The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2742 GLASGOW DR; ; CB880401; Permit- - iic RAIIPAIBT PN ABlY & DD ADfl APPLICANT TO FILL IN INFORMATION WITHIN SHADED AREA AND DECLARATIONS. :'•iY't 2ri104I'nereby affirm that I am licensed under UI provlelone.ot-Chapter 9 (commencing with I '-SsctIon 7000) of Division 3 of the Business i- and.Profeeelons Code, and my license is in - 1 '.fuii't6rco and effect. I hereb, atlirm that i am exempt from the Contrac- tors License Law for the following reason (Sec. 7031.5 ..- Business and Professions Code: Any city or county which re I quires a permit to Construct, alter,.. improve, demolish.or repair any structure, prior to its issuance also requires the ap- phcant for such permit to life a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions ot' the Conrracrsrs License Law (Chapter 9 commencing with Suction 7000 of Division 301 the Business and Professions Code) or that is ex' ompt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any - violation 01 Section 7031.5 by an applicant for a permit sub- jects the applicant to a Civil penalty of not more than live han' dred dollars l$500i. /11 'i as owner of the property. r my employees with wages - , as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the siruc- o ture is not intended or oitered for sate (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: 'The Contractor's License Law does not app iy to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own •, employees, provided that such improvements are not intend- W ed or offered for sale., It, however, the building or improve Z meet is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of pruning that he did not build or im. o prove for the purpose 01 sale). I I I, as owner 01 the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the pro)ect (Sec. 7044, Business and. Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or im- proves thereon, and who contracts for each projects with a U) C contractor(s) license pursuant to the Contractor's License - Z "' Law). o - •. - ii As a homeowner lam improving my home, and the follow' 4 ing conditions exist: •- - I ' The work is being performed prior to sale. I have lived in my home for twelve months o - , prior to completion of this work. W I have net claimed this exemption during the b o . last three years. - • O lam exempt under Sec. . B& P.C. • tor ,this reason "0 Irrereby affirm that I h'a;e a certificate of consent to seII.insure. or.á certificate of Workers' Compensation In. sorarrce. or a certified copy thereof (Sec. 3800. Labor Code) POLICY COMPANy,1. - -. 0 Copy is filed the with City , 0 Certified copy is hereby furnished LU It o CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM 0 ', ' WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE U) (This'sectión need not be completed it the permit ' , is br one hundred dollars ($100) or less) UJs. .. ' 0 I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. I shall not employ any person in any 0 manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Cempev. nation Laws of California. • NOTICE TO APPLICANT: II, alter making this Certificate 'I ThI Exemption, you should become subject to the Workers', • Compensation provisions, of the Labor Code, you mast - forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revxked." - - L. • " 1 herbV-Itirm that there is a construction lending LLI agency for the pertormance of the work for which this per. 01 mill is issued (Sec. 3097, CivilCodel #- ZI WI Lender's Name L Lender's Address_________________________________ - CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION - PERMIT - - - - —: - 2075' Las Palmas Dr., -Carlsbad, CA 92009-1915 (619) 438-1161 -. . -. - . - • - . . '.• - - - • - .' ' JOB ADDRESS AV, ST. RD. THOMAS BROS NO. DATE OF APPLICATION BUSINESS LICENSE VALUATION PERMIT NUMBER ZONE LOT BLOCK SUBDIVISION ASSESSOR PARCEL NO, CONTRACTOR Ci CONTRACTORS PHONE N I OWN NA NA OWNER'S PHONE BUILDING SO. FOOTAGE CONTRACTOR'S ADDRESS ( /gIa', ~et"h Lf31.4 ,icr'J- on I (4,7 STATE LICENSE NO. OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS , • -. . — DESIGNER DESIGNERS PHONE DESCRIPTION OF OR 64JJ11'r\ DESIGNER'S ADDRESS STATE LICENSE NO. F/P LRELEV. __ NO OCCGP EDIJ - STORIES " "' - '' - - - NO 01 FIRE SPR .. CENSUS TRACT PARKING SPACE RES UNITS GRADING PERMIT ISSU - REDEVELOPMENT AREA TYPE - CON fjJ 0CC LOAD Y N1 I , - ••- ________ Y N N 2on/ &chxne Certified, — 51.0. v..0.Aurtitt - ISSUE ,Q:r :LUMBI NG PERMIT 4 OT. - MECHANICAL PERMIT - ISSUE, - SUMMARY/ACCOUNT NUMBER -- -- — 7 _3_ _flXTURE TRA, e,a-s - — INSTALL FURN. DUCTS UP TO 100,000 BTU - BUILDING PERMIT 001-810-00-00-8220 Z /7 S(CH BUJ,1ING - - , ' OVER 100,000 BTU - SIGN PERMIT 001-810-00-00-8221 "EACH IER H,E'AND/OR.VENT - , - BOILER/COMPRESSOR UP TO 3 HP — PLAN CHECK - 001-810-00-00-8891 x~-)r EA51bGAS S)SI/EM rIO 4 OUTLETS . — BOILER/COMPRESSOR 3.15 HP ' , TOTAL PLUMBING 00810-00-00-8222 /45 EA'LI' GAS ,'TnE5 OR MORE . METAL FIREPLACE . ' - ELECTRICAL 001-810-00-00-8223 i 0 çACH INSE1tTER, REPAIR WATER PIPE ' —1- VENT FAN SINGLE DUCT -- .- - - .- --MECHANiCAL 001-810-00-00-8224 ''----J - - - v Z'EACH ACtJ'M BREAKER ' - - r - MECH EXHAUST HOOD/DUCTS • - MOBILEHOME 001-810-00-00-8225 - we/R,LITNER( '' - . ' RELOCATION OF EA FURNACE/HEATER - - SOLAR - 001-810-00-00-8226 IIIi'c1oF-oRAlN (INSIDE) - - . DRYER VENT ' ' - . - '. . . - . _STRONG MOTION. - . - - - TOTAL MECHANICAL . - vi - , '' .° FIRE SPRINKLERS a 001-810-00-00-8227 I' TOIALpLUMBING ,a r dY '0 PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE' " 320810:00008740 - - - - OTY MOBILE - - BRIDGE FEE ' 360-810-00-00-8740 - 'PARK -IN-LIEU (AREA I - QTY -PERMIT ELECTRICAL - ISSUE ,- 5q° NEW CONST EA AMP'SWi BKR - -: - . - CAR PORT - - _4 - " ,\ -- '''TIF - - ' - 312-810-00-00-8835 - • IPH - - - • - 3 PH • - - ' ' , AWNING , . , LA COSTA TIF 311-810-00-00-8835 EXIST BLDG EA AMP/SWT,BKR - ' - GARAGE fg' ' HAY 1988 - FMF — 1 PH .' . 3 PH ' , - • ' - 'ri - ID - , LICENSE TAX-- - ' - 0Ol-S10'00-00-8162 -- - - - - REMODEL ALTIR PER CIRCUIT OF o; cT MFF 8805199257 TEMPPOLE 200 AMPS " • •- ' \9 __________ ________________________________ ________________ OVER 200 AMPS , U - ' . \:s,:N, ' 1 ' - - ' - -.• - ' v--- - - TEMP OCCUPANCY 130 DAYS) - -- - -. ''''' - - • . ,,- - • , - • . CREDIT DEPOSIT 0 / TOTAL ELECTRICAL' TOTAL a. TOTAL FEES PAYABLE - '970 — lq.- I HAVE CAREFULLY. EXAMINED THE COMPLETED —APPLICATION AND PERMIT" AND DO HEREBY Expiration. Every permit issued by the Building Ott cr81 under the provlsrons Of this * AN OSHA PET IS REQUIRED FOR EXCAVATIONS OVER CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL INFORMATION HEREON INCLUDING THE Code sh&Iex r,,tJjflatrotron and become null and void It the building 0 work 50' DEEP AND DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION OF su mm enced within 180days from the defeat such DECLARATIONS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT AND I FURTHER CERTIFY AND AGREE IF A PER in w zed by such emit s - STRUCTURES OVER 3 STORIES IN HEIGHT ISSUED: TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY, COUNTY AND STATE LAWS GOVERNING BUILDI CON abeIed at an\ time afier ie c4ris'commenced for a penOd 01180 days. - STRUCTION.-WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDE IFY AND , A LICANT S Sit NAT ' APPROVED BY OW E CONTRACTOR 0 DAT.jr • KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, OSTS AND WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEOUEN OF THE - _______ • / - BY PHONE 0 GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT i TYPE DATE INSPECTOR - BUILDING ft FOUNDATION . _____ REINFORCED STEEL MASONRY GUNITE OR GROUT - - SUB FRAME LI FLOOR -'O-CEILING SHEATHING LI ROOF LI SHEAR ( FRAME - . ' ., 1:' .:. EXTERIOR, LATH 4- - INSULATION. .. .. . INTERIOR LATH & DRYWALL PLUMBING LI SEWER AND BLICO LI PLICO. UNDERGROUND LI WASTE LI WATER.. TOP OUT LI WASTE LI WATER - - - - - TUB AND SHOWER PAN GAS TEST LI WATER HEATER LI SOLAR WATER ELECTRICAL LI ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND DUFFER ROUGH ELECTRIC LI ELECTRIC SERVICE 0 TEMPORARY LI BONDING LI POOL •, ..______ ________ MECHANICAL El DUCT & PLEM., LI REF. PIPING HEAT - AIR COND. SYSTEMS VENTILATING SYSTEMS . ('\', CALL FOR FINAL INSPECTION WHENiALLAPPROPRIATE ç ITEMS ABOVE HAVE BEEN tAPPRO VIED.`J FINAL . • j' I I&lBlklf' . PLUMBING ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL GAS: _._.-,_. _. -•• --tt' BUILDING _... . . . SPECIAL CONDITIONS : '• 7' ,.. ... ., e.aao'-o ( FIELD INSPECTION RECORD ' EQUIREDSPECIAL _NSPECThIONS INSPECTORS NOTES -- , - ', - INSPECTION REQ. IF CHECKED INSPECTOR'S APPROVAL,_.DATE - .• . , . 4 SOILS COMPLIANCE . . .. . ...__.-. _-. PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSP - STRUCTURAL ONCRETE OVER 2000 PSI - ._..- CONCRETE -PRESTRESSED POST,TENSIONED CONCRETE FIELD WELDIrIä ,HIGH.STRENGTH -- . . . -- BOLTS \,- _ SPECIAL MASONRY --. '• . * , , . -, . .. - - . . . - - .- • A PILES CAISSONS . - - -- . . - - -- . . - • -. .. .._. . ._ - -. . . ,_,I • - - -;- --- - -. -.--. - p ,,•.-. __• tr _____________ . - - _ V - - __.•* , - -• .. ,-' • - DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING'SERVICES DIVISION . . 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 - (619) 438-1161 MISCELLANEOUS, FEE RECEIPT Applicant Please Print And Fill In Shaded Area Only • PLAN ID NO. PARCEL NOS 0~00 . 0011 03/30 0101 05Misc ' '2906-00 - OWNER'S MAILING . ADDRESS )r' ,Q)L c4Y1sI1.cl . VALIDATION AREA CITY I 'ZIP f2yo2 TEL. • CONTRACTOR (' - - . ESTMATED VALUATION CONTRACTOR'S MAILING ADDRESS PLAN CkCK FEE' : NO b0: i1 T IF THE APPLICANT TAKES WITHIN 180 DAYS, PLAN CHECK FEES CITY S ZIP TEL. WILLfi!FELTED. - STATE. . BUSINESS S LICENSE NO: • LICENSE NO. :,DlslON. t -4/ HEOO)F SUBMITTED: . LEGALDESCRIPTION * - - S 21987 ENERGY CALCS Ej FOR NON RESIDENTIAL BLDGS DESCRIPTION OFWORK Ybi •n/ 2 STRUCTURAL CALCS) •. ElI 2 SOILS REPORTS - El 2 SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPES - . - DATE GIVEN! DATE - - SENT TO APPLICANT CONTACT PERSON LA COSTA LETTER ADDRESS - SCHOOL FEE FORM S CITY (P,~f - TEL. P & E CORRECTIONS LIST • - 5 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 'APPLICANT' 1GN1 DATE - -7l-2s' White - File - Yellow- Applicant * Pink -'Finance Gold - Assessor .' . .., FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION -• PLAN CHECK NUMBER: aaoqoi DATE: ' 9-6-88 PROJECT NAME: * ADDRESS 2742 GIsçow Or PROJECT NO.: UNIT NUMBER: PHASE NO.: TYPE OF UNIT: • re :Tt NUMBER OF UNITS: PERSON Nancy I'emos r CONTACT TELEPHONE: 434-6467 b1dgengtn, plan, fit,h2o INSPECTED ftSPECTED APPROVED _____ DATE DISAPPROVED ) INSPECTED: APPROVED, ______ DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY '.•' -• INSPECTED APPROVED ______ DISAPPROVED , • . ; 17 OM M ENTS • . - ,,• 1161. 1186 WHITE Suspense BLUE Water District GREEN Engineering CANARY Utilities Ianni GOLD Fire fINALBUILDINGINSPECTION - . 0 - . PLAN CHECK NUMBER: 880401 DATE: 91688 PROJECT NAME: • ADDRESS: • 2742 Glasgow Dr . '• S PROJECT NO.: UNIT NUMBER: _________________ PHASE NO.: TYPE OF UNIT: res TI NUMBER OF UNITS: CONTACT PERSON: Nancy Remos CONTACT TELEPHONE: 4346467 . 0 bldgeiin, plan, fire, h2o IXTO V-w"~ • 'INSPEC DATE INSPECTED:9/f1Z 'PPROVED ______ DISAPPROV INSPECTE DATE - BY: • INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED NSPECTED .. • DATE. BY: INSPECTED: • APPROVED ______ DISAPPROVED .OMMENTS: 0 0 : dk v 1/86 WHITE Suspense BLUE Water Dustrict EngineerinCANARY UtuIutie PINK: Planning GOLD: Fire NBUILDINGiNSPE.CT1ON .:;. . , t = PLAN CHECK NUMBER: 880401 DATE: 9-16-88 : PROJECT NAME: . ADDRESS: 2742GIasgow Dr . PROJECT NO.: UNIT NUMBER: _________________ PHASE NO.: TYPE OF UNIT: res TI NUMBER OF UNITS: CONTACT PERSON: Nancy Remos . L CONTACT TELEPHONE: 0 4314-6467 o bIdqenqin, plan, fire, h2o . . INSPECTED DATE ise. 1 91988 / BY:- INSPECTED: __________ APPROVED ______ DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: ___________ APPROVED DISAPPROVED 0 INSPECTED DATE 5 0 BY: INSPECTED: ____________ APPROVED DISAPPROVED 55• 0 00 5' .,Costa,.Real MunnSrpal Water District COMMENTS:. Engineering Department • (619) 438-3367 S \•: •a • S - • .• •'•.• '5S050 R. 1/86 WHITE: Suspense., BLU . ater DistrictGREEN: Engineering - CANARY: Utilities PINK: Planning GOLD: Fire • / FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION VED SEP 1RECEI 91988 - U 880401 PLAN CHECK NUMBER: DATE: PROJECT NAME: ADDRESS: 2742 Glsow Dr PROJECT NO.: UNIT NUMBER: _________________ PHASE NO.: res T1 TYPE OF UNIT: NUMBER OF UNITS: CONTACT PERSON: Nancy Rero CONTACT TELEPHONE: 6467 . b$dgnqn, plan, fire, h2o . NSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED ISPECTED DATE EY: -. INSPECTED: ____________ APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE' Be': . INSPECTED: APPROVED ______ DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: 1/) I 0' A. L,. / Rev. 1186 WHITE: Suspense BLUE:'Water District GREEN: Engineering CANARY: Utilities PINK: Plan ng GOLD: Fire • ( \ ( ESGIL CORPORATION - 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 DATE: /a EAPP CANT URISDICT JURISDICTION: CITy OF C,',RLSBAD EIPLAN CHECKER []FILE COPY PLAN CHECK NO: 5o4o/ SET: UPS . . . ODESIGNER PROJECT ADDRESS: 274Z C7LAscok p • V PROJECT NAME: Al2DITfo,*..J ioR tHfr1 RESIPENC. V The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where . necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's V V .building codes. . V The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply I withthe jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified be to w are resolved and V - V checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected V and resubmitted for a complete recheck. V • V V The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. V . The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected V plans are submitted for recheck. V The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list.has been sent tö - V 0k.L Rc'ih 2742 cb- CB CA f-2 003 Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. V Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has V V V been completed. Person contacted:______________________ VV. Date contacted: Telephone # _V V REMARKS:' Proi'il€ o;1 ppp O Ofrt Cl/~ QOver 4 All shee-L of F) 1s r,uisl- be p-ersot-' re5pOr)slé/e -Por -Me plcrns Vt V I V •• By:.. 7,4V//7 YA 0 Enclosures: - V V ESGIL CORPORATION V V V V V V V V V — ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO C92123 3 (6 10) 360-1468 DATE 4/u / GAPPLICANT -: URISDICTIO JURISDICTION: - __CITY OF CARLSBAD OPLAN CHECKER * 0 FILE COPY' PLAN CHECK NO: '04-b ( SET: I - []DESIGNER r •• PROJECT ADDRESS: 2747- Ipsoj r. C, * PROJECT NAME: AD,rw,..j" k,H/i D -The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and .iubstâatially-comply with the jurisdiction's - building codes. * 4. - The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply .*fl with .the jurisdictión'sbuilding codes when.minor deficien* • cies identified are resolved and checked by building department staff.- - The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies 0 identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is the jurisdiction's 4 copy for your information. The plans are being held at Esgi]. Corp until corrected plans are submitted for recheck * ..,The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the, jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to 'obet. Rei bin Ps F3 6A A - Egil stiff didnot advise the applicant 'contact person that plan check has been completed Esgil staff did advise applicantthat the plan check has been completed Person contacted Date contacted ' 4'H_ Telephone #44-667 / REMARKS-.',- - - S - .4 _4. S .-.-., BY o i ENCL O;iiv [ec ESGIL CORPORATION 1 - • 1)' elc-tb('.4 PP9I J. - 1 4 5 . .• - 5 _________________ 4.4-' 4 - • p r.v-t' - •. •.• • - • - - - jURISDICTI ON: CITY 0F4zc,&Date 4111 /8,3 PROXCI ADDRESS: -274Z ic/a-co.ow Pr. TO: RbeL 274 7 O.Sgpiai D,. CjjrI'I,ad co 92008 PLAN CORRECTION SHEET Plane Deck No. 80401 __________________________ Date plans received by the jurisdiction_________ Date plans received by plan checker___________ Date initial plan check completed_ 411 11b& __________ By. DAVIP '(40 'FOREWORD: PLEASE READ Plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform 'Plmbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state -laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation andaccess for the handicapped. The plan check is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or ether departments.' The items circled below need clarification, modification or change. All circled items have to be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), 'of the Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not per the 'violation or any state, county or city law. A. PLANS, Please make'all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, to: &S - IL 2. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each circled item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this check sheet with the revised plans., lhd;c -4' pn -H' T;#/. of '&rii prov. 'y'o'h! -A-i- — /- ' Dppprz,'fios, t'f +Ae p/iis (D All C/7'71.s " ,P/atir he 17 +J?f pi -c 7 -A--th p;de n. Sf+e'rn. on olo - --i chi! wi/-A Ti*/é z4 ar,d v7sg LJC,LJBC. LJP( a,A 1987 r'Jc n4 shyK) ta<nLem c4-' 'nô k'e ,jP+°r +OY /OY' Df,CPd ______ -ex,c+i,'p 1,#cIro0Yn { VLAIftC, r,,,iJ(E+nr)IS_VP) rr.ek.' d.'i- siI be p; Jeri t* qi#,.ig b4rer,pp-.. ) cJi,tii .c 4r- dc,s J,pcL'.. ('?fl ,sho.j rm/u',9 '.-p,gh -Pr' h,1,}-cmoJ1. n' 7 c Z( j)f')(1p".,) n+ he Q/m. ,f 'aJ'oor- (') c C , to e . ,' - -r,ô4' -& I cm (IT) M_______ shrn., 1-'c y+;Io+,'cm'i I-s r c-, +i4 ih__so; /-S_do ._(m)/,Q*Imf-r_0P Me ' (2.) I orl +lmc)i ±o tA pIii 4. ,7 ,f " Msm'J. p,p;n."pr /i',.,,c' 76p *in-- ( c1, o tt) .44 o,,d (p r,+ pt-i , rc4m-mFAU Z ) chotJ Z C R t- appiumJ t--i; h- -Pc- ______4U do b (1') Jp• (,lyrmIpm1( 0IJ+(P+ it-. 616+A 0101h sI-cm/ he fTh cl sy rir' Pry vde m-i rty 4c F U I, - 4'' - - - , * -'.: - - - - • - / .-- * - -. - .• ,:- ..:--- ' - -• - S - - - - - c - ' yoLLcJflG NOTES SPEFYD MAMIAnn RJTVDfIS SB=Z BE INCORPUR.A= ON PLAN OR V COICIADM Wtuiu( JOB SPECIY DOCrrS. V MANDATORY EMMM (X)NSVAIIOM n)(L'rrs OF THE STATZ OF CALIFORNIA (,Ø All heating, ventilating, air conditioning, and water heating equipment shall meet all of the V requirements of the Appliance Efficiency Standards and shall be certified by the California Energy -, Commission. C A two stage thermostat, which controls the supplementary heat on its second stage, shall be V provided for heat pumps. . Thermostats shall be equipped with an automatic setback, which the building occupant can program to - automatically set back the thermostat twice in 24 hours. V (,ø' Equipment which requires preventive maintenance to maintain efficient operation shall be furnished V V - with complete necessary.maintenànce information. All gas-fired fan type central furnaces, gas-fired fan type wall furnaces, and cooking appliances V shall be equipped with an intermittent ignition device. V 0') All fan systems exhaisting air to the outside shall be provided with backdra.ft dampers. • C (7) All transverse duct, plenum, and fitting joints shall be sealed with pressure sensitive tape or 1. mastic to prevent air loss and shall be insulated to conform to the provisions of Section 1005 of the UNC, 1982 Edition. A vapor barrier , is required in climate zone 1, 14, and 16. V 9) All manufactured windows and sliding glass doors shall meet the 1972 ANSI air infiltration V V - .. standards and V shall be certified and labeled., V (10) All swinging doors and windows leading to unconditioned areas shall be fully weather-stripped. • V V V Storage type water heaters V and storage and backup tanks for solar systems shall be externally 'C wrapped with R-12 insulation or greater. V çz) The five feet of pipe closest to V the water heater, if outside conditioned space, shalt be insulated with a minimum of R-3. Steam and steam condensation return piping and recirculating hot water piping outside the building envelope shall be insulated in accordance with T20-1406(d). çL5S Lamps used in luminaries for V general lighting in kitchens and bathrooms shall have an efficiency of not less than 25 lumens, per watt. V V V ,çzt() - Showerheads and faucets shall be equipped with flow restrictors as outlined in the appliance V efficiency standards and shall be certified to the Energy Commission. V Masonry and factory-built fireplaces on exterior walls, shall be equipped with tight-fitting C / closeable metal or glass doors covering the entire opening. of the firebox; a combustion air intake V C • VV equipped with a readily accessible, operable, and tight fitting damper to draw air from the outside C of the building; and a tight fitting flue damper with a readily accessible control. 16 • Insulation' used shall comply with California Quality Standards. V - 1 The insulation installer shall post. a signed certificate. . .Section. 276.. Insulation Certificate C (All Occupancies). After installing insulation, the installer shall post in a conspicuous location V C •• •, in the building a certificate signed by the installer and the builder stating that the installation V V confórma the requirements of Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 2-53,-and that the materials installed V V conform with the requirements of Title 20, Chapter 2, Subchapter t, Article 3. The certificate 'C -shall state the manufacturer's name and material identification, the installed "R" value, and (in applications of loose fill insulation) the minimum installed weight per square foot consistent with the manufacturer's labeled density for the desired "R" value. (18) For infiltration control all openings and penetrations must, be caulked and sealed, such as around V windows, at sole plates, and openings for utility pipes and wires. -C__ti C V Form EQi 3/5/86' C • - V V V -- - - - J ,• •,,' . - - 0 3/88 I MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 'These are minimum specifications entablished by the Uniform Building Code and shall not supersede any more restrictive specifications shown on the approved plans. - - -. A. FOUNDATION AND UNDERFLOOR 1. Concrete for footings shall have a minimum compressive strength of 2000 psi at 28 days and shall .. be composed of 1 part cement, 3 parts sand, 4 parts, of .1 maximum size rock, and not more than - - 71/2 gallons of water per sa:k of cement., (Table No. 26-A.) 2. Wood and Earth Separation. Foundations supporting wood shall extend at least 6" above the ad- jacent finish grade. (Sec. 2907(a).) Provide 18" clearance under wood joists and 12" clearance under wood girders. (Sec. 2517(c)2.) a, . - Concrete Slabs. Slabs on grade shall be at least 3Y2" thick. (Sec. 2623.) Treated Wood. All foundation plates or sills and sIeeers on a concrete slab, which is in direct -, - - contact with earth, and sills which rest on concrete or masonry foundations, and wood joists closer than 18", or wood girders or supports closer.than 12" to the ground shall be pressure treated wood or foindation grade rédwood. . . Anchor Bolts and Footing'SilIs. All fOoting sills shall have full bearing on the footing wall or slab and shall be bolted to the foundation with 1/2" x 10" bolts embedded at least 7" into the concrete - - or reinforced masonry or 15" into unreinforced grouted masonry. Bolts shall be spaced not to exceed 6' on center with bolts not over 12' from cut end of sills. (Sec. 2907(e).) 4•. '•',,4,- - - Underfl9or. Vents. Underfloor areas shall be ventilated byL openings in foundation walls. Wall openings shall have a net area of not less than 1% sq. ft. for each 25 linear feet of exterior wall. Openings shall be arranged to provide cross ventilation and shall be covered with corrosion-resistant. wire mesh of not less than '4" nor more than W' in any dimension. (Sec. 2517(c)6.) , Undefldor Access. Underfloor areas shall be provided with a crawl hole not less than 18" x 24". (Sec 2517(c)2) B WOOD FRAMING .'t ••- .-". . 1.-Lumbei. All joists, rafters, beams, and posts 2" to' 4" thick shall be No. 2 Grade Douglas Fir- • Larch or better. All posts and beams 5" and thicker shall be No. 1 Grade Douglas Fir-Larch or ' better.,(See item 814 for lumber grading requirements for studs) Wall Bracing. Every exterior wood stud vall and main cross partition shall be braced at each end 'and at least every 25 feet of length with 1 x 4 diagonal let-in braces or equivalent. (Sec. 2518(g)5.) Cross Bridging. Floor joists and rafters more than 12" in depth and spanning more than 8 feet -. shall be supported laterally by bridging at intervals not exceeding 8 feet. (Sec. 2506(g).) .4. Provide blocking at ends and at supports of floor joists, and for rafters at exterior walls. 5 Provide blocking at ends and supports of rafters more than 8 in depth 6 Provide solid blocking at ridge line and at exterior walls on trussed roofs 7 Double Joists Floor Joists shall be doubled under bearing partitions running parallel with the joists. 2518(d)5.) ,(Sec. 8 Rafter Purlin braces to be not less than 450 to the horizontal (Sec 2518(h)5) ;". ': • 9.- Rafter Ties. Rafter ties shall be spacednot more than 4 feet on center where rafters and ceiling • joists are notparallel. (Sec. 2518(h)4.) • -' • • 10. Provide %" minimum clearance between'top plate of interior partitionsand bottom chord of - •• . • trusses. * 11. Provide double top plate with minimum 48" lap splice. (Sec. 2518(g)4.) 12. Nailing will be in compliance with Table 25-P. . . - 13. Fire blocking shall-be provided for walls over 10'-0" in height. (Sec. 2517(f)), also for horizontal. - shafts 10'-0" o.c., and for any concealed draft opening. 14 Studs In one or two-story buildings studs for exterior walls and interior bearing walls shall be not less than 2 x 4 at 16" o.c, Studs for interior nonbearing partitions may be 2 x 3 at 16.o.c. Studs 2 4 thick and 2 4 wide and not more than 8 feet long shall be stud grade Douglas Fir Larch or better when supporting not more than one floor and a roof. (Sec 2518(g)) . ' • 15. An A.I.T.C. Certificate of Conformance for glued laminated wood members shall be giver to the • - Building Inspector prior to erection 10F2 3 /88 - MINIMUM CONSTRCTION SPECIFICATIONS (Continued) ' C. GENERA' L MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS - 1 o I 3—ar to '-e ..s tor COriSL UL ion ol masonry valls foundation wals retaining. v alc stall Yis s of 1 'a'i ortlard cement 3' parts sand and to ' part hydrated lime or lime pry. D ar -n with. plastic cement shall be 1 part plastic cement to 3 parts sand - 2. Grout Mix. Th'rnix for the grout shall be 1 part portland cement, 2.3 parts sand. 1:10 pan hy- drate lirne of lime putty, and 2 parts gravel. Grout shall attain a minimum compressive strength of 2000 5; at 26 days. 3 Masonry. The rrason y units shall comply with ASTM Spec.,C070 Grade N for hollow unit 'concrete hio:i;s. , 4 einfor:ing Steel The reinforcing steel used in construction of reinforced masonry or concrete structures shall be deformed and comply with ASTM Spec A615-68, Grade 40 5 Steel.' Steel used as tructural shapes such as wide flange sections, channels, plates, angles shall comply with ASTM Spec A-36. Pipe columns shall comply with ASTM Spec A-53. -D.. ROOFING AND WEATHERPROOFING -' 1 Wood Siding All wood siding shall be placed over an approved weatherproofing barrier. (Sec 1707(a).) 2 Flashing Around Openings Every opening in any exterior wall shall be flashed with sheet metal or waterproof building paper. (Sec. 1707(b).)' 3. Roof C6vering. Wood shingle, split shake and composition shingle roofs shall not be installed on a L ' roof having a pitch of less-than 4 inches to 12 inches. Tile roofs shallnot be installed on a roof -- , having a piich of .less than 3 inches to 12 inches. Mineral surfaced, built-up roofing shall not be installed on a roof having a pitch of more than 3 inches to 12 inches (Sec 3203(d) and Table 32-B.) 4. Weep Screed. A weep screed 'shall be provided for all exterior stud walls finished on the exterior with stucco at the foundation plate line (Sec 4706(e).) , .'. . - . ' E. GENERAL - - ; 1. Attic Access. Attic areas shall be accessible by an opening not less than 22" x 30". With a furnaae - in the attic, the opening shall not be less than 30" x 30". (Sec. 3205(a).) . 2 Shower Enclosures Shower walls must be finished to a height of 6 feet with a smooth hard non ' absorbent surface (Sec 1711 (d) 3 Electric Meter Enclosure Contact San Diego Gas & Electric Company Customer Extension Plan - •. ' fling Department, for meter location. All wiring must comply with the National Electrical Code (1975 Edition) _,_.4 .,. ,•-. . , '. -, t , . . ''_j_ s• ' _ _ . - -. E . ., . , .: S I acknowledge by my signature below that these minimum construction specifications are part of the ap proved 'plans and that the construction will comply with these specifications or any more restrictive spec if i- - cat ions shown on the approved plans.. 'SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR DESIGNER. DATE ,k, • . ] . S ,. - . -: . - .- . , . . -. . 20F2 n. . •' ' . . . ., , , . - .. .' '. Table 7. Alternative Component Packages, Climate Zone 7 Building Measure PàckageDesignation A B C D E 1 2 345 6 - .INSULATION R-VALUE MINIMUM . Ceiling 19 30 19 30 30 30 19 30 19 30 19 Wall 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 "Heavy" Wall' . 2.5 2.5 2.5 NA NA 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 "Light Mass" Wall2 4.0 3.5 3.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Slab Floor Perimeter . MR 7 NR MR NA MR NR, MR NR .7 MR Raised Floor 11 11 11, NA 19 NR MR 19 19 11 11 ATTIC3 MR MR MR REQ REQ REQ MR REQ MR MR MR GLAZING . Maximum U-Value . 1.1 .65 1.1 .65 .65 .65 1.1 665 1.1 .65 .65 Maximum Toal Axea 741,5 MR 14, 14 20 20 20 24 20 24 NR MR Maimum Total Noñsouth - Area % 9.6 NA NA NA NA MR NR ML MR 8.4 9.6 Minimum Total South . - Area Z 6.4 MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR 5.6 6.4 SHADING COEFFICIENT . . Suth-facing Glazing6 MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR West-facing Glazing MR MR MR. ". .36 MR MR MR. NR MR. MR North-facing Glazing NR, MR MR MR MR MR. MR MR MR MR MR East-facing Glazing MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR THERMAL MASS EQUIVALENT . .% Slab Floor Exposed789 50 NR MR 25 5 25 25 20 15 NR 50 INFILTRATION CONTROL . Continuous Barrier MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR. MR Electrical OutletPlate MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR NB. Caskets . . A1rTo-Air Heat Exchanger'° MR MR NB. NB. MR MR MR NB. MR NB. NB. SPACE HEATING SYSTEM ' Gas Furnace, Seasonal . . -. Efficiency Z .. MIN MIN MIN MIN MIN MIN MIN KIN KIN Heat Pump ACOP. 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 'Electric-Resistance" NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO YES YES SPACE COOLING SYSTEM A/C or Heat Pump SEER WATER HEATING SYSTEM Gas, Heat Pump or Solar with Any Backup REQ REQ REQ REQ REQ REQ • REQ REQ Solar with Gas Backup • REQ . REQ REQ 'V .4 Date Jurisdiction_C/fl' OF cALS&415 Prepared byi- o Bldg. Dept. L/( VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK EE Q Esgil PLAN CHECK NO. B& a 40 1 BUILDING ADDRESS - 2-742 alas w _Pr APPLICANT/CONTACT bep PHONE NO 434-6467 BUILDING OCCUPANCY R -3 DESIGNER PHONE_____________ TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR PHONE__________ V -• 4 - - - - - - ris Building Permit Fee $_ ____3!- Plan Check Fee $ $ CO.MMENTS: V 4 V SHEET I oi / 12/87 ENGINEERING CHECKLIST LEGEND Date item Complete 3QI/Oj ,Plan Check No. Item Project Address Z7"/2 Incomplete - Needs Your Action Project Name:Rtmni "DP.nON - • - 1,2,3, Number in circle iiecn ,ate. • - .•:- indicates plancheck By number that deficiency was identified CO CO -CO LEGAL REQUIREMENTS J w_ - > W , > ) 4) - Site Plan I - / 1 Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale Show North El arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed struétures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width and dimensioned setbacks 2 Show on Site Plan Finish floor elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing LJ El i:i A4 and proposed slopes, driveway and percent (%) grade and drainage patterns F1 3 Provide legal description of property. 4 Provide assessor's parcel number. PERMITS REQUIRED Grading El El 5 Grading permit required (Separate submittal to Engineering Department required for Grading Permit) 6 Grading plans in plan check PE___________ El" El El 7 Need the following completed prior to building permit issuance [1" El A Grading plans signed F-1 B Grading permit issued [dt FD C Grading completed El El D Certification letter and compaction reports submitted tF El E Grading inspected and permit signed off by City Inspector El E El Right-of-Way Permit required for work in public right-of-way - - (e.g., driveway approach, sidewalk, connection -to water main, etc) Industrial Waite Permit application required. To be filled out completely and returned to Development Processing -- FEES REQUIRED - 0 Park-in-Lieu fees required. • :, Quadrant: - , Fee Per Unit: - , Total Fee: 0 Traffic impact fee required. Fee Per Unit - , Total Fee 12; Bridge and Thoroughfare fee required. - .. Fee Per Unit: -, Total Fee: -----. 0 13. Public facilities fee required. 0 0 14 Facilities management fee required Fee 4O7%2_ 15. Additional EDU's required: -w . • • •• • Sewer connection fee: _-- Sewer'permit no. - - 0 'D 16 Sewer lateral required REMARKS a.' •* A4 • - I • - - • _,-I,, • - -- 4 - 4 - • • - .4 4•• 1••. • - .- • t - 0 K to issue _- Date 4 If.. you have any questions about any of the above items identified on this plan check,,, please call the Development Processing Department at 438-1161. -; 4 • I. t - . -. '-4 •- k 4 .4 4 - - - 'C 1 - • - - - : - ) 4- ( w - 'tO - w - • - - - • I 4 ••- 4 • H' * - PLANNING CHECKLIST • - .' • •. * -.. -- - .- t-. - .• Plan Check -No.'S8O0J Address 27l,2L %5& D1 • *; t_ Type of Project and Use 5FL7 /,i-r,c.v Zone R-/ Use Allowed?, YE—P( NO r,i m Setback Front 01<' Side c Rear &k S 4 4 1 4$r 4 Facilities Management Zone 7 ç School District San Dieguito Encinitas Carlsbad San Marcos Discretionary Action Required YES NO Type:, Environmental Required YES NO D Landscape Plan Required YES NO Comments fl Coastal Permit Required YES NO U Additional Comments • - - ' - • - - • '•• - fl - -. s - . ,• , • • -,* •• • • • • -• •• *.•• -• - I 4• • -. -* . 4 '• -' • C 4 4 OK TOISSP DXTE 3467 Kurtz Street San Diego, California 92110 714-224:2911 WoodwardIyde Consultants May 13, 1981.. Project-No. 502161-FC01 Pacific Scene, Inc. -.. 3900 Harney Street San Diego, California 92110 Attention Mr. Doug Nystrom ADDENDUM TO FINAL REPORT OF ENGINEERING OBSERVATION OF GRADING -. • . AND TESTING OF COMPACTED FILL .LAKE CAVERA HILLS, UNIT NO. 1 LOTS 2 THROUGH 141 . . . CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 76-12 . CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Gentlemen In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the founda- tion recommendation section of our report entitled "Final Report of Engineering Observation of Grading and Testing of - '• Compacted'.Fill, Lake Calay.era Hills, Unit No. 1, Lots 2 through141, Carlsbad Tract No. 76-12, Carlsbad, California," dated April 28, 1981. We recommend in our report that footings be founded at least ; 12 inches below, finish grade; It is lour opinion that the footings may be placed 10 inches below rough as compacted grade providing at least 2 inches of soil is placed against the footing during the fine 1t grading. - V If you have any questions, please call Very truly -yours. WOOD WOOD ARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS Richard-P. While . • , R.E. 21992. - RPW/SA/eej .. , V% - . Consulting Engineers. Geologists - and Environmental Scientists ' '. • • Otfiàes in Other Principal Cies 3467 Kurtz Street . Woódward-!yde Consultants San Diego, California 92110 714-224-2911 . Telex 697 -841 April 28, 1981 . 'Project No,. 502161-FC01 Pacific Scene Inc..,. 3900 Harvey Street . San Diego,Caiifornia '92110 Attention Mr Doug Nystrom FINAL REPORT OF ENGINEERING ç OBSERVATION OF GRADING AND TESTING OF COMPACTED FILL LAKE CALARA HILLS, UNIT NO. 1 -' LOTS 2-THROUGH 141 CARLSBAD TRACT NO 76-12 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Gentlemen ::In accordance with your request and our proposal dated December 30, 1980 we have provided engineering services in '. , .•.• conjunction with the grading of the subject site. ' SCOPE OF WORK Our services included ° Providing engineering observation of the grading operation, and other subdrains to control ground water, Providing, inspection of the placement, of canyon subdrain' and' other subdràins to control ground water, le 0 Performing field density tests in the placed and compacted fill, ° Performing laboratory tests on representative sam- . pies of the material used for fill, ' '- o Providing engineering observation of the under- cutting of highly expansive soils from finish .grade And,, r_.'' '•.,'." '"S" .' '' ' ' . ' ' Consulting Engineers. Geologists' and Environmental Scientists Offices in Other Principal Cities .. : aci9Sc1.. ene I Wcllward-Clyde Consultants April 2 , Project No. 502161-FC01 Page 2 Providing professional opinions regarding the con- tractor'.s general adherence to plans and 'specifica- tions. SUMMARY OF GENERAL EARTHWORK AND TESTING Site preparation, compaction, and testing were done between January 7 and April 3, 1981. In our opinion, based on our observation and testing, the work performed during that period was, in general, conformance with the Specifications for Con- trolled: Fill attached' ,to our report 'entitled "Update Geo- . technical Investigation for The Proposed Lake' Calavera Hills Tract 7,6-12, Carlsbad, California," dated January 20, 1981. During the_grading,...period,. _fill was. placed, 'compacted, and 1Xested on[fill_and' cut-fifl Lot'2 through 6, 8 through 12,L14 tthrough 34, 40 through 46, 501, 52 through 63, 69 through 78; 81T"thi6iigh' 92,' 95 through 98, 101, 105 through 111, 118 - through, 120, and 122 through 139. Lot 140 remains as -an ,,. ' ungraded open space lot and Lot 141, a future school site, was used .as a borrow and.-stockpile area. Lot 1, designated as a mini park, has not been finish graded and will be reported when grading is complete. Grading of the site essentially consisted of excavating loose surface and alluvial soils, installing subdrains' in the can- yons, preparing areas' to receive fill and making cuts and fills to design grade. An existing 14-inch watermain located along Glasgow Drive was removed and the void filled with com- pacted soil. During the grading operation, compaction procedures were ob- served, and field density tests were made to help evaluate the relative' 'compaction' of the placed fill. Field observations and results 'of field density tests indicate that the fill has been generally compacted to 90 percent or more of maximum dry laboratory density as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Method No,. D1557-70. For reference, the approximate location of'field, density tests and the limits of compacted fill have been recorded on a copy of the grading plan. The results of field density tests, expressed as a percent of maximum labor- atory dry density (relative compaction), are given on the attached forms. Laboratory tests were made on representative samples of 'the materials used for fill.. The. tests were per- formed to 'evaluate moisture density-relationships, maximum dry density, optimum moisture content, grain size distribution, and plasticity, strength, and swell characteristics. The, results of laboratory tests are attached. Pacific Scene '. April 29, 1981 ProjectNo. 502161-FCOl Page Woward.CIyde Consultants SUMMARY OF FINISH GRADE SOIL CONDITIONS During the grading operation, certain lots were specially treated to provide a specified depth of select soil at rough r nrmAn Fill Lots and Fill Portion of Cut-Fill Lots çiipection ,and laboratory tests indicate that nonepansive 11 wig' placed within 2 feet of rough gradeon all fill lots and the fill portion oft-fill lots noted herein - Cut Lots and Cut Portion of Cut-Fill Lots On Lots 2 through 6, 8 through 12, 14, 15, 7througi29, 40 through .46, 50, 53 through. 63;. 70 through 78, 81 through 841 92, 9-5 through 98 ,_jO1, 105 through, 111, 118 through 120, and ,.1-22. ,through. 134, expansive -soil was., excavated and -replaced-, with nonexpansivefi11-to2a , depth of 2 feet beld roughjot, grade over, the entire r levellot$or * along daylight line where .expansive "soils were encountered. The recommendations pre- sented-herein are not intended for structures or appurtenances .-. ,. .' located beyond the limits of the undercut. '- Cut Lots Not Undercut .. • . Cut Lots 7, 13,35 through 39, .47 through 49, 51, 64 through 68, 7.9, 80, 93, 94 99, 100, 102 through 104, 112 through 117 and 121' were .inspected at the completion of grading. The ws inspection indicated that no expansive soil is evident at rough grade surface RECOMMENDATIONS Foundations for Structures on Nonexpansive Soils Wer recommend that foundations for single- or two-story (resi- dential)' structures placed on nonexpansive, undisturbed soil 'oron -nonexpansive, properly compacted fill be designed for a bearing, pressure not exceeding 2000 psf (dead plus1-ie loads). We recommend that footings be founded at least 12 inches below finished grade, and have a minimum width of '. 12 inches. In our opinion, this bearing pressure can be in- creased by-no more than one-third for loads that include wind or seismic forces., -•-•' .•-. - - - ' . - 5-. -. ' - S - - Pacific Scene IL.. . Wclward..Clyde Consultants April 29, 1981 Project No. 502161-FC01 Page Slopes Fill slopes at the site have 'inclinations varying from approx- imately 2 to 1 to 1-1/2 to 1 (horizontal to vertical), and are approximately 60 feet high. Fill slopes were treated by peri-odically. backrolling with a sheepsfoot compactor and track rolled. We recommend that structures that will not tolerate differential settlements (such as foundations, swimming pools, - concrete decks, walls, etc.) not be located within 8 feet of the top of a slope. We recommend that footings that are lo- cated within 8 feet of the top of a 'slope be extended in depth until the outer bottom edge of the footing is 8 feet hori- zontally from the outside face of the slope. "Additional Fill and Utility Trenches This report discusses the fill placement observed by personnel from our firm during the period specified. Werecömmend that any additional fill placed, as well as backfill placed in • utility trenches located within 5 feet of a building' and deeper than 12 inches, or backfill placed in any trench-lo-cated 5 feet or more from a building and deeper than 5 feet, be compacted under our observation and tested to verify com- pliance with the earthwork specifications for the project. We V should-be contacted at least 24 hours prior to backfilling V •• operations. V . Drainage We recommend , that positive measures be taken to properly V V finish grade each lot (after structures and other improvements V VV are, in place), so that. drainage waters from the lot and ad- jacent. properties are directed off the lot and away from foundations, floor slabs, and slope tops. Even when these measures are taken, a shallow ground water or surface water condition V can and may develop in areas where no such water condition existed prior to site development; . this is parti-cularly true where a substantial increase in surface water infiltration results from landscape irrigation. V V. LIMITATIONS V The elevations of compaction tests. shown as finished grade (FG) tests on the attached forms correspond to the elevations shown on the Grading Plans for Calavera Hills, Carlsbad Tract V 76-12 dated October 30, 1979 latest revision dated October 8, . , 1980, prepared by. Rick Engineering Company with the exception of .Lots 8 through 12 which were raised .7 to 2.0 feet. Ele- vations, and locations used in this report were based on field surveys done by others.. • . . Pacific Scene Wward Clyde Consultants April 29,,1981 Project No. .502161-FCOl . Page '5 S The soil conditions described in this report are based on observations and periodic testing. This office should be notified of any indications that soil conditions are not as described herein. We will inspect foundation excavations for. - each lot' .if we are requested to do so %: For this report, rough lot grade is-defined as that grade.set in the field by the grade checker from reference stakes estab- lished by the surveyor, and represents rough grade at the time - we were inspecting the grading operation Likewise, the indicated depths of undercutting of expansive soil and/or ' depths; of placement of, nonexpansive soil were based on the measurements made by and grades 'set by the contractor's grade checker. . The conclusions and opinions drawn from test results and site inspections apply only to our work with respect to grading, and represent conditions at the date of our final inspection We will accept no responsibility for any subsequent changes , made to this site by others, or by uncontrolled action of water, or by failure of others to properly repair damaes. bi I, uncontrolled action of water. If you have any questions, please give us a call ' - Very truly yours, WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS ',,..Richard 'P. While RE 21992 RPW/DT/mm - Attachments (4) -- • - ;, ..*lb._c -. .. .. ., • . - I - L -•-:, . - .• •.- .,..•.- ,.,•. 'I - •,, . . '.•. fl., ''• . • . - . . . •l- ' . . . I. MPACTION TEST RESUL1S .JOJ NAME. LAKE CALAVERA HILLS, UNIT 1 DATE REPORTED 4/29/81 Job NUMBER 502161-FC01 S DATEE COVERED JANUARY.16, 1981 THROUGH APRIL 9, 1981 PAGE 1 Oir 10 RELATIVE COMPACTION S DATE TEST RETEST LOCATION ELEVATION MOISTURE CONTENT FIELD DENSITY LABORATORY DENSITY NUMBER - or OF TEST % any WT. PCF PCP % OF LAS. DENS. JAN 16 1 LOT 131 140' 12.4 110.1 120.0 91 2 . LOT 31 - 144' 13.6 111.7 120.0 93 3 . LOT 52 . 152' 13.9 110.0 .120.0 91 .:. - LOT 89 168 13.4 109.0 120.0 .90 s5 LOT 86 184' 14.2 109.4 120.0 91 . 6 . LOT 84 .. 215' 13.8 111.2 120.0 92 '1 7 LOT 82 226' 13.3 108.6 120.0 90 JAN 17 8 LOT 31 148' 13 9 110.5 120.0 92 9 . * - LOT 91 .160' 14.5 110.3 120.0 91 10 LOT 31 156' 13.0 109.3 120.0 91 5 .S.•11.5 . LOT 52 - 158' 12.5 108.8 120.0 . 90 12 . - LOT 90 . 167' . 12.7 109.2 120.0 91 13 - . LOT 88 171' 13.6 110.0 120.0 91 14 : LOT 44 192' 13.9 109.4 120.0 91 I JAN' 20. 15.. .. . LOT 31 160' 9.0 106.6 125.5 84 ;. 16 . .. LOT 52 . 164' 9.2 107.5 125.5 .85 17 .. .15 LOT 31 160' 12.4 115.9 . 125.5. 91 . ... S. - 16 ;- LOT 52 164' 13.1 113.6 125.5 90 19; - LOT 90 . 175' 11.9 113.4 125.5 90 . . 20 . LOT 88 180' 12.7 106.4 115.5 92 . : 21 . LOT 86 190' 12.9 104.7 115.5 90 22 - . . .5. LOT'84 220' .12.0 114.9 125.5 91 . . 23, .LOT 32 168' 11.7 114.3 .125.5 92; 24 It LOT 53 175' 13.2 104.8 115.5- 90 25 - LOT 91 5 179' 14.7 105.1 115.5 91 26... LOT 56 . 185' 13.1 105.5 115.5 91 27- LOT 88 185' 12.5 115.4 125.5 91 28 LOT 85 203' 13.2 116.1 .125.5 92 29 . LOT 87. 190' 12.8. 114.7 125.5 . 91 JAN 21 30 LOT 32 . 172' 11.1 112.1 118.5 94 31 LOT 52 178' .11. 4* 108.9 . 118.5 91 32 . LOT 55 182' 13.4 105.5 115.5 91 33 . . .. LOT 89 . 188' 12.9 105.0 115.5 . 91 .34 LOT 57 195' 14.6 104.1 115.5 90 • 35. LOT 87 193 . 14.6 104.1 115.5 90 36. LOT 59 208' 11.8 113.9 125.5 .90 -37 . LOT 86 200' 12.4 114.9 125.5 91 38 LOT 85 . 206' 13.0 104.6 115.5 90 39 . LOT 83 . . 225' 12.7 109.6 118.5 . 92 • 40 . LOT 84 . 227' 11.2, 107.3 118.5 90 41 . LOT 88 . 189' 14.1 104.3 115.5 90 42 . LOT 90'_.- 186' 11.2 L07.8 118.5 91 ACi Woodward Clyde Consultants wt 4/28/81 - • . . CONSULTING S S • NO ENVINONMINTAL ICIElITISTI - "OMPACTION TEST RESULT LAKE CALAVERA HILLSSJNIT JOj NAME 1 DATE REPORTED 4/29/81 Jo. NUMBER 502161-FC01 DATEE COVERED JANUARY 16, 1981 THROUGH APRIL 9, 1981 2 10 PAGE OF - CATS TILT NUMSLR RLYLLT O - LOCATION ELEVATION MOIETU& CONTENT P111.0 OENLITV LA•ONAYOV DENLITY ILLATIVE COMPACTION '0? TILT % DRY WY. PC? PC? S or LAS. OLNI JAN 22 43 LOT 32 178' 13.7 105.8 115.5 91 44 . LOT 54 185' 13.1 105.2 115.5 91 = 45 -- LOT 57 ' 200' 12.8 .. 104.6 115.5 90 46 LOT 85 217' 13.6 105.0 115.5 90 - 47 LOT 87 212' 11.5 .104.4 115.5 90 ' 48 LOT 56 201' 13 1 102.2 115.5 88 49 LOT 31 - 182' 12.1 100.8 115.5 87 50 LOT 91 195' 13.4 102 .4, 115.5- JA N 24 51 . LOT 135. 225' 13.1 '111.0 120.0, 92 "' '52 LOT 134. 228' 13.8 110.0 120.0 91 ' 53. . '- LOT 124 ' • 180' ' 13.0 110.4 120.0 V 92 54 . ' - LOT 124 '185' .12.4 112.2 120.0 93 55 50 LOT 91 195' 14.4 106.4 115.5 92 56 48 LOT 56 201' 14 2 103 0 115 5 89 57 49 LOT 31 182' 13.1 101.2 115.5 87 "V 58 LOT 60 210' 13.9 105.6 115.5 91 59 ". LOT 61 . . 214' 14.2 108.9' 118.5 91 60'' - LOT 57 ' . 205' . 14.2 102.2 ' 115.5 88 ' LOT 58 , 208' 15.1 105.6 115.5 91 JAN *29 .62. V'V 56 LOT 56 ' 201' . 15.5 ' 105.4 115.5 91 V V63 5 60 LOT 57 ' . 205' .14.9. 105.0 115.5 V 90' .64 ' LOT '61 ' ', . 217' 13.7 107.3 118.5 90 .65 . " LOT 59 , 215' .14.4 L09.5 118.5 . 92 66 -'; . -LOT 135 ' ', 231' . .15.0 109.1 118.5 92 'V 67.'• LOT 134 234' 16.1 108.7 118.5 ' 91 JAN 30. --68 ' 57 'LOT 31' ' , 182' 14.3 105.2 115.5 91,, 69 LOT 43 ' : 175' 151 107.9 ' 118.5 91 70 LOT 43 178' 14.7 107.2 118.5' 90 FEB 2 • 71. LOT V 135 ' . " - ' 237' .16.7 100.3 110.0 . , 90 V 72 LOT 134 ' V• 240'. 16.9 101.7 , 110.0 91, 73 : ' LOT 136 . 252' . -.13.0 114.5 125.5 91 74'. LOT 138 261' .13.4 113.4 125.5 ' 90 75 LOT 135 243' 15.5 108A 118.5 91 76 LOT 137 255' 14.9 107 ..4 118.5 90 FEB 3 V 77 - LOT 139 ' 269' : 22.2 96.1 105.5. ' 91 78 :'V . LOT '134 . - 27' 22.9 95.9 105.5 .90 V 79 . LOT 136 ' 258' V 23.4 ' 97.4 105.5 92 .' 80 ' LOT 138 ' ' ' 265' 18.5 .103.2 112.0 92 81 - . LOT 135 ' . 250' , 17.5 1 103.8 .112.0 92 82 LOT 137 259' 16.2 102.8 "112.0 91 V S • V .5 . Woodward-Clyde Consultants4/28/81 Mp Wt . , .. ' S V CONSULTING ENGINEIRS. AND INVISONMENYAL SCIENTISTS GEOLOGISTS ' V • . ' MPACT(ON TEST RESULT.-i . . JOJ NAME, .. LAKE CALAVERA HILLS, UNIT 1 DATE REPORTED 4/29/81 Jon NUMBER 502161-FC01 DATES COVERED JANUARY 16, 1981 THROUGH APRIL 9, 1981 PAGE 3 Or 10 DATE • - ?I$Y RETEST NUNSgR 0?, LOCATION ELEVATION MOISTURE CONTENT YIELD DENSITY LASOSATORY DENSITY RELATIVE COMPACTION OF TEST % DRY WY. PC? PC? S OP LAR. DENI FEB 4 83 LOT 134 2531 '. '18.9 102.4 112.0 91 84 LOT 136 ' 261' 18.3 101.6 112.0 90 - - 85 . LOT 138 268' 13.7 115.0 125.5 91: 86 LOT - 'l 35 256' 156 ' . 109.0 118.5 ' 92 87 , LOT 137 263' 15.0- 107.2 118.5 90 88 '. LOT 134 , ' 257', 15.6 107.8' 118.5 90 FEB 5 89 'LOT 124 ., 192' 17.6 102.8- 1i2.0 91 90- . - - - LOT 124 ' ' ' 195' - 184 102.3 112.0 91 91 LOT 129 . 215' 17.3 101.9 112.0' 91 92 ' -, 'LOT 135 259' . 17.7 ' 102.3 112.0 ' 91 FEB 6 ' 93 LOT 43 , -. 180' 16.0 , 104.5 115.5 90 : , LOT 44 , , 195' 15.5 " 106.7 115.5 92 ,. "95 ". . LOT 124 197' 1-7.6 101.9 112.0 91 96 LOT 124 200' 17.9 102.7 112.0 ' - - 91 97 LOT 129 220' 14.7. 108.2 118.5 91 98 LOT 129 225' 15.3 109.0 118.5 92 .99 ..,T LOT 129 -. 228' 16.8 102.8 11.2.0 - - 91 - 'FEB 17 100 . LOT 43 . ' 183' 18.0 ' 103.6 112.0 - 92 LOT 44 , 198' 19.7 104.1 112.0 ' 92 102 LOT 43 186' 19.0 102.3 112.0 91 FEB18 - 103 - - LOT 43 . '. - 189' 18.5 , 104.9 112.0 93 .104 LOT44 . 200' ' 16.9 102.6 . 110.0 93 105 LOT 120 205' .14 .7 109.2 118.5 92 106 , '. ' 'LOT 119 211' 13.9 - 108.2 118.5 91 - FEB 19 107 LOT 43, , ' . 192' 15.2' 109.4 . 118.5 92 108 - LOT 124 , ' - 205' 17.7 1064 115.5 92 :m • LOT 124 ' 210' - -16.4 104.8 115.5 90 '. - 110 • 'LOT 124 ' '215' 15.7 107.2 '118.5 90 LOT 123 - 220' ' 13.0 99.6 112.0 . 88 112 LOT ' 130 231' 12.7 114.4 125.5 . 91 : - • ' 113' LOT 129 234'. 13.7 106.9 118.5 .90 -- -. . 114 LOT 128 -. 236' '14.0 97.9 112.0 87 FEB 20 . 115 ...... ' .LOT. 15 - ' . - ' - 220, ' 12.7 114.5 125.5 91 116 T18 OP3' 13.2 113.2 125.5 '-.--LOT 20 ' 195' 13.9 109.8 118.5 - 92 - . 118 . , LOT 22 ' 184" 14.7 109.9 118.5 .92 119 ' ' LOT 24 159' 16.9. , 103.2 112.0 92 - -120 LOT 26 ' '153' 17.2. '102.4 112.0 ' 91 Woodward Clyde Consultants wt .4/28/81 . ', - ' - . ' . CONSULTING ENGINEESS. GEOLOGISTS AND INVINONMINTSL SCIENTISTS t MPACTION TEST RESULtS Joj NAME LAKE CALAVERA HILLS, UNIT 1 DATE REPORTED 4/29/81 Jo. NUMBER 502161-FC01 MATES COVERED JANUARY 16, 1981 THROUGH APRIL 9, 1981 - PAGE 4 op 10 DATE TEST * Hummel,Or RETEST - LOCATION ELEVATION NOISTUNE CONTENT FIELD DENSITY I..ASORATORY DENSITY' RELATIVE COMPACTION . OF TEST % DRY WY. . PC? PC? % or LAS. DEN, FEB 20. 121 , LOT 28 . . 147' .' ' 137 113.9 - .125.5' 122 "- ,- . LOT -90 _77- 29 ' 140' 12.7 113.6 125.5 90 1 123 LOT 27 153' .14 .1 114.2 125.5 90 -, 124- - LOT 29 .' ' 144'. 13.5 113.7 125.5 9O A, - . . , FEB 23 125 LOT 14 223' 14 5 108 3 118 5 91 126 LOT 16 227' 16.4. 104.8 115.5 90 127 LOT 27 156' 15.0 98.6 112 0 88 128 127 LOT 27 156' 17.1 104.4 112.0 93 .'- 129 . . LOT 19 ' - 200' '- 16.8 103.3-- 113.0 91 130 -- 'LOT ,21 . 192' . 13.9 115.6 125.5' - 92. . ' 131 'LOT '- 5 : ' ' 170' ' 18.6 ' 99.2 112.0 88 132 131''-LOT 25 170' 18 8 .102.3 112.0 91 133 LOT 23 190' 16.7 102.0 112.0 91 134 LOT 25 175' 18.2 103.2 112.0 92 135 ' LOT 29 145' 17.5 .103.2 112.0 92 136 LOT 28 154' 16.-3 102.3 112.0 91 137 LOT 26 160' 15.1 108.4 118.5 91 138 LOT 27 ' ' 166 ' 15.9 109.1 118.5 91 FEB 24 " 139 . , PLOT 24 ' 171' . 14.6 111.0 118.5 93 t40 , '' LOT 22 , 193' 15.9 104.9 ' 115.5 '90 141 LOT 20 2011. 14.4 110.7. 118.5 93 OT -18 . 2O8' 16.81 1035 112.0 143 LOT 16 231' 17.6 102.2 112.0 91 144 LOT 14 233' 17.0 102 5 112 0 91 LOT 15 . 234' 16.5 101.4 '-112.0 ' 90 146 LOT 16 237' :16.2. 103.0 112.0 92 -148. 147- LOT-.17 tOT181 -' 214!, - 16.7 15.5 104.9 110.0 115.5 118.5 90: 149 LOT 19 206' 14.4 108 8 118 5 91 150 . LOT 21 195' 15.9 109.7 118.5 92' 151 LOT 23 180' 16.7 101.8 112.0 90 -. .152 ' LOT 25 ' ' 175' 18.9 103.3 "112.0 92 153 LOT 27 160' 17.5 104.2 113.0 92 154 LOT 28 175' .17 .8 103.5 113.0 91 FEB 25 155 '. ' ' LOT 17 . 235' , 16.7 102.2 112.0 91 .156 ' ' LOT - 15 ' 237' - 16.9 103.3 ' 112.0 92 157 LOT 16 239' 14.7 110.8 118 5 93 158 -. - LOT 17 - 238' . 15.5 105.2 115.5 - 91 -- ,. 159 , ', 'LOT 14 ' ' 240'-' 13.1' 114.0 125.5 . 90 " 160 LOT 16 242' 17 3 101 5 112.0 90 ,-. "161 ' - - LOT 15 , , , 242' 14.5 110.4 118.5 ' 93 - i 162 LOT 11 252' 15.4 107.5 118.5 90 $ F Woodward Clyde Consultants 110 wt- CONSULTING ENGINEERS. GEOLOGISTS 4/28/81 - - - ' - ' ' - ' , NO ENVIRONMENTAL MPACTIO TEST RESULTh• Jo NAME LAKE CALAVERA HILLS, UNIT 1 DATE REPORTED 4129/81 JoaNuMaER 502161FC01- DATES COVERED JANUARY 16, 1981 THROUGH APRIL 9, 1981 PAGE 5 Or 10 - OATS TEST RETEST LOCATION ELEVATION MOISTURE CONTENT YIELD DENSITY LABORATORY DENSITY RELATIVE COMPACTIOI NUMBER or OF TEST % DRY MT. PCF PC? % OF LAID. DC? FEB 25 . 163 . LOT 10 . 254' 14.9 107.0 118.5 90 .164 ,. LOT 12 254' .15.9 109.0 118.5 92 165- LOT 12 256' i5.4 107.9 118 5 1 90. • 166 LOT 11 . ' 258' 13.7 100.9 118.5 82 167 LOT 12 . 258' 12.5 98.6 118.5 ' . 83 168 LOT 17 240' 12 .6, 114.1 125.5 90 FEB 26 j9' 15.7 111.0 118.5 170' - LOT 20 216' 18.4 '103.5 112.0 92 171 . LOT 22 . 209 13.5 . 115.2 125.5 91 ' •,172 , LOT 24 '' 197' 14.2 109.7 118.5' 92 173. . ... LOT 26 ' . .87' 14.8 110.7 118.5 93 [LOT ii 26 14.2 110.3 118.5 175 166 LOT 11 258' 15.9 109.3 118.5 - 92 176 167 LOT 12 258' 14 5 110 0 118 5 92 177 $ LOT 10 260' 14.1 105.0 115.5 91 178 LOT 11 261' 14 0 109 4 118.5 92 179 LOT 12 262' 14.3 107.8 118 5 90 180 111 LOT 123 220' 18.5 102.0 112 .0, 91 FEB 27 181 LOT 124 221' 17.2 .104.4 112.0 93 t 182 . ' LOT 124 , 223' 17.5 '104.4 113.0 92. , * 183 LOT 123 V, . 226' 16.7 103.7 113.0 91 '. 184 LOT 124 229' ' 16.8 102.3 113.0 ' 90 185 LOT 123 232' 17.7 104.0 113.0 92 186 LOT 124 235' 18.6 '102.6 113.0 90 187 , 114 LOT 128 236' 18.3 102.7 112.0 .. 91 188 . . LOT 130' . 239' 16.7 , 105.7 115.5 . 91 189 LOT 129 241' 15.9 104.6 '115.5 90 190 'V -LOT 23 ', . 206' .14.4 109.9 118.5 92 191 LOT 85 200' 13.5 107.6 118 5 90 192 ' V LOT 27 '' 182' 14.0 111;1 118.5 93 : . 193. . . LOT 2 ' V ' , 167' 15.2 1088 .118.5 .91 194 LOT 128 244' 13 9 108.4 118.5 91 V VAJR_ V 195 LOT 5 -. ' . 263 16.6 104.3 '113.0 92 196 ' LOT 6 273' 17.1 103.2 113.0 91 197 . . LOT V 29 175! 17.7 100.9 111.5 90 198 LOT V 27 190' 17.4 102 1 111 5 91 :199 ' ' LOT 25 ' - V 205' 14.8 109.6 118.5 92 200. V . LOT 55 V 267' ' 16.1 - 102.7 113.0 90 . 201. '. . LOT -5 V 269.' V 16.9 102.9 113.0 91 •V V 202 LOT 4 264' 16 0 101.2 111 5 90 ' 203 V LOT 1 264' 18.5 101.5 111.5 90 ' 204 - - LOT 130 241' 17.2 100.1 , 111.5 V90 Woodward C,4e Pons4tants An V WL 4/20/81 V V ' V V . V . NO SNYIRONMNTL SCISNYISTS MPACTIQN TEST RESULT• Jo NAME LAKE CALAVERA HILLS, UNIT 1 DATEREPORTED 4/29/81 Jo' NUMEER 502161-FC01 . DATES COVERED JANUARY16, 1981 THROUGH APRIL 9, 1981 PAGE 6 or 10 RELATIVE COMPACTION DATE TEST RETEST LOCATION ELEVATION MOISTURE CONTENT YIELD DENSITY LASORATORY DENSITY NUMUER OF OF TEST % DRY WY. PCP PC? S OF LAR. OEN, MAR 10 205 ' LOT 29 . 180' 14.7 104.9 115.5, 90 ,. 206 . ., LOT 28 187' 16.6 106.7 115.5 92 . 207 LOT 27 199' 14.9 105.7 115.5 91 • - 208 LOT 5 . 271' 15.8 103.4 113.0 .91. - 209 .' LOT ' 4 - 267' 16.5 101.8 113.0 90 210 . LOT 29 .. 185' 14.6 107.9 118.5 91 211 LOT 28 . 194' 14.9 108.8 115.5 94 212 " LOT 4 270' 18.9 101.2 .111.5 90 :213 ' . LOT 1, ' 270' . 17.2 103.8 115.5 90 • 214 LOT 43' 1951. 17.7 104.4 113.0 92 215 . LOT ' 29 , 190' 13.7 . 107.5 118.5 90 216 LOT 28 . 196' 14.2 .109.1 118.5 92 ' 217 ' , ' LOT 27 201' ' 13.5 104.7 115.5 90 218 LOT 1 226' 17 7 102 5 111 5 91 , 219 ' 'LOT 29 196' 15.3 ' 107.9 ' 118.5 91 MAR 11 220 '.' LOT 28 .198' 14.9 107.6 118.5 90 -. 221 , LOT 137 . 266' 15.9 109.6 118.5 92 222 - ' :LOT 128 . 243' 16.2 102.2 113.0 - 9.0 1223k 18 ' 226' 14.5 110.5 115.5 95 .224 ' '- LOT 129 , . 245' .17.8. 102.4 112.0 91 .. 225, LOT 26 . 204' 14.3 106.6 ' 117.0 91 '226 . LOT w25 . . 207' 15.0 107.1 117.0 91 227 LOT 24 209' 14.7 109.9 118.5 92 . ,228 . LOT . 23 211' 15.4 107.1 113.0 94 229 " ',• .LOT 22 -. . . 215' 16.5 .. ,105.0 115.5 90 230 ' LOT 21 218' 15.6 106.8 117.0 91 231 LOT 20 222' 14.9 108.4 118.5 91 .. ' 232 . LOT 19 . :' '. 224' . 15.6 - 108.9 118.5 91. '233 . LOT 53 ' - 182' 16.6 . 104.3 115.5 90 - . 234 , - LOT. 52 - , 185' 16.8 108.0 115.5 -' , .93 MAR 12 235 ' 'LOT 52- . , 188' 13.1 110.8 118.5 93 .236 . LOT 85 . ' . 217' 15.6 104.5 113.0 92 237 . . LOTS 87 . . . 216' 12.7 . ' , 109.2 118.5 92 238. ' LOT 89 - 200' 13.9 110.1 118.5 92 239 ' . .' LOT 53 ' . 192' 15.2 102.6 '113.0 90 .240 ' * , 'LOT 90 203' . 16.6 104.9 115.5 90 241 * . .' ' LOT 95 FG 219.2' 14.5 108.4 118.5 91 - 242 LOT 96 FG 218.7.1 . 14.7 107.7 118.5 .90 243 - . ' LOT 97 ' - FG 217.9' '15.0 107.9 118.5 91 244 . ' . LOT 98 ' .. FG 217.6' 13.6 107.3 118.5 - 90 - 245- - LOT 92 FG. 215.3' , 15.9 105.6 " 115.5 . 91. * - AGi Woodward Clyde Consultants wt 4/28/81 ' ' • . ... CONSULTING EnGistlal. GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS MPACTION TEST RESULT:. LAKE CALAVERA HILLS, UNIT 1 Jo,) NAME DATE REPORTED 4/29/81 Jos NumBER_ 502161-FCC)]. V - V DATEe COVERED JANUARY 16, 1981 THROUGH APRIL 9, 1981 PAGE o, 10 IELATSVE COMPACTION DATE TWIT RETEST LOCATION ELEVATION MOISTURE CONTENT FIELD - DENSITY LASORATOAT DENSITY NUMSEN - of Of TEST .% DAY WT. PCF PCF S OP LA. DEN, MAR 13 246 LOT 86 223' 15.7 107.1 117.0 91 247 - LOT 88 215' 14.9 106.8 117.0 91 248 -' - LOT 90 : , 206" 14.2 109.1 117.0 . 93 249 - LOT 52 195' 15 1 109.3 117.0 93 250 LOT 32 181' 20.4 95.2 113.0 84 251 250 LOT 32 . 181" 14.9 108.2 118.5 91 ry LOT 17 FG 242.7' 15.4 108.4 117.O ' 92 253 ' 16 V FG 244.0' 13.0 110.0 118.5 92 V , 254 -. LOT 15 . FG 244.3' 14.9 109.7 117.0 93. [255 CLOT 18 .14 .9 108.9 118.5 V 256 . , LOT 87 219' 14.3 107.2 118.5 ' ' 91 MAR 16 ____ LOT 2 [jj 30 4'j 16 9 100 7 110 0 258 r - LOT 21 FG ' '220.6' 17.8 110.9 117.0 94 V, 259 i LOT 24 FG 211.9' 16.5 110.2 117.0 94 .,,' 260 , LOT 25 ' FG 209.0' 15.9 ., 112.3 117.0 V 96 261 LOT 26 V FG , 206.1 16.7 .109.0 117.0 93 ' V 262 , LOT. 14 FG ' 244.0' '15.5 109.5 118.5 . 92. -- 263 -. ' LOT 32 , 184' 15.9 111.5 118.5 94 264 - V' - LOT 89 , - 209' 16.0 105.6 115.5 91 ,;-' ' •' 265 LOT 22 . FG ' 217.7' 16.6 .112.0 117.0 .95 266 • - ', LOT 23. . - ' FG ' 214.8 15.6 110.2 115.5 93 ' 267 ' ' •' LOT 27 FG 203.1' 15.7. 112.7 115.5 95 268 ' LOT 85 . . ' 225' 14.7 . 110.6 115.5 93 ' 269 . V -LOT 53 'V 197' 14.1 107.2 115.5 90 '270 ', LOT 52 , 198' ' 16.4 106.6 1155 V V 92 271 LOT 56 207' 15.7 105.2 115.5 91 272 , -, ' LOT 55 204' 16.9 ... 106.4 115.5 -92 MAR 17 273 LOT 91 202' 14.2 106.6 115.5 92 V 274 LOT 28 FG 200.2' 16.2 112.2 117.0 95 V - 275 - LOT 53 - ,, FG , 200.0' 16.9 100.3 110.0 91 , V 276 - . LOT 88 ' . 215' '1-7.2 .106.3 115.5 92 V 277 LOT , 54 ' , FG 202.9' 13.5 107.4 118.5 90 . 278- . V - :LOT 86 , 223' 16.9 105.6 115.5 91' - 279 ' . . LOT 91 , ,FG , 205.6' 15.6 112.1 117.0 95 280 • LOT 32 ' 187' 15.8 - 11,1.1 118.5 - 93 V 281 . ,V ,' LOT'52 V FG 201.6' 16.8 111.4 117.0 95 282 LOT 90 • FG V 209.5' '15.5 107.8 '117.0 92 :'. .. 283 . ,. LOT 29 - FG 198.0' 14.9 1095 118.5 92 284 • -' LOT 33 - . '192' 15.5 110.0 118.5 92 285 . LOT85 FG 227.1" 16.4 103.7 110.0 94 286 .. LOT 86, V , FG 225.1'- 14.9 ' 105.6 - 117.0 ' 90, .287 - 'LOT 87 - - ' V 218' 15.7 108.8 118.5 91 -5' ,_.-i_' •* V ' - - - , • ' '' V •V ,' ArA Woodward Clyde Consultants Wt' 4/28/81 ' - V V ' . COHSULYIG ENGINIESS. GEOLOGISTS NO ENIS0NMENTAI. SCIENTISTS SOMPACTION TEST RESULI• J0d NAME LAKE CALAVERA HILLS, UNIT 1 , DATE REPORTED 4/29/81 .IOINUMBER 502161-FC01 DATESCOVERED JANUARY 16, 1981 THROUGH APRIL 9, 1981 PAGE 8 OF 10 RELATIVE COMPACTION DATE TEST • RETEST LOCATION ELEVATION MOISTURE CONTENT FIELD DENSITY LABORATORY DENSITY NUMULS OF .. OF TEST % DRY WT. PC? PC? % OF LAS. DEN, MAR 18 . 288 LOT 87 FG 221.2' 14.4 109.7 119.0 92 289 LOT 88 ' PG 217.3' 13.8 108.7 119.0 ' 91 '..'90 ' LOT 84 230' 14.5 110.0 118.5 92 ' 291 LOT 83 ' . 228' 15.2 108.1 118.5 91 292' .,'WT 84 232' .13.7 108.0 118.5 91 293 . 'LOT 89 FG 213.4'' 14.0 109.5 119.0 92. ¶ . 294 •.. ' LOT 55 . FG 206' 14.9 109.0 '118.5 92 , 295 LOT 56 FG 209 1' 12 8 109.8 118.5 ' 92 296 'LOT 57 FG 212.2' 14.7 108.1 119.0 , 90 297 LOT 31 - 188' 15.0 , 105.3 '115.5 '. 91 ' 298 LOT 30 190' 14.6 108.4 118 .5, 91 'MAR 19 299 LOT 83 234 16.2 106.4 115.5 92 300 "• LOT 31 . 1901. 16.7 107.6 115.5 93 301 LOT 60 FG 222.9' 15.0 108.0 118.5 91 302 '. ' ' LOT 61 FG 221.5' 15.5 109.0 118.5 . 91 303 LOT 50 193' 16.9 104.2 113.0 92 .304 " 'LOT 58 ' FG 215.3' 16.0 ' 107.1 117.0.: 9].' 305 . LOT 59 FG . 218.4' 14.9., 111.2 118.5. 93 -." 3Q6 LOT 82 230' 14.1 - 108.4 '118.5 9i ' ' ,307 . LOT 19 FG 226.,9' , 13.8 . 112.1 119.0 94 '308 ' ' LOT 20 , ' FG . . 223.9' 14.2 '109.4 119.0 92 309 LOT 33 194' 16.7 105.5 115.5 91 MAR 23- 310 - LOT 30 ' 195' 16.7 106.6 115.5 92 311 , - . LOT 32 ' ' 196' . 17.5 106.0 115.5 '91 312 LOT 31 ' ' 190' 13.7 107.6 . 118.5 90' 313 ', LOT 33 . 196' 14.9 108.9 . 118.5 92 314 LOT 82 234' 17.0 102 9 113.0 91 MAR 24 315 LOT 109 FG 241 6' 15 5 111 .6 118.5 94 316 ' ' LOT 108 FG 240.5' 14.8 ' 109.1 118.5 92 '317 LOT 107 , FG - 238.6' 151 . 109.3 118.5 92 318 ' LOT 106 ' . FG 231.5' . 14.4 110.1 118.5 92 319 ' '. . . LOT 105 . - FG 231.2' 14.8 108.3 118.5 . 91 320 . LOT 32 ' FG 198.8' 16.2 , 107.7 117.5 91 321 . . LOT 33 ' . , FG ' 199.5' 15.7 . 108.6 117.5 ' 92 322 '- LOT 62 . . ' FG 232.6' 16.5 .109.0 117.5 92' 323' LOT 63 . . FG '236.7' 14.9 106.3 .117.5 90 324 LOT 34 , FG ' 199.8' 14.7 108.0 . 118.5 . 91 MAR 25 ' 325 . ' . 'LOT 70 ' FG 264.9' 14.9 108.2 117.5 92 326 - . ' .''LOT 69 , FG. ' 261.0' 14.2 107.9 , 117.5 91 . - 327 . ' LOT 71" . FG 268.3' 14.7 109.6 117.5 ' 93 328 " LOT 139 . , . , 271' . 17.7 102.6 111.5 92 329 - ', LOT' 101 ' FG 230.6' '15.3 1106.2 117.5 90 ' .'. 330 ' ' ,, LOT ,110 . . FG 240.2' 14.5 109.2 118.5 92 Woodward Clyde Consultants S wt 4/29/81 , , -' . ' . '. , CONSULTING INGINEIRS, GCOLOGISTS AND SNVISoNMIIT(. SCICNTISTS MPACTION TEST RESULTh'• .Io,i NAME • LAKE CALAVERA HILLS, UNIT 1 DATE REPORTED 4/29/81 .101 NUMBER '502161-FC01 DATES COVERED JANUARY 16, 1981 THROUGH APRIL 9, 1981 PAGE 9 OF 10 RELATIVE COMPACTION DATE - - TEST RETEST LOCATION ELEVATION uoI.wsg CONTENT rli1.0 DENSITY LABORATORY DENSITY NUMBER of OF TEST % DRY WV. PC? PC? 'A or LAS. DLII, MAR 25 331 •. LOT 129 247' 15.2 106.7 115.5 92 332 . .. LOT 130 247' 15.8 105.8 115.5 91 * 4'•' 333 LOT . 131 . I PG 200.7' 14.8 110.6 118.5 93 MAR 26 ,'334' LOT 72 PG 272.5' 14.2 110.2 119.0 92 335 . LOT 73 PG 269.'5 15.7 109.3 118.5. 92 336 '. . - LOT 74 . PG 266.6' 15.1 109.1 118.5 92 . 1337 LOT 75 PG 261.7' 15.9 110.4 118.5 93 MAR 27 338 LOT 111 PG 237.8' 14.9 107.9 117 ..5 91 339 LOT 30 PG 197.3' 15.7 111.1 117.5 94 340 - LOT 31 PG. 192.5' 13.9 108.0 118.5 91 341' . LOT. 76 PG 255.5' 14.9 111.2 117.5 94 342 . • . LOT 77 PG 250.5' 15.7 110.9 . 117.5 .94 MAR 30 343: ' LOT 132 PG 251.5' 14.7 111.2 117.5 93 344 LOT 133 PG 255 1' 15.5 110.2 117 .,5 93 MAR 31,. 345- LOT 134 PG 259.0' 15.7 109.9 , 117.5 93 . 346 : LOT 135 PG 262.4' 15.0 109.6 118.5 92 347 LOT 127 PG 248 0' 15.4 112.7 118.5 95 ' 348 . - LOT 128 PG '.249.2' 14.2 109.7 .118.5 92' 349 • LOT 129 PG 249.5' 14.5 108.9 118.5. 91 350; LOT 130 . FG-' 249.5' 14.9 107.0 117.5 91 APR 1 351 LOT 43 196' 17.5 106.0 115.5 91 352 LOT 131 . PG 249.2' 14.5 110.8. 118.5 . 93 . 353 '- -. LOT. 118 PG 216.3' 14.4 108.9 118.5 .92 I' LOT 119 PG 213.2' 15.2 107.9 118.5 - 91 ' 355 LOT 81 . PG 238.8' 15.5 104.3 111.0 94 356. ; LOT 82 • PG 237.2' 16.2 •• 103.0 111.0 92 4 - . .AP R'2'' 357. LOT 122 . , PG 237.1' 13.8 109.6 117.5 93 358 LOT 123 PG 237 5' 14.0 108 0 117.5 91 359 . , '' LOT 124 PG 237.5' 13.2 107.6 117.5 91 360 LOT 125 PG 237 1' 14 4 108 3 117 5 92 ' 4361 , • ' LOT 126 .. PG 236.2' 13.9 109.6 117.5 93' 362 LOT 120 PG 210.1' 13.4 108.6 118.5 91 APR 3 363 . . . LOT 136 PG 2658' 13.5 107.b 117.5 91 364., ' '. LOT 137 . . PG 269.2' 14.5 111.8 118.5 94 365 • ' • LOT 138 - PG 272.6' 15.2 110.2 118.5 . 93 .' '•. 366 LOT 139 - PG 273.6' 13.7 . 107.3- - 117.5 91 .. ,,.',,367- - LOT 78 . PG 243.5' 12.7 108.0 .'118.5 91 ' 368 LOT .83 ' PG 235.6' - 13.8 110.6 118.5 93 369 - • .'LOT 'J 1' 84 PG 234.0' . 14.1 107.1 118.5 90 ' 4 '- :- Woodward-Clyde Consultants C 4129/81 . CONSULTING INGINEISS. GEOLOGISTS - fr. '' . . . . - NO INVISONMINTAl. SCIUNTISTI LABORATORY R(I.ATIVE DENSITY COMPACTION PC? %OF LAD. Dam. 119.0 92- '. 119.0 93 119.0 94 119.0 94 119.0 95- 119.0 93 119.0 - 92 118.5 92 '115.5 92 117.5.-- 91 119.0 '91' 117.5 - 94 11,9.0' - 94 117.5 ' 93 117.5 - . 93 117.5 91 117.5 .93 117.5 92 117.5 - 93, 118.5 - 92 UMPACTION TEST RESULT.-.. .JO. NAME " LAKECALAVERA HILLS, UNIT 1 DATEREPORTEO 4/29/81 Jo. NUMBER 502161-Fcol DATES COVERED JANUARY 16, 1981 THROUGH APRIL 9, 1981*PAGE 10 OF 10 DATE - - - TEST RETEST NUMBER of -. ' LOCATION ELEVATION MOISTURE GONTENT FIELD DENSIT , OF TEST % DRY WY. PC? APR 6' 370, LOT 1 273' 13.9 110.2 .371 LOT 10 FG 264.0'. 15.4 111.4 • - '/t 372 ' LOT 11 '. FG . 263.5'. 14.9 112.9 373 LOT 12 FG 263 2' 15.2 112 1 374 LOT 9 FG 264.4' 14.7 113.0 .,i.., 375 '. LOT 8 FG 265.1' 14.9 111.4 376 LOT 5 FG 273.0' 14.5 110.1 377-" LOT 6 FG 275:5' 16.9 104.4 APR .-7 . 378 ' LOT 43 .- 198' 15.9 106.8 '379 'LOT 43 200' 14.2 107.1 380 LOT 42 FG 202.6' 14.7 109.4 381 LOT 43 FG 202.6' 15.2 110.5 382 LOT 44 FG 202 0' 14 1 112.7 383 LOT 45 FG 202 4' 15.0 110.2 384 LOT 46 FG 202.8' 15.6 109.9 .APR .8 385 '' LOT 40 , FG 202.7' 14.5 -107.9 386 , LOT 41 . , . FG 202.4' 15.0 110.0 APR 9 387 ' LOT 2 ' FG '2754' 14.1 108.3 388 , LOT 3 ' FG 274.8' 15.0 ' 110.2' 389 LOT 4 FG 273.2' 14.8 109.8 I, ' .•t ,. - .- - - 4/29/81 Woodward-Clyde Consultant.s 4W - . .. - , - - , - -- ' COIULTINO MINtIU. GCOLOGISTS -, ,- - , - ( - AND ENVIONINTAL SCIANTSITI r PLASTICITY CHARACTERISTICS 1 - 2 3 Liquid Limit, % - - - Plasticity Index, % - - - Classification by Unified Soil Classification System SM—SC SM—SC SM—SC f I c[ m f SILT & CLAY1 FBBLESI GRAVEL ND I SA 150-'-r ZERO AIR VOIDS CURVES TUN -2.80. SG \ 2.70 SG 2.60 SG 140—— 2.50 SG 130 • --.--\ QL 110 ------ -- --- 100 ---- - 1 N's Maximum Dry 1 2 3 Density, pcf 120.0 115.5 125.5 • um Moisture EContent,% 11.5 14.0 10.0 - —T—F7FMOISTURE CONTENT,% 80 - 10 20 '30 LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST 0 1000 100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.00 GRAIN SIZE, mm MECHANICAL ANALYSIS DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA 3 Dry Density, pcf - 104 Initial Water Content, % , - 14 Final Water Content, % 19 - Apparent Cohesion, psf - 600 - Apparent Friction Angle, degrees SWELL TEST DATA 1 2 3 Initial Dry Density, pcf - - - Initial Water Content, % - .- - Final Dry Density, pcf - - - Final Water Content, % Load, psf Swell, percent SAMPLE LOCATION 1 LOT 32 2 LOT 95 3 LOT 35 40 LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST METHOD: ASTM D 1557 70 A ' • FILL SUITABILITY TESTS • LAKE CALAVERA HILLS, UNIT 1 DRAWN BY: 6 h I CHECKED BY:)' PROJECT NO: 502161—FC01 ' DATE: 4/29/81 FIGURE NO: 1 it 4/29/81 ' ' • . W000WARO-CLYDE CONSULTANTS PLASTICITY CHARACTERISTICS 4 5 6 Liquid Limit, % - - 33 Plasticity Index, % - 8 Classification by Unified Soil Classification System SC-SM SC-SN SC-SM ___ z ___ __ z I- 1000 100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE. mm MECHANICAL ANALYSIS [COBBLeIE?GRAVELICI SAP -J SILT & CLAY1 a. w () ir a- SAMPLE LOCATION 4 FILL LOT 31 - 5 LOT 33 6 LOT 17 J 40 LABORATORY COMPACTION TrQT .J1fl. AC'DM fl Ill :,• 1501 -r. - ZERO AIR VOIDS CURVES • 2.80 SG )•. ç 2.70 SG 2.60 SG p140 — — 2.50 SG : 130--—- 1 --—--h 120--—---- 110 Nk / '•;• ,, --------------- VS 90 .. -- ---___\ S Maximum Dry 4 5 6 Density, pcf 118.5 111.0 113.0 Optimum Moisture Content.% 12.0 16.5 16.0 1'MOISTURECONTENT,% = 80 0 10. 20 30 LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA 5 6 Dry Density, pcf 107 100 102 Initial Water Content, % 14 17 16 Final Water Content, % 18 22 1 21 Apparent Cohesion, psi 800 1 800 800 Apparent Friction Angle, degrees 16 19 16 SWELL TEST DATA 4 5 6 Initial Dry Density, pcf • 109 99 103 Initial Water Content, % 14 17 17 Final Dry Density, pcf 108 99 103 Final Water Content, % 18 23 21 Load, psf 160 160 160 Swell, percent 0.4 0.7 1.2 - FILL SUITABILITY TESTS LAKE CALAVERA HILLS, UNIT 1 DRAWN BY: sh [ CHECKED BY:4+j I PROJECT NO: 502161-FC03. f DATE: 4/29/81 f FIGURE NO: 2 wt 4/29!P. WflflflWARD-1YD DPS1I1.TAWTS PLASTICITY CHARACTERISTICS 7 - 9 Liquid Limit, % 49 35 42 Plasticity Index, % 24 8 18 Classification by Unified Soil Classification System CL SC—SM CL IC0SIiVEfLIcI ml f_I SAND SILT & CLAY1 __I- ___ I ___ WOMMMUMN I~Wmmmwkmm 'I 1000 100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01, 0.001 GRAIN SIZE, mm MECHANICAL ANALYSIS SAMPLE LOCATION 7 LOT 135 '8 LOT 9 LOT 74 40 LABORATORY,COMPACTION TESTMETHOD: ASTM D 1557 70 A 150 4 . ZERO AIR VOIDS CURVES - j-2.80SG - ç- 2.70 SG —2.60SG .140 2.50 SG 130 -----s 120 - - - - - ------- MN iiIi=I 110 91 100 90 ------___'s — Maximum Dry 7 8 9 . _... ç Density, pcf 105.5 110.0 112.0 - : Optimum Moisture - Content.,% 21.0 16.0 15.5 I I I I I MOISTURE CONTENT.% = = 8C 10 .20 30 . LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA 7 8 9 Dry Density, pcf 95 99 101 Initial Water Content, % 22 16 14 Final Water Content, % 31 22 26 Apparent Cohesion, psf 270 600 270 Apparent Friction Angle, degrees 15 18 17 SWELL TEST DATA 7 8 9 Initial Dry Density, pcf 95 101 101 Initial Water Content, % 22 16 15 Final Dry Density, pcf 88 1 100 94 Final Water Content, % 33 24 30 Load, psf 160 160 160 Swell, percent 7.4 1.3 7.4 FILL SUITABILITY TESTS LAKE CALAVERA HILLS, UNIT 1 DRAWN BY: sh I CHECKEDBY:iWq PROJECT NO: 502161—FCo1 DATE: 4/29/81 FIGURE NO: 3 wt 4/29/81 W000WARD.CLYOE CONSULTANTS PLASTICITY CHARACTERISTICS 13 14 I I Liquid Limit, % 31 34. Plasticity Index, % 6 9 1 Classification by Unified Soil Classification SM—SC Sc nuniva I- __I 0..60 I-. z w 40 C) cr 'U o. 20 0 1000 100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.00 GRAIN SIZE, mm MECHANICAL ANALYSIS DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA 13 14 Dry Density, pcf • - - Initial Water Content, % - - Final Water Content, % - - Apparent Cohesion, psf - - Apparent Friction Angle, degrees - - SWELL TEST DATA 13 14 Initial Dry Density, pcf 108 104 Initial Water Content, % 14 15 Final Dry Density, pcf 106 100 Final Water Content, % 20 23 Load, psf 160 160 SweIl,percent 2.1 3.9 SAMPLE LOCATION 13 LOT 80 14 LOT 113 j LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST METHOD: ASTM D1557 70 A 150 VOIDS CURVES SG • -OSG kZAIR .6OSG 140 2.50 SG Tc 130---- - - - - - - 120 110 • IIIOF _Ii\ Lu ---- — 100 90 NN Maximum Dry 13 T 14 11- • Density, pcf 118.5 115.5 Optimum Moisture Content.% 13.0 14.5 • I I I I MOISTURE CONTENT,% - 800 10 20 30 • . LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST FILL SUITABILITY TESTS TAKE CALAVERA HILLS, UNIT 1 DRAWN BY: sh I CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO: 502161—FC01 [DATE: 4/29/81 { FIGURE NO: 5 wt 4/29/81 W000WARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS