The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2650 GALICIA WAY; ; CB013840; Soils Report06-16-2003 Job Address Permit Type Parcel No Valuation Occupancy Group # Dwelling Units Bedrooms Project Title Applicant WRIGHT SAM ; City of Carlsbad 1635Farada^Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No CB013840 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 2650GALICIAWYCBAD RESDNTL 2161802400 5291,43600 1 Sub Type SFD Lot# 0 Construction Type NEW Reference # Structure Type SFD Bathrooms 3 BALES RESIDENCE 3,218 SF HOUSE.482 SF GARAGE.35 SF DECK.345 SF Owner BALES JIM Status Applied Entered By Plan Approved Issued Inspect Area Ong PC# Plan Check# STEN 2911 STATE ST 92008 760 720-7631 1 807 LODGEPOLE RD 92069 ISSUED 12/14/2001 MDP 03/08/2002 03/08/2002 RB Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee ' Plan Check Discount / Strong Motion Fee ' Park in Lieu Fee ,' Park Fee t LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee \ BTD #2 Fee \ BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee '• Pot Water Con Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot Water Con Fee Reel Water Con Fee $1,13792 MeterSize •,' , / yy$000 Add'l Reel Water Con Fee $73965 Meter Fee $0 00 , SDCWA Fee • - SO 00 , CFD Payoff Fee $2914 'PFF •• $000 ^PFF(CFDFund) $0 00 License Tax ' - $31000 " License Tax (CFtfFund) $53000 " Traffic Impact Fee'' SO 00 Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) > $000. Sidewalk Fee '' + ' $000' • PLUMBING TOTALS - « - SO'OO , ELECTRICAL'TOTAL1 ^ v $0 00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $60 00 ," ^ , Housing Impact Fee^ - SO 00*, " Housing InLieu Fee"'-' / r Housing Credit Fee $0 00 Master Drainage Fee $000 • •/ 'Se_wer Fee / Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $000 $000 $000 SO 00 $5,304 14 $4,896 12 $000 $000 $442 00 5*498 00 $000 $18900 ,$60 00 $7400 $2,925 00 / $0 00 ' $000 ' $000 t $000so oo $17,19497 Total Fees $17,194 97 Total Payments To Date , $17,134 97 ' Balance Due $60.00 7542 06/16/03 ©OR1 02 60-00 Inspector FINAL APPROVAL Date Clearance NOTICE Please lake MD^fCE thajapacffSroTvour protect includes the Imposition' ol (ees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exrofions" TOotwe 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set ffartn in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3 32 030 Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exacliQns of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008 FOR OFFICE USE PLAN CHECK NO EST VAL 7-&'2- Plan Ck Deposit Validated Bv ; Date 1 ONLY ^MV*'i- 1-1 1 Ll S8HC o 63 //bi 7G..<ro Address {include Bldg/Suite #)Business Name (at this addre 25 12/14/01 OOQ2 Legal Description t ff>r> . 2.4. Name i^^rirr^crr^'TTr13 iuJA5^LlCANT Address^~-Ta--'—rj Contractor Address r» (Sec 7031 5 Business and Professions Code Any City or County which requires a permii to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor s License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption Any violation of Section 7031 5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($5001) Name State License # Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License ff Telephone # Designer Name State License ff Address City State/Zip Telephone i Mti^-j ~|^tj, , -s-fi "•^ffg—'T"*! f"j^"*w'rr" ' *~r,fT^ lypi - Workers' Compensation Declaration I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations 0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued Q I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued My worker s compensation insurance carrier and policy number are Insurance Company Policy No Expiration Date [THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$1001 OR LESS) [J CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California WARNING Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100 000) in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code interest and attorney a fees SIGNATURE DATE / I heresy-affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason ' ^[ I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec 7044 Business and Professions Code The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does / such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale If, however the building or improvement is ' sold within one year of completion the owner builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale) / n I, as owner of the property am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec 7044, Business and Professions Code The I Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor s License Law) Q I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason 1 I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement 0YES QNO 2 I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work 3 I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number) ^ 4 I plan to provide portions of the work but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number) /) J^-"""" ..i ————-^-j ~-——-—^^^ '~*-—:—•——'—•— • \ 5 1 will provide some of the work, but I have contacted (hired) the^otTowmg persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work) 'I I/ /I ^ /\ PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE ^ t_ - „ •"^-•-"'-••"•--""f&'-'^-'trei-'-™"'*'v *n'p w^>«ti"*^^ "" ftp"**- J!i"'r*r:Tm'"- THr-TM^BUllfclNG^ERMITS^W^i^ ^ITfluilB &E, WAI&! d5& Is the applicant or future building occupant/equired to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or Z5534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Q YES Q NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district7 O YES Q NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? n YES Q NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRfCT roWT?^T™Trf^rnuTiE5ni^^|8 i>y CONSTRUCTION LEND ING 'AGENCY^' *'siw.'if lUisis ?Ja4 ~w-Mti aJU^^Sl HU»UJJ i< hl' Mk, fj, rl s»« ,h Uxl? *&<, A nJiSl! 1 H^Lr iP I [fr^^r yU,M!,,><MM »i«\\f < M I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 3097(0 Civil Code) LENDER S NAME LENDER S ADDRESS kE™ I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT OSHA An OSHA permit is required for excavations over^Jb" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stones in height EXPIRATION Every permit issued by thjwCuildmg qwjM-andar the- provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commertKd withiruwj-oays frotntMe date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after Ihe work is commeprCsa for a parlo^of/lsqJays/Section 106 4 4 Uniform Building Code)* _ DATEAPPLICANT'S SIGNATURE iJ4~ File YELLOW Applicant PINK Finance • \e City of Carlsbad Final Building inspection Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Lite Fire Plan Check # Date Permit*. CB013840 Permit Type- Project Name. BALES RESIDENCE Subtype SFD 3,218 SF HOUSE.482 SF GARAGE.35 SF DECK.345 SF T Address *" 2650 GALICIA WY Lot- 0 Contact Person Phone Sewer Dist LC Water Dist O Inspected By NT* C Inspected By Inspected Comments ^AjuL Date Inspected Date Inspected Date Inspected \U\1L Approved Approved Approved Disapproved Disapproved Disapproved l i - (° Permits CB013840 Type RESDNTL SFD Date Inspection Item Inspector Act 07/28/2003 89 07/28/2003 89 07/24/2003 89 07/24/2003 89 07/17/2003 89 07/16/2003 89 07/16/2003 89 07/07/2003 23 07/03/2003 89 06/27/2003 39 06/27/2003 84 06/25/2003 22 06/20/2003 22 06/1 3/2003 39 06/05/2003 39 02/04/2003 17 02/04/2003 18 02/04/2003 23 01/28/2003 13 01/27/2003 16 01/27/2003 84 01/22/2003 84 01/17/2003 84 12/23/2002 13 12/19/2002 13 12/18/2002 13 12/17/2002 13 11/25/2002 15 11/25/2002 32 11/20/2002 15 11/20/2002 32 10/29/2002 14 • 09/24/2002 11 09/16/2002 11 09/16/2002 21 09/16/2002 22 09/10/2002 11 09/10/2002 12 09/09/2002 11 Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Gas/Test/Repairs Final Combo Final Electrical Rough Combo Sewer/Water Service Sewer/Water Service Final Electrical Final Electrical Interior Lath/Drywall Exterior Lath/Drywall Gas/Test/Repairs Shear Panels/HD's Insulation Rough Combo Rough Combo Rough Combo Shear Panels/HD's Shear Panels/HD's Shear Panels/HD's Shear Panels/HD's Roof/Re roof Const Service/Agricultural Roof/Reroof Const Service/Agricultural Frame/Steel/Bo It ing/Weld in Ftg/Foundati on/Piers Ftg/Found at i on/Piers Underground/Under Floor Sewer/Water Service Ftg/Foundati on/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers - JE - RB RB RB - JE RB RB RB PD RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB PD PD RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB RB Rl AP Rl CA PA CO Rl AP CO AP AP AP AP NR CO AP AP NR AP AP CO PA CO AP CO CO NR PA NS NR CO PA AP we AP we AP AP CO BALES RESIDENCE 3,218 SF HOUSE,482 SF GARAGE.35 SF D Comments FINAL NEED SAFETY GLASS IN OFFICE FOR REINSP-TEMPCOFO SEE NOTICE ATTACHED 114-G1 STOP - TOO MUCH NR - SEE NOTICE ATTACHED EMR ON 1/28/2003 FOR CO WATER DEPT TO VERIFY P L CLEANOUT PAY REINSP FEE, SEE NOTICE SEE NOTICE ATTACHED @ DOUBLE SHR FIX OK TO INSULATE - SEE NOTICE ATTACHED SEE NOTICE ATTACHED STOP SEE NOTICE ATTACHED STOP - 1ST 3 SHRS NOT PER PLAN MISSING APPROVED SHEAR SCHEDULE SEE NOTICE ATTACHED FLR NAILING ABOVE GARAGE & OFFICE ONLY OK SLAB INSPECTION OK UNDRG WATER PIPING UNDR BLDG SLAB OK FOR FTGS ONLY - SLAB @ NEXT INSP SEE NOTICE ATTACHED Monday, July 28, 2003 Page 1 of 2 09/09/200212 Steel/Bond Beam RB CO 09/04/2002 21 Underground/Under Floor RB AP ON WASTE SYSTEM 07/22/2002 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RB WC 07/22/200212 Steel/Bond Beam RB PA STEEL OK STEM WALL @ REAR 07/12/2002 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RB PA CAISSONS OK & GRADE BEAMS @ LINE B & LINE B-C FRM LINE 1 & 4 OK 07/11/200211 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RB CO ON PA FTG INSP SEE NOTICE 06/26/200211 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RB PA 15 OF 16 CAISSONS OK-SEE NOTICE Monday, July 28, 2003 Page 2 of 2 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For 07/28/2003 Permits CB013840 Title BALES RESIDENCE Inspector Assignment RB Description 3,218 SF HOUSE,482 SF GARAGE,35 SF DECK.345 SF TERRACE Type RESDNTL Sub Type SFD Job Address 2650 GALICIA WY Suite Lot 0 Location Inspector APPLICANT WRIGHT SAM Owner BALES JAMES T&PAMELAS 2001 FAMILY TRUST Remarks Phone 7602077159 Total Time CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Requested By TIM Entered By KAREN Act Comment Associated PCRs/CVs CV030496 UNFOUND Z- FENCE OVER 6 FEET, PCR02132 ISSUED BALES - REVISE FOUNDATION PCR02256 ISSUED BALES RES/ 138 SF CON VERTING, FROM GARAGE TO LIVI PCR02314 ISSUED BALES RES-REVISE TRUSS DESIGN, Inspection History Date Description Act Insp 07/24/2003 89 Final Combo CA RB 07/17/2003 89 Final Combo PA RB 07/16/2003 89 Final Combo CO RB 07/07/2003 23 Gas/Test/Repairs rAP~ JE 07/03/2003 89 Final Combo CO RB * 06/27/2003 39 Final Electrical AP RB 06/27/2003 84 Rough Combo AP RB 06/25/2003 22 Sewer/Water Service AP PD 06/20/2003 22 Sewer/Water Service AP RB 06/13/2003 39 Final Electrical NR RB 06/05/2003 39 Final Electrical CO RB 02/04/2003 17 Interior Lath/Drywali AP RB 02/04/2003 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP RB Comments NEED SAFETY GLASS IN OFFICE FOR REINSP - TEMP C OF O SEE NOTICE ATTACHED 114-G1~~\7 STOP - TOO MUCH NR - SEE NOTICE ATTACHED EMR ON 1/28/2003 FOR CO 0 WATER DEPT TO VERIFY P L CLEANOUT PAY REINSP FEE, SEE NOTICE SEE NOTICE ATTACHED CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE NOTICE (760) 602-2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE LOCATION PERMIT NO TIME A f w $:s (o)cc* - 7^\ /< 5- T &/&#-? ' / f ts^/et £ r f " "„-? /— e^ y r. A FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725 RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? FOR FURTHER INF.OfflMATIOALCONTACT YES PHONE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER NOTICECITY OF CARLSBAD (760) 602-2700 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 FARADAY AVENUE DATE *—*''*" TIME LOCATION PERMIT NO V LJFOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725 RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? LJ YES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT PHONE BUILDING INSPECTOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 1 ENGINEERINGI DESIGN GROUP •I2121 Montrel Road. San Marcos California 92069 • (760) 839-7302 • Fax (760) 480-7477 - E-mail ENGDG©aol cgm Date,July 11,2002 To' Mr James Bales c/o Mullen Construction 2890 PiO Pico Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re Proposed New Residence to be located on Lot 87, A P N 216-180-2400, Galicta Way City of Carlsbad, California Subject- Grade Beam along the Rear Elevation We have provided this letter addressing the issue of grade beam embedment depth along the rear building foundation The caisson -grade beam - retaining wall assembly does not utilize any passive pressure from loose soil profiles at he at slope face, thus embedment of the grade beam is not necessary from a soil or structural standpoint. If you have any questions regarding thus letter, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, ti ENGINEERING DESIGN Steve Morris RCE 47672 JoftNg 012W4-1H HETTCT4.ETTW 1TOQ1WXW4 SALES. GrMt tarn Qtnflcwen Ltt «W> ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP 2121 Montiel Road San Marcos Cai'fcrn-a 92009 • 1760} 839 7302 - pax (760) 480 7477 * E-mai! ENGDG@aoi FOOTING OBSERVATION SUMMARY Date- June 7, 2002 Project Name: BALES DEVELOPMENT Location: Galtcia Way, Carlsbad, California Caissons for BL tiding Permit No. Referenced G*otechmcal R»port{$)' Caisson Foundation Recommendation dated Apni 30 2002 prepared my Engineering Design Group Code 1997US.C Observatton of Summary Initials initials A representative of E D G observed on-stfe soil conditions Soil conditions for the proposed footings are substantially HI conformance with those assumed m the geotpchnical A representative of E D G observed and measured footing excavation depth/width for the proposed footings. Footing excavations extend to proper depth and bearing strata, and are in general confomance with the geotechnical report A representative of E D G measured footing setback from slope face The setback was in general accordance with the recommendations of the qeotechnica! reporl Comments. 1 Footing/caisson excavations should be deaned of foose debris and thoroughly moistened just prior to placing concrete 2 fn the eve^t of a site change subsequent to our footing/caisson observation and pnor to concrete placement (i e heavy ram, etc ), we should be contacted to perform additional site observations Notes to Building Inspector 1 Sort compaction test results, tociud ng depth of fill, relative compaction, bearing values, and soil expansion index test results are contained in the As-Graded Geotechnical Rpport provided at the completion of grading {IF APPLICABLE) OL epresenfabve of ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP Date NOTICECITY OF CARLSBAD (760) 602-2700 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 FARADAY AVENUE TIME PERMIT NO FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725 RE-INSPECTJON FEE DUE^ YES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT ___ CODE LNFOPCEMENT OFFICER ® Baker Land Sunevs, Inc 4213 Sunn}hiHDrhe Carlsbad, CA. 92008 (760) 729-6676 Fax 729-7803 Certification letter Date:7/10/02 From To. Doos Tinker City of Carlsbad - Building Department Subject: Building Lino Certification ioi the Hales Residence Picked located at 2650 Galicm \\a\ (ailsbad C\ Cit\ of Cailsbad Building Pemut CH013R40 Tins letter is to iniorm >ou that 1, (ohn Douglas Baker Licensed Sutve\or6287 set building hnevtakes on 4/16'02 Said stakes \\eieset pei CiU appnned building plans ENGINEERING I DESIGN GROUP 2121 Montiel Road, San Marcos, California 92069 • (760) 839-7302 • Fax (760) 480-7477 • E-mail ENGDG@aol com Date. December 19, 2002 \ To Bruce Canale MULLEN CONSTRUCTION 2890 Pio Pico, Suite #202 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re Bales Residence, Lot 87 on Galicia Way, Carlsbad, CA Subject RFI Response Our office has prepared this letter to respond to your RFI regarding the use of OSB as an alternate for the 1/2" Struct 1 plywood noted in the shear wall schedule. 1 The P3 shear walls have been installed utilizing 15/32" OSB with a plywood index of 32/16 without the Struct 1 designation Along Grid 1 and Grid D, Sheet S3 of the City of Carlsbad approved drawings, OSB may be used as an alternate with no upgrades Along Grid D, Sheet S4, the panels in place per the plans are adequate as constructed with the addition of a shear panel per the P3 designation installed on the interior of Grid D on the wall closest to Grid 1 2 The L3 shear walls have also been installed with 15/32" OSB L3 shear walls only require 3/8" plywood; therefore this condition is adequate as constructed if 10d nails were utilized, contractor to field verify. If you have any questions_regarding this letter, please feel free to contact our office j*^^?\cctZttZSL Prepay Ton Project Engine' Page No. 1 Job No 012684-2 \\Maln\file on mam\LETTER\LETTER 21012684-2, BALES, RF112-19-02 wpd ENGINEERINGI DESIGN GROUP 2121 Monttel Road, San Marcos, California 92069 • (760) 839-7302 - Fax (760) 480-7477 • E-mail ENGDG@aol com Date: To Re Subject July 17, 2002 Bruce Canals MULLEN CONSTRUCTION 2990 Pio Pico, Suite #202 Carlsbad, CA 92003 Bales Residence, Lot 87 on Gadcia Way, Carlsbad, CA RFI Response Our office has prepared this letter to respond to your RFI regarding Detail 1, Sheet S2 of the City of Carlsbad approved drawings The proposed retaining wall was an 8 inch thick CMU block wail This wall may be an 8 inch thick cast in place concrete waif utilizing #5 bars at 8" O.C. vertical steel each face an J #4 bars at 12" O.C horizontal steel. It should be noted, the vertical steel shall maintain a 3 inch clearance from the face of wail on the retaining side and a 2 inch clearance on the non-retaining side. The doweling from the cast-m-place concrete wal! to the concrete slab shall be #5 bars at 8" O.C extending 36 inches into the wall and 36 inches into the slab. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feet free to contact our office. Prepar Tony Ca Project V*H^'"Y/ Page No. 1 Job No. 012684-2 Wtahrtflto on m»imieTTemt.eTT£K ZWIZiM-J, 8ALC3, RK 7-17-92 wpd ENGINEERINGiDESIGN GROUP <6» •((ifllllKll 1 COMMiKiiH. (0*1 2121 Montiel Road, San Marcos Califomta 92069 • (760) 839-7302 • Fax (760) 480-7477 • E-mail ENGDG@aol com Date To Re- Subject July 10, 2002 Bruce Canale MULLEN CONSTR JCTION 2890 Pro Pico, Suite #202 Carlsbad, CA 9200JJ Bales Residence, L^t 87 on Galicia Way, Carlsbad, CA RFI Response Our office has prepared this letter o respond to your RFI regarding Detail 1 , Sheet S2 of the City of Carlsbad approved drawings The proposed retaining wall was an 8 inch thick CMU block wall. This wall may be an 8 inch thick cast in place concrete wall utilizing #5 bars at 8" O C vertical steel each face an j #4 bars at 12" O C horizontal steel It should be noted, the vertical steel shall maintain a 5 inch clearance from the face of wall on both sides If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact our office Tony Project Enineer Page No. 1 Job No. 012684-2«i» on mimiLFrremLeTTe* memo**, au.es, nwi T-IO-« wpd From Doug Bdker, Baker Land Surveys Inc 5 00' § — 900' <v 5 00' Date W5/2G02 Time & 42 54 AM 5400' U1LDING ENVELOP 54 00' 70 00' Page 2 of 2 ooto 500' [—700— Stakes set 4/16/02 for the Bales Residence, 2650 Galacta Way, Carlsbad 8-28-2002 8 10AM 'FROM P 2 ENGINEERING [DESIGN GROUP 2121 Monttel Road. San Marcos. Cahfor na 92069 • (760) 839-7302 • Fax (760) 480-7477 - E-mail ENGDG@aol com FOOTING OBSERVATION SUMMARY Date: August 21. 2002 Project Name: BALES DEVELOPMENT Location: Gahcia Way, Carsbad, California Footing for New Residence Permit No: Referenced Geotechnical Reports) -United Geotechnical Investigation for Proposed Bales Developemtn, to be located on Lot 84, A P N 21&-180-2400, Galicia Way, City of Carlsbad, CA." prepared by Engineering Design Group, dated Novembers, 2001 Code: 1997U.B.C. Observation of Summary: {^.Initials A representative of E.D.G. observed on-site soil conditions Soil condition 5 for the proposed footings are substantially in conforms nee with those assumed in the geotechnical report. A representative of E.D.G observed and measured footing excavaticn depth/width for the proposed footings. Footing excavations extend to proper depth and bearing strata, and are in general conformance with the geotechnjcal report. .initials A representative of E.D.G. measured footing setback from slope face. The setback was in general accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report. Comments: Notes to Superintendent/Foreman 1, Footing/caisson excavations should be cleaned of loose debris and thoroughly moistened just pnor to placing concrete 2 In the event of a site change s Jbsequent to our footing/caisson observation and pnor to concrete placement (i e . heavy ram, etc ), we should be contacted to perform additional site observations. Notes to Building Inspector 1 Soil compaction test results, tr eluding depth of fill, relative compaction, beanng values, and soil expansion index test results are contained in the As-Graded Geotechnical Report provided at the completion of grading (IF APPLICABLE)." Representative orENGINEERMG DZSIGN GROUP Date ENGINEERING I DESIGN GROUP 2121 Montiel Road, San Marcos, California 92069 • (760) 839-7302 • Fax (760) 480-7477 - E-mail ENGDG@aol com Date February 4, 2002 To Mr James Bales 1807 Lodgepole Road San Marcos, CA 92069 Re Proposed New Residence to be located on Lot 87, A P N 216-180-2400, Galicia Way, City of Carlsbad, California Subject Plan Review Letter Ref 1 "Limited Geotechnical Investigation, for Proposed New Bales Development, to be located on Lot 87, A P N 216-180-2400, Galicia Way, City of Carlsbad, California " Prepared by Engineering Design Group, EDG Project No 002684-1 2 Plans prepared by Sam Wright, Sheets CS, A1-A8, E1, ID1, GN, S1-S6, for the Proposed Residence at 2650 Galicia Way, California, dated December 14, 2001 Mr Bales We have reviewed the above revised plans for compliance with the project limited geotechnical report and our initial plan review letter We find the plans generally meet the recommendations set forth in the above referenced report It should be noted that the recommendations of the soils report, referenced above, should be used , in conjunction with the project plans Recommendations of the soils report are considered mmimums and may be augmented by designers and structural engineers If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact our office ESIGN GROUP 'Project Engineer cc Sam Wright, Project Designer Job No 012684-1 mamlLETTERU-ETTER 1\2001\012684 BALES PLAN REVIEW LETTER REVISED wpd A Carl Schmidt Inspection P O Box 17-8403^ San Diego. CA 921 77-8403 Phone (619) 855-9252 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT. O^/eS A€ 5 I d<€.^i C^ JOB START _/^ ADDRESS. ^2 &S~C> &-<^ /1 e_ / ^ JOB STOP CITY' L ^r PERMIT # C&O f $$tf PLAN FILE # TYPE OF OBSERVATIONS: MASONRY REINFORCED CONCRETE FIELD WELDING EPOXYX PRESTRESSED CONCRETE SHOP WELDING BOLTING REINFORCING STEEL FIREPROOF1NG SAMPLES: NUMBER TYPE _____^ Materials/Design Mix Numbers/PSI1 Inspection Date. /' /£> - Ol REPORT If '/^2 ^/8" j-hr-tct </Hg(/ A& CIS /"iTb ./y*ic ^ •£& r- / /7 £> £~ A o/c/ C/QC^^T j- a,^. c/ d -*i c £jS~ Ts Jj S^Tv C o ^ cir~£ T-£ T U & INSPECTED CONFORMS WITH APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED A/ 3^A>^ / o/T^ ^yZ Project Billing Information- Print Name Certification# Phone Fax. ( Inspector's Signature Carl Schmidt Inspection P O Box 178403 San Dieao. CA 92177-8403 Phone (619) 855-9252 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT tfesfPROJECT - c---* -~ >^ ~ JOB START ADDRESS. ^L & .T^C 6^<s- / / c / ^ ^f-J^ JOB STOP' CITY. CSTrA^W PERMIT #: C-£ O/Zgy) PLAN FILE # TYPE OF OBSERVATIONS: MASONRY REINFORCED CONCRETED FIELD WELDING EPOXY PRESTRESSED CONCRETE SHOP WELDING BOLTING REINFORCING STEEL FIREPROOFING, SAMPLES, NUMBER'JL TYPE Materials/Design Mix Numbers/PS!' Insection Dorfe. ^ .>-<- REPORT S / cj s r o-f (3j c <s / / n d-e-T-S 4- or- C6S-, -A/^ c//o/< WORK INSPECTED CONFORMS WITH APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED Project Billing Information: Pnnt Name Certification* Phone Fax-f Inspector's Signature CARL SCHMIDT REG6TERED SPECIAL INSPECTOR P. O. Box 1 78403 San Diego. CA 92 1 77-8403 Phone (6 19) 855-9252 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT. y^^ /Zcvfrvr-t _ JOB START: ADDRESS 2t$o C*Uc.'cy u>y _ JOB STOP, CITY- C<+rl s bJ PERMIT #: ^o I $$r<1 PtAN FILE #; TYPE OF OBSERVATIONS: MASONRY REINFORCED CONCRETED FIELD WELDfNG EPOXY PRESTRESSED CONCRETE SHOP WELDING BOLTING REINFORCING STEEL FIREPROOFING. SAMPLES: NUMBER'_JL TYPE: £«wx.f r~Matenate^DesignMixNumbers/PSI: K*^ Co^t/xh- fo/-l Inspectkxi Date: ^^T-l -QT, REPORT /We-i.o & 5 ' V 7/ /'^y A* KMft \/^- ^ -<'J -) j- __ fA.*/? J ^/ /r. _ raS^ _ ^ / _ teJ: _ Q^ _7 \f _ C\i lif** WORK INSPECTED CONFORMS WHH APPROVED PIANS AND SPECIRCAHONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED <i Project Billing Information, Print Name Certification # Phone1 Fax;( Signature of Special Inspector CARL SCHMIDT REG67ERED SPECIAL INSPECTOR P.O. Box 178403 Son Diego. CA 92177-8403 Phone (619) 855-9252 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: £&14A Uts, dfrfci JOB START, / i)O ADDRESS: 3-&S-Q &A!<±^ t*y JOB STOP; CITY: Gc^fsAucf PgRMfT#: (12 013*"* PLAN FILE #: TYPE OF OBSERVATIONS: MASONRY REINFORCED CONCRETED FIELD WELDING EPOXY PRESTRESSED CONCRETE SHOP WELDING BOLTING REINFORCING STEEL FIREPROOFING. SAMPLES: NUMBER._^ TYPE. /. Mgtenal^Design Mix Number^PSI: /^ Inspection Date, 1^1^ ot REPORT -/ c *. o_E_ 6 L»L*tr c^</^< uJ/^ty C. ft fl^ fr-k ,OM-f^. -J <L/V>«/L L^<^V /^tA>uvy.y A-r" I n-T WORK INSPECTED CONFORMS WHH APPROVED PIANS AND SPECFCAtiONS UNLESS OTHERMSE NOTED Project Billing Information; Print Name Certification# Phone: Fax, f Signature of Special Inspector GARL SCHMIDT REG67ERED SPECIAL INSPECTOR P.O. Box 178403 Son Diego. CA 92 1 77-8403 Phone {6 19} 855-9252 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: EvtA t&Qtrttt _ JOB START: ADDRESS: ^faQ G*!.^,^ ^v _ JOB STOP: CITY: r_c*r)iLc.l _ PERMfT #: CB Ol 33"tn PLAN RLE #; 1YPE OF OBSERVATIONS; MASONRY REINFORCED CONCRETED. FIELD WELDING EPOXY PRESTRESSED CONCRETE SHOP WELDING BOLTING REINFORCING STEEL RREPROORNG. SAMPLES: NUMBER:^. TYPE: J ^.f *? 3SAMPLES: NUMBER:^i_ TYPE: / ^.f &? S go+jcrA^ C^t^rt/ ~^*^^ — Moteria&Design Mix Numbers/PSt: % ft* C*w^*k. /H^ /T^ST^ fciy C^/^^/cv- ^ / / ' / _ / Inspection Date: /y?" Z V-Q^ REPORT f u fiotM A 6c f , ^c WORK INSPECTED CONFORMS WITH APPIKA^D PLANS >VC) SPECFCATOI^ LMfSS OW /</'// UJ*-ltl<^ S^OS"?^ ^ Project Billing Information' Print Name Certification* rn^uit-js ifc^cf. Phone: (ftSJ8-) S'(x otr.t. Fax, ( ) Signature of Special Inspector KLEINFELDER Report No 5 5015 Shoreham Place San Diego CA 92122 CONCRETE CYLINDER COMPRESSIVE STRENG FH REPORT ASTM C39 ReportDate 10/31/02 Last Reissued on Report To Carl Schmidt Carl Schmidt Inspection Services PO Box 178403 San Diego, CA 92177 Supplier Hanson Mix No 3032500 Design Strength 3000 psi @ 28 Mix l)at,i Date Sampled 9/26/02 Date Received Source of Sample SLAB- ON GRADE FOOTING UPPER SLAB Sample Data 9/27/02 Contractor Truck/Tfcket Sampled By Submitted By Curing Method Specimen Prep Field Cure Temp {' Field Cure Time Call Schmidt Carl Schmidt Cure Room Sulfur 'F) HI Lo 24±4 hrs Weather Wind (MPH) Rh (%) Project No 18780 Ref No Project Bales Residence ££SQ £+/,•&*. k/*-t San Diego <2&rflb&JL / Phase Perm.t No Observed by Klemfelder Cement Type ||/V Cement Factor (sk/cy) Max Size Agg (in ) Admixtures Observed by Klemfelder Slump(m ) Slump w/plasticizer(m ) Air Temperature (°F) Mix Temperature (°F) Air Content (%) Unit Weight (pcf) Batch Size (cy) Water Added (gal) Time Batched Time Sampled Time in Truck Measured 50 Specified Laboratorj Data Sample Date Age Dimensions Number Tested (days)Diam Ht Len Area (m'J 11Gb2 A 1U/24/02 28 6 x 12 x 28 2/ 11 652 B 1 0/24/02 28 « x 1 2 x 28 2 / 11652 C 0 b X 12 x 2827 Ultimate Load (Ibs) 100990 99560 Compressrve Required Strength (psi) 3570 Strength (psi) 3000 3520 3000 3000 Average 28 Day Strength (psi) All fractures were conical in nature unless noted otherwise Remarks (0 ,V o Reviewed on 10/31/02 by Linda Hodo Concrete Lab Asst Untess prior arrangemenls have been made, ail HOLD specimens will be discarded if required strength is attained KLEINFELDER \ Report No 3 5015 Shoreham Place San Diego CA 92122 CONCRETE CYLINDER COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH REPORT ASTM C39 Report Date 10/3/02 Last Reissued on Report TO Carl Schmidt Car! Schmidt Inspection Services PO Box178403 San Diego, CA 92177 Supplier Superior Mix No 8355P Design Strength 3000 psi @ 28 Project No Project 18780 Ref No Bales Residence N/A Mix Data Phase Permit No Reported to Kleinfelder It/ay ! Sample Data Cement Type Cement Factor (sk/cy) Max Size Agg (in } Admixtures Observed by Kleinfelder Concrete Date Sampled Source of Sample Contractor Truck/Ticket Sampled By Submitted By Curing Method Specimen Prep 7/24/02 Date Received Foundation walls, North end of property 348/106295 Cure Room Sulfur Field Cure Temp (°F) Hi Lo Field Cure Time 24±4 Mrs Weather Wind (MPH) Rh (%) S!ump(m } Slump w/plasticizer(m ) Air Temperature f°F) Mix Temperature (°F) Air Content (%) Unit Weight (pcf) Batch Size (cy) Water Added (gal) Time Batched 12 34 Time Sampled 1315 Measured 50 Specified 10 Time m Truck 0 41 Laboratory Data Sample Number 11342 A 11342 B 11342 C Date Tested 7/30/02 8/14/02 8/21/02 Age (days) b 21 *B Dimensions Diam Ht Len ti X 12 x 6 X 12 X 6 X 1^ X Area (in1) 2827 2827 2827 Ultimate Load (Ibs) 50550 81810 96530 Compressive Strength (psi) 1/90 2890 3410 Required Strength (psi) 3000 3000 3000 Average 28 Day Strength (psi)341U All fractures were conical in nature unless noted otherwise Remarks Reviewed on 10/3/02 by Linda Hodo Concrete Lab Asst Unless prior arrangements have been made, all HOLD specimens will be discarded if required strength is attained As a mutual protection lo our clients and ourselves all reports submitted are the confidenlial property ol our clients and authorization for publicalion ot statements conclusions or extracts from our reports ara reserved pending our wilten approval KLEINFELDER Report No 3 5015 Shoreham Place San Diego CA 92122 CONCRETE CYLINDER COMPRESSTVE STRENGTH REPORT ASTM C39 Report Date 9/20/2002 Last Reissued on Report To ^ar| Schmidt Carl Schmidt Inspection Services PO Box 178403 San Diego, CA 92177 Supplier Superior MIX NO 3355P Design Strength 3000 psi @ 28 Date Sampled 7/24/2002 Source of Sample Contractor Truck/Ticket Sampled By Submitted By Curing Method Specimen Prep Field Cure Temp (°F) Hi Lo Field Cure Time 24±4 nrs Date Received Project No 18780 Ref No Project Bales Residence San Diego Phase N/A Permit No Mix Data Reported to Klemfelder Cement Type Concrete Cement Factor (sk/cy) Max Size Agg (in ) Admixtures Sample Dat i Obser/ed by Klemfelder Measured Weather Wind (MPH) Rh (%) \ Specified Slump(in ) Slump w/piasticizer(in ) Air Temperature (°F) Mix Temperature (°F} Air Content (%) Unit Weight (pcf) Batch Size (cy) Water Added (gal } Time Batched Time Sampled Time in Truck Laboratory Data Sample Number 11342 11342 11342 A B \_i Date Tested 7/30/200 8/14/200 8/21/200 Age (days) 6 21 28 Dimensions Diam Ht Len 6 X 6 X 5 X 12 X 12 X '2 X Area On2) 282/ 28 2/ 2827 Ultimate Load (Ibs) 50550 81810 96530 Compressive Strength (psi) 1790 2890 3410 Required Strength {psi) 3000 3000 3000 Average 28 Day Strength (psi) All fractures were conical in nature unless noted otherwise Remarks O • Reviewed on 9/20/2002 by Unless prior arrangements have been made all HOLD specimens will be discarded if required strength is attained As a mutual protection to our clients and ourselves ail recoils submitted are the "or'iapntiai prppe'ly 01 out Clients ana .authorization ior puClicaiion ol itatements onclu^ions of "itrjcls Iram out reports jte reserved pending our written approval KLEINFELDER Report No 4 5015 Shoreham Place San Diego CA 92122 CONCRETE < YUNDERC OMPRESSIVE STREW; 111 KEI'OR I VS I'M C3 Report Date 8/27/02 Last Reissued on Report To Carl Schmidt Carl Schmidt Inspection Services PO Box 178403 San Diego, CA 92177 Supplier Superior Mix No 8355P Design Strength 3000 pst @ 28 days Project No Project 18780 Ref No Bales Residence (,30 n/a Mix Data Sample Data Phase Perm.tNo Reported to Klemfelder Cement Type Cement Factor (sk/cy) Max Size Agg (in ) Admixtures Observed by Klemfelder Concrete Measured Specified Source of Sample Contractor Truck/Ticket Sampled By- Submitted By Curing Method Specimen Prep Field Cure Temp ( Field Cure Time Sample Number 11262 A, 11262 B 11262 C Grade Beams at North Enc! 462/104775 Cure Room Sulfur Weather F)H| Lo Wind(MPH) 24±4 hrs Rh (%) Date Age Dimensions Tested (days) Diam Ht 7/19/02 7 ,6 x 12 x 8/9/02 ,28 6 x 12 x 8/9/02 28 5 x 12 x Laboratory D.U.i Area Len ' (in2) 28 2/ 2827 28 27 Average 28 Slumpfm ) Slump w/plasticizer(m ) Air Temperature (°F) Mix Temperature (™F) Air Content (%) Unit Weight (pcf) Batch Size (cy) Water Added (gal ) Time Batched Time Sampled Time in Truck Ultimate Load Compressive Required (Ibs ) Strength (psi) Strength (psi) 59810 2120 i 3000 86980 3080 3000 84790 3000 , 3000 Day Strength (psi) ;jU4U All fractures were conical in nature unless noted otherwise Reviewed on 8/27/02 by Linda Hodo Concrete Lab Asst Unless prior atrangements have been made, all HOLD specimens will be discarded if required strength is attained KLEINFELDER 5015 Shoreham Place San Diego CA 92122 Report No 3 CONCRETE CYLINDER COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH REPORT ASFM C39 Report Date 8/27/07 Report To Carl Schmidt Carl Schmidt Inspection Services PO Box 178403 San Diego, CA 92177 Supplier Superior Mix No 8355P Design Strength 3000 psi @ 28 Last Reissued on Project No 18780 Ref No Project Bales Residence Mix Data Sample Data Permit No Reported to Klemfelder cement Type Concrete Cement Factor (sk/cy) Max Size Agg (in ) Admixtures Observed by Klemfelder Specified Source of Sample Cassion/ Foundation Contractor Truck/Ticket Sampled By Submitted By Curing Method Specimen Prep 336/103062 Cure Room Sulfur Field Cure Temp (°F) hi Lo Field Cure Time 24+4 hrs Footing #6 Weather Wmd(MPH) Rh (%) Slumpfin ) Slump w/plasticizer(m ) Air Temperature (°F) Mix Temperature (°F) Air Content (%) Unit Weight (pcf) Batch Size (cy) Water Added (gal ) Time Batched Time Sampled Time in Truck Laboratory Data Sample Number 11206 A 11206 B 11206 C Date Age Tested (days) 7/4/02 T" 7/25/02 28 8/22/02 ! 56 Dimensions Diam Ht Len 6 X 12 X 6 X 12 X 6 X 12 X Area Ultimate Load Compressive (In1) (Ibs ) Strength (psi) 2827 55430 1960 28 27 78740 2780 2827 94840 3350 Required Strength (psi) 3000 3000 3000 Average 56 Day Strength (psi)3350 All fractures were conical in nature unless noted otherwise Remarks Reviewed on 8/27/02 by **, j> Linda Hodo Concrete Lab Asst Unless prior arrangements have been made all HOLD specimens will be discarded if required strength is attained eports SAN DIEGO (COUNTY) AREA CIRCUIT CARD ^ND LOAD SUMMARY 1996 NEC) DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND LAND USE - BUILDING DIVISION --<•-- Permit Numuer iO/^ '"C..5 Phone Censi.6 Trjci Njnvjet Wo \W wWcA-C\C P-oneJ TVV- l \ | t \ v <^T *^* v — • - \L2°_ _ /o/acso A,c - "_ - CKT (r/r£ Qc-frC. G^ G^Pr P/VM - fecxt i "•-£- 7 "7 T-!I / y*7 _l *^ ^ A^-^-k^O^^ 11 k,, F L'I Ks Oi^e, U^<J En\^i ^fjjjU*^ ^^Li-r/?xj^5 /Vo^ rs .^Aft^, b«f^v^ p/^y p(?_ c3u fy^/ ^ /C BKR SIZE 5" '3 15 17 19 21 23 27 29 31 ^ WIRE SIZE 4 / TYPE CM I/ 3b i^> 5o 33 35 fe •\ MISC LTG "^ n 5 7 % REC Area in S'M f1 * *^ / ^) 1 REC ^Ttri 5 7 t 1 3 LTG Ml&C A'iRE SIZE liPE SIZE ' CKT ^^^ . , rt CM T_O 2 <,iT G " fiep£fi & i3A7KCv6 Cv^ , ^ O.^<12 L^^ U "P" ' ^/*\./^'/'1' ^ VA T M 1» tZ. 3 (o (, K 1 ' i i 37 39 41 c -: j •^ i f 1 I 16 1 16 2: J 22 24 26 ?8 I — r , J^'Z^O AMPBKR/FUSE D MIO - - ZOO AMP , vt c ~>, .' fee3er concuctors _ ^ \. Bl Type D CU D AL D) 5 Z Vv j''OP i Conojn Size . Type i8;?CU >& AL ;1|C, 30'a^ 8Ka) 33{c) 34 , oC J8 4J « Corrpuied Load f Z? r,',' i See Ce'co a.'iof1 Wo^sheer on oack Bran.!) Circuits requirec A) Lighting ci'cuns/ 220-3(b)4(o) B} Two small appliance ci c«its 220 - 4(b) C) Lcurdr)' circuit 220 4(c) u; Central neaung equ p'ie"i 422 7 £ G i|Vl con 2^0 52(J Pe -a-KS _ XT s ^S Kitchen "K Hyoromassage JTZ/isTJjcuci oc,s ano ;nsf n« ] Owner SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ELECTRICAL SERVICE LOAD CALCULATION OPTIONAL METHOD NEC 220-30 As an alternative method, the STANDARD METHCD found m ART/C'.E 220 of the Natic-nai Efoctnc Code, may be used 1 GENERAL LIGHTING LOADS Dwel'ing 1>1O\ sq ft x ? VA = 11*0 VA Small appliance loads - 22Q-16^a) 1500 VA x ^- circuits = _^^-oc VA Launary load -220-16(b) 1500 vX x ' circuits = t5"o<v VA General Lighting Total |54?°3 VA 2 COOKING EQUIPMENT LOADS - Nameplate Value R 3 -ge VA = VA Cocktoo VA = VA U-5o<5 VA = ^5oO VA Cooking Equipment Total oQ VA 3 ELECTRIC DRYER 220-18 (Narr eplate, 5000 VA m.nimum) ^ D-verS^o VA= Dryer Total ^^O VA 4 FIXED APPLIANCE LOADS 230-30(b3) Dishwasher = / 5 o<^ VA Disposal = ^ou Compactor = _ VA A/arer Heater = _ VA n^romassage Bathtub = /5<>o VA ',J crc..vave Oven = ___ VA 3, *-" Vacuum = _ VA ___________ = __ V A Fixed Appliance Total 9 ^-£^ „ VA 5 OPTIONAL SUBTOTAL (Add all of the above totals) 1 (3^3 v 6 APPLYING DEMAND FACTORS - TABLE 220-30 First 10,00:) VAx 100%= 10000VA i.cnai Suctotal (from me 5) { Remj'ning "*•* 3o^ VA x 40% -VA HEATING OR AC LOAD - TABLE 220-30 Larger of the Heating or AC Load ~ ^pc. VA 3 OPTIONAL LOADS TOTAL (Add tota.b from lines 6 and 7) = 17 ^2-1 0 MINIMUM SERVICE SIZE = Optio L I L.'ads Total = -i *z~~ 1-* (Please out total on front of card unJ f Computed Load) EsGil Corporation In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE 1/30/02 OARftUCANT GKiURIS} JURISDICTION Carlsbad aipTAKfREVIEVVER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO 01-3840 SET II PROJECT ADDRESS 2650 Galicia Way PROJECT NAME (Bales) Galicia Way SFD The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to 2911 State St Carlsbad, CA 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed [X] Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Sam Wright Telephone # (760)720-7631 Date contacted /) SO/OSL (by 6y) Fax # (760)720-7634 Mail ^Telephone Fax i^- In Person REMARKS By Kal Tumalieh Enclosures Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 12/17/01 tmsmtldot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 NOTE: The item numbers listed below refer to the numbers from the previous list. These items have not been adequately addressed. The notes in bold at the end of each item are to emphasize the remaining unsolved items (corrections). Please provide a response list stating where each item has been addressed on the plans. 1 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects) For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways 1 Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments 2 Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468 Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building 2 All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation (California Business and Professions Code) PROJECT ENGINEER OF RECORD TO STAMP AND SIGN ALL STRUCTURAL SHEETS 6 Openable window area in habitable rooms must be 1/20 of the floor area and a minimum of 5 square feet In bathrooms and water closet compartments, 1/20 of area is required and minimum is 1 5 sq ft Section 1203 3 At study THE REQUESTED INFORMATION WAS NOT SUBMITTED. PLEASE MAKE WINDOW TYPE G OPENABLE. 17. Show anchored veneer support and connections attached to wood in Seismic Zones 3 and 4, comply with Section 1403 Show ties, #9 wire in horizontal joints, etc PLEASE SPECIFY THE ICBO APPROVAL NUMBER FOR CULTURE STONE. • STRUCTURAL 25 Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents THE REQUESTED INFORMATION WAS NOT SUBMITTED. 29 Per UBC Section 2321 4, provide the following note on the plans if trusses are used "Each truss shall be legibly branded, marked or otherwise have permanently affixed thereto the following information located within 2 feet of the center of the span on the face of the bottom chord a) Identity of the company manufacturing the truss b) The design load C) The spacing of the trusses " THE REQUESTED INFORMATION WAS NOT SUBMITTED. 30. Project engineer of record to review and shop stamps manufacturer drawings or provide review letter confirming the roof truss design meets structural specifications (live, dead and drag loads, etc) (UBC Section 106 3 4 1) THE REQUESTED INFORMATION WAS NOT SUBMITTED. 37. Show how you will provide lateral resistance for font of terrace in the east -west direction? Please provide X bracing or kikers between supporting posts See building section (B/A6) and foundation plan THE REQUESTED INFORMATION WAS NOT SUBMITTED. PLEASE SPECIFY THE SIZE, LOCATION AND CONNECTION OF X BRACING ON PLANS. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list ff there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate Yes Q No a The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kal Tumalieh at Esgil Corporation Thank you EsGil Corporation In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE 12/28/01 a APPLICANT JURISDICTION Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO 01-3840 SET I PROJECT ADDRESS 2650 Galicia Way PROJECT NAME BGL\ e.e> SFD The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to 2911 State St Carlsbad, CA 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed X] Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Sam Wright <v M>j Telephone # (760)720-7631 ^^t (by fo^ Fax # (760)720-7634 Mail -" Telephone **- Fax ./ In Person REMARKS By Kal Tumalieh Enclosures Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 12/17/01 trnsmtldot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4- San Diego, California 92123 4 (858)560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 01-3840 12/28/01 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO 01-3840 PROJECT ADDRESS 2650 Galicia Way FLOOR AREA Dwelling (3080) Garage (620), Terrace (345) Deck (35) REMARKS DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED 12/28/01 JURISDICTION Carlsbad STORIES Two HEIGHT 26 Ft (App per UBC) DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION 12/17/01 PLAN REVIEWER Kal Tumalieh FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes 1997 UBC, 1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99) The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 106 4 3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 01-3840 12/28/01 1. Please make ait corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects) For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways 1 Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Buiiding Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments 2 Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468 Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building 2 All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation (California Business and Professions Code) Project engineer of record to stamp and sign all structural sheets 3 Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans stating that this project shall comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the 1997 UBC, UMC and UPC and the 1996 NEC 4 On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below Section 106 3 2 • REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec 1701 of the Uniform Building Code ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS • SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION • STRUCTURAL CONCRETE OVER 2500 PSl 5 When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit Please review Section 106 3 5 Please complete the attached form 6 Openable window area in habitable rooms must be 1/20 of the floor area and a minimum of 5 square feet In bathrooms and water closet compartments, 1/20 of area is required and minimum is 1 5 sq ft Section 1203 3 At study Carlsbad O1-3840 12/28/01 7. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406 4 • a) Walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of the bottom and top of stairways where the bottom edge of the glass is less than 60 inches above a walking surface Window type R 8 Guardrails (Section 509 1) a) Shall be detailed snowing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-B Provide detail and cross reference to plans 9 Handrails (Section 1003 3 3 6) a) Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends Revise note 26 on sheet CS 10 Provide details of winding stairway complying with Section 1003 3382 a) Minimum tread is 6 inches at any point and minimum 9 inches at a point 12 inches from where the treads are narrowest 11 The walls and soffits of the enclosed usable space under interior stairs shall be protected on the enclosed side as required for one hour ft re-res i stive construction Section 1003 339 At laundry 12 Specify on the plans the following information for the roof materials, per Section 10633 a) ICBO approval number, or equal 13 Show the required ventilation for attics (or enclosed rafter spaces formed where ceilings are applied directly to the underside of roof rafters) The minimum vent area is 1/150 of attic area (or 1/300 of attic area if at least 50% of the required vent is at least 3 feet above eave vents or cornice vents) Show area required and area provided Section 1505 3 Provide calculation of required attic ventilation area and area provided 14 Note on the plans "Attic ventilation openings shall be covered with corrosion-resistant metal mesh with mesh openings of 1/4-inch in dimension " Section 15053 15 Garage requires one-hour fire protection on the garage ceiling common to the dwelling Table 3-B, Section 302 4 a) Provide 2 layers of 1/2" of type "X" Gyp Boards for TJI floor joists, per ICBO approval (NER 200) for TJI 16 Doors may open into the garage only if the floor or landing in the garage is not more than one inch lower than the door threshold Section 1003 316 17 Show anchored veneer support and connections attached to wood in Seismic Zones 3 and 4, comply with Section 1403 Show ties, #9 wire in horizontal joints, etc Carlsbad 01-3840 12/28/01 • MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 18 Show permanent electrical outlet and lighting fixture controlled by a switch for furnace located in attic space Sections 306 3 and 306 4, UMC • ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 19 Show receptacle outlets at courtyard • PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 20 In Seismic Zones 3 and 4, show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces Provide two straps (one strap at top 1/3 of the tank and one strap at bottom 1/3 of the tank) UPC, Section 510 5 • ENERGY CONSERVATION 21 Cloth backed duct tape is no longer permitted to be used as the sole connection for mechanical ducting Note on the plans that duct tape, as a minimum, meeting the requirements of UL181, 181A, or 181B, shall be used or additional duct attachment devices such as tie wraps or mastic will be required for installing mechanical ducting 22 Detail or note on the plans "The return air plenum serving the mechanical equipment must be fully ducted from the equipment to the conditioned space Drop ceilings, wall cavities and equipment platforms may not be used as plenums" 23 Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in kitchen(s) and bathrooms (containing a tub or shower) At master bath 24 Note on the plans "The manufactured windows shall have a label attached certified by the National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) and showing compliance with the energy calculations " • STRUCTURAL 25 Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents 26 Please justify the use of slab on grade span of 10 feet In many areas like at garage, living room, etc slab span is more than 10 feet Carlsbad 01-3840 12/28/O1 27 Show distance from foundation to edge of cut or fill slopes ("distance-to- daylight") and show slope and heights of cuts and fills Chapter 18 Soil report requires minimum of 15 feet to slope daylight A)Please show required set backs at building elevations shown on sheets SA6 & A7 B) It appears that terrace foundation does not meet the required setback See building sections (B/A-6) and (C/A7) 28 Lumber grades for structural members shown on structural calculation page G1 are different form grades shown on drawings sheet GN Please revise notes on sheet GN to be consistence with structural calculation 29 Per UBC Section 2321 4, provide the following note on the plans if trusses are used "Each truss shall be legibly branded, marked or otherwise have permanently affixed thereto the following information located within 2 feet of the center of the span on the face of the bottom chord a) Identity of the company manufacturing the truss b) The design load c) The spacing of the trusses " 30 Project engineer of record to review and shop stamps manufacturer drawings or provide review letter confirming the roof truss design meets structural specifications (live, dead and drag loads, etc) (UBC Section 106 3 4 1) 31 Manufacturer roof trusses package as submitted is incomplete Package does not specify the girder trusses and jack trusses 32 Project architect of record to verify the required span of manufacturer trusses Manufacturer package shows roof trusses span of 31' - 6" It appears that the actual span is larger than 31' -6" 33 Please cross-reference all roof trusses to roof framing plan or the manufacturer roof truss package shall have roof trusses layout plan 34 Revise the design of floor joist (TJI) Please use 40-psf live load instead of 16 psf on floor potion See calculation page V3 35 Revise the TJI series with span of 15 feet over living room and garage Use TJI 350 series instead of 250 series, per calculation page V4 36 Specify the size of stud wall balloon framing at open area See sheet S-3 37 Show how you will provide lateral resistance for font of terrace in the east -west direction'? Please provide X bracing or kikers between supporting posts See building section (B/A6) and foundation plan Carlsbad 01-3840 12/28/01 38 Provide ledger connection calculation and detail between terrace to building Please provide detail and cross reference to plans Detail (3/S6) does not show the connection of deck to building 39 Show minimum 18" clearance from grade to bottom of floor joists and minimum 12" clearance to bottom of girders Section 2306 3 • CITY SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: Nails for shear transfer connection (using A35's, etc) may not be driven parallel to the flanges of TJl's (i e , along the sides), per city policy, unless specific written approval from Trus-Joist Macmillan is first obtained Details or notes on the plans should make this clear Nails may be driven perpendicular to TJI flanges Omit the option forA35 for shear transfer detaif (10.11.12.etcon sheet S5).ancf specify the required nailing to transfer the shear for each shear wall types New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating Note "two roof jacks must be installed" where the water heater is in the one story garage and directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No 8093) Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No 8093) All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (City Policy) To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate Yes Q No Q The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ka! Tumalieh at Esgil Corporation Thank you >GIL CORP Fax.18585601576 Dec 31 2001 12:12 P 09 Carlsbad 01-3840 12/28/01 City of Carlsbad Building Depart merit BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICED REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION Do Not Remove From Plans Plan Check No. 01-3840 Job Address or Legal Description . 2650 Gallcia "Way <JOwner < *H ^-Ug^ Address You are hereby notified that in addition to the inspection of construction provided by the Building Department, an approved Registered Special Inspector is required to provide continuous inspection during the performance of the phases of construction indicated on the reverse side of this sheet. The Registered Special Inspector shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Building Department prior to the issuance of the building permit. Special Inspectors having a current certification from the City of San Diego, Los Angeles, or ICBO are approved as Special Inspectors for the type of construction for which they are certified The inspections by a Special Inspector do not change the requirements for inspections by personnel of the City of Carlsbad building department, The inspections by a Special Inspector are m addmon to the inspections normally required by the County BuMing Code The Special Inspector is not authorized to inspect and approve any work other than thai for which he/she is specifically assigned to inspect The Special Inspector is not authorized to accept alternate materials, structural changes, or any requests for plan changes, The Special Inspector is required to submit written reports to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that he/she inspected and approved. The final inspection approval will riot be given until all Special Inspection reports have been received and approved by the City of Carlsbad building department, Please submit the names of the inspectors who will perform the special inspections on each of the items indicated on the reverse side of this sheet ESSIL CORP Fax 18585601576 Dec 51 2001 12-13 P 10 Carlsbad 01-3840 12/28/01 SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM Z.6s^c±> ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION; A«T-<4-"*fc OQ PLAN CHECK NUMBER:OWNER'S NAME: \, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may osl employ the special inspector), certify that I, or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special inspectors) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701 1 for the construction project located at trie site listed above, UBC Section 106.3 5. I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as required by U3C Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at the site listed above Signed 1. Lister work requiring special Inspection: B Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection • Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSi D Prestressed Concrete B Structural Masonry Designer Specified U Field Welding High Strength Bolting Expan&ion/Epoxy Anchors Sprfty»d-On Fireproofing Other 2. Nama(a) of individual(a) orfirm(a) responsible for the special inspections listed above: A. B. C. 3. Duties of the special Inspectors for the work fisted above: A. B. C. Speoal inspectors shall check In with the City and present their credentials for approva1 orior.to beginning work on the job site / Carlsbad 01-3840 12/28/01 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO . 01-3840 DATE' 12/28/01PREPARED BY Kal Tumalieh BUILDING ADDRESS 2650 Galicia Way BUILDING OCCUPANCY' R-3/ U-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION VN BUILDING PORTION Dwelling Garage Terrace Deck Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jiinsdiction Code AREA (Sq Ft) 3080 620 345 , 35 cb Bldg Permit Fee by Ordinance ^ Valuation Multiplier City Val By Ordinance Reg Mod VALUE ($) 282,840 ' 282,840 $1,110.20 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review Q Repetitive Fee Repeats Complete Review D Other Hourly Esgil Plan Review Fee Structural Only Hour* $721.63 $621.71 Comments Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue doc City of Carlsbad Public Works Engi neering DATE BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO CB Q)( BUILDING ADDRESS PROJECT DESCRIPTION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal, therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result m suspension of permit to build !U A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements EST VALUE DENIAL Please see ths attached report of deficiencies marked witlVD ft)lake necessary corrections to plans or specifidatietls for compliance with applicable codes and standards Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review Date Date Date By By By; USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO-ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT. /^/jj/)j^ ."..:-'"'" ',' /->' ;,.: " i- ; Date:!' ATTACHMENTS L-J Dedication Application ^ Dedication Checklist ^ Improvement Application ^ Improvement Checklist U Future Improvement Agreement U Grading Permit Application D Grading Submittal Checklist D Right-of-Way Permit Application D Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT CONTACT PERSON Name TAN IYA WADE City of Carlsbad Address 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone (760) 602-2773 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No Lots Recordation Carlsbad Tract D Sewer Fee Information Sheet A-4 aradav Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92OO8-7314 • (76O) 602-272O - FAX (760) 6O2-8562uildlngPlanclfeckCklstBPoool Form JJ doe 4 R6v i»2o«B - Ufa'-/-1 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 1 Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale Show 0"" North Arrow Sr Existing & Proposed Structures ** Existing Street Improvements Property Lines Easements ight-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets Driveway widths Existing or proposed sewer lateral Existing or proposed water service Existing or proposed irrigation service 2 Show on site plan. ' Drainage Patterns 1 Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course 2 ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building " Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project Each unit requires a separate service, however, econd dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception 'Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards 3. Include on title sheet Site address Assessor's Parcel Number Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc ) previously approved EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ST D D D DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No D CH 4b All conditions are in compliance Date DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 5 Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm dram or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $15.000. pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18 40 030. Dedication required as follows Dedication required Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 Y*" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by Date D D IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $75.000. pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 1840040 Public improvements required as follows Attached please find an application form and submittal' checklist for the public improvement requirements A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process The completed application form and the requirements on the H WVORDMXJCSlCHKLSraulMIng Plancheck CMst Form (RIDDLE HARVEY 7 12-00) Ooc . ST pND QRD BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST checklist must be submitted in person Applications by mail or fax are not accepted Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit Improvement Plans signed by Date. 6b Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 1840 Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $310 so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit Future public improvements required as follows CD CD D 6c Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department Future Improvement Agreement completed by Date CD D 6d No Public Improvements required SPECIAL NOTE Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11 06 030 of the Municipal Code D CD 7a Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export) CD CD CD 7b Grading Permit required A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE" The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit Grading Inspector sign off by Date \oA CD CD D 7c Graded Pad Certification required (Note Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required ) H WOHD\DOCS\CHKLST\Bulldlng Planehack Cklftt Form (Generic 7 14-00} doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 7d No Grading Permit required. O D C3 7e If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS D D D 8 A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way Types of work include, but are not limited to street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities Right-of-Way permit required for ^^ D 9 INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Cammo Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008 District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance Industrial Waste permit accepted by Date: D D D 10 NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City .Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first Required fees are attached - Q No fees required WATER METER REVIEW 12a. Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. • All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service H-\WORD\DOCS\CHKLS'nBuiW!ng Planchm* CWst Fotm (Generic) doc 1ST )ND )RD D D 12b BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST • If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm) A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit • Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter • If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street) Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval The developer must provide these calculations Please follow these guidelines 1 If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W" The irrigation service should look like STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 5 meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach) Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference In general the calculations will include • Hydraulic grade line • Elevation at point of connection (POC) • Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) • Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve • Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) • Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA) As long as the project is located within the City recycled water H \WOKD\DOCS\CHKLST\Bufldlno Pfcttchocfc CHst FMTn (Generic).doc " BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST •f ST 2ND 3RD service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future D CH [H 12c irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) 1 Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. 2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water ' Capacity fees However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this D D D 13 Additional Comments: H \WORl3\0OCS\CHKLS~nBullding Pttntteck Cklst Farm (Generic) doc Q ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal Address Prepared by CUP- Bldg Permit No-- Checked by Date EDU CALCULATIONS- List types and square footages for all uses Types of Use J$fr^ Sq Ft/Units [ Types of Use Sq Ft /Units APT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses Types of Use SFP\ Sq Ft/Units I Types of Use Sq Ft/Units EDU's EDU's ADT's ADT's FEES REQUIRED: WITHIN CFD D YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee)NO Q 1 PARK-IN-LIEU FEE FEE/UNIT PARK AREA & # X NO UNITS TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT's/UNITS X FEE/ADT -3 BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST #1 DIST #2 DIST #3 ADTs/UNITS / -U FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE UNIT/SQ FT ( 5 SEWER FEE EDU's BENEFIT AREA EDU's FEE/ADT £J X ZONE X FEE/SO FT/UNIT 610 •B- 6 SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) Q- 7 DRAINAGE FEES PLDA_ ACRES X FEE/EDU FEE/EDU HIGH X FEE/AC /LOW -8 POTABLE WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION F \FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET doc 1 of 2 Rev 7/14/00 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET D 9 RECLAIMED WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES* $ *NOTE. This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits 2 of 2 F \F?E CALCULATION WORKSHEET doc Rev 7/14/00 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB <<?/ ' Planner APN Address Phone (760) 602- Type of Project & Use " Zoning: General Plan: Net Project Density _ Facilities Management Zone- DU/AC CFD fin/nut) Circle One .Date of participation Remaining net dev acres: (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: ) Legend: |/\ Item Complete Environmental Review Required: DATE OF COMPLETION: Item Incomplete - Needs your action YES NO TYPE Compliance with conditions of approval7 If not, state conditions which require action Conditions of Approval Discretionary Action Required: APPROVAL/RESO. NO PROJECT NO. YES NO TYPE DATE OTHER RELATED CASES Compliance with conditions or approval7 If not, state conditions which, require action Conditions of Approval: J-,H Vv. Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone7 YES_ CA Coastal Commission Authority7 YES N0_ NO If California Coastal Commission Authority Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego CA 92108-4402, (61 9) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? \ If NO, comp!ete,Coastal Permit Determination Form now Coastal Permit Determination Log #• ^ . YES NO Follow-Up Actions: 1} Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete1 Coastal" Permit Determination Log as needed H \ADMlN\COUNTER\BldgPinchkRevChklst Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES A NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance • May 21, 1993 ) Data Entry Completed? YES NO .(A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CBff, toolbar, Screens Housing Fees Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE') v % ^ Site Plan: V , , 1 Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale Show North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes) , 2 Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front Interior Side Street Side Rear. Top of slope: 2. Accessory structure Front Interior Side. Street Side Rear Structure separation Required Required Required Required Required setbacks Required Required Required Required Required Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown 3 Lot Coverage:Required Shown 4 Height Required Shown 5 Parking Spaces Required Shown (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown ^Additional /Comments /T^ff^/ f$M _ _T*ii *. A. OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTEF/^. H \ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst DAT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ENGINEERING ! DESIGN GROUP 2121 Montiel Road, San Marcos, California 92069 • (760) 839-7302 • Fax (760) 480-7477 • E-mail ENGDG@aol com PROJECT:BALES RESIDENCE PROJECT ADDRESS: 2650 Galicia Way, Carlsbad, CA DATE: January 10, 2002 JOB No: 012684-2 RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS SHEETS 1 AND 2 WITH ATTACHMENTS V3 AND V4 PREP Moe MougharJ»€l lENG'tNEERING lillDESIGN GROUP Job I I I I I I I I I I• 2121 Montiel Road San Marcos CA -92069 Office (760) 839-7302 FAX (760) 480 7477 E mail ENGDG@aol com Job Address Job No tz By^_ - ?Sheet No Date "U." - \ \ u J1 F - y f- DESIGN GROUP I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2121 Montiel Road San Marcos CA -92069 Office (760) 839-7302 FAX (760) 480-7477 E mail ENGDG@aoi com Job Name Job Job No By — -"L.sheet Date No . _ — . _i_ i V3 21 FOOT JOIST WIH PARTIAL FLAOOR LOAD AND PARTIAL ROOF LOAD AND A POINT LOAD T,Beam~ v5 55 **i HuA 700113000 14" TJI®/PrO™ -550 JOIST @ 8.0" O/C BEAMUSA 1001 1/9/2002 21025PM Page 1 of 1 Build Code 148 THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED I I I I ffl: -21' LOADS Product Diagram is Conceptual Analysis for Joist Member Supporting FLOOR - RES Application Loads(psf) 0 Live at 100% duration, 0 Dead, 5 Partition, and TYPE CLASS LIVE DEAD LOCATION APPLICATION COMMENT Pomt(lbs ) Floor(1 00) 100 250 8'6" Adds to Umform(psf) Floor(1 00) 40 15 0 to 8'6" Adds to Umform(psf) Floor(1 00) 16 24 8' 6" to 21' Adds to I I I I I I I 1 2 2x4 Plate 2x4 Plate Mil \J 1 WIDTH 350" 350" LJ k~ I » 1 M 1 ^ VJ LENGTH 225" 225" 1 M_/-\«_. 1 IWINO\IU3 / LIVE/DEAD/TOT 281 /311 /592 179/294/473 PLY 1 1 DEPTH 140" 140" DETAIL Detail A3 Detail A3 OTHER 1 25" LSL Rim 1 25" LSL Rim - See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDER'S GUIDES for detail(s) A3 DESIGN CONTROLS MAXIMUM DESIGN CONTROL CONTROL Shear(lb) 584 581 2125 Passed{27%) Reaction(lb) 584 584 1539 Passed(38%) Mornent(ft-lb) 3467 3467 9797 Passed(35%) LiveDefl(m) 0119 0515 Passed(L/999+) Total Defl (in) 0 299 1 029 Passed(L/825) LOCATION Lt end Span 1 under Floor loading Bearing 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading - Allowable moment was increased for repetitive member usage - Deflection Criteria STANDARD(LL L7480, TL U240) - Deflection analysis is based on composite action with single layer of the appropriate span-rated, GLUED & NAILED wood decking - Bracmg(Lu) All compression edges {top and bottom) must be braced at 2' 8" o/c unless detailed otherwise Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability ADDITIONAL NOTES - IMPORTANT The analysts presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ) TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate - Not all products are readily available Check with your supplier orTJ technical representative for product availability - THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS - Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Code NER analyzing the TJ Residential product listed above I I I I I I PROJECT INFORMATION No Project Information available OPERATOR INFORMATION ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP STEVEN B NORRIS 2121 MONTIELROAD SAN MARCOS CA 92069 760 839-7302 760 480-7477 Copyright 02000 by Trus Joist o Weyerhdeuser Business Pro'" TJ Pro'" and TJ Beam'" are trademarks of Trus Joisl TJI® is a registered trademark of Trus Joist Id I 15 FOOT FLOOR JOIST ALTERNATE 14" TJI®/Pro™-250 JOIST & 16.01 o/cTJ-Beam™ v5 55 Serial Number 700118000 BEAMUSA 1001 1/9/2002 21614PM Page 1 of 1 Build Code 146 THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED I -15'- I I I I I I I I LOADS Product Diagram is Conceptual Analysis for Joist Member Supporting FLOOR - RES Application Loads(psf) 40 Live at 100% duration, 15 Dead, 5 Partition SUPPORTS 1 2x4 Plate 2 2x4 Plate INPUT WIDTH 350" 350" BEARING LENGTH 225" 225" REACTIONS(lbs ) LIVBDEADTOT 400 / 200 / 600 400 / 200 / 600 PLY 1 1 DEPTH 140" 140" DETAIL Detail A3 Detail A3 OTHER 1 25" LSL Rim 1 25" LSL Rim MAXIMUM Shear(lb) Reaction(lb) Moment(ft-lb) Live Defl (in) Total Defl (in) 583 583 2127 DESIGN CONTROL 577 583 2127 0 120 0180 1710 1171 5418 0365 0729 CONTROL Passed(34%) Passed(50%) Passed(39%) Passed(l_/999+} Passed(L/974) - See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDER'S GUIDES for detail(s) A3 DESIGN CONTROLS LOCATION Lt end Span 1 under Floor loading Bearing 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading - Allowable moment was increased for repetitive member usage - Deflection Criteria STANDARD(LL L/480, TL L/240) - Deflection analysis is based on composite action with single layer of the appropriate span-rated, GLUED & NAILED wood decking - Bracmg(Lu) All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 2' 8" o/c unless detailed otherwise Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability ADDITIONAL NOTES - IMPORTANT' The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ) TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate - Not all products are readily available Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability - THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY' PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS - Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Code NER analyzing the TJ Residential product listed above I I I I I I I PROJECT INFORMATION OPERATOR INFORMATION No Project Information available ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP STEVEN B NORRIS 2121 MONTIELROAD SAN MARCOS, CA 92069 760 839-7302 760 480-7477 Copyright'02000 by Trus Joist a Weyerhaeuser Business Pro'" TJ-ProIU and TJ-Beam™ are trademarks of Trus Joist TJI® is a registered trademark of Trus Joist yvy fct-Ti I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHITCW CIVIL STRUCtUIWSARCHITECTURAL CDNSULTAN15FOHRESIKNTInUCO"MiF!CI L CONSTRUCT 1011 2121 Montiel Road, San Marcos, California 92069 • (760) 839-7302 • Fax (760) 480-7477 • E-mail ENGDG@aol com PROJECT: PROJECT ADDRESS: DATE: ' JOB No.. BALES RESIDENCE Galicia Way Carlsbad, CA December 10,2001 012684-2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM DESIGN DATA SHEET DESIGN LOADS VERTICAL DESIGN BASE SHEAR AND STORY DISTRIBUTION SHEAR SCHEDULE LATERAL DESIGN FOUNDATION DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS SHEET # Gl G2-G3 V1-V7 L1-L2 L3-L4 L5-L9 Fl S1-S4 PRE Mohamad MoueKarbel Project Engines Julie Donar 01' PROJECT JOB No. SHEET- BALES RESIDENCE 012684-2 GI CODE- SEISMIC ZONE. WIND EXPOSURE. SOIL DATA STRUCTURAL DESIGN DATA SHEET 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 4 C, 70 MPH WIND SPEED "PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNIC\L INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BALES RESIDENCE AT GALICIA \V \V, CARLSBAD, C V" PREPARED BY ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP, DATED DECEMBER, 2001 \LLOW4BLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE=2000 PSF MATERIALS STEEL ROLLED SHAPES BOLTS WELDS A36 A307 E70XX, PER AWS Dl 1 SPECIFICATIONS CONCRETE FOUNDATION (STD) FOUNDATION (FRAME) REBAR#5orLESS REBAR#6orLARGER F; = 2.500 PSI F; = 3,000 PSI F, = 40 KSI F, - 60 KSI LUMBER BOARD DIMENSION 2X DIMENSION 4X DIMENSION 6X TIMBERS GLU-LAMS PARALLAMS HARDWARE PLYWOOD D.F.tfl D.F. #1 DF #1 D.F #1 DF #1 24FV8 DF/DF 2 OE WS PSL SIMPSON CD or CC F, - 95PSI F, = 95 PSI F, = 85 PSI F,=165 PSI Fx=290 PSI STRUCT I or II Fb=1000 F.-1000 Fh=1350 Fh=2400 F,=2900 E= 1.7X10" E=l 7X10" E=l 6X10" E=I 8X10" £=20X10" CONCRETE MASONRY UMTS BLOCK GROUT MORTAR Fm^ 1500 PSI Ft = 2000 PSI Ft= 1800 PSI PROJECT. BALES RESIDENCE JOB No: 012684-2 SHEET G2 STRUCTURAL DESIGN LOADS ROOF LOAD ROOFING PLYWOOD FRAMING INSULATION MECH & ELECT CEILING MISC DEAD LOAD ' LIVE LOAD TOTAL TILE Vi" or 5/8" LIGHT WEIGHT WOOD R3SorLESS STANDARD GYPSUM STANDARD SLOPED/ FLAT DEAD -r LIVE 100 20 30 25 05 45 1 5 24.0 160/200 40.0 / 44.0 FLOOR LOAD FLOORING PLYWOOD FRAMING PARTITION MECH & ELECT CEILING MISC DEAD LOAD LIVE LOAD TOTAL CARPET AND PAD 3/4" LIGHT WEIGHT WOOD STANDARD GYPSUM STANDARD RESIDENTIAL DEAD + LIVE 1 5 25 30 25 05 35 I 5 15.0 400 55.0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PROJECT: JOB No: SHEET: BALES RESIDENCE 012684-2 G3 TYPICAL EXTERIOR WALL LOAD EXTERIOR INTERIOR FRAMING INSULATION MISC TOTAL 7/8 INCH STUCCO 5/8" GYPSUM 2X STUDS R 13 STANDARD 80 45 20 1 5 1 0 17.0 IENGINEERINGDESIGN GROUP Job Name 2121 Montiel Road San Marcos CA -92069 Office \7GQ) 839-7302 FAX u60) 480 747-7 E mail ENGDG@aol com Job No By^ J/i Hoc Sheet No — Date _ \I- u?- o\ Rfel < \ -f 3'- 4- X - 5 o / 'S< q: - •ENGINEERING .•niUhMUN UKOUF . . . .. r*iic_.* , ..v /**|Bin i -, uu-ruui,!- .InhAHHrP^Q 6,^1-iCMA. \Jx^ , OV^L. ^^^| j| | | 3-r, ii '*i ' i-CMW-L CKiPlh. >•! ^H"l 1 1 ~1"1 rinnnrl Rnnri Job N^ C1' 2_L7^tH - 2. ShP^T N V Sa'1 Marcos CA -92069 _ ,, _ __ x nff,cp> f7Rn\ Rnq-7inp Ry nov^ Dat^ • FAX (760) 480 7177| Email ENGDG@aotcom " " "'\s^J ~ 'i]J-' f^\ * ^> '~&y -^ 'y '^>o ^J-1-* 'Zt'J'J' i— _J ^^ },^<^^^^^ = ^^.^ lJ ^^^ • /^* — r~\ — 7*^ v/^Uvl ^ x ^ :T •* "" ~ "" l~y ~ I 1 ,. «,.l.o.-.^ ^ 1 1 KL^ / x * QJ _ _— . — _ „ s_ ^ "~"" ' ' ^" ~ ^ -*—.«« * • — ' ^ --» ' -•- - J 1 1 '3~*3<J> 1 t , ,; T-«. vo,--, = ?'y: .-- | ^ | T =. ^3o / 0-J-o / ^= fcTfZ^ - 1 J i ^^ i SSKC? "j \/ Tx' \r-6^-o\ u1 -.• = , ~ » ;/ A - ^- . b ,.- L/ 1 A x »u ^ •= 6t? ln— - * — •* — ' A _ 5v ^" "X i L. x .- «, ^ - I 21 FOOT FLOOR JOIST -,^_— WITH POINT LOAD TJ-Beam™ v555 Serial Number 700118000 BEAMUSA 1001 12/6/2001 42847PM Page 1 of 1 Build Code 146 THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED 14" TJI®/Pro™-550 JOIST & 8.0" o/c i i i i i i i i i i i -21' LOADS Analysis for Joist Member Supporting FLOOR - RES Application T2' Product Diagram is Conceptual Loads(psf) 16 Live at 100% duration 24 Dead, 0 Partition, and TYPE Point(lbs ) Uniform(plf) CLASS Floor(1 00} Floor(1 00) LIVE 0 16 DEAD 393 11 LOCATION 8'6" 0 to 8' 6" APPLICATION Adds to Adds to COMMENT 1 2 2x4 Plate 2x4 Plate Mil •_! 1 WIDTH 350" 350" LJL_ril XH **-* LENGTH 225" 225" i xi_r~vw i iwi i*J \IMO / LIVE/DEADrrOT 221 7478/699 139/345/483 PLY 1 1 DEPTH 140" 140" DETAIL Detail A3 Detail A3 OTHER 1 25" LSL Rim 1 25" LSL Rim - See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDER'S GUIDES for detaii{s} A3 DESIGN CONTROLS MAXIMUM DESIGN CONTROL Shear(lb) 688 683 2125 Reaction(lb) 688 688 1539 Moment(ft-!b} 3859 3859 9797 Live Deft (in) 0081 0515 Total Def! (in) 0 329 1 029 CONTROL Passed(32%) Passed(45%) Passed(39%) Passed(l_/999+) Passed(l_/751) LOCATION Lt end Span 1 under Floor loading Bearing 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading - Allowable moment was increased for repetitive member usage - Deflection Criteria STANDARD(LL L/480, TL L/240) - Deflection analysis is based on composite action with single layer of the appropriate span-rated, GLUED & NAILED wood decking - Bracing(Lit) All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 2' 8" o/c unless detailed otherwise Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability ADDITIONAL NOTES - IMPORTANT' The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ) TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate - Not all products are readily available Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability - THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY' PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS - Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Code NER analyzing the TJ Residential product listed above I I I I I I PROJECT INFORMATION BALES RESIDENCE OPERATOR INFORMATION ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP STEVEN B NORRIS 2121 MONTIELROAD SAN MARCOS, CA 92069 760 839-7302 760 480-7477 Copyright 0 2000 by Trus Joist a Weyerhaeuser Business TJ!® is a registered trademark of Trus Joisl Pro*" TJ-Pro1" and TJ Beam1" are trademarks of Trus Joist I I 15 FOOT FLOOR JOIST T^m" v555 Sena,Number 7001,000 H-875" TJI<D/PrO™-350 JOIST @ 16.0" O/C BEAMUSA 1001 12/6/2001 42451PM Page 1 of 1 Build Code 146 THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED I I I I I I I -15' I21 Product Diagram is Conceptual LOADS Analysis for Joist Member Supporting FLOOR - RES Application Loads(psf) 40 Live at 100% duration, 15 Dead. 20 Partition 1 2 2x4 Plate 2x4 Plate WIDTH 3 50" 350" um~nxu '•vj LENGTH 225" 225" l «-T«^ l IWINO\IUO 1 LIVE/DEAD/TOT 400 / 350 / 750 400 / 350 / 750 PLY 1 1 DEPTH 11 9" 11 9" DETAIL Detail A3 Detail A3 OTHER 1 25" LSL Rim 1 25" LSL Rim Shear(lb) Reaction(lb) Moment(ft-fb) Live Defl (in) Total Defi (in) MAXIMUM 729 729 2658 DESIGN 721 729 2658 0 143 0267 CONTROL 1420 1234 5200 0365 0729 CONTROL Passed(51%) Passed (59%) Passed(51%) Passed(L/999+) PassedfL/654) - See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDER'S GUIDES for detail(s) A3 DESIGN CONTROLS, LOCATION Lt end Span 1 under Floor loading Bearing 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor ioadmg MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading - Allowable moment was increased for repetitive member usage - Deflection Criteria STANDARD(LL L/480, TL L/240) - Deflection analysis is based on composite action with single layer of the appropriate span-rated, GLUED & NAILED wood decking - Bracmg(Lu) All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 2' 8" o/c unless detailed otherwise Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability ADDITIONAL NOTES, - IMPORTANT' The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ) TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate - Not alt products are readily available Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability - THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY' PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS - Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Code NER analyzing the TJ Residential product listed above I I I I PROJECT INFORMATION BALES RESIDENCE OPERATOR INFORMATION ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP STEVEN B NORRIS 2121 MONTiEL ROAD SAN MARCOS, CA 92069 760 839-7302 760 480-7477 Copyright 9 2000 by Trus Joist a Weyerhaeuser Business TJI® is a registered trademark of Trus Joist Pro™ TJ-Pro™ and TJ-Seam™ are trademarks of Trus Joist ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP Job Name I I I I I I I I 2121 Montiel Road "V San Marcos CA 92069 Office (760) 839 7302 FAX (760) 480-7477 E mnil ENGDG@aol com Job Address. Job No - 2. By riot -Sheet No -Date 17,-to-Qt fa 1 ftf1 x. £> W -^ A P. i i i 2_- 521 5 < "93 A x IENGINEERING••^-T^rVMV r,~iV .JnhNamfl Sft,L.6<, \<£<**V£^£•HIDES ION OkUU? .. ... . fcll/ . tl.v ri-••fin - n lnh Adrirpsq ^^ul^iA uJ*V ( CA^u ^^^K| | | .' ,i.L' HII liLuM .R-.-UMWiKMi,! ___ •^11 | | •>.-, n-nti-i I-JQ-!-] .lnh Nn 6l7_L?fe^ - Z- s^oa( M X, San Marcos CA 92069 _ - _ntfirp i7fini nriQ-77np Ry rioi^ n^tA (FAX (760) 480 7477 E mail ENGDG@aol com I r ' , ^ ''' ^ 'i ^-' ^ I "^^- ^- / 6 •• ^ t^ij» v i <-o , 5 ~ /-. . , 3 — f SL- 1^ 'si 1 | L_ ^/ **^ >* * •^'^ J^2 f / / S" ^^S^r~ -' I J -~ t -s s ^ ! i_^, j. <r — f^\ ( ~, ^ f ,^r- ^ \ \ \ F^ I \^) =- ^^i^s^"?4' 2 ^/-7 - ^ 3 •"} ^ -^ ^f j o\s — > — / / _>',--/ -^_ ^ / y L**"-* '-' ^- - 1 ' "'2- --/i"1'- 1 ^ • - - f\ - //>',':< ^1") ' '>• "• ^ 73 < ^7 /* — 1 " 1^7 ' ^ '/-'y - LvC-'^ t^'^? /?/ ' /- • 7- ^ x f o^-^ i 1 h ! .---j" - - <>i3Ax7 . n V(^ l^-fa-01 — _ _ .^— U ^f -=- 3 „ 9 3 , -T /^ - jjT s. - 2*^-> ") ^-w -_ X ^^ ^^.n_ ^ ^/-z, V^ - tNGINEERING DESIGN GROUP I I I I I uvtL i'3ifC*N°..i t jioiU 2121 Montiel Road San Marcos CA -92069 Office (760) 839 7302 FAX [760) -180-7477 E mail ENGOG@ao) com Job Name Job Address. No By L>-- 55 ft, -_ I I I I I f b^ K t -. -£.", A - _r -- v i.' I PROJECT NAME: BALES RESIDENCE DATE: \ 1- (*- Q\ _ JOB NUMBER: 012684-2 SHEET: LI | BASE SHEAR DESIGN The subject design shall be in conformance with the 1997 Uniform Building Code, Section • 163021 Since no soils report is available, the following data is assumed • Soil profile ~ Sd , hence Ca = 0 44 Na | Z = 04 . Cv = 0 64 Nv Seismic source type = B I Closest Distance to known seismic source < 9 5 km, hence Nv =1 2 • R = 4 5 bearing wall system R = 2 2 for flagpoles V= 2 5 Ca I W = 2 5 x (0 44 x 1 0) x 1 0 x W = 0 244 W • R 45 Base Shear = 0.244W (bearing wall system) Shear on a flagpole element shall be multiplied by the factor = Fi = 4.5/2.2 = 2i i i i i i i feNGINEERING I Mr"Si;> II I lUM M V it "iH1 u<i»i 2121 Montiel Road San Marcos CA -92069 Office (760) 839 7302 FAX (760) 480 7477 Email ENGDG@aolcom Job Name Job Address Job No By Tloe .Sheet No -Date r /v i i i i i i i i i i ' (i/. - ,— / <-• / - PROJECT: BALES RESIDENCE JOB No: 012684-2 SHEET SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE MARK 12 J2 J3 K3 L3 P3 Q3 R MATERIAL 3/8 PLY STRI 3/8 PLY STRI 3/8 PLY STRI 3/8 PLY STRI 3/8 PLY STRI 72 PLY STRI '/a PLY STRI STUCCO Note 9 EDGE NAILING 8d @ 6" o c 3d @ 4" o c 8d @ 4" 0 C 8d @ 3" 0 C 3d @ 2" 0 C Note 1 10d@3" 0 C Note 1 10d@2" 0 C Note 1 Note 10 INTERMEDIATE NAILING STUDS (5) 24"*t££ *~ l 8d @ 6" o c 8d @ 6" 0 C 8d @ 6" 0 C 3d @ 6" 0 C 3d @ 6" oc 3d @ 6" o c 3d @ 6" 0 C Note 10 STUDS @ 16" OR < 8d@ 12" 0 C 8d@ 12" o c 8d@ 12" 0 C 8d@ 12" 0 C 8d@ 12" 0 C 8d@ 12" o c 8d@ 12" 0 C Note 10 SHEAR PLF * increased when studs are 16"O c or panels are applied with long dimensions cross studs 230 280* 350 360 430* 460 550* 610 730* 665 870 90 SHEAR TRANSFER NAIL, SILL NAILING 16d @ 6" o c A35 @ 24 0 C Note 3 16d @ 4" 0 C A35@ 12 0 C Note 3 16d@4" o c A35@ 12 0 C Note 3 16d@3" A35@ 10" Note 3 16d@2" A35 @ 8" Note 4, Note 5 16d@ 2" A35 @ 6" Note 4, Note 5 16d@ 1 5" A35 @ 4" Note 4, Note 5 16d@8" Note 2 AB SPACING (Note 6) 5/8DIA® 32" o c 2x sill 5/8 DIA @ 16"oc 5/8 DIA @ 16" oc Note 7 5/8 DIA @ 1 6" o c Note 7 5/8 DIA @ 12" oc Note 7 5/8 DIA @ 12" oc Note 7 5/8 DIA @ 8"oc Note7 5/8 DIA @ 48" o c I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PROJECT: JOB No- 0\T_u»<2?M-?_ SHEET: 1 EDGE AND BOUNDARY NAILING ARE REQUIRED TO BE IN MINIMUM 3" SILL BLK AND POST STAGGER NAILS OR PRE-DRILL TO PREVENT SPLITTING 2 TOE NAILING 3 SHEAR TRANSFER BLK 2x4 MINIMUM 4 PRE-DRILL NAIL HOLES 5 SEE SHEAR TRANSFER DETAILS 6 BEARING BASED ON A #2 D F SILL PLATE, REDUCE SPACING 20% FOR HEM-FIR PLATES ALL ANCHOR BOLTS MINIMUM 10" IN LENGTH 7 3X SILL PLATES 8 I C B O APPROVED POWDER-ACTUATED FASTENERS 9 EXPANDED METAL OR WOVEN WIRE LATH AND PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER 10 NO 11 GAUGE, 1 5" LONG 7/16" HEAD AT 6" O C OR NO 16 GAUGE, STABLES 7/8" LEGS AT 6" O C APPLIES TO NAILING AT ALL STUDS, TOP AND BOTTOM PLATES AND BLOCKING I I I I I ENGINEERINGDESIGN GROUP I I I I I I 2121 Montiel Road "X San Marcos CA -92069 Office (760) 839 ?302 FAX (760)480 74/7 E mail ENGDG@aol com ,5 JobAddress- Job No — By x ^ y y x z-,*•'' -.'''SJ < ^ 1 1 s 'V f ^ sz. . * •ENGINEERINGDESIGN GROUP Job Name I I I I I I I I i2i Montiel Road San Marcos CA -92069 Office (760) 839 7302 FAX (760) 480-7477 E-mail ENGDG@aol com Job Address. Job No By HOG. .Sheet No .Date > i i i i i i i - >,- ) / ' i-/ IENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP 2121 Montiel Road San Marcos CA -92069 Office (760) 839 7302 FAX (760) 480-747.7 E mail ENGDG@aol com Job Name Job Job No By U7 _( x. L / i • - 1 • 1 •tit HoVo o-\°l v n n •ENGINEERINGDESIGN GROUP Job Name i i i i i i 2121 Montis! Road San Marcos CA -92069 Office (760} 839-7302 FAX (760) 480 747.7 E-mail ENGDG@aol com Job Address. Job No By .Sheet No _Date. oT x on ' ^~> > I I I I M f. (!/rf[ 33 U(^ --P = 50* IENGINEERING fll I »m I I I I JobName 2121 Mcntiel Road San Marcos CA 92069 Officp (760) 839 7302 FAX (760) 430-7477 E-mnil ENGDG@nol com Job Address. Job No .Sheet No By rloe .Date. : 1 PH& ^ • iii r1OT. YL.L A z&o o "I. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2121 Montiel RoadSan Marcos CA -920b9 Office (760) 839 7302 FAX (760) 480 747.7 E mail ENGDG@aol com Job Name Job Address Job No By Sheet No Date VJ , —V Q 9 ioco 0 itooc ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP Job Address, 2121 Montiel Road San Marcos CA 92069 Office (760) 839-7302 FAX (760) 480 7477 E mail ENGDG@ao! com Job No By •ENGINEERINGDESIGN GROUP Job Name i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i 2121 Monttel Road "V San Marcos CA -92069 Office (760) 839 7302 FAX (760) 480-7477 E-mail ENGDG@aol com Job Address. Job No ___ By -Sheet No -Date 7-X-7 PROJECT NAME BALES RESIDENCE JOB NUMBER 012684-2 PAGE SI GENERAL 1 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS BEFORE STARTING WORK, AND NOTIFY THE DESIGNER/ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND 2 SPECIFIC NOTES AND DETAILS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THESE GENERAL NOTES AND THE TYPICAL DETAILS ON THIS SHEET IN CASE OF CONFLICT 3 WHERE NO CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ARE SHOWN OR NOTED FOR ANY PART OF THE WORK, THE DETAILS USED SHALL BE THE SAME AS FOR OTHER SIMILAR WORK 4 THE DESIGN IS BASED ON THE 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE AND THE LOCAL BUILDING CODE 5 NEITHERTHE OWNER NOR THE DESIGNER/ENGINEER WILL ENFORCE SAFETY MEASURES OR REGULATIONS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN, CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN ALL SAFETY DEVICES, INCLUDING SHORING AND BRACING, AND SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFORMING TO ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS, LAWS, AND REGULATIONS FOUNDATION 1 FOUNDATION DESIGN WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED BALES RESIDENCE AT GALICIA WAY, CARLSBAD, CA" PREPARED BY ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP, DATED DECEMBER, 2001 ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE 2000 PSF 2 IF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR SUSPECTS EXPANSIVE SOILS BASED ON OBSERVATION OF THE FOUNDATION EXCAVATION, HE/SHE MAY REQUIRE SOIL EXPANSION INDEX TESTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH U B C STD 29-2 OR CHAPTER 6, DIV 7, TITLE 8 OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE AND RESUBMITTAL OF PLANS TO PLAN CHECK TO VERIFY THAT THE SOIL ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED 3 FINISH GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING WITH A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 2% FOR AT LEAST 5'-0" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PROJECT NAME BALES RESIDENCE JOB NUMBER 012684-2 PAGE S2 4 HOLDOWNS SHALL BE TIED IN PLACE PRIOR TO CALLING FOR FOUNDATION INSPECTION 5 PROVIDE MINIMUM FOUNDATION PER TABLE 29A OF THE 97 U B C FOR STUD BEARING WALLS, UNO CONCRETE 1 CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH IN 28 DAYS OF 2,500 PSI, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF FOOTINGS SUPPORTING MOMENT RESISTING STEEL FRAMES WHICH SHALL HAVE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH IN 28 DAYS OF 3,000 PSI SPECIAL INSPECTION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTHS IN EXCESS OF 2500 PSI 2 REINFORCING SHALL COMPLY WITH ASTM A615, GRADE 60 FOR #6 AND LARGER, OTHERWISE GRADE 40 3 NO PIPES OR DUCTS SHALL BE PLACED IN CONCRETE COLUMNS, WALLS, OR SLABS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY DETAILED 4 REINFORCING DETAILING SHALL CONFORM TO THE ACI 318-89 AND THE CONCRETE REINFORCING STEEL INSTITUTE ''MANUAL OF STANDARD PRACTICE", LATEST EDITION 5 REINFORCING, ANCHOR BOLTS AND ALL OTHER EMBEDDED ITEMS SHALL BE SECURELY HELD IN POSITION PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE 6 WALLS AND COLUMNS SHALL BE DOWELED FROM SUPPORTS WITH BARS OF THE SAME SIZE AND SPACING 7 SPLICE CONTINUOUS REINFORCING WITH 30 DIAMETER OF 2'-0' MINIMUM LAP 8 TYPICAL CONCRETE COVERAGE OF REINFORCING CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH 3" EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER LARGER THAN #5 2" #5 AND SMALLER 1 1/2" UNEXPOSED- COLUMNS, BEAMS, AND GIRDERS 1 1/2" SLABS AND JOISTS 3/4" 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 PROJECT NAME BALES RESIDENCE JOB NUMBER 012684-2 TIMBER PAGE S3 I ALL FRAMING LUMBER SHALL BE DOUGLAS FIR/LARCH AND SHALL BE GRADE MARKED AS FOLLOWS STUDS AND LIGHT FRAMING "CONSTRUCTION" JOIST AND RAFTERS "NO 2" POSTS, BEAMS, AND PLANKS'1 NO 1" 2X4 STUDS OVER 10' HIGH "NO I" OR "STUD" 2 ALL PLYWOOD SHALL BE DOUGLAS FIR CONFORMING TO PS-l-83 WITH EXTERIOR GLUE EXCEPT WHERE PERMANENTLY EXPOSED GRADE USE EXTERIOR 3 SILL PLATES ON CONCRETE SHALL BE DOUGLAS FIR, PRESSURE TREATED I • 1 • I^B I I i i I• 1 i WITH 5/8" X 10" ANCHOR BOLTS AT 6'-O" MAXIMUM ALL 3x 5/8" X 12" ANCHOR BOLTS, SPACING PER SHEAR SCHEDULE 4 TOP PLATES OF ALL STUD WALLS SHALL BE DOUBLED, SAME LAP PLATES 4'-0" MINIMUM WITH AT LEAST 6-16D NAILS + 12" EACH SIDE 5 SOLID BLOCK STUDS AT lO'-O" VERTICAL INTERVALS SILLS REQUIRE SIZE AS STUDS MAXIMUM O C 6 PLACE 2X SOLID BLOCKJNG BETWEEN ALL ROOF JOISTS AND RAFTERS AT SUPPORTS 7 CROSS BRIDGE OR SOLID BLOCK BETWEEN ROOF JOISTS AND 10 INCHES DEEP AT CENTER OF SPAN RAFTERS OVER 8 BOLTS SHALL HAVE 7 DIAMETER MINIMUM END DISTANCE AND 4 DIAMETER MINIMUM EDGE DISTANCE 9 ALL BOLTS SHALL BE FITTED WITH WASHERS HOLES IN WOOD SHALL BE BORED WITH A BIT 1/32" TO 1/16" LARGER THAN THE BOLT 1 0 STEEL FRAMING CONNECTORS SHALL BE MANUFACTURED BY THE SIMPSON STRONG-TIE COMPANY UNLESS ALTERNATE CONNECTORS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SUBJECTEDTO CONDITIONS OF EXCESSIVE MOISTURE SHALL GALVANIZED CONNECTORS BE HOT-DIPPED I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PROJECT NAME BALES RESIDENCE JOB NUMBER 012684-2 PAGE S4 11 GLUE LAM BEAMS SHALL BE DOUGLAS FIR/LARCH COMBINATION 24FV8 INDUSTRIAL APPEARANCE UNLESS NOTED, MANUFACTURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LATEST EDITION OF THE A I T C SPECIFICATIONS MANUAL 12 AN A I T C CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ERECTION OF GLUE LAM BEAMS SUBMIT COPIES OF THE CERTIFICATE WITH ATTACHMENTS TO THE DESIGNER/ENGINEER 13 NAILING AT TOP AND BOTTOM PLATES, STUDS, AND BLOCKING SHALL BE PER TABLES 25M1, M2, Nl, N2, O, P, V AND 471 OF THE 97 U B C . UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLANS 14 PRE-ENGINEERED ROOF AND FLOOR TRUSSES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE DESIGN REQUIREMENT OF THE 97 UBC, AND THE DESIGN LOAD REQUIREMENTS AS SET IN THE ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS A COPY OF THE PROJECT DESIGN LOADS SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE DESIGNER/ENGINEER TO THE TRUSS MANUFACTURER WHEN THE TRUSS ORDER IS PLACED / , 8tfe0-2002 9 57AM FROM P 1 Engineering Design Group 2121 Montiei Road, San Marcos, California 92069 JHONE; (760^ 839-7302 FAX: (760) 480-7477 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION s> TOTAL PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET; c>C Comments; P DATE: COMPANY: ATTENTION: PROJECT NAME: FAX NUMBER: SENT BY: \\Mam\fila\Fonns\9 FRM\MASTER FAX TRANSMITTAL - A-7-00 Wpd 8*30-20132 9 58AM FROM P 2 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP i [OltrilA -U t\ ; * i 1 K«. t4M.»'tt tl**l »>Hl •"'' 'WHLjIttlM 1 tl 1 "1- "1 V »*l(lij« I i*l 2121 Moniief Road San Marcos CA -92069 FAX (760) -ISO 7477E-mflut ENGDG@aol co^ Jnh AHHrp<;«; Irth M<^ B.. M — I**-*- *-- — — ' •• ' — • — ShPPt No 1 ^^ * k^e, n^- SU^/C^T- I ENGINEERING ••DESIGN GROUP 2121 Montiel Road, San Marcos, California 92069 • (760) 839-7302 • Fax (760) 480-7477 • E-mail ENGDG@aol com I I (LIMITED GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED NEW BALES DEVELOPMENT, TO BE LOCATED ON LOT 84, A.P.N. 216-180-2400, GALICIA WAY m CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA i i • EDG Project No 012684-1 i i — November 6, 2001 i i I PREPARED FOR: I Mr. James Bales 1807 Lodgepole Road San Marcos, CA 92069i i 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION FIELD INVESTIGATION SUBSOIL CONDITIONS GROUND WATER LIQUEFACTION CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL EARTHWORK FOUNDATIONS CONCRETE SLABS ON GRADE RETAINING WALLS SURFACE DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND TESTING MISCELLANEOUS FIGURES Site Vicinity Map Site Location Map Location of Exploratory Trenches Logs of Exploratory Test Pits APPENDICES References General Earthwork and Grading Specifications Page 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 6 9 11 12 13 13 Figure No 1 Figure No 2 Figure No 3 Figures No 4-6 Appendix A Appendix B I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SCOPE This report gives the results of our geotechnical investigation for the property located on Lot 84, A P N 216-180- 2400 on Galicia Way in the City of Carlsbad, California (See Figure No 1, "Site Vicinity Map", and Figure No 2, "Site Location Map") The scope of our work, conducted on-site to date, has included a visual reconnaissance of the property and neighboring properties, a limited subsurface investigation of the property, field analysis and preparation of this report presenting our findings, conclusions, and recommendations SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION For the purposes of this report it is assumed that the property faces west The subject property consists of a previously graded pad in the La Costa Community of the City of Carlsbad The site is bordered to the north and south by custom developed residences, to the east by descending slope onto La Costa Avenue, and to the west by Galicia Way The overall topography of the site area consists of hillside terrain The lot consists of a relatively flat previously graded building pad, flanked by 2 1 fill slope It is our understanding the pad was previously graded as part of the tract development Although the grading operations were reportedly conducted under the observation of an engineer, we understand quality control reports and pad certifications are not available Based upon our conversations with the project owner, it is our understanding that the proposed new improvements will consist of the following >* Design and construction of a new two story single family residence, founded on slab on grade floors FIELD INVESTIGATION Our field investigation of the property, conducted October 30,2001, consisted of a site reconnaissance, site field measurements, observation of existing conditions on-site and on adjacent sites, and a limited subsurface investigation of soil conditions Our subsurface investigation consisted of visual observation of three small diameter borings, logging of soil types encountered, and sampling of soils for laboratory testing The locations of the borings are given in Figure No 3, "Location of Exploratory Borings" Logs of the exploratory borings are presented in Figures No 4-6, "Boring Logs" SUBSOIL CONDITIONS Materials consisting of fill underlain by siltstone were encountered during our subsurface investigation of the site Soil types within our boring excavations are described as follows BALES DEVELOPMENT Page Mo 1 LOT 34 APN 216 1802-100 GALICIA WAY CALIFORNIA JooNo 012684 1 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GCOTEChNICnL CIVIL STRUCTURAL 4 ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Fill. Fill materials were found to extend to depths ranging between 0-13 feet below adjacent grade in the area of the proposed residence and attached garage Fill materials consist of light brown, slightly moist to dry, dense, silty sand Due to the uncertified nature of the fill, they are considered suitable for the support of structural or cosmetically sensitive improvements, but materials may be used as re-compacted fill if the grading option is utilized. Fill materials classify as SM according to the Unified Classification System, and based on visual observation and our experience, possess expansion potentials in the low- medium range Sandstone-Siltstone Fine gram sandstone-siltstone materials were found to underlie the fill profiles within the bonng excavations For/national materials consisted of grey brown, moist, dense, slightly sandy sandstone-siltstone Formational materials are considered suitable for the support of structures and structural improvements, provided the recommendations of this report are followed. Formational materials classify as SM-ML according to the Unified Classification System, and based on visual observation and ourexperience, possess expansion potentials in the low-medium range For detailed logs of soil types encountered in our trench excavations, as well as a depiction of our trench locations, please see Figure No 3, "Location of Exploratory Borings", and Figures No 4-6, "Boring Logs" GROUND WATER Ground water was not encountered during our subsurface investigation of the site Ground water is not anticipated to be a significant concern to the project provided the recommendations of this report are followed LIQUEFACTION It is our opinion that the site could be subjected to moderate to severe ground shaking in the event of a major earthquake along any of the faults in the Southern California region However, the seismic risk at this site is not significantly greater than that of the surrounding developed area Liquefaction of cohesionless soils can be caused by strong vibratory motion due to earthquakes Research and historical data indicate that loose, granular soils underlain by a near-surface ground water table are most BALES DEVELOPMENT Page No 2 LOT 84 A P N 2(6 180 2400 GALIClA WAV CALIFORNIA Job No 012684 ! ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHMICAL CIVIL STRUCTURAL <!. ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I susceptible to liquefaction, while the stability of most silty clays and clays is not adversely affected by vibratory motion Because of the dense nature of the soil materials underlying the site and the lack of near surface water, the potential for liquefaction or seismically-mduced dynamic settlement at the site is considered low The effects of seismic shaking can be reduced by adhering to the most recent edition of the Uniform Building Code and current design parameters of the Structural Engineers Association of California BALES DEVELOPMENT Pa9e No 3 LOT 34 ,APN 216-180-2400 GALICIA WAY, CALIFORNIA Job No 012684-1 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNIOL CIVIL STRUCTURAL '. ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL In general, it is our opinion that the proposed construction, as described herein, is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, provided that the recommendations of this report and generally accepted construction practices are followed Two options are presented herein for the mitigation of unsuitable fill soils in the area of the proposed residence Mitigative grading (if chosen) may be conducted in accordance with Option 1 described below It is anticipated that due to the limited working area mitigative grading & associated shoring may prove to be costly In lieu of grading under Option 1, footings may be founded through the fill into competent formationat material (deepened foundation) with a structural building slab - Option 2 The following recommendations should be considered as minimum design parameters, and shall be incorporated within the project plans and utilized during construction, as applicable Recommendations for pools are beyond the scope of this report Where pools are to be considered design recommendations should be reviewed by Engineering Design Group OPTION 1 EARTHWORK In areas of structural or cosmetically sensitive improvement, fill soil found to mantle the site will require removal and recompaction Based upon ourfield investigation, as a minimum, required removals should extend through loose profiles, anticipated being approximately 13 feet deep in the area of the proposed improvements All grading should be done in accordance with applicable details of Appendix B Removals should extend to a minimum distance of 5 feet outside the footprint of the proposed structure (where possible), or at a 45-degree angle projected from the bottom of building footings (11 + feet), whichever is greater Where removals cannot be made as described above, the non-conforming condition should be brought to the attention of the Engineering Design Group in writing so modified recommendations may be provided 1 Site Preparation Prior to any grading, areas of proposed improvement should be cleared of surface and subsurface organic debris (including topsoil) Removed debris should be properly disposed BALES DEVELOPMENT Page No 4 LOT 34 A P N 216 180 2400 GALICIA WAY CALIFORNIA Job No 012634 T ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL CIVIL STRUCTURAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONSUL UMTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I of off-site prior to the commencement of any fill operations Holes resulting from the removal of debns, existing structures, or other improvements which extend below the undercut depths noted, should be filled and compacted using on-site material or a non- expansive import material 2 Removals Fill soils found to mantle the site in our exploratory borings (i e , upper approximately 13 feet where the building pad), are not suitable for the structural support of buildings or improvements in their present state, and will require removal and re-compaction in areas of proposed slab on grade floors or other settlement sensitive locations In general, grading should consist of the removal of the fill to competent subgrade materials, scarification of subgrade to a depth of 12 inches, and the re-compaction of fill materials to 90 percent minimum relative compaction Excavated fill materials are suitable for re-use as fill material during grading, provided they are cleaned of debris and oversize material in excess of 6 inches in diameter (oversized material is not anticipated to be of significant concern) and are free of contamination Improvements should be constructed on a uniform building pad Where a cut/fill transition occurs, the cut portions oOf the pad should be undercut to a minimum of 3 feet, creating a uniform fill mat Removals and undercuts should extend a minimum of 5 feet (or to a distance at least equal to depth of fill removals, whichever is greater) beyond the footprint of the proposed structures and settlement sensitive improvements Where this condition cannot be met, it should be reviewed by the Engineering Design Group on a case by case basis Removal depths should be visually verified by a representative of our firm prior to the placement of the fill. 3. Fills Areas to receive fill and/or structural improvements should be scarified to a minimum depth of 12 inches, brought to near optimum moisture content, and re-compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM 01557-91) Compacted fills should be cleaned of loose debris, oversize material in excess of 6 inches in diameter, b) ought to near optimum moisture content, and re-compacted to at least 90% relative compaction (based on ASTM D1557-91) Surficial, loose or soft soils exposed or encountered during grading (such as any undocumented or loose fill materials) should be removed to competent formational material and properly compacted prior to additional fill placement Fills should generally be placed in lifts not exceeding 8 inches m thickness If the import of soil is planned, soils should be non-expansive and free of debris and organic matter Prior BALES DEVELOPMENT ~ ' Page No 5 LOT 34 A P N 216 180 2400 GALICIA WAY CALIFORNIA Job No 012684 1 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GbQ TECHNICAL CIVIL STRUCTURAL -4 ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS to importing, soils should be visually observed, sampled and tested at the borrow pit area to evaluate soil suitability as fill i i i i i i i i i i i i FOUNDATIONS-Ootion 1 Under Option 1, uncertified fill material in the area of structural improvement will be removed and replaced resulting in a certified pad Foundation design for this option should be as follows 1 Footings bearing in compacted fill, may be designed utilizing maximum allowable soils pressure of 2,000 psf 2 Seismic Design Parameters Seismic Zone Factor Soil Profile Type (Table 1 6- J) Near Source Distance (Distance to Closest Active Fault Seismic Source Type (Table 16-U) 4 sd 24km Elsmore D Bearing values may be increased by 33% when considering wind, seismic, or other short duration loadings The following parameters should be used as a minimum, for designing footing width and depth below lowest adjacent grades No of Floors Supported 1 2 3 Minimum Footing Width 15 inches 15 inches 18 inches 'Minimum Footing Depth Below Lowest Adjacent Grade 18 inches 18 inches 24 inches BALES DEVELOPMENT LOT 84 APN 2161802400 GALICIAWAY CALIFORNIA Page No 6 Job No 012684 1 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP I 'Please note minimum footing depths are based upon performing mitigative grading (Option _ 1), in the area of proposed improvements If mitigative grading is not, performed footings may be deeper I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I All footings should be reinforced with a minimum of two #4 bars at the top and two #4 bars at the bottom (3 inches above the ground) Aft fsolated spread footings should be designed utilizing the above given bearing values and footing depths, and be reinforced with a minimum of #4 bars at 12 inches o c in each direction (3 inches above the ground) Isolated spread footings should have a minimum width of 24 inches For footings adjacent to slopes, a minimum 15 feet horizontal setback in a formational material or properly compacted fill should be maintained A setback measurement should be taken at the horizontal distance from the bottom of the footing to slope daylight Where this condition cannot be met, it should be brought to the attention of the Engineering Design Group for review All excavations should be performed in general accordance with the contents of this report, applicable codes, OSHA requirements and applicable city and/or county standards All foundation subgrade soils and footings shall be pre-moistened a minimum of 18 inches in depth prior to the pouring of concrete OPTION 2 EARTHWORK In the areas of non structural, non cosmetically sensitive improvement, we recommend a deep ripping and moisture conditioning of pad soils to a depth of 24 inches Ripped materials should be re-compacted to 90 percent minimum relative compaction FOUNDATIONS Based upon our visual observations, the quality of the fill (within our test pits) generally appeared good However given the lack of written certification, it is our recommendation the fill not be utilized for structural support of structural improvements Where building foundations and other structural loads are proposed, we recommend deepened foundations with structural slabs be utilized m lieu of regradmg BALES DEVELOPMENT Page No 7 LOT 34 APN 216-180-2400 GALICIA WAY CALIFORNIA Job No 012684-1 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL CIVIL STRUCTURAL J, ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS Footings shall be excavated to a minimum embedment depth of 6 inches into competent siltstone material For footings up to 30 inches deep, the below noted recommendations apply For depths extending below 30 inches, an unremforced slurry footing (3 feet wide - 2,500 psi concrete) should be utilized to fill deep footings to a depth of 18 inches below grade (1st pour) Subsequently (after curing), a conventional footing per the below noted recommendations may be utilized (2nd pour) We anticipate the deepened slurry footing will be required on approximately 20 to 40 percent of the foundation system The structural detailing of the slurry footing should be reviewed by our office prior to plan check submittal Footings bearing on slurry mix, excavated a minimum of 6 inches into competent formational material, may be designed utilizing maximum allowable soils pressure of 1,500 psf Seismic Design Parameters Seismic Zone Factor Soil Profile Type (Table 16-J) Near Source Distance (Distance to Closest Active Fault Seismic Source Type (Table 16-U) 4 sd 95km Rose Canyon D Bearing values may be increased by 33% when considering wind, seismic, or other short duration loadings The following parameters should be used as a minimum, for designing footing width and depth below lowest adjacent grades No of Floors Supported 1 2 3 Minimum Footing Width 15 inches 15 inches 18 inches *Mimmum Footing Depth Below Lowest Adjacent Grade 18 inches 18 inches 24 inches BALES DEVELOPMENT LOT 84 , A P N 216 180 2400 GALICIA WAY CALIFORNIA Page No 3 Job No 012684-1 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I * Please note minimum footing depths are based upon backfilling excavations to competent formational materials with 2,500 psi concrete slurry mix (Option 2), in the area of proposed improvements 5 All footings should be reinforced with a minimum of two #4 bars at the top and two #4 bars at the bottom (3 inches above the ground) For footings more than 30 inches in depth, additional reinforcement, and possibly a stemwall system will be necessary This detail should be reviewed on a case by case basis by our office prior to construction 6 All isolated spread footings should be designed utilizing the above given bearing values and footing depths, and be reinforced with a minimum of #4 bars at 12 inches o c in each direction (3 inches above the ground) Isolated spread footings should have a minimum width of 24 inches 7 For footings adjacent to slopes, a minimum 15 feet horizontal setback (not including slurry footing) in a formational material or properly compacted fill should be maintained A setback measurement should be taken at the horizontal distance from the bottom of the footing to slope daylight Where this condition cannot be met, it should be brought to the attention of the Engineering Desiqn Group for review 8 All excavations should be performed in general accordance with the contents of this report, applicable codes, OSHA requirements and applicable city and/or county standards 9 All foundation subgrade soils and footings shall be pre-moistened a minimum of 18 inches in depth prior to the pouring of concrete GENERAL CONCRETE SLABS ON GRADE The following design values are provided for a slab on grade floors, garage and general flatwork under Option 1 Under Option 2, the interior building slab system should be designed as a structural slab by the project structural engineer, the garage slab (isolated in garage stem) and flatwork may utilize the below noted recommendations 1 Concrete slabs on grade of the building should have a minimum thickness of 4 inches (5 inches at garage and driveway locations) and should be reinforced with #3 bars at 18 inches o c placed at the midpoint of the slab Ail concrete shall be poured per the following BALES DEVELOPMENT Page No 9 LOT 34 APN 216 1802400 GALICIA WAY CALIFORNIA Job No 012684-1 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL CIVIL STRUCTURAL 1 «RCHITECTUPAL CONSULTANTS • Slump Between 3 and 4 inches maximum • Aggregate Size 3/4 -1 inch • Air Content 5 to 8 percent • Moisture retarding additive in concrete at moisture sensitive areas • Water to cement Ratio - 0 5 maximum All required fills used to support slabs, should be placed in accordance with the grading section of this report and the attached Appendix B, and compacted to 90 percent Modified Proctor Density, ASTM D-1557 Where remedial grading is not performed in areas of settlement sensitive improvements a structural slab should be designed by the structural engineering consultant A uniform layer of 4 inches of clean sand is recommended under the slab in order to more uniformly support the slab, help distribute loads to the soils beneath the slab, and act as a capillary break In moisture sensitive areas, a visqueen layer (10 mil) should be placed mid-height in the sand bed to act as a vapor retarder Adequate control pints should be installed to control the unavoidable cracking of concrete that takes place when undergoing its natural shrinkage during curing The control joints should be well located to direct unavoidable slab cracking to areas that are desirable by the designer All subgrade soils to receive concrete flatwork are to be presoaked to 2 percent over optimum moisture content to a depth of 18 inches Brittle floor finishes placed directly on slab on grade floors may crack if concrete is not adequately cured prior to installing the finish or if there is minor slab movement To minimize potential damage to movement sensitive flooring, we recommend the use of slip sheeting techniques (linoleum type) which allows for foundation and slab movement without transmitting this movement to the floor finishes Exterior concrete flatwork and driveway slabs, due to the nature of concrete hydration and minor subgrade soil movement, are subject to normal minor concrete cracking To minimize expected concrete cracking, the following may be implemented • Concrete slump should not exceed 4 inches • Concrete should be poured during "cool" (40 - 65 degrees) weather if possible if concrete is poured m hotter weather, a set retarding additive should be included in the mix, and the slump 3ALES DEVELOPMENT Page No 10 LOT 84 A P M 216 180 2400 GAUCIA WAY CALIFORNIA Job No 012684 1 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL CML STRUCTURAL S ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS kept to a minimum Concrete subgrade should be presoaked prior to the pouring of concrete The level of presoaking should be a minimum of 2% over optimum moisture to a depth of 18 inches Concrete may be poured with a 10 inch deep thickened edge Where concrete flatwork is poured along the top of a slope, a footing should be excavated along the outside edge to achieve a minimum of 7 feet distance to daylight Concrete should be constructed with tooled joints or sawcuts (1 inch deep) creating concrete sections no larger than 225 square feet For sidewalks, the maximum run between pints should not exceed 5 feet For rectangular shapes of concrete, the ratio of length to width should generally not exceed 0 6 (i e , 5 ft long by 3 ft wide) Joints should be cut at expected points of concrete shrinkage (such as male corners), with diagonal reinforcement placed in accordance with industry standards Drainage adjacent to concrete flatwork should direct water away from the improvement Concrete subgrade should be sloped and directed to the collective drainage system, such that water is not trapped below the flatwork The recommendations set forth herein are intended to reduce cosmetic nuisance cracking The project concrete contractor is ultimately responsible for concrete quality and performance, and should pursue a cost-benefit analysis of these recommendations, and other options available in the industry, prior to the pouring of concrete RETAINING WALLS Retaining walls are not anticipated for this project, yet retaining walls up to 8 feet may be designed and constructed in accordance with the following recommendations and minimum design parameters 1 Retaining wall footings should be designed in accordance with the allowable bearing criteria given in the "Foundations" section of this report (no slurry footing detail permitted), and should maintain minimum footing depths outlined in "Foundation" section of this report 2 Unrestrained cantilever retaining walls should be designed using an active equivalent fluid pressure of 35 pcf This assumes that non expansive, granular, free draining material will be used for backfill, and that the backfill surface will be level For sloping backfill, the following parameters may be utilized Backfill Sloping Condition Active Fluid Pressure 2 1 Slope 50 pcf 1 5 1 Slope 65 pcf BALES DEVELOPMENT LOT 84 A P N 216 180 2400 GALICIA WAY CALIFORNIA Page No 11 Job No 012684 1 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEQTECHNICAL CIVIL STRUCTURAL 1 .ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Any other surcharge loadings shall be analyzed in addition to the above values 3 If the tops of retaining walls are restrained from movement, they should be designed for an additional uniform soil pressure of 7XH psf, where H is the height of the wall in feet 4 Passive soil resistance may be calculated using an equivalent fluid pressure of 350 pcf This value assumes that the soil being utilized to resist passive pressures, extends horizontally 2 5 times the height of the passive pressure wedge of the soil Where the horizontal distance of the available passive pressure wedge is less than 2 5 times the height of the soil, the passive pressure value must be reduced by the percent reduction in available horizontal length 5 A coefficient of friction of 0 35 between the soil and concrete footings may be utilized to resist lateral loads in addition to the passive earth pressures above 6 Retaining walls should be braced and monitored during compaction if this cannot be accomplished, the compactive effort should be included as a surcharge load when designing the wall 7 All walls shall be provided with adequate back drainage to relieve hydrostatic pressure, and be designed in accordance with the minimum standards contained in the "Retaining Wall Drainage Detail", Appendix Retaining wall backfill should be placed and compacted in accordance with the "Earthwork" section of this report Backfill shad consist of a non-expansive granular, free draining material SURFACE DRAINAGE Adequate drainage precautions at this site are imperative and will play a critical role on the future performance of the dwelling and improvements Under no circumstances should water be allowed to pond against or adjacent to foundation walls, or tops of slopes The ground surface surrounding proposed improvements should be relatively impervious in nature, and slope to dram away from the structure in all directions, with a minimum slope of 2% for a horizontal distance of 7 feet (where possible) Area drains or surface swales should then be provided to accommodate runoff and avoid any ponding of water Roof gutters and downspouts shall be installed on the new and existing structures and tightlmed to the area dram system All drains should be kept clean and unclogged, including gutters and downspouts Area drams should be kept free of debris to allow for proper drainage During periods of heavy ram, the performance of all drainage systems should be inspected Problems such as gullying or ponding should be corrected as soon as possible Any leakage from sources such as water lines should also be repaired as soon as possible In addition, irrigation of planter areas, lawns, or other vegetation, BALES DEVELOPMENT ~ ~~~ Page No 12 LOT 84 APN 216 180-2400 GALICIAWAY CALIFORNIA Job No 012684-1 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I located adjacent to the foundation or exterior fiat work improvements, should be strictly controlled or avoided CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND TESTING The recommendations provided in this report are based on subsurface conditions disclosed by our investigation of the project area Interpolated subsurface conditions should be verified in the field during construction The following items shall be conducted prior/during construction by a representative of Engineering Design Group in order to verify compliance with the geotechnical and civil engineering recommendations provided herein, as applicable The project structural and geotechnical engineers may upgrade any condition as deemed necessary during the development of the proposed improvement(s) 1 Attendance of a preconstruction meeting prior to the start of work 2 Review of final approved structural plans and foundation plans prior to the start of work, for compliance with geotechnical recommendations 3 Observation of pad subgrade prior to scarification 4 Testing of any fill placed, including retaining wall backfill and utility trenches 5 Observation of footing excavations prior to slurry or steel placement 6 Field observation of any "field change" condition involving soils 7 Walk through of final drainage detailing prior to final approval The project soils engineer may at their discretion deepen footings or locally recommend additional steel reinforcement to upgrade any condition as deemed necessary during site observations Engineering Design Group shall, prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy, issue in writing that the above inspections have been conducted by a representative of their firm, and the design considerations of the project soils report have been met The field inspection protocol specified herein is considered the minimum necessary for Engineering Design Group to have exercised "due diligence" in the soils engineering design aspect of this building Engineering Design Group assumes no liability for structures constructed utilizing this report not meeting this protocol Before commencement of grading the Engineering Design Group will require a separate contract for quality control observation and testing Engineering Design Group requires a minimum of 48 hours notice to mobilize onsite for field observation and testing MISCELLANEOUS It must be noted that no structure or slab should be expected to remain totally free of cracks and minor signs of cosmetic distress The flexible nature of wood and steel structures allows them to respond to movements BALES DEVELOPMENT LOT 84 A P N 216 180 2400 GALICIA WAY CALIFORNIA ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEO TECHNICAL CIVIL STRUCTURAL 4 ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I resulting from minor unavoidable settlement of fill or natural soils, the swelling of clay soils, or the motions induced from seismic activity All of the above can induce movement that frequently results in cosmetic cracking of brittle wall surfaces, such as stucco or interior plaster or interior brittle slab finishes Data for this report was derived from surface observations at the site, knowledge of local conditions, and a visual observation of the soils exposed in the exploratory test pits The recommendations in this report are based on our experience in conjunction with the limited soils exposed at this site and neighboring sites We believe that this information gives an acceptable degree of reliability for anticipating the behavior of the proposed structure, however, our recommendations are professional opinions and cannot control nature, nor can they assure the soils profiles beneath or adjacent to those observed Therefore, no warranties of the accuracy of these recommendations, beyond the limits of the obtained data, is herein expressed or implied This report is based on the investigation at the described site and on the specific anticipated construction as stated herein If either of these conditions is changed, the results would also most likely change Man-made or natural changes in the conditions of a property can occur over a penod of time In addition, changes in requirements due to state of the art knowledge and/or legislation, are rapidly occurring As a result, the findings of this report may become invalid due to these changes Therefore, this report for the specific site, is subject to review and not considered valid after a penod of one year, or if conditions as stated above are altered It is the responsibility of the owner or his representative to ensure that the information in this report be incorporated into the plans and/or specifications and construction of the project It is advisable that a contractor familiar with construction details typically used to deal with the local subsoil and seismic conditions, be retained to build the structure If you have any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us We hope the report provides you with necessary information to continue with the development of the project Sincerely, ENGINEERING DESI Steven Norri California RCE #47672 BALES DEVELOPMENT LOT 34 APN 216-180 2400, GALICIA WAY CALIFORNIA Page No 14 Job No 012684 1 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP 3EOTECHNICAL CIVIL STRUCTURAL-i ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS SITE PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS JOB NUMBER 012684-1 NEW BALES DEVELOPMENT LOT84.APN 216-180-2400, GALICIA WAY CITY OF CARLSBAD CA ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GFOTEChNICAL CIVIL STRUCTURAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS J121 Montid Roau 3 in Mjrros CA 92069Phone ITfiOIBJn n(12 Fa. (7fiO)4RO 7477 FIGURE 1 n hie on rnairvFormsU FRM'2000iMASrER f-(G SITE LOCATION MAP PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS JOB NUMBER 012684-1 NEW BALES DEVELOPMENT LOT 84 A P N 216-180-2400, GALICIA WAY CITY OF CARLSBAD, CA ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP 'jECTECHNlCAL CIVIL STRUCTURAL 4 ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS 2121 Montitl Road Sin M irios CA 920b(J Phone f7fiO,f }<J 7W c " (,(50,480 M77 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN / LOCATION OF BORINGS PROJECT NAME PROJECT ADDRESS PROJECT NUMBER 012684 BALES DEVELOPMENT LOT 87, APN 216-180-2400, GALICIAWAY, CALIFORNIA ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEQ TECHNICAL CIVIL STRUCTURAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS •"1J1 Moni.el Road San Marcos CA 92069 Ption- 1760)839 7302 Fa. (760)430 7-177 FIGURE 3 Project Name EDG Project Number Project Address Bales Development 012684-1 BORING LOG NO. 1 Lot 84, A P N 216-180-2400, Galicia Way, California Drilling Hollow Stem Auger Dates October 30, 2001 Total Depth Method Type of Rig Beaver, Access Drilled Limited Logged By E Rist Approx Surface Elev Diameter of 6 inches Drilling R Marshall Groundwater Boring Type of 140 !b , Hammer Contractor Level 30 inch drop Comments FIGURE NO 4 15' Type of CAL, SPT Samplers Depth 1- 2- _ 3— 4- 5- 6- 7- - 8- 9- - 10- 11- 12- - 13- 14- - 15 S a m PI e - * e .. f "• * «•»- " s- ' ,- - ~; , J =: - -- — - _ Blow Counts 50 13 19 23 13 13 21 7 12 21 CAL OR SPT CAL SPT SPT SPT Log Materials Description and Notes @_0'13' FILL - SILTY SAND (SM) Light brown, siightly moist, s;lty sand & 13-15' SILTSTONE (SM) Tan to yellow brown, moist, dense, silty sandstone to siltstone Total depth = 15' Geologic Attitude ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL CIVIL STRUCTURAL 4 ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS Project Name Bales Development EDO Project 012684-1 Number Project Address Lot 84, A P N 216-180-2400, Galicia Way, California Drilling Hollow Stem Auger Dates October 30, 2001 Method Drilled BORING LOG NO. 2 FIGURE NO 5 Type of Rig Beaver, Limited Logged By E Rist Access Diameter of 6 inches Drilling R Marshall Boring Contractor Type of 140 ID , 30 inch drop Comments Hammer Type of CAL, SPT Samplers Depth 1- 2- 4- 5- 6- 7- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- S a m PI e *- Blow Counts CAL OR SPT Log Total Depth Approx Surface Elev Ground water Level 3' Materials Description and Notes (SJ.0-31 SiLTSTONE (SM) Tan to yellow brown, moist, dense, silty sandstone to siltstone Upper 18-20 inches is a weathered profile Total depth = 3' Geologic Attitude ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP CEOrECHNlCAL CIVIL STRUCTURAL i ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS Project Name EDG Project Number Project Address Bales Development 012684-1 Lot 84, A P N 216-180-2400, Galicia Way, California BORING LOG NO. 3 FIGURE NO 6 Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger Dates Drilled October 30, 2001 Total Depth 6' Type of Rig Beaver, Limited Access Logged By E RiSt Approx Surface Elev Diameter of Bormg 6 inches Drilling Contractor R Marshall Ground water Level Type of Hammer Type of Samplers 140 Ib , 30 inch drop Comments CAL, SPT Depth Blow Counts CAL OR SPT Log Materials Description and Notes Geologic Attitude 1- 2- 3- 4- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- WJ_F/14-_SILTY SAND (SM) Light Brown, moistt medium dense to dense, silty sand - (SM) Tan to yellow, moist, dense, silty sandstone to siltstone Upper 18-20 inches is a weathered profile Total depth = 6' APPENDIX -A- APPENDIX A REFERENCES | 1 California Department of Conservation. Division of Mines and Geology, Fault-Rupture Zones in California, Special Publication 42, Revised 1990.i 2 Greensfelder, R.W , 1974, Maximum Credible Rock Acceleration from Earthquakes in • California California Division of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet 23. 3 Hart, Michael, June 17,1994, Geologic Investigation, 7505 Hillside Drive, La Jolla, CA, | File No- 153-94. 4. Engineering Design Group, Unpublished In-House Data. 5 Ploessel, M R., and Slosson, J.E., 1974, Repeatable High Ground Acceleration from • Earthquakes. California Geology, Vol. 27, No. 9, P. 195-199. I 6 State of California, Fault Map of California, Map No. 1, Dated 1975. I 7 State of California, Geologic Map of California, Map No: 2, Dated 1977. iiiiiiii APPENDIX -B- GENERAL EARTHWORK AND GRADING SPECIFICATIONS 1 0 General Intent These specifications are presented as general procedures and recommendations for grading and earthwork to be utilized in conjunction with the approved grading plans. These general earthwork and grading specifications are a part of the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report and shall be superseded by the recommendations in the geotechnical report in the case of conflict Evaluations performed by the consultant during the course of grading may result in new recommendations which could supersede these specifications or the recommendations of the geotechnical report It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to read and understand these specifications, as well as the geotechnicai report and approved grading plans 2 0 Earthwork Observation and Testing Driorto the commencement of grading, a qualified geotecnnical consultant should be employed for the purpose of observing earthwork procedures and testing the fills for conformance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report and these specifications It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to assist the consultant and keep him apprised of work schedules and changes, at least 24 hours in advance, so that he may schedule his personnel accordingly No grading operations should be performed without the knowledge of the geotechnical consultant. The contractor shall not assume that the geotechnical consultant is aware of all grading operations It shall be the sole responsibility of the contractor to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish the work in accordance with applicable grading codes and agency ordinances, recommendations in the geotechnical report, and the approved grading plans not withstanding the testing and observation of the geotechnical consultant If, in the opinion of the consultant, unsatisfactory conditions, such as unsuitable soil, poor moisture condition, inadequate compaction, adverse weather, etc , are resulting in a quality of work less than recommended in the geotechnical report and the specifications, the consultant will be empowered to reject the work and recommend that construction be stopped until the conditions are rectified Maximum dry density tests used to evaluate the degree of compaction should be performed in general accordance with the latest version of the American Society for Testing and Materials test method ASTM 01557 -1- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3 0 Preparation of Areas to be Filled 3 1 Clearing and Grubbing Sufficient brush, vegetation, roots and alf other deleterious material should be removed or property disposed of in a method acceptable to the owner, design engineer, governing agencies and the geotechnical consultant The geotechnical consultant should evaluate the extent of these removals depending on specific site conditions In general, no more than 1 percent (by volume) of the fill material should consist of these materials and nesting of these materials should not be allowed 3 2 Processing The existing ground which has been evaluated by the geotechnical consultant to be satisfactory for support of fill, should be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches Existing ground which is not satisfactory should be overexcavated as specified m the following section Scarification should continue until the soils are broken down and free of large clay lumps or clods and until the working surface is reasonably uniform, flat, and free of uneven features which would inhibit uniform compaction 3 3 Overexcavation Soft, dry, organic-rich, spongy, highly fractured, or otherwise unsuitable ground, extending to such a depth that surface processing cannot adequately improve the condition, should be overexcavated down to competent ground, as evaluated by the geotechnical consultant For purposes of determining quantities of materials overexcavated, a licensed land surveyor/civil engineer should be utilized 3 4 Moisture Conditioning Overexcavated and processed soils should be watered, dried-back, blended, and/or mixed, as necessary to attain a uniform moisture content near optimum 3 5 Recompaction Overexcavated and processed so/is which have been properly mixed, screened of deleterious material, and moisture-conditioned should be recompacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent or as otherwise recommended by the geotechnical consultant -2- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3 6 Benching Where fills are to be placed on ground with slopes steeper than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical), the ground should be stepped or benched The lowest bench should be a minimum of 15 feet wide, at least 2 feet into competent material as evaluated by the geotechnical consultant Other benches should be excavated into competent material as evaluated by the geotechnical consultant. Ground sloping flatter than 5 1 should be benched or otherwise overexcavated when recommended by the geotechnical consultant. 3 7 Evaluation of Fill Areas All areas to receive fill, including processed areas, removal areas, and toe-of-fili benches, should be evaluated by the geotechnjcal consultant prior to fill placement 4 0 Fill Material 4 1 General Material to be placed as fill should be sufficiently free of organic matter and other deleterious substances, and should be evaluated by the geotechnical consultant prior too placement Soils of poor gradation, expansion, or strength characteristics should be placed as recommended by the geotechnical consultant or mixed with other soils to achieve satisfactory fill material 4 2 Oversize Oversize material, defined as rock or other irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater than 6 inches, should not be buried or placed in fills, unless the location, materials, and disposal methods are specifically recommended by the geotechnical consultant Oversize disposal operations should be such that nesting of oversize material does not occur, and such that the oversize material is completely surrounded by compacted or densified fill. Oversize material should not be placed within 10 feet vertically of finish grade, within 2 feet of future utilities or underground construdion, or within 15 feet horizontally of slope faces, in accordance with the attached detail -3- 4.3 Imflod. If importing of fill material is required for grading, the import material should meet the requirements of Section 4 1 Sufficient time should be given to allow the geotechnical consultant to observe (and test, if necessary) the proposed import materials 5.0 Fill Placement and Compaction 5 1 Fill Lifts Fill material should be placed in areas prepared and previously evaluated to receive fill, in near-horizontal layers approximately 6 inches in compacted thickness Each layer should be spread evenly and thoroughly mixed to attain uniformity of material and moisture throughout 5 2 Moisture Conditioning Fill soils should be watered, dried-back, blended, and/or mixed, as necessary to attain a uniform moisture content near optimum 5 3 Compaction of Fill After each layer has been evenly spread, moisture- conditioned, and mtxed, it should be uniformly compacted to not less than 90 percent of maximum dry density (unless otherwise specified) Compaction equipment should be adequately sized and be either specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability, to efficiently achieve the specified degree and uniformity of compaction 54 Fill Slopes Compacting of slopes should be accomplished, in addition to normal compacting procedures, by backrolling of slopes with sheepsfoot rollers at increments of 3 to 4 feet in fill elevation gain, or by other methods producing satisfactory results At the completion of grading, the relative compaction of the fill out to the slope face would be at least 90 percent. -4- 5 5 Compaction Testing. Field tests of the moisture content and degree of compaction of the fill soils should be performed at the consultant's discretion based on field conditions encountered. In general, the tests should be taken at approximate intervals of 2 feet in vertical rise and/or 1,000 cubic yards of compacted fill soils. In addition, on slope faces, as a guideline approximately one test should be taken for each 5,000 square feet of slope face and/or each 10 feet of vertical height of slope 6 0 Subdrain installation Subdrain systems, if recommended, should be installed in areas previously evaluated for suitability by the geotecnnical consultant, to conform to the approximate alignment and details shown on the plans or herein The subdram location or materials should not be changed or modified unless recommended by the geotechnical consultant The consultant, however, may recommend changes in subdrain line or grade depending on conditions encountered AI! subdrains should be surveyed by a licensed land surveyor/civil engineer for line and grade after installation Sufficient trme shall be affowecf for the survey, prror to commencement of filling over the subdrains 7 0 Excavation Excavations and cut slopes should be evaluated by a representative of the geotechnical consultant (as necessary) during grading If directed by the geotechnical consultant, further excavation, overexcavation, and refilling of cut areas and/or remedial grading of cut slopes (i.e , stability fills or slope buttresses) may be recommended 8 0 Quantity Determination For purposes of determining quantities of materials excavated during grading and/or determining the limits of overexcavation, a licensed land surveyor/civil engineer should be utilized .5- t I I I MINIMUM RETAINING WALL WATERPROOFING & DRAINAGE DETAIL FINAL WATERPROOFING SPECIFICATIONS & DETAILS TO BE PROVIDED 3~T PROJECT ARCHITECT MASTIC TO BE APPLIED TO TCP OF WAL. PROPOSED SLOP£ 3ACKOJ'0£R OSHA STANDARDSCR »ER ALTERNATIVE SLCP'NCPLAN, OR PER APPROVEDSHORING PLAN UASTTC TYPE WATER PRCCRNC INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS !e PROTECTED wi*H 3ACKER 30ARO (ABOVE EXPOSED TO SUNLCHT 3CIL 3ACKRLL, COMPACTED "0 RELATIVE COMPACTION PER REFERENCE (top) DETAINING WALL AREA DRAIN SYSTEM UlRAORAiN MEMBRANE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS OVER MASTIC WATERPROOFING - HLM 50OO Oft EQUIVALENT CMPACTD FILL P 3E3RCCK WALL ~COT1NG FILTER FABRIC ENVELOPE (MIRAFl 14QN OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) 12" MIN LAP 3/4- _ i 1/2" CLEAN GRAVEL +'X4" (+Sd) CONCRETE CANT O FOOWNG/WAU. CONNECTION (UNDER WATER PROOFING) +' (MIN ) DIAMETER PERFORATED PVC PIPE (SCHEDULE 40 OR EQ } WITH PERFORATIONS ORIENTED DOWN, AS DEPICTED MIN 2?! GRADIENT TC SUITABLE CUTUT £NO WIRACRAIN bot'am I I COMPETENT BEDROCK OR FILL MATERIAL AS EVALUATED 3Y THE GEOTECHN1CAL CONSULTANT PROJECT NUMBER tOJECT NAME. PROJECT ADDRESS •PAWN RALE WN BY r-r-o' ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP 810 WEST LOS VALLECITOS BLVD SUITE "A" SAN MARCOS, CA 92069 (760) 752-7010 FAX (760) 752-7092 DETAIL/FIGURE NUMBER DATE SIDE HILL STABILITY FILL DETAIL EXISTING GROUNDSURFACE FINISHED CUT PAD FINISHED SLOPE FACE PROJECT 1 TO 1 LINE FROM TOP OF SLOPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF KEY U - 1 (•= i OVERBURDEN UNSUITABLE MATERIAL PAD ovenexcAVATioN DEPTH AND RECQMPACT1ON MAY BE RECOMMENDED BY THE QEOTSCHNICAL CONSULTANT BASED ON ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED. r t *?' ' 15* MIN."MIN. LOWEST *** BENCHDEPTH <KEY) -COMPETENT BEDROCK OR MATERIAL A3 EVALUATED BY THE QEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT NOTE: Subdram details and key width recommendations to be provided based on exposed subsurface conditions I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CANYON SUBDRAIN DETAILS \ QROUNO SURFACE BENCHING REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL 3U8DRAIN TRENCH SEE BELOW 9' MtN. OVERLAP SUBDRAIN TRENCH DETAILS FILTER FABRIC ENVELOPE ,(MJRAF! 140N OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT)* \ •6" MIN. OVERLAP 374'-1-1/2' CLEAN <3flAVEL (9*t.3/ft. MIN.) PERFORATED PIPE DETAIL OF CANYON SUBORAIN TERMINAL 3/4--1-1/2* CLEAN QRAVEL (9ft.3/ft. MINJ *IF CALTF1ANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL IS USED IN PLACE OF 3/4*-l-l/2* GRAVEL. FILTER FABRIC MA^ BE DELETED DESIGN FINISH QRAOE SU3DRAIN TRENCH SEE ABOVE l.i 1 13* MIN. L^ T 5'MIN, 6* & MIN. PIPE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL U S Standard Sieve Size j/ -<• 3/3" Nc 1 No 3 ,'lc 30 Nc 5C No .ZOO 100 90-iOG -1G-10G 25-10 0-7 0-3 Sand £qu v/a"enc > 75 Subdrain should a* conatructad only on competent material as evaluated by tho geotacfimcal consultant, 3U80RA1N INSTALLATION Subdram pipa shoulcj b« inataltad with perforations down as depicted. At locations recommended by me geotechntcal conaultant, nonperforated pipe should be Installed SUBDRAIN TYPS-Subdrain type should be AcrylonitrUe Butadiene Styrerte (A.B.S.I. Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) or approved equivalent. Class 125, 30R 32.5 should be used for maximum fill depths of 35 feet. Clao 200,SOR 21 should be u«ed for maximum fill depthe o* 100 feet, STABILITY FILL / BUTTRESS DETAIL OUTLET PIPES 4* 0 NONPERFORATED PIPE. 100' MAX. O.C. HORIZONTALLY, 30' MAX. O.C. VERTICALLY »Hl3i, SACK CUT VI OR FLATTER BENCH SEE 3UBDRAIN TRENCH DETAIL ^^>----^---^-I^I^' F>>>Z>=C O MP A CIgP LOWEST 3U8ORAJN SHOULD BE SITUATED A3 LOW AS POSSIBLE TO ALLOW SUITABLE OUTLET KEY 06PTH ~~~~'~MIN KEY WIDTH A3 NOTED ON GRADING. PLANS 13' M1N. PERFORATE D PIPE - d NON-PERFORATED OUTLET PIPE —- 10' M1N. EACH SIDE CA? T-CONNECTION DETAIL 6* MIN. OVERLAP 3/4*-1-1/2' CLEAN GRAVEL (3ft?/ft. MIN.) 4* 0 NON-PERFORATED PIPE. FILTER FABRIC ENVELOPE (MIRAF1 140N OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT)* SEE T-CONNECTION DETAIL a' MIN. COVER 4' 0 PERFORATED PIPE 4* MIN 3EOOING SU8DRAIN TRENCH DETAIL IF CALTRAN3 CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL IS USED IN PLACE OF 3/4--1-1/2' GRAVEL, FILTER FABRIC MAY BE DELETED SPECIFICATIONS FOR CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL U S Standard 5 eve Size O ZOO Sand S :oo 90-100 -1C-100 25 --1C .3-33 0-7 0-3 NOTES. For buttr.s. dim.n.iona, see geot.chn.cai report/plans. Actual may be changed by the geotechmcai consultant based on tieia 3UBORAIN IN3TALLATION-3ubdraln pipe should be Installe At locatlona recommended by the geotechmcal consultant,» SUBORA.N TYPE-3«bdr.in typ. .hou.d be Acry.on tr«. (PVC) or approv.d .qulv.l.nt. CI... 123,3OR 32.5 .nould b. U.ad (or m«, Cl... 200.30R 21 .hould b« u..d for maximum fill d.pth. of 100 '« H ofill depth, of KEY AND BENCHING DETAILS FILL SLOPE EXISTING GROUND TO PfVOJKCT 1 TO 1 UNC FROM TOg Of 3COPE COMPITBNT MATERIAL SURFACE REMOVE 9UtrAO MATERIAL 2' MIN.-—15' M1N KEY I LOWEST DEPTH BENCH (KEY) FILL-OVER-CUT SLOPE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE MIN.—J LOWEST ' BENCH (KEY) REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL CUT SLOPE <TO BE EXCAVATED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT) EXISTING GROUND SURFACE- CUT-OVER-FILL SLOPE PROJECT 1 TO 1 LINE FROM TOE OF SLOPE TO COMPETENT MATERIAL CUT SLOPE (TO BE EXCAVATED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT) REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL BENCH 2' MIN. KEY 06PTH BENCH (KEY) NOTE: Back drain may b« recommended by the geotechnical consultant baaed on actual field conditions encountered. Bench dimension recommendations may also be altered based on field conditions encountered. ROCK DISPOSAL DETAIL SLOPE FACE OVERSIZE WINDROW GRANULAR 3OIL <3-E.> 3O> TO DEN31F1ED IN PLACE 3Y FLOODING DETAIL TYPICAL PROFILE ALONG WINDROW and 15 feet horizontally of slope faces. 2) ROCK3 »,th max.mum d.mens.on, greater than 4 f.e« shou.d not Da ut.hzed ,n 3, ROCK piacement. Mood.ng of granu.ar so,,, and Ml P.acemant shou.d be observed by the geotechnical consultant. « BBSS sss; ass-.:: vertically (as depicted). 5) ROCK 3hou,d be placed m excavated to 30) should be flooded in the windrow to rocks. ^ mi vo.ua APPENDIX -C- I LABORATORY TESTING PROCEDURES Direct Shear Test Direct shear tests are performed on remolded and/or relatively undisturbed samples which are soaked for a minimum of 24 hours prior to testing After transferring the sample to the shearbox, and reloading, pore pressures are allowed to dissipated for a period of approximately 1 hour prior to application of shearing force The samples are sheared in a motor- driven, strain controlled, direct-shear testing apparatus After a travel of approximately 1/4 inch, the motor is stopped and the sample is allowed to "relax" for approximately 15 minutes Where applicable, the "relaxed" and "peak" shear values are recorded It is anticipated that, in a majority of samples tested, the 15 minutes relaxing of the sample is sufficient to allow dissipation of pore pressures set up due to application of the shearing force The relaxed values are therefore judged to be good estimations of effective strength parameters Expansion Index Tests: The expansion potential of representative samples is evaluated by the Expansion Index Test, U B C Standard No 29-2 Specimens are molded under a given compactive energy to approximately the optimum moisture content and approximately 50 percent saturation The prepared 1 -inch thick by 4-inch diameter specimens are loaded to an equivalent 144 psf surcharge and are inundated with tap water for 24 hours or until volumetric equilibrium is reached Classification Tests. Typical materials were subjected to mechanical grain-size analysis by wet sieving from U S Standard brass screens (ASTM D422-65) Hydrometer analyses were performed where appreciable quantities of fines were encountered The data was evaluated in determining the classification of the materials The grain-size distribution curves are presented in the test data and the Unified Soil Classification is presented in both the test data and the boring logs City of Carlsbad» w*^^M^BMiHM^Mi^^^^B[^^^^^^^^^^^^^Building Department CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit The City will not issue any building permit without a completedyschool fee form Project Name Building Permit Plan Check Number: 7 Project Address: A.P.N.: Project Applicant (Owner Name): Project Description- Building Type: Residential* 2 f Number of New Dwelling Units -= 3 Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling. —— .y Second Dwelling Unit. Square Feet of Living Area in SDU y///^2/ Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area Commercial/Industrial- Square Feet Floor Area City Certification of Applicant Information:Date- SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD San MarcosCarlsbad Unified School District 801 Pine Ave Carlsbad CA 92009 (729-9291) Encmitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encimtas, CA 92024 (944-4300) m MarcosJJarfte l-5"Mata Way ^^—— " "^sT—- San Marcos ^92069 (736-2200) ^ v San Dieguito Union High School District 710EncinitasBlvd Encmitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners The person executing this of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee tf Owner requests an increase tn the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above descnbed project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner Signature Date 1635 Faraday Avenue * Carlsbad, CA 92OO8-7314 • (760) 6O2-27OO • FAX (760) 6O2-S56O Revised 4/20/00 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school distnct(s))>*#********* THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE . BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT. The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL ,Eric J. Hall TITLE W^st. superintendent. Business NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER / -TfeX City of Carlsbadv •" —• ——^^^^•••^••••^^^^^•^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^HBuilding Department CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit The City will not issue any building permit without a completed -school fee form Project Name Building Permit Plan Check Number Project Address. APN. Project Applicant (Owner Name)' Project Description Building Type* Residential' "7 £ Number of New Dwelling Units j>Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling __^_ ^ Second Dwelling Unit Square Feet of Living Area in SDU *) f Residential Additions* Net Square Feet New Area Commercial/Industrial Square Feet Floor Area City Certification of Applicant Information Date- SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad Unified School District 801 Pme-Ave San Marcos Unified School District 215MataWay San Marcos, CA 92069 (736-2200) Encinitas Union School District . 101 SouthRancho Santa FeRdX/ Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300j~Y San Dieguito Union High School District 710 Encinitas Blvd Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Apt>tiQant/Owners The person executmgthj&^ecla ration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided aBGve-aaiLorrect and trueJcuthyrJest of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner Signature Date 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92OO8-7314 • (76O) 602-270O * FAX (760) 6O2-856O Revised 4/20/00 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school districts)) THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed Bother»applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may isstje building permits for this project SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT APPLICATION FOR SEWER SERVICE The application must be signed by the owner (or his representative) of the property to be served The total charges must be paid to the District at the time the application is submitted APPLICANT MUST SUBMIT EVIDENCE OF BUILDING PERMIT WITHIN 60 DAYS FAILURE TO MAKE SUCH SUBMITTAL WILL RESULT IN AUTOMATIC CANCELLATION OF THE SEWER PERMIT THE SEWER CONNECTION FEE LESS A $50 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE WILL BE REFUNDED A six-month construction period shall be provided and sewer service charges for the balance of the fiscal year shall be collected at the time of application for sewer permits Sewer service charges for subsequent fiscal years shall be collected on the tax roll in same manner as property taxes If the six-month construction period extends into the subsequent fiscal year, a prorated sewerservice charge for that fiscal year shall be collected on the tax roll in the same manner as property taxes The full sewer service charges for all subsequent years shall be collected on the tax roll rn the same manner as property taxes There will be no additional fee or refund if service actually commences on a different date The prorated sewer service charge shall not be required in those application for sewer permits for subdivisions Such applicants shall be required to notify the District, on forms provided by the District, of escrow closing on individual properties within the subdivision Sewer service charges shall commence upon close of escrow and will be the responsibility of the buyer If a service lateral is required, it must be installed by the owner/applicant in conformance with the specifications, rules and regulations of the District and subject to inspection by the District A DISTRICT INSPECTOR MUST BE ON THE SCENE ATTHE TIME OF CONNECTION. The service lateral is that part of the sewer system that extends from the mam collection line in the street (or easement) to the point in the street {at or near the applicant's property line) where the service lateral is connected to the applicant's building sewer The applicant is also responsible for the construction, at the applicant's expense, of the building of sewer from the applicant's plumbing 1o the point in the street (or easement) where a connection is made to the service lateral and for construction, maintenance and connection of the service lateral to the mam line IT MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE DISTRICT BEFORE THE SEWER SYSTEM MAY BE USED BY THE APPLICANT THE APPLICANT, OR HIS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MUST NOTIFY THE DISTRICT AT THE TIME INSPECTION IS DESIRED ANY CONNECTION MADE TO THE SERVICE LATERAL OR COLLECTION LINE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL AND INSPECTION BY THE DISTRICT WILL BE CON- SIDERED INVALID AND WILL NOT BE ACKNOWLEDGED ALL SUCH CONNECTIONS MUST BE MADE WITH AN LCWD INSPECTOR ATTHE SCENE ATTHETIME OF CONNECTION IF, FOR ANY REASON, A CON- NECTION IS IMPROPERLY MADE, IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT, AT THE APPLICANTS EXPENSE, TO DIG UP OR OTHERWISE RE-EXPOSE THE CONNECTION SO THAT AN INSPECTION MAY BE MADE AND THE APPLICANT AT THE APPLICANTS EXPENSE SHALL MAKE ANY CORRECTIONS OR ALTERATIONS REQUIRED BY LCWD IN THE EVENT THAT THE APPLICANT, FOR ANY REASON, FAILS TO TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION, THE DISTRICT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO DIG UP AND INSPECT THE CONNECTION AND MAKE ANY CORRECTIONS NECESSARY, AT THE APPLICANTS EXPENSE OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO DISCONNECT SERVICE ANY COSTS INCURRED BY LCWD IN TAKING SUCH CORRECTIVE ACTION SHALL BE BILLED TO THE APPLICANT AND MAY BE RECORDED AS A LIEN AGAINST THE APPLICANTS PROPERTY EQUAL IN PRIORITY TO A TAX LIEN OWNER'S NAMF James Bales _ MAILING ADDRFSS1307 Lodge Pole Rd PHQNFN1JMRFR (76°) 599-8515 _ San Marcos, CA 92069 SERVICE AHDRFRS 2650 Galicia Way TRACT NAME/NO _ LOT* _ CONNECTION FEE $ _ 3,950.00 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO 216-18024000 _ PRORATED SEWER SERV FEE $ TOTAL Si 3,950.00 TYPE/BUILDING _S^B _ #/UNITS 1 PAID BY D CASH £1 CHECK* / The undersigned hereby agrees that the above information given is correct and agrees to the conditions as sta>ed Date Rec'd by Account No Ref 15BSPERMIT1 10-04-2002 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Check Revision Permit No PCR02256 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address Permit Type Parcel No Valuation Reference # Project Title Applicant SAM WRIGHT 2911 STATE ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 213-1460 2650 GALICIA WY CBAD PCR 2161802400 Lot# $0 00 Construction Type BALES RES/138 SF CONVERTING FROM GARAGE TO LIVING SPACING 0 NEW Status Applied Entered By Plan Approved Issued Inspect Area PENDING 09/24/2002 CB Owner BALES JAMES T&PAMELA S 2001 FAMILY TRUST 1807LODGEPOLERD SAN MARCOS CA 92069 Total Fees $12000 Total Payments To Date $000 Balance Due $12000 Plan Check Revision Fee Additional Fees $12000 $000 Inspector FINAL APPROVAL Date Clearance NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions" You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3 32 030 Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feestexactions of which vou have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the slatutejjfjmitations has previously otherwise expired 'ERMIT APPLICATION CITY'OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK EST VAL Plan Ck Deposit Validated By Pate Address (include Bldg/Suite #}Business Name {at this address) Legal Description Lot No Subdivision Name/Number Unit No Phase No Total # of units Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use Proposed Use Name Address City State/Zip elephone S' M Fax # Name Address City State/Zip {Sec 7031 5 Business and Professions Coda Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that ha is exempt therefrom, and the basts for the alleged exemption Any violation of Section 7031 5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($5001) Name State License # Address License Class City State/7ip City Business License # Telephone # Designer Name State License ft Address City State^p Telephone Workers' Compensation Declaration I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations d I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued Q I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are Insurance Company _ : _ Policy No _ ______ __________ Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) Q CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California WARNING Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney s fees SIGNATURE _ DATE __ 7.^'K>vi«Vm»eD 'OB «« rien"V*K/1«^«'o A T^^H^^ "*;$•* *~iN$l^'^s%£w&Sfc: ^JS^ttara ;&&&*fe-m>. &&$t*^r^fo$^^ J^>~ ('$" l M3 'i:^ *~*~fhh\ s K« ^ ' hiiJI'^^^R^ S^' -ffi«'^f" ^""ws -^ ~ l'*'?^ ^"! « 'I.^V^L't.TiaOWNER-BUlLOER DECLARATION Pk?I^wCsMraftasJ^f4«^Jlra'ifiW&fe^lit*il^ b» V'n HHisPfp- i» *| Er»** .- IMj. Hal s\ j*!**' I tfti >J ».s. A^,L J((V I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason n I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale ISec 7044, Business and Professions Code The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale) 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec 7044, Business and Professions Code The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law) -- ^ f n I am exempt under Section _ Business and Professions Code for this reason 1 I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement Q YES QNO 2 I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work 3 I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number) 4 I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number) __ _ _ 5 I will provide some of the work, but 1 have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work) _ __ ^__ PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Q YES Q NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Q YES Q NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1 ,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? G YES Q NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 'aCE! co* NSTRUPTION" LENDINO' AGENC vAi*ff§|^* ^HSf M-^t JINIC1,*1^ 4<~1! l^i .M h* ifll JHIH! 1> ii uii » $V~ $f if H*, » ^ A* ' « ih * **'' !* s <- I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (5ec 3097(i) Civil Code) LENDER'S NAME LENDER S ADDRESS, 9s ^APPLICANT'CERTIFICATION, I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plains is accurate I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes I ALSO AGREE TQ SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IhKWIY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF 1 HE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT / / ^^^•••^SfcOSHA An OSHA permit is required for excavations^oyjlrvO'' oeg(i and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height EXPIRATION Every permit tssued by th^wldinjj Official under/Ae provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not comme/lBed witbrnyreO daw fron/tjhe date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commeno^/for a j&Rd of 1/(y/ay/J|5eCllorrT\J6 4 4 Uniform Building Code) 'APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE YELLOW Applicant PINK Finance EsGil Corporation In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE 10/01/02 a APPLICANT JURISDICTION Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO 01-3840 (REV. # 2) - PCR02-256 SET I PROJECT ADDRESS 2650 Galicia Way PROJECT NAME Galicia Way SFD XI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to Xj Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed | I Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Sam Wright Telephone # (760)720-7631 Date contacted (by ) Fax # (760) 720-7634 Mail Telephone Fax In Person [Xj REMARKS: Minor revisions to the interior floor plans By SADRE FOR Kal Tumalieh Enclosures Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 9/24 trnsmtldot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 + Fax (S5S) 560-1576 Carlsbad O1-384O (REV. # 2) - PCR02-256 10/01/02 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION Carlsbad (REV. # 2) - PCR02-256 PLAN CHECK NO O1-384O PREPARED BY SADRE FOR Kal Tumalieh DATE 1O/01/02 BUILDING ADDRESS 2650 Galicia Way BUILDING OCCUPANCY R-3/ U-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION VN BUILDING PORTION INTERIOR PLAN REV Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA (Sq Ft) 1 HR cb Valuation Multiplier By Ordinance Reg Mod VALUE ($) Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Eiorr/ou checked Structur' Type of Review $12000 n Repetitive FeeRepeats i and Hourly at the same time Complete Review D Other r-i Hourly Structural Only Hour Esgil Plan Review Fee $9600 * Based on hourly rate Comments Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue do PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No Planner Greg Fisher frW APN Address £6 5~Q Phone (7601 Type of Project & Use Zoning #--( General Plan CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation Net Project Density DU/AC Facilities Management Zone Remaining net dev acres Circle One (For non-residential development Type of land used created by this permit . ) n n an ns Legend Item Complete Environmental Review Required. DATE OF COMPLETION Item Incomplete - Needs your action YES _ NO A. TYPE Compliance with conditions of approval7 If not, state conditions which require action Conditions of Approval. . Discretionary Action Required. APPROVAL/RESO NO PROJECT NO YES NO X_ TYPE __ DATE OTHER RELATED CASES Compliance with conditions or approval7 If not, state conditions which require action Conditions of Approval' I I I 1 Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone7 YES NO X" CA Coastal Commission Authority7 YES NO If California Coastal Commission Authority Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego CA 92108-4402,1619)767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt) Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed7 YES__ If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now Coastal Permit Determination Log # NO I I I | Follow-Up Actions 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Requned" (at minimum Floor Plans) 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed Inclusionary Housing Fee required YES NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993 ) Data Entry Completed7 YES NO (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE') H \ADM!N\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 n n Site Plan. 1 Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale Show North arrow, property lines easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right- of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes) 2 Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number Policy 44 - Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines 2J D D 1 Applicability YES [?J D D 2 Project complies YES ^PT\ Zoning VOJD D 1 Setbacks ^V) Front \ Interior Side \ Street Side \ Rear \ Top of slope- NO A, NO V Required Required Required Required Required P^ki~~l Q 2 Accessory structure setbacks Front Required Interior Side Street Side Rear Structure separation D D D 3 Lot Coverage p^JZI D 4 Height Required /) Required Required Required Required Required $ K-D D 5 Parking Spaces Required fftfc \ (breakdown Residential Guest Spaces Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown * J , Shown / // Shown / f rT Shown / Shown Shown s^x Shown + «n o_ - *• X^ ' Shown «^"~ by uses for commercial and industrial projects required} Required Shown -^iNJvl PI Additional Comments fa&.$.&' fifatVlhlf p£07" pt-A™ PfrottfflVb £&TtrAc£-£> ^\\ £#*- AJ&jJ At*h />?&*;<i / *&&{/* *rfify *TCttvjL C$s "5/A^f (*"k> I /y/M /V^-A "~ ff(/t3 ffetf/ #<SJ l«X-riVl- ff&ffal— ft^C+'faUfs'pftS' , OK TO JSSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL ^^-^^/^~^>i^ /# VA^ H \ADMlN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 ^ ^ X, S3§3!;o O r- »^rno, O CO OD CDm 3goc^ O Q2 z >O < < coS? ^HOi* ^^ CD O^ >^ CD D 05-30-2002 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Check Revision Permit No PCR02132 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 ;Job Address 2650 GALICIA WY CBAD Permit Type PCR Parcel No 2161802400 Lot # Valuation $0 00 Construction Type Reference # CB013840 Project Title BALES - REVISE FOUNDATION 0 NEW Status ISSUED Applied 05/10/2002 Entered By JM Plan Approved 05/30/2002 Issi&Bii Ofe?3Q/22fiD200Q2 01 02 Inspect Area CGF" 240- .Applicant WRIGHT SAM '?911 STATE STREET CARLSABD CA 92008 ,./ 60-213-1460 Owner BALES JAMES T&PAMELA S 2001 FAMILY TRUST 1807LODGEPOLERD SAN MARCOS CA 92069 Total Fees $240 00 Total Payments To Date $000,Balance Due $240 00 Plan Check Revision Fee Additional Fees $240 00 $000 Inspector FINAL APPROVAL Date Clearance — NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as lees/exactions" You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3 32 030 Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously begj] given a NOTICE similar to flis. or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA.92008/ / ^/3 V^:^PfWJ^TINFOR«ATlONM.,^^:T4r">fr "" ~ " " *" " FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO EST VAL Plan Ck Deposit Validated By__ Date Address (include Bldg/Suite #)Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No Subdivision Name/Number Unit No Phase No Total K of units Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use Proposed Use ^Description of Work {& SO. FT #of Stones ft of Bathrooms Address (TJfAgent YoKConVactor5"^ QjJwnery JJQ f Agent^n City State/Zip Telephone #Fax* Name Address City State/Zip Telephone Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # CONTRACTOR -[COMPANY NAME , (Sec 7031 5 Business and Professions Code Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractors License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption Any violation of Section 7031 5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [S500]} Name State License # Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone # Designer Name State License # Address City State/Zip Telephone Workers' Compensation Declaration I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations Q I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided fay Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued C] ' have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are Insurance Company Policy No Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$1001 OR LESS) Q CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California WARNING Failure to secure workers compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars (4100 000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for m Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees SIGNATURE DATE 7 ' "riPfl ARATinM 4fl'f,?^ >? s^'s j i " L «?"* ' W'las;" i - i!j '' t f tit MS * * '- *f ">. >» !LiJ>! * ssUt*jLAKA IIUIM js,a8ii*^r 8 !f i U-ciSs --ts ~>it " ^ ? !i #1 3 i s sa! ' !J*> il U t >' f ! * '„ s 1 S, * ^ I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason n I. as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec 7044, Business and Professions Code The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale If however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale) Q I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec 7044, Business and Professions Code The Contractor s License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for '>uch projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law) Q I am exempt und^r Section Business and Professions Code for this reason 1 I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement [D /ES QNO 2 I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work1 3 I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number) 4 I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number) 5 I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work) DATE , ^" , " . w 8 <,i ,«--'[,- ,,,,'> *„*•„ ' Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Q YES Q NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? C3 YES Q NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1 ,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school sits? Q YES O NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 3097(i) Civil Code) LENDER'S NAME __ LENDER'S ADDRESS I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT OSHA An OSHA permit is required for excavations qj EXPIRATION Every permit issued by t» building authorized by such permit is not commenced withm/yC d= at any time after the work is comme/liBed for a afoea of ^MAPPLICANT'S SIGNATURE 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height der the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work he date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned Section 106 4 4 Uniform Building Code) DATE WHITE File YELLOW Applicant PINK Finance EsGil Corporation In yartnerskip witfi government for DATE 05/21/02 Q .APPLICANT JURISDICTION Carlsbad " Q PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO 01-3840 (REV. # 1) - PCR02-132 SET I PROJECT ADDRESS 2650 Galicia Way PROJECT NAME Galicia Way SFD The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes XJ The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Sam Wright Telephone # (760) 720-7631 (by ) Fax p /76p) ?20-7634 Mail /lelapVione Fax In Person REMARKS: 1) Note on detail 1/S2, CMU wail reinforcertfejt is #3 @ 16" o c horizontal and vertical bars (alternating on each face) with efowels into slab matching vertical bars on detail 2/S2, the spirals require 1 5 turn/at each end with 48-db @ lap splices [UBCrSection 1907 104] By SADRE FOR Kal Tumalieh Enclosures Esgil Corporation n GA D MB n EJ D PC 5/14 trnsmtldot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 •* San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 01-3840 (REV. # 1) - PCR02-132 05/21/02 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION Carlsbad (REV. # 1) - PCR02-132 PREPARED BY SADRE FOR Kal Tumalieh PLAN CHECK NO 01-3840 DATE 05/21/02 BUILDING ADDRESS 2650 Galicia Way BUILDING OCCUPANCY R-3/U-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION VN BUILDING PORTION FOUNDATION REVISIONS Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA ( Sq Ft ) 2 HOURS cb Valuation Multiplier By Ordinance Reg Mod VALUE ($) Plan Check Fee by Ordinance $240 00 Type of Review Complete Review DRep V etitive Fee Repeats a l—T Other Hourly 2 _ _ Structural Only Hours $192.00 Based on hourly rate Comments Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue do ENGINEERING I DESIGN GROUP 2121 Montiel Road, San Marcos, California 92069 • (760) 839-7302 - Fax (760) 480-7477 - E-mail ENGDG@aol com Date April 30, 2002 To Mr James Bales 1807 Lodegepole Road San Marcos, CA 92069 Re Proposed New Residence to be located on Lot 87, A P N 216-180-2400, Galicia Way; City of Carlsbad, California Subject Caisson Foundation Recommendations Ref 1 "Limited Geotechnical Investigation, for Proposed New Bales Development, to be located on Lot \ 87, A P N 216-180-2400, Galicia Way, City of Carlsbad, California " Prepared by Engineering Design Group, EDG Project No 002684-1 Mr Bales Based upon conversations with you and the project contractor, we understand the proposed building footprint at the rear elevation extends beyond the top of the existing fill slope We further understand the structure cannot be moved due to setback limitations This extension of the building beyond the slope will require modification of the foundation recommendations, specifically use of caissons at the back portion of the building We have provided the following soils recommendations for the design of a caisson foundation system in association with the proposed new development at the above address CAISSON AND GRADE BEAM FOUNDATIONS The following minimum parameters may be utilized for the design of caisson and pad footings for the proposed new residential dwelling This foundation design is based on our subsurface investigation and preliminary review of the site and architectural plans 1 Caissons should extend a minimum of 7 feet into competent formational materials beyond the point of fixity, (anticipated to be a maximum of approximately 1 8 feet below proposed finish slab grade) Skin friction values provided herein are to be used only for that portion of the caisson which lies below the point of fixity Fixity may be assumed to be at the point 1 8 feet below finish slab grade Caisson embedment into formational material should be verified by a representative of this office prior to placing reinforcement or concrete Caissons should be designed based on a skin friction of 475 psf (neglecting caisson weight) for that portion of caisson lying below the point of fixity, to a maximum total bearing capacity of 60 kip per caisson Designs with proposed vertical bearing greater than 60 kip (omitting caisson wt ) shall be reviewed on a case by case basis by Engineering Design Group Cleanliness of caisson excavations are to be inspected prior to placement of steel l/'fy &/C) - Job No 012684-1 hMainrile on mam LETTER1LETTER U'001\012G84 BALES CAISSON FOUNDATION wpd 3 Caissons may be designed with an arching effect of three (3) caisson diameters total 4 Bearing values may be increased by 33% when considering wind, seismic, or other short duration loadings 5 Caissons shall not be out of plumb by more than 2% of their total length 6 Caisson excavations should be cleaned of all loose soil debris subsequent to excavation and prior to the placement of reinforcing steel The contractor should utilize a clean out bucket to remove loose debris in the bottom of the excavations Caisson excavations should then be visually observed by our representative in order to verify depth of embedment and cleanliness of the excavation bottom 7 Caissons should be designed with a minimum diameter of 24 inches and be reinforced in accordance with the recommendations of the structural engineer 8 Caissons may be designed using a passive earth pressure, of equivalent fluid weight, of 400 pounds per cubic foot for below point of fixity 9 Concrete for caissons shall have a maximum water to cement ration of 0 5 and a minimum compressive strength of 3,000 psi The actual water to cement ratio and concrete strength specifications shall be determined by project structural engineer Summary of design values Minimum Diameter Minimum Embedment Skin Friction Allowable Passive Pressure Maximum Caisson Spacing Point of Fixity 24 inches 7 feet below point of fixity 475 psf below fixity, to maximum of 40 kips 400 psf 10 feet 18 feet below finish slab grade The proper installation of caissons will be of great importance Care in drilling, placement of steel, and the pouring of concrete will be essential to avoid excessive erosion of caissons boring walls within the upper fills Concrete placement by pumping or tremie tube may be considered Both clean out and concrete placement should be addressed in the specifications Caissons excavations should be observed by our office prior to the installation of reinforcement Caissons excavations should be properly shored prior to allowing any personnel into the excavation BALES DEVELOPMENT Page No 2 GALICIA WAY, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Job No 012684-1 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL CIVIL STRUCTURAL S ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS It should be noted that the recommendations of the soils report, referenced above, should be used in conjunction with the project plans Recommendations of the soils report are considered minimums and may be augmented by designers and structural engineers If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact our office Sincerely, ENGINEERING DESI Steve Norns RCE 47672 BALES DEVELOPMENTGALICIA WAY, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Page No 3 Job No 012684-1 ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP GEOTECHNICAL CIVIL STRUCTURAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP 2121 Montiel Road, San Marcos, California 92069 • (760) 839-7302 • Fax (760) 480-7477 • E-mail ENGDG@aol com PROJECT: PROJECT ADDRESS: DATE: JOB No.: BALES RESIDENCE - Foundation Design 2605 Gahcia Way Carlsbad, CA Apnl 29, 2002 012684-2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM DESIGN DATA SHEET CAISSON DESIGN DETAILS SPECIFICATIONS SHEET # Gl F1-F4 D1-D4 S1-S2 PREPARED BY Ton/Ca^aJk/da Project Engineer PROJECT- JOB No: SHEET: BALES RESIDENCE 012684-2 Gl CODE: SEISMIC ZONE: WIND EXPOSURE: SOIL DATA: STRUCTURAL DESIGN DATA SHEET 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 4 C, 70 MPH WIND SPEED "CAISSON FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROPOSED BALES RESIDENCE TO BE LOCATED AT 2650 GALICIA WAY, CARLSBAD, CA" PREPARED BY ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP, DATED APRIL 25, 2002 MATERIALS STEEL ROLLED SHAPES BOLTS WELDS A36 A307 E70XX, PER AWS Dl.l SPECIFICATIONS CONCRETE FOUNDATION (STD) FOUNDATION (FRAME) REBAR #5 or LESS REBAR#6orLARGER F '* c F '* c F F = 2,500 PSI = 3,000 PSI v = 40 KSI v = 60 KSI LUMBER BOARD DIMENSION 2X DIMENSION 4X DIMENSION 6X TIMBERS GLU-LAMS PARALLAMS HARDWARE PLYWOOD D.F. #1 D.F. #1 D.F. #1 D.F. #1 D.F. #1 24FV8 DF/DF 2.0E WS PSL SIMPSON CD or CC Fv = 95PSI Fv = 95 PSI Fv = 85 PSI F4=165 PSI Fv=290 PSI STRUCT I or II Fb=1000 Fb=1000 Fb=1350 Fb=2400 Fb=2900 E=1.7X106 E=1.7X106 E-1.6X106 E=1.8X106 E=2.0X106 CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS BLOCK GROUT MORTAR Fm= 1500 PSI Ft = 2000 PSI Fc= 1800 PSI NGINEERING DESIGN GROUP i I:, vl T~i. i U>^*f-> JI__ __ :- .U'lU—.--,! • i^^ytvt/ ^ I I I 2121 Montiel Road San Marcos CA -92069 Office (760) 839 7302 FAX (760) 480-7477 E mail ENGDG@aol com Job Job Job No By .Sheet No -Date "rpO -^uJM- WiLJ>-s^_ -- '- 'rt^^J « HP/I r- 5.—» y- I i I I I I I I I I . _'_LJ .^ — i I ~^xV.> ^-^r ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP Job Name 2121 Montiei Road San Marcos CA -92069 Office (760) 839-7302 FAX (760) 480-7477 E-mail ENGDG@aolcom ~~ T ..1Ia Job Address. Job No By —, .Sheet No -Date 1 1 •? 01M-/~ \ ~ i i i i i i i A) NGINEERING DESIGN GROUP Job Name 2121 Montiel Road *V San Marcos CA *92069 Office (760) 839-7302 FAX (760) 480-7477 E-mail ENGDG@aoicom Job Address. Job No By .Sheet No -Date . -I— NGINEERING DESIGN GROUP 2121 Montiel Road "S. San Marcos CA -92069 Office (760) 839-7302 FAX (760) 480-7477 E-mail ENGDG@aol com Job Name Job Job No By — ENGINEERING DESIGN Job Name 2121 Montiel Road San Marcos CA -92069 Office (760) 839-7302 FAX (760) 480-7477 E-mail ENGDG@aol com Job Address Job No By .Sheet No 01 feNGINEERING DESIGN GROUP JWt j«U«,JW>l i JflCWIECruHW. CDHSUIMNTS "SilDESHW i COMMERCIAL i,ONiHULtlON 2121 Montiel Road San Marcos CA -92069 OHtce (760) 839-7302FAX (760) 480-7477 E-mail ENGDG@aol com Job Name Job Address. Job No By .Sheet No -Date \o -o INGINEBRINGDESIGN GROUP I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2121 Monttel Road San Marcos CA -92069 Office (760) 839-7302 FAX (760) 480-7477 E-mail ENGDG@aol com Job Name_ Job Address. Job No By TC. .Sheet No -Date pf t • - * * t 1 • -. •I _ Ii — NGESfEERINGDESIGN GROUP Job Name i itOtaWNiaL C1VII jTBUCfUIMLi WHITE' TI)N»L ONilLUhtS OB "ES DE1T AL i lOMUtRCai. LjHbf1Ul.iTM 2121 Montiel Road San Marcos CA -92069 Office (760) 839-7302 FAX (760) 480-7477 E-mail ENGDG@aolcom Job Address. Job No By .Sheet No -Date JBH. iii I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PROJECT NAME BALES RESIDENCE JOB NUMBER 012684-2 PAGE Si GENERAL 1 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS BEFORE STARTING WORK, AND NOTIFY THE DESIGNER/ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND 2 SPECIFIC NOTES AND DETAILS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THESE GENERAL NOTES AND THE TYPICAL DETAILS ON THIS SHEET IN CASE OF CONFLICT 3 WHERE NO CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ARE SHOWN OR NOTED FOR ANY PART OF THE WORK, THE DETAILS USED SHALL BE THE SAME AS FOR OTHER SIMILAR WORK 4 THE DESIGN IS BASED ON THE 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE AND THE LOCAL BUILDING CODE 5 NEITHER THE OWNER NOR THE DESIGNER/ENGINEER WILL ENFORCE SAFETY MEASURES OR REGULATIONS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN, CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN ALL SAFETY DEVICES, INCLUDING SHORING AND BRACING, AND SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFORMING TO ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS, LAWS, AND REGULATIONS FOUNDATION 1 FOUNDATION DESIGN WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "CAISSON FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED BALES RESIDENCE AT GALICIA WAY, CARLSBAD, CA" PREPARED BY ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUP, DATED APRIL 25, 2002 2 IF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR SUSPECTS EXPANSIVE SOILS BASED ON OBSERVATION OF THE FOUNDATION EXCAVATION, HE/SHE MAY REQUIRE SOIL EXPANSION INDEX TESTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH U B C STD 29-2 OR CHAPTER 6, DIV 7, TITLE 8 OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE AND RESUBMITTAL OF PLANS TO PLAN CHECK TO VERIFY THAT THE SOIL ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED 3 FINISH GRADE SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILDING WITH A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 2% FOR AT LEAST 5'-0" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 1 1 • 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 • 1 • 1 1 1 1 •1 •1 1 PROJECT NAME BALES RESIDENCE JOB 4 5 - NUMBER 012684-2 PAGE S2 HOLDOWNS SHALL BE TIED IN PLACE PRIOR TO CALLING FOR FOUNDATION INSPECTION PROVIDE MINIMUM FOUNDATION PER TABLE 29A OF THE 97' U B C FOR STUD BEARING WALLS, UNO CONCRETE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH IN 28 DAYS OF 2,500 PSI, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF FOOTINGS SUPPORTING MOMENT RESISTING STEEL FRAMES WHICH SHALL HAVE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH IN 28 DAYS OF 3,000 PSI SPECIAL INSPECTION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTHS IN EXCESS OF 2500 PSI REINFORCING SHALL COMPLY WITH ASTM A615, GRADE 60 FOR #6 AND LARGER, OTHERWISE GRADE 40 NO PIPES OR DUCTS SHALL BE PLACED IN CONCRETE COLUMNS, WALLS, OR SLABS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY DETAILED REINFORCING DETAILING SHALL CONFORM TO THE AC1 318-89 AND THE CONCRETE REINFORCING STEEL INSTITUTE "MANUAL, OF STANDARD PRACTICE", LATEST EDITION REINFORCING, ANCHOR BOLTS AND ALL OTHER EMBEDDED ITEMS SHALL BE SECURELY HELD IN POSITION PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE WALLS AND COLUMNS SHALL BE DOWELED FROM SUPPORTS WITH BARS OF THE SAME SIZE AND SPACING SPLICE CONTINUOUS REINFORCING WITH 30 DIAMETER OF 2'-0' MINIMUM LAP TYPICAL CONCRETE COVERAGE OF REINFORCING CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH 3" EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER LARGER THAN #5 2" #5 AND SMALLER 1 1/2" UNEXPOSED - COLUMNS, BEAMS, AND GIRDERS 1 1/2" SLABS AND JOISTS 3/4" CD _O ^"Q<oOLLSLULUCS.KCO 'N ^o UJK dO <Q. CD COh-X^5Q: £\>^ ^1? ^4 ^ >^-^ 01-17-2003 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Check Revision Permit No PCR02314 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address Permit Type Parcel No Valuation Reference # Project Title 2650GALICIAWYCBAD PCR 2161802400 Lot* 0 $0 00 Construction Type NEW BALES RES-REVISE TRUSS DESIGN Status Applied Entered By Plan Approved Issued Inspect Area ISSUED 12/12/2002 RMA 12/23/2002 01/17/2003 Applicant BRUCE CANALE 2820 PIO PICO DR 92008 760 434-2233 Owner BALES JAMES T&PAMELAS20W^A^ILV7YB2JS3002 Oi 02 CGP 120-00 551 SAMUEL CT ENCINITASCA 92024 Plan Check Revision Fee Additional Fees $120 00 $000 Total Fees $12000 Total Payments To Date $000 Balance Due*$120 00 Inspector FINAL APPROVAL Date Clearance NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions" You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exaction1, If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3 32 030 Failure to timely follow ihat procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewei connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which_voy have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired PERMIT APPLICATION /A{A CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDfNGTCPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008 hi-,-* PROJECT INFORMATION^ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. EST VAL Plan Ck Deposit Validated By, . Date /A////Wf f { v. " Address (include Bldq/Suite #}Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No Subdivision Name/Number Unit No Phase No Total # of units Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use Proposed Use SQ FT #of Stones # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms Name Address City State/Zip Telephone #Fax* Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # (Sec 7031 5 Business and Professions Code Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption Any violation of Section 7031 5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars I5500J) Name State License Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone # Designer Name State License # Address City State/Zip Telephone Workers' Compensation Declaration I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations n I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued Q I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are Insurance Company _ Policy No _ Expiration Date _ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) f~1 CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall noi employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California WARNING Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), m addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3703 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees SIGNATURE _ DATE __ 7,i!fg,OWNER:BUILDER|DECLARATION IT^f**? ' ^^^if^S&^^^^^,^i-^ *MI'?t $ I * ? *Wvk*-*i . , I ll fl V .VAS IL " !|T IIs " • ,! tf- ' S^W*' " ' ? I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason n I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec 7044, Business and Professions Code The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who bjilds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale) l~1 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec 7044, Business and Professions Code The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractors} licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law) f~1 I am exempt under Section _ Business and Professions Code for this reason 1 I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement l~1 YES ONO 2 I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work 3 I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number) 4 1 plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number) __ 5 1 will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work) _ _ PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE IBUlLbiN^PERMlTSWY^^'iP 1'* ~~'^ u AS& ^tl! ,-I.UC^ 1 (V "$">! il F<"•„ ^,,. * S' "V.,f( /It*fr Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act7 Q YES Q NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Q YES Q NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Q YES Q NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY WOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 8 I |CONSTHUCTIQN7LENDINQ1AGENCYfl7lt4i''rL T^-K^^rl*1 "'^?'^ *£ -^H^l,1^ *«^»*f <[ ir^V A/^l*'^^ A i/ ' JT, A I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued l'5ec 3097|i) Civil Code) LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS '9.'4ft APPLICANT CERTIFICATION ^J^f\ (if Ui ^S'*jfotN^Pu™'^ J^C^M -^Y^'^lXVjU !2&jr'<'!.M'!iHft !V*45< "^t f -rf"(f <*' 1l "^i ">"3 I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT OSHA An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stones in height EXPIRATION Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is corrjrj^nced for a penod^lSO days (Section 106 4 4 Uniform Building Code) / APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ^^ff lATE WHITE File YELLOW Applicant PINK Finance EsG\l Corporation In Partnership with Government for Building Safety DATE DEC, 19, 2O02 Q a(JURIS JURISDICTION' Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO 01-3840 (REV. # 3) - PCR02-314 SET I PROJECT ADDRESS 2650 Galicia Way PROJECT NAME Galicia Way SFD X] The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person f-t The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to XI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Sam Wright Telephone # (760)720-7631 Date contacted (by ) Fax # (760) 720-7634 Mail Telephone Fax In Person XI REMARKS: Truss calculations & drawings under this revision By SADRE FOR Kal Tumalieh Enclosures Esgil Corporation D GA --D MB D EJ D PC 1216 trnsmtldot 9320 Chesapeake Dave, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 'Carlsbad 01-3840 (REV. # 3) - PCR02-314 DEC. 19, 2002 • VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION. Carlsbad (REV. # 3) - PCR02-314 PLAN CHECK NO O1-3840 PREPARED BY SADRE FOR Kal Tumalieh DATE DEC. 19, 2002 BUILDING ADDRESS 2650 Galicia Way BUILDING OCCUPANCY R-3/U-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION VN BUILDING PORTION revisions Atr Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA (Sq Ft) 1 HR cb Valuation Multiplier By Ordinance Reg Mod VALUE ($) Plan Check Fee by Ordinance $120 00 Erorr you checked Structur' Type of Review [ Repetitive Fee Repeats * and Hourly at the same time Complete Review D Other m Hourly Structural Only Hour* Esgil Plan Review Fee $9600 * Based on hourly rate Comments Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue do OloOZmC/)DOO>D Oom Om o CO I\D Ocn CO CT> oo o> O C33 r ^03 g o STONE TRUSS COMPANY www.stonetruss.com STONE TRUSS CO. CERTIFIED INSPECTION ICBO EVALUATION SERVICE INC. AA-583 IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH UBC2321.3 PREFABRICATED WARNING * WARNING * WARNING BE SURE ERECTION CONTRACTOR UNDERSTANDS HIB-91. SUMMARY SHEET ENCLOSED 507 JONES ROAD • OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92054 • (760) 967-6171 • FAX (760) 967-6178 E-mail stc mc@ix netcom com ST001 34'5"8 t- T) 3)O CD~n rn i— Zo CD UXJ Ocn CDo2o DESIGNED BY STONE TRUSS CO. JOB DESCRIPTION BflLES RESIDENCE JOB LOCRTION 2650 GRLICIR WflY —t CD to —I —( t/i e/i i/i o o o o r-oo |3 !^ r> 2 > ii. tO O 1 ii ° ' O, 1o 1t1 t o 1— (0n ^ xe- 3 ^* 5*0 CT)>1 "G C" S 3n f— ffl O fTXn —»— o3 - r" C2 (T (ft 1CZ rr C" S3 ,n -v.a 1d (^ xO r^-n no r-— 3 ra01O 3*-* C^*QCU (-TO 3"?c •-3 < 'Z, 5d > OG tr1 1-3en f men M - en -T) mm O ir1 H »-3O O SO en en > > -n «-3 O >-3 o *T\ i-n "r* D^AJ LLJ *-L* -" I—I M otsJ i-9 2; m G M"1 r~~i m^q tiJ u» ^ M S cn •-3 O M M M ° ° c O O n en t) O M w t-H D CD2O mCD ^ td £ 1-3 H O ffi OnQDOOQ.QQQOffN^xJOOO0 30- * / \ i'0 Q 0 Q QO'QOOOGOOOO ic--1., "J< ;--°S £5^:f ^>? n""S o On O 0 ID CD X l/lIMm33>o o n O O <~Crn <33 > mo -o~co en o ai OC O O 0.0 Oo O en en "DTJO3D CO CO O i — a a oo rn m oo ^ co ^> en n <i— O o m--a m O m - O-n ^3 ^z.m m -o >Co O r- r-cn -i >- 33 2 Zrn c c o2 eo -no co > 1-1*-< m o en m > 33 o3J 33 rn Mrn 3333 - Hmo ia > z: m> c o33 H 33 33o t-< mn o H enz z 3) -gO m c: oo en 2o en enOH nZ O ~n CD< > nm en CD r~2 m 33 nM rn n Hn ?: o -<o > „z: > H o> o o -ni~ < 33 -n o33 m CD xm -533c:enen X X X X X X X -to too=1 Q 10/13/^002 11 46 FAX 1 760 967 6178 STONE TRUSS CO INC ©006/007 z: "*^aHt.':5""aQ'^nsi-wanS: ti^ss trl ~Vrt i-"e53S?,Bgs-5 O un •*»• CTi O O O O u~> co GO co -n -J| ci(— o LO -O en CO o<: n? ^1 OJa orn o~?3 tyi ©(S> t/) OCI ^~D —I n-o o ' > rn-< o -H h f-f CD CDc fij mQ. r-l- r+ ro oo 3•a -5c: CD n> n> Q. [02330043] [ALPINE] [IJBC CODhJ [*A 2PLY HIP H8] [B760/BALES RESIDENCE] =====BearingS=== rx-Loc] [React] [Size] ===== MaxTen MaxComp MaxTcn MaxCoinp Grade 4 QF-L #l&Bet * DF-L #]&Bet 6 DF-L ?! 6 DF-L frl 6 DF L *1 6 DF-L #1 DF-L #18Bet Uf -L j/lSBet 4 DF-L DF-L 4 DF L £UBet 4 DF L jilSBet 4 UF-L #l£Bet GF-L ^tlSBet PL ME MEMBER Dt -L jfl&Bet PL^TE MEMBLR DF L s 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 4 4 4 Grade llf- HF DF- HF DF-m DF- HF DF HF Std/Stud Std/stud L jtlSBet Std/Stud L #l£Bet Std/Stud L ^ISBet Std/SLud L jfUBet Std/Stud Length Brace 38 t] 62 2* 62 ?S &l 25 &£ 27 47 81 IS 06 15 06 15 06 Ib 81 0 tn 2 4 IIP Std/Stud 38 47 ate Method deflY(L) 5X6 28 @ 32 @ 34 24 @ 34 15 2 15 2 15 2 2 oiler Pressed]= ip] [OC 24 00] [DF [UBC pasb\«2] [OC ?4 00] [Dh deflY (I) —I CD CD —I —I o o r~CO COo oCO !_n--J --J CD o> in h [0233001/1] [ALPINE] [UBC CODE] [#A7 COMN] [B76Q/BALES RESIDENCE] 'Beanngs=== [X-Loc] [React] [Size] ===== CSI 0 0 36 0 40 40 0 36 39 50 0 81 69 0 70 0 81 0 50 _ = = Plate Member = = =Fi cti uus Mernber=- =-= Piste Member =- =-=Fictious FndPts MaxTen MaxComp = =- [Rol ler Pr pass -f2] [OC 24/00] [DF 1 PLF @ 00 to/ ?8 PLF @ 00 to/ 20 @ 34 PLF @ 00 trf 10 @ 34 -= = [Rol 1 ery Pressed]^- A Dl -L Std/St Method deflV(L) (/I LTl U~> CO CO r H £ //J O CD=; 50en >:w ci (~> © ui 1>- m o 70 ~ — C3 X rt- CD co-p" IT (T> (T>a. n- r+ CD © © o o o o o o ro oo 3 T3 —i ro r-frp CO CO 00 CL Indicates Forces Per Ply Br>anngs=== [X-Loc] [React] [Si7e] ===== Grade 4 DF-L #]&Bct DF-L #l&Bet 6 DF-L #1 6 DF-L #1 6 DF-L rfl 6 DF-L fl 4 DF-l DT-L DF-L ilSBet DF-L jfl&Bct 4 DF-L #l&Bet 4 DF- 4 DF-L jlSliet- PLATE MEMBER - DF-I rfl&Bet Std/Stud Std/Stud L #U6et HI Std/Stud 4 DF-L *UBet 4 Hh Std/Stud DF-L HF Std/Stud 4 Dl -L *HBet 4 HF Std/Slud 4 DF-L 4 Hf- Std/Stud [MM 2] /-I 5 2] [ 0%] 2] [100%] 2] 2][100%] =] 5 2] [ 0%] =15 2][100%] 15 2] [100%] =15 2J 15 2][ 01] =lb 2][100%] =4 1 ] f 0%] 28 PLF 32 PLF 54 PLF 62 PLF Method deflV(L) -H cn CDo <~i n r- cu o O <Ji -C- en O O O O O O O H H o o o r~CD CD i—• i— eno o o o oCT> CD O o o3: xo o CO (g>m—1 © o o o x IV) O O CD <-l- fD fD on ft> -5 0) CL [02330046] [ALP1NF] [UBC CODE] [*B 2PLY GIRDER] [B760/RALES RESIDENCE] [TCLL 16 0] [TCDL 14 0]LBCDL 5 0] [8CLL 0 0] [OF 1 25] [OC ?A 0][NM 2] [SOFFIT 0 0] [OHLL 1 Ox] Page I = Hearings— [X-Loc] [React] [bi ze] [ 0 00][ 4628] [0 33] [18 67] [ 6977] [0 33] EndPts MaxTen MaxConip 1- 4 4- b 5- 7 7 9 2- 3 3- 6 6 B 8-10 1- 2 0- 1 9 10 9 11 0 0 0 0 11447 11405 13435 13589 0 7 0 61 -12118 -10923 -10920 -14351 0 0 0 0 4025 0 -4732 -0 AXL 0 36 0 31 0 31 0 50 0 35 0 35 0 41 0 42 BND 0 1C, 0 20 0 22 0 21 0 17 CSI GLC 0 bl 1 0 51 0 54 0 71 0 52 0 77 0 71 0 88 Membe- • Member- Member • Member• S Grade 4 DF L ,/UBet 4 DF L 4 DF L 4 DF-L rfUBet 8 DF-L SS 8 DF-L SS 8 DF L SS 8 DF-L SS •- PLATF MEMBER 1 DF-L #lSBet • PLATE MEMBER 1 Dl -L Length 62 77 53 68 53 68 62 77 58 38 52 12 V 12 58 38 0 50 3 71 0 50 3 /I Brace Plywd 4 -3 99 -0 18 0 00 0 00 0 18 -Vert 4 22 Ver L -4 22 Plywd p 1 ywd @120 @120 O120 @120 EndPts MaxTen MaxCorap 3- 4 598 0 4-6 0 -1167 b- 6 6595 0 67 0 -3365 7- 8 21G2 AXL GLC S GraOe Length 0 14 1 4 HF Std/Stud 15 77 0 21 1 4 HF Std/Stud 51 12 04? 1 4 DF L ±lM)c! 32 56 0 60 1 4 HF Sid/Stud 51 1? 3f ace 0 0 51 1 4 HF SU/SUid 15 77 Node 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 Plate 0 29 0 29 16 26 13 74 13 84 18 71 18 /] 19 00 Method def1Y(L)deflY(T)dxL dxT 0 00 L/999 0 13 L/999 0 13 L/999 0 14 L/999 0 00 L/999 0 00 0 28 L/788 0 01 0 28 L/785 0 02 0 i/ 1/694 0 01 0 33 I/666 0 01 0 31 L/709 0 00 0 31 L/706 0 02 0 00 0 01 0 05 0 03 0 03 0 00 0 04 [MOO 28 32 0 0 10 1615 1350 605 719 719 605 719 605 719 605 /19 605 [Hip 32 28 9 -16 6 4 5 ?57 316 1238 1470 STD-AUTO LOAD] PLF @ 00 to PLF @ 00 to PLF @ 00 to PLF @ 00 to PLF @ 00 to 00 Lt>s @ 8 00 L1)S @ 8 71 Lbs @ 10 29 Lbs @ 10 29 Lbs @ 12 71 Lbs @ 12 29 Lbs @ 14 71 IDs @ 14 29 Lbs @ 16 71 Lbs @ 16 29 Lbs 0 18 71 Lbs @ 18 = -- [Relief Gird Ld ][0 PLF @ 0 0 t PLI @ 0 0 t/i PLF @ 0 0 l/o PLF @ oo io PLF @ 2 0/Lo PLF @ 2 (V to PLF @ 701o PLF @ 9/0 to PLF @ 9/0 to 56 Lbs /@ 8 79 LbS/@ 8 -----[Roller P [OC 24 00] f/Dr 28 @ 19 C [ 32 @ 19/0 [ 122 @ 6/0 [ 103 @ 6 0 [ 10 @ 1/9 0 [ 0 0 0 0 0 32 @ 19 0 [ 19 0 [ 2 0 [ 2 0 [ 7 0 [ 7 0 [ 9 0 [ 19 0 [ 19 0 [ 0 4 X Ang 0 4 1\ Ang t essed] 0 00 L/999 0 00 L/999 0 03 0 06 1 25][NM 2] =15 /][ 0%] =15 7][100X] = 4 1][ OS] =41][100%] - 4 1] [ 0%] —) CO CO —I —1 [— o o i— o o o o ~a ~o ~a ~o ~aCO t/l C/l t-O Cn CO o< CD ro rv> r-o Page 1 [STD AUTO LOAD] [OC 24 00] [DF 1 25] [NM 1] 60 PLF @ 00 to 60 @ Ib b [y=15 6] [ 10 PI F @ 0 0 To 10 @ 16 b \_y= 4 1] [ = =.=.= --[Roller Pressed]=-= = =-=-=-= = pass ^2] [OC 24 00] [DF 1 25] [NM 1] 28 PLI 0 0 0 to ^8 @ 15 5 [y=15 6] [ 30 PI F @ 0 0 to 30 @ 15 5 [>= 4 1] [ = =- = - = -[Rol1er Pressed]- =-= =- = -= =- = 15 ^9 23 co co t/i CO o< (D H h-r O O <-t <-t rt-1-1- <-t o o o O O Xwo o ro oo 0) c-t- 0) 01 CO CO 0)_Q ft) D. [02330048] [ALPINE] [UBC CODF] [#C1 STUB 2PLV GIRDtR] [B/60/BALES RESIDENCE] [TCLL 16 0] [TCDL 14 0] [BCOL 5 0] [BCLL 0 0] [DF 1 25] [OC 24 0] [NM 2] [SOFFIT 0 0] [OHLL 1 Ox] Page 1 [DF 1 25] [NM 2] =====Beanngs=== [X-Loc] [Reart] [Size] [y-15 6] [100%] Brace Plywd PlywO Plywd Plywd EndPts Maxlen MaxComp AXL GLC 5 Gradei 4 HF srd/stua O ODmCOi) rom <J><gCO Om >52co 5 O o!^CDCO > 0°