The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2720 ARGONAUTA ST; ; 79-4158; PermitBUlLDtNG PERMIT APPLlCATlCJN7g'9'c 1,77.7', i.: City of CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 Applicant ro complete numbered spaces only. Phone 729-1181 Permrl No. 18 Class of work: XNEW 0 ADOITION fl ALTERATION .[7 REPAIR fl MOVE 0 REMOVE I SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REOUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMB^ THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC- ING, HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. CONSTRUCTION OR WORK ISSUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A TlON AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS,OR IF PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COM- N CHECK VALIDATION u /%+N PROPERLY VALI'DATEO iINTHlS SPACE1 THlS'lS YOUR PERMIT CK. CASH PERMIT VALIDATION CK. M.O. CASH . TOTAL FEES $ /Cdi*?~ ' k L,4 Lt! '..& (, B Class of work: &W' 0 ADDITION 0 ALTERATION 0 REPAIR 3 Describe work: SPECIAL CONDITIONS: NOTlCF . . . - . . - . I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REA0 AN0 EXAMINED THIS ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AN0 ORDINANCES GOVERNING TH!S TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE HEREIN OR NOT THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. 1 I / LAUNDRY TRAY I I CLOTHES WASHER WATER HEATER URINAL I 1 DRINKING FOUNTAIN INSPECTOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT APPLICATION 7y+ ++-+-gD NOTICE THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC- TION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 OAYS,ORIF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK ISSUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COM MENCED. ~~~. ~. ~. ~ ~ ~ ~~ PERMIT FEES SWIMMING POOL WIRING, NO INCREASE IN SERVICE AMPERES OF MAIN SERVICE, SWITCH, ~ NEW CONSTRUCTION, FOR EACH r. ,,_, ;;I,, I ~, ,, jj F SE OR BREAKER F# <* ; !. I NEW SERVICE ON EXISTING BLDG. IN MAIN SERVICE, SWITCH, FUSE FOR EA. AMPERE OF INCREASE OR BREAKER REMODEL, ALTERATION, NO CHANGE IN SERVICE, FOR EA. AMPERE OF INCREASE I I I I TEMP. SERVICE UP TO AND INCLUD- ING 200 AMP. TEMP. SERVICE OVER 200 AMP. PER 100 /I/ I c I TOTAL FEES -E+/'. I " PERMIT VALIDATION CK. M.O. CASH -.- HIS SPACE1 THIS IS YOUR PERMIT 3/ INSPECTOR -- t I ..LecI CM Li Classof work: WWUo AOOlTlON 0 ALTERATION 0 REPAIR Oncribs work: THIS PERMIT BECOMES NU IF WORK OR CONSTRUC- TION AUTHORIZED IS NOT C WITHIN 120OAYS.OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT AFTER WORK IS COM- MENCED. APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AN0 ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS HEREIN OR NOT THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVk AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. INSPECTOR REQUEST FOR INSPECTION TIME: !NSPEC3'ORA PERMIT NO. ?.F-/S/3 ~~~ ~ ~ BUILDING 0 FOUNDATION 0 REINFORCING STEEL 0 MASONRY 0 GROUT - GUNITE 0 FLOOR AND CEILING FRAME 0 SHEATHING 0 FRAME 0 EXTERIOR LATH 0 INSULATION 0 INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL FINAL I\ d PLUMBING 0 UNDERGROUND PLUMBING 0 UNDERGROUND WATER 0 ROUGH PLUMBING 0 TOP OUT PLUMBING 0 SEWER AND PLKO 0 TUB OR SHOWER PAN 0 GAS TEST 0 WATER HEATER 0 FINAL ELECTRICAL 0 TEMPORARY SERVICE 0 ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND 0 ROUGH ELECTRIC 0 POOL BONDING 0 ELECTRIC SERVICE 0 CEILING HEAT U G.F.I. 0 SMOKE DETECTOR 0 FINAL 3 MISCELLANEOUS 0 PLENUM AND DUCTS 0 COMBUSTION AIR 0 PATIO c_ 0 SIGN 0 GRADING 0 DRIVEWAY 0 CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS 0 REFER PIPING 0 FINAL READY FOR INSPECTION: 0 MONDAY 0 TUESDAY 0 WEDNESDAY 0 THURSDAY 0 A.M. MP.M. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS - PHONE NO. YfP- $/3b 2- PERSON TAKING REPORT ~~ ~~ ~ ~. OWNER ADDRESS 0 MASONRY 0 ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND 0 GROUT. GUNITE n ROUGH ELECTRIC 0 FLOOR AND CEILING FRAME 0 POOL BONDING 0 SHEATHING 0 ELECTRIC SERVICE 0 CEILING HEAT 0 EXTERIOR LATH 0 INSULATION 0 SMOKE DETECTOR PLUMBING 0 UNDERGROUND PLUMBING n UNDERGROUND WATER 0 ROUGH PLUMBING 0 TOP OUT PLUMBING 0 SEWER AND PLlCO 0 TUB OR SHOWER PAN 0 GAS TEST 0 WATER HEATER 0 FINAL MISCELLANEOUS 0 PLENUM AND DUCTS 0 COMBUSTION AIR n PATIO 0 SIGN 0 GRADING n DRIVEWAY n CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS 0 REFER PIPING 0 FINAL READY FOR INSPECTION: 0 TUESDAY 0 WEDNESDAY 0 THURSDAY 0 FRIDAY 0 P.M. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS REQUESTED BY PHONE NO. PERSON TAKING REPORT " BUILDING u 0 FOUNDATION 0 REINFORCING STEEL 0 MASONRY 0 GROUT - GUNITE 0 FLOOR AND CEILING FRAME 0 SHEATHING 0 FRAME 0 EXTERIOR LATH 0 INSULATION D”i.pTH OR DRYWAL / -. . PLUMBING 0 UNDERGROUND PL BlNG 0 UNDERGROUND WATER 0 ROUGH PLUMBING 0 TOP OUT PLUMBING 0 SEWER AND PL/CO 0 0 TUB GAS OR TEST SHOWER PAN kd FINAL ELECTRICAL 0 TEMPORARY SERVICE 0 ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ROUGH ELECTRIC OOL BONDING LECTRIC SERVICE ElLlNG HEAT OR ,\ PLENUM AND DUCTS 0 COMBUSTION AIR 0 PATIO 0 SIGN 0 GRADING 0 DRIVEWAY 0 CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS READY FOR INSPECTION: MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAYATHURSDAY )n FRIDAY SPECIAL INSTRUCTID REQUESTED BY PHONE NO. 1 // BUILDING u- ELECTRICAL 0 FOUNDATION Ill REINFORCING STEEL 0 POOL BONDING U FLOOR AND CEILING FRAME n ROUGH ELECTRIC C GROUT. GUNITE 0 ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND i7 MASONRY 0 TEMPORARY SERVICE L?, El SHEATHING FRAME ,#@- 0 0 CEILING ELECTRIC HEAT SERVICE 0 INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL n FINAL 0 FINAL A F n EXTERIOR LATH 0 G.F.I. INSULATION 0 SMOKE DETECTOR 0 UNDERGROUND WA MBUSTION AIR 0 ROUGH PLUMBING n TOP OUT PLUMBING 0 SEWER AND PLICO 0 TUB OR SHOWER PAN 0 GAS TEST CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS 0 WATER HEATER 0 REFER PIPING 0 FINAL 1 - READY FOR INSPECTION: OMONDAY OTUESDAY OWEDNESDAY OTHU VQ- SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS REQUESTED BY KIA- PHONE NO. PERSON TAKING REPORT ~~ ~ ~~ - L .CORRECTION NOTICE CITY OF CARLSBAD .@ BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT TIME: Note: Final Inspection Required DATE: INSPECTOR PHONE - 438.5525 a7ao /%K&PoiffA BUILDING 0 FOUNDATION n REINFORCING STEEL 0 MASONRY 0 GROUT. GUNITE 0 FLOOR AND CEILING FRAME urwul DF il SHEATHING P?M&s nod FRAME I? EXTERIOR LATH PLUMBING UNDERGROUND PLUMBING UNDERGROUND WATER ROUGHT PLUMBING TOP OUT PLUMBING SEWER AND PL/CO TUB OR SHOWER PAN GAS TEST WATER HEATER ELECTRICAL TEMPORARY SERVICE ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ROUGH ELECTRIC POOL BONDING ELECTRIC SERVICE UPPER GROUND G.F.I. SMOKE DETECTOR MISCELLANEOUS 0 PLENUM AND DUCTS 0 COMBUSTION AIR 0 CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS 0 SOLAR 0 GRADING 0 POOL 0 PATIO 0 SIGN 0 OTHER ” I I/ 0. 4+g& RNTERDEPARTMENTAL / INFORMATION SHEET ,;' BUILDING~EPARTMENT BUILDING ADDRESS: 2 72) fld A!' ," Dq:M In v Au PLANNING DEPARTMENT ? 1 \IE LOT SIZE LOT WIDTH UNITS ALLOWED U TS PROVIDED \ PARKING SPACES REQUIRED BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED / PROVIDED PROVIDED % COVERAGE ALLOWED PROVIDED FRONT SETBACK: REAR SETBACK: ALLOWED PROVIDED INTRUSIONS LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION PLAN CO I ENTAL PROTECTION REQ: I ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT /57m 9 / R.Q.W. ExiS7/A& .&INDUSTRIAL WASTE SEWER CONNECTION FROM LLWD #v€zo LZTIC& GRADING PERMIT 3&bn/T70 #,XS4EASEMENTS , " L1/( 9-4- $3& Pve4"LAIJrO FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRIKKLING SYSTEM I ION EQUIP. t j FIRE ALARKS \ FIRE HYDRANTS \ LOCATION ADDITIONAL COMMENTS -. W OK TO ISSU DATE /~-/5-27 OK TO FINAL DATE WATER DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS OF APPROPRIATE DISTRICTS MET DATE . I/' \ \ I <: JOHN VERNON & ASSOCIATES \ '859 S ESCONDIDO BLVQ. ESCONDIDO. CA 92025 TEL 17141 743-8808 -. " GRADING REPORT Agency Project Location 2720 LA bs* Name of Permittee C Li+fa R Grading Permit No. A. COh!PATIBILITY WITH GRADING PLAN AND PEWIT 1. Was the compacted fill placed only in the approximate lo- Yes= No- .cations designated on the grading plan as areas to be filled? 2. Did the quantity of fill material placed approxircately Yes-/. F:Q conform to the grading plan? 3, Did the toe of fill or the top of cut appear to meet the prescribed property line setback (1.5' for fill; 3.C' Yes " 1, No for cuts)? izontal to 1 vertical? I - 4. &ere the finished fill slopes equal tc; or less than 2 hi r- i'es r/ Nc- 5. If the fill material was obtained by cuts on the site, Yc: c/ No were the cuts made in the proper lccation and tr the prgper slope approximately as shown on rhe approvec, cjr2.riir~ plan? the grading plan? "- 6. Were brow ditches constructed approximately as shown on YesK ?:c- E. LOCATION AND AMOUNT CF CGhiFACTI9N TE:;TS 1. Have you attached a sketch and'data showinr the locaticn Y c, s " p - li i - ::. NaS a compaction test made so that there is at least one 'i f, v *.: - 3. AS indicated by inspections, observations anu compact:on Yesy NO- and relative elevation for all compaction tests? test in each 2' thick lens of compacte:! mat.eria1. test results, was the fill, excluding the top 1.0'. compacted to at least 90% of maximum dry density? " _. C. QUALITY OF FILL COMPACTION OPERATION 1. Was the area to receive fill properly prepared in terms of YeSL/ ";O- brush removal, benching, wetting, removal of noncompacted fill or debris and related items? 3' or more below finish grade? 2. Was all detrimentally expansive soil placed in the fill at Ye-E p!o- Duplicate of DPL #73 Rev. 3-7-79 . * -1. w sk~~.Y,&"ve you attached a copy of your curve showing, thi? rela- resy--~-mr--.-. 1. ti'onship between optimum moisture content and maximum - . density? . smaller than 12" in size? k. Was all material used as fill (earth. rocks, gravel) YeSL/ - No - 5. Are all areas of the fill suitable for support of ~esL/ No 6. Were all existiw; fills on the site recompacted in accord- Yesz No structures? ance with the provislons of the grading ordinance? - - D. STATISTICAL DATA 1. Dates the grading work was performed: 7-2 7-a-79 2. Dates your representative was on site and number of hours on site for each date, and name of representative: 7: 8 - 2,.~#17: , 4" w-79 / .MR.. +hP " -. . .- E. AS-BUILT DATA 1. If the fill placement was not in accordance with the approved grading plan, did you notifjr the permittee to ceeding with additional fill Flacenent? obtain approval for deviatior, from the plan before prc- 2. If the approved grading plan coes not reflect the actual location, depth ana type oi fill, have you subnitted fcr review and appro;ra1 an as-tuilt alar!': P+ Id.- 1\' 0- + 3DYARKS: 0 Mr* WD P"w-;rLme-Qed . .-!*-!L- AB k h/n//md~# 6 rOmA 6%/6#, ___ "" . - "" ZEATIFICATIGN Xev. 3-7-79 Duplicate of D?L ,973 INmAL WEIGHT OF SAND WWT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SANO DENSITY VOL. OF HOLE 8 CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE: WET WEIGHT DRY WEIGHT WEIGHT OF WATER Ye MOISTURE IN PLACE WET DENSITY bl PLACE DRY DENSITY IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET DENSlTY WTIMUM DRY DENSITY OPTIMUM MolsTwK % . .. SANO VOLUME DATA: INmAL WEWT OF SAND .WEIGHT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SAND DENSITY VOL. OF HOLE 6 CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE: WET WEIGHT DRY WEIGHT WEIGHT OF WATER % MOISTURE IN PLACE WET DENSITY IN PLACE DRY DENSITY IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET DENSrrY WTIMUM DRY DENSITY OPTIMUM MolsTuRE % RELATIVE COMPACTION: -" 8.09 A43 SAND VOLUME DATA: INITIAL WElGHT OF SAND WWT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SAND DENSITY VOL. OF HOLE Ef CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE: WET WEIGHT DRY WEIGHT WEIGHT OF WATER % MOISTURE IN PLACE WET DENSITY WV PLACE DRY DENSITY IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET DENSrrY OPTIMUM DRY DENSITY OPTIMUM MolsTwK % RELATIVE COMPACTION: 1 % MOSTUIE SAND VOLUME DATA: INITIAL WEIGHT OF SAND WIGHT OF RESIDUE WEIGH7 OF SAND USED SANO DENSITY VOL. OF HOLE 8 CONE '4OL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE: WET WEIGHT DRY WEIGHT WEIGHT OF WATER X MOISTURE IN PLACE WET DENSITY IN PLACE DRY DENSITY IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET DENWY OPTIMUM MOISTURE % OPTIMUM DRY DENSITY //e 8 LB/CF RELATIVE REMARKS: . SAND VOLUME DATA: INITIAL WEIGHT OF SAND WKWT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED S.W DENSITY VOL. OF HOLE 8 CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE . 0.67 I CF EXCAVATED SAMPLE: IN PLACE OPT. MOISTURI WET WEIGHT 400 OR /@.@3 LB DRY WEIGHT 435 GR WEIGHT OF WATER 65 OR % MOISTURE -" /&, LB/CF rJ PLACE DRY DENSITY /zz. 6 "/CF 5@ 3 OR 4# GR f *,.* 1, M PLACE WET DENSITY SANO VOLUME DATA: lNmAL WEIGHT OF SAND WEWT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SAND DENSITY VOL. OF HOLE EI CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE: IN PLACE OPT. MOISTUF WET WEIGHT OR /3,.3& l-0 -OR DRY WEIGHT +# OR WEIGHT OF WATER 62 OR S4 OR % MOISTURE /s- /L IN RACE WET DENSITY /336 LB/CF IN PLACE DRY DENSITY // 6. L %F OPTIMUM WET DENSFTY OPTIMUM DRY DENSITY fp-yz: IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM MOlSTURE % RELATIVE COMPACTION: REMARKS: XMOBTUIK px v . SAND VOLUME DATA: lNmAL WEIGHT OF SAND MKWT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SAND DENSITY VOL. OF HOLE 6 CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE: IN PLACE OPT. MOISTURE WET WEIGHT grw OR /2.f&- La 5-oom DfW WEIGHT QJ6- 446 QR WEIGHT (x WATER 62 OR :$*$' OR % MOISTURE /5- /= IN PLACE WET DENSITY /373 LVCF W PLACE DRY DENSITY / /r7. 4 LB/CF IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET DENSITY OPTIMUM MOISTURE % OPTIMUM DRY DENSITY fp2i;: RELATIVE COMPACTION: XWTUIE h \\ REMARKS- . SANO VOLUME DATA: INITIAL WEIGHT OF SAND WIGHT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SANDDENSlTY VOL. OF HOLE 8 CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE A. 0 67 CF EXCAVATED SAMPLE: IN PLACE OPT. MOISTURE WET WEIGHT DRY WEIGHT WEIGHT OF WATER @ GR P Oh MOISTURE /I ci IN PLACE WET DENSITY IN PLACE DRY DENSITY /z3. I OPTIMUM WET DENSITY OPTIMUM OPTIMUM MolsTURE DRY DENSITY % f$yi;L:: qm GR 5/6 LB Q( 454 OR LELA!! GR /% -6 WCF LB/CF IMPACT TEST DATA: RELATIVE COMPACTION: EMARKS %YOBtUtE -v SANO VOLUME DATA: INmAL WEIGHT OF SAND MIGHT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SANDDENSlN VOL. OF HOLE 8 CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE : WET WEIGHT DRY WEIGHT WEIGHT OF WATER X MOISTURE ,&RACE WET DENSITY ,# PLACE DRY DENSITY IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET ENSKY OPTIMUM DRY DENSITY OPTIMUM MOISTURE % RELATIVE REMARKS: . . SAND VOLUME DATA: INITIAL WEtGHT OF SAND MIGHT Of RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SAND DENSlTY VOL. OF HOLE 8 CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE : WET WEIGHT DRY WEIGHT WEIGHT OF WATER 'X MOlSTURE IN PLACE WET DENSITY IN PLACE DRY DENSITY IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET DENSITY OPTIMUM MOISTURE % OPTIMUM DRY DENSITY 0.077 CF RELATIVE REMARKS: COMPACTION: IN9W WElGHT OF SAND WWT OF RESIDUE WElGHT OF SANO USED SAND DENSITY VOL. OF HOLE Et CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. Of HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE: WET WEIGHT DRY WEIGHT WEIGHT OF WATER X MOISTURE IN RACE WET DENSITY IN PLACE DRY DENSITY IMPACT TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET DENSrrY OPTIMUM DRY DENSITY OPTl" MOISTURE % RELATIVE COMPACTION: IN PLACE OPT. MOISTURE // 2.3 LB/CF Y u TEST# 2- RELATIVE COMPACTION OG + s FG - ps TEST REPORT TESTED BY "- .. ."- SANO VOLUME DATA: INtTlAL WElGHT OF SAND WEIGHT OF RESlWE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SAND DEF(sITY va. OF HOLE a CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. Of HOLE EXC4VATED SAMPLE: WET WEIGHT DRY WEIGHT WEIGHT OF WATER X MOISTURE IN PLACE WET ENSITY N PLACE DRY DENSITY OPT. MOISTURE /5 IWACT TEST DATA: RELATIVE' TEST REPORT SAND VOLUME DATA: INmAL WEIGHT OF SAND WKWT OF RESIDUE WEM OF SAND USED SAND DEMTY VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE va. OF HOLE 6 CONE EXCAVATED SAMPLE: WET WEIGHT DRV WEIGHT WEIGHT OF WATER X MOISTURE IN PLACE WET DENSITY IN PLACE DRY DENSITY %PACT s: TEST DATA: OPTIMUM WET DENSrrY OPTIMUM MOISTURE 70 OPTIMUM DfW DENSITY IN PLACE OPT. MOISTURE I I +. 1 JOHN VERNON 81 ASQClATES ' . 1859 S. ESCONDIDO BLVD. ,' ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 TEL. (714) 743-8808 July 2,. 1979 Mr. John Frazer Leucadia, Ca. 92024 1334 Hemes! Subject: Soil Testing Site: 2720 Argonauta, Carlsbad, Ca. Mr. Frazer: At your request we have terminated your Preliminary Soils boring, soil samples and had testing done. The results of Investigation for the above site. We have already taken a the testing we have completed we will keep on file for your future reference. We can tell you that the soil is not detrimentally expansive. No unusual footing design will be required unless the soil you import is expansive. C. W. DAVIS R.C.E. 21719 SUBJECT: Laboratory Test Results on Sample Submitted by Chuck Davis, Frazier Residence. Gentlemen: In accordance with the request of Chuck Davis on June 13, 1979, we have performed a Direct Shear Test and an Expansion Test on the submitted soil sample. The samples were remolded to 90% of the maximum dry density which was provided by John Vernon and Associates. Please refer to Plate No. 1 for the results of these tests. If you have any questions after reviewing our report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of pro- fessional service is appreciated. Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. ., &/24 Charles H. Christian, R.C.E. t22330 DESCRIPTION m MAXIMUM DENSITY 81 OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT ASTM ~~ DESCRIPTION EXPANSION TEST RESULTS t t I I I 1 I SAMPLE 1 No. 1 I I I I I I I CONDITION Remolded Air Dried IN11 IAL M.C ("/e; 3.2 111 .2 INITIAL MNSITY(pcO I FINAL M.C. ('/e) 18.5 I I I I I EXPANSION (*/e) 1.6 I I I I C’ I200 ELM AVENUE - CARLSBAO. CALIFORNIA 92008 Building Department ERT ‘IFICU‘TE I7141 7241181 TELEPHONE: 7 lereby certify that I am .Familiar standards mandated in comply withm current requirements of these regulations. Submit to the Building Department with permit application. Form 78-101 .” - ~~. .. r- LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT ' APPLICATION FOR SEWER SERVICE - Owner's Name - John Frazar Phone No. Mailing Address p.0.~0~;702 ~- Service Address: Tract Description: - lot 730 La Costa Meadows Assessor's Parcel No. ""_I Carl sbad Calif. 92008 Type of Building s.f. No. Units " 1 Connection Fee $ 600.00 Lateral Size: 4" " 6" - 8" - Saddle - Easement Connectio8 re-pd (200.00) - Extra Footage: -@$ Amount Rec'd $"+&j,&O Ck. Flo/Cash Rec'd By Extra Depth: @$ -YEA.@. 7 Lateral Fee " Prorated Sewer Total Service Fee $- The application must 6e signed by the owner (or his authorized representative) of the property to be served. The total charges must be paid to the District at the time the application is submitted. If a service lateral is required, it will be installed by the Leucadia County Water . District. The service lateral is that part of the sewer system that extends from the main collection line in the street (or easement) to the point ir. the street (at or near the applicant's property line) where the service lateral is connected to the applicant's building sewer. The applicant is responsible for the construction, at the applicant's expense, of the sewer pipeline (building sewer) from the appli- cant's plumbing to the point in the stree: (or easement) where a connection is made to the service lateral. made by the applicant at his expense. The connection must be made in conformity The connection of the applicant's building sewer to the service lateral shall be with the District's specifications, rules and regulations; and IT MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE DISTRICT BEFORE THE SEWER SYSTEM MAY BE USED BY THE APPLICANT, THE APPLICANT, OR HIS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, MUST NOTIFY THE DISTRICT AT THE TIME INSPECTION IS DESIRED. ANY CONNECTION MADE TO THE SERVICE LATERAL OR COLLEC- TION LINE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL AND INSPECTION BY THE DISTRICT WILL BE CONSIDEREE INVALID AND WILL NOT BE ACKNOWLEDGED. The prorated sewer service fee is based upon the date the District estimates that service will begin and covers the balance of the fiscal year. There will be no additional fee or refund if service actually comnenccs on a different date. For succeeding fiscal years, the sewer service fee will be collected on the tax roll in the same manner as property taxes. The utidersigned hereby agreesthat the above information given is correct and agrees to th rett 'tions as stated. - ' 9&/23 Account No. INSULATION CERTIFICATION This is to certify that insulation has been installed in c'onformance wi'th the current energy regulation~s, California Administrative Code, Title 25, State of California, in the building located at: SITE ADDRESS 2720 Argonnauta. Carlsbad. (XLiL Owens-Corning and Manufacturer Johns-Mansville Thickness/Type 3%" FrAction R-value ~__ 11 CEILINGS Owens-Corning and Batts: Manufacturer Johns-hlansville Thickness/Type 6" Kraft R-value& Blown: Manufacturer Thickness/Type R-value R-value Wt . /Bag Sq. Ft. Covered FLOORS Manufacturer Thickness/Type R-value GENERAL CONTRACTOR LICENSE # DATE LICENSE # 221517 C-2 President DATE INSULATION CERTIFICATION with the current energy regulations, California Administrative Code, This is to certify that insulation.has been installed in conformance Title 25, Sta.te of California, in the building located at: SITE ADDRESS 2720 Argonnauta, Carlsbad, Calif. hens-Coming and Manufacturer Johns-Mansville Thickness/Type 3%" Friction R-value2 CEILINGS Batts: Manufacturer Johns-Mansville Thickness/Type 6" Kraft R-value19 Blown: Manufacturer Thickness/Type R-value - Owens-Corning and Wt. /Bag Sq. Ft. Covered R-value FLOORS Manufacturer Thickness/Type R-value - -:ENERAL CONTRACTOR BY TITLE DATE LICENSE # 221517 C-2 BY TITLE President DATE ~~ ^____~ ~ __ CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT (714) 729-1181 CERTIFICATION I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers' compensation laws of California. visions of the California Labor Code, I will forthwith comply with Section 3700 of the If, after making this certificate, I become subject to the workers' compensation pro- Labor Code. I understand that if I fail to comply with the workers' compensation laws, this permit shall be deemed revoked. I further certify that if I should contract including any compliance by that contractor firm or company, to do all or Code. Application for Grading Permi, ,I PERMIT NO..: "_ :' ''. \ (letter code + numberli ', CITY OF CARLSBAD L= I ot PUBLIC WORKS & BUILDING DEPARTMENT S=subdivision 1200 Elm Avenue C=City contract 729-1 181 FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN I I Grading permi t fee $ ' . Work completed Suretv bond released . i Permit Validation by.. , Permit Expiration Date , .. . .. ~ ,a . , ., Date - ; ..., ,.*., THIS FORM WHEN PROPERLY VALIDATED BY SIGNATURE IS A PERMIT TO DO THE WORK DESCRIBED THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A SIX (6) MONTH PERIOD ? .. ..