The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2612 OBELISCO PL; ; CB971257; PermitZ,0 0 B U I L. D I N G P E R'M I ~T Permit No: CB971257- 12/03/97 12 -:09 Project No: A9701637 Page 1. -of 1 Development No: Job Addre'ss: 2612 OBELISCO PL Suite: Permit Type:' RETAINING WALL , 1954 12/03/97 0001 01 02 P arcel-No: 215-460-28-00 Lot#: C-PRMT 20 00 Valuati'on: 26,244 Construction Type: NEW Occupc 'Reference#:.. Status: ISSUED ancy Group: Descriptio.n: RETAIN,wALL 800 SF,TO CITY Applied-: 05/16/97 :.SPECS .222, ALSO TEMP_.,_POWER POLE - Apr/Issue: 10/24/97 Entered By: J~M Appl/Ownr':' HYATT, DAVID 760 431-5993 2612 OBELISCO PLACE CARLSBAD, CA 92009 Fees Required ---Fees Collected'& Credits - ---------------------- -------------- --------------------- tees: *460. 0 Adjustments: .0 0 o t nrCa) 1 C`r e~d i, ~t s .00 Total Fees: 460 0 Tol?ke~avmentsl 440.00 zB a ra, bue: 20.00 -.F6e descripti.on 1~~-Un 1 t, /L~n i t Ext fee Data s1\ <),~9_1 Building'Permit , 265.00 Plan Check 172.00. -Strong Aotion Fee 3.00 0.0 20.00-EL~CTRIC Other BUILDING TOTAL 460.00 ~ 1w - INCORPORATED 1?52 on A rz FIN INSR CLEARANCIIE ''CITY OF CARLSBAD - 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 FOR OFFICE.USE ONL-Y- iPERMIT-APPLICATION. PLAN. CHECK NO. V ,CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING-DEPARTMENTIwe', Plan,Ck.'Depo 26643 207 s a asbr., S C 9 ~,Jf qu .1. 5. Vafidati6d.-Bv Vi(760),~38 1161 Qate :~z ZEZ Add%p (include Bldg/Suite #) Business Naive (at th_is~aiddeess) 7 .Legal Desdipti, --Lot Ndf. S bd'v'slon Name1N b 7 o.1/7 ',Phase'No. -1-Total f'uhim— I u t . gL~6.;; 2F 5; 6A 6 Existing Proposed Use Tor's P 91 T~_- - - Y.- Q-Jt~: -71 e k vN!a .1)er- C~ rip-ATi 'Ce~~Q to Des6ription of Work ----3 - -SWFT.~i— V of Bedrooms - 4~of,Bathrooms,~— e;n* 1ro I i t 11.~r 2, 0 CT PE ~-RAIC-6- t -N p I I X—nt) . - TII, -'44 - ~ - -- 74 ul aA .14~6 qa 6. ,~Name- ----Address -FaxV-.' ~~~ojtdct., 77 7 Name --Address City State/Zip - - Telephone # ~7 . ................ . ............ . . WT T1-P—RnPF:RT-.v-,-nwrjr.R 7 7 7 7 1 .77-7—, Name Address "City Sta-le1Z pj Jdlephode # f (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions'dode: Any, City or County,which requires a permit to construct, alter,, improve,, di~rnolish 'or-'rejp-airrany,.strutcture'i,prior.to its %issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant,to the provisions,of the'.Contractor,s License,Law ;(Chapter. 9, -commending with Section-7000 of Division,3 of the,Business and, Professions', Code] .or..that'he", is e"~er~pt therefrom'; iind th~e I ba~sis -jor,-the alleg'ed-11' I exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the appli ant to'a civil penalty of, not more than five hundred dollars [$5001) Name 'Address Cityi` W4 State/Zip-, I. ~'.Telephone # Lic6s"e'Clias~' -ficity Busi-n~es'~ ulci;~se # State Lic Address r City I—. Telephon 4 I Designer Na,me!o, State/Zip I State License # d U.' t~ T 777771 qOMPENSATkCI4 L 'Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: , f It., I It . . ) -,- - ~".- ; ',.:- I ;i. V 1i I have, and,will maintain a certificate of co'nseni to self-insure for workers' coi~pensation iis provided by. Section 37;0 of the Labor Code, for the performance I$ of the work for which this permit is issued. - as require C] 'I have and will maintain, workers' compensation, d by Section 3700 of the -.Labor Code,- for the performance of the work -for which; this permit'is - issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$1001 OR LESS) 0_,.CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: .1 certify that in the performance of the work.for which,this-p`erinit is iS's'ued,,I.sh6lI not employ any person in anyjna~rjrtersR~as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. " A "" I WARNING: - Failure to secure wdrkers"compehsation coverage is unlawful,- and shall subject an employer'to criminal penalties and civil fines up-to,one hundred, thousand dollars ($100,000). in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees:) ~SIGNATURE DATE ER7BUItb0R.DECiAhAflbN ,I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: ig 1, a;7wner of the property or my employees with wages,as their sole compensation, will do the,work and,the structure is not intended or offered,for sale (Sec.,7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's Licen;e La w' does not apply t~ an'6w' ner 'of pr4feh~ wh6'builds oi iritproves thereon, and 'who`d6es 'such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion,- the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the PuF;3ose -6f saie)."'-~-',4, C:1 I,as owner of the,property, am exclusively contracting. with licensed contractors to constrt!pt the project (S-rj-" O'Z/11,~/97 ec!'~7044,Business an(d~'Afes`rs'lons CoQe:-- T6 Contractor's License Law does not apply to'an owner of-p!operty vv~obuilds'or improves thereon, and contracts for suc~'-projectswil~rc' r~ctor(s) licin;;~a 7q0 pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 4 .0 I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 7 1 1 1 personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for.6'onstruction of the proposed property improvement. YES,,jONO a n- rt) sigrt~~ —an i~p1i66ii;; for a building ~er`mit for the proposed 1 riia;e i h~av ~;ork" 1 have contracted with the following person ~ (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name address phone number contractors license nOr~ber): 11 7~l-a;1opr;-vZ—p;;io`ns of the'mk'-6uXI h9 hi i ;Wfoll4ng person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name address phone:- ,,number / contractors licens I q -S rt $5. 1 will provide some of the work, but I have contracNed (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name address,/,phone number /,type',, ,of work):"-- PROPERTY OWNER SIGN rC-0MP.LETET.HISi7 &K—TTIOWFORA j). the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention ,program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous SubstanceAccount Act?--El- YES C] No 'Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permii from t4 a~ir -pollution control district or.air.quality manag'smek district?. C], YES .Is the, facility,to ba~ciinstructed 6thin 1,000 feet of the outer b6undary of a'school , site? E). YES--C1-iNO. Ir JF ANY OF THE.ANSWERS ARE,~is, AFINACERTIFICATE OF'O C*CU i PANCY. MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT. HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND TH U ONTROL'DISTRIC'T. POLL. TION C FS N S T R U CT 10 N - L B I hereb~ affirm that there is a construction' lending agency for the performance of the work for.which~this permit is issued (Sec. 3097 (1), Civil, Code). is S, LENDER'S NAME LENDER'SADDRE S L9.'_-'_~,PPLICANT_CERkTIFICCA—TI~ON-----~-.~--.----,.~—i-;:—.,— I certify thit I have read the%~pHcsti6n and itat; ilhat t6'abovejLnformation ii c&ie6t'a-nd` that the irfoirom-kioni-6n'the -plans is accurate.-I agree- to 'compl~ 'w'Cth all City ordiKiniiei and State,16wi relating'io buildiribic6iistruictioh. I hereby' aiuth'oirizie' 'representative's 6f t J he - CitV of Carlsbad to lintei 'upon the latiove mentioned property_ for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP. HARMLESS THE CITY OF! CARLSBAD~., *GAINST 'ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS , COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAYACCRUEAGAINST SAID CITY IWCdh9EQUENCE OF"THE GRANTING'OF THIS PERMIT.- - . ., .0 ." ; 1. . " . v , . - 1. f P. -, . I " " .1 - -11. 1, .., - - .1 ~ .- . . 'j, A I '. L OSHA~ An OSHA permit is required for excavations,over ii'o- deep and demolition o;'co'Kstrubtion.of structures over 3;siorias G haig`ht:- EXPIRATION: Every 7permit issued by' "4- the,BL~11~ing OA;,bai"6;,iier the provisions of thii'Code shall"expire by limitation,and become null and void if the buildi ork authorized by such- perm t is ot commenced, within 3,65 days from the date of,.such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is susp ad ~j or abandoned at any*tirne after' a ork is c I f I ov9period of"I 80 days (Section 106.4. - 4 Uniform, Building Code)'. =.0 ni P ' M ~ - ! 11AP LICANT'S SIGNATUR 'DATE - -%tr- File YELLOW: Appliciint—PINK: Finance nspe6tion, List P6rfnit#-. ~CB971251 Type:. RETAIN RETAIN WALL 800 SF,T0 CITY Date Inspection Item Inspector 'Act Com~m'ents 10/20/99, .69 Final Masonry NF AIP 6/1/99 14 Frarhe/Steel/Boltihg/Weldin NFI, AP DECK UNDERTLOOR 4/2/99 66 Grout NF wc~, 4/8198 62 Steel/Bon.d Beam NF, -3/3/98 61 Footing PD co 2/20/98 66, 'Grout, NF co .22 Sew6r/Water Service NF:, Wc 2/18/98 63 Walls. -NF AP' DRAINS COMPLETE 2/12/98 66 Grout NF, AP 2/6/98 66 Grout NF AP 2/4/98, 63 Walls NF CO 1/28/98 61 Footing NF AP RADIUS AREA, 1/27/9& -61 Fpoti ng - NF CO, 1/26/98 61, Footing, NF CO FTGS FOR WALL EX.fENSibN 1/23/98...63. Walls NF: AP.. DRAINS BACKFII LL 1 114/9&~ 6.1 Footing NF~ AP 1/9/98 63 Walls NF AP 1/5/98 66 Grout NF AP 12/31/97 62 .Steel/Bond Beam NF CO .12/29/97 62 Steel/Bond Beam NF. AP, 6ROUT TO 8FT 661 , Grout NF Cd 12/15/97 61 ';.Footing NF AP 'SEE NOTES-ON SHEET #2 i2/12/97 BS ':Walls -NF WC 12/8/97 32 C6nst.'Service/Agricultural NF, AP 11/25/97 12 Steel/Bond Beam, NF WC 11/25/97 62 Steel/Bond Beam NF AP 8EE,NOTES ON'PLANS 11/10/91 63 Walls NF AP SEE NOTES~'ONINSPEC CARD .10/28/97 61 Footing NF AP' q A. Saturday, Octo er. 23 1999 Page 1.of 1 cv, SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT SHEET TYPE OF INSPECTION: Frr~oo OF OWNER OR PROJECT NAME C-A L A G ap- 5 v- A0_'hf;&3 Itucri3gA tr) PERMIT NO. q 7- 31, 0,) PLAN FILE NO. VI-i - I'Xr -7 ADDRESS '%V_ Ir 2,6 12- QRrL1SC_Q PL^C_r~. SUB-CONTRACTOR CAalLSgAp , r'A, C1;k00!j SUB-CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT nAAnALUS &aQQP CONST. MATERIAL ASTAA.A6#~' Arz, 14 r2CE14;Z tTA.IA ENGINEER 14,AlAtLL GENERAL CONTRACTOR tAYA,~r INSPECTION DATE ARRIVED DEPARTED SAMPLES TAKEN INSPECTIONS PERFORMED, PROGRESS. WORK REJECTED. MATERIAL I.D.. REMARKS PC4,101Z C.00frZnTO 900k, 'SPt~tcm< Lpt_Atmf\ Ar OP '~ht_Txtt 0,~~ Cjg,00r..~n Cj_nwArrmi3. tk)t%L& L^C^'Tre'~) era~ 01.1'Agk, 'IS. kcici'). AI.L_ [7,Aars 1A),X-rPtAj r.4x.!r j7m,),tjr,~ la r~,_, 1—i Aoeac\nr,-Ae_rC 0jtm~~t tar, Ifl4rC -TA4,rC ALL INSPECTION REPORTS WILL BE ACCOMPANIED BY A SIGNED SERVICE TICKET OR NO REPORT WIU BE ISSUED. APPROVED BY: JOB SUPERINTENDENT OR SHOP SUPERVISOR PRINTED NAME: INSPECTOR-.' CERTIFICATION NO.: A, CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: I hereby certify that I have inspected the above reported work and unless noted otherwise have found all areas listed to be in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the governing building codes. CONTRACTORS JOB N T.A. STONE ENTERPRISES P.O. Box 191603, San Diego, Ca. 92119 TEL: (619) 463-0619 INSPECTION JOB NO. S P E GIAL -INSPECTION REPORT' SHEET TYPE OF INSPECTION: —Fr e L --n LJEL-1>x,,14 POJEST~ NA -OWNER OR ,P ME* 6.A C_ PERMIT NO. PLAN F1 LE NO. 7' 'ADDRESS tZ aAD SUR!~,- TRACTOR,;.~ v` "CON ARCHITECT L U 5 ZO 6,- CONST.,,;MATERIAL -73 ENGINEER K A-Ak' & L 2-.* VA_ N 6- -70 jq A GENERAL CONTRACTOR INSPECTION DATE. IL/14-7/4-7 ARRIVED DEPARTED SAMPLES TAKEN INSPECTIONS PERFORMFD. PROGRESS. WORK REJECTED. MATERIAL I.D.. REMARKS 0 m-,rm y4v gu-, VL & txa - \1 - rN a 01 r, w IQ I- ti r oe, 9 (1 4%Z C IAhdt INS SPLLC_F_ If- fZ 1: 4 --. F. t~um To nr Sikz e- m P r r- (s QU9&XLAtO Pkro~ To C-poe-Irtgre Poug, 'G9Lrcmc Loc.ATprj~ A,-r Op Vao_,^ SCfti_- CE U) XkLt_ 0- 0 U r4 (I A-P. VAr r-m 0 LULt. Locg-rroA) egiz Sqemr S-2. JC A, j F c tz 124 kz etc r? A,~,- 13AtV~ UNRK,_' tom,el o:_-Tir m - QrTmx" T~4r-s WA,-A-, Ag-t- F-6(ikin. To r3p- Vrstj4,-4.~ QsM4 ALL INSPECTION REPORTS WILL BE ACCOMPANIED BY. A.- SIGNED, SERVICE TICKET. OR NO. REPORT. WELL BE. ISSUED., A PROVED BY: P JOB SUPERINTENDENT OR SHOP SUPERVISOR PRINTED NAME: I NSP EC S-0 - Ct-T I/ S'47 3 CERTIFICATION CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: I hereby 'certify'fhaf I have inspected the above reported work and -unless noted otherwise have * found all areas listed to be in accordance with the approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the governing building. codes. T.A. STONE ENTERPRISES P.O. Box 191603, San Diego, Ca. 92119 TEL: (619) 463-0619 INSPECTION JOB NO. CONTRACTORS JOB NJ 1 1 I 11" '~ Date: 15 July 1997 To: Plan Check File - ~6'12 Obelisco Place From-: Principal Build.ing Inspector Re:__ Work W/o Permits or Inspections Visited site today w/ Mike- Peterson. Contacted contractor Dave. Asked him if retaining walls supporting deck were new. He I said yes. He sa id he called our office and asked about permits for retaining walls less than three feet, andwas told not permits or. inspections were required. I'asked him if he'stated that the walls were carrying -a deck He said, "No, I don't think I said that." I.told him that I'm not inclined to accept any of the wall foundations done without City approval, permits, or inspections.- He can anticipate'having to remove thatwork. Left a Stop Work, Red Tag with, him. PATRICK KELLEY Principal Building Inspector 0 Page 1 -.City; of 'C a' ~rj s b ad' Building Department August 19, 1997 HYATT TENANT, DEVELOPMENT PO BOX 31.3 DESCANSO- - CA'91916 RE: 2612 Obelisco.Pl. In response to your letter dated-August 15, 1997, 0ease be advised that no work may progress on th,is.project until permits are issued for the project. As you were' advised by me'on July 115,1997 when a Stop Work Notice~was given to Y0 . U; none of the in place Work requiring City inspection will be accepted and must be removed and re-inspectedprior to'concrete placement. A f6undation inspection is a required inspection per Section 1.08.5 in the. Uniform Building Code.' P.lease complete the permitting process, and the Cit -make an in~spe6tiom y Will prior to concrete placement at that'point. ........... Patrick,kelley Principal Building Inspector c: Plan Check File 2075 Las Paimas'Dr.- Carlsbad, CA 92009-11576 -.(61,9) 438-1161 FAX (619) 438-0894 UJ Z Lx A tA ku 4-Y QL TZ Ot, jA z2-/ ~`71-7 ~4 J 4) ;>Adc 74 'Lla 14P ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY P.O. BOX 1932 e EL CAJON, CALIFORNIA 92022-1932 TELEPHONE (619) 447-4747 ROBERT CHAN, P.E. June 10, 1997 Hyatt,Tenant Development P.O. Box 313 Descanso, Ca. 91916 Subject Project No. 97-1127H6 Review of Foundation and Prading Plans Proposed Retaining'Wall Site 2604 Obelisto Place Carlsbad, California Gentlemen The undersigned has reviewed ,the foundation plan,.and grading plan for the proposed retaining wallto be constructed on subject', property, more specifically,' 'referred - to as.~ being Lot 667' acco , rding to Map thereof~No,. 7367, in'the City,o-f Carlsbad, State of California. The grading plan was.prepared,by our firm and the retaining wall plan was prepared by CasA'Engifieerling of'San Diego~, California. Based on the review of the above plans, it ,has been determined that the,recommendations as presented.in the Project Soil Report are properly incorporated into the plans., R ectfully s itted LIED EARTH HNOL ji'30FESSI() "S 0 5~ % ROBERT HAN, &b PCH A N, CAL Ej~~ICANT- DATE: June 18, 1997 J~URIS JURISDICTION: Carlsbad L) PLAN REVIEWER El FILE PLAN CHECK..NO.:- 47-i257 SET: IV PROJkTADIDRESS: 2612,0belisco Pl. PROJECT NAME- Ret,aininix:Wall!.D'e~k Addition The plans triansmitted.hei.rewith. have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply ~vith the jurisdiction's buildind codes..,, The,plan's transmitted herewith will subst,6ntially 6oenply with thejOrisdittipi-i's building qodes wh6nminor deficiencies identified below -are fesolved and checked,by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies ~identified on the enclosed check list 4nd sho'61d be-corrected and resubmitted for a'domplete recheck. R,,tThe check list transmitted hereWith is for, your information., The pl~ns are being held a,t Es I' Corporation until cbrrected,plans.are. submitted foe recheck. R The a_pI icant's copy of the I check list is enclosed for the urisdi6tion' to forward to the applicant P, contact. person. The' applicant."s~copy of the check list has be'en.se,nt to: r Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan ch6ck has been completed'. Esgil -Corporation staff ti 1z did" dvise the'applicant that the. 'Ian check hasbeen completed.- p~ 'Person contacted: Kamel, Tele~hone #-.appt.' .Zayat Datebontacted: 6/18/97 (by: kc) Fax ,#: Mail ''.~elelbhon&'- . Fax In Person' 'REMARKS: Enclosures: By: Kurt.Culver ~4.'.fEsgi I _Q~~bo'ration ',GA C Ej EJ 0 PC log ~::.trnsmtl.dot M 4: eake Drive, Suite'208 San -1468 9320 Chesap Diego, Califomia 92123 (619)560 Fax(619)560 ----------------- EsG11. C,orporation , lbrofessionaf Plan Review Engineers -June 17, 1997 bAT~E:` C]_AEP,~ICANT ~URI JURISDICTION: Carlsbad -,I] PLAN REVIEWER - El FILE P LAN'C H E C K NO.; 97-1257 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 2612 Obelisco Pli PROJECT NAME' Retaining Wall/ Deck, Addition Thewans transmittedherewith have been corrected where necessary'and'substan tially comply with..the jurisdiction's building codes. T~ Thep'lans transmitted herewith will substa,ritially comply with the jurisdiction's bui ldi ng. codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and check6d. by building department.. staff. ~F] The -plans transmitted' herewith have significant.d.eficiencies identified on the enclosed check list ,and should be corrected and resubmitted for a comp!ete recheck. Z The Check list transmitted herewith is for your'information.-.,The plans 'are being held at Esgil Corporation. unti I 6orrected plans,a're submitted for-recheck. F-1 The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to* the applicant contact person.,.. Z' 'The ~ppliicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: !,David Hyatt 2604,Obelisco Pl. -Carlsbad 92009 Also, given to*K~melZayat during meeting on 6/17/97 F Esgil Corporation s , taff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. ] Z `F'Esgil Corp o*r'a'tion staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed..' Telephone'#: 695-2761. Person contacted: Kamel Zayat Date contacted: 6/17/97, (by:'kc): Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person F1 R'EMARKS.:, -RurtCulve Enclosures: ;lEsgil Corporation Gk 'CM, [j EJ. El PC 6/12/97 !rnsmtl.~Ot p, t; ~~Q-~ 1576 9320 Chesai)6ak6* Driv6,~ Suite 208 4 San Dieg~o, Califonlia, 92123 *,(619) 56071.468 4; 6irlsbad 97-12,57. 111. June 17, '1997. RECHECK PLAN CORRECTIONI LIST JURISDICTION:. Cirisbad PROJECT ADDRESS:. 2612 Obelisco Pl. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY CORPORATION: 6/12/9Y REVIEWED BY: Kurt Culver PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-.1257 SET- II1- DATE. RECHECK COMPLETED: June 17, 1997 FOREWORD -(PLEASE READ)S-.. 'this plan review is limited to the technic'al requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,:Unif6rm Plumbing-Co'de, Uniform'M . echanical C , ode,* -National Electrical -Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review "is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. ~ You may have other corrections., 'based on laws and ordinances enforced by.the Planning Department$ Engineering Departme.nt, or other departments. 'The:following items list"d need clarification,, modification or change'. All items 'Must be satisfied P .-'before the.plans will be in conformance'with the cited .6odes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 11994-Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans.do,es'not permit the violation of any 'state, county oir city law..' Please'm''ake all corrections on the original tracihgs and s6bmit two new sets of print§ to'. ESGIL CORPORATION. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon -with the, which each -correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet. revised'plans. -The.following -items. have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction- number hai been givdin for your reference.. Please con tact me if you have pU questions regarding these items. Please, indicate here if, any. changes have been made to the plans- that'bre not a res6it of corrections from this list. If'ther6 are other changes, please- briefly describe them' and where ? they are located on the plans. HaVe chandes.been made not res~lting.from this ist. LI.Yes UNo EsGil Corporation Professiondl Plan ~Xeview Engineers DATE: June 9, 1997 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-1257 PRbJECT A I DDRESS: .2612 Obelisco Pl. SET: 11 EI,APPUCANT U ~Rl S El PLAN REVIEWER El FILE- PROJECT NAME: Retaining Wall/Deck Addition The lans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply p with the jurisdictions building codes. El 'The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. F-1 The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. - The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected -plans ar6 submitted for recheck.. El The ap I plicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the cfieck list has been sent to: David Hyatt 2604 Obelisco Pl. Carlsbad, CA.'92009 cc: Casa Engineering 7940 Silverton Ave.,.Suite 206 San Diego, CA 92126 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan,check has been-completed. F I Esbil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed; Per-son contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: Fax #: Carlsbad 97-1257 11 June 9, 1997 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2612 Obelisco Pl. I DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 6/3/97 REVIEWED BY: Kurt Culver PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-1257 SET: Il DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: June 9, 1997 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National'Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise. attenu ' ation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have.other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department .or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations.' Per Set. 1.06.4.3,. 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county orbity law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for C'ommercia.1/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious process.ing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of. two wa ys: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculatiohs/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA, 92009,.(619) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil -Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA ~92123, (619) 560-1468. 'Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to,the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning,.Engineering a,nd Fire Departments. NOTE: Rlans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City, Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is 7olakiliteite rechecking, pleas6 identify, next to each item'-the sheet of the'plang dpon w,hidh'each correction on this sheet has been, made'and return this sheet With "the d plans. revisd Carlsbad 97-1257 Il June 9, -1997 G. The following items have not been resolved from, the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you..did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed' those. -pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if You have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans. that are not a resu It of corrections from this list. If thore'are other changes, please briefly'describe them and Where Ahey are located-on the plans. Have, changes been made not resulting from this list? L3Yes,* L3No 3. On the Site Plan, please. indicate if there will be any structures other than the deck/walls shown. If so, -indicate their locations and uses. The bending stress'in the 6" track of detail.7 will be, too high.'Please revise the detail.' A handrail is required along the'length of the stair. The- handrail must have a gripping portion that is not less than 1 -%" nor more than 21" in cross-sectional -dimension. The top tracka't detail 7 Won't comply. Please add a conventional handraiL Please, show on the plans the intended use of the deck. For the glass guardrail shown, please review all the provisions in -UBC Section 2406.6. The soils report was.not provided! Nothing was,provided, in writing from the soils engineer regarding liquefaction.. The requested letter was not. provided. The maximum moment for the footing should be measured to the bottom of the footing. 'This will increase the moment over-'50 percent'. 15. Please submit the soils report to verify. 18. Please justify the allowable. screw value used of 923 pounds. Please reference a specif ic ICBQ report. For example, the ICBO, report for the Simpson 'screws lists values haff of what was us0d,in the design. '19. A. The ICBO. number for the anchors (1372.) lists them for concrete installation onlY.'(not :.-f6rmasonry). Please revise this. - B Please provide the I s pins used at the shear transfer detail.- tBO number for the "hot 0,,Sr The's., report should contain the "allowable" values used in the engineers-, nse to this correction. IsGil'-Corporation rofessionaf Plan Review'!tngineers, PATE: May 239 19.97 E3 APPLICANT P-JURIS.7: 101 PEA—NREVI EWER'-' Carlsbad JURISDICTION. EI FILE - 'PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-1257. SET: I . -PROJECTIADDRESS: 26 1 Obelis.co Pl. - PROJECT. NAME: Retaining Wall/ Deck Addition FT The plans transmitted herewith have been,corrected where necessary.and,substantially comply with the jurisdiction's kh***hhkh'* codes. The plans transmitted herewithwill substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes' when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and-checked by building department. staff. El' The plans transmitted herewith have sign ific~nt defi'cien'cies identified on the' enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubm.itted for 6 complete recheck. 'The *check list'transmitted herewith' is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil ,,,,Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. F1 The aippl'icant's,cop . y of the check list is'enclosed for the juri,sdiction to forward tothe applicant t contactperson. The applicant's copy.of the check list has been sent to: David.-Hyatt 2604-Obelisco Pl. Carlsbad, CA 92009,,- Esgil Corporation staff did no't advi s*e the applicant that tlie. plan- check ha§' been completed. - 'Esgil Corporation staff did advise-the applicant that the plan"check has been complete d.- Person contacted: Telephone V Date contacted: (by: Fax #: Mail Telephone -Fax In Person F-1 REMARKS: By:. Kurt Culver Enclosures: ~Esgil Corporation -1 PC 5/19/97 E] GA'~ -CM E] EJ E trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake DriN~ . e, Suite 208 _ '*,San Diego, , Califomia 92123 (61 , 9) 560-14~8 Fax(619)560 . -1576 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST COMMERCIAL V. PLAN,CHECK NO.'-- 97-12S7 JURISDICTION: dirlsb'ad OCCUPANCY: U72 USE:. Reit.-Wall & Deck TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N ACTUAL AREA: -,1404 ALLOWABLE FLOOR A EA: bK .'STORIES" HEIGHT: SPRINKLERS,?: 'No, -,OCCUPANT LOAD: REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY, DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 5/16/97 ESGIL CORPORATION: .,5/19/97 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN ~EVIEWER: Kurt Culver, COMPLETED:'May~.23, 1997. FOREWOR6(PLEASE~ READ): 0 ,-This plan re-view .is-limi.ted to. the, technical requirerrIents'~6 ntained in. the Uniform Building' Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Unifoft Mechanical Code, Notional Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy, cbnservation,, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan 7 review is based ori` regulations- enforced by the Building Department. You,~may.,have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning. Department, Engineering -Cleara . nce from those departmehts may be Department, lFire Department or olhe~ depa required prior to th6. issuance of a building 'Permit. .'.Code section s'ci te'd-a re based on the 1 994, U B C. Oterris listed need clarification, modification or chbng6. All, items must,be sat . i4ied-, ..Thefollowihg bbfoi~e'thb, plans will be',in'co.nlonmance with the cited cocieslana,regul.ations.%. Per'Sec. 1016.4.3, -1 994 Uniform. Building Code, the 'approval of -the plans does not permit the -violation ~"of, any state, -county or city. law. 'T s. 'P''Ie'- a's e 6 6 t' e on'this' list - (o a co6y), O.S6'eed up'the ir6check pr&6~ whete te~6h correc "fi e i6j," t tion Hein has bien `~ddre~sed,, i.e., plan sheet riu' im'ber,'specl ication ct e c.' M SU M ..~'.-';`-1Be sfire to enc o b th'e"' dirkdd d0istiklf6n y6d ~6' it the'r'e-vis'e*d' P-Ia'I[fis::Z,- _:~-AI~T'N6:_22, GENERAL COMMERCIAL WITHOUT ENERGY OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC')'- co fo "'d t M rw. 0 Carlsbad 97-1257 May 23, 1997 VALUATION AND PLAN CHEck FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-1257 'PREPARED BY: Kurt Culver DATE: ..,May 23, ~997. -BUILDING ADDRESS: 2612 Obelisclo Pl.. bu ILDING OCCUPANCY: U-2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTIO . N: V-N BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION MULTIPLIER' VALUE r Ret. Wall/Deck .26,244 _(per ap Air Conditionind Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 26,244 Carlsbad 97-1257 May 23, 1997 GENERAL 'Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commerciallindustrial projects (two' sets of plans for residential projects). 'For expeditious processing, -corrected set's - can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City,. of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009,', (619~ 438-1161. The City will route the'plans to'Es-Gil'Corporatio'n and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments, - Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports-to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive', Suite -208,-,San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560A 468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans andcalculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building- Department for routin6 to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that'are s.ubm.itted directly to EsGil'Corporation only will n . at be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and, Fir6 Departments until review by EsGil Corporation isbomplete. PLANS Provide the names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner and the responsible design professionals on the Title Sheet. Provide a stalemerft on the Title Sheet of the plans thafthis project shall comply with Title'24 and 1994 UBC, UIVIC and UPC and 1.993 NEC. SITE PLAN Show on the site. plan all buildingg on this. site.' Additionally, show all- uses and.- 'further indicate in what capacity the deck will be used. STAIRWAYS .4! Stairway'riser must be 4 inches minimum and 7 inches maximum and minimum" rOn shall be 11 inches.'Section'l 006.3'. Ca'rlsbad 97-1257 May. 23, 1997 Handrails: a) Handrails 6~e required-on each side of'stairways. ~b) Handrails, and extensions shall be 34" to 38" *above nosing of treads and be continuous. Except for private. stairways, at least one rail ghall,e~tend 12" beyond top and bottom risers., 7 All stairs'shall have handrails terminating in a, newel or s6fety post. Section 1006.9.. Note: Where access for the disabled is necessary, Title 24 requires -handrails on both sides'to extend 12 inches beyond the top nosing and 12 inches plus the tread width beyond the bottom nosing. Additionally, show stair stripes, etc. per Title 24 if applicable. 6. The handgrip portion.of. all handrails shall be'not less-'than 1-1 /4 inches nor more than 2 inches in,cross-sectional,dimension. Handrails projecting from wallp shall have at least 1-1/2 inches,between the wall and the handrail.'Section 1006.9., EXITS 7— Please specify on the plans the intended use for the deck. If public assembly, two.complying exits will be provided. -MISCELLANEOUS Guardrails (Section 509.1): a), Shall be installed at all unenclosed floor and roof openings. b) Shall., be installed at open and glazed sides of landings,and ramps. c) Shall be install.6d at balconies or porches.more than 30" above grade or' I o or below., d) Shall have d height of 42". e) Shall be detailed showing adequacy of ,,connections to resist the horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-B. f) Op6nings between railings shall be less than 4". The triang tular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a I at a stair shall be less than 6". FOUNDATION 9. Per City of Carlsbad require m'e'nt,, a soils repori mu'st be provided for this proje6t Of particular concern are the soils bearingvaluib 6h.d.equivalent fluid pressure .used: in the calcu ations. Cailsbad 97-1257 May 23,- ~997 10. Investigate the l5otential for seismically inducied soil liquefaction and soil instability in seismic,zones 3 and 4. Section 1804. 5 11'. Specify on the foundation plan or structural specifications sheet the'soil classification, the soils:.expansion indexand the'design, bearing capacity of-the foundation. Section 1804.3. 12. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirminb that the foundation. plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed 6rid that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report-ar& properly incorporated into the plahs.,(When required by the soil report), 13.,: In the, retaining wall details, the tension in the footing will be along the top. The, rebar shown there alSpe6rs to be inadequate. 14. Define the wall's horizontal rebar at detail 6.. 315. Once the soils report is pr6videdJt,\W1I be Verified if the 7' distance-to-dbylight shown is;adequate for the retaining walls using passive press u re/fri cti on,to resist earth pres'sures. The vertical rebar shown for the 8" CMU.is inadequate. The existing retaining wall at detail 2 will how feel new loads from the added'- construction. The entire.existing wall syste'm must be re-balculated. Provide calculations.to justify the joist connection shown at detail 2. '19. Detail 2 show s'shbt pin s~ and expansion anchors for connections to mas I onry. Very few are ICBOeap'roved for that particular condition. Plea~e specify the P ICBO approval number for each,type of anchor (aind review the report to'e6su're, they're.approved for this'condition. ..'20. Please clarify the referencd to th6 8" x 9" pier indicated on.the framing plan. STRUCTURAL' 21. Provide minimum structural specifications 6n't~e plans to show that all structural materials will, comply with the design calculations and building code requiremenig.. 22.-. Reference.. EVERY. bubbled detail,back to the framing plans. .23. Show detailing at the de6k/stair shown at thd right side ofthe.,pil6ris. Carlsbad 97-1257 May 23, 1997 24.. There'are some details that don't have a reference bubble associated with them. Please assign'a referenite number'and then show where on* the plans they.', apply." Also, those details appear to be incomplete- and don't make much sense. 25.- The framing plan refers to detail 7,".but that detail wasn't provided. .26. At detail 1: a) Show blocking at theexisting 2x1 O's below. the.new bearing wall. b) If 1he. new. metal members next to the exist.ing (2) 2xl 2's don't bear on the concrete,, then the (2) ~xl 2's must be shoWn.to be.adequate in horizontal shear. c) Provide calculations for,the existing foundation to.show Jt is still adequate for the new loads (vertical and.lateral). ',.For the, larger"deck shown,~ please clarify what resist's lateral load . s in the X and Y directions. The diaphragm ratio is excessive. Regarding the structural calculations- p) Why was no I ive load considered on sheet 1 ?! ?. b) Justify. a live load of only 40 psf as used on sheet 2, etc. c),.. Specify on the plans the manufacturer and ICBO approval numberfor the joists selected on sheet 2. (to verify allowable moments, etc.). d) Since, the compression side of the cantilever joist on s heet 2 is laterally, unbraced, the allowable moment there wil.1 be very low. Please investigate. e) The methodology used on sheet 5 is -wrong. The V6od/steeI beam must be designed by assigning load to each'portion using the stiffnesses to distribute the loads. f) Why does sheet 5 assume the size of the 2x12's to be'l.75" x 11.5"? g) If the (2) 2x1 2's have* been the only beam present for the 14' span shown on sheet 5, -then they could only have supported a dbad-plus'-Iive -load of only 30psf ! (Based on the M,.p shown.). h) The design on sheet 6 doesn't make- any sense. Please provide ulh its for,. each number, and a discussi o*n of the mlethodology. -ber "26" come. from in the Ito'tal equation?-. i On sheet.6, wheredoes the num The allowable bdaring:Value used on sheet 7-is incorrect. There are retaining wall calculations for.the 8.5' hei ght! but not. for the 6.5' height.' 1) 'The footing Width'shown.'On'thd- plans does not m*atc sheet' i'l. m) _~".~.'.The footing rebar.shown'bn the plans dogs not match.slheet 11. Carlsbad 97-1257 -May 23,1997 n The rebar selected on sheet 11 for the maximum moment is 0.25 square inches. The #4 rebar chosen won't provide this. 0) -Please, recheck the m6ments on, sheet 11.' The 8"'CMU trans.itions to 12" CMU at a distance of 6'-6" from the,. surface (per the plans). At that depth, the.moment is*,much higher than reflected in the calculations:* p) Please recheck the program that selects that wall rebak on sheet 14-. For,-, - the maximum moment shown, the rebar selected appears to be inadequate (0.0775 square inches)-. ADDITIONAL 29.-' 30-.'~ To spe6d up'the review process, note on this list (oir a copy) where ~each correction'item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, dalculation page,, etc. Please indicate here ifany.changesba~e been~made to the plans thait-are.not a'... resblt of corrections from this list., If the . re are'other changes, pleasia* briefly describe them and, where they are,located in the plans. Have'changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate:, U Yes., No 32. 'The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil,Corpgration located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, *San Diego, California, 92123; telephone number. . of 619/560-1468,,to perform the plan review.for your project. If you have any questions. regardi nb -these plan revi6W items,- Olease contaicit Kurt CiAver at Esgil Corporation. Thank you.,. 8f b F City of Carlsbat! Engineering Departnient] BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DA _E: 2c) PLANCHECK NO.: CB'q2- Q2 7 BUILDING ADDRESS: C)6ells(c, PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ret DeCL,,- ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: c25 EST. VALUE: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please.review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in sudpension of permit to build. A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: I i:lmr_-il Please s t attached report of deficiencies marked wil0ilMake necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with 'applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By: By: By: 90 Date: 5 12-0 /q 7 1 / Date: 7 L ,U7 1) Date: A FOR OFFICIAL USE:',ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZ4TION TO ISSUE BUILDiNG'PERMIT:..' Date:: By, ATTACHMENTS Dedication Application Dedication Checklist Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist Right-of-Way Permit Application Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: David Rick -City of Carlsbad Address: ' 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 Phone: (619) 438-1161, ext. 4324 A-4 H:1W0RD1DffdTtS'U."g PgfffJ&Pfy~ F0 Pt!Trlsbad, CA 92009-T 576 (619) 438-1161 - FAX (619) 4'392-R%94 BUILDING. PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE OLAN ,'* -dimensioned site plan arawnto scale. Show: 11. Pro-vlide a fully '.Property Lines North Arrow Rear iL 1J. J41 Existing & Proposed Structures Easements 5h--,- C. xisting Street Irn kight-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets provemeInts G. Dr veway wi s - Show on site plan:' 1 a nage Patterns,. 3yilding-pad, surface drainage must maintain 6 minimum slope O'f.one' percent toWafrd,s,an adjoining street drbn approved drainage course. GVADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE:.- "Finish arade will-provide-a minimum positiv . e drainaige,of, 2% to,swale 5' away from bNlding." B. xisting & Proposed Slopes and Topograipoy,- 'Include on title sheet: Site,'address'. Assessor's, Parcel Number Legal Descrilp!ion, - 4 Vindustrial, buildings and tenant -improv"em' For dommercia ent~ projects, include: tot . al building square footage" ith 'the square footage for each different use,. existing. sewer permits showing square footage of, different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, 6tc.) previously, approved.-, EXISTING: PERM IT. NUM BER... DESCRIPTION,' DISCRETIONARY~APPRdiyAl_ COM PLI . ANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of. approval for Project No'. 4b.'.All conditions are in complianc6. Date: I& N 2. S d aina e 2 0 toswa r g , of 0 xisti~ng & P r op!3sed Slop clu f I s t. In de )n tle hee . WWORDOOCSICHKLST~B.ilding Plancheck Cktst 6P0001 Foffn DR.doc' 2 'Rev. 12126/96 i BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS SW N D,/ RD.( 2 3 5. Dedication for all street. Rig hfs-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or 6tilit~ easements on the building, site is required for all, n' ew buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ Dursuant to Carlsbad 0 4 Q Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please hav e* a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an._8 Y2" x 11" plat map. and submit with a title repo.rt. Al_I easement documents must be approved and signed by ow'ner(s) prior to issuance of - Buildinb Permit. Attached please find 'an application form- and submittal: checklist for the dedication process. Submit the 'Completed application form 'With the required checklist items. and f6es 'to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: constructed . at time of building construction whenever the value of the Construction exceeds pursuant to Carlsbad' Municipal Code 'Section 18.40.040., Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find'~n application form and submittal checklist for the public impeovem.ent requirements. A ,registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit, them together with the requirements on the attached ~checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. -the completed, application 'form' and the requirements on the checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or-fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities, posted and fees p9id prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans sighed by: Date:' 6b. Conitruction of the public',irriprovements may,be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Muinlicip"al _Cdcle,Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title r~eport or current grant deed on the property and procbssing fee of $ so we may prepare the necessary F~ture Improvement Agreement. This 'agreement must be signed, -notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: IMPROVEMENT, REQUIREMENTS C3 Q 6a. All needed Dublic improvements upon and'adiacent to the builefin --ito m"--t him HAWORDIDOCSICHKLSTIBuilding Plancheck CkIst BP0001.Form OR.doc M Rev. 12/26198 BUILDING PLANCHECK'CHECKLIST nd./ ls',', 2. '.3 ed.1 8c. Enclosed please find,`yodr Future, .,Improvement Agreement. Pleas6~ 'return -agreement signed and notatiz , e , d to the Engineering Depa'rtrnent~. Future lmprovernent.Agre~ment clompleted r by: Date: Q 6d.'No- Public Irnpro.Ve.rnents'requiired.. SPECIAL NOTE', Damaged '.or defective, improvem nts found adiacent to building site, must be repaired, to- the'satisfaction of the City IriSDector Prior, to'occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions, that* invoke 1he" need for a grading' permit are found in Section, 11 06-030 of the'Mun.icipal Code.,,: ~a. Inadequate information available. on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements.. Include accurate grading quantities (cut,' fill import, -.export),. Q 7b. Grading- Permit required., A separate gradin plan prepared by a reg I istered'Civil 9 Engineer must be submitted together with -the completed iap pAcation. form 35- 2 -,?~4 )OA) q attached. NOTE: The Gr6dinq':Permit must be issued and rough rading Pido 4 $%or approval obtained prior to issuance of a Buildin Permit. Gr ading Inspector'si gn off by:' Date: POJ Certl A6r -to ; I 't. v4541% re . li-J, - I I Al Y-1 - L] _0 ~c. Graded Pad, Ce"rtification required. (Note: Paid certification may -be required 'even if a,gra ding permit ishot required) U L3. 7d..No Grading' Permit required. 'MISCELLANEOUS.PERMITS 0 8. ARIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to,do work Jn City Right-of-Way. and/or private work adjacent to the,public Right-of-way.- Types of'work, include, but are not limited to: street'. improvements, tree trimming, driVeway'cohstruction, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water uti I lities. Right-of-Way permit required for- H:1WO'RD\DOCS~CHKLST%Bu5dhg Plancheck MIS1 BPOOO1 Fom ORAOC Rev. 12126196 BUILDINO PLANCHECK CHECKLI,~T J.. sV ~dV rd V Z 3_ 'Ll Q .9. SEWER PERMIT is required, concurrent 'With the building,permit issuance. The... fee is noted, in the fees. section, on 4he following page~.' 10. INDUSTRIALVASTE PERMIT.is re , qu'ired,., 'Applicant -must complete Industrial Waste Permi , t Application Form I a . nd - submit for City appr6vai 'prior to'is~uance of. I a, Permit. Industrial Waste permit accepted by Date: U C3 11. NPQES PERMIT `b : Cit e Coni-plies with th y_s requirem'*nts f the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Syite'm. *(NPDES)' permit. Th6' applicant shall~~, provide ' 'best management practices to reduce surface pollutant~ t6 . a n,accep!a~~16 leve Lpri or to, discharge to sensitive areas. Plans'forzuch~ im,piove,ments shall be approved:!by the City Engi~eei 'prior 'to issuance of grading of' building permit; whichever occurs first. u(/ LI U 12. U equired fee's ate attached..' ~~'N lio fees . required 13~ Additional Comments: JAA WA +e 0 11, var~(j J5 bf VN ~~ I C/ bo*m avwk elevwxl~ 54,~, CA 51-4e) (-e7o auU4 SX-e 44 All ~41 ( 4+ ~P__ , a e 44) a 5~6.j 3.,r-NC V &r4kt j'.1V -t*-- A'rrowJ 41 a 0 Ili ?Ir4 4 66 r 71 04i e '44t ~Zj 1'17 P14t,) COC 4aw ',lj- hp Li r,,A -4 G" -M. pig ce ? HAWO~D1DOCS\CHKLsrB.ndmg Plancheck CWt BP0001 FO ORA= Rev. 12/26~96 A F.-OR N ' M IN D E ' PA FTI~~NT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB Address C; Planner Greg Fisher Phone (619) 438-1161, extension 4 R APN: Type of Proje 'and Use::J iA4 Zone: Facilities Managemeint Zone: C1FD On/j t) r Circit9e (if property in, complete SPECIAL TAX CALCULATION WORKSHEET provided by Buildin 9 Department.) Legend Ite m Complete Item I ncomplete - Needs your action F-1 Environmental R eview Required: YES NO T I YPE DATE OF,C010LETIOW. Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval Discretionary Action Required: YES('C~) NO TYPE APPROVAURESO. NO. DATE., PROJECT NO. -OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Co'nditionsofAP'proval Coasta I Zone Assessm'ent/Co mpliance. Project site located in Coastal Zone?'—YES CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES. -. "NO., If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Camino Del Rio North, S'Yite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725;.(619)'521-8036 ,Determine (Coastal Permit Required or-Exempti: Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NOk' If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now.,~ Coastal Permit Determination L6g'.#: 1 o ctions: 1"W"!-UP A N, 1 Stamp Building',PI-ans'. a's Exemot"'Or' "Coi—si6l- Permit Riequired (at-rninimurn 7' Floor Plans)'." 2) Complete CoayStal Permit. Determination Log -as needed.. *V% F nclusionary Housing: Ne. requited: `-Y~'E§ 10 ~9 (Effective date,of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May ~1, ~1 ~93.) .,Date.Entry Completed! YES Site Plan: 1 Provide a fully. dimensional site ,plan 'dr-a wn"" , to , scale'. Show: -/h4 a" Nort rrow, property lines, -ease . me . nts, 'existing and prop-os'ed'-,,structures, st ' ets, existing re street improvements, right-bf-Way 'widtfi," dimensional setbacks and lexisting topographical lines. F] F-1 F1 2'.-: Provide legal description of property, and ;assess6r.'s parcel number'. Zoning: F-T 1. Setbacks: Front: Requii' ..-Shown ed Int. Side: Required Shown Street Side: Required Shown Rear: Required Shown 7 FL2'. "Accessory Structure Setbicks: Front: Required Sh6wn %11 nt. Side: Required Shown* Street Side: Re~uiried 'Shown Rear x Required- Shown d. -S WhL F-1 F~ 17 3. Lot Coverage: ~Requir'e' i;o .F~ F_~ F-1 4. Height: Required' -Shown —1 F -1 F71 '5. Parking- Spaces Required Shown Guest Spaces .Required,- Shown Additional Comments 7(ov, t/ /1 4pwvp 6 I I A C t"D A'^ iv 14e-fe- t)AI "o I P(~A ne 'OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DAT -7 007 P03 HAY 27 '97 15:51 March 24, 1997 Arnold and Judy calibri~ce 2604 Obelisco Place Carlsbad, CA 9,2009-6527 (619) 431-5064 - RE. Calibric.e Residence, Lot,60 map 7367, Obelisco Pl, Carlsbad, CA. Work order #97-121 SUBJECT: 'Preliminary Soi I s: Investigation Per the request of Judy Calibrice this firm has performed A subsurface investigation of' the soils found at'the above referenced site. This report contains the findings of that investigation and makes recommendations for tl~e development ,of the'site. 007 PO4 pw 27.'97 15:51 SCOPE OF REPORT Exp4ore the subiurface conditions .to the'depths-influenced by the 'proposed construction. Evaluate, by laboratory'.tests~, the pertinient engineering ~properties of the various strata which will influence the development, including their bea ' ring capaciti4is', e'xpansive Characteristics and settlement potential.-, Define the general geology at the site. Develop,soil engineering criteria f,or the site grading and provide design information -'regarding.the stability of cut and fill slopes. Determine potential.construction difficulties and-provide recommendations concerning these problems. Develop soil engin I eering criteria -to be used by the structural -engineer to design an appropriate.foundation s ys t em. J 2 THE SITE The project site is an irregularly,shaped parcel of 0.5±. acres created by Map 7'367.,. It i-s located on the north face of a predominate ridge line, north east of the Hatiquitos Lagoon in Carlsbad, California; Geologically,,it is within the foot hills,of the Peninsular-range mountains ofthe western margin of-the Southern California Batholith.. The underlying soil is weathered rock~of.the cretaceous age. 'The parcel slopes steeply to the north,. The high point on the parcel is near the south east corner' @ 550± MSL.,. The low point lies near the -north west corner, of the parcel at 511± MSL. This site has been previously graded'for the construction of a single family residence which has recently beendemolished. The current topography.(see'attached plat co . nsists of a split level house pad with-cut and fill slopes along the northerly and southerly property lines. The remains of a partially demolished. .house were,on this site at the time of-this investigation. The original'natural slope gradient of the parcel was approximately 20%:t . .The south east property line has frontage on .th6 cul-de-sac of Obelisco Place. The vegetation on the lot consists,,of grass 'and sh r rubs that are typical'of this,region. The existing land use.is vacan ' t residential. The surrounding Parcels have been,d.eveloped with large single family estates. It is my~understanding that a new Split level house is to be constructed in the same general location as the previous 1 11 structure. The purpose of this,report is to develop the soils engineer ing criteria for the construction of this new residence. 007 P06 PIRY 27 '97 15.-52 FIELD INVESTIGATION In February of 1997, 1 conducted a field investigation of the subject site.~ The presences of'the existingfoundation made access to the.site V . ery limited.. An exploration excavations was made to the depth of -4't in the exi.sting driveway area of the site utilizing a tractor mounted back hoe with an 18" bucket. Soil profiles were visually ' examined. Soils,encountered, in general, consist of brown.sl,lty sands.changing to very dense fractured meta-volcanic rock at 2-4 feet below the natural s I urface. Excavation became increasingly more-difficult with depth. Bulk samples were taken for laboratory analysis to ' help evaluate pertinent soil characteristi,cs. Theseboring logs are included 'at the end of,this report. No ground water was ,encountered du ' ring this investigation, and naturally occurring -ground water is not likely to be a problem during or after the grading operation. (See recommendations for , perched ground water due to-lover-irrigating in Grading Recommendations") Rock was encountered in the boring4_ There is always the potentialthat non-r,ippable rock can-be encountered during the grading operation. If blasting becomes necessary,.a-special blasting permit shall be required by the City of Carlsbad. 4 007 P01? PIP"(- 27 '97 15:52 LABORATORY TESTS~ .,The laboratory information u sad for this report .was developed from actual -laboratory testing - which had been previously performed by this,firm on several -O'f the surrounding,yarcels- in this. s ubdivision'. Laboratory~tests wer'e, performed in accordance With generally. accepted test methods of the American Society for-, e Testing.and Mat rials (is-M.. A Proctor,Anal'ysis was per-formed on the ,"predominate on site soil -(occurring below the top soil layer) according to ASTM D1?57—The. MaXiMu L m dry%density-was d4t - ermined to be-122.1-lbs/ft at an 6ptinium , . I P_ I moisture .of 14.3%. A direct shear test was performed on a ~ample remolded to 90% relative density. The friction:ingle was determined to'be'32'. and the.coheslon was 524 pst. A summary-of these tests are contained at, the end of: this report.' -For the'purposes of this report it ~hall be assumed that the native,clayey-tbp,soil has a low to medium potential for expansion. Ho,i4ev~r, the nitive rocky,,ma~eria-l which i,~; typ,ical-ly, found directly beneath the clayey top,soil material generally has a very--low potential for expansion. Consequently, select grading shall be required to'discard any unsuitable material during the grading process. Any,materiil with a-medium potential for' expansion (or greatei) is not to be used for the backfill of any ,.. of the'.proposed retaining wal Is, and'is not to be ' within V of the finish grade-of the ,proposed.resi.dence. it is, ' likely that material that is acceptabl,e for retaining wall backfill-will not— be,foufid on site during th*e grading opera I tion. 'A*suitabl'a. g~an~ll,ar,'non-~-expansive'material'wilI likely need to be imported to the sii~.for the retaining'wall backfill. ]§ecause of the extent of coverage of the exis,ting structure,.. access for subsurface excavations was very limited during th~is~' _~nvestigation. ' Upon the completion of-re-moval.of the existing structures ad4itional,~§ub.surfa.ce-exploration may be necessary-to, further define the -limits',of.,unsuitable material that may (or m4y not) exist, on s'ite., It,shall be determined-at that time if— expansion testing of c'ertain'soil:types will be necessary. 007 POO NHY 27 '97 15:53 GRADING RECOMMENDATIONS The site shall be cleared of all vegetatio-n and toreign.debris within the grading envelope shown'on the sita'plan-. This debris is,to be -removed from site prior to rough grade approval. From our limited'sdbsurface investigation it,is.anticipated that the'site.has relatiVely thin lens of loose'top soil and/or fills which will need to be-removed and recompacted prior to placing fill. The ' actual depth:of these r'emovals shall be , 'determi , n6d by the soils engineer at time of the removal of the" existihg-.structure. At that time. more thorough recommendations. can be, made.' All fill material is to be compacted into- * 'a.dense uniform embankment of 90% minimum relative density. The moisture content of the soil should be between 1% and 4% over optimum moisture.' Cut and fill slopes are to -,be provided with appropriate surface drainage features and landscaped with drought-tolerant, slope-' stabilizing.vegetatibn as-soon as possible.in order'to' minimize potential for er6sion. 'Berms are to be provided at the top of all slopes and lot drainage directed such that runoff on slope faces is minimized. All grading shall-be performed in accordance with the attached "Recommended Grading Specifications" and,ih~ City of Carlsbad grading,,ordinan.ce-\ 007 P09 P1HY :27 '97 15:53 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS The following foundation recommendations -shall be considered a minimum, and shall be reviewed by the project structural engineer for their a dequacy: For tvo story construction, the minimum foundation shall be 15 inches -wide a--id founded 18 inches below grade. For the single'story construction, the minimum foundation shall be 12 inches.wide and founded 18 inches below grade... Both types of construction shall have four #4 bars of reinforcing steel. Two bars shall be placed 3 inches below the top of foundation, and the other two bars shall be placed 3 inches from the bottom of foundation. These~recommendations are based upon soil characteristics only and do not reflect any special considerations imposed by the building design which,may require a stronger foundation. The proposed foundations may be designed utilizing an allowable bearing pressure of 2000 lb/sf. This value may be increased by 1/3 for the'design of loads that include wind and seismic analysis. Slab-on grade and exterior flat work shall be at- least 4" thick and reinforced with number 3 rebar placed in a grid on 24"' centers. The interior house slab shall be poured on f-our inches of clean washed bedding sand (native sands are riot acceptable). with a 6 mil. visqueen vapor barrier placed'at mid-depth in the bedding sand. In addition, in order to avoid drying shrinkage cracks or minor settlement cracks from occurring in aesthetical l y or structurally sensitive areas the architect for this project should provide a schematic diagram of the locati'ons of the saw cut control joints,in the hous.e. The maximum allowable square footage of monolithic concretefor the interior slab (with out saw cuts), should not exceed 144 sf. (these sections shall be more or less square in shape with the lengths not exceeding 1.5 times the width.) The depth of these saw cuts should be 1/5 of the thickness of the slab, and be installed within 24 hours of the pour., Tooled control joint's (as opposed to saw cut) are preferable for garage.slabs and exterior flat work. All utility trenches shall be properly backfilled and compacted with a mechanical compacting device_-~rior to placement of any concrete. All foundation excavations shall be inspected by this engineer prior to placement of concrete. These recommendations are made based upon the assumption that the soils found on the site will be used for foundation embankment. In the event that addition soil is imported to the site, these recommendations will need to be updated accordingly.- Additional or final foundation recommendations contained in the final -"As Graded Report" when evaluation of foundation soils'can be made. will'be made and a more complete K 007 P10 11HY 27 197 15:54 I RETAINING WALL RECOMMEVDATIONS The theoretica-I laboratory soils data for the following retaining wall recommendations is,contained at the end of this'rep6rt. Howeve.r due.--to non-uniformity of soil conditions throughout a site and the' inexa-ct nature.of soils engineering the following, more conservative, values should be used in the design of retaining walls for this project. Retaining walls, which are not fixed at the top and have a level backfill are to be designed for an act ' ive ~sodl pressure equiv~tlent to a-fluid pressure of not less than;~~_8..S pcf.. This value is based on the assumption of a drained b~a`FlFfill condition.-Wall drainage details are to be'provided by-the project architect.. When retaining walls are restrained at the top an at'- rest soil pressure of not less than 58.0 pcf shall be used.for design of the,wall. A pas,-,i-v-e soil pressure value not greater than"250"pc- shal I be used. A coefficient of'fricti'on not greater tha~~(0.35'may be assumed forresistance of sliding between concrete_~~~soil. SEI.SMICITY This site, as well as most of California, is considered to be in' a seismically active area.',No active, or potentially active, faults are, documented in the immediate area of the site. The nearest potentially active, documented fault is the Rose Canyon Fault located approximately 6 miles west of the site. The ' Elsinor Fault is approximately 25 miles north east of the site. Due to the relative distance to the known faults, ground rupture 3.s.no considered a potential hazard for.this site. Consequently, the structures for this site should be designed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, Seismic Zone IV. I The presents of dense to medium dense.bedrock. combined with the absence of shallow ground water, make the potential for very low. Tsunami damoge is not considered to be a potential hazard for this site., H. 007 P11 NHY 27 '97 15:54 CONCLUSIONS' In'general no soil conditions were encountered which would preclude the proposed development-of the site,.pro.vid4d that the,' recommendations of this report are.-followed and that this f Irm monitors I the grading op , ~ration. The pridominant soils to be encountered by residential grading are considered to,be non-expansive and no specia,l .design. considerations. wi'll be 'rie'cessary. The-anticipated total arid/or differential-settlements for the' proposed structures may.be considered to be within, the tolerable limits provided -the recommendations presented in .this report arei followed. Fractured rock was encountered in the exploration e ' xcavati-ons., and there is.-always'a chance that unrippable rock will b.e encountered,during the,grading operation. In the.event that blasting becomes necessary,'a special-blasting permit willbe required by the City''of,Carlsbad. 9 007 P12 MAY 'W 15: 5~ LIMITATIONS AND UNIFORMITY OF~CONDITIONS The recommendations of this re'port,'pertalin only.to the.site inVestigated and'are based -upon the assumption that the soil, conditions do not deviate from those disclosed in the investigati,on. -if any variation or undesirable conditions ~are encountered during construction, or if the'pro~osed construction will differ from,that"anticipated.herein,,South,, Coast civil Engiheering.must be notified so~that supplemental recommendations can be given. 2,.- This report is.issued with"the understandin* that it is the, 'or respons'ibility -lof the owner, of, his. representative, to ensure-that the information and.recommen * dations contained -herein are brought to the attenti,on O'f.-the. aichitect and, 'd,incorporated into the other engineers for,the project an plans, and the 'ri-~c~essary steps are taken to see that their 7 contractor and subcontractors carry out such-recommendations in the field. .,31 . The findings of this report are valid as of, the -present date, However, 'changes in,the condi tions bf -a property can occur with the passage 'of time, whether -they be due -to natural process,esor the works of man- on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards.may',occur, whether , they result from legislation or the.broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findi I ngs of this report ffiay be invalidated wh~olly "'or partially'by changes outside of-our~lcontrol. Therefore, U'biect i this report i's s to ,review and shbuld.-not be, relied upon after a period of two years. Russell. Bergener. Date RCE 44641 Exp. 3/31/98 Wof E M No- 0 1 EV. 341M 007, pi~ PIRY 27 1 97 15:55 RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS General These specifications have been prepared for the Calibrice Resi,dence, Lot 667, Map 7367 .. 1'. 2, -The grading contractor shal I be responsibl e for performing the Irading operation in strict conformance with these specifications. All fill placement shall be done under the , observation of, the soil Engineer. The Soil Engineershall be consulted if the contractor or owner wishes to deviate from these specifications., -1.3 The grading shall consist of clearing, grubbing, and removing from the'site all material the Soil Engineer de signates as "unsuitable";-preparing areas:to be filled; properly placing and compacting fill materials; and al-I other work necessary to conform with the lines, grades, and slopes.on the approved plans.'. PrepaKation of Areas to be Graded 2.1 All trees.and shrubs not to be used for landscaping, structures, weeds, and rubbish must be-removed from the grading envelope prior to commencing any e.xcavating or filling operations. This debris must be removed from site prior to rough grade approval. 2.2 All buried structures (such as tanks, leach lines, and pipes) not designated to remain on the site shall be removed, and the resulting depressions must be properly backfilled and compacted', prior. to any grading or iilling operations. ~2.3, All water wells shall be'-treited in accordance'with the requirements of the San Diego County Health Department. The owner shall verify the requirements. 2.4 All vegetation and soil designated as "unsuitable" by the .Soil Engineer shall be removed,under his'abservation. The exposed surface.must the: be plowed'or scarified to a depth n of at least 12 inches until the surface is free from ruts,'' hummocks, or other uneven features that-would prevent uniform compaction by.the equipment used. 2.5 Where the slope ratio of the original ground is steeper'than 6.0 horizontal 41--o 1.6 vertical, or where recommended by the Soil Engineer, the bank shall be benched in accordance with the following il-l'ustration: 007 P14 MHY 27 '97 15:56 FILL~-S.LOPE. -12:1 MAXIMUM SLOPE, (RATIO ORIGINAL ~NQTES GROUND "Alp should be 21' wider than the compaction equipment (10' min. (2) "B" 'should be .1 - 5'the w *dth of the co action ~mp equipment (15' min.),. A The'out7side toe should be B ~EE NOTE 2 at least 2.' into,dense, formational 'material 2.6 After the areas have~been plowed or scarified, the surface shall be disced and ]bladed until- t * hey are free from-large clods; brought to the proper moisture content by adding water or aerating; and compacted a's specified in Section 4 of these speci.fi6ations. Materials-suitable for_ use in COMRacted Fill 3.1 Material that is perishable, spongy, contains organic matter, or is otherwise unsuitable must not be used in compacted fill. 3.2~ The Soils'Consultant shall decide what materials, either imported to the site or excavated from on-site cut areas,, are suitable for use in compacted ,fills;'the Soils Consultant shall approve any import material before it is delivered to the site. During gradi.ng,,the'contractor may encounter soil types'other than those analyzed for the Soils investigati'on. The.Soils,Conslultant shall be informed so that he,may evaluate the suitability of-such soils. 3,3 Any material containing rocks or hard lumps greater than 12 inches in diameter- must be placed in accordance with Section 6 of these,5pecilications. 3.4 The Soils Cons ultantAs to perform laboratory t ests on representative samples of material to be.used in compacted fill. Such,tests are to be performed to evaluate ' the maximum dr~,density and moisture content of the samples. I Y The tests are to be performed in accordance with the accepted te'st'method,s -o'f the,,American S8ciety of Testing and Materials (ASTM). 4. Placing, Spr~a_dinq,' and Compacting Fill Material 4.1 Unless otherwise specified, fill material shall be ~Comp a c t e d while at '+I% to +4% of the optimum moisture content and .to a relative compaction of at least- 90 parcentl as determined by accepted ASTM test methods. 12 007, P15 HH"t"2Y 15:56 4.2 Fill material.s,shall be placed in 8" layers so that,when compacted, they have a rel-ative compaction in conformance~ with the,project specifications. *Each layer shall be -spread evenly and mixed th , oroughly,to prov,ide uniformity of materials in each layer., Fill slopes shall be compacted'by sheepsioot rollers or by ttack-w~Ll king with 'a dozer. Compaction tests shall ber t a k al-I on the slope faC e to verify,the 10% minimum,relative density'. Ob8ervatiQn of -Grading operations The,Soil Engineer shall be on site, during a,11'filling and compaction ope'ra:tion's. 5.2 The Sail Enginee ' r is to perform in-place density tests at :2 foot.elevation intervals inaccordance with accepted ASTM test,methods; such density test!5 are to be made in the 'compacted materials below the disturbed surface.' When. results of tests taken within any layer indicate.a relative compaction below that *recommended," that layer or-portion thereof shall be reworked.until'the recommended relative, compaction 'is.obtain'ed. Disi;,osal of Oye'rsize Rock 6.1 Rock greater than 11" in diameter, is considered oversized and shall eitheribe exported, or used for.la*ndscaping or rip-rap. 6.2 If rock blasting is neces , sary a special blasting permit will he required by,the City-of Carlsbad. Pro tectio n of Wor k 7.1 During ,construction, th*e contractor is.-to grade the site to - provide positive drainage away from structures and to prevent water'from ponding adjacent to structures..' Water should not be allowed to damage adjacent properties or finished work on the site.'rPositive drainage must be maintained by the contractor until permanent drainage and erosion control facilities are installed in accordance with project plans. 7.2 No additional grading sha'll be done, except under the observation of the Soil Engineer. 13 007 P17 mHY 27..'97 15:57' -LI f -CA MLE RE31DEN(-Z. BoRllyc PLB-T zz -ARGONAUIA: n Yoc ell 667 awe-,4-,?r ir r lit F/I 'OBEL co PLACE JS ;:C—o 007 Pie VINJE & MiDULt i ur4 tt~o 2450 Vineyard A,venue, #102 , Escondido, Califomia.92029-1,229 Phone (619).'743-1214 Fax (619) 739-0343 1-lHY '97 15:58 DIRECT SHEAR.TEST )B :97-102L DATE 3710-1997 TD )B NAME: SOUTH COAST CIVIL.ENGINEERING SAMPLE:, LLABRRESE RESIDENCE SOIL TYPE: ~SCRIPTION-- ORANGEISH BROWN SILTY CLAYEY.'SAND r* CAUTION ***' THE BEARING CAPACITY SHOWN BELOW IS,JrUST IE TOOL OF SEVERAL USED'BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER DETERMINE IF THE FOUNDATION.IS ~ADEQVATE! -iction Ang14 32 Cohesion'(psf) 524 ~t Density(pcf) =,.124.200 Dry Density (pcf) 108. 8519,, )isture content(-%) 14-100 Factbr of Saf4~tty .3 - - ~TERAL'LOAD PARAMETERS -TIV'E PRESSURE (psf) 38.2 ISSIvE pREssURE~(psf) 404.2 REST PRESSURE (psf) 58.4 0. 3 1' ~<p =3. 2 5 Ko =0.47 .)EFFICENT OF FRICTION,= 0.39 i~'ARING CAP(psf) DEPTH/FTG,. !.WIDTH/FTG. !984.847 1 ~024.835' 1.25 1064-824- 1.5 1104-812 il44-800 1 2 il98.017 1.5 1 1238.005 1.5 1.25 1277.994 1.5. 1.5 017.982 1.5 1.75 1357.970 1'5 2 1411.187 2 1 :1451.176 2 1.25 1491.164 2. 1.5 1531.152 2 1.75 1571.141 2 - -2 20.6 NQ 10.3 NG 7.7 RESIDENCE )B :97-102L LOCATION :.CALABRR.ESE 112 X2= 179 X3= 299 34.72 F2= 55.49 F3= 92.69 1130-466 T2= 1806.727 'T3=13~017.941 TB-- 1759.624 )OT MEAN SQUARE ERROR IS 21.80441 ,RCENT AGREEMENT -T2..AND TB 97 FR2= 32 C2= 501 OVING RING -SERIAL'.NUMBER ='13012 ~ICTION ANGLE 32 COHESION 524 90~ 140 I so~ 170 I go I A--LfM- W W ffffA W, NA I C FMA VA 701FMIA 80M AWMEMMMMEMM MIR wm=~M=Emw 11801MMMMMMMM 10 w Soaked Ws + Ww 15~,S Ws J~~16 w Soaked' 0.859 x ( Summary Co PSF C, W 3000 z a~ ' 2000 0 1000 0 1 2 3 VERTICAL (KSF) Average Ww + WS initial Soaked :-2. 1 Ll 3. 1,1(y15 345--~,f Av. ,90x1.1 64 x x w Initial Initial WS + Ww 60, 49 o.8s9x( M-5 WS w Iti't - Xoz =108 007 P19 NAY 27 '97 15:58 Wht:Q I :::ihhAK I r-Q.1 Mel 1 MUCU 6j wa "J10tus wc.A " #2 JOq NO. J 0 8 NAME* SAMPLE 801L TYPE DESCRIPTION J~ RING NO. W. Rate i~ displacement inches/min. DATE TEST SPECS . F16OLD TO 90% AT PCF AT OlVIC #3 T #4 INITIAL SOAkED SOAKED IN171AL SOAKED INITIAL SOAKED WS +WW + r r7 INITI~ A/s R2/1~7 Rll,~7 ?, 1p 7 wx + Ww a, 5 q, '57 #2 43 #4 Ver. Hor. Ver. Hor. Ver. Hor. - Ver. lo~ or. ? I I e2 /a 715 1 4; - I ~ 7 1 T-,57 4000