Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout270 PACIFIC AVE; ; CB041125; PermitCity of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 04-25-2008 Residential Permit Permit No: CB04I 125 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 270 PACIFIC AV CBAD Permit Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Status: ISSUED Parcel No: 2030232200 Lot #: 0 Applied: 04/02/2004 Valuation: $236,796.00 Construction Type: VN Entered By: RMA Occupancy Group: Reference #: Plan Approved: 04/01/2005 # Dwelling Units: I Structure Type: SF0 Issued: 04/01/2005 Bedrooms: 3 Bathrooms: 2.5 Inspect Area: JM Project Title: MAGANA RES-DEMO EXIST 612 SF Orig PC#: HOUSE-NEW 2571 SF,400 SF GAR, 1 ROOF DECK @360 SF, Plan Check#: Applicant: BAIRD WHEATLEY 843 NEPTUNE AV 92024 760 632-5317 Owner: -. MAGANA WANDA L 270 PACIFIC AV CARLSBAD CA 92008 Building Permit 1 -$968.52 Meter Size AddI Building Permit Fee $0.00 Add'I Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Plan Check ' $629.54 7- Meter Fee .. . $0.00 Add'l Plan Check Fee / '- ,' $35.00 , Fee . ..-' ,SDCWA $0.00 Plan Check Discount I .7 $0.00 •CFD Pyoff Fee \. . $0.00 Strong Motion Fee $23.68 . PFF(3105540). $0.00 Park in Lieu Fee " 10.00 - / PFF (4305540) ./ $0.00,. Park Fee "$0.00 License Tax (3104193) -' $0.00 LFM Fee . $0.00 License Tax (4304193) , . $0.00 Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee (3105541) . , $0.00 Other Bridge Fee .. -' $0.00\ Traffic Impact Fee (4305541) - -' $0.00 BTD #2 Fee -. $0.00 Sidewalk Fee ' - . $0.00 BTD #3 Fee ' $0.00 - •PLUMBING TOTAL'\ r $175.00 Renewal Fee '-. $0.00-.. ELECTRICAL TOTAL I $60.00 Add'I Renewal Fee ' ¼ \ $000 - MECHANICAL TOTAL. 1 / $56.50 Other Building Fee _$O.00 Housing Impact Fee / $000 HMP Fee ¼. /?? Housing lnLieu Fee ,' $0.00 Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Housing Credit Fee / . $0.00 Meter Size - ' - Master Drainage Fee . / $300.70 Add'I Pot. Water Con. Fee .. $0.00 Sewer Fee -' . ' $0.00 Red. Water Con. Fee '7- . $0.00- Additional Fees ", \ ./ $4.50 / TOTAL PERMIT FEES \..) $225344 Total Fees: $2,253.44 Total Payments To Date $2,253.44 Balance Due: $0.00 BUILDING PLANS _uN . Ct"E- ___ATTACHED JT FINAL APR'IVAL Inspector: Date: t2.tj Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. 4 PEAMIT APPLICATION .... : CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 '00-Ck'I7/'15 ft&t FOR OFFICE USE PLAN CHEQK NO EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit - Validated By Address (include Bldg/Suite #1 'l.l 0pr7 Y' Legal Description Lot No. uMivisio Name 1,0*720 S13 fTe,'t Assessor's Parcel # Existing Use i --2$7 A e cription of Work - S 90 M -00-A Name Business Name (at this address) - amber U) 7 Me No. To (0002 i Proposed Use 11/2- Stories # aEtdrdorvis qoL -i City State/Zip Telephone # # of units 02 throom? ( H c2 Ir1 Fax I cvr5 Name ') Address - ' City State/Zip,,,, Telephone # (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law iChapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged. / exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars IS5001). Name . Address . City , State/Zip TelOphone # State License # License Class City Business License # Designer Name Address . City State/Zip Telephone State License # _______W Ireby L6QcQM L,TE'.. TTT . TL Workers' Compensation Declaration: affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self.insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of -the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: - Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date__________________ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$1001 OR LESS) CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manne so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. . WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage I nlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollar ($ 1 O0O)1eddii6 eost f &bmpenjIdamages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. Al 1A SIGNATUR! Jt.t__IV 4J5/Ifl' L> -. . DATE - - 7 OWNER'BUIL'A CIARATION ,J4_____ -' _: - I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Coptctor's License Law for the following reason: - - - I, as owner of the property or my emp4cees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the, work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale - (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property, who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is soldithin one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). IV I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does'.not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contiacts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason:,,,- - I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO ave / hayS nat) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. - ave contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name /address / phone number / contractors license number): I plan to provide portions of the work, but 1-have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number I contractors license number): - - I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type To iROPERTY OWNER - .' 'DATE HiãWiF0RNONRESWENTL4L MI LV ±L.A. TF Is the applicant or future building occupant required to sui1dit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES, D NO - - IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE' OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 18 CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY ':2 r'rr'r I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i), Civil Code). - ,LENDER'S NAME . ' LENDER'S ADDRESS MLiANT CERATIONZI,. I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the informàtioñ on the plans is accurate. I agree' to 1comply with all 'City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby, authorize representatives 'of the Citc of Carlsbad'to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE. INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS' THE CITY OF, CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF'THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit.or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is cam e d for a period of 180 ays (Section 1064.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE '. . DATE Z...' ITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK FirIence iL List 1- Permit-Type From the following list, determine the permit-type that best describes the work you propose to do. Please put the code of that permit-type in the blank at the top of the page on the front of this application. Residential permits (only) also require the identification of the structure-type to be associated with the permit. Choose a structure-type from "List 2 - Structure-Types' and put its code in the appropriate blank on the front of this application. Residential Permits Code Description APT Apartments - new construction. CONDO Condominiums - new construction. CVNNR Conversion. Convert all or a portion of a non-residential building to residential use, creating one or more new residential units. CVNRN Conversion. Convert one or more residences in a building to non-residential usage. CVNRR Conversion. Increase or reduce the number of dwelling units in a residential structure through interior modifications (i.e.: a four bedroom house converted to a duplex, with 2 bedrooms each). DEMO Demolition permit. (Also specify type of structure from List 2). DUP Duplex - new construction. MOHO Mobile home, renovation, repair, or addition of accessory structure not yielding a new living unit. MOHON Mobile home, pre-fabricated house, or trailer installed (plumbed, wired) in a mobile home park (see distinction from single-family residence, below). RAD Residential addition/alteration, creating no new dwelling unit(s). RREISSUE Residential permit re-issue. RREPAIR Residential building repair. Damage, fire. etc. RREPLACE Residential building replacement (no additional units). SFA Single-family, attached - new construction. A one-family house attached to one or more other houses, with one or more common walls extending from foundation to roof at, or forming, a lot line. Has own plumbing and heating system (e.g.: townhouse, row house, half-plex) SFD Single-family, detached - new construction: A one-family house with open area on all four sides. May have an attached or detached garage, or a business. May be a detached 'granny flat". May be a mobile home or trailer on an individual lot, but not in a mobile home park. Non-Residential/Accessory Permits Code Description COM Commercial structure, new construction. CREISSUE Commercial permit re-issue. CREPAIR Commercial building. repair. Damage, fire, etc. CREPLACE Commercial building - replacement. Cli Commercial tenant improvement. DEMO Demolition permit. ELEC Electrical permit, for electrical work only. HOTEL Hotel or motel (including Managed Living Unit hotel) - new construction. HOTELR Hotel renovation. INDUST Industrial structure, new construction. Ill Industrial tenant improvement. MECH Mechanical permit, for mechanical work only. MISC Miscellaneous. Use only if proposed work doesn't fit another activity type. PATIO Patio and/or deck. PLUM Plumbing permit, for plumbing work only. POOL Gunite pools and spas. RETAIN Retaining wall permit. SIGN Sign construction/installation permit. SOLAR Solar energy system installation permit (specify structure type to be served). SPA Factory-made or Gunite. List 2 - Structure-Type (Use with Residential Permit Only) From the following list, determine the type of residential structure that best describes the structure on which you will be working. Please put the code of that structure-type in the appropriate blank at the top of the page on the front of this application. Code Description SFA Single-family, attached. A one-family house attached to one or more other houses, with one or more common walls extending from foundation to roof at, or forming, a lot line. Has own plumbing and heating system (e.g.: townhouse, row house, half-plex). SFD Single-family detached: A one-family house with open area on all four sides. May have an attached or detached garage, or a business. May be a detached 'granny flat". May be a mobile home or trailer on an individual lot, but not in a mobile home park. MF2-4 Multi-family, 2 to 4 units. A residential structure on a single lot, containing two, three, or four dwelling units. Units may share master heating, plumbing, or electrical service (e.g.: duplex, triplex, quad-plex). MF5+ Multi-family, 5 or more units. Same as MF2-4, except the building has a t least five attached units on the same lot. MOHO Mobile home, pre-fabricated house, or trailer installed (plumbed, wired) in a mobile home park (see distinction from single-family residence, above). City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 08/21/2009 Permit# CB041125 Inspector Assignment: JM Title: MAGANA RES-DEMO EXIST 612 SF Description: HOUSE-NEW 2571 SF,400 SF GAR, I ROOF DECK @360 SF , IROOF DECK @ 100 SF Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Phone: 7608032423 Job Address: 270 PACIFIC AV Suite: Lot: • 0 Location: APPLICANT BAIRD WHEATLEY Owner: ADAMSON DONALD R&MAGANA WANDA L Remarks: Total Time: Inspector: Requested By: DON ADAMSON Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Act Comments 1 Comments/Notices/Holds Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC# PCR07209 ISSUED MAGANA RES- REVISE PLANS TO; ADD A 100 SF ROOF DECK Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 08/11/2009 89 Final Combo CO JM NOTICE ATTACHED 08/07/2009 84 Rough Combo WC PY 12/09/2008 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP PC 10/09/2008 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP JM DECK FRAME I CLARIFICATION 10/01/2008 15 Roof/Reroof CA JM DON 09/30/2008 15 Roof/Reroof CA JM 09/24/2008 14 FramelSteellBoltinglWelding CO JM CLARIFICATION OF DETAIL FRAMING 04/24/2008 49 Final Mechanical AP JM 02/26/2008 89 Final Combo CA JM PER DON 02/25/2008 89 Final Combo CA JM rescheduled for Tuesday 01/22/2008 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding WC JM 01/22/2008 19 Final Structural NR JM WALLS IN FRONT OVER 42 IN 01/22/2008 63 Walls WC JM Inspection List Permit#: CB041125 Type: RESDNTL SFD MAGANA RES-DEMO EXIST 612 SF HOUSE-NEW 2571 SF,400 SF GAR, I ROO Date Inspection Item Inspector Act 08/21/2009 89 Final Combo - RI 08/21/2009 89 Final Combo JM Fl 08/11/2009 89 Final Combo - RI 08/11/2009 89 Final Combo JM CO 08/07/2009 84 Rough Combo PY WC 12/09/2008 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall PC AP 10/09/2008 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin JM AP 10/01/2008 15 Roof/Reroof JM CA 09/30/2008 15 Roof/Reroof JM CA 09/24/2008 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin JM CO 04/24/2008 49 Final Mechanical JM AP 02/26/2008 89 Final Combo JM CA 02/25/2008 89 Final Combo JM CA 01/22/2008 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin JM WC 01/22/2008 19 Final Structural JM NR 01/22/2008 63 Walls JM WC 11/14/2007 19 Final Structural JM NR 11/14/2007 29 Final Plumbing JM NR 11/08/2007 29 Final Plumbing PC NR 10/26/2007 22 Sewer/Water Service PC AP 10/26/2007 39 Final Electrical PC PA 10/25/2007 21 Underground/Under Floor PC NR 10/25/2007 22 Sewer/Water Service PC NR 10/24/2007 22 Sewer/Water Service RB NR 10/18/2007 22 Sewer/Water Service JM NR 10/17/2007 22 Sewer/Water Service JM CO 10/03/2007 23 Gas/Test/Repairs JM AP 10/03/2007 34 Rough Electric JM WC 03/05/2007 39 Final Electrical JM CO 02/27/2007 98 BMP Inspection DB P1 02/05/2007 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall JM AP 01/25/2007 17 Interior Lath/Drywall JM CO 01/25/2007 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall JM CO 01/25/2007 23 Gas/Test/Repairs JM CO 01/18/2007 16 Insulation JM AP 01/16/2007 16 Insulation JM CA 01/11/2007 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers JM WC 01/11/2007 84 Rough Combo JM AP 01/10/2007 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers JM WC 01/10/2007 84 Rough Combo JM CO 01/05/2007 84 Rough Combo JM CO 01103/2007 18 Exterior. Lath/Drywall JM CA Comments NOTICE ATTACHED DECK FRAME / CLARIFICATION DON DON CLARIFICATION OF DETAIL FRAMING PER DON rescheduled for Tuesday WALLS IN FRONT OVER 42 IN NOT ON SITE EMR NO TEST NOT UNDER TEST NOTICE ATTACHED HOUSE SEE NOTICE IN FILE 6FT 81N HEADROOM @ 1ST FLR STAIR COMPLETE LATH © CORNERS & DOORS REGGIE OK TO INSULATE SAME LIST NOT COMPLETE TOP OUT REQUIRED Friday, August 21, 2009 Page 1 012 1/21/200 84 Rough Combo JM CO LIST - NOT A COMPLETE INSPECTION LEAK - TOP OUT AGAIN 12/07/2006 84 Rough Combo JM CO COMPLETE LATH. TOPOUT REQUIRED 10/13/2006 13 Shear Panels/HD's JM AP OK TO WRAP 10/12/2006 13 Shear Panels/HD's JM CO SEE NOTICE ATTACHED 09/26/2006 13. Shear Panels/HD's JM CO LIST ONSITE - WINDOW CHANGES TO BE APPROVED THRU CITY 09/22/2006 13 Shear Panels/HD's JM CO APPROVED PLANS/NO ONE ON SITE 08/18/2006 15 Roof/Reroof JM AP 08/16/2006 15 Roof/Reroof . JM CO 08/15/2006 15 Roof/Reroof JM CO 03/16/2006 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers JM AP 03/15/2006 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers JM CO 03/09/2006 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers JM WC 03/09/2006 21 Underground/Under Floor JM AP 02/21/2006 32 Const. Service/Agricultural JM AP 02/13/2006 32 Const. Service/Agricultural JM NR roof @ south side not per plan COMPLETE ROOF SHEATING OK TO POUR- LIFER OK MISSING HOLD DOWNS TEMP POWER Friday, August 21, 2009 Page 2 of 2 rrom: uoug baker '0u.'i.-lbuJ 10: reggie uarcia uae: in uiuuo I me. rm rage .1 CT 1 Baker Land Surveys, Inc. 4213 Sunnyhill Drive Carlsbad, CA. 92008 (760) 729-6676 Fax 729-7803 Slab /Foundation Footing Forms Certification Letter Date: March 10, 2006 From: John Douglas Baker To: City of Carlsbad Engineering and Building Department Subject: Footing forms certification for the construction of the slab/foundation for the Magana Residence located at 271 Pacific Avenue, Carlsbad, CA. City of Carlsbad Building Permit # CB041 125. This letter is to inform you that I, John Douglas Baker, Licensed Surveyor 6287, performed a field survey on 2/21/06 to provide RNM Construction Company with building line stakes per said approved plans. A boundary survey was performed to establish property lines and said construction staking was in relation to the boundary survey. I again visited said site on 3/10/06 to verify building line stakes were used to construct slab- footing forms. Slab footing forms were found to be constructed per said approved plans. John D. Baker Ex 9/3g/06 No. 6287 I • CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENGINEERING DAII V REPORT Project Name .iA I - //'/2 1171yll- Project # 7f)'//) /,2? Project Address ( / 12 Permit # Plan e # Contractor I ' Architect Subcontractor - Engineer - - Maferial/EuiPment:I J 'L,ar/v 1) 4( A?;yz:' M Weather: Llwlv /,( Time Arrived: 7I Time Departed: / '' 0 Hours Charged: e-5 17462, — J ,- o/x '4 Pz) £I 7/7/)4 f (V 2/)X / f / - 'fl 4 cJ J,j1/,SJ—%4 cei1 r 44(/(i'i c E i U t 2. 0 . o L 9X ) i&n /t/P %' Unless noted other.ise, the work observed is, to the best of my knowledge, in compliance with the approved plans and specifications. 1 tVT M ,4 ___________________________ Teèhnicin's Siriature . Supervisor's Signature Dote 4925 Mercury Street + San Diego, CA 92111 + 858-496-9760 + FAX 858-496-9758 4_c f ) . - S DAILY RRPflRT CHRiSTIAN WHEELEft ENGINEERING — I Project Name Project # Project Address A (1,7/ ha(-( Permit # Plan File # Contractor ,_ , ' 1/I? Architect Subcontractor . ,I.1 Engineer Material/Equipment: Weather: — - Time Arrived: (Q.._J ,) 7,20 Time Departed: Hours Charged: K jr>' -i/4 ./ ( /c cis. 'a to F oz .2.3 V,LU Li c a z( FA E A42 Unless noted otherw, th'wq obseiv2 i)(to the best of my knowledge, in compliance with the approved plans and specifications. /9N744'A. i4'i Technician's Signaturé ' / - 5upesor's Signature Date 4925 Mercury Street + San Diego, CA 92111 + 858-496-9760 + FAX 858-496-9758 ? ib •w. a CHRISTIAN WHEELER E N C I N E E R I N C rA1Lv PR1)flPT M 4J11 .i•h Project Name 4i7 I /\Q Project # r' 0 '/1) Project Address 7yp//'/7 /'4//r16i?d Penit# Contractor ,j ,_) /-V Architect Subcontractor ,ç7 / ) Engineer Material/Equipment. 01 j/,C u4t/1, ZJip,' Weather: 1) J \ 1,4 IM Li / .J / 1_" 6 Time Arrived:777 ()()..J Time Depsrted: /0 0 Hours Charged: 3 -T'/A 4cfzV/ )4çI/p 4V n!A,-%/ 7 c/nbfl7i/g24 4 /?ii u,t/ 2LI- 11 T 9t'nAj r/ -7 t 7 ' 7L 72/J /ev/c /-(fr4741e,-/ o I ! ..3 o uJ j Vol 0 3 C '' - t; Al h/ AI , A't 4t Th 2/'/50c ç / Unless noted oji er'qte Ala'- wä is, to the best of my knowledge, in compliance with the aproved plans and specifications. () Technicids gi6ifoture' .- SuperviIor's Signature Date 4925 Mercury Street + San Diego, CA 92111 + 858-496-9760 + FAX 858-496-9758 ii e..*fr j• $ -•• '-. \•; - :DAILY REPORT CHRJSTIAN WHEELEft E N G IN E E R IN C Project Name - 4. / Project # Project Address fl ?7fl i ,c Av., (,-/r'4a,I Permit # Plan File # Contractor A Architect Subcontractor 9 '1 Engineer Material/Equipment: j ;7J/) Weather: b',Q1/ /27M Time Arrived Time Departed: Hours Charged: -Z A 4fñ t1 / S fiij i-I tc 4 ,' va i / /i4 / /4f1j7Jf ,' ' 1 .-b 2 itfl4't' /Z (/ 4',' / /'2V 3,1,?)' 1J17c7 f)4 A*) - -. c, 4I A,',y-"o; 2( -½ c Ii". /,MC6 /24t -t7) / . ii1J1 / 111-V1 7p ,'M'i /'4'J'/S _/' I i ,pL .%-)t143 / ,ñ?/,4 -i ',SA,10,W '4 1' / 4 ,/I4f.'fl,1l 1h V/lt lie %,')74ó - /e / ___ .'-,'4 ,4 A10110.W-1 JL—,40 0a' // :.-:• , •• •1• .2 -'r,L Y' E Ii H - ,5• O .3 .3 LU /V/vo pPii 1/ ')'2 / ? '2? 1 3/2,15 L2 • . 4 Unless noted otheri , theoilc observed is, to the best of my knowledge, in compliance with the approved plans and specifications. , 6 Techinician's Siguiaf'ure Supervisors Signature Date : 4925 Mercury Street + San Diego, CA 92111 + 858•496?9760 + FAX 858-496-9758 I, w CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENGINEERING DAILY RTP(RT Project Name Project # qj Project Address -70 Arr K' dGeny o A rls ia V Permit # Plan File # Contractor Architect Subcontractor Engineer 0 Reinforced Concrete 0 Pre-Stressed Concrete 0 Reinforced Masonry o Shop Welding 0 Field Welding 0 Fireproofing 1 ors Material/Equipment- Weather: M4 Dote Time Arrived: Time Departed: Hours Charged: ) p°,'ga' RIO t e 47/'oø,S i6- TA, /'7~/a'1 teGrn't il , a''t' 7Ze soi4 yek ce0/,/ IZ oc(o4',3, ,7A'p ,f 3%" i0p7 S9/ i4' 64 4 1 I Unless noted otherwise, the kb d i, to best knowledge, i compliance se e work observed the es o my comian - td specifications. I Inspector /Technician's Signature Reg. # Superintendent's Signature Date / 560e // ae-11-119, Inspector/Technician (Print or Type) 4925 Mercury Street + San Diego, CA 92111 + 858-496-9760 + FAX 858-496-9758 City oICarlsbad ' R)VULV 4V&J Final Building lnsection Dept: Building Engineerin ijiiijiig MWD St Lite Fire Plan Check #: Date: 02/25/2008 Permit #: CB041125 Permitlype: RESDNTL Project Name: MAGANA RES-DEMO EXIST 612 SF Sub Type: SFD HOUSE-NEW 2571 SF,400 SF GAR,360 SF ROOF DECK Address: 270 PACIFIC AV Lot: 0 Contact Person: DON Phone: 7608032423 Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA Inspected .Date ... By: ected: Approved: I Disapproved: Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: Inspected / Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: Comments: ON at Carlsbad !iE1iEiiT Final 1101111109 11800C1101 FFE8 2 5 2007 i L - JJ I CITy OF CA - Dept: Buildi neeri lanning CMWD StLite Fire GAD CM WISION Plan Check #: Date: 02I25I2008 Permit #: B041 1 Permit Type: RESDNTL Project Name: MAGANA RES-DEMO EXIST 612 SF Sub Type: SF0 HOUSE-NEW 2571 SF,400 SF GAR360 SF ROOF DECK Address: 270 PACIFIC AV Lot: 0 Contact Person: DON Phone: 7608032423 Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA Inspected Date By: I 0 Inspected: /2 5/i Approved: Disapproved: Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: ______ Disapproved: Comments: DATE: JULY 27, 2004 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-1125 EsGil Corporation In (Partnership with government for tftiUlng Safety SET: 11 O APPLICANT O PLAN REVIEWER O FILE PROJECT ADDRESS: 270 PACIFIC AVENUE PROJECT NAME: SFR FOR MAGANA The plans transmitted herewith .have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. fl The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. PLEASE SEE BELOW The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: BAIRD WHEATLY 843 NEPTUNE AVENUE, LEUCADIA, CA 92024 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: BAIRD Telephone #: (760) 632-5317 Date contacted: -(a-k (by: ç ) Fax #: -5317 Mail ..- Telephone Fax-' In Person REMARKS: Please see attached for remaining-items from previous list. None of the corrections were found on plans despite your responses on the list. May be the wrong set of plans were re- submitted to EsGil. [The, resubmitted plans had no revision date, no clouds, etc. to identify any changes]. By: All Sadre Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB 0 EJ 0 PC 7/22 trnsmtidot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 04-1125 JULY 279 2004 I [PLANS Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit two sets of plans for residential projects. For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. A reminder that the revised plans need to be stamped and signed by the engineer and /or architect of record. Please note the floor area of patio & decks/ balconies on the cover sheet of plans as well. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans stating that this project shall comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the 1997 UBC, 2000 UMC, 2000 UPC and the 1999 NEC. Recirculating fans cannot be used in bathrooms if a tub or shower is present. Section 1203.3. Note that the discharge point for exhaust air will be at least 3' from any opening which allows air entry into occupied portions of the building. Section 1203.3. Specify 1.6 gal/flush for all water closets. Please specify the deck slope on plans. Label all the windows on floor plans showing the types of all windows on plans to indicate that the required ventilation of 1/20 (of floor area) is maintained Please show the size and location of the electrical service panel on plans. Specify size, embedment, I.C.B.O. number and manufacturer of power driven pins, expansion anchors or epoxy anchors. Show edge and end distances and spacing. Section 106.3.3. . Carlsbad 04-1125 JULY 279 2004 11. When hold downs are required, note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation inspection. Section 108.5.2. 12. Please clarify HD on foundation plans, i.e., are these HD2A, etc. 13. Specify nail size and spacing for all shear walls, floor and roof diaphragms. Indicate required blocking. Maintain maximum diaphragm dimension ratios. Sections 2315 and 2513. 14. Provide a complete shear wall, schedule on plans with the anchorage information at top & bottom. 15. All elements supporting floor abOve garage, including walls/beams/columns supporting floor joists, must haveone-hour fire-resistive protection on the garage side. Section 302.2. 16. Garage requires one-hour fire protection on the garage side of walls and ceiling common to the dwelling. Table 3-B, Section 302.4. 17. Show a self-closing door, either 1-3/8" solid core or a listed 20 minute assembly, for openings between garage and dwelling. Section 302.4. 18. Note on the plans: "Attic ventilation openings shall be covered with corrosion- resistant metal mesh with mesh openings of 'A" in dimension." Section 1505.3. 19. Plastic skylights must be separated from each other by at least 4', unless they are over the same room and their combined area does not exceed 100-s.f. (or 200-s.f. if the plastic is a "CCI" material). Section 2603.7.1. 20. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4: Fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors. Doors and enclosures for bathtubs and showers and in any portion of a building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60" above a standing surface and drain inlet. C) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24" arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60" above the walking surface. d) Individual fixed or operable panels, other than those locations described above, that meet all of the following conditions: Exposed area of an individual pane is greater than 9 square feet, and: Exposed bottom edge is less than 18" above the floor, and: Exposed top edge is greater than 36" above the floor, and: One or more walking surfaces are within 36" horizontally of the plane of the glazing. e) Walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5' of the bottom and top of stairways where the bottom edge of the glass is less than 60" above a walking surface. The page numbers are not coordinated with detail numbers as referenced on framing structural plans. I.e., 43/Sb, 49/S1 1, 42/Sb, 36/S9, etc. 21. Carlsbad 04-1125 JULY 27, 2004 22. Please show ICBO # for the skylights on plans. 23. Specify all structural material specifications on plans, per 8W x 11 package. 24. A soils report is required for this project; submit a copy to EsGil for review. 25. Note on plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive & note the allowable bearing value per soils report. Section 106.3.3. 26. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfihled and compacted, and C) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 27. Detail the dryer exhaust duct design from the dryer to the exterior. The maximum length is 14 feet with (two) 900 elbows. UMC Section 504.2.2. 28. All bedroom branch circuits now require arc fault protection. Note on plans that "Bedroom branch circuits will be arc fault circuit protected." NEC Art. 210-12(b). 29. For a single-family dwelling unit show that at least one receptacle outlet accessible at grade level will be installed outdoors at the front and back of the dwelling. NEC Art. 210-52 (e). This receptacle must be GFCI protected. 30. Show on the plans the location of required GFCI countertop receptacle outlets per NEC Art. 210-52(c), which reads as follows: In kitchens and dining areas of dwelling units a receptacle outlet shall be installed at each counter space wider than 12 inches. Receptacles shall be installed so that no point along the wall line is more than 24 inches measured horizontally from a receptacle outlet in that space. Island and peninsular countertops 12 inches by 24" long (or greater) shall have at least one receptacle. Counter top spaces separated by range tops, refrigerators, or sinks shall be considered as separate counter top spaces. 31. Show T and P valve on water heater and show route of discharge line to exterior. UPC, Section 608.5. 32. Per NEC Art. 210-11(c)3, note on plans that bathroom circuiting shall be either: A 20 ampere circuit dedicated to each bathroom, or At least one 20 ampere circuit supplying only bathroom receptacle outlets. . CITY OF CARLSBAD REQUIREMENTS 33. New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. (City Ordinance No. 8093). . .. .. Carlsbad 04-1125 JULY 279 2004 Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093). All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (City Policy). To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Eégil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ali Sadre at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGfl Corporation In cpartners/lip wit/i government for(Building Safety DATE: APRIL 9, 2004 0 CANT JUR JURISDICTION: Carlsbad 0 t7TS1EVIEWER 0 FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-1125 SET:I PROJECT ADDRESS: 270 PACIFIC AVENUE PROJECT NAME: SFR FOR MAGANA LI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. LI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. ElI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. Li The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: BAIRD WHEATLY 843 NEPTUNE AVENUE, LEUCADIA, CA 92024 LI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: BAIRD (I. -4) Telephone #: (760) 632-5317 Date contacted: L4I)Ot.i (by:-. ) Fax #: -5317 Mail '-1e1ephone - Fax - in Person - - U REMARKS: By: All Sadre Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB 0 EJ 0 PC 4/05 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 tarlsbad 04-1125 APRIL 9, 2004 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-1125 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 270 PACIFIC AVENUE FLOOR AREA: 2571 (LIVING); GARAGE = 400; DECK = 375; STORIES = 2 HEIGHT: 22' REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 4/2 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: APRIL 9, 2004 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 4/5 PLAN REVIEWER: All Sadre This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National E!ectrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review. is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may háve;other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Departrnent, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 2000 UPC, 2000 UMC and 1999 NEC (all effective 11/1/02). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section. etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. lJ Carlsbad 04-1125 APRIL 9, 2004 PLANS Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit two sets of plans for residential projects. For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review biEsGilCórporãtion is complete. .,• •• A reminder that the revised plans need to be stamped and signed by the engineer and /or architect of record. I. "Please note the floor area of patio & decks/ balconies on the cover sheet of• plans as well. • • • . • •. I Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans stating that this projecf shall comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the 1997 UBC, 2000 UMC, 2000 UPC and the 1999 NEC. . Recirculating fans cannot be used in bathrooms if a tub or shower is present. Section 1203.3. Note that the discharge point for exhaust air will be at least 3' from any opening which allows air entry into occupied portions of the building. Section 1203.3. • Specify 1.6 gal/flush for all water closets. Please specify the deck slope on plans. Label all the windows on floor plans showing the types of all windows on plans to indicate that the required ventilation of 1/20 (of floor area) is maintained. Please show the size and location of the electrical service panel on plans. Specify size, embedment, I.C.B.O. number and manufacturer of power driven pins, expansion anchors or epoxy anchors. Show edge and end distances and spacing. Section 106.3.3. Carlsbad 04-1125 APRIL 9, 2004 11. When hold downs are required, note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation inspection. Section 108.5.2. 12. Please clarify HD on foundation plans, i.e., are these HD2A, etc. 13. . Specify nail size, and spacing for all shear walls, floor and roof diaphragms.. Indicate required blocking. Maintain maximum diaphragm dimension ratios. Sections 2315 and 2513. 14. Provide a complete shear wall schedule on plans with the anchorage information at top & bottom. 15. All elements supporting floor above garage, including walls/beams/columns supporting floor joists, must have one-hour fire-resistive protection on the garage side. Section 302.2. 16. Garage requires one-hour fire protection on the garage side of walls and ceiling common tothe dwelling. Table 3B, Section 302.4. .. . 17. Show a self-closing door, either 1-3/8" solid core or a listed 20 minute assembly,. 'for openings between garage and dwelling. Section 302.4. -: 18. Note.on.the plans: "Attic ventilation openings shall be covered with corrosion-:. resistart metal mesh with mesh openings of 1/4" in dimension." Section 1505.3. 19. Plastic skylights must be separated from each other, by at least 4', unless the: are over the same room and their combined area does not exceed 100-s.f. (o(. 200-s.f.'if the plastic is a "CCI" material). Section 2603.7.1. . 20. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4: Fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors. Doors and enclosures for bathtubs and showers and in any portion of a building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60" above a standing surface and drain inlet C) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24" arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60" above the walking surface. ......- -. d) Individual fixed or operable panels, other than those locations described above, that meet all of the following conditions: Exposed area of an individual pane is greater than 9 square feet, and: Exposed bottom edge is less than 18" above the floor, and: Exposed top edge is greater than 36" above the floor, and: One or more walking surfaces are within 36" horizontally of the plane of the glazing. e) Walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5' of the bottom and top of stairways where the bottom edge of the glass is less than 60" above a walking surface. 21. The page numbers are not coordinated with detail numbers as referenced on framing structural plans. I.e., 43/SI 0, 49/SII, 42/SI 0, 36/S9, etc. Carlsbad 04-1125 APRIL 9, 2004 22. Please show ICBO # for the skylights on plans. 23. Specify all structural material specifications on plans, per 8W' x 11 package. 24. A soils report is required for this project; submit a copy to EsGil for review. 25. Note on plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive & note the allowable bearing value per soils report. Section 106.3.3. 26. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and C) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 27. Detail the dryer-exhaust duct design from the dryer to the exterior. The maximum length is 14 feet with (two) 900 elbows. UMC Section 504.2.2. 28. All bedroom branch circuits now require arc fault protection. Note on plans that "Bedroom branch circuits will be arc fault circuit protected." NEC Art. 210-12(b). 29. For a single-family dwelling unit show that at least one receptacle outlet accessible at grade level will be installed outdoors at the front and back of the dwelling. NEC-Art. ,210-52 (e). This receptacle must be GFCI protected. 30. Show on the plans the location of required GFCI countertop receptacle outlets per NEC Art. 210-52(c), which reads as follows: In kitchens and dining areas of dwelling units a receptacle outlet shall be installed at each counter space wider than 12 inches. Receptacles shall be installed so that no point along the wall line is more than 24 inches measured horizontally from a receptacle outlet in that space. Island and peninsular countertops 12 inches by 24" long (or greater) shall have at least one receptacle. Counter top spaces separated by range tops, refrigerators, or sinks shall be considered as separate counter top spaces. 31. Show T and P valve on water heater and show route of discharge line to exterior. UPC, Section 608.5. 32. Per NEC Art. 210-11 (c)3, note on plans that bathroom circuiting shall be either: A 20 ampere circuit dedicated to each bathroom, or At least one 20 ampere circuit supplying only bathroom receptacle outlets. . CITY OF CARLSBAD REQUIREMENTS 33. New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. (City Ordinance No. 8093). Carlsbad 04-1125 APRIL 9, 2004 Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093). All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (City Policy). To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact All Sadre at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. 4 Carlsbâd04-1125 APRIL 9, 2004 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.:. 4-1125 PREPARED BY: All Sadre. DATE: APRIL 9, 2004 BUILDING ADDRESS: 270 PACIFIC AVENUE BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3/U1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) LIVING 2571 82.00 210,822 GARAGE 400 23.00 9,200 DECK 375 13.00 4,875 Air Conditioning . . .. . . . Fire Sprinklers _________ .. . .• . . . - TOTAL VALUE . .224,897 Jurisdiction Code 1GB IBy Ordinance I 1994 UBC Building Permit Fee V. 1994 UBC Plan Check Fee Type of Review: Complete Review I $931.56! I $605.51! D Structural Only I $521.671 0 Other 0 Repetitive Fee Hourly Hour * . Repeats D Esgll Plan Review Fee Comments: - Sheet I of 1 macvalue.doc EsGil Corporation In cPartnersfiip with government for 8ui(&ng Safety DATE: MARCH 21, 2005 U APPLICANT E3 JU Is JURISDICTION: Carlsbad U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-1125 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 270 PACIFIC AVENUE PROJECT NAME: SFR FOR MAGANA The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. LII The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LII The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. LI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: BAIRD WHEATLY 843 NEPTUNE AVENUE, LEUCADIA, CA 92024 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. LI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: BAIRD Telephone #: (760) 632-5317 Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: -5317 Mail Telephone Fax In Person LI REMARKS: By: Ali Sadre Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB 0 EJ 0 Pc 3/17 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 -S .!. City of Carlsbad IP fl .1 I 'ATIT Ii! II iLJ I I iIJ BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE: NO.: C1301'II5 BUILDING ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION:. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER..*. 33-- EST. VALUE:' ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. El A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: ]4ITI Please sete attached report of deficiencies marked w)th 0. jAake necessary corrections to plans or specifisatiot for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By: Date: By: Date: By:'he Date: 3/R9/Q3 :FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: __ Jsz~ ate: 000, ANTS . ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON El Dedication Application Name: TANIYA BARROWS El Dedication Checklist . City of Carlsbad El Improvement Application o Improvement Checklist El Future, Improvement Agreement El Grading Permit Application El Grading Submittal Checklist Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 602-2773 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: El Right-of-Way Permit Application • . Recordation: Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist Carlsbad Tract: and Information Sheet El Sewer Fee Information Sheet 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760) 602-8562 MOULDING PLANCHEcK CKLST FoRM.doc i Rev. 7/14100 I BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 2 ND 3 RD 1. Provide afuIIy dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: _Jc North Arrow ht-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets .B( Existing & Proposed Structures KDriveway widths Q(Existing Street Improvements sting or proposed sewer lateral p Property Lines sting or proposed water service mE E' Easements ( J. Existing or proposed irrigation service 66 5kec..j ki-k-izt( Q4 flSeAcr 5ze. El a.~9~rZ ow on site plan: ainage Patterns Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. —2-.-ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second d lung units and apartment complexes are an exception. Sewer and water, laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. El El 3. Include on title sheet: -ASite address - -B:jAssessor's Parcel Number • ....C' Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION F:8UILDING PLANcHECK CKLST FORM.doc 2 Ret.. 7114100 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD DO 1:1 &) A Project does not comply with the following Engineering Condit' oji of approval for Project No. ,,k e-46 'i) CetçJ gnu red. -1ir Ill A ifl A-Pda £(c,vj a nJ- &ka,J- I th4- .— L Ii1i9i4 .T) ,4. 4. CtY? SPA .6 L7>' U 0 0 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 0 0 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm / drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and / for remodels with a value at or exceeding $_15.000 , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 /? x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 0 0 • 0 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $_75.000 , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the FBUILDING PLANCHEcI( CKLST FORM ADC 3 • Rev. 7114100 1ST ND 3R0 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. ' b O provement Plans signed by: Date: EI 0 F El V_]6b. Construction of the 'public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Pleas ubmit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $3490 we may I1 prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a ta9- qo() Building permit. public improvements required as follows: fic'o -9. Oaq 0 0 0 6c. Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: 0 0 0 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective• improvements found-adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). DOD Grading Permit required A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Ciyil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: ODD 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) FBUII.DING PLANCHECK CKLST PORM.dac 4 Rev. 7114100 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 8Q El 7d .No Grading Permit required. 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS WA 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public .Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: Scc 40 FaI, a c1g4 ôlZ u.oac p (iA M2o. 40 e (1t(Qd 40 -kD , -.nin .'.1- i 1'J1Ch ti.'i4kr t114 ,pV 7VIC144&? INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. Iuired fees are attached 0 No fees required 07 • WATER METER REVIEW O • 0 0 12a. Domestic (potable) Use • Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. AII.single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. FBUI WING PI.ANCHECK CKLST FORM doc 5 Rev. 7114100 at a 1ST 2ND 3R0 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated rmeter size for the unit. Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter. If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand. (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). 0 0 El 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is. reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should look like: Q STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 1.5 meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and' the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: Hydraulic grade line Elevation at point of connection (POC). Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection 3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SF0 with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water Roe. 7114100 F:0UILDING P4.ANCHECK CKLST FORMA=6 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. E D IJ 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available)- Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the. recycled water is • there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge: If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. • U 13. Additional Comments: 111 7, PFA W, MA 11111111VF_ - . Rev. 7114100 F:BUILDlNG PI.ANCIIECK CKLST FORM dec 7 1. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA & #: FEE/UNIT: X NO. UNITS: 2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT's/UNITS: X FEE/ADT: 3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 01ST. #2 ADTs/UNITS: X FEE/AbT:________ 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE:________ UNIT/SQ.FT.: X FEE!SQ.FT./UNIT:_______ 0. 5. SEWER FEE EDU's: X FEE/EDU:______ BENEFIT AREA: EDU's: X FEE/EDU:______ 6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) 7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA • .14 : HIGH /LOW_ ACRES: 10 X FEE/AC:______ 8. POTABLE WATER FEES DlST.#3 =$ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. D Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address: fO 96,Q1tc_.4&ia-_ Bldg. Permit No. C6 Prepared by: _g/.Q/Og bate: '7 Checked by: Date: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: 2'jtô i-velv(Id 9Sq. Ft./Units: L_. EDU's: ) Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: EDU's: ADT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use:,,ie ' }uiIo( 51S Sq. Ft./Units: ADT's: / Types of Use: Sq. Ft.IUnits: ADT's: FEES REQUIRED: WITHIN CFD: 0 YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) 0 NO UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION I of 2 F:WEE CALCULATION WORKSKEET.doc Rev. 7114100 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET 0 9. RECLAIMED WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*:$ *NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which maybe due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. 2 of 2 F:FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET.doc Rev. 7114100 ra 0 a cc ci 0 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Chec%B Address 990 iAlyz AV ,wc Iitf1 Phone (760) 602- L/6 tq APN: Planner ____________ Type ofroject & Use: I'T?h''cF('L Net Project Density: DU/AC Zoning:3 General Plan: Facilities Management Zone: ( CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres:______ (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this CircleOne permit:___________________________________________________________ Item Incomplete - Needs your action YES ___ NO t TYPE Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: 't]j 0 0 Discretionary Action Require YES ___ NO ___TYPE C DP APPROVAL/RESO. NO. 7 '' DATE /- PROJECT NO. COP_o — OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval:_________________________________________________________ Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES_ Y. NO____ CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES____ NO 'S1( If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at — 9;_41 oolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 6V1mt1) Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES____ NO (1/03 If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp BUilding Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). A 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. Lj '0 0 Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NCI X N (Effective date of lnclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES ____ NO (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) Site Plan: H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 Legend: Item Complete El Environmental Review Required: DATE OF COMPLETION: ôfb El 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing Street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes). El M 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Policy 44— Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines El El 1. Applicability: YES NO El 0 2. Project complies YES _NO_______ Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front: Required _____________ Cdiwn Interior Side: Required Shown Street Side: Required Shown Rear: Required Shown Top of slope: Required Shown , 0 0 2. Accessory structure setbacks: Front: Required Shown Interior Side: Required Shown Street Side: Re ed Require Shown Rear: Shown Structure separation: equired Shown Shown i 3. Lot Coverage: Required 45P162 'ElEl 1-3 4. Height: Required Shown El 0 5. Parking: Spaces Required - Shown (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required -- Shown - 0 El El Additional Comments_____________________________________________________________ OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER •DATE_ _________ H:ADMiN\COUNTER\BidgPInchkRevChkist Rev 9/01 JPALOS VERDES ON Engineering (iviI an:i Stiicturi Consulting 6027-I Paseo Delicias P.O. Box 2211 Rancho Santa Fe California 92067 pvecrsf@earthlink.net 858 759 2434 858 759 8324 FAX Structural Calculations New Residence PREPARED FOR Wanda Magana 270 Pacific Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 PROJECT 270 Pacific Avenue Carlsbad, CA Ci I :577" ;EXP.12I31IO5 *) C10- OFC Mow Paul S. Christenson RCE C57182, exp. 12-31-05 December 5, 2003 WU9 2- 2oV PVEC File No. 24-03-366 moo I LJLA PA L(II) S 6027-1 Delicias V1 R Rancho Santa Fe WA-r. California 92067 Engineering pvecrsf@earthtink.net 858 759 2434 Civil and Structural Consulting 858 759 8324 FAX 1-0. Design Criteria: Code: 2001 California Building Code Timber: Douglas Fir-Larch (DF-L), WWPA or WCLIB 2x Wall Framing: DF-L #2 (unless noted otherwise) 2x Rafters & Joists: DF-L #2 Posts & Beams: DF-L #1 Glue-Lam Simple Span: Grade 24F-V4 (OF/OF) Beams: Cantilevers: Grade 24F-V8 (OF/OF) Sheathing: Mm. APA-Rated Sheathing, Exposure 1, Plywood or OSB (U.N.O.) Engineered Wood I-Joists: TJI/Pro 150,250350,550 - NER-200 Framing: LVL, PSL 1.9E Microllam, 2.OE Parallam - NER-481 Concrete: Compressive Strength © 28 days per ASTM C39-96: Footings: f' = 2500 psi Grade Beams: f c = 3000 psi Concrete Block: Grade N-I per ASTM C90-95, f'm = 1500 psi per ASTM E447-92 Mortar: Type S Mortar Cement per ASTM C270-95, Min. f'm = 1800 psi @ 28 days. Grout: Coarse Grout wl 3/8" Max. Aggregate per ASTM C476-91, Mm. rm = 2000 psi @ 28 days. Reinforcing #4 & Larger: ASTM A615-60 (Fy = 60 ksi) Steel: #3 & Smaller: ASTM A615-40 (Fy = 40 ksi) Structural 'W' Shapes: ASTM A992, Fy= 50-65 ksi Steel: Plates, Angles, Channels: ASTM A36, Fy = 36 ksi Tube Shapes: ASTM A500, Grade B, Fy= 46 ksi Pipe Shapes: ASTM A53, Grade B, Fy=35 ksi Welding Structural Steel: E70-16 Electrodes: A615-60 Rebar: E90 Series Bolts: Soils: References: Sill Plate Anchor Bolts & Threaded Rods: A307 Quality Minimum Steel Moment & Braced Frames: A325 (Bearing, U.N.O.) Palos Verdes Engineering Corporation JOB Z."t• . Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO L OF CALCULATED BY 1'SL. DATE 6027-I Paseo Delicias • P.O. Box 2211 . Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 CHECKED BY DATE________ Telephone (858) 759-2434 . Fax (858) 759-8324 SCALE___________________________ Z.L Lc..Ars :l P Lit L3 u ILr- L) () .0 Ps F £ OL l.o?s 2 '2. 1LL)(. LL (,o ?F £io PLYUJQ FL.YL. 151-5 3.! Wit .co Lb Att3L?1C. DL o' LL LID or5F 13 Ufu FZA r:. ..uP5T1 iMt s,o('cF 2 Li) Pc-c 4cT. I. )& 1. 2..3 Sizll.1c. z.rnq4 co:cc. Pp lt Palos Verdes Engineering Corporation Consulting Structural Engineers 6027-1 Pasco Delicias S P.O. Box 2211 . Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Telephone (858) 759-2434. Fax (858) 759-8324 JOB 2.9-3. 366 SHEET NO OF CALCULATED BYPu.. DATE 11.&T-0 CHECKED BY DATE______ SCALE 3. o Q-00F FRAM,v A. ! £i Psr(Jcfiz.1' 3a cøA: 1j' 'kq N j;; ..6 76 3..t4t 1J.6c4 i,W I Us&. Lu £th lb(J SPAKA 1 S A 1. t 1.4 it 4eA Palos Verdes Engineering Corporation Consulting Structural Engineers 6027-I Paseo Delicias 0 P.O. Box 2211 S Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Telephone (858) 759-2434 • Fax (858) 759-8324 JOB 24.0 366 SHEET NO 'I OF___________ CALCULATED BYPc DATE I?.. I -' CHECKED BY DATE______ SCALE L3 lc/2iLI 30) P p 7 S 1 ia '.c x oSI7Z l9O.I' 'ic S6ci., lL6< or" Us is (A) (.3' i,y\: 91 —z S-'I,, MoIb.rlz. 124 l3L21 1k - L £V4 3016.Y 10O•,1Z; 63 S I. .L co- 1172,b ZSSIA'917 lbef 0, 66" U5b42.. M: lh6c6o Palos Verdes Engineering Corporation Consulting Structural Engineers 6027-1 Paseo Delicias S P.O. Box 2211 • Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Telephone (858) 759-2434 S Fax (858) 759-8324 JOB Z-o3.66 SHEET NO c OF___________ CALCULATED BY Pc DATE CHECKED BY DATE______ SCALE __ 11Fft&13? (i), Li4x \tL 3ccfkF 5Pi\tA - i S7ct I. i 1.2 A- I. IA ChI2,3c4c1nu) 2J.9v Z : )7J.1 44 I.bi o1 b.SL Lt,(, " 11s 411 r AL 3•ç3 2.O 113 LS60 c - < 11.3 Palos Verdes Engineering Corporation Consulting Structural Engineers 6027-1 Pasco Delicias S P.O. Box 2211 5 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Telephone (858) 759-2434 S Fax (858) 759-8324 JOB 21o3.366 SHEET NO ' OF CALCULATED BY ?'c DATE i}i co CHECKED BY DATE______ SCALE _7 T1F2H °L (.Jt LVdtiI7i- IIoc L751-1 64 12, 'tcir- t \j. l'tfl? S: 3orzo : (kL2. I.2 AlS( I't rz_' 4 bJ,6.: o.6sr 1.5 r1P' rAo4 ISTL WX SS'.o esr- SPAJ(:11. Zi fl r41. kJ. Willa A 4.(jIl (7f) Pm.j jt .-, -' Palos Verdes Engineering Corporation Consulting Structural Engineers 6027-I Paseo Delicias • P.O. Box 2211 • Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Telephone (858) 759-2434 • Fax (858) 759-8324 ,Z'- 4.1 JOB SHEET NO '7 OF CALCULATED BY P'c... DATE 12-.o CHECKED BY DATE SCALE c'. 2 W1tz ?2P ;Piw 2d L ? - Lbj.11,O 1'c LOz47l1) I -n. Is iz. '_•_Il_ Od IV 2.4 12 8. u. Al 2i' SPJ Lti LI L3'1'\ 47t) c' SQI)t" s.. 'le1?o 'iird7 II 3'G 121 jz ?t16t I c 47o r.% *'4 67 o.ccr 63 I Palos Verdes Engineering Corporation Consulting Structural Engineers 6027-1 Paseo Delicias . P.O. Box 2211 . Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Telephone (858) 759-2434. Fax (858) 759-8324 JOB 94.0.566 SHEET NO & OF CALCULATED BY _ DATE '--°3 CHECKED BY DATE______ SCALE FflcM4 a. rvuvo LL): L..z (J(E).L3'1 '1.2TSOopr e- vra 6-Los ii iif.Li6OO' (j.77 > oJ,'"-'c.i 4L rlQ. Bri e SAUILMMI- 4, £tj: L.n it2 61Yo pP 40 s S'1 loS' 67 I'4F C I568'tO II6.ZdzJ $3 Sb-' .ci .ci" X0.35 -Tm Palos Verdes Engineering Corporation Consulting Structuial Engineers 6027-1 Pasco Delicias . P.O. Box 2211 . Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Telephone (858) 759-2434. Fax (858) 759-8324 JOB vio3•6 SHEET NO C) OF CALCULATED BY,c DATE lZ-Z-o CHECKED BY DATE______ SCALE cf-16,rv- JlPF ()L: L574,1 6 /1'2 J %LJ kj ~t(.51).r 1&0 Pr PI lilt CZS CI ). 0 L .-.( l S= ?JOO4o 4r A /*I±)-n3 2.o6 'loo- L 14 hL 'LL HD 112 mtt ii L'rt fd)-L IT- ) s L3Y1 ra7opp P:: t' k-i.: 6"1c6' L7iv .z b.-L'r' co.•\ 't14( cZ. 2-10o-4-0 A I(ito 333 e 3oo I3Z' .0 V' I/24CL) cc Palos Verdes Engineering Corporation JOB LM .o Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO It) OF CALCULATED BYP3 DATE 12 6027-1 Pasco Delicias • P.O. Box 2211 S Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 CHECKED BY DATE_______ Telephone (858) 759-2434 5 Fax (858) 759-8324 SCALE___________________________________ 4): 1flopj Worr (Jt' 7 tsi21flY &U' l'i .vtr 3o0r I 4V 3 .7j, ó.c; 1'.13 S rL'44O A Lc 4L'1 6It1Z, 430Q( o.'V'o. )'-ci b Palos Verdes Engineering Corporation Consulting Structural Engineers 60274 Paseo Del icias . P.O. Box 2211 s Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Telephone (858) 759-2434. Fax (858) 759-8324 JOB 2403. 66 SHEET NO 1) OF CALCULATED BY P'c. DATER' 3.0 CHECKED BY DATE______ SCALE S-o LATAL Ai AL4'L! — 0 iL rov 2D 4 : Pi 17.1 P5fg Ui 5"? A A;' •7 600 I 0 -(.J ': )J.(5' çv )79sf i1 (________ (,('.••- ()J: It.oL'1 7t32.? RF: I . o c 7' LLV. .o esr i u OL t06 Li (1: I C.,b Pst.i 01 Aio Pi DL Lfl.,: 14.tPr'.c67 IJ DL" A &11. 0,I •CbI j )6o LLQ £CJ,4raoL! 01 SIML. WALL FV2 A 61 ---- /\ £1 N/5 WALLS WALL— _______ ISo .t r;•' t'fl? e-o' Palos Verdes Engineering Corporation Consulting Structural Engineers 6027-1 Paseo Delicias . P.O. Box 2211 S Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Telephone (858) 759-2434 S Fax (858) 759-8324 JOB V4° 3U SHEETNO III I OF__________ CALCULATED BY DATE______ '12- CHECKED BY DATE______ SCALE ?vf Roo a_LJ%1L Gr- 4pool jr4 LL!I 1 L ® :1ZL.c lbo OT1 Q' ko KOF-z Sa'ij fL) LJLL\ UAL t1 -ko.c OF c tbo I'7.i' 161 LJTALL® - ' 2oioi -: PF D C tco O&v ric. kP M14 151-0 Cf-C OK Xw -Lp up "U- A M'5-T~7 Palos Verdes Engineering Corporation JOB " 36 Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO b2 OF CALCULATED BY Pc DATE______ 6027-1 Paseo Delicias• P.O. Box 2211 S Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 CHECKED BY DATE________ Telephone (858) 759-2434. Fax (858) 759-8324 SCALE_____________________________ 5:fl?3 V1FO. t3 c .it 'fP -or WALL.@ 3 Q' iT 7Ziô -123 Prct, C) LJ/tL... AA ctF. .ci:- ttcV4 flF St It .C2c2j cI 6Z( WALL @ 13 ne - - -) U -1iCO,Ij E/LJLAJ'A 1f 7 A7e L Pr I SO LJALL ® a LOAM- Izo rr - t. a 64 S's, .. v,-- 7 2,1f 7 le 0.3 T ~cj (,L) A UL~ AD\ 6 ,tr. fl4V'.1 1. oiJ4 'Ii: t97 OF S6t -J f 3 j 2 -:3 —J Jp- -3 V V., 0 N' LL Cli IL kr PH Ps' Palos Verdes Engineering Corporation Consulting Structural Engineers 6027-I Paseo Delicias• P.O. Box 2211 . Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Telephone (858) 759-2434. Fax (858) 759-8324 JOB 24O36 SHEET NOj'f OF L& CALCULATED BY DATE 12S3 CHECKED BY DATE_______ SCALE I A J: 034 3)L'14z JS2.PIf4ISO ¶;' -t drr ts2A 136 flF 6947 EL'c Ii LZO LS/ DfrS76" az6L . - , - 4 c1 c; JI P'LO I.4D fQ flF0 .6 thi- 'iPc./z ko1 '.fj, L'Au. ® lI Liz Li 035o L34,S\ -•6M?) PF< 17O PjLtj)A1 L. orf'3e ej:. ut!r flj L.4Or: 'lJ L co.3T' 714r <73o WA U- 6'.t 4! 3It.'i-cc't9 U !sL® 36 " If-i L )ococi - 216 PR LO UAtL. cc d 1677 IIJPaPALOS rfl= VER DES A• Engineering 2001 CALIFORNIA 8UILPING CODE SWEAR WALL SCHEDULE 4 SHEAR WALL APA COMMON ALLOWABLE SLIDING ANCHOR SYSTEM No. RATED NAIL SPACING SHEAR / FT STRiCT. I EDGES AND WOOD STUDS WOOD BOUNDARIES, *0 O.C. PANEL FIELD NAILNG UN.O. 5/S" AB. A35 I6d in". LAG THICK. 12" O.C. SPACIN 2 OR COMMON 5CW EJIV. NAIL . SPACING 2x SILL SPACING 2x SOLE V' 11640 V" 450' 2x SOLE PLATE PLATE ONLY 3x SILL ONLY V. 5500 V: I520' V" 12i (MIPL4 FeRAT'10 TO MN. 4x) OZ. Oc. Oc, Oc. 1/8' No Ii GA • IS0'IFT 60' A35• 8" 560 511000 6" O. 300 OC. 3/811 ad .6' o.. 260'IFT. 480 A351 5° 360 IS' OC 15/32 Sd I 4° or. 430'IFT 42' 4351 30 24° 12n Or. 5/32' Sd 30 550'IFT . 32" 435• 2' IS" C SuOc. 15/32' Sd I 2' o.c 130'#1 24" 4351 IS" in Or. 15/32' IOd I 2" o.c. 8100iFT. 20' 435 I 12" 60 Ot. I. FRAMING AT FOUNDATION SILL PLATES AND ADJONNG PANEL EDGES SHALL BE IN A SINGLE 3-INCH NOMINAL MEMBER, AND ALL NAILS SHALL BE 5TA4ED. 2-INC14 NOMINAL SILL PLATE MAY BE USED AT UPPER LEVELS. 1/2" EDGE DISTANCE REQUIRED AT 3x BOUNDARY AND PANEL. EDGE MEMBERS OF THESE WALLS SIMPSON EP 5/8 BEARING PLATES (LARR 25253), OR E2IAL., SHALL BE USED WITH 5/5" A.B. 5/80 SIMPSON WEDGE-ALL ANCHO (LARR 24652) MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF 5/8' AB AT EXISTING FOOTINGS WITH SAME SPACING PER TABLE ABOVE. ALL SILL NAILING SHALL BE STAGGERED 1/2" MINIUl. (TYPICAL) UI4EN A SHEARUALL IS SPECIFIED ON 80114 SIDES OF WALL ,ALL SLIDNG ANCHOR COPt4EC1O SHALL BE ATr,ocwED WITH SPACINGS FROM THE TABLE ABOVE TO BE EDUCED BY HALF. Palos Verdes Engineering Corporation Consulting Structural Engineers 6027-1 Paseo Delicias . P.O. Box 2211 S Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Telephone (858) 759-2434 5 Fax (858) 759-8324 JOB 2.4-o,366 SHEET NOi(, OF6 CALCULATED BY r'C. DATE t2.l 0 CHECKED BY DATE______ SCALE L -L-i. F.'LI(4 Z&.tLcL.,( ) t ioo'tpr< bsL. 15 ulumT Fr-C. 1-94 1 Th :IbbI L)MIC1CI LL. flAc. Pi-. LoAd1 O.l Fr6_ OL— _ hI I3 Pic PAO 9, P (/2- it 4 17 ) P2. 2.i trw uJ 3t 1 t (2'00P' TOLLS Pot r1 Lfl'. )OO -' - LDAO Pio.'a ?1Lr t ' P q42 ccv' P: lQck7Pci 23'z6Zb :• ,H. CHR-ISTIAN WHEELER. ENGINEEKING REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PRCPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 270 PACIFIC AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED TO: WANDA MAGANA 270 PACIFIC AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 SUBMITTED BY.- CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENGINEERING 4925 MERCURY STREET SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92111 4925 Mercury Street + San Diego, CA 92111 + C58- ?997 ~OJV851 6,V01 fM CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENG INEERANG July 15, 2004 Wanda Maana CWE 2040423.01 270 Pacific Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 SUBJECT: REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNIAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, 270 PACIFIC AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA. Dear Ms. Magana: In accordance with the request of Baird Wheatley and our Proposal dated April 30, 2004, we have completed a preliminary geotechnical investigation fo: the subject property. We are presenting herewith our findings and recommendations. In general, our findings indicate that the iubject property is suitable for the proposed construction, provided the recommendations provided herein are followed. We have determined that the site is underlain by Quaternary- age terrace deposits that are overlain by an approximately 3-foot-thick layer of residual soil. The residual soil is considered unsuitable in its present condition to support settlement sensitive improvements and will need to be removed an d replaced as properly compacted fill. If you have any questions after reviewing, this report, please do not hesitate to contact our office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. C) No.GE215 z MM Respectfully submitted, CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENGINEERING '4~ 6-- Charles H. Christian, R.G.E. #00215 Z55f~ 90 Curtis R. Burdett, ~CE.G Cr. Exp. 9.30-05 IFC OF CHC:CRB: cc:wm cc: (2) Submitted (4) Factum, Att: Baird Wheatley, 843 Neptune Avenue, Leucadia, CA 92024 F .Ho.1O.D CERTIFIED ENGIEING GEOLCGST 1O4 4925 Mercury Street + San Diego, CA 92111 + 858-496-9760 + FAX 858-496-9758 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Introduction and Project Description ............................................................................................................................... I Project Scope........................................................................................................................................................................2 Findings................................................................................................................................................................................ SiteDescription...............................................................................................................................................................3 General Geology and Subsurface Conditions............................................................................................................3 GeologicSetting and Soil Description...........................................................................................................................3 ResidualSoil..............................................................................................................................................................3 TerraceDeposits......................................................................................................................................................3 Groundwater....................................................................................................................................................................4 TectonicSetting...............................................................................................................................................................4 GeologicHazards............................................................................................................................................................5 GroundShaking...............................................................................................................................................................5 Conclusions.......................................................................................................................................................................... Recommendations..............................................................................................................................................................6 Gradingand Earthwork.................................................................................................................................................6 General..............................................................................................................................................................................6 Observationof Grading.................................................................................................................................................6 Clearingand Grubbing....................................................................................................................................................6 SitePreparation................................................................................................................................................................6 Processingof Fill Areas...................................................................................................................................................6 Compactionand Method of Filling...............................................................................................................................7 SurfaceDrainage.............................................................................................................................................................7 Foundations......................................................................................................................................................................7 General..............................................................................................................................................................................7 ConventionalFoundations............................................................................................................................................7 BearingCapacity...............................................................................................................................................................7 FootingReinforcing.........................................................................................................................................................8 LateralLoad Resistance...................................................................................................................................................8 SettlementCharacteristics..............................................................................................................................................8 ExpansiveCharacteristics..............................................................................................................................................8 FoundationPlan Review................................................................................................................................................8 Foundation Excavation Observation...........................................................................................................................8 Seismic Design Parameters.............................................................................................................................................8 On-Grade Slab.................................................................................................................................................................9 General..............................................................................................................................................................................9 InteriorFloor Slabs.........................................................................................................................................................9 Moisture Protection for Interior Slabs.........................................................................................................................9 ExteriorConcrete Flarwork ......................................................................................................................................... 10 Limitations.........................................................................................................................................................................10 Review, Observation and Testing................................................................................................................................10 Uniformityof Conditions.............................................................................................................................................10 Changein Scope.............................................................................................................................................................11 TimeLimitations ................................................................................................................................................. ............ 11 ProfessionalStandard....................................................................................................................................................11 Client's Responsibility....................................................................................................................................................11 FieldExplorations.............................................................................................................................................................12 LaboratoryTesting ................................................................................................................................................ ............ 12 CWE 2040423.01 Proposed Single-Family Residence 270 Pacific Avenue, Carlsbad, California ATTACHMENTS TABLES Table I Maximum Ground Acceleration, Page 5 Table II Seismic Design Parameters, Page 8 FIGURES Figure 1 Site Vicinity Map, Follows Page 1 PLATES Plate I Site Plan Plates 2-4 Test Pit Logs APPENDICES Appendix A References Appendix B Recommended Grading Specifications - General Provisions CWE 2040423.01 Proposed Single-Family Residence 270 Pacific Avenue, Carlsbad, California CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENGINEERING PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 270 PACIFIC AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION This report presents the results of a preliminary geotechnical investigation for a proposed single-family residence to be constructed at 270 Pacific Avenue, in the city of Carlsbad, California. Figure Number 1 presented on the following page provides a vicinity map showing the location of the property. We understand that the existing structure and improvements will be razed and a new two-story, single-family home will be constructed. The structure is expected to be of wood-frame constructions and will be supported by conventional shallow foundations and will have an on-grade concrete floor slab. Grading is expected to consist of cuts and fills of less than a few feet from existing grades. Tc aid in the preparation of this report, we were provided with a site plan prepared by Factum Design, dated April 14, 2003. A copy of the site plan was modified to show our geologic mapping and is included herewith as Plate Number 1. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Wanda Magana and her design consultants for specific application to the project described herein. Should the project be changed in any way, the modified plans should be submitted to Christian Wheeler Engineering for review to determine their conformance with our recommendations and to determine if any additional subsurface investigation, laboratory testing and/or recommendations are necessary. Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained and our recommendations prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties, express or implied. 4925 Mercury Street + San Diego, CA 92111 + 858-496-9760 + FAX 858-496-9758 SITE VICINITY MAP (Adapted from Thomas Brothers Maps) PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 270 PACIFIC AVENUE CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA North CVVE 2040423 July 2004 Figure 1 CWE2040423.01 July 15, 2004 Page No. 2 PROJECT SCOPE The scope of our preliminary investigation included: surface reconnaissance, subsurface exploration, obtaining representative soil samples, laboratory testing, analysis of the field and laboratory data and review of relevant geologic literature. Three test pits were dug in order to explore the subsurface soil conditions, and to obtain soil samples for laboratory testing. Our scope of service did not include assessment of hazardous substance contamination, recommendations to prevent floor slab moisture intrusion or the formation of mold within the structure, or any other services not specifically described in the scope of services presented below. More specifically, the intent of this investigation was to: Explore the subsurface conditions of the site to the depths influenced by the proposed construction; Evaluate, by laboratory tests, the engineering properties of the various strata that may influence the proposed development, including bearing capacities, expansive characteristics and settlement potential; Describe the general geology at the site including possible geologic hazards that could have an effect on the site development, and provide the seismic design parameters as required by the most recent edition of the Uniform Building Code; Address potential construction difficulties that may be encountered due to soil conditions, groundwater or geologic hazards, and provide recommendations concerning these problems; Develop soil engineering criteria for site preparation and grading; 0 Recommend an appropriate foundation system for the type of structure anticipated and develop soil engineering design criteria for the recommended foundation design; h) Present our professional opinions in this report, which includes in addition to our conclusions and recommendations, a plot plan, exploration logs anda summary of the laboratory test results Although a test for the presence of soluble sulfates was performed as part of the scope 'Of our services, it should be understood Christian \Vheeler Engineering does not practice corrosion engineering. If such an analysis is C\''E 2040423.01 July 15, 2004 Page No. 3 considered necessary, we recommend that the client retain an engineering firm that specializes in this field to consult with them on this matter. The result of this test should only be used as a guideline to determine if additional testing and analysis is necessary. FINDINGS SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is an irregular-shaped parcel located at the address of 270 Pacific Avenue, in the city of Carlsbad, California. The subject site is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Pacific Avenue and Mountain View Drive. The property is identified as Assessor's Parcel Number 203-023-22 and as Lot 27 of Map 1782. The property supports an existing two-story, wood-frame home and associated improvements. Improvements include a concrete driveway that leads from Mountain View Drive to a two-door attached garage. Topographically, the site is relatively level. Vegetation on-site consists of typical residential landscaping and a few medium- to large-sized trees. GENERAL GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS GEOLOGIC SETTING AND SOIL DESCRIPTION: The subject site is located in the Coastal Plains Physiographic Province of San Diego County. Based on the results of our subsurface explorations and review of pertinent, readily available geologic literature, the site was determined to be underlain by Quaternary-age terrace deposits that are overlain by a layer of residual soil. Each of the encountered soil units is discussed below. RESIDUAL SOIL: A layer of residual soil was encountered within each of our exploratory test pits. The residual soil layer extended to a depth of about 3 to 3.5 feet below existing site grades. The residual soil generally consisted of medium to dark brown, silty sand (SM) that was typically damp to moist and range in consistency from loose to dense in consistency. Based on our experience with similar soils, the existing residual soil is expected to possess a "low" Expansion Index and a low to moderate settlement potential. Due to its settlement potential, the existing residual soil is considered unsuitable in its present condition to support settlement-sensitive improvements, but may be used as structural fill. TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Quaternary-age terrace deposits were encountered below the residual soil within our exploratory test pits, and are expected to underlie the entire site. The terrace deposits generally consisted of medium brown, silty sand (SM) that was typically damp to moist and dense in consistency. Based on our experience with similar soil types, the existing terrace deposits are C\VE2040423.01 July 15, 2004 Page No. 4 expected to have a "low" Expansion Index and relatively high strength properties. The terrace deposits are considered suitable in their present condition to support settlement-sensitive improvements. GROUNDWATER: Groundwater was not encountered in any of our exploratory test pits and we do not anticipate that any groundwater-related problems will be encountered either during or after the proposed residence is constructed. However, it should be recognized that minor groundwater seepage problems might occur after construction and landscaping at a site even where none were present before construction. These are usually minor phenomena and are often the result of an alteration in drainage patterns and/or an increase in irrigation water. Based on the anticipated construction and landscaping, it is our opinion that any seepage problems that may occur will be minor in extent. It is further our opinion that these problems can be most effectively corrected on an individual basis if and when they occur. TECTONIC SETTING: It should be noted that much of Southern California, including the San Diego County area, is characterized by a series of Quaternary-age fault zones that consist of several individual, en echelon faults that generally strike in a northerly to northwesterly direction. Some of these fault zones (and the individual faults within the zone) are classified as "active" according to the criteria of the California Division of Mines and Geology. Active fault zones are those that have shown conclusive evidence of faulting during the Holocene Epoch (the most recent 11,000 years). The Division of Mines and Geology used the term "potentially active" on Earthquake Fault Zone maps until 1988 to refer to all Quaternary-age (last 1.6 million years) faults for the purpose of evaluation for possible zonation in accordance with the Aiquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act and identified all Quaternary-age faults as "potentially active" except for certain faults that were presumed to be inactive based on direct geologic evidence of inactivity during all of Holocene time or longer. Some faults considered to be "potentially active" would be considered to be "active" but lack specific criteria used by the State Geologist, such as siffident/y active and we/I-defined. Faults older than Quaternary-age are not specifically defined in Special Publication 42, Fault Rupture Hazard Zones in California, published by the California Division of Mines and Geology. However, it is generally accepted that faults showing no movement during the Quaternary period may be considered to be "inactive". A review of available geologic maps indicates that the Newport-Inglewood (offshore) faultzone is located approximately 7 kilometers southwest of the subject site. Other active fault zones in the region that could possibly affect the site include the Rose Canyon, Coronado Bank and San Clemente Fault Zones to the southwest and the Earthquake Valley, San Jacinto, and San Andreas Fault Zones to the northeast. C\VE2040423.01 July 15, 2004 Page No. 5 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS GROUND SHAKING: A likely -geologic hazard to affect the site is ground shaking as a result of movement along one of the major active fault zones mentioned above. The maximum ground accelerations that would be attributed to a maximum probable earthquake occurring along the nearest fault segments of selected fault zones that could affect the site are summarized in Table I presented below. TABLE I: MAXIMUM GROUND ACCELERATIONS Fault Zone Distance Max. Magnitude Earthquake Maximum Ground Acceleration Newport-Inglewood 7.0 km 6.9 magnitude 0.31 g Rose Canyon 7.3 km 6.9 magnitude 0.30 g Coronado Bank 33 km 7.4 magnitude 0.14 g Elsinore (Julian) 40 km 7.1 magnitude 0.11 g Palos Verdes 56 km 7.1 magnitude 0.08 g Earthquake Valley 72 km 6.5 Magnitude 0.05 g Probable ground shaking levels at the site could range from slight to moderate, depending on such factors as the magnitude of the seismic event and the distance to the epicenter. It is likely that the site will experience the effects of at least one moderate to large earthquake during the life of the proposed improvements. CONCLUSIONS In general, our fmdings indicate that the subject property is suitable for the proposed construction, provided the recommendations provided herein are followed. We have determined that the site is underlain by Quaternary- age terrace deposits that are overlain by a layer of residual soil. Based on its settlement potential, the residual soil is considered unsuitable in its present condition to support settlement sensitive improvements and will need to be removed and replaced as properly compacted fill. This being done, the proposed residence can be supported by conventional foundations. --No geologic hazards of sufficient magnitude to preclude development of the site as vepçpIyçpntempJatc__ it are known to exist. In our professional opinion and to the best of our knowledge, the site is suitable from a geologic perspective for the proposed construction, provided the structure is designed in accordance with the requirements of the most recent edition of the Uniform Building Code and the local governmental agencies. C\VE 2040423.01 July 15, 2004 Page No. 6 RECOMMENDATIONS GRADING AND EARTHWORK GENERAL: All grading should conform to the guidelines presented in Appendix Chapter A33 of the Uniform Building Code, the minimum requirements of the city of Carlsbad, and the Recommended Grading Specifications and Special Provisions attached hereto as Appendix B, except where specifically superseded in the text of this report. Prior to grading, a representative of Christian Wheeler Engineering should be present at the preconstruction meeting to provide additional grading guidelines, if necessary, and to review the earthwork schedule. OBSERVATION OF GRADING: Continuous observation by the Geotechnical Consultant is essential during the grading operation to confirm conditions anticipated by our investigation, to allow adjustments in design criteria to reflect actual field conditions exposed, and to determine that the grading proceeds in general accordance with the recommendations contained herein. CLEARING AND GRUBBING: Site preparation should begin with the complete removal of the existing improvements that are designated for demolition, including the existing foundations and floor slabs. The resulting construction debris and any other deleterious material such as vegetation should be removed from the construction area and disposed of properly. This should include all root balls from the trees to be removed and all significant root material. SITE PREPARATION: The site preparation should consist of the removal of the existing residual soil and replacing it as structural fill. The layer of residual soil was found to have a thickness of approximately 3 to3.5 feet, but may be thicker in localized areas. The removals should extend to contact with the underlying competent terrace deposits. The removals should be extended horizontally at least five feet outside the perimeter of the proposed structure and three feet outside the areas to support concrete flatwork such as the driveway. The bottom of the excavation should be approved by our project geologist, engineer, or technician supervisor prior to placing fills or constructing improvements. PROCESSING OF FILLAREAS Priditdpliciiijiiiiy new fillioils or constructing any new ràeirnt in areas that have been cleaned out and approved to receive fill, the exposed soils should be scarified to a depth of 12 inches, moisture conditioned, and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. No other special ground preparation is anticipated at this time. CWE 2040423.01 July 15, 2004 Page No. 7 COMPACTION AND METHOD OF FILLING: All structural fill placed at the site should be compacted to a relative compaction of at least 90 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Laboratory Test D1557. Fills should be placed at or slightly above optimum moisture content, in lifts six to eight inches thick, with each lift compacted by mechanical means. Fills should consist of approved earth material, free of trash or debris, roots, vegetation, or other materials determined to be unsuitable by our soil technicians or project geologist. Fill material should be free of rocks or lumps of soil in excess of twelve inches in maximum dimension. However, in the upper two feet of pad grade, no rocks or lumps of soil in excess of six inches should be allowed. Utility trench backfill within five feet of proposed structures and beneath concrete flatwork should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of its maximum dry density. SURFACE DRAINAGE: The ground around the proposed residence should be graded so that surface water flows rapidly away from the building without ponding. In general, we recommend that the ground adjacent to the building slopes away at a gradient of at least two percent. Densely vegetated areas where runoff can be impaired should have a minimum gradient of five percent within the first five feet from the structure. Gutters and downspouts should discharge to controlled drainage systems. FOUNDATIONS GENERAL: Based on our findings and engineering judgment and pervaded the site is prepared as recommended herein; the proposed single-family residence may be supported by conventional continuous and isolated spread footings. The following recommendations are considered the minimum based on soil conditions and are not intended to be lieu of structural consideratiotis. All foundations should be designed by a qualified structural engineer. CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATIONS: Conventional spread footings for the proposed structure should have a minimum embedment depth of 18 inches below finish pad grade. Continuous and isolated footings should have minimum widths of 15 and 24 inches, respectively. —BEARING-CAPACITY. Si -d allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 pounds per square foot. This value may be increased by one-third for combinations of temporary loads such as those due to wind or seismic loads. C\VE 2040423.01 July 15, 2004 Page No. 8 FOOTING REINFORCING: Reinforcement requirements for foundations should be provided by a structural engineer. However, based on the expected soil conditions, we recommend that the minimum reinforcing for continuous footings consist of at least one No. 5 bar positioned three inches above the bottom of the footing and one No. 5 bar positioned approximately two inches below the top of the footing. LATERAL LOAD RESISTANCE: Lateral loads against foundations may be resisted by friction between the bottom of the footing and the supporting soil, and by the passive pressure against the footing. The coefficient of friction between concrete and soil may be considered to be 0.35. The passive resistance may be considered to be equal to an equivalent fluid weight of 350 pounds per cubic foot. This assumes the footings are poured tight against competent soil. If a combination of the passive pressure and friction is used, the friction value should be reduced by one-third. SETTLEMENT CHARACTERISTICS: The anticipated total and differential settlement is expected to be less than about 1 inch and 1 inch in 40 feet, respectively, provided the recommendations presented in this report are followed. It should be recognized that minor cracks normally occur in concrete slabs and foundations due to shrinkage during curing or redistribution of stresses, therefore some cracks may be anticipated. Such cracks are not necessarily an indication of excessive vertical movements. EXPANSIVE CHARACTERISTICS: The anticipated foundation soils are expected to have a "low" expansion potential. The recommendations presented in this report reflect this condition. FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW: The foundation plans should be submitted to this office for review in order to ascertain that the recommendations of this report have been implemented, and that no additional recommendations are needed due to changes in the anticipated construction. FOUNDATION EXCAVATION OBSERVATION: All foundation excavations should be observed by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to concrete in order to determine if the foundation recommendations presented herein are complied with. All footing excavations should be excavated neat, level and square. All loose or unsuitable material should be removed prior to the placement of concrete. DESIGN PARAMETERS Based on our Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis, the Maximum Ground Acceleration at the site is estimated to be approximately 0.31 g. For structural design purposes, a damping ratio not greater than 5 percent of critical dampening, and Soil Profile Type Sc are recommended (IJBC Table 16-J). Based on the site's location at C\VE 2040423.01 July 15, 2004 Page No. 9 approximately 7 kilometers from the Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone (Type B Fault), Near Source Factors N equal to 1.0 and N equal to 1.12 are also applicable. These values, along with other seismically related design parameters from the Uniform Building Code (UBC) 1997 edition, Volume II, Chapter 16, utilizing a Seismic Zone 4 are presented in tabular form below. TABLE II: SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS UBC Chapter 16 Table No. Seismic Parameter Recommended Value 16-I Seismic Zone Factor Z 0.40 16-1 Soil Profile Type Sc 16-Q Seismic Coefficient C. 0.40 Na 16-R Seismic Coefficient C 0.56 N 16-S Near Source Factor Na 1.0 16-T Near Source Factor N 1.12 16-U Seismic Source Type B GENERAL: It is our understanding that the floor system for the proposed residence will consist of a concrete slab-on-grade floor. The following recommendations assume that the subgrade soils have been prepared in accordance with the recommendations presented in the "Grading and Earthwork" section of this report. In addition, the following recommendations are considered the minimum slab requirements based on the soil conditions and are not intended to be in lieu of structural considerations. INTERIOR FLOOR SLABS: The minimum floor slab thickness should be four inches (actual) and the floor slab should be reinforced with at least No. 3 reinforcing bars placed at 18 inches on center each way. Slab reinforcement should be supported on chairs such that the reinforcing bars are positioned at mid-height in the floor slab. The slab reinforcement should extend into the perimeter foundations at least six inches. MOISTURE PROTECTION FOR INTERIOR SLABS: It should be noted that it is the industry standard that interior on-grade concrete slabs be underlain by a moisture retarder. We suggest that the subslab moisture retarder consist of at least a two-inch-thick blanket of one-quarter-inch pea gravel or clean -- coarse sand overlain byalayer of 10-milvisqueen. The visqueen should be overlain bya two-inch-thick layer of coarse, clean sand that has less than ten percent and five percent passing the No. 100 and No. 200 sieves. Our experience indicates that this moisture barrier should allow the transmission of from about six to twelve pounds of moisture per 1000 square feet per day through the on-grade slab. This may be an excess amount of moisture for some types of floor covering. If additional protection is considered necessary, the concrete mix CWE'2040423.01 July 15, 2004 Page No. 10 can be designed to help reduce the permeability of the concrete and thus moisture emission upwards through the floor slab. EXTERIOR SLABS: Exterior slabs should have a minimum thickness of four inches. Reinforcement and control joints should be constructed in exterior concrete flatwork to reduce the potential for cracking and movement. Joints should be placed in exterior concrete flatworkto help control the location of shrinkage cracks. Spacing of control joints should be in accordance with the American Concrete Institute specifications. LIMITATIONS REVIEW, OBSERVATION AND TESTING The recommendations presented in this report are contingent upon our review of final plans and specifications. Such plans and specifications should be made available to the Geotechnical Engineer and Engineering Geologist so that they may review and verify their compliance with this report and with the Uniform Building Code. It is recommended that Christian Wheeler Engineering be retained to provide continuous soil engineering services during the earthwork operations. This is to verify compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event that subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to start of construction. UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS The recommendations and opinions expressed in this report reflect our best estimate of the project requirements based on an evaluation of the subsurface soil conditions encountered at the subsurface exploration locations and on the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate appreciably from those encountered. It should be recognized that the performance of the foundations and/or cut and fill slopes may be influenced by undisclosed or unforeseen variations in the soil conditions that may occur in the intermediate and unexplored areas. Any unusual conditions not covered in this report that may be encountered during site development should be brought to the attention of the Geotechnical Engineer so that he may make modifications if necessary. C\VE 2040423.01 July 15, 2004 Page No. 11 CHANGE IN SCOPE This office should be advised of any changes in the project scope or proposed site grading so that we may determine if the recommendations contained herein are appropriate. It should be verified in writing if the recommendations are found to be appropriate for the proposed changes or our recommendations should be modified by a written addendum. TIME LIMITATIONS The findings of this report are valid as of this date. Changes in the condition of a property can, however, occur with the passage of time, whether they are due to natural processes or the work of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in the Standards-of-Practice and/or Government Codes may occur. Due to such changes, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or in part by changes beyond our control. Therefore, this report should not be relied upon after a period of two years without a review by us verifying the suitability of the conclusions and recommendations. PROFESSIONAL STANDARD In the performance of our professional services, we comply with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of our profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in the same locality. The client recognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those encountered at the locations where our borings, surveys, and explorations are made, and that our data, interpretations, and recommendations are based solely on the information obtained by us. We will be responsible for those data, interpretations, and recommendations, but shall not be responsible for the interpretations by others of the information developed. Our services consist of professional consultation and observation only, and no warranty of any kind whatsoever, express or implied, is made or intended in connection with the work performed or to be performed by us, or by our proposal for consulting or other services, or by our furnishing of oral or written reports or findings. CLIENT'S RESPONSIBILITY It is the responsibility of the client, or her, design consultants, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the structural engineer and architect for the project and incorporated into' the project's plans and specifications. It is further their responsibility to take the necessary measures to insure that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out such recommendations during construction. C\VE2040423.01 July 15, 2004 Page No. 12 FIELD EXPLORATIONS Three subsurface explorations were made at the locations indicated on the attached Plate Number I on June 2, 2004. These explorations consisted of test pits excavated using hand tools. The fieldwork was conducted under the observation of our engineering geology personnel. The explorations were carefully logged when made. The test pit logs are presented on the following Plate Numbers 2 through 4 The soils are described in accordance with the Unified Soils Classification System. In addition, a verbal textural description, the wet color, the apparent moisture and the density or consistency are provided. The density of granular soils is given as very loose, loose, medium dense, dense or very dense. The consistency of silts or clays is given as either very soft, soft, medium stiff; stiff, very stiff, or hard. Disturbed and "relatively undisturbed" samples of typical and representative soils were obtained and transported to the laboratory for testing. LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed in accordance with the generally accepted American Society for Testing and Materials ASTM test methods or suggested procedures. A brief description of the tests performed is presented below: CLASSIFICATION: Field classifications were verified in the laboratory by visual examination. The final soil classifications are in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. MOISTURE-DENSITY: In-place moisture contents and dry densities were determined for representative soil samples. This information was an aid to classification and permitted recognition of variations in material consistency with depth. The dry unit weight is determined in pounds per cubic foot, and the in-place moisture content is determined as a percentage of the soil's dry weight. The results are summarized in the test pit logs. COMPACTION TEST: The maximum dry 'density and optimum moisture content of the existing - fill were determined in the laboratory in accordance with ASTM Standard Test D-1557-78, Method A. The results of this test are presented on the following page. C\VE2040423.01 July 15 2004 Page No. 13 Sample Number: Test Pit P-i @ 1.51- 3.5' Sample Description: Brown, silty sand Maximum Density: 130.5 pcf Optimum Moisture: 7.0% d) DIRECT SHEAR TEST: A direct shear test was performed to determine the failure envelope based on yield shear strength. The shear box was designed to accommodate a sample having a diameter 012.375 inches or 2.50 inches and a height of 1.0 inch. Samples were tested at different vertical loads and a saturated moisture content. The shear stress was applied at a constant rate of strain of approximately 0.05 inch per minute. The results of this test are presented below Sample Number: Sample Type: Angle of Internal Friction:. Cohesion: Test Pit P-i @ 1.51- 3.5' Remolded to 90 % 34 150 psf e) SOLUBLE SULFATES: The soluble sulfate content was determined for a sample of soil likely to be present at the foundation level. The soluble sulfate content was determined in accordance with California Test Method 417. The results are presented below. Test Pit P-I @ 1.5'- 2.5' 0.003 % (SO4) 50V LEGEND . P-2 APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATION Qt TERRACE DEPOSITS PACIFIC A VENUE V - V - deler - eerina Christian Job be 3 Dá 06-09-04 Plate No. 1 LOG OF TEST PIT NUMBER P-i Date Excavated: 6/2/2004 Logged by: STH Equipment: Hand Tools Project Manager: CHC Existing Elevation: Depth to Water: N/A Finish Elevation Drive Weight: N/A SAMPLES ihU I SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS z PQ Residual Soil Medium to dark brown moist loose to medium ii x dense, SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium grained, with roots.CK 1.9 1090 - - 2 At 11/2 feet becomes medium dense MD CK D' -3 4 Terrace Deposits (Qt)L Medium brown, damp, dense SILTY CK 83 1222 - SAND (SM), fine to medium grained - 5 - - - - - - - Test pit terminated at 5 feet. 6 -7 -8 19 10-1 - - -- PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE I I 270 Pacific Avenue, Carlsbad, California I . I CHftISAN WHEELER IBY: HF IDATE: July 2004 I ENGINEERING I I I IlOB NO.: 2040423 IPLATE NO.: 2 I LOG OF TEST PIT NUMBER P-2 Date Excavated: 6/2/2004 Logged by: STH Equipment: Hand Tools Project Manager: CHC Existing Elevation: Depth to Water: N/A Finish Elevation: .. Drive Weight: N/A r.LI SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS I Residual Soil Medium to dark brown, damp loose to medium dense, SILTY SAND (SM) fine to medium -grained. At 1 foot becomes medium dense.CK 34 972 2 3 Terrace Deposits (Qt): Medium brown damp, dense, SILTY - CK 344 91.4 SAND (SA-) fine to medium grained 4 Test pit terminated at 4'/2 feet. 6 . ., 7 8 9. 10 PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 270 Pacific Avenue, Carlsbad, California Jed CHRISTIAN WI-IEELER. BY:. HF DATE: July 2004 E N C ! N E E It I N C JOB NO.: 2040423 . PLATE NO.: 3 LOG OF TEST PIT NUMBER P-3 Date Excavated: 6/2/2004 Logged by: STH Equipment: Hand Tools Project Manager: CHC Existing Elevation: Depth to Wat&: N/A Finish Elevation: Drive Weight: N/A SAMPLES • Lo- SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS I 0 0 • Residual Soil Medium to dark brown damp medium dense to dense, SILTY SAND fine (SM), to medium grained 2 CK 22 1114 3 Terrace Deposits (Wt Medium brown, moist, dense, SILTY - - 4 SAND (SM) fine to medium grained CK 71 1147 -5 6 - - - - - - Test pit terminated at 6 feet. -7 -8 - PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 270 Pacific Avenue, Carlsbad, California CHRJS11 AN WHEELER. HF DATE: • July 2004 E N C I N E 17 It I N C NO.: 2040423 1 PLATE NO.: 4 C\VE 2040423.01 July 1.5, 2004 Appendix A, Page A-i REFERENCES . Anderson,J.G.; Rockwell, R.K. and Agnew, D.C., 1989, Past and Possible Future Earthquakes of Significance to the San Diego Region, Earthquake Spectra, Volume 5, No. 2, 1989. Boore, David M., Joyner, William B., and Fumal, Thomas E., 1997, "Empirical Near-Source Attenuation Relationships for Horizontal and Vertical Components of Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Pseudo-Absolute Acceleration Response Spectra", in Seismological Research Letters, Volume 68, Number 1, January/February 1997. California Division of Mines and Geology, 1998, Maps of Known Active Fault Near Source-Zones in California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada. Jennings, C.W., 1975, Fault Map of California, California Division of Mines and Geology, Map No. 1, Scale 1:750,000. . Kern, P., 1989, Earthquakes and Faults in San Diego County, Pickle Press, 73 pp. United States Department of Agriculture, 1970, Soil Survey, San Diego Area, California. U.S. Geological Survey, 1968 (Photo-revised 1975), 7'/2 Minute Topographic Map, Poway Quadrangle, scale 1:24,000. \Vesnousky, S.G., 1986, "Earthquakes, Quaternary Faults, and Seismic Hazards in California", in Journal of Geophysical Research, Volume 91, No. B12, pp 12,587 to 12,631, November 1986. CWE2040423.01 July 15, 2004 Appendix B - 1 RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS - GENERAL PROVISIONS PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 270 PACIFIC AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA GENERAL INTENT The intent of these specifications is to establish procedures for clearing, compacting natural ground, preparing areas to be filled, and placing and compacting fill soils to the lines and grades shown on the accepted plans. The recommendations contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation report and/or the attached Special Provisions, are a part of the Recommended Grading Specifications and shall supersede the provisions contained hereinafter in the case of conflict. These specifications shall only be used in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which they are a part. No deviation from these specifications will be allowed, except where specified in the geotechnical report or in other written communication signed by the Geotechnical Engineer. OBSERVATION AND TESTING Christian Wheeler Engineering shall be retained as the Geotechnical Engineer to observe and test the earthwork in accordance with these specifications. It will be necessary that the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative provide adequate observation so that he may provide his opinion as to whether or not the work was accomplished as specified. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to assist the Geotechnical Engineer and to keep him appraised of work schedules, changes and new information and data so that he may provide these opinions. In the event that any unusual conditions not covered by the special provisions or preliminary geotechnical report are encountered during the grading operations, the Geotechnical Engineer shall be contacted for further recommendations. If, in the opinion of the Geotechnical Engineer, substandard conditions are encountered, such as questionable or unsu construction should be stopped until the conditions are remedied or corrected or he shall recommend rejection of this work. CWE2040423.01 July 15, 2004 Appendix B - 2 Tests used to determine the degree of compaction should be performed in accordance with the following American Society for Testing and Materials test methods: Maximum Density & Optimum Moisture Content - ASTM D-1557-91 Density of Soil In-Place - ASTM D-1556-90 or ASTM D-2922 All densities shall be expressed in terms of Relative Compaction as determined by the foregoing ASTM testing procedures. PREPARATION OF AREAS TO RECEIVE FILL All vegetation, brush and debris derived from clearing operations shall be removed, and legally disposed of. All areas disturbed by site grading should be left in a neat and finished appearance, free from unsightly debris. After clearing or benching the natural ground, the areas to be filled shall be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, brought to the proper moisture content, compacted and tested for the specified minimum degree of compaction. All loose soils in excess of 6 inches thick should be removed to firm natural ground which is defined as natural soil which possesses an in-situ density of at least 90 percent of its maximum dry density. When the slope of the natural ground receiving fill exceeds 20 percent (5 horizontal units to I vertical unit), the original ground shall be stepped or benched. Benches shall be cut to a firm competent formational soil. The lower bench shall be at least 10 feet wide or 1-1/2 times the equipment width, whichever is greater, and shall be sloped back into the hillside at a gradient of not less than two (2) percent. All other benches should be at least 6 feet wide. The horizontal portion of each bench shall be compacted prior to receiving fill as specified herein for compacted natural ground. Ground slopes flatter than 20 percent shall be benched when considered necessary by the Geotechnical Engineer. Any abandoned buried structures encountered during grading operations must be totally removed. All underground utilities to be abandoned beneath any proposed structure should be removed from within 10 feet of the structure and properly capped off. The resulting depressions from the above described procedure should be backfilled with acceptable soil that is compacted to the requirements of the Geotechnical Engineer. This includes, but is not limited to, septic tanks, fuel tanks, sewer lines or leach lines, storm drains and water lines. Any buried structures or utilities not to be abandoned should be brought to the attention of the Geotechnical Engineer so that he may determine if any special recommendation will be necessary. C\VE 2040423.01 July 15, 2004 Appendix B - 3 All water wells which will be abandoned should be backfilled and capped in accordance to the requirements set forth by the Geotechnical Engineer. The top of the cap should be at least 4 feet below finish grade or 3 feet below the bottom of footing whichever is greater. The type of cap will depend on the diameter of the well and should be determined by the Geotechnical Engineer and/or a qualified Structural Engineer. FILL MATERIAL Materials to be placed in the fill shall be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer and shall be free of vegetable matter and other deleterious substances. Granular soil shall contain sufficient fine material to fill the voids. The definition and disposition of oversized rocks and expansive or detrimental soils are covered- in the geotechnical report or Special Provisions. Expansive soils, soils of poor gradation, or soils with low strength characteristics may be thoroughly mixed with other soils to provide satisfactory fill material, but only with the explicit consent of the Geotechnical Engineer. Any import material shall be approved by the Geotechnical Engineer before being brought to the site. PLACING AND COMPACTION OF FILL Approved fill material shall be placed in areas prepared to receive fill in layers not to exceed 6 inches in compacted thickness. Each layer shall have a uniform moisture content in the range that will allow the compaction effort to be efficiently applied to achieve the specified degree of compaction. Each layer shall be uniformly compacted to the specified minimum degree of compaction with equipment of adequate size to economically compact the layer. Compaction equipment should either be specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability. The minim'um degree of compaction to be achieved is specified in either the Special Provisions or the recommendations contained in the preliminary geotechnical investigation report. When the structural fill material includes rocks, no rocks will be allowed to nest and all voids must be carefully filled with soil such that the minimum degree of compaction recommended in the Special Provisions is achieved. The maximum size and spacing of rock permitted in structural fills and in non- structural fills is discussed in the geotechnical report, when applicable. Field observation and compaction tests to estimate the degree of compaction of the fill will be taken by the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative. The location and frequency of the tests shall be at the Geotechnical Engineer's discretion. When the compaction test indicates that a particular layer is at less than CWE 1040423.01 July 15, 2004 Appendix B - 4 the required degree of compaction, the layer shall be reworked to the satisfaction of the Geotechnical Engineer and until the desired relative compaction has been obtained. Fill slopes shall be compacted by means of sheepsfoot rollers or other suitable equipment. Compaction by sheepsfoot roller shall be at vertical intervals of not greater than four feet. In addition, fill slopes at a ratio of two horizontal to one vertical or flatter, should be trackrolled. Steeper fill slopes shall be over-built and cut- back to finish contours after the slope has been constructed. Slope compaction operations shall result in all Fill material six or more inches inward from the finished face of the slope having a relative compaction of at least 90 percent of maximum dry density or the degree of compaction specified in the Special Provisions section of this specification. The compaction operation on the slopes shall be continued until the Geotechnical Engineer is of the opinion that the slopes will be surficially stable. Density tests in the slopes will be made by the Geotechnical Engineer during construction of the slopes to determine if the required compaction is being achieved. Where failing tests occur or other field problems arise, the Contractor will be notified that day of such conditions by written communication from the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative in the form of a daily field report. If the method of achieving the required slope compaction selected by the Contractor fails to produce the necessary results, the Contractor shall rework or rebuild such slopes until the required degree of compaction is obtained, at no cost to the Owner or Geotechnical Engineer. CUT SLOPES The Engineering Geologist shall inspect cut slopes excavated in rock or lithified formational material during the grading operations at intervals determined at his discretion. If any conditions not anticipated in the preliminary report such as perched water, seepage, lenticular or confined strata of a potentially adverse nature, unfavorably inclined bedding, joints or fault planes are encountered during grading, these conditions shall be analyzed by the Engineering Geologist and Geotechnical Engineer to determine if mitigating measures are necessary. Unless otherwise specified in the geotechnical repot, no cut slopes shall be excavated higher or steeper than that allowed by the ordinances of the controlling governmental agency. C\VE 040423.01 July 15, 2004 Appendix B - 5 ENGINEERING OBSERVATION Field observation by the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative shall be made during the filling and compaction operations so that he can express his opinion regarding the conformance of the grading with acceptable standards of practice. Neither the presence of the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative or the observation and testing shall release the Grading Contractor from his duty to compact all fill material to the specified degree of compaction. SEASON LIMITS Fill shall not be placed during unfavorable weather conditions. When work is interrupted by heavy rain, filling operations shall not be resumed until the proper moisture content and density of the fill materials can be achieved. Damaged site conditions resulting from weather or acts of God shall be repaired before acceptance of work. RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS - SPECIAL PROVISIONS RELATIVE COMPACTION: The minimum degree of compaction to be obtained in compacted natural ground, compacted fill, and compacted backfill shall be at least 90 percent. For street and parking lot subgrade, the upper twelve inches should be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction. EXPANSIVE SOILS: Detrimentally expansive soil is defined as clayey soil which has an expansion index of 50 or greater when tested in accordance with the American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM) Laboratory Test D4829-95. OVERSIZED. MATERIAL: Oversized fill material is generally defined herein as rocks or lumps of soil over six inches in diameter. Oversized materials should not be placed in fill unless recommendations of placement of such material is provided by the Geotechnical Engineer. At least 40 percent of the fill soils shall pass through a No. 4 U.S. Standard Sieve. TRANSITION LOTS: Where transitions between cut and fill occur within the proposed building pad, the cut portion should be undercut a minimum of one foot below the base of the proposed footings and recompacted as structural backfill. In certain cases that would be addressed in the geotechnical report, special footing reinforcement or a combination of special footing reinforcement and undercutting may be required. ! MAR-24-2005 THU 09:24 All CITY OF CAP.SLBAD FAX NO, 760 602 8658 P. 02 CitV 01 Carlsbad CERTIFICATE OF CQMPIJIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES Q& 91JR M(TICATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City with not issue any building permit without a completed school tee form. Project Name: Building Permit Plan Check Number: Project Address: A.P.N.: c:e,f l..17J Project Applicant (Owner Name): Project Description: Building Type: -9VZ` ,J4? ;,c7/ 00' '2 ij Residential: - Number of New Dwelling Urjts Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SDU Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area Commercial/Industrial: Square Feet Floor Area City Certification of Applicant Information: • Date: CHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THEC!XY OF CARLSBAD fl -. (CarIsba.1a*+ie1chool District] '\ San Marcos Unified School District / 251ICamino Real -, 215 Mats Way .Cartsbad CA 92009 (33 -5000..--" Saii Marcus, CA 92069(290-2649) Encinitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300 ext 166) San Disguito Union High School District 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration rOwner certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the Information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Ownei?s knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certificaticn of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage aftet the building permit is issued or if th initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the onarIdeveloper of the bdve described prs, or that the person execiting thi$ declaratiqp is authorized to sign on bh4lf tar the Owr#r. k Ill - I I Signature: 1 V WV - Date: I I ((A) *v2OfOO 1635 Faraday Avenue .Carhsba& CA 92008.7314. (780)602.4700 t — IIAR-24-2005 THU 09:2E All CITY OF CARSLBD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 03 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by thei school district(s)) THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED, SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER GAYLEN FREEMAN DEPUTY SUPERINTENDj ClIMBADUNFUMOMOMM 6225ELcAM1NOREAL - 2&. p Rtvisi.d 00.40 TITLE 24 REPORT Title 24 Report for: Magana Residence 270 Pacific Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Project Designer: Baird Wheatly 843 Neptune Avenue Encinitas, CA 92024 (760) 632-5317 Report Prepared By: Wayne Seward, CEA Bear Tech nologys 7774 Calle Mejor Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 635-2327 Job Number: 5030811 Date: 3/9/2005 The EnergyPro computer program has been used to perform the calculations summarized in this compliance report. This program has approval and is authorized by the California Energy Commission for use with both the Residential and Nonresidential 2001 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. This program developed by EnergySoft, LLC (415) 897-6400. EnergyPro 3.1 By EnergySoft Job Number: 5030811 User Number: 5956 io - M ai. 1. - IX-S • City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 04-25-2008 Plan Check Revision Permit No:PCR07209 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 270 PACIFIC AV CBAD Permit Type: PCR Status: ISSUED Parcel No: 2030232200 Lot #: 0 Applied: 12/13/2007 Valuation: $0.00 Construction Type: VN Entered By: LSM' Reference #: CB041125 Plan Approved: 03/07/2008 PC #: Issued: 03/07/2008 Project Title: MAGANA RES- REVISE PLANS TO Inspect Area: ADD A 100 SF ROOF DECK Applicant: Owner: ADAMSON DONALD R&MAGANA WANDA L ADAMSON DONALD R&MAGANA WANDA L 1022 SUNSET DR 1022 SUNSET DR VISTA CA 92081 VISTA CA 92081 760 724 6445 Plan Check Revision Fee $0.00 Additional Fees $0.00 Total Fees: $0.00 Total Payments To Date $0.00 Balance Due: $0.00 FINAL APPROVAL Inspector: Date: Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any EsGil Corporation In tFartnersUp wit/i government for Buitding Safety DATE: FEB. 12, 2008 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-1125 (REV. # 1) - PCR O7.209 PROJECT ADDRESS: 270 PACIFIC AVENUE PROJECT NAME: SFR FOR MAGANA O APPLICANT O JURIS. O PLAN REVIEWER U FILE SET: II The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. Eli The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LI The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: WANDA MAGANA 270 PACIFIC AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. LI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: WANDA Telephone #: (760) 724-6445 Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: New 100 s.f. roof deck addition. By: All Sadre Enclosures: Esgil Corporation El GA [I MB flEJ 0 PC 2/11 trnsmti dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 - EsGil Corporation In Partners/iip witfi government for Bui(iing safety DATE: DEC. 18, 2007 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-1125 (REV. # 1) - PCR 07-209 PROJECT ADDRESS: 270 PACIFIC AVENUE PROJECT NAME: SFR FOR MAGANA O APPLICANT U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE SET:I The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. LI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the checklist is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: WANDA MAGANA 270 PACIFIC AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: WP NDA Date coptacted (ilb7(b4 Mail Telephone V In erson REMARKS: addition. Telephone #: (760) 724-6445 Fax #: By: All Sadre Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB El EJ 0 PC 12/17 tmsmtLdot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 I Cafisbad 04-1125 (REV. # 1) - PCR 07-209 DEC. 18, 2007 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-1125 (REV. # 1) - PCR 07-209 - JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 270 PACIFIC AVENUE FLOOR AREA: 2571 (LIVING); GARAGE = 400; DECK = 375 + 100 (new addition); STORIES = 2 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 12/14 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: DEC. 18, 2007 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): HEIGHT: 22' DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 12/17 PLAN REVIEWER: All Sadre This plan review is limited to .the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 2000 UPC, 2000 UMC and 1999 NEC (all effective 11/1/02). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 04-1125 (REV. # 1) - PCR 07-209 DEC. 18, 2007 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit two sets of plans for residential projects. For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. A reminder that the revised plans need to be stamped and signed by the engineer and /or architect of record. Specify on plans the scope of the new addition, i.e., new deck addition = 100 s.f. resulting in the total deck area = 475 s.f. Make sure that the total deck area is under 500 s.f., otherwise, two exits are required. Please show post and adequate footing under the 7x1 1-7/8 beam supporting the deck members. Show 1,4"/ft. deck slope adequate for drainage. Show how the roof drains are continuous to the outside. Please show all guardrail connection details & references on plans. Note on plans that the deck members are not notched for the deck slope as this will nullify the joists grading certification. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact All Sadre at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. I: • Carlsbad 04-1125 (REV. # 1) - PCR 07-209 DEC. 18, 2007 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-1125 (REV. # 1) - PCR 07-209 PREPARED BY: All Sadre PATE: DEC. 18, 2007 BUILDING ADDRESS: 270 PACIFIC AVENUE BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3/U1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) DECK 100 16.00 1,600 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 1,600 Jurisdiction Code 1GB TBy Ordinance 1994 UBC Building Perrilt Fee I $33.091 11994 UBC Plan Check Fee I $21 .511 Type of Review: P Complete Review r Structural Only __ r_Repetitive Fee E Other _ IJ Repeats - Hourly THour * r r Esgil Plan Review Fee $18.531 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST ()W- O7?O Plan Check No. CB Address ?70 Planner Greg Fisher Phone (760) 602-4629 APN: Type, of Project & Use: 3 Net Project Density: DU/AC Zoning: _____ General Plan: fli.f Facilities Management Zone: CFq/out) #_Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres: Circle One (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: ) 0 Legend: Item Complete LI Environmental Review Required: DATE OF COMPLETION: Item Incomplete - Needs your action YES LI NOfYPE ZN Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: YES E] NOTYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YESYJ NO El CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES Q NOEl If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Habitat Management Plan NA Data Entry Completed? YES E] NO E] If property has Habitat Type identified in Table 11 of HMP, complete HMP Permit application and assess fees in Permits Plus (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, HMP Fees, Enter Acres of Habitat Type impacted/taken, UPDATE!) (NI.. LI LI Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES [] N o (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - , 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES E] NQJ1 (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance rner CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) F:\Plan Checks\Bldg Plnchk Rev Chklst REVISED.doc Rev 3/06 Site Plan: FIN 0 0 Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing Street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes). Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Policy 44— Neighborhood Arhitectural Design Guidelines 0 0 1. Applicability: YES 0 NO'q 2. Project complies: YES E] Zoning: 0 0 1. Setbacks: Front: -Required Shown Interior Side .- Required Shown Street Sid Required Shown Rear Required Shown Required of slop Shown 2. Accessory structure Front: Required Shown 25et Interior Side: Required Shown Required Shown Street SSW Required Shown ructure separation: Required Shown Lot Coverage: Required Shown 1i 0 0 4. Height: Required Shown 5. Parking: /l.4Spaces Required Shown (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown LJ 0 Additional Comments Z 2., 5- o5 OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTE DATE d e. p 40W e,44c OF 7 /h47 6 At 4 &.i4 Mt'* ETE#WJe pll"ih', p rdfe ,- cp -' f oSek'f lAri, 'P 110L F:\Plan Checks\Bldg Pinchk Rev Chklst REVISED.doc IV if) Rev 3/06 I CITY OF CARLSBAD PLANNING DEPARTMENT Administrative Policy Policy No. Date Issued Effective Date Revised Date Supersedes No. Page 1 of I 15 August 15, 1988 Auaust 15, 1988 General Subject: Roof decks Specific Subject: Within the Beach Area Overlay Zone Copies to: Department Staff, File POLICY: . Roof decks shall be permitted in the Beach Area Overlay Zone. pro v i d e d t h e f o l l o w i n g c r i t e r i a a r e complied with: Roof decks shall not be covered or enclosed; however, an enclosed sto r a g e a r e a l e s s than 200 cubic feet shall be allowed. The roof deck can satisfy no more than 25% of the required open s p a c e / r e c r e a t i o n a l - amenities of any proposed development within the Beach Area Overl a y Z o n e ; a n d 3.. Total roof deck area shall be less than 25% of the building footprint. -(5-- APPROVED BY: Michael J. Holzmiller Planning Director Palos Verdes Engine&ing Corporation Consulting Structural Engineers 6027-I Paseo Delicias • P.O. Box 2211 • Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Telephone (858) 759-2434 • Fax (858) 759-8324 JOB. '141). SHEET -NQ I OF 3 CALCULATED BY -DATE I.*cJ7 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE atxflGr- 170 9Aam4 A CAU.M1I C1 Soma.._ p.CQI DC L);5rP t1&i tz)OF $tsMa ES2' S 74 _IS2I 71I.II.c It L I7 3&14J.6C4%. O4 bS.2zateWt 1'i 0D4OJo A 1óii14 VjkOFE 57182 P. 12/31/07 ..__.--Prlos 'Verdes Engineering Title: Job # P.O. Bpx 2211 Dsgnr: Date: 11:37AM, 1 NOV 07 : Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 Description (858) 7593434 Scope: (858) 759-8324 (Fax) KW-0606948Ver5.8.0 1-Dec.2003. Win32 Single Span Beam Analysis Page 1 [ (c)1983-2003 ENERCALC Engineering Software westhoffret.ecw:Calculatjons I Description 7 x 11 7/8 PSL © Deck General Information ' Center Span 18.00 ft Moment of Inertia 975.000 1n4 Left Cantilever ft Elastic Modulus 2,000 ksi Right Cantilever ft Beam End Fixity Pin-Pin [Point Loads Magnitude 3.460 k 0.840 k k k k Location 3.000 ft 17.500 ft ft ft ft Trapezoidal Loads Magnitude @ Left 0.267 k/ft k/ft 0.400 k/ft kift Magnitude @ Right 0.320 k/ft 0.400 k/ft k/ft k/ft Dist. To Left Side ft 3.000 ft 11.000 ft ft Dist. To Right Side 3.000 ft 11.000 ft 18.000 ft ft Query Values Center Location 0.000 ft Left Cant 0.000 ft Right Cant 0.000 ft Moment 0.00 k-ft 0.CO k-ft 0.00 k-ft Shear 4.93 k 0.CO k 0.00 k Deflection 0.00000 in 0.00000 in 0.00000 in Moments... Shears... . Reactions... Max +@Center 15.45k-ft at 7.86 ft @Left 4.93k @Left 4.93k Max- @ Center 0.00 k-ft at 0.00 ft @ Right 3.25 k @ Right 3.25 k Maximum 4.93 k @ Left Cant 0.00 k-ft @ Right Cant 0.00 k-ft Deflections... @ Center -C.476 in at 8.66 ft Maximum = 15.45 k-ft @ Left Cant. 0.000 in at 0.00 it @ Right Cant. 0.000 in at 0.00 ft 4, f yUb1182 1 12/31/o7J P/Los YERDES ENGINEERING CORPORATION Consulting Structural Engineers ShEET UO.___. OF 27520 HAWTHOHNE tJOULEVAID. SUITE I30 • RoLLINQHILLs ESTATES. CA00274 CALCULATED DY____________________ DATE ?. TELEPhONE (Io) 541-5055 • FAx (3!O) 541-0321 CHECKED DY DATE SCALE (LO0 ) CLIArLQflJUL: Zb PLrft 80 UArvViL ZOOM S —floO IIM* 1L A20.o :o,:g. <o6 Jcjjoe'. hl1( LIZ S ttL(i: jo:*3' )72 O.2.t.ii1 tôAZ 3iZtTh6 i 0.4' USE . OLr tjl. 4'0" C.&NEC1I £iJ t#\:r 12Oo)•'"•• . 6.I8IA1: .1 .24VIC c 1.5' • I . I ' T:C H11 :1Zt3d/2 TC 210C R T/LL: 278_2.61 z io)7 tO So' LAC!a LM L. PL. AG- - G4WRIL PE - DETAIL e!- 4 - - - w, -A bi • ORE4r1PER 1 1/4" SQ. W.I. 4' . 48" TYPICAL TOP RAIL %" SQ. INTER. TOP OF r . / RAILS ® 4"• oc I -n Z, Imik,[é 3" X 3" X 1/4" STEEL PLATE WI 4-3/8" DIA X 4" LAG SCREWS BTTM RAIL GUARDRAIL DETAIL PECK J5T5 PER FLAMi eN ELAToMERIc WAT- P0GFNG 0/ PLYUC' /S" 14G, CD-XPLYWP :j:/ IØd a 6,12' NAILING & 5Ir1PSON LU EEAM - HANGER PER PLAN 7 °57182 ) (P -.12/31/07 IL3 BthLDING PLANNING If ENGINEERING PCR07209 270 PACIF1CAV - MAGANA RES- REVISE PLANS TO ADD A 100 SF ROOF DECK I o -Oc!t IQX' - 5&- I L de* ,d JOT P I-lQiE 51 Ld/ OC ii 9-S' 70 Be o4ded 'fr r o4. -1 /L-(o1- cc1J q' (cJ&/st edc p4J4J I (I .21 -a)og 6,seiL 5AJD -*et)AL r °e o( I' ac APL) aoDrriOp.)A'_ .00P! Al- Q24 aA-Qd lv (6 OLI-, ac1 I ( " 1 7(o' L15YVV.