The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2719 NAPLES CT; ; CB001874; PermitCity ofCärlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 0I01/2000 Residential Permit Permit NoCB001874 - Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 2719 NAPLES CT CBAD Permit Type: . RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Status: ISSUED Parcel No: 1673933600 Lot #: 0 Applied: 05/10/2000 Valuation: $15,680.00 Construction Type: NEW Entered By: MDP Occupancy Group: 27 Reference #: Plan Approved: 08/28/2000. # Dwelling Units: 0 Structure Type: Issued: 09/01/2000 Bedrooms: 0 Bathrooms: 0 Inspect Area: Project Title: LAUBACH RESIDENCE Orig PC#: KITCHEN & CLOSET EXPANSION Plan Check#: Applicant: Owner: LAUBACH JOHN&JULIE -CAUBACH JOHN&JUIJE 2719 NAPLES CT 2719 NAPLES CT, CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBADCA 92008 7 \ ) '7738 09/01/00 0001 01 02 Total Fees: $377.60 Total Pamentsffo Date: $107;95 Balaice Due: $6165 269.65 Building Permit $166.08 Meter.Size--- ierm1Fee ' M.00 ' \$0.00 Plan Check / . $0.00 Add'I Plan Check Fee 0.00 S-DCWA FeeoO' $0.00 Plan Check Discount $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $0.00 Park in Lieu Fee 0.00 O-F'(CFD Funid) $0.60 LFM Fee 0-66 0166ni~ Tax (CFD'Fund)) $0.00 Bridge Fee \ \ $0.00 7 çrraffic impact Iee' $0.00 Other Bridge Fee \ $0.00 TräfficImpact'(CFD Fund) / $0.00 BTD #2 Fee \ . \$0.00 LFMZ Transportation Fee / $0.00 BTD #3 Fee $0.00 lNCCSiddIk Fee ./' / $0.00 Renewal Fee $0.00 PLUMBING,TOTAL / $56.00 Add'l Renewal Fee $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL / $20.00 Other Building Fee $0.00 MECHANICAL\TOTeB / $26.00 Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 [Housing Impact Fee $0.00 Meter Size '- Housh,glrLiei:Fee _-' $0.00 Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee -$0.00 Mèster Drainage Fee: $0.00 Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 ---_ Sewer Fee: _-- $0.00 TOTALPERMIT FEES $377.60 FINAL APPROVAL Inspector: &3- Date: •/I -5-/ Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the 'Imposition' of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as fees/exactions.' You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Cadsbâd Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to potest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. 3873 PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NoLi Lk EST. VAL. ( o& — Plan' Ck. Deposit Validated By________________________ Date - £/ Address Address (include Bldg/Suite #) Business Name (at this address) 2111 19 kii4r?LS (.J Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Assessor's Parcel # ExistintU se Proposed Use 0 6881 05/10/00 0001 01 02 of Work #0? # or Bedrooms Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # Fax if '-a City State/Zip Name Address City State/Zip Telephone if L5ONIRACJJY.,NAME iii JT (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). Name Address City State/Zip Telephone if State License if License Class City Business License if Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License if go Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. 1 have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date__________________ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1001 OR LESS) CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for In Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE I h9by affirm that I am exempt from the Contractors License Law for the following reason: I, as owner of the property. or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044. Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). o I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES .DNO - I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide (include name / address / phone-number / contractors license number): I plan to provide portions of the work, but I hay red t%!0~,r6e;~4poordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name /-address / phone number / contractors license nu number I will provide some of the ork, but I v con t ired a o)Ig persons to provide the work indicated (include namej address / phone number / type of work): f PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE ' DATE -i/fl / ___ Is the applicant or future buildine or ire o submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1.000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR _POLL N_CONTROL DISTRICT. - 18'.~c.',tt,,i~'CONSTRUCTION,-LENDING~AGENC -Y I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 30970) Civil Code) LENDER'S NAME. LENDER'S ADDRESS_______________________________________________________ E L ri. - - * I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agrie to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Citi of Carlsbad to enterupon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, DEMNIF D KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY C AGA ST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavati s over 5' d n moliti or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit• sued by the bu ing Offici d th ovision of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permi is not co ence it • ys f date uch permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work commen r a period 1 ays ec• 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE -_• DATE ff0/p WHITE: ile YELLOW: Applicant. PINK: Finance- City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 10/04/2001 LJ Permit# CB001874 Title: LAUBACH RESIDENCE Description: KITCHEN & CLOSET EXPANSION Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Job Address: 2719 NAPLES CT Inspector Assignment: RB Phone: 7604345136 Suite: Lot 0 Location: Inspeótor: APPLICANT LAUBACH JOHN&JULIE Owner: LAUBACH JOHN&JULIE REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST Remarks: Total Time: Requested By: JOHN Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description Act Comments i9 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Associated PCR Inspection History Date Description Act lnsp Comments 06/05/2001 19 Final Structural Co RB SEE NOTICE ATTACHED 06/05/2001 29 Final Plumbing AP RB 06/05/2001 39 Final Electrical CO RB 06/05/2001 49 Final Mechanical AP RB 12/05/2000 82 Drywall/Ext Lath/Gas Test AP RB 12/04/2000 13 Shear Panels/HD's AP RB DOUBLE SHEAR 12/04/2000 17 Interior Lath/Drywall CA RB 12/04/2000 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall CA RB 12/01/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP RB ENG OK ON RAFTERS 12/01/2000 16 Insulation AP RB SEE ATTACHED NOTICE 11/29/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PA RB ND ENG. FOR RAFTER SEAT CUT 11/29/2000 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall CO RB SEE NOTICE ATTACHED 11/29/2000 24 Rough/Topout AP RB 11/29/2000 34 Rough Electric AP RB 11/29/2000 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers AP RB 11/22/2000 16 Insulation PA RB @ DOUBLE SHR AREA ONLY City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 12/1/2000 Permit# CB001874 Inspector Assignment: RB Title: LAUBACH RESIDENCE Description: KITCHEN & CLOSET EXPANSION Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Phone: 9494665105 Job Address: 2719 NAPLES CT Suite: Lot 0 Location: Inspector: APPLICANT LAUBACH JOHN&JULIE Owner: LAUBACH JOHN&JULIE REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST Remarks: p Total Time: Requested By: JOHN Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description Act Comments 16 Insulation . . 4 /5a /4' #9 P j1á Associated PCRs Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 11/29/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding. PA RB ND ENG. FOR RAFTER SEAT CUT 11/29/2000 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall CO RB SEE NOTICE ATTACHED 11/29/2000 24 Rough/Topout AP RB 11/29/2000 34 Rough Electric AP RB 11/29/2000 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers AP RB 11/22/2000 16 Insulation PA RB @ DOUBLE SHR AREA ONLY 11/22/2000 24 Rough/Topout WC RB 11/22/2000 34 Rough Electric WC RB 11/15/2000 15Roof/Reroof PA RB OK TO FELT SEE JOB PERMIT 11/14/2000 13 Shear Panels/HD's AP RB 11/14/2000 15Roof/Reroof NR RB 11/14/2000 31 Underground/Conduit-Wiring AP RB 11/7/2000 13 Shear Panels/HD's PA RB NEXT TO FIRE PL OK 10/24/2000 11 FtgiFoundation/Piers AP RB FTGS & SLAB 10/19/2000 21 Underground/Under Floor AP RB UNDERGROUND GAS LINE 10/19/2000 23 Gas/Test/Repairs AP RB NOTE: RE-INSTALL PROTECTIVE FENCING 10/11/2000 21 Underground/Under Floor AP RB FOR ABS 10/11/2000 21 Underground/Under Floor CO RB FOR GAS LINE - SEE NOTICE - S. jtXt''1 A m it DEC-01-200e 08:32 AM SOUTHBAYCOI4SiJLTINC 7607269898 P.01 L P4 - 3..O27 27/0 .1'. • F- low I 3 LA-N VtW' I.-.-- ft ø,-r- ot xe4 ZK S "V -I t.4 I I I M '3 rk wool COLEMAN GEOTECHNICAL DAILY REPORT OF 3002 DOW AVENUE, SUITE 414, TUSTIN, CA 92780 GRADING CONTROL PHONE (714) 573-5776 FAX (714) 573-04= JOB NO iios 1CUENT Joir Lcbcc.h TIME I DATE I Q-Z.3')- JOB ADDRESS L7 j C N C'. Dk S C i .. Cc4 r t s hQd TECHNICIAN cIzs I ENGINEER Z-- GRADING PERMIT NO. FILL LOCATION STRUCTURE TYPE . DATE -' DAY Rescenrtc.i f'I'%Qfl GENERAL CONTRACTOR GRADING CONTRACTOR MAX USED 5 LAYER I I C.I. SUPERINTENDENT SOURCE AND CLASSIFICATION OF FILL OR BACKFILL MATERIAL WEATHER TIME CHARGED TO PROJECT flci#vC.. C.,o I, S k k 't CC4'(s LIFT THICKNESS TIME ACKNOWLEDGED HAULING EQUIPMENT BACKFILLING INFORMATION (]INTERIOR I I EXTERIOR II FULL TIME F I PART TIME II INFO REPORTED BY OTHERS SPREADING EQUIPMENT II SEWER I J WATER I ELECTRICAL (J STORM DRAIN [J GAS I PHONE (J FIRE SPRINKLER I IN I ] RETAININING WALL () COMMUNICATION WATERING EQUIPMENT [ 1 GALLON PULL FUTURE FACILITIES OVER LINE: CHECK MORE THAN ONE IF APPLICABLE I I GAL. TRUCK ( 3 WATER HOSE II BUILDING []PAVEMENT [I SIDEWALK I I LANDSCAPE AREA COMPACTION EQUIPMENT TRENCH LENGTH AND WIDTH: TRENCH DEPTH: OTHER EQUIPMENT SIZE & TYPE OF PIPE: GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF AREA BEING WORKED, MEETINGS, VISITORS, ETC. OQIt\ IWA6n Fc.,*tn C)k'erL.cJiiJn 1IC C4ovc. crc'n-rr d flç C,C441Jfl h4 been obsecicci rLr pr Qnund s uttqkc ESg r S r- oi de41 nc4 bct r ___ ff TEST NO. TYPE TEST LOCATION ELEVATIONS FIELD MOIST VFIELD DENS OPTIMUM MOISTURE PMUM1 oGE22 COMP RE TEST PIPE OR NATURAL FINAL )La C.. CAM c'.$ D- 1 i rir 4 _____ -S _ CM ___ pkcrm'14, City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 10/19/2000 Permit# CB001874 Title: LAUBACH RESIDENCE Description: KITCHEN & CLOSET EXPANSION Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Job Address: 2719 NAPLES CT Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT LAUBACH JOHN&JULIE Owner: LAUBACH JOHN&JULIE Remarks: Total Time: CD Description Act Comments 21 Underground/Under Floor ftP 1106 - 23 Gas/Test/Repairs $1f 46i'e- Inspector Assignment: RB Phone: 9494665105 Inspector: Requested By: JOHN Entered By: CHRISTING /,• Associated PCRs Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 10/11/2000 21 Underground/Under Floor AP RB FOR-ABS 10/11/2000 21 Underground/Under Floor CO RB FOR GAS LINE -SEE NOTICE .1 d9C:EO 00 ET °0 1-3 EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for Building Safety DATE: August 22, 2000 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad 0 APPLICANT O I3t1REVIEWER O FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-1874 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2719 Naples Court PROJECT NAME: Addition & Remodel-Laubach Residence fl The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved & checked by building department staff. LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed checklist and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. LI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted (by: ) Fax #: hone Fax In Person REMARKS: I Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan and ,speci ave been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the s ort are properly incorporated into the construction documents. Provide investigation letter of seismically induced soil liquefaction by soil's engineer. By: Tony Embuido Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB 0 EJ PC 08/14/00 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 I - EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for Bui&fing Safety DATE: May 22, 2000 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-1874 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2719 Naples Court PROJECT NAME: Addition & Remodel-Laubach Residence O APPLICANT 0 PLAN REVIEWER O FILE F-1 The plans transmitted -herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes: The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed checklist and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The checklist transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the checklist is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the checklist has been sent to: John Laubach 2719 Naples Court, Carsibad, CA 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: John Laubach (j.t4) Telephone #: 760-434-5136 Date contacted: 111)0' (by: ) Fax #: Mail "Telephone V Fax In Person UI REMARKS: By: Tony Embuido Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB EJ n PC 05/15/00 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 00-1874 May 22, 2000 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-1874 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2719 Naples Court FLOOR AREA: + 160-R3 STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: N/C REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 05/10/00 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: May 22, 2000 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 05/15/00 PLAN REVIEWER: Tony Embuido This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department,. Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 00-1874 May 229 2000 . PLANS . Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. Final set of plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). . FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 2. All now residential buildings including additions, require a soil's report. An update letter is required if the report is more than 3 years old. If a room addition is less than 1000 sq. ft. in area and only one story, then a soil's report is not required. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor. Identify this value in the soils report and on the plans. Section 1629.4.2. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction & soil instability in Seismic Zones 3 and 4. Section 1804.5. Note on the plan the soil's classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and note the allowable bearing value. Section 106.3.3. Carlsbad 00-1874 May 22, 2000 7. The soil's engineer may require .that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 8. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report). 9. Notion plans that surface water will drain away from building and show drainage pattern and key elevations. Section 1804.7. 10. Note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation inspection. Section 108.5.2. 11. Foundation plan and details have not been completely checked due to lack of soil's report. Additional corrections may follow upon submittal. FRAMING 12. Show on the plans all structural requirements developed in the structural calculations. Section 106.3.3. Make shear symbol schedule part of the design caic's a part of the-plans. i.e., sticky back, etc. See last sheet of the calc's. Please show in the calculations how the redundancy was determined, per Section 1630.1.1. 13. In Seismic Zones 3 and 4, where allowable shear values exceed 350 plf in wood structural panel shear walls, foundation sill plates and all framing members receiving edge nailing from abutting panels shall not be less than a single 3" nominal member. In shear walls where the total wall design shear does not exceed 600 plf, a single 2" nominal sill plate may be used, provided the anchor bolts are designed for a load capacity of 50% or less of the allowable capacity. Table 23-I1-I-I, footnote 3. a) It would appear that the side (6') shear walls per shear symbols shown on sheet 5 should be 3 x sill plate members. Please prove otherwise. Carlsbad 00-1874 May 22, 2000. . MISCELLANEOUS 14. Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in kitchen. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes O. No L3 The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Tony Embuido at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 00-1874 May 22, 2000 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-1874 PREPARED BY: Tony Embuido DATE: May 22, 2000 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2719 Naples Court BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3/U-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA (Sq. Ft.) VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE ($) PER CITY 13,000 13,000 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 13,000 199 UBC Building Permit Fee D Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 139.83 199 UBC Plan Check Fee Fj Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 90.89 Type of Review: J Complete Review El Structural Only I Hourly E Repetitive Fee Applicable fl Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 72.71 Comments: Sheet I of I macvalue.doc 5100 Carlsbad 11F Mpublii BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE: C /7;) ( PLANCHECK NO.: CB ( 7 L BUILDING ADDRESS: ?1I PROJECT DESCRIPTION: /(OO/M44L ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: ((p1 -33 3(0 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL EST. VALUE:' I DENIAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. EA Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked with 0. Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By: Date: By: Date: By: Date: FOR OFFICIAL. USE ONLY / ENGIN ERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: By: (C Date: ATTACHMENTS Dedication Application El Dedication Checklist U Improvement Application Improvement Checklist ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: KATHLEEN M. FARMER City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue Phone: . (760) 602-2741 U Future Improvement Agreement CFD INFORMATION C1 Grading Permit Application Parcel Map No: U Grading Submittal Checklist Lots: U Right-of-Way Permit Application Recordation: Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist Carlsbad Tract: and Information Sheet U Sewer Fee Information Sheet A-4 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760)-602-8562. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN I ST/ ND/ 3RD,/. U U I. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: ti rth Arrow Property Lines ..2(ting & Proposed Structures EEasements -Ecisting Street Improvements .E.- -Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets G1—Driveway widths U U 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography U 3. Include on title sheet: Site address Assessor's Parcel Number• Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION A DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE (,kijiik, U U 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for V Project No.________________________________________________________ U U U 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: H:WORDWARMERAThASTRSth Plandied, Mt 6P000I Fern, KF.doc 2 Rev. 013197 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS .TA 2ND/ 3RDI U U 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 1/2') x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an: application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS A U U 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be %JV constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the checklist must, be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: . Date: U U U 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $________________ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: H:WORDFARMERKATHYVblASTERSSBUldi1IO PancIied, Cklst BP0001 Form KF.dOC 3 . Rev. 913197 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST st.I 2nd/ 3rdl U U U 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed. by: Date: U U U 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. U U U 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). U U 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date:- U U U 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) U U U 7d. No Grading Permit required. U U U 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS U U U 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: H:WORDW Th 19 ARMERAASTERSU Planthedi Cklst BP000I Form KF.doc 4 Rev. 913197 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST st.f 2nd/ 3rd/ U U U 9. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. U U U 10. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: U U U 11. NPDES PERMIT UUU Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System •(NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. U eiid fees are attached No fees required Local Facilities Management Zone Transportation Fee Agmt Signed. LII U U 14. Additional Comments: H:WORDFARMERXATHVlMASThRSiBUVdIfl9 Pbnthedc Cldst BP000I Form KF.doc 5 Rev. 013197 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB (( i'4 Address _'24 I T'JCS p Le$ t: - Planner kt) I C41(A)('V) Phone(760)602- 'U, 2-- 4 APN: Type of Project & Use: (9.a.dd.1h iV1 Net Project Density: DU/AC 0 0 Zoning:_ I DO General Plan:12._LJV1 Facilities Management Zone: CFD (in/out) #_ Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres:_______ Circle One (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this : : ; permit: ) i.. Legend: Z Item Complete Environmental Review Required: DATE OF COMPLETION: ' Compliance with condition& of approval Conditions of ADoroval: LI Item Incomplete - Needs your action YES NO X TYPE If not, state conditions which require action. Discretionary Action Required: YES NOX TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES:,_______________________________________ Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: I \.• J.. E fl ' Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES____ NO____ CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES____ NO____ If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO____ If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans).. * Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. H:ADMIN\COUNTER\BIdgPlnchkRevChklst Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES NO ,. (N nan P/Ds,Acvity Maibtece, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens Housing Fees, Construct Housing YIN, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) p , .• . Site Plan: . E Provide a fully dimensional site plan draWn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing arid jroposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks "and existing topographical lines. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: Setbacks: / Front: Required Shown Interior Side: Required I ' Shown 2 Street Side: Required Shown Rear: Required Shown 2.9' Accessory structure setbacks: Front: Required Interior Side: Required Street Side: Required Rear: Required Structure separation: Required Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown '[EJ El 3. Lot Coverage: Required -407' Shown 90 7w,, F-1 J 4. Height: Required Shown - ?' 5. Parking: Spaces Required 1- 14i- 6Xhown ZO"j( Z1 / Guest Spaces Required Shown fl Additional Comments_____________________________________________________ OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER QdLLOAOLABATE_511'4 O G H:\ADMINCOUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevchklst COLEMAN GEOTECHNICAL 9272 JERONIMO ROAD, SUITE 104 IRVINE, CA 92618 PHONE (949) 461-5260 FAX (949) 461-5262 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBERS August 30, 2000 Job No. 1905 Laubach Construction, Inc. 23151 Verdugo Drive, Suite 201 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Attention: Mr. John Laubach Subject: Response to Reviewer's Plan Check Comments 2719 Naples Court, Carlsbad, California Plan Check No. 00-1874 References: 1. Review Letter issued by EsGil Corporatioh, for Addition and Remodel, Lau- bach Residence, 2719 Naples Court, Carlsbad, dated August 14, 2000. Foundation Plan, prepared by Hiram S. Andrade, Scale 1,4= 1' Limited Geotechnical Investigation, Review of Building Plans, and Re- sponse to Reviewer's Plan Check Checklist Comments, 2719 Naples Court, Carlsbad, California, prepared by this firm, dated July 27, 2000. Dear Mr. Laubach: This letter presents our responses to review comments by Esgil Corporation daetd August 14, 2000. Their remarks and our responses are as follows: REMARKS: 1. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommen- dations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents. Pro- vide investigation letter of seismically induced soil liquefaction by soil's engineer. RESPONSE: This engineer has reviewed the Foundation Plan prepared by Hiram S. Andrade, which includes a notation of the vertical and lateral bearing values from our investigation report. The plan footing depths and reinforcing exceed that recommended in our report, and as a result, it is our opinion that the plan is suitable for the proposed construction. With regard to soil liquefaction, the site was not accessible to drilling equipment to drill a boring to a depth of 50 feet, as required by the Uniform Building Code (UBC). Our in- vestigation did, however, reach bedrock materials at a depth less than 5 feet. 1905resp.doc Page 1 a0VAF711_1 As noted in our report, our Certified Engineering Geologist, who performed the investiga- tion, could not positively identify the materials as bedrock or as compacted fill derived from the bedrock in our 4 inch diameter hand auger boring. Based on the site elevation of about 300 feet above sea level (and the likelihood that ground water is quite deep) and the nature and density of the materials beneath the site, it is our opinion that liquefaction potential below the site is remote. The opportunity to be of further service is appreciated and we trust that these responses are suitable. Please call if there are any questions. Very truly,' COLEMAN GEOTECH7 FESS co S\ NO. GE 229 g G.E. 229 1 1905resp.doc Page 2 ROM Corporation 7* Tannrip wid gwiriuiot/.r outdriew Sa/i(y DATE: August 22, 2000 Cl APPLICANT O RIS. JURISDICTION: Carlsbad u P REVIEWER 0 FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-1874 SET: It PROJECT ADDRESS: 2719 Naples Court PROJECT NAME: Addition & Remodel-LaubachRe.ldencc 0 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdictions building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved & checked by building department staff. [I] The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. El The applicants copy of the check fist is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's cOpy of the check list has been sent to: IN Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: contacted (by: ) Fax #: Fax In Person REMARKS: I Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan and ecifications ye been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations In the rt are properly incorporated into the construction documents. Provide investigation letter of seismically induced soil liquefaction by soil's engineer. 11 By: Tony Embuido Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA 0 MB 0 EJ 0 PC 08114/00 . vnsmV.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • Sin Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560.1468 • Fax (958) 560-1576 Vfl ) Oet'.O 7nn nfl •ALI VU ,1Ufl(1UU1i JA iitn 1 I I('.tWl hAil AAfl fl A1%U Od vt:90 00-6-6flV - COLEMAN GEOTECHNICAL 9272 JERONIMO ROAD, SUITE 104 IRVINE, CA 92618 PHONE (949)461-526Ô FAX (949) 461-5262 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES I PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBERS July 27, 2000 Laubach Construction, Inc. 23151 Verdugo Drive, Suite 201 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Attention: Mr. John Laubach Subject: Limited Geotechnical Investigation, Review of Building Plans, and Response to Reviewer's Plan Check Checklist Comments, 2719 Naples Court, Carlsbad, California Plan Check No. 00-1874 References: 1. Review Letter and Checklist issued by EsGil Corporation, for Addition and Remodel, Residence, 2719 Naples Court, Carlsbad, dated May 22, 2000. Foundation Design Sketches, prepared by Hiram S. Andrade, Scale %"= 1', no date. Weber, F.H., 1982, Recent Slope Failures, Ancient Landslides, and Related Geology of the North-Central Coastal Area, San Diego County, California, DMG Open-File Report 82-12. Dear Mr. Laubach: We have performed a limited geotechnical investigation on the subject property for the pur- poses of evaluating the geotechnical conditions within the planned addition area and to ad- dress comments by EsGil Corporation in their plan check letter dated May 5, 2000. Our review of the building plans indicate the proposed addition will extend approximately 6 feet outward from the rear building wall. It is our opinion that the property is suitable for the planned addition provided that our recommendations are incorporated into the project plans and implemented during the design, construction and occupancy phases of the project. Following foundation excavation and slab subgrade compaction, a letter will be provided stating that the work was completed in accordance to the recommendations of this firm and other conditions as required by EsGil Corp. (see Reference No. 1, page 2, Item No. 7). 19051imgeo.doc Page 1 CI ob (,P.w 1. GENERAL Preliminary Building Plans (referenced) call for extending a portion of the existing building wall outward approximately 6 feet along the rear westerly half of the home along with some remodeling of the interior. The new addition will be supported on continous footings and slab on grade floors. The building and foundation details (referenced) faxed to our office tentatively meet our minimum footing and building slab recommendations, however, a note should be added on the final plans that the slab subgrade soils below any new slab area shall be either removed 12 inches to firm ground or recompacted in-place to a depth of 12 inches. 1.1 Purpose and Scope of Work The purposes of this investigation were to: (1) obtain information on the general geologic conditions and specific subsuiface conditions within the project area; (2) review available geotechnical reports prepared for the site, (3) perform an engineering and geologic evalua- tion of the collected data and its influence on the project; and (4) provide geotechnical con- clusions and recommendations for design and construction. The work performed during this study included the following: Collected and reviewed project data available to us and develop an exploration program. Excavated a hand auger boring in the proposed addition area to confirm geologic condi- tions previously reported and to obtain representative bulk samples of the subsurface materials for evaluation. Performed a visual reconnaissance of the site to discern if any obvious unstable or oth- erwise adverse geologic conditions exist. Selected representative samples for laboratory testing and perform laboratory tests to establish the classification and engineering properties of the subsurface materials. Analyzed the collected data and prepare this report of our geotechnical conclusions and recommendations. The boring log is included with this report and is plotted on the at- tached Geotechnical Plan. 2. INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING 2.1 Field Exploration Our field investigation consisted of both visual and subsurface geologic observation on the property to verify the current site geotechnical conditions. Selected specimens of the soils were obtained for additional laboratory analysis. These soil samples served as the basis for the laboratory testing and the engineering conclusions contained in this report. 190511mgeo.doc Page 2 2.2 Laboratory Testing The laboratory testing consisted of performing soluble sulfate and expansion tests to confirm test results previously reported. Descriptions of the test standards used in this investigation in addition to other tests not used in this investigation are included in the Appendix of this report. The results of all laboratory tests are presented in the text below, in the Appendix, or on the test pit logs. 3. SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3.1 Site Description This rectangular shaped corner lot occurs along the southeast side of Naples Court within a previously mass graded residential tract development. Two horizontal to one vertical (2:1) manufactured slopes ranging from 8 to 15 feet high descend from the southeasterly and southwesterly property lines. Other portions of the property are relatively level with sur- rounding properties and streets. Well maintained landscaping, hardscape areas, area drains, fences, and a swimming pool occur within the rear yard. The slopes descending along the rear of the property were visually observed and no ground cracks, scarps, landslides, unusual depressions, springs, seeps, or other adverse geologic features were observed. The proposed addition will occur 20 to 30 feet inward from the nearest top of slope. A single family residence occurs within the central portion of the property. No visual signs of structural distresses such as exterior stucco cracking, stuck window or door frames, or other forms of distress or cracking were seen. Some localized minor heaving and cracking has affected localized portions of the hardscape but is not considered problematic or signifi- cant based on the age of the house. 3.2 Soil and Geologic Conditions This site is in general underlain by a relatively thin layer of soft, very moist, dark brown sandy clay and clayey sand fill overlying moderately dense to dense deposits of moist brownish red clayey sand and gravely sand fill/bedrock(?). Due to the generally massive nature of the deposits, the brownish red soils could not be readily identified as native depos- its. If bedrock, the deposits are most certainly part or derived from the Linda Vista Forma- tion (TLV) which also consists predominately of similar brownish red coarse grained deposits which outcrop just east of the project site. Published geologic maps do not reveal any faults or ancient landslides beneath the property prior to mass grading (Weber, 1982). More detailed descriptions of the subsurface conditions are shown on the attached boring log. 19051imgeo.doc Page 3 ( .-_- ' I 11-73 . - - . • . - : '- '-: "kb \ ' \' •_;V - 't. V •• - V. • •r'-• •. /• -. - ..,_•••4_ .. \:-:.O. •• I' i. I - • '.' -.-;:--- - • :•-•- - • • '-: I •• II' / - :- - •I F II ••\ •• / - S •. I •- -• -.-- .. .. •- . . L . •' - •' •• V. •V _•._d •'SI . ,;-_.i' O j l - .2/ .. •r • :'-. :•- --- - LJ - 10 1 :- -: - -:.. I :J-- ,I . 113333 , el - I - - -. >-• •0 .- . - / - - - ° - - 4. GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS It is the opinion of this office that the subject site is suitable for support of the proposed addition without detrimental effects on the adjacent properties. The grading, building construction, backfilling, and other construction supported by the earth materials should be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the applicable edition of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) as adopted by the controlling agency. Conventional footings seated into compacted fill and/or bedrock can be used to support the structure providing the design and construction recommendations presented in this report and the requirements of applicable grading codes are followed. Based on our boring log, suitably dense materials occur about 12 inches below existing grade within the addition area. Adverse surface water discharge from runoff onto or from the site is not anticipated, pro- viding proper engineering design, construction, and maintenance of graded surfaces and drainage devices. Concrete floor and hardscape slabs may be founded entirely on firm competent com- pacted fill. Following the removal of the landscaping and after the footings have been placed, the upper 12 inches of the slab subgrade soils should be compacted in place to 90 percent or more. No active faults are known to transect or trend towards the site, therefore the project is not expected to be affected by ground rupture. It will be affected by substantial ground motion from earthquakes during the design life of the project. More detailed seismicity data is included in the appendix of this report. 5. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 Foundation Design and Construction 5.1.1 Vertical and Lateral Bearing Vertical The soil materials on this site when properly prepared are considered suitable for the sup- port of the proposed structures using conventional shallow continuous and/or pad footings. Footings may be designed using an allowable bearing value of 1,800 pounds per square foot for footings placed to a minimum width of 12 inches and a minimum depth of 18. inches below the lowest adjacent final grade. An increase of 1/3 of the aforementioned bearing value is permissible for short duration wind or seismic loading. The above bearing values have been based on footings placed into approved natural soil or compacted fill. These bearing values are considered to be net values and as a result the weight of the footings and/or backfill above the footings may be ignored in calculating the footing loads. 19051imgeo.doc Page 4 Lateral For purposes of resisting lateral forces, an allowable lateral soil pressure of 275 pounds per square foot per foot of depth may be used for the design. A coefficient of friction of 0.40 may be used for concrete placed directly on the natural soils or compacted fill. These val- ues may be combined without reduction for resisting lateral forces. An increase of 1/3 of the above values may be used for short term wind or seismic loads. The above values are based on footings placed directly against approved native soils or compacted fill. In the case where footing sides are formed, all backfill against footings should be compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum density. Foundation Construction All foundation excavations should be observed by the project soils engineer prior to the placement of forms, reinforcement, or concrete. The excavations should be trimmed neat, level, and square. All loose, sloughed, or moisture softened soil should be removed prior to concrete placement. Excavated material from footing excavations should not be placed in slab-on-grade areas unless properly compacted and tested. 5.1.2 Settlement Estimates of settlement have been made based on the anticipated foundation loading and density of the soils within the footing influence zone. We anticipate that the total settlement will be less than 1/2". Differential settlement is expected to be about 1/2 of the total settlement. It is anticipated that the majority of the settlement will occur during construction as the loads are applied. Minor differential settlement and cracking of drywall or other crack sensitive materials may occur where new construction joins existing. Such cracking should be of a "cosmetic" na- ture, and should be easily repaired The above settlement estimates are based on the assumption that the grading will be per- formed in accordance with the grading recommendations presented elsewhere in this report and that representatives of this firm will observe or test the bearing conditions in the footing excavations. 5.1.3 Seismic Design Seismic design of the structures should be performed using criteria presented in the Uniform Building Code for Zone 4 seismic conditions. 19051imgeo.doc Page.5 5.2 Concrete Slabs Floor slabs should be designed in accordance with the 1997 UBC requirements and the rec- ommendations presented below in Section 5.3. It is our opinion that concrete floor slabs in areas to receive carpet, tile, or other moisture sensitive coverings should be constructed over a 6 mu plastic vapor barrier membrane. The plastic membrane should be properly lapped, sealed, and protected with at least a two inch thick layer of sand. The sand layer should be moistened just prior to placing concrete. It is cautioned that slabs in areas to receive ceramic tile or other rigid, crack sensitive floor coverings must be designed and constructed to reduce hairline cracking. 5.3 Expansive Soils The results of tests indicate that the near-surface soils located within the proposed addition area is moderately expansive. The test results are as follows: Sample Expansion Location Index B-i @ 0-2' 58 The tentative design and construction details presented below may be considered for re- ducing the effects of expansive soils. These recommendations have been developed based on the previous experience of this firm on projects with similar conditions and have been found to reduce, but not positively prevent, post-construction movement, cracking, and other effects of expansive soils. The owner, design civil engineer, structural engineer, and con- tractors must be made aware of the expansive soil conditions which exist on the site. Addi- tional slab thickness, footing size and reinforcing should be provided as required by the structural engineer. Tentative recommendations are as follows: Subgrade Treatment Just prior to placing concrete floor slabs, the moisture of the soil should be at least 4 per- cent above optimum. This moisture content should extend to a depth of 18 inches. The subgrade for garage floor slabs should conform to the above requirement. Footing Treatment Exterior footings should be constructed to a minimum depth of 18 inches. The exterior footings should be reinforced with one No. 4 bars placed in the top and one No. 4 bars placed in the bottom of the footing. Interior footings should be constructed to a minimum depth of 12 inches. The following are recommended design features of interior footings: a. The major interior footings should be tied into exterior footings for structural continu- ity. 19051imgeo.doc Page 6 b. The continuous footings should be reinforced with one No. 4 bar placed in the top and one No. 4 bar placed in the bottom of the footing. Reinforcing of individual isolated pad footings is not required for expansive soil purposes. Footings should be carried across garage door openings as a grade beam. These should be reinforced as for exterior footings. Floor Slabs Concrete floor slabs should be at least 5 inches thick actual. The floor slabs should be reinforced with No. 3 bars at 18 inches on center each way. Reinforcement for slabs-on-grade should be located in the center 1/3 of the thickness of the slab. 5.4 Soil Chemistry Considerations 5.4.1 Soluble Sulfates The results of tests show that the near-surface soils within the addition area possess negli- gible concentrations of soluble sulfates. The test results are as follows: Sample % Soluble Location Sulfates B-i @ 0-2' 0.037% A soluble sulfate content in excess of 0.10 percent is considered to be potentially detrimen- tal to most standard concrete mixes. As a result, design of Portland cement concrete mixes should be performed by an engineer specializing in concrete products and the methods available to resist sulfate attack. 5.5 Grading Recommendations The following special grading provisions are recommended for the grading of this project in addition to the Grading Specifications, General Provisions included in the Appendix of this report. The construction may include future retaining walls which may or may not be shown on the currently available plans. Such walls should be considered as part of the structures to be constructed, and foundation design, construction, and grading recommendations presented in this report should apply to these walls as if they were part of the house structure. The upper 12 inches of soils located within the proposed addition area is soft and com- pressible. This material shall either be removed entirely to 12 inches below existing grade or can be recompacted in-place after footing placement. All excavation bottoms shall be observed by the project engineering geologist/soils engineer. 19051imgeo.doc Page 7 Soil utilized for filling shall consist of approved on-site or imported soil. On-site soils which are free of trash, debris, vegetation, and organic material can be considered as suitable. Any imported soil shall be approved by the soil engineer for both expansive and strength qualities prior to importation to the project site. Final acceptance of any imported soil will be based on observation of the soil actually delivered to the site. All fill shall be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. The maximum density of all soils shall be determined in accordance with A.S.T.M. Test Method D-1557. The maximum density of aggregate base shall be determined in accor- dance with California Test Method 216. 6. ADDITIONAL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES The recommended bearing values presented in this report are based on the assumption that the footings will be supported directly on firm compacted fill or approved bedrock. All foot- ing excavations should be observed prior to placing steel or concrete to insure that the foot- ings are founded into suitable material. All grading and fill compaction should be observed and/or tested by this firm, including rough grading, installation of special drainage devices, retaining wall backfills, utility trench back- fills, precise grading, and pavement subgrade and aggregate base, if applicable. It is the responsibility of the owner or his representative to review the recommendations pre- sented herein and to authorize the other design consultants and contractors to perform such work as necessary to comply with the recommendations as well as to inform this firm when necessary observations or testing are needed. CLOSURE This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Mr. John Laubach to assist the proj- ect design consultants and contractors in the design and construction of the proposed de- velopment. It is recommended that this firm be engaged to review the design drawings and specifications prior to construction to verify that our recommendations have been properly interpreted and included in the design. If we do not perform this review, we can accept no responsibility for misinterpretation of our recommendations. This firm strives to perform it's services in a manner consistent with generally accepted cur- rent professional principles and practice in geotechnical engineering. We make no other warranty, either expressed or implied. It has been assumed, and it is expected, that the geotechnical conditions which exist be- tween the test excavations are similar to those encountered in the test excavations. How- ever, no warranty of such is implied in this report. 19051imgeo.doc Page 8 The conclusions and opinions contained in this report are based on the results of the de- scribed geotechnical evaluations and represent our best professional judgment. The find- ings, conclusions, and opinions contained in this report are to be considered tentative only, and subject to confirmation by the undersigned during the construction process. Without this confirmation, this report is to be considered incomplete and this firm or the undersigned professionals assume no responsibility for its use. In addition, this report should be re- viewed and updated after a period of one year or if the site ownership or project concept changes from that described herein. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner or his representative to insure that interested parties have this information. This report is subject to review by the controlling governing authorities for the subject proj- ect. It must be noted that this: report may not meet all the requirements of the controlling agency since codes and agency interpretation of same are continually changing, and a re- view document may be issued which requires additional analysis and follow up information. This additional work will be performed at the billing rates which have been established. Respectfully submitted, COLEMAN I(I No0E229 /—xp6O3 ) orecti G.E. 229 R. OF c Coleman . 1981 CERTIFIED I ENGINEER!NG % •R' GEOLOGIST Lee A. Shoemaker C.E.G. 1961 19051imgeo.doc Page 9 APPENDIX 19051imgeo.doc Page 10 LABORATORY TESTING PROCEDURES Below are brief descriptions of the laboratory tests which are performed by our firm on various projects. All of these may, or may not, have been performed as part of our analysis on the subject project. The selection of which samples to be tested and which tests to perform is a part of the professional services performed. SHEAR STRENGTH The shear strength of the soil is determined by performing direct shear tests in accor- dance with A.S.T.M. Test Method D-3080. Direct shear tests are performed on either "undisturbed" or remolded samples which represent anticipated conditions at the finished site. The samples are either tested at in-situ moisture or are saturated to simulate the most severe field conditions expected. The relationship between the normal stress and shear stress are shown on the Direct Shear Summary. 1Ir. EXPANSION Tests for Expansion Index are performed on compacted samples in accordance with Uniform Building Code (UBC) Test Method 18-2. Test results are included within the report body. SETTLEMENT 0 The settlement characteristics of soil samples are determined by performing consoli- dation tests on "undisturbed" or remolded specimens in accordance with A.S.T.M. Test Method D-2435. The samples are tested in the original sample liner ring and the incremental loads for consolidation are applied for periods of 12 or 24 hours by means of a single counter- balanced lever system. Sample consolidation is measured in increments of 0.0001 inches. The pressure-consolidation curves are shown in the appendix. ,- MOISTURE-DENSITY L.M The moisture-density relationship of the various soil types is determined in accor- dance with A.S.T.M. Test Method D-1557. The results are shown on the subsurface logs. CLASSIFICATION A. "tZZ.~ The following test methods are used to aid in the classification of soils in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification system: Particle size analysis - A.S.T.M Test Method D-422 Liquid Limit / Plastic Limit - A.S.T.M. Test Method D-423 The results of these tests are included on the Grading Analysis sheets or are tabulated within the report body. Iabtest.doc COLEMAN GEOTECHNICAL 12/97 Page T-1 O RESISTANCE "R"-VALUE The resistance "R"-Value of soils is determined in accordance with California Test Method 301. The results are used for pavement design purposes. 1 SAND EQUIVALENT U The sand equivalent (S.E.) of granular soils and fine aggregates in determined in ac- cordance with A.S.T.M. Test Method D-2419. The results are used to determine the applica- bility of the material for use as fill or backfill and to establish whether flooding or jetting is a suitable compaction method. SOLUBLE SULFATE CONTENT U U U The concentration of soluble sulfates in the soil is determined by A.S.T.M. Test Method D-516, Method A, and is expressed as a percentage by weight of the dry soil. The re- sults are included within the body of the report and are utilized in determining suitable con- crete mixes. 1H11[ CORROSION POTENTIAL U U U The potential for the soil to corrode buried metal components is consists of determin- ing the following: Soil pH (Acidity-Alkalinity) Soluble Chloride content in accordance with California Test Method 417. Minimum Resistivity in accordance with California Test Method 643. These results are included within the body of the report and are intended to be utilized by a Corrosion Engineer in determining protection methods for various buried metal components of the project. Iabtest.doc COLEMAN GEOTECHNICAL 12/97 Page 1-2 GRADING SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL PROVISIONS These specifications are presented to be used wholly, or in part, either as presented or as a guide for the preparation of separate grading specifications. RESPONSIBILITY The geotechnical consultants are his clients representative on the project. For the purposes of these specifications, observations and/or testing by the soil engineer includes the obser- vation and/or testing performed by any person or persons assigned by, and responsible to, the licensed geotechnical engineer signing the report. All clearing, site preparation, or earthwork performed on this project shall be conducted by the contractor(s) with periodic :or full-time observation and testing by the geotechnical engi- neer. It is the contractors responsibility to conform to the Grading Specifications for the project and the applicable grading ordinances for the jurisdiction in which the project is located. Services performed, and test results obtained, by the geotechnical consultants in no way relieve the contractor(s) from their responsibilities. CLEARING The site shall be cleared of all vegetable growth and other deleterious materials including, but not limited to, trees, stumps, logs, trash, heavy weed growth, and organic deposits. Unless otherwise approved, all remnants of any previous facilities on the site shall be removed from the site. Included with the removal of foundations and slabs shall be the removal of basements, cellars, cisterns, septic tanks, paving, curbs, pipes, storage tanks, improperly abandoned water or petroleum wells, and other deleterious materials. No cavity created by demolition shall be backfilled until it has been observed by the geotechnical engineer. Unless otherwise specified, all -cleared materials shall be removed from the boundaries of the project to an approved disposal site. The determination of the acceptability of the material for disposal or the disposal site is not the responsibility of Coleman Geotechnical. SITE PREPARATION Loose soils within areas of fill shall be processed by either excavating and stockpiling the loose soil or by scarifying, adjusting the soil moisture content to the amount specified elsewhere in this report, and compacting to the recommended relative compaction as de- termined by A.S.T.M. Test Method D-1557. gradspec.doc COLEMAN GEOTECHNICAL 12/97 Page S-i The soils within areas of fill placement shall be processed to a depth adequate to insure the removal of major tree roots and pipelines and the compaction of cavaties left from tree removal. Excavation voids created following the removal of subsurface structures shall be cleared of any loose soil, the resulting surface moisture conditioned, and filled with compacted soil. The backfill of such excavations shall be compacted to the relative compaction recom- mended elsewhere in this report. Cesspools shall be pumped of liquids and solids and backfilled with clean sand, pea gravel, "birds eye", or sand-cement slurry. Sand backfill may be flooded and jetted into place for compaction. Any unsuitable backfill shall be removed when found to not be in compliance with the recommendations contained in this report. Preparation of cesspools for backfill- ing shall be observed by the soil engineer. Permits may be required by governing agen- cies for the project, and any specifications which the agency has should be complied with, unless the above is more restrictive. Abandonment of oil, gas, or water wells shall be performed in accordance with applicable state or local laws. The backfilling of any voids left from such abandonment shall be performed as specified in Section 3.3, above. Unless otherwise specified, the tops of any abandoned subsurface structure shall be removed to a depth of 5 feet below any planned improvements, such as footings, slabs, utility lines, future swimming pools, etc. FILL PLACEMENT Unless otherwise approved and unless a specific rock disposal plan is shown on the plans in this report, no cobbles over 12 inches in diameter shall be accepted in any fill. All on site and imported soils to be used for an engineered fill shall be subject to the approval of the geotechnical engineer prior to placement. Preliminary approval of a source of im- ported soil shall not relieve the contractor of delivering proper material to the site. Final acceptance of imported soil will be based upon the material actually delivered to the site. Fill shall be placed in near horizontal lifts with a maximum placed thickness such that the re- quired compaction can be achieved for the entire lift thickness with the available equip- ment and methods. Site and project specific recommendations for overexcavation, processing, special materials, fill placement, and compaction shall be as recommended in the "Grading Recommenda- tions" section in the main body of this report and any addendum reports which have been prepared by the geotechnical consultants for the project. gradspec.doc COLEMAN GEOTECHNICAL 12/97 Page S-2 COLEMAN GEOTECHNICAL 9272 JERONIMO ROAD, SUITE 104 IRVINE, CA 92618 PHONE (949) 461-5260 FAX (949) 461-5262 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES KEY TO SOIL SYMBOLS AND TERMS Terms used for describing soils according to their Texture, Grain Size, and Moisture Content. Terms are generally in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System FINE GRAINED SOILS COARSE GRAINED SOILS Cl) (More than half of material is finer than #200 sieve) (More than half of material is larger than #200 sieve) IX 00 SILTS AND CLAYS SILTS AND CLAYS SANDS GRAVELS More than half of coarse More than half of coarse fraction is finer than 94 sieve fraclion is larger than #4 sieve ~ 000 (Liquid Limit Greater (Liquid Limit Less 0 Than 50) Than 50) SANDS WITH CLEAN GRAVELS CLEAN FINES SANDS WITH FINES GRAVELS c PT OH CH MH OL CL ML SC SM SP SW GC GM GP GW / . .-.: -- • 0 0 C' - LU o o2' o ' 0 -c fl.- c ( C _.c) U)W in 5I .2'" Omj Oq,O , ._ .-2 C , 0 • . U) 0 . 0 C.9 Vi >C) C)' E . 00 c' . Oe.9> U) o >0 e E CC E' Z 0i 1A 2 .9 W C 0 0 - OVC -- !?E -j VC >> - 4 C 0 rn .&5 2,çø8 >.9 U) 610 U) '-' iu.c0. -E on b'° =~ 9 c En 5a. ° , = U) ? -c 9. 0 >s O.(!) 0 - .E ° , , - CO U)>.. u_. CONSISTENCY SHEAR SPT "N" VALUE STRENGTH RELATIVE DENSITY SPT "N" VALUE Uj Very Soil Less Than 0.25 (51 tess Thai, 2 Very t.00e Less Than 4 Z Soft 0.25 -0.50 tsf 2 4 Loose . 4.10 14111 050 .1.00 tsf 5.8 Medium Compact 11-30 31-50 Q Still 1.00 .2.00 tsf 9-15 Compact X 06 Very Stiff 2.00 -4.00 tsf 16-30 Very Compact Greater Than 50 Hard Greater Than 4.00 tsl Greater Than 30 TERMS CHARACTERIZING SOIL STRUCTURE Shckned r having inclined planes of weakness that are slick and MOISTURE glossy in appearance. SAMPLER From low to high, the Fissured u containing shrinkage cracks, frequently filled with rute TYPES moisture is indicated by: soil, nearly vertical. Dry (Very Rare) Laminated i composed of thin layers of varying color and texture. t Ring Interbedded composed of alternating layers of different soil types Damp Calcareous it contains appreciable amounts of calcium carbonate. S SPT Slightly Moist Well Graded having a wide range in grain sizes and substantial Moist (Near Optimum) amounts of intermediate particle sues. Bulk Very Moist Poorly Graded I predominantly one grain size or having a range in grain Wet (Saturated) sizes with some intermediate sizes missing. Porous having visibly apparent void spaces through which water, air, or light may pass. COLEMAN GEOTECHNICAL SUBSURFACE LOG CLIENT: Mr. John Laubach I JOB NO: 1905 DATE: 7/17/2000 BORING NO B-I EQUIPMENT: [x] HAND PIT/AUGER HOLLOW STEM []BACKHOE ADDRESS: 2719_ Naples _Court, Carlsbad, CA LOGGED BY: LAS DD RE Y N S (pcf) MD AE X N S (pcf) RCM EQ L M PS (%) 0 I T(%) D E P T H (ft) BS U L K A M P L Sc 0 L I A L S S SOIL/BEDROCK DESCRIPTION 1 2' B FILL FILL: Mixed Sandy CLAY and Clayey SAND, some cobble, very moist, soft, trace of rootlets 106 12.7 D FILL T, 5' FILL/BEDROCK(?): Clayey SAND(STONE), fine to coarse, moist, dense, moist, scattered pebble and cobble, uniform color, massive appearance 11.3 1 Bottom of Boring @ 5.0 Feet No Groundwater or Seepage Noted - 91 10' This log is a representation of conditions at the time and place of excavation. With the passage of time and at other locations, conditions may vary. . SHEET _1 OF _1_•' APPENDIX PAGE - * * * E Q F A U L T * * * * Version 3.00 * * * DETERMINISTIC ESTIMATION OF PEAK ACCELERATION FROM DIGITIZED FAULTS JOB NUMBER: 1905 DATE: 07-27-2000 JOB NAME: Residential Addition, 2719 Naples Court, Carlsbad, CA CLIENT NAME: Mr. John Laubach FAULT-DATA-FILE NAME: CDMGFLTE.DAT SITE COORDINATES: SITE LATITUDE: 33.1672, SITE LONGITUDE: 117.3098 SEARCH RADIUS: 60 mi ATTENUATION RELATION: 8) Bozorgnia Campbell Niazi (1999) Hor.-Soft Rock-Uncor. UNCERTAINTY (M=Median, S=Sigma): M Number of Sigmas: 0.0 DISTANCE MEASURE: cdist SCOND: 1 Basement Depth: 5.00 km Campbell SSR: 1 Campbell SHR: 0 COMPUTE PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION FAULT-DATA FILE USED: CDMGFLTE.DAT MINIMUM DEPTH VALUE (km): 3.0 --------------- EQFAULT SUMMARY --------------- ----------------------------- DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS --------------------------- I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IESTIMATED MAX. EARTHQUAKE EVENT I APPROXIMATE I ------------------------------- ABBREVIATED I DISTANCE I MAXIMUM I PEAK lEST. SITE FAULT NAME I mi (km) IEARTHQUAKEI SITE IINTENSITY I I MAG. (Mw) I ACCEL. g IMOD.MERC. ROSE CANYON I I I 6.9( 11.1)1 ========== I ========== 6.9 I 0.328 I I IX NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (Offshore) I 7.2( 11.6)1 6.9 I 0.318 I IX ELSINORE-TEMECULA I 22.4( 36.1)1 6.8 I 0.095 I VII ELSINORE-JULIAN I 22.6( 36.3)1 7.1 I 0.118 I VII CORONADO BANK I 22.9( 36.9)1 7.4 I 0.144 I VIII ELSINORE-GLEN IVY I 33.0( 53.1)1 6.8 I 0.059 I VI PALOS VERDES I 37.3( 60.0)1 7.1 I 0.064 I VI EARTHQUAKE VALLEY I 42.2( 67.9)1 6.5 I 0.034 I V SAN JACINTO-ANZA I 45.0( 72.5)1 7.2 I 0.054 I VI SAN JACINTO-SAN JACINTO VALLEY I 45.7( 73.5)1 6.9 I 0.042 I VI NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (L.A.Basin) I 46.8( 75.3)1 6.9 I 0.041 I V CHINO-CENTRAL AVE. (Elsinore) I 47.6( 76.611 6.7 I 0.041 I V SAN JACINTO-COYOTE CREEK I 50.5( 81.3)1 6.8 I 0.034 I V WHITTIER I 51.1( 82.3)1 6.8 I 0.034 I V COMPTON THRUST I 56.5( 90.9)1 6.8 I 0.040 I V ELSINORE-COYOTE MOUNTAIN I 56.6( 91.1)1 6.8 I 0.029 I V SAN JACINTO-SAN BERNARDINO I 58.8( 94.7)1 6.7 I 0.026 I V ELYSIAN PARK THRUST I 59.0( 94.9)1 6.7 I 0.035 I V -END OF SEARCH- 18 FAULTS FOUND WITHIN THE SPECIFIED SEARCH RADIUS. THE ROSE CANYON FAULT IS CLOSEST TO THE SITE. IT IS ABOUT 6.9 MILES (11.1 km) AWAY. LARGEST MAXIMUM-EARTHQUAKE SITE ACCELERATION: 0.3275 g 1905eqf.doc Page eqf- 1 2000 1600 LL: U) 0 o 1200 -J 0 z w 800 400 rom uaa.RIi.aau•uuu•uumm MEMEMEMEMMEME MEMEMEMEMEMEMEM ON iau•rniuumuuuuua. MEMMEMMISMERNMEME 01 M IMMEMMEEM92o"Mon ,,,IuI uuRaa!'isuauIuuu•uuum UNRRaimlRIlmau•uuumam MUSUUII*UIRURUUURU pauumsma•aau•uauu HEMEMEMMINEMEMNEEMMENE ••aRuusIIam•uuuRu•um 01 400 800 1200 1600 2000 433° NORMAL LOAD, P.S.F. C. z 175 SAMPLE INFORMATION Boring No. B Sample Depth: 0_/ TEST INFORMATION Undisturbed • Remolded Moisture Content • Saturated H Natural Remolded Density 111111 90% of Max. Natural Mit NA E XZ Tz ,VG HoillE NOTE:4I'4PrEP P6d'.1 5X 7-Z- 5c4L: l"z30' F4F- X' fi L'47E BORING LOCATION I COLEMAN GEOTECHNICAL 272 JERONIMO ROAD, SUITE 104 IRVINE, CA 92618 PHONE (949) 461-5260 FAX (949) 461-5262 GEOTECHNICAL PLAN I JOB NO. I DATE JDRAWNBYJ APPENDIX 1705 71yos 1 , ,c Page