Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2775 CARLSBAD BLVD; ; 80-501; Permit1 hereby affdino aaencv 1a =;•m that thT the nnrD 2n tO3 _.11 Ul3 ...1 »B 0iiM.tructionthp uunrk-provisions or!CONSTI-O T-UCTION 1m~rOZo>o lis permitin^=CTnQ.<D<Dng go Labor Co-fe, y.Ou must to33"S0•oIf o3aSoSCDOO3•DCDU>E-a<_SIIS NOTICE TO Atificate of ExePUCANTiplion, yo« =if"c i*— (DCL -iE3CD DlO 3T.ing thisiome subthe Worker' (C.)ompensa'o'rD)So^person in any3lanner saDJoET<DOO3o sEL w0 0"3 *2. n 1 certify thawhich this pera in the peilit Is issu'ID -i.Q. 0~33- S• |8°the work: employ(This sectiomit is for ofieu rid red d°S51or less).33OiQO£ya CERTIFIWORKERS;ATE OF iCOMPENw3>>— 2z IJ|zFROMURANCEc —n 3-3- ID an "s 3100 °° 2W O S ^ CD3TI T)O 0s-< > -< -ootj:t>^at 5g spso = 9sO cp•< jat —j —51 =*•CB CP"* S:c ^33-p.E-*rDlIO(D _DUlcuDnpo~*0>flID5Q.oO CD3MC3o0)CD3.o2.CDgoS-CD -5fsS. w3 0- Sw ^K m_ zIT WIs^3OJ zn _cp OIpl|0 H0 °§ Z S 3 ° 3^ < cp— & S —« s z f g 2. ip-^sn3»3-oSS3«S--rt -^ ^. » «_3£3^ -„.3 JB 01 CL SC < ^ y"t -*• O* n^s- *J i —!lf2 w o*: tu S1 • r "ocp o o uT c 01'•<=O CD< S — (D -Q— — -3 i-i :r E.S TJIs Q. Q. o !5 en o —': O T3 » CB: < = a at = SSH u n y,«-•=•- —^ oCD C.r* a_. •<3 CD cp O^12; m3 ** o . n3 5 a.™ §!»2. * «• = ™* * 3„ cr 2. g ™ ft -'3 5 --j ^ Q. OR3S.-g Tco a ^' S — o. _,' 3 O„ z"- ~& -a tfli -, — X •—« CP o 01! o " 5- ff ^ o ;£• CD•< 3 i 18- = 5r g 5= S«iP»:Hiilii>sz i« *0 >•" <1 2« >TlZm <If 1 HAVE CAREFULLY AMINED THHEREBY CERTIFY THAV ALL INFORMAFURTHER CERTIFY AND AGREE IF A PCOUNTY AND STATE LAWS GOVERNINSPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. 1. ALSO AUESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAININSPECTION VALIDATE* CWSOV- HO. &0-<50\ b) M-. ftw- aAM pop.€*tr. M01B6> ^HT NO- 7?fj$-coes Nor (3 caver. ^ CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT" 1275 ELM AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CA S2008 } 438_552l P.O. PLAN CHECK REPORT APPVD. PROJECT ARCH 1TPCT >/ ^T~- '£*«/ ^^-o^- OWNIPB nCCUPAN^V/>ff»«v /^ /^-^CONftT. u D SPRINKLEREO D TENANT IMP. ADDRESS ADDRESS (^ TOTAL SO. FT. PHONP >^>*-S PHONF ^d?d? STOBIPS ''??$' / Approval of plans is predicated on making the following corrections. All circled items shall be noted under separate heading "FIRE DEPT. NOTES", items checked indicate corrections or additions. A copy of the final site plan, all floor plans and sheets _ : _ __ _ : _ shall be submitted to the Rre Department in addition to sets for the Building Department. Rechecks by appointment only. 1. Fire Dept final inspection required. Schedule all inspections 24 hours in advance. Phone (714) 538-3551. (jp Fire extinguishers shall be provided. Type, location and number to be determined by fire inspector. 3. Storage, dispensing or use of any flammable or combustible liquids, flammable gases and hazardous chemicals shall comply with Uniform Fire Code regulations. 4. Bui!dlng{s) not approved for high piled combustible stock. Storage in closely packed piles shall not exceed 1 5 feet in height, 1 2 feet on pallets or in racks and 6 feet for tires, plastics and some flammable liquids. If high slock piling is to be done, comply with Uniform Fire Code. Article 35 or 81. 5. Medical gas system(s) shall comply with N.F.P.A. Standard 56F. 6. Fire sprinkler systems(s) per N.F.P.A. Standard _ shall be provided to protect 7. Dry chemical extinguishing system(s) shall be installed per N.F.P.A. Standard 96 to protect cooking equipment and exhaust system. 8. Plans of ___ _ _ _ , _ __. _ _ _ system(s) shall be approved by the Fire Dept. prior to installation of system(s). D 9. Show legal address(es) on site plan and sheets _ . _ . D 1 0. tShowsize and location of address numbers which shall be plainly visible from roadway building is addressee!. D 11. Show on site plan locations of all nearby proposed or existing hydrants within 200 feet .D 12. Hydrant(s) shall bo provided and located _ . _ . _ ... Show location^) on site plan. Fire Flow:gpm for hours from hydrants D 13- Access for fire apparatus is not adequate. Provide D 14.shall be of hour construction with openings protected with hour assemblies. G 15. A mechanical ventilation system providing minimum G air changes per hour shall be provided in _. Exhaust air shall be taken within 1 2 inches of floor with nvAe-up air inlets located on opposite side of room within 12 inches of floor. ir 16. Comply wi!h regulations on aUachcd sheet(s). _ , " Pl.m Examine/ D Report mailed to architect D Met with Date /F •* 'CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT * '275 ELM AVE., CARLSBAD, CA 52008 (yl/l) i,38.5521 PLAN CHECK REPORT O •/ ^^cV&*=^£ ADDRESS • ^ ^ ^^ (!L «*•*-& pt*4& -- ggM*C~PROJECT O • cV*= ADDRESS Drapes and other decorative materials shall be flame retardant. Certification thereof shaft be provided. Exits, exit lights, fire alarm stations, hose cabinets and extinguisher locations shall not be concealed by decorative material. 18/) Interior finish shall conform with Title 2$/California Administrative* Code regulations. Fireplaces and other appliances employing open flames shall have metallic guards. 20. Loose chairs exceeding 299 shall be bonded together in groups of 3' or more. 21 . Storage and janitor closets shall be of one-hour construction with alt openings protected with 3/4 hour self closing and latching assemblies. 22. An approved fire alarm or two-way communication system shall be provided per Title 24. California Administrative Code. 23. An occupant capacity sign, with minimum one Inch letters and numbers, shall be posted near mam exit . ( _ - square feet per person). - • . 24. Exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. 25. .AMTHISDOORMUSTaEMAINUNLOCKEDWHENEVERTHEPUBLIClSPRESENrsign,withmmimumone Inch letters, shall be provided adjacent to main exit door _ _ , 26. "EXIT" signs shall be in block letters minimum 6 inches high. Luminance on face of sign shall be 50 tux. D 27. "EXIT' signs shall be electrically illuminated and energized from separate circuits. Show on electrical plan (3). D 28. One of the above circuits shall be part of the emergency lighting system. D 29. An "EXIT sign shall be posted over exit door _ _ „ and directional signs located D 30.' Approved panic hardware shall be provided on exit doors _i Show locations on floor plan(s). .. Show on door schedule. D 31. Corridor shall be of one-hour construction with door openings protected with 20 minute self closing and latching assemblies. D 32. An additional exit door shall be provided in _ per Uniform Building Code, Chapter 33. [J33./i DaU Los 4-0 LL. - 7J-73 60= 4 -4-x. uJ =. 7* ~ T M: \i-L.F-ir a 1 t (2-liocj V ^ 2?+. o O , 14 4 4 T- 5 x= ! 2 0 ^ O A */ - -<^s-*/'c. ^ -" ' -i f-j . F: < KL: - . ? -2 x I ( ' , ) / ... •_, -• 'Z v ^ >< , -T { J) ^ ;- <T ! -r i - -. f '-— 'N . y_, --, E A'_ •= ' • ;.J X ^<J^.L_\^. \T"—/ * ii.P 6 r. v :. c c /—^ . - ts * John R Landry Inc. 1011 MoMvalt ttr**t , C*H«*fM* MCHITICTUM • PUNNING M* ''i & •• t'-c" u 37.2. IV* 4 X - \\ PRELIMINARY SOIL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED ADDITION ST. MICHAELS EPISCOPAL CHURCH 2775 CARLSBAD BOULEVARD CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA FOR JOHN LANDRY, INC. 2921 ROOSEVELT STREET CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 22 DECEMBER 1980 30B NO. 80-398P CLAUDE B. PARKER GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT OFFICE 740 METCALF, STE. 7 • ESCOND1DO, CA 92025 (714)741-2592 HOME 1922 HOWE PL. " ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 (714)746-6182 CIVIL ENGINEER #18.987 GEOLOGIST #512 CERT. ENG. GEOLOGIST #922 CLAUDE B. PARKER GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT OFFICE 740METCALFSTE 7 CIVIL ENGINEER #18,987 (714) 741-2592 ESCONDIDO, CA _--. „-.„ *KIIHOME 1922 Howe PI. 92025 GEOLOGIST #512 17141 746-6182 CERT. ENG. GEOLOGIST #922 22 December 1980 John Landry , Inc. 2921 Roosevelt Street Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Mr. Bill Booth RE: Job No. 8D-398P Proposed Addition St. Michaels Episcopal Church 2775 Carlsbad Boulevard Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Booth: Enclosed is my report of the Preliminary Soil Investigation done in accordance with your instructions far the above referenced site. The investigation consists of three test holes dug to depths of 2 to 4 feet belou the existing ground surface. Appropriate laboratory testing and engineering analyses were performed. The results of this investigation along uith my recommendations are to be found in the accompanying report. In summary, it is my opinion that there are no unusual soil or geologic conditions uhich would preclude or greatly hinder the development of the project, provided the recommen- dations contained herein are followed. If there are any questions or problems, please feel free to contact me at anytime in the future. Respectfully submitted, CLAUDE B. PARKER CBP:bl TABLE OF CONTENTS I. General Information II. Purpose of Investigation III. Field Investigation A. Surface Conditions B. Test Holes C. Subsurface Conditions IV. Tests and Results A. Grain Size Analyses B. Density Tests C. Direct Shear Test V. Bearing Capacity VI. Conclusions and Recommendations VII. Reference Page 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 5 7 APPENDIX -Plot Plan Log of Test Holes Specifications for Construction of Controlled Fills Unified Soil Classification Chart Plate 1 2 CLAUDE B. PARKER GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT OFFICE 740 METCALF, STE. 7 • ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 (714)741-2592 HOME 1922 HOWE PL. • ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 (714)746-6182 CIVIL ENGINEER *18,987 GEOLOGIST #512 CERT. ENG. GEOLOGIST *922 II PRELIMINARY SOIL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED ADDITION ST. MICHAELS EPISCOPAL CHURCH 2775 CARLSBAD BOULEVARD CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA GENERAL INFORMATION A Preliminary Soil Investigation has been completed for the above mentioned site legally described as southerly 200' of Blk 6, Map 775, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California. The site is located on the NU Corner of Cedar Avenue and Carlsbad Boulevard. It is understood the site is planned for a one story uood frame library addition to be constructed on the south side of the existing Parish Hall. The foundation uill use continuous concrete uall footings uith a uooden floor. The only grading uill be some recompaction of the loose surface soil and perhaps • some import fill to attain grade. PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION The purpose of this investigation is to determine the following: 1 - the existing soil conditions, 2 - the presence and effect of any expansive soil or existing fill, 3 - the allowable soil bearing pressures, 4 - the presence of near surface bedrock or soft compressible soil, 5 - any construction problems that can be anticipated and to make appropriate foundation recommendations. CLAUDE B. PARKER GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT OFFICE 740 METCALF, STE. 7 • ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 (714)741-2592 HOME 1922 HOWE PL. • ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 (714)746-6182 CIVIL ENGINEER #18.987 GEOLOGIST #512 CERT. ENG. GEOLOGIST <T922 III. FIELD INVESTIGATION A. Surface Conditions The subject site south of the existing Parish Hall is a nearly level garden area approximately 50' x 15'. There are three large trees and at least 10 bushes in the area of the proposed addition uhich will be removed prior to constructio The site is currently uet from irrigation of the plants. B. Test Holes Three exploratory test holes uers dug uith a hand auger on 17 December 1980 at the approximate locations indicated on Plate 1. One test hole uas dug next to the common uall of the Parish Hall to determine the depth of the existing footing and the soil conditions in that area. Samples of the soils excavated uere obtained for laboratory analyses. The soils uere visually class, fied by field identification procedure in accordance uith the Unified Soil Classification. A simplified version of the Unifiei Soil Classification is included in the Appendix. Continuous logs of the soils encountered in the test holes uere recorded in the field. The logs of the test holes shoun on Plate 2 are basei on the field logs, on inspection of the samples and on the labo- ratory test results. C. Subsurface Conditions The site is geologically situated on a recent marine terraci uhich is comprised mainly of granular soil. The soil profile to the depth of interest for this project consists of a broun silty sand. The upper 1-J foot uas loose, uet and contained many roots CLAUDE B. PARKER GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT OFFICE 740 METCALF. STE. 7 • ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 CIVIL ENGINEER 118.987 (714)741-2592 rcm nniQT «1DHOME 1922 HOWE PL. • ESCONDIDO. CA 92025 -2- ^tuj-uuioi rei* (714)746-6182 CERT. ENG. GEOLOGIST *922 The soil graded firmer with depth. The site is underlain by essentially one soil type for engineering purposes uhich is referred to on the logs and throughout the report as Soil Type 1. There uas no expansive clay, existing fill or groundwater encountered during the investigation. A review of the literature and field observations indicate no active faults on site and the closest may be an inferred off- shore fault connecting the San Diego fault system with the Newport-Ingleuood fault. The closest known active fault is the Elsinore fault some 40 miles to the east. There were no obvious geologic hazards observed or known to exist in the area. IU. TESTS AMD RESULTS A. Grain Size Analysis Two grain size analyses were performed on samples of the main soil encountered to verify the classification. The tests were done according to ASTH D422-63. The results follow: GRAIN SIZE ANALYSES Location TP 1 (i 1-J-1 TP 2 © 1*' Percent 4 100 100 Passing U 10 99 99 .S. Standard Sieve No. Unified Soil 40 100 200 Classification 75 77 36 34 32 27 SM SM TP = Test Pit The results verify the field observations about the uniformity and Unified Soil Classification as a Silty Sand. CLAUDE B. PARKER GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT OFFICE 740 METCALF, STE. 7 - ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 CIVIL ENGINEER #18,987 (714) 741 -2592 rpn, ,-.- |QT „., „ HOME 1922 HOWE PL. • ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 ~<->- weuuwwi WVM (714} 746-6182 CERT. ENG. GEOLOGIST *922 B. Density Tests Moisture contents and densitites uere determined by direct measurements from paraffin coated undisturbed samples using the uater displacement method. The ratio of field dry density to the laboratory maximum dry density is defined as the relative compaction. These results are presented on the logs, Plate 2. C. Direct Shear Test A direct shear test uas performed on a representative sample of Soil Type 1 for strength parameters in the bearing capacity calculations. Three specimens of Soil Type 1 were prepared by remolding the soil in 2-J- inch diameter 1 inch high rings to the inplace condition of moisture and density. The specimens uere loaded uith normal loads of .57, 1.15 and 1.72KSF respectively and sheared to failure in undrained shear. The results follow: DIRECT SHEAR TEST Location Soil Unit Angle of Type Density Internal . (pcf) Friction(°) Apparent Cohesion (psf) 112 3D 150Test Pit 1 Q l1 1 V. BEARING CAPACITY The values of internal friction and apparent cohesion derived from the direct shear test uas used in the Terzaghi Formula in accordance uith the procedure outlined in Ref. 1, Page 222, to compute the allowable bearing capacity. CLAUDE B. PARKER GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT OFFICE 740 METCALF, STE. 7 • ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 (714)741-2592 HOME 1922 HOWE PL. • ESCONDIDO. CA 92025 -4- (714)746-6182 CIVIL ENGINEER #18.987 GEOLOGIST #512 CERT. ENG. GEOLOGIST #922 Terzaghi Formula: Bearing Capacity = 2/3cN* 4 jTb.N1 + £ tfBNVc ~ q ^ Assumptions: Depth of Footings, Df= 1^' Uidth of Continuous Footing, 8=1* N1 , N' , N1, = dimensionless parameters found from c q 9 page 222, Ref. 1. Factor of Safety = 3. ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY Soil Soil Bearing Type Description Capacity (psf) 1 Broun Silty Sand 1160 VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1 - It is recommended that any grading and the prepa- ration of native soil be done in accordance uith the enclosed i "Specifications for Construction of Controlled Fills" except if superseded by the following recommendations. 2 - The main soil problem uill be the recompaction of the loose upper soil, especially after removal of the tree root system. It is recommended that the entire tree root system of the large trees be removed and all other roots hand picked and hauled off site. The voids should be backfilled uith decomposed granite and uheel rolled to a dense condition. Since the addition uill use a uood floor instead of a slab, the compaction isn't that critical. CLAUDE B. PARKER GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT OFFICE 740 METCALF, STE. 7 • ESCONDtDO, CA 92025 CIVIL ENGINEER #18,987 (714) 741-2592 GEOLOGIST #512HOME 1922 HOWE PL. • ESCONDIDO. CA 92025 -5- tatumwai ron (714) 746-6182 CERT. ENG. GEOLOGIST 1922 3 - The tests and calculations indicate an allouable bearing capacity of 1160 psf for continuous uall footings. Experience and good engineering practice however uould limit this value to 1000 psf. It should be recalled that the common _ual_l_ (north side of the proposed addition) uill carry loads from the existing building and the neu addition. The footing for the existing building is 1-J feet in depth and founded in moderately compact soil. It is recommended that the footing for .the proposed addition be extended at least one foot belou the bottom of the existing footing. Care must be taken not to undermine the existing footing. Use l£ foot deep footings for the other ±hree ua11s. *• .— '— 4 - In order to minimize the possibility of damage from settlement or for any other soil related reason, it is recom- mended that the footings be reinforced uith at least tuo #4 reinforcing rods. Place one rod 3 inches from the top and the other rod,3 inches from the bottom of the footing in the three !•£ foot deep footings. jJaa four #4 rodsr tuo rods 6 inches from the bottom and tuo rods 3 inches from the top in the common footing. Please call me to verify the soil conditions after the footings are dug. 5 - Drainage should be provided and maintained to prevent water from ponding around the building foundations. CLAUDE B. PARKER GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT OFFICE 740 METCALF, STE. 7 • ESCONDIDO. CA 92025 (714)741-2592 HOME 1922 HOWE PL. • ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 -6- (714)746-6182 CIVIL ENGINEER #18.987 GEOLOGIST *512 CERT. ENG. GEOLOGIST #922 VII. REFERENCE 1 - Terzaghi and Peck, 1967, "Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice" , John Uiley, N.Y. Respectfully submitted , CLAUDE B. PARKER CBP:bl Distribution: 4 Addressee CLAUDE B. PARKER GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT OFFICE 740 METCALF, STE. 7 • ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 (714)741-2592 7 HOME 1022 HOWE PL. • ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 ~ ' ~~ (714)746-6182 CIVIL ENGINEER #18,987 GEOLOGIST #512 CERT. ENG. GEOLOGIST 1922 EXISTING PARISH HALL o 1 I PROPOSED LIBRARY ADDITION I PARKING AREA 28 TO PROP. LINE ' TO < CEDAR AVE. I :IO TEST HOLE TREE PLATE I TEST HOLE LOCATION ST. MICHAEL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH 2775 CARLSBAD 6LVD-, CARLS BAD, CA. CLAUDE B. PARKER GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT OFFICE 740 METCALF, STE. 7 • ESCONCMDO. CA 92025 (714)741-2592 HOME 1822 HOWE PL. • ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 (714)746-6182 CIVIL ENGINEER #18.987 GEOLOGIST #512 CERT. ENG. GEOLOGIST *922 LOG OF BORING z o 0 1- 2- 3- A n 1- 2- 3- - 1- 2- -SAMPLEA A A BORING NO Test HD!RS lr 2 & 3 PLFVATinN IPV/P! SAMPLING , _,METHOD hand auqer TEST HULL 1 Broun Silty Sand top 18" loose, moist - roots grades moderately firm light broun ST1 FtnTTnn — — TEST HOLE 2 Broun Silty Sand top 12" loose, moist - roots grades moderately firm light broun ST1 TEST HHI r 3 Broun Silty Sand dry - some roots firm li 18" nnrrnn /\ = undisturbed sample = disturbed sample Date: 17 Dec. 1980 St. Michaels Episcopal Churcd By:ciaude B. Parker 2775 Carlsbad Blvd. .Carlsbad SOILCLASSIFICATIONSF) sn sn FIELD MOISTURE(% Dry Weight)10.3 9.8 4.5 Job No. ao DRY DENSITY(pcf)101.8 98.9 103.6 D TQR RELATIVECOMPACTION (%)P Plate No. 2 OFFICE HOME 740METCALFSTE.7 (714)741-2592 1822 HOWE PL {714)746-6182 CLAUDE B. PARKER QEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT ESCONOIDO, CA 92025 CIVIL ENGINEER #18.967 GEOLOGIST #512 CERT. ENG. GEOLOGIST #922 CLAUDE B. PARKER GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT OFFICE 740METCALFSTE.7 CIVIL ENGINEER #18987 (714) 741-2592 ESCONOIDO, CA ««. «..lHOME 1922 Howe PI. 92025 GEOLOGIST #512 (714) 746-6182 CERT. ENG. GEOLOGIST #922 SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CONTROLLED FILLS GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The construction of controlled fills shall consist of adequate preliminary soil investigations, and clearing, removal of existing structures and foundations, preparation of land to be filled, excavation of earth and rock from cut area, compaction and control of the fill, and all other work necessary to complete the grading of the filled areas to conform with the lines, grades, and slopes as shown on the accepted plans. CLEARING AND PREPARATION OF AREAS TO BE FILLED: (a)All fill control projects shall have a preliminary soil investigation or a visual examination, depending upon the nature of the job, by a qual- ified soil engineer prior to grading. (b) All timber, trees, brush, vegetation, and other rubbish shall be re- moved, piled and burned, or otherwise disposed of to leave the prepared areas with a finished appearance free from unsightly debris. (c) Any soft, swampy or otherwise unsuitable areas, shall be corrected by drainage or removal of compressible material, or both, to the depths in- dicated on the plans or a^ directed by the soil engineer. (d) The natural ground which is determined to be satisfactory for the support of the filled ground shall then be plowed or scarified to a depth of at least six inches (6") or deeper as specified by the soil engineer, and until the surface is free from ruts, hummocks, or other uneven fea- tures which would tend to prevent uniform compaction by the equipment to be used. (e) No fill shall be placed until the prepared native ground has been approved by the soil engineer. (f) Where fills are made on hillsides with slopes greater than 5 (hori- zontal) to 1 (vertical), horizontal benches shall be cut into firm un- disturbed natural ground to provide lateral and vertical stability. The initial bench at the toe of the fill shall be at least 10 feet in width on firm undisturbed natural ground at the elevation of the toe stake. The soil engineer shall determine the width and frequency of all suc- ceeding benches which will vary with the soil conditions and the steep- ness of slope. (g) After the natural ground has been prepared, it shall be brought to the proper moisture content and compacted to not less than 9056 of max- imum density, A.S.T.Pfl. D1557-64T. (h) Expansive as di rected in soils may require special compaction specifications the preliminary soil investigation by the soil engineer. (i) The cut portions of building pads in which rock-like material exists may require excawation and recompaction for density compatibility with the fill as directed by the soil engineer. IYIATERIAL5: The fill soils shall consist of select materials graded so that at least 40 percent of the material passes the No. 4 sieve. The material may be obtained from the excavation, a borrow pit, or by mixing soils from one or more sources. The material used shall be free from vegetable matter, and other deleterious substances, and shall not contain rocks or lumps greater than 6 inches in diameter. If excessive vegetation, rocks, or soils with unacceptable physical characteristics are encountered, these materials shall he disposed of in waste areas designated on the plans or as directed by the soil engineer. If soils are encountered during the grading operation luhich were not reported in the preliminary soil invest- igation, further testing will be required to ascertain their engineering properties. Any special treatment recommended in the preliminary or sub- sequent soil reports not covered herein shall become an addendum to these specifications. No material of be used in the a perishable, fills. spongy, or otherwise unstable nature shall PLACING. SPREADING AND COMPACTING FILL MATERIAL: (a)The selected fill material shall be placed in layers which shall not exceed six inches (6") when compacted. Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly blade-mixed during the spreading to insure uniformity of material and moisture in each layer. (b) When the moisture content of the fill material is below that speci- fied by the soil engineer, water shall be added until the moisture con- tent is near optimum as determined by the soil engineer to assure thor- ough bonding during the compacting process. (c) li/hen the moisture content of the fill material is above that speci- fied by the soil engineer, the fill material shall be aerated by bidding and scarifying, or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is near optimum as determined by the soils engineer. (d) After each layer has been placed, mixed and spread evenly, it shall be thoroughly compacted to not lesa than the specified maximum density in accordance with A.S.T.ffl. D1557-64T. Compaction shall be by means of tamping or sheepsfoot rollers, multiple-wheel pneumatic-tired rollers, or other types of rollers. Rollers shall be of such design that they will be able to compact the fill to the specified density. Rolling of each layer shall be continuous over its entire area and the roller shall make sufficient passes to obtain the desired density. The entire area to be filled shall be compacted to the specified density. OFFICE HOME CLAUDE B. PARKER GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT 74o mETcftiF: STE.?(7141 741-2592 ESCONOIDO, CA 1922 Howe PI 92025 (7141 746-6182 CIVIL ENGINEER *1fl,!)H7 GEOLOGIST #512 CERT. ENG GEOLOGIST #922 (e) fill slopes shall be compacted by means of sheupsfoot rollers or other suitable equipment. Compacting operations shall be continued until the slopes are stable but not too dense for planting and until there is no appreciable amount of loose soil on the slopes. Compacting of the slopes shall be accomplished by backrolling the slopes in increments of 3 to 5 feet in elevation gain or by other methods producing satisfactory results. (f) field density tests shall be made by the soil engineer for approx- imately each foot in elevation gain after compaction, but not to exceed two feet in vertical height between tests. The location of the tests in plan shall be spaced to give the best possible coverage and shall be taken no farther than 100 feet apart. Tests shall be taken on corner and terrace lots for each two feet in elevation gain. The soil engineer may take additional tests as considered necessary to check on the uniform- ity of compaction. Where sheepsfoot rollers are used, the tests shall be taken in the compacted material below the disturbed surface. No additional layers of fill shall be spread until the field density tests indicate that the specified density has been obtained. (g) The fill operation shall be continued in six inch (6") compacted layers, as specified above, until the fill has been brought to the fin- ished slopes and grades as shown on the accepted plans. SUPERVISION; Supervision by the soil engineer shall be made during the filling and compacting operations so that he can certify that the fill was made in accordance with accepted specifications. The specifications and soil testing of subgrade, subbase, and base materials for roads, or other public property shall be done in accordance with specifications of the governing agency. SEASONAL LIMITS: No fill material shall be placed, spread, or rolled during unfavorable weather conditions. When the work is interrupted by heavy rain, grading shall not be resumed until field tests by the soil engineer indicate that the moisture content and density of the fill are as previously specified. In the event that, in the opinion of the engineer, soils unsatisfactory as foundation material are encountered, they shall not be incorporated in the grading and disposition will be made at the engineer1s discretion. CLAUDE B. PARKER GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT OFFICE 7*0 mEtCftlf STf 7 1714) 741-2592 ESCONDIDO, CA HOME 1922 How* PI. 92025 (714) 746-6182 CIVIL ENGINEER 118,987 GEOLOGIST #512 CERT. ENG. GEOLOGIST *922 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART IDENTIFYING CRITERIA I. COARSE GRAINED (More than 50£ #200 sieve) GRAVELS than 50^ #4 sieve but smaller than 3 inches) Non Plastic SANDS (fflore than 5Q# smaller than #4 sieve) Non Plastic II. FINE GRAINED (fyiore than 50# smaller than #200 sieve) Liquid Limit less than 50 Liquid Limit greater than 50 III. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS GROUP SYMBOL GIU GP cm GC SU) SP SIYI SC CL OL fflH CH OH PT SOIL DESCRIPTION GRAVEL, well graded gravel- sand mixture, littlu or no fines. GRAVEL, puurly qraded gravel- sand mixture, little or no fines. HRAVEL, SILTY, poorly nr.ided yravel-sand—silt mixtures. GRAVEL, CLAYEY, poorly graded graval-sand-clay mixture. SAND, well graded, gravelly sands, little or no finec. SAND, poorly graded, gravelly sands, little or no fines. SAND, SILTY, poorly graded sand-silt mixtures, SAND, CLAYEY, poorly graded sand-clay mixtures. SILT, INORGANIC, silt and fine sand, sandy silt or clayey- L.tit-sand mixtures with slight plasticity. CLAY, INORGANIC, clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays. SILT, ORGANIC, silts and or- ganic silt-clays of low plasticity. SILT, INORGANIC, silts micaceous or dictomaceous fine sandy or silty soils, elastic silts. CLAY, INORGANIC, clays of med- ium to high plasticity, fat clays. CLAY, ORGANIC, clays of medium to high plasticity. PEAT, other highly organic swamp soils. CLAUDE B. PARKER GEOTECHN 1CAL CONSULTANT HOME 1714) 741-2592 ESCONDIDO. CA 1922 How* PI. 92025 (7141 7466182 CIVIL ENGINEER 1*18,987 GEOLOGIST *M2 CEHT. EN(i GEOLOGIST #922 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92008 Building Department Cttp of Cartebab ELEPHONE: (714) 729-1181 JUL 1<i 1981 NONRESIDBfTIAL BiERGY DESIGN CERTIFICATIOfcHy of CARLSBAC PernnPWJLDING DEFT.'- Issue Date ._ CERTIFICATE OF COf'PLIANCE WITH ENERGY CONSERVATION DESIGN REQUIRED CONTAINED IN ARTICLE 2, PART 5, TIM 24, CALIFORNIA ACM", CODE, I. William J. Sevier hereby certify that I QAS-tg-aaKi Reviewer am familiar with the state energy conservation standards mandated . in CAC Title 24, Section T20-1451 through T20-1542, and that the plans and other documents submitted in support of the application for a Building permit at 2775 Carlsbad Avenue > _> _i Address Assessor's Parcel Mo. .-Dated comply with all current requirements of these regulations. Indicate method of compliance: Component Performance (Standard Design) Energy Budget Analysis (Alternative Design) Non-depletable Energy Analysis (Alternative Design) A. B. C. D. n D a Other (specify) Signature ineer, Contractor State License or Certificate No. M13246 Oat e July 13. 1981 Submit to the Building Department with permit application. SEVIER ENGINEERING. INC. 9461 EL CAJON BLVD, SUITE A / LA MESA, CA 92041 Phone (714) 464-1549 July 13, 1981 City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: St. Michaels Episcopal Church The proposed design for the addition to St. Michaels Episcopal Church will not incorporate any new HVAC equipment. Instead, the existing gas furnace system will be used to supply the heating for the addition. Heat loss calculations show that the existing furnace (80000 Btuh output) is adequate to maintain comfort levels in both the existing and new areas. ACTIVE HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING 9510 MISSION GORGE ROAD SANTEE, CALIF. 92071 (714)449-8090 • 583-2653 June 12, 1981 Carey Construction Company 1996 Milford Place El Cajon,CA. 92020 Re: St. Michaels ChurchCarlsbad, CA. Dear John: We have enclosed a set of our heat loss calculations as outlined for the above "existing parish hall" and new library. These calculations are based on the latest edition of A.S.H.R.A.E. manual, California Energy Commission Temperature Design manual, Title 24 and best Practices of S;iM.A.C.N.A. ducting and design manual. There is no question in our mind the proposed ducting additions to the existing system will work, but in the long run save on cost of operation. The added insulation will provide far better comfort than in- stalling another furnace that would have to be over- sized since there are no manufacturers that make a unit to match the "heat loss" of the new library. Sincerely, Ray Noyes RN/pv John R Lcindry Inc. July 10, 1981 City of Carlsbad Building Department 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 ATTN: Carter Darnell Re: Mechanical Plan St. Michael's Episcopal Church 2775 Carlsbad Boulevard Plan Check No. 80-501 Dear Mr. Darnell: Pursuant to our telephone conversation of this morning, July 10, 1981, please delete sheet M-l from the approved plans for the library addition at St. Michael's church. This letter shall serve notice that we withdraw our professional approval of this sheet (M-l). We have been notified in writing by the owner that an alternate mechanical system will be installed. We neither approve of in any way nor accept liability of any kind for the alternate system that is proposed. This letter shall not affect our professional approval of the balance of the approved set of plans prepared for this project by this office. Sincerely, William X. Booth Architect, C 11978 /mp cc: John Carey St. Michael's Church *JUL * 01981 0, Mr* John Carey John Carey Construction Oo., Inc. 1996 MUford Place XL Qajon, California 92020 DMT Mr. Careys Pursuant to our telephone eonvaraatlon of *aly 2, this Kill serve to author!** your ooapany to patoceed idth the hmting ^Xn iMch you had proposed, nannly to ingtell an additional (haot ialo tba amr aaetion of the Pariah Hill, which will taring th» haat froa tha aiaaaut baaUa nnlt and nil! aake it ui'maoaiaary to pot IB an addltlontl furnace at this Al«or I ahall poraaant to tba Vaatry tha »aad for th« laaulAtion la tha oaUlng of the poraaent P«rl«h fcll to hal^ with the heating plan, the oo*t to be $500. He are also aping to rtlnmiM with the Veatry the need far the preaeat ayBtam of requiring both a aontMtional and an wnnnrtUlanal lien «ai-var before TOUT wmymy la able to collect peyMct for aervloee rendered* Thank yxra for your eonoldaratlen of our needs In the eenetrttotion of the Pariah HC1 addition, and «• hope that the work «U1 be aaapLatad aoon with both your aoapanr and the architect In aoaplate a£reea*nt ae to tha outcome* Ve feel that the aenatraotlon baa been vary aatia- faotory ao far and are pleased vlth your part in it* We Senior Harden ces John P« landryy IBS John R Landry Inc. March 11, 1981 City of Carlsbad Building Department , 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Dear Her: This letter is attached to two new .sets of plans for the Parish Hall Addition for St. Michael's Episcopal Church at 2775 Carlsbad Blvd., your Plan Check No. 80-501. We are re-submitting these for second check. Please note that the original (total) project has been split into two phases, Phase I and Phase II. Generally, Phase T entails the proposed construction on the southside of the existing building and Phase II on the north. See plans for specific information regarding the respective phases. We are re-submitting these plans to obtain a building permit : for Phase I only. In as much as the original plan check fee was paid for the entire project, we wotild like the fees already paid to be applied to the processing (i.e. plan check, permit, etc.) of this phase only. At such time as Phase II becomes financially feasible, we will apply for a separate permit and pay any applicable fees as if it were an independent project. Please let me know as soon as possible if there are any problems with the plan check corrections or the above arrangement. Our number is (714) 729-8974. Sincerely, enc (2) WMB:dim HECEIVED NOV 5! 51980 CITY OF CARLSBAD Build'™ Episcopal Church Post Office Box 127 Carlsbad, California 92008 Telephone (714) 729-3264 November 25, 1980 Mr. Marty Orenyak - Building Official Building Department City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA. 92008 Dear Mr. Orenyak: In accordance with the provisions of Section 303 (C) of the 1976 Uniform Building Code, we hereby request an extension of the expiration date (time for action) on our Plan Check Fee for our proposed Parish Hall Addition (Plan Check 80-507). Our reasons are as follows: 1. On June 23, 1980, we received the City's first comments on our plans. It was on this day we became aware that our project would require a Conditional Use Permit. 2. We met with the Planning Staff the next day, June 24, 1980. At that time, we were advised by the Assistant Planner handling our project that continuing to process our project through the Building Department would be "at our own risk" as no guarantee could be made that our C.U.P. request would be approved. November 25, 1980 Pa9e City of Carlsbad 3. On July 30, 1980, we tried to submit our C.U.P. Application. The application form itself had been revised and additional requirements had been included. 4. On August 8, 1980, our application was accepted. 5. No action was taken by the Planning Staff until late September . 6. On October 8, 1980, our C.U.P. was unanimously approved by the Planning Commission (C.U.P-. 183) , and we began to "gear-up" to complete this project. Inasmuch as we have made a continuing effort to complete the necessary administrative process leading to a Building Permit, expending over 100 of our allotted 180 days during the C.U.P. process alone, we feel our request for an extension is justified. Since our expiration date is impending (November 27, 1980), we would appreciate your immediate action. Thank you. Sincerely yours, < The Rev. Douglas E. Woodridge Rector DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES D Assistant City Manager (714) 438-5596 K Building Department (714)438-5525 D' Engineering Department (714) 438-5541 D Housing & Redevelopment Department {714)438-5611 D Planning Department {714} 438-5591 Citp oC 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 December 8, 1980 St. Michael's by the Sea Episcopal Church Post Office Box 127 Carlsbad California (92008) Re: Plan Check #80-501 / Extension In answer to your letter of November 25, 1980, an extension has been granted to March 24, 1981. No further extension will be granted. MARTIN ORENYAI Building Official MO/gl