The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2750 ARGONAUTA ST; ; 81-256; PermitDECLARATIONS LENDER -1 WORKER'SCOYPENSATION OWNERllUlLDER It CONTRACTOR T 4 3 !- 'I I t i I I ~ t . + I c j , , iI li II i 1 7 c kt- [!! 'h t 1 I I ., I L \ I ! T " T 7 i 1 4- + "--- !I u- t I li L T 1 m (I) m -1 1 MISCELLANEOUS FEE RECEIPT ' \ 0 VALUATION 0 DEMOLITION ." ,- / 517 %$P. CI ~. I U 0 0 0 a 0 0 1 HOUSE MOVING . ,. 1.- . , . , * - '. .,e PARKS AND RECREATION FEE PUbLlC FACILITIES FEE SCHObL FEE - DISTRICT "j Carlsbad Encinitas 6an Dlsgc San Marcos :: ; 'e: .. ~ ' "/ ., ., . .... .r t a_ 3 While - Applicant Yellow - File Pink - (1) Finance (2) Data Process Gold - Assessor . ~~ . ~ __~_l"l - 1 . ..~.. .~ I I" I 1 , i ii I :7 1 T T- t c i It L DECLARATIONS LENDER WORKER'SCOYPENSATION -1 OWNEWWILDER lr CONTRACTbR 1- k J= i !I i t i ! L c + L .- I i 1 I i 1. T j I ! ! . .. BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE : BUILDING ADDRESS: JUN 26 CI~ OF, CAWBAD i, BUllV 4. I PLANNING DEPARTMENT F&OT SIZE LOT WIDTH UNITS ALLOWED &b\ UNITS PROVIDED r2- PARKING SPACES REQUIRED PROVIDED 4 % COVERAGE ALLOWED PROVIDED ' BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED s-c PROVIDED 0 6 tiZ::E:DF~ 3- FRONT SETBACK: SIDE SETBACK: REAR SETBACK: INTRUSIONS lC3 ipt" LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION PLAN COMMENTS: ENVIRONHENTAL PROTECTION REQ: dl& I A ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT R.O.W. IMPROVEMENTS SEWER CONNECTION DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS GRADING PERMIT DRAINAGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADDITIONAL COMMENTS v i/ V h.. OK TO ISSUE: DATE PWI OK TO FINAL " FIRE DEPARTMENT , SPPIKKLING SYSTEM FIRE PROTECTION EQUIP. FIRE ALARXS EXITS FIRE HYDRANTS LOCATION ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OK TO ISSUE: DATE OK TO FINAL DATE ~ 1:. WATER DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS OF APPROPRIATE DISTRICTS MET DATE .mi to b. m. " . Air Cohditioning .. - x .. 1,5100.00 .. 1; 500.00 .... . .. . , . ..- , . .. .. , " -.. . . .. . _. .. .. -. -. .. i .. ._ -.. . . .. * 6. ..- . . . . Section 3305 (~$t Handrails 1979 Uniform By'lding Code 1%. b 2' ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR.. SC'ITE 1x2 SAN DIEGO. CA 92125 (714) 860-146U x207 RESIDENTIAL ENERGY WW STATEMENT OF PLAN CONFOWCE PLAN CHECK NO. &/ 256 Effective July I, 1978 every proposed residential building must be designed to coniply with the State Residential Energy Conservation Law before a building permit can be issued. Section A or B of this form mt be completed for each residential building permit application. @ STANDARD DESIGN STAlTbENT I have reviewed the ulms beinrz submitted for the UroDosed residential building at (site) for " (owner) and the design submitted substantially conform to the State Energy Conservation Standards mandated in WC Title 24, Sections T20-1401 through T20-1414. 2. Ceilings, walls, and flcors comply with the prescribed mounts of insulation. 1. Total window and skylight glazing does not exceed 165 of the gross floor area. 4. No electric service water heating proposed. 3. Electric resistance sgace heating does not exceed 10% of the annual heat load. 5. Complies with mandatory construction requirenents f Date Signature Licensed as (optional) State of '3 License B. ALTERNATIVE DESIGd STATE:ENT No. (optional) I have reviewed the plans and the required sqporting calculations and data being . submitted for the proposed residential building at (site) for (owner), and the design submitted substantially conforms by the alternative design nethod to the State Enerpv Conservation Standards mandated in WC Title 24. Sections T20-1401 through T20-1414; including mandatory construction requirements Check all items submiited to document compliance by the alternative design method. Items 1 through 4 are required for alternative designs affecting the building envelope. I 0 Form 1 , - Proje,ct Date Summary I 0 Form 2 I - Kourly and Annual Building Heat Loss Rate I 0 Fom 3 ! - Heat Transfer Coefficient, Proposed Construction Assembly """_ . .. -. I ~ I """- 0 Fom 4 - Alternative Design Summary ,' Form 5 - Life Cycle Cost Analysis for WAC Systems (Electrical Resistance Heating) 0 Forn 6 - Life Cycle Cost Analysis fot Service ?later Heating Specify Additional Supporting Date Submitted ESGIL CORPORATION (714) sao-14~~ 9320 CHES.APEAKE DR.. SC'ITE 132 SAN DIEGO, CA 92125 EC207 RESIDFATIAL ENERGY LAW STATEMENT OF PLAN CONFOWCE PLAN CHECK NO. &I -256 Effective July 1, 1978 every proposed residential building must be designed to comply with the State Residential Energy Conservation Law before a building permit can he issued. Section A or B of this form must be completed for each residential building permit application. @ STANDARD DESIGN STATBENT I have reviewed the plans being submitted for the proposed residential building at submitted substantially conform to the State Energy Conservation Standards mandated in CAC Title 24. Sections T20-1401 through T20-1414. 1. Total window and skylight glazing does not exceed 16% of the gross floor area. 2. Ceilings, walls, and flcors comply with the prescribed amounts of insulation. 3. Electric resistance s?ace heating does not exceed 10% of the annual heat load. 4. No electric service water heating proposed. 5. Complies with mandatory construction requirements (site) for (owner) and the design I I Date Signature Licensed os (optional) State of CZ License B. ALTERNATIVE DESIGN STAEXEXT No. (optional) I have reviewed the plans and the required supporting calculations and data being . submitted for the proposed residential building at (owner), and the design submitted substantially conforms (site) for by the alternative design nethod to the State Energy Ccmservation Standards mandated in CAC Title 24. Sections T20-1401 through T20-1414, including mandatory construction requirements Check all items submitted to document compliance by the alternative design method. Items 1 through 4 are required for alternative designs affecting the building envelope. -. -""" I 0 Form I , - Project Date Suamary , 0 Form 2 I - Hourly and Annual Building Heat Loss Rate I 0 Fom 3 ! - Heat Transfer Coefficient, Proposed Construction Assembly I . I - 0 - - Fors - - - 4 " ' - Alternative Design Summary 0 Form 5 - Life Cycle Cost Analysis for WAC Systems (Electrical Resistance Heating) . . EI Specify Additional Supporting Dare Submitted 0 Fora 6 - Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Service Water Heating Dare Sig,.- -*Cure Licensed as (optimal) Stare 3f CA License - (optional) Revlsed ?/3/?0 .. Air Conditioninn I I Commercial I !" I i . BRIAN SMITH ENGSNEERS, INC. Client: Windsor Company 2656 State Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 SHEET Vito & Peter J. Gerardo Carlsbad, CA 92008 6741 Corintia Street C) t I 2 I1 Job No. 5177-2 E. Brian Smith RCE 13817 July 28, 1981 EBS : yh " . Structural calculations for a proposed duplex for Mr. Vito Gerardo. 24 i ! i c . .. i 37425 $7 -@ i . . .. .. . ” . 10 0 T- 7 . . . . . . " "_.. . i L . ” . - -. . . . . . . .. - . ~... . ... . . -. . ! I I_.i~. ................. . 1 SCW.'.' Ih or .- " . I. . . ." .. " ...... - , . . . . . . - . " . . . . ... . .. .. .. . . . _. ~... "~ ............ @;, ". .. &J ce, V" .. // $5 BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. APPLIED SOIL YECNAUICS .- FOUNDATIONS SIN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 02123 SS40 RUFFIN ROAD August 13, 1981 Mr. Vito Gerard0 6741 Corintia Street Carisbod, California 92008 Subject: Project No. 81-5-21D AI ternate Footing Design Lot 589 of La Costa Meadows Unit No. 4 Carlbad, California Dear Mr. Gerordo: This is to present an alternate to the special footing design for expansive soil conditions recommended on page 2 of our previous report on this project doted June 23, 1981. It is underrtood thot the proposed footing depth is now 1.0 foot below the lowest adjacent ground surface rather than 1.5 feet as recommended in the above dated report. In order to compensate for this reduction in footing depth, it is recommended that the 1 .O foot deep footing should be reinforced with two 15 bars at 3 inches above the bottom of the footing and two #5 bors ploced 1 1/2 inches below the top of the stem wall of the footing. All other recommendations for special design presented in our previous report would still be volid. Respectfully submitted, BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. By R.C. Remer RCE .NO. 1 G332 - " PHlLlP HENKING DENTON P"l.$D1*, . ClVlL 116111~. Mr. Vito Gerordo 6741 Corintia Street Carlsbad, California 92008 BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. APPLtED SOIL MECHANICS FOUNDATIONS SAN DIEGO. CILIFOUN!A 92111 E.540 IUFFlN ROAD June 23, 1981 Subject: Project No. 81-5-210 .,I j Final Report on Compacted Filled Ground Lot 589 of La Costa Meadows Unit No. 4 Carlsbad, California \, '. . # Gentlemen: This is to report the resulk of tests ond observations made in order to inspect the compaction of filled ground placed in the proposed building area on Lot 589 of Lo Costo Meadows Unit No. 4 in Carlsbad, Colifornia. The fill was placed on June 17 and 18, 1981. The approximate area and depth of filled ground placed under our inspection in accordance with the approved specifications are shown on the attached Drawing No. 1, entitled "Location of Compacted Filled Ground." The grading plan used for the placement of filled ground, dated December 11, 1980, was prepared by Brion Smith Engineers. The approximate .locotions at which the tests were taken are shown on the attached Drawing No. 1 and the final test results are presented on page 3, under the "Toble of Test Res. ":." The laboratory determinations of the maximum dry densities and optimum moisture cont ~jf the major fill materials ore presented on page 3, under the "Loboratory Test Results.' 5 of the maximum dry densities shown in the "Table of Test Results" were combinations The tests were token on the dates indicated below: ,e. Test Number Date - 1,2 and 3 4 ond 5 June 17, 1981 June 18, 1981 The final results of tests and observc:ionr indicate that the compacted filled ground has been placed at 90 percent of the maximum dry density or greater. It hos been determined that the Fill mo:erials, cozpocted ic 90 perccni of the rnoxirntm dry dewiry, have o safe bearing value of 1,930 pcundr per qbgre Fm: for one foot wlde cs; ';rluous Fwt;ny:, founded at least 1.5 Feet below the lowe;i ac;w.tsjt cxopoc:rd K!lr:d grouni ,sldoce and within the limits of the proposed buiidir,g sl:uwr~ on Drawing No. 1. A++ Vito Gerard0 -2- June 23, 1981 Project No. 81-5-21D Approximately 2 feet of non-expansive soils were placed over the existing critically expansive soils. In order to minimize possible detrimental effects caused by these lower patentiolly expansive soils, the following special design ond precautlonr are recommended: . 1. Use continuous interconnected reinforced concrete footings, wherever pduible, and ploce these at a minimum depth of 1.5 feet below the lowest adjacent exterior final ground surfocs. If isoloted interior column Footings ore required, these should be placed at a depth of 2.0 feet below the lowest adjacent ground surface. ' 2. Reinforce and interconnect continuously with steel ban all interior and exterior footings with a minimum of one 14 bar at 3 inches above the bottom of all footings and one #4 bor placed 1 1/2 inches below the top of the stems of the footings. 3. Rehforca all concrete slob with a minimum of 6 x 6 - 10/10 welded wire fabric and provide o base layer of at least 4 inches of sand beneath all concrete slabs. A moisture barrier should be provided in the middle of the rand layer. 4. Saporote gorage slobs from perimeter footings by a 1/2 inch thickness of f-7 construction felt or equivalent, to allow independent movement of garoge slabs relative to perimeter footinp. Assure complete separation by extending the felt ,'! ,,,I over the full depth of the front thickened edge of the goroge slab. Also, cut off _I the garoge door stops at leort 1/2 inch above the slob. ;r~\ 5. It is recommended that positive drainage, 6 inches of vertical fall in 6 feet horizontally, should be provided around the perimeter of the building in landscaped,, areas. Dminage systems should also be provided to collect all runoff from roofs - and conduct the water in watertight pipes elther into the streets or storm drains. ' 11 ,. surface drainage should be prevented from ponding adjacent to or running eve" _- tops of slopes. Inlet boxes and watertight pipes should be installed when n- to comply with the above requirements. I ./ 1; ,.. , I ,. . . / 4 ,/ 1 Respectfully submitted, BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. By -&'?LC' &. R.C. Remer Distribution: (3) Addressee RCR/ir Mr. Vito Gerard0 Project No. 81-5-21D Depth of Fill Test ot Test No. in Feet - 1 1 .o 2 1 .o 3 1 .o 4 2 .o 5 2.0 -3- TABLE OF TEST RESULTS Field Dry Moisture Density % dry wt Ib/cu ft 12.9 115.9 13.2 120.0 10.1 115.3 10.4 118.7 8.1 121 .a June 23, 1981 Moximum Density Percent ib/cu ft Compaction bY 127.6 90.2 131.4 91.3 127.6 90.4 131.4 90.3 135.1 90.2 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS The maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the major fill materials as determined by the A.S.T.M. D 1557-70 method that uses 25 blows of a 10 pound rammer falling from a height of 18 inches on eoch of 5 loyers in o 4-inch diometer 1/30 cubic foot compoction cylinder, ore presented as follows: Moxirnurn Optimum Moir- Dry Density ture Content Soil Description Ib/cu ft Yo dry wt Light groy brown clayey fine to medium sond with scattered grovel 127.6 Brown silty fine to coarse sond with scottered grovel 135. I 9.0 8.3 CORlNTlA I I hl Q I I I I I I I! DRAWING NO 9/28/79 LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT APPLICATION FOR SEWER SERVICE 481-0978 Owner Is Name Double Vee IQE~ Phone No. Mailing Address LO. ~sx-w43 Randm Santa Fe. CA 92067 Service Address: NOTE: One permit for this Tract Description: lot 589. Me&$ #4 - lot has already been Assessor's Parcel No. Type of Building duplex . No. Units 1 Connection Fee $urn Lateral Size: 4" - 6'' I ' 8" Saddle - Extra Footage: - e$ Extra Depth: as 1,300.00 paid for. - Easement Connection (Pre-Pd 200.00) - 1-1 lateral Fee Ck. No/Cashs ~1.~7 : Rec'd By Prorated Sewer Service Fee Total $"-no The application must be signed by the owner (or his authorized representative) of the property to be served. The total charges must be paid to the District at the time the application is submitted. If a service lateral is required, it will be installed by the Leucadia County Water District. The seryice lateral is that part of.the sewer system that extends from or near the applicant's property line) where the service lateral is cor" Id to the main collection lfne in the street (or easement) to the point in the c'.-eet (at the applicant's building sewer. The appiicant is responsible for the .' ..uction, at the applicant's expense, of the sewer pipeline (building sewer) fr0.i . . appii- cant's plumbing to the point in the $tree.: (or easement) where a connectisn is made to the service lateral. The connection of the applicant's building sewer to the service lateral shall be made by the applicant at his expense. The connection must be made In conformity AND APPROVED BY THE DISTRICT BEFOiX THE SEWER SYSIEM MAY BE USE0 BY with the District's specifications. rules ad regulations; and IT .E INSPECTED THE APPLICANT. OR HIS AIJ:'!iORLZED REZRESE4TATiVE, IYUST NWlFY THE D: '{:T AT T!IE F. 'PLICANT. TIME INSPECTION IS DESIXD. ANY CO>i?aiCI''Ofi! bli\CIF TO THE SERVICE LAT.., . OR COLLEC- TION LINE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL AND vwxrm AY THE DISTRICT WILL BE CONS!CERE~. INVALID AND WILL NX LIE ACKNWLEOGED. 4 The prorated sewer service fee is bad u:c<a ike date tk-a District estiwter that service will begin and clt.:'t'rs the bt!?aric. ?f %he FPc;t7 YF:~T'. There will be no additional fee or ref!;::+! if vir::. ac!i':,.;'y c'.~~~Fn~es 0.7 a different dste. For succeedin9 fiscal ya'r~, the -::.re!" f~ii,. I:, x;j 1 0:: col!i,:tcd on the tax rcll in the smi: mnn.::. as pr!?~r!.y ~ta;~..~;. The under;<g,,& :;cr,s.:,.y ag,-c:.,3, !;: .-it .I*, ,;,', .. .. - .. !. . .:'. ;.,I,.x sit,$ 11 is correct and agrees LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT APPLICATION FOR SEWER SERVICE Owner's Name Victor Ottenstein . Phone No24-8788 Mailing Address P. 0. Box 1343 - RSF CA 92067 I__- Service Address: Tract Description: lot 589 Meadows 83 " Assessor's Parcel Ro. ""___ Type of Building s.f. No. Units 1 Connection Fee $- Lateral Size: 4" - GI' - 8" - Saddle - Easement Connection ( pre- pd 200 .OO) Extra Footage: - I Q L" Extra Depth: @$ 400.00 Rec'd By WllliW Lateral Fee Prorated Sewer Total Service Fee $%E."- The application must be signed by the owner (or his authorized representative) of time the application is submitted. the property to be served. The total charges must be paid to the District at Ihe If a service lateral is required, it will be installed by the Leucadia County Water District. The service lateral is that part of the sewer system that extends from or near the applicant's property line) where the service lateral is connected to the main collection line in the street (or easement) to the point in the street (at at the applicant's expense, of the sewer pipeline (building sewer) frosn . ' ap?li- the applicant's building sewer. The applicant is responsible for the construction, cant's plumbing to the poi,-: in the stree; (or easement) where a com : to the service lateral. is made The connection of the applicant's building sewer to the service lateral il he made bv the applicant at his exoense. The connection must be made in Cor. mi+.! with tihe District's specifications, rules and regulations; and IT MUST BE ;NS;-:. -ED AND APPROVED BY THE DISTRICT BEFORE THE SEWEX SYSTEM MAY BE USED BY THE AIPLICA i. THE APPLICANT, OR HIS AUTHORlZEO RC?I.XSEbiTATIVE, MUST NOTIFY THE DISTRICT AT TI ~.~~. ~- . ~ ~ T!ME INSPECTION IS DESIRED. ANY CONNECTION "ADE: TO THE SERVICE LhTTERAL OR COCLLC- TION LINE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL A?:D INSPECTION BY TiiE DISTRICT WILL BE CONSIDEhED INVALIE AND WILL NOT BE ACKNOWLEDGED. The prorated sewer service fee is based upon .the date the District estimates th& service will begin and covers the baiance cf the fiscal year. There will be no additional fee or refwd if service actually cmences on a different date. For succeeding fiscal years, the sewer sxvice f;.e wlll be collected on the tax roll in the same manner as prspen-:y ta..::.s. The undersigned hereby agree:- thJt t','? abze .Infa': 1z.hn g'iven is correct and agrees to the corditions as sratxl. SERVICES DEVELOPMENTAL August 18, 1981 CARLSBAD. CAlSFORNIA 92008 1200 ELM AVENUE , M;. Jerry Sprtht ..- SawDiego Gas & .Electric Co. 4940 Carlsbad Blvd. California (92008) Carlsbad i . *.A , ::A SUBJECT: DUPLEX 2748-2750 ARGONAUTA STREET (Add ress) CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA (92008) UITO P. GERARD0 (6741 CORINTIA ST .CARLSBAD, CALIF.) .. (Owner) In accordance with Sections 301, 505 and (1301 or 1401) of the Uniform Building Code, this agency has determined that there are two (2) buildings in subject proj.ect and will issue separate building permits to cover these g,roup R3 (R1 or R3 occupancies. .. .. .. .~ . . . . ' ': : .. .. .. .. ... . , CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 438-5568 PERMIT FOR WORK ON CITY RIGHT OF WAY FOR APqLlCANT TO FILL IN BUILDING 27~ & ADDRESS I I STARTING DATE EST. DATE OF COMPLETION that the information siren is correct. I hereby IclmowIW~ that I have read this application and state I agree to comply With a11 .ppIic.blo city Ordinances and state SIGNATURE OF PERMITTEE ADDRESS 4 AUTHORIZE0 AGENT ENDORSEMENT OF COMPLIANCE wllh ai1 requiremantr of the CarlsDdd Onvironmental vrofection I have examined this appl!cation and have found that it compliel ordinance. I DATE Planning Dbrector COPIES: BLUE-OFFICE YELLOW-INSPECTOR GREEN-FINAh - N? 04042 *1 SSUEO BY 'ALIDATION STAMP PERMITTEE CALL CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FOR INSPECTIONS 24 Hours Notice Reauired. CHECKED BELOW: DATE INSPECTOR 0 EXCAVATION 0 FORMS 0 BACKFILL 0 PAVEMENT 0 PRIOR TO BACKFILL 0 PRIOR TO CUR8 CUT SPECIAL CONDITIONS (A) ALL WORK MUST CONFORM TO REWIREMENT': 9F CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARDS, PLANS 40 A P W A SPFPIFlCATIOU NCE WITH TRAFFIC MUST BE KEP I A -. . . -. . . . -. ". IBl INTERFERE1 ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~ MINIMUM. IC) PERMIT EXPIRES SIX 16) MONTHS FROM DA ' 3F ID) OTHER ISSUANCE UNLESS EXTENDED BY CITY ENGlh .R. . -. . . . .. - - - PERMiT FEE /- t * ,/!e- TOTAL $ APPROVAL FOR RELEASE INSPECTOR'S e I ..., ~,. .- . .