The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2635 HIGHLAND DR; ; CB961022; PermitI ./t \ .• '. L . ' : :.... •BUILDI'NG'PERMIT •Permit No: CB961022 09/30/98 11:.53 . Pro'ject No: A9601460 Page, 1 of 1 - Development No: Job Address: 2635 HIGHLAND DR ' Suite: Permit'Type: RESIDENTAL ADD/ALT . Pa±cel: No: 156-110-85-00 ' Lôt#: - . - Valuation: .' 143, - 219 ., Construction Type: VN - Occupancy Group: 'Reference#: Status: ISSUED Description: 838SF ADDITION, 2018 SF Applied: 06/07/96- : REMODEL AND 1089 SF DECKS •Apr/Issue: 07/22/98 .-• - Entered By:. MDP.. Appl/Ownr- : PORTER; ROBERT . .' 619 631-7287 P.0. .2593 CARLSBAD, CA. 92018 .. *** Fees Required - Fees Gollected & Credits T _______-;___(_,?__\_,--s.N - '.Adjustfrtents: .'OO. To't'ai-redits\ .00 Total' Fees: 1,62200 0 Total Pirnç: ?5 09/A/4 2(&P d •', / Baln.eDue.:-\ \ . 1 9-4 199.00 Fee 'description UnTs \Fee7Unit\ Ext fee Data ------------------------- Building-Permit 794.00 516 Plan Check .00 Strong Motion Fee \ Other 9. 0 I RENEW/FINL *BUILDING TOTAL ..'\/ c/I' 1523.00 Each Plumbing Fix ure 00 21.00 Each Install/Repair WaterLine: )> ' . 7.00 7 7.00 Enter "Y"- for Electric Issue,....FeeU> 10.00 Y Enter ''Y. for Mechanical INCORPORATED H 15.00 Y "InstallFurn/Ducts/HeatPumpsThJ'> 1 9/00 - 9.00 `Each Exhaust Fan 6. 50 6 50 p • - DATE CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 S PLANCHECKNO. EST. vAL PLAN CX DEPOSIT VALID. BY tIOQ DATE C'/:' - - Net Loss/Gain of Dwelling Units PROJECT INFORMATION .. . :- . . - -FOR OFFICE YSE ONM~;, Address 263 fi/c//L4JIJ bk, Building or Suite No C-PRMT - 354 00 Nearest Cross Street L,,4S fl_ORES LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number ... - Unit No. Phase No. CHECK BELOW IF SUBMITTED: •. - ... Energy Calcs 2 Structural Calcs 2 Soils Report 0 1 Addressed Envelope ASSESSOR'S PARCEL - EXISTING USE - PROPOSED USE - DESCRIPTION OF WORK 'gflObEL ,4A/1) SQ. FT. 8M - - # OF STORIES 2 #OF BEDROOMS 2 # OF BATHROOMS B WN'IAU'I PEI*ItJN (ii ditterent Irom applicant) - NAME (last, name first) ADDRESS CITY -. STATE ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE - - APPLICANT D CON TRACYOR U AGENT FOR CON'I}IADOR DOWNER DAGENT FOR OWNER NAME (last name first) ' ADDRESS CITY i. ,' • STATE ZIP CODE - . DAY TELEPHONE PROPERTY OWNER NAME (last name first) gOBET - ADDRESS P 04101K - ' . CITY 44RLS&4b STATE CA ZIP CODE' 92018 DAY TELEPHONE (6/9) sf- 7297 .4 CONTRACFOR " - . - NAME (last name first) - - -. ADDRESS CITY - , STATE . - ' ZIP CODE •, DAY TELEPHONE . STATE DC. # LICENSE CLASS -' CITY BUSINESS DC. # :_DS1GNEN.4E name tirs / Jprip. '-- ADDRESS 241 cE,e1e/ros ,W CIT4;4 &5tV - STATE - CA ZIP CODE 706'06 DAY TELEPHONFII )7-444bTATE DC. , WORKERS' WMPENSATION Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to sell-insure issued by the Director ollndustnal - Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, Lab. C). INSURANCE COMPANY ' POUCY NO. EXPIRATION DATE -Certificate of Exemption: I certity that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. - - SIGNATURE DATE S. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION - . Owner-Builder Declaration: I hereby affirm that I am exempt trom the Contractors License Law for the following reason: - 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). , .' '. , -. - I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions 'Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon; and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). O I am exempt under Section - Business and Professions Code for this reason: - (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair -' any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of e Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code). - " or that he i e empt therefropand the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjectsth a ph nt)5 a ciienal of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). SIGNATURE DATE 722 —,- COMPLETE IS )N FOR N 14- SIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY: Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a buiness plan, 'acutely hazardous mateilals registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? .. D- YES - .. .13 NO .. .... . ..,.. . . . - - Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? -. . DYES .DNO - - ,,,. — Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? DYES •. 0 N IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED AFI'ER JULY 1, 1989 UNLESS THE APPLICANT' HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CDNmOL DISTRICT. .9. WNS11{IJCI10N LENDING AGENCY - - -;. 1, . - -. - - - - I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME ' LENDER'S ADDRESS 10. APPUCANr CEffIlFICflON I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL UABflJ'IIES, JUDGMENTS COSTS - AND EXPENSES WHJCH MAY IN ANY-WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CI1Y IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT.. -- I , . ,' OSHA An OSHA l e' is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. Expiration. Every permit issued by the Buil ng Official under the provisions of this C5d shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such pe t i not ommenced ithin 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at y er the kJimenced for a period of 180 days (Section 303(d) Uniform Buildpg cqde 'APPUCANVS SIGNATURE f DATE: '/,c 4--' WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance - -,-- -4..---- -- .- - 'PERMiT APPUCATION City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr., CarLsbad, CA 92009(619) 438-1161 1. PERMITTYPE From List I (see back) give code of Permit-Type: g/4 1) : For Residential Projects Only: From List 2(see back) give - rn,1. n CITY OF CARLSBAD - INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB961022. ' FOR 10/01/98 INSPECTOR AREA PY DESCRIPTION: 838 SF ADDITION, 2018 SF PLANCK# CB961022 - REMODEL AND 1089 SF DECKS 0CC GRP TYPE: RAD CONSTR. TYPE VN JOB ADDRESS: 2635 HIGHLAND DR STE: LOT: APPLICANT: PORTER, ROBERT PHONE: 619 631-7287 CONTRACTOR: S PHONE: OWNER:'. PHONE: REMARKS: C/ROBERT/29-4 AST') INSPECTOR________ -,SPECIAL INSTRUCT TOTAL TIME --RELATED PERMITS-- PERMIT# TYPE STATUS CB911091 MISC EXPIRED 4 'CD.'LVL.DESCRIPTION,. , •. - ACT COMMENTS :1, 4 H'• . 19 ST Final Structural fl . 29 PL Final Plumbing 39 EL Final Electrical 49, ME Final Mechanical C. * I .• . S ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP COMMENTS 070997 Rough Electric S NR PD 070997 Rough/Topout S NR PD 1 041897, Rough/Topout S AP PY 022097 Interior Lath/Drywall . AP PY 022097 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP PY 021997 Interior Lath/Drywall CA PY S 02i997 Exterior Lath/Drywall CA PY 012397 Interior-'Lath/Drywall AP PY 012397 Gas/Test/Repairs AP PY 012397 - Exterior Lath/Drywall PA PY 011697 Insulation AP PY 011397' Rough Electric AP PY S 011397 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PA PY SEE CORR LIST S ',011397 Rough/Topout S AP PY 011397 4 Rough/Ducts/Daiupers S AP PY S .011097 Fireplace/Chimney . * . , AP PY MASONRY 010997 Rough Electric A PA PY AL FOR OVEN OK 010997 .Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding NR PY ND LATH 010297 Shear Panels/HD's - AP PD S 010297 Fram/Steel/Bolting/We1ding NR PD ' 010297 Exterior Lath/Drywall NR PD 122796 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PY DECK FTGS (7) .122796 Rough/Topout - - AP PY ' 121696- Roof/Reroof . '' AP PY - 121396 Roof/Reroof -. - AP PD 110596 - Insulation 5 - -- PA PY - . - INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK# CB961022 0CC GRP CONSTR. TYPE VN JOB ADDRESS: • 2635 HIGHLAND DR STE: LOT: APPLICANT: PORTER, ROBERT PHONE: 619 631-7287 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: - ONER: : . PHONE: REMARKS:. MW INSPECTOR,_______________________ SPECIAL,INSTRUCT: - TOTAL TIME --RELATED PERMITS-- PERNIT# TYPE STATUS CB911091 MISC EXPIRED CDH .LVL. DESCRIPTION- . ACT COMMENTS 14 ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding . 24 PL Rough/Topout 34.f 'EL Rough Electric Ar 44 ME Rough/Ducts/Dampers AV t - •• ,• . . t .• l ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** -•. , ,,,, . ,-,. •_••t_ • •. •. .' - : - -. - CITY OF CARLSBAD ,. INSPECTION REQUEST IT PERN#.CB961022 , FOR 01/13/97 DESCRIPTION: 838 SF ADDITION, 2018 SF ••J, REMODEL AND 1089 SF DECKS TYPE PAD DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP 010997 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding NR PY 010997 Rough Electric PA PY 010297., Shear Panels/HD's AP PD 010297 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding NR PD 010297 - Exterior Lath/Drywallo NR PD 122796 Ftg/Foundation/Piers. AP PY 122796 Rough/Topout • AP PY 12,696- Roof/Reroof . . .. AP PY - 12i396 Roof/Reroof . AP PD 110596 Insulation PA PY fl0596' Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PA PY 103196 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PY 102596, Ftg/Foundatiôn/Piers , PA PY .• - ,•, ., I . :- .- . COMMENTS ND LATH AL FOR OVEN OK DECK FTGS (7) SUB-FLOOR ., I.. - V -. _;VIV '7 V. - V - LANDMARK STRUCTURES INC.. 12062 VALLEY VIEW STREET, SUITE 237 H GARDEN GROVE CA. 92845 TEL; (714) 891-0361 FAX;(714)891-3955 January 28' 1997 Re: Robert Porter residence -v •. 2635 Highland drive ?. Carlsbad Ca. 92008 ' c To whom it may concern : I have reviewed my calculations for beam 9 on sheet 8 and have checked the shear and moment at 21" from the right support with the reduced cross sections and have determined that the beam is still adequate - V• for the given loads. ff1 miy be of further help, please do not hesitate to call this office. - V.. - - -V • - . Tony Hoballah ZZ -: • •. V '4 *.J_. \• fV V •V V V • •fr V .. ,-. ': • ••, V - V V •V : .1 V V V - - V •V - * - •V - V 1' i EsGil Corporation Trofesstona(P[izn Review Engineers DATE: July 11, 1996 DAP IC T JURI D FIRE -JURISDICTION: Carlsbad 0 PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE 'PLAN CHECK NO 96-1022 SET II PROJECT ADDRESS 2635 Highland Dr. .:PROJECT NAME: SFD Addition & Remodel for Robert Porter EIIThe plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply. r ' with the jurisdiction's ********** codes c • The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff., The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck El The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to R Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Date contacted (by ) Telephone # .1 REMARKS: Plans must be signed by the licensed architect or engineer who is responsible for their preparation Please include the stamp or seal, license expiration date and the date the plans are signed 1 - l By Abe Doliente Enclosures ... ,.., - . Esgil Corporation ""O R 'GA CM EJ fl GP fl PC 7/3/96 trnsmtl dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive Suite 208 • San Diego California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619) 560-1576 - . . EsGil Corporation 3, !ProfesswnaCTlan Review Engineers DATE: June 21, 1996 LI APPLICANT .. .. U FIRE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad U PLAN REVIEWER 0 FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1022 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS 2635 Highland Dr PROJECT NAME: SFD Addition & Remodel for Robert Porter The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. t F-] The` plans tranrnitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list' and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck Thecheck list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. Jhe appliant s copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person ,The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Bhijpendra Singhal ..2440 Cerritos Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90806 I 2EgilCoporàtion staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. ,Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: - r - REMARKS:,Please see revised valuation - By Abe Doliente Enclosures Esgil Corporation S L). GA: LI CM [] EJ' [] GP 0 PC 6/10/96 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619) 560-1576 -.' •9•_- •5 '5 • * , *. r Carlsbad 96-1022 June 21, 1996 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1022 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS 2635 Highland Dr FLOOR AREA: Addition - 838 SF STORIES: 2 Remodel-2,0185F Decks - 1089 SF HEIGHT: REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: ESGIL CORPORATION: 6/10/96 DATE1NITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER: Abe Doliente COMPLETED: June 21, 1996 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ) ' This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, ..LJniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based, on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire - Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with Title 24 and the following model codes: 1994 UBC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UPC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 pMC (effective 2/23/96) and 1993 NEC (effective* 12/28/95). : J'The above regulations appI to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance ; ''The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items.must be satisfied before the'plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any -; state, county or city law. -- .rTO speed up the recheck process please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section. etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 1 GENERAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC) r3forw.dot - -: "• Carlsbad 96-1022 June 21, 1996 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, to: • • Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, (619) 560-1468 or to the jurisdiction's building department. •:. .- ' -2- - - Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with Title 24 and the 1994 UBC, UMC and UPC and the 1993 NEC. 3. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): Show these on the door ' schedule. Fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging - doors other than wardrobe doors. Doors and enclosures for bathtubs and showers and in any portion of a building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed : - edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and -. .. : drain inlet. -- • - C ) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is - less than 60 inches above the walking surface 4 Show on the Title Sheet on the plans, the information required by the attached Developmental Services Sheet 112383 %. MISCELLANEOUS 5 Show beam # 14 (6-3/4" X 12" GLB) as called out on page 12 of the structural calculations . 6. Show spacing of the deck joists over the family room. 7 Show the required hold down (Simpson HD5A) at each end of the shear wall at office as called out on sheet 26 of the structural calculations. r .• 4 - - 8. -To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each • correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, - - áalculation page, etc. 44 *! t. -. -i- I• • -- - 4 t -. - ,• S - '• - Carlsbad 96-1022 -• . June 21, 1996 9 Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list Please indicate Yes U No U S -4 :- - The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 619/560-1468, to Perform the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Abe Doliente at Esgil Corporation Thank you _•5 , -- :-. -5 4" 1 -• . 5.., .5 • . -.. 5.,. 5 . • - -S .5 :'-. . • S I -S -,. 55,5 " • • - . . . -. - . - - -S. • '4 r•" - •• 45 ' ' . • - - . - . 44 - •-'• • -, --,. - ,-• I. • - -• : -," : , "- -. -- , : DEVELOPMENTAL. 1200 ELM AVENUE SERVICES.. CARLSBAD. CA DEPARTMENT (5 BUILDING 4 (Itp of Carl5bab THE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW MUST BE SHOWN ON THE TITLE SHEET OF THE PLANS FOR YOUR SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING Site Address Legal Description Assessor's Parcel N.?Der Quantity of Grading in cubic yards Contact Person - Name and daytime Phone Number Circle any Planning Commission or City Council Action on this Property . Variance, Conditional Use Permit, Tract or Parcel Map, Zone Change, Planned Development, Redevelopment Permit, Specific Plan, Site F Development Plan. ••'t - .. - • . -- PLAN CHECK NUMBER - 0 cd 112383 r- - - - a. -. '4. 2 a ¶ ,L .. ' Carlsbad 96-1022 June 21,1996 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE - - JURISDICTION Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO 96-1022 - PREPAREDBY:AbeDoliente DATE: June 21, 1996 BUILDING ADDRESS:-2635 Highland Dr BUILDiNGOCCUPANCY: R-3/U-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING PORTION - BUILDING AREA (ft.2) VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE ($) Dwelling Addition 838 SF 94.00 78,772 Remodel, 2,018 SF 26.00 52,468 Decks 1,089 SF 11.00 11,979 . Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 4 143,219 a 1991 UBC Building Permit Fee Bldg Permit Fee by ordinance $ 793.50 1.1991 UBC Plan Check Fee - Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 515.78 Type of Review:,LI Complete Review Structural Only J Hourly Repetitive Fee Applicable j Other: Esgul Plan Review Fee $ 412 62 : .Comments:-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fire Services Review:. Complete Review Suppression System Fire Alarm . Other: • Esgil Fire Services Review Fee: $ Cómrnents- Sheeti of 1 .1 macvalue.doc 5196 V _City of Carlsbad ___________________________________ BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE: PLANCHECK NO. CB, /0 BUILDING ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR's PARCEL NUMBER /5(c —//OS EST VALUE 1& 77 a... ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 4 DENIAL - APPROVAL . Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked The item you have submitted for review has been with Make necessary corrections to plans or approved. The approval is based on plans, information specifications for compliance with applicable codes and . and/or specifications provided in your submittal; standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications - therefore any changes to these items after this date, to this office for review. ' including field modifications, must be reviewed by this " office to insure continued conformance with applicable - codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can By: Date:__________ ' result in suspension of permit to build IJ By: Date:_________ A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: - By: Date It 4 'S -•- • -• ATTACHMENTS Dedication Application Dedication Checklist El.. ,' Improvement Application ' Improvement Checklist - Future Improvement Agreement E Grading Permit Application El Grading Submittal Checklist • Right of Way Permit Application E Right of Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON NAME2&& 77'7a2 City of Carlsbad • - ADDRESS: 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 PHONE :(619) 438-1161. Ext. A-4 P:\DOCS\CHKLST\BP0001.FRM REV 04/30196 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad. CA 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619' 438-0894 '4 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ..% SITE PLAN isV2nd/ 3rd,/, ' 0 0 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North Arrow D. Property Lines Easements Existing & Proposed Structures E. Easements Existing Street Improvements F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets 0 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns C; Existing Topography B Existing & Proposed Slopes 0 3 Include note "Surface water to be directed away from the building foundation at a 2 % gradient for no less than 5' or 2/3 the distance to the property lin e ( w h i c h e v e r i s l e s s ) [Per 1985 UBC 2907(d)51. On graded sites, the top of any exterior foundation shall extend a b o v e t h e e l e v a t i o n of the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet of an approved d r a i n a g e d e v i c e a minimum of 12 inches plus two percente (per 1990 UBC 2907(d)5.). 0 4. Include on title sheet . Site address S. Assessors Parcel Number Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement proj e c t s , i n c l u d e T o t a l - building square footage with the square footage for each differe n t u s e , e x i s t i n g s e w e r - . permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturin g , w a r e h o u s e , o f f i c e , etc.) previously approved. 'EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION - :' a . Page 1 of 4 I BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ryls DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIAN C E Ap istV 2ndV 3rdV 0 D 0 5 Project does not comply with the followi n g E n g i n e e r i n g C o n d i t i o n s o f a p p r o v a l f o r Project No : Conditions were complied with by: Date DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS . 0 6. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to t h e b u i l d i n g s i t e a n d a n y s t o r m drain or utility easements on the building si t e i s r e q u i r e d f o r a l l n e w b u i l d i n g s a n d for remodels with a value at or exceedi n g $_______________ _ pursuant to Code Section 1840030 Dedication required as follows S Dedication required. Please have a regist e r e d C i v i l E n g i n e e r o r L a n d S u r v e y o r - prepare the appropriate legal descripti o n t o g e t h e r w i t h a n - 8 - 1 / 2 " x 1 1 p l a t m a p and submit with a title report. All ease m e n t d o c u m e n t s m u s t b e a p p r o v e d a n d signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of B u i l d i n g P e r m i t . A t t a c h e d p l e a s e f i n d a n application form and submittal checklist f o r t h e d e d i c a t i o n p r o c e s s , . P r o v i d e t h e completed application form and the requi r e m e n t s o n t h e c h e c k l i s t a t t h e t i m e o f resubmittal. - Dedication completed by • Date:___________ . - IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS O D 0 7a All needed public improvements upo n a n d a d j a c e n t t o t h e b u i l d i n g s i t e m u s t b e - constructed at time of building construct i o n w h e n e v e r t h e v a l u e o f t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n - - . exceeds $ -pursuant to Code Section 18.40.040. $ Public improvements required as follows: •.:'J _,_ . . •._ • . • Please have a registered Civil Engineer prep a r e a p p r o p r i a t e i m p r o v e m e n t p l a n s a n d '.. -o - submit them together with the requir e m e n t s o n t h e a t t a c h e d c h e c k l i s t f o r a - •. • . separate plancheck process through the E n g i n e e r i n g D e p a r t m e n t . I m p r o v e m e n t plans must be approved, appropriate se c u r i t i e s p o s t e d a n d f e e s p a i d p r i o r t o issuance of permit. - -. • '• * Attached please find an application fo r m a n d s u b m i t t a l c h e c k l i s t f o r t h e p u b l i c improvements requirements Provide th e c o m p l e t e d a p p l i c a t i o n f o r m a n d t h e requirements on the checklist at the ti m e o f r e s u b m i t t a l ., •• Improvement Plans signed by: Date: , P:OOCS\CHKLST\BPOOO1.FIRM Page 2 of 4 REV 04IOI -. -' - s V lst)V2ndV' 3rd/ BUILDING PNCHECK CHECKLIST U U 7b. Construction of the public improvements may be def&red pursuant to code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit ••__'*.••._ -.-. -.. -- I' .4 Improvement Plans signed by: Date:__________ 0 12 0 Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return signed and notarized Agreement to the Engineering Department 1 Future Improvement Agreement completed by Date 0 No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective - ... improvements found adtacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. • GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11 06 030 of the Municipal Code O 0 12 8a Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export) O 0 0 8b Grading Permit required A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil • . Engineer must be Submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior : to issuance of a Building Permit Grading Inspector sign off by Date 0 8c No Grading Permit required •. :. . . . oocs1'woo1 r Page 3 of 4 V .' 41! .. - .*,• . * A. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 1stk/dv'3rd'/ * NYD 0 9. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to street improvements, trees, driveways, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities Right-of-Way permit required for A separate Right-of-Way permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following 0 10 A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page -0 11. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a Permit Industrial waste permit accepted by Date Jr - .. ., . 4 4.. .. . J4 . .* .. .. 4 . .. 1, . -. ., - 1• PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST I Plan Check No CB IOD2- Address 23c Planner David Rick Phone (619) 438-1161 ext. 4328 (Name) • APN: • -L- Type of Project and Use bAJ Zone - I Facilities Management Zone CFD (in ou #________________________ • ci (If property in, complete SPECIAL TAX CALCULATION WORKSHEET provided by Building Department) Legend gItem Complete •1 Item Incomplete 7 Needs your action Environmental Review Required YES NO '-"TYPE 0 + DATE OF COMPLETION Cothpliance with conditions ôf approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval 0 c94PE Discretionary Action Required YES NO APPROVARESO. NO. - DATE PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: *j - - Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. ,._• Conditions of Approval _____________________________________________________ --. . 0 —Z California Coastal Commission Permit Required YES NO DATE OF APPROVAL San Diego Coast District, 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 521-8036 • Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval 0 Inclusionary Housing Fee required YES (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinande - May 21,1993).'. . . % "V . i:•i. • \. .i •••4'•.••I• • . Site Plan: 0 1 Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale \Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed stctürès, streets, existing street, improvements, right-of-way width, dimensioned setbacks and existing topographical. lines. - • •-.':' . :..j . . EJ/ El 0 2. Provide legal description of property, and.assessor's parcerumber. Zoning L?1iEEi 0 1 Setbacks Front: Required oRQ' Shown 7.0'. Int. Side: Required 7 ) Shown 7' • . -: Street Side: Required Mft - Shown i&ifr Rear Required Shown 57' 0 2 Lot Coverage:_Required 3 M144 Shown 27 0 3. Height: . Required L Shown 0 4. Parking Spaces Required 2c4 t Shown 2. Guest Spaces Required Shown .- - . -: -' . • . - • - . . . : 0 0 0 Additional Commeits______________________________________________________ OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE K:\ADMIN\COUNTER\PLANCK.FRM . . . . 1-17-96 north county. giotchnicaI P.O. Box 1751 0 Oceanside, California 92051 0 619-757-7857 Mr. Robert Porter May 24, 1996 2635 Highland Drive - Job No. 129-1-01 Carlsbad, California 92008 Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Addition to Existing Residence at 2635 Highland Drive, in the City of Carlsbad, California Dear, Mr., Porter; - Thisreport preèents the reults of our preliminary geotechnical investigation of the subject; site The purpose of this investigation was to determine the geotechnical conditions at the rear of the properti with respect to constructing a two-story addition to the existing, dwelling 1Thi eport includes a description of the site and the geotechnical conditions encountered, results of laboratory testing and engineering analysis and our conclusions and U recommendations - SITE CONDITIONS . . .f The subject site is locate in northwestern Carlsbad on the westerly side of Highland Drive.- The site slóes gently to the west. It appears that minor (3± feet) cut/fill grading was performed to create _a building pad The proposed addition would be constructed on the existing pad. A sktch of the site and cross-section are included as Plates A and B. . . -.1 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Our substhiace exploration consisted of the sampling and logging of two hand-dug borings' to depthsof six feet. Access to all areas of proposed construction was limited by existing structures (deck, patio slab). Logging was performed a geologist and a civil engineer who also obtained samples for laboratory and engineering analysis. The borings were backfilled and tamped following logging Logs of the borings are included as Table A Mr Robert Porter Job No 129-1-01 May 24, 1996 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS Our exploration revealed up to 3 feet of fill over native ground Both fill and native soils consisted of medium dense sands with minor amounts of silt The fill and native soils were in a slightly moist to moist condition SAMPLING METHODS AND LABORATORY TESTING Sampling Methods Soil samples have been collected as bulk or bag samples and/or as in-situ or relatively "undisturbed" core samples The samples were collected in plastic bags to retain their original moisture content and transported to our laboratory. Laboratory Testing 4 1 The physical and engineering properties of the soils were determined by laboratory testing of samples The types of tests typically conducted are briefly discussed below. All test results using these procedures are specific to the soils collected and variations could be 1 expected at other depths and locations Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content Typical bulk samples have been tested for their maximum dry density and optimum moisture content The results are obtained using the ASTM standard procedure D 1557- 78 These tests are generally used to compare natural densities and may be used for compaction testing Additional testing for other soil types or soil mixes may be necessary at a later date .4. . The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content are presented below Maximum Dry Optimum Moisture Sample Density (pcf) Content (%) B-1@3 ft. 1300 90 north county geotechnical 2 t 4: .#.. ;..; '•J . - Mr Robert Porter Job No 129-1-01 May 24, 1996 Expansion Index The expansion or swell character of typical soils found within this project have been tested using the Uniform Building Code Standard #29-2 This test creates a remolded sample in a four-inch diameter, one-inch high ring The sample is loaded with 144 pounds per square - ,. foot pressure and then inundated with water. The expansion of the soil is recorded in the - percent of the original height and is classified according to UBC Table No 29-C If soils r.. are "imported" to the site for fill placement, additional testing may be required to determine -. the expansion potential of soils at pad grade - •.. All - ••.4._ - The current test results and classification are shown below -- Sample Expansion Index UBC Classification B-1@3 ft. 0 Very Low -: Sulfates £_ $ , - Samples of the typical soils have been analyzed for their soluble sulfate content The Uniform Building Code requires that concrete exposed to soil containing sulfate concentrations of more than 0.2 percent should be made with Type V cement Sulfate concentrations higher than 0.1 and below 0.2 would require Type II or Type V cement Additional testing may be required after site development to determine the sulfate content -f:at pad grade. The current test results are presented below Soluble Sulfate Sample Content (%) B-1@3 ft. <0001 - _, -- - 8 • 8 - • • 8•' _I -: - I -. • I_ - I 8 • - 1 ,F • north county geotechnical 3 V - - _.•.4 C' Mr. Robert Porter '. 5.r- -• I General Job No. 12971-01 May 24, 1996 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1.. Based on our review, field exploration, laboratory testing and our engineering analysis, it is our opinion that the project may be developed for the proposed use from a geotechnical viewpoint The preliminary recommendations presented below should be incorporated into the design, grading and construction considerations 2 Due to existing structures in the area of the proposed addition, the geotechnical consultant should observe the footing excavations prior to steel placement to verify .: ••• . the conditions describedin this report and to provide additional recommendations as necessary. S. S • & - I 1 I- 3 If any grading is planned, inspections by the geotechnical consultant should be provided to verify the conditions described in this report and to provide additional recommendations as necessary. Grading recommendations are provided in the following section Treatment of Existing Ground and Fill Placement 1 Prior to grading, if necessary, vegetation and debris should be removed from the building area 2 Subsequent to removals, exposed natural ground should be processed to a depth - • of six to 12 inches, moisture conditioned to near optimum moisture content and compacted S • 3 The fill soils (if any) should then be placed in uniform 6-inch(±) lifts, cleansed of major vegetation or debris, watered or dried to achieve optimum or slightly above moisture conditions and compacted 4 Grading should be performed in accordance with the requirements of the grading code of the City of Carlsbad north county geotechnical • 4 .. S. - Mr Robert Porter Job No 129-1-01 May 24 1996 5 All fill should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum density as determined by test method ASTM D 1557-78 6 Compaction tests should be performed periodically by the geotechnical consultant to verify the compaction and moisture content. These results should be reported to the contractor to aid in completion of his work This testing, however, should not relieve the contractor of his obligation to deliver a buildable site FOUNDATION DESIGN Allowable Bearing Value - An allowable bearing value of 1000 pounds per square foot (psf) may be used for the design of continuous footings 12 inches wide and 12 inches deep. This value maybe increased by 200 psf for each additional 12 inches in depth and by 100 psf for each additional 12 inches in width to a maximum value of 2000 psf The design values may be increased by one-third when considering' short duration seismic or wind loads FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS 1 Due to the existing fill condition we recommend steel reinforcement of at least one No 4 and the top and bottom of each footing Exterior and interior footings may be constructed in accordance with standard building code requirements regarding width and depth. Consult with your project architect or structural engineer for other reinforcement requirements if any. 2 Concrete slabs in residential or moisture sensitive areas should be underlain with a vapor barrier consisting of a minimum of 6-mil water resistant membrane (visqueen or equivalent) with all laps sealed This membrane should be covered 4 with a minimum of one inch of sand. If the subgrade soils are rocky or otherwise with sharp edges which may damage the membrane, then additional sand should be placed below the membrane for protection. The concrete slab surface (finish floor level) should be six inches above the soil grade adjacent to the outside edge of the footings north county geotechnical 5 .Mr. Robert Porter Job No. 129-1-01 ; : - May 24, 1996 T. . Concrete slabs do not require reinforcement from an expansive soils standpoint, however, a welded wire mesh (6" x 6", Wi 4 x W1.4) may be desirable to control concrete shrinkage and for quality control Slabs should be at least 4 inches thick (nominal) and we recommend that a low water cement ratio and a low slump concrete be used ' 3 Soils at the bottom of the footing excavations and at slab subgrade should be kept in a moist condition. The moisture content should be at optimum or higher prior to pouring concrete. UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL 1. Utility trenches, if any, should be backfilled with native soils adequately densified for the particular use intended Ninety percent relative compaction should be used for deep trenches and where trenches pass under driveways, walks or exterior improvements As an alternative clean sand with a Sand Equivalent value of at least 30 or above may be utilized and flooded in place. Probing and, if deemed necessary, testing should be required to determine the relative compaction of backflfls placed A native I soil cap is recommended to prevent water infiltration 2. . Exterior trenches paralleling a footing, and extending below a 1:1 plane projected from the outside bottom edge of the footing should be compacted to 90 percent of the laboratory standard. Sand backfill, unless it is similar to the in-place fill, should not be allowed in these trench backfill areas Density testing, along with probing, should be performed to verily the required relative compaction . 3... . All trench inspections and backfill should be coordinated with the geotechnical consultant so that adequate records can be submitted to the City. Trench locations and depths should be noted - --.' - Mr Robert Porter Job No 129-1-01 May 24, 1996 LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION 1 At all times, pad drainage should be maintained to flow adequately away from structures Water should not be allowed to pond We recommend that roof gutters be tied to the area drains and that area drains should extend around the house - - 4- 2 The owners should be aware that drainage should be maintained and that improvements may be necessary depending upon yard and patio plans t Improvements may include roof gutters, area drain systems and/or paved surfaces I. designed to carry water. 3 All flower beds and planter areas should be well drained 4.-' Yard irrigation should be minimized and if automatic systems are used, they should be set for short duration (five minutes or less) and should not come on every day. The owner should be aware that over-irrigation could lead to ground saturation which could result in ground distress and building damage This should be avoided INVESTIGATION LIMITATIONS The materials 4encountered on the project site and utilized in our laboratory investigation are believed representative of the total area, however, soil materials vary in characteristics between excavations. Since our investigation is based upon the borings excavated and the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses the conclusions and recommendations are considered professional opinions These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice in this area at this time and no 4 warranty is expressed or implied - The above recommendations are provided for your exclusive use in design and construction of the expected structures. They should not be used by others for yard improvements and additions without specific plan reviews Soils conditions may change with time and standards of geotechnical practice may change Therefore, a review of r noithcounty-geotechnical • • • 7 4 ;. .., ,. 4 - Mr Robert Porter Job No 129-1-01 May 24, 1996 conditions should be made after a time period of 6 months and/or after heavy seasonal rains or abnormal events. -, .4 The above recommendations include inspections and testings for various soil conditions and backfills It is the responsibility of the client to call us for the appropriate services We * , will not be responsible for work conducted without our knowledge and can only be partially responsible for work conducted on an on-call basis Your contractors should be responsible for their workmanship regardless of our observations and/or testings unless we are permitted full time observation with testing as necessary. - We sincerely appreciate this opportunity to be of service and we would continue to provide you with consultation during the continuing phases at your request If you have any questions regarding the information in this report, or if you know of any conditions which might affect our opinions, please contact us a Respectfully submitted, NORTH COUNTY GEOTECHNICAL By. VJames R McLaughlin J Michael Nelson Principal Geologist Pnncipal Engineer CEG 1580 RCE41347 VVLOFEStjo UA 1n :a Dist: )Addressee IP Cl m OF CALLAO End: Plate A - Site Sketch Plate B - Cross-section A-A' Table A - Logs of Borings north county geotechnical 8 • \JI• Q I I. ¼ • 6T-k#t4\CAL' I ?oR1 e'StDeMcE I zi24b. (Z9- I Pocre . •- • S - - -; - -- '.-.- F - - •_y_ - F - -- -F- I - 5EC_TION\ A-A - _ I I ?e1'R ftnitOLNM I N&. tadti - I Sample Boring Depth Depth •USCS Description (f9 (ft) B-i 0-3 1 SM FILL: Silty Sand, dark and light mottled red-brown, slightly 11/2 moist, medium dense 3-6 3 SM NATIVE: Silty Sand, red-brown, moist, dense Total depth 6 feet B-2 0-1 SM FILL: Silty Sand, red-brown, slightly moist, medium dense •1-6 1 SM NATIVE: Silty Sand, red-brown, moist, dense 2 Total depth 6 feet C 41A ,t' - - - ; CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE - CITY OF CARLSBAD Plan Check No •; - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ,_•, 2075 LAS PALMAS DR, CARLSBAD, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 This form shall be' used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to verify that the projeèt applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for the projects shall be .issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate school district and returned to the City of r Carlsbad Building Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT: ' • . Glsbad 'Unified ,•. San Marcos Unified 801 Pine Avenue 1 290 West San Marcos Blvd. .,. 'Carlsbad CA 92009 (434-0661) San Marcos CA 92024 (744-4776) - * - Encinitas Union San Dieguito Union High School 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd. 710 Encinitas Boulevard Encinitas CA 92024 (944-4300) 'Encinitas CA 92024 (753-6491) `."Project Applicant:. I • APN: ( _-\\O - Project Address:IIJ ,RESIDENTIAL-: SQ. FT. of living area ~31 number of dwelling units -,.SQ. FT of covered area SQ. FT of garage area OMMERCIAL/INDUST AL: S . T. AREA Prepared by ________________________________ Date fi / - .•• - * FEE CERTIFICATION , (To be completed by the School District) CtC" V" Applicant has compl!ed with fee requirement under Government Code 53080 cL ': Project is subject to an existing fee agreement Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 'Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. - • (other school fees paid) Other Residential Fee Levied $51, 1/O based on _____ sq ft @ ,L-?Y 30 Comn/Indust Fee Levied $_____________ based on sq. ft @ V City of Carlsbad V SCHOOL FEES T - I Please fill out the form on the reverse side of this page and take it to the appropriate school district - Once you have paid the school fee, a school official has signed the school fee form, and all other plan check requirements have been met, a building permit can be issued. The City ' of Carlsbad will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. 1- - - BUILDING. DEPARTMENT -'V - V • .4V_V VVC '.' ' - I • fl-I - V - flu I - V V tz r ' . *, fl-V - IV V V 'V - • V • - •' I -. I I • ' . •' ' - V fi • - , '% _ \V.1 •- •V " P S \ , (REV 2/21/96) f:\forms\certcomp.frm V Vfl I .: VV •t -' 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576- (61 9) 438-1161- FAX (619) 438-0894