Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2663 CREST DR; ; CB081009; Permit
09-22-2008 Job Address Permit Type Parcel No Valuation Occupancy Group # Dwelling Units Bedrooms Project Title Applicant DAVID STOCKEY City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No CB081009 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 2663 CREST DR CBAD RESDNTL Sub Type 1561521000 Lot# $67,954 00 Construction Type Reference # 0 Structure Type 0 Bathrooms ARMSTRONG RES-BUILD 557 SF RAD 0 5B Status Applied Entered By Plan Approved Issued Inspect Area Ong PC# ISSUED 05/30/2008 LSM 09/22/2008 09/22/2008 DETACHED GUEST HOUSE ( NO COOKING FACILITIES) Plan Check* Owner ARMSTRONG CHARLES P&THERESA M PO BOX 1112 BONSALL CA 92003 439 0070 1767 BUTTERS RD CARLSBAD CA 92008 Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong ,'onFee Park m Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee HMP Fee Pot Water Con Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot Water Con Fee Reel Water Con Fee $461 86 Meter Size $0 00 Add'l Reel Water Con Fee $300 21 Meter Fee $0 00 SDCWA Fee $0 00 CFD Payoff Fee $680 PFF (3105540) $0 00 PFF (4305540) $0 00 License Tax (3104193) $0 00 License Tax (4304193) $000 Traffic Impact Fee (3105541) $0 00 Traffic Impact Fee (4305541) $0 00 Sidewalk Fee $0 00 PLUMBING TOTAL $0 00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $0 00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $0 00 Housing Impact Fee $0 00 Housing InLeu Fee $0 00 Housing Credit Fee Master Drainage Fee $0 00 Sewer Fee $0 00 Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $000 $000 $000 $000 $0 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $41 00 $2000 $3050 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $860 37 Total Fees $860 37 Total Payments To Date $860 37 Balance Due $000 BUILDING PLANS _>/_ IN STORAGE ATTACHED Inspector Clearance NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations v other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions" You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3 32 030 Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to wate, ind sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired City 6f Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave, Carlsbad, CA 92008 760-602-2717 / 2718 / 2719 Fax 760-602-8558 Building Permit Application Est. Value 6?~7, Plan Ck. Deposit 300 • Date JOB ADDRESS CT/PROJECT #PHASE tt # OF UNITS # BEDROOMS DESCRIPTION OF WORK Include Square Feet of Affected Area(s) d£_ SUITE#/SPACE#/UNIT# tt BATHROOMS TENANT BUSINESS NAME CONSTR TYPE OCC GROUP ^4 (Sec 7031 5 Business and Professions Code Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any struclicensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Section 7031 5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars {$500}) structure, pnor to its issuance also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he isand Professions Code} or that he is exempt therefrom, and die basis for the alleged exemption Any violation of This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars ($100) or less O Certificate of Exemption I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers Compensation Laws of California WARNING Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars (4100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees J8$ CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE Workers' Compensation Declaration / hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self insure for workers compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued Ihave and will maintain workers^compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code for the performance^ the work for which this oermit is issued^My workers compensation insurance carrier and policy number are InsuranceCo S frff•* ' the performance^ the work for which this oermit is issued^My workers compensation insurance carrier and policy PohcyNo J-J X rfflO Pf ^ O Expiration Date I I I (A / l^^^^* I ' / ' / f DATE / hereby affirm that I am exempt from Contractors License Law for the following reason O I as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec 7044 Business and Professions Code The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale) a I as owner of the property am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec 7044 Business and Professions Code The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law) O I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason 1 I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement G Yes O No 2 I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work 3 I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name address / phone / contractors license number) 4 I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone / contractors license number) 5 I will provide some of the work but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone / type of work) .^PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act' O Yes n No Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district' G Yes D No Is the facility to be constructed within 1 000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site7 d Yes O No IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, / EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work this permit is issued (Sec 3097 (i) Civil Code) Lender's Name Lender's Address I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction I hereby authorize representative of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT OSHA An OSHA permit is required for excavatons over 5'0 deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stones in height. EXPIRATION Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit oiWthe tjuildmg or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after (he work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106 4 4 Uniform Building Code) ^APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE \Hj~~*" is^~~" " DATE MfLJ 3<S City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For 01/21/2009 Permit* CB081009 Title ARMSTRONG RES-BUILD 557 SF Description DETACHED GUEST HOUSE ( NO COOKING FACILITIES) Inspector Assignment PC Type RESDNTL Sub Type RAD Job Address 2663 CREST DR Suite Lot 0 Location APPLICANT DAVID STOCKEY Owner ARMSTRONG CHARLES P&THERESA M Remarks AM PLEASE, *-_ Total Time Phone 7606440714 Inspector . Requested By DANNY Entered By CHRISTINE CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Act Comments/n Cji_ Comments/Notices/Holds Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC# Inspection History Date Description Act Insp 11/25/2008 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP PC 11/20/2008 16 Insulation AP PC 11/13/2008 84 Rough Combo AP PC 10/23/2008 13 Shear Panels/HD's AP PC 10/23/2008 15 Roof/Reroof AP PC 10/06/2008 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PC 10/06/2008 21 Underground/Under Floor AP PC 10/06/2008 31 Underground/Conduit-Wiring AP PC Comments SOILS REPORT ON SITE COPY SENT TO CITY EsGil Corporation In Partnership -with government for <Buihfing Safety DATE September 11, 2008 jpjxppi ICANT _JUR]| JURISDICTION Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO 08-1009 SET II PROJECT ADDRESS 2663 Crest Dr. PROJECT NAME New Guest House for Charles & Theresa Armstrong The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes XI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified in the attached list are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to XI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed JEsgil CorporatioiLstaff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Telephone # Date contacted (by ) Fax # Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS By Sergio Azuela Enclosures Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 09/05/08 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad O8-1009 September 11, 2008 • Please revise the "GENERAL ", note # 6 pr{ CODES information, showing "THIS PRO. CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, WHICH AND THE 2005 NEC" 1 of the plans to up-date the 5HALL COMPLY WITH THE 2007 )OPTS THE 2006 IBC, 2006 UMC, 2006 UPC The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that a) The building pad was-prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and c) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report" , , EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for <Buitd~ing Safety DATE June 10, 2008 OA£ELJ£ANT JURISDICTION Carlsbad Q PLAN REVIEWER G FILE PLAN CHECK NO 08-1009 SET I PROJECT ADDRESS 2663 Crest Dr. PROJECT NAME New Guest House for Charles & Theresa Armstrong The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to David L Stokey P O Box 1112, Bonsall, CA 92003 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed X] Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted yDayid L Stokey Telephone # (760) 439-0070 Date contacted 6 /^/^(by^^) Fax # (760) 439-0071 Wlaii^X^ Telephone Fa>fr' In Person REMARKS By Sergio Azuela Enclosures Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 06/03/08 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad O8-1009 June 10, 2O08 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO 08-1009 PROJECT ADDRESS 2663 Crest Dr. FLOOR AREA Dwelling 557 SF REMARKS DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED June 10, 2008 JURISDICTION Carlsbad STORIES 1 HEIGHT DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION 06/03/08 PLAN REVIEWER Sergio Azuela FOREWORD (PLEASE READ). This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the International Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit Present California law mandates that construction comply with the 2007 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes 2006 IBC, 2006 UPC, 2006 UMC and 2005 NEC The above regulations apply, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 105 4 of the 2006 International Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans Carlsbad 08-1009 June 1O, 2008 • PLANS 1 Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list Submit three new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects) For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways 1 Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments 2 Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468 Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments NOTE Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete 2 All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation (California Business and Professions Code) This correction will be rechecked at Final Submittal 3 Structural plans for projects deviating from conventional wood frame construction shall have the structural portions signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, along with structural calculations (California Business and Professions Code) This correction will be rechecked at Final Submittal 4 Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans, stating that this project shall comply with the 2007 California Building Code, which adopts the 2006 IBC, 2006 UMC, 2006 UPC and the 2005 NEC a) Please revise the "GENERAL ", note # 6 provided on sheet 1 of the plans to up-date the CODES information 5 Please revise the section numbers and notes on the plans to match the 2006 IBC, as adopted by California • FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 6 According to the CARLSBAD SPECIAL CODE REQUIREMENTS, all new residential buildings, including additions, require a soils report Provide a copy of the project soil report The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings Carlsbad 08-1009 Mlune 10, 2008 7 Show distance from foundation to edge of cut or fill slopes ("distance-to- daylight") and show slope and heights of cuts and fills Figure 1805 3 1 8 Note on plans that surface water will dram away from building and show drainage pattern The grade shall fall a minimum of 5% within the first 10 feet (2% for impervious surfaces) Section 1803 3 • EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 9 Handrails (CBC Section 1009 10) a) Shall be provided on at least one side of each stairway • Exception Stairs with fewer than four risers do not require any handrails b) Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and be continuous c) The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension See Section 1012 3 for alternatives d) Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail e) Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends • FRAMING 10 Please provide evidence that the engmeer-of-record (or architect) has reviewed the truss calculation package prepared by others (i e , a "review" stamp on the truss calculations or a letter) Section A106 3 4 1 11 Shear walls with openings. The design of shear walls with openings should meet the requirements of Section 2305 3 8, either for "force transfer around openings" or "no force transfer around openings " (Section 2305 381) Please provide the calculations for the shear walls on line 3 • ELECTRICAL 12 Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the service panel and the location of any sub-panels If the service is over 200 amperes, submit a single line diagram, and provide service load calculations 13 All bedroom branch circuits now require arc fault protection Note clearly on the plans that "Bedroom branch circuits will be arc fault circuit protected " CEC Article 21012(6) Carlsbad 08-1009 June 1O, 2O08 14 Per CEC Article 210 11(C)3, note on the plans that bathroom circuiting shall be either a) A 20 ampere circuit dedicated to each bathroom, or b) At least one 20 ampere circuit supplying only bathroom receptacle outlets • ENERGY CONSERVATION 15 The regulations require a properly completed and properly signed Form CF-1R (4 pages) to be either imprinted on the plans, taped to the plans or "sticky backed" on the plans, to allow the building inspector to readily compare the actual construction with the requirements of the approved energy design The required signatures are missing on the imprinted form on sheet 2 of the plans To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i e, plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes U No Lf The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad O8-1O09 June 10, 20O8 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO 08-1009 PREPARED BY Sergio Azuela DATE June 10, 2008 BUILDING ADDRESS 2663 Crest Dr. G House/Charles 85 Theresa Armstrong BUILDING OCCUPANCY R-3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION V-B BUILDING PORTION Guest House Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA ( Sq Ft ) 557 cb Rlrin Pprmit FPP hu DrHmani-p ; ^ Valuation Multiplier 101 99 By Ordinance Reg Mod VALUE ($) 56,808 56,808 $41565 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance ^ j Type of Review 0 Complete Review I I Repetitive Fee~\ Repeats D Other r-1 Hourly Esgil Plan Review Fee Structural Only Hour* $27017 $232 76 Comments Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue doc City of Carlsbad "*^ P^HHVHV^^^^^BVMHiV^H^^BMi^P^^^BBHnHHM^^HV^M^^HPublic Works — Engineering BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE _ BUILDING ABBESS PROJECT DESCRIPTION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER PLANCHECK NO /££ - 1*2 -fo EST VALUE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal, therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build D A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements DENIAL Please see\the>^ttached report of deficiencies marked withp^lvlake necessary corrections to plans or specifi|2atior»s for compliance with applicable codes ana standards Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review Date Date By Date By FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT Date /ATTACHMHM^NT D De~die~Stion Application D Dedication Checklist D Improvement Application D Improvement Checklist D Neighborhood Improvement Agreement D Grading Permit Application D Grading Submittal Checklist D Right-of-Way Permit Application [] Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet D Storm water Applicability Checklist Name ENGINEERING DEPT CONTACT PERSON JOANNE JUCHNIEWICZ City of Carlsbad Address 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone (760) 602-2775 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No Lots Recordation Carlsbad Tract Carlsbad, CA 9200^-7314 • (76O) 6O2-2720 • FAX (760) 602S>03'02 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ,ST SITE PLAN 1 Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale Show A North Arrow B Existing & Proposed Structures C Existing Street Improvements D Property Lines E Easements 2 Show on site plan Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets Driveway widths Existing or proposed sewer lateral Existing or proposed water service A Drainage Patterns 1 Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course 2 ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building " B Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography C Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception D Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards 3 Include on title sheet Site address Assessor's Parcel Number 73 M" Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc) previously approved EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION F (BUILDING PLANCHECK CKLST FORM doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE D 4a Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No D D D 4b All conditions are in compliance Date DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 5 Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm dram or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ 17,000 . pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18 40 030 Dedication required as follows Dedication required Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 Y2" x 11" plat map and •stibmit witn a title reporf>AII easement documents must be approved and signed •by "uwiitJf(s') prior to Issuance of Building Permit Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person Applications will not be accept by mail or fax Dedication completed by Date D D D IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ 82.000 . pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 1840040 Public improvements required as follows Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process The completed application form and the requirements on the F \BUILDING PLANCHECK CKLST FORM doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ,ST ,ND ,RD D D checklist must be submitted in person Applications by mail or fax are not accepted Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit Improvement Plans signed by Date 6b Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 1840 Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $430 so we may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit Future public improvements required as follows D D 6c Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by Date 6d No Public Improvements required SPECIAL NOTE Damaged or defective improvements found adiacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS D D D D D The conditions that invoke the 15 16 010 of the Municipal Code need for a grading permit are found in Section 7a Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements Include accurate grading quantities in cubic yards (cut, fill, import, export and remedial) This information must be included on the plans. 7b Grading Permit required A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached NOTE The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit ODD Grading Inspector sign off by Date 7c Graded Pad Certification required (Note Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required ) F \BUILDINC PIANCHECK CKLST FORM doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ,ST D 7d No Grading Permit required 7e If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 8 A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way Types of work include, but are not limited to street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm dram, sewer and water utilities Right-of-Way permit required for INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Cammo Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008 District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7138, for assistance Industrial Waste permit accepted by Date D f c D 10 NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first 10 a STORM WATER COMPLIANCE FORM Q Requires PSWP (project storm water permit) # xaTfier I/Tier II (Requires SWPPP) - Please complete attached forms ' Q Exempt - Please complete attached exemption form 11 FEES equired fees are attached J2 No fees required F \BUILDING PLANCHECK CKLST FORM doc ,RD D BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST WATER METER REVIEW 12a Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used • All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service • If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm) A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit • Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter • If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street) 12b Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval The developer must provide these calculations Please follow these guidelines 1 If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W" The irrigation service should look like STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 5 meter (estimated 100 gpm) 2 If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach) Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference In general the calculations will include • Hydraulic grade line • Elevation at point of connection (POC) • Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) • Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve • Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) • Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection F BUILDING PLANCHECK CKLST FORM doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD 3 In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA) As long as the project is located within the City recycled water service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future D D 12c Irrigation Use (where recycled water Is available) 1 Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above 2 If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this CD d 13 Additional Comments: F \BUILDINO PLANCHECK CKLST FORM doc moo r>o enmenenO •oo l?i & *• -o = zS 0> COTI O) O (—4 > O WINTERGREEN '" "" fii> /T> WIP-»""8/T »J» v (FOREST AVE) DP o CO MS7PM5628 N55°2533 E 234 20 (ROS165311 10/15/2002 N55°25J3 E 22110 (ROS165.il) PM18952 (6-189 N55"2533 E 162 92 (ROS1653 (5979 N552533E PM18957 R S 5d/^_ . BUENA's VISiA Jc?0 AV£ u0 I«k Oi Refresh Map Layers Visible Active Surveyed City Boundary Municipal Boundaries Beach Overlay Deferred Certification Commercial Visitor Overlay Coastal Zone Street Names r Streets F C Facilities r r ESA <" Drainage Basins Storm Drain yci... i / CIS Map Listing - Microsoft Internet Explorer provided by City of Carlsbad Refresh Map Sewer Mam Water Appurtenance Water Service Water Main Water Hydrant Parcel Boundaries Slope 2005 Water Bodies Contour Lines - 2005 Building Permits Planning Projects Home Owners Association Flood Hazard Zones •<> I 1 l tfCM O bj_j O - £td H asO a D MATERIALS SHALL BFH'E RAPIDALL NECESSARY EQUIPMENT AN!AVAILABLE ON SITE TO FACILIT/—SEDIMENT CONTROLINSTALLATION OF EROSION ANDBMPS WHEN RAIN IS EMINENTz L RESTORE ALL EROSIOORDER TO THETHE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALCONTROL DEVICES TO WORKING(N INEER AFTER EACH RUNSATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENG:OFF PRODUCING RAINFALLa L INSTALL ADDITIONALS MAY BE REQUIRED B>DING INSPECTOR DUE TTIONS OR UNFORESEENUSETHE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHAL:EROSION CONTROL MEASURES Arf,THE CITY ENGINEERING OR BUIL:UNCOMPLETED GRADING OPERACIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MAY AJEVICES SHALL BE INALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE D!Tf <KING DAY WHEN T HEFORECAST EXCEEDSPLACE AT THE END OF EACH WOIFIVE (5) DAY RAIN PROBABILITYOTHER DEBRIS SHALL•ALLFORTY PERCENT (40%) SILT ANDBE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAINTRLAP TYPE WITH 3/4ALL GRAVEL BAGS SHALL BE BUINCH MINIMUM AGGREGATE•n ENT CONTROL ANDANAGEMENT PRACTICEADEQUATE EROSION AND SEDIMPERIMETER PROTECTION BEST Mso AND MAINTAINEDMEASURES MUST BE INSTALLEDIAL NOTESy cu09 >, 221 3 i S v> r- »•o S g 5-o-f »- S^•S « F^ r E1 "5c c end intoX < 2H — Z LUn i_ n ^ i 1 s i5 OT i- LU ILU I -_ S ciS S 8.2 £So -p o u <D O » § 2 Si="? 2o2ll»«~s|la•g I -D ^ B >. •fi o3 P a u E - L i£«&§i tu -Waste Management and MaterialsPollution Control BMPsNon-Storm aterManagement BMPsTrackingControl BMPsSediment Control BMPsErosion ControlBMPsejSBM 8)8JDUOO luauieBeuew 8!SBM PI|OS pus uoi)U8A8jc' nids |uau»6BUBW8|,d,po,s 8Sn |BU816H puE^a™^ lUSLudinb^ pue apiLjaA uoi]c6uj|/j8]eyv\ eiQEiOd suoiiejado BuipuuQ pue CuiAEd uoije/ussuoo JSiEM uoiomisuoo p9Zi|iqeis ss9j63/ssoj6ui uoipnjjsijOQ p87i|iqeis UOI]08)OJcJ }8[U| UIBJQ LUJOJS jsijjeg 6eqpues busujnnoeA pue 6uid88MS )38J]S UJJ89 6eg |8AEJQ snoyjaqy IUBQ^BMO OBJJ. lUSUJIpSg 80U8J J|lg SUIEJQ edois pue SS^IQ ujjea 6u.ipmN pooM SIEIAJ 9 sainxajoso Best Management Practice(BMP) Description ->8 WM 9 IAIM 9 WM .-^M e WM Z MM I WAA 8SN i SN C SN 1 SN 3 Ml i ai (H as s as ias 9 as 9 as fas e as i as a oa 6 O3 803 Z03 CASQA Designation ->-^Construction Activity\\ 1 y ^ j I | j \ * X pf<d[ng/Soil Disturbance\ V >«. c 1 11 £^ j J ! j Stockpiling\Drilling/GoringConcrete/Asphalt SawcuttingConcrete flalwork1 % )< i 1 < i V 1 i i J i 1 xj*Ki i i 5 S i I (C s Waste DtsposalStaging/Lay Down Area\. *^gq'uipment Maintenance and Fueling^c X, a 6 1DI 1 1 V. B 1 j •c Q 1M S CO ¥Instructions Begin bv reviewing the list of construction activities and checking the box to ihc left of anv activity thai will occur during the proposed construction Add anv other activity descriptions in the blank>rc best managementty that was checked off andview the list for something.ress/Hgress column andt of BMPs then wnic ininnemcnt Practice measuresity descmbed pick one or milumn Do this for each activiAccess Across Dirt Then ree Stabilized Construction Imasiic sheeting is nQt on the hsnew Cover with Plastic collon of appropriate Best Manai.1 i£ 5 § 5 ^ 5c. B x ? £ -=u V C O C. 00 g S S Si *- ™ •= -selected BM Ps to a projecto (N SP CL. •C=:5trD. !£ M >.g^D^-g ^g S>"O>^ ^Pifi||l I| c o p £ g £ -8 II §tl^ s >. *" - re y y "v•«; s '• =; 2 .2 OL ^ C 'C — ro c: ^. ^ ~' -2 if 13 •= ~ w a o. hr «i — :*,designation and how to aCASQA)ption boxes provided for that purpose nnd place a check in ih^s) from the list located alon the top of the form Then placeselected BMPs selected from the list For Example - If thechas Stabilized Construcion Ingress/Egress under Trackin,he box where the two meet As another example say the proastic in the blank column under the heading Erosion Controabout what each BMP description means you may wish to realso explains the California Stormwater Quality Associationc 2 S Z c ^ " IS-slSb iE c 8 | g S ^The reference PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS PERMIT NUMBER CB081009 DATE 5/30/08 ADDRESS 2663 CREST DR. RESIDENTIAL ADDITION- MINOR (<17,000.00) OTHER PLANNER DEBORAH Ml LAM DATE 6/12/08 ENGINEER DATE ii \AIIMI.\\KIII\TI II/IU\.\IM,/I:M;INI HIINI; AITIIOYAIS Mike Surprenant & Associates Consulting Structural Engineers September 2. 2008 Charles and Theresa Armstrong 2663 Crest Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Project Armstrong Guest House 2663 Crest Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Job No 08076 In accordance with your request, we have compared the roof framing plan, prepared by our office, and the roof truss manufacturer's roof truss layout, prepared by Escondido Roof Truss Company Inc , for the above referenced project Specifically, we were asked to verify that the roof truss manufacturer's truss layout and design loads are in general conformance to the truss layout and engineering design shown on our approved structural drawings Based on our review of the documents, we have determined that the roof truss manufacturer's truss layout generally conforms to the roof framing plan on the approved structural drawings and the truss design loads generally conform to the engineering calculations prepared by our office We realize that there may be some items of interest to you that have not been discussed in this letter Therefore, we encourage you to call with any additional questions you may have Respectfully submitted. Brian Quails Structural Designer Mike Surprenant & Associates MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS Project: Armstrong Guest House 2663 Crest Drive Carlsbad, California 92008 Prepared for Dave Stockey Designs 4432 Skimmer Way Oceanside, California 92057 Project No 08076 Date May 15, 2008 335 15th Street San Diego, California 92101 Tel (619) I n MIKE SURPRENANT SHEET NO ! OF. l° & ASSOCIATES r,,_RV <WP? DATE_!/ilki. Consulting Structural Engineers CHECKED BY DATE SCALE . TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 PROJECT SCOPE "3- 2 DESIGN CRITERIA SUMMARY 1> 3 DESIGN LOADS ^ 4 VERTICAL ANALYSIS <• A HORIZONTAL MEMBER DESIGN (BEAMS, HEADERS, JOISTS, ETC ) * B VERTICAL MEMBER DESIGN (COLUMNS, STUDS, ETC ) - 5 LATERAL ANALYSIS A SEISMIC / WIND COEFFICIENTS B B W,, (DEAD LOADS) c. C LATERAL LOAD DISTRIBUTION - D LATERAL LOAD-RESISTING DESIGN I SHEARWALL DESIGN \Q II CANTILEVERED STEEL COLUMN ELEMENTS ~ III STEEL MOMENT FRAMES FOUNDATION DESIGN A CONTINUOUS FOOTINGS _J_Z B SPREAD FOOTINGS " _ I ^ C RETAINING WALLS ~- D SPECIAL SYSTEMS ^_ I GRADE BEAMS ^ II DEEPENED PIERS -~_ SCHEDULES ;c A SHEARWALL SCHEDULE _jjft_ B HOLD DOWN SCHEDULE ;; C SPREAD FOOTING SCHEDULE ; ,g |ob 'Mike Surprenant & AsSOCiateS Sheet No Consulting Stnictural Engineers Calculated bv Date. Checked by Date . Scale PROJECT SCOPE Q Provide vertical & lateral load calculations for a proposed approximate 550 square foot one-story detached accessor)' building at 2663 Crest Drive, Carlsbad, California Residence to be constructed utilizing primarily wood-frame construction Roof framing to consist of pre-fabncated wood trusses to be designed by other, and the foundation system to consist of a raised floor with conventional concrete perimeter footings A soils report was not provided for this project Therefore, the foundation design will be based on the minimum soil bearing capacity as specified in the current version of the Governing Code - 2007 California Building Code Mike Surprenant & Associates makes no representations concerning the suitability of the soils and/or minimum soil values allowed by the CBC These calculations have been prepared for the exclusive use of Charles and Theresa Armstrong and their design consultants for the specific site listed above Should modifications be made to the project subsequent to the preparation of these calculations, Mike Surprenant & Associates should be notified to review the modifications with respect to the "recommendations/conclusions provided herein, to determine if any additional calculations and/or recommendations are necessary Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our recommendations prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB. SHEET NO . CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE OF_ 660/U 6 DATE. DATE_ DESIGN CRITERIA SUMMARY GOVERNING CODE CONCRETE MASONRY MORTAR GROUT REINFORCING STEEL STRUCTURAL STEEL WELDING SAWN LUMBER I-JOISTS MICROLLAMS/ PARALLAMS/ TIMBERSTRAND GLULAMS 2007 C B C f c = 2500 PSI, NO SPECIAL INSPECTION REQ'D, (UNO) ASTM C90, f m = 1500 PSI, NO SPECIAL INSPECTION REQ'D, (U N O ) ASTM C270, f c = 1800 PSI, TYPE S ASTM C476, f c = 2000 PSI ASTM A615, Fv = 40 KSI FOR #3 AND SMALLER ASTM A615, Fy = 60 KSI FOR #4 AND LARGER (UNO) ASTM A992, Fv = 50 KSI (ALL 'W SHAPES, ONLY) ASTM A36, Fv '= 36 KSI (STRUCTURAL PLATES, ANGLES, CHANNELS) ASTM A500, GRADE B, Fv = 46 KSI (STRUCTURAL TUBES-HSS) ASTM A53, GRADE B, Fv = 35 KSI (STRUCTURAL PIPES) E70-T6-TYP FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL E90 SERIES FOR A615 GRADE 60 REINFORCING BARS DOUG FIR LARCH, ALLOWABLE UNIT STRESSES PER 2005 NDS TrusJoist MacMillan - ICC ESR-1153 - (TJI & TJI/PRO MEMBERS) TrusJoist MacMillan - ICC ESR-1387 - (LVL/PSL/LSL MEMBERS) DOUGLAS FJR OR DOUGLAS FIR/HEM GRADE 24F-V4 (SIMPLE SPANS) GRADE 24F-V8 (CANTILEVERS) SOIL EXISTING NATURAL SOIL VALUES PER CBC TABLE 1804 2 SOIL CLASSIFICATION - b r-j SOILS REPORT BY DATED ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE ACTIVE SOIL PRESSURE (CANTILEVER) ACTIVE SOIL PRESSURE (RESTRAINED) PASSIVE SOIL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION _PSF _PCF _PCF PCF -4-^' \ .PDR ^gSISfir* MIKE SURPRENANT ,,» '"•i '^ ^ ^'T /v A^^Or^TATP^ SHFFT wo ' ^ \..T=IT-. Consulting Structural Engineers cAinui ATEDBY OHFCKFn BY RCAP F DESIGN LOADS MATERIAL i ROOF SLOPE DEAD LOAD ROOFING MATERIAL SHEATHING RAFTERS/CJ (or) TRUSSES INSULATION DRYWALL OTHER (ELEC , MECH , MISC ) TOTAL DEAD LOAD LIVE LOAD TOTAL LOAD FLOOR MATERIAL DEAD LOAD FLOORING FINISH i LT WEIGHT CONCRETE ( in ) SHEATHING JOISTS DRYWALL OTHER (ELEC , MECH , MISC ) TOTAL DEAD LOAD LIVE LOAD TOTAL LOAD i EXTERIOR WALL FINISH STUDS DRYWALL INSULATION EXTERIOR FINISH OTHER •! TOTAL LOADi INTERIOR WALL STUDS DRYWALL OTHER TOTAL LOAD i C( OF DATE HATE CASE1 4*4 5-r >• f- i-C M .7-. 5 & PSF 15 40 15 25 05 l^ 0 PSF -2* 0 PSF "£> 0 PSF FLOOR f" A ff Pi*»-*'-' f\ %-Jf ^ H" PSF 20 35 25 30 ^ 0 PSF K<? o PSF ^ 0 PSF 10 PSF 25 15 5 0 10 i f 0 PSF *<?"7fe. (6 CASE II PSF 15 40 15 25 05 0 PSF 0 PSF 0 PSF DECK PSF 20 35 25 30 0 PSF 0 PSF 0 PSF 10 PSF 25 15 0 10 0 PSF 10 PSF 50 10 / ' J MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB. SHEET NO . CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE OF_ DATE, DATE, HORIZONTAL MEMBER DESIGN LEVEL K MEMBERS LABEL SPAN= iM/> FT M UNIFORM LOAD D POINT LOAD (CENTERED) D CUSTOM LOADING (SEE DIAGRAM) Pi =P2 = USE ALT *M. = . VMAX = MMAX- 67 lbs RR = . E = _lbs ksi ft lbs IRKOD - 2-%in _GRADE. GRADE C C LABEL SPAN= \ •FT El UNIFORM LOAD D POINT LOAD (CENTERED) D CUSTOM LOADING (SEE DIAGRAM) Pi = P2 = USE ALT .GRADE N)o GRADE RL = _iMl VMAX = i £?4? MMAX = if h^ Jbs .lbs ft-lbs E = IREQ D ksi " C C LABEL SPAN= FT W W Pi P2 US AI D Dn 1 - >E ,T UNIFORM LOAD POINT LOAD (CENTERED) /r Rr = lbs VMAX = lbs MMAX= ft-lbs GRADE C GRADE C // Rc = lbs E = ksi IREO D = in" TJ Beam® 6 30 Serial Number 7005102660user 2 5/13/20081323,PM Page 1 Engine Version 6 30 14 THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED -18 Product Diagram is Conceptual LOADS Analysis is for a Joist Member Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf) 40 0 Live at 100 % duration 150 Dead SUPPORTS 1 Stud wall 2 Stud wall Input Bearing Vertical Reactions (Ibs) Width Length Live/Dead/Uplift/Total 350 225 480/180/0/660 350 225' 480/180/0/660 Detail Other A3 Rim Board 1 Ply 11/4 x 11 7/8" 0 8E TJ-Strand Rim Board® A3 Rim Board 1 Ply 1 1/4' x 11 7/8 0 8E TJ-Strand Rim Board® -See iLevel® Specifiers/Builders Guide for detail(s) A3 Rim Board DESIGN CONTROLS Shear (Ibs) Vertical Reaction (Ibs) Moment (Ft-Lbs) Live Load Defl (in) Total Load Defl (in) TJPro Maximum 645 645 2834 Design -639 645 2834 0269 0369 42 Control 1705 1202 6180 0440 0879 30 Result Passed (37%) Passed (54%) Passed (46%) Passed (L/785) Passed (L/571) Passed Location Rt end Span 1 under Floor loading Bearing 2 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading Span 1 -Deflection Criteria STANDARD(LL L/480 TL L/240) -Deflection analysis is based on composite action with single layer of 19/32 Panels (20 Span Rating) GLUED & NAILED wood decking -Bracmg(Lu) All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 4 10 o/c unless detailed otherwise Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability TJ-Pro RATING SYSTEM -The TJ-Pro Rating System value provides additional floor performance information and is based on a GLUED & NAILED 19/32 Panels (20 Span Rating) decking The controlling span is supported by walls Additional considerations for this rating include Ceiling - None A structural analysis of the deck has not been performed by the program Comparison Value 1 69 ADDITIONAL NOTES -IMPORTANT' The analysis presented is output from software developed by iLevel® iLevel® warrants the sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with iLevel® product design criteria and code accepted design values The specific product application input design loads and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user This output has not been reviewed by an iLevel® Associate -Not all products are readily available Check with your supplier or iLevel® technical representative for product availability -THIS ANALYSIS FOR iLevel® PRODUCTS ONLY' PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS -Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code IBC analyzing the iLevel® Distribution product listed above PROJECT INFORMATION Armstrong Guest House Job # 08076 OPERATOR INFORMATION Mike Bishop Mike Surprenant & Associates 335 15th Street San Diego CA 92021 Phone (619)531-0757 Fax (619)531-0758 MikeBishop@(619) 531-0757 id " ;:y xL-rvcil TT' s.-fr r-scji :-;t-..:: rod tr Floor Joists 11 7/8" TJI® 360(5)16" o/cTJ Beam® 6 30 Serial Number 7005102660 v-' pal I E™rlon * ™4 THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED Load Group Primary Load Group A 17' 7 00" A Max Vertical Reaction Total (Ibs) 660 660 Max Vertical Reaction Live (Ibs) 480 480 Selected Bearing Length (in) 2 25 (W) 2 25(W) Max Unbraced Length (in) 58 Loading on all spans, LDF = 0 90 Shear at Support (Ibs) Max Shear at Support (Ibs) Member Reaction (Ibs) Support Reaction (Ibs) Moment (Ft-Lbs) 1 0 Dead 174 -174 176 -176 176 176 180 180 773 Loading on all spans, LDF = 1 Shear at Support (Ibs) Max Shear at Support (Ibs) Member Reaction (Ibs) Support Reaction (Ibs) Moment (Ft-Lbs) Live Deflection (in) Total Deflection (in) 00 , 1 0 Dead +10 Floor 639 -639 645 -645 645 645 660 660 2834 0 269 0 369 PROJECT INFORMATION Armstrong Guest House Job # 08076 OPERATOR INFORMATION Mike Bishop Mike Surprenant & Associates 335 15th Street San Diego CA 92021 Phone (619)531-0757 Fax (619)5310758 MikeBishop@(619) 531-0757 id Copvr.cht O ?C07 :?>• iLe-elO Fc-Ceri '• .vay a- TJIO and Tu-Beair.': are registered tr^cer.ir'••.. C-L e-I Joisc Frc"1" 2.ici 7J-?rc"" ar-3 r:racjemark; of i Mike Surprenant & Associates Consulting Structural Engineers Job Sheet No A of !6 Calculated by Checked by _ Date Date Mam Wind Force Resistma System Method Used = Maximum Building Height (z) = Design Wind Speed = *d = 1 = Exposure Category = Kz = G = GCPI = CP = P = CHOSEN EXPOSURE = Method used = Occupancy Category = R = 1 = Site Class = ss = Seismic Design Category (SDS) = Seismic Design Category (SD1) = Ta = Cs = Cgmax = Csmin ~ Csac. = Site Class A B C D E WIND DESIGN Analytical Procedure 15 85 085 1 00 feet mph C| 085 1 00 085 018 080 1335 | 11 48 Exposure B C D psf |psf a 70 95 11 5 (85 mph for California) (perASCE7 6563) Zg a BA d B c I E Zm,n 1200 014 084 025 045 030 320 033 30 900 011 100 015 065 020 500 020 15 700 009 107 011 080 015 650 013 7 SEISMIC DESIGN Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure 2 (1234) (Residential = 2) 65 1 0 D 1 360 0514 D D 0 15 014 052 001 0139 | 9 g sec (6 5 for wood shear walls) (Residential = 1 0) (A B C D E) (0 2 sec) Fa = 1 0 SDS = 0 91 g (1 sec) Fv - 1 5 Sm - o 51 g (Use the worst case seismic design category) p=| 1 3| c=> V=| 0130|Wx (CSact*P)*Wx/1 4 Fa Fv Ss Values S1 Values <025 08 1 0 1 2 16 25 05 08 1 0 1 2 14 1 7 0 75 1 >1 25 <0 1 02 03 04 SO 5 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 10 10 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 24 20 18 16 15 12 09 09 35 32 28 24 24 .IOR IMIKE SURPRENANT SHEET NO & ASSOCIATES CALCULATED BY DATE. Consulting Structural Engineers CHECKED BY DATE. SCALE . Wt (DEAD LOADS) (SEISMIC) ROOF WEIGHT Diaphragm = (C»06 C v I r^' J ""^ LBS Extenor Wall Weight = (liOfrY "fJ J>> '"J H$^G LBS A,r -V-? ' y £•',Intenor Wall Weight = ( Me1*-' / Y / •^'•/ Total Weight (Tnbutary to Diaphragm) = J 530^1 FLOOR WEIGHT. Diaphragm = Exterior Wall Weight = Intenor Wall Weight = Total Weight (Tributary to Diaphragm) = LBS LBS LBS LBS FLOOR WEIGHT Diaphragm = LBS Extenor Wall Weight = LBS Intenor Wall Weight = LBS Total Weight (Tnbutary to Diaphragm) = LBS TOTAL DEAD LOAD, Wt = I ± >OH LBS BASE SHEAR, V = C .5* Wt = 7 366 LBS UNIT SHEAR, v = V / Area (Applies to single level structures only) = 3 13 i l,o^<y ! "^ ' K < MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES .inn RHFET NO (6 ! i ii : | i 1 i I C.HFCKED BY DATF SCAIE SHEARWALL DESIGN r~&d* Story Shearwalls y/1^ Direction Unit Lateral Load, v = 7 ' ^ Cridlme ' /!Aifi/ \"' i \ ^ " Tributary Area (This Level) ' • ' '•) / tx* ) >° > Lateral Load (This Level) IMS Lateral Load (Level Above) — Total Load (All Levels). F,= H<i5 Shearwall(s) Length. L £ i ft Unit Wall Shear, v = F,/L = ^9 plf Shearwall Type \j_f Overturning L = ft Okav bv Inspection Uplift = Lbs Holdown Anchor Type i — i Cridlme 5 , \f\L/ «•-?«/• . - Tributary Area (This Level) ''- ' " "V " "" J W Lateral Load (This Level) \\^ Lateral Load (Level Above) ~ , , Total Load (All Levels). F,= ^l5 Shearwall(s) Length. L = 1 5 * l<^5 ' ^ "Z-5 ft Unit Wall Shear, v = F,/L = "54. 6 plf Shearwall Type ( 3>p Overturning -. L = ft Okav by Inspection Uohft = f ?&6f f fY @^ " 14 1 4 Lbs Holdown Anchor Type rpn . , u , % ._-,. .- , , . n1_D L{ y pf?y w / H t> d ' ^ /p '-^ S ? ' >„ " I p A I* Cridlme Tributary Area (This Level) Lateral Load (This Level) Lateral Load (Level Above) Total Load (All Levels). F, - Shearwall(s) Length. L = ft Unit Wall Shear, v = KYL = plf Shearwall Type ( 1 psf sq ft Lbs Lbs Lbs sq ft Lbs Lbs Lbs sq ft Lbs Lbs Lbs Overturning L =. Uplift = ft Okay by Inspection Lbs Holdown Anchor Type D ^^ ,oR 0&rt<* MIKE SURPRENANT ,. , ffp^" \ ~~f9 P A CCrV~T ATT7C SHFFTNO l| OF *If j, l|ii| & ASotJvJ.Al.I15 r^L. Vvs=;. Consulting Structural Engineers CAI RUI ATED BY DATF l_« !* \ ' r-HFrxpn BY DATF e> r°°i Story Shearwalls fj'>» Direction Unit Lateral Load, v = / 3 Gridlme " /„ . , / VW ' Tributary Area (This Level) i >'M7^ I I1{j j ?CJM Lateral Load (This Level) ~~ 1 V\ 5 Lateral Load (Level Above) ~ . /. Total Load (All Levels). F,= 11^5 Shearwall(s) Length. L = 2 '^> * b *> * 1 Vi f> ft LCctTji ?^ ^Y^^ T Imt Wall Shear, v = F,/L = ^^ plf LW^I-OK, • - ^_ '-— ^- - 2^ Shearwall Tvpe ( \ 1'* ^ ~ Overturning* L = ft Okav bv Inspection Uplift = Lbs Holdown Anchor Type i — i Gridlme "? (^"141 )f IA; ' ' Tnbutarv Area (This Level) V ""Vt- V l~> * ) ?O'1 Lateral Load (This Level) ' ^ ? Lateral Load (Level Above) Total Load (All Levels). Fr= !'1< ShearwallCs) Length. L = 5"* ° "' i"*- ft Unit Wall Shear, v = FT/L = I <2r? plf Shearwall Tvpe ( I ^ Overturning L = ft * Okav bv Inspection Uplift = Lbs Holdown Anchor Type j — i Gndline Tributary Area (This Level) Lateral Load (This Level) Lateral Load (Level Above) Total Load (All Levels). F, = ! Shearwall(s) Length. L = ft Unit Wall Shear, v = F,fL = plf Shearwall Tvpe ( fJ L \ f Overturning* L = ft Okav bv Inspection Uplift = Lbs Holdown Anchor Type i — i * Prf sq ft Lbs Lbs Lbs sq ft Lbs Lbs Lbs sq ft Lbs Lbs Lbs MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB. SHEET NO .OF_ CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE DATE. DATE. (ft 6 FOUNDATION DESIGN ALLOWABLE APPLIED LOADS Allowable Soil Bearing Pressure (ASBP) = \OQO psf (Per Design Criteria) CONTINUOUS FOOTINGS I ^ MARK CF-1 Ftg Width (b) = _J_L_ft WALLOW = ASBP (b) = Depth of Ftg (h) = J_ft USE 1 6 " WIDE x DEEP WITH 2- #TOP & BOTTOM MARK CF-2 Ftg Width (b) = _.ft Depth of Ftg (h) =.ft WAU.OW = ASBP (b) =_plf USE " WIDE x DEEP WITH #TOP & BOTTOM WMAX @ Gndlme WMAX @ Gndlme WMAX @ Gndlme WMAX @ Gndlme -Plf -Plf USE CF-J_ USE CF-_ USE CF-_ USE CF- MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB. SHEET NO . CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE OF_16 DATE. DATE_ CONTINUOUS FOOTINGS - MAX POST LOADS MARK CF-1 PMAX = ASBP(b)(2h) = (\ 2h (ft) h(ft) LBS MARK CF-2 PMAX = ASBP(b)(2h) =_LBS MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineer SHEET NO CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE OF_ DATE. DATE. SPREAD FOOTINGS - MAX. ALLOWABLE CONCENTRATED LOADS PMAX MARK P-l b rft.1) LBS h(ft) USE 24" SQUARE x ^ " DEEP WITH (2) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MARK P-2 LBS USE 30" SQUARE x ( 2, " DEEP WITH (3) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MARK P-3 LBS USE 36" SQUARE x t £_ " DEEP WITH (4) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MARK P-4 PMAX =ASBP(b)2 =.LBS USE 42" SQUARE x \ ^ " DEEP WITH (5) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MARK P-5 PMAX =ASBP(b)2 =.LBS USE 48" SQUARE x r> " DEEP WITH (6) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MIKE SURPRENANT , r & ASSOCIATES SHEET N0 — JOB SHEET NO L^ OF. Q>nsulting Structural Engineers CALCULATED BY DATE. CHECKED BY DATE. SCALE SCHEDULES MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB. SHEET NO . CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE OF_I ft DATE. DATE. 5 Of.. I P Q K-l MHuco ffiCO t 1g I I: i OO «D SS 001 £ §5 •* ^t IS <n SH <3?3£S X 00 J 3<§s O O ?« «£ 3§5 [I SQ ^1££ «o IH 00 § I P I -te !Dty w oS 3 ^fi ft «D ^}y ? uj mi Ui < IS5 g si a^B ^ S^g 2*5 ? U* * pim: ^ ID b 3 S 6 O „ ^ 8 IN^ p a 5 i 5 Si j 5 t 12 e II i i iii i gi i u i j 111 g 5© ©@© ©© ©© ©(S)©®@© JOB. MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO . CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE OF_ (3SV DATE. DATE. HOLD-DOWN SCHEDULE 4x POST LU/ MSTC40 FLR-To-FLR HOLD-DOWN 4x POST w/ MSTC52 FLR-To-FLR HOLD-DOWN 4x POST LU/ MSTC66 FLR-To-FLR HOLD-DOWN 4x POST LU/ MSTC48B3 HOLD-DOWN (TO 4x MIN BEAM BELOW LU/ MIN 38 lOd TO POST) 4x POST LU/ STHD10 HOLD-DOWN 4x POST ui/ HDU2 HOLD-DOWN ON SSTBI6 A B 4x POST tu/ HDU4 HOLD-DOWN ON SSTB20 A B 4x POST LU/ HDU5 HOLD-DOWN ON SSTB24 A B 6x POST LU/ HDU8 HOLD-DOWN ON SSTB28 A B 6x POST LU/ HDUII HOLD-DOWN ON SBIx30 A B 6x POST LU/ HDU14 HOLD-DOWN ON SBIx30 A B NOTES 1) HOLD DOWN ANCHORS MUST BE TIED IN PLACE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION 2) DEEPEN FOOTINGS TO PROVIDE 3" MIN CONCRETE COVER WHERE HOLD DOWN ANCHORS ARE LONGER THAN THE FTG DEPTH 3) USE (RJ) OPTION ON STHD HOLD-DOWNS FOR RAISED WOOD SUB-FLOOR CONDITION A) MSTC HOLD-DOWNS MAY USE I6d SINKERS OR lOd COMMON NAILS 5; MSTC HOLD-DOWNS TO BE CENTERED BETWEEN UPPER I LOWER FLOORS MAXIMUM CLEAR SPAN = 18" NAILS NOT REQUIRED IN CLEAR SPAN (RIM BOARD,) AREA REV JAN 2008 MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB. SHEET NO .\e>OF_(8 CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE DATE. DATE. SPREAD FOOTING SCHEDULE SYMBOL <8> <8> <S> <9> <S> SIZE AND REINFORCEMENT f F c*2£00 pel < fy«fc0k»i; 24" SQUARE X yL " DEEP w/ (2) * 4 ^^ WAY 30" SQUARE X it " DEEP W/ C3j « 4 EACH WAY 36" SQUARE X 12 " DEEP W/ C4,) * 4 EACH WAY 42" SQUARE X 11. " DEEP W (5) » 4 EACH WAY 48" SQUARE X ^ " DEEP W/ ft; 4* 4 EACH WAY MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (Plan Check Corrections) Project Armstrong Guest House 2663 Crest Drive Carlsbad, California 92008 Prepared for Dave Stockey Designs 4432 Skimmer Way Oceanside, California 92057 Project No 08076 Date August 26, 2008 335 15th Street San Diego, California 92101 Tel (619) 531 0757 • Fax (619) KJ1 0758 /-"" Mike Surprenant i & Associates Consulting Structural Engineers ** 7* >f**rtUM* £«*,/«« Sheet No / of & Calculated liy 7^ ^^ Date &f76/0t Checked hy Date Scale Correction Response tl Correction #11 See revised framing and foundation plan with shear walls moved to interior bearing line See attached calculations for shear wall loads and increases to load to meet the 3-1/2 1 ratio requirement Q Note See revised foundation details and calculations to accommodate the recommendations found in the soils report )• i lit. rcmpl ire-> coruxrion ie->pon-e v~^ ^ QQo+rb ^P$-'^"' MIKE SURPRENANT «Zr li [r \ Ijjfrri o, ACCrVTATIi* SHFETNO OFII X II AaoiXJAl U»> -T*l_^_^i^_ Consulting Structural Engineers CAI nui ATFO RY RATF CHFCKFORY DATE SCAI E 6 ' Storv Shearwalls £" ^ Direction Unit Lateral Load, v = > Gridhne ^ Tributary Area (This Level) Lateral Load (This Level) Lateral Load (Level Above) Total Load (All Levels). F,= // ?5 ShearwalKs) Length. L = /'-i> ft . 2.4-4 /"-/— ^- 7. / 7 (• Unit Wall Shear, v = FJL = /59 plf Q?1$(V> ' CV??.)' "'-TL^W 'V' Shearwall Tvpe \ i ^ Overturning L = ft w Okay by Inspection Uplift = Lbs Holdown Anchor Type i — i Gndline Tributary Area (This Level) Lateral Load (This Level) Lateral Load (Level Above) Total Load (All Levels). Fr = ShearwalKs) Length. L = ft Unit Wall Shear, v = FJL = plf Shearwall Type ( fjr \ f Overturning L = ft Okay bv Inspection Uohft= Lbs Holdown Anchor Type i — i Gndune Tributary Area (This Level) Lateral Load (This Level) Lateral Load (Level Above) Total Load (All Levels). F, = ShearwalKs) Length. L ft Unit Wall Shear, v = F,/L = plf Shearwall Type < f Overturning. L = ft Okay by Inspection Uplift = Lbs Holdown Anchor Type i — i '.5 DSf sq ft Lbs Lbs Lbs f sq ft. Lbs Lbs Lbs sq ft Lbs Lbs Lbs JOB. MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO . CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE DATE. DATE. DESIGN CRITERIA SUMMARY GOVERNING CODE CONCRETE MASONRY MORTAR GROUT REINFORCING STEEL STRUCTURAL STEEL WELDING SAWN LUMBER I-JOISTS MICROLLAMS/ PARALLAMS/ TIMBERSTRAND GLULAMS 2007 C B C f c = 2500 PSI, NO SPECIAL INSPECTION REQ'D, (UNO) ASTM C90, f m = 1 500 PSI, NO SPECIAL INSPECTION REQ'D, (UNO) ASTM C270, f c = 1800 PSI, TYPE S ASTM C476, f c = 2000 PSI ASTM A615, Fy = 40 KSI FOR #3 AND SMALLER ASTM A615, Fy = 60 KSI FOR #4 AND LARGER (UNO) ASTM A992, Fy = 50 KSI (ALL ' W SHAPES, ONLY) ASTM A36, Fy = 36 KSI (STRUCTURAL PLATES, ANGLES, CHANNELS) ASTM A500, GRADE B, Fy = 46 KSI (STRUCTURAL TUBES-HSS) ASTM A53, GRADE B, Fy = 35 KSI (STRUCTURAL PIPES) E70-T6-TYP FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL E90 SERIES FOR A615 GRADE 60 REINFORCING BARS DOUG FIR LARCH, ALLOWABLE UNIT STRESSES PER 2005 NDS TrusJoist MacMillan - ICC ESR-1 153 - (TJI & TJI/PRO MEMBERS) TrusJoist MacMillan - ICC ESR-1 387 - (LVL/PSL/LSL MEMBERS) DOUGLAS FIR OR DOUGLAS FIR/HEM GRADE 24F-V4 (SIMPLE SPANS) GRADE 24F-V8 (CANTILEVERS) SOIL EXISTING NATURAL SOIL VALUES PER CBC TABLE 1804 2 SOIL CLASSIFICATION - SOILS REPORT BY TlrfZgA CKMM6C*J'<». DATED cp/L-v if 1QQ& ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE ACTIVE SOIL PRESSURE (CANTILEVER) ACTIVE SOIL PRESSURE (RESTRAINED) PASSIVE SOIL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION _PSF _PCF _PCF PCF ^gjteg* MIKE SURPRENANT If V! & ASSOCIATES r*L\-r_ \— ^-'- Consulting Structural Engineers SHEFTNO T OF W . r.AI CIJI ATFO RY DATE rnpr:Ki=r> RV DATE SCALE FOUNDATION DESIGN ALLOWABLE APPLIED LOADS Allowable Soil Bearing Pressure (ASBP) =psf (Per Design Criteria) CONTINUOUS FOOTINGS |wn MARK CF-1 Ftg Width (b) =ft = ASBP (b) =) Depth of Ftg (h) = ' ° ft USE \T~ "WEDEx DEEP WITH £- # *V TOP & BOTTOM | MARK CF-2 Ftg Width (b) = _.ft Depth of Ftg (h) =..ft = ASBP(b)=_Plf USE WDDEx DEEP WITH . TOP & BOTTOM I WMAX @ Gndlme. WMAX @ Gndlme. WMAX @ Gndlme. WMAX @ Gndlme USE CF-_|_ USE CF- USE CF- USE CF- n ooi^nt I^T *» JOB. MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO . CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE OF.<£> DATE. DATE. CONTINUOUS FOOTINGS - MAX POST LOADS MARK CF-1 = ASBP(b)(2h) = > 2h(ft)/// LBS h(ft) MARK CF-2 PMAX = ASBP(b)(2h) =_LBS MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB. SHEET NO . CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE OF DATE. DATE. SPREAD FOOTINGS - MAX. ALLOWABLE CONCENTRATED LOADS PMAX MARK P-l PMAX =ASBP(b)2 =. b (ft.') LBS h(ft) USE 24" SQUARE x 12." DEEP WITH (2) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MARK P-2 PMAX =ASBP(b)2=.LBS USE 30" SQUARE x ^ " DEEP WITH (3) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MARK P-3 PMAX =ASBP(b)2 =.LBS USE 36" SQUARE x ,-z. " DEEP WITH (4) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MARK P-4 PMAX =ASBP(b)2 =.LBS USE 42" SQUARE x ^ " DEEP WITH (5) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MARK P-5 PMAX =ASBP(b)2 =.LBS USE 48" SQUARE x j-j, " DEEP WITH (6) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM ww ON CD 00oo P-o C/3 C/3 •Oo 00o U)ON 00<1oo m s © CDWO O P-o C/J C/)• O O ON ON Lfii— i OS ao ot-1 o 9 td O C/3 to o 00 2 co \/ \ m nm rnex) B-l A-l IX \\\ \\\=££= nj h-td \ -i X N X X > X •—A-l \ -Ft-vI \_/ ro\\\\ \\\\ X X X X ~nmm nm iM CT' 19'-0 O 8° QJ — ^5 Ul H- O C 03 C i- QJ Ul< "O 3 Q- Ul M "O CD i-03 O " 3 -h £ -! CO IH- n QJ O O O 3~5 Q_ 3 -hi M 03 < 3 i- Ul 03 H-CD Ul CD <-t- C "O X) 3 i- Ul i—o) ui o in QJn 3 03 3€+ o" QJ in h- ' **< I ' "^ O O 033 "O -hi Z -hi-i -5 r~ 03O O Q> -< ^1 <— 3 - Ul0) 1— '<+ n 3 r~ <-t- 3" (+(O QJ O03 - H- Ul QJ 03 i — • 03 -i 3" -5 On QJ QJ n H- 3" 3 i— Q)<-h i- CD r+ 03 H~ 03 i — ' t-^3 03 -5 O Oin n ui QJ 3H- - Q_QJ - QJ~T ft f— 1 ~~ 1) U I 1 _J 0) ^ O Q. Q_3 t- t- 03 3 QJ < 3 3 03 T) 03T) CD n 3" 1 1 — • t— <-t- ~"5 H- M 3 ,_ QJ M 03 03 O 3 n Q. 03 3 QJ~5 Ul 1— ^ h— C3 Qi — 1 O H- 3303 C Z -! CX) OD> (/) —\i — ' H- 1 O -i (X) -HC -Hin > oUl P" 33 25" m 3>^5 3) r~Ql —1n z: m i- d 33 3 (X) CD — 1 ^Z 03 -1n o) — iC < 33 1- M d~5 0) CX) 0) S CxO 303 c-t- s; 3 -s 1-1<-h C — 1Ul Ul X Ul Of~~ i— i 0) — 1Z 3nco ~o(-I-33/^— — » 1 1( _) 1 — 1t) 03 0 i—i 03 3)z -^C7I i- 3>3 T3 2:CD T3m 33 td -h, O (X3 O < — ~^ ^>|— r~on zI> i — i O — 1 Z Z1 1 1 11 1 1 1Om f siI T 1 C/3Z Z — 1a 33i— i m czZ td O~n — iO "H 3333 O J>3 33 r~ I>—i —i a1-1 33 33 O CZ 3>Z CX3 5: CX3 i — io zz eni "*• td > —Ii i x: \~* td (-> 3> "D i- aro co ro m H- CX> (X3 <X3 CX) t)n m n n 03o D o o inn CO CO CO CO n \l ^j oo \J ~O Ji. 4i. CO 4^- r+ro ro ro ro H-!-> h" Ul S O I— > K) PO 'vD 3 n t) -1 -H O — ll~3333a<_ZT" ^Q 3) ^* <C f ) f ) C3 ( 3 ^> ( i ]> p~| "^> f — | | |T1 "p ^^ f — j f — j 1 Wj "^ r)5ic/)r"33 ti~n"nm n -<T)-HCn33(X3— | — | | 2 — | -< n en 33 1 cr* — intdm~oro z i-i i337Co o i 4^ro 3> (son :s -^ co \ en iro w o >vD i—1 i> -^ — 1 ro 33 33* ~r~ ~o i — i rn ~^ o -n m —i 33n oz £71 ^ m C/^ f — ^k/J k J -n z -N z> CO t)X ^ (S i — i> a^N ^ /^ 33 CXI O00 --J --J OS! 0> CT^ O 3)S3 (S3 (S3 C/3 < CD\-- ^ vx " i— i Oi> ~nco --J ^i ncrs j». .)> > < — i~vl 45. 42. m 33 III 33 CZCO CP1 -P^ >J3 3> C/3^i ui (S nj c/) CX) h-> -> (S O ^1 (7s (S3 CT1 33 OsD CZ O1 M4^ ^M ^J i — i 00 Zn mo IO CO & 0 03 15 § m o co eo -n -n -n o ro ro RS J» CD 37 r~5=0 mi-*= 58 r-SI-H m §5 rn o m coZ -HS| o o S1"* orn*>"o z S3 p_ •—• mow 1 iS O I- 30 -Im o >K^C 00 S oen -u o o o ~D "W TlCO O> CO o rn O II O -* o roen u 0 03 15 33' -Hj^r-r- to ro o r-r^ r^ n n ii n - o—i r- oo o r™ r~ >•rn rn o o o o —i~n~noo ocoo»-<r~r—mrnro-»OO o-n-no — oo ocnozn n i— r- to -* o o o> tn «h o to -» ssO 5 5S H- -j o -o vi CD O O -* i-i ff Q. X r- c o oo .-» o ro —j co coO> (O— A CD ID ro h- s s a en CD -^ ou en O —I QD-j .u <o •-» m -* -* o o » co ro —* ro a>4k O 4k CD 4k O O O> o o o -n ~n ~n-—•ro n con n n .—.^.-^ oen en en KS- gOD to o> tn en co oon it —. r~ o o o-» -- oro -» CD oo -•• oO 00 4k to -» 00 o> CD eo en4fc CO ^4 Cno en ro CD 8 E «g i01 Or\3 oo ??»{ -«•+ X O 3Dh- M *-»• 3:O (- >B> O» O ZI—1 3 OO O) CO 333D 3D --a ft 3 5 O Ofi3S -•"•-» CO 3 ^* ^5O 3* ~ZO SH • O O O -H ->3D O> —I O - Is £5 £' = m S-•> r~ <n o orn o n o -»o U 0 03 15 oooor—r—(—r— m rn t~ t— t— r——* r— r- r-r~ r~ n n n n—l i— r—r-mrnro-*oo % n n (— r~ to -* o o I oo"" -*ooo — —e- rri oo o 01 (o-^<oto3 3 en rs>cooo-^-^J<oto to ro o r- o GS o M o w o z i—• -j o -a 1P *S> -l\>01 <0—' -g - § 52,~ i-* -K CD CD — £?8•o r-O. nc o co Som * i t/tII II II -—. —^—» O o o o en <n in »-•-—* --- oro -* co CD -* oo a> 4k. ro -t OD oo to O» en eno *. to -» w o co to CD ro z o> to OB rn ro -^ Ero -» ooSSS3 tO A CD CO O3D en to * CD mII II II II CO 2CD os en 30CO -si 01 -~O C» (O OD 0 ~£ ^- O) rn ff *S CO 7O HO CO3Q. Q.H *O. la O H<Q31 3OO T3-* T<D-I TOT COC -ICO (Dco a. -)CD o rtID H2•O o-«< •J-l-30)a CO ^1—I•*o ro MA v> o 5m 5" 5D OT m i 8 5 ScB 0 03 15 3D O CD—I * CO —( l~o>< oo rnoocBI m co Eo 30 r~ r~ co co«-» 3e ^ ^ rn o £ rn rn to ro ro3 O 3D 3D XXX 0» CO >> .te.fe.feCOr~ r- -oo o o mco co -n ~n ~n o •o f»003D 3D A A ro ro So- li §co 30 r~O rn t-i ± ^Smo £!lj m o 11 s s o. a. I s O |- I! °"§:*-^rgi o coz -v I —I "" CO >3D3D OHOl~ O O O O O O < ro rn n n n •z m o roo —i eno r~ en o Is 3 -I CD CO -O -O -Ono rn ft co co co= -n M > -n -n -n u 0 03 15 : x to » : :r -H i> o r~ i S —* r-r- i- H- rn o>3 3 en sro_* _*. _* _k oen ** fe o> oCD * ..v en eno o> oo CD o> ^ co to CD ro z S2; ro - rn o CD eu 'ISH-t I 01 o>ro roen en » k A U * m ro <oro roCD -* CO ro ° i SS; i:0 03 15 t—1 ro 1= •-» CD O >eoo -n |e g = rn o rn co o rnCOro§§ ro m§-•en o SCO-o CO COCD 01 * O O O g CO 30 C•D 3» CO> -H CO rn o coO 3C -O O rn o n o -» o roen ?•" S3 u 0 03 15 XXXXXXXX o o o o O O - rn rn~ ~i— i— rn m o O o o-n -n -* o o ou ii i— r- o» CD o O ro 4k to CD> oa ro co co> -«j ro to CD> 01 ro u> CD co ca o o> ro o r— o ro o o o o 1-4 o o o o o o z CO —* —* O) —*cn-si-»cnoa4». o o o -* o o o oi cn 4k u ro -k « cn ro rotn -J 4^ <> 4k O 4k -* -J O C ro ^ o co CD ro -* ro -* roO CO O> 4k CD 4kO O O Oto cn n n n u i— r- o O O O o o o ocn 4kCO O -* 4k (O GO O cn -^ 4k co rnn n n it co ,i j o><o cn c >R § »O. Q.tr » Ia (O ro jo o w - m o F m . il O.L.1 CO o>: I Bi Iso fio0!M Ig \>r/a3TJ ^C01 R ii£i§9 -»m°is* 5 £g OB -J O>Ui fa>M - 5'riHti1 i^ff£ lip!|1§8|5 3 |-o» « ? »3|S|I •US* j ss. - - I t| ir ww 00 ON CDooO O P-O C/3 *O O -1^ o 00o U) I 00 oo W o>8 a 8 8 COmO COto o to CCD Ocb "^ 73m Tl tocn Dmco COo o s o 1s00 -npm O COO5 * R5 J^o D OZ Omw O cn do cog N 8 O 5! Ul as a "w "w "w I 2 ^ ^ ,& > i. 6 co gw II H Hro -i ' » ^ S DC ii c S b bO) H" O ;o m D zj Qo ^•u U. "• o S _» -». Qn 73O O !< o o o 5 is3 e*» c*> 4>Jfc O O> *• O O O CO COmD coNJenoo o cCD 0 <b-g 33 0m > ~" Fl JO 0en ^ •* | 00 Dmco co0 Tlrm O ^^Q£ i 9*fv Xko 5 o co O F4 D OZ mco g 5? S co o bJ en 68 gg' ro &> w*• O O» 6 6 A> 11 o o U S 5 6 cb M tO I O O o»I— -I OI PIUG-29-2008 08 35 FROM TERRfl TECH ENG 760 741 6568 TO 4390080 TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING, INC Project No. TE-2300 August 29,2008 Mr. & Mrs Armstrong c/o Dave Stockey Designs P O Box 1112 Bonsall, CA 92003 Subject! Foundation Plan Review Proposed Guesthouse 2663 Crest Drive Carlsbad, California Reference; 1) "Preliminary Soils Investigation" prepared by Terra Technology Engineering, Inc. dated July 11,2008 2) Foundation Plans prepared by Dave Stockey Designs dated August 26,2008 Dear Mr & Mrs. Stockey: Per the City of Carlsbad's request, we have reviewed the project foundation plans (Ref No 2) Our review revealed mat plans were prepared in conformance with the recommendations set forth in our preliminary soils report (Reference No. 1). Therefore, we recommend plans be submitted to the City of Carlsbad as scheduled. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated Respectfully submitted, Terra Technology Engineering, Inc. Ronald K. Adams Dale R. Regli President Registered Civil Engineer 19393 Geotechmcal Engineer 000713 RKApaj cc- (4) submitted P O Box30l06J • Etcondiao, CA 920)0 • (760)7-\94fil26 FAX (709^41-69^^^ f TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING, INC PRELIMINARY SOILS INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED GUESTHOUSE 2663 CREST DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 PREPARED FOR MR & MRS ARMSTRONG C/O DAVE STOCKEY DESIGNS P O BOX 1112 BONSALL,CA 92003 JULY 11, 2008 PROJECT NO TE-2300 TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING, INC Project No TE-2300 July 11,2008 Mr &Mrs Armstrong c/o Dave Stockey Designs P O Box 1112 Bonsall,CA 92003 SUBJECT: Preliminary Soils Investigation Proposed Guesthouse 2663 Crest Drive Carlsbad, California 92008 Dear Mr &Mrs Armstrong In response to your request, we have performed a Preliminary Soils Investigation for the subject project The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate the suitability of the site for the proposed development and make recommendations with regard to site grading and foundation design Briefly, our investigation revealed favorable soil conditions and in our opinion, the site is suitable for the proposed development, provided recommendations set forth in the attached report are adhered to If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated Respectfully submitted, Terra Technology Engineering, Inc. Ronald K Adams President RKApaj cc (4) submitted Dale R. Regli' Registered Civil Geotechmcal Engin P O Box 301061 • Escondido, CA 92030 • (760)740-0826 FAX (760) 741-6568 TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING, INC TABLE OF CONTENTS 1) Purpose and Scope 2) Location and Description of Site 3) Field Investigation 4) Soil Conditions 5 ) Laboratory Soil Testing 6) Recommendations and Conclusions A) Grading B) Foundations C) Seismic Design Considerations D) Review of Foundation Plans 7) Uncertainty and Limitations Page 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 APPENDK Appendix A Exploration Legend & Unified Soil Classification Chart Plate No One Plate No Two & Three Plate No Four Test Pit Location Plan Exploration Logs Tabulation of Test Results TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING, INC Project No TE-2300 July 11,2008 Page 1 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of the investigation was to determine if the site is suitable for the proposed guesthouse The scope of the investigation was to A Determine the physical properties and engineering characteristics of the surface and subsurface soils B Provide design information with regard to foundation design of the proposed guesthouse 2. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF SITE The site is located at 2663 Crest Drive in the City of Carlsbad, California The new detached single story guesthouse (19 feet x 32 feet) will be constructed within the backyard area of the existing residence and detached garage approximately 10 feet inside the northwest property line (see attached Plate No One) The area is predominantly flat pitched downhill to the west Sheet flow drainage at the site is directed to the west property comer The area is generally landscaped with lawns, shrubs, planters, walkways, etc Landscaped areas are provided with underground irrigation systems 3. FIELD INVESTIGATION The field investigation was performed on July 8,2008 and included an inspection of the site and the excavation of two hand dug test pits to depths of 4 feet Location of test pits are shown on the attached Plate No One, entitled "Test Pit Location Plan" As excavation proceeded, representative bulk samples were collected In place natural densities and moisture contents were determined at different depths in the excavations and are included on Plate No 's Two and Three Subsequent to obtaining soil samples, our exploratory excavations were backfilled TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING, INC Project No TE-2300 July 11, 2008 Page 2 4. SOIL CONDITIONS Loose surficial soils (silty-sands) consisting of plowed ground/landscape fill was found to be 3 feet and 1V* feet in depth in Test Pit No 's One and Two, respectively Underlying native soils to depths explored were medium dense to dense silty-sands of the Coastal Terrace Formation On-site soils were found to have an expansion index of less than 5 and are classified as being "very low" in expansion potential Groundwater was not encountered at the time of our investigation, nor did caving of exploratory trenches occur In addition, due to the dense nature of the underlying coastal terrace formation at the site, it is our opinion, soil liquefaction is unkkely to occur m the event grading is performed in accordance with the recommendations set forth in this report. 5 LABORATORY SOIL TESTING All laboratory test were performed on typical soils m accordance with accepted test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Tests conducted include A) Optimum Moisture & Maximum Density (ASTM D-1557) B) Direct Shear (Remold) (ASTMD-3080) C) Sieve Analysis (ASTM D-l 140) D) Field Density & Moisture (ASTM D-l556) E) Expansion Potential (FHA Standard) Test results are tabulated on the attached Plate No 's Two through Four entitled "Exploration Log" and "Tabulation of Test Results" 6. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS General It is our understanding, the proposed guesthouse will consist of single story wood frame construction utilizing a raided floor foundation system TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING, iNc Project No TE-2300 July 11,2008 Page 3 In our opinion, the site is suitable for the proposed guesthouse Recommendations presented in this report should be incorporated into the planning, design and construction phases of the subject project 6A. Grading (Not Required) hi lieu of grading at the site, the proposed raised floor footings will be deepened as necessary to protrude through compressible topsoils and bear a minimum of 1 foot into firm native ground Prior to trenching foundations, the building area should be cleared of vegetation and obstructions, if any The building area may be defined as under and a minimum of 5 feet horizontally beyond the building footprint 6B. Foundations General Foundation bearing soils will be comprised of medium dense to dense silty-sands of the Coastal Terrace Formation This formation generally provides good supporting characteristics and is generally 'Very low" in expansion potential The following foundation criteria is in accordance with the 2007 California Building Code, Chapter 18 All footings should be deepened as necessary to protrude through plowed ground/landscape fill and bear a minimum of 1 foot into firm native ground (coastal Terrace Formation) Continuous footings having a minimum width of 12 inches founded a minimum of 12 niches into firm native ground will have an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 pounds per square foot Isolated square footings having a diameter of 18 inches into firm native ground will have an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 pounds per square foot All continuous footings are to be reinforced with one #4 bar top and bottom Steel should be positioned 3 inches above bottom of footing and 3 inches below top of footing hi addition, the project structural engineer should provide vertical steel recommendations for footings deeper than 3 feet in depth (we anticipated footings of the west portion of the proposed building will be in the order of 3 to 4 feet deep) We should be contacted to inspect footing excavations prior to forming to assure they are trenched into the recommended soil bearing stratum Pnor to pouring of concrete, Terra Technology Engineering, Inc. should be contacted to inspect foundation recommendations for compliance to those set forth (i e steel placement) TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING, INC Project No TE-2300 July 11,2008 Page 4 6C. Seismic Design Considerations (Soil Parameters) Seismic design considerations are based on the 2007 California Building Code, Chapter 16, USGS National Seismic Hazard Maps, Java Ground Motion Parameter Calculator - Version 508 (46MB) A ) Site Class = D (Su = 1,000 to 2,000 psf) (Table 161355 California Building Code) B) Values of coefficient Ss = 1251 (Fig 1613 5 [3]) Fa =100 (Table 1613 5 3 [1]) Si =0472 (Fig 1613 5 [4]) Fv=1528 (Table 1613 5 3 [2]) 6D. Review of Foundation Plans When foundation plans become available, we would like to review them to assure they are prepared in compliance with the recommendations presented in this report 7. UNCERTAINTY AND LIMITATIONS Surface and subsurface soils are assumed to be uniform Therefore, should soils encountered during construction differ from those presented in this report, we should be contacted to provide their engineering properties It is the responsibility of the owner and contractor to carry out recommendations set forth in this report During our investigation of the subject site, evidence of faulting was not encountered Subsequent to review of available geologic literature, we feel any faulting in the vicinity of the site may be classified as inactive However, it should be noted that San Diego County is located in a high seismic area with regard to earthquake Earthquake proof projects are economically unfeasible Therefore, damage as a result of earthquake is probable and we assume no liability o: TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING, INC Project No TE-2300 July 11,2008 PageS We assume the on-site safety of our personnel only We cannot assume liability of personnel other than our own It is the responsibility of the owner and contractor to insure construction operations are conducted in a safe manner and in conformance with regulations governed by CAL-OSHA and/or local agencies Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated Respectfully submitted, Terra Technology Engineering, Inc. Ronald K Adams President Dale R Re; Registered Geotechnical RKApaj cc (4) submitted TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING, INC EXPLORATION LEGEND UNIFIED SOIL SOIL DESCRIPTION I COARSEGRAINED More than half of material is larger than No 200 sieve size GRAVELS CLEAN GRAVELS More than half of coarse fraction is larger than No 4 sieve size, but smaller than 3" GRAVELS WITH FINES (Appreciable amount of fines) SANDS CLEAN SANDS More than half of coarse fraction is smaller than No 4 sieve size SANDS WITH FINES (appreciable amount of fines) II FINEGRAINED More than half of material is smaller than No 200 sieve size SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid Limit less than 50 SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid Limit greater than 50 HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS CLASSIFICATION CHART GROUP SYMBOL TYPICAL NAMES GW GP GM GC sw SP SM SC ML CL OL MH CH OH PT Well graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines Poorly graded gravels, gravel sand mixtures, little or no fines Silty gravels, poorly graded gravel- sand-silt mixtures Clayey gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand, clay mixtures Well graded sand, gravely sands, little or no fines Poorly graded sands, gravely sands, little or no fines Silty sands, poorly graded sand and silt mixtures Clayey sands, poorly graded sand and clay mixtures Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, sandy silt or clayey- silt-sand mixtures with slight plasticity Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravely clays, lean clays Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous find sandy or silty soils, elastic silts Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays Organic clays of medium to high plasticity Peat and other highly organic soils US - Undisturbed, driven nng sample or tube sample CK - Undisturbed chunk sample BG -Bulksample V - Water level at tune of excavation or as indicated APPENDIX 'A m** m^fL/L TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING, INC TERRA TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING, INC Soil Testing and Inspection Services TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN Proposed Guesthouse Crest Drive Carlsbad, California V n n PROJECT NO. TE- 2300 PLATE NO. ONE TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING, INC :XPLORATION LOG PROJECT NAME: Crest Drive. Carlsbad DATE LOGGED: 7/08/08 ELEVATION:Existing Grade TEST PIT NO. ONE Depth (Feet) - 1- - 2- 3. 4- Sample Type BG CK Dry Density (pel) 1201 Moisture Content (%) 47 Passing #200 Sieve 27 7 Sample Depth 3' Soil Classi- fication SM SM * Description & Remarks Dark Brown, Moist, Loose, Silty-Sand (Landscape Fill / Plowed Ground) (Becomes Brown) (Roots) Light Brown Orange, Humid, Dense, Silty-Sand (Firm Native / Coastal Terrace Formation) * Found footing 12 Inches into this stratum PROJECT NO.TE-2300 PLATE NO. TWO TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING, INC EXPLORATION LOG PROJECT NAME: Crest Drive. Carlsbad DATE LOGGED: 7/08/08 ELEVATION:Existing Grade TEST PIT NO. TWO Depth (Feet) - 1- 2- 3- S ample Type Dry Density (pcf) Moisture Content (%) Passing #200 Sieve Sample Depth Soil Classi- fication SM SM * Description & Remarks Dark Brown, Humid, Loose, Silty-Sand (Landscape Fill / Plowed Ground) (Roots) Brown Orange, Humid, Dense, Silty-Sand (Firm Native / Coastal Terrace Formation) Bottom of Test Pit * Found footing 12 Inches into this stratum PROJECT NO.TE-2300 PLATE NO. THREE m^ m^r1L/L TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING, INC TABULATION OF TEST RESULTS OPTIMUM MOISTURE/MAXIMUM DENSITY SOIL DESCRIPTION TYPE Light Brown Orange Silty Sand PI @ 3' MAX DRY DENSITY (LB CU FT) 131 5 OPT MOISTURE (% DRY WD 085 SAMPLE NO EXPANSION POTENTIAL PI (a), Condition Initial Moisture (%) Air Dry Moisture (%) Final Moisture (%) Dry Denstiy (PCF) Load (PSF) Swell (%) Expansion Index Remold 90% 85 16 129 1184 150 000 Less than 5 DIRECT SHEAR '£ NO PI (a). 3' Condition Angle Internal Fnction Cohesion Intercept (PCF) Remold 90% 35 100 PROJECT NO. TE-2300 PLATE NO. FOUR CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 1 Project Title Prefect Address Documentation Author Date 05/22/08 08 50 20******* *v7 10* ******* _ I Building Permit # I __ I Plan Check / Date | I ARMSTRONG GUEST HOUSE 2663 CREST DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92208 RON MOORE Ron Moore Title 24 Energy Calcs 4152 Chasm Street Oceanside, CA 92056 _ 760-806-1026 Field Check/ Date 1 Climate Zone 07 --------------------- Compliance Method MICROPAS7 v7 10 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc I MICROPAS7 v7 10 File-ARMSTRON Wth-CTZ07S05 Program-FORM CF-1R I I User#-MP1315 User-Ron Moore Title 24 Energy Run-ARMSTRON I MICROPAS7 ENERGY USE SUMMARY = Energy Use Standard Proposed Compliance (kTDV/sf-yr) Design Design Margin = Space Heating 8 88 6 71 2 17 = Space Cooling 15 49 19 05 -3 56 = Water Heating 31 61 16 46 15 15 ~ -------- -------- -------- = Total 55 98 42 22 13 76 = *** Building complies with Computer Performance *** = GENERAL INFORMATION HERS Verification Not Required Conditioned Floor Area 557 sf Building Type Single Family Detached Construction Type New Fuel Type NaturalGas Building Front Orientation Front Facing 234 deg (SW) Number of Dwelling Units 1 Number of Building Stories 1 Weather Data Type FullYear Floor Construction Type Number of Building Zones Conditioned Volume Slab-On-Grade Area Glazing Percentage Average Glazing U-factor Average Glazing SHGC Average Ceiling Height Raised Floor 1 4874 cf 0 sf 25 8 % of floor area 0 4 Btu/hr-sf-F 0 35 8 8 ft CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-lR Page 2 Project Title ARMSTRONG GUEST HOUSE Date 05/22/08 08 50 20 MICROPAS7 v7 10 File-ARMSTRON Wth-CTZ07S05 Program-FORM CF-lR User#-MP1315 User-Ron Moore Title 24 Energy Run-ARMSTRON BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION Zone Type Residence Floor Area (sf) 557 Volume (cf) 4874 1 of Dwell Units 1 00 1 of Peop- le 2 0 Cond- it- ioned Yes Thermo- stat Type NoSetback Vent Height (ft) 2 0 Vent Area (sf) Standard Verified Leakage or Housewrap No Surface OPAQUE SURFACES U- Sheath- Solar Appendix Frame Area fact- Cavity ing Act Gains IV Location/ Type (sf) or R-val R-val Azm Tilt Reference Comments 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Wall 5 Roof 6 Floor Wood Wood Wood Wood Wood Wood 162 162 256 256 557 557 0 102 0 102 0 102 0 102 0 032 0 037 13 13 13 13 30 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 234 54 144 324 n/a 234 90 90 90 90 0 90 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No IV IV IV IV IV IV 9 A3 9 A3 9 A3 9 A3 1 A7 20 A4 Front Wall Back Wall Right Wall Left Wall Vented R- 30 BAT Over Crawlspac FENESTRATION SURFACES Orientation Area U- Act (sf) factor SHGC Azm Tilt Exterio Shade Type r Location /Comments 1 Wind Front (SW) 2 Wind Back (NE) 3 Door Right (SE) 4 Wind Right (SE) 24 0 0 400 0 350 234 90 16 0 0 400 0 350 54 90 99 9 0 400 0 350 144 90 4 0 0 400 0 350 144 90 OVERHANGS Standard FG1/DUAL Vin /Wd LE2 Standard BG1/DUAL Vin /Wd LE2 Standard RG1/DUAL Vin /Wd Dr LE2 Standard RG2/DUAL Vin /Wd LE2 Surface Window Overhang Area Left Right (sf) Width Height Depth Height Extension Extension 3 Door 4 Window 99 9 4 0 n/a n/a 6 66 1 33 4 0 2 0 0 25 0 25 n/a n/a n/a n/a CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 3 Project Title ARMSTRONG GUEST HOUSE Date 05/22/08 08 50 20 I MICROPAS7 v7 10 File-ARMSTRON Wth-CTZ07S05 Program-FORM CF-lR I I User#-MP1315 User-Ron Moore Title 24 Energy Run-ARMSTRON I HVAC SYSTEMS Verified Number Verified Verified Verified Verified Maximum System of Minimum Refrig Charge Adequate Fan Watt Cooling Type Systems Efficiency EER or TXV Airflow Draw Capacity Wall 1 0 630 AFUE n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a NoCooling 1 13 00 SEER No No No No No HVAC SIZING Verified Total Sensible Design Maximum Heating Cooling Cooling Cooling System Load Load Capacity Capacity Type (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Wall 9343 n/a n/a n/a NoCooling n/a 8187 9227 n/a Sizing Location CARLSBAD Winter Outside Design 34 F Winter Inside Design 70 F Summer Outside Design 81 F Summer Inside Design 75 F Summer Range 10 F DUCT SYSTEMS Verified Verified Verified System Duct Duct Duct Surface Buried Type Location R-value Leakage Area Ducts Wall NoCooling None Attic R-n/a n/a R-4 2 No n/a No n/a No CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 4 Project Title ARMSTRONG GUEST HOUSE Date 05/22/08 08 50 20 I MICROPAS7 v7 10 File-ARMSTRON Wth-CTZ07S05 Program-FORM CF-1R I User#-MP1315 User-Ron Moore Title 24 Energy Run-ARMSTRON WATER HEATING SYSTEMS Number Tank External Heater in Energy Size Insulation Tank Type Type Distribution Type System Factor (gal) R-value 1 Instantaneous Gas Pipelnsulation 1 n/a n/a R-n/a WATER HEATING SYSTEMS DETAIL Standby Internal Tank Recovery Rated Loss Insulation Pilot System Efficiency Input Fraction R-value Light 1 Instantan 0 82 n/a n/a R- n/a n/a SPECIAL FEATURES AND MODELING ASSUMPTIONS *** Items in this section should be documented on the plans, *** *** installed to manufacturer and CEC specifications, and *** *** verified during plan check and field inspection *** This building does not have a cooling system installed This building incorporates a non-standard Water Heating System REMARKS **************+******IMp0RTANT NOTES***PLEASE READ****J NOTE A OWNER OR DESIGNER OF BUILDING MUST SIGN THESE CALCULATIONS BEFORE SUBMITTING THEM TO BUILDING DEPARTMENT SIGNED CALCULATIONS INDICATE THAT OWNER AND DESIGNER UNDERSTANDS TITLE 24 COMPLIANCE METHODOLOGY AND EXPRESSLY APPROVE USE OF SUGGESTED COMPONENTS LISTED HEREIN ++++QUESTIONS? CALL RON MOORE TITLE 24 ENERGY CONSULTANT AT (760) 806-1026 BEFORE MAKING EXPENDITURES NOTE B CONTRACTORS INSTALLING HVAC AND/OR WATER HEATING EQUIP- MENT MUST BE GIVEN A COPY OF THESE CALCULATIONS BY OWNER PRIOR TO ANY WORK BEING DONE EACH INSTALLING CONTRACTOR IS TO REVIEW THESE DOCUMENTS AND TO VERIFY EQUIPMENT SIZING AND WARRANT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE SYSTEMS SPECIFIED MAY BE REPLACED BY APPROVED EQUAL EQUIPMENT (SPECIFIED MINIMUM CAPACITY & EQUAL OR BETTER EFFICIENCY) IF CHANGES ARE MADE INSTALLING CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY (1) OWNER (2) DESIGNER (3) DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR IN WRITING AT ADDRESSES LISTED UNDER THE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT OF THIS CF-1R FROM PRIOR TO DOING ACTUAL WORK CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-lR Page 5 Project Title ARMSTRONG GUEST HOUSE Date 05/22/08 08 50 20 MICROPAS7 v7 10 Fxle-ARMSTRON Wth-CTZ07S05 Program-FORM CF-lR | User#-MP1315 User-Ron Moore Title 24 Energy Run-ARMSTRON | REMARKS NOTE C DIRECT VENT GAS WALL FURNACE USED IN CALCULATIONS IS A CHAMBERLAIN 14036, BY WILLIAMS, RATED OUTPUT 10,039 BTUH, AFUE 0 80 SEE ATTACHED SPEC SHEETS ***********THIS INFORMATION IS SUPPLIED AS A COURTESY TO SHOW THERE IS HVAC EQUIPMENT WITH THE EFFICIENCY CALLED OUT IN THESE CALCULATIONS THE HVAC CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SIZING EQUIPMENT, SELECTION AND WARRANTING SYSTEM PERFORMANCE ******** NOTE D INSTANTANEOUS GAS WATER HEATER USED IN CALCULATIONS IS A RINNAI 2020W, RATED INPUT 150,000 BTUH, E F 0 82 SEE ATTACHED SPEC SHEETS NOTE E FOR ENERGY CALCULATIONS FRONT OF RESIDENCE IS CONSIDERED TO BE WALL FACING THE BOTTOM OF FLOOR PLAN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 6 Project Title ARMSTRONG GUEST HOUSE Date 05/22/08 08 50 20 MICROPAS7 v7 10 File-ARMSTRON Wth-CTZ07S05 Program-FORM CF-1R User#-MP1315 User-Ron Moore Title 24 Energy Run-ARMSTRON COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This certificate of compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title-24, Parts 1 and 6 of the California Code of Regulations, and the administrative regulations to implement them This certificate has been signed by the individual with overall design responsibility DESIGNER or OWNER DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR Name CHARLES ARMSTRONG Name RON MOORE Company HOMEOWNER Company Ron Moore Title 24 Energy Calcs Address 2663 CREST DRIVE Address 4152 Chasm Street CARLSBAD, CA 92208 Oceanside, CA 92056 Phone Phone 760-806-1026 License __^ " ' 5-2Z-6<?Signed Signed (date) / / (date) ENFORCEMENT AGENCY Name Title Agency Phone Signed (date) HVAC SIZING Project Title Project Address Documentation Author Climate Zone Compliance Method ARMSTRONG GUEST HOUSE 2663 CREST DRIVE ******* CARLSBAD, CA 92208 *v7 10* RON MOORE ******* Ron Moore Title 24 Energy Calcs 4152 Chasm Street Oceanside, CA 92056 760-806-1026 07 HVAC Page 1 Date 05/22/08 08 50 20 I I I Building Permit # | I I I Plan Check / Date I I I I Field Check/ Date I MICROPAS7 v7 10 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc MICROPAS7 v7 10 File-ARMSTRON Wth-CTZ07S05 Program-HVAC SIZING User#-MP1315 User-Ron Moore Title 24 Energy Run-ARMSTRON GENERAL INFORMATION Floor Area Volume Front Orientation Sizing Location Latitude Winter Outside Design Winter Inside Design Summer Outside Design Summer Inside Design Summer Range Interior Shading Used Exterior Shading Used Overhang Shading Used Latent Load Fraction 557 sf 4874 cf Front Facing 234 deg (SW) CARLSBAD 33 2 degrees 34 F 70 F 81 F 75 F 10 F Yes Yes Yes 0 12 HEATING AND COOLING LOAD SUMMARY Description Opaque Conduction and Solar Glazing Conduction and Solar Infiltration Internal Gain Ducts Sensible Load Latent Load Heating (Btu/hr) 5438 2072 1833 n/a 0 9343 n/a Cooling (Btu/hr) 2388 2360 142 2060 1237 8187 1040 Minimum Total Load 9343 9227 Note The loads shown are only one of the criteria affecting the selection of HVAC equipment Other relevant design factors such as air flow requirements, outside air, outdoor design temperatures, coil sizing, availability of equipment, oversizing safety margin, etc , must also be considered It is the HVAC designer's responsibility to consider all HVAC SIZING HVAC Page 2 Project Title ARMSTRONG GUEST HOUSE Date 05/22/08 08 50 20 MICROPAS7 v7 10 File-ARMSTRON Wth-CTZ07S05 Program-HVAC SIZING | User#-MP1315 User-Ron Moore Title 24 Energy Run-ARMSTRON I factors when selecting the HVAC equipment T>/7 GLAZING Page Code # Wth Ht TOT Ovrh TOTAL Code # Wth Ht TOT Ovr 2 2 f' TOTAL .-., Code # Wth Ht TOT Ovrh r£" 1 s ^.d •*"* ?W I- ' I 3 1733 3'^jf* Z1425-' - - - - _ — — - - _ TOTAL )D3,^7^ Code # Wth Ht TOT Ov C/— ... - - - - - TOTAL A/rf? WIN GLAZ l^d.F-}^ SKYLITES >- „ TOTAL / ^3"^?^' PERCENT i9»25<? Williams THE COMFORT PRODUCTS PEOPLE Direct Vent Home Furnace Economical, safe and convenient heat for both new and existing construction THREE MODELS 14,000,22,000 & 30,000 Btu/hr Chamberlain direct vent heaters feature attractive styling, low cost installation, compact size, and heating capacities up to 30,000 Btu/hr The safe, energy efficient, direct vent design makes the ideal choice for new or existing construction Choose the Chamberlain for bedrooms, garages, hotels, offices and schools Heating costs have never been higher So it makes good sense to use the most effective method of heating available With Chamberlain heaters, you can choose natural gas or liquid propane Both are less expensive than electricity or kerosene, and by heating only the area in use, no heat is wasted In fact, you can save up to 90% of your installation cost because through-wall venting eliminates the need for flues, pipes, and chimneys All venting mounts through-the-wall behind the heater A convenient template for positioning the vent opening is included with all models Installation is very flexible, as our standard heater comes eauipped with vent fittings for a 5" to 9" wall thickness And by using accessory vent extensions, a wall thickness of up to 24" is possible For added convenience, the Chamberlain heater mounts off the floor No carpeting to cut, and no worries about "kick damage' to the cabinet 14,000 Btu/hr 22,000 or 30,000 Btu/hr DESIGN FEATURES All vent material included — ready to install All models comply with federal efficiency and energy conservation requirements and are certified by the American and Canadian Gas Associations Long life ceramic coated combustion chamber increases efficiency 1007o safety automatic gas shut-off Choice of wall or built-in thermostats (included with all models) No electricity required All combustion products vent outdoors Cast-iron burners Uses no inside air for combustion "Matchless" push button pilot ignitor Save energy — heat only the room you're in n n n n a member CanadianGas Association Association cunadienne du g gama Direct-Vent Furnace Model Number Natural 1403622 1403612 2203622 2203612 3003622 3003612 Propane 1403621 1403611 2203621 2203611 3003621 3003611 Btu/hr Input Rating 14000 14000 22000 22000 30000 30000 Btu/hr Output Rating 10039 10039 16462 16462 21 849 21 849 Thermal Efficiency % 76 76 75 75 73 73 AFUE % 63 63 67 67 66 66 Width X Depth 18 x7'/8 18 x7Ve" 32 Ve x101/4 32 VB X10V< 32 Va XlO'/4 32 VB x101/4 Overall Height 263/<" 263/< 28° 28" 28" 28 Maximum Wall Thickness 24* 24"* 24* 24* 24* 24"* Type of Control Millivolt Wall Built In Millivolt Wall Built-in Millivolt Wall Built In Shipping Weight 52lbs 56lbs 98lbs 98lbs 100lbs 1 00 Ibs DIRECT-VENT MOBILE HOME FURNACE ** *•* 1403621 05 3003621 05 14000 30000 9800 21 000 70 I 62 70 I 65 28 x7° 30 x 9 28 30V/' 9 9 Millivolt Wall Millivolt Wall 52lbs 78 Ibs All units have 112 Gas Connection * Accessory Venting shipped with furnace for up to a 9 wall thickness ** Field converts to natural gas Conversion kit included FEATURES Air Circulation Patl WARM ROOM AIR *m I X1'HAOIANTHEAT •* .1 ii!INSIDE [£ COOL ROOM AIR em * _--—LJ COMBUSTIC PRODUCTS VENTEDTOOUTSIU n r„• »»»: i* * -* E — «• 4- ?••. COMBUSTIOAIR FROM OUTSIDE OUTSIDE Direct-Vent Safety For clean comfortable heat when and where you want it The gas flame is completely sealed inside away from all contact with room air Air necessary for combustion is drawn into the chamber from outside through direct wall vent and all combustion products are vented directly to the outside Only clean gentle heat in continuous circulation is delivered into the room Windows and doors can stay closed because no room air is used for combustion "Matchless" Pilot Ignitor All models include a Piezo pilot ignition and a glass observation door Assures convenient pilot lighting without matches Automatic Thermostats (No Electricity Required — Included with all Models) Available with your choice of a self-generating millivolt wall thermostat or a self-contained bulb thermostat with a full range of adjustment on the gas valve dial All models feature 100% safety shut-off as standard equipment Mobile home models equipped with wall thermostat only Contemporary Finish Light powder-coat scratch resistant finish to blend with any decor Conversion Kits Available Williams THE COMFORT PRODUCTS PEOPLE 225 Acacia Street Coltort CA 92324 USA (909) 825-0993 Fax (909) 370-0581 or (909) 824-8009 www williamscomfortprod com ACCESSORIES High Capacity Blower Blower fits inside casing and is easily added to 22 000 and 30 000 Btu/hr models Comes with a fully automatic fan switch 115V power supply required 140 CFM Model 2302 shipping weight 6 Ibs Thin Wall Collar Kit For wall thicknesses from 1 to 5 Installs with vent kit Order Model 9307 shipping weight 4 Ibs Vent Cap Guard Protects pedestrian traffic from heat of vent cap Model 9308 Shipping weight 3 Ibs Vent To meet your installation needs all models accommodate optional through-the-wall vent which may extend up to a 24 maximum Shipping weight 10 Ibs Cannot be used on mobile home models Model No Length Application 9301 15 22Q36 & 30036 Senes 9302 24 22036 Series 9303 24 14036 & 30036 Senes 9304 15 14036 Series Recommended Minimum Clearances 2 from intersecting wall 18 from top of appliance to ceiling or other obstruction for 14 000 Btu/hr models 24 from top of appliance to ceiling or other obstruction for 22 000 and 30 opo Btu/hr models IMPORTANT Read owner's manual before using Photographs are representative only Specify propane or natural gas when ordenng Check local codes and ordinances for permitted uses Consult installation manual for clearances prior to installation We reserve the nght to amend product specifications without notice Installation and servicing recommended by a qualified service person Please read the warranty for any limitations or disclaimers Combustion chamber carries a ten year limited warranty All other parts carry a one year limited warranty Venting must comply with the Venting and Chimney Requirements section of installation manual °1999 Williams Furnace Company Printed in U S A All Rights Reserved L1109 7/99 CA dXKb 10 04PIM KEYUNt SHLtb Continuum t«r 2020W Type of AppLauce Operation Exhaust system Ramai model number Minimum/Maximum gas rate (Input Btuh) Electrical Electrical consumption V Hot water capacity Temperature range (with optional remotes) Temperature (without remote) Approved gas types Installation DimsisioQs 13-3/4" • Temperature controlled, continuous flow, gas hot water system. With or without remote controls, mounted in kitchen, bathroom, etc Power vented forced combustion RBU-2020W-.US 19,000 BTlTs-150,000 Btuh Natural Gas or Propane Appliance - AC 120 Volts - 60H2, Remote control - DC 12 Volts 47 watts 6wattB 74 watts ca Normal Standby Anti-frost protection 0 7 to 4 9 GPM (50aF use), 0 7 to 5 3 GPM (35°P nse) MC controller, 96 - 1408F, BC and BSC cootrollws, 96 - 120T I20°F (Factory Defeult) Natural or Propane - Ensure unit matches gas type it's being installed on. External _J Weight Energy Factor 34Lbs 082 Thermal Efficiency Service Connections 81% Gas supply 3/4" MNPT Cold water inlet 3/4" MNPT Hot water outlet 3/4" MNPT Rinnai 2020WSP-1 INC. 11. inc. OM-C.D I1U Continuum www.rinnai.us on ol lit Ignition system Water temperature control Water flow control Direct electronic ignition Simulation feed forward and feedback Water flow sensor, electronic water control device, and fixed by-pass Minimum/maximum water supply pressure 20 - 150 PSI (50 or above is recommended for maximum flow) Water Flow Capacity Curves (For 1 to 5 units manifolded m parallel- Manifolding requires 1 2532W with add on2020W's) Safety Devices Remote Conaols Remote control cable Clearances from combustibles Clearances from non-combustibles Clearances from Eaves, Porches, Overhangs Clearances from Eaves, Porches, Overhangs Mm and Max gas supply pressure Manifold Gas Pressure (InchesWC) Warranty 60 75 100 AT - Tmfmtom IMw ff) • Flame failure - Flame rod « Remaining flame (OHS) » Boiling protection - 203°F * Thermal fuse 264°F • Combustion fan rpm check * Automatic frost protection • Over current - Glass fuse (3 amp) MC-45-4 US (96-140 °F range) BC-45^ US or BSC-45-4 (96-120 °F range) Non-polanzed two-core cable • Top of heater • Front of heater. • Sides of heater • Top of heater „ • Front of heater » Sides of beater, 12" 24" ..6" 2" ,,24' 112' • Back of heater,.. • Bottom of Heater • Back of heater, • Bottom of heater , 0" ,12" Mm 6" W C Mat, 10 5" W.C » Top of heater ., . 36" • From Vent Discharge 12" Natural (NAT) Natural Gas 3 7" W C high fire Propano Gas 3 5" W C high fire Residential Ten years heat exchanger / five years parts Commercial or Space heating No Warranty Propane Gas; Mm 10" WC (LPG) Max 135" WC 0 74" W C low fire 0 74" W C low fire Rinnai Technical Support 1-800-621-9419 b8/20/2007 11 14 b!93340/30 KUN OAKItK 01 RGB-20 Recess Box Installation Instructions 1 Determine a suitable location for the installation of the recess box meeting the installation clearances shown in Figure 1, below IMPORTANT Local building codes may restrict the clearances shown below If you are unsure if the clearances above are acceptable in your area, consult with local building officials to venfy pnor to proceeding with installation Clearance to gas meter and electric meter shall be in accordance with local codes and the requirements of the gas supplier or electnc supplier respectively Note- When installed in the RGB-20 Recess Box, as shown in these instructions, the clearance to combustibles of the "water heater/RGB-20 recess box assembly" are zero inches to all surfaces of the recess box. You must maintain a 24" clearance to combustibles and non-combustibles from the front of the unit for servicing of the unit. 2 Prepare a rough opening to the following dimensions Height 40-1/2' Width 14-3/4" Depth 71/2" Insert the recess box into the rough opening and secure it to the building structure by drilling holes in the sides and fixing into position with suitable screws 3 Dnll holes m the recess box for the gas, cold water inlet, and hot water outlet. Suggested options for the location of these holes are shown in Figure 2, below (An additional hole must be drilled for the electncal service for the water heater - locate this hole in a convenient location) INSTALLATION M- FROM EA AU. DIMENSIONS ARE FROM EDGE OF BOX «- FROM MALL (ONE SIDE ONLY I OM EAVES, PORCHE3, AND OVERHANGS. 12" FROM OPENAAIB WINDOWS OPBNABLE DOORS AND WINDOWSo 12-FROM VENTSoft AIR INTAKES ir PROM GROUND (M- RECOMMENDED) oeoatu srawu OTW PIITWT Figure 1 Figure 2 City of Carlsbad Building Department CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form Project Name Building Permit Plan Check Number Project Address APN Project Applicant (Owner Name) Project Description Building Type Residential Second Dwelling Unit ARMSTRONG GUEST HOUSE CB081009 2663 CREST OR 156 152 10 00 CHARLES & THERESA ARMSTRONG GUEST HOUSE ( NO KITCHEN) 5B New Dwelling Units Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Square Feet of Living Area in SDU Residential Additions 557 SF Net Square Feet New Area Commercial/Industrial City Certification of Applicant Information Square Feet Floor Area Date 09/12/2008 SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad Unified School District 6225 El Cammo Real Carlsbad CA 92009 (331-5000) Vista Unified School District 1234 Arcadia Drive Vista CA 92083 (726-2170) San Marcos Unified School District 215MataWay San Marcos, CA 92069 (290-2649) Contact Nancy Dolce (By Appt- Only Encmitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encmitas, CA 92024 (944-4300 ext 166) San Dieguito Union High School District 710 Encmitas Blvd Encmitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner Signature Revised 3/30/2006 Date SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school distnct(s))************************************************** THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District The City may issue building permits for this project SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL WAHER FREEMANTITLE ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOLDBTRICr NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT 6225 EL CAMINO REALCARLSBAD. CA 92009 DATE PHONE NUMBER -,, ./(00- Revised 3/30/2006 ^QfCARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT \ \ JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY \ \AVIARAOAKSELEMENTARY | ] CARLSBAD HIGH SCHOOL \ \ MAGNOLIA ELEMENTARY \ \ AV/ARA OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL |~~| CARLSBAD VILLAGE ACADEMY \ | CALA VERA HILLS SCHOOL \ \ RKIFIC RIM [^VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL [^] KELLEY SCHOOL \ \ CALAVERA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL | J BUENA VISTA SCHOOL \ } HOPE SCHOOL | [ OTHER Receipt No 23056 RECEIVED FROM (If Applicable) PARENT OF PAYMENT FOR DATE ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT i-U.Jit RECEIVED BY .CASH..CHECK*.TOTAL Check a License or Home Improvement Salesperson (HIS) Registration - Contractors Stat Page 1 of 2 Department of Consumer Affairs KSOV Contractors State Li oard Contractor's License Detail - License # 890055 DISCLAIMER A license status check provides information taken from the CSLB license database Before relying on this information, you should be aware of the following limitations » CSLB complaint disclosure is restricted by law (B&P 7124 6) If this entity is subject to public complaint disclosure, a link for complaint disclosure will appear below Click on the link or button to obtain complaint and/or legal action information >% Per B&P.7Q71 17, only construction related civil judgments reported to the CSLB are disclosed » Arbitrations are not listed unless the contractor fails to comply with the terms of the arbitration » Due to workload, there may be relevant information that has not yet been entered onto the Board's license database License Number Business Information Entity Issue Date Expire Date License Status Classifications Bonding Workers' Compensation 890055 Extract Date 09/22/2008 _ DM BUILDING 1825 MCCAULEY LANE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Business Phone Number (760) 644-0714 Sole Ownership 01/24/2007 01/31/2009 This license is current and active All Information below should be reviewed DESCRIPTION GENERAL BUILDING CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR'S BOND This license filed Contractor's Bond number 5000984 in the amount of $12,500 with the bonding company SURETY COMPANY OF THE PACIFIC Effective Date 01/01/2007 Contractor's Bonding History This license has workers compensation insurance with the STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Policy Number 238-0003957 Effective Date 11/28/2007 Expire Date 11/01/2008 WgjJsereLCojripensatjQn History http //www2 cslb ca gov/OnlmeServices/CheckLicense/LicenseDetail asp 09/22/2008