Fractures per ASTM C39 TESTING SERVICES 3030 Main Street & San Diego, CA 92113 tsi-sandiegocom INSPECTION, INC. (619) 234-9904 fax (619) 234-4931 "A Quality Assurance Firm" tsi92113@yahoo.com VISUAL J1ASrhU'I'JlUN K1'UKI JUN 14 2013 Project Name: Pool Cabana/ Wine Cellar BUILDING DIVISION Project Address: 2574 Muirfield Drive Carlsbad, Ca 92009 Permit Number: CB122663 Architect: A Roper I Engineer: HTK Engineering File Number: General Contractor: Fassino Construction Job Number: Contractor Doing Reported Work: Copper Concrete Other: Lab. Receiving & Testing Constr. Mat'l Samples: TSI Other: INSPECTION - MAT'L SAMPLING QTY - MAT'L DESCRIPTION - - INSPECTION CHECK LIST * Field Shop - Concrete Cylinders - Reinforcing Steel • Plan/Specs - Concrete - Mortar Samples - Conc. Mix/PSI Clearances - Structural Steel I Grout Samples (4) - Conc. Mix/PSI * Positions * Masonry - Masonry Prisms - All Thread Bolts * Sizes - Fireproofing - Masonry Block * Grout Mix/PSI 2500 psi * Laps - Pile Driving - Reinforcing Steel - Mortar Type/PSI * Consolidation - Roofing - Fireproofing - H.S. Bolts - Torque Applied - Specialty G - Asphalt Concrete - Electrode - Tension Applied - Soils Technician - Roofing - Steel - Epoxy - Bolt Pull-Out - Steel - Fireproof - Drilled Holes - Prestress Concrete - High Strength Bolts - Units Block Corrective Action - Waterproofing - Other - Unit Brick - - OSHPD - Other - Metal Deck - — OSA - Other - Reinf. Tendons - Corrections Complete - Mechanical - Other - Epoxy - — Electrical - Other - Other - Batch Plant —I - - Other Other DATE: 6/6/13 Inspected reinforcing steel and masonry at 8" and 12" C.M.U. walls at Wine cellar and Tunnel. #6 @ 16"o.c. (V) and #4 @ 16" o.c. (H). All laps, bends and clearances of reinforcing steel are to plans and specs. Referenced detail 19/SD-1. All block is of Type I. Mortar beds are 5/8" or less and mortar is Type S spec mix (city of L.A. RR#24968). All cells are clean and free of debris. Observed the placement and consolidation of 2 cubic yards of Superior Ready Mix 3/8" rock 2500p5i concrete mix design # 866p. All cells were clean and free of debris prior to grouting. All cells were filed to 1 V2" of top of block. All grout in cells was proper consolidated with mechanical vibrator. The following test and (4) 2x2x6 grout samples were taken from Superior Ready Mix truck # 203, ticket # 240203; Slump 7 Y2" Temp 75 F CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the reported work, unless otherwise noted, complies with approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the building codes. This report only covers the locations of the work inspected and does not constitute engineering opinion or project control. INSPECTOR NAME: William Witkowski CERTIFICATE NUMBER: S.D.#1104/ICC#8035652 INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE NOTE: Inspections based on a 4-hour minimum; actual time after 4 hours; 2 hour show up minimum for job cancellations. Overtime effective on Saturdays, double time on Sunday SUBMITTED TO: C.O.D./CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENI $0 J c'%EId U€(dI 11:91 cOn 1j -4- Junt SPECIAL INSPECTION Development Services Building Division CITY OF AGREEMENT 1635 Faraday Avenue B-45 760-602-2719 CARLSDJ6%1) D In accordance with Chapter 17 of the California Building Code the following must be completed when work being performed requires special Inspection, structural observation and construction material testing. Project/Permit: 1 — 246 3' Project Address:_14'?4 IJ/12ijc pp, HIS SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE PROPERTY OWNERIAUTHORIZED 6;) GEN I Please check if you are Owner-Builder 0. (If you checked as owner-builder you must also complete Section B of this agreement.) Name: (Please print) (First) (MI.) (Last) Mailing Address: Email: 1 1'PZ Phone: 16o 27- 11 7 I am: UProperty Owner ,roperty Owner' of Record UArchitect of Record 0Engineer of Record *& State of California Registration Number Expiration Date: AGREEMENT: I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that I have read, understand, acknowledge and promise to comply with the City of Carlsbad requirements for special inspections, structural. observations, construction materials testing and off-site fabrication of building components, as prescribed in the statement of special inspections noted on the approved plans and, as required by the California Building Code. Signature: i\ti_, Date: / / CONTRACTOR'S STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY (07 CBC, Ch 17, Section 1706). This section must be completed by the contractor / builder I owner-builder. Contractor's Company Name: FA Siix o/Svc2.varbL Please check if you are Owner-Builder Name: (Please print) I'Ja U 11f1i..i0 (First) (M.I.) (Last) Mailing Address: _4-i5 .f(& V1ST D CA 262 Email:.Ccr( Phone: 1,c-1i5 -'T( IT State of California Contractor's License Number:_?(( Expiration Date: I ( I acknowledge and, am aware, of special requirements contained in the statement of special inspections noted on the approved plans; I acknowledge that control will be exercised to obtain conformance with the construction documents approved by the building official; I will have in-place procedures for exercising control within our (the contractor's) organization, for the method and frequency of reporting and the distribution of the reports; and I certify that I will have a qualified person within our (the contractor's) organization to exercise such control. I will provide a final report / letter in compliance with CBC Section 1704.1.2 prior to reauestina final inspection. r Sig Date: •11 J&e;: B-45 Page 1 of 1 Rev. 08/11 Carlsbad 12-2663 02/05/13 RECORD COPY EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for(Building Safety DATE: 02/05/13 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 12-2663 iQpy PROJECT ADDRESS: 2574 Muirfield Drive U PPLICANT %)JURIS. U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE PROJECT NAME: Non Habitable/i odj%t9ned Pool Cabana/Patio Cover/ Wine Cellar /Underground Steel Tank Stora'JTh13oC,1 Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will sub ly with the jurisdiction's building q ' codes when minor deficiencies identified below aPd4sAQd checked by building department staff. "I")' The plans transmitted herewith havignificant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be correctedT ubmitted for a complete recheck. V1 The check list transmitted herewith is for yo i?P,ation. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submiWe(dcheck. LII The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the juris'iction to forward to the applicant contact person. EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone Date contacted: (by: ) Email: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: 1) Complete special inspection list for soils compliance, field welding and masonry. 2) Provide a update soils letter for this project (as report is 9 years old). 3) Per the Designer and phone call with Building Official - third party certification will be required for the storage tanks and any electrical, plumbing and mechanical equipment installed inside and /or serving the tanks. By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: EsGil Corporation El GA DEJ El PC (P) 01/29/13 EsGil Corporation In (Partners/lip with government for CBui&fing Safety DATE: 12/20/12 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 12-2663 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2574 Muirfield Drive SET:I U APPLICANT J URIS. U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE PROJECT NAME: Pool Cabana/Patio Cover! Non Habitable Wine Cellar /Underground Steel Tank Storage for Thornton Residence LI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. LI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LI The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Arden Roper 1617 Prince Street Fallbrook, Ca. 92028 LI EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Arden Roper Telephone #: (760) 522-3997 Date contacted: (by: ) Email: arlenroperqmail.com Mail Telephone Fax In Person LI REMARKS: By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: EsGil Corporation DGA DEJ 0 P 12/13/12 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 12-2663 12/20/12 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 12-2663 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2574 Muirfield Drive FLOOR AREA: STORIES: 1 Plus Basement Enclosed cabana 276 Patio Cover 564 Non Habitable Wine Cellar 276 Non Habitable Underground Tunnel 70 Non Habitable Under ground shelter 450 HEIGHT: lift per CBC REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 12/12/12 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 12/20/12 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 12/13/12 PLAN REVIEWER: Ray Fuller This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the California version of the International Residential Code, International Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that construction comply with the 2010 edition of the California Code of Regulations (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 2009 IRC, 2009 IBC, 2009 UPC, 2009 UMC and 2008 NEC. The above regulations apply, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 105.4 of the 2009 International Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 12-2663 12/20/12 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for residential projects. For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete 2. Verify final sets of architectural sheets will be signed by designer and that the structural sheets and any new calculations will be stamped and signed by engineer of record also. 3. The plans must clearly note that proposed project including the shelters are to be a U occupancy - Storage Only—Non habitable Space . If choose option to have this as habitable then storage tanks would not comply with light, ventilation, egress etc. Have talked to Will Foss at the City of Carlsbad and he would allow it as shown to be a U occupancy only 4. Please provide a copy of the soils report t so can verify the parameters used in the design of the masonry walls/tunnel and recommendations. In addition the City will need a compaction report for backfill. 5. Souls report to address water table level. Is hydrostatic pressure going to be a issue and if so how will this be addressed? 6. Assume tanks are factory coated so as to be water proof. Please clarify. In addition how will masonry walls at cellar and tunnel be waterproofed and could not locate the drains at base of walls? 7. Please provide some type of third party listing for proposed under ground tanks. Listing to verify thickness of steel with maximum amount of fill allowed above. In addition are tanks designed for surcharge of water storage tanks? If no approved third party listing then engineer-of-record must design the storage tanks to show that they are adequate to resist vertical forces etc. 8. If concrete steps from tunnel to shelter then structural should reference detail 12 and 13 on SP2 at appropriate locations. Carlsbad 12-2663 12/20/12 Please verify that exterior fireplace is listed for this application (generally required to be stainless steel to resist corrosion). The bench at cabana bath appears to be encroaching into the 24" clearance required in front of the water closet? Please verify that exterior fireplace is listed for this application (generally required to be stainless steel to resist corrosion). Detail and reference how beams will be supported where they intersect over post(s) i.e. ECCLL's at the corners? Please provide ISB details and reference to the plans. Verify details reflect connections to foundation, bolt size, type, depth of embedment etc. and connections to top plates. Detail and reference complete lateral load path from foundation to roof sheathing at gable ends of cabana i.e. where the lSB's occur and the 7'10" shear wall. The plans seem to indicate that sub purlins are to be provided where roof rafters are shown at 4 1/2 ft spacing. Could not locate size, spacing and roof diaphragm. Could not locate where special inspection list included the 3000 psi concrete, soils compliance /backing or why noting no special inspection for masonry walls at bottom of list (as appears applies). Missing HDU2's for the 5 ft shear wall on line 1? No design calculations provide for concrete lid and what is maximum height of fill above? To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes ( ) No ( ) The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ray Fuller at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 12-2663 12/20/12 ARCH ITECTURAL/PLUMBING/MECHINCAL AND ELECTRICAL ITEMS 1. Are these two shelters licensed by the State pre-manufactured structures? If so, PME plan review is limited to site hook up items (sewer connection, water connection, and electrical connection: The PME for the units themselves are not part of the plan review or permitting. Note: If the bunkers are State licensed pre- manufacturer buildings, any PME improvements will require a State permit for modification. . Provide the shelter State certification number. If not certified by the State, complete PME plans will be required for both shelters. An instantaneous water heater is shown on the plans. Please include a gas pipe sizing design (isometric or pipe layout) for all gas loads. Include in design (assume) length of separate run to the gas meter with loads of the tankless water heater, BBQ, gas heaters, gas fireplace etc. If coming from main dwelling or pool equipment all existing and proposed gas loads and run must be included in the gas isometric. Provide plumbing plans for the new pavilion/wine cellar building. How is the wine cellar restroom connected to the site sewer and what is the source of water supply? I'm not real sure what the (2) 2" pipes routed to the pool water are for however: Pool water is considered non-potable and is not regulated by the CPC. If the underground bunkers require potable water, include that supply design with the design plans. Where does the waste from the sump pump go? The bunker designs reference building plans, nothing shown. Health Department approval will be required for the 500 gallon septic holding tank shown on C-4. Specify on the plans that any new plumbing fixtures must comply with the following: New water closets shall use no more than 1.28 gallons of water per flush, lavatories and kitchen faucets may not exceed 2.2 GPM, and showers may not exceed 2.5 GPM of flow. CPC Section 402.0. When plumbing fixtures are located below the crown level of the Main Sewer, UPC Section 710.0, the following applies;: Fixtures shall discharge by gravity into an approved sump or receiving tank. From such sump or receiving tank the sewage or other liquid wastes shall be lifted and discharged into the building drain or building sewer by approved ejectors, pumps, or equally efficient approved device. UPC Section 710.2 The ejectors, pumps, or equally efficient approved device discharge shall be sized for 1 gallon per minute for every two fixture units. UPC Section 710.5. In no case shall the discharge be less than 20 gallons per minute. UPC Section 710.3.1 Carlsbad 12-2663 12/20/12 C) The discharge line from the ejectors, pumps, or equally efficient approved device shall be provided with an approved backwater or swing gate check valve. A gate or ball valve shall be located on the discharge side of the backwater or swing gate check valve. UPC Section 710.4. All devices mentioned in a), b) and c) shall be accessible for repair and inspection. UPC Section 710.6. Fixtures in the same structure located above the crown level of the Main Sewer shall not discharge into the sump. UPC Section 710.1 When plumbing fixture flood level rims are below the next upstream manhole the drainage lines serving these fixtures shall be protected by an approved type backwater valve. Fixtures in the same structure that are above the next upstream manhole shall not drain through this valve. UPC Section 710.1 Note on plans that BBQ Installation Guide to be provided to Building Inspector to verify all clearances to combustibles". The covered roof over head must be addressed per Section 920. Domestic open top broiler units will require a metal ventilating hood of sheet metal not less than 0.0122 inch thick to be installed with mm %" clearance to combustibles. The required hood must be at least as wide as the appliance and to be centered over appliance. Exception: Listed domestic open-top broiler units incorporating an integral exhaust system and listed for use without a ventilating hood . If using this exception is used then the plans to note this as well as noting that the underside of the combustible material above the broiler must be protected with not less than ¼" insulating millboard cover with sheet metal not less than 0.0122 thick. If using this exception then provide the manufacturer's cut sheets and listing information and note on the plans Manufacturer's name, model number and listing agency and number. Section 916.1 (B) Bunker(s) mechanical designs are either part of a licensed assembly (See "Architectural" under PME heading) or are field installed. Mechanical plan review will commence after the state licensing has been verified or non-verified. If subject to plan review: Generator and/or battery specifics will need to be provided. Fresh air availability will be reviewed. Exhaust/polluted air evacuation design will be reviewed. Include the grounding/bonding design for the pavilion on the electrical plans. Provide the electrical connection to the bunkers, complete with grounding electrode system. Interior bunker electrical not plan reviewed pending licensing clarification. Note: If you have any questions regarding this Electrical, Plumbing, Mechanical, and Energy plan review list please contact Eric Jensen at (858) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. Carlsbad 12-2663 12/20/12 [DO NOT PAY— THIS IS NOT ANINVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 12-2663 PREPARED BY: Ray Fuller DATE: 12/20/12 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2574 Muirfield Drive BUILDING OCCUPANCY: U TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VB BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) UnHabit Shelter 520 28.74 14,945 Tunnel Cabana 276 102.99 28,425 Covered Porch 564 9.58 5,403 Wine Cellar 276 102.99 28,425 Air Conditioning _ Fire Sprinklers _ TOTAL VALUE 77,198 Jurisdiction Code 1Gb 1By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance _j Plan Check Fee by Ordinance I $587.82 I $382.081 Type of Review: D Repetitive Fee Repeats 21 Complete Review D Other Hourly EsGil Fee fl Structural Only Hr.@* I $329.181 Comments: Sheet I of I macvalue.doc + 404 s.. CITY OF CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK REVIEW TRANSMITTAL Community & Economic Development Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 www.cárlsbadca.gov DATE: 02/13/2013 PROJECT NAME: Thornton Residence_Magnolia Estates PROJECT ID:CT 02-19 PLAN CHECK NO: CB 12-2663 SET#: ii ADDRESS: 2574 Muirfields Dr APN: 213-250-13 VALUATION: $121,532 SCOPE OF WORK: 276 SF UNDERGROUND WINE CELLAR / 70 SF UNDERGROUND TUNNEL / 450 SF UNDERGROUND SHELTER >< This plan check review is complete and has been APPROVED by: LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION Final inspection by Construction Management & Inspection Division required: YES I1 NO LIII I X APPROVAL CONTINGENT UPON THE FOLLOWING: Copy of update letter from geotechnical company - Payment and issuance of Minor grading, GR 12-32 PLANNING ENGINEERING FIRE PREVENTION 760-602-4610 760-602-2750 760-602-4665 1 Chris Sexton Kathleen Lawrence P Greg Ryan - 760-602-4624 - 760-602-2741 760-602-4663 Chris.Sexton@carlsbadca.gov Kathleen.Lawrence@carlsbadca.gov Gregory.Ryan@carlsbadca.gov E Gina Ruiz Linda Ontiveros 17 Cindy Wong 60-602-4675 760-602-2773 760-602-4662 Gina.Ruiz@carlsbadca.gov Linda.Ontiveros@carIsbadca.gov Cynthia.Wong@carIsbadca.gov E Dominic Fieri i 760-602-4664 Dominic.Fieri@carlsbadca.gov Remarks: balance for minor grading attached for reference. V171L -------_-_--- MOW A?Apj $ PLAN CHECK Community& Economic Development Department C I T Y 0 F REVIEW 1635 Faraday Avenue CARL SBAD TRANSMITTAL Carlsbad CA 92008 DATE: 12/27/2012 PROJECT NAME: Thornton Residence_Magnolia Estates PROJECT ID:CT 02-19 PLAN CHECK NO: CB 12-2663 SET#: I ADDRESS: 2574 Muirfietds Dr APN: 213-250-13 VALUATION: $121,532 SCOPE OF WORK: 276 SF UNDERGROUND WINE CELLAR / 70 SF UNDERGROUND TUNNEL / 450 SF UNDERGROUND SHELTER . You may have corrections from one or more of the divisions Listed in the table below. To determine status by one or more of these divisions, please contact 760-602-2719. F-1 This plan check review is complete and has been APPROVED by: LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION Final inspection by Construction Management & Inspection Division required: YES Lii NO D FXI This plan check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended plans as required. Plan Check Comments have been sent to: arlenroper@gmail.com PLANNING ENGINEERING I FIRE PREVENTION r 760-602-4610 760-602-2750 - . . - -- . .. . .. ... 760-602-4665 - Chris Sexton ' Kathleen Lawrence Greg Ryan 760-602-4624 760-602-2741 -- 760-602-4663 ChrisSexton@carlsbadca.gov Kathleen.Lawrence@carlsbadca.gov Gregory.Ryan@carlsbadca.gov Gina Ruiz Linda Ontiveros X r Cindy Wong 760-602-4675 760-602-2773 - 760-602-4662 Gina.Ruiz@carlsbadca.gov Linda.Ontiveros@carlsbadca.gov Cynthia.Wong@carlsbadca.gov Dominic Fier! L L_ 760-602-4664 Dominic.Fieri@carlsbadca.gov Remarks: Thornton Residence—Magnolia Estates PLAN CHECK NO ft CB 12-2663 - ..— Any outstanding issues will be marked with LX. Make the necessary corrections for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to the Building division for re-submittal to tleEngineering division. Items that conform to permit requirements are marked with /ór have been left blank. 1. SITE PLAN Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: See (10. INorth arrow E11 Additional E31I E1 Existing & proposed structures LI I Comments) for EJ I EZJ Existing street improvements I clarification on I Eu Property lines (show all dimensions) I marked items EJ Easements ii! £11 Right-of-way width & adjacent streets Driveway widths i: Existing or proposed sewer lateral Existing or proposed water service Submit on signed approved plans: DWG No. Show on site plan: For clarity, please add some more topo/high point elevations to the civil plan EJ J Drainage patterns Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building". =Existing & proposed slopes and topography • =size, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service(s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service; however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. LJ Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. Include on title sheet: EJ =Site address fJ Assessor's parcel number jJ J Legal description/lot number Lot/Map No.: Lot 13: MAP 14892 Subdivision/Tract: Bressi Ranch PA 11 Reference No(s): DWG 418-8C E-36 Page 2 of 6 REV 6/01/12 .,* I, Thornton Residence—Magnolia Estates PLAN CHECK NO St CB 12-2663 DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE I 1 I F,_/_J Project does not comply with the following engineering conditions of approval for project no.: n/a DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS L1 Dedication for all street rights-of-way adjacent to the' building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ 20,000.00 , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. For single family residence, easement dedication will be completed by the City of Carlsbad, cost$605.00. I-I 121 Dedication required as follows: with map, CT 02-19 IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS, fj All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $100,000.00, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. =I EJ Public improvements required as follows: Construction Of the public improvements must be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ 441 DO so we may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the city prior to issuance of a building permit. -I 121 Future public improvements required as follows: N/A E-36 Page 3 of 6 REV 6/01/12 Thornton Residence_Magnolia Estates PLAN CHECK NO ft CB 12-2663 GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that require a grading permit are found in Section 15.16 of the Municipal Code. =Inadequate information available on site plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities in cubic yards (cut, fill, import, export and remedial). This information must be included on the plans. If no grading is proposed write: "NO GRADING" EJ LJ Grading Permit required: NOTE: The grading permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a building permit. EJ fJ Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) All required documentation must be provided to your Engineering Construction Inspector * **to be determined upon issuance***. The inspector will then provide the engineering counter with a release for the building permit. LJ EJ No grading permit required. EZJ EJ Minor Grading Permit required. See section 10. Additional Comments for specific requirements. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in city right-of-way and/or private work adjacent to the public right-of-way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. EJ Right-of-way permit required for: E-36 Page 4 of 6 REV 6/01/12 LJ 4 Thornton Residence—Magnolia Estates PLANCHECK NO U CB 12-2663 7. STORM WATER Appropriate SWPPP Construction Compliance appears to be a Tier 2 - the link to Tier 2 SWPPP can be found by visiting the link shown to LJ the right >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Project Threat Assessment Form complete. Requires Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, Tier Level: 2 VET suBMrrrED44 Tier 2 àndlor 3 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan submitted, payment of processing fee and review by city completed. http:/Iwww.carlsbadca.gov/business/building/Documents/StormWaterTier2template.pdf Post-Development (SUSMP) Compliance The questionnaire indicates STAN DARDEJ STORM WATER REQUIREMENTS development. Site plan should incorporate measures which comply with the city's SUSMP. Measures include, but are not limited to: 1) reducing the use of new impervious surfaces (e.g. paving), 2) designing drainage from impervious surfaces to discharge over pervious areas (e.g.: turf, landscaping). Storm Water Standards Questionnaire complete. Project needs to incorporate low impact development strategies throughout in one or more of the following ways: JJ Rainwater harvesting (rain barrels or cistern) J Vegetated Roof EJ Blo-retentions cell/rain garden El Pervious pavement/payers EJ Flow-through planter/vegetated or rock drip line 1J Vegetated swales or rock infiltration swales EJ Downspouts disconnect and discharge over landscape El Other: ____ Storm Water Standards Questionnaire incomplete. Please make the corrections, re-sign the questionnaire and resubmit with next submittal. LZ Project is subject to Standard Storm Water Requirements. See city Standard Urban Storm Water Management Plan (SUSMP) for reference. htto://www.carlsbadca.Qov/business/building/Documents/EnciStandsw-stds-vol4-ch2.Ødf E-36 Page 5 of 6 REV 6/01/12 Thornton Residence—Magnolia Estates PLAN CHECK NO.* CB 12-2663 9. WATER METER REVIEW Domestic (potable) Use IEZ1 What size meter is required? EJ jJ Where a residential unit is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system, the minimum meter size shall be a 10 meter. NOTE: the connection fee, SDCWA system capacity charge and the water treatment capacity charge will be based on the size of the meter necessary to meet the water use requirements. EJ For residential units the minimum size meter shall be 5I8, except where the residential unit is larger than 3,500 square feet or on a lot larger than one quarter (1/4) acre where the meter size shall be W. 8. FEES J Required fees have been entered in building permit. SEE GR 12-32 / SW12-537 Drainage fee applicable Added square feet 5379 Added square footage in last two years? J yes no Permit No. paid at MS 01-04 Permit No. Project built after 1980 yes [Zino Impervious surface >50% yes no Impact unconstructed facility El yes IZin EZJ Fire sprinklers required 7Jyes no (is addition over 150' from center line) • Upgrade ayes Dno EJ EJ No fees required 10. Additional Comments Provide (2) copies of soils reports Provide (2) copies of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Provide a completed grading permit application, Form E-24 Show the temporary stockpile location and include a separate erosion control sheet for the BMP's during construction --provide a reference to the SWPPP permit which has been assigned as permit# SW12-537 <<<All items must be addressed for building plan re-submittal to Engineering>>> Attachments: EngineeringAppllcatlon Storm Water Form Right-of-Way ApplicatIon/Info. L'IJ Reference Documents E-36 Page 6of6 REV 6/01/12 is Tier 2 Construction SWPPP Site Assessment Form Project Information: Project ID: Project Name: Thornton Residence-Magnolia Estates Project Address/Location; 2574 Muirfields Drive Responsible Parties/Contact Information; Name of Preparer: Aaron Parker, PE Qualification of Preparer (Registration/Certification): California RCE 68547 Address: 3990 Ruffin Road, Ste. 120 City/State/Zip Code: San Diego, CA 92123 Phone Number: 858-560-1141 Name of Owner/Owner's Agent: Snd 0 Address: W. City/State/Zip Code: '!54J 1q Old J9 66 / Phone Number: / Name of Emergency Contact: )hn& (during construction) Address: zc79 /Asps jt City/State/Zip Code: IL.~5ro1 /_CP/_92X.)Q Phone Number: Page 1 of 10 Tier 2 Site Assessment Form 3/24I0 Site and Construction Activity Description: Construction Start Date: ~As4.' :ZO 3 End Date: P-. ZOD If work begins in rainy season or extends into rainy season, explain how project work can be scheduled can be altered to avoid rainy season impacts or to lessen exposure of site during rainy season: 2oZ.fT ?a ecW?UW7d=V 45 jd.Li4 A Grading Quantities: Cut: CY; Fill: CY; Import: CY; Export: ç CY Any Stockpile Proposed? '4'5 If yes, then estimate quantity: I 1.a6 CY Estimated duration of stockpile: < I Months Soils types: AP'TiVidow, flW l4411 Does site contain a preponderance of soils with USDA-NRCS erosion factor kf greater than or equal to 0.4? IO Is a staging area proposed (yes/no)? t49> If yes, then where is it located? Is concrete washout required (yes/no)? Where is it located? /'tII%1O... C,'id.. KdZ11AJBwW W.4GL7T Any existing site contamination (yes/no)? Np - - Where is it located? Any vehicle storage, maintenance or fueling area proposed (yes/no)? ,i4 Where is it located? Any de-watering operation proposed (yes/no)? 4'tj Where is it located? Any other special operations proposed that may impair water quality (yes/no)? NO What and where? Page 2oflO Tier 2 Site Assessment Form 3/24/08 I Watershed Basin project drains to: 0 Buena Vista Lagoon 0. Agua Hedionda Lagoon 0 Encinas Creek ik Batiquitos Lagoon Pacific Ocean Is project drainage tributary to a CWA section 303(d) listed water body impaired for sediment (includes Buena Vista and Agua Hedionda Lagoons) (yes/no): 140 If yes, describe additional controls that will be used on project site to mitigate for sediment impairments (if any): Is project inside or within 200 feet of an Environmentally Sensitive Area (yes/no): it/C If yes, describe additional controls that will be used on project site to mitigate for potential storm water impacts (if any): Are any agency permits required (yes/no)? NO Check off permit types required: 0 Army Corps 404 permit Regional Board Water Quality 401 Certification 0 Coastal Commission Certification U.S. Fish and Wildlife Section 7 0 Fish and Game Stream Alteration Agreement Other list: Page 3 of 10 Tier 2 Site Assessment Form 3/24/08 J List materials that will be used on construction site and their handling and storage requirements Material Characteristics/Toxicity Handling requirements If any toxic or hazardous materials are proposed, then a spill prevention plan is required. Is a spill prevention plan required (yes/no)? NO If yes, attach spill prevention plan. Perceived Threat to Storm Water Quality rating: Using the Construction Threat Assessment Worksheet for determination of the projects Perceived Threat to Storm Water Quality rating (E-33): The Construction Threat to Storm Water Quality rating for this project is: KHigh 0 Medium Signature of Plan Preparer:• NO. 68547 7V'- ; Signature: A=221 (jLk_ \*#' Date:______ Print Name: AAROR Title: Attachments: Storm Water Compliance Form - Tier 2 O Spill Prevention Plan O Hydrology and/or hydraulic study O Solis and/or geotóchnical report(s) O Other. List: Page 4 of 10 Tier 2 Site Assessment Form 3/24/08 BMP Selection: The following tables are provided to help identify and select appropriate site specific BMPs for the proposed project. Review the list of potential site construction activities and site conditions described along the left hand column of.each sheet. Then, for each activity or site condition that is included in the proposed project, pick one or more of the BMPs described at the top of the form and place an X(s) in the box(es) that form(s) an intersection between the activity/site condition row and BMP column(s). All structural (physical facility) BMP's should be shown on the site plan in the Construction SWPPP drawing set. Any proposed no-structural BMP should be, noted in the Special Notes on the Construction SWPPP drawing set. Page 5 of 10 Tier 2 Site Assessment Form 3/24/08 0 0 10 XCWO ,) m5• • 0• CD - = D) CO CD O CO CD (0 .40 (0 0 0 (110 m -0 M fl) CO) CD o o 0) 0 FD 0 0 EC-1 Scheduling EC-2 Preservation of Existing Vegetation EC-3 Hydraulic Mulch EC-4 Hydroseeding m EC-5 Soil Binders 0 0 EC-6 Straw Mulch C) EC-7 Geotextiles & Mats 0 a EC-8 Wood Mulching — W EC-9 Earth Dikes and ic Drainage Swales u EC-10 Velocity Dissipation EC-1.1 Slope Drains EC-1 2 Streambank Stabilization EC-13 Polyacrylamide WE-i Wind Erosion Control 0cL 0000 m Cl) 0" Cl) 000 C) C) C) C) Ct CL • 0 ca U U IU co (C CE CD 5 in 9CL > a •- 0) 4.. K SE-1 Silt Fence SE-2 Sediment Basin SE-3 Sediment Trap -------- SE-4 Check Dam CD 0. 3 ---- SE-5 Fiber Rolls SE-6 Gravel Bag Berm - - - - - - - - - - --- Street Sweeping and SE -7 Vacuuming — w SE-8 Sandbag Barrier - SE-9 Straw Bale Barrier U) --— SE 10 Storm Drain Inlet Protection SE-il Chemical Treatment CD 00 0 Ift (0 -I C) 0 > Cl) (n '- mCD on—. . C) . CD A CA CO)(I) CD CL as—. to 0 tn - () . 0 o 7 TR-1 Stabilized Construction In W5 TR-2 Stabilized Construcion Roadway C) - - - TR-3 Ingress/Egress Tire Wash 0 -I I..' I. > 'I 3 I.. I Non-Storm Water Management BMPs - 0) . C to 0) 5 t C is ID 2' o LOL a is - (5 BMP Description 4 S a 0 0) 0 0 ° • E t! 0 • a C E .CL c 0. is E (5 (5 0 - a w Cr Ui Ui 05 U 5 2 0 cc a a 0 0 I- CO - ° 0 5) ° ° — C (5 5) 0 a ! cj E ! dl 25 0.>>> 0.00 CASQA Designation 4 Construction Activity & Site Conditions — - — Landscaping & irrigation - - — — Drilling/Boring - - - - — — - Concrete/Asphalt Sawcutting Concrete flatwork - - -- Paving — — — Wire, Cable & -- Connector Installation Site Housekeeping - — - — -- — — — — — — - — Staging Area Equipment Maintenance --- and Fueling -- Hazardous Substance Management - - Dewatering - - - - - - - Steam crossing -- — — Material delivery - Solid waste handling -- - - including trash and --- debris removal Concrete or stucco work — .- — Other (list): -- - Page 9 of 10 Tier 2 Site Assessment Form 3/24/08 C O 1 -IC)) g g 0J0Q0.(D a,0 C) C—) Cr -- F5 CO Cn 7r CD . 0 CD CL - U) -. 0) 0 0 to to woImcow -0000r- 03 4, to WM-1 Material Delivery and Storage WM-2 Material Use IA WM-3 Stockpile Management ic 0) WM-4 Spill Prevention and Control CD ------------- 0 CD ------- WM-5 Solid Waste Management WM-6 Hazardous Waste Management W CL WM-7 Contaminated Soil Management CD çWM-8 Concrete Waste Management up WM-9 Sanitary! Septic Waste Management 0 WM-1O Liquid Waste Management .40 CITY OF CARLSBAD STORM WATER COMPLIANCE FORM - TIER 2 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP E-30 Development Services Land Development Engineering 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2750 www.carlsbadca.gov I am applying to the City of Carlsbad for one or more of the following type of construction permit(s): Grading Permit Building Permit 0 Right-of-Way Permit (MINo1a) My project does not meet any of the following criteria for a project that poses a significant threat to storm water quality I My project does not include clearing, grading or other ground disturbances resulting in soil disturbance totaling one or more acres including any associated construction staging, equipment storage, stockpiling, pavement removal, refueling and maintenance areas; and, / My project is not part of a phased development plan that will cumulatively result in soil disturbance totaling one or more acres including any associated construction staging, equipment storage, stockpiling, pavement removal, refueling and maintenance areas; and, I My project is not located inside or within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area and will not have a significant potential for contributing pollutants to nearby receiving waters by way of storm water runoff or non-storm water discharge(s). My project requires preparation and approval of a Tier 2 Construction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) because my project meets one or more of the following criteria demonstrating that the project potentially poses a moderate threat to storm water quality: U My project requires a grading plan pursuant to the Carlsbad Grading Ordinance (Chapter 15.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); and/or, My Project will result in 2,500 square feet or more of soils disturbance including any associated construction staging, stockpiling, pavement removal, equipment storage, refueling and maintenance areas and, my project meets one or more of the following additional criteria: Project is located within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area or the Pacific Ocean; Project's disturbed area is located on a slope with a grade at or exceeding 5 horizontal to I vertical; Project's disturbed area is located along or within 30 feet of a storm drain inlet, an open drainage channel or watercourse; and/or __• Project will be initiated during the rainy season or will extend into, the rainy season (Oct. 1 through April 30). I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE ABOVE CHECKED STATEMENTS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. I AM SUBMITTING FOR CITY APPROVAL A TIER 2 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CITY STANDARDS. I UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST ADHERE TO, AND AT ALL TIMES, COMPLY WITH THE CITY APPROVED TIER 2 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IS COMPLETE AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. Aøllcant Information and Sianature Box Address: Assessors Parcel Numbers: ZS7q Mi.flS P Z13--3 Applicant Name: Applicant Title: 6 GO -ro9.t4rcw Applicant Signatur Date: This Box for City Use Only City C=7~10a: Yes No Project ID:(6gJ1 %13 (6 /2-32J E-30 Page 1 of 1 REV 4130/10 Address: z67q AUIFLAWAPS P Assessor's Parcel Numbers: I3-Z.-13 Applicant Name: Applicant Title: 1pD 1iov.4rbw Applicant Signatur Date: 1/9/13 City Concprfce: Yes No __ By: Project ID:fr1 Applicant Information and Signature Box This Box for City Use Only ~ -K— /,a -, 5, ?7~,2, J 40.hk CITY OF CARLSBAD STORM WATER COMPLIANCE FORM - TIER 2 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP E-30 Develonment Services Land Development Engineering 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2750 www.carlsbadca.gov I am applying to the City of Carlsbad for one or more of the following type of construction permit(s): 14 Grading Permit Building Permit. 0 Right-of-Way Permit (Mt Noy) My project does not meet any of the following criteria for a project that poses a significant threat to storm water quality: I My project does not include clearing, grading or other ground disturbances resulting in soil disturbance totaling one or more acres including any associated construction staging, equipment storage, stockpiling, pavement removal, refueling and maintenance areas; and, v' My project is not part of a phased development plan that will cumulatively result in soil disturbance totaling one or more acres including any associated construction staging, equipment storage, stockpiling, pavement removal, refueling and maintenance areas; and, I My project is not located inside or within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area and will not have a significant potential for contributing pollutants to nearby receiving waters by way of storm water runoff or non-storm water discharge(s). My project requires preparation and approval of a Tier 2 Construction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) because my project meets one or more of the following criteria demonstrating that the project potentially poses a moderate threat to storm water quality: IJ My project requires a grading plan pursuant to the Carlsbad Grading Ordinance (Chapter 15.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); and/or, My Project will result in 2,500 square feet or more of soils disturbance including any associated construction staging, stockpiling, pavement removal, equipment storage, refueling and maintenance areas and, my project meets one or more of the following additional criteria: Project is located within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area or the Pacific Ocean; Project's disturbed area is located on a slope with a grade at or exceeding 5 horizontal to I vertical; Project's disturbed area is located along or within 30 feet of a storm drain inlet, an open drainage channel or watercourse; and/or ..__.-. Project will be initiated during the rainy season or will extend into the rainy season (Oct. 1 through April 30). I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE ABOVE CHECKED STATEMENTS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. I AM SUBMITTING FOR CITY APPROVAL A TIER 2 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CITY STANDARDS. I UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST ADHERE TO, AND AT ALL TIMES, COMPLY WITH THE CITY APPROVED TIER 2 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IS COMPLETE AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. E-30 Page 1 of 1 REV 4/30/10 I 4fpQL 90 Is-4aEy>—gô'øi,l I- 311- iA1âI21J 7., 52 CITY OF CAR LSBAD PLANNING DIVISION Development Services BUILDING PLAN CHECK Planning Division REVIEW CHECKLIST 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-4610 P28 www.carlsbadca.2ov DATE: 12-12-12 PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ID: PLAN CHECK NO: CB 12-2663 SET#: I ADDRESS: 2574 Muirfields Dr APN: 213-250-13 This plan check review is complete and has been APPROVED by the Planning Division. By: Chris Sexton A Final Inspection by the Planning Division is required Yes N No You may also have corrections from one or more of the divisions listed below. Approval from these divisions may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Resubmitted plans should include corrections from all divisions. This plan check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended 'plans as required. Plan Check Comments have been sent to: For questions.or clarifications on the attached checklist please contact the following reviewer as marked: PLANNING ENGINEERING FIRE PREVENTION 760-602-4610 760-602-2750 760-602-4665 Chris Sexton Kathleen Lawrence LII Greg Ryan 760-602-4624 Chris.Sexton@carlsbadca.gov 760-602-2741 Kathleen.Lawrence@carlsbadca.gov 760-602-4663 Gregorv.Rvan@carlsbadca.gov Gina Ruiz Linda Ontiveros Cindy Wong 760-602-4675 Gina.Ruiz@carlsbadca.gov 760-602-2773 Linda.Ontiveros@ca rlsbadca.ov 760-602-4662 Cynthia.Won@carIsbadca.ov L.j LI Dominic Fieri 760-602-4664 Dominic.Fieri@carIsbadca.gov Remarks: Plan Check No. CB 12-2663 Address 2574 Muirfields Dr Date 12-12-12 Review #j Planner Chris Sexton Phone (760) 602-4624 Type of Project &.Use: cabana/patio/wine cellar Net Project Density: 1.0 DU/AC Zoning: P-C General Plan: RLM Facilities Management Zone: .17 CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres:_____ (For non-residential development: Type of land use created by this permit: REVIEW #: 1 2 3 Legend: Z Item Complete 0 Item Incomplete - Needs your action IJ El Environmental Review Required: YES 0 NO El TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: El El Discretionary Action Required: YES El NO El TYPE.____ APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Z El El Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES 0 NO M. CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES 0 NO 0 If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): El El Habitat Management Plan Data Entry Completed? YES El NO El If property has Habitat Type identified in Table 11 of HMP, complete HMP Permit application and assess fees in Permits Plus (AIP/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, HMP Fees, Enter Acres of Habitat Type impacted/taken, UPDATE!) El El Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES El NO El (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES [] NO El (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) El El Housing Tracking Form (form P.20) completed: YES El NO El N/A El P-28 Page 2 of 3 07/11 Site Plan: Z El 0 Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow; property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of- way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear - yard slopes). Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. City Council Policy 44— Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines U U 1. Applicability: YES U NO U U El 0 2. Project complies: YES 0 NOD Zoning: 1. Setbacks: N/A Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Top of slope: Required Shown Required Shown Required Shown Required Shown Required Shown OMSK 2. Accessory structure setbacks: cabana Front: Required 20 Shown 20 Interior Side: Required IcY Shown jQ Street Side: Required 10 Shown 10' Rear: Required Q Shown Structure separation: Required icY Shown 17 Lot Coverage: Required <40% Shown <40% Height: cabana Required <14' with 3:12 roof pitch Shown 13'5" Z 0 0 5. Parking: Spaces Required 2 Shown (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown El 11 El Additional Comments OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER Chris Sexton DATE-12-12-12 P-28 Page 3 of 3 07/11 PLANNING DIVISION Development Services BUILDING PLAN CHECK Planning Division Faraday Avenue CITY OF REVIEW CHECKLIST 1635 F(760)602-4610 C R LS B1AD P28 DATE: 10/3/12 PROJECT NAME: McDonalds PROJECT ID: CD 12-07/CUP 94-09/SDP 83-11(F) PLAN CHECK NO: CB 12-1908 SET#: I ADDRESS: 5990 Avenida Encinas APN: 210-170-06&07 LI This plan check review is complete and has been APPROVED by the Planning Division. By: Greg Fisher A Final Inspection by the Planning Division is required once approved Z Yes J No You may also have corrections from one or more of the divisions listed below. Approval from these divisions may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Resubmitted plans should include corrections from all divisions. This plan check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended plans as required. Plan Check Comments have been sent to: Applicant For questions or clarifications on the attached checklist please contact the following reviewer as marked: PLANNING ENGINEERING FIRE PREVENTION 760-602-4610 760-602-2750, 760-602-4665 Chris Sexton Kathleen Lawrence . Greg Ryan 760-602-4624 760-602-2741 760-602-4663 Chris.Sexton@carlsbadca.gov Kathteen.Lawrence@carIsbadca.OV Gregory.Rvan@carIsbadca.gov [] Gina Ruiz [] Linda Ontiveros LI Cindy Wong 760-602-4675 760-602-2773 760-602-4662 Gina.Ruiz@carlsbadca.gov Linda.Ontiveros@carisbadca.gov Cvnthia.Wonp@carIsbadca.gov Greg Fisher 760-602-4629 LI Dominic Fieri G re.f isher@carisbadca.gov Corrections required 760-602-4664 Domineri@carisbadca.gov Remarks: Building plans are not approved/corrections required. Plan Check No. CBI 2-1908 Address 5990 Avenida Encinas Date 10/3/12 Review #1 Planner Greg Fisher Phone (760) 602- 4629 Type of Project & Use: Existing Restaurant Net Project Density:N/A_ Zoning: C-T-Q General Plan: lEFacilities Management Zone: CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres:_____ (For non-residential development: Type of land use created by this permit: REVIEW #: 123 Legend: Z Item Complete 0 Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES 0 NO 0 TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: YES Z NO D TYPE CD 12-07 APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: CUP 94-09/SDP 83-11(F) II.Iu Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES 0 NO 0 CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES 0 NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Exempt 0 0 Habitat Management Plan Data Entry Completed? YES IJ NO 0 If property has Habitat Type identified in Table 11 of HMP, complete HMP Permit application and assess fees in Permits Plus (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, HMP Fees, Enter Acres of Habitat Type impacted/taken, UPDATE!) O 0 • Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES 0 NO 0 (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES 0 NO 0 (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing YIN, Enter Fee, UPDATE') 21 0 0 Housing Tracking Form (form P-20) completed: YES [] NO E] N/A P-28 Page 2 of 3 07/11 Site Plan: El El Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of- way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes). Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. City Council Policy 44— Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines Z El El 1. Applicability: YES El NO Z El El 2. Project complies: YES El NOD Zoning: El El 1. Setbacks: N/A Front: Required Shown - Interior Side: Required Shown - Street Side: Required Shown - Rear: Required Shown - Top of slope: Required Shown - Z El El 2. Accessory structure setbacks: N/A Front: Required Shown Interior Side: Required Shown Street Side: Required Shown Rear: Required Shown Structure separation: Required Shown Z El 0 Lot Coverage: Required: N/A Shown El El Height: Required: 17:6 Shown 17.6 to main parapet 50 Z(LIJEl Parking: Required:"41%paces per CUP 04-09 Shown 6spaces El Do )c+fi.eek1 CORRECTION: The building plans are not consistent with CD 12 -07/site plan regarding total parking spaces provided: building square footage: ADA path. etc. The building plans need to accurately depict the approved Consistency Determination (CD) site plan otherwise the CD needs to be modified and approved by the City Planner. Also, under the scope of work, a 75 SF addition to the drive-thru area is proposed. Please clarify this addition as this may not have been approved under the CD. OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE ?A) Te Not ready to issue permit until scope of work shown on the building permit is consistent with the approved CD and/or receives City Planner approval for changes. -IJ— scoRE 0f— ,x R-kgWUJ %,e.* fuP 4: OSE PtA",t ow"ot HID £ çC 'p 10 3 McDonalds Plan Check CB 12-1908 2' plan check submitted 12/21/12 December 27, 2012 The new scope of work shown on the building plans submitted to the City on 12/21/12 requires the approval of a conditional use permit amendment and coastal development permit applications. These discretionary permits require City Council approval. Application materials can be obtained at the City's website or calling the planner. The new scope of work is also inconsistent with the Preliminary Review application PRE 12-29. response letter dated 12/3/12 and the Consistency Determination DC 12-07 response letter dated October 12, 2012. The proposed scope of work does not comply with Chapter 21.208 of the CIVIC and is therefore not supported. Please call me Greg Fisher at 760-602-4629 for further clarification and/or questions. k ) 00&1) I lix (VL Leighton and Associates, Inc. A LEIGHTON GROUP COMPANY February 22, 2013 Project No. 10175.001 To: Todd Thornton 2574 Muirfields Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Attention: Mr. Todd Thornton Subject: Geotechnical Update Letter and Addendum Recommendations for Lots 12 and 13, Thornton Residence, Bressi Ranch, PA-1 1, California References: California Building Standards Commission (CBSC), 2010, California Building Code (CBC) Leighton, and Associates, 2001, Geotechnical Preliminary Investigation for Mass Grading, Bressi Ranch Carlsbad, California, Project No. 971009- 005, dated March 14, 2001 Leighton and Associates, 2004, As-Graded Report of Rough and Fine Grading, Lots I through 25, Planning Area PA-1 1, Bressi Ranch, Carlsbad Tract No. 00-06, Carlsbad, California, Project No. 971009-014, dated October 8, 2004 Leighton and Associates, 2010, Geotechnical Update Letter, Magnolia Estates, Bressi Ranch, PA-1 1, Carlsbad, California, Project No. 042458- 001, dated February 10, 2010 In accordance with your request, we have prepared an update letter for the geotechnical conditions for Lots 12 and 13, the Thornton Residence, located at 2574 Muirfields Drive in Carlsbad, California. The purpose of our geotechnical update evaluation was to observe the existing geotechnical conditions of the subject site, review the project geotechnical reports, update seismic design parameters per 2010 California Building Code, and to provide appropriate conclusions and additional recommendations, if 3934 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite B205 • San Diego, CA 92123-4425 I 858.292.8030 • Fax c' eighto%roup 10175.001 necessary, for the proposed site improvements. Currently, it is our understanding that the proposed improvements will consist of an underground shelter, a pool, patio structures, hardscape and landscaping. As background, the original geotechnical investigation of the subject site, Bressi Ranch PA-1 1, was performed by Leighton in 2001 (Leighton, 2001). In addition, Leighton provided geotechnical observation and testing during the mass grading of PA-1 I that was performed between June 2003 and August 2004 (Leighton, 2004). Subsequently, a geotechnical update was performed by Leighton for the Magnolia Estates, Lots 6 through 19 (Leighton, 2010). Site Reconnaissance and Observations On February 19, 2013, we performed a site reconnaissance of the subject site. During our site visit, we observed on-going construction activity associated with the backyard improvements, and an excavation in the northeast corner of lot 13 for an underground shelter. The excavation was approximately 15 feet wide, 60 feet long and roughly 14 feet below the existing ground surface. The excavation currently contained two large diameter horizontal cylindrical units that have been partially backfilled with 4 to 5 feet of % inch gravel. The exposed soil within the excavation side slopes (i.e., near vertical) was dense compacted fill placed during the original mass grading of PA-1 I (Leighton, 2004). It should be noted that we were unable to observe the bottom of the excavation due to the gravel, and there was no evidence of any filter fabric separating the gravel and excavation walls. Based on our observations and review of the referenced project geotechnical report, the geotechnical conditions of the subject site have not significantly changed since the publication of previous geotechnical update report (Leighton, 2010), excluding the construction of the residential home that was recently completed in 2012, and current construction activities, as discussed above. Therefore, it is our professional opinion that the geotechnical recommendation presented in the As-Graded Report of Rough and Fine Grading (Leighton, 2004) are still applicable for its intended use, provided the following recommendations are incorporated into the design and construction of the structures and improvement. Undated Seismic Recommendations We have provided updated seismic design parameters per California Building Code (CBC 2010) for proposed design of buildings. The following seismic design parameters have been determined in accordance with the 2010 CBC and the USGS Ground Motion Parameter Calculator (Version 5.10). -2- Leighton 10175.001 CBC (2010) Seismic Code - Parameters for the Site Description Values CBC Reference Site Class . 0 Table 1613.5.2 Short Period Spectral Acceleration S 1.123 Figure 1613.5(3) 1-Second Period Spectral Acceleration S1 0.425 Figure 1613.5(4) Short Period Site Coefficient F3 1.051 Table 1613.5.3(1) 1-Second Period Site Coefficient F 1.575 Table 1613.5.3(2) Adjusted Short Period Spectral Acceleration SMS 1.181 Equation 16-36 Adjusted 1-Second Period Acceleration SMI 0.669 Equation 16-37 Design Short Period Spectral Response Parameter SDS 0.787 Equation 16-38 Design I Period Spectral Response Parameter 11-Second S, 0.446 Equation 16-39 Foundations The proposed structures may be supported by conventional continuous or isolated spread footings. Footings should extend a minimum of 24 inches beneath the lowest adjacent finish grade. At these depths, footings may be designed for a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. The allowable pressure may be increased by one-third when considering loads of short duration such as wind or seismic forces. The minimum recommended width of footings is 18 inches for continuous footings and 24 inches for square or round footings. Reinforcement of footings should be per the structural engineer's design. We anticipate that structures constructed as recommended may experience total settlement of about 1 inch. Differential settlement may be assumed as half of the total settlement. Temporary Excavations Excavations of the onsite materials may generally be accomplished with conventional heavy-duty earthwork equipment. In accordance with OSHA requirements, excavations deeper than 5 feet should be shored or be laid back if workers are to enter such excavations. Temporary sloping gradients should be determined in the field by a "competent person" as defined by OSHA. For preliminary planning, sloping of surficial soils at 1:1 (horizontal to vertical) may be assumed. Although not anticipated, excavations greater than 20 feet in height will require an alternative sloping plan or shoring plan prepared by a California registered civil engineer. -3- Leighton 10175.001 Fill Placement and Compaction The on-site soils are generally suitable for reuse as compacted fill, provided they are free of organic materials and debris. Areas to receive structural fill and/or other surface improvements should be scarified to a minimum depth of 12 inches; brought to at least 2 percent above optimum moisture content; and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM Test Method Dl 557). The optimum lift thickness to produce a uniformly compacted fill will depend on the type and size of compaction equipment used. In general, fill should be placed in uniform lifts not exceeding 8 inches in thickness. Placement and compaction of fill should be performed in general accordance with the current City's grading ordinances under the observation and testing of the geotechnical consultant, sound construction practices, and the General Earthwork and Grading Specifications for Rough Grading presented in Appendix A. Note that a geotextile filter fabric (e.g.. Mirafi 140N. or equivalent) should be used to separate gravel and fill soil. Lateral Earth Pressures for Basement/Subsurface Walls The recommended lateral pressures for the onsite very low to low expansive soil (expansion index less than 50) or medium expansive soil (expansion index between 51 and 70) and level or sloping backfill are presented on the table below. Higher medium to very high expansive soils (having an expansion potential greater than 70) should not be used as backfill soils. Note that previous expansion testing indicates the site has medium expansive soils at finish grade. Lateral Earth Pressures Conditions Equivalent Fluid Weight (pcf) Very Low to Low Expansive Soils Medium Expansive Soils Expansion Index less than 50 Expansion Index between 51 and 70 Level 2:1 Slope Level 2:1 Slope Active 35 55 60 70 At-Rest 55 65 70 80 Passive 350 150 350 150 -4- Leighton 10175.001 Embedded structural walls should be designed for lateral earth pressures exerted on them. The magnitude of these pressures depends on the amount of deformation that the wall can yield under load. If the wall can yield enough to mobilize the full shear strength of the soil, it can be designed for "active" pressure. If the wall cannot yield under the applied load, the shear strength of the soil cannot be mobilized and the earth pressure will be higher. Such walls should be designed for "at rest" conditions (i.e., a basement wall). If a structure moves toward the soils, the resulting resistance developed by the soil is the "passive" resistance. To account for potential redistribution of forces during a seismic event, basement walls should also be checked considering an additional uniform seismic pressure distribution equal to 8 H psf, where H equals the overall retained height in feet (ASCE. 2006). For design purposes, the recommended equivalent fluid pressure for each case for walls founded above the static ground water and backfilled with soils of very low to low expansion potential or medium expansion potential is provided on the table above. The equivalent fluid pressure values assume free-draining conditions. If conditions other than those assumed above are anticipated, the equivalent fluid pressures values should be provided on an individual-case basis by the geotechnical engineer. The geotechnical and structural engineer should evaluate surcharge-loading effects from the adjacent structures. All retaining wall structures should be provided with appropriate drainage and appropriately waterproofed. The outlet pipe should be sloped to drain to a suitable outlet. Typical wall drainage design is illustrated in Appendix A. For sliding resistance, the friction coefficient of 0.35 may be used at the concrete and soil interface. In combining the total lateral resistance, the passive pressure or the frictional resistance should be reduced by 50 percent. Wall footings should be designed in accordance with structural considerations. The passive resistance value may be increased by one-third when considering loads of short duration including wind or seismic loads. The horizontal distance between foundation elements providing passive resistance should be a minimum of three times the depth of the elements to allow full development of these passive pressures. The total depth of retained earth for the design of cantilever walls should be the vertical distance below the ground surface measured at the wall face for stem design or measured at the heel of the footing for overturning and sliding. All wall backcuts and excavations should be made in accordance with the current OSHA requirements. The granular and native backfill soils should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM Test Method D1557). The granular fill should extend horizontally to a minimum distance equal to one-half the wall height behind the walls. The walls should be constructed and backfilled as soon as possible after backcut excavations. Prolonged exposure of backcut slopes may result in some localized slope instability I -5- Leighton 10175.001 Control of Surface Water and Drainage Surface drainage should be carefully taken into consideration during precise grading, landscaping, and building construction. Positive drainage (e.g., roof gutters, downspouts, area drain, etc.) should be provided to direct surface water away from structures and towards the street or suitable drainage devices. Ponding of water adjacent to structures should be avoided; roof gutters, downspouts, and area drains should be aligned so as to transport surface water to a minimum distance of 5 feet away from structures. The performance of structural foundations is dependent upon maintaining adequate surface drainage away from structures. Water should be transported off the site in approved drainage devices or unobstructed swales. We recommend that the minimum flow gradient for the drainage be 1-percent for area drains and paved drainage swales; and 2-percent for unpaved drainage swales. We recommend that where structures will be located within 5 feet of a proposed drainage swale, the surface drainage adjacent to the structures be accomplished with a gradient of at least 3-1/2 percent away from the structure for a minimum horizontal distance of 3 feet. Drainage should be further maintained by a swale or drainage path at a gradient of at least 1-percent for area drains and paved drainage swales and 2-percent for unpaved drainage swales to a suitable collection device (i.e. area drain, street gutter, etc.). We also recommend that structural footings within 4 feet of the drainage swale flowline be deepened so that the bottom of the footing is at least 12 inches below the flow-line of the drainage swale. In places where the prospect of maintaining the minimum recommended gradient for the drainage swales and the construction of additional area drains is not feasible, provisions for specific recommendations may be necessary, outlining the importance of maintaining positive drainage. The impact of heavy irrigation or inadequate runoff gradient can create perched water conditions, resulting in seepage or shallow groundwater conditions where previously none existed. Maintaining adequate surface drainage and controlled irrigation will significantly reduce the potential for nuisance-type moisture problems. To reduce differential earth movements (such as heaving and shrinkage due to the change in moisture content of foundation soils, which may cause distress to a structure or improvement), the moisture content of the soils surrounding the structure should be kept as relatively constant as possible. All area drain inlets and mechanical dewatering sump pumps should be well maintained and kept clear of debris in order to function properly. In addition, yard landscaping should not cause any obstruction to the yard drainage. Rerouting of yard drainage pattern and/or installation of area drains should be performed, if necessary. A qualified civil engineer or a landscape architect should be consulted prior to rerouting of drainage. owl 0 Leighton 10175.001 Landscaping and Post-Construction Landscaping and post-construction practices carried out by the owner(s) and their representative bodies exert significant influences on the integrity of structures founded on expansive soils. Improper landscaping and post-construction practices, which are beyond the control of the geotechnical engineer, are frequently the primary cause of distress to these structures. Recommendations for proper landscaping and post-construction practices are provided in the following paragraphs within this section. Adhering to these recommendations will help in minimizing distress due to expansive soils, and in ensuring that such effects are limited to cosmetic damages, without compromising the overall integrity of structures. The recommendations provided herein have been developed in general accordance with the guidelines provided within the Post-Tensioning Institute's (1996) recommendations for the design and construction of post-tensioned slabs-on- ground. Initial landscaping should be done on all sides adjacent to the foundation of a structure, and adequate measures should be taken to ensure drainage of water away from the foundation. If larger, shade providing trees are desired, such trees should be planted away from structures (at a minimum distance equal to half the mature height of the tree) in order to prevent penetration of the tree roots beneath the foundation of the structure. Locating planters adjacent to buildings or structures should be avoided as much as possible. If planters are utilized in these locations, they should be properly designed so as to prevent fluctuations in the moisture content of subgrade soils. Planting areas at grade should be provided with appropriate positive drainage. Wherever possible, exposed soil areas should be above paved grades. Planters should not be depressed below adjacent paved grades unless provisions for drainage, such as catch basins and drains, are made. Adequate drainage gradients, devices, and curbing should be provided to prevent runoff from adjacent pavement or walks into planting areas. Watering should be done in a uniform, systematic manner as equally as possible on all sides of the foundation, to keep the soil moist. Irrigation methods should promote uniformity of moisture in planters and beneath adjacent concrete flatwork. Overwatering and underwatering of landscape areas must be avoided. Areas of soil that do no have ground cover may require more moisture, as they are more susceptible to evaporation. Ponding or trapping of water in localized areas adjacent to the foundations can cause differential moisture levels in subsurface soils and should, therefore, not be allowed. Trees located within a distance of 20 feet of foundations would require more water in periods of extreme drought, and in some cases, a root injection system may be required to maintain moisture equilibrium. During extreme hot and dry periods, close observations should be carried out around foundations to ensure that adequate watering is being undertaken to prevent soil from separating or pulling back from the foundations. '4 -7- Leighton Respectfully submitted, LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 1-0 10175.001 Construction Observation and Testing Construction observation and testing should be performed by the geotechnical consultant during future excavations and foundation Or retaining wall construction on the graded portions of the site. Additionally, footing excavations should be observed and moisture determination tests of subgrade soils should be performed by the geotechnical consultant prior to the pouring of concrete. Foundation design plans should also be reviewed by the geotechnical consultant prior to excavations. Limitations The nature of many sites is such that differing geotechnical or geological conditions can occur over small areal distances and under varying climatic conditions. The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based in part upon data that were obtained from a limited number of observations, site visits, excavations, samples, and. tests. Such information is by necessity incomplete and therefore preliminary. Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendations presented in this report are considered preliminary and can be relied upon only if Leighton has the opportunity to observe the subsurface conditions during grading and construction of the proposed improvements, in order to confirm that our preliminary findings are representative for the site. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact this office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Mike D. Jensen, CEG 2457 William D. Olson, RCE 45283 Project Geologist Associate Engineer Distribution: (4) Addressee Attachments: Appendix A - General Earthwork and Grading Specifications -8- Leighton LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. General Earthwork and Grading Specifications 1.0 General 1.1 Intent These General Earthwork and Grading Specifications are for the grading and earthwork shown on the approved grading plan(s) and/or indicated in the geotechnical report(s). These Specifications are a part of the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report(s). In case of conflict, the specific recommendations in the geotechnical report shall supersede these more general Specifications. Observations of the earthwork by the project Geotechnical Consultant during the course of grading may result in new or revised recommendations that could supersede these specifications or the recommendations in the geotechnical report(s). 1.2 The Geotechnical Consultant of Record Prior to commencement of work, the owner shall employ the Geotechnical Consultant of Record (Geotechnical Consultant). The Geotechnical Consultants shall be responsible for reviewing the approved geotechnical report(s) and accepting the adequacy of the preliminary geotechnical findings, conclusions, and recommendations prior to the commencement of the grading. Prior to commencement of grading, the Geotechnical Consultant shall review the "work plan" prepared by the Earthwork Contractor (Contractor) and schedule sufficient personnel to perform the appropriate level of observation, mapping, and compaction testing. During the grading and earthwork operations, the Geotechnical Consultant shall observe, map, and document the subsurface exposures to verify the geotechnical design assumptions. If the observed conditions are found to be significantly different than the interpreted assumptions during the design phase, the Geotechnical Consultant shall inform the owner, recommend appropriate changes in design to accommodate the observed conditions, and notify the review agency where required. Subsurface areas to be geotechnically observed, mapped, elevations recorded, and/or tested include natural ground after it has been cleared for receiving fill but before fill is placed, bottoms of all "remedial removal" areas, all key bottoms, and benches made on sloping ground to receive fill. The Geotechnical Consultant shall observe the moisture-conditioning and processing of the subgrade and fill materials and perform relative compaction testing of fill to determine the attained level of compaction. The Geotechnical Consultant shall provide the test results to the owner and the Contractor on a routine and frequent basis. -1- LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. General Earthwork and Grading Specifications 1.3 The Earthwork Contractor The Earthwork Contractor (Contractor) shall be qualified, experienced, and knowledgeable in earthwork logistics, preparation and processing of ground to receive fill, moisture-conditioning and processing of fill, and compacting fill. The Contractor shall review and accept the plans, geotechnical report(s), and these Specifications prior to commencement of grading. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for performing the grading in accordance with the plans and specifications. The Contractor shall prepare and submit to the owner and the Geotechnical Consultant a work plan that indicates the sequence of earthwork grading, the number of "spreads" of work and the estimated quantities of daily earthwork contemplated for the site prior to commencement of grading. The Contractor shall inform the owner and the Geotechnical Consultant of changes in work schedules and updates to the work plan at least 24 hours in advance of such changes so that appropriate observations and tests can be planned and accomplished. The Contractor shall not assume that the Geotechnical Consultant is aware of all grading operations. The Contractor shall have the sole responsibility to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish the earthwork in accordance with the applicable grading codes and agency ordinances, these Specifications, and the recommendations in the approved geotechnical report(s) and grading plan(s). If, in the opinion of the Geotechnical Consultant, unsatisfactory conditions, such as unsuitable soil, improper moisture condition, inadequate compaction, insufficient buttress key size, adverse weather, etc., are resulting in a quality of work less than required in these specifications, the Geotechnical Consultant shall reject the work and may recommend to the owner that construction be stopped until the conditions are rectified. 2.0 Preparation of Areas to be Filled 2.1 Clearing and Grubbing Vegetation, such as brush, grass, roots, and other deleterious material shall be sufficiently removed and properly disposed of in a method acceptable to the owner, governing agencies, and the Geotechnical Consultant. The Geotechnical Consultant shall evaluate the extent of these removals depending on specific site conditions. Earth fill material shall not contain more than 1 percent of organic materials (by volume). No fill lift shall contain more than 5 percent of organic matter. Nesting of the organic materials shall not be allowed. -2- LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. General Earthwork and Grading Specifications If potentially hazardous materials are encountered, the Contractor shall stop work in the affected area, and a hazardous material specialist shall be informed immediately for proper evaluation and handling of these materials prior to continuing to work in that area. As presently defined by the State of California, most refined petroleum products (gasoline, diesel fuel, motor oil, grease, coolant, etc.) have chemical constituents that are considered to be hazardous waste. As such, the indiscriminate dumping or spillage of these fluids onto the ground may constitute a misdemeanor, punishable by fines and/or imprisonment, and shall not be allowed. 2.2 Processing Existing ground that has been declared satisfactory for support of fill by the Geotechnical Consultant shall be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches. Existing ground that is not satisfactory shall be overexcavated as specified in the following section. Scarification shall continue until soils are broken down and free of large clay lumps or clods and the working surface is reasonably uniform, flat, and free of uneven features that would inhibit uniform compaction. 2.3 Overexcavation In addition to removals and overexcavations recommended in the approved geotechnical report(s) and the grading plan, soft, loose, dry, saturated, spongy, organic-rich, highly fractured or otherwise unsuitable ground shall be overexcavated to competent ground as evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant during grading. 2.4 Benching Where fills are to be placed on ground with slopes steeper than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical units), the ground shall be stepped or benched. Please see the Standard Details for a graphic illustration. The lowest bench or key shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide and at least 2 feet deep, into competent material as evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant. Other benches shall be excavated a minimum height of 4 feet into competent material or as otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant. Fill placed on ground sloping flatter than 5:1 shall also be benched or otherwise overexcavated to provide a flat subgrade for the fill. 2.5 Evaluation/Acceptance of Fill Areas All areas to receive fill, including removal and processed areas, key bottoms, and benches, shall be observed, mapped, elevations recorded, and/or tested prior to being accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant as suitable to receive fill. The Contractor shall obtain a written acceptance from the Geotechnical Consultant 54 LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. General Earthwork and Grading Specifications prior to fill placement. A licensed surveyor shall provide the survey control for determining elevations of processed areas, keys, and benches. 3.0 Fill Material 3.1 General Material to be used as fill shall be essentially free of organic matter and other deleterious substances evaluated and accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement. Soils of poor quality, such as those with unacceptable gradation, high expansion potential, or low strength shall be placed in areas acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultant or mixed with other soils to achieve satisfactory fill material. 3.2 Oversize Oversize material defined as rock, or other irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater than 8 inches, shall not be buried or placed in fill unless location, materials, and placement methods are specifically accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant. Placement operations shall be such that nesting of oversized material does not occur and such that oversize material is completely surrounded by compacted or densified fill. Oversize material shall not be placed within 10 vertical feet of finish grade or within 2 feet of future utilities or underground construction. 3.3 Import If importing of fill material is required for grading, proposed import material shall meet the requirements of Section 3.1. The potential import source shall be given to the Geotechnical Consultant at least 48 hours (2 working days) before importing begins so that its suitability can be determined and appropriate tests performed. 4.0 . Fill Placement and Compaction 4.1 Fill Layers Approved fill material shall be placed in areas prepared to receive fill (per Section 3.0) in near-horizontal layers not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness. The Geotechnical Consultant may accept thicker layers if testing indicates the grading procedures can adequately compact the thicker layers. Each layer shall be spread evenly and mixed thoroughly to attain relative uniformity of material and moisture throughout. -4- LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. General Earthwork and Grading Specifications 4.2 Fill Moisture Conditioning Fill soils shall be watered, dried back, blended, and/or mixed, as necessary to attain a relatively uniform moisture content at or slightly over optimum. Maximum density and optimum soil moisture content tests shall be performed in accordance with the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM Test Method D1557). 4.3 Compaction of Fill After each layer has been moisture-conditioned, mixed, and evenly spread, it shall be uniformly compacted to not less than 90 percent of maximum dry density (ASTM Test Method D1557). Compaction equipment shall be adequately sized and be either specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability to efficiently achieve the specified level of compaction with uniformity. 4.4 Compaction of Fill Slopes In addition to normal compaction procedures specified above, compaction of slopes shall be accomplished by backrolling of slopes with sheepsfoot rollers at increments of 3 to 4 feet in fill elevation, or by other methods producing satisfactory results acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultant. Upon completion of grading, relative compaction of the fill, out to the slope face, shall be at least 90 percent of maximum density per ASTM Test Method D1557. 4.5 Compaction Testing Field-tests for moisture content and relative compaction of the fill soils shall be performed by the Geotechnical Consultant. Location and frequency of tests shall be at the Consultant's discretion based on field conditions encountered. Compaction test locations will not necessarily be selected on a random basis. Test locations shall be selected to verify adequacy of compaction levels in areas that are judged to be prone to inadequate compaction (such as close to slope faces and at the fill/bedrock benches). 4.6 Frequency of Compaction Testing Tests shall be taken at intervals not exceeding 2 feet in vertical rise and/or 1,000 cubic yards of compacted fill soils embankment. In addition, as a guideline, at least one test shall be taken on slope faces for each 5,000 square feet of slope face and/or each 10 feet of vertical height of slope. The Contractor shall assure that fill construction is such that the testing schedule can be accomplished by the Geotechnical Consultant. The Contractor shall stop or slow down the earthwork construction if these minimum standards are not met. -5- LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. General Earthwork and Grading Specifications 4.7 Compaction Test Locations The Geotechnical Consultant shall document the approximate elevation and horizontal coordinates of each test location. The Contractor shall coordinate with the project surveyor to assure that sufficient grade stakes are established so that the Geotechnical Consultant can determine the test locations with sufficient accuracy. At a minimum, two grade stakes within a horizontal distance of 100 feet and vertically less than 5 feet apart from potential test locations shall be provided. 5.0 Subdrain Installation Subdrain systems shall be installed in accordance with the approved geotechnical report(s), the grading plan, and the Standard Details. The Geotechnical Consultant may recommend additional subdrains and/or changes in subdrain extent, location, grade, or material depending on conditions encountered during grading. All subdrains shall be surveyed by a land surveyor/civil engineer for line and grade after installation and prior to burial. Sufficient time should be allowed by the Contractor for these surveys. 6.0 Excavation Excavations, as well as over-excavation for remedial purposes, shall be evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant during grading. Remedial removal depths shown on geotechnical plans are estimates only. The actual extent of removal shall be determined by the Geotechnical Consultant based on the field evaluation of exposed conditions during grading. Where fill-over-cut slopes are to be graded, the cut portion of the slope shall be made, evaluated, and accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement of materials for construction of the fill portion of the slope, unless otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant. 7.0 Trench Backfills 7.1 Safety The Contractor shall follow all OSHA and Cal/OSHA requirements for safety of trench excavations. LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. General Earthwork and Grading Specifications 7.2 Bedding and Backfill All bedding and backfill of utility trenches shall be performed in accordance with the applicable provisions of Standard Specifications of Public Works Construction. Bedding material shall have a Sand Equivalent greater than 30 (SE>30). The bedding shall be placed to 1 foot over the top of the conduit and densified. Backfill shall be placed and densified to a minimum of 90 percent of relative compaction from 1 foot above the top of the conduit to the surface. The Geotechnical Consultant shall test the trench backfill for relative compaction. At least one test should be made for every 300 feet of trench and 2 feet of fill. 7.3 Lift Thickness Lift thickness of trench backfill shall not exceed those allowed in the Standard Specifications of Public Works Construction unless the Contractor can demonstrate to the Geotechnical Consultant that the fill lift can be compacted to the minimum relative compaction by his alternative equipment and method. 7.4 Observation and Testing The densification of the bedding around the conduits shall be observed by the Geotechnical Consultant. -7- FILL SLOPE PROJECTED PLANE 1:1 - (HORIZONTAL: VERTICAL) MAXIMUM FROM TOE OF SLOPE TO APPROVED GROUND EXISTING GROUND SURFACE - -r UNSUITABLE t MATERIAL LBENCH HEIGHT. (4 FEET TYPICAL) 2 FEET MIN.-'.' LO KEY DEPTH BENCH FILL-OVER-CUT SLOPE EXISTING .,.--------- -:--: GROUND SURFACE \ ':-:-- ) I _- ..-:-x L----- BENCH HEIGHT (4 FEET TYPICAL) X MIN J5 FEET MIN- LOWEST . REMOVE 2 FEET BENCH (KEY) . UNSUITABLE MIN. KEY MATERIAL DEPTH '-CUT FACE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT TO ALLOW VIEWING. OF GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS EXISTING UT FACE SHALL BE __ 2 CONST GROUND SURFACE RUCTED PRIOR __ CUT-OVER-ALL SLOPE - TO FILL PLACEMENT OVERBUILD AND qzzz TRIM BACK DESIGN SLOPE-4 PROJECTED PLANE ,.. 1 TO 1 MAXIMUM FROM TOE OF SLOPE TO APPROVED GROUND - - -'-- -1 I 15 FEET MIN., 2 FEET MIN:- LOWEST KEY DEPTH BENCH (KEY) -REMOVE UNSUITABLE - - - MATERIAL --1 BENCH HEIGHT (4 FEET TYPICAL) BENCHING SHALL BE DONE WHEN SLOPES ANGLE IS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 5:1. MINIMUM BENCH HEIGHT SHALL BE 4 FEET AND MINIMUM FILL WIDTH SHALL BE 9 FEET. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND KEYING AND BENCHING GRADING SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD DETAIL A w V-PmAll GRANULAR MATERIAL TO BE"DETAIL DENSIFIED IN PLACE BY FLOODING OR JETTING. GRADE SLOPE FACE OVERSIZE WINDROW * OVERSIZE ROCK IS LARGER THAN 8 INCHES IN LARGEST DIMENSION. * EXCAVATE A TRENCH IN THE COMPACTED FILL DEEP ENOUGH TO BURY ALL THE ROCK. * BACKFILL WITH GRANULAR SOIL JETTED OR FLOODED IN PLACE TO FILL ALL THE VOIDS. * DO NOT BURY ROCK WITHIN 10 FEET OF FINISH GRADE. '. WINDROW OF BURIED ROCK SHALL BE PARALLEL TO THE FINISHED SLOPE. JETTED OR FLOODED GRANULAR MATERIAL TYPICAL PROFILE ALONG WINDROW OVERSIZE ROCK DISPOSAL GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD DETAIL B / / , / MOVE SUITABLE SERIAL TRENCH SEE DETAIL BELOW FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI 140N OR APPROVED 8" MIN EQUIVALENT)* 7 OVERLAP' CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE '<.i6 MIN. OR #2 ROCK (9FT3/FT) PED 7(OVER IN FILTER FABRIC 4" MIN. BEDDING COLLECTOR PIPE SHALL BE MINIMUM 6" DIAMETER SCHEDULE 40 PVC PERFORATED PIPE. SEE STANDARD DETAIL D SUBDRAIN DETAIL FOR PIPE SPECIFICATIONS DESIGN FINISH GRADE .FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI 140N OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) 5i I ::A '" • . ' •' • . •• - .- CAL TRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE .--2 .• • •.. • ••• " - -' - OR fl2 ROCK (9F73/FT) WRAPPED If . • • • • • • • • - S • • IN FILTER FABRIC 20' MIN. I 5' MIN. -PERFORATED 6" ØMIN. PIPE NONPERFORATED 6" 0 MIN. CANYON SUBDRAINS GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD DETAIL C 15' MIN. - OUTLET PIPES 4" 0 NONPERFORATED PIPE. 100' MAX. O.C. HORIZONTALLY, 30' MAX O.C. VERTICALLY -..BACK CUT 1:1 OR FLATTER SEE SUBDRAIN TRENCH DETAIL LOWEST SUBDRAIN SHOULD BE SITUATED AS LOW AS POSSIBLE TO ALLOW SUITABLE OUTLET L KEY WIDTH KEY DEPTH F (15' AS NOTED ON GRADING PLANS MIN.) 12" MIN. OVERLAP FROM THE TOP H01 (2' MIN.) RING TIED EVERY 6 FEET T-CONNECTION FOR COLLECTOR CALTRANS CLASS II PIPE TO OUTLET PIPE PERMEABLE OR 112 ROCK (3 FT-3/FT) WRAPPED IN FILTER . 1 6" MIN. FABRIC COVER 4"0 PERFORATED PIPE OUTLET PIPE - - MIN. -[__4" MIN. BEDDING L.......FILTER PROVIDE POSITIVE-' FABRIC SEAL AT THE ENVELOPE (MIRAFI JOINT 140 OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) SUBDRAIN TRENCH DETAIL SUBDRAIN INSTALLATION - subdroin collector pipe shall be installed with perforation down or. unless otherwise designated by the geotechnicol consultant. Outlet pipes shall be non-perforated pipe. The subdroin pipe shall have at least 8 perforations uniformly spaced per foot. Perforation shall be 1/4" to 1/2 if drill holes ore used. All subdroin pipes shall hove a gradient of at least 27. towards the outlet. SUBDRAIN PIPE - Subdroin pipe shall be ASTM 02751. SDR 23.5 or ASTM D1527. Schedule 40. or ASTM D3034. SDR 23.5. Schedule 40 Polyvinyl Chloride Plastic (PVC) pipe. All outlet pipe shall be placed in o trench no wider than twice the subdroin pipe. BUTTRESS OR GENERAL EARTHWORK AND REPLACEMENT GRADING SPECIFICATIONS I STANDARD DETAIL D FILL SUBDRAINS CUT—FILL TRANSITION LOT OVEREXCAVA11ON REMOVE b UNSUITABLE GROUND-S - -r - -4- 5' - I p.1 _________---___-- ckO('ckVc'OcckI MIN - -COMPACTED FII - - - <\/ =:=:==:= OVEREXCAVATE '7 AND RECOMPACT - - - - -- - - - -.. TYPICAL --- BENCHING - - UNWEATHERED BEDROCK OR MATERIAL APPROVED .\\ BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT-,--- TRANSITION LOT FILLS GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD DETAIL ri SOIL BACKFILL. COMPACTED TO 90 PERCENT RELATIVE COMPACTION BASED ON ASTM D1557 RETAINING WALL -... E-_:-r WALL WATERPROOFING -_PER ARCHITECT'S : '4 I FILTER :-:-(MIRAFI 140N OR APPROVED FA9C ENVELOPE SPECIFICATIONS ., I o o°I EQUIVALENT)" sl 00 10 . MIN TO TO ii/t CLEAN GRAVEL FINISH GRADE F 0 • 4 (MIN.) DIAMETER PERFORATED ..--:-• PVC PIPE (SCHEDULE 40 OR J I . 00 . EQUIVALENT) WITH PERFORATIONS . 0 ORIENTED DOWN AS DEPICTED --------------------------- MINIMUM I PERCENT GRADIENT ------------------------------- Icf< :TO SUITABLE OUTLET 3' MIN. WALL FOOTING I COMPETENT BEDROCK OR MATERIAL AS EVALUATED BY THE CEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT NOTE: UPON REVIEW BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT. COMPOSITE DRAINAGE PRODUCTS SUCH AS MIRADRAIN OR J-DRAIN MAY BE USED AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO GRAVEL OR CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL INSTALLATION SHOULD BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS STANDARD DETAIL F ACTIVE ZONE GRAVEL- DRAINAGE FILL MIN 6" BELOW WALL MIN 12" BEHIND UNITS ':T~3 ii REINFORCED RETAINED I ZONE ZONE / [ BACKDRAIN f- -: . ' :•:.:.:::: / WALL HEIGHT L E~FILTER FABRIC:::::::::.: -WALL SUBDRAIN \ REAR SUBDRAIN: 4" (MIN) DIAMETER PERFORATED PVC PIPE (SCHEDULE 40 OR EQUIVALENT) WITH PERFORATIONS DOWN. SURROUNDED BY I CU. FT/FT OF 3/4" GRAVEL WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI 140N OR EQUIVALENT) OUTLET SUBDRAINS EVERY 100 FEET, OR CLOSER, BY TIGHTLINE TO SUITABLE PROTECTED OUTLET NOTES: 1) MATERIAL GRADATION AND PLASTICITY I FOUNDATION SOILSI GRAVEL DRAINAGE FILL: % PASSING 100 SIEVE SIZE 1 INCH 3/4 INCH 75-100 NO.4 0-60 NO. 40 0-50 NO. 200 0-5 SIEVE SIZE % PASSING 1 INCH 100 NO.4 20-100 NO. 40 0-60 NO. 200 0-35 FOR WALL HEIGHT < 10 FEET, PLASTICITY INDEX <20 FOR WALL HEIGHT 10 TO 20 FEET, PLASTICITY INDEX < 10 FOR TIERED WALLS, USE COMBINED WALL HEIGHTS WALL DESIGNER TO REQUEST SITE-SPECIFIC CRITERIA FOR WALL HEIGHT >20 FEET CONTRACTOR TO USE SOILS WITHIN THE RETAINED AND REINFORCED ZONES THAT MEET THE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS OF WALL DESIGN. GEOGRID REINFORCEMENT TO BE DESIGNED BY WALL DESIGNER CONSIDERING INTERNAL, EXTERNAL, AND COMPOUND STABILITY. 3) GEOGRID TO BE PRETENSIONED DURING INSTALLATION. IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE ACTIVE ZONE ARE SUSCEPTIBLE TO POST-CONSTRUCTION SETTLEMENT. ANGLE a-45+4'/2, WHERE IS THE FRICTION ANGLE OF THE MATERIAL IN THE RETAINED ZONE. BACKDRAIN SHOULD CONSIST OF i-DRAIN 302 (OR EQUIVALENT) OR 6-INCH THICK DRAINAGE FILL WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC. PERCENT COVERAGE OF BACKDRAIN TO BE PER GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW. SEGMENTAL GENERAL EARTHWORK AND 'I GRADING SPECIFICATIONS RETAINING WALLS I STANDARD DETAIL 49 Applicant: ARLEN ROPER Plan Check Revision Fee / Fire Expedited Plan Review Additional Fees City of Carlsbad 1635 Fa'aday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 03-15-2013 Plan Check Revision Permit No:PCR13023 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 2574 MUIRFIELDS DR CBAD Permit Type: PCR Status: ISSUED Parcel No: 2132501300 Lot #: 0 Applied: 03101/2013 Valuation: $0.00 Construction Type: NEW Entered By: JMA Reference #: Plan Approved: 03/15/2013 PC #: Issued: 03/15/2013 Project Title: ENGINEERING FOR UNDERGROUND Inspect Area: STRUCTURE TO ELIMINATE STRUCTURAL SPECIAL Owner: MAGNOLIA PARTNERS L L C '1O94CUDAHY,PL#212 'N SAN DIEGO CA.921107 I / / 7 $107 56 / i i/ •N' Total Fees: $107.50TT) Total Payments To Date: $107.50 'Balance Due: $0.00 / INCORPORATED /- 1952 / FINAL APPROVAL Inspector: Date: Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. ( CITY OF CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK REVISION APPLICATION B-15 DeveloDment Services Building Division 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2719 www.carlsbadca.gov Plan Check Revision No. ?'C(E-t - 2- Original Plan Check No._C13( 2- 2L & 3 Project Address 2-74 rmullsfloc4az i7R1 V& Date Contact Ph 1120 Z'Z 3 Fax Email ,AIZL&I1_20f'E(2_ ? COMM L__ Contact Address_I/of "7 i'J( 1 - City Zip "Z7Z& General Scope of Work t-A1J 12im 171201 r&efloitI 904 - t'(/&rZ t/.6 774i\1v Original plans prepared by an architect or engineer, revisions must be signed & stamped by that person. 1. Elements revised: 'ioi -i' ii-z-o vsre Plans Acalculations LI Soils . Energy LI Other__________________________ 2. Describe revisions in detail 13. List page(s) where each revision is shown 4. List revised sheets that replace existing sheets / 1e,7#O O - A- pAfrL r iA-910 (' - 7Z) hi/fZ t /A -71474 M'vJ 0 OM -/ r?-A -v'i--c - A -/771E 401(- I A14P Does this revision, in anyway, alter the exterior of the project? LI Yes PkNo Does this revision add ANY new floor area(s)? LI Yes X No Does this revision affect any fire related issues? LI Yes No Is this a complete set? 4W* MA A €5Signature 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 ff2: 760-602- 2719 Fax: 760-602-8558 Email: building@carlsbadca.gov www.carlsbadca.gov EsGil Corporation In (Partnership with government for Bui(iing Safety DATE: 03/12/13 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR13-23 (12-2663) SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2574 Muirfield Drive ,APPLICANT %'J URIS. D PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE PROJECT NAME Plan Change Add Partial Gunite Cage around Storage Tanks for Thornton The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. E The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. E The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. 11111 The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Email: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: Add gunite to special inspection list at the city. Previous approved City Sets sent back. By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: EsGil Corporation F1 GA U EJ 0 PC (P) 03/05/13 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax(858)560-1576 Carlsbad PCR13-23 (12-2663) 03/12/13 [DO NOT PAY — THIS IS NOT ANINVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR13-23 (12-2663) PREPARED BY: Ray Fuller DATE: 03/12/13 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2574 Muirfield Drive BUILDING OCCUPANCY: U TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VB BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code Icb IBY Ordinance I Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance v Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: Complete Review Structural Only Repetitive Fee El Other El Repeats Hourly I IHr. @ * EsGil Fee $86.00I Based on hourly rate I I I $107.501 I $86.00I Comments: Sheet I of I macvalue.doc + PALOS VERDE--) Engineering Civil and Structural Consulting O Please Respond To: 663 Valley Avenue Suite 101 Solana Beach California 92075 858 509 8505 858 509 8515 FAX sandiegopvec.com O Please Respond To: 27520 Hawthorne Blvd. Suite 250 Rolling Hills Estates California 90274-3512 310 541 5055 310541 0321 FAX info@pvec.com Structural Calculations Vault Prepared For Thorton Residence 2574 Muirlands Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Project Thorton Vault 2574 Muirlands Drive I '/t'o57182 1EXP 12J31/1 I V 41A' ---- Paul 9CI1fit6nson RCE C57182, exp. 12/31/13 June 25, 2012 PVEC File No. 24-13-090 ?c a I 1!> W. Z~p PALOS VERDES ENGINEERING CORPORATION 663 Valley Avenue, Suite #101, Solana Beach, CA 92075 Telephone (858) 509-8505 Fax (858) 509-8515 1.0 Design Criteria: Thorton Vault 24-13090 Code: 2010 California Building Code - ASCE 7-05 Timber: Douglas Fir-Larch (DF-L), WWPAor WCLIB 2x Wall Framing: DF-L #2 (unless noted otherwise) 2x Rafters & Joists: DF-L #2 Posts & Beams: DF-L #1 Glue-Lam Beams: Simple Span: Grade 24F-V4 (DFIDF) Cantilevers: Grade 24F-V8 (DFIDF) Sheathing: Mm. APA-Rated Sheathing, Exposure 1, Plywood or OSB (U.N.O.) Engineered Framing: Wood I-Joists: TJI 110,210,230,360,560 ICC ESR-1 153 LVL, PSL 1 9E Microllam, 2.OE Parallam ICBO ER-4979 Concrete: Compressive Strength @ 28 days per ASTM C39-96: Footings: f'c = 2500 psi Grade Beams: f = 3000 psi Concrete Block: Grade N-I per ASTM C90-95, f'm = 1500 psi per ASTM E447-92 Mortar: Type S Mortar Cement per ASTM C270-95, Min. I'm = 1800 psi @ 28 days. Grout: Coarse Grout w/ 3/8" Max. Aggregate per ASTM C476-9 1, Mm. I'm = 2000 psi ® 28 days. Reinforcing Steel: #4 & Larger: ASTM A615-60 (Fy = 60 ksi) #3 & Smaller: ASTM A615-40 (Fy =40 ksi) Structural Steel: 'W' Shapes: ASTM A992, Fy= 50-65 ksi Plates, Angles; Channels: ASTM A36, Fy = 36 ksi Tube Shapes: ASTM A500, Grade B, Fy= 46 ksi Pipe Shapes: ASTM A53, Grade B, Fr35 ksi Welding Electrodes: Structural Steel: E70-T6 A615-60 Rebar: E90 Series Bolts: Sill Plate Anchor Botls & Threaded Rods: A307 Quality Minimum Steel Moment & Braced Frames: A325 (Bearing, U.N.O.) Soils: 1000 psf Bearing Pressure References: It = £S'ilt):io" r r I ' ' Palos Verdes Engineering Corporation Consulting Structural Engineers 663 Valley Avenue., Suite 101 •Solana Beach, CA 92075 Telephone (858) 509-8505 • Fax (858) 509-8515 JOB Z413g 1 p Tliber&4 SHEET NO 2.. OF 5 CALCULATED BY DATE z/ZV/ff CHECKED BY _DATE_____ SCALE n'-l_, •1 . IL" krF .i k r — - f- Iri,r o• Lbs!i.): II Wit EI SbO Pt? 'l.1 iD j.u !Iuor)r1: 17vp 'AJa..r; 1LL110 I1u.: huzi'i 11S'I2 M&i 31; Lf. Q_ l L1 C-z 34" r< 11CL. L ?ba oO31 r%a 01'e 67(io.r)J MAP. 0,613 14"Um Palos Verdes Engineering Corporation Consulting Structural Engineers m~~ 663 Valley Avenue., Suite 101 • Solana Beach, CA 92075 Telephone (858) 509-8505 • Fax (858) 509-8515 JOB 2.'143-øiu SHEET NO 2 OFY CALCULATED BYP L. DATE______ CHECKED BY DATE______ SCALE - fm". 13-00 ?W tLJifMl Z3S'' L' MAD hr USL 30' UIIOV 6 c_ 12;' r&t( VdI City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 05-21-2013 Plan Check Revision Permit No:PCR13057 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 2574 MUIRFIELDS DR CBAD Permit Type: PCR Status: ISSUED Parcel No: 2132501300 Lot #: 0 Applied: 04/26/2013 Valuation: $0.00 Construction Type: NEW Entered By: LSM Reference #: CB122663 Plan Approved: 05/21/2013 PC #: Issued: 05/21/2013 Project Title: THORNTON RES= REVISE ROOF Inspect Area: TO TRUSS! RECOFIGURE BATHROOM! RECONFIGURE Applicant: Owner: ARLEN ROPER THORNTON W & T TRUST 1617 PRINCE ST 2574 MUIRFIELDS DR FALLBROOK CA 92028 CARLSBAD CA 92009 760-522-3997 Plan Check Revision Fee $215.00 Fire Expedited Plan Review $0.00 Additional Fees $0.00 Total Fees: $215.00 Total Payments To Date: $215.00 Balance Due: $0.00 FINAL APPROVAL Date: Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the lmposition of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as fees/exactions. You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any 074 4-> PLAN CHECK REVISION Develo pment Services Building Division CITY OF APPLICATION 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2719 CARLSD/-%D B-I 5 Plan Check Revision No. eM I Original Plan Check No. Ca ) Project Address 7711 /4V/tZ'êt425 /2,z, Date Contact__________ Ph 7b0 572'i 3''?7 Fax Email &=b C=J 1Z2P&- cE- rV%4-i 60 %^,O\ Contact Address /(oI) _cJ'T _City_F_i3i'è.22t(Zip General Scope of Work _MDOJW%7DPOoLMfJ4___1/tO/At 6' Original plans prepared by an architect or engineer, revisions must be signed & stamped by that person. 1. Elements revised: EiPlans Li/I Calculations [1 Soils 0 Energy [1 Other___________________________ 2'. Describe revisions in detail 3. List page(s) where each revision is shown 4. List revised sheets that replace existing sheets 64-M ro A- -i7uc Thx'f 7tA A, A 114 ,1 CJL,%YKc *o 4 C+*JE,-ID &tJea of pw (ee /&J flvU, y a By I V1 • LOO L c4rv3kp'IA /OVID, Z -W5&Z- -V eltoe fl . (tr NO 04w -- Does this revision, in, anyway, alter the exterior of the project? X, Yes El No Does this revision add ANY new floor area(s)? El Yes 1Rf No LNM-(bU/, Does this revision affect any fire related issues? El Yes No Is this a complete set? es El No 4% SSignature 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 W.760-602-2719 E: 760-602-8558 Email: building@carlsbadca.gOv www.carlsbadca.gov C v, Lu JL Oh1 fl 4zfic /2c#%44d!7 OW CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION RECORD Building Division 21 INSPECTION RECORD CARD WITH APPROVED JOB ADDRESS PLANS MUST BE KEPT ON THE JOB 0 CALL BEFORE 3:30 pm FOR NEXT WORK DAY INSPECTION LOT NO/SUITE 21 FOR BUILDING INSPECTION CALL: 760-602-2725 OR GO TO: www.Carlsbadca.gov/fluildlng AND CLICK ON Request Inspection' OWNERS' NAME DATE: IF YES' IF YOU HAVE ALL REQUIRED OR BRING REACHED IS CHECKED BELOW THAT DIVISION'S APPROVAL IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL THE APPLICABLE DIVISIONS AT THE APPROVALS ARE SIGNED OFF— FAX TO 760-602-8560, EMAIL IN A COPY OF THIS CARD TO: 1635 FARADAY AVE., CARLSBAD, CA AT 760-602-2700 BETWEEN 7:30 AM - 8:00 AM THE DAY OF YOUR Required Prior to Requesting Building Final It Checked YES REQUESTING PHONE NUMBERS 92008. INSPECTION. TO BLDGINsPEcTIoNs@CARLSBADcA.Gov A FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION. PROVIDED BELOW. AFTER BUILDING INSPECTORS CAN BE Planning/Landscape 760-944-8463 Allow 48 hours FirePrevention 76"02-4"0 Allow 48 hours Type of Inspection Type of Inspection :1u1I]ILc Date #11 FOUNDATION Inspector #31 0 ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND 0 UFER Date Inspector #12 REINFORCED STEEL #34 ROUGH ELECTRIC #66 MASONRY PRE GROUT #33 0 ELECTRIC SERVICE 0 TEMPORARY 0 GROUT 0 WALL DRAINS #,35 PHOTO VOLTAIC #10 TILT PANELS #39 FINAL #11 POUR STRIPS #11 COLUMN FOOTINGS #41 UNDERGROUND DUCTS & PIPING #14 SUBFRAME 0 FLOOR 0 CEILING #44 0 DUCT& PLENUM 0 REF. PIPING #15 ROOFSHEATHING #43 HEAT-AIR COND. SYSTEMS #13 EXT. SHEAR PANELS #49 FINAL #18 EXTERIOR LATH #16 INSULATION #81 UNDERGROUND (11,12,21,31) #17 INTERIOR LATH & DRYWALL #82 DRYWALL,EXT LATH, GAS TES (17,18,23) #51 POOL EXCA/STEEL/BOND/FENCE #83 ROOF SHEATING, EXT SHEAR (1315) #55 PREPLASTER #84 FRAME ROUGH COMBO (14,24,34,44) #19 FINAL #85 T-Bar (14,24,34,44) uJI:II[c #22 0 SEWER & BL/CO 0 P1./CO Date Inspector #89 FINAL OCCUPANCY (19,29,39,49) Date Inspector l:1 #21 UNDERGROUND OWASTE_OWTR #24 TOPOUT OWASTE DWTR A/S UNDERGROUND VISUAL #27 TUB & SHOWER PAN A/S UNDERGROUND HYDRO #23 0 GAS TEST 0 GAS PIPING A/S UNDERGROUND FLUSH #25 WATER HEATER A/S OVERHEAD VISUAL #28 SOLAR WATER A/S OVERHEAD HYDROSTATIC #29 FINAL A/S FINAL #600 PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING F/A ROUGH-IN F/A FINAL #603 FOLLOW UP INSPECTION FIXED EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM ROUGH-IN #605 NOTICETO CLEAN FIXED EXTING SYSTEM HYDROSTATIC TEST #607 WRITTEN WARNING FIXED EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM FINAL #609 NOTICE OF VIOLATION MEDICAL GAS PRESSURE TEST #610 VERBAL WARNING MEDICAL GAS FINAL SEE BACK FOR SPECIAL NOTES EsGil Corporation In cPartners/iip with government for(Building Safety DATE: 05/17/13 0 APPLICANT JURIS. JURISDICTION: Carlsbad U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR13-057(12-2663) SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2574 Muirfield Drive PROJECT NAME: Plans Changes/ Conventional Frame to Trusses/ Reconfigured Tunnel/Changed Engineer-of-Record Thornton Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. LI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. I The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Email: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: Set II consist of providing the required complete new sets of calculations as required for the new engineer-of-record. Previous approved City Sets sent back By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: EsGil Corporation 0 GA E EJ 0 PC (P) 05/13/13 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax(858)560-1576 EsGil Corporation In (Partners flip wit/i government for(Building Safety DATE: 05/06/13 O.APPLICANT J URIS. JURISDICTION: Carlsbad 0 PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR13-057(12-2663) SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2574 Muirfield Drive PROJECT NAME: Plans Changes/ Conventional Frame to Trusses/ Reconfigured Tunnel/Changed Engineer-of-Record Thornton Residence LI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LI The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Arden Roper 1617 Prince Street Fallbrook, Ca. 92028 EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Arden Roper Telephone #: (760) 522-3997 Date contacted:c) (1' (by:y Email: arlenroperi mail. com Mail . Tel hone Fax In Person LI KS ' By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: EsGil Corporation El GA El EJ El PC 04/26/13 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad PCR13-057( 12-2663) 05/06/13 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR13-057(12-2663) JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2574 Muirfield Drive FLOOR AREA: REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 12/12/12 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 05/06/13 STORIES: 1 Plus Basement HEIGHT: lift per CBC DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 04/26/13 PLAN REVIEWER: Ray Fuller FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the California version of the International Residential Code, International Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that construction comply with the 2010 edition of the California Code of Regulations (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 2009 IRC, 2009 IBC, 2009 UPC, 2009 UMC and 2008 NEC. The above regulations apply, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 105.4 of the 2009 International Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad PCR13-057( 12-2663) 05/06/13 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for residential projects. For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete 2. Change in engineer of record requires complete new calculations from new engineer-of-record. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes ( ) No ( ) The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ray Fuller at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad PCR13-057( 12-2663) 05/06/13 (DO NOT PAY— THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE) VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: PCR13-057(12-2663) PREPARED BY: Ray Fuller DATE: 05/06/13 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2574 Muirfield Drive BUILDING OCCUPANCY: U TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VB BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code 1cb IBY Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: El Complete Review El Structural Only I I I I $215.00I El Repetitive Fee Repeats Based on hourly rate El Other Hourly 2 Hrs.@ EsGil Fee $86.00 I $172.00I Comments: Sheet 1 of I macvalue.doc + CITY OF CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK REVIEW TRANSMITTAL Community & Economic Development Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 www.carlsbadca.gov DATE:04/30/13 PROJECT NAME: (ORIGINAL CB 12-2663) PROJECT ID: PCR 13-57 PLAN CHECK NO: 1 SET#: 1 ADDRESS: 2574 MUIRFIELDS DR APN: VALUATION: $ W/1 This plan check review is complete and has been APPROVED by the ENGINEERING Division. By: KATHLEEN LAWRENCE 04/30/13 A Final Inspection by the Division is required £Yes F77No [ This plan check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed on - ' the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended plans as required. Plan Check Comments have been sent to: ARIENROPER@GMAIL.COM You may also have corrections from one or more of the divisions listed below. Approval from these divisions may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Resubmitted plans should include corrections from all divisions. For questions or clarifications on the attached checklist please contact the following reviewer as marked: PLANNING ENGINEERING FIRE PREVENTION 760-602-4610 760-602-2750. 760-602-4665 Chris Sexton {7J Kathleen Lawrence [T Greg Ryan 760-602-4624 760-602-2741 - - 760-602-4663 Chris.Sexton@carlsbadca.gov Kathleen.Lawrence@carlsbadca.gov Gregorv.Rvan@carlsbadca.gov Li Gina Ruiz Linda Ontiveros Cindy Wong - 760-602-4675 760-602-2773 760-602-4662 Gina.Ruiz@carlsbadca.gov Linda.0ntiveros@carlsbadca.ov Cvnthia.Won@carlsbadca.ov LI1 1 Dominic Fieri 760-602-4664 Dominic.Fieri@carlsbadca.gov Remarks: BUILDING PLANCHECK Development Services Land Development Engineering CITY OF CHECKLIST 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2750 CARLSBAD QUICK-CHECK/APPROVAL ENGINEERING Plan Check for PCR 13-57 Date:04130113 Project Address: 2574 MUIRFIELDS DR APN: CHANGING ROOF SYSTEM, RECONFIGURE Project Description: BATHROOM/TUNNEL AND MOVING POOL CABANA Valuation: 2' CLOSER TO PL ENGINEERING Contact: Kathleen Lawrence Email: kathIeen.IawrencecarIsbadca.gov Phone: 760-602-2741 Fax: 760-602-1052 ED RESIDENTIAL INTERIOR El TENANT IMPROVEMENT Li RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR PLAZA CAMINO REAL (<$20,000.00) E CARLSBAD PREMIER OUTLETS El COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING El OTHER: CELL ANTENNAS/EQUIP OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT BY: KATHLEEN LAWRENCE DATE:04/30113 REMARKS: NO ADDITIONAL ENG. FEES Notification of Engineering APPROVAL has been sent to via EMAIL on 04/30113 E-36 Page 1 of 1 REV 4/30/11 PLANNING DIVISION BUILDING PLAN CHECK Development Services Planning Division CITY OF APPROVAL 1635 Faraday Avenue CARLSBAD P-29 (760) 602-4610 www.carlsbadca.2ov DATE: 4-26-13 PROJECT NAME:' PROJECT ID: PLAN CHECK NO: PCR 13-57 SET#: I ADDRESS: 2574 Muirfields Dr APN: This plan check review is complete and has been APPROVED by the Planning Division. By: Chris Sexton A Final Inspection by the Planning Division is required El Yes Z No You may also have corrections from one or more of the divisions listed below. Approval from these divisions may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Resubmitted plans should include corrections from all divisions. This plan check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended plans as required. Plan Check APPROVAL has been sent to: arlenroper@gmail.com For questions or clarifications on the attached checklist please contact the following reviewer as marked: PLANNING ENGINEERING FIRE PREVENTION 760-602-4610 760-602-2750 760-602-4665 Chris Sexton Kathleen Lawrence Greg Ryan 760-602-4624 760-602-2741 760-602-4663 Chris.Sexton@carlsbadca.gov Kathleen.Lawrence@carIsbadca.gov Gregory.Ryan@carIsbadca.gov Gina Ruiz Linda Ontiveros Cindy Wong 760-602-4675 760-602-2773 760-602-4662 Gina.Ruiz@carlsbadca.gov Linda.Ontiveros@carlsbadca.gov Cynthia.Wong@carlsbadca.gov fl Dominic Fieri 760-602-4664 Dominic.Fieri@carIsbadca.gov Remarks: