The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2660 ACUNA CT; ; 80-107; PermitI. ' i n YI r? ,. . . NSPKTION VALIDATED .- ;a .. J -. LNSPKTION VALIDAT€# 1 ti I c VI rn W D r r Q Z -I 0- 0 Z rn 0 n $ P .," x* DQ 0- -I= -r rf 'F 4 3 z i r LNSPECTION VMIDATED .. -r - " " " " " ., .. NSPKTION VALIDATE. Bo - 637 ESGIL CORPORATION 0820 CHESAPEAKE DR., (JK'ITE 122 RAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (714) ~ao-1468 h +.a,- ." INTERDEPARTMENTAL INFORMATION SHEET * BUILDING DEPARTMENT BECEIVED . . BUILDING ADDRESS: 26h & C? i. c PLANNING DEPARTMENT ZONE P- c LOT SIZE 'zL,uoo I-?.,cr.LOT WIDTH /v6 I %NITS ALLOWED UNITS PROVIDED I PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 2 PROVIDED 614 % COVERAGE ALLOWED PROVIDED BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED 35' PROVIDED FRONT SETBACK: SIDE SETBACK: REAR SETBACK: ALLOWED PROVIDEDF clK INTRUSIONS LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION PLAN COMMENTS: - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT /f/./ 1% NY5 F a 7.3.d ; .o.w. INDUSTRIAL WASTE IMPROVEMENTS 5/l)e*.bl-K -1 SEWER CONNECTION DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS "GRADING PERMIT YASEMENTS DRAINAGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADDITIONAL COMMEN OK TO ISSUE I FIRE DEPARTM SPFIKKLING S FIRE ALARPfS .. , FIRE HYDRANTS LOCATION I i 1 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OK TO ISSUE: DATE OK TO FINAL DATE .* -4."- .f 1 August 14,lQSO ' Mr. Paul Smith 118 Countrywood Lane Encinitas, Ca. 92024 JDMN VERNON & ASSOCIATES $858 S. ESCONDIW BLVO. ESCONDIDO, CA BZMS TEL. (714) 7438808 Subject: Preliminary Soils Survey Site: 2660 Acuna Court, La Costa, Ca. Re: Lot 97 La Costa Estates North Map No. 8302 .. Grading Plan by Bucher Drafting Service, dated 8-11-80 Mr. .Smith: Our office has completed a Preliminary Soils Survey on the above site. The soil horizon consists of a reddish brown clayey silt (ML per the Unified Soils Classification) topsoil over bedrock. In general the depth of the topsoil is less than 2 feet and has a large amount of sandfgravel in it derived from the underlying parent rock. The bedrock is highly weathered and factured in the upper 12". It is our understanding the site is to be developed for a wood frame residence. According to the above grading plan cuts to a depth of 7' below the surface are planned w.ith fill depths of up to 9'. Cuts of this magnitude may require blasting, although most of the bedrock exposed appears rippable. Fills made with the topsoil will be satisfactory as long as rock sizes are less than 1' in diameter. Rocks of larger size may be placed in embankment only under the supervision of a qualified soils engineer and at least 4' clear of utility trenches or foundations. The soils in the area exhibit slight to moderate expansive potential and footing reinforcement may be limifed to one #4 at top and bottom of all footings. Footings should be sized the U.B.C. bar per L' .. JOHN VERNON e ASSOCIATES ”. 1869 S. ESCONDIDO BLVD. ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 TEL. (714) 7438808 Cut slopes and fill slopes of topsoil will be stable at 2:l inclination and rock cuts may be stable at vertical slopes if inspected for competence by the soils,engineer. Footings may’ be designed to support up to 2000 #/SF. Grading is to be done in accordance with the approved Grading Plan, standard specifications for placement of compacted filled ground. the Grading Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad and the attached C.W.DAVIS RCE 21719 ENGINEERING SOILS TESTING SURVEYING JOHN VERNON 8 ASSOCIATES 1859s. ESCONDIDO BLVD. ESCONOIDO, CA 92025 TEL. (714) 743-8808 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLACEMENT OF COMPACTED FILLED GROUND Objective: strength to support any structures proposed. The method by which this is obtained is described herein. Preliminary Proceedures: Obtain filled ground which is uniform and has adequate internal ments of the agency whose jurisdiction covers the land on which the 1. Permits - Owner shall ascertain the grading permit require- gradirg is to be performed and shall be responsible for complying with them. compaction of filled ground will not be delayed. 2. Water - An adequate water supply shall be provided so that vide direction in grading, testing for compaction and certification 3. Soils Engineer - A soils engineer shall be retained to pro- that the grading complies with grading ordinances and with approved grading plans. Grading: 1. Clearing and Grubbing - All natural surface which is to be covered by filled ground, excavated or needed for brow ditches, Trees, shrubs and 'grass, as well as organic overburden shall be swales or other grading appurtenances shall be cleared and grubbed. removed from the area to be graded. Cleared material may be disposed of as approved by the local controlling agency. No embanbent shall consist of trees, shrubs or other organic material. 2. Natural Ground Preparation - Natural ground shall be excavated from beneath embankment areas to solid material, the exact depth as determined by the soils engineer. This material shall be brou ht to proper moisture content and recompacted to not less than 902 maximum density as determined by A.S.T.M. D-1557-70. X)HN VERNON & ASSOCIATES 1860s. ESCONDIDO BLVD. ESCONDIDO, CA 02025 TEL. (714) 743-8808 Any existing fill which has not been certified must be removed and recompacted. If the slope of the existing ground exceeds 1' vertical in 6' horizontal, a bench cut level, 10' wide shall be excavated at the a horizontal base for more uniform compaction. toe of the fill. This will allow the embankment to be placed on 3. Embankment Placement - Fill material should consist of native or imported material which has been brought to the optimum moisture content. Material to be used for embankments may have racks with diameters greater than 12" providing they are evenly distributed in the soil mixture and are at least 3' below finish grade. Pill slopes shall not consist of, nor be founded on, large rocks. Although rocks may be placed along the outside of the toe of the fill slopes. Rock placement in enbankments shall be under direct supervision of the soils engineer, Embankment material shall be placed in layers varying from 6" to 12" deep depending on soil type, and compacted by suitable compact- ive effort to a density of not less than 90% of the maximum density as determined by A.S.T.F. D-1557-70. Koisture content and depth grading, and shall be updated whenever embankment soil types change. of layers shall be determined by the soil engineer at the time of As the embankment increases in elevation new benches shall be cut into original ground. Benches shall be at least 6' horizontally determined by the soils engineer at the time of grading. into natural ground, be level and shall occur at intervals to be ment which will result in an embankment that is properly compacted, C,ompaction may be obtained by the use of any combination of equip- uniform in moisture and properly finished to the lines and grades shown on the plans or to those set forth in the applicable grading ordinance. 4. Additional Grading - Cut slopes shall be cut to the lines and grades as shown on the plans or set forth in the applicable grading ordinance. PROPSRTV DEVELOCYLNT INOINEERS c*avmccmwe -soILsmsTwa .sU~V~IIW~ X)HN VERNON & ASSOCIATES 1869 S. ESCONDIDO BLVD. ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 TEL. (714) 743-8808 Cut slopes shall be protected from erosion by brow ditches. Brow ditches shall be either earthen or lined with erosion resistant material as shown on the plans or as recommended by the engineer. Embankments shall be protected from erosion by placing an earthen Where drainage is brought down the slope, the drainage way shall berm along the top of slope for the entire perimeter of the fill. be lined with erosion resistant material to prevent loss of embank- ment slopes. Where eaves are located less than 5' horizontally from top of fill slopes, eaves troughs shall be provided to prevent weakening of slope due to water intrusion, All areas of the building pad must be well drained. Drainage swales shall have a mimimum slope of 1' vertical in 100' horizontal unpaved or 1' vertical in 200' horizontal paved with concrete. Drainage shall be provided to ensure foundations will not be subjected to ponded water. - vEnm (L ASSOCIATES 1859 S. ESCONDIDO BLVD. ESCONDIDO. CA 92025 Agency 0 Project Location ’ Name of Permittee LLUJ0& rS“/ i4 Grading Permit No. A. COMPATIBILITY wIm GRNING PLAN AND PERMIT A4 L&fc A?%,A4 I 1. Was the campacted fill placed only in the approximate lo- Yesx No- cations designated on the grading plan as areas to be filled? conform to the grading plan? prescribed property line setback (1.5’ for fill! 3.0‘ for cuts)? izontal to 1 vertical? were the cuts made in the proper location and trJ the proper slope approximately as shown on the approved grading plan? the grading plan? 2. Did the quantity of fill material placed approxinately YesV ” KO 3. Did the toe of fill or the top of cut appear to meet the Yesk No- - 4. Were the finished fill slopes equal to or less than 2 hcr- YesVNc- 5. If the fill material was obtained by cuts on the site, Ye .k_/ N 0”- ” 6. Were brow ditches constructed approximately as shown on YesE KO- B. LOCATION AND AMOUNT OF CONPACTION TESTS 1. Have you attached a sketch and data showing the location Yes& Nc- 2. Was a compaction test made so that there is at least one VesE K-8- 3. As indicated by inspections, observations and compaction Yesz No- and relative elevation for all compaction tests? test in each 2‘ thick lens of compacted material. test results, was the fill, excluding the top l.O’, compacted to at least 90% of maximum dry density? C. QUALITY OF FILL COMPACTION OPERATION 1. Was the area to receive fill properly prepared in terms of Yesg No- brush removal, benching, wetting, removal of noncompcted fill or debris and related items? 3’ or more below finish grade? 2. Was all detrimentally expansive soil placed in the fill at YesK No- Duplicate of DPL 1573 Rev. 3-7-79 +, I. '. . ' .J, Halve you attached a COPY of your curve showing the rela- Yes1/ No '.. tionship between optimum moisture content and maximum c density? .smaller than 12" in size? structures? ance with the provisions of the grading ordinance? ,' 4. Was all material used as fill (earth, rocks. gravel) YeSy No 5. Are all areas of the fill suitable for support Of Yesy No 6. Were all existing fills on the site recompacted in accord- YeSC No - - - D. STATISTICAL DATA 1. Dates the grading work was performed8 / I %. zq. 28. i!-1 -&r 2. Dates your representative was on site and number of hours on site for each date, and name of representative! 9 c /4, 23- BO GL AH5 &G JE L/B/r7- " E. AS-BUILT DATA 1. If the fill placement was not in a with the Ye 6- Nc approved grading plan, did you not obtain approval for deviation fro ceeding with additional fill pla location, depth and type ~f Til u Sl2:nmittPe f@I review anti 22;?rov2? an as-built pl23? - rmittee to before prc- 2. If the approved grading plan do lect the actual Yes-. No- SERTIFICATION T hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that the informaticn cro,Jjded in this certification is true t.0 the best r.: my kr;cw?e.~.".-' 2nd belief. Rev. 3-7-79 hplicate of CI'L %73 i i i ,- 1 .' . ...... ". t ....... .\ ' T=:- t RELATIVE TEST TEST* / COMPACTION OG +3 FG - & . " . .. REPORT SAND VOLUME DATA: INITIAL WEIGHT OF SAND WIGHT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SAND DENSITY VOL. OF HOLE 6 CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE: IN PLACE OPT. MOISTURE WET WEIGHT 3- LB -OR DRY WEIGHT 4s GR WEIGHT OF WATER a #5 GR IN PLACE WET DENSITY /37 LB/CF N PLACE DRY DENSITY /24 LB/CF 7'0 MOiSTURE A L IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET DENSITY OPTIMUM DRY DENSITY W p" /32 LB/~~ OPTIMUM MolSTURE 'Yo RELATIVE COMPACTION: REMARKS: XuoISTlm? TEST# 2 REPORT JOHN VERNON e ASSOC. "TY OIVOL- mRS DATE: 9~/4-80 ma *rrtacporLv~rrmaoo.cr 9202s d 7U3-0000 TESTED BY LOCATION: IV. HL~~ r,tr SAND VOLUME DATA: cOS/G &/fJ INITIAL WEIGHT OF SAND WIGHT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SAND DENSITY VOL. OF HOLE 8 CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE: IN PLACE OPT. MOISTURE WET WEIGHT 500 OR &.Os LE 5- GR DRY WEIGHT 955 Q( Q55 GR WEIGHT OF WATER 45 GR 45 OR % MOISTURE /O A IN PLACE WET DENSITY 34 LE/CF IN PLACE DRY DENSITY /zz LB/CF IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET DENSITY OPTIMUM DRY DENSITY OPTIMUM MolSTURE % RELATIVE COMPACTION: REMARKS: I %Y)(StUK TEST# 3 RELATIVE COMPACTION OG ++ FG - 3 TESTREPORT I SAND VOLUME DATA: INITIAL WEIGHT OF SAND WIGHT OF RESIWE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SAND DENSITY VOL. OF HOLE 6 CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE: WET WEIGHT DRY WEIGHT WEIGHT OF WATER IN PLACE WET DENSITY IN PLACE DRY DENSITY 70 MOISTURE IMPACT TEST DATA: IN PLACE OPT. MOISTURE .n OPTIMUM WET DENSITY OPTIMUM DRY DENSITY W 1- /3JJ LE/= OPTIMUM MOISTURE Yo RELATIVE COMPACTION: XYWSTUK INITIAL WEIGHT OF SAND WEIGHT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SAND DENSITY VOL. OF HOLE S CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE Ob9 CF EXCAVATED SAMPLE: IN PLACE OPT. MOISTURE WET WEIGHT <e OR 8,83 LE 500 OR DRY WEIGHT - 960 OR WEIGHT OF WATER so GR OR IN PLACE WET DENSITY 127 LB/CF IN PLACE DRY DENSITY 20 L9/CF % MOISTURE 6 4 IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET DENSlTY OPTIMUM DRY DENSITY OPTIMUM MOISTURE % RELATIVE COMPACTION: REMARKS: LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT APPLICATION FOR SEWER SERVICE Owner ' s Name Paul D. Smith Mailing Address 118 Countrywood Lane Encinitas, CA 92024 Service Address: Lot 97 Mar Vista Estates Tract Description: d66b #r#,.v,A ~7; L,C. ~Sf97~5 mtrH 0 Assessor's Parcel No. 215-491-22 Phone No. 436-5287 SEWER PERMIT ISSUED Ukd RECEIPT OF BUILDING PERMIT. BUILDING PERMIT MUST BE APPLIED FQR lr( Type of Building s.f. No. Units 1 Connection Fee $600.00 Lateral Size: 4" __ 6" 8" - Saddle - Easement Connection - Extra Footage: - pre-pd.00) - @$ Extra Depth: @$ L4QF Amount Rec'd $ Rec'd By Lateral Fee Prorated Sewer Total Service Fee gALa2E > <I The application must be siyned bi the owner (or his aithorized representative) of the property to be served. The total charges must be paid to the District at the time the appli.cation is submitted. If a service Tatera1 is required, it will be installed by the Leucadia County Water District. The service lateral is that part of the sewer,system that extends from the.main collection line in the street (or easement) to the point in the street (at or near the applicant's property line) where the service lateral is connected to the applicant's' building sewer. The applicant is responsible for the construction, at the applicant's expense, of the sewer pipeline (building sewer) from the appli- cant's plumbing to the point in the stree.:. (or easement) where a connection is made to the service.latera1. made by the applicant at his expense. The connection must be made in conformity The connection of the applicant's building sewer to the service lateral shall be with the District's specifications, rules and regulations; and IT MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE DISTRICT BEFORE THE SEWER SYSTEM MAY BE USED BY THE APPLICANT, THE APPLICANT, OR HIS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, MUST NOTIFY THE DISTRICT AT THE TfME. INSPECTION IS 'DESIRED. ANY CONNECTION MADE TO THE SERVICE LATERAL OR COLLEC, TION LINE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL ANP INSPECTION BY THE DISTRICT WILL BE CONSIDERED INVALID AND WI.LL NOT BE ACKNOWLEDGED. The prorated sewer service fee is based upon the date the District estimates that additional fee or'refund if service actually comnences on a different date. For service will begin and covers the balance of the fiscal year. There will be no succeeding fiscal years,, .the sewer .service fee will be collected on the tax roll in the same manner as property taxes. . The undersigned .hereby agree,s that the above information given is correct and agrees to the conditions as ,stated. ., .. ... .. ... .- .. Attention Property Owner: '3. .. An "owner-builder" building permit has been applied for in your name and bearing your signature. Please complete and return this information in the envelope provided at your earliest opportunity to avoid unnecessary delay in processing and issuing your building permit. No building permit will be issued until this verification is received. 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor construction of . the proposed property improvement (yes OK no) .. .... .. 2.. I [hava/have not; for the proposed w# e aigned an application for a building permit .~ ...... .:. .. ... .. .. .. ,. . ... .. ... ... .. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide:he proposed con- struction: ... .~ .. ... - , Name .. &of ibXlcA4L& It, j,: ., .. ........ ~ .Address .... ........ ... .. ,. ...... - .: . . ,I .. ......... .. . . ,: . .I - .. , .. .? : . .; ... I Phone Contractors License No. ... . ~~ ..... ... ...... .. ... .. .. .. .. ... ... - .. ... . .: i -;., . . ': .. , .. . ,, , . ., ... .. ., . . ,_. ,. I. L .... .. .. ._. . ,. .. , .. 4. 5 plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hirer3 the following person to . "Name AKUY G .. . svl/72+ f&O ,. coordinate, supervise and provide the major work: . ., .. .. ... .. , - .~ # .: . , < .' ,: .. .. ......... ' .5 ?'. ..... ' , . Addsess j 8. r bvrWAkwbob ~ AM& ... .... .. : Z~. ........ ... :- . .,.. .. .. ..... ... .... , City, r@~nr,TR& rA ~, I I . .,.. .. ~ i '8 , ?a 0x3 .. ........ ..... . ...... , ,_ .. .. ,- .. ... ... 1.. :.:.::'..:ii? 3.1 '.'..1 2. .:,,: *:, :I..i: ::. ,Li::,!:;>?4...) ;.?; ,:?,;:. ..a.. s ...... . ...... ........... ... ..... ....... .... :', ,,;, .~,.'., -.I. 2 .. 1 i. I i ,.., .., ,. ~.. . ,~.,~~, ; '," I .. ...... : ,, , .~ . , .._ . . . : .... .. ,. .. I .. ' 5. 1 will proviSe some'o€ the.work'but I have contracted Ckisedl the'following par- ,. sons to provide the work indicated:. ... ......... ..... ...... . Name : ' . Address . ., .. Phone ., Type of Wrk .. . . ~. Nor AVQ~A a .. .. ., Ii .. ....... . ., .. .. .... ,. . .. .. L. I I state LIC. city s. cla8sll. Lic. No. :OMPLETE FOR PLAN CHECK ONLY .. PLAN ID NO. Y. DESIGNER ADDRESS c PHONE CONTACT PERSON 0 ' PLAN CHECK FEE- 0 VALUATION 0 DEMOLITION 0 HOUSE MOVING 0 PARKS AND RECREATION FEE 0 PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE 0 SCHOOL FEE. DISTRICT 0 Carlsbad 0 Encinitas 0 San Diego 0 Sa" Marcos n I *WARNING: PLAN CHECK FEES. WHERE NO ACTION IS TAKEN BY THE APPLICANT IN 180 DAYS AND NO BUILDING PERMIT IS ISSUED, FEE ARE FORFEITED TO THE CITY. I ____I White - Applicant Yellow - File Pink - (1) Finance (2) Data Process Gold - Assessor