Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2617 OCEAN ST; ; CB950167; PermitBUILDING PERMIT 05/09/95 14:53 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 2617 OCEAN ST Suite: Permit Type: RESIDENTAL ADD/ALT Parcel No: 203-140-04-00 Lot#: Valuation: 203,372 Construction Type: VN Occupancy Group: Ref erence#: Description: ADD 2208 SF TO EXISTING HOUSE 2710 SF TOTAL HSE, 67 SF DECK,258 Appl/Ownr : MULLEN,RAYMOND AND BARBARA 2617 OCEAN ST CARLSBAD,CA. 92008 Permit No: CB950167 Project No: A9500210 Development No: 1815 05/09/95 0001 01 02 C-PRAT 1485.00 Status: ISSUED Applied: 01/27/95 SF GAR Apr/Issue: 05/09/95 Entered By: PD 619-729-6853 cted & Credits *** Fees Required *** ------------------------ Fees: 2,917.00ç\ Adjustments: / 00 Total Fees: 0 00 tNo Fee description -------------- Building Permit Plan Check ..Strong.Motion.Fee., . * BUILDING TOTAL A Enter. ' "Y"..for,Plum ,ing Isuè Fe Each Plumbing Fixture or 7 .091 Each Install/Repair Water Li e 7 00 Each Water Heater a or 7 . .10 Gas Piping System * PLUMBING TOTAL Enter '5 Y" for Electric Single Phase Per AMP -Oi I2'cZ" .25 * ELECTRICAL TOTAL Enter '1' for Mechanical issueT) .Install Furn/Ducts/Heat Pumps > Each Exhaust Fan > * MECHANICAL TOTAL PLDAA > .00 582.00 1 ,485.00 Ext fee Data ---------------- 1004.00 653.00 20.00 1677.00 20.00 Y 91.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 132.00 10.00 Y 50.00 60.00 15.00 Y 9.00 32.50 57.00 141.00 L ni 1 9.00 5 6.50 .09 ANAL /APPROVAL !NSP.'ft_DATE CLEARANCE \ CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 PERMiT APPLICATION City of CarLsbad BuiLding Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr., CarLsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 From List I (see back) give code of Permit-Type: For Residential Projects Only: From List 2 (see back) give Code of Structure-Type: S FD Net Loss/Gain of Dwelling Units PLAN CHECK NO. FsrvAL / 2. PLAN Cy. VALID. BY DATE 0468 01/27/95 0001 01 02 C-PRt1T 582.00 2. PROJECT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ~ft?s ocean street Building or Suite NO. Nearest Cross Street ypress Street LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Lot # ç of block A of Hayes Land Co. Map #2 Carlsbad, Map 1221 San Diego Co. CHECK BELOW IF SUBMItTED: (12 Energy Caics 192 Structural Calcs [R 2 Soils Report DI Addressed Envelope ASSESSOR'S PARCEL -CU-1-ifU-U4 EXISTING USE SFU PROPOSED USE SI-U ) e 90111 to exist. residence . 1J # OF STORIES 2 + basement# OF BEDROOMS 2 3 # OF BATHROOMS N (if different from applicant) P. o. Box 1217 Carlsbad, Ca. Z8 NAME (last name first) ADDRESS Ardent Rpbert CITY Carlsbad STATE CA ZIP CODE 92018 DAY TELEPHONE( 619 444525 Z' NAME (last name first) ADDRESS Mullen Raymond & Barbara 2617 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, Ca. 92008 CITY Carlsbad STATE Ca. ZIP CODE 92008 .,,DAY TELEPHONE 729-6853 PROPERTY OWNER NAME (last name first) Mullen Raymond & Barbara ADDRESS 2617 Ocean Street CITY Carlsbad STATE CA ZIP CODE 92008 DAY TELEPHONE 729-6853 CONTRACTOR mucls NAME (last name first) tCHTVP•'S•' ADDRESS '' CITYP&,VF-4e STATE CA- ZIP CODE 9906 V DAY TELEPHONE 6/91 - 4'8& --4,2...3 STATE LIC. #300&09 LICENSE CLASS .L) CITY BUSINESS LIC. # Ardent Robert F. '2617 Roosevelt, P.O.B6x 1217 Crlsbad CA CITY Carl sbad STATE CA ZIP CODE 92008 DAY TELEPHONE 434-4525 STATE LIC. # r. RFI WORKERS" COMPENSATION Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to sell-insure issued by the Director of Industrial Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, Lab. Q. INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. EXPIRATION DATE Certificate of Exemption: I certily that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, t snail not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. SIGNATURE DATE OWNER-BUIlDER DECLARATION uwner-liullcler Declaration: I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's Ucense Law for the following reason: 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). OX I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exem re , and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031,5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the ap a penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). SIGNATURE ,,-7 / /) DATE /7 -j /9J Is the applicant or future building occ&hnt required to submit a busin plan, acutely hazardous mateials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? DYES 0 N Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? DYES ONO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? DYES 0 N IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED AFTER JULY 1, 1989 UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISflUCr. ereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 3097(i) Civil Coce). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS 10. APPLICANT CEWflH(11UN I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARISBAI) AGAINST AM LIABilITIES, JUOGMEN1S, (X)STS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. (HA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5,0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. Expiration. Every permit issued by*Bufliding Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by suc o,commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or jf th e bujjding or work authorized by such permit is suspended or aba ifhe afteie wor is commenced for a period of 180 days (S~tion (d) Uniform Building Code). APPUCANrs SIGNATURE /9,(/ //.j 9jfiAE: 0 CITY OFCARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERNIT# CB950167 FOR 12/28/95 INSPECTOR AREA PY DESCRIPTION: ADD 2208 SF TO EXISTING HOUSE PLANCK# CB950167 2710 SF TOTAL HSE, 67 SF DECK,258 SF GAR 0CC GRP TYPE: RAD CONSTR. TYPE VN JOB ADDRESS: 2617 OCEAN ST STE: LOT: APPLICANT: MULLEN,RAYMOND AND BARBARA PHONE: 619-729-6853 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: REMARKS: BJN/DENNIS/735-9996 INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: P.M. INSPECTION PLEASE TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS-- PERMIT# TYPE STATUS RW950067 ROW ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 19 ST Final Structural 29 PL Final Plumbing 39 EL Final Electrical 49 ME Final Mechanical *****.INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP 122095 Final Combo CO P1 103195 Gas/Test/Repairs AP P1 102595 Interior Lath/Drywall AP P1 102595 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP PY 101995 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP PY 101995 Rough/Topout AP PY 101995 Rough Electric AP PY 101995 Rough/Ducts/Dampers AP PY 101995 Insulation AP PY 101895 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CO P1 101895 Rough Combo CO P1 101295 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CO P1 092895 Shear Panels/HD's AP P1 092795 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PA P1 092795 Rough/Topout NR P1 092795 Rough Electric NR P1 092795 Rough/Ducts/Dampers NR PY 092095 Roof/Reroof AP P1 092095 Rough/Topout AP P1 091495 Shear Panels/HD's NR P1 091495 Roof/Reroof CO P1 090895 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PD 082595 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PA PD 082395 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PA P1 081695 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP P1 081595 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PA PY COMMENTS SEE LIST SEE INSP REQ FOR 10/18 SEE LIST 10/12195 OK TO WRAP DOUBLE SHEAR WALLS ND 24" SHEATHING SLAB ND FTG @ FIREPLACE DRIPACK COLUMNS CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB950167 FOR 12/20/95 INSPECTOR AREA PY DESCRIPTION: ADD 2208 SF TO EXISTING HOUSE PLMCK# CB950167 2710 SF TOTAL HSE, 67 SF DECK,258 SF GAR 0CC GRP TYPE: RAD CONSTR. TYPE VN JOB ADDRESS: 2617 OCEAN ST STE: LOT: APPLICANT: MULLENIRAYMOND AND BARBARA PHONE: 619-729-6853 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: REMARKS: MW/DENNIS/735-9996 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS-- PERNIT# TYPE RW950067 ROW INSPECTOR STATUS ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 19 ST Final Structural ***** ***** INSPECTION HISTORY 29 PL Final Plumbing 39 EL Final Electrical 49 ME Final Mechanical DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP 103195 Gas/Test/Repairs AP PY 102595 Interior Lath/Drywall AP PY 102595 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP PY 101995 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP PY 10195 Rough/Topout AP PY 101995 Rough Electric AP PY 101995 Rough/Ducts/Dampers AP PY 11995 Insulation AP PY 101895 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CO PY 101895 Rough Combo CO PY 101295 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CO PY 092895 Shear Panels/HD's AP PY 092795 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PA PY. 092795 Rough/Topout NR PY 092795 Rough Electric NR PY 092795 Rough/Ducts/Dampers NR P1 092095 Roof/Reroof AP PY 092095 Rough/Topout AP PY 091495 Shear Panels/HD's NR PY 091495 Roof/Reroof CO PY 090895 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PD 082595 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PA PD 082395 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PA PY 081695 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PY 081595 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PA PY 081095 Ftg/Foundation/Piers CO PY COMMENTS SEE INSP REQ FOR 10/18 SEE LIST 10/12/95 OK TO WRAP DOUBLE SHEAR WALLS ND 24" SLAB ND FTG @ FIREPLACE DRYPACK COLUMNS r "i - ONSTRUCTION - .ESTING & 'ENGINEERING, INC. ESCONDIDO • CORONA • MODESTO • OXNARD ENGINEERING, INC. PROJECT NAME: /1'114 //t1 Res ; c/he ti ADDRESS: 2.(/ 7 0 C E4'14 .5 77 Cr/sLcc(, C. &O? ARCHITECT: If b C" 7 ENGINEER: CONTRACTOR: 2. '-' C, INSPECTION DATE: 419 - /_5S ARRIVED: /'3 DEPARTED:3 :30 PLAN FILE: BLDG PERMIT: OTHER: PAGE / OF / CTE JOB # /0—/3J6 REPORT# () INSPEcT!. -. MASONRY j GOu+ =Ps I_t P/2COOI1 ...•_•j,.,/ • -". .: - V'.. (.;) p.T.:CONC. 4•'.MoRrARTYPEIpsI : ?' ; (.) FIELD WELD REBAR GRADE _ () SHOP.WELDING STR:STEEC (-) PILE DRIVING US: BOLT ç fj. } () BATCH M. I. . (.i)EXP:ANCHOR. ' r _-,-t .e' '- cc11, &,, A;."• i t -ch&• * - INSPECTION REPORT Material Samalin ( ) CONCRETE (' )MORTAR ( )GROUT ( )FIREPROOFING ()MASONRY BLOCK ()REBAá ( ) STRUCTURAL STEEL ( ) BOLTS .' I_-;_INSP__PERFORMED, JOABLEM, MATERIAL1DENTIFICATIOt, PROGRESS, WORK REJECTED, REMARKS r-o i-i Tic, -P'rsY ' Cc trseS /2 ' c- OF, 8/oc 1( r r c Co1,'ct/c,0r r" 8/c c k -1oi-k /9 7i 7..T Certification of Compliance: All work, unless otherwise noted. L , complies with the approved plans and specifications and the uniform buildin code. .•. . . 4' • . IQ NAME: (PRINT) dt/ /.&_-::4 ,Q/7 _. SIGNATURE: CERTIFICATION NO.: 7 ?c GEOTECHNICAL & CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING & INSPECTION 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE SUITE 0 ESCOND(DO, CA 92029 (619) 746-4955 FAX (619) 746-9806 ' - ONSTRUCTION. .ESFHNG liNGINEERING, INC. ENGINEERING, INC. ESCONDIDO. CORONA' MODESTO • OXNARD INSPECTION' REPORT T A I PROJECT NAME: M td L L tj Re.c ; Je1 r ADDRESS: Cci-/Ec.c/, ARCHITECT: ENGINEER: CONTRACTOR: bL c. Ch ; INSPECTION DATE: 0 ARRIVED: 7'00 _DEPARTED:__________ PLAN FILE: BLDG PERMIT.- OTHER: ritjjr I CTE JOB # 1316 REPORT # 00 8 MaterialSampling ( ) CONCRETE ( ) MORTAR ( ) GROUT ( ) FIREPROOFING ( ) MASONRY BLOCK ( ) REBAR ( ) STRUCTURAL STEEL ( ) BOLTS cl JL' '06"0 /€e,',i e- ,, e-c- C/ /3 , *07 A /s c2 or Certification of Compliance: All work, unless otherwise noted, complies with the approved plans and specifications and the uniform building code . NAME: (PRINT) Ct /SCh ,_d SIGNATURE:_____________________ CERTIFICATION NO.: 790 3 * GEOTECHNICAL & CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING & INSPECTION 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE SUITE G ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 (619) 746-4955 FAX (619) 746-9806 . -: - ONSTRUCTION tESTING &. NGINEERING, INC. ESCONDIDO • CORONA • MODESTO • OXNARD ENGINEERING. INC. INSPECTION REPORT - -. PROJECT NAME: L•L EJ R, cle-1r ADDRESS: (P /? 6C-f-,41--J 57; C, 9Oo ARCHITECT: R1 ARbift.' ENGINEER: CONTRACroR, b4 T b,L C INSPECTION DATE: _(' 19-9-5— ARRIVED: 'O 0 DEPARTED: /C),'O o. - PLAN FILE: I BLDG PERMIT: e OTHER: PAGE ± OFt CrEJOB# /0 - /3100 REPORT# 00? Material Sampling ( )CONCRETE' ) MORTAR ( ) GROUT ( ) FIREPROOFING ( ) MASONRY BLOCK ( ) REBAR ( ) STRUCTURAL STEEL ( ) BOLTS rpeG7c( S7rT e.r otrs€ /2w" 4'/ocJ( oi cz' Lc. 1z / Certification of Compliance: All work, unless otherwise noted, complies with the approved plans and specifications and the uniform building code. . - NAME: (PRINT) L-r C / _.7., . SIGNATURE: L-f J. CERTIFICATION NO.: 79 4>2 GEOTECHNICAL & CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING & INSPECTION 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE SUITE 0 ESCONDIDO, CA 92029 (619) 746-4955 FAX (619) 746.9806 SPECIAL INSPECTOR'S REPORT CHUCK HILL P.O Box 1420 San Marcos CA 92079-1420 ( " [A & 619-538-4904 Office 619-999-8355 Pager Invoice *095217-136 j Add IV Building Permit: Plan File: 2617 Ocean St.1 IT ProjTName: Jurisdiction: Mullen residence, Ray&Barb. Carlsbad Bldg Insp Dept. Materials: Arch: Robert Ardent P.O. 1217 A36 steel. Eng: Gen: Dennis Christen Electrodes: Sub: E71T-1 Carroll Metal Works. job *071 Welder: Pearson, Castanado Date & Time ( Description of Inspection Service Provided Visually inspected and monitored the welding work for the fabrication of the new W8X28 moment frame. Reference the approved plans and reference AWS D1.1-92. July 13, 95 Fabricate the moment frame at the west end. Details A-2 & B-2, 1/4 inch fillet welds connects the 1/2X12X18 base plate to the W8X28 frame. Detail N/14, 1/4 fillets welds connects the 2ea W1OX30 and lea W8X28; also the 1/2 thick web stiffners and the 1/2 thick bolt shear plates. Detail R/14, 3/16 fillet welds, one side , connects the new 3/8 stiff ner plates on the cross beams. 3/16 fillet weld a/around conneäts the 4X2X1/4 tubes to the W10X30... Observed certiified welders performing per proper methods and techniques. This work does meet the design and code requirements... .There are no visual defects. I hereby certify that I have found this work to comply with the pproved specifications, and applicable sections of the go bui 312 e. City of San Diego registerd Inspector, I = ' A*. - Charles Hill C.W. 479 - - a SOJTM VALt..SENGINEERING, INC. S46 BROADWAY - (619) 53-1125 VOICE /(619) -353-8311 FAA Dnniz L. Cltr:istencn July 26, 3.995 Geueral 3ui1dJ.ncj Contractor, Inc. .1669 East Th.1. Norte 1rkway Escondido, California 9 7=3(-- (6i.9) 735-9996, 725 98 Subject: MuLLen Rs, 26 Thar Mr. Christensen: Mr. Robert Ardent called me today and explained that a large pic (4' 'diameter x 9' deep) was discovered in the proximity of the proposed -garage. He also informed me that the inspector required a letter from the engineer. Pursuant to that request by both yc tr1d the 4nspector, I've prepared this letter. To ..vo1d any collapse of surrounding subsurface and surfa- surLoundJ.nqs, It would be p .ident to restrain the pit wi1)r rernov any loose material o rving all Cal Oha rest;ri excavdtion safety measures. Upon evacuating the pit o. and organic material, backfill che pit with a sand-coiicr' --mix. The slurry should-attain significant hardness ' compact! on efPorts that may collapse the pit walls. tne cv alurr' backfill for consolidation. Allow the slurL cure f dy!3 prior to 1i1ling the upper portion with either COflCIett? compacted sand to provide garage rooting support. / Please provide a copy of this letter to both the COI1L. actor and Robert Ardent for their records. Call 'me should you have any on this matter. Siflcer&y yours, South Valle IngiJigiming, Inc.. W.Seit3538 CC: Robert irdenc (Architect) C: \WPDoCS \L,TRS \MTJLLENi. . LTL k - CEIt 33538 '•1 1* s_•'• Qf: (%_\ Pcc L 5.4ec SlddNd7ediN9.lee 746-4544 1/ . JOB NAME /m4'/e,v 'ro PROJECT ENGINEER CONTRACTOR EQUIPMENT WORKING FIELD REPORTS FILE NO. 300 ' DATE (S 2i/,12 &fA d' REPORT NO. 1' — —FIELD TECHNICIAN FOREMAN TYPE OF COMPACTOR DATE REMARKS , ezul I- _____ / J-i L-G...- ____ (/ Xk4E -a'.- _____ Z4 Q7' ____ 7 1 -' '1g. A V'L DATE HOURS CHARGED I 105 ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 DATE: 4/21/95 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-167 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2617 Ocean St SET: III O.APPLICANT, r -L-3 JURISDICTION' -- O PCAWREVIEWER O FILE PROJECT NAME: Mullen Residential Remodel & Addition The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until correctedplans are submitted for recheck. FJ The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. J The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. EJ Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) D REMARKS: By: Chuák Mndenhall Esgil Corporation 4120/95 E) GA F] CM E) PC Telephone #: Enclosures: trnsmtl.dot ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 DATE: 3/20195 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-167 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2617 Ocean St SET: II aPE ION U FILE PROJECT NAME: Mullen Residential Remodel & Addition The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Robert Ardent P0 Box 1217, Carlsbad 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: REMARKS: By: Chuck Mendenhall Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 3,9,95 0 GA 0 CM M PC CITY OF CARLSBAD PLAN REVIEW No: 95-167 II DATE: 3120/95 Note: the corrections listed below refer to the corrections from the previous list. The item below have not been adequately addressed. Submit two sets of revised plans or other documentation to show that the items have been corrected. Show on the plans that the inside face of the fireplace will be lined with 5/8 type x drywall to comply with the code required 1 Hr wall const. the plans note that the wall is to be 1 Hr but there is no detail to show how this is accomplished. 12. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and the specifications have been reviewed and that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated in the plans. This is required as part of the soil report. 18.The design of the garage front shear walls requires the walls to be a mm. of 2'-4" wide. Sheet 2 of the plans shows the shear walls to be only 7-2 1/2". PLUMBING 3. Show on the plans the route of the T & P discharge line from the water heater. STRUCTURAL 10. the design of the moment frame connections shows the max. moment occurring at joint 2 as 12.89 K-Ft. The computer output shows the max moment as 28.36 K-Ft between nodes 2 & 7. Include in the calc's the design of the beam connection using the max moment. Also, detail N114 show a F.P. square end weld. this type Of full penetration weld is approve for up to 1/4" in thickness. The WIOX30 beam has a flange of 1/2" which will require a FP groove weld. ENERGY CONSERVATION Show on the electrical plans the flourescent lights in the-kitchen controlled by at switch located at the entrance to the kitchen. The energy calc's model the existing building as a raised floor. However, the plans show the existing part of the building as a slab on grade. Revise the energy calc's to model the existing as a slab on grade. ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 DATE: 2/7/95 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-167 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2617 Ocean St SET:! U APPLICANT : n DIc ER U FILE PROJECT NAME: Mullen Residential Remodel & Addition The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Robert Ardent, Architect P0 Box 1217, Carlsbad 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicantthat the plan check has been completed. exce?4 6y moLt Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: REMARKS: By: Chuck Mendenhall Esgil Corporation DGA C] CM OPC ) Telephone #: Enclosures: 1/30/95 trnsmtl.dot Carlsbad 95-167 2/7/95 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-167 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2617 Ocean St FLOOR AREA: 2090 Added STORIES: Three HEIGHT: 241-6" Approx UBC REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 1/27/95 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 2/7/95 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 1/30/95 PLAN REVIEWER: Chuck Mendenhall FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with Title 24 and the following model codes: 1991 UBC (effective 8/14/92), 1991 UPC (effective 8/14/92), 1991 UMC (effective 8/14/92) and 1990 NEC (effective 7/1/91). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), 1991 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed. up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number. specification section. etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 1, GENERAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTS (1991 UBC) r3forw.dot Carlsbad 95-167 2/7/95 Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite #208, San Diego, California 92123, (619) 560-1468. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). The plans contain only the architect's stamp. 2. Show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup: Inside each bedroom. Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms. On each story. In the basement, if part of the dwelling unit. When sleeping rooms are upstairs, at the upper level in close proximity to the stair. In rooms adjacent to hallways serving bedrooms, when such rooms have a ceiling height 24 inches or more above the ceiling height in the hallway. NOTE: Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in all sleeping areas of the unit. Section 1210 3. Exterior walls closer than 3 feet to property lines shall be one-hour rated construction. Table 5-A. This appllies to the fireplace walls that are 1 1/2' from the side P/L. The fire place interior must be lined with 5/8" type X drywall 4. Show safety glazing in the following locations, per Section 5406(d): a) Glazing in shower and tub enclosures (including windows within 5 feet of tub or shower floor. This applies to the tub area of the Master Bath. EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 5. All handrails, per Section 3306 (i), shall satisfy the following: Provide handrail for stairways with 4 or more risers. This applies to the new exterior steps on grade. Handrails and handrail extensions shall be 34" to 38" above the nosing of treads. Detail these requirements on the plans• The handgrip portion of handrails shall be not less than 1-1/2", nor more than 2" in cross-sectional dimension. 6. Floors above the second story shall have not less than 2 exits. This building is considered three story and requires a mm. of 3 exits from the 3rd floor. . ROOFING 8. Specify deck material and application. Chapter 32. Carlsbad 95-167 2/7/95 9. Specify l.C.B.O. or U.L. approval number for roof materials not covered in U.B.C., e.g., tile, etc. Section 107. GARAGE AND CARPORTS 10. Show a self-closing door, either 1-3/8" solid core or a listed 20 minute assembly, for openings between garage and dwelling. Section 503 (d) . FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 11. The foundation plan does not comply with the soils report recommendations for this project. Please review the report and modify design, notes and details as required to show compliance: A footings must be reinforced with 245 top and bottom of the footing B Slabs must be reinforced with #3 (g 24" OC each way. or #3 © 12" OC where there is fill for a retaining wall. C Slabs must be underlain with a 4" thick blanket of clean course sand. 12. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (required by the soil report). 13. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and• The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 14. Dimension foundation per U.B.C. Table 29A: This applies to the existing foundation. Floors Footing Supported* Thickness Width Depth Stemwall 2 8" 15" 18" 7" . FRAMING 15. Show or note fire stops at the following locations per Section 2516 (f): Carlsbad 95-167 2/7/95 Show draft stop at 10' vertically in the side walls of the Living Rm Show stud size and spacing. Maximum allowable stud heights: Bearing wall: 2 x4 and 2 x 6 max. 10'; Non-bearing: 2 x 4 max. 14', 2 x 6 max. 20'. Table 25-R-3. Living Rm stud walls must be 2X6. Provide calculations for lateral loads, shear panels, shear transfer and related. Section 302 (b). This applies to the garage front and the study above. The plans and caic's do not show how you intend to resist lateral loads for these areas. Specify plywood thickness, grade and panel span rating. Table 25-S. MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) Show the BTU rating of all heating appliances, the Electric wall heaters must be capable of providing 70 degrees temp in all habitable rooms. Every dwelling unit shall be provided with heating facilities capable of maintaining a room temperature of 70 degrees F at 3 feet above the floor in all habitable rooms. Show basis for compliance. UBC, Sec. 1212. Note on the plans that approved spark arrestors shall be installed on all chimneys. UBC, Section 3703(h). Provide dryer vent to outside. The maximum length is 14 feet with two 90-degree elbows. UMC, Section 1903. ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) All wiring shall comply with the National Electrical Code. Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the service panel and the location of any sub-panels. If service is over 200 amps, submit single line diagram, panel schedule and load calculations. Show on the plans that countertop receptacle outlets comply with 1990 NEC Art. 210-52(c), which reads as follows: In kitchens of dwelling units a receptacle outlet shall be installed each counter space wider than 12 inches. Provide a receptacle at the end of the counter separating the kitchen from the living rm. PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) Show water heater size, type and location on plans. UPC, Section 1301. 2. Note on the plans that "combustion air for fuel burning water heaters will be provided in accordance with the Uniform Plumbing Code". Carlsbad 95-167 2/7/95 3. Show T and P valve on water heater and show route of discharge line to exterior. UPC, Section 1007 (e). Show that water.heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces. UPC, Section 1310. STRUCTURAL Show on the floor and the roof framing plans the W6X9 steel beams spanning between the W6X9 columns. Why do you show F139 as a 4X8 on sheet 10 of the plans. It appears that this beam should be a W6X9 steel beam as part of the lateral frame. Floor beam FB2 at the garage wall openings supporting the cantilever joists must be designed for the loads shown on page F3A of the calc's. (1 184X1 2/16=888PLF). Expand the calc's to show how you arrived at the loading on the structural frame shown on page F2 of the calc's. It is not clear what tributary area you are intending the frame to resist. Clearly show on the plans and in the calc's where the other thear walls occur within the building. The lateral loads applied to the frame shown on page F2 of the calc's must be distributed vertically per UBC Section 2334(d) formula 34-8.1t does not appear that this distribution was used in the development of the forces at the various levels. Expand the calculations using the Portal method to develop the moments in the frame shown on page F2 of the calc's. Also include the shear and the reactions of the frame. The design of the frame must include a drift analysis to show that the drift will not exceed the limits of UBC Section 2334(h). The frame design is not consistent with the conditions shown on the plans . The frame will resist lateral loads only at the roof and the upper floor level. There will be no load at the lower floor since the loft floor system is not connected to the frame. Show how the Loft level floor lateral loads will be resisted. Do you intend to install interior shear walls to resist the forces from this level? Include in the design of the frame the connection to show that they will comply with UBC Section 2710 (f) for an ordinary moment frame. The connections must be capable of resisting 3Rw/8X the design loads resisted by the beams and the columns. Clearly detail on the plans the connections designed using UBC Section 2710(f). Carlsbad 95-167 2/7/95 Include in the design shear resistance of the garage front and the Study above the garage. Also, include any interior shear walls you intend to use. How does the, building resist lateral loads in the longitudinal direction? Per the soil report prepared by Southern Calif. testing the restrained retaining walls must be designed for an active pressure of 55PCF. Sheets Ml through M4 of the calc's use an equivalent pressure of only 45PCF. Resubmit plans and calculations for a complete recheck . ENERGY CONSERVATION NOTE: Plans submitted after January 1, 1993 must comply with the new energy standards. Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in kitchen(s) and bathrooms. The energy calc's model the existing building as a raised floor building. however, the plans show the existing part of the building as a slab on grade revise the energy calc's to model the existing as a slab on grade. Note on sheet EMI of the plans that the water heater recirculation pump will be on a timer. Provide a note on the plans stating "All new glazing (fenestrations) will be installed with a certifying label attached, showing the U-value." . CARLSBAD S.F.D. & DUPLEX SUPPLEMENT City Ordinance 9792 requires two parking spaces/unit with clear area of 20'x20' i.e. no washing machines, etc. Show compliance. Overflow roof drains shall terminate in an area where they will be readily visible and will not cause damage to the building. If the roof drain terminates through a wall, the overflow drain shall terminate 12" minimum above the roof drain. Policy 84-35. MISCELLANEOUS Carlsbad 95-167 2/7/95 Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: DYes ONo The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Chuck Mendenhall at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 95-167 2/7/95 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-167 PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall DATE: 2/7/95 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2617 Ocean St BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3/M TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA (sq.ft.) VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE ($) Dwelling Add'n 2090 78x1.2 195624 Garage 260 22X1.2 6864 Deck 67 IIXI.2 884 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE J 203372 Building Permit Fee: Plan Check Fee: Comments: ~0 G7 $1003.50 (OOt $ 652.28 -.5 09") - Sheet I of valuefee.dot City of Carlsbad BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE: PLANCHECK NO.CB BUILDING ADDRESS: ,X/7 eaeniSf' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 'iti,t// 4*Dp ' t? i/ 1$ ASSESSOR's PARCEL NUMBER: 2"J-/ —' EST. VALUE 17Z. 2-2 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DENIAL I Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked I with IN Make necessary corrections to plans or I specifications for compliance with applicable codes and I standards. Submit corrected plans and/or speofications I to this office for A'c fre/ qi' q3.a) I?1Ph'iess d%" I By:4(1I4..l -i-- Ié4-T-) yj Date:____ By:i6 _ By: Date:__________ APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval Is be on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these Items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please . review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result In suspension of permit to build. 0 A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: ATTACHMENTS ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Dedication Application Dedication Checklist AN Future Improvement Agreement O Grading Permit Application O Grading Submittal Checklist O Right of Way Permit Application O Right of Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet 0 Sewer Fee Information Sheet P:\D0CS\CHKL.31\9P000I.FRM NAME: £c?-4,k City of Carlsbad ADDRESS: 2075 Las Palmas Dr.. Carlsbad, CA 92009 PHONE: (619 438-1161. Ext. A-4 REV 08/1114 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST /V2 siiiuN 1sd' 3rdv' 106 0 0 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North Arrow D. Property Lines Easements Existing & Proposed Structures E. Easements / C. Existing Street Improvements F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets 121 0 0 2. Show on site plan: Drainage Patterns C. Existing Topography Existing & Proposed Slopes 0/0 0 3. Include note: "Surface water to be directed away from the building foundation at a 2% gradient for no less than 5' or 2/3 the distance to the property tine (whichever is less). [Per 1985 UBC 2907(d)5].. On graded sites, the top of any exterior foundation shall extend above the elevation of the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet of an approved drainage device /1 a minimum of 12 inches plus two percenr (per 1990 UBC 2907(d)5.). UY 0 0 4. Include on title sheet Site address Assessor's Parcel Number Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant Improvement projects, include: Total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION P:OOCScHKLS1\5P0001.FRU Page 1 of 4 REV 05/11/94 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE d&W 2nd,/ 3rd,/ ) 0 0 5. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. 1011-93-6,-< Conditions were complied with by: Date:_________________ DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 0 0 6. Dedication for all Street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building Site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $_____________ -pursuant to Code Section 1.8.40.030. Dedication required as follows: f ty - - Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Dedication completed by Date:__________ IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS ,)4Mgt 0 7a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ . cJ -pursuant to Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Please have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist for a separate plancheck process through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvements requirements. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: P:\DOcS\CHKLSV\8P000I.FRM Page 2 c( 4 REV 05/11/94 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 4W 3rd' ,J?4 O/V 0 lb. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to Issuance of a Building Permit. Future public improvements required as 1 er i1/ Improvement Plans signed by: Date:__________ ')b( 1 0 lc. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return signed and notarized Agreement to the Engineering Department. -) /1 Future Improvement Agreement completed by://M.ct#- (/U" Date: Pi'5;c- '3 0 0 0 7d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector orior to occuancv. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. O 0 0 8a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). o 0 0 8b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be Submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: 0 0 Sc. No Grading Permit required. P:DOcS\CHKI.ST\8POOO1.FRM Page 3 4 REV 05/11/94 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 2nd,/ 3rd./ 0 0 9. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or 'y private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, trees, driveways, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for A separate Right-of-Way permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following: 0 0 10. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. 0 0 ii. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT is required. Applicant must complete Industrial ' Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a Permit. Industrial waste permit accepted by: • Date: P:OOcS\CHKLS1\5POOO1.FRM Page 4 at 4 • • REV 05/11/94 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING REVIEW SECTION FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET El Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. 20 3 —,('f-0 —O Calculation based on building Rlancheck plan submittal. Address: c?/7 -7 A7gPermftNo: Prepared by: Date: _C7/fShecked by: Date: 7/_f 100, EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: EDU's:/7I'ce Total EDU's:- ADTCALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: ADT's:______________________ Total ADTs PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE REQUIRED 0 YES 0 NO (See Building Department for amount) WITHIN CFD: DYES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee, 0 NO reduced Traffic Impact Fee) 1 .PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA:_________ FEE/UNIT: • X NO. UNITS:______ 2.TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT's/UNITS: X FEE/ADT: BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE ADTs/UNITS: X FEE/ADT:_________ FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE: / A SOFT.: X FEE/SQ.FT.:_______ 5: SEWER FEE PERMIT No. EDU's: X FEE/EDU:_______ BENEFIT AREA: DRAINAGE BASIN:/ c' EDUs: X FEE/EDU:_______ =$ =$ O 6. DRAINAGE FEES PWA 14 ACRES: 7. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500 DEPOSIT) i1 8. WATER FEE 114 ECU's: HIGH ILOW X X FEE/AC. /.'f, - =$_1 X FEE/EDU:_______ eGf • 2..ç • TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: & 4 C-- *NOTE: This calculation cheat Is NOT a complete list of all fees which may b. due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. !:\00CS\MISF0RMS\BP0002.M REV 01/04195 3.q-i6 -1 Mullen Family This AV 93-05 March 23, 1994 Page 2 'S A must be covered) is not provided in a covered garage, the space must be at least 200 square feet in area and situated so that it may later be covered by a garage. If this space were later covered by a garage, the garage would encroach into the side yard setback. The most narrow width that could be achieved per standard for a garage on this property is 20 feet, measured from interior wall to interior wall. Exceptional circumstances exist because a 20 foot wide garage could not be placed on a 25 foot wide property without encroaching into the side yard setback. The requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied to the property in question because similar variances have been granted in the area. Since 1957, over 20 variances have been granted for reduced side and front yard setbacks on the west side of Ocean Street. These variances have established a precedent for substandard lots west of Ocean Street. The granting of this variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located because similar reduced standards in the past have not been injurious to the neighborhood and the proposed remodel is consistent in size and character with other ocean front buildings in the area. The granting of this variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan because no use change is being proposed and all requested modifications are proposed for only one lot. Conditions: 1. Approval is granted for AV 93-05, as shown on Exhibits "A" - "C", dated March 23, 1994, incorporated by reference and on ifie in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted In these conditions. Prior to the issuance of building permit, a five foot deep section of property shall be dedicated by the owner along the frontage on Str based onacetne'Iine..tQJig- of-way width of twenty-five feet and in conformance w—iffi--C1—ty--of--C`arlsbad standards. 3. Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all public Improvements shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to issuance of building permit and iC A' in accordance with City Standards, the applicant shall install, or agree to install and secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements shown on the site plan and full 03 1/2 width street improvements including paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, Street lights, and 5 7 storm drain facilities along the project frontage on Ocean Street. Improvements shall be In 7 accordance with City standards. 3. The garage door will be limited to a roll-up model, as the operation of the door cannot encroach into the public right-of-way. Plan Check No. 195 -/O Address 261 7 Dcea, : Planner DAVID RICK Phone 438-1161ext. 14328 (Name) APN: 03-1+Q0Lf Type of Project and Use J ccSc Zone __ Facilities Management Zone (D (in/ r) #_____________ cirle (iTproperty in, complete SPECIAL TAX CALCULATION WORKSHEET provided by Building Department.) ; [tern Complete (J [tern Incomplete - Needs your action 1,2,3 Number in circle indicates plancheck number where deficiency was identified 0 Enviionm,ntal Revew Required: YES - NO ..'TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval 0 0 Discretionary Action Required: YES NO - TYPE______ APPROVAL/RESO. NO. ______ DATE: Mtrc ,jqqL/ PROJECT NO. fr.J 91-57 OTHER RELATED CASES: - Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval (O California Coastal Commission t Required —Z NO O - DATE OF APPROVAL: (T '31,'7 /4 San Diego Coast District, 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, CA. 92108.1725 (619) 521-8036 Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval Cl0 Enclusiocazy Housing Fee rçxired: YES ___ NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Site Plan: 0 Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensioned CY 0 setbacks and existing topographical lines. 0. Provide legal description of property, and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: . . . / 0 0 0 .. Setbacks: Front: Required. .3 Shown 5. • Exit. Side: Required 3' Shown 3' Street Side: Required "fi Shown ' Rear: Required (c Shown -f- 13/0 0 Lot coverage: . . Required 1C Shown Height: Required 3 Shown 3° 0 Parking: Spaces Required Car h cp4hown I tcc .tr/f s.et- Guest Spaces Required / Shown 0 0 0 Additional Comments • • . • . • OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMP ~aATE Sh PLNCK.FRM STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY PETE WILSON, Goemer CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SAN DIEGO COAST AREA 3111 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH, SUITE 200 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT No. 6-94-62 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-1725 Page 1 of 2 (619) 521-8036 On September 16.'1994 , the California Coastal Commission granted to Mullen Family Trust this permit for the development described below, subject.to the attached Standard and Special Conditions: Description: Additions to existing 1,332 sq.ft. two-level home including 982 sq.ft. to upper level, 689 sq.ft. to middle/street level and 431 sq.ft. to lower/basement level including new attached one-car garage on a 3,500 sq.ft. oceanfront. parcel. Lot Area Building Coverage Pavement Coverage Landscape Coverage Unimproved Area Parking Spaces Zoning Plan Designation Ht abv fin grade 3,500 sq. ft. 1,066 sq. ft. (31%) 497• sq. ft. (14%) 787 sq. ft. (22%) 1,150 sq. ft. (33%) 2 R-3 R-H (15-19 dua) 30 feet Site: 2617 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, San Diego County. APN 203-140-04 Issued on behalf of the Cali.forniaCoastal Commission by PETER DOUGLAS Executive Director and IMPORTANT: THIS PERMIT IS NOT VALID UNLESS AND UNTIL A COPY OF THE PERMIT WITH THE SIGNED ACKNOWLEDGEMENT HAS BEEN RETURNED TO THE COMMISSION OFFICE. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The undersigned permittee acknowledges receipt of this permit and agrees to abide by all terms and conditions thereof. Date Signature of Permittee ECE%VD MAR 71995 CI-M, O COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 6-94-62 Page 2of...L. STANDARD CONDITIONS: Notice of Receipt and Acknowledgement. The permit is not valid and development shall not commence until a copy of the permit, signed by the permittee or authorized agent, acknowledging receipt of the permit and acceptance of the terms and conditions, is returned to the Commission office. Expiration. If development has not commenced, the permit will expire two years from the date on which the Commission voted orVthe application. Development shall be pursued in a diligent manner and completed in a reasonable period of time. Application for extension of the permit must be made prior tothe expiration date. Compliance. All development must occur in strict compliance with the proposal as set forth below. Any deviation from the approved plans must be reviewed and approved by the staff and may require Commission approval. Interpretation. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition will be resolved by the Executive Director or the Commission. Inspections. The Commission staff shall be allowed to inspect the site and the development during construction, subject to 24-hour advance notice. As The permit may be assigned to any qualified person, provided assignee files with the Commission an affidavit accepting all terms and conditions of the permit. Terms and Conditions Run with the Land. These terms and conditions shall be perpetual, and it is the intention of the Commission and the permittee to bind all future owners and possessors of the subject property to the terms and conditions. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The permit is subject to the following conditions: 1. Assumption of Risk: Prior to the issuance of the coastal development permit, the applicant shall execute and record a deed restriction, in a form and content acceptable to the Executive Director, which shall provide: (a) that the applicant understands that the site may be subjectto extraordinary hazard from waves during storms and from erosion or flooding and the (b) applicant hereby waives any future claims of liability against the Commission or its successors in interest for damage from such hazards. The document shall run with the land, binding all successors and assigns, and shall be recorded free of prior liens. (4062P) 0 STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY PETE WILSON, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SAN DIEGO COAST AREA 3111 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH, SUITE 200 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-1725 (619) 521-8036 RECEIVED Robert Ardent 2956 Roosevelt St. P.O. Box 1217 Carlsbad, CA 92018-1217 MAR 1 1 1995 CTY OF C1LA pjG BUT. NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE Date: March 2. 1995 Applicant: Mullen Family Trust Document or Plans: 1. Deed Restriction recorded as document #1994-0690576 on 11/30/94 and updated title report dated 11/28/94. Submitted in compliance with Special Condition(s) No(s)._1 of Coastal Development Permit No. 6-94-62 Material submitted in compliance with said Special Condition(s) of your development permit has been reviewed by the District Director and found to fulfill the requirements of said condition(s),. Your submitted material and a copy of this letter have been made a part of the permanent file. Sincerely, Charles Damm District Director 6"Laukinda R. Owens (4827N) REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED MULLEN RESIDENCE ADDITION 2617 OCEAN STREET CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR: RAYMOND AND BARBARA MULLEN 2617 OCEAN STREET CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 PREPARED BY: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. 6280 RIVERDALE STREET SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92120 Providing Professional Engineering Services Since 1959 <5—C.1 > SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 14 SOIL & TESTING, INC. 6280 Riverdale Set, San Diego, C92120 P.O. Box 600627, San Diego, CA 92160-0627 619-280-4321, FAX 619-280-4717 January 20, 1995 Raymond and Barbara Mullen SCS&T 9411137 2617 Ocean Street Report No. 2 Carlsbad, California 92008 SUBJECT: Report of Géotechnical Investigation, Proposed Mullen Residence Addition, 2617 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, California. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Mullen: In accordance with your request, we have performed a geotechnical investigation for the subject project. We-are presenting herewith our findings and recommendations. The findings of this study indicate that the site is suitable for the proposed addition provided the recommendations presented in the attached report are followed. If you have any questions after reviewing the findings and recommendations contained in the attached report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. Avd—ler—JfC.E. #36307 DBA:JRH:mw cc: (6) Submitted ,an i NO. 36037 i EXP. 6.30.9'.o 1*. ___ TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Introduction and Project Description ........................................ 1 Project Scope .....................................................1 Findings.........................................................2 Site Description ..................................................2 Geology.........................................................3 Cliff Geometry and site Topography ..................................3 Cliff Erosion .................................................3 Geologic Conditions ............................................4 Landsliding ..................................................5 Impact of Construction Activity .....................................5 Groundwater and Surface Water Conditions ..............................5 Erodibility ..................................................5 Marine Erosion ...............................................6 Seismic Forces ...............................................6 Other Factors ................................................7 Conclusions......................................................7 General........................................................7 Recommendations ...................................................7 Grading.......................................................7 Site Preparation .................................................7 Surface Drainage .................................................7 Temporary Cut Slopes ..............................................7 General......................................................7 Shoring......................................................8 Foundations ....................................................8 General......................................................8 Reinforcement ..................................................8 Expansive Characteristics ...........................................8 Settlement Characteristics ...........................................8 Concrete Slabs-on-Grade ............................................9 Interior Concrete Slabs-on-Grade ......................................9 Exterior Slabs-on-Grade ...........................................9 Earth Retaining Walls ..............................................9 Foundations ....................................................9 Passive Pressure ................................................9 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) PAGE Active Pressure ................................................10 Backfill.....................................................10 Factor of Safety ................................................10 Limitations......................................................10 Review, Observation and Testing ......................................10 Uniformity of Conditions ...........................................11 Change in Scope ................................................11 Time Limitations ................................................11 Professional Standard .............................................11 Client's Responsibility .............................................12 Field Explorations ..................................................12 Laboratory Testing .................................................12 ATTACHMENTS FIGURE Figure 1 Site Vicinity Map, Follows Page 1 PLATES Plate 1 Plot Plan Plate 2 Unified Soil Classification Chart Plates 3-4 Pit Logs Plate 5 Grain Size Distribution Plate 6 Direct Shear Test Results Plate 7 Weakened Plan Joint Detail Plate 8 Retaining Wall Subdrain Detail APPENDIX References SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA T SOIL & TESTING, INC. 6280 RiverdaleStreet, San Diego, CA 92120 P.O. Box 600627, San Diego, CA 92160-0627 619-280-4321, FAX 619-280-4717 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED MULLEN RESIDENCE ADDITION 2617 OCEAN STREET CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for the proposed addition to the Mullen residence, located at 2617 Ocean Street, in the City of Carlsbad, California. The site location is illustrated on the following Figure Number 1. It is our understanding that the proposed development will consist of an addition to the front of an existing residential structure. The resulting structure will be two and three stories high. A partial basement is proposed within the three-story portion of the building. The addition will be of wood-frame and masonry construction. New shallow foundations and conventional slab-on-grade floor systems are anticipated. Grading will be minor and consist of cuts less than ten feet deep for the proposed basement. To assist in the preparation of this report, we have been furnished with an undated site-topographic plan, prepared by Joseph Lukdiski and an undated site plan and elevations prepared by Robert Ardent Architect. The site configuration, topography and approximate locations of our subsurface explorations are shown on Plate Number 1 of this report. PROJECT SCOPE This investigation consisted of: surface reconnaissance, subsurface explorations, obtaining representative disturbed and undisturbed samples, laboratory testing, analysis of the field and laboratory data, research of available geologic literature pertaining to the site, and preparation of this report. More specifically, the intent of this analysis was to: a) Explore the subsurface conditions to the depths influenced by the proposed construction. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. MULLEN RESIDENCE IBY: DBA/SD IDATE: 0111-95 I NUMBER:941 113 URE t N SCS&T 9411137 January 20, 1995 Page 2 Evaluate, the pertinent engineering properties of the various strata which will influence the development, including their bearing capacities, expansive characteristics and settlement potential. Describe the general geology at the site, including possible geologic hazards which could have an effect on the site development. Develop soil engineering criteria for site grading and provide recommendations regarding the stability of temporary cut slopes. Address potential construction difficulties and provide recommendations concerning these problems. Recommend an appropriate foundation system for the type of structures anticipated and develop soil engineering design criteria for the recommended foundation design. FINDINGS SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is a rectangular shaped parcel of land located at 2617 Ocean Street in Carlsbad, California. The property is bounded by Ocean Street on the east, residential structures on the north and south and the Pacific Ocean on the west. The site is occupied by a one and two-story (split level), single- family residence. The upper level of the house is located at Street level. The lower level of the home extends from the west side of the building for a distance of approximately 35 feet toward the east. The most easterly portion of the lower level has been excavated into the slope, thus creating a partial basement. A retaining wall four feet in height, and an unretained slope is located along the easterly side of the lower level. A stairway and concrete sidewalk exist adjacent to and south of the existing building. Topographically, the site slopes toward the west. A height differential of approximately 32 feet exist between the eastern portion of the site and the beach west of the site. The eastern portion of the residential lot slopes downward to a relatively level bench located on the western portion of the site. The bench area extends the width of the lot and is approximately 20 feet wide in an east-west direction. The bench terminates in a downward, west facing slope which in-turn terminates at the sandy beach. This lower slope which is approximately 11 feet in height is constructed of rock riprap (revetment) and SCS&T 9411137 January 20, 1995 Page 3 covered with a thick growth of ice-plant. It is our understanding that the riprap revetment was constructed in 1983. The revetment is six feet wide at the top, 14 feet wide at the base with a total height of 18 feet. The riprap slope extends approximately 11 feet above the existing sand beach. The lower bench area and western slope (riprap) was constructed for erosion/wave mitigation control. Vegetation consists of thick ice-plant on most of the site, however shrubs and typical landscaped vegetation is located on the eastern portion of the site adjacent to the driveway/parking lot. GEOLOGY Based on the results of our reconnaissance and our experience in the area, the following discussion is presented. Each item of discussion is numbered to correspond with the applicable points mentioned in Section 1 (Geologic Stability of Bluff-Top Development) of the California Coastal Commission Interpretative Guidelines. CLIFF GEOMETRY AND SITE TOPOGRAPHY: The bluff top is essentially horizontal and the bluff face varies due to the existing residential development and the improvements (soil/riprap bench and slope) on the western portion of the site. The slope inclinations are approximately 2 to 1, horizontal to vertical, and flatter. A cross-section showing the topography and the associated elevations is presented on Plate No. 1. CLIFF EROSION: We have reviewed available topographic maps and aerial photographs in order to asses the amount of historic bluff erosion at the site. Our review of these materials indicates that the amount of historic sea bluff retreat has not been large enough to be accurately determined using the available reference materials. The 1928 aerial photographs indicated that the existing structure and the existing western bench was not constructed at that time. In reviewing the aerial photographs of 1953 it appears that a building exists and the sea bluff extends farther west than in the 1928 photographs. This would indicate that a house was built and fill soils were imported so as to extend the lot westward prior to 1953. The westerly bench and the associated stairway leading down to the beach were noted in the 1978 aerial photographs and appear to be very similar to the existing conditions. The maximum recorded water surface elevation along this coast was about + 8.0 feet (mllw) which included storm surge and high water associated with a severe storm event in the winter of 1983 (reference 9). With the revetment in place on the western portion of the site, it is unlikely that SCS&T 9411137 January 20, 1995 Page 4 significant wave-caused erosion of the sea bluff (slope) will occur over the life (50 years) of the structure. Subaerial erosion is not evident at the site and based on the relative flatness of the heavily vegetated slopes on the site, subaerial erosion should be considered to be negligible. It should be noted that sea cliff erosion in the coastal areas of San Diego County is generally episodic and that years or decades of little or no erosion followed by a relatively short period of rapid erosion may occur. 3) GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS: The native materials at the site consist of unconsolidated Quaternary-age terrace deposits. Two hand-dug excavations were performed on site and the locations of these two pits (P-i and P-2) are indicated on Plate Number 1. The materials encountered in P-i consists of approximately six inches of loose, sandy topsoils underlain by the medium dense, moist, reddish brown silty sands of the terrace deposits. The soils encountered in excavation P-2 consist of approximately 1.5 feet of loose, sandy fill underlain by the medium dense, reddish brown, silty sands of the terrace deposits. The relatively level bench on the western portion of the site is comprised of fill soils with a stone riprap slope face. The stone appears to consist of angular, granitic boulders which range up to approximately three feet in diameter. No faults were observed on the subject site proper but it should be recognized that much of Southern California, including the San Diego County area, is characterized by a series of Quaternary-age fault zones which typically consist of several individual, en echelon faults that generally strike in a northerly to northwesterly direction. Some of these fault zones (and the individual faults within the zone) are classified as active while others are classified as only potentially active according to the criteria of the California Division of Mines and Geology. Active fault zones are those which have shown conclusive evidence of faulting during the Holocene Epoch (the most recent 11,000 years) while potentially active fault zones have demonstrated movement during the Pleistocene Epoch (11,000 to 2 million years before the present) but no movement during Holocene time. A review of available geologic maps and literature indicates that the off-shore extension of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone is located approximately five miles southwest of the site. Recent earthquake activity along faults in the southern extension of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone and recent geologic investigations have caused this zone to be classified as active. No direct evidence of on-site faulting was noted at the subject site proper during our reconnaissance nor in any of the available geologic literature. Other active fault zones in the region that could possibly affect the site include SCS&T 9411137 January 20, 1995 Page 5 the Coronado Banks and San Clemente Fault Zones to the west, the Elsinore and San Jacinto Fault Zones to the northeast, and the Agua Blanca and San Miguel Fault zones to the south. LANDSLIDING: It should be noted that coastal bluff recession is a process which is presently occurring in much of the coastal San Diego County and that a primary concern is the potential hazards associated with slope failures occurring on nearby sea cliffs. Typically, cliff failures in coastal San Diego County occur through three modes which include: 1) undercutting of the base of the cliff by wave action and subsequent blockfails of the overlying materials; 2) undercutting of the terrace deposits, initiated by water seepage conditions at the formational contact, and subsequent slumping of the overlying soil; and 3) deep-seated, rotation-type failures involving both the bedrock materials and the overlying Quaternary materials. A deep-seated failure in a bluff is considered to be the most significant hazard because the mode of failure may influence a structure with a considerable setback from the bluff edge. The failure mode could conceivably occur in a single catastrophe event whereas the previously mentioned modes generally involve lesser amounts of material eroding over a long period of time. Based on our knowledge of the on-site materials and the site geometry, it is our opinion that a deep-seated failure should be considered unlikely to occur at the site. IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY: It appears that minor grading to extend a basement is proposed on the eastern portion of the site, however the impact of construction activity on the stability of the site is considered to be nominal. GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER CONDITIONS: No groundwater seepage was noted at the site. Groundwater seepage phenomena are common along the coastline in San Diego County. It is possible that seepage may occur during the winter months or during periods of heavy irrigation. However, it is our opinion that groundwater seepage is unlikely and that no distress to the proposed or existing structure is likely to occur due to seepage conditions. ERODLBILITY: Generally terrace deposits are poorly indurated and susceptible to erosion by water and wind. Review of the aforementioned soils report for the nearby property to the north indicated medium dense to very dense soils conditions; this would tend to decrease the erosion potential. Erosion of the terrace deposits and fill by wind and water runoff can be effectively reduced by the use of proper landscaping techniques such as the existing landscaping on the slopes. SCS&T 9411137 January 20, 1995 Page 6 The existing riprap on the face of the western slope should effectively impede erosion. Future change in climate conditions or the state of the revetment may result in accelerated base erosion. However, it is our opinion that erosion will not be great enough during the projected life of the proposed structure to affect it. MARINE EROSION: Marine erosion on sea cliffs/bluffs is typically episodial with periods of little or no measurable erosion occurring and then rapid erosion in a relatively short time span. The amount of historic erosion at the subject site proper has been minimal. The stone revetment appears to be sufficient for reducing the potential for wave-caused erosion and based on the results of our reconnaissance, we are of the opinion that the amount of wave-caused erosion at the site during the life of the existing structure will be of insufficient magnitude to endanger the structure. SEISMIC FORCES: The site is considered average with respect to similar sites in northwestern San Diego County regarding expected ground accelerations from seismic activity. The bedrock accelerations resulting from a maximum probable earthquake occurring along the nearest portion of selected fault zones that could affect the site are summarized in the following table. Design acceleration is commonly considered to be only two thirds of the maximum acceleration. TABLE I Fault Zone Distance Maximum Probable Earthquake Bedrock Acceleration Design Acceleration Rose Canyon 5 miles 6.5 magnitude 0.47 g 0.31 g Coronado Bank 18 miles 7.0 magnitude 0.24 g 0.16 g Elsinore 24 miles 7.3 magnitude 0.20 g 0.13 g San Clemente 57 miles 7.3 magnitude 0.07 g 0.05 g Probable groundshaking levels at the site could range from slight to moderate depending on such factors as the magnitude of the seismic event and the distance to epicenter. It is likely that the site will experience the effects of at least one earthquake during the life of the proposed structure. Construction in accordance with the minimum standard of the Uniform Building Code and other applicable codes should minimize potential structural damage resulting from seismic activity. SCS&T 9411137 January 20, 1995 Page 7 10) OTHER FACTORS: The effect of other factors such as foot traffic or construction on adjacent property should be considered to be negligible. CONCLUSIONS GENERAL In general, no geotechnical conditions were encountered that would preclude the construction of the proposed addition as presently proposed provided that the recommendations contained in this report are followed. The main geotechnical consideration for site development is the presence of friable, relatively cohensionless sandy soils underlying the proposed addition area. This condition will require flatter than usual temporary cut slopes and may hamper trenching operations. It is anticipated that shoring will be required for portions of the northern and southern sides of the temporary cut anticipated for basement construction. RECOMMENDATIONS GRADING SITE PREPARATION: Site preparation should begin with the demolition of existing portions of the structure to receive the proposed addition, and the removal from the site of the resulting debris. Soils disturbed in conjunction with this operation should be removed and replaced as compacted fill. Minimum fill relative compaction should be 90 percent as determined in accordance with ASTM Test D1557-78, Method A or C. SURFACE DRAINAGE: It is recommended that all surface drainage be directed away from the structure. Ponding of water should not be allowed adjacent to the foundations. Rain gutters are recommended. TEMPORARY CUT SLOPES GENERAL: It is anticipated that temporary cut slopes associated with the proposed basement construction will extend to a maximum height of approximately ten feet. The following table provides recommendations for unshored temporary cut slopes. SCS&T 9411137 January 20, 1995 Page 8 Slope Height (feet) Recommended Inclination (feet)* 0-5 0.5:1 5-10 1:1 * Continuous from top to toe of slope SHORING: It is anticipated that shoring will be required for portions of the northern and southern temporary cut slopes necessary for the proposed basement. The shoring may consist of an "H" beam and lagging or similar system. The active and passive pressures provided in the earth retaining section of this report are also applicable for temporary shoring design. FOUNDATIONS GENERAL: New shallow foundations may be utilized for the support of the proposed addition. The footings should have a minimum depth of 24 inches below lowest adjacent finish pad grade. A minimum width of 18 inches and 24 inches is recommended for continuous and isolated footings, respectively. A bearing capacity of 2000 psf may be assumed for said footings. The bearing capacity may be increased by one-third when considering wind and/or seismic forces. REINFORCEMENT: Both exterior and interior continuous footings should be reinforced with two No. 5 bars positioned near the bottom of the footing and two No. 5 bars positioned near the top of the footing. This reinforcement is based on soil characteristics and is not intended to be in lieu of reinforcement necessary to satisfy structural considerations. EXPANSIVE CHARACTERISTICS: The prevailing foundation soils were found to be nondetrimen- tally expansive. The recommendations contained in this report reflect this condition. SETTLEMENT CHARACTERISTICS: The anticipated total and/or differential settlements for the proposed improvements may be considered to be within tolerable limits provided the recommendations presented in this report are followed. It should be recognized that minor cracks normally occur in concrete slabs and foundations due to shrinkage during curing or redistribution of stresses and some cracks may be anticipated. Such cracks are not necessarily an indication of excessive vertical movements. SCS&T 9411137 January 20, 1995 Page 9 CONCRETE SLABS-ON-GRADE: INTERIOR CONCRETE SLABS-ON-GRADE: Interior concrete slabs-on-grade should have a thickness of four inches and be reinforced with No. 3 reinforcing bars placed at 24 inches on center each way, extending 12 inches down into the perimeter footings. Slab reinforcement should be placed within the middle third of the slab. Where the slab is underlain by retaining wall backfill, slab reinforcement should be increased to No. 3 bars at 12 inches on center each way extending at least ten feet beyond the backfill daylight line. The slab should be underlain by a four-inch blanket of clean, poorly graded, coarse sand or crushed rock. This blanket should consist of 100 percent material passing the half-inch screen and no more than ten percent and five percent passing sieves #100 and #200, respectively. Where moisture sensitive floor coverings are planned, a visqueen barrier should be placed on top of the sand layer A one-inch-thick layer of clean sand should be placed over the visqueen to allow proper concrete curing. EXTERIOR SLABS-ON-GRADE: Exterior slabs should have a minimum thickness of five inches. Walks or slabs exceeding five feet in width should be reinforced with No. 3 bars placed at 18 inches each way welded wire mesh and provided with weakened plane joints. Any slabs between five and ten feet should be provided with longitudinal weakened plane joints at the center lines. Slabs exceeding ten feet in width should be provided with a weakened plane joint located three feet inside the exterior perimeter as indicated on attached Plate Number 7. Both traverse and longitudinal weakened plane joints should be constructed as detailed in Plate Number 7. Exterior slabs adjacent to doors and garage openings should be connected to the footings by dowels consisting of No. 3 reinforcing bars placed at 24-inch intervals extending 12 inches into the footing and the slab. EARTH RETAINING WALLS FOUNDATIONS: The foundation recommendations provided in the foundation section of this report are applicable for proposed earth retaining structures. PASSIVE PRESSURE: The passive pressure for the prevailing soil conditions may be considered to be 300 pounds per square foot per foot of depth up to a maximum of 1500 psf. This pressure may be increased by one-third for seismic loading. The coefficient of friction for concrete to soil may be assumed to be 0.35 for the resistance to lateral movement. When combining frictional and passive resistance, the former should be reduced by one-third. The upper six inches of exterior retaining wall footings should not be included in passive pressure calculations unless the wall abuts asphaltic pavement SCS&T 9411137 January 20, 1995 Page 10 or a concrete slab. For soldier beam shoring design the passive pressure may be assumed to act on an area equal to twice the pier diameter and starting at a depth of one foot below lowest adjacent grade. ACTIVE PRESSURE: The active soil pressure for the design of unrestrained and restrained earth retaining structures with level backfihls may be assumed to be equivalent to the pressure of a fluid weighing 35 pounds per cubic foot and 55 pounds per cubic foot, respectively. These pressures do not consider any surcharge. If any are anticipated, this office should be contacted for the, necessary increase in soil pressure. This value assumes a drained backfill condition. Waterproofing details should be provided by the project architect. A subdrain detail is provided on the attached Plate Number 8. BACKFILL: All backfill soils should be compacted to at least 90% relative compaction. Expansive or clayey soils should not be used for backfill material. The wall should not be backfihled until the masonry has reached an adequate strength. FACTOR OF SAFETY: The above values, with the exception of the allowable soil bearing pressure, do not include a factor of safety. Appropriate factors of safety should be incorporated into the design to prevent the walls from overturning and sliding. LIMITATIONS REVIEW, OBSERVATION AND TESTING The recommendations presented in this report are contingent upon our review of final plans and specifications. Such plans and specifications should be made available to the geotechnical engineer and engineering geologist so that they may review and verify their compliance with this report and with Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code. It is recommended that Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc. be retained to provide continuous soil engineering services during the earthwork operations. This is to verify compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to start of construction. SCS&T 9411137 January 20, 1995 Page 11 UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS The recommendations and opinions expressed in this report reflect our best estimate of the project requirements based on an evaluation of the subsurface soil conditions encountered at the subsurface exploration locations and on the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate appreciably from those encountered. It should be recognized that the performance of the foundations and/or cut and fill slopes may be influenced by undisclosed or unforeseen variations in the soil conditions that may occur in the intermediate and unexplored areas. Any unusual conditions not covered in this report that may be encountered during site development should be brought to the attention of the geotechnical engineer so that he may make modifications if necessary. CHANGE IN SCOPE This office should be advised of any changes in the project scope or proposed site grading so that we may determine if the recommendations contained herein are appropriate. This should be verified in writing or modified by a written addendum. TIME LIMITATIONS The findings of this report are valid as of this date. Changes in the condition of a property can, however, occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the work of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in the Standards-of-Practice and/or Government Codes may occur. Due to such changes, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or in part by changes beyond our control. Therefore, this report should not be relied upon after a period of two years without a review by us verifying the suitability of the conclusions and recommendations. PROFESSIONAL STANDARD In the performance of our professional services, we comply with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of our profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in the same locality. The client recognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those encountered at the locations where our borings, surveys, and explorations are made, and that our data, interpretations, and recommendations be based solely on the information obtained by us. We will be responsible for those data, interpretations, and recommendations, but shall not be responsible for the interpretations by others of the information developed. Our services consist of professional consultation and observation only, and SCS&T 9411137 January 20, 1995 Page 12 no warranty of any kind whatsoever, express or implied, is made or intended in connection with the work performed or to be performed by us, or by our proposal for consulting or other services, or by our furnishing of oral or written reports or findings. CLIENT'S RESPONSIBILITY It is the responsibility of Raymond and Barbara Mullen, or their representatives to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the structural engineer and architect for the project and incorporated into the project's plans and specifications. It is further their responsibility to take the necessary measures to insure that the contractor and their subcontractors carry out such recommendations during construction. FIELD EXPLORATIONS Two subsurface explorations were made at the locations indicated on the attached Plate Number 1 on December 29, 1994. These explorations consisted of hand dug test pits. The field work was conducted under the observation of our engineering geology personnel. The explorations were carefully logged when made. These logs are presented on the following Plates Number 3 and 4. The soils are described in accordance with the Unified Soils Classification System as illustrated on the attached simplified chart on Plate Number 2. In addition, a verbal textural description, the wet color, the apparent moisture and the density or consistency are provided. The density of granular soils is given as either very loose, loose, medium dense, dense or very dense. The consistency of silts or clays is given as either very soft, soft, medium stiff, stiff, very stiff, or hard. Disturbed and "undisturbed" samples of typical and representative soils were obtained and returned to the laboratory for testing. LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed in accordance with the generally accepted American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) test methods or suggested procedures. A brief description of the tests performed is presented below: SCS&T 9411137 January 20, 1995 Page 13 CLASSIFICATION: Field classifications were verified in the laboratory by visual examination. The final soil classifications are in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION: The grain size distribution was determined from representative samples of the native soils in accordance with ASTM D422. The results of these tests are presented on Plate Number 5. COMPACTION TEST: The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of typical soils were determined in the laboratory in accordance with A.S.T.M. Standard Test D-1557-78, Method A. The results of these tests are presented herein. Optimum Moisture Maximum Sample Description Content (%] Density (pcfl P1@2'-3' Red Brown Silty Sand 8.3 130.7 DIRECT SHEAR TESTS: Direct shear tests were performed to determine the failure envelope based on yield shear strength. The shear box was designed to accommodate a sample having a diameter of 2.375 inches or 2.50 inches and a height of 1.0 inch. Samples were tested at different vertical loads and a saturated moisture content. The shear stress was applied at a constant rate of strain of approximately 0.05 inch per minute. The results of these tests are presented on the attached Plate Number 6. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION LEGEND UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART SOIL DESCRIPTION GROUP SYMBOL TYPICAL NAMES COARSE GRAINED, more than half of material is larger than No. 200 sieve size. GRAVELS CLEAN GRAVELS GW Well graded gravels, gravel- More than half of sand mixtures, little or no coarse fraction is fines. larger than No. 4 GP Poorly graded gravels, gravel sieve size but sand mixtures, little or no smaller than 3". fines. GRAVELS WITH FINES GM Silty gravels, poorly graded (Appreciable amount gravel-sand-silt mixtures. of fines) GC Clayey gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand, clay mixtures. SANDS CLEAN SANDS SW Well graded sand, gravelly More than half of sands, little or no fines. coarse fraction is SP Poorly graded sands, gravelly smaller than No. 4 sands, little or no fines. sieve size. - SANDS WITH FINES SM Silty sands, poorly graded (Appreciable amount sand and silty mixtures. of fines) SC Clayey sands, poorly graded sand and clay mixtures. FINE GRAINED, more than half of material is smaller than No. 200 sieve size. SILTS AND CLAYS ML Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, sandy silt or clayey-silt-sand mixtures with slight plas- ticity. Liquid Limit CL Inorganic clays of low to less than 50 medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays. DL Organic silts and organic silty clays or low plasticity. SILTS AND CLAYS MN Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or silty soils, elastic silts. Liquid Limit CH Inorganic clays of high greater than 50 plasticity, fat clays. OH Organic clays of medium to high plasticity. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Peat and other highly organic soils. - Water level at time of excavation CK - Undisturbed chunk sample or as indicated BG - Bulk sample US - Undisturbed, driven ring sample SP - Standard penetration sample or tube sample SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MULLEN RESIDENCE SOIL & TESTING, INC. BY: DBA 1DATE: 011195 JOB NUMBER: 9411137 IPlate No. 2 - W -.W - Z (I) Ix L >0 09 Oz WQ- I.' ') 0 U Loose US z PIT NUMBER 2 CC Q 0 ELEVATION W 0< a) CL o - DESCRIPTION IM FILL AND TOPSOIL, Brown and Humid to - j Red Brown, SILTY SAND Moist 2 SM! TERRACE DEPOSITS OR BEACH Humid to SP SAND, Light Yellow Brown, Moist BAG SLIGHTLY SILTY SAND 3 PB 14 Medium Dense I5 Li Pit Ended at 5' eSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA I IPLATE PROJECT: MULLEN RESIDENCE LOGGED BY: CRB DATE LOGGED: 1Z_29_941 SOIL & TESTING, INC. IJOB NUMBER: 9411137 NUMBER: 4 180 -- 1440 (50Gm) E lkYZyIL1 [1 1M11ZI - "1IIIUEIItHIUIIIIIIIlIHIU1LINI.IIIIUul'-IluI ::uIuI.IuIIIuJIIIuHuuuIIIIh.IIuhIIIuI ___ IIIIIIIIUIIOUIlIWiI[IJIHIHIHhiNIIIIllhIUIIIii ___IIIHllUItIIIUIlIIiI1HIHI0IHkIo'.lHIuIMNu1p! ItIIIIllhItHhIHIIuoIflIuIIHHhiqMIiuulyIIiIi JmIIIIllhIUUIIUIlImiuHIuhImHhIIIuInIouu JIIIUIIItI1IiIIIlWOUHIflIIHHIIN!!FIUNI 10111 jIIHfflhUItUlUlIIIWHIflIUlHh1IIllIHIUIW 111111 ,:IuIuIuIsuuuIIl,iI1H,o.unhull.IHIuIn 11111 1.tLL- 4 r 1000 (I PARTICLE SIZE LIMITS BOULDER. COBBLE GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY I COARSE FINE COARSE I MEDIUM FINE d (12) 3 3/4 No. 4 No. 10 No. 40 No. 200 U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE P1 @ 2' -3' --Z-987 6 5 4 3 2 98765 4 3 2 987654 3 2 1.0 0.1 .01 .001 GRAIN SIZE (mm) .._ U.... ••••• u•••a i•uu••u •................ • . . . . . . . . . . mommaignamossommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ....i i••u uu•u•uu•• ..........uuu....u . u . . . . . . . . ...• ••••• ••••••••• ................ . . . . . . . . . u . . . ••ui uuu•u uuu••uuuuu ••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • u mmmmmilmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm m•••• uu•u uuuuuu ...••..•..••..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . mmmmmilmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmiimmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm •••••••••• I_mU...... •••U••U•••U••••••U• • • U • U • • • U U U •••u• ua•u .......m. ...mm.........•.m u . . . m . . . . . . 0 mmmmmilmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm u...•i..•. •U•••••••• UUUUUUuUUU•UUUUUU U U U • u u u P mmmmmilmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm9dmI muuui iuuuu .•uu•uuuu uuuuuuuu•uuuuuuuuuuuuuu•u•uu mmmmmilmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmammmm uuuuiuuuuu auuu••mm• ....u.............muu....... uu•i mumu •uu•••u•uu u••U.uuU.UU•u•UUuuPd••uuuuu mmmmmiammmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommmmmmmm uuauri••u• ••uui iuuuu u•uu••u•u •u•••u•••u•• u • • • u u • u • • • • • mmmmmilmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm uuu.iimuu .uuuuuauuumuuuuuauuuu•upuumu u m m m • • • • u mmmmmilmmmm ommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmgdmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ...•....• Iuu•uuuuuu••uuu•uuuruuumuuuuu u u u • u u • u u•uui U•UUU IUuuu•UUU UUUUUU•UUPd•U•UUUNUUUURUUUU .uui uuu•u •uuu•uumuu u...._u..a•.u... . . . . . . . _ . . u . 0 ••uiuuuuu uuuuuuuuu uu•uuuu•uuuuuu•uuu•••uuuuuuu muui iuum uu••uuuu uuu••ua•ummm•um•uuuuuu u • u u U•UulU••U U_U.N..... .u.••UUR•u•••••u•u•UN•uuuUN•• uuuuuuu•u ........_....g....u.u....m . . . . . u . . . . . . . uuuUII..UN Uuu•uUuuURU•UuU•UuRu•uuNuNUuNU U U u U • U u U : ..... i.... U......... pd.....U....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . mmmmmilmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm m m m m m m m m m m m m m mmmmmilmmmmummmmmmm2nmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmiimmmmmmmmmmmdmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm uuui u•uuu uuuu•uu• ........u.........u.......... U•UU• UU••U UUuPU•uN UU•••••••••U•Uu••• • • • U • • • u • • • • .... I.... iUuuUU•U ...UN•....N_.... . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . MMMMMIOMMMMPWMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmilmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm u•uui uuuru u•.uU.u•• I...........u...............0 mmmmmigrammommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm m m m m m m m m m m m m m mmmmmi2ommmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm .uurt u..0 uu.uuuu•uu .uuu...mu..u..u.u. u m u . . m u . . MmEdmilmmmsommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm wnmmmilmmmwmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm d.u..i...•. INU•UUUU N....U.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . u• ••uiuumu .s...u•uuu•auaa•uuua.m - I - - TRANSVERSE CONTROL JOINTS W (ft) 113' 3 W (ft) - JOINT 3,4 SPACING SLAB ON GRADE 10 FEET OR GREATER IN WIDTH SLAB ON GRADE 5 FEET TO 10 FEET IN WIDTH TRANSVERS CONTROL JOINTS }I2 W/2 W/2 NOTE: I. W SHOULD NOT EXCEED 15 FEET. 2. JOINT PATTERN SHOULD BE DEARLY SQUARE. 1-TOOLED OR SAWED JOINT *1/4 REINFORCEMENT PER REPORT (2 MN. COVER) *1= THICKNESS PER REPORT CONTROL JOINT DETAIL NO SCALE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA kT: MULLEN RESIDENCE SOIL & TESTING, INC. BY: DBA JOB NUMBER: 9411137 *T I DATE: 01-20-95 Plate No. 7 1% SLOPE MINIMUM - - 6 MIN. 6 WATERPROOF BACK OF WALL PER ARCHITECT'S SPECIFICATIONS 0. o. 3/4 INCH CRUSHED ROCK OR MIRADRAIN ;••; _- --`6000 OR EQUIVALENT ,_......._-GEOFABRIC BETWEEN ROCK AND SOIL 12" 00 TOP OF GROUND OR CONCRETE SLAB 6 MIN[ L _____________ MINIMUM 4 INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED PIPE RETAINING WALL SUBDRAIN DETAIL NO SCALE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MULLEN RESIDENCE SOIL & TESTING, INC. By: DBA DATE: 01-20-95 JOINUNI!R. 9411137 Plate No. 8 APPENDIX SCS&T 9411137 January 20, 1995 Appendix A REFERENCES Abbott, P. Editor, 1985, On the Manner of Deposition of the Eocene Strata in Northern San Diego County, SDAG Field Trip Guide Book. Anderson, J.G., Rockwell, R.K. and Agnew, D.C., 1989, Past and Possible Future Earthquakes of Significance to the San Diego Region, Earthquake Spectra, Volume 5, No. 2, 1989. Cantarim Tractor, February 5, 1983, Agreement or Contract for Seawall Construction. Geocon, Soil Investigation and Geologic Reconnaissance, Puesta Del Sol Condominiums, Carlsbad, California, July 1982, File No.-D-2763-JO1. Jennings, C.W., 1992, Preliminary Fault Activity Map of California, California Division of Mines and Geology, Open-File Report 92-03. Mualchin, L. and Jones, A., 1992, Peak Acceleration from Maximum Credible Earthquakes in California (Rock and Stiff-Soil Sites), California Department of Conservation, DMG Open-File Report No. 92-1. Ruden, Alton, R.C.E., March 10, 1983, Supporting Papers for the Seawall Construction. Wilson, K. L., 1972, Eocene and Related Geology of a Portion of the San Luis Rey and Encinitas Quadrangles, San Diego County, California. User Kling Consultants, Inc., Beach Bluff Erosion Technical Report, City of Encinitas General Plan, January 24, 1994. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS San Diego County, 1928. Section 22 Photographs A-3 and A-4 and Section 30 Photograph F-i. U.S.D.A., San Diego County, 1953, Photographs AXN-14M-19 and 21. San Diego County, 1978-1979, Flight 12, Photos B21 and B22. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE CITY OF CARLSBAD Plan Check No. 7S -[6? DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION 2075 LAS PALMAS DR., CARLSBAD, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to verify. that. the project applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for the projects shall be issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate school district and returned to the City of Carlsbad Building Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT: X Carlsbad Unified • San Marcos Unified 801 Pine Avenue 1290 West San Marcos Blvd. Carlsbad, CA 92009 (434-0610) San Marcos, CA 92024 (7414-4776) Encinitas Union . . San Dieguito Union High School 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd. .. 710 Encinitas Boulevard Encinitas, CA. 920214 (619) 94k-4300L • Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Project Applicant: 'Au Project Address: 2.0 1?14 A-15 RESIDENTIAL: SQ. FT. of living area 22b A ,Tifer of dwelling units___________ SQ. FT. of covered area SQ. FT. of garage area COMMERCIALiN1YiSTRIA,L: SQ. . AREA______ /0 A Prepared by (ñ Date / ------------------- :- FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the School District) ______Applicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080 Project is subject to an existing fee agreement Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. (other school fees paid) - Other Residential Fee Levied: $ /9.'f based on Qao S7 sq. ft. @ Comm ndust Levied:$ based on sq. ft. @ a ssistant r. et ate AB 2926 and SB 201 fès—aFè capped at 0. 72 per square foot for residential. AB .2926 is capped at .28 per square foot for commercial /industrial. LI