Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2762 LOKER AVE W; ; CB991702; Permit; f) lfi '&O\ City of Carlsbad 07/28/1999 Commercial/Industrial Permit Permit No: CB991702 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 438-3101 Job Address: 2762 LOKER AV WEST CBAD Permit Type: Tl Sub Type: INDUST Parcel No: Lot#: O Valuation: $2,000.00 Construction Type: NEW Occupancy Group: Reference #: Project Title: ASYMTEK RELOCAT EXIST RACK FROM OTHER BLDG Applicant: ANDERSON HOWARD 2194 CARMEL VALLEY RD DEL MAR CA 619-7 55-5009 Total Fees: $73.02 Building Permit Add'I Building Permit Fee : Plan Check Add'I Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'I Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'I Pot. Water Con. Fee Inspector. &_ Owner: $0.00 FINAL APPROVAL Date: g. {·ff Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: Clearance: ISSUED 05/04/1999 DT 07/26/1999 07/26/1999 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $73.02 NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been qiven a NOTICE similar to this or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise exoired. CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 02 ?J .. 02 / FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PERMIT APPLICATION PLAN CHECK NO.C/317(70 2- CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 EST. VAL. __________ _ Plan Ck. Deposit ________ _ Validated By_-=7>........_1 ___ _,.. __ _ Date 1/-1/72 Address (include Bldg/Suite #J Business Name (at this address) l)tJt,--4=l=z-. \t--J C--t'f¼ O.p-~ Lor: oq or ~f>S\-Q :t:@>:e:C#-81 ~4 Co Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units 2-0tl/ -07'2 I .-D °l Assessor's Parcel # ~ Existing Use Proposed Use Uk:DcAr:::I ~E,, e)(t Sw(,, ~LS. r::--rwl-1 ~ Bl,,{)6 mSToU::--Sf?;)~ Description of Work SQ. FT. #of Stories # of Bedrooms Name Address City i~• ,·:APP,!;:1_9, . , Q Cqntra¢t9r. 7:J'~gent,fqr C:9.ntr~oto_r"'{J pVl(ner ,~Agent f9(0-wt1er· "· .. , -: .. ·:".,,, ,, __ ---..... ~. -z_.,. ~~ u p. . QA-. Name Address · City ;4< . PROPl;RiY OWNER : ,, •. Name Address ,?, ,, COr,,!IRAQJQl;l.~ COijJ))\~YNA!Yllf , . . ' · City S,tate/Zip Telephone# (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty qf not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). Name ;q..-r(A.J" (£G.vl/'· Cc,, Address 70tJ<.{ Cl4A2o'(.. ~,/JO City S,1-)).{ {)J/!Go State/Zip ~ Telephone# 6/C,-o/ff-~OcJ . . . et;2./.l.( State License# -,:S::;3 J'ir :2 0 License Class CG: I City Business License # --~----- / ~0.3'1 q ( Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License# _________ _ f~:-"WPR!C1;·1\$~-~c;1)~1p1;N,s1\ticfN: -:-: . . · · · . ··-· ,, . · ..... Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: ~ I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. tJ I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: / / Insurance Company Egf:lf.hoH'S" 1.J..l.r. Policy No. wAJ 9 fC 2,,j<( /9t?c/ Expiration Date ¾ 'jtJO (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100) OR LESS) D CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. · WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,0 , in addition to t e cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor ode, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE ' DATE ZR. ' !.?., . , QW,NJ:JH~l.JlkQi;l3,.. _Q!A' . . . . . . , .. , I hereby affirm that I a exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: D I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensatfon, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an own'er of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). D I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). D I am exempt under Section ______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: .i. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materi.als for construction of the proposed property improvement. D YES ONO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted _with the rollowing person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include.name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): , 5. I will provide some of the ·work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number I type of work): _______ ~------------------------------------------------ PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE ______________________ _ ;~i;>Mi>~i:;r1trr:t11~ ·sECliQf( FQ& 'rJpfJ;R£.SIDENTfAii ~u1t.t>il'\!G :~~-iJN!tt:~ Ql'\!!, Y · · ·· DATE ________ _ Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES D NO Is the applicant or future building occupant.required to obtain a permit from the air pollution· control district or air quality management district? 0 YES D NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? D YE~ 0 NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. [8i;;,~ __ ¢o1'f~lR!iCtt9.N·~~1?1NG-~CENqv~--" ----~ :~~~ ~~.:_: -.,-,, ----~ ~~.,,_~-~--~---~ -~-¥/"'~" "",-~,,·v -· ;•·------~-~;·-~ ,,,, I hereby affirm that there is a constru~tion lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME______________ LENDER'S ADDRESS ________________________ _ 19.t-_J!.Pl?~lGAJ':ff.G~Jrf!f.J,,q-AJJQtf'. . _. -. . . · : : ; , · , . . : , , " , · · . . · .,. , , .· "· ;; .. · ... , ·, , : '' ~. , I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building coristruction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit~ of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATIQN: Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not comme d within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after ' ommenc d o a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE6iiiei~~i~~========~== DATE M-NJ &,q Cz YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance City of Carlsbad Inspection Request Permit# CB991702 Title: ASYMTEK For: 8/3/99 Description: RELOCAT EXIST RACK FROM OTHER BLDG Type: Tl Sub Type: IN DUST Job Address: 2762 LOKER AV WEST Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT ANDERSON HOWARD Owner: Remarks: HI BAY RACKING SYSTEM Total Time: Inspector Assignment: Phone: 7609307229 lnspectoM- Requested By: WILLIAM RUFFNER Entered By: CHRISTINE CD 14 Description Act Comments -F-ra_m_e-/S-t-ee_l/_B_o_lti_n_g/W_e_ld-in_g_¥-__ 6_, _AJ_/J,'_V _____________ _ Inspection History Date Description Act lnsp Comments EsGil Corporation 2n Partnersliip witli (}ovemment for '.BuiUing Safety DATE: 6/3/99 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-1702 SET: II CJ PLAN REVIEWER CJ FILE PROJECT ADDRESS: 2762 Loker Avenue West PROJECT NAME: Asymtek Storage Racks D D D D D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: i()r (by: ) Fax /j /9.//~i Mail Teleph~ I-' Fax In Person / f ~ V '-l7 REMARKS: 1. Fire Department approval is required. 2. City to verify that the path of travel from the handicapped parking space to the rack area and the bathroom serving the rack area comply with the current disabled access requirement,t r1ase slip revised sheet LM-3 into city l.set.(at building department) w By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 5/26 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation 'l,n Partnersfiip witfi qovemment for tJ3ui[aing Safety DATE: 5/13/99 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-1702 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2762 Loker Avenue West PROJECT NAME: Asymtek Storage Racks SET:I D APPLICANT ~ D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The pla~s transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith wili ·substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes · when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ~ The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. ~ The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Howard Anderson 2194 Carmel Valley Road Del Mar CA 92014 ~ Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person D REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 5/4 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 h ''!fl ' -· Carlsbad 99-1702 5/13/99 GENERAL PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2762 Loker Avenue West DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 5/4 REVIEWED BY: David Yao -FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-1702 DATE REVIEW COMPLETED: 5/13/99 This plan review is limited to the teqhnical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. 2. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. 3. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? 0 Yes 0 No 4. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with Title 24 and 1994 use. 5. UBC Section 107.2 requires the Building Official to determine the total value of all construction work proposed under this perm_it. Please provide a signed copy of the designer's or contractor's construction cost estimate of all work proposed. Carlsbad 99-1702 5/13/99 6. The tenant space and new and/or existing facilities serving the remodeled area must be accessible to and functional for the physically disabled. Title 24, Part 2. 7. Obtain Fire Department approval for groups F, Mand S occupancy storage_ per USC Sections 306.8, 309.8 and 311.8. 8. Indicate the clearance from the new racks to the existing building walls and building columns per Section 1631.2.11. The clearance must be at least 3Rj8 times the deflections of both the rack and the building. 9. Provide forklift protection per Section 2231.5. Recheck the "pallet'' racks as follows: 10. Sheet 3 of the calculation shows LBF356 beam will be used. Beam LBF356 is not in the beam schedule.(2/LM-3). (LBF354?) 11. Sheet 4 of the calculation shows the equation for the period has been· approved by ICBO. Provide evidence to show it. (letter? Approval number?) 12. Provide a seismic distribution of lateral loads per Section 2237.5.2. 13. Recheck all connections on sheet LM-3 as follows: a) The rivet bearing capacity is only dtF u = 0.406(0.0747)65 = 2 kips. b) Provide calculations for all beam to bracket weld capacities per Section 2230 (allowable weld stress is the member thickness times 26 ksi times 1.33, or the weld stress, whichever is lower). c) Check the bracket maximum weak axis moment. 14. Indicate the safety pin size and verify it is adequate for the 1000# load. Section 2236.1. 15. Recheck the base plate anchors as follows: a) Check the transverse seismic for overturning with only the top shelf loaded with the force acting through the center of gravity of the top load per Section 2237.7. 16. Provide calculations for the column weak axis bending plus axial for transverse seismic loading. The axial load is the maximum compression load at the base from vertical plus seismic overturning. The column moment will probably be maximum for the lateral load from the base plate to the first diagonal brace (not only to the first horizontal member). 17. Check the slab stress for the maximum transverse overturning axial load. Show the slab thickness on the plans per the calculations. Check the maximum slab stress under the base plate per Section 1915.4.2. 18. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to Carlsbad 99-1702 5/13/99 perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact David Yao at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. .. ,,, Carlsbad 99-1702 5/13/99 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: David Yao BUILDING ADDRESS: 2762 Loker Avenue West BUILDING OCCUPANCY: BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA (ft. 2) Storage racks Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE PLAN CHECK NO.: 99-1702 DATE: 5/13/99 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VALUATION VALUE MULTIPLIER -($) 20000 (estimate) D 199 USC Building Permit Fee IZ! Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance:$ 201.08 D 199 UBC Plan Check Fee IZ! Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 130.7 Type of Review: D Complete Review D Structural Only D Hourly D Repetitive Fee Applicable D Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 104.56 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS PERMIT NUMBER CB 9 9 l 7 0 ~ DATE s 1{09 ADDREss ..... 2 _____ 7_,_J ___ L~o ..... K ..... ~_r ___ f-\_v_Q __ Lu_. _______ _ RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL ADDmON MINOR < < $1 o,000.00, OTHER ? Cl l le+ PLANNER~ C:\WP51\FILES\BLDG.FRM c:-IMPROVEME~ PLAZA CAMINO REAL VILLAGE FAIRE COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING Rev 11115/90 - ·carlsbad Fire Department 990197 2560 Orion Way Carlsbad, CA 92008 Fire Prevention (760) 931-2121 Plan Review Requirements Category: Building Plan Date of Report: 07/12/1999 Reviewed by: \-\vt-h. \\~ ------------,--- Name: C,,-,.3 o \\ J. ..... l-e_) f.i~c.. A-i:.ii/!.L--L.)A. Address: City, State: Plan Checker: Job #: 990197 Job Name: Asymtek Racks Bldg #: CB991702 ------------------ Job Address: 2762 Loker Av Ste. or Bldg. No. [XI Approved D Approved Subject to D Incomplete Review The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modificat_ions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and/ or specifications to this office for review and approval. 1st 2nd 3rd Other Agency ID FD Job #i_: 990197 FD File# ------- .. , Asymtek LMTRacks Location: Carlsbad Airport Business Center 2762 Loker Ave. West Carlsbad, CA Prepared For: Howard Anderson & Associates 2194 Carmel Valley Road Del Mar, CA Prepared By: Peter S. Higgins And Associates Consulting Structural Engineers 1225-F North Pacific Glendale, CA (818) 549-0072 REPRODUCTIONS OF SIGNED COPIES ARE INVALID ~ I I Project: Asymtek April 30, 1999 PETER S. IDGGINS AND ASSOCIATES CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Table of Contents Job No. 3685 Sheet ii 1 Reference Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 Documents . .. .. .. . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . . 1 1.1.1 Drawings ...................................................................................... 1 1.1.1.1 By Peter S. Higgins and Associates . .. .. . . . .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. . .. . . . . 1 1.1.1.2 By Others .............................................................................. 1 1.2 Loads .................................................................................................. 1 1.2.1 Vertical (Dead plus Live) .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . . .. .. . . .. . .. . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . 1 1.2.2 Seismic ......................................................................................... 1 1.2.2.1 General (UBC 2222) .. .. . . . .. .. .. .. .. . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . 2 1.2.2.2 Short Formulation .. . .. . . .. . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . .. .. .. . .. . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 2 2 Evaluation of Existing Storage Racks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.1 Selective Rack Type A . .. . . .. . . . . .. . .. . .. .. .. .. . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . 2 2.1.1 Components and Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.1.2 Check Beams . . .. .. . . . .. .. . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . .. . .. .. .. .. . . . 3 2.1.2.1 Design Forces . . .. .. . .. . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . .. .. . .. . . .. .. . .. . . . . .. .. .. . .. .. .. 3 2.1.2.1.1 LBF356 < 108" .............................................................. 3 2.1.2.1.2 Beam Properties ............................................................... 3 2.1.3 Check Posts (Dead plus Live Loads) .. .. . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. .. .. 4 2.1.3.1 Load to Post ........................................................................... 4 2.1.3.2 Post Properties (net section) ........................................................ 4 2.1.4 Longitudinal Seismic . . .. . . . . .. . .. .. . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1.4.1 Base Shear ............................................................................. 4 2.1.4.2 Design Forces ......................................................................... 5 2.1.4.3 Post -Combined Stresses ........................................................... 5 2.1.4.4 Beam Connections .................................................................... 5 2.1.4.4.1 Design Forces ................................................................. 5 2.1.4.4.2 Connection Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1.5 Transverse Seismic .. . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . .. . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . 5 2.1.5.1 Base Shear ............................................................................. 5 2.1.5.2 Design Forces ......................................................................... 6 2.1.5.2.1 Stability ......................................................................... 6 2.1.5 .2.2 Braces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.1.5.2.2.1 Design Force ........................................................... 6 2.1.5 .2.2.1.1 Compression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.1.5.2.2.2 Brace Capacity ......................................................... 6 ©Copyright by Peter S. Higgins and Associates. Provided as an instrument of service. Copying by written permission only. Project: Asymtek April 30, 1999 1 Reference Data PETER S. IDGGINS AND ASSOCIATES CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Job No. 3685 Sheet 1 This calculation reviews the installation of shelving for structural adequacy. The sealing of drawings is for the structural review of the gondolas only. Other information is not reviewed, nor approved. 1.1 Documents 1.1.1 Drawings 1.1.1.1 By Peter S. Higgins and Associates LM-3 1.1.1.2 By Others Howard Anderson & Associates Drawing Number Asymtek Lot-09 Ex. Bid. II 1.2 Loads 1.2.1 Vertical (Dead plus Live) Design Loads Sheet A-1 A-2 Max. = 2.0 kips/Level upto 4.0 kips/Bay Design beams for 25 % impact/Unit Load 1.2.2 Seismic Rev Remarks -Rack Layout Plan -Elevations & Sections ©Copyright by Peter S. Higgins and Associates. Provided as an instrument of service. Copying by written permission only. PETER S. IDGGINS AND ASSOCIATES CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Project: Asymtek April 30, 1999 1.2.2.1 General {UBC 2222) 0.8ZNul Cuf 2.5Cal 0.11 CaJW ~ ----W~ V = -W ~ ---W Where: For default soils: Ca=0.44Na Cv=0.64Nv I=l.00 1.0::SNa= ::S 1.5 1.0::SNv= :::;2.0 Substitution yields: R RT R For working stress designs: R=(l.4)(5.6)=7.84 Longitudinal (moment frame) (1.4)(4.4)=6.16 Transverse (braced) T=Structure Period (sec) W=Rack+Contents per 2228.5.1 0.082N u 0.048N a W ~ 0.041 N uw:,; V long= T W:,; 0.140N a W 0.104Nu 0.048N aW :5 0.052N uW ~ Vtrans = T W ~ 0.179N aW For sites distant from major faults: Na =Nv= 1.0: Substitution yields: 0.048W::; V long= 0.~82 W::; 0.140 W 0.052W ~ V trans= O. ~04 w::; 0.179W 1.2.2.2 Short Formulation Job No. 3685 Sheet 2 If racks are interconnected such that 4 posts in each direction resist lateral load, then using code maximum loads, and W=rack rated capacity: For sites distant from major faults: Na=Nv=l.0: V long::; 0.140W = 0.140(DL + LL/2)"'" 0.070W V trans :5 0.179W = 0. l 79(DL + LL/2)"'" 0.090W (since DL < < LL) This condition is usually satisfied by interconnecting back to back rows of rack, or by tieing single rows across the aisles. 2 Evaluation of Existing Storage Racks 2.1 Selective Rack Type A This design includes by inspection rack types B,C,D,E,F,G,H,J,K,L,M,N,T,U & V which have similar components and geometry for similar or reduced design loads per level for a similar or reduced height to the first beam level. @Copyright by Peter S. Higgins and Associates. Provided as an instrument of service. Copying by written permission only. PETER S. IDGGINS AND ASSOCIATES CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Project: Asymtek April 30, 1999 2.1.1 Components and Geometry w b a I W=max 108" a=max 76" b=max 76" Beam Type-ALL LBF356 < 108" 2.1.2 Check Beams 2.1.2.1 Design Forces 2.1.2.1.1 LBF356 <108" L,W M 5 (2)(8) = 15.2 inch kips 2.1.2.1.2 Beam Properties 0.8811 - 2.75" LBF356 t=16 ga Sx=0.62 in3 lx=l.16 in4 H D ... .. H=168" D=min. 42" ly=48" Upright Type-ALL LM-20 (3x3x 14 Ga.) S < M mm-0.6Fy =0.51 in3 Job No. 3685 Sheet 3 ©Copyright by Peter S. Higgins and Associates. Provided as an instrument of service. Copying by written permission only. PETERS. IDGGINS AND ASSOCIATES CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Project: Asymtek April 30, 1999 2.1.3 Check Posts (Dead plus Live Loads) 2.1.3.1 Load to Post p < (# of levels)([) -2 =2.0 kips 2.1.3.2 Post Properties (net section) 3" .. ~ 2.1.4 Longitudinal Seismic 2.1.4.1 Base Shear LM20 t=0.075 in X As =0.58 in2 Sx=0.67 in3 rx=l.31 in Sy=0.46 _in3 ry=l.12 m lylry=43 a/rx=58 Fa=23.l ksi P3 =13.4.K -"k Mxa=20.1- Job No. 3685 Sheet 4 Determine Period-Rayleigh Method -This equation has been reviewed and approved by ICBO for use with steel storage racks. n ( ( l 1 ) ) 112 T~--Wl 2 --+-(2n2 +2n+l) ~5G 6El Ke Where: G = Gravitational acceleration W = Load per level 1 = Spacing between levels E = Young's Modulus I = Moment of inertia of post Kg = Connector stiffness n = Number of levels For units = kips, inches, seconds G = 386 in/sec2 E = 29,000 kips/in2 The equation reduces to: 1 ( ( l 1 ) ) 112 T~ 14 Wl2 174,000/+ Ke (2n2+2n+ 1) The column stiffness component may be conservatively ignored reducing the formula to: T~ ---(2n2 +2n+l) ( w z2 ) 112 196K0 For this configuration W = 2.0 kips/Level 1 = 76 inches Kg =600 (300 inch kips per radian per connector) @Copyright by Peter S. Higgins and Associates. Provided as an instrument of service. Copying by written permission only. Project: Asymtek April 30, 1999 PETER S. HIGGINS AND ASSOCIATES CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS Substituting yields: T> 1.1 sec Thus: V<0.086W 2.1.4.2 Design Forces P::;2.ok; v ::;o.11k Job No. 3685 Sheet 5 M :S Max of [Va-(2.3)P] & Va/2 (fixity due to width of base plate) :S [(0.17)(76) -(2.3)(2.0)] or (0.17x76)/2 =8.5 inch kips 2.1.4.3 Post -Combined Stresses 2.1.4.4 Beam Connections 2.1.4.4.1 Design Forces p M -+- Pa Ma =0.57 :S 1.33 O.K. 2.1.4.4.2 Connection Capacity • 7 /1 6" diam. Rivet Va = 2.5 kips 2.1.5 Transverse Seismic 2.1.5.1 Base Shear Standard Connection Ma=(l.33)(2.5)(4)=13.3 ink O.K. Use Code Default Values for Ca & R V=0.179W=0.72k/Bay- @Copyright by Peter S. Higgins and Associates. Provided as an instrument of service. Copying by written permission only. Project: Asymtek Apri130, 1999 PETERS. IDGGINS AND ASSOCIATES CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 2.1.5.2 Design Forces D .. ... h' =114.0 inches Peq=l.9 kips Job No. 3685 Sheet 6 Note: Bracing shown is schematic -see this section, sub- section .2 for actual geometry. 2.1.5.2.1 Stability Peq::S Po+ L -Stable-No Uplift. Anchors provide added Factor of Safety. Use min. 1/2" diam. ICBO approved expansion anchors. O.K. Minimum embedment 2.5" into slab. 2.1.5.2.2 Braces 2.1.5.2.2.1 Design Force 2.1.5.2.2.1.1 Compression Pbr::;'.l.Ok 2.1.5.2.2.2 Brace Capacity t t=0.060" 11 4 -1~ Anet=0.26 in2 11 rmin=0.38 in 2 Q=0.82 L kl F& Pa (in) r (ks1) (k) 54 142 7.40 2.56 O.K. ®Copyright by Peter S. Higgins and Associates. Provided as an instrument of service. Copying by written permission only.