Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2739 LLAMA CT; ; CB020545; Permit
06-25-2002 Job Address Permit Type Parcel No Valuation Occupancy Group # Dwelling Units Bedrooms Project Title Applicant RESOR STEWART 1268 BLUESKY DRIVE 92007 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 CB020545 2739 LLAMA CT CBAD RESDNTL 2154201100 $10546800 0 Sub Type Lot# Construction Type Reference # Structure Type Bathrooms RAD 0 NEW KING RESIDENCE TWO STORY ADDITION Status Applied Entered By Plan Approved Issued Inspect Area Orig PC# Plan Check* ISSUED 02/21/2002 MDP 06/25/2002 06/25/2002 Owner KING BRAD L&ERICA L 2739 LLAMA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 0100 06/25/02 0002 01 02 CGP 711*0" Total Fees $1 078 37 Total Payments To Date $367 28 Balance Due $71 1 09 Building Permit Add I Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add I Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add I Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot Water Con Fee Meter Size Add I Pot Water Con Fee Reel Water Con Fee $565 04 $000 $367 28 $000 $000 $1055 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 Meter Size Add'l Reel Water Con Fee Meter Fee SDCWA Fee CFD Payoff Fee PFF PFF (CFD Fund) License Tax License Tax (CFD Fund) Traffic Impact Fee Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) Sidewalk Fee PLUMBING TOTAL ELECTRICAL TOTAL MECHANICAL TOTAL Housing Impact Fee Housing InLieu Fee Master Drainage Fee Sewer Fee Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $8300 $2000 $3250 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $1 078 37 Inspector y^ FINAL APPROVAL Date ~S—'_—j5 Clearance NOTICE Please take/j0TIClrtriat approval of your project includes the Imposition of fees dedications reservations or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as fees/exactions You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions If you protest them you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a) and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3 32 030 Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack review set aside void or annul their imposition You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes nor planning zoning grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. 02-25-2003 Job Address Permit Type Parcel No Valuation Occupancy Group # Dwelling Units Bedrooms Project Title Applicant RESOR STEWART 1268 BLUESKY DRIVE 92007 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No CB020545 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 2739 LLAMA CT CBAD RESDNTL 2154201100 $10546800 0 0 Sub Type Lot# Construction Type Reference # Structure Type Bathrooms RAD 0 NEW KING RESIDENCE 600 SF TWO STORY ADDITION Status Applied Entered By Plan Approved Issued Inspect Area Orig PC# Plan Check# FINAL 02/21/2002 MDP 06/25/2002 06/25/2002 PY Owner KING BRAD L&ERICA L 2739 LLAMA CT CARLSBAD CA 92009 Building Permit Add I Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add I Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot Water Con Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot Water Con Fee Reel Water Con Fee $565 04 Meter Size $0 00 Add I Reel Water Con Fee $367 28 Meter Fee $0 00 SDCWA Fee $0 00 CFD Payoff Fee $1055 PFF $0 00 PFF (CFD Fund) $0 00 License Tax $0 00 License Tax (CFD Fund) $0 00 Traffic Impact Fee $0 00 Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) $0 00 Sidewalk Fee $0 00 PLUMBING TOTAL $0 00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $0 00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $0 00 Housing Impact Fee $0 00 Housing InLieu Fee Master Drainage Fee $0 00 Sewer Fee $0 00 Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $8300 $2000 $3250 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $1 078 37 Total Fees $1 078 37 Total Payments To Date $1 078 37 Balance Due $000 Inspector FINAL APPROVAL Date Clearance NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the Imposition of fees dedications reservations or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as fees/exactions You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions If you protest them you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a) and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3 32 030 Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack review set aside void or annul their imposition You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your nght to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes nor planning zoning grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which YOU have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008 PROJECT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO EST VAL Plan Ck Deposit Validated By _ Date __ 7 Address (include"Bldg/Suite #)Business Name (at this address) Lot No Subdivision Name/Number Unit No Phase No Total # of units Namfe J1 ' ' Address , Ti HI Contractor-- Q Agent foSSahtractor GO OwneT fflAE Address City State/Zip Telephone #Name 5 CONTRACTOR COMPANY^NAME^ ~ ' ^ ^ ~~ Ji*""' * , iF' "*" ^ ^ » (Sec 7031 5 Business and Professions Code Any City or County which requires a permit to construct alter improve demolish or repair any structure prior to its issuance also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor s License Law [Chapter 9 commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption Any violation of Section 7031 5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]) Name State License # Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone # Designer Name State License # Address City State/Zip Telephone COMPENSATION N '•<• * ~" «* _i* ,.,..<» ^ Workers Compensation Declaration I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations n I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self insure for workers compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued 0 I have and will maintain workers compensation as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued My worker s compensation insurance carrier and policy number are Insurance Company Policy No Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS l$100] OR LESS) n CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers Compensation Laws of California WARNING Failure to secure workers compensation coverage is unlawful and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100 000) in addition to the cost of compensation damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code interest and attorney s fees SIGNATURE DATE 1 OWNER BUILDER DECLARATION """" at """ *~~ ^ ^* I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor s License Law for the following reason O I as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec 7044 Business and Professions Code The Contractor s License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale If however the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion the owner builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale) ^T I as owner of the property am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec 7044 Business and Professions Code The Contractor s License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor s License Law) Q I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement d YES (~lNO I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work I haye cqptracjed with the following person (firml.to provide the proposed cor^struction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number)>-i 7 4 I plan to provide portions'of the work but I have'htfed the following person to coordinate supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number) 5 I will provide some of the work but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work) f—s / , PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTIONsFOR NON^£S/D£NT/At BUILDING PERMITS ONLY J ' ^ J"~ r*f* I , / .,„...„"<-•« Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505 25533 or 25534 of the Presley Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? C] YES l~l NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district' l~l YES l~l NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1 000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site' Q YES Q NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 8 JiCONSTRUCTIONlENDING AGENCY™ ^ - ^ i* ^ '>s~^ T I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 30970) Civil Code) LENDER S NAME LENDER S ADDRESS 9 APPLICANrCERTClCATION ,., ^'-Z ^ - i,^ .... ti. §f I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES JUDGMENTS COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT OSHA An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5 0 deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height EXPIRATION Every permit issued by the tjuilding Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is nof commencesf5luthinj£ftdays from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for arae/iod qH80 days (Section 106 4 4 Uniform Building Code) APPLICANT S SIGNATURE V J "^ C£g*ST' " DATE **~- fc- / Q1— WHITE File YELLOW Applicant PINK Finance City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For 01/14/2003 Permit* CB020545 Title KING RESIDENCE Description 1,034 SF TWO STORY ADDITION Inspector Assignment PY Type RESDNTL Sub Type RAD Lot Job Address 2739 LLAMA CT Suite Location APPLICANT RESOR STEWART Owner KING BRAD L&ERICA L Remarks Total Time Phone 7605185230 Inspector Requested By BILL Entered By CHRISTINE CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Act Comment Associated PCRs/CVs Date 10/22/2002 10/22/2002 10/22/2002 10/17/2002 10/16/2002 10/11/2002 10/11/2002 10/01/2002 09/30/2002 09/30/2002 08/23/2002 08/22/2002 08/21/2002 Inspection History Description Act 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP 1 8 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP 23 Gas/Test/Repairs AP 16 Insulation AP 84 13 84 15 11 15 11 21 11 Rough Combo Shear Panels/HDs Rough Combo Roof/Reroof Ftg/Foundation/Piers Roof/Reroof Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Under Floor Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PA we AP CO CO AP AP CO Insp PY PY PY PY PY PD PD PY PY PY PY PY PY Comments emr work already done AT REAR REVISE PLAN OK TO POUR FOR CHANGES SEE NOTICE ATTACHED * CITY OF CARLSBAD NOTICE BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE / - /.^-^J LOCATION A "7 (760) 602 2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE TIME PERMIT NO FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602 2725 RE INSPECTION FEE DUE? ?RMATION CONTACT ; x YES PHONE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For 01/13/2003 Permit* CB020545 Title KING RESIDENCE Description 1,034 SF TWO STORY ADDITION Inspector Assignment PY Type RESDNTL Sub Type RAD Lot Job Address 2739 LLAMA CT Suite Location APPLICANT RESOR STEWART Owner KING BRAD L&ERICA L Remarks Total Time Phone 7605185230 Inspector Requested By BILL Entered By ROBIN CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Comment Associated PCRs/CVs Inspection History Date 10/22/2002 10/22/2002 10/22/2002 10/17/2002 10/16/2002 10/11/2002 10/11/2002 10/01/2002 09/30/2002 09/30/2002 08/23/2002 08/22/2002 08/21/2002 Description 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 1 8 Exterior Lath/Drywall 23 Gas/Test/Repairs 16 Insulation 84 Rough Combo 13 Shear Panels/HD s 84 Rough Combo 15 Roof/Reroof 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 15 Roof/Reroof 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 21 Underground/Under Floor 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act AP AP AP AP AP PA we AP CO CO AP AP CO Insp PY PY PY PY PY PD PD PY PY PY PY PY PY Comments emr work already done AT REAR REVISE PLAN FOR CHANGES OK TO POUR SEE NOTICE ATTACHED CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE (760) 602-2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE DATE / •"TIME LOCATION PERMIT NO FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602 2725 RE INSPECTION FEE DUE1? ?RNMTION CONTACT. DING INSI/ECT/R YES PHONE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER © City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For 08/23/2002 Permit# CB020545 Title KING RESIDENCE Description 1,034 SF TWO STORY ADDITION Inspector Assignment PY 2739 LLAMA CT Lot Type RESDNTL Job Address Suite Location APPLICANT RESOR STEWART Owner KING BRAD L&ERICA L Remarks Sub Type RAD Phone 7605185230 PInspector I Total Time CD Description 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act Comments Requested By BILL Entered By CHRISTINE / Associated PCRs/CVs Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 08/21/2002 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers CO PY SEE NOTICE ATTACHED FIELD REPORT TO SUMMARY OF INSPECTION DATE . PROJECT CONTRACTOR WEATHER PRESENT AT SITE PROJECT NO OWNER TEMP ® So u\., ^\b-tA'XO-V\ Gvty Cr-~\ Vj-'-XV.V>OO-OS -vs o ^ A <-t«j- \^\ RECOMMENDATIONS -^- - !.^ _3 c^r fC^f av\x-i /S^\ Xv.QC-> "Vv cV^^ v^ PREFERRED CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC (858) 576-9110 4888 Ronson Court "G" Fax (858) 576-7028 San Diego, Ca. 92111 TEST REPORT JOB NO : 3311 _ _ _ __„ __«. — —. — — — — — __*____ — — — — —————— — — — —• — — — — — — — — — — — — • JOB KING RESIDENCE ADDRESS 2739 LLAMA COURT OWNER- CONTRACTOR SCHAFFER CONSTRUCTION CLIENT SCHAFFER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER HARBOR ENGINEERING ARCHITECT BLDG AUTH CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTOR TOM PAYNE PERMIT NO CB020545 PLAN FILE FIELD LOCATION OF SPECIMEN SAMPLE OF CONCRETE IN JOB OR STRUCTURE 2 PIER FOOTINGS MIX NO 90-044 PROPORTIONS ADMIXTURE MADE BY SLUMP - DATE MADE TOM PAYNE 4 1/2" 10/09/02 TYPE OF CEMENT DATE RECEIVED- 10/10/02 CONCRETE SUPPLIER MAR CON PRODUCTS TICKET NO 35164 I &GE TESTED SPECIMEN MARKINGS DATE TESTED DIAMETER- AREA- SQ IN ULTIMATE LOAD - LBS : JNIT STRESS - PS I ABORATORY TE 10 DAYS 62899 10/16 28 28 70000 2480 1ST DATA 28 DAYS 62900 11/06 28 28 109000 TQKn s&?' 28 DAYS H DAYS 62901 11/06 28 28 108000 **? •aoon JPECIFIED STRENGTH iT 28 DAYS - PSI 3250 USTRIBUTION: SCHAFFER CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CARLSBAD EST BREAK IN USUAL CONFIGURATION WITH UNBONDED CAPS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE EST METHODS - ASTM C39: C173 C231 C1231 C172 C143 C138 ENGINEER K&FJSKK1S0 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS, INC 888 Ronson Court "G" an Diego, Ca 92111 (858) 576-9110 Fax (858) 576-7028 INSPECTION REPORT ORK PERFORMED CONCRETE INSPECTION JOB NO 3311 OB ADDRESS 2739 LLAMA COURT OB NAME KING RESIDENCE ESCRIBE MATERIAL IX #90-044 3000 PSI PERMIT NO PLAN FILE NO ARCHITECT CB020545 ENGINEER HARABOR ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHAFFER CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR SHAFFER CONSTRUCTION LO/09 Inspected the placement of reinforcing steel and concrete in pier footings (2 total) for elevated deck at rear of residence Placed 2 50 cubic yards of 3000 psi concrete supplied by Mar-Con (mix #90- 044) Made one set of three test cylinders Work observed was in accordance with the approved plans and specifications Arrived on 30bsite at 12 30 PM, left at 3 00 PM INSPECTOR •^s DATE- 10/09/02 CERT^ NO PAYNE 084166-81 EsGil Corporation In (partnership with government for "Buikting Safety DATE April 18, 2002 O^APP-LJCANT q_jURiy) JURISDICTION Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO 02-545 SET II PROJECT ADDRESS 2739 Llama Court PROJECT NAME SFD Addition for King XI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff \ The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck •T- The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to XI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Telephone # Date contacted (by ) Fax # Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS f By Bert Domingo Enclosures Esgil Corporation PI GA n MB n EJ PI PC 4/9/02 trnsmtldot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 +• (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In ^Partnership With government for 'Bmfd'ing Safety DATE March 6, 20O2 CUAPPttSAfH. Cn jiJRIS^——— JURISDICTION Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO 02-545 SET I PROJECT ADDRESS 2739 Llama Ct PROJECT NAME SFD Addition for King The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person /<] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to Stuart Resor 1268 Blue Sky Drive, Cardiff, CA 92007 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed IXl Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Stuart L^A Telephone # (760) 753-8022 Date contacted ^U? (by T3S) Fax # (760) 753-8058 Mail ^Telephone -— Fax''" In Person REMARKS By Bert Domingo Enclosures Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ n PC 2/22/02 trnsmtldot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 4 (858)560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad O2-545 March 6, 20O2 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO 02-545 PROJECT ADDRESS 2739 Llama Ct FLOOR AREA 1034 SQ FT REMARKS DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED March 6, 2002 JURISDICTION Carlsbad STORIES TWO HEIGHT DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION 2/22/02 PLAN REVIEWER Bert Domingo FOREWORD (PLEASE READ) This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes 1997 UBC, 1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99) The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 106 4 3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i e . plan sheet number, specification section, etc Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans Carlsbad O2-545 March 6, 2002 • PLANS 1 Please make all corrections on the original tracings as requested in the correction list Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects) For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways 1 Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments 2 Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468 Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments NOTE Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete 2 All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation (California Business and Professions Code) 3 Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction Specify expiration date of license (California Business and Professions Code) 4 Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans stating that this project shall comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the 1997 UBC, UMC and UPC and the 1996 NEC • FIRE PROTECTION 5 Show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup a) Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms b) On each story NOTE Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in all sleeping areas of the unil Section 3109 1 Carlsbad 02-545 March 6, 20O2 GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS 6 Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406 4 (see exceptions) a) Doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools, saunas, steam rooms, bathtubs and showers and in any portion of a building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and dram inlet b) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface • EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 7 Guardrails (Section 509 1) a) Shall have a height of 36" b) Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-B Please submit calculations c) Openings between railings shall be less than 4" The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a guardrail at a stair shall be less than 6" 8 Provide stairway and landing details Sections 1003 3 3 a) Maximum rise is 7" and minimum run is 11" When the stairs serves less than 10 occupants, or serves an unoccupied roof, rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum b) Minimum headroom is 6'-8" 9 Handrails (Section 1003 336) a) Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and be continuous b) The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail c) Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends Carlsbad 02-545 March 6, 2002 10 The walls and soffits of the enclosed usable space under interior stairs shall be protected on the enclosed side as required for one hour fire-resistive construction Section 1003 339 • ROOFING 11 Specify on the plans the following information for the roof materials, per Section 10633 a) Manufacturer's name b) Product name/number c) ICBO approval number, or equal 12 Provide skylight details to show compliance with Sections 2409 and 2603, or specify on the plans the following information for the skyhght(s), per Section 10633 a) Manufacturer's name b) Model name/number c) ICBO approval number, or equal 13 Where eave vents are installed, insulation shall not block the free flow of air A minimum of 1" of air space shall be provided between the insulation and the roof sheathing To accommodate the thickness of insulation plus the required I" clearance, member sizes may have to be increased for rafter-ceiling joists Section 1505 3 14 Note on the plans "Attic ventilation openings shall be covered with corrosion-resistant metal mesh with mesh openings of 1/4-inch in dimension " Section 1505 3 • GARAGE AND CARPORTS 15 Garage requires one-hour fire protection on the garage side of walls and ceiling common to the dwelling Table 3-B, Section 302 4 16 All elements supporting floor above garage, including walls/beams/columns supporting floor joists, must have one-hour fire-resistive protection on the garage side Section 302 2 Carlsbad O2-545 March 6, 2OO2 FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 17 In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor Identify this value in the soils report and on the plans Section 1629 4 2 18 The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and c) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report" • FRAMING 19 Show or note fire stops at the following locations per Section 708 2 1 a) In concealed spaces of stud walls and partitions, including furred spaces, at the ceiling and floor levels and at 10 foot intervals both vertical and horizontal, b) At all interconnections between concealed vertical and horizontal spaces such as occur at soffits, drop ceilings and cove ceilings, c) In concealed spaces between stair stringers at the top and bottom of the run and between studs along and inline with the run of stairs if the walls under the stairs are unfinished, d) In openings around vents, pipes, ducts, chimneys, fireplaces and similar openings which afford a passage for fire at ceiling and floor levels, with noncombustible materials e) At openings between attic spaces and chimney chases for factory-built chimneys • ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 20 Note on the plans that receptacle outlet locations will comply with NEC Art 210-52(a) 21 Show on the plans a wall receptacle adjacent to each lavatory in the bathroom NEC Art 210-52(d) The same shall be GFCI Protected 22 All the receptacles at the kitchen counters shall be GFCI protected 23 The WP exterior receptacles should be GFCI protected Carlsbad 02-545 March 6, 20O2 ENERGY CONSERVATION 24 The window schedule shall clearly describe the required U-factor and solar heat gam coefficient (SHGC) values and demonstrate compliance with the Title 24 energy calculations 25 Cloth backed duct tape is no longer permitted to be used as the sole connection for mechanical ducting Note on the plans that duct tape, as a minimum, meeting the requirements of UL181, 181 A, or 181B, shall be used or additional duel attachment devices such as tie wraps or mastic will be required for installing mechanical ducting 26 Detail or note on the plans "The return air plenum serving the mechanical equipment must be fully ducted from the equipment to the conditioned space Drop ceilings, wall cavities and equipment platforms may not be used as plenums" 27 Note on the plans "The manufactured windows shall have a label attached certified by the National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) and showing compliance with the energy calculations " 28 Please show the recommended R value on the sections of the insulation of the roof, walls and floor • MISCELLANEOUS 29 Please show how the addition would be heated 30 Please show on the plans the ICBO approval for the Z walls or submit complete calculations to include the connections Any required details should be reflected on the plans and cross referenced to the structural walls 31 When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit Please review Section 106 3 5 Please complete the attached form Carlsbad O2-545 March 6, 2002 To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate Yes Q No Q The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bert Domingo at Esgil Corporation Thank you Carlsbad 02-545 March 6, 2002 City of Carlsbad Building Department BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION Do Not Remove From Plans Plan Check No 02-545 Job Address or Legal Descnption 2739 Llama Ct Owner Address You are hereby notified that in addition to the inspection of construction provided by the Building Department, an approved Registered Special Inspector is required to provide continuous inspection during the performance of the phases of construction indicated on the reverse side of this sheet The Registered Special Inspector shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Building Department prior to the issuance of the building permit Special Inspectors having a current certification from the City of San Diego, Los Angeles, or ICBO are approved as Special Inspectors for the type of construction for which they are certified The inspections by a Special Inspector do not change the requirements for inspections by personnel of the City of Carlsbad building department The inspections by a Special Inspector are in addition to the inspections normally required by the County Building Code The Special Inspector is not authorized to inspect and approve any work other than that for which he/she is specifically assigned to inspect The Special Inspector is not authorized to accept alternate materials, structural changes, or any requests for plan changes The Special Inspector is required to submit written reports to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that he/she inspected and approved The final inspection approval will not be given until all Special Inspection reports have been received and approved by the City of Carlsbad building department Please submit the names of the inspectors who will perform the special inspections on each of the items indicated on the reverse side of this sheet (over) Carlsbad 02-545 March 6, 2002 SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION PLAN CHECK NUMBER OWNER'S NAME I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify that I, or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special mspector(s) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701 1 for the construction project located at the site listed above UBC Section 106 3 5 Signed I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as required by UBC Section 106 3 5 for the construction project located at the site listed above Engineer s/Archltect s Seal & Signature Here Signed 1 List of work requiring special inspection O Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection G Field Welding Q Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI D High Strength Bolting O Prestressed Concrete Q Expansion/Epoxy Anchors O Structural Masonry Q Sprayed-On Fireproofmg Q Designer Specified D Other 2 Name(s) of mdividual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed above A B C 3 Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above A B Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site Carlsbad 02-545 March 6, 2002 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION Carlsbad PREPARED BY Bert Domingo BUILDING ADDRESS 2739 Llama Ct BUILDING OCCUPANCY R3 PLAN CHECK NO 02-545 DATE March 6, 2002 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION VN BUILDING PORTION Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA ( Sq Ft ) cb Rlrln Pprmif FPP hu Orrlinanro TT Valuation Multiplier By Ordinance Reg Mod VALUE ($) 105,468 105,468 $565 04 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review Repetitive Fee Repeats Complete Review D Other P-, Hourly fj Structural Only Hour Esgil Plan Review Fee $367 28 $31642 Comments Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue doc City of Carlsbad Public Works — Engineering DATE BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST BUILDING ADDRESS PROJECT DESCRIPTION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER LAfiW\q PLANCHECK NO CB ~ H ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved The approval is based on plans information and/or specifications provided in your submittal therefore any changes to these items after this date including field modifications must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build D A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements EST VALUE DENIAL Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked with D Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review By By By Date Date Date FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT Date ATTACHMENTS D n Li D D Dedication Application Dedication Checklist Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist Right-of-Way Permit Application Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT CONTACT PERSON Name TANIYA WADE City of Carlsbad Address 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad CA 92008 Phone (760) 602-2773 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No Lots Recordation Carlsbad Tract A-4 CA 92008-7314 • (760) 6O2-272O • FAX (760^60^-8562 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST o )(° IGl SITE PLAN * ST <~fno oRD CD D 1 Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale Show Arrow JP"" Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets Existing & Proposed Structures -e^^Driveway widths ^^^Existmg Street Improvements -H*" Existing or proposed sewer lateral ^-Q-'Property Lines *f"" Existing or proposed water service <JE:Easements -& Existing or proposed irrigation service n 2 Show on site plan A- Drainage Patterns 1 Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course 2 ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building " B ' Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography ^C Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service ' (s) that serves the project Each unit requires a separate service, however, v— 2 second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception D/ Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards CD 3 Include on title sheet A Site address B Assessor's Parcel Number C Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc ) previously approved EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION HVWORD\DOCS\CHKLSHBu«dinoPlanch«*CMstFotm (Generic) doc o Rev 7/14/00 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST |ST 2ND 3* DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE n D 4a Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No 4b All conditions are in compliance Date DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS n 5 Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm dram or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $15.000. pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18 40 030 Dedication required as follows Dedication required Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 Va" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person Applications will not be accept by mail or fax Dedication completed by Date IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $75.000. pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 1840040 Public improvements required as follows Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process The completed application form and the requirements on the H \WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\BuikJing Planctleck Cklst Form (RIDDLE HARVEY 7 12 00) doc .. ST BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST checklist must be submitted in person Applications by mail or fax are not accepted Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit Improvement Plans signed by Date 6b Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18 40 Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $310 so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit Future public improvements required as follows D 6c Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department Future Improvement Agreement completed by Date [H 6d No Public Improvements required SPECIAL NOTE Damaged or defective improvements found adiacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11 06 030 of the Municipal Code EH EH 7a Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export) D D 7b Grading Permit required A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached NOTE The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit Grading Inspector sign off by _ Date 7c Graded Pad Certification required (Note Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required ) H \WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Building Plancheck Cklst Form (Generic 7 14-00) doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST oRD Q 7d No Grading Permit required Q 7e If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS D 8 A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way Types of work include, but are not limited to street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm dram, sewer and water utilities Right-of-Way permit required for D D 9 INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Cammo Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008 District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance Industrial Waste permit accepted by Date 10 NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first 11 Q Required fees are attached Jo fees required WATER METER REVIEW D D D 12a Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used • All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service H \WORDU30CS\CHKLS-nBullding Plancheck Cktet Form (Generic) doc 1ST ->ND 3RD D D 12b BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST • If owner/developer proposes a size other than the 'standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm) A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit • Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter • If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street) Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval The developer must provide these calculations Please follow these guidelines 1 If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W" The irrigation service should look like STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 5 meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach) Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference In general the calculations will include • Hydraulic grade line • Elevation at point of connection (POC) • Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) • Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve • Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) • Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA) As long as the project is located within the City recycled water H \WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\BuiMing Plancheck CHst Forni (Generic) doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ^ ST 2ND 3RD service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future Zl D D 12c Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) 1 Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above 2 If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this D D D 13 Additional Comments H \WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Bu1KJino Plancheck Cklst Form (Generic) doc ID D PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No CJB Planner _ APN 09-Address -. Phone (760) 602 Type of Project & Use ^ / Aftiy Net Project Density Zoning f^"' General Plan /cC-Xv Facilities Management Zone /., DU/AC CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation Remaining net dev acres Circle One non-residential development Type of land used created by this permit _ ) Legend ^ Item Complete I I Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required YES _ NO// TYPE _ DATE OF COMPLETION 7 Compliance with conditions of approval7 If not, state/conditions which require action Conditions of Approval ' Discretionary Action Required APPROVAL/RESO NO PROJECT NO YES NO DATE TYPE OTHER RELATED CASES Compliance with conditions or approval7 If not state conditions which require action Conditions of Approval D D Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone7 YES NO CA Coastal Commission Authority7 YES NO If California Coastal Commission Authority Contact them at - 75/5 Metropolitan Drive Suite 103, San Diego CA 92108-4402, (61 9) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt) Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed7 YES NO If NO complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now Coastal Permit Determination Log # Follow-Up Actions 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt or "Coastal Permit Required (at minimum Floor Plans) 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed Inclusionary Housing Fee required YES (Effective date of Inclusionary Hoursmg Ordinance - May 2^k 1993 ) Data Entry Completed7 YES NO \(A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenar/ce enter CB# toolbar Screens Housing Fees Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee UPDATE'), H \ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 D pn n n n n n n n n n n Site Plan 1 Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale Show North arrow property lines easements, existing and proposed structures, streets existing street improvements right of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes) 2 Provide legal description of property and assessor s parcel number Policy 44 - Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines 1 Applicability YES \C NO 2 Project complies YES /C/NO Zoning ( 1 Setbacks Front Interior Side Street Side Rear Top of slope Required Required Required Required Required Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown 73o' 2 Accessory structure setbacks Structure separation 3 Lot Coverage 4 Height 5 Parking Required Required Required Required Required Required Spaces Required Front Interior Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown A '(breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown Additional Comments OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER H \ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 ENGINEERING GEOLOGY CONSULTANTS P O BOX 161079 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92176-1079 (619)230-9492 Project No 00-09 March 10,2000 ft. Brad & Erica King 2739 Llama Court Carlsbad, California 92009 and Mr Stuart Resor Resor Architect 135 Liverpool Drive, Suite C Carlsbad, California 92007-1843 Subject Soil/Geological Investigation Proposed Property Improvement 2739 Llama Court Carlsbad, California APN 215-420-11 Dear Mr & Mrs King In accordance with your request and authorization, we are pleased to present the results of our soils/geological investigation at the subject property The purpose of our work was to evaluate the site soil and geological conditions relative to the plans proposed for the improvement of the property The primary improvement proposed for the property include lower floor expansion and addition of a second story addition over the garage, west and south sides of the residence, as well as plans for future construction of a swimming pool area We appreciate this opportunity to be of service If you have any questions pertaining to this report or require additional service, please do not hesitate to contact us Respectfully submitted, Ernest R\Artim CEG Distribution (1) addressee - King (2) addressee - Resor John Niven RCE SOILS/GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION 2739 LLAMA COURT CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION In response to your request, we have completed a soils/geological investigation at the subject site The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate the existing soil/geological conditions at the subject site and provide recommendations and parameters for site improvements to include expansion of the lower level and second story additions to the existing residence We were also to evaluate the potential of on-site geological hazards This report presents the results of our findings, as well as our conclusions and recommendations The following key documents were reviewed and/or utilized for our study 1 Part of Grading Plan, La Costa Meadows, by Rick Engineering, approved May 18,1971 2 Final Report on Compacted Filled Ground and Classification of Soil Conditions, Lots 585 to 665, inclusive 712 to 717, inclusive 725,726,728,729,736,737,739,740, and 742, and Certain Street Areas, La Costa Meadows Unit No 4, Carlsbad, California, by Benton Engineering, Inc , project no 71-3-24D, dated September 10, 1973 3 Seismic Risk in the San Diego Region, 1989, San Diego Association of Geologists 4 Seismic Safety Portion of the Safety Element, San Diego County General Plan, 1990 Draft, County of San Diego Planning Department 5 Alquist-Pnolo Special Study Zone Maps - La Jolla and Point Loma Quadrangles, 1991, California Division of Mines and Geology 6 Brad & Erica King Remodel - Site Plan, by Resor Architect, dated 9-20-99, scale 1/8"=!' SCOPE OF STUDY The scope of our investigation included the following tasks * Review of readily available published and unpublished reports and maps relative to the property, and listed above * Geologic reconnaissance and mapping, * Observation of soil/geologic conditions in five test boring locations The test boring locations are shown on Figure 1 * Results of the field findings and laboratory test results are presented in the text of this report Page! Project No 00-09 March 10, 2000 * Engineering and geologic analysis, * Preparation of this report presenting our findings, conclusions, and our recommendations GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS The subject property is an existing single family residential lot with a one and two story residence and attached garage The pre-existing topography as shown on reference 1 has been shown on Figure 1 as a general guide for thickness of fill within the areas proposed for site improvement The property has a primary building pad with reported elevation of about 536 feet (MSL), reference 1, and is located along the south side of Llama Court The property is primarily a fill lot as reported in reference 1 and 2, with the earthwork operations performed dunng the period of March 17,1971 and May 10,1973 (reference 2) As checked in reference 2, the fills in the area of the site were field tested to be greater than 90% relative density during earthwork operations and were approved for construction For the subject property (Lot 625), reference 2 provides a "safe bearing value of 1930 pounds per square foot for one foot wide continuous footings" founded in the fill soils The reference also provides that, "Use continuous interconnected reinforced footings throughout, and place these at a minimum depth of 24 inches below the lowest adjacent exterior final ground surface " "Reinforce and interconnect continuously with steel bar all interior and exterior footings with one #5 bar at 3 inches above the bottom of the footing and one #5 bar placed 1 Vi inches below the top of the stems of the footings " Reference 2 also indicates fills up to 24 feet in depth at the site, however, we note the presence of a sewer easement along the southern portion of the property that may be related to the deeper fill placement The pre-existing topography and grading plan (see reference 1) withir tne areas of the building pad and proposed improvements indicate fills within the building pad to be less than about 8 to 10 feet in depth PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT We understand that the site is proposed to be improved with a second story addition The proposed building loads will be relatively light with final design work for the development and grading to be determined based in part on the findings of this report SOIL AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS The soil units and foundation conditions encountered on-site are descnbed below Page 3 Project No 00-09 March 10,2000 Fills Fill soils were encountered in the test excavations to depths on the order of less than 4 feet to about 8 1/2 feet The fill soils encountered consisted of compact, brown, silty sand with trace of clay and a few thin clay layers, as well as silty sand with rock fragments Testing of the fill soils provided a maximum density of 124 0 pcf with optimum moisture of 12 0 % A direct shear test of the fill soils provided a result of 32 degree friction angle and cohesion of 300 psf These fill soils are suitable in their present condition for the support of engineered structures and/or additional compacted fill soils Santiago Peak Volcanics The entire site appears to be underlain below the fill soils by bedrock of the Santiago Peak Volcanics, a Jurassic meta-sedimentary and meta-volcamc bedrock unit Observations of Existing Foundations/Flatwork There are no apparent significant distress features to the exposed sections of the perimeter foundations and flatwork at the property Along some edge of the foundation , there are white precipiate stains to heights of about 1 foot indicating previous presence of high moisture The existing foundation and flatwork appear to be performing as designed Ground Water At the time of our study, no groundwater was encountered in any test excavations Ground water to the best of our knowledge and findings will not be encountered and should not be a constraint to the proposed improvement The depth to the regional ground water table is estimated to be greater than 25 feet Geologic Hazards Faulting Our review of available geologic literature pertaining to the subject site indicates that there are no known active or significant surface faults mapped that traverse the subject site There are many faults within the greater San Diego County area The closest significant faults to the site include the Rose Canyon Fault with the closest active mapped trace about 10 +/- miles west of the property Page 4 Project No 00-09 March 10, 2000 Nearby, several mapped faults do not displace the Pleistocene Bay Point Formation thus are not a constraint to the site None of these faults project toward or under the subject site The active Coronado Bank Fault is about 25 miles southwest of the site, and the Elsmore Fault Zone is about 30 to 40 miles northeast of the site, but no faults trend toward or under the site Principal seismic considerations for development include surface fault ground rupture, liquefaction, and ground shaking or seismically induced ground settlement The potential for any or all of these hazards depends upon the recency of fault activity and proximity of such faulting to the subject property The possibility of damage at this site due to fault ground rupture is considered unlikely to nil since there are no known faults crossing the property The hazards of liquefaction and seismicity are discussed in the following sections Seismicity The seismic hazard most likely to impact the subject site is ground shaking following a large earthquake on one of the major active regional faults Because of the location within about 10 +/- miles of the site, the Rose Canyon Fault Zone will be considered the most likely fault to affect the site with significant ground shaking, should an earthquake occur on the fault A maximum probable event on this zone within about 20 miles of the site, of about a 6 5 Richter magnitude (see reference 3) could produce a peak horizontal acceleration of greater than about 0 2 g at the subject site With respect to the hazard of seismicity, the site is comparable to others in this general area in similar geologic settings The proposed buildings should be designed in accordance with the current seismic design requirements of the Uniform Building Code or Structural Engineers Association of California Liquefaction Liquefaction of soils can be caused by strong vibratory motion as a result of earthquakes Both research and historical data indicate that saturated, loose, granular soils are susceptible to liquefaction, while the stability of moist, silty clays and clays and very dense sandstone does not appear to be adversely affected by vibratory motion Because ground water is not a constraint at the site and the site is underlain by dense to very dense, bedrock and compact fill, the probability of liquefaction and/or seismically induced dynamic settlement at the site is considered unlikely to ml Page 5 Project No 00-09 March 10,2000 Other Geologic Hazards Based on our review, knowledge of the geology of the area, and the topographic setting and geological units present, there are no other significant geologic hazards, such as landslides, creep zones, on the subject site CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on our soils/geological study of the site and our review of available reports and literature, it is our opinion that the proposed improvement at the site is feasible from a soils engineering and engineering geology standpoint There appear to be no significant soil or geological constraints on- site that cannot be mitigated by proper planning, design, and utilization of sound construction practices The following sections discuss the principal soil/geological concerns which should be considered for proper site improvement Earthwork We understand that no significant grading and/or earthwork is proposed Fills and Placement If grading or fill placement is proposed, the on-site fill and natural soils are suitable for re-use as compacted fill, provided they are free of oversize material, organic materials, and/or other deleterious debris All areas to receive fill and/or other surface improvements should be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches, brought to at least 1 percent over optimum moisture condition and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction If necessary, import soils for near-surface fills should be predominately granular, possess a low or very low expansion potential, and be approved by the soil engineer Lift thickness will be dependent on the size and type of equipment used In general, fill should be placed in uniform loose lifts not exceeding 8 inches Placement and compaction of fill should be in accordance with local grading ordinances under the observation and testing of the soil engineering consultant field representative We suggest that fill soils be placed at moisture content at least 1 percent over optimum, and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction Excavations and Backfill Relative to the proposed swimming pool excavation, to satisfy OSHA requirements and for workmen's safety, it will be necessary to shore excavations deeper than 5 feet, or the walls should be laid back at inclinations no steeper than 1 1 (horizontal to vertical) if workers are to enter such excavations, unless field examination, mapping, and written approval is provided for temporary steeper backcuts by a certified engineering geologist Page 6 Project No 00-09 March 10,2000 In the event of construction during rainy seasons, de-watering of excavations may need to be initiated All excavations, not planned for shoring, bracing, or laid back excavations, should be examined by an engineering geologist from our office to evaluate the potential for collapse and any potential need for shoring, bracing, or tie backs Slope Stability We understand that no significant permanent cut and/or fill slopes will be constructed at the site All excavations including retaining wall cuts should be mapped by an engineering geologist for indications of potential instability and/or adverse geological conditions during excavation operations If adverse conditions are encountered, recommendations for mitigation can be provided in the field at the time of construction If favorable geological conditions are encountered, temporary steep back cuts may be approved by the project engineering geologist Foundations The existing perimeter foundation is of sufficient depth and reinforcement, and founded in very compact fill soils, to provide support for the proposed second story building addition At the existing depths, the existing perimeter foundation has an allowable soils bearing value of 1, 960 pounds per square foot for dead-plus-live loads This value may be increased by one-third for loads of short duration, including wind or seismic forces New foundations should be designed and constructed in conformance with the guidlemes provided in reference 2 and outlined on page 2 of this report The perimeter foundation have a passive lateral bearing pressure of 250 pounds per square foot per foot of depth The maximum allowable lateral bearing value may be assumed to be 2,000 psf A coefficient of friction against sliding between the base of the concrete foundation and slab and soil may be assumed to be 0 35 If the factional and lateral bearing resistance are combined, the lateral bearing resistance should be reduced by one-third The above values may be increased by one-third for short duration of seismic and wind forces Slabs New slab on grade construction should have a minimum thickness of 4 inches and should be reinforced We recommend that slabs be reinforced with minimum No 3 bars placed at 18 inches on center in two directions at mid-height in the slabs We recommend that the steel be supported on concrete blocks (lifters or cradles) to assure proper placement at mid-height in the slab Misplacement of the steel would result in insufficient reinforcement of the slab Evert with reinforcement, some minor slab cracking is normal and possible Page 7 Project No 00-09 March 10, 2000 The slab should be underlain by at least two inch of sand to aid in concrete curing, with the sand underlain by at least a 10-mil thick visqueen moisture barrier if the slab is for an interior occupied area The visqueen should be underlain by at least six inches of clean granular sand We emphasize that it is the responsibility of the contractor to ensure that the slab reinforcement is placed at mid-height of all slabs Our experience indicates that use of reinforcement in slabs and foundations will generally reduce the potential for drying and shrinkage cracking However, some cracking should be expected as the concrete cures The potential for slab cracking may be lessened by the addition of fiber mesh in the concrete The contractor should take appropriate curing precautions during the pouring of concrete in hot weather to minimize cracking of slabs Surface Drainage Surface drainage should be controlled at all times Positive surface drainage should be provided to direct surface water away from the structure toward suitable drainage facilities Ponding of water should be avoided adjacent to the structure CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION AND LIMITATIONS The recommendations provided in this report are based on our observations We recommend that any foundation excavations and/or fill soil placement operations be observed by a representative of this firm so that construction is performed in accordance with the recommendations of this report The recommendations contained in this report are based on our review of field exploration, laboratory tests, and our understanding of the proposed improvement If the scope of the proposed structure changes from that described in this report, our firm should also be notified This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engmeenng practices within the greater Southern California area Professional judgements presented herein are based partly on our evaluations of the technical information gathered, partly on our understanding of the proposed improvement, and partly on our general experience in the geotechmcal field Our engmeenng work and judgments rendered meet current professional standards We do not guarantee the performance of the project in any respect We do not direct the contractor's operations, and we cannot be responsible for the safety of personnel, including our own, on the site Site safety is the responsibility of the contractor The contractor should notify the owner if he considers any of the recommended actions presented herein to be unsafe PageS Project No 00-09 March 10, 2000 1 vl Figure 1 Site Plan, Locations of Field Exploration DRILLING COMPANY £.C,-C RIG 9»*V^\>V DATE | CORING DIAMETER Hfc DRIVE WEIGHT DROP || Depth (feet) 0 \ 1 1 ' H S <0 7 8 9 W Bag Sample \ / \/VA/ \/ \ Dnve Sample •1HI Blows per foot Dry Density (PCf) \Vbo Moist Content (%) \V5 Visual Log Soil Class (USCS) <?*) ^cu) ISH) TEST BORING NO 6> A ELEVATION <J^ SOIL DESCRIPTION ^AV- <i>M^V^\jcv^ ,<*.>.>>V, SAW S<^i v^-t*^ 0Q. cXc-j C\c-^ Ne>.^o- &t\n><y;» 4 ^<M«.y ^r«~j-y**^/ ^«*.^x % \\^ M C^. SO 'CtWiA ^ c.X^.V \o \A\\ V V*' cc^.^\s uV 5'^Vy ^ H^Y- QcvsW O^V^^Vl^Vt C^^^ QA /6-1 o'-^1 \CLH o ^jct vx o a> TEST BORING LOG project No oo-O^ Name Wb^ V.W<* QwV Figure No P J SLUNG COMPANY Q.G-C. RIG ?<>V«^jV DATE 1 BORING DIAMETER t-\ Depth (feet) 0 \ a i H 5" 4 7 g <? \o Bag Sample V /\ / Y A/ \/ \ Dnve Sample HBB Blows per foot ** DRIVE WEIGHT DROP || Dry Density (pcf) •" Moist Content \\o Visual Log Sol Class USCS) <S") CcO l^ui TEST BORING NO ^-0, ELEVATION ^^ II SOIL DESCRIPTIONF-vv-^±^e^'w c\t1 \^^ cV^ \^<, TEST BORING LOG Project No Name Figure No DRILLING COMPANY <C.CrC RJQ Vo«VOoV DATE [BORING DIAMETER V1 DRIVE WEIGHT DROP [Depth (feet) 0 \ A 3 s !f C 7 S q \o Bag Sample \ / \ / VA / \ / \ Dnve Sample EHBi Blows per foot Dry Density (pcf) «. Moist Content \f\ ^*^\ i *i v^. Visual Log Soil Class (USCS) TEST BORING NO €>-^ ELEVATION ^ SOIL DESCRIPTION TEST BORING LOG Project No OO-OC(Name Figure No IRILLING COMPANY ^.G-c RIG ^0X^,V DATE EpRING DIAMETER MH DRIVE WEIGHT DROP [Depth (feet) Jor r \ A- 0, ^ 5" C» 1 ^ s \o Bag Sample \ / \ /yA \ Dnve Sample BBB ••• Blows per foot Dry Density (pcf) .0 Moist Content \\.o Visual Log Soil Class USCS) CU^ Cs*\- TEST BORING NOft-S ELEVATION f«A SOIL DESCRIPTION ^4^*,s ' ::s--" TEST BORING LOG Project No Figure No 1LLING COMPANY RIG DATE )RING DIAMETER V DRIVE WEIGHT DROP pth set) 0 I X 3 M 9 (, -? % T \o Bag Sample Onve Sample Blows per foot Dry Density (pcf) Moist Content (%) Visual Log Soil Class USCS) (S-V) TEST BORING NO fc-S" ELEVATION ^ SOIL DESCRIPTION ?s\\ - OA^u^T^ftw^ SV^ S^ V-.^ roo^ Qcv^Ocv rtQ^<\ TEST BORING LOG Voject No oo o Name Figure No City of Carlsbad B u il di n g D epartment October 18, 2002 San Marcos Unified School District 215MataWay San Marcos CA 92089 To Whom It May Concern This is to inform you that Mr Brad King has reduced the scope of construction of his new addition by 384 square feet His permit (CB02-545) is now a total of 600 square feet for living space We have sent him back to you to inquire if a refund would be possible in light of this modification to his building permit Please contact me if you have any questions I can be reached at (760) 602- 2719 Sincerely, Cindy Bacon 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2700 • FAX (760) 602-8560 Building Counter • (76O) 602-2719 • FAX (760) 6O2-8558 November 4,2002 Ms Cindy Bacon Building Department City of Carlsbad Faraday Center Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Cindy This letter will serve to notify your department of the following reduction of scope of the remodel at our home 2739 Llama Court Carlsbad, 92009 Former square foot addition Second Floor, 629' First Floor, 405' Revised amount Second Floor, 240' First Floor, 360' Reflects reduction in garage (Non-living) Total reduction of 384' The portion of the remodel that has been eliminated includes the expansion over the garage, including the addition two-foot expansion of the garage itself, and all modifications to the existing/adjoining bedrooms (See attached) Should you have any questions regarding these changes please don't hesitate to contact me at 760 536 1018 or 760 822 8889 Jjimcerely, Brad King Cc Bill Schaffer, Schaffer Construction Stuart Resor, Resor Architects 1076 1084 2001 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE 107 6 Fee Refunds The building official may authorize refund ing of any fee paid hereunder which was erroneously paid or collected The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the permit fee paid when no work has been done un der a permit issued in accordance with this code The building official may authorize refunding of not more than 80 percent of the plan review fee paid when an application for a permit for which a plan review fee has been paid is withdrawn or canceled before any plan reviewing is done The building official shall not authonze refunding of any fee paid except on written application filed by the original permittee not later than 180 days after the date of fee payment L c 707 61 [ForSFMJ Other fees Pursuant to Health and Safety L c Code Section 13146 2, a city, county or district which inspects a c hotel, motel, lodging house, or apartment house may charge and c collect a fee for the inspection from the owner of the structure man c amount, as determined by the city, county or district, sufficient to A pay its costs of that inspection A Ac A C Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1597 46, Large c Family Day care Homes, the local government shall process any required permit as economically as possible, and fees charged for review shall not exceed the costs of the review and permit process Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 13217, High rise Fees and Costs, a local agency which in Ac A J Structure Inspection £ spects a high rise structure pursuant to Health and Safety Code c Section 13217 may charge and collect a fee for the inspection from c the owner of the high-rise structure in an amount as determined c by the local agency, sufficient to pay its costs of that inspection AcA £ ft ve licensee of a community care facility, as defined in Section c 7502, of a residential care facility for the elderly, as defined in c Section 1569 2 or of a child day care facility, as defined in Sec c tion 1596 750, the local fire enforcing agency, as defined in Sec Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 13235, Fire Clear ance Preinspection fee, upon receipt of a request from a prospec- tion 13244, or state fire marshal, whichever has primary c jurisdiction shall conduct a premspection of the facility prior to the final fire clearance approval. At the time of the premspection,A A the primary fire enforcing agency shall price consultation and m- inspection of a facility with a capacity to serve 26 or more persons terpretation of the firesafety regulations, and shall notify thepro- A spective licensee of the facility in writing of the specific firesafety A regulations which shall be enforced in order to obtain fire clear A ance approval A fee of not more than $50 00 may be charged for A the premspection of a facility with a capacity to serve 25 or fewer A persons A fee of not more than $100 00 may be charged for a pre AC A The primary fire enforcing agency shall complete the final fire A clearance inspection for a community care facility, residential A care facility for the elderly, or child day care facility within A 30 days of receipt of the request for the final inspection, or as of the A date the prospective facility requests the final prelicensure inspec A tion by the State Department of Social Services, whichever is latercA Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 13235, a prem A spectionfee of not more than $50 may be charged for a Group R, A Division 2 facility with a capacity to serve 25 or less clients A fee A of not more than $100 may be charged for a premspection of a A facility with a capacity to serve 26 or more clients c Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 13131 5, a reason c Me final inspection fee, not to exceed the actual cost of inspection £ services necessary to complete a final inspection may be charged £ for Group R, Division 2 1 Occupancies classified as residential A care facilities for the elderly (RCFE) - 1-68 Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569 84 neither the state fire marshal nor any local public entity shall charge any fee for enforcing fire inspection regulations pursuant to state law or regulation or local ordinance, with respect to residential care facilities for the elderly which service six or fewer persons Whenever a local authority having jurisdiction requests that the state fire marshal perform plan review and/or inspection services related to a building permit, the applicable fees for such shall be payable to the Office of the State Fire Marshal SECTION 108—INSPECTIONS 108 1 General All construction or work for which a permit is required shall be subject to inspection by the building official and all such construction or work shall remain accessible and exposed for inspection purposes until approved by the building official In addition certain types of construction shall have continuous in- spection as specified in Section 1701 5 Approval as a result of an inspection shall not be construed to be an approval of a violation of the provisions of this code or of other ordinances of the jurisdiction Inspections presuming to give au- thority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or of other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid It shall be the duty of the permit applicant to cause the work to remain accessible and exposed for inspection purposes Neither the building official nor the jurisdiction shall be liable for expense entailed in the removal or replacement of any matenal required to allow inspection A survey of the lot may be required by the building official to verify that the structure is located in accordance with the approved plans 10811 [HCD1] Excavation and grading Subject to other pro visions of law reference Health and Safety Code Sections 17953 17954,17955, and California Code of Regulations Title 25, Divi sion 1 Chapter 1 commencing with Section 1 and Title 24, Part 2, Appendix Chapter 33, Excavation and Grading commencing with Section 3304 108 2 Inspection Record Card Work requiring a permit shall not be commenced until the permit holder or an agent of the permit holder shall have posted or otherwise made available an inspec tion record card such as to allow the building official to conve mently make the required entries thereon regarding inspection of the work This card shall be maintained available by the permit holder until final approval has been granted by the building official 1083 Inspection Requests It shall be the duty of the person do ing the work authonzed by a permit to notify the building official that such work is ready for inspection The building official may require that every request for inspection be filed at least one work ing day before such inspection is desired Such request may be in writing or by telephone at the option of the building official It shall be the duty of the person requesting any inspections re- quired by this code to provide access to and means for inspection of such work 108 4 Approval Required Work shall not be done beyond the point indicated in each successive inspection without first obtain ing the approval of the building official The building official upon notification shall make the requested inspections and shall either indicate that portion of the construction is satisfactory as completed, or shall notify the permit holder or an agent of the per mil holder wherein the same fails to comply with this code Any portions that do not comply shall be corrected and such portion shall not be covered or concealed until authonzed by the building official c L £ tA fc£ fc A LC LA fe £ tA L C L A L C L 04/22/2002 11 25 7607538358 RESOR ARCHITECT PAGE 02 FAX HO 7BO City of Carlsbad"**•— *"• "tmp"1" ^^~w<-'-ip*-'<w-->«'--'-vM||*^—ta^p^B 1.1 i Him o f> e p<» rji * »*•« n't jgftk .EEJES OR OTHER MITIGATfON This forr« rwisl be completed fry "fa Cliy, the applicant and fo«* Appropriate school disinctj. and retymed to JheClly prior to !**umg a bu istjng penriii The City wittnot issuejany buiJdjWJ permit without a completed school fee form Project Nam» Building Permit Plan Clw* Nurtibpr project Address APN Project Applicant (Owner Ngime) Project De»scnpKon Building Type Residential •f, V \f of New Dyye.tyrig.Units Second Owellrna Unst Re$id«nti3i AcWrttofss Comm©tc!gKlndMSti*iai City Cerbficatton of Applicant Squdr»-agt of Living Area in SOU Net Square Feet New Area Square Feet Roar Area "\> f" Date San Morcob Lrnfisd School Dismct 215 Mate Way San Marcos, CA 920^ (736 Umf ed Sdwol Distriut Avt _Cyil«ha»CAM<K» (729 9291) Enciniws 101 SfrutJtRa^ho ?! CA 9a&24 ( San Diegaito Union High School Diitict Bnctoitas, CA 92024 (7J3 6491) Cortifioatlen of Appl!caft^Owt«rs f n$ p«r«>n wxetutlnp mis £jacl«f*tkw ("Ownei') efirtifias nnd0f panafty af pe/jury that (1) the Infortiatlon provj<l»i4 abo«B i* comet end tnM U» We beat <if the Otvner's Unowladge and l'>at the O^imr wii fils an «rn»nd«d c«rttffcafi(ui of1 p«ymeft! !a«d pay the addittoat fea if Owmr raqvasts an Incrws* in the number o< cfbwlitng units or square Icotage attof tn« aulidina pvimitu. issued or H «te mrtial 3£'arrwnalion w un<t« or square foutags u found to be mcorrecr and tiiat (2) tlw 0^n*r ts ttis ownerWeVtjlOper o< the #txp/$ <i< sortftsd projeetfs) or that the p*fson Executing t*%5 declawticn Is !i)«*na!fcf tn«C*!ne'y \ Date * f (760)FAX 03/22/2002 1601 7607538058 RESOR ARCHITECT PAGE 03 >, ,"M m 03 11 UH 011Y 0- CftRSLbftJ "AX NO 760 80£ fi^8 P 33tim-f i SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school distnct(s)) THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THi SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT The under5ignedt being duly anthorKzed by the apolicaote School Oistnct certifrast that the developer, fcuitder. or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities This is to certify that the applicant iisted on page 1 has paid &K amounts or completed other appiicaole school mitigation det^rmJned by the School District The City may issue building permits lor this project SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATe 6-2$ PHONE NUMBER Y~ City of Carlsbad Building Department CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form Project Name Building Permit Plan Check Number Project Address APN Project Applicant (Owner Name(s) Project Description U BUILDING TYPE Residential Number of New Dwelling Units Square Feet of Living Area m New Dwelling Second Dwelling Unit Square Feet of Living Area in SOU Residential Additions Net Square Feet New Area J Commercial/Industrial City Certification of applicant's information Square Feet Floor Area Date SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad Unified School District 801 PineAve Carlsbad CA 92009 (729-9291) San Tvlarcos Unified School District X215MataWay ( San Marcos, CA^2069 (290-264$ Encmitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encmitas, CA 92024 (944-4300) San Dieguito Union High School District 710 Encmitas Blvd Encmitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owners knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/ developer of the above described project(s) or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner Signature Date SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school distnct(s)) 1635 Faraday Avenue Revicart A/17/flO Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (76O) 602-27OO • FAX (760) 602-856O THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School Distnct The City may issue building permits for this project SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL , TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER