Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2712 MADISON ST; 101; CBR2017-2633; Permit
'. . (7c i t yof Carlsbad [••. ' . :ResentIPermit.. •.,• •; ,jPrint Date: 07/19/2018 Permit No: CBR2017-2633 Job Address: 2712 Madison St, 101 ' Permit Type: ' BLDG-Residential , Work Class: Second Dwelling Unit Status: Closed - Finaled Parcel No: .2031100500 ' Lot #: Applied: 11/01/2017 Valuation: $116,952.00 .. Reference U: 0EV2017-0187 Issued: 03/12/2018 Occupancy Group: - , , Construction Type: Permit Finaled: U Dwelling Units: 1. ' , Bathrooms: Inspector: PBurn -. BedroornsT - . Orig. Plan Check U: Final - ' Plan Check U: Inspection: 7/19/2018 2:37:50PM. Project Title: FRANKLIN GUEST HOUSE, Description: FRANKLIN: 825 SF DETACHED ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ' 'Owner: COOWNER FRANKLIN MICHAEL AND SANDRA 2712 Madison St -CARLSBAD, CA 92008 - BUILDING PERMIT FEE ($2000+) - - $686.35 BUILDING PLAN CHECK FEE (BLDG) . . $537.60 ELECTRICAL BLDG RESIDENTIAL NEW/ADDITION/REMODEL . $66.00. GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION 1$170.00 MECHANICAL BLDG RESIDENTIAL NEW/ADDITION/REMODEL $92.00 PLUMBING BLDG RESIDENTIAL NEW/ADDITION/REMODEL $182.00 PUBLIC FACILITIES FEES - outside CFD - $4,093.32 5B1473 GREEN BUILDING STATE STANDARDS FEE -. ' / $5.00 STRONG MOTION-RESIDENTIAL ' - - ' $15.20 SWPPP INSPECTION FEE TIER 1- Medium BLDG ' $238.00 SWPPP PLAN REVIEW FEE TIER 1- MEDIUM . . $56.00 Total Fees: $6,141.47 Total Payments To Date: $6,141.47 Balance Due: $0.00 - Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition' of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter -. 'collectively referred to as "fees/exaction.' You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, yOu must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Managr for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their • - imposition. - . - - • , You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that yoir right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the ' statute of limitation has previously otherwise expired. - ..4 .' _.._s_. . .. - " . • 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 760-602-2700 I 760-602-8560 f I www.carlsbadca.gov . THE FOLLOWING APPROVALS REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE: [—]PLANNING JENGINEERING EIBUILDING FIRE EHEALTH EJHAZMAT!APCD_I, Building Permit Application Plan Check No.c2gQfl -a 6 Est. Value c() City of ' . . 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Ph: 760-602-2719 Fax: 760-602-8558 caiSbad ... ' . email: buildingcarlsbadCa.gov ' '' ' ." " I Plan Ck. Deposit Date ,, , SWPPP , . . . www.carlsbadca.gov JOB ADDRESS ' v... SUITE#/SPAcF(3NITç 00 - (p - c,ç - ,T/PROJECT a - LOla PHASE U A OF UNITS A BEDROOMS a BATHROOMS TENANT BUSINESS NAME 1 CONSTR.TYPE 0cc. GROUP DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Include Square Feet of Affected Area(s) -. euc&T 14C, wbIJb, EXISTING USE , ' - ' PROPOSED USE . GARAGE (SF) PATIOS (SF( DECKS (SF) FIREPLACE AIR CONDITIONING YES NO[::] YES ENO IFIRESPRINKLERS NO[— YESE NOE APPLICANT NAME r PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS . ' ' '.. - . . . L-1ii. - ADDRESS pikt,itJ CITY . STATE ZIP : .,. -C-fruhkt' CITY STATE ZIP 'Z7vz- frrISoJ 51. - PHONE , -, o(p1 FAX ' . . PHONE CktM41i7 FJkX LOOt?' itap ' - '7 EMAIL - M - per6or @ go-no(), corn EMAIL DESIGN PROFESSIONAL , L CONTRACTOR BUS. NAME ADDRESS ' , - . ' . . ADDRESS tp)( (p.1/ CITY ' ' ' - STATE ZIP -. CITY - . ' STATE ZIP PHONE, - -' '7(0 . FAX : • - PHONE FAX EMAIL '- . EMAIL STATE LIC. A STATE LIC.# CLASS CITY BUS. LIC.# (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to Construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any Structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code( or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty'of not more than five hundred dollars ($500fl. xoo° h.m Workers Compensation Declaration: thereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: II I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. - t have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My workers' compensation insurance carrier and policy - number are: Insurance Co. ' Policy No. Expiration Date This section need not be cmpIeted if the permit is for one hundred dollars ($100) or less, Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of Califoriria, WARNING: Failure to secure workers compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars (&100,000), In ,addition to the cost of compensatioI, damages as provided for In Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. . . CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE [:]AGENT DATE thereby affirm that! am exempt from Contractor's License Law for the following reason: I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for K ale, If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). as If, of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of roperly who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). I am exempt under Section ' Business and Professions Code for this reason: I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. EYes ENo I (have! have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name address I phone I contractors' license number): 4.1 plan Is provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name! address! phone !contractors' license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired the following persons to p vide the work indicated (include name! address! phone! type of work): ' PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATUR ' []AGENT DATE lo .-2f-J 7 S. GOODGMM am OJOØ1 DW alwoo(300CDOOV00a D!JOlaIDOZ1g clalwavo 0DQS Is the applicant or future building occupant required tosubmit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the• Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? ' Yes - No Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district Or air quality management district? Yes No - is the facility In be constructed within 1000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Yes - No IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. WC?QCDCJ C - hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work this permit is issued (Sec. 3097 (I) Civil Code). Lenders Na'rne - - -- - Lender's Address - accii Gooa0oG- I certify that i have read the application andstate that the above Information isconectand thatthe information on the plans is accurate. I agree tocompfywith all Cityordinancesand State laws refattngto building construction. I hreby authorize representativeof the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA An OSHApermti is required for excavatiOns over 50' deep and deOroIitn or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official unde provisions of this Cqdqhall expire by limitation and become null and void tithe building orwork authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such penirilor if the bUilding orwo au orized by such pe it is uspendedor abandoned at any time after the work is commenced fora period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). .. APPLICANT'SStGNATURE,. - - . DATE - CO# (Office Use Only) 0 ,, CONTACT NAME '. , . - S. . . . - . •• . OCCUPANT NAME - ADDRESS . ' - - - . BUILDING ADDRESS I - . .,•, •. 0 , . - CITY:'-' ' . STATE - ZIP CITY STATE ZIP - 'T- . . •; Carlsbad CA PHONE - '-. . '''' 7,FAX :- -. EMAIL, -- ...- - ,'. - - OCCUPANT'S BUS. LtC. No. * . - • '3 - ' - v DELIVERY OPTIONS .. .. 0 '• •• 0 PICK UP: ,CONTACT (Listed above)' OCCUPANT (Listed above) . - CONTRACTOR (On Pg. 1), ..., . Sc - - - - ASSOCIATED CB# • MAIL TO:. (Listed above) ,CONTACT .. . OCCUPANT (Listed above) CONTRACTOR (On P.'1.) • 0 '. ' NO CHANGE IN USE/ NO CONSTRUCTION ir -.MAIL/ FAX TOOTHER:' . ....... , .r '. . CHANGE OF USE / NO CONSTRUCTION e,. . - ~APPLICAN,T'S,SIGNATURE` DATE - - 0 •. • •0 • : .'.- ,.. , •0 STOP: THIS SECTION NOT REQUIRED FOR BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE.. Complete the following ONLY if a Certificate of Occupancy will be requested at final inspection CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (Commercial Projects Onlyl Fax (760)602-8560, Email buiIdinQCarIsbadCa.qov or Mail the completed form to City of Carl sbad, Building Division 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. - Permit Type BLDG Residential Application Date 11/01/2017 Owner COOWNER FRANKLIN MICHAEL AND SANDRA Work Class Second Dwelling Unit Issue Date 03/12/2018 Subdivision SEASIDE LANDS Status Closed Finaled Expiration Date 12/04/2018 Address 2712 Madison St 101 Carlsbad, CA92008-1727 IVR Number 7387 Scheduled Actual Inspection Type ' Inspection No ;tart Inspection Status Date bate Primary Inspector Reinspection Complete - Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed / BLDG Building Deficiency Not ready No BLDG-14 No - Frame-Steel-Bolting-Welding - • - - (Decks) k * . BLDG24 Rough-Topout No 2-- - BLDG-34 Rough Electrical • No BLDG-44 .- No - r Rough-Ducts-Dampers 4 - 05/31/2018 05/31/2018 BLDG 17 Interior 059619-2018 Cancelled Paul Burnette Reunspection - Complete . c Lath/Drywall 'Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG Building Deficiency No BLDG-84 Rough 059i22-2018 Passed Paul Burnette Complete ; - Combâ(14,2434,44). i --- I - Checklist ltm COMMENTS Passed - BLDG-Buildirig Deficiency Not ready Yes .., BLDG 14 Yes Frame-Steel-Bolting-Welding (Decks) BLDG 24 Rough Topout Yes - BLDG 34 Rough Electrical Yes BLDG44 Yes - Rough-Ducts-Dampers -- . 06/04/2018 06/04/2018 BLDG-16 Insulation 059870-2018 - Passed Paul Burnette Complete Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes - '4 -? 4 - 06/07/2018 06/07/2018 ' BLDG'-17 Interior p060344-2018 Passed Paul Burnette Complete. Lath/Drywall " 4, Checklist Item - COMMENTS Passed BLDG Building Deficiency Yes - 4 '• . ,,. *4 , 4 * 07/17/2018 07/17/2018 BLDG Final 064175 2018 Failed Paul Burnette Reunspectuon Complete Inspection - / 4- - - Checklist Item -. COMMENTS Passed c - - BLDG Building Deficiency No BLDG-Plumbing final - - No - - - - - BLDG-Mectanical Final - No . BLDG-Structural Final - No BLDG Electrical Final No 44 .- 07/19/2018 07/19/2018 BLDG-Final. - - -064456-2018 -. Passed Paul Burnette Comlet Inspection -- -4 July 19, 2018 Page 3of4 - , - . ' - - -C - •' p. - - -- .. 4. S : Prmit Type: BLDG-Residential . Application Date: 11/01/2017 Owner: COOWNER FRANKLIN MICHAEL * .. AND SANDRA '_ ,. , Work Class: Secorid Dwelling Unit ' Issue Date: 03/12/2018 Subdivision: SEASIDE LANDS r Status: Closed - Finaled ,.' • Expiration Date: 12/04/2018 Address: 2712 Madison St, 101 Carlsbad, CA 92008-1727 * a IVR Number: 7387 Scheduled. Actual Date Start Date Inspection Type' Inspection No. Inspection Status Primary Inspector Reinspection Complete ( . Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes - -, BLDG-Plumbing Final * Yes BLDG-Mechanical Final Yes BLDG-Structural Final Yes - BLDG-Electrical Final Yes - • -. - . .:;. S • - S - - 5 .. ,- S . , •_19 .4 S. . p... - 1 -.5 4. _. • . 44 - P 5 4 . - 4• i-±-4 - .-. ' *••4-_ •-•.., ,t. 5_ . - •4., . - I _4_5 .. .4 p • ,.. • .5, S .. • . --.' .51 . S Ir S - - ç• .4 .4 - 4 5. I . , • • 4.. . ..- . S ;i. - •• S S -. .4 * 4- -•*.. S - .4 . - : 4--4-: - :. 5.'S * July 19,2018 -- - * ' .' \ Page 4of4 .5 * / P • 1. •_•,_ - -p - - - j 'S 4 - S Permit Type BLDG Residential '- 'Application Date 11/01/2017 Owner COOWNER FRANKLIN MICHAEL • •'" • AND SANDRA - -_ Work Class: Second Dwelling Unit * Issue Date: 03/12/2018 Subdivision: SEASIDE LANDS Status Closed Finaled '- ' Expiration Date 12/04/2018 Address 2712 Madison St 101 • Carlsbad, CA 92008-1727 -• IVR Number: 7387 Scheduled Actual l Inspection Type Inspection No. Inspection Status Primary Inspector Reinspection Complete Date. Start Date 4, 4 . Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed - BLDG-Building Deficiency No i ,. •,- -•-• •;•. -. 'BLDG-24 059030-2018 Cancelled Paul Burnette - Reinspection Complete Rough/Topout 'Checklist Item , COMMENTS Passed ." - BLDG-Building Deficiency ' , No ' -- I' •• BLDG 31 ,, 069029-2018 Cancelled Paul Burnette Reinspection Complete UndergroundlCondu / it Wiring 444 t Checklist Item! •, COMMENTS Passed BLDG Building Deficiency No .i•*I• 4 - i",- .• 4 BLDG-34 Rough _059031-201i Cancelled Paul Burnette Reinspection Complete Electrical"' - 'Checklist Item. . COMMENTS Passed . BLDG-Building Deficiency No - - .•. .- -S 05/2512018 05/2512018 BLDG-13 Shear 059212-2018 , Passed Michael Collins Complete Panels/HD (ok to : • . - wrap) Checklist Item -' - COMMENTS . Passed BLDG Building Deficiency Yes BLDG-IS, 059209.2018 4 , Passed Michael Collins Complete - - Roof/ReRoof (Patio) 5, - -. Checklist Item -- COMMENTS Passed -* •• - ', ; 4 BLDG-Building Deficiency See card for pick up Yes - -BLDG.24' 059211.2018 Failed Michael Collins Reinspection Complete * Rough/Topout Checklist Item - • COMMENTS- Passed - - - BLDG-Building Deficiency Not ready No ,' '',- - . - * •I- • 'I -' -. - - •• - 6LDG-31 - - - 059208-2018 Failed Michael Collins Reinspection - Complete • - UndergrundlCondu : , .• -, - it - Wiring' 5, • . • • -5 --. -•*-•• :- - • - ' • Checklist Item • • COMMENTS Passed- BLDG-Building Deficiency Not ready No -: - -: - - BLDG-84 Rough - '059210.2018 Failed Michael Collins Reinspection Complete - Combo(14,24,34,44) • * ' -: I . l, r July 19, 2018 • ':' ••, ' Page 2 of 4 -• -• .• S '•. - ,• - 5 - • • 4 • - •• • 8 ••. - -• Permit Type: BLDG-Residential Application Date: 11/01/2017 Owner: COOWNER FRANKLIN MICHAEL AND SANDRA : Work Class: SecondDweIlingUnit Issue Date: 03/12/2018 Subdivision: SEASIDE LANDS Status: - Closed - Finaled Expiration Date: 12/04/2018 Address: 2712 Madison St, 101 Carlsbad, CA 92008-1727 - . IVR Number: 7387 Scheduled Actual Inspection Type Inspection No. Inspection Status Primary Inspector Reinspection Complete Date Start Date 06/07/2018 BLDG-18 Exterior 060662.2018 Passed Paul Burnette Complete Lath/Drywall Checklist Item • COMMENTS Passed • , BLDG-Building Deficiency No 04/0612018 04/06/2018 6LDG-21 - 054169-2018 Passed Paul Burnette Complete Underground/Underf , • -- Ioor Plumbing Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed - - • BLDG-Building Deficiency Yes / 04/12/2018 04/12/2018 BLDG-Il. k 054761.2018 Failed Paul Burnette Reinspection Complete - - Foundation/Ftg/Pier -. s(Rebar) - - Checklist Item ' COMMENTS Passed - , BLDG-Building Deficiency , No 04/13/2018 \ 04/13/2018 - BLDG-11 054990-2018 Passed Michael Collins Complete • Foundatión/Ftg/Pier ' - s (Rebar) - " Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed • BLDG-Building Deficiency See card for notes including form cert Yes 05/01/2018 05/01/2018 BLDG-15 ' , 056534.2018 Failed Paul Burnette Reinspection Complete Roof/ReRoof (Patio) - Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed - • - BLDG-Building Deficiency No - 05/02/2018 • 05/02/2018 BLDG-15 -"" - 056749-2018 Cancelled Paul Burnette Reinspection Complete Roof/ReRoof (Patio) - - , Checklist Item - COMMENTS Passed BLDG-Building Defiiency No - 05/24/2018 05/24/2018 BLDG-13 Shear - 059026.2018 Cancelled Paul Burnette Reinspection Complete - Panels/HD (ok to - - - wrap) - - ' Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed • - BLDG-Building Deficiency No • BLDG-I4 059027-2018 • Cancelled Paul Burnette Reinspection Complete ,Frame/Steel/Bolting/ - - - - Welding (Decks) • - "Checklist Item COMMENTS Passed - BLDG-Building Deficiency ,,-' • - No ,-- : - - BLDG-15 ' 059028-2018 - Cancelled Paul Burnette Reinspection Complete - - Roof/ReRoof (Patio) . - July 19 2018 Page lof4 I - EsGil - A SAFEbuiltCornpany DATE: 03/05/2018 13 APPLICANT EI JURIS. JURlSDlCTlON:CC1bi.( PLAN CHECK #.: CBR2017-2633 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS 2712 Madison St ,PROJECT NAME Franklin Guest House 1111 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes The'planstránsmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes" 'I.wheh minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck LII The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at EsGil until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to EsGil staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed EsGil staff did advise ,9...alicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted: Telephone #: Datecontacted: ,"> (by: ) Email: Mail TelephOne Fax In Person REMARKS Please add red-clouded note to sheet S-i of any additional copies at the city By:," Ryan Murphy Enclosures: EsGil • : , 02/27/2018 - - 9320 Chesapeake Drive Suite 208 • San Diego California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 .........4 . 4 EsGil - - A SAFEbuiLtCompany DATE: 12/11/2017 IJ PPLICANT —JURIS. JURISDICTION: Carlsbad .1. .PLAN CHECK #.: CBR2017-2633 SET:!! .PIOJEdT ADDRESS: 2712 Madison St. - PROJECTNAME: Franklin Guest House L-' •- - FT The 'plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply - with the jurisdiction's codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ::codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. '--ElI-: The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list' and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at EsGil until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. .: The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant ---contact person. ..T 'he applicant's áopy of the check list has been sent to: -t Michael Franklin .1 _ Eli EsGil staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed ; -'• -EsGil-'staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. PersOn contacted: Michael Franklin Telephone #: (760)586-4061 Date contacted: /( 'L._ (by:Y'C_)- Email: mdfpersonal(äyahoo.com /IlaiI ,/Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS By: Ryan Murphy • Enclosures: : .. EsGil * - 12/04/2017 '1= , • ., -• 9.320 Chesapeake Drive Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 - -: • • • •• •• .•• Carlsbad CBR2017-2633 12/11/2017 NOTE: The items listed below are from the previous correction list. These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The numbers of the items are from the previous check list and may not necessarily be in sequence The - ' notes in bold font are 'current. Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit FOUR new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (THREE sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of 'Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602- 2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring TWO corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil, 9320 Chesapeake 'Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of - plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil is complete. - . PLANS ' 1.. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their -' ' • ' -preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). Current set is missing '- designer signatures and structural sheet Si needs to be signed and sealed by ' EOR. Current set signed, will be reverified. . FOUNDATION ii Provide a copy of the project soil report The report shall include foundation - • design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with Section R401.4. Response received. Per City of Carlsbad, to utilize this exception the ADU must be < 500 sq. ft. The Correction still applies. ' 12., If the soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting - a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that ' •, , - a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and - . - - - - - c) - The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and -• - •, bearing capacity conform to the soils report." ' - :' lf'applicable, per soils engineer recommendation. - Carlsbad CBR2017-2633 12/11/2017 13. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly - incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report). * . ELECTRICAL 24 All new residential units shall include provisions specifically designed to allow the later installation of any system which utilizes solar energy as an alternative energy source No building permit shall be issued unless the piping or conduit and roof penetration details required pursuant to this section are indicated in the building plans. Response received. 200A panel meets the minimum service - size, however, the "solar equipment zone" is applicable to the roof. Please call out an area of the roof that will be utilized in the future for solar equipment which is free of plumbing vents and will not block athc ventilation. Please see CBC Section 3111 for additional requirements. I • MISCELLANEOUS S • - To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each - ••• •correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, -: • calculation page, etc. - Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? ••-- .• ' • - Please indicate: - Yes -13 No U -- . : The jurisdiction has contracted with EsGil, located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the . plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ryan Murphy at EsGil Thank you 'i -, .5• 5, . S S - • S -• -'3 .5* - .•-'-. S S - • . '\,) - . :. .I -. EsGil - , - - A SAFEbu,LtCornpany DATE: 11/14/2017 g4PPLICANT eQ JURIS. JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK #.: CBR2017-2633 SET: I 4 PROJECT ADDRESS 2712 Madison St PROJECT NAME: Franklin Guest House The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's , codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building _department staff. -• The plans'trãnsmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list - and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at EsGil until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. l•5 F The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person The pplicaht's copy of the check list has been sent to: •• •; Michael Franklin LI EsGil staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed EsGil staff dud advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Michael Franklin Telephone # (760)586-4061 4 ail te concted. (4_.. (by\C.. Email: mdfpersonal(äyahoo.com elephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Ryan Murphy -. Enclosures: • F EsGil 11/02/2017 F * •1 • • - - '.4 . - • •, - 9320 Chesapeake Drive Suite 208 • San Diego California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 F, •. -. -• •- 4 • I . •' - . - .. . - .-' Carlsbad CBR2017-2633 11/14/2017 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST ' SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK #.: CBR2017-2633 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2712 Madison St. FLOOR AREA: Detached Guest House: 825 sq. ft. STORIES: 1 HEIGHT: 13-9' REMARKS:, DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 11/01/2017 ESGIL CORPORATION: 11/02/2017 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER: Ryan Murphy COMPLETED: 11/14/2017 'I. FOREWORD (PLEASE READ) ' This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the California version of' the International Residential Code, International Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code; Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on :regulations enforced by the Building Department' You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinanôe by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present -California law mandates that construction comply with the 2016 edition of the California Code of Regulations (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 2015 IRC, 2015 IBC, 2015 UPC, 2015 UMC and 2014 NEC. * The above regulations apply, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. Thd following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 105.4 of the 2015 International Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of :an state, county or city law. . .•, .•• .-- ,.• . To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans ,' . * -.• * I- : •• Carlsbad CBR20172633 11/14/2017 Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit FOUR new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (THREE sets of plans for. residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of ' • Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602- 2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. - B'ring TWO corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil, 9320 Chesapeake - - Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of - plansand calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for -routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. - NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil only will not be reviewed by the City * Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil is complete -- -- . PLANS 1. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation (California Business and Professions Code) Current set is missing ,designer signatures and structural sheet Si needs to be signed and sealed by EOR ' -2. Plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction shall have the structural portions signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or . architect responsible for their preparation, along with structural calculations. • (California Business and Professions Code) Please have EOR sign and seal -. . • sheet Si. - .. - • 3 ' On sheet A-i, under parcel information, please revise construction type to V-A (projections must be fire rated <5' from property line) 4 Glazing in the following locations should be shown on the plans as safety glazing -, - material in accordance with Section R308.4: •. a) Glazing indoors. - - b) ' Glazing adjacent to a door where the nearest vertical edge of the glazing is • - within a 24" arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60" above the Walking surface Please indicate the 5'x5' windows on western exterior wall -. . • - - of office as safety glazing. .-: • - c) - Glazing in the walls/doors facing or containing bathtubs, showers, hot tubs, -' spas, whirlpools, saunas, steam rooms and indoor/outdoor swimming pools - where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60" above the - standing surface Exception Glazing that is more than 60", measured .. -.. - - -. - horizontally, from the water's edge of a bathtub, hot tub, spa, whirlpool or swimming pool Please indicate window in wall that contains proposed shower as safety glazing See the figure below. .• ',-., ,.. .. -. Carlsbad CBR2017-2633 . ' 11/14/2017 - Bathtub, whirlpool tub or hot tub — SG SG SG SG SG '...• 6O in. = - <60 in. k <60111.,.. . I fl '1 <60 in. Floor - Plan view Section view r SG = Safety glazing required Measurements are to exposed glazing .4 ;- . FIRE PROTECTION :• - 5. Please indicate on the plans whether the existing residence has a fire sprinkler I system installed. If so, then provide a note stating that any additions/alterations .• ; ;. ' •' will be provided with an automatic residential fire sprinkler system. Section R313.2.. 6 Exterior walls and projections shall comply with one of the following tables Section R302.1. Please review and address the following specific concerns: a) Projections on north and east side of proposed structure appear to be - : within 5' of property line. Use this table if the building DOES NOT have an automatic fire sprinkler system. -p . * _%I_+• - - - 4. -•• ;__. - .- Exterior Wall Element . . . Mm. Fire Rating Mm. Fire Separation - ______________________ Distance - (Fire-Resistance Rating) 1-hour, with exposure ' <5 feet Walls from both sides (Not Fire Rated) 0 hours ~ 5 feet Not Allowed N/A <2 feet . Projections (Fire-Resistance Rating) 1-houronthe • ~ 2 feet to 5 feet underside a - -- (Not Fire Rated) 0 hours ~5feet Not Allowed N/A <3 feet Wall Openings 25% maximum of wall 0 hours 3 feet • area - 4.- Unlimited ______ 0 hours 5 feet Penetrations All See Sec R302.4 <5 feet • None required 5 feet ( . 4 "''Carlsbad CBR2017-2633 11/14/2017 a May be reduced to 0 hours on the underside of the projection if fireblocking is provided from the wall's top plate to the underside of the roof sheathing ROOF 7: Show the required ventilation for attics (or enclosed rafter spaces formed where - ceilings are applied directly to the underside of roof rafters). The minimum vent k area is 1/150 of attic area (or 1/300 of attic area if at least 40% (but not more - than 50%) of the required vent is located no more than 3' below the ridge). Show , • -' on the plans the area required and area provided. Section R806.2. I a) When using a radiant barrier, California energy design affects the attic ventilation area requirement If using the Prescriptive method for energy compliance, then the attic vent area must be at the 1/150 area: If using - -• - the Performance method, either the 150 or 300 areas may be used, as documented on the energy forms Section RA4 2 1 8 Erclosed rafter spaces do not require venting if the following specific insulation 7 design is used, per Sections R806 5/EM3 9 6 If the insulation is air-permeable and it is installed directly below the roof sheathing with rigid board or sheet insulation with a minimum R-4 value installed : . above the roof sheathing. (or) . If the insulation is air-impermeable and it is in direct contact with the underside of the roof sheathing. (or) If two layers of insulation are installed below the roof sheathing: An air- impermeable layer in direct contact with the underside of the roof sheathing and .• an additional layer of air permeable insulation installed directly under the air impermeable insulation -: 9. Note on the plans: "Attic ventilation openings shall be covered with corrosion-resistant metal mesh with 1/16" minimum to 1/4" maximum openings. Section R806.1. '- - 10. 'Show location of attic access with a minimum size of 22"x30", unless the -., -maximum vertical headroom height in the attic is less than 30". Access must be provided to each separated attic area (if over 30 sq. ft.), shall be located in a hallway or other readily accessible location and 30" headroom clearance is required above the opening. SectionR807.1. ,. ' '-•:- -- - .* - • FOUNDATION 11 Provide a copy of the project soil report The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with - - Section R401.4. - 12. 'If the soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation -: excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting -• a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the ' * building official in writing that: . -- -. 'i- •.-• , ' - 1 4. -• - Carlsbad CBR2017-2633 11/14/2017 ,. ' a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and c). The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." : 13: Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, :; grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been . '. determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly . V incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report) V -; 14. Please add slab for concrete patio to foundation plan and revise shear transfer: details at exterior walls in vicinity of patio slab to match proposed conditions (slab on both sides of footing) STRUCTURAL & - I *•. 1. 15. For the lateral calculations, please provide justification for the shear reduction of 1.2 on sheet 12 and 13 of the calculations. Is this a factor of safety being removed? Unable to find provisions in the NDS/ASCE 7 for unit shear to be reduced by 1.2. In the past your response was this was a factor of safety being removed, but I don't see a factor of safety being applied here. Please clarify in the calculations where 1.2 came from. V . 16. Section cutout B oh sheet A-3 shows a steel beam between the high and low . - "• . windows at southern exterior wall in vicinity of proposed patio. Please provide - • •• design calculations for this beam, and revise sheet S-i to show the beam with - , appropriate connection details. MECHANICAL .17.. The T24 energy analysis indicates that there will be heat pump. Show on the -' plans the location, type and size (Btu's) of all heating and cooling appliances or 'systems. 18 . Detail the installation requirements necessary when installing a central heating - furnace opening into a bedroom or bathroom (per CIVIC Section 904.1): a) - Non-direct vent appliance: Listed gasketed self closing and latching door assembly with a threshold and with all combustion air supplied from the outdoors. The furnace closet shall be dedicated to the furnace only and V will have no other uses. Or . . V -V • • ,. b) - Specify that the appliances are of the direct vent style. i. Kitchens require exhaust fans with a minimum 100 cfm ducted to the exterior. V. • Detail compliance by including a complying exhaust fan or a ducted range hood V - • :. to the exterior. - V V •V V V -S t VVVV VV S V 4 • . V • • • V V V S - I ;. ' ' Carlsbad CBR20172633 11/14/2017 20. Residential bathroom exhaust fans shall be energy star rated and shall be control by a humidistat capable of an adjustment between 50 and 80% humidity. CalGreen 4.506.1. Exception: Control by a humidistat is not required if the bathroom exhaust fan is also the dwelling whole house ventilation. . ELECTRICAL 21. NoteV on the plans that receptacle outlet locations will comply with CEC Article :210.52. , 22 Include on the plans the following specifications for electrical devices installed in .' dwellings: CEC Article 210 & 406 Tamper resistant receptacles for all locations described in 210.52 (i.e., all ,,• -. . receptacles in a dwelling). b) Weather resistant type for receptacles installed in damp or wet locations : • (outside). • - c) Arc-fault protection for all outlets (not just receptacles) located in rooms described in NEC 210.12(A): Kitchens, laundry areas, family, living, bedrooms, dining, halls, etc. V d) GFCI protected outlets for locations described in NEC 210.8(A): Laundry areas, kitchen dishwashers, kitchens, garages, bathrooms, outdoors, V V within 6' of a sink, etc. - V V 23 Per CEC Article 210.11(C)3, note on the plans that bathroom circuiting shall be • V either: • -V A 20 ampere circuit dedicated to each bathroom, or At least one 20 ampere circuit supplying only bathroom receptacle outlets - - 24.,,% All new residential units shall include provisions specifically designed to allow the later installation of any system which utilizes solar energy as an alternative energy source No building permit shall be issued unless the piping or conduit and roof penetration details required pursuant to this section are indicated in the V building plans. 25 Include the following "solar ready" requirements on the plans Solar Zone (area and location/Additionally, see CRC R331 or CBC 3111) and the potential inverter V - and metering equipment locations, the future pathways available between the • • • - - - - - .. solar zone and equipment and a minimum 200 ampere electrical service size. ES 11010 V ,V 'V • •. V • V • - . PLUMBING 4 V V V -j • 1 - -- - V•• * V V -, V V •- • 4 - - Carlsbad CBR2017-2633 11/14/2017 26. Show water heater size (1st hour rating), type, and location on plans. Note: For both new dwellings and additions the Energy Standards (150.0(n)) requires a gas 1- input rating of 200,000 Btu for both tank and instantaneous gas water heaters. .• ' (Also) Provide a gas piping design for the gas system. 27. Note or provide the following design requirements for gas water heaters installed • to serve individual dwelling units: ES 150.0(n) a) Gas piping sizing based upon a minimum input of 200,000 btu/hr. - b) A condensate drain installed no higher than 2" above the base of the - . heater that also allows for gravity drainage. c) The "B" vent installed in a straight position from the room containing the -. water heater to the roof termination. (For future possible sleeving for high efficiency heater venting.) d) 'A 120volt receptacle accessible to the heater installed within 3'. -. .-28. Instantaneous water heaters shall have isolation valves on both the cold and the - . - hot water piping leaving the water heater complete with hose bibs or other fittings . * on each valve for flushing the water heater when the valves are closed. ES 110.3 29 All hot water piping sized 3/4" or larger is required to be insulated as follows 1" : pipe size or less: 1" thick insulation, larger pipe sizes require 1 1/2" thick insulation Additionally, the 1/2" hot water pipe to the kitchen sink and the cold- water pipe within 5' of the water heater are both required to be insulated ES 150 O(j)2 30.-. Prbvide a note on the plans: The control valves in showers, tub/showers, - bathtubs, and bidets must be pressure balanced or thermostatic mixing valves. CPC Sections 408, 409, 410. 31 Specify on the plans Water conserving fixtures New water closets shall use no •• -- - more than 1.28 gallons of water per flush, kitchen faucets may not exceed 1.8 - GPM, lavatories are limited to 1.2 GPM, and showerheads may not exceed 2.0 '; • . GPMofflow. CPC Sections 407, 408, 411, 412. - . RESIDENTIAL GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS ' 'The California Building Standards Commission has adopted the Green Building Standards Code and must be enforced by the local building official. The following - mandatory requirements for residential construction must be included on your plans. • CGC Section 101.3. The Standards apply to newly constructed residential buildings, ••, ;. • along with add itionslaIterations that increase the building's conditioned area, volume or size. CGC Section 301.1.1. Provide a sheet on the plans labeled "Green - - Building Code Requirements" and include the following notes as applicable. 32. Storm water drainage/retention during construction. Note on the plans: - Projects which disturb less than one acre of soil shall manage storm water * . . drainage during construction by one of the following: A. Retention basins. B. Where storm water is conveyed to a public drainage system, water shall be -•t ', •• • - * . •. - - Carlsbad CBR2017-2633 1i/14/2O17 filtered by use of a barrier system, wattle or other approved method. CGC Section 4.106.2. 33. Grading and paving. Note on the plans that site grading or drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering buildings (swales, water collection, French drains, etc.). CGC Section 4.106.3. Exception: . Additions not altering the drainage path. 34 Indoor water use Show compliance with the following table per CGC Section •4.303.1. •, ' •• -- t 1 4 .. . (• FIXTURE FLOW RATES • -- -- -. • L - FIXTURE TYPE MAXIMUM FLOW RATE Water closets 1.28 gallons/flush Urinals (wall-mounted) 0.125 gallon/flush Urinals (others) 0.5 gallon/flush Showerheads - 2 gpm @ 80 psi Lavatory faucets 1.2 gpm @ 60 psi' Kitchen faucets 1.8 gpm @ 60 psi Metering faucets 0.25 gallons per cycle - . 1 Lavatory faucets shall not have a flow rate less than 0.8 gpm at 20 psi. 35. Note on the plans that landscape irrigation water use shall have weather or - soil based controllers CGC Section 4.304.1. - 36. Recycling. Note on the plans that a minimum of 65% of construction waste is to • be recycled CGC Section 4.408.1. : -37. Recycling. Note on the plans that the contractor shall submit a Construction ' Waste Management Plan, per CGC Section 4.408.2. 38 Operation and maintenance manual Note on the plans that the builder is to - provide an operation manual (containing information for maintaining appliances, etc.) for the owner at the time of final inspection. CGC Section 4.410.1. 39. Pollutant control. Note on the plans that VOC's must comply with the . . limitations listed in Section 4.504.3 and Tables 4.504.1, 4.504.2, 4.504.3 and 4 504 5 for Adhesives Paints and Coatings, Carpet and Composition Wood Products CGC Section 4.504.2. 40 Interior moisture control Note on the plans that the moisture content of wood - . • •:-. shall not exceed 19% before it is enclosed in construction. The moisture content - - -: - needs to be certified by one of 3 methods specified. Building materials with -• - visible signs of water damage should not be used in construction The moisture 4 4 4_ • .-• ••, ,•• , - • Carlsbad CBR2017-2633 11/14/2017 content must be determined by the contractor by one of the methods listed in CGC Section 4.505.3. . 41. Indoor air quality. Note on the plans that bathroom fans shall be Energy Star rated,yented directly to the outside and controlled by a humidistat. CGC 4.506.1. 42.,' Note on the plans that prior to final inspection the licensed contractor, architect or engineer in responsible charge of the overall construction must provide to the building department official written verification that all applicable provisions from the Green Building Standards Code have been implemented as part of the construction CGC 102.3. MISCELLANEOUS - To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page etc Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans . Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: YesU No U The jurisdiction has contracted with EsGil, located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan .review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ryan Murphy at EsGil. Thank you. ., -1.•• ..'. - -. - - - t jL 9 . , ••.. --. . & ) *4 4, 4 - * * -- - ,'-' .4.__•_ - (4 - 1 • • 4. 'Car'lsbad CBR2017-2633 .'. -11/ 14/2017 (DO NOT PAY THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE) VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad - PLAN CHECK #.: CBR2017-2633 PREPARED BY Ryan Murphy DATE 11/14/2017 BUILDING ADDRESS 2712 Madison St BUILDING OCCUPANCY R-3 4, :-Jurisdiction Code .' cb By Ordinance Bldg Permit Fee by Ordinance V $768 061 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance I W I I 241 Type of Review Complete Review Structural Only L Repetitive Fee E Other - . . Repeats , Hourly ____________ Hr. @ * EsGil Fee I Comments Sheet of 1 '. .. .. ' .t . 'A •' . .• '-- If / , -. '. .,- . . I • - - U -r BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.). Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Guest House 825 city est. 139,838 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 139,838 STANDARD PROJECT ity::of • REQUIREMENT Carlsbad ' CHECKLIST E-36 Land Development Engineering 1635 Faraday Avenue (760) 602-2750 www.carlsbadca.gov A .j....',.--.. a -.. .-.- Project Information ..•-'-- ---., ..--- j Project Name:cI(Jç ffri J 'C -1 ('7 %'4cti 41 tV 5 Project ID: . . DWG No. or Building Permit No.: '•SurcéCantroI;BMPs' 4U .: ,. All development projects must implement source control BMPs,SC-1 through SC-6 where applicable and feasible. See .Chapter 4 and Appendix E.1 of the BMP Design Manual for information to implement source control BMPs shown in this checklist. .... Answer each category below pursuant to the following. Yes means the project will implement the source control BMP as described in Chapter 4 and/or Appendix E.1 of the Model BMP Design Manual. Discussion/justification is not required. 'No' means the BMP is applicable to the project but it is not feasible to implement. Discussion/justification must be provided. Please add attachments if more space is needed. 'N/A" means the BMP is not applicable at the project site because the project does not include the feature that is addressed by the BMP (e.g., the project has no outdoor materials storage areas). Discussion/justification may be provided. -- TI ti1Tsourc ónt?oif Requirement SC-1 Prevention of Illicit Discharges into the MS4 Yes 0 No 0 N/A Discussion/justification if SC-1 not implemented: / SC-2 Storm Drain Stenciling or Signage . 0 Yes No Discussion/justification if SC-2 not implemented: ov\ SC-3 Protect Outdoor Materials Storage Areas from Rainfall, Run-On, Runoff, and Wind Dispersal es o No 0 N/A Discussion/justification if SC-3 not implemented: E-36 Page 1 of 4 Revised 03/16 : ,, SoUrce:ColitróI Wind'Dispersal . S ..J Yes 0 No ON/A Discussion/justification if SC-4 not implemented: S •. S SC-5 Protect Trasl Storage Areas from Rainfall, Rdn-On, Runoff, and Wind Dispersal Yes ON 0 N/A Discussion/justification if SC-5 not implemented: , V ........IS V SC-6 Additional BMPs based on Potential Sources of Runoff Pollutants must answer, for each source listed elow and identify additional BMPs. (See Table in Appendix E.1 of BMP Manual for guidance). O On-site storm drain inlets . V 0 Yes ñ No 0 N/A O Interior floor drains and elevator shaft sump pumps V 0 Yes . PZ iJo . N/A O Interior parking garages . .. El Yes 0 N/A 0 Need for future indoor & structural pest control 0 Yes D N/A O Landscape/Outdoor Pesticide Use r 0 Yes. 1 No 0 N/A .0 Pools, spas; pdnds, decorative fountains, and other water features DYes 0 N/A []Food service Yes . 4o 0 N/A O Refuse areas . S V V 0 Yes p4o 0 N/A 0 Industrial processes . . . DYes 1.io 0 N/A O Outdoor storage of equipment or materials : . 0 Yes ,)2'No 0 N/A O Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning . ' S . 0 Yes No 0 N/A O Vehicle/Equipment Repair and Maintenance S 0 Yes No 0 N/A :0 Fuel Dispensing Areas •S V S .0 Yes ØNo .0 N/A O Loading Docks : I . 0 Yes %No .1 N/A O Fire Sprinkler Test Water S .. 0 Yes No 0 N/A [],Miscellaneous Drain or Wash Water . . . J.-,. j- (1 0 Yes' 0 N/A O Plazas, sidewalks, and parking lots S S 5 0 Yes No 0 N/A For "Yes" answers, identify the additional BMP per Appendix E.1. Provide justification for "No" answers; V V V :• : V E-36 Page 2 of 4 Revised 03/16 _ Jit Chapter 4 and Appendix E.2 thru E.6 of the BMP Design Manual for information to implement site design BMPs shown in this checklist. Answer each category below pursuant to the following.- - "Yes' means the project will implement the site design BMPs as desiribed in Chapter 4and/or Appen'dix E.2 thru E.6 of :the Model BMP Design Manual. Discussion /justification is not required. : "No" means the BMPs is applicable to the project but it is not feasible to implement. Discussion/justification must be provided: Please-add attachments if morespace is needed. "N/A' means the BMPs is not applicable at the project site because the project does not include the feature that is addressed by the BMPs (e.g., the project site has no existing natural areas to conserve). Discussion/justification may be. provided. . !C ControIRequrement .; . . -I X . Apphed?. SD-1 Maintain Natural Drainage Pathways and Hydrologic Features jl Yes I 0 No I D N/A Discussion/justification if SD-i not implemented: 0 tL SD-2 Conserve Natural Areas, Soils, and Vegetation I 0 Yes 0 No N/A Discussion/justification if SD-2 not implemented: e\Qc 11 k0t SD-3 Minimize Impervious Area I 0 Yes I 0 No I 0 N/A Discussion/justification if SD-3 not implemented: k 6 A SD-4 Minimize Soil Compaction Yes I 0 No Discussion/justification if SD-4 not implemented: OV' 113 4'Je SD-5 Impervious Area Dispersion IJ6 Yes 01 0 No I 0 N/A Discussion/justification if SD-5 not implemented: t-c- 4 - tsof( (dcq\ 1 14 Page 3 of 4 Revised 03/16 ..••- '•. ••. • • • "•• : • -SbiirceConfroI Iiéd?i SD-6 RunofLo1le.tian H . . . . :. •' —R—Yes—f p Discussion/justification if SD -6 not implemented 7 4 L pt SD-7 Landscaping with Native or Drought Tolerant Species i j. 0 Yes 1 0 No /N/A Discussion/justification if SD -7 not implemented 4WA 4Cya kt • L •. SD-8 Harvestingand Using Precipitatioh • .• .. • • 0 Yes -No I 0 N/A Discussion/justification if SD -8 not implemented . • .. ir ( . • •,. .. . - • . '.'.JJ .• .1.'.. .. . •' H \• • :. •- •: - - E-36 •- • Page 4 of 4 .' • Revied 03/16 -- • PCSD Engineering Corp 3529CoastviewtOut Carlsb'ád,CA 92010 Ph 76.0710-188's, RECEIVED -, NOV 0 12017 Strulctural Design Calculations Guest House CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DIVISION Client Michael Franklin 2712 Madison Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 Project Franklin Residence 2712 Madison Street Car ~s ' b~08 Si ry 718 CL- xP1213147 * OF PaUl S. Cm tson RCEC57182, exp. 12/31/17 -. 0ôtber10,2017 .PCSD File #: 17-390 7' L C4ristt,on 5pn - ':- - 1. 4. c13gwr1 •' •°?. .••..'.• - - Paul Christenson San Diego Engineering 3529606stview Ct - Carlsbad, CA 92010 • Telephone -(760)207-1885 - Email: paul.pcsd@gmail.com 1.0 Design Criteria Franklin Residence 1 7-390 Code: 2016 CaliforniaBuiiding Code -ASCE 7-10 Timber:. Douglas Fir-Larch (DF-L), WWPA or WCLIB 2xWall Framing:. DF-L #2 (unless noted otherwise) 2xRftèrs&'Joists: DF-L#2 " Pots & Beam:.: DF-L #1 Glue-Lam Beams Simple Span Grade 24F-V4 (DF/DF) Cantilvers Grade 24F-V8 (DF/DF) Sheathing: Mm. APA-RatedSheathing, Exposure 1, Plywood orOSB (U.N.O.) Engineered Framing Wood i-Joists.; TJI 110,210,230,360,560 iCC ESR-1 153-. LVL, PSL.. 1.9E Microllam, 2.OE Parallam ICBO ER-497G- Concrete: Comfressive Strength @ 28 days per ASTM C39-96: Footings:-. -, f = 2500 psi Grade Béamè . f'c = 3000 psi Concrete Block: Grade N-I per ASTM C90-95, fm = 1500 psi per ASTM E447-92 Mortar: Type S MortarCernent per ASTM C270-95, Mm. f'm = 1800 psi @ 28:.days. Grout: Coarse GroutM3/8' Max. Aggregate per ASTM C476-91, Mm. f'm =2000 psi @28 days. Reinforcing Steel #4 & Larger ASTM A615-60 (Fy = 60 ksi) #3 & Smaller .- ASTM A615-40 (Fy = 40 ksi) Structural. Steel: 'W'Shapes: .- :. ASTM A992, Fy= 50-65 ksi P!até, Angles, dIlIahneIsASTM A36, Fy = 36 ksi Tube Shapes ASTM A500, Grade B, Fy= 46 ksi Pipe Shapes: $' ASTM A53, Grade B, Fy=35 ksi Welding Electrodes Structural Steel E70-T6 A615-60'Re&ar:-'; E90 Series Bolts: Sill-Plàte-AichôiBotls & Threaded Rods: A307 Quality Minimum Steel Moment & Braced Frames: A325 (Bearing,U.N.O.) Soils: 1500 psf Bearing Pressure References: • .._: corn Interior Wall 1/2" Gyp. Bd. (2 Sides) 2x4 Studs @ 16" o.c. Esc. 4.6 psf 1.1 psf 2.3 psf DL = 8.0 psf I %' 46, 41ote '3529 CoasMewCt - Caisad, CA 92010 JOB 17-390 SHEET NO 1 OF_________ CALCULATED BY PSC DATE_ 10/10/17 CHECK BY DATE - SCALE .i.eiepnone ((bU) w-i tsts5 - Email: 2.OLOADLiST : 2 1 Roof (Vaulted)' Roofing 6.0 psf 15/32" Sheathing 2.0 psf Roof Framing 2.8 psf ., 5/8" Gyp. Bd. . 28 psf Insulation and Misc. 1.4psf .EDL —. 15.0 psf 20'0 psf Total Load 35.0 psf 2.2 Roof (w/ceiling) Roofing 6.0 psf 15/32" Sheathing , 2.0.psf Roof Framing. 2.8 'psf Insulation and. Misc. 1.2 psf 'DL 12.0psf.. ILL .= '200 psf Total Load 320psf • ' 2.3 Ceiling Ceiling Joists 1.3 -psf - 5/8'"1 Gyp. 4d. . 2.8 psf." Insulation and Misc. 1.9 psf LOL 6.0 psf : LL = 10.0 psf Total Load 16.0 pf, . 2.4 Walls . Exterior. Wall . 5' 7/8" Stucco 9.0psf. . 15/32" Sheathing 1.5 psf 2x4 Studs @ 16" o.c. 1.1 psf 5/8" Gypsum Bd. 2.8 psf. Misc. .0.6 psf 15.0psf S - ,•-t tifZ4zfr,ovn m £yo JLVeOJJr , 3529 COastvlew Ct - Carlsbad, CA 92010 Telephone (760) 207-1885 Email: pauipcsdc mail.com JOB 17-390 SHEET NO 3 OF/ CALCULATED BY PSC DATE 10/10/17, CHECK BY DATE: SCALE . I- - 2.0 LOAD LIST (CONTINJ.. 2.5 Floor Floor Cover 5.5. psf Sheathing 2.3 psf " 2xF.J. ..3.1"psf 518" Gyp. Bd. 2:8 psf Insulation and Misc. - 1.3 psf. DL 15.0:psf LL = 40.0 psf . Total-Load = 55.0 psf •. Ps = AKzrl*Ps30 (ASCE 7 -Equation 6-1) - P = 26.6 psf P = 16.0 psf (*0.6 ASP) 2.7 Seismic SMSFaSs :. SMS = 1.197 S05 = (2/3) S,,15 (11.43) SOS = 0.798 SDS C — (Ij1) ... Cs= 0.123 USE: VCSWDL Equation I2.81Aj,plies V= 0.123 WDL ASD BASE SHEAR V=_CS WDL .s 1.4 VASD= 0.088 WDL 2.6 Wind WIND PARAMETERS 110 mph ExposureCat,= B A = 1.00 (fig. 6-3) Ps30= 26.6 psf s(fig:6-3) Kzt = 1.00 (fig. 6-4) I = 1.0 -..5(table 11.5-1) USGS APPLICATION S= 1.151 S= 0.441 - F 1.04 F= 1.56 R= 6.5 1= 1.00 •5 h= 15.00 Occupancy Category: 2 Site Class: D SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY S1 (11.6 ASCE 7-05) (11.4.1 ASCE 7-05) Ss>015 - 075 T3 = *(ho 0.152 Ta < (0.)Ts,OK Ts=SDI/SDs 0.458 k= 1.0 Ta<0.5 Seismic Design Category: D Basic Wind Speed = Design Maps Summary Report User—Specified. Input - Report .Title Franklin' Mn October9, 2017 14:45:59 UTC Building Code Reference DOcüm'entASCE 7:10 Standard (which Litilizes USGS hazard data available in 2008) Site Coördiflates 33.164010N, 117.3492°W Site Soil classification. Site Class D - "Stiff Soil" USGS—Provided OUtput I S = 1.151'g = 1197g : SOS = 0.798 g S1 = 0.441 g -SMI = .9.688,g Sol = 0.459 g For Information on how the SS and 51 va11ies above have been calculated from probabilistic (risk-targeted) and deterministic ground motionsiii the direction dfrnaximum horizontal response, please return to the application and select the 2009 NEHRP" building code reference.docurent. pper)se Sp:rn -. porise .Sprum IT : - - For PGA,, TL, C, and C 1 values, please viethé detailed report. AILI-lough this information is a product of the U.S. Geologic al Survey, we provide no warranty, expressed Or implied, as to the accuracy of the data contained therein. This tool is not a substitute for technical subject-matter knowledge. ,- . •,_ -; - r '•,--• '..• 1 F 0 R T E' MEMBER REPORT Roof Frming (RR 1) Rafters 1 piece(s) 2 x 8 Douglas Fir-Larch No 2 © 16" OC PASSED - + o 'q. LI' All locations are measured from the outside face of left support (or left cantilever end) All dimensions are horizontal. 1. Member Reaction (lbs) 207 @2 1/2' ', 3281(3.50") j Passed (6%) -- 1.0 0 + 1.0 Li (All Spans) Shear (Ibs) 166 @ 10 3/16" 1631 Passed (10%) 1.25 1.0 0 + 1.0 Li (All Spans) Moment (Ft-lbs) . .403 © 4' 3 1/2" 1700 Passed (24%) 1.25 1.0 C) + 1.0 Ii (All Spans) Live Load Defi. (in) . 0.041'@ 4' 3 1/2......0.295 Passed (L/999+) - 1.00 + 1.0 Li (All Spans) Total Load Deft. (in) 0.074 @43 i/2" '0.442 ... Passed (1/999+) -- 1.00 + 1.0 Li (All Spans) - lurid. U i.LlOU) dflU I I./'WI. Top Edge Bracing (UI): Top compression edge must be braced at 9' 4" 0/C u51e55deta11ed otherwise. Bottom Edge Bracing (Lii): Bottom compression edge must be braced at 94' o/c unless detailed otherwise. A 15% Increase in the momentcapacity has been added to account for repetitive member usage. Applicable calculations are based on NOS. iRi ------------- - Beveled Plate - OF L3.W . '3.50" 1.50' - 93 114 207 Blocking 2 Beveled Plate- DI" 3,50" 350" 1.50" 93 114 207 BloCking 'idid O O'' LWJy flu IQeuS appseu u!recuy aDore mem ana the tus toad Is applied to the member being designed. System: Roof Member Type: 201st Building Use: Residential Building Code: IBC 2015 Design Methodology: ASD Member Pitch: 5/12 SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY aitnianve nh1oIrn(PsF) 0to8'7'- •j , .. P15.0 ' ' 20.0 Roof Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of iis products will be In accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software. 'Use of this software Is not Intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having Jurisdiction. The designer of record, builder or framer Is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the ov-evalJ project Accessories (Rim Board, Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks) are not designed by this software. Products manufacbred at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards. Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES wider technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-3387 and/or tested ln.accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evatuabon reports, Wertraeuser product literature and installation details refer bo.www.wey6rhaeuser.com/woodproducts/document-library'. The product application, Input design load, dimensions and support information have been provided by Forte Software Operator a 10/12/2017 8:30:23 AM Forte v5.3, Design Engine: V7.0.0.5 Frar,kfiri,4t Page lof 1 1 F 0 R T E MEMBER REPORT Roof Framing (CJ 1) ClgJst 1 piece(s) 2"x 6 Douglas Fir-Larch No 2 @ 16" OC Overall Length: 1410" PASSED 1 0 + 0 :. All locations are measured from the outside face of left support (or left cantilever end).All dimensions are horizontal. Member Reaction (Ibs) 168 @2 1/2" 3281(3.50"), Passed (5%) -- 1.01) + 1.0 Lr(All Spans) Shear (Ibs) 1 151 @ 91, 1238 L Passed (12%) 1.25 1.0 1) + 1.0 Ir (All Spans) Mornent(Ft-lbs) 589 @75" 1060 Passed (56%) 1.25 1.01) + 1.0 Lr(All Spans) Uve Load Deft. (In) .0.389 @7' 5" 0.41911 Passed (11444) -- 1.0 D + 1.0 Lr (All Spans) Total Load Den. (in) . 0.662 @ 7' 5" 0.721 Passed (11261) - 1.0 0 + 1.0 Li (All Spans) Defiestionaitenla: LL(IJ360) and Tl.(1/240). Top Edge Bracing (Lu) Top compression edge must be braced at 14 10 c/c unless detailed otherwise Bottom Edge Bracing (Lu): Bottom compression edge mtst be braced at 14 10" 0/C unless delled otherwise. A 15% Inasase in the moment capacity has been added to account for repetitive member usage. Applicable calculations are based on NDS -. aa4 e$ I. - Stud wall - OF 3.50" ..3.50. 1.50" . 69 99 168 BlockIng 12-S wall - OF 3.50" 3.SO". 1.50"111.1.5O 69 99 168 Blocking Blong Panels are assumed to carry no loads applied directly above them and the hill load is applied to the member being designed. -Uniform (PSF) - 0 to 1410" 16" - 7.0 1' 10.0 Roof Sn:Ro Member Type : Jobe Building Use Residential Building Code IBC 2015 Design Methodology : ,SD Member Pitch: 0/12 SUSYAiNA1.1FOIiEsTRy iNITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of Its products win be in accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weywtiaeuser exprely disclaims any other warranties related to the software. Use of this software is not intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having Jtmeiiction. The designer of record, builder or framer Is responsible ID assure that this calculation Is compalittle with the onecaJJ P.'O/Ct Accessories (Rile Board, ,Biocldnq Panels and Squash Blocks) are not designed by this software. Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards. Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested In accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For currant code evaluation reports, Weyerhaeuser product literature and Installation deteils refer to www.weyeeusa.corn/woodproductdocument.1lbrary. The product application, input design loads, dimensions and support Information have been provided by Forte Software Operator Paul Chriutunsr. °CSD Ergineorirg * 1760) 207-1885 ,1 paul.pr.sd@91na1.ccm 10/12/20178:32:09 AM Forte v5.3, Design Engine: '/7.0.0.5 Franklin.4te - Page 1 of 1 à - I F 0 R T E MEMBER REPORT Roof Framing (RB-I) Ridge Bm ipiece(s) 5 1/4" x 14 2 OE Parallam® PSL Overall Length: 25' 10" 253" Es All locations are measured from the outside face of left support (or left cantilever end) All dimensions are horizontal. Member Reaction (Ibs) 'i.' 3461 @ 2. 11484 (3.50") Passed (30%) -- 1.00 + 1.0 Is (All Spans) Shear (Ibs) 3071 @ 1' 5 1/2" -.. .;17763. 12f Passed (17%) 1.25 1.00 + 1.0 Is (All Spans) LMomentR-bs) '-21782 @ 12', 11". 50928.'- Passed (43%) 1.25 1.00 + 1.0 Lr(A1l Spans) Live Load Defi,(In) 0.573 @ 12' 11" .- "0,850 ' Passed (1/534) -- 1.00 + 1.0 Li (All Spans) I.Total-Load Defi (In) 1.096 @ 12 11 1 275 Passed (1/279) — 1 0 0 + 1.0 Li (All Spans) tdt1I.UU1l cnie; U ,t/JDU) dflU IL (L/L'U). s Top Edge Bracing (Lu) Top compression edge must be braced at 25 10 o/c unless detailed otheiwise. Bottom Edge Bracing (Lu): Bottom Compression edge must be braced at 2510" a/c unless detailed otherwise. .. i4 00, Deat' 1-Column - OF ' 3.50" - 3.50" - .1.50 1653 1808 3461 Blocking 2- Column OF . 3.50" . 3.50". - .1.50 1653 1808 3461 Blocking - mvumj reIm am eurrii w carry no Ioaos appuea oirecuy aoove tisem and the tuli oars Is applied 10 the member being designed. ..,.i.. S;_ . -....5e' L '.'' rrI.-.. 1dd Oa 0- Self Weight (PLF) 0 to 2510" . - N/A 23.0 - Uniform (PSF) 0 ID 25 10 .T 7' - 15.0 -; 20.0 Roof Weyerhaeuser warrant that theslzlng of Its product will be In aacirclaince with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any oIlier warranties related to the software. Use of this software is not Int&ici& to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by Use authority having jurisdiction. The designer of record, builder or framer Is responsible ID assure that this calculation Is compatible with the overall project. Accessoi-les(Rlrn Board, Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks) are not designed by this software. Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser ibcilTtfes are third-party cerSifed to sustainable forestry standards. Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by fIX ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports, Weyerhaeuser product literature and installation details refer towwwweyertlaesser.com/woodproductsjdocurnent.11brary. The produt application, Input design loads, dimensions and support information" have been provided by Forte Software Operator - 1-, PASSED 5fi - 4. - System: Roof Member Type : Drop Beam Building Use: P.esldential Building Code : IBC 2015- Design Methodotogy:ASD Member Pitch: 0/12 4. J. SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE + 0 -"-"-S. -S . . .. .......................................'' •-.. r -:----- Forte SofiwareOperator loeNotes 1 Oil 3/2017 9:20:43 AM Paul Ciastersos' Forte v5.3. Design Engine V7.0.0.5 PCSDErrcir.eenng Franklin. 419 1?tiOj 207-1h85 ' - ' I - . - paui.pcsd@g:r.ail.com - — - - Page 1 of I PASSED r MEMBER REPORT RocfFraning, (RB-2) Hdr Bin 1 piece(s) 6 x 10 Douglas Fur-Larch No 2 Length: 12'7" + 0 4 0 -. - All locations are measured from the outside face of left support (or left cantilever end) All dimensions are horizontal. AIR Member Realon (Ibs) 1551 @ 2" 12031(3.50") Passed (13%) -- 1.0 D + 1.0 Ir (All Spans) Shear (Ibs) 1284 @ 1.1" . .7402 Passed (17%) 1.25 1.0 D + 1.0 Lr (All Spans) Moment (Ft-lbs) 462$ @ 6' 3 1/2' 7540 Passed (619%) 1.25 1.0 D + 1.0 Lr (All Spans) Live Load Defi. (In) 0.132 @,6'3 1/2" 0.408 Passed (1/999+) -- 1.0 D + 1.0 Lr 11 Spans) Total Load Dee. (in) 0.245 @6' 3 112" . .6.613-; Passed (11601) - -- 1.0 D + 1.0 Lr (All Spans) - Llerwcuvncnmria: U. I, OU)dflQ ILi,L/L4U). V . Top Edge Bracing (Lu): Top comprodslon'edge must be braced at 12' 7" oft unless detailed otherwise. Bottom Edge Bracing (Lu) Bottom compression edge must be braced at 12'7' o/c unless detailed otherwise. Applicable calculations are based on NOS. . . ;k --• 1 -Column - OF 3.50" 350' 1.50'' 712 839 1551 Buixking 2- Column -Dl' 3.50' 3.50" 1.50' 712 839 151... Blocking mucjr1g ransis are assumea to carry no ioaas applieo Girecay above tnern and trw fuii toad is applied to the member being designed. ' : .-s: •---.- '- ,. - .i— _ Cn'r knuflt o - Self Weight (PIJ) 0 to 12' 7 N/A 13.2 -_Uniform (PSF) 0 to 12'?' (Front) 6'S 15.0 20.0 Roof System: Roof. Member Type Drop Seam Building Use: Residential Building Code :IBC 2015 Design Methodology : ASO Member Pitch: 0/12 () SUSTAifIanLE FOIIESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of Its products will beiu acc&dance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software. Use of this software is not intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having judsdiction.-The designer of record, builder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with ow overaiJ pmj. Accessories (Rim Board. Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks) are not designed by this saftware. Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facUlties are third-party certified to sustainable forestry standards. Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES I under technical reports ESR-1153 and E-1387 arsd/or fasted in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports, Weyerhaeuser product literature and Installation details refer to ww.weyerhaeuser.com/woodproducts/document-library. The product application, Input design loads, dimensions and upportinformadon have been provided by Forte Software Operator - I, 10/13/2017 9:22:05 AM Forte v5.3. Design Engine: V7.0.0,5 Franklin.41e Page lof 1 ' T E Rraniag, (RB-3)HdrBm I F 0 R 1 piece (s) 6.x 12 Douglas Fir-Larch No. 2 .1" Overall Length: 19' 1 + 0 11 0 All locations are measured from the outsIde face of left support (Or left cantilever end) All dimensions are horizontal Member Reaction (Ibs) 1656 @2 12031(3.50") Passed (14%) -- 1.00 + 1.0 Lr (All Spans) Shear(lbs) 1439 013" 8960.. Passed (16%) 1.25 1.00 + 1.0 Lr (All Spans) Moment (Ft-lbs) 7626@19'6112" 11050. 1 Passed (69%) 1.25 1.0 D + 1.0 Lr (All Spans) Uve Load Defi. (Itt) .0.276 @9' 6 1/2 - 0.625 :. Passed (1/815) -- 1.0 0 + 1.0 Lr (All Spans) Total Load Dell (In) 0533 @9'6 1/2 0.938 Passed (1/423) 100+10 Lr (All Spans) - ,enss.uQn rnwna; U. ,L/OUJ 200 IL tL/U)., Top Edge Bracing (Lu) Top compression edge roust be braced at 19" V 0/c unless detailed otherwise. 8051om Edge Bracing (Lu): BOtthth compression edge roust be braced at 19', 1ofc unless detailed otherwise. Applicable calculations are based on NOS ?4 F 'new , 51 1-Column - OF . 3.50" 3.50 ' .1.5V 1 797 059 1656 Blocking 2- Column - OF 3.50"- 350' 1.50" J 797 859 1656 Blocking oiocsing vanem are assumed W carry no loads applied directly abose them and the full load Is applied to the member being designed. -: -1thV -ea live .4 • 0 Self Weight (PLF) 0 to 19' 1' N/A 16.0 1 - Uniform (PSF) 0 to 19 1' (Front) 46' - 15.0 - 20.0 Roof System Roof Member Type: Drop Beam Building Use: Residential Building Code: IBC 2015 Design Methodology : ASD Member Pitch: 0,'12 SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE Weyerhaeuser warrants that the sizing of its products will be In accordance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values, Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims anyother warranties related to the software. Use of this software Is not intended to drtumvent the need for a design professional se determined by the authority having jurisdiction. The designer of record, builder or framer is responsible to assure that this calculation Is compatible with the overall projari Accessories (PJni Beard, Blocking Panels and Squash Blocks) are not designed by this software. Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser facilities are third-party certified to sustelnable forestry standards. Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 and/or tested In accordance with applicable ASTM standards. for current code evaluation reports, Weyetlaeuser product literature and Installation details refer to www.weyertiaeuser.conVwoodproducts/document-llbrary. The product application input design loads dimeneons and support lnfurrretion have been provided by Forte Software Operator . - : -. Forte Software Operator Job Notes 10/13/2017 4041 AM Paul Christenson Forte v5.3. Design Engine: V700.5 PCSD Enur.srinno Frarik/in4fe (7601207-1865 PduIpcsiJ©gma corn Page 1 of 1 -:'- .-- - - MEMBER REPORT Roof Framing, (RB-4) RfBrn '} F 0 R T E " '1 piece(s) 4 x 10 Douglas Fir-Larch No. 2 Overall Length: 11'1" + 0 + C All locations are measured from the outside face of left support (or left cantilever end).AII dimensions are horizontal. - S _______ Member Readlon (Ibs) . 1662 @ 2" 7656 (3.50) Passed (22%) -- 1.0 D + 1.0 Lr (All Spans) Shear (Ibs) 1343 @ 1' 3/4" . 4856 Passed (28%) 1.25 1.0 0 + 1.0 Lr (All Spans) Moment (Ft-lbs) 4332 @5' 6 1/2" - 5615 1 Passed (77'0) 1.25 1.0 D + 1.0 U- (All Spans) Live Load Defi. (in) 0.136 @ 5 6 1/2' . -.0.358 Passed (11951) -- 1.0 0 + 1.0 Lr (All Spans) Total Load Deft (In) 0.244 @ 5'6 1/2' 0.538 Passed (11529) - 1.0 D + 1.0 Lr (All Spans) Deflection criteria: U. ([/360) and TI. ([/240) Top Edge Bracing (Lu): Top compression edge must bebraced at ii 1" 0/C unless detailed otherwise. - Bottom Edge Bracing (Lu): Bottom compression edge must be braced at11' 10/c unless detailed otherwise. Applicable calcuiations are based on NDS. [ too 1 -Column - OF 3-50"- 3.50 . 1.50 738 924 1662 BlockIng 2 Column - Of 3.50.. 3.5O 1.50 738 924 1662 Blocking Blocking Panels are assumed to carry no loads applied directly above them and the full load Is applied to the member being designed. -. - ..•..- ,-' -- - rf- t - 7g 0-Self Weight (PLF) 0 to 11 1' N/A 8,2 - Uniform (PSF) 0 to 11' V (Front) B-4- is.o 20.0 Roof System Roof Member Type Drop Beam Building Use Residmitlal Building Code : IBC 2015 Design Methodology: ASO Member Pitch: 0/12 SUSTAINABLE roapsrgy INITIAMA Weyerhaeuser warrant that the sizing of its producrIl) be In acrance with Weyerhaeuser product design criteria and published design values. Weyerhaeuser expressly disclaims any other warranties related to the software. Use of this software is not Intended to circumvent the need for a design professional as determined by the authority having jurisdiction. The designer of record, builder or framer Is responsible to assure that this calculation is compatible with the overall projact'Acce1es (Rim Board, Blocking Panels and Panels , Blocks) are not designed by this software. Products manufactured at Weyerhaeuser the are thirri-party certified to sustainable forestry standards. Weyerhaeuser Engineered Lumber Products have been evaluated by ICC ES under technical reports -ESR-1153 and ESR-1387 arid/or tested in accordance with applicable ASTM standards. For current code evaluation reports, Weyerhaeuser product literature and instellatlon details refer to www.weyertraeuser.conVwoodproducts/document-library. The product apçthcaton Input design loads dimensions and support information have been provided by Porte Software Operator 0/13/2017 9:43:23 AM Forte v5.3, Design Engine: V70.0.5 - - Frank!in,41e ,:"- Page lofi P = 16.0 psf -S. Criteria Each Story Resists > 35% Base Shear: Wind Loads -. Any Shear Wall WI (hll)>1 .0 is <33% Story Force: P 16.0 psfx Trib Area .' p = Roof Level Direction: N/S 16.0 PS x 336 sq. ft. = 5363 lbs. Direction: E/ W 16.0 psf .5 x 227 sq. ft.= 3623 lbs. Roof Weight . Roof Wt. = 150 psf x. 1i8'sq ft. = 17370 lbs. Exterior Wall Wt = 15.0 psf x 488 s4.ft. = 7320 lbs. Interior Wail Wt = 8.0 psf x 266i. ft 2128 lbs. Ceiling Wt = 6.0 psf x 965 sd. ft. = 5790 lbs. Total Trib.WR = 32608 lbs. .4. Total Seismic Dead Load: Wt= . 32608 lbs. ASD Base Shear: V = 0.088'Wt = 2860 lbs. -S 1st Story 2nd Story not satisfied A-. satisfied satisfied satisfied I 1 3529CoastviewCt Carlsbad CA 92010 JOB 17-390 SHEET NO to OF.' .;. CALCULATED BY PSC DATE10/10/17.. CHECKBY DATE SCALE Telephone (760) 2071885 -,Email: paul.pcsd@gmaii.com 50 Lateral Design & Analysis Wind: P = A Kzt I p830 t,SCE7-EquatOn!) . Seismic: V = CWDL A = 1.00 S5 = 1.151 Kzt= 1.0 (.o'4) Fa = 1.0 PS30= 26,6 psf R= 6.50 1= 1.0 (table ll.5-L) V = 0.088 * Wt * p ((BC Equation 125-1) 0.441 F='' 1.6 1= ;.00 (p -Redundahcy) ,r- - - 3529 Coastview Ct - çartsbadcA 92010 JOB 17-390 SHEET NO 11 OF CALCULATED BY PSC DATE 10/10/17 CHECK BY DATE SCALE - Telephone (760) 207-1885 - Email: paul.pcsd©gmail.com 5_1_ Lateral DesI2n_&Analysis - 2nd Story Shear Walls -•N!S-... _____ E/W - _____ _______ (iridline Length of Shearwalls Total. Wail 1-It. Type 1 4 4 7.0 9 A 2,2.1 10 6 .. - - 16.0 9 S 3 5 6 -10.5 9 . S 0.0 - * 0 ,0.0 - 0.0 FA - : 0.0. -. . F4SE - - 0.0: - - -. FAE 0.0 - FAEE 0.0. .FA[E Gridline A B C Length of Shearwall ITotal I Wall HI. 9 9 9 0 -Type - A - S. #D /0! #D /0! /0! Th 6 7 12.5 3 6 9 10 10 0 0 0 0 (1 ........ . ----...J......:IJL------------ .,-. ... *•_••2_ ............ ---:_. -- I . .............. I .....&_._... -.-- I ---- ....- ................- .... .-_.-.-.-- --.-....................- -j--------...........:. ....--. ....i--.-.. I..........._..............-.._.._. .... --.-- .. -H;....H--•-....H...... --r-------- ...*.., ...I.... -l. -....-........ - .- .........................jrr:'irr........--1....i•ii1 $I -.4 - -.- I -- I 1 - .- ----------------- I - - .-.- I 4 ..... 1 1 h- I I -. r ---- - ---'--- - - 4 4 .......... I 1 4 -.4 . . - _4•, - -.-- .: 2681 # ) 4rmyy • 3529 CoatviewCt -Carlsbad'CA 92010 - Telêphöne (76%207-186'5,_' I Eñail: paul.pcsdCa 5 1 Lateral Desn & Arnilysis (cent) Gridline (7') 32 % ( 363 x 0.32 = 1716 Ih V = 7 ft.= 245 plt'A rr OTF = 2084 lbs. - Gridline ;. - :.5Ø % 5363x 0.50 = 2681' lbs - V = 16 ft. = -168 Of OTF = 1424 lbs. - -- Gridline - 18. % (5363-x 0.18 = 965 lbs . V = 10.5 ft. • '? plf OTF = 827 lbs. -• - .•*__ - .• - . • - . ma ii. corn 1716 #) JOB 17-390 SHEET NO (3 OF __ CALCULATED BY PSC DATE 10I1OI17 CHECK BY __ DATE T SCALE Telephone (760) 207-1685 - Email: paul.pcsdgrnaiLcom 5.1 Lateral Désin &Análvsis(cont;) Grid1inc(T') %(3623x 0.27= 978#) .. 978 lbs v = 12.5 ft. = 78 pif A OTF 1 704.316s. $o0 Y PJ Gridline (T) 50 % (,3623 x 0.50 = 181 V = 1811 lbs. 9 ft. =201 pifA .. ZXZ.-?F A OTF 1811 lbs. -'twIJp ' l-1DU2 ' Gndline 33 % ( 3623 x 0.33 = 1196 ) 1196 lbs. A V = 10 ft. = 120 plf OTF = 1076 lbs. HIDU2 a . . 1.._... jran yo 3529 Coâstviev Ct - Carlsbad, CA 92010 a- t/ 4rwfAzeio,, 1a,7 2lIffO 35 CoàstvieCt 29 Carlsbad CA 92010 Tèlphone (760) 207.1885 Email: pauI.pcsdgmail.com 6.0 FOUNDATfONDESiGN 6.1 CONTINUOUS FOOTING w = 1125 plf width 1125 plf' 075 ft(MTN.) >:9 INCHES (MIN.) 1500 pf USE . 12 "WIDE CONT[N FTG WI 4 TOP AND BOTTOM & EMBED. INTO UNDISTURBED SOIL (MIN.) 6.2 MAX POINT LOAD ON FOOTING JOB 17-390, SHEET NO Iq OF .11 CALCULATED BY PSC DATE 10/10/17-.- CHECK BY D.TE SCALE , ASBP 1500 psf P= 1500 * 12 * 48 12 ii aJi 6000 lbs 6.3 PAD DESIGN PAD SIZE P1 24" SQUARE ,i2 "TFfK W/ 3' -# 4IEACI-I WAY - r - * LOAD P= 1500 * 2 2 = 6000 lbs February 12, 2018 Michael Franklin 2712 MadiOn Stieet P.O. Box Lakeside, Califôr 92( (619) 4430( y,. SCOPE In accordance with your request, a Site Inspection has been performed at the subject site The purpose of this investigation was to examme existing site conditions and provide engineering recommendations for the proposed ranny flat FIELD INSPECTION In order to accomplish this purpose, a representative of this firm visited the site, reviewed the topography and site conditions and visually and textually classified the surface and near surface soils Representative samples of the on-site soils were obtained from a test exploration approximately 4 feet in depth and tested for density, shear strength and expansive characteristics SITE CONDITIONS The subject site is located on the asterly side of Madison Street The site is approximately 3 feet above street elevation andhas a relatively level area for the house pad and front yard The backyard is approximately 3 feet above the house pad area The property is currently occupied with a smgle family residence Neighboring properties are residential and commercial Man-made fill matenals were encountered to a depth of approximately 12 inches and native soils were loose to a depth of 12 inches 1 Carlsbad, California 92008 - SUBJECT: FileNo. 1106E5A-17 SITE INSPECTION Proposed Residential Building Site 2712 Madison Street City of Carlsbad Dear Mr. Franklin: I - - - -- MichaelFranklin .'c.File No. 1106E5A-17 February 12, 2018 SOIL CONDITIONS Soils encouiItered.- in the Jest, exploration were fill materials consisting of loose to firrn brown, silty, lightly cemented fine an to approximately 12 inches in depth These surface soils were underlain by native soils consisting of firm to medium dense, brown, silty, lightly cemented fine, sändsánd light clay binder to a depth of 24 inches where medium denseto dense, brown, silty, cemented fiie sands were encountered to the bottom of the exploration, approximately 4 feet in depth The soils we encountered were nSi considered to be detrimentally expansive with respect to change in volume with change in moisture content SITE EROSION CONTROL Dunng the construction, surface water should be controlled via berms, gravel bags and/' sandbags, siltf%ence, stra maintainingwattles, siltation basins, while maintaining positive surface grades or other methods to avoiddamage to the finish work or adjoinmg properties All site entrances and ekits must have coarse gravel or steel shaker plates to minimize offsite sediment tracking Best management Practices (BMP's) must be used to protect storm drains and minimize pollution The contractor should take measures to prevent erosion of graded areas untilsuch time as ,ermanent drainage and erosion control measures have been installed After completion of grading, all excavated surfaces should exhibit positive drainage'nd eliminate,âreas wher& water might pond. I •-• CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1 A representative sample of the foundation soil was remolded to 90% of maximum dry density. Based oxithe following test results, a safe allowable bearing value of at least 2000 .pótinds persquare foot for 12 inch deep footings may be used in design ing thefoündations and slab for the proposed structures. This value my be increased by one thirdfor wind and/or seismic loading This value may be increased accordmg to the CBC Table 1 8A-I-A by 20 percent for each additional fo6t6f depth and or' width to a maximum of 3 times the designated value. Màximuni:DDensity 124.0 pcf Optimum. Moisture 8.8% - Angle of internal friction 36° COhesiOn ..-,. 119psf .. Unit weight •- 111.4 pcf Expansion Index 17 2 .- -- ........... 2 Michael Frankim File No 1106E5A-17 February 12, 2018 -7 Lateral resistance to h6tizo'nta1 movement 'may be :provided by. the: soil passive pressure an'd 'frIction. f n.crete to Soil. An allowable passive pressure of 250, poundsper square foot pr foot of depth may be used A coefficient of friction of 0 35 is recommended The soils passive pressure may be'm—creased by 1/3 for wn'd and seismic loading,IJ . '... •'- S - 5_'''••' ' ' S , ' The seismic parameters for the site coordinates 33 16401°N, 117 3492°W for assumed Site Class D are as follows S USGS-frovided Output ..' ,"41 ie = 1..131 g .. . = 1.197 g S= 0:7981 S-=. 0,441'g ' 0,688g Sol 0,4,9g : For inrorrnatic*n on ho# the SS and Si value boFie have been cfrulaed rrr m Probabili (nk tergeted) ad deteministiground rnOti'ch's i.n the dtiectiOh a 'niairhu'n horithi'ta .rep hse please return to the epôhcaton and eIect the 2009 NEHRP huding code reference document. MCE, i.sj-ori , 3,t;ur, Uc~, je ui a Se' in I I The fill soils and compressible native soils encountered during this inspection should not be used to support proposed structures It is our recommendation hat these soils in proposed building area be removed to competent natural ground to an anticipated depth of 3 feet and recompacted to 90 percent compaction in accordance with the Grading Sp'eciflcations in this report The recompaction should extend at least 5 feet -outside,1the proposed building footprint and up to the footprint of the existing structure Any organic or other deleterious material that may be encouitered should bg removed prior to recomp action. - .5 . - 3 - -•S - 4_ Michael Franklin File No. 1106E5A-17 February 12. 2018 -, 5 Conventional spread footings founded a minimum of 12 inches below lowest adjacent grade and having a width determined by the allowable soil bearing value as detailed above are recommended fr foundation support Footing widths should be at least 12 inches for continuous' f64otmgs and 24 inches for square footings due to practical considerations as well as Building Code requirements These recommendations are based updn the 'soil.type encountered and do not take into consideration the propoed bearing load. 6 Reinforcing in footings should consist of at least one #4 steel bar placed continuously in the top and bottom of contmuous footings regardless of structural requirements ,=for isolated footings is dictated by the structural requirements Thee recom-nendtions are based upon on the soil type encountered and do not take into considerttion the proposed beanng load Footings deeper than 24 inches should have an additional #4 steel bar for each additional foot of depth - 2 In lieu of grading, footings for the proposed structure may extend through the existing fill soils and loose native soils a minimum of 12 inches into finn natural ground Anticipated foundations depth is 36 to 40 inches Footing excavations should be inspected by a representative of this firm prior to placement of forms and reinforcing steel in order to insure that adequate depth has been achieved and that all footings are founded a minimum of 12 inches into firm natural ground Loose soils should be removed from excavations pnor to our inspection Proposed concrete slabs areas should be preparöd according to the slab recommendation below. These recommendations are-,based entirely upon the soil types and do not take into consideration the requireiients of the proposed structure Proposed concrete slabs areas for the new structure should be prepared according to the recommendations below for concrete slab on grade 7 Concrete Slab-On-Grade, SOG, should be designed by the project's structural engineer based on anticipated loading conditions We recommend that conventional reinforced concrete SOG for this project be founded on 4 inches of Class II Virgin Aggregate Base (with approximately 2% +1- over optimum moisture content and;90% omaction, relative to the lab maximum dry density, AST D 1557), overlying a12 inch thick zone of adequately placed and compacted structural fill We recommend that a moisture barrier be provided by a membrane, visquen 10 mils in mimmum thickness or equivalent, be placed at top ofwell compáted Class II Aggregate Base, then covered with 2 inches of moist clean sand having a minimum 'sand equivalent of 30 when tested in accordance with the Amencan Society of Tdting and Materials test method ASTM D1555 In lieu of Class II base, an additional layer of 2 inches of sand may be used - I -••,-- - fl•' *&•_ t 'A 1 '-p Michael Franklin ile No 1106E5A-17 February 12, 201& Floor, slabs, as a thinimüni,- hould be 5 inches thick with #4 reinforcing steel at 16" on-center each way Reinforcement should be placed at mid-height of the slab The final slab thickness and reinforcement should be determined by the structural design engmeer Control joints should be provided in accordance with the recommendations of the structural design engineer. SITE AND SURFACE: DRAINAGE Drainage at the site should be directed away from foundations, collected and tight lined to appropriate discharge points Consideration may be given to collecting roof drainage by eave, gutters and diiecting it" away from foundations via non-erosive devices. Water, either natural or from irrigation, should not be permitted to pond, saturate the surface soils or flow towards the founda,ion Landscaping requiring a heavy irrigation schedule should not be planted adjacent to foundations or paved areas The type of drainage issues found within the project and thaerials speàiflèd and used should be determined by the Engineer 'of Record. GROUNDWATER AND SURFAE WATERS There was no indication of a near-surface groundwater table within our exploratory trench or perched groundwater A1tFogh groundwater is not expected to be a sigmficant constraint to the proposed development, our experience indicates that near-surface groundwater conditions can develop in areas where no such groundwater conditions previously existed, especially, in areas where a substantial increase in surface water infiltration results from landscape irrigation or unusually heavy precipitation It is anticipated that site development will include appropriate drainage provisions for control and discharge of surface water ,runoff. The type of drainage issues found within the project and materials specified and used should be determined by the Civil Engmeer. The type of plants and soil aloiIg with proper irrigation used should be determined by the Landscape Architect The following wading specifi'atiris should be utilized. . . . RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS For 'Proposed Residential Building Site 2712 Madison Street City of Carlsbad GENERAL Soil Testers and Engineer' are synonymous hereinafter and shall be employed to inspect and teif earth'v76rk in accordance with these specifications, the accepted plans, and 5 I Michael Franklin :FileNo. 1106E5A-17 February 12, 2018 the requirements o any jurisdictiveovemmental agencies. They are to be allowed adequat access so hat the inpections ana tests may be performed. The Engineer shall be apprised of schedules and any unforeseen soil conditions Substandard conditions or workmanship, inadequate compaction, adverse weather, or deviation from the linôs and grades shown on the plans, etc., shall be cause for the engineer, to either stop construction until the conditions are corrected or recommend rejection of the work Refusal to comply with these specifications or the recommendations and/or interpretations of the engineer will be cause for the engineer and/or his representative to immediately térininãte his services.'',' Deviatiors from the reconimendations of the Soil Report, from the plans, or from thse Specifications must be aprdved in writing by the owner and the contractor and endorsed by the engineer. . SOILTEST:METHODS: Maximum Density & Opt Moisture -- ASTM D1557-70 Density of Soil hi-Place ASTM D1556, D2922 and D3017 Soil Expansion -- UBC STANDARD 29-2 ShearStrength -- ASTM D3080-72 Gradation &Grain Size --ASTM D1l40-71 Capillary Moisture Tension -- ASTM D2325-68 Organic Content -- % Weight loss after heating for 24 hours at 300° F and after deducting soil moisture LIMITING SOIL CONDITIONS-' Minimum Conpaction 90% for 'disturbed' soils. (Existing fill, newly placed fill, plowed ground, etc.) 84%3or natural, undisturbed soils. 95% for pavement subgrade within 2' of finish grade and pavement base course. Expansive Soils Eansion index exceeding 20 Insufficient fines Less than 40% passing the #4 sieve. Oversized Prticies R'ocks over 10" in diameter. PREPARATION OF AREAS TO RECEIVE FILL Brush, trasli,debris and détfimental soils shall be cleared from the areas to receive fill'. Detrimental soils shall be removed to firm competent soil Slopes exceeding 20% should be stepped uphill with benches 10' or greater in width Scarify area to receive fill to 6" depth and compact. • ••' ... 6 .• t - "t.• ) - • • . • Michael Franklin :File No. I 106E5A-17 February 12, 2018 FILL MATERIAL shall not contain insufficient fines, oversized particles, or excessive organics On-site disposition of oversized rock or expansive soils is to be at the written direction of the Engineer. Seleot.Elt shall be as specified by the engineer. All fills shall be compacted and tested. SUBDRALNS shall be installed4 if required by and as directed by and detailed by the engineer aiid shall be left.~operable and unobstructed. They shall consist of 3" plastic perforated pipe set in a minimum cover of 4" of filter rock in a vee' ditch to intercept and di-áin free ground ', froii ; the'.thäss fills. Perforated pipe shall be schedule 40, Poly-Vinyl-Chlondeor Acrylomtnle Butadienne Styrene plastic Rock filter material shall conform to the'fol1oihg gradation:.. Sieve size'-- 3/4".-, 94 #30 #200 %Passing: 90400; 25-50 5-20 0-7 Subdrains shall beset ata.minimim gradient of 0.2% to drain by gravity and shall be tested by dye flushing before acceptahce Drains found inoperable shall be excavated and replaced. CAPPING EXPANSIVE SOILS If capping expansive soils with non-expansive soil to mitigate the expansive pbtentiai is used, the cap should be compacted, non-expansive, select soil placed for a minimum thickness 3' over the expansive soil and for a minimum distance of 8' beyond the exterior., perimeter of the structure. Special precautions should be taken to ensure that the non-expansive soil remains uncontaminated and the minimum thickness and dimensions arotind the structure are maintained The expansive soils underlying the cap of non-expansive cap should be pre-saturated to a depth of 3' to obtain a degree saturation exceeding 90% before any construction supported by the compacted cap The non -exanalvesoi1cothprisiiig the cap should conform to the following: S.: ,.. MinimtiimCompactión' 90% . Maximum Expansion Index 30 Minimum Angle .f Internal Friction 33 Deg Cohesion.Intercept 100 psf UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS Soil Testers assume no responsibility for conditions, which differ from those, descnb'ed in the applicable current reports and documents for this property. Upon termination of the engineer's services for any reason, his fees up to the time of termination become due and payable If it is necessary for the engineer to issue, an unfavorable reporf concerning the work that he has been hired to test and inspect,, the engiheer sh.1l not ;b'é held liable for any damages that might result from his 'unfavoiable report'. Michael Franklin' i )FileNo. 1106E5A-17 February 12, 2018 If we can be of any further assistaice, please do not hesitate to contact our office This opportumtyto be of service is siicere1y appreciated :• '. Rspecthi1ly submitted, ES si0 eL p: C03444T9 Chin CChen,RPE C34442 w 9- jF OF - S : M h h .. • I4NL THUrEn P.O. Box 119! ½ - - - - . - Lakeside, Californi 9204( (619) 4"6(- : February 20, 2018 - . $ ', .. . . . Michael Franklin - .2712 Madison Street - Carlsbad, California 92008 4 • __., . "_ _4 ?_ •, . - SUBJECT: FileNo. 1106E5A-17 - ' :- :- - - Foundation Plan Review -. Proposed Residential Building Site 2712 Madison Street City of Carlsbad .1• 4 -. - Dear Mr Franklin: -. - We have reviewed the building plan set for the proposed granny flat prepared by Brian Olfe and Paul Christenson, Job No 17-390, dated February 21, 2018 and find that from a - geotechnical perspective; the foundation design presented therein conforms to the required , specifications in our Site Inspection dated February 12, 2018. A representative of this company must inspect the foundation excavations prior to placement .' . . of forms and reinforcing steel to insure that adequate depth has been achieved. Our * - -recommendations are based upon on the soil type encountered and do not take into consideration the proposed bearing load If e can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated Respectfully submitted, ESSIO LU ________ Chi Cr rn n C. Chen RPE C34442 zo OF CA r -. '• -. •_• - . - .- -- -- - •'._,-4 - ¼ cF007ity of Community & Economic Development Carlsbad CERTIFICATION OF SCHOOL FEES PAID This form must be completed by the City, the applicant and the appropriate school districts and returned to the ,City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fed form Project No & Name DEV2O17 0187 FRANKLIN GUEST HOUSE Fv Carlsbad Unified School District 6225 El Camino Real Plan Check No.. •. , CBR20172633 Carlsbad CA 92009 '. Phone (760) 331-5000 Project Address 2712 MADISON ST 101 -Assessor's Parcel No 2031100500 [=1 Encinitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Project Applicant COOWNER FRANKLIN MICHAEL AND SANDRA Encinitas CA 92024 , (Owner Name) Phone: (760) 9444300 x1166,. -4 4 - - Residential Square Feet L..J San Dreguito Union H S District 684 Requeza Dr. New/Additions: Encinitas CA 92024 " '4' * Phone: (760) 753-6491 Ext 5514 - - Second Dwelling Unit 825 (B" Arnt Only) - , ,•4,,.. ' , r-r' .' Commercial Square Feet:[ San Marcos Unified Sch District New/Additions 255 Pico Ave Ste 100 San Marcos CA 92069 City Certification City of Carlsbad Building Division Date 03/06/2018 Phone (760) 290-2649 ' Contact Katherine Marceija - (By Appt only) Certification of Applicant/Owners The person executing this declaration (Owner") certifies 'under penalty, of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the ' best of the Owner's knowledge and that the Owner will file an amended certification of Vista Unified School District payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of 1234 Arcadia Drive ' dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial Vista CA 92083 determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect and that (2) the Owner is Phone (760) 726-2170 x2222 '-, the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this ,declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner. - -' SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION 4 - (To be completed by the school district(s)) THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED J -The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all . amounts , - or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District The City may issue building permits for this project. Signature of Authorized School District Official 'P CI I A 2 JL.O - G \ Title: Date: CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT - Name of School District:55 EL CAMINO PEAl, Phone 3 3 / CARLSBAD, CA 921 /9, .: -:•. ,Building Division4' - 1635 Faraday Avenue I Carlsbad CA 92008 I 760-602-2719 1760-602-8558 fax I building@carlsbadca.gov PROJECT INFORMATION - Site Address: '27/ 2— 444t ;7.b,ti 5-= Assessor's ParceI 'Numb-er: - Emergency Contact: - - Name: At - 24 Hour Phone: 70 ) - Construction Threat to Storm Water Quality- (Check Box) •c - . - -- :- - IA EJ MEDIUM • A0W_ - - - • 1--. ' t ' - -r 3, = - k • • • - -: • - - Page 1 of 1 REV 02/16 -t - I ..1. - -. ,- . - 1 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES ALL NECESSARY -EQUIPMENT;AND. MATERIALS SHALL'-BE • AVAILABLE -ON SITE TO-FACILITATE RAPID INSTALLATION -OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT. CONTROL BMPs WHEN RAIN - IS EMINENT -THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES JO WORKING ORDER TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY.INSPECTOR AFTER EACH RUN—OFF PRODUCING RAINFALL. 1, THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL- ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS MAY BE -REQUIRED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR DUE TO INCOMPLETE GRADING OPERATIONS OR UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MAY ARISE. ALL; REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY WHEN THE FIVE (5) - .,DAY RAIN PROBABILITY FORECAST EXCEEDS FORTY -PECENT (40%). SILT AND OTHER DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAINFALL. ALL GRAVEL BAGS SHALL CONTAIN 3/4 INCH MINIMUM AGGREGATE. ADEQUATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND PERIMETER PROTECTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED. THE CITY INSPECTOR SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO ALTER THIS PLAN DURING OR BEFORE CONSTRUCTION AS NEEDED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH CITY STORM WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS. STORM WATER COMPLIANCE FORM TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP .11- BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) SELECTION TABLE Erosion Control Sediment Control BMPs Tracking Non Storm Water Waste Management and Materials - - I • - - BMPs . . Control BMPs Management BMPs Pollution Control BMPs - -- -- - .2 .2 C -d .2 C . . -- - - 0 -l- 0 0 C C -i-i 0 E C 0 E C - - - •• • - V ._, ._• .2- 4-, E >-_ . - 0 - - , 0 (I) C (1) j5 0' C L_. • C Cl) CI) CCL > C • - 0' LiJ - - 0' 0 CO Best Management Practice* Ad s; - E 0 0 j5 ,,. - (BMP)DesCription — DD C 0 EL 0 V (1) > a • 0 0 = -D a) ') 0 C C 0 .... a .._., 0' a 0 _, 4-' 0 0 L 0 D 0 a 0 .,_' 4-' 0 0 ,_' = o. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - C) LU (1) U) U) C) i C) U)> U) U) Q U) -E U) C O- ø 0 Q > C) U) (I) U) 0 U) 0 CASQA Designation - r co 0) T.- r) -ci- If) (0 i- 2 . C'J T Construction Activity LU LU Li LjJ (1) U) U) (I) U) (n U) (1) I— I— - grading/Soil Disturbance Vv'7"7 vlrenching/Excavation - Stockpiling - - - - - - - - ,Drill inq/Boring V Concrete/Asphalt Sawcutting V Concrete Flotwork Paving . --- V - - 7' - - P-, tucco/Mortar Work - - - - - - - V Waste Disposal conduit/Pipe Installation. -- — - - - - - - V Staging/LayDown Area - - - - - - - — — Eguipment Maintenance and Fueling Hazardous Substance Use/Storage ..-- - Dewatering - - - - - - - Site Access Across Dirt - Other (list): -- - - - - - Instructions: - Check the box to the left of all applicable construction activity (first column) expected to occur during construction. Located along the top of the BMP Table is a list of BMP's with it's corresponding California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) designation number. Choose one or more BMPs you intend to use during construction from the list. check the box where the chosen activity row intersects •with the BMP column. 3. Refer to the CASQA construction handbook for information and details of the chosen BMPs and how to apply them to the project. OWNERS CERTIFICATE: I UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE. THAT I MUST: (1) IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRAC110ES (BMPS) DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRAC11CABLE TO AVOID THE MOBILIZATION OF POLLUTANTS •SUCH AS SEDIMENT AND TO AVOID THE EXPOSURE OF STORM WATER TO CONSTRUCTION RELATED POLLUTANTS; AND (2) ADHERE TO, AND AT ALL TIMES, COMPLY WITH THIS CITY APPROVED TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION SWPPP THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACh11v1h1ES UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IS COMPLETE AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF CARLSBAD. -A4 1 * -ei-- CENT NA (PRINT) OWNER(S)/OWNER'S AGENT NAME (SIGNATURE) - DATE - - E-29 - - - - -: City Of Carlsbad Print Date: 07/20/2018 Permit No: PREV2018-0108' Job Address: ' 2712 Madison St, 101 Permit Type: BLDG-Permit Revision Work Class: Residential Permit Revisi Status: Closed - Finaled Parcel No: 20311Ô0500 - Lot #: Applied: 04/20/2018 Valuation :1 ;$ 0.00 . Reference #: DEV2017-0187 Issued: 05/22/2018 ' Occupanèy Groups - - Construction Type Permit 07/20/2018 - . Finaled: # Dwelling Units: r - Bathrooms: Inspector: PBurn Bedrooms: . - Orig. Plan Check #: CBR2017-2633 Final • - Plan Check #: Inspection: . Project Title: FRANKLIN GUEST HOUSE Descriptior: FRANKLIN: CHANGE DOOR LOCATION AND SHEER WALL I - Owner: COOWNER FRANKLIN MICHAEL AND SANDRA 2712 Madison St - . CARLSBAD, CA 92008 FEE AMOUNT BUILDING PLAN CHECK ADMIN FEE : $35.00 MANUAL BUILDING PLAN CHECK FEE - $9000' Total Fees $ 125.00 Total Payments To Date $ 12S.00 Balance Due $0.00 . . I .. ml I -• -. 'S - • . ( . S *-- •- S • 'S - .• I - e 55 - ••-- '. - - S-S '' •. .5 - -. Building Division - 1635 Fa'raday Avenue, Carlsbad CA 92008-7314 760-602-2700 I j60-602-8560f I www.carlsbadca.gov - .5-. • , 1•' V/0 A SAFFbudt Compn 4 * ... DATE: 05/22/18 U APPLICANT U JURIS. JURlSDlCTlONCitfCi ______tid7 PLAN CHECK # PREV2018-0108 (Org CBR2017-2633) SET III PROJECT ADDRESS:, 2712 Madison Ct. PROJECT NAME Door Revision and Shearwall Adjustment ' The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply, with the jurisdiction's building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff 'The pláhs transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at EsGil until corrected plans are submitted for recheck 11111 The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person '1 V The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to Es' staff dud not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed EsGil staff did advise the 5applicant that the plan check has been completed Person 'contacted 7 Telephone # bate contacted by Email Mail Telephone Fax In Person / L1 REMARKS - By Kurt Culver - Enclosures Previously-approved EsGil plans (2 sets) 5/21/18 'I .1 9320 Chesapeake Drive Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 '.- - t . S•• t S•5 5 . . . 1 .. . -S S •, , .- - EsGil A SAFEbuilfCornpany c DATE: 05/14/18 : •, I APPLICANT JURIS JURISDICTION:'City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK # PREV2O18-0108 (Org CBR2017-2633) SET II PROJECT ADDRESS 2712 Madison Ct PROJECT NAME: DoorRevision and Shearwall Adjustment The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes LIII The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building cods when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and shôüIdbecorrected and: resubmitted for a complete recheck. The che . ck list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at EsGil until c6rrectedplans are submitted for recheck - - - •t. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant - contact person - The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to Mike Franklin ' • • -si * ••* ,* - EsGil staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed EsGil staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed ,• Person contacted Mike Franklin Telephone # (760) 586-4061 Date contacted (by c,,) Email mdfpersonalyahoo com Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS By Ryan Murphy (by KC)'':Enclosures EsGil-. -- 5/11/18 4 -. * 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576, City of Carlsbad PREV2018-0108 (Org CBR2017-2633) 05/14/18 NOTE The items listed below are from the previous correction list These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The numbers of the items are from the previous check list and may not necessarily be in sequence. 567 Fnótiuil.,óici font areürrent' .' Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit FOUR new. = complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (THREE sets of plans for residential projects) For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: ¼ • 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) - - 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. ' •. 2. Bring TWO corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil, 9320 '• Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire ; Departments. - - NOTE Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil is complete PLANS - •__•,f_' -.5 5 - - - t S •• - 1 Will reverify all sheets of plans are signed by the person responsible for their preparation (California Business and Professions Code) STRUCTURAL . 2' Please provide a complete revised sheet S-i in which framing plan matches - •. • * layout shown on sheet A-2 from approved set. In addition to the modified shearwalls, please call out all proposed braced wall panels and appropriate hold- downs that were previously called out on sheet S-i for clarity. WE HAVE RECEIVED YOUR REVISED PLANS. PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING: `.REVISED SHEET S-I CONFLICTS WITH SHEET A-2. THE 5' SHEAR WALL. ,•• AT THE EAST SIDE CONFLICTS WITH THE —4' DIMENSION SHOWN IN THE BATHROOM. CHECK FOR OTHER SIMILAR CONFLICTS. B. THE PLANS HAVE BEEN FURTHER REVISED TO SHOW TRUSSES NOW. PLEASE PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THE ENGINEER-OF-RECORD • (CHRISTENSON) HAS REVIEWED THE TRUSS CALCULATIONS. C.' BY REMOVING THE FRAMING PLANS FROM SHEET S-I (REPLACING IT ,. WITH THE TRUSS LAYOUT SHEET), YOU HAVE REMOVED SOME VERY IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM THE PLANS (HEADER SIZES, DETAIL REFERENCE BUBBLES, ETC.). END OF REVIEW -• •- • • • '-S 4 -4 • • - S S - - • .4. - S - - S • • ;-'-. : -•. City of Carlsbad PREV2018-0108 (Org. CBR2017-2633) 05/14/18 To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly - describe them and where they are located in the plans Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate r - Yes El NoU The jurisdiction has contracted with EsGil, located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to * perform the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ryan Murphy (by KC) at EsGil Thank you. . - • 7*. T. --- - - ,! . • * 5, - - -S. - -. -- . .; , :. :- - - . 5,. __•__5 5 5 * , . 5 , ._- . - .1 .5 - . -.. _4•., 4 - EsCii ASAFEbuiftCompany DATE: 05/14/18 : . . U APPLICANT UJURIS. JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad . .. PLAN CHECK #.: PREV2018-0108 (Org CBR2017-2633) SET II .. ,. .,.,. . .- PROJECT ADDRESS: 2712 Madison Ct. ',.. PROJ ECT NAME Door Revision and Shearwall Adjustment LI. Thplan tra'n'smitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially corhp1y with-the jurisdiôtion's building codes. LI The plan ransmilled herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes' .': when' minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.-, he plans 'transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed chick list .and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Es Gil until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The-applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant, contact person The aplicart's copy of the check list has been sent to: Mike Franklin -. ;.. * •,,.: .- . -S . •. LII EsGil staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed EsGil staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person dontacted Mike Franklin Telephone # (760) 586-4061 Date contacted ' (by ) Email mdfpersonal@yahoo.com - MaiL. fax In Person .. . - LI1REMARKS 1 By Ryan Murphy (by KC) Enclosures EsGil , 5/11/18 34 t_ - 4--rn 42. - • - .4 •,,• . . . S ..• S 9320 Chesapeake Drive Suite 208 • San Diego California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 S.. City of Carlsbad PREV2018-0108 (Org. CBR2017-2633) t 5' 05/14/18 '.. . NOTE The items listed below are from the previous correction lists These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The numbers of the items are from the previous check list and may not necessarily be in sequence. otes in bold font are current' Please make all corrections, as requested in the 'correction list. Submit FOUR new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (THREE sets of plans fort,, residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring TWO corrected set of plans and calculations/reports toEsGil, 9320 - Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad, Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments , - NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil is complete PLANS - . • 1. Will reverify all sheets of plans are signed bytheperson responsible for th'eir preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). ... - STRUCTURAL - -- 2. Please provide a complete revised sheet S-i in which framing plan rriatches- layout shown on sheet A-2 from approved set.ln addition to the modified shearwalls, please call out all proposed braced wall panels and appropriate hold-. downs that were previously called out on 'sheet S-i for clarity. WE HAVE RECEIVED YOUR REVISED PLANS. PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING6. A. REVISED SHEET S-I CONFLICTS WITH SHEET A-2. THE 5' SHEAR WALL AT THE EAST SIDE CONFLICTS WITH THE —4' DIMENSION SHOWN IN THE BATHROOM. CHECK FOR OTHER SIMILAR CONFLICTS. THE PLANS HAVE BEEN FURTHER REVISED TO SHOW TRUSSES NOW. PLEASE PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THE ENGINEER-OF-RECORD • • ':, (CHRISTENSON) HAS REVIEWED THE TRUSS CALCULATIONS. BY REMOVING THE FRAMING PLANS FROM SHEET S-I (REPLACING IT WITH THE TRUSS LAYOUT SHEET), YOU HAVE REMOVED SOME VERY IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM THE PLANS (HEADER SIZES, DETAIL REFERENCE BUBBLES, ETC) END OFREVIEW' J -• '- . S. • • p ", . S. r - City of Carlsbad PREV2018-0108 (Org CBR2017-2633) 05/14/18 To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, , calculation page, etc. - Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans ; S . Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate Yes s No I. The jurisdiction has contracted with EsGil, located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, r Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to 4 perform the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ryan Murphy (by KC) at EsGil. Thank ,you r 4 . •' . S - u . .-.-- 1- 4 - -. + 1 * . V V V V EsGil r V V A SAFEbui1tCompany DATE 04/30/2018 D,APLICANT V JURIS. ** JURISDICTION:.City of Carlsbad .—PLAN CHECK #.: PREV2018-0108 (Org. CBR2017-2633) SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS 2712 Madison Ct V V PROJECT NAME: Door Revision and Shearwall Adjustment V, The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply V - •... with the jurisdiction's building codes. V The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes V when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed checklist' and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck V The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at EsGil, : untilcorrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant V contact person. V V VJ V• V V The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: V V Mike Franklin EsGil staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed EsGil staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed 'Person.contacted Mike Franklin Telephone # (760) 586-4061 Date contacted: 1-4b (by) Email: mdfpersonal@yahoo.com V QMail X Telephone)( Fax in Person . V .MARKS V •- V V By: Ryan Murphy V Enclosures: V EsGil 04/23/2018 V 4 V. -V V . V V V V - V V VV9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 , : City of Carlsbad PREV2018-0108 (Org. CBR20172633) 04/30/2018 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK#.: PREV2018-0108 (Org. CBR2O17-2633) JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2712 Madison Ct. FLOOR AREA: No change REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 04/20/2018 STORIES: No change HEIGHT: N.C. DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 04/23/2018 S - •• FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): - This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the California version of l the International Residential Code, International Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, ,. Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. .. Present CIifornia law mandates that construction comply with the 2016 edition of the Califdrnia Code of Regulations (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 2015 IRC, 2015 IBC,. :- 2015 UPC, 2015 UMC and 2014 NEC. .The 'above regulations apply, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied' before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 105.4 of .the 2015 lhternational Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. :1 . IF To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each, correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc.' Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans I •'' r . - City of Carlsbad PREV2018-0108 (Org. CBR2017-2633) 04/30/2018 Please make all corrections, as.requested in the-correction list. Submit FOUR new ., complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (THREE sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602- 2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and : Fire Departments. . 2. Bring TWO corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. :. •, ' • NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil is complete. PLANS 1 Will reverify all sheets of plans are signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). STRUCTURAL 2 Please provide a complete revised sheet S-i in which framing plan matches layout shown on sheet A-2 from approved set In addition to the modified shearwalls, please call out all proposed braced wall panels and appropriate hold- downs that were previously called out on sheet S-i for clarity. END OF REVIEW To speed up the review process note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet note or detail number, calculation page, etc. . • ' ' Please indicate here if any changes have, been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans .- -, 4, Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate -Yes L3 No U The jurisdiction has contracted with EsGil, located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to , '- .. perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regading ' these plan review items, please contact Ryan Murphy at EsGil Thank you : ' . •. - . , • * - City of Carlsbad PREV2018-0108 (Org. CBR2017-2633) 04/30/2018 [DO NOT PAY— THIS IS NOTAN INVOICE] - r VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE : JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK #.: PREV2018-0108 (Org. CBR2017-2633) PREPARED BY: Ryan Murphy DATE: 04/30/2018 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2712 Madison Ct. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3 BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Structural Rev. Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE * . 'Jurisdiction Code #N/A 1997 UBC Building Permit Fee - 1997 UBC Plan Check Fee S I Type of Review E Complete Review El Structural Only LI Other . Repetitive Fee - '-I Repeats '. Hourly 1 Hr. @ * EsGil Fee $90.00 I $90 001 ) - * Based on hourly rate k - .• - Comments: '-L:-. - Sheet 1 of -. - •. :. •'; •.- - •, PLAN CHECK REVISION OR Development Servics Gity of DEFERRED SUBMITTAL Building Division. Carlsbad APPLICATION 1635 Faraday Avenue, B15 www.carisbadca.gov Original Plan Check Numbe ?_oi 7 24 3 Plan Revision Number PREVO1OI Project Addres 2..7/L 44 c4• Qbu.S6kc General Scope of Revision/Deferred Submittal T_.. , cPrIFEC clAL,. SI CONTACT INFORMATION: .• • Nam AMI43 1(4,Ad4' Phone 79 SW 106 / Fax Address274. /k*iJ cityrZip Email Address rsgnci.f j 'r . Cc' Ak Originalpians prepared by an architect or engineer, revisions must be signed & stamped by that person. 1 . Elements revised 'iins LI Calculations LI Soils LI Energy LI Other () Describe revisions in detail List page(s) where each revision is shown 4- 4.:# -44 • .. . IS - 4 A Does this revision in any way, alter the exterior of the project? 'yes LI No Does this revision add ANY new floor area(s)? LI Yes No bóes this revisibn affect any fire related issues? LI Yes No 7..Is this acornpleteset? - LI Yes IiNlo 4 Y12oll 'Sighature - Date 1635 FaràdayAvenue, Carlsba•d, cA 92008 %Ph: 760-602-2719 Fax: 760-602-8558 Email: building@carlsbadca.gov www carlsbadca gov -4 - .•4 ,, 4 - -• -. - 4. t•_• 4- S -- * MiTek® - MuTekUSA, Inc 7777 Greenback Lane - - Suite 109 •, Citrus Heights, CA', 95610 - -• Telephone 916/676-1900 Re 07838-18,,,Fax 916/676-1909 Franklin Guesthouse ' -- - - 4¼ 4 V - : - s - - -• S The truss drawing(s) referenced below have been prepared by MiTek USA, Inc under my direct supervision based on the parameters provided by Mission Truss Company. 4' , • - Pages or sheets covered by this seal R53294341 thru R53294347 My license renewal date for the state of California is March 31, 2018 - RECEIVE MAY 15;,2018 - CITY OF CARL " BAD' BUILDING DIVISION ----4. ,FESSi0, 'EXP. 0313112018 C10- February 27,2018 : rioscu, Eduard :'•-' •- • IMPORTANT NOTE Truss Engineer's responsibility is solely for design of individual trusses based upon design parameters shown on referenced truss drawings Parameters have not been verified as appropriate for any use. Any location identification specified is - for file referenceonly and has not been used in preparing design. Suitability of truss designs for any particular building is the responsibility of the building designer, not the Truss Engineer, per ANSl/TPl-1 Chapter 2 - - • 3 I Job Truss Truss Type Qty Ply Franklin Guesthouse 078345-18 -. - 101 - scissor 12 1 JobReferencetootional) 74-0 • 7-8-0 * ID:hj9QRqxqKqSY6V_spvsyGzicvo.ayob0fHD5OIwIGOXZGgazoB51yoX1qH13_uuKMz0yNfl I 1544 74.0 Scale 1:27.5 - 458 3 '1'3•& -: • •' 1 - 7-8-0 15-0 - - ... 7 Plate Offsets (XY).- 12:0-3-70-0-101, F4:0-3-70-0-101 - • LOADING (psi). . -SPACING- . 2-0-0 • CSI. DEFL. in (lc) I/dell L/d PLATES GRIP 20.0 - ' Plate Grip DOL 1.25 • TC 0.74 Vert(LL) -0.10 5-8 >999 240 MT20 220/195 - - TCDL 14.0 - Lumber DOL 1.25 BC 0.41 Vert(TL) -0.33 5-8 >549 180 - BCII 0.0 .. Rep Stress lncr YES'. WB 0.10 Horz(TL) 0.11 4 na nla - • BCDL 10.0 - Code lBC2012ITP12007 (Matrix-M) Weight: 48 lb FT = 0%f, - LUMBER- - - ,- -. ' BRACING- - - TOP CHORD 2x4 DF No 1&Btr G TOP CHORD Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 3-5-6 oc pulllns • BOT CHORD 2x4 OF No.1&Btr G - -. ' GOT CHORD Rigid calling direody applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing. - WEBS 2x4OF No. 1&BtrG ' • ', - - REACTIONS. (lb/size) 4657/0-3-8,2=758/0-3-8 Max Horz2=51 (LC 12) FORCES. (lb) Max. CompJMax. Ten All forces 250 (Ib) or less except when shown * TOP CHORD 2.12=_1517/0. 2-13=-1727/0, 3-13=-164410, 3-14=-164210, 4-14=-172610, 4.,15=1530I0 - GOT CHORD 2-5=0/1570.4-5=0/1571 ' WEBS .. 3-5=0/813. - . - •. .. * 3 . NOTES- Unbalanced roof five loads have been considered for this design. - Wind: ASCE 7-10; Vultilomph (3-second gust) Vasd87mph; TCOL=8.4psf; BCDL=6.0psf; h=251t; Cat. II; Exp B; enclosed; MWFRS (envelope) game end zone; cantilever left and right exposed; end vertical belt and right exposed; Lumber DOL=1.25 plate grip DOL=1.25 -. - This truss has been designed for a 10.0 p5f bottom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live loads. r- , • This truss has been designed for a live load of 20.0pat on the bottom chord in all areas where a rectangle 3-6-0 tall by 2-0-0 wide lit between the bottom chord and any other members. A plate rating reduction of 20% has been applied for the green lumber members • Bearing at joInt(s) 4.2 considersparallelto grain valueusingANS!/TPI I angle to grain formula; Buiding:designershouldverify capacity of bearing surface. - 7) This truss has been designed for a moving concentrated load of 250.01b live located at all mid panels and at all panel points along the Top Chord, nonconcurrent with any other live loads. 8) 5em1-itgid pitchbreaks including hee15 Member end fixity model was used in the analysis and design of this truss. '.4'' .- ,- & . !• - 4 4 - -I February 27,2018 -. AwsRalNG- ia and RE4D MOMS ON "Us AM INCLUDED WEX NCENCE PAGE ND-7473 rev. W1031201 5 BEE USE Design valid fOr use only with liffekS comiestora This design is based only upon parameters shown. and is for an indi4lduai building component, not - a truss syslara Befom use, the building designer 05151 verity the Wmgbft of design parameters and property Incorporate this design into the 010mg building desigit 855shr9 vidiceted IsIS prevent budding olindRildual Vuss web andior chord members only A on ,nporrp and permanent bracing MeW - is aays required for etebEly and to prevent collapse wlitr possdite personal injury and property damage. For general guidance regarding the - fabricatm $tW59it de". erediori and bracing of busses and buss systenm we AN511TP11 Quality Criteria, 058.89 and Bc09BiatdIn CGEpOa0n1 7777 Greenback Lane Safety InformatIon avelistite from Truss Plate Institute. 218 N Lee Street, SuIte 312, Alexandria. VA 22314. Suite 109 - - - - Citrus Helcit5s, CA 95610 - -,•,-.. _4_ . •* -I Job - Truss Truss Type Ply Franklin Guesthouse Tr - R53294342 07838-18 - TOIA ScIssor . 1 Job Reference I octionall Mission truss, lakeside. ca 7.640 s Aug 162017 Mrrek lndushles, Inc. Tue Feb 27 0921:17 2018 Page 1 - ID:hj9QRqxqKqSY6V_spvsyGsievo-38 b_h thanNQ1)7_BpW?kGoM8mmHV8HeeRsozgyNm - 7-6-0 I 15-0-0 I - 7-6-0 7.6-0 Scale = 125.1 - * -. 4x8 - - 2 3x8 -.. I 15-0-0 7-6-0 - - 7-6.0 Plate Offsets (XV)— rl ii 0-0-101 13:0-3-110-0-101 LOADING (psi) SPACING- 240-0 CSI. DEFL in (lc) Udell Ud PLATES GRIP TCIL 20.0 Plate Grip DOL 1.25 TC 0.74 Vert(LL) -0.10 4-10 >999 240 MT20 2201195 TCDL . 14.0 - Lumber DOL 1.25 BC 0.41 Vert(TL) -0.33 4-10 >552 180 BCLL 0.0 Rep Stress bncr YES WB 0_11 Horz(TL) 0.11 3 n/a We BCDL . 10.0 . Code 1BC20121TP12007 ' (Matrix-M) . Weight 46 lb FT = 0% LUMBER-.' - BRACING TOP CHORD 2x4 OF No.l&Btr G - TOP CHORD Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 3-5-6 cc purlins. BOT CHORD 2x4 OF No.1&Btr G , SOT CHORD Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing. WEBS ,. 2x4 OF No.1&Btr G . 4 REACTIONS. (lblsize) 1=66010-3-8, 3=660/0-3-8 Max Horz l37((_C 9) FORCES. Ob) - Max. CompiMax. Ten. - All forces 250 (lb) or less except when shown. TOP CHORD 1-11=-1528110, 1-12--1749/0.2-12--166510.2-13--1665/0.3-13-1749/0, 3-14-152810 SOT CHORD 14--01,1593 :3-4=0/1593; WEBS - NOTES- 1) Unbalanced roof live loads have been considered for this design. 2) Wind: ASIDE 7-10; Vult=ilomph (3-second gust) Vasd=87mph; TCOL=8.4p5f; BCDL=6.0pst h=25f1 Cat. II; Exp B; enclosed; MWFRS - (envelope) gable end zone; cantilever left and right exposed ; end vertical left and right exposed; Lumber DOLu1 .25 plate grip DOL=1.25 This truss has been designed for 810.0 psI bottom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live loads. • This truss has been designed for a live load of 20.0psf on the bottom chord in all areas where a rectangle 3-6-0 tall by 2-0-0 wide will fit between the bottom chord and any other members 5)Aplateratingreductionof20%has.beenappliedforthegreenlumbermembers. 6) Bearing at joint(s) 1.3 considers parallel to grain value using ANSIITPI I angle to grain formula. Building designer should verify capacity of beating surface. This truss has been designed for a moving concentrated load of 250.0lb live located at all mid panels and at all panel points along the Jop Chord, nonconcurrent with any other live loads. 'Semi-rigid pitctibreaks including heels" Member end fbdty model was used in the analysis and design of this truss. IEODO - , C 75435 .• EXP. 03131/2018 - . - February 27,2018 burwn,,.,kandREADNOTES ON ThIS AND INCLUDED a,IseRueERENCE PAGE ND-74?3 sow. 1083f2O15B LISE. - I - Design seed for use only with MITeSS This design is based only upon parameters shown. and Is for an individual holding component net I a truss spates. Before row the building designer roust verify the appOcability of design parameters and property Incorporate this design Into the overall I buSting design. Bracing ste of hslivtdual truss web soWer oily. Additional temporary Welk' I Is always requited for st55115y and to prevent collapse with poasete personal injury and property damage. For general guidance regarding the I fabrication, iforego, delivery. erection and bracing of trusses and truSs syetnm see Af4SVTPU Quep.h ce'serta, 056-59 and BCS1 Building Component ITTrT Greenback lane -. I • Safety biforinatlon available from Truss Plate Inatthde. 218 N, Lee Silent Suite 312. Alexandria, VA 22314. Sulte109 I CitrusHokttrts,CA 95810 - Job Truss - Truss Type Qty Ply Fronktn Guesthouse - • R53294343 07838.10 - . TO1GE OASI.E I I Job Reference toolionall -- Mission truss, lakeside. ca 7.840n Aug 18 2017 NiTek Industries, Inc.Toe Feb 27 OP.21:18 2018 Page 1 l0:h9QRqxqKqSY6V_spvsyGacvo-XKvLRKJTd?5e?aghi22OGYnnYSVldlWlN?0FzgyNI '(- -1-4-0 7-6-0 I 15-00 -• . 1-4-0 -: -e-o 7-6-0 - k scale 129.4 - - - MT 1.5x3 ON EACH FACE OF BOTH ENDS OF UN-PLATED 'MEMBERS OR EQUIVALENT CONNECTION BY OTHERS. 4x12 II TOP CHORD NOTCHING ALLOWED INAREAS WITH STACKED TOP CHORD ONLY; HOWEVER, NO TOP CHORD NOTCHING IS ALLOWED WITHIN 24' OF THE HEEL JOINTS. -. - NO PLATE NOTCHING IS ALLOWED. -. -' - 3x6 3 3nt 01 ç4 SAA 3x4 4x8 2.5o[ 4x8 3x4 z= -. '•S_*S ' _•I . S 1 -. - I 7-6.0 743-0 I . Rate Offsets (XY)- 102.3)] 12:0-6-8,Edgej, 14:0.6 n,EdQe1, 14:0-6-2.0-3-01 LOADING (pat). SPACING- . 2-0-0 CSI. DEFL in (lc) IIdefl Ud PLATES GRIP TCLL 20.0 - Plate Grip DOL 1.25 - TC 0.27 Vert(LL) 0.00 1 n/r 120 MT20 220/195 TCDL 14.0 Lumber DOL 1.25 BC • 0.19 Vert(TL) 0.03 1 fIr 120 BCLL 0.0"' Rep Stress tncr YES WB 0.05 Horz(TL) 0.00 4 n/a n/a BCDL 100 Code IBC2012TTPI2007 (matrix) Weight: 69 lb FT 0% LUMBER . BRACING - TOP CHORD 2x4 OF No.l&Btr G • '. TOP CHORD Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 6-0-0 oc purina. BOTCHORD 2x4DFNo.1&BtrG BOTCHORD Rigid ceiling directly applied or6.-0-oocbracing. WEBS - ' 2x4OFNo1&BtrG- OThERS 2x4DFNo1&BtrG REACTIONS. All bearings 15-0-0. . (Ib) - Max I-borz 2er48(LC 12) . . ' MaxUplift Allupftftlo0lbortessatjotnt(s)4,2,6 - . Max Gray All reactions 250 lb or less at joint(s) except 4=392(LC 27), 2=435(LC 25), 6411(LC 1), 7=305(LC 3) * . . • 5=310(LC 3) - * •'-' u. . •55 --'. FORCES. (lb) - Max. Con1pJMax Ten. - All forces 250 (Ib) or less except when shown. WEBS- 34-542/28 NOTES- roof Unbalanced of live toads have been considered for this design. - -. Wind: ASCE 7-10; Vuttllomph (3-second gust) Vasd=87mph; TCDLs8.4psf; BCDL=6.opsf; har25ft Cat. II; Exp B; enclosed; MWFRS - . (envelope) gable end zone; cantilever left and right exposed ; end vertical left and right exposed; Lumber DOL=1.25 plate grip DOLer1.25 ' - 3) Truss designed for wind loads in the plane of the truss only. For studs exposed towind (normal to the race), see StàndardIndustry - . Gable End Details as applicable, or consult qualified building designer as per ANSWTPI 1. . -. - 4) Gable requires continuous bottom chord bearing. Gable studs spacedatl-4-0 or- This truss has been designed for a 10.0 pat bottom chord live toad nonconcurrent with any other live loads. -. 7) • This truss has been designed fore We toad of 20.opsf on the bottom chord in all areas where rectangle 3.6-0 tall by 2-0-0 wide will -: • itt between the bottom chord and any other members. - 8) A plate rating reduction of 20% has been applied for the green lumber members. Pg) Provide mechanical connection (by others) of truss to bearing plate capable of withstanding 100 lb uplift at joint(s) 4,2,6. . 10) Beveled plate or shim required to provide full bearing surface with truss chord at joint(s) 6.7,5. 9 ofESSio,. 11) This truss has been designed for a moving concentrated toad of 250.01b live located at all mid panels and at all panel points along the Top Chord, live loads. 'I EOo 1' ) Oi nonconcurrent with any other , * 12) "Semi -rigid pitchbrealcs including heels" Member end fixity model was used in the analysis and design of this truss. G , - '- . -- -:- -- - - C 75435 -. - - - .' -.- S - - - S - EXP. 03/31/2018 - * *.t. - * • * 0FCAU . - . -. - - - : - - -: February 27,2018 WARNING. verry apwrarnelers end READ HOlES ON ThAND INCLUDED NITEK REIRENCE PAGE 711-7473 rev. 101032015 BEFORE wE Design valid for use only with Mffek8 connectors. This design is based only upon parameters shown. and is for an individual building component not a truss system. Before use, the building designer must verity the appOcabitily of design parameters and property incorporate this design Into the overall -. building design. Bracing indicated is to prevent buckling of individual truss web end/or chord members only. Additional temporary and permanent bracing MiTek Is always required for stability and to prevent collapse with possible persona) injury and property damage. For general guidance regarding the fabrication, storage, delivery, erection and bracing of trusses and truss systems. we ANSVVPft Quality criteria, DS8.89 and 6C51 BuIldIng Component I 'iii Greenback Lane - • I - Safetytn64rsnation available from Truss Plate Institute. 218 N. Lee Silent suIte 312, AlexandrIa, VA 22314. suIte toe ' I I citrus l-lelotrts.CA 95610 I 3nb 7 - S I - 7-60 1.5x4 II C 75435 EX 018 CIV OFC February 27,2018 Job Truss Truss Type - Franklin Guesthouse - Qty Ply V R53294344 07838.18 • - T02 - - - Common - 5 Job Reference foptionall & .1 Mission truss, lakeslde,ca . 7.640a . Augg l62Oi7MiTeklndusldes. h TueFeb 270921;192018 Page 1 - -- lD:y8zF3hfO2K6utb8tFTCh47-?XTje9K50J0Udct8EPOHbQpe?9r?EC1Rhj7YwhzgyNk - I 7-6-0 15-0-0 18-4-0 - -'. 1-4-0 . • 7-6-0 7-6-0 - - :- - ScaIet29.4 -- 4x8 - -, -V. -. •• . 3 -- PLATES GRIP MT20 220/195 Weight- 5llb FT 0% LUMBER- - : -- . • BRACING- -- V V TOP CHORD 2x4 OF No.1&Btr G - - - V V TOP CHORD Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 5-6-3 oc purtins; - V ROT CHORD 2x4 OF No.1&Btt S V DOT CHORD Rigid ceding directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing. V V WEBS ZA OF No.1&Bfr G : V V . - - REACTIONS. - Qb/erze) 2755/0-3-8,4=755/0-3-6 V V V - - - - Max Hosz 2=-44(LC 13) V V V V FORCES. (Ib) - Max CompJMaL Ten.- All forces 250 (Ib) or less except whenshown V V, V - TOP CHORD 2-13=-1372/17, 2-14=-897/0, 3-14=-80310, 3-15=-80310.4-15=-897/0,4-16--1372/11 BOT CHORD 2-6=0/741,4-6=01741 • V WEBS $-6=0/304 V . - • - . - • V -•-. NOTES- .--. . 1) Unbalanced roof live loads have been considered for this design. 2) Wind: ASCE 7-10; Vult=llomph (3-second gust) Vasd=87mph; TCDL=8.4psf BCOL=60psf: h=251t; Cat. II; Exp B: enclosed; MWFRS (envelope) gable end zone; cantilever left and right exposed: end vertical left and right exposed; Lumber DOL1.25 plate gap DOL=125 . 3) This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psi bottom chord live load nonconcerrent with any other live loads. 4) This truss has been designed for a live load of 20.opsf on the bottom chord in all areas where a rectangle 3-6-0 tall by 24)-0 wide will fit between the bottom chord and any other members. 5) A plate rating reduction of 20% has been applied for the green lumber members. .6) This truss has been designed for a moving concentrated load of 250.0lb live located at all mid panels and at all panel points along the Top Chord, nonconQirrent with any other live loads. 7) Semi-slgid pitchbreaks including heels Member end fixity model was used in the analysis and design of this truss. * A wamiwre k4r8 gn ..ba ash READ NOES ON ThIS AND IZ4CUIDED8UTEI( R CE PA GE ND-7473 so,. IDC1GO15BOREtISE Design valid ftr use ordy mliii Mffde5 connectors. Tide design to based only upon parameters slimen. and is for an IrtdMdUaI building component not - a truss system. Before use, the building desigem must verify the apØcabduty of design parameters and property Incorporate thin design Into the mevag sitø prevent buckling of IndMdual truss web and/or chard members only. Mdilianal ternporary and pennanent bracing MiTek . Is atmays required foe mbbNly arid to prevent cetspse with prisdele personal Injury and property damage. For general guidance regarding the BC of 4 fabrication, stomp, ___ Safety avatabin from Trims te trrstltrde, 218M Lee Sheet Sate 312. Ainsondtta. VA 22314. I ,,,, Greenback Lane detrvery. er ection and bracing trusses and truss 5951et05 see ANSUWlI Quality Criteria, 0S8-89 and IS Building Component I SrAN1O9 - I cam HeigtrtsCA 95610 V _•••_ •V_• • V . -- :'- V • ,. - LOADING (psi) V V SPACING- 2-0-0 CSI. DEFL. in (lc) I/dell lid - TCLL - 20.0 Plate Grip DCL 1.25 V ,- - TC 0.63 Vert(LL) -0.04 6-12 >999 240 TCDL 14.0 V• Lumber DOL 125 BC 0.30 Vert(TL) -0.14 6-12 >999 180 V : DCLI - 0.0 Rep Stress Incr YES -. WE 0.04 Horz(TL) 0.02 4 n/a n/a V BCDL 10.0 V• Code IBC2012ITPl2007 (Matrix-M) J -. • - Truss . Truss Type Qty Ply Franklin Guesthouse P V R53294345 07838-I8 TOSA V Common 8 1 V Job Reference loolional) MenSRP UUaa. IcMn. so ,.uw a PU LUIP PRPPCP. IPPP1USPJPRO. PR.. PPfl ruM sot P. PC PU ra,ju I IO:y8zF3hfO2K6utb8tFTCW2zh47-?X7egK5OJDUck96EPDHb0pew9ryEClRly7YwhzgyNk I 7.6.0 I 15.0.0 16-4.0 - - 7.4-0 7.6.0 - Scale 127.5 - I 4d/ 5.OD r12 13 14, 112 15 3x6= .' ' 1.5x411 . - 7-6-0 I 15-0.0 3x8 7-6.0 7430 - - Plate Offsets (XV)- r1:0-3-0.0-1-21, r3:0-3-0.0-1-21 LOADING (psl). r SPACING- 240-0 CSI. DEFL in (lc) Well Ud PLATES GRIP TCLL * 20.0 - Plate Grip DOL 1.25 TC 0.63 Vert(LL) -0.04 5-8 >999 240 MT20 220/195 TCDL V 14.0 . Lumber DOL 1.25 BC 0.30 Vert(TL) -0.15 5-8 >999 180 V V BCLL 0.0 * - Rep Stress lncr YES WB 0.04 Horz(TL) 0.02 3 n/a n/a V BCDL- 10.0 •- Code IBC2012ITPI2007 (Matrix-N) Weight 49 lb FT 0% - V V - BRACING- TOP CHORD 2x4 OF No.1&Btr G . V V TOP CHORD Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 5-5-12 oc puilins. BOTCHORD 2x4DF No. 1&BtrG - V BOTCHORD Rigid ceding directly applied orlo-0-oocbracing. V WEBS V 2x4 DF No.1&81r G V REACTIONS. (lb/size) Max Ho,z1=51(LC9) V FORCES (ib) - Max. CompiMax. Ten. - All forces 250 (Ib) or less except when shown. V V - TOP CHORD 1-12--1373/39,1-13--903/0,2-13=-81010,2-14=-81010, 3-14=-904/0, 3-15=-1370/12 BOTCHORD 1-5=01748,3-5=0/748 WEBS 2-5=0/308 V V NOTES- 1) Unbalanced roof live loads have been considered for this design. 2) Wind: ASCE 7-10; Vult=llomph (3-second gust) Vasd=87mph; TCOL=8.4ps1 B OL=60pSf h25fi Cat. U; Exp 8; enclosed; MWFRS (envelope) gable end zone; cantilever tell and right exposed; end vertical left and right exposed; Lumber DOL=1.25 plate grip 00L125 V This truss has been-designed for a 10.0 pat bottom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live loads. V • This truss has been designed for a live load of 20opsf on the bottom chord in all areas where a rectangle 3-6-0 tall by 2-0-0 wide will fit between the bottom chord and any other members. V A plate rating reduction of 20% has been applied for the green lumber members. - This truss has been designed for a moving concentrated load of 25001b live located at all mid panels and at all panel points along the Top Chord, nonconoirrrent with any other live loads. 'Semi-rigid pitchbreaks including heels" Member end fixity model was used in the analysis and design of this truss. V LU 03131/2018 . •V V February 27,2018 AWAMMG-Vaft t and READ NOTES ON Titsi AND INCLUO56) NO95(RiCEPAGEND-T4T3,w 1062/2015 BEFORE USE. Design v59d for use only with Mffe1s2I connectors. This design is based only upon parameters shown. and IS for an Individual building component not a truss syatarn. Before use, the building designer must vurify the .p 0.-.t.l5ly of design parameters and property incorporate this design into the overall bu*Sng design. Bracing indicated Is to prevent budding of kndtodiia)truss web and/or shard members only. Add/usual temporary and pemranent bracing MiTek' V - Is always required for efabtily and to pravera udlapse with possitite personal bljury and property damage. For genera) guidance regarding the I fabulcahon, atorage. delivery, eredion and teasing of trusses andtruss systems. see aasutii Quality Criteria, 0S8.89 and BCS1 Building Component I 7777 Greenback Lana 1u11e109 V Safoly lüf..,...a&**. avadebte froni Trims Plate lnliuluta. 218 N Lea Street fonts 312. Atessndrta, VA 22314. Br I citjusHeinfita,CA 95610 - Job - Truss -' - - - Truss Type thy Ply Franklin Guesthouse - - - R53294346 07838-18 - -- ' -. T028 - -. - - - GABLE 1 1 Job Reference (cotional) - ,. Mirsiontiuss. lakeside, ca 7.640 a Aug 182017MlteiithisirIes.Inc. Tue Feb 2709-21:202018 Page ID:y8zF3hf02K6uth8tF_TCW2zh_47-Tj18s0Lj9cLLEutdo6M7eLxoZEmzdRbzcs617zgyNj * -4- 3-9-o I 11-3.0 I 15-0-0 18-4-0 -- 1-4-0 3-9.0 - -. - 3-9-0 3-9-0 3-9-0 .5. - - - - Scale 1:30.4 MT 15x3 ON EACH FACE OF BOTH ENDS OF UN-PLATED MEMBERS OR EQUIVALENT CONNECTION BY OTHERS. 4x12 - TOP CHORD NOTCHING ALLOWED IN AREAS WITh STACKEDTOP CHORD ONLY; . HOWEVER, NO TOP CHORD NOTCHING IS ALLOWED WITHIN 24" OF THE HEEL JOINTS. - NO PLATE NOTCHING IS ALLOWED. 4 20 j 5.66 Fi2 21 42 4 c - 3x4 22 4x8II - '-. 10 9 8 45811 3s4= - '4 t - - 7-8.0 7-8-0 . Plate Offsets (X.Y)— l:0-3-9.Edne1. 120-3-14.Edael. 16:O-3-9,Edqel. (6:0-3-14.Edqt-' . LOADING (pat) .,. .s SPACING- 2-0-0 CSI OEFL. in (lc) Udell Lid PLATES GRIP • TCLL 20.0,- Plate GnpDOL .. 1.25 TC 0.11 Vert(LL) 0.00 6 n/r 120 MT20 2201195' TCDL. 14.0 Lumber DOL 125 ,.' BC 0.07 Vert(TL) -0.00 7 fIr 120 . - -,BCLL - 0.0 .. Rep Stresslncr YES - WB 0.16 Hovz(TL) 0.00 6 nla n/a -' BCDL 100 ' Code IBC2012/TP12007 (Matrix) Weight. 91 lb FT = 0% LUMBER . , BRACING- TOP CHORD .2x4DFNo1&BtrG, . S ' TOPCHORD Structural wood sheathing directly àpphedor6-0-0ocpuvlins. + BOT CHORD 2x4 OF No 1&Btr (3 - BOT CHORD Rigid ceiling directly applied or 6-0-0 oc bracing. -WEBS- 2x4DFStud/StdG OTHERS 2x4 DF StuWStd C 5,.. 4.••_ ,-I ,, REACTIONS' All bearings 15-0-0:!- (Ib) - Max Hors 2=-42(LC 13) .-, MaxUplift All uplift loolborlessatjoint(s)Z6,9 - 4 - - . MaxGrav All reactions 2501bor less a1 joint(s) 10,8 except 2=383(LC 27), 6=383(LC 31), 9=775(LC 1) FORCES. (Ib) Max. CompJMax. Ten. - All forces 250 (Jb) or less except when shown. TOP CHORD 2-19=-290170, 3-19-269/89, 4-2@-101303, 4-21=01303, 5-22=-269/89, 6-22=_290/70 BOT CHORD 210=66!251, 9-10=-66/251, 8-9=-66/251, 6.8=.66/251 - WEBS - 4-9=-474/24, 5-9=-487/86, 3-9=-487/84 -, NOTES,; . .., Unbalanced roof liveloads have beenoonsideredfor this design:. Wind: ASCE 7-10; Vult=llomph (3-second gust) Vasd-87mph; TCDL=8.4p5f; BCDL=6.opsf; h=25ft; Cat. II; Exp B; enclosed; MWFRS -. (envelope) gable end zone; cantilever left and right exposed; end vertical left and right exposed; Lumber DOL=125 plate grip DOL=1.25 - . - 3) Truss designed for wind loads in the plane of the truss only. For studs exposed to wind (normal to the face), see Standard Industry - - Gable End Details as applicable, or consult qualified building designer as per ANSI/WI 1. Gable requires continuous bottom chord beating. • Gable studs spaced at 1-4-0 oc. - .6) This truss has been designed for a 10.0 pat bottom chord five load nonconcurrent with any other live loads. 7) This truss has been designed for a live load of 20.opsf on the bottom chord in all areas where a rectangle 3-6-0 tall by 240-0 wide will fit between the bottom chord and any other members, - 8) A plate rating reduction of 20% has been applied for the green lumber members. - :.. 9) Provide mechanical connection (by others) of truss to beating plate capable of withstanding 100 lb uplift at joint(s) 2,6,9. ?90FESSO/,/ ....- 10) This truss has been designed for a moving concentiat load of 250.b I located at at mid panels and at at panel points along the IE Top Chord, nonconcurrent with any other live loads..4- • 11) "Semi-rigid pitchbreaks including heels" Member end fixity model was used in the analysis and design of this truss. C-2 , -, .. ID Q C 75435 : - - -. - • -, -- EXR0313112018 ','-J. -.s' •-'. r- - * -. - * - -. '4 - •' ,. ''• -. . - - 4 I OFcpL , February 27 2018 Parameters and PEAD NOTES ON SWS AND INCLUDED WrB( REFERENCE PAGE 8W-T4T3 sow. 1O$JVZOIS BEFORE USE . -. •-' - Design valid for use only w8h idrieir5 connectors. This design is based only upon parameters shown, and is for an Individual building component not - -. - a truss sysieni. Before use, the building designer nwdi veflfy the app8ceblbiy of design parameters and property Incorporate this design into the overall •. - - building design Bracing indicated isle present buckling of Individual truss web andtor chord members only. Additional temporary and permanent bracing M1T k • is always required for stability and to prevent collapse with possible personal injwy and property damage. For general guidance regarding the - ' - - - fabrication. ciorage, delivery, erection and bracing of trusses and truss system we 5455 y5 055.89 wid BCS1 Beesng component 7777 Greenback Lane Safety lnfonnatlon available from Truss Plato Incihtute, 218 N. Lee Street. Suite 312, AlexandrIa, VA 22314. Suite 109 - - ' -- -• • - citnisHeiahts.CA 95610 t -I..- • " - - • • . • S q - WARN2NG - kebi daslga Su. arid READ NOIES ON TANDINCWDED7EK REFERENCE PAGE 81J-7473 sw. 14025015 BEFORE USE. Design valid for use only with MiTe This design is based" upon parameters thorn, and is for an Individual building component not MI! a truss system. Before tee, the buesng designer must seillytite applicability of design parameters and properly incorporate this design Into the overall buorg design Brig indlosied is to preyed buckling ofindbldual buss web endior druid members only. Mdutbnat temporary arid permanent bracing I Milek' Is akays required (or atabilhly and to prevent coltopse with possible persona) Iltuly and property damage For general guidance regarding the fabrication, storage, delivery. erection and bracing of trusses and truss 5y0tem91 see ANSIJTP?1 Quality criteria, 058.89 and SCSI BuildIng COmpctwflt I 7777 Greenback Lane Safety Information available from Truss Plate institute, 218 It Lee Street. Suite 312. Alexandria. VA 22314. I Suite 109 ' -- • I citrus Heiqtts,CA oneto - 'I -• I' -- •,• '•: 5 • ' Mietonthiss. - - , 7.640sAug 162017 Nfl industries, Inc. Tuo Fab 27O921212018 Page 1 I0.y&F3hfO2K8uth8tFjCW247-xvbU3MU.wwTCs1JVMqGlgni6Yza?i4hkCGd7ZzgyNi 11-3.0 1-4-0 3-9.0 , 3.9-0 3-9-0 3-9-0 d scale 1:30_4 MT 1.5x3 ON EACH FACE OF BOTH ENDS OF UN-PLATED -- . - MEMBERS OR EQUIVALENT CONNECTION BY OTHERS. 4x12 II TOP CHORD NOTCHING ALLOWED IN AREAS WITH STACKED TOP CHORD ONLY; ,•, . HOWEVER, NO TOP CHORD NOTCHING IS ALLOWED WITHIN 24' OF THE HEEL JOINTS. NO PLATE NOTCHING IS ALLOWED. 3X4 3X4 -- &oo F12 21 ~z 20 402 22 -, 4X8111 " 10 9 8 4x8 II 3x4 = '.4, - - -. 3x4 = -' .- - - . - 3x8 = - . .-' '/ - 7-6-0 I 15-0-0 7-6-0 7-8-0 ,- Plate Offsets ((Y)— 12:0-3-9Edqe1. 12:0-3-14.Edgel, [6:0-3-9.Edqel, r6:0-3-14.Ednr' 4 --- = - - r '-'-. LOADING(psf) I SPAClNG- 2-0-0.,,- - 'CSI. OEFL in (Icc) I/deft Ud PLATES GRIP t 4- TCLL 20.0 .' Plate Grip DOL 1.25 TC 0.11 Vert(LL) 0.00 6 n/r 120 MT20 2201195 TCDL. 14.0' ,' Lumber DOL' 125 BC 0.07 Vert(TL) -0.00 7 n/r 120 - BCLL •-" 0.0 Rep Stress Incr YES i : - WE 0.16 Horz(TL) 0.00 6 n/a n/a - BCDL . 10.0, . Code tBC20121TPl2007 - '(Matrix) Weight 911b FT = 0% .' LUMBER- - . BRACING- - TOP CHORD 2x4 DF No 1&Btr G - TOP CHORD Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 6-0-0 cc purlins ,n BOTCHORD 2x4DFNo.1&BtrG • -. " - BOTCHORD Rigid ceiling directly applied 0r6-0-oocbradng. ', •. ,. ' .1 WEBS 2x40 Stud/Std G •• •• OTHERS 2x4 OF StudlStd G - REACTiONS. All beanngs -0-I) " (Ib) - Max Horz 2-42(LC 13) . •. MaxUplift Allupliftloolborlessatjoint(s)2,6,9 MaxGrav Aflreactions250Ibor less atjoint(s)10,8 except 2=383(LC27).6=383(LC31),9=775(LCI) - FORCES. (ib) - Max CornpiMax. Ten: - All forces 250 (Ib) or less except when shown. TOP CHORD 2-19=-290/70, 3-19=-269189, 4-20-10/303, 4-210/303, 5.22=269/89, 6-22=-290170 - BOTCHORD 2-10=-66/251, 9-10=46/251, 8-9-66/251, 6-8=46/251 . . WEBS . 4-9=7474124,5-9=4 87/86, 3-9=-487/84 - -. - -.-•-- .... •- -- I NOTES-. -.' ,'. •. 1) Unbalanced root live loads have been considered for this design. I - 2) Wind: ASCE 7-10; Vult"llomph (3-second gust) Vasd87mph; TCDL=8.4psf; BCDL=6.0ps1; h=2511; Cat. II; Exp 8; enclosed; MWFRS •- (envelope) gable end zone; cantilever left and right exposed end vertical left and right exposed; Lumber DOL=125 plate grip DOL'1.25 - .• '3) Truss designed for wind loads in the plane of the truss only. For studs exposed to wind (normal to the face), see Standard Industry ,•• - Gable End Details as applicable, or consult qualified building designer as per ANSIJTPI 1. ' - 4) Gable requires continuous bottom chordbeaiing. '. 15) Gable studs spaced at 1-4-0 cc. Ths truss has been designed for a 10.0 psI bottom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live loads. -This truss has been designed for a live load of 20.0p51 on the bottom chord in all areas where a rectangle 3.6-0 tall by 240-0 wide will . fit between the bottom chord and any other members. , f - 8) A plate rating reduction 0120% has been applied for the green lumber members. Provide mechanical connection (by others) of truss to bearing capable of withstanding 100 lb uplift at joint(s) 26,9. - ,9) plate -- '. ?9,0SSOiv This truss has been designed for a moving concentrated load of 250.Olb live located at all mid and at all along the panels panel points 2 ,.. - nonconcurrent with any other Top Chord, live toads. , Semi-sigid pitchbreaks including heeIs Member end fixity model was used in the analysis and design of this truss. - C75435 EXP 03/31/2018 - * * - ' - - - -. ••- . : • . -. - -. - OFC -. -. - - • - . - February 27,2018 Job - ., Truss Truss Type; Oty Ply Franklin oueathouae t- - . - • - . - R53294347 TGE GABLE - I _____________ Job Reference (cotional) - Symbols 4 PLATE LOCATION AND ORIENTATION Center plate on joint unlegg x, y I I offsets are indicated. Dimensions are in ft-in-sixteenths. Apply plates to both sides of truss and fully embed teeth. For 4 x 2 orientation, locate Plates 0- "id from outside edge of truss. This symbol indicates the required direction of slots in connector plates. * Plate location details available In MiTek 20120 software or upon request. PLATE SIZE The first dimension is the plate 4 v 4 width measured perpendicular to slots. Second dimension is the length parallel to slots. Numbering System- A General Safety Notes * 6-4-8 dimensions shown in ft-in-sixteenths' .- Failure to Follow Could Cause Property - (Drawings not to scale) Damage or Personal Injury 1 2 3 1. Additional stability bracing for truss system, e.g. TOP CHORDS diagonal or X-bracing, is always required. See BCSI. Truss bracing must be designed by an engineer. For wide truss spacing, individual lateral braces themselves may require bracing, or alternative Tor I bracing should be considered. Never exceed the design loading shown and never L) stack materials on inadequately braced trusses. a- o 4. Provide copies of this truss design to the building designer, erection supervisor, property owner and all other interested parties. 6 5 S. Cut members to bear tightly against each other. 6. Place plates on each face of truss at each JOINTS ARE GENERALLY NUMBERED/LETTERED CLOCKWISE joint and embed fully. Knots and wane at Joint AROUND THE TRUSS STARTING AT THE JOINT FARTHEST TO locations are regulated by ANSI/TPI 1. THE LEFT. Design assumes trusses will be suitably protected from CHORDS AND WEBS ARE IDENTIFIED BY END JOINT the environment in accord with ANSiiTPI 1. NUMBERSILETTERS Unless otherwise noted, moisture content of lumber shall not exceed 19% at time of fabrication. PRODUCT CODE APPROVALS Unless expressly noted, this design is not applicable for ICC-ES Reports: use with fire retardant, preservative treated, or green lumber. Camber Is non-structural consideration and is the ESR-1 311 ESR-1 352, ESRI 988 responsibility of truss fabricator. General practice is to ER-3907, ESR-2362, ESR-1 397, ESR-3282 camber for dead load deflection. 44 oI.,4 . C;.. ..A h......41,,... ,4IC,C..I... 0 0 I 0 0 BOTTOM CHORDS 8 7 - 1 I. rICIC I7JC, CISC, %IIICIIICIIUII CIIC IVLIUII me". ..a Indicated are minimum plating requirements. LATERAL BRACING LOCATION ' 12 Lumber used shall be of the species and size and - ' . '• - - -. ' in all respects, equal to or better than that . Indicated by symbol shown and/or Trusses are designed for wind loads in the plane of the specified. by text in the bracing section of the - . truss unless otherwise shown. ' ', 13. Top chords must be sheathed or purlins provided at output. Use T or I bracing '. . . spacing Indicated on design. If indicated. , ,- ' Lumber design values are in accordance with ANSI/TPI I '• - section 6.3 These truss designs rely on lumber values 14 lateral bracing at 10 ft. spacing, or less, If no ceiling Is Installed. unless otherwise d BEARING ' .. established by others. .. 15. Connections not shown are the responsibility of others. Indicates location where bearings ' 16 Do not cut or after truss member or plate without prior (supports) occur. Icons vary but . '. - . © 2012 MiTek® All Rights Reserved ', approval of an engineer. reaction section indicates joint number where bearings occur. 17 Install and load vertically unless indicated otherwise Min size shown is for crushing only ____ 18 Use of green or treated lumber may pose unacceptable environmental health or performance risks Consult with . . I . - project engineer before use. Industry Standards ANSI/TPII: : National Design Specification for Metal , ': 19. Review all portions of this design (front, back, words Plate Connected Wood Truss Construction.',. and pictures) before use Reviewing pictures atone r9..ao Design IBracing.Is not sufficient $ BCSI Building Component Safety Information 20 DesIgn assumes manufacture In accordance with Guide to Good Practice for Handling ..M U ANSl/TPI I Quality Criteria Installing & Bracing of Metal Plate I Connected Wood Trusses. " . '. Milek Engineering Reference Sheet: MlI-7473 rev. 10/03/2015 -0 - J j 35 Coastview Ci- Carlsbad, CA 200 -Joe 1-lETNO OF ___ CALCULA'rO V PC DA 10110/17 C}1C3Y CATE CAL - &phone (760) 207-1885 - Ern uLsdenaWcn - - - SA Lateral Desin & A,ialsis - 2nd Story Shear Walls N/S 1I LVJ) . . . MAY 1 5 2011 IT] - CITY OFCARCS'B D BUILDINGDI\IjS •••.. " - ........................-- -- - Li. .-----;........... :-: •' -• ------: -- -.. . -7 .j_4..__ ....... ---T 4.2. -. -. ... i LI ........... . ,..,. - •. ,. .....-._.. . ...... I . ... \V ril"Zi! Gridlne .1 3 . Lesgth r.fSh w11s - Tool W&1 Ht, 9 Q !) Type c S FAI/E PALE FALE --..- Grid line the C .---- ----- Lih of 1i mwiUs - Total WÜI1 H1. Typo s D '/0 L \'/fli 710 60 T- 0.0 -.--- ----- D - 0.0 0.1) — 0,0 .. rn3: aul.pernfl.cm 5Witera1DsLgn& AnaIyis (cont) Gridfle - 32 '-( 533 032 .W6 ) 1716 1h. 7 2d5 P1lAtccrr - OTI, Gridh 50 , 0 fl = 26M.. Ibs J6. -ft 168 911 ,JTGrid11ni (T - 1- % I 536 / NDU2 : 4 - - jaw ff:j~oto 329 Coastulew Ci - Csbad, CA 92010 jOB t . -SHT'JO Z. or CALCULATED T'? -- P-SC OATS 10/10117 CHECK BY DATI E -. - _l -. • J - - - -. - eIepflOnet(bU)•U(tIt- 5.1 5LateriI .I)eitn & .Anahsi (Cont.) 27 3023, 0.27 fl 16S. 979 97R -ft. 78 plf - -.YOTF '70L lbs. iT Gtd1ine ( 50 % ( 3623 0-50 1 m i ) - -__ !?1 OTF • •jib. Grthme 33 ' 0 3 1 190 i) (.9 . . i6 - '\ ', IL -.- S0 OF OTF I ** - - - -- _.9 -I ,.-- •- - . . -. 1•. - • 9 --...•.' -.-----.- ••••.- :- -.: -• -. ['. . :• - - .. ir II :9 /\ 'I UDU? A HtL12 I - - c4/ZAttrntj7 Jm ffzk 3.529 Coaswtew Ct Carlsbad, CA 920Q 19 - JOB ,SHEET NO 1) OF CALCULATE-08Y P-SC DATE CHECkY DAT C 5 - f :- 5 ,? . - - .5- -5 9. •:- -___ -. - , 9