The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2712 LA COSTA AVE; ; CB131033; PermitCity of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 06-25-2013 Residential Permit Permit No: CB131033 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 2712 LA COSTA AV CBAD Permit Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Status: ISSUED Parcel No: 2162801500 Lot #: 0 Applied: 04/22/2013 Valuation: $223650.00 Constuction Type: 513 Entered By: JMA Occupancy Group: Reference #: Plan Approved: 06/24/2013 # Dwelling Units: 0 Structure Type: Issued: 06/24/2013 Bedrooms: 0 Bathrooms: 0 Inspect Area: Orig PC #: Plan Check #: Project Title: BIER: 318 SF 1ST FLR. ADDITION 932 SF 2ND FLR. ADDITION/ 294 SF ROOF DECK / 1000 SF REMODEL EXIST. HOME! 147 SF COVERED PORCH Applicant: MARK A. SILVA 3666 ARGONNE ST SAN DIEGO CA 92117 858-278-5121 Building Permit Add'I Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'I Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'I Renewal Fee Other Building Fee HMP Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'I Pot. Water Con. Fee Red. Water Con. Fee Green Bldg Stands (SB1473) Fee Green Bldg Stands Plan Chk Fee Total Fees: $3,856.55 Owner: -BIER THOMAS R&LAURA F 2712 COS TA-AVE 1 CARLSBAD'CATh2009 $118170 Meter ize. $0.00 Ad 'I Red. Water Con.'Fee $827.19 Meter Fee $0.00 SDCWA Fee \ (\c $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee 'U $22.37 PFF (3105540) $0.00 . PFF (4305540) . - -$0.00 License Tax (3l 04193) $o:oo License,Tax (4304193) . .$0.00 TraffiElmpact Fee(3,105541) $0.00 TrafficImpact Fee (4305541) l$0.00 Sidewalk Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL (so.00 \ ELECTRICAL TOTAL, f $0.00 I MECHANIALTOTAL i $0.00 Housing impact Fee ($0.00' lHousirfg InLieuFe6 $5060.00 > Housing Credit Fee D3/4 Master Drainae Fee ($3,549.00) 0Sewer1Eee0 $0.00' AJditional Fees $8.00 Fire Sprinkler Fees $0.00 V --K\ -..TOTAL PERMIT. FEES Total Payments to/1 ,1DatTJ ( ( ) $3,856.55 Balance 7 Due: t .- D3/4 $0.00 $374.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $171.00 $41.00 $60.29 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($340.00) $0.00 $3,856.55 $0.00 I - - 1)1 / FINALAPP1ROYAL Inspector: " h1_- Date: t,/31/Ls<'c" Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as fees/exactions. You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Permit 06-25-2013 Permit No:SW130158 Job Address: 2712 LA COSTA AV CBAD Permit Type: SWPPP Status: ISSUED Parcel No: 2162801500 Lot #: 0 Applied: 04/22/2013 Reference #: Entered By: JMA CB#: CB131033 Issued: 06/24/2013 Inspect Area: Project Title: BIER RESIDENCIAL ADDITION Tier: 1 Priority: L Applicant: Owner: MARK A. SILVA BIER THOMAS R&LAURA F 3666 ARGONNE ST 72712 LACOSTA AVE SAN DIEGO CA 92117 (CARLSBAD CA 92009 858-278-5121 Emergency Contact: MARK SILVA 858-735-2375 . SWPPP Plan Check \ / .•\ '-$47.00 SWPPP Inspections -i . $56.00 Additional Fees 3. I .. 1 1 $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES $103.00/ Total Fees: $103.00 Total PaymentslovaieDO $103.00 Balance Due: // $0.00 / - (\ v I z FINAL APP•• ROVAL DATE 4L1!LCLEARANCE . SIGNATURE 4 1!~\%, Building Permit Application 1h 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 CI T Y O F Ph: 760-602-2719 Fax: 760-602-8558 PlanCheck No. e0. W33 Est. Value c'2t -7z0 Phan k flnnsIf IF C A R' SBAD email: buildingcarlsbadca.gov /4. L www.carlsbadca.gov - Date cf f'.2.//3 SWPPP (3 - JOB ADDRESS 21 if. M uqrA AVE. surrE#/!AcE#/uNrr APN Q 69 - 2,0 0 - / - CT/PROJECT H LOT H PHASE H H OF UNITS H BEDROOMS H BATHROOMS 1' TENANT BUSINESS NAME - t't.7 CONSTR. TYPE 0CC. GROUP DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Include Square Feet of Affected Area(s) . - ot4ApPrJ7 ON] PPfl '-. 46 ion I/sja,vPE 'cN (7 TO12-'( Aç7DillO/'). eoi'eI 3) I . EXISTING USE PROPOSED USE S1L7 GARAGE (SF) '7 PATIOS SF i,'iM DECKS (SF) 2i FIREPLACE 1 YESL. NO[—] AIR CONDITIONING YES VINO FIRE SPRINKLERS YESDNc APPLICANTNAME (Primary Contact) fr1/z44 A (/.\ APPLICANT NAME (Secondary Contact) ADDRESS AuNt T• ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP j 7 CITY STATE ZIP PHONE9 FAX PHONE, FAX EMAIL , JVa 1 . EMAIL PROPERTY OWNER NAME - i/P-4 jc. ADDRESS 2,71 1-4 605T,4 AV . A D ESS - CITY STATE (4 ZIP CIA y STATE ZIP PHOf FAX PcONE FAX 514 EMAIL .). EM IL j4v4 rJ L () VV ARCH/DESIGNER NAME & ADDRESS 3&44f k' M&W4Arr STATE H rjf,*'172- ATE LI H CLAS ,& CITY BUS LIC H lc>v (Sec. 7031.5 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to constrOct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issucee, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law jChapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500)). KUD° -------- - "Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: HI have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My workers' compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Co. Policy No. Expiration Date ZLwection need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars ($100) or less. ertificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of alifomia. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' c_qnpensaUon coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars (&100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, da as - vided for In Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. , I . CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE EAGENT DATE 113OoB(OQD 0130GUM9000 I hereby affirm that lam exempt from Contractor's License Law for the following reason: [] I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractors License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). [] I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). [] I am exempt under Section _____________Business and Professions Code for this reason: I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. [3v'es II'io I (have! have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name address I phone! contractors' license number): I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name! address I phone! contractors' license number): I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name! address! phone! type of work): ..PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE []AGENT DATE _OO OQ(3?OCDW OWOOIDO(J@ 1PONDUVEJ ®(ZJ(7 Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 Yes 0 No Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district orair quality management district? 13 Yes 0 No Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? DYes I] No IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. Oø @U(ZJGS7 I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work this permit is issued (Sec. 3097 (i) Civil Code). Lenders Name Lender's Address K31? O(O1OØW I cmrlifythat I have read the application and state thatthe above Information Is correctand thatthe Information on the plans isairate. I agree to cemplywith all Cityordlnances and State laws relatingto buildIngcenstrulon. I hereby authorize representative of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPEN S WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY INCONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations ov 5'0'c d demolition or cton of structures over 3 stories in eht EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building I under provisions of this shall expire itation and null and void the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within l80 days from the date ofsuthperrnitorif the butdin rwo orizedbysudi pen orabandonédat aft the work Is commenced for a period 0f180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). .APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE Inspection List Permit#: CB131033 Type: RESDNTL RAID BIER: 318 SF 1ST FLR. ADDITION • 932 SF 2ND FLR. ADDITION! 294 SF ROOF Date Inspection Item Inspector Act Comments 05/29/2014 19 Final Structural - , RI 05/29/2014 89 Final Combo PY AP 02/07/2014 23 Gas/Test/Repairs PB AP 01/22/2014 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PY - AP 01/21/2014 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall PY AP 01/08/2014 84 Rough Combo PY AP 12/24/2013 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall PY NR 12/13/2013 84 Rough Combo MC PA EXTERIOR SOFFITS 12/02/2013 13 Shear Panels/HD's MC AP 11/19/2013 13 Shear Panels/HD's' • PY CA 11/19/2013 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PY NR 08/06/2013 13 Shear Panels/HDs MC NR 08/06/2013 92 Compliance Investigation MC PA 07/17/2013 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers • PY AP 07/16/2013 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PY - • PA need soils report Fq Monday, June 02, 2014 Page 1 of 1 .2 -71 L L4 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING ELECTRICAL SERVICE LOAD CALCULATION OPTIONAL METHOD NEC 220-30 As an alternative method, the STANDARD METHOD foundin ARTICLE 220 of the National Electric Code, may be used GENERAL LIGHTING LOADS Dwelling ill51 sq. ft. x 3 VA = 220-3(a) /2,Y53VA Small appliance loads - 220-16(a) 1500 VA /2.. circuits = /'1foO VA Laundry load -'220-16(b) 1500 VA j circuits = JSOO VA General Lighting Total 3,7753 VA COOKING EQUIPMENT LOADS - Nameplate Value Range VA= VA Cooktop :1200 VA = 72cr VA Oven (s) -13oo VA = '-f3o0 VA Cooking Equipment Total / I5OO VA ELECTRIC DRYER 220-18 (Nameplate, 5000 VA minimum) Dryer VA = Dryer Total VA FIXED APPLIANCE LOADS 230-30 (b) (3) Dishwasher = /1200 VA Disposal = 42 00 VA Compactor = . VA Water Heater = VA Hydromassage Bathtub = VA Microwave Oven 1,2 o 0 VA Built-in Vacuum = VA VA Fixed Appliance Total __ VA OPTIONAL SUBTOTAL (Add all of the above totals) L/7053 VA APPLYING DEMAND FACTORS - TABLE 220-30 First 10,000 VA 100%= 10,000 VA Optional Subtotal (from line 5){ Remaining 2ZCSii'VAx40%= / V1 &2/ VA HEATING OR'AC LOAD - TABLE 220-30 Larger of the Heating or AC Load = ' 12? 00 VA OPTIONAL LOADS TOTAL (Add totals from lines 6 and 7) = 373,? j VA MINIMUM SERVICE SIZE = Optional Loads Total = /55'5 Ampere 240 Volt (Please put total on front of card under Computed Load) 5201 RUFFIN ROAD, SUITE B, SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 • (858) 565.6920 • (888) 336-7553 DPLU #184 (06/28/2007) 2.7/2w. I4 t74 Av' I -.J~ - 1 01'5> County of San Diego, Department of Planning and Land Use SAN DIEGO (COUNTY) AREA CIRCUIT CARD AND LOAD SUMMARY BUILDING DIVISION (1999 NEC) DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND LAND USE - BUILDING DIVISION THIS CARD MUST BE FILLED OUT AND AVAILABLBE AT THE SERVICE EQUIPMENT FOR THE ROUGH INSPECTION Address: 27/2 La Cos1a Av& Permit Number: 4C8'I3 1033 Owner: Toni Phone: Census Tract Number: Contractor: t f.dr/. Coy4-iig Phone: C/ g 2-7300 Area in Sq. Ft. 1//5/ PANEL: 200A /6.000 A.I.C. 2 VO VOLTS 1 0 WIRE LOCATION CKT BKR SE WIRE MISC LTG REC REC LTG WIRE BKR CKT LOCATION SIZE TYPE S IZE Garaq i_ /9' N/1 ___ 6 . 0 1-160 J1/ NI'1 15. 2 bdreams V POt3I 3 5— / g Nfl EL.. 5 .13 1 11/ ,1JM1 1S 4 Pool kO44fh a' L_ I V ___ IL 20 W /4/ NMS JI ± 6-4, L LL _LL-_ /9 ___ NMB ___ IL .i ..TL /1 411 - off L L 1( A'/ig 1_ .L S 7 - /tf ,VM5 1s 10 off /at/1.ts I/as b.Iyoci,i .11 _ L1_ Y iVt15 3 ..±L k_ _L_ 3 7(J) 1 V Nfl5 - IS - i_ hIvm/ 5 SP Pno!ba+h 12.. ,4'flB 2 11111 12- 1w1i5 2Q 14 kid sba/ K-d11 1520 /2 IVfl 3 I2 N/1P 2i1avi'idyv,, K fd7 l2 iVnp ___ I?LI z_ I ivns . K*h-/ 19 12 JV/'19 '1 L /2 Nflfl 2 Q.. 2,iriwaA r Iiq Røi 21 20 /2 Nfl L L Ii N/1$ 20 22 C aj b 12 NM _L i2 ,4J1 20 24 6arp9e Bar Fvidje 25 20 17.. NI1 L L ii.. Nn,5' 20 26 ___ ('o 27 2P.. /2 iV/'15 L_ L 12 N1115 20 28 rna v'aj Maj bcJh 29 20 £2. NM8 '2 L /- Nil t 20 30 Ca a9 e 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 _ _ _ 38 39 40 41 42 MAIN: 200 AMP BRK/FUSE LI MLO Computed Load /555 AMPS BUS: 201 AMP See Calculation Worksheet on back Service entrance or feeder conductors: Branch circuits required: A) Size: No. VI? •B) Type: 0 CU Cg AL Lighting Circuits 220 - 3(b), 4(d) C) Insulation: __________ D) Conduit Size: 2" Two Small Appliance Circuits 210— 11(e) Service ground/bond: Laundry Circuit 220— 16(b) A) Size: No. q B) Type: XCU LI AL Central Heating Equipment 422 -12 C) Clamp location(s): Bathroom 210- 52(d) UFER 250-50(c) Remarks: Water Pipe 250-104 DGround Rod 250-52 GFCI locations 210— 8, 680 - 70: / certify that all terminations have been torqued in accordance with Bathroom(s) P9 Kitchen manufacturer's instructions and that the work shown on this circuit card Garage(s) LI Hydromassage Tub represents the full extent of the work performed under this permit. 0 Owner Outdoors 0 _______________ AFCI Protected Circ. 210— 12 Contractor aC,- '/cfric (cISYa6/77L.1 Bedroom(s) Signed/(44r7 Date . 5201 RUFFIN ROAD, SUITE B, SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 • (858) 565-5920 • (888) 336-7553 OPLU #184 (06/28/2007) Z- 7.12:. LA- T7 - 4v Care Schmidt Inspection (6 19) 855-9252 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT Project: 1ej/c Address: . 2 -7 /Z..L J /2 City: r 0 C, C. - Permit Number: ' /3 /033 Plan File Number: TYPE OF OBSERVATIONS: Reinforcing Steel Reinforced Concrete Structural Masonry Field Welding Epoxy X Prestressed Concrete Shop Welding Bolting Fireproofing Number of Samples:. Type: Materia1s/DesinMjxJPsi: _A 307, I 1 7jo SoL. Date:''T13 REPORT 7/; :X -S c,'--e:c ?ee P 1O 1/ s h Ic ,t)7s c/ S" e -t 11// A7 / /( t- A c-- Cj Ae WORK INSPECTED CONFORMS WITH APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED TIME IN: Z A) TIME OUT:______ Inspector (Print) . . Certification # . General Contractor: Z Inspector's Signature : . . City: Phone: Authorized Job Site Contact Signature - * 0 1As / jo /Q>4O3 27/2 i-A Co!n Vé W.O.'' i r" - n ( 7 DATE 7- / 6 -/3 e. osls,Iic. NAME A'C/Z,5k7A1 U1IID ...- '---- .---- I UI1___________________________ Géotechnical • Coastal • Geologic• Environmental FOOTING TRENCH OBSERVATION SUMMARY \ Client Name: 131 ex Project Name: 27z Location/Tract: 2 7/l / 64> r4 4yc- . C1 It 44 £. Unit/Phe/6oi(s): L i I 3 1033 t F/ - Referenced Geotechnical Report(s): Dt J,,-_. 9'. Z.4' b1 / -f IT i f Ai2' C ' t - /Z')L / Observation Summary Z, 11 A representative of GeoSoils, Inc. observed onsite soil and footing trench conditions. Soil conditions ?Ii4- Date in the trench are generally free of loose soil and debris, non-yielding, and, uniform, and plumb; and are in general conformance with those indicated in the geotechnical report. : J#' Initials A representative of GeoSoils, Inc. observed and reviewed footing excavation depth/width. Footing 4 Date excavations generally extend to proper depth and bearing strata, and are in general conformance with recommendations of the geotechnical report lniials A representative of GeoSoils, Inc. reviewed footing setbacks from slope face (if applicable). The 7)1 Date setbáck was in general accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report. initials , ? ; i Date a,'-/ —9-/..3. I/I Notes to Superintendent/Foreman \i. ' Footing excavations should be cleaned of loose debris and thoroughly moistened just prior to placing concrete. 2—' Based on expansion potential of underlying soils, presoaking of soil below slabs may be recommended. Consult the geotechnical report for presoaking recommendations. We note that clayey soils may take an extended period of time for such, and the contractor should schedule accordingly. 3. In the event of a site change subsequent to our footing observation and prior to concrete placement (i.e., heavy rain, etc.), we should be contacted to perform additional site obse?vations and/or testing. - 4. This memo does not confirm the minimum footing dimension as required by the project structural engineer's design, if different frOm the geotechnical report. Notes to Building Inspector bearing values, corrosivity, and soil expansion index test results are contained in the orEinal-Compaction Reportprovided at-the completion .of-grading cfC epresentive of GeoSoils, Inc. 5741 Palmer Way • 1446 E. Chestnut Ave. 26590 Madison Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 - • Santa Ana, CA 92701 Murrieta, CA 92562 (760) 438-3155 (714) 647-0277 (951) 677-9651 Carlsbad 13-1033 05/01/13 CITY OF CARLSBAD SPECIAL INSPECTION AGREEMENT B-45 Development Services Building Division .1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2719 www.carlsbadca.gov In accordance with Chapter 17 of. the California. Building Code the following must be completed when work beIng performed. requires special Inspection structural observation and construction matenal testing 'roject/Permit: Project Address.: THIS SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE PROPERTY OWNERIAUTHORIZED AGENT: Please check if you are Owner-Builder Q. (If you checked as owner-builder you must also complete Section B of this agreement) Name: (Please print) 1 Vf'.,.C41 . . (First) - (LII.) (Lest) Mailing Address, t'S c'tvPb C1/ 3aZ Ce uISisJ c?OO Email, Phone: co9ZC' I am Property Owner OProperty Owners Agent of Record 0Architect of Record uEngineer of Record State of California Registration Number Expiration Date:, AGREEMENT I the undersigned declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I have read understand acknowledge and promise to comply with the City of Carlsbad requirements for special inspections structural observations construction materials testing and off site fabrication of building components as prescribed in the statement of special inspections noted on the approved plans and, as required by the California Building Code. ,Signature* Date: CONTRACTOR'S STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY (07 CBC, Ch 17, Section 1706). This section must be completed by the contractor I builder I owner-builder. Contractor's Company Name:V..2_ ('/1+/2(tv'cj_(t' _. Piease check if you are Owner-Builder 0 Name: (Please print) -C?ii . . Sir (First) . . Mailing Address: i C.-'¶7L_(1_(_.. 'y4V\ _I /_c_U L_A_.'-(_' _( Email: _2_d:ile2kj_(e1A Phone: ._27cSi7 State of California Contractor's License Number:_' 2-( 3'4 Expiration Date: ___________ I acknowledge and, am aware, of special requirements contained in the statement of special inspections noted on the approved plans; I acknowledge that control will be exercised to obtain conformance with the construction documents approved by the building official; I will have in-place procedures for exercising control within our (the-contractor's) organization, forthe method and frequency of reporting and the distribution of the reports; and I certify that I will have a qualified person within our (the contractor's)organization to exercise such control. (z4f2'is B-45 Page 1 of 1 ' Rev; 08/11 (Last). EsGil Corporation In (Partnership with government for Building Safety DATE: 06/12/13 LIJPPLICANT Rr JURIS. JURISDICTION: Carlsbad LI PLAN REVIEWER LI FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 13-1033 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2712 La Costa Ave. PROJECT NAME: Room Additions/Covered Porches/ Deck/Remodel for Bier Residence LII The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. El EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: - (by: ) Email: Mail Telephone Fax in Person set(s) at the City. On sheet A-14 note kitchen hood to beminimum 100 cfrñ (instead of 50) and complete special inspection form for items listed on (1(soscompIiance and epoxy anchors) Per page 10 of the soils report the soils engineer has statedth at. Want .to reviev the plans again prior to construction. (The recommendations ade on-pages 9 and 10 of the soils report were incorporated into the plans). By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: EsGil Corporation E1 GA EJ EJ El ic (P) 06/07/13 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax(858)560-1576 EsGil Corporation In (Partnership with government for Bui(dIng Safety DATE: 05/01/13 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 13-1033 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2712 La Costa Ave. SET: I U APPLICANT JURIS. U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE PROJECT NAME: Room Additions/ Covered Porches/ Deck/Remodel for Bier Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdictions building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of thecheck list has been sent to: Mark Silva 3666 Argonne Street San Diego, Ca. 92117 EsGil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. EsGil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Mark Silva Telephone #: (858) 278-5121 Date contacted:çf (by:-) Email: markitectsilvastudios.com I y"Mail Telephone Fax In Person ThCk\\ V.1Y) REMARKS: By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: EsGil Corporation LI GA LI EJ [I PC 04/23/13 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • SanDiego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax(858)560-1576 Carlsbad 13-1033 05/01/13 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 13-1033 . - JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2712 La Costa Ave. FLOOR AREA: Additions 1250 Deck 294 Covered Roof 147 Remodel 1000 REMARKS: STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: 21 ft per CBC DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 04/22/13 ESGIL CORPORATION: 04/23/13 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER: Ray Fuller COMPLETED: 05/01/13 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the California version of the International Residential Code, International Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates,thät construction comply with the 2010 edition of the California Code of Regulations (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 2009 IRC, 2009 IBC, 2009 UPC, 2009 UMC and 2008 NEC. The above regulations apply, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 105.4 of the 2009 International Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 13-1033 05/01/13 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for residential projects. For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete 2. Verify that the final sets of plans and any new calculations will be stamped and signed by engineer and /or architect of record also. 3. Cover sheet to include in scope of work 147 sq ft of covered roof (nest) and approximately 1000 sq ft of remodel. 4. Provide a copy of the project soil report as required by the City of Carlsbad . The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with Section R401.4. Please verify report is current (as most reports expire after one to three years). Provide copies of any updated reports and verify soils report addresses current code parameters (IBC and not UBC) liquidation potential etc. 5. If applies: The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report). Carlsbad 13-1033 05/01/13 Plans to reflect locations of required tempered windows i.e. within 2 ft of interior/exterior doors, shower/tub areas, within 18" of floor and exceeded 9 sq ft and stairwells if applicable. Section R308.4 See windows A, B, C, M, K, I, Q etc. Please recheck all details to verify that they are complete and/or correct. See for example where cros sections are reflecting wrong page numbers. Could not locate door6 as shown at great room on the door schedule. Please show how the pool house is being provided with the 4% of the floor area minimum required for ventilation . Section R303.1. Cannot determine from west elevation on A-8 which portion of the window is openable. Appears to be a existing fireplace at living room. Is this a direct vented fireplace as the elevations do not reflect a flue /termination. Appears proposing to hide it with parapet which.is not allowed as must extend at least 3' above the highest point where it passes through a roof and at least 2' higher than any portion of a building within a horizontal distance of 10 feet. CIVIC Section 802.5.2.1 The" parapet as shown on A-8 was not adequately addressed. Plans to reflect height, engineer-of-record to address lateral stability in the out of plane direction. In addition the engineer-of-record to address added vertical loads from equipment. Could not determine how equipment is to be accessed. An instantaneous water heater is shown on the plans. Please include a gas pipe sizing design (isometric or pipe layout) for all gas loads. Show or note that the pressure relief will extend to within 6-24" of grade. Specify minimum 1/4 inch per foot roof —deck slope for drainage. Specify how obtaining the required rninimum 1/4 inch per foot deck slope for drainage i.e. ripping, sleepers, slope framing etc. If ripping, note maximum taper cut and calculations to reflect this and if sleepers detail attachment to floor joist. If slope framing then note difference ii elevations Section R905.9.1. Show the sizes/locations of roof drains and overflows. Minimum 3" required if runs horizontal ,2" in vertical and minimum scupper size is 4". Plans to reflect how water is being diverted to drains i.e. crickets etc. Section R903.4. Habitable rooms shall have a floor area of not less than 70 square feet and shall not be less than 7' in any horizontal dimension. Section R304.2. & Section R304.3 The office shown on A-4 is considered a habitable room. 18: Show or note dryer vent to the exterior with termination to be a minimum of 3 ft from any opening.. Carlsbad 13-1033 05/01/13 19. Could not see how floor plan/structural addressed what is shown on the elevations. See window Xl thru X5 for example as shown on north elevation on A-7. Recheck all locations. 20: Couldnot locate where plan reflected the following for the stairs: a) Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends b )A nosing (between 3/4" and 11/4") shall be provided on stairways with solid risers. Exception: No nosing is required if the tread depth is at least 11 inches. Section R311.7.4.3 c) The walls and soffits of the enclosed usable space under stairs shall be protected on the enclosed side with 1A-inch gypsum board. Section R302.7 Sheet A-4 is reflecting a new door 32 at existing garage (per demo plan on A-2. Structural stated this was existing. Please clarify. Window at garage must be tempered due to new door location, (unless noted to be 5 ft above floor level. Plans to specify use of room at right of stairs on A-5. It will be considered a potential bedroom due to closet and window N does not meet egress as fixed. Specify on the plans the following information for the deck materials, per Section R106.1.1: Manufacturer's name and ICC approval number, or equal. Sheet A-5 is noting 1/8" per foot slope and minimum is 14" per ft. The plans are reflecting. glass railings. Detail and reference on the plans the connections to show capability to resist a concentrated load of 200 pounds in any direction alongthe top rail. Table R301.5. Plans to reflect thickness of the glass railing and must be tempered. Detail and reference the glass guard to be supported on all four sides per Section 2407. If not providing a top rail then provide design calculations and details to show that glass railing can resist lateral forces per Section 1607.7.1 and must obtain Building Official approval per Section 2407.1.2 The plans are reflecting'tempered glass skylights. Please review Section R308.6.5 considering screens and show how plans will comply as appears will be greater than 12 ft to walking surface below (stairs). Bathrooms (defined as having a shower or tub), shall be provided with mechanical ventilation (an openable window is no longer allowed as a exception allowed). Energy Standards 150(o). If applies: The water closet compartment is considered a separate room and there for cannot use this as bath/tub exhaust fan. See master bath for example on A-14. Smoke detector required outside of bedroom on A-IS (plans reflect carbon monoxide alarm but not smoke detector? Carlsbad 13-1033 05/01/13 29. Show on the plans that countertop receptacle outlets comply with CEC Article 210.52(C): In kitchens a receptacle outlet shall be installed at each counter space 12 inches or wider; Receptacles shall be installed so that no point along the wall line is more than 24 inches; Island and peninsular countertops 12 inches by 24" long (or greater) shall have at least one receptacle. (Counter top spaces separated by range tops, refrigerators, or sinks shall be considered as separate counter top spaces). 30. Include on the plans the following specifications for any new electrical devices being installed Tamper resistant receptacles required for all new locations. Weather resistant type for any new receptacles installed in damp or wet locations (outside). Arc-fault protection for all new outlets (not just receptacles) located in rooms described in NEC 210.12(B): Family, living, bedrooms, dining, halls, etc. GFCI protected outlets for any new locations described in NEC 210.8: Kitchens, garages, bathrooms, outdoors, within 6' of a sink, etc. 31. Specify on the plans: Water conserving fixtures: New water closets shall use no more than 1:28 gallons of water per flush, lavatories and kitchen faucets may not exceed 2.2 GPM, and showers may not exceed 2.5 GPM of flow. CPC Section 402.0. 32. Is existing electrical panel location unaffected by proposed addition(s) and is it adequate for the additional sq footage proposing? 33. Show onthe sheets A-14 and A-145 compliance with the residential energy lighting requirements. In the kitchen at-least one-half of the wattage rating of the fixtures must be high efficacy with non-high efficacy fixtures switched separately. Note: Aproximately% of the fixtures will be required to be of the high efficacy variety. In bathrooms, garages, laundry rooms, and utility rooms all fixtures must be high efficacy style or be controlled by a vacancy sensor. All other areas require any installed fixtures to be high efficacy or be controlled by vacancy sensor or dimmer. (Closets under 70 square feet are exempt). Outdoor lighting fixtures that are attached to a building are required to be high efficaôy or controlled by a combination photo-control/motion sensor Note: Generally a high efficacy style of fixture is fluorescent, complete with electronic ballasts. Regular incandescent, quartz halogen, low voltage and halogen MR lamps do not comply. Carlsbad 13-1033 05/01/13 34. Residential ventilation requirements: Kitchens require exhaust fans (either intermittent/1 00 cfm or continuous/5 air changes/hour), ducted to the exterior. Detail compliance by including a complying exhaust fan or a ducted range hood to the exterior. Note: CFM and noise rating ("Sone") must be specified on the plans. Bathrooms require exhaust fans (minimum 50 cfm) to be ducted to the exterior. Note: CFM and noise rating ("Sone") must be specified on the plans. A bathroom is defined "as a room with a bathtub, shower, or spa or some similar source of moisture". Residential bathroom exhaust fans shall be energy star rated and shall be control by a humidistat capable of an adjustment between 50 and 80% humidity. CalGreen 4.506.1. Exception: Control by a humidistat is not required if the bathroom exhaust fan is also the dwelling whole house ventilation. Mechanical whole house ventilation must be provided. Include the following information: Fan sizing (cfm), "Sone" specification, and the duct sizing and length. Note: The information must match or exceed the design found on CF-6R-MECH energy forms. All fans installed to meet the preceding requirements must be specified at a noise rating of a maximum I "Sone" (for the continuous use calculation) or 3 "Sone" (for the intermittent use calculation). For additions exceeding 1,000 sq. ft: Compliance with the above ventilation requirements must be shown on the plans. The whole house ventilation CFM shall be based upon the entire (existing and addition) square footage, not just the addition. CITY OF CARLSBAD REQUIREMENTS All new residential buildings, including additions, require a soils report. An update letter is required if the report is more than 3 years old. If a room addition is less than E007 sq. ft. in area and only one story, then a soils report is not required. The maximum allowable soil bearing value used in any design must be 1000 psf for this exception-In addition engineer-of-record used 1500 psf in design. Roof mounted equipment must be screened and roof penetrations should be minimized (City Policy 80-6) If special inspection is required, the designer shall complete the city's "Special Inspection Agreement". CarlSbad 13-1033 05/01/13 To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. • Have changes been made tothe plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes ( ) No ( ) The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items; please contact Ray Fuller at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. - Jurisdiction Code 1cb 1By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fed by Ordinance Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: LJ Complete Review Ej Repetitive Fee El Other Repeats El Hourly EsGil Fee I $1,181.701 I $768.11I Structural Only Hr. @ * $661 Carlsbad 13-1033 05/01/13 [DO NOT PAY- THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE] VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 13-1033 PREPARED BY: Ray Fuller DATE: 05/01/13 BUILDING ADDRESS: 27121a Costa Ave. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 U TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VB BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq7 Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Additions A-2 .9 . 131.73 164,663 Deck 294 . 15.57 4,578 Covered Pefeh )' 147 9.59 1,410 Remodel ' 1000 53.00 53,000 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE . 223,650 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc + F' CITY OF CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK REVIEW TRANSMITTAL Community & Economic Development Department 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 www.carlsbadca,gov DATE: 05/09/13 PROJECT NAME: BIER RESIDENCE PROJECT ID: CB 13-1033 PLAN CHECK NO: 1 . SET#: 1 ADDRESS: 2712 LA COSTA AVE APN: 216-280-15 VALUATION: $226,720 REMODEL AND ADDITION This plan check, review is complete and has been APPROVED by the ENGINEERING - Division. By:. KATHLEEN LAWRENCE 05/09/13 A Final Inspection by the Division is required ljYes[/]No This plan check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended plans as required. ONLY ITEMS MARKED 'X' NEED CORRECTION/CLARIFICATION Plan Check Comments have been sent to: TVORKOPER@DW-DESIGNS.COM LYou may_aIshaye córrect!öiWfrom one or more of thëdiigio s!itëdbIow. Approvalj (from these dii!ons may be ofbiIdiñpermit. (Rëii57fl!ttd j51ans should !iiEliide corrections from all dWiiãii) For questions or clarifications on the attached checklist please contact the following reviewer as marked: PLANNING ENGINEERING FIRE PREVENTION 760-602-4610 760-6022750 760-602-4665~~,- F~Chris Sexton '. Kathleen Lawrence F-1 Greg Ryan 760-602-4624 - 760-602-2741 760-602-4663 Chris.Sexton@carlsbadca.gov KathIéen.Lawrence@carIsbadca.ov Greeorv.Rvan@carIsbadca.gov Gina Ruiz F-1 Linda Ontiveros F1 Cindy Wong 760-602-4675 760-602-2773 760-602-4662 Gina.Ruiz@carlsbadca.gov Linda.Ontiveros@carlsbadca.gov Cynthia.WonE@carlsbadca.gov El -F-1 Dominic Fieri 760-602-4664 Dominic.Fieri@carIsbadca.gov Remarks: D 1 STOP! Any outstanding issues will be marked with {] . Make the necessary corrections for compliance with, applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to the Building division for re-submittal to the Engineering division. Items that conform to permit requirements are marked with7J Set# 1. SITE PLAN Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: EEl [2] North arrow E1 EZJ Existing & proposed structures LEJ EIZJ Existing street improvements El E1 Property lines (show all dimensions) LJ El Easements LEI Right-of-way width & adjacent streets El El Driveway widths El El Existing or proposed sewer lateral [II] [III Existing or proposed water service El LIII Submit on signed approved plans: DWG No. Show on site plan: EEl LII Drainage patterns. El El Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. . El =ADD THE FOLLOW NGNOTE: Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swalé 5' away from bJilding". El Existing & proposed slopes and topography El El Siz,'location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service(s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service; however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. El El Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. Include on title sheet: El m Site address El E-71 Assessor's parcel number ElF71 Legal description/lot number El El For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. El El Showall existing use of SF and new proposed use of SF. Example: Tenant improvement for 3500 SF of warehouse to 3500 SF of office. Lot/Map No.: 344 Subdivision/Tract: LA COSTA SO Reference No(s): MAP 6600 E-36 . Page 2 of 6 REV 6/01/12 Set # DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE NIA LIII iJ Project does not comply with the following engineering conditions of approval for project no.: DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS NIA Dedication, for all, street rights-of-way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ 20,000.00 pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. For single farriily residence, easement dedication will be completed by the City of Carlsbad, cost$605.00. El El Dedication required as follows: 4. IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS NIA LII All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $100000.00, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. EIIIJ Publiô ithprovernents required as follows: Construction of the public improvements must be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ 441 00 so we may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the city prior to issuance of a building permit. fl Future public improvements required as follows: E-36 • Page 3 of 6 . REV 6/30/10 Set# 1 5. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that require a grading permit are found in Section 15.16 of the Municipal Code. lnadequate, information available on site plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities in cubic yards (cut, fill, import, export and remedial). This information must be included on the plans. If no grading is proposed write: "NOGRADING" LIII Grading Permit required. NOTE: The grading permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a building permit. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) All required documentation must be provided to your Engineering Construction Inspector . The inspector will then provide the engineering counter with a release for the building permit. LZ] No grading permit required. LIII LIIIJ Minor Grading Permit required. See attached marked-up submittal checklist for project- specific requirements. 6. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in city right-of-way and/or private work adjacent to the public right-of-way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. L1II11IIIJ Right-of-way permit required for: E-36 • • Page 4 of 6 • REV 6/01/12 7. STORM WATER Construction Compliance 171 Project Threat Assessment Form complete. LJ Enclosed Project Threat Assessment FOrm incomplete. Requires Tier I Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Please complete attached form and return (SW 13-158 ) Requires Tier 2 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Requires submittal of Tier 2 SWPPP, payment of processing fee and review by city. Post-Development (SUSMP) Compliance Storm Water Standards Questionnaire complete. Storm Water Standards Questionnaire incomplete. Please make the corrections, re-sign the questionnaire and resubmit with next submittal. Project is subjecttô Standard Storm Water Requirements. See city Standard Urban Storm.Watèr Management Plan. (SUSMP) for reference. htt://www.cárlsbadca.gov/business/building/Documents/EngStandsw-stds-vol4-ch2.pdf J Project needs to incorporate low impact development strategies throughout in one or more of the following ways: Rainwater harvesting (rain barrels or cistern) • Vegetated Roof Biô-retentions cell/rain garden Pervious pavement/payers . Flow-thróügh planter/vegetated or rock drip line El Vegetated swales or rock infiltration swales LI Downspouts disconnect and discharge over, landscape JOther: . 1 Page 5of6 REV 6/01/12 Set# 1 9. WATER METER REVIEW Domestic (potable) Use EEl What size meter is required? EEl ft i1 Where a ,residential unit is required to have an automatic fire extinguishing system, the minimum meter size shall be a 1" meter. NOTE: the connection fee, SDCWA system capacity charge and the water treatment capacity charge will be based on the size of the meter necessary to meet the water use requirements. For residential units the minimum size meter shall be 5/8", except where the residential unit is larger than 3,500 square feet or on a lot larger than one quarter (1/4) acre where the meter size shall be 8. FEES EElE Required fees have been entered in building permit. Drainage fee applicable Added square feet Added square footage in last two years? LJ yes no Permit No. Permit No. Project built after 1980 yes El no Impervious surface > 50% []yes Eno Impact unconstructed facility LjJ yes F-1 no ,Fire sprinklers required ]yes no (is addition over 150' from center line) Upgrade fl yes Elno No fees required 10. Additional Comments NOTE ONL: Total SF is over 3500 and over 1/4 acre, water meter needs upgraded from a 5/8 to 3/4" Attachments: EEl Engineering Application = Storm Water Form Right-of-Way Application/ Info. E1 Reference Documents E-36 Page 6of6 REV 6/01/12 Fee Calculation Worksheet ENGINEERING DIVISION Prepared by: 05/09/13 Date: 05/09/13 GEO DATA: LFMZ: I B&T: Address: 2712 LA COSTA AVE Bldg. Permit #: CB 13-1033 Fees Update by: KML Date: 05/09/13 Fees Update by:. Date: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: 500 SFADDTN Sq.Ft./Units EDU's: Types of Use: Sq.Ft./Units EDU's: Types of Use: Sq.Ft./Units EDU's: Types of Use: . . Sq.Ft./Units EDU's: ADT CALCULATIONS: List types, and square .footages for all uses. Types of Use: .500 SF ADDT.N , Sq.Ft./Units ADT's: Types of Use: , Sq.Ft./Units ADT's: Types of Use: Sq.Ft./Units ADT's: Types of Use: SqFt,/Units ADT's: FEES REQUIRED: Within CFD:DYES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District 01, reduces Traffic Impact Fee) ENO 1. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE:[JNW QUADRANT LINE QUADRANT ElSE QUADARANT LISW QUADRANT ADT'S/UNITS: X FEE/ADT: $ N/A 23RAFF!C IMPACT FEE: ADT'S/UNITS: X FEE/ADT: $ N/A LII 3. BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE FEE: El DIST. #1 IlDlST,#2 0 DIST.0 ADT'S/UNITS: .FEE/ADT: . N/A El 4, FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE: ADT'S/UNITS: X . FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: N/A SEWER FEE EDU's X FEE/EDU: $ N/A BENEFIT AREA:. EDU's X FEE/EDU: $ N/A DRAINAGE FEES: P , PLDA: HIGH EMEDIUM F7VLOW ACRES: .14 X FEE/AC: 1960 $ $274.40 POTABLE WATER FEES: UNITS ' . CODE'', CONN. FEE I METER FEE I SOC WA FEE TOTAL PLANNING DIVISION BUILDING Development Services PLAN CHECK Planning Division C I Y OF 1635 Faraday Avenue - APPROVAL (760) 602-4610 CARLSBAD P28 www.carIsbadcov RECORD COPy DATE: 6/11/13 PROJECT NAME: ADDITION PROJECT ID: PLAN CHECK NO: CB131033 SET#: ADDRESS: 2712 LA COSTA AV APN: This plan check review is complete and has been APPROVED by the PLANNING Division. By: GINA RUIZ A Final Inspection by the PLANNING Division is required Yes Z No You may also have corrections from one or more of the divisions listed below. Approval from these divisions may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Resubmitted plans should include corrections from all divisions. This plan check review is NOT COMPLETE. Items missing or incorrect are listed on the attached checklist. Please resubmit amended plans as required. Plan Check Comments have been sent to: MARKITECT@SILVASTUDIOS.COM For questions or clarifications on the attached checklist please contact the following reviewer as marked: • PLANNING 760-602-4610 ENGINEERING 760-602-2750 FIRE PREVENTION 760-602-4665 Chris Sexton 760-602-4624 Chris.Sexton@carlsbadca.gov Kathleen Lawrence 760-602-2741 KathIeen.Lawrence@carIsbadca.gov Greg Ryan 760-602-4663 Gregory.Ryan@carIsbadca.gov Gina Ruiz 760-602-4675 Gina.Ruiz@carlsbadca.gov Linda Ontiveros 760-602-2773 Linda.Ontiveros@carlsbadca.Eov Cindy Wong 760-602-4662 Cynthia.Wong@carlsbadca.gov • Dominic Fieri 760-602-4664 Dominic.Fieri@carIsbadca.gov Remarks: Plan Check No. CB1 31033 Address 2712 LA COSTA AV Date 6/11/13 Review #2 Planner GIN RUIZ Phone(760)602-4675 Type of Project & Use: ADDITION Net Project Density: DU/AC Zoning: R-1 General Plan: RLM Facilities Management Zone: CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres:_____ (For non-residential development: Type of land use created by this permit: REVIEW #: 2 3 Legend: Z. Item Complte fl Item Incomplete - Needs your action El El Environmental Review Required: YES El NO 9 TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: LI El Discretionary Action Required: YES El NO TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE -PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval:.____ El El Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES El NO CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO E. If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): El El Habitat Management Plan Data Entry Completed? YES El NO If property has Habitat Type identified in Table 11 of HMP, complete HMP Permit application and assess fees in Permits Plus (NP/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, HMP Fees, Enter Acres of Habitat Type impacted/taken, UPDATE!) El El 1nc1Jsi0nary Housing Fee required: YES El NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES El NO El (NP/Ds,' Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) El El Housing Tracking Form (form P-20) completed: YES [] NO El N/A P-28 Page 2 of 3 07/11 Site Plan: LI LI SEE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BELOW City Council Policy 44 - Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines • LI LI 1. Applicability: YES NO I LI LI 2. Project complies: YES LI NOEl Zoning: 7 7 NON CONFORMING LI LI 1. Setbacks: . Required 2 Shown Front: CALCULATIONS NOT SHOWN PLANCHECK #2: NON-CONFORMING CALC ADDED Interior Side: 'Required Shown 7.6' *EXISTING NON CONFORMING CALCULATIONS NOT SHOWN PLANCHECK #2: NON-CONFORMING CALC ADDED Street Side: Required Shown iL Rear: Required .t Shown IlL Top of slope: Required N/A Shown N/A 2. Accessory structure setbacks: N/A Front: Required Interior Side: Required Street Side: Required Rear: Required Structure separation: Required Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown LILI 3. Lot Coverage: Required 40% max Shown LI LI 4. Height: Required 24' (FLAT ROOF) Shown LI LI 5. Parking: Spaces Required 2 Shown 2 (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown LI I LI Additional Comments #1. THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD SETBACK IS 8.5 FEET AND STATED ON THE PLANS IS 7.6 FEET. THIS MEANS THE HOUSE WILL FOLLOW THE EXISTING NON CONFORMING SECTION OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE WHICH STATES CONSTRUCTION CAN OCCUR AT THE SAME DEGREE OF NON CONFORMITY (7.6 FOOT EXISTING HOUSE SIDE YARD SETBACK) AS LONG AS THE ADDITION IS NOT OVER 10% OF THE FLOOR AREA OF THE EXISTING HOUSE. PLEASE ADD A TABLE TO THE PLANS CALCULATING HOW THE ADDITION IS UNDER 1024 OF THE EXISTING SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE HOME. PLANCHECK #2: NON-CONFORMING CALC ADDED STATING ADDITION IS 39% OF EXISTING FLOOR AREA OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER GINA RUIZ DATE 6/11/13 P-28 Page 3 of 3 S 07/11 Ceotechnical'. Geologic -Coastal • Environmental 5741 Palmer Way • Carlsbad, California'92010 •,(760)438-3 1 155 • FAX (760)931-0915 • www.geosoilsinc.com June 4, 2013 W;0. 6554-A-SC Tom and Laura Bier 2712 La Costa Avenue Carlsbad, California 92009 Subject: Allowable Bearing Value, Lateral Pressures, and Seismic Design Parameters, Proposed Additional Construction at 2,712 La Costa Avenue, City of Carlsbad, San Diego County, California Dear Mr. and Mrs. Bier: In accordance with your request, GeoSoils, Inc. (GSI) has obtained a representative sample of site soil for laboratory testing. The purpose of our testing was to evaluate a soil bearing value forthe proposed additional construction at 2712 La Costa Avenue in the City of Carlsbad, California. The scope of our services includes a site reconnaissance, soil sampling, laboratory testing, engineering analyses, and 'preparation of this report. This summary report has been prepared for the sole purpose of simply providing a limited description of soil conditions onsite, and engineering parameters derived from testing of a site soil sample in our laboratory, and does not constitute a geotechnical evaluation of site suitability, performance, slope stability, seismic hazards, corrosion potential, etc. LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed on representative samplesof'site earth materials in order to evaluate their physical characteristics. The results of our evaluation are summarized as follows: An evaluation of soil expansion potential, in general accordance with ASTM D 4829, indicates a low expansion potential (Expansion Index [E I] = 40), where tested The grain size distribution of the sample was evaluated in general accordance with ASTM D 422. Based on this test, the soil is generally classified as a clayey sand ([SC] 60 percent sand and 40 percent fines). , BEARING VALUE . . . In accordance with Table 1806.2 of the 2010 California Building Code ([2010 CBC], California Building Standards Commission [CBSC], 2010), an allowable bearing value of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) may be assumed for continuous footings, a minimum 12 inches wide and 12 inches deep (below lowest adjacent grade [excluding slab underlayment, etc.]), and for design of square footings, 24 'inches wide and 24 inches deep (below lowest adjacent grade [excluding soft soils, landscape.. zones, slab and underlayment thickness, etc.]), both bearing on suitable, approved soil. It is anticipated that actual footing depths will be deeper than those indicated above, in order to penetrate any loose, near surface soils. Actual footing depths.would be based on conditions exposed within the footing excavation,. The allowable bearing value may be increased by 20 percent for each additional 12 inches in depth of embedment, or 6 inches in width, into approved suitable bearing soil, to a maximum value of 2,500-psf. The, above values may be increased by one-third when considering short duration seismic or wind loads. Differential settlement may be minimally assumedl'as 1 inch in a 40-foot span, provided the footing bears on suitable, competent and similar earth materials. All interior and exterior isolated footings.should be tied to the main foundation in two directions with a grade beam to mitigate lateral drift and adverse seismic performance Foundations should be designed for all applicable surcharge loads and should consider the inherent corrosive coastal environment. . . '• . . LATERAL 'PRESSURE Passive earth pressure may be computed as an equivalent fluid having a density of 150 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) per foot of depth into suitable, approved soil to a maximum earth pressure of 2,000 psf. An allowable coefficient of friction between soil and concrete of 0.25 may be used with the dead load fOrces. When combining passive pressure and frictional resistance, the passive pressure. component should be reduced by one-third. FOOTING SETBACKS' Foundations should maintain a minimum 7-foot horizontal distance between-the base of the footing and any adjacent descending slope, and minimally comply with the guidelines per the 2010 CBC (CBSC, 2010). This. may also result in a, deeper footing'than per plan. Tom and Laura Bier . W.O. 6554-A-SC 2712 La Costa Avenue, Carlsbad c-eosous,'Inc. " ' ' ' June 4, 2013 Fi1e:e:\wp9\6500\6554a.abv ' ' ' ' ' . . Page 2 SEISMIC DESIGN General It is important to keep in perspective that in the event of an upper bound (maximum probable) or credible earthquake occurring on any of the nearby major faults, strong ground shaking would occur in the subject site's general area. Potential damage to any structure(s) would likely be greatest from the vibrations and impelling force caused by the inertia of a structure's mass than from those induced by the hazards listed above. This potential would be no greater than that for other existing structures and improvements in the immediate vicinity. Seismicity A probabilistic seismic hazards analysis was performed using a PSHA Interactive Deagregation computer program provided by the USGS (2012). Based on a review of these data, and considering the relative seismic activity of the southern California region, probabilistic horizontal site accelerations (PHSA) of 0.27g and 0.50 g were evaluated. These values were chosen as they correspond to a 10 and 2 percent probability of exceedance in 50 years, respectively. Seismic Shaking Parameters Based on the site conditions, the following table summarizes the site-specific design criteria obtained from the 2010 CBC. The computer program Seismic Hazard Curves and Uniform Hazard Response Spectra, provided by the United States Geologic Survey (U.S.G.S., 2011) was utilized for design. The short spectral response utilizes a period of 0.2 seconds. CBC SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS PARAMETER VALUE' , 2010 CBC REFERENCE Site Class D Table 1613.5.2 Spectral Response -(0.2 sec), S 1.143g Figure 1613.5(1) Spectral Response - (1 sec), S 0.430g Figure 1613.5(2) Site Coefficient, Fa 1.043 Table 1613.5.3(1) Site Coefficient, F 1.57 Table 1613.5.3(2) Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration (0.2 sec), 5M8 1.192g Section 1613.5.3 (Eqn 16-36) Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration (1 sec), 5M1 0.674g Section 1613.5.3 (Eqn 16-37) Tom and Laura Bier W.O. 6554-A-SC 2712 La Costa Avenue, Carlsbad June 4, 2013 GeoSoils, Inc. Fi1e:e:\wp9\6500\6554a.abv Page 3 L CBC SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS PARAMTER.J.. VALUE: 210. cB.RaFERENCE 5% Damped Design Spectral Response 0.7959 Section 1613.5.4 Acceleration (0.2 sec), SDS I (Eqn 16-38) 5% Damped Design Spectral Response 0.450g Seätion 1613.5.4 Acceleration (1 sec), 5D1 (Eqn 16-39) GENERAL SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS Distance to Seismic Source 65 ml. (Rose Canyon fault zone) (10.4 km) Upper Bound Earthquake (Rose Canyon) Mw 6.9*/7.2** Probabilistic Horizontal Site Acceleration ([PHSA] 2% probability of exceed ance in 50 years) 0.45g Probabilistic Horizontal Site Acceleration ([PHSA] 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years) 0.259 * International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO, 1998) **Cao et. al. (2003) Conformance to the criteria above for seismic considerations is not assurance that significant structural damage or ground failure will not occur in the event of a large regional earthquake. The primary goal of seismic design is to protect life, not to eliminate all damage, since such design may be economically prohibitive. Cumulative effects of seismic events are not included in the Code, and regularmaintenance and repairfollowing significant local seismic events (i.e., >M5.0) will likely be necessary. DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA Foundations Soil conditions are considered expansive per the 2010 CBC (as defined per Section 1803.5.3 of the 2010 CBC), as such, foundation design and construction shown on Lovelace Engineering (LE, 2013) should be reviewed by the project structural engineer, and be in compliance with Section 1808.6 Of the 2010 CBC (CBSC, 2010), and the findings of this report. S Conventional foundation design may be used provided that the existing expansive soils are either exported from the site and replaced with a suitable import, or blended with import soils,to reduce the overall expansive character Of the soil. All foundations supported by expansive soils (as defined per Section 1803.5.3 of the 2010 CBC), shall be in compliance with Section 1808.6 of the 2010 CBC (CBSC, 2010), and the findings of this report. Tom and Laura Bier •. S W.O. 6554-A-SC 2712 La Costa Avenue, Carlsbad CreoSoilsq Inc. June 4, 2013 File:e:\wp9\6500\6554a.abv S S Page 4 Due to concerns regarding water vapor transmission through thefloor slabs, consideration should be given to constructing slabs with a minimum thickness of 5 inches (plans currently indicate a 4 inch thick slab), and using concrete with a minimum water/cement ratio of 0.5, or less. A minimum slab underlayment consisting of a 10 mill vapor retarder, placed near the vertical midpoint of a minimum 4 inch thick layer of clean sand (SE > 30), should also be utilized. The vapor retarder should comply with the ASTM E 1745- Class A or B criteria, and be installed in accordance with ACI 302.1 R-04, and ASTM D 1643. Planting Water has been shown to weaken the inherent strength of all earth materials. Only the amount of irrigation necessary to sustain plant life should be provided Over-watering should be avoided as it can adversely affect site improvements, and cause perched groundwater conditions. Plants selected for landscaping should be light weight, deep rooted. types that require little water and are capable of surviving the prevailing climate. Utilizing plants other than those recommended, above will increase the potential for perched water, staining, mold, etc., to develop. A rodent control program to prevent burrowing should be implemented These, recommendations regarding plant type, irrigation practices, and rodent control should be provided to all interested/affected parties. Drainage Adequate lot surface drainage is a very important factor in reducing the likelihood of adverse performance of foundations and hardscape. Surface drainage should be sufficient to prevent ponding of water anywhere on the property, and especially near structures. Lot surface drainage should be carefully taken into consideration during landscaping. Therefore, care should be taken that future landscaping or construction activities do not create adverse drainage conditions. Positive site drainage within the property should be provided and maintained at all times. Water should be directed away from foundations and not allowed to pond and/or seep into the-ground. In general, the area within 5 feet around a structure should slope away from thestruOture. We recommend that unpaved lawn and landscape areas have a minimum gradient of 1 percent sloping away from structures, and whenever possible, should be above adjacent paved areas. Consideration should be given to avoiding construction of planters adjacent.to structures. Site drainage should be directed toward the street or other approved area(s). Although not a geotechnical requirement, roof gutters, downspouts,ór other appropriate means may be utilized to control roof drainage. Downspouts, or drainage devices should outlet a minimum of 5 feet from structures or into a subsurface drainage system. Areas of seepage may develop due to irrigation or heavy rainfall, and should be anticipated. Minimizing irrigation will lessen this potential If areas of seepage develop, recommendations for minimizing this effect could be provided upon request. Tom and Laura Bier . W.O. 6554-A-SC 2712 La Costa Avenue, Carlsbad . , June 4, 2013 001nc. FiIe:e:\wp9\6500\6554a.abv Page 5 Landscape Maintenance •. Only the amount of irrigation necessary to sustain plant life should be provided. Over-watering the landscape areas will adversely affect existing and proposed site improvements We would recommend that any proposed open-bottom planters adjacent to proposed structures be eliminated for a minimum distance of 10 feet. As an alternative, closed-bottom type planters could be utilized. An outlet placed in the bottom of the planter, could be installed to direct drainage away.fro.m structures or any exterior concrete flatwork. If planters are constructed adjacent to structures, the, sides and bottom of the planter should be provided with a moisture retarder to prevent penetration of irrigation water into the subgrade. Provisions shOuld be made to' drain the excess 'irrigation water from the planters without saturating the. subgrade below or adjacent to the planters. Consideration should be given to the type of vegetation chosen and their potential effect upon surface improvements (i.e., some' trees will have an effect on concrete flatwork with their extensive root systems). From a geotechnical -standpoint ' leaching is not recommended for establishing landscaping. If the* surface soils are processed for the purpose of adding amendments, they should be, reOompacted to 90 percent minimum relative compaction. Gutters and Downspouts As previously discussed in the drainage sect ion,,the installation of gutters and downspouts should be considered to collect roof water that may otherwise infiltrate the soils adjacent to the structures. If utilized, the downspouts should be draihed into PVC collector pipes or non-erosive devices that will carry the water away from the house. Downspouts and gutters are not a geotechnical requirement provided that positive drainage is incorporated into project design (as discussed previously) Subsurface and Surface Water Subsurface and surface water are generally not significantly anticipated to affect site development, provided that the recommendations contained in this report are properly incorporated into final design and construction and that prudent surface and subsurface drainage practices are incorporated* into the 'cohstruction plans. Perched groundwater conditions along zones of contrasting permeabilitiés may not be precluded from occurring in the future due to site irrigation, poor drainage conditions, or damaged utilities, and should be anticipated. Should perched groundwater conditions develop, this office could assess the affected area(s) and provide the appropriate recommendations to mitigate the observed groundwater conditions. Groundwater conditions may 'change with the introduction of irrigation, rainfall, or other factors., ' Tom and Laura Bier ' ' .' ' ' ' . ., W.O. 6554-A-SC 2712 La costa Avenue, Carlsbad o$Ojk, Inc. ' ' ' ' . June 4, 2013 File:e:\wp9\6500\6554a.abv . Page 6 Site Improvements Recommendations for exterior concrete flatwork design and construction can be, provided upon request. If in the future, any additional improvements (e.g., pools, spas, etc.) are planned for the site, recommendations concerning the geological or geotechnical aspects of design and construction of said improvements are recommended to be. provided at that time. This office should be notified in advance of any fill, placement, grading of the site, or trench backfilling after rough grading has been completed. This includes any grading, utility trench, and retaining wall backfills. ' Footing Trench. Excavation All footing excavations should be observed by a représéntative of this firm subsequent to trenching and prior to concrete form, and reinforcement placement. The purpose of the observations is to verify that the excavations are made into the recommended bearing material and to the minimum widths and depths recommended for construction. If loose or compressible materials are exposed within the footing excavation,a deeper footing or removal and recompaction of the subgrade materials would be recommended at that time. In general, deepened footings beyond the minimum depths provided herein and shown on the plans will likely be recommended, and should be anticipated. The Client may want to consider having a representative of 'GSl onsite at the start of foundation trenching to evaluate the depth to competent bearing.soils and provide recommendations for footing embedment to the contractor performing the' work. Footing trench spoil and any excess soils generated from utility trench excavations should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent, if not removed from the site. Trenching Considering the nature of the onsite soils, it should be anticipated that caving or sloughing could be a factor in subsurface excavations and trenching. .Shoring or excavating the trench walls at the angle of repose (typically 25 to 45 degrees) may be necessary and should be anticipated. All excavations should be observed by one of our representatives and minimally conform to Cal-OSHA and local safety codes.' ' Utility Trench Backfill All interior utility trench backfi!l should be brought to at least 2 percent above optimum moisture content andthen compacted to obtain a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent of the laboratory. standard. As an alternative for shallow (12-inch to 18-inch) under-slab'trenches, sand having a sand equivalent value of 30, or .greater, may be utilized 'and jetted or flooded into place. Observation, probing, and testing should be provided to verify, the desired results. Tom and Laura Bier W.0. 6554 A sc 2712 La Costa Avenue, Carlsbad oSoiJs Inc. ' ' ' ,June 4, 2013 Fi1e:e:\wp9\6500\6554a.abv '• ' . . ' Page 7 Exterior trenches adjacent to, and within,, areas extending .below a. 1:1 plane projected from the outside bottoms edge qf the footing, and all trenches beneath hardscape features and in slopes, should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the laboratory standard. Sand backfill, Unless excavated from the trench, should not be used in these backfill 'areas.: 'Compaction'.testing'.and observations, along with probing, should be accomplishedto verify the desired results. " All trench excavations should conform to Cal-O.SHA.ànd'locàl.sàfety codes. Utilities crossing grade beams, perimeter beams, or footings: should either pass below the footing or grade beam utilizing 'a hardened collar Or foam spacer, or pass through the footing or grade beam in accordance with the. recommendations of the structural engineer. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDI NG' GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATION AND TESTING We recommend that observation and/Or testihg be performed by''Gl at each, of the following construction stages: During grading/recertification. During significant excavation (i.e., higher than '4 feOt).' .' During placement of subdrai'ns or other sübdraiñage devices, prior to placing fill and/or backfill. '. ;' •' ' ' ' After excavation of building footings, retaining .wall'footings,. and free standing walls footings, prior to the placement.of reinforcing steel or concrete. ' Prior to pouring any, slabs or flatWork,: after presoaking/présaturation of building pads and other flatwork subgradé,:before the placement of concrete, reinforcing steel, capillary break. (i.e., sand, . pea-gravel, 'etc.), or vapor retarders (i.e., visqueen, etc) During retaining wall subdrain installation, prior to'bäckfill placement.. During placement of backfill for area drain, interior plumbing, utility lihe trenches, and retaining wall backfill During slope construction/repair. •I ' . ' '. S Tom and Laura Bier ' . :. .' . 's •. . s. •. :.. . ....W.O. .6554-A-SC 2712 La Costa'Avenue, Carlsbad oSojis, 5 5 5 ' ' June 4, 2013 FiIe:e:\wp9\6500\6554a.abv S , '. . . . . 5. . Page 8 When any unusual soil conditions are encountered during any construction operations, subsequent to the issuance of this report. When any improvements, such asflatWork, spas, pools, walls, etc., are constructed. A report of geotechnical observation and testing should be provided at the conclusion of each of the above stages, in order to provide concise and clear documentation of site work, and/or to comply with code requirements. OTHER DESIGN PROFESSIONALS/CONSULTANTS The design civil engineer, structural engineer, architect, landscape architect, wall designer, etc., should review the recommendations provided herein, incorporate those recommendations into all their respective plans, and by explicit reference, make this report part of their project plans. This report presents minimum design criteria for the design of slabs, foundations and other elements possibly applicable to the project. These criteria should not be considered as substitutes for actual designs by the structural engineer/designer. The structural engineer/designer should analyze actual soil-structure interaction and consider, as needed, bearing, expansive soil influence, and strength, stiffness and deflections in the various slab, foundation, and other elements in order to develop appropriate, design-specific details. As conditionsdictate, it is possible that other influences will also have to be considered. The structural engineer/designer should consider all applicable codes and authoritative sources where needed. If analyses by the structural engineer/designer result in less critical details than are provided herein as minimums, the minimums presented herein should be adopted. It is considered likely that some, more restrictive details will be required;. If the structural engineer/designer has any questions or requires further assistance, they should not hesitate to call or otherwise transmit their requests to GSI. In order to mitigate potential distress, the foundation and/or improvement's designer should confirm to GSI and the governing agency, in writing, that the proposed foundations and/or improvements can tolerate the amount of differential settlement and/or expansion characteristics and design criteria specified herein. PLAN REVIEW A preliminary review of the available plans (LE, 2013) was provided herein. Based on our review, the plans, notes, and details reviewed (LE, 2013) the following comments are provided. "Soil parameters (assumed)" indicated in the "design parameters" (general notes) shown on Sheet Si of LE.(2013)'indicate a bearing value of 1,500 psf. Based on the current study, this value may be revised to 2000 psf. Other soil parameters are presented in a previous section .of this report. Tom and Laura Bier W.O. 6554-A-SC 2712 La Costa Avenue, Carlsbad GeoSojis Inc..June 4, 2013 Fi1e:e:\wp9\6500\6554a.abv Page 9 Seismic design data indicated in the "Design Criteria" box shown on Sheet Si of LE (2013) indicate S = 1.18, SDS = 0.8091 S1 0.444 g, and S01 = 0.461g. A review of this evaluation indicates that these parameters should be revised to S = 1143, Sos = 0.795, S = 0.430 g, and SDl 0.450g. Concrete Note No. 1, shown on! Sheet Si indicates that floor slab concrete is to be 2,500 psi. In order to mitigate water vapor transmission through the slab, concrete used should have a water/cement ratio of. 0.5, or less. Foundation Note No. 4, shown on Sheet S? of LE (2013) indicates that floor slabs should be a minimum 4 inches in thickness'In order to mitigate the potential for water vapor migration through the slab, floor slabs should have a minimum a minimum thickness of 5' inches: Foundation Note Nos 4 and 5:shown'onSheet'52.of LE (2013) indicates that a 10-mil vapor barrier should, be used. The! 1&-mil vapor "retarder" should comply with the ASTM E 1745 - Class A.or B criteria, and be installed in accordance with ACl 302.1 R-04, and ASTM D 1643 Due to the presence of compressible surficial soil in the addition area, foundation depths shown on the plans are considered minimums. Mitigation of compressible surficial soils should be considered forthe adequate support of planned floor slabs. Based on observations made in.-preparation of Reference No. 1,' consideration should be given to processing and recompacting soils within 12 inches of existing grades. Soils should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent, at, or above the soils optimUm moisture content per ASTM D1557. Depth of embedment to the lowest adjacent grade does not include the landscape zone (top ±6 inches), topsoil/colluvium, slab underlayment (i.e., sand, slab thickness, etc.). . Final project plans should be reviewed by this office prior to construction, so that construction is in accordance with the conclusions and recommendations of this report Based on our review, supplemental recommendations and/or further geotechnical studies may be warranted. This review has been prepared for the purpose of evaluating the plans only, and does not represent an evaluation of the overall stability or suitability of the site for its intended, use, nor contain recommendations for earthwork or foundation construction'. Tom and Laura Bier ' ..' . ' " ' ' W.O. 6554-A-SC 2712 La Costa Avenue, Carlsbad o$ojk, in. '' ' . . . , .June 4 2013 File:e:\wp9\6500\6554a.abv ' ' . ' . . ' . Page 10 LIMITATIONS. The materials encountered on the project site and Utilized for our analysis are believed representative of the area, however, soil and bedrock materials vary in character between excavations and natural outcrops or conditions exposed during mass grading Site conditions may vary due to seasonal. changes or other factors. Inasmuch as our study is based upon our review, engineering analyses nd laboratory data, the conclusions and recommendations presented herein are profesioral opinions These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice and no warranty is express or implied Standards of practice are subject to change with time This report has been prepared for the purpose of providing soil design parameters derived from testing of a soil sample received at our laboratory, and does not represent an evaluation of the overall stability, suitability, or performance of the property for the proposed development GSI assumes no responsibility or liability for work or testing performed by others, or their inaction, or work performed when GS is not requested to be onsite, to evaluate if our recommendations have been properly implemented Use of this report constitutes an agreement and consent by the user to all the limitations outlined above, notwithstanding any other agreements that may be in place In addition, this report may be subject to review by the controlling authorities Thus, this report brings to completion our scope Of services for this. portion of the project: The opportunity to be of service is greatly. appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact any of the undersigned. Respectfully submi GeoSoills, Inc. CE' 4785 Cortified ngineering Exp.hbda ciologist Robert G aZoFG\*: David W.Skt O Engineering Geologis 34 Civil Engineer, ACE 47 RGC/DWS/JPF/jh Attachment: Appendix -References Distribution: (2) Addressee Tom and Laura BIr . . . . . . W.O. 6554-A-SC 2.712 La Costa Avenue, Carlsbad Coe0 O O- SflCa . June 4,2013 . File:e:\wp9\6500\6554a.abv . Page 11 APPENDIX REFERENCES'.. Building News, 1995, CAL-OSHA, State of California, Construction Safety Orders, Title 8, Chapter 4, Subchapter 4, amended October 1 California Building Standards Commission,:201 0, California Büilding.Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2, Based on the 2009 International Building Code, 2010 California Historical Building Code, Title 24, Part 8, 2010 California Existing Building Code, Title 24, Part 10 Cao, T., Bryant, W.A., Rowshandel, B,.Branum, D, and willis, C.J.,2003, The revised 2002 California probalistic Seismic 'hazard ' maps, •dated June, http://www.conversation.ca.goV/cqs/rqhrri/`psha/fault parameters/pdf/documents /2002-ca-hazard maps. bd •' " International Conference of Building Off icials, 1998, Mapsof known active fault near-source zones in California and adjacent portions of Nevada Kennedy, M.P, and Tan, S.S, 2005, Geologic map' of the Oceanside 30! x 60' quadrangle, California, United States Geological Survey, 1100,000-scale Lovelace Engineering, 2013, Structural plans for Bier house, 2712 La Costa Avenue, Carlsbad, Ca 92009, Job No J13025, dated April 22 Petersen, M. and others, 2008, Documentation for the 2008 update' of the national seismic hazard maps, USGS OFR 08-118. http://pubs.usqs.gov/of/2008/1 128/. Sowers and Sowers, 1979, Unified soil'classifi'cation system (After U. S. Waterways Experiment Station and ASTM 02487667) in Introductory soil mechanics, New York. Silva Studios, 2013, Architectural site plan for: Bier house, Job No. 1202, dated April 21. United States Geological Survey, 2012, 2008 Earthquake Hazards' Program, 2008 interactive deaggregations (Beta), 'Earthquake Hazards Program; hftp.://egint.cr.usgs.gov/deaggint/2008/ 2011, Seismic hazard curves and Uniform hazard response spectra, NEHRP Option, Version 5.1.0, dated February 10 2007 Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities, 2008, The uniform California earthquake rupture forecast, version 2 (UCERF 2), U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1437, and California Geological Survey Special Report 203, http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1437/. GeoSoils, Inc. 4 ^AL 1141~1> CITY OF CARLSD/-%D13 PLUMBING, Development Services ELECTRICAL, Building Division MECHANICAL 1635 Faraday Avenue WORKSHEET 760-602-2719 B-18 Project Address Permit No.:13 1033? Information provided below refers to woth being done on the above mentioned permit. only. This form must be comaleted and returned tothe Buildina Division before the permit can be issued. Building Dept. Fax: (760) 602-8558 Number of new or relocated fixtures,.traps or floor drains New building sewer line? .............................................................. ........... .................. . Yes No Number of new roof drains? .................. . ................... .......................... ............................................... 7 InstaIl€)ater line? ................................ ..iA1J1' ................... ...... Number of new water heaters? ........... .. ....................................................................... . ......... .. ............ I Number of new, relocated or replaced gas outlets? ................ ........................................................ 4 Number of new hose bibs? Residential Permits: New/expanded service: Number of newamps: Minor Remodel only: Yes No Commercial/Industrial: Tenant Improvement: Number of existing amps involved in this project: - Number of new amps involved in this project: - New Construction: Amps per Panel: Single Phase Number of new amperes________________ Three Phase ................................................................ Number of new amperes________________ Three Phase 480 ........................................... ............. Number of new amperes________________ Number of new furnaces A/C or heat pumps? New or relocated duct work? ........................................................................... Yes X No Number of new fireplaces? .................................................................................................................... Numberof new exhaust fans? ....................................... ............... ............................... .......................... Relocate/install vent? ................................................................ Numberof new exhaust hoods? ................. ................... ............................................ ........................... Number of new boilers or compressors? ........I.. ....................................... Number of HP c$4 B-18 Page 1 of 1 . Rev. 03/09 m CITY OF CARLSD/-%D1) CERTIFICATION OF SCHOOL FEES, PAID B-34 Development Services Building Department 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2719 www.carlsbadca.gov This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name BIER ADDITION Project ID: CTIMS: Building Permit Plan Check Number CB131 033 Project Address: 2712 LA COSTA AV A.P.N 216-280-15-00 Project Applicant (Owner Name): TOM & LAURA BIER Project Description: RESIDENTIAL ADDITION Building Type SFD Residential: NEW DWELLING UNIT(S) Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling/s Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SDU Residential Additions: 1158 Net Square Feet New Area /q145• 44 Commercial/Industrial: Net Square Feet New Area City Certification of Applicant Information: c1izeaLtd*QfM1f Date 6/17/2013 El Carlsbad Unified School District D Vista Unified School District []San Marcos Unified School District 6225 El Camino Real 1234 Arcadia Drive 255 Pico Ave Ste. 100 Carlsbad CA 92009 (760-331-5000) Vista CA 92083 (760-726-2170) San Marcos, CA 92069(760-290-2649) Contact: Nancy Dolce (By Appt. Only) El Encinitas Union School District - San Diegulto Union High School District-By Appointment Only 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd 684 Requeza Dr. Encinitas, CA 92024 Encinitas, CA 92024 (760-944-4300 x1166) (760-753-6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration (DOwner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the Information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an Increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner Is the owner/developer of the above described project(sy, or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner. Signature: _1 .__-..,. Date: B-34 Page 1 of 2 Rev. 03/09 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THESCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. . 0 SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL John Addleman TITLE Director of Planning & Financial Mgcmcnt NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT MN EQUO UMON HIGH SCHOOL DCT DATE 113 •0 PHONE. NUMBER 0(0) B-34 Page 2 of 2 Rev. 03/09 4et!'h> CITY OF CARLSBAD CERTIFICATION OF SCHOOL FEES PAID B-34 Development Services Building Department 1635 Faraday Avenue 760-602-2719 www.carlsbadca.gov This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name BIER ADDITION Project ID: CT/MS: Building Permit Plan Check Number: CB131 033 Project Address: 2712 LA COSTA AV Project Applicant (Owner Name): TOM & LAURA BIER Project Description: _RESIDENTIAL ADDITION Building Type SFD Residential: NEW DWELLING UNIT(S) Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling/s. Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SDU Residential Additions: 1158 Net Square Feet New Area Commercial/Industrial: Net Square Feet New Area City Certification of Applicant Information: . Date 6/1712013 SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD 0 Carlsbad Unified School District Vista Unified School District [II San Marcos Unified. School District 6225 El Camino Real 1234 Arcadia DrIve 255 Pico Ave Ste. 100 Carlsbad CA 92009 (760-331-5000) Vista CA 92083 (760-726-2170) San Marcos, CA 92069 (760-290-2649) - Contact: Nancy Dolce (By Appt. Only) N Encinitas Union School District Li San Dieguito Union High School District-By Appointment Only 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd 684 Requeza Dr. Encinitas, CA 92024 Encinitas, CA 92024 (760-944-4300 x1166) (760-753-6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner') certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be Incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner. Signature: Date: B-34 Page 1 of 2 Rev. 03109 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE Pcck NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER B-34 Page 2 of 2 Rev..03/09 C8131033 2712 LACOSTAAV BIER: 318 SF 1ST FLR. ADDITION 932 SF 2ND FLR. ADDITION/ 294 SF POCP fl'V / 1fWV '7 Od4UW ff '/ i0f1 ci 1-7 1(3 \ 13 CJN1 AAW 1 -7113 - sw(- /5 UED (DCV Approved Pate By BUILDING PLANNING ENGINEERING FIRE E)pedite? Y N AFS Checked by. HazMat APCD Health Forms/Fees Sent Recd Due? By Encina V N Fire V N HazHeaIthAPCD y N PE&M V N 5oI frziU12 V N Sewer V N Stormwater y/ V N Special Inspection V N CFD: Y UN LandUse: Density: ImpArea: FY: Annex: Factor: PFF: Comments Date Date Date Date Building Planning Engineering - Fire Need? fl / 4, Ly/ - Done one ('O1kY7-d C r--- f,/j,-?' one fl977 7 ( one . 5jtL €tuat/ . )ne .. . :.. -bcIone.