Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2778 GALICIA WAY; ; CB961076; PermitH - B U I L D I N G P E R N I T Permit No CB961076 08/12/96 14:-3 9 ' Project No A9601538 Page 1 of 1. '. Development No,:",,. . Job,Address: 2778' GALICIA WY ' '' Suite:' Permit Type RESIDENTAL ADD/ALT Parcel No: 216-230-02--00 ...: Lot#:' e - valuation:,' ., 155,476 . ' . CortructionTyp,.'VN Occupancy Gr"oup': Rf•eré.rice#: . ' 'Status,: ISSUED Description: 1654 SF ADDITION,1&2 STORY ' Applied:. 06/14/96 EXISTING2535SF . . / Apr/Issue:. 08/12/96 ,Entered:By: RM Appl/Ownr : CUMMINGS ARCHITECT .' 619-236-1444 2870.FIFTH-AV SAN DIEGO CA 9210 . Fees Required 00 Fees: .1,417.0'\. Adjustments:" , / .d Tot C'it: , '.00 Total -Fees: .'. 400 /'j T1'frt\ 543.00': f ' "a1 c MU MU :\ ' 944'.00 . Fee.description/' -/ ,' Units Un\Lt' Ext'fee Data ----------------------______ Building'Permit "' 836.00 Pla 543.06 Fee * BUILDING TOTAL 1395:00 Each Plumbing ubingIs : 7.0 * . * PLUMBING. TOTAL . ) 41.00 Enter Y for Elect\ic I,ss. e NORPoRATED :10 00 Y Enter '1' for, Remode1 1 ' > 1952 . - '10.. o0 Y *'ELECTRICAL TOTAL,. \ . .. ' 20.00.. Enter 'Y' for Mehanica\Is f1 •. 1'S.'OO Y Install Furn/Ducts/Heat. ' 'ut' 0 1 9.00 9. 00; .Each'Install Fireplace > . 6.50. ' 6.50 * MECHANICAL TOTAL ' , . - 31.09 n' (pViRED !VU B C t INSP PCCOROP WES AA 11 WHOM'. DATE - NC XLEARANC . "CITY OF CARLSBAD. 2075 Las Palmas Dr, Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438 1161 .g• -' • ' •, ' q1V PERMIT APPUCATION PLAN CHECK NO g 107t S City of Carlsbad BuildingDepartment 20 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 • .EST. VAL I __________________________________________ PLAN CK DEPOSiT_______________ I PERMIT TYPE VALID. BY________________ DATE AA-v From List 1 (see back) give code of Permit-e: --------------------------------------------------------- For Residential Projects Only: From List 2 (see back) give Code of Structure-Type: lf,4 8057 06/14/96 0001 01 02 C—PRMT 543 00 Net Loss/Gain of Dwelling Units FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PROJECT INFORMATION Address Building or Suite No. 277' '' Nearest cross Street LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. CHECK BELOW IF SUBMITFED: 02 Energy Calcs 02 Structural Calcs 02 Soils Report 0 1 Addressed Envelope ASSESSOR'S PARCEL XI,TING USE PROPOSED USE DESCRIPTION OF WORK i: /ffl/1ia b -54T SQ. FT. j4790 1/eFf /ff)jJ # OF STORIES 2- # OF BEDROOMS 15- # OF BATHROOMS WN SAC! PFJUN (I piterent Itbm applicant) NAME (last name first) ADDRESS ' 1V CITY 5 0 STATE ,/4- ZIP CODE ? DAYLEPHONE L, 1(. - NAME (last name first) , ADDS PROPERIY CITY STATE DAY TELEPHONE cr- NAME (last name first) 1/Ze-Z6-, ,41\/ ADDRESS Z 77 ts CITY STATE ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE L4 I "7 CDNTRACFOR NAME (last name first) 0/8 ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE STATE UC. # LICENSE CLASS CITY BUSINESS UC. # DESIGNER NAME (last name first) ADDRESS 'Z 7o 7e) ,'i'7- 1v CITY ' /7 STATE 44- ZIP CODE 'q/ZtObAY TELEPHONE 7_$,,'9TATE UC. # - WORKERS (OMPENSAT!ON Workers' Com d b pensation Declaration: I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to self-insure issuey the Director 01 Industrial Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, Lab. C). INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. EXPIRATION DATE Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. SIGNATURE DATE S. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION Owner-Builder Declaration: I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, an e si for t e e ed exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to civil p a lty re hu dollars [$500]). / SIGNATURE DATE /7/9 ((2/ Is the applicant or future buildin'g occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? DYES 0 N Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? DYES 0 N Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? DYES 0 N IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED AFTER JULY 1, 1989 UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DLS11uCr. WNSfHUCI1ON LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 3097(1) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME Cl LENDER'S ADDRESS APPLICANT C.FJ(.!tX'IION I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE 10 SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CI1Y IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5,0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. Expiration. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced witl such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time af APPLICANTS SIGNATURE the wo7 of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the s from e ate of such permit or if the building or work authorized by M daon/UnifonBuilding 7 DATE: 07/12/97 INSPECTION HISTORY LISTING FOR PERNIT# C9961076 DATE INSPECTION TYPE INSP ACT COMMENTS 03/03/97 Final Combo RI RI BJN/DAREN/633-1930 03/03/97 Final Combo PD CO ON CARD 11/07/96 Interior Lath/Drywall RI RI MW/GARY 11/07/96 Exterior Lath/Drywall RI RI MW/GARY 11/06/96 Interior Lath/Drywall PD AP 11/06/96 Exterior Lath/Drywall PD AP 11/06/96 Gas/Test/Repairs PD AP 11/05/96 Interior Lath/Drywall RI RI MW/ANDY/633-1930 11/05/96 Interior Lath/Drywall RI RI MW/ANDY/633-1930 11/05/96 Interior Lath/Drywall PD NR 10/28/96 Insulation RI RI BJN/633-1930 10/28/96 Insulation PD AP 10/21/96 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Wel RI RI MW/CHRIS/729-0863 10/21/96 Rough Combo PD AP 10/11/96 Shear Panels/HD's PD AP 10/08/96 Rough Electric RI RI NW 10/08/96 Rough Electric PD PA AT SHR WALLS 10/04/96 Rough Electric RI RI MW/ANDY/633-1930 10/04/96 Rough Electric PD NS 09/23/96 Shear Panels/HD's RI RI NW 09/23/96 Shear Panels/HD's PD NR 09/23/96 Roof/Reroof RI RI MW 09/23/96 Roof/Reroof PD AP 08/19/96 Underground/Conduit-Wir RI RI MW/MELZER/633-1930 08/16/96 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RI RI NW/ANDY.633-1930/431-4205 08/16/96 Ftg/Foundation/Piers DC CO STILL ND UFER 11:00 08/16/96 Ftg/Foundation/Piers DC AP UFER INSTALLED 08/14/96 Ftg/Foundation/Piers RI RI NW/MELZER/433-4205 08/14/96 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PD CO HIT <RETURN> TO CONTINUE... BASE ** ACTIVITY' PROCESSING ** 07/12/97 Permit No: CB961076 11:30 Type: RAD RESIDENTAL ADD/ALT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status: ISSUED Dates:' Applied : 061496 Apr/Issue : 081296 Finaled : , Expired : 080597 Job Title: 1654 SF ADDITION,1&2 STORY Valuation: 155,476 Descr: EXISTING=2535 SF TvDe Const: VN Altkey: Address: 2778 Street: GALICIA WY Lot#: ' Suite: Parcel: 2162300200 Owner: MELZER ANDREAS J&DARYN S Occupancy:. .• Reference#: _____ No district keyword Appl/Ownr : CUMMINGS ARCHITECT ' Telephone: 619-236-1444 Address:' 2870 FIFTH AV SAN DIEGO CA 92103 Insp Area: PD Entered By: RMA INSP: YES APPR: YES COMM: NO NULTP: NO MULTA: NO $ BAL: NO -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prolect: A9601538 1654 SF ADDITION,1&2 STORY Entered: 06/14/96 By: COUNTER TESfl__ - ... TEB1NG ENGINEERS- SAN DIEGO - - EablMh.d 104U .- - l r--- - • - - 3467 Kurtz-'-P Sarr Diego, Caiifomia 92110-4430 ,- __________ - - JbNo: 06374000 Distributed To: Job Name: MELZEE RESIDENCE CITY OF CARLSBAD - Address: 2778 GALICIA WAY BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT ANDY & DARYN MELZER CARLSBAD, CA 92009 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CITY OF CARLSBAD * , S CARLSBAD, CA 92009 TESTING ENGINEERS Plan Number: Permit: 961076 Application-. Report No: 1851291 . Date: November 26, 1996 ENGINEER: DENNIS E. ZIMMERMAN RCE 26676, GE.928 EXPIRES 03/31/00 --- - - - '- FIELD INSPECTION AND TEST REPORTS ,- Enclosed are field Inspection and/or test reports, for the above referenced project, for work performed on 09/19/96.,':- Thesereports cover the locations of work inspected and/or tested following recognized standards and do not constitute engineering opinion or projectcontrbl. - These reports do not relieve the contractor of his responsllillty to build per the plans, specifications and all applicable codes: S - - Should you -have any questions regarding these reports, please contact our office at (619) 225-9641'. - - - -- - Enclosures -(1)-- S - - - -- -. S 4flt10 III&fl - CH&A. / CORPORATION (800) 998-9588 - - - - -- - - I FIELD INSPECTION REPORT (Concrete I Masonry) - Date flP27 )71L El PRESTRESS CONCRETE ,'REINFORCED CONCRETE LII REINFORCED MASONRY D REWORK CH&A JOB NUMBER OSA / OSHPD I CONTRACT NUMBER PERMIT NUMBER PLAN NUMBER 714 CONTRACTOR PERFORMING WORK SUPP lEA MIX DESIGN NUMBER DESIGN SENGTH P.S.'. CUBIC YARDS PLACED PLACEMENT METHOD 0 Pump 0 Truck 0 Other - MORTAR TYPE! STRENGTH M S N 0 BLOCK SIZE 6" 8" 12" 16" rrEM.: CONFOANGE NOTES -: Placement 24i-,Pd) Reinforcing Steel Batch Tickets Consolidation Form Clean Tendons Mortar Proportions Clean Outs SETNuMBER CYLINDERS PER SET SLUMP. INCHES AIR PERCENT, -. UNITWEIGHT. TEMPERATURE 1--1 To the best of my knowledge, work inspected was in accordance with the building department approved design drawings, specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the U.B.C. except as noted above. L NO See DNP4jmber _________________________________ Dated ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY P.O. BOX 1932 • EL CAJON, CALIFORNIA 92022-1932 ROBERT CHAN, P.E. TELEPHONE (619) 447-4747 August 14, 1996 Andreas .J.....Meltzer 2.778 Galicia Way Carlsbad, CA. 92009. Subject : Project No. 96-1147G1 Report of Foutidatior Inspection Proposed Addition to Existing Residence 2.778 Galicia Way Carlsbad, California Dear.Mr. Meltzer In accordance with your request, the undersigned has inspected the foundation trench excavations for the proposed additions on sub- ject property, more specifically referred to as being Lot 268 of La Costa South Unit No. 2, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California. The results of the inspection indicated that the foundation .trench excavations-have been extended..into. competent .natural or compacted fill soils, and are of the depths. and widths as shown on the ap- proved foundation plans.. - • • The soil conditions encounteredd1d not differ substantially from.. those. presented in our "Limited Soil Investigation" Report for subject propertyk ndsafe allowable soil bearing values presented there'beusd. • - • * ~pectfuW sylbmitted, LIED EM4'H 2ECHNOLOGY ROBEF CHAN, P.E. EsGil Corporation Professional Plan Review Engineers DATE: 8/9/96 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1076 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2778 Galicia Way PROJECT NAME: Melzer SFD Additon QA NT LI JURIS. LI FIRE LI PLAN REVIEWER U FILE SET: III The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ********** codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the checklist is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plancheck has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 G 0 C DEJDGP 0 P 8/5 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation Professional Plan Review Engineers DATE: 7/30/96 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1076 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2778 Galicia Way PROJECT NAME: Melzer SFD Addition U AP LICANT JURI. U FIRE U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE SET: II The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ********** codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the checklist is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: James Cummings 2870 Fifth Avenue #200 San Diego CA 92103 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: LII REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation fl GA fl CM fl EJ LI GP [J PC 7/22 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 96-1076 II 7/30/96 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2778 Galicia Way DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 7/22 REVIEWED BY: David Yao PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1076 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: 7/30/96 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? UYes UNo I 1 Carlsbad 96-1076 II 7/30/96 Provide special inspection program to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit.(name of the special inspector). See UBC 106.3.5 Provide smoke detectors at a)first floor. b) upper level in close proximity to the stair. 20. The embedment length for the HD2A and HD6A are not clearly identified on the foundation plan. 22. a)The detail reference for hold down anchors at grid line H appears to miss label. Please check. b)The 2x4 stud wall did not have the minimum 5" edge distance. Please check all condition. The detail N6 may not work. 25. Specify truss identification numbers on the framing plan. a)Provide lateral analysis for grid line 1,2, and E at upper level. b)Provide shear transfer detail for the 8 feet panel along grid line D upper level. c)Provide shear transfer detail for the new shear wall along grid line H lower lever. Sheet 2 of the plan indicating that there is a gap between the wall and floor(?) a) Note on the plan that all wood are Douglas Fir Larch. Note on the plan that all beams are DF#1 or better. Note on the plan that RB-I is Select Structure or better. Sheet 11 of the calculation show F4 is 26" square footing. The foundation plan show F4 is 19" square footing. Please revise the foundation plan. e)The anchor bolts size and spacing for the shear panels 9 feet and 15 feet along grid line 5 are not shown on the foundation plan. f)Sheet 19 of the calculation show the shear wall type along grid line A is type L. Sheet 5 of the plan show type J. Please check. g) The anchor bolts size and spacing for the shear wall along grid A,4,1 and D is not on the foundation plan. Carlsbad 96-1076 II 7/30/96 Sheet 19 of the calculation show the shear wall calculation for the shear wall along line H-upper level. It appears to be the lower lever. Sheet 5 of the plan only have one 6 feet panel for the shear wall along line H. Please check. Sheet 19 of the calculation show the anchor bolts for the shear wall along line H are 1/2" @ 19"o.c.. The foundation plan on sheet 5 shows 1/2" @ 21"o.c.. Please check. Sheet 20 of the calculation show the shear wall along line 4 has 3 panels-6.5 feet, 6.5 feet and 4.5 feet. Sheet 5 of the plan show only two panels-6.5 feet and 4.5 feet. Please check. Sheet 21 of the calculation show the shear wall along line I has 3 panels-6 feet, 10.5 feet and 6 feet. Sheet 5 of the plan show different shear panel length. Please check. m) Sheet 25 of the calculation show the shear wall along line 4 is type J. Sheet 6 of the plan show type I shear wall. n) Sheet 25 of the calculation show the shear wall along line 4 has 2 panels-3.5 feet and 5 feet. Sheet 5 of the plan show only 3.5 feet panel. Please check. If you have any questions regarding these items, please contact David Yao of Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. tj EsGil Corporation Professional Plan Review Engineers DATE: 7/5/96 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1076 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2778 Galicia Way PROJECT NAME: Meizer SFD Addition O APPLICANT JURIS: U FIRE U REVIEWER U FILE SET: I The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ********** codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: James Cummings 2870 Fifth Avenue #200 San Diego CA 92103 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: El REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation 0 GA E:] 0 EJ fj GP Ej PC 6/24 trnsmtldot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 96-1076 7/5/96 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1076 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2778 Galicia Way FLOOR AREA: living addition 1654 sf STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: -24 feet REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 6/14 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 7/5/96 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 6/24. PLAN REVIEWER: David Yao FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with Title 24 and the following model codes: 1994 UBC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UPC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UMC (effective 2/23/96) and 1993 NEC (effective 12/28/95). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 1 GENERAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC) r3forw.dot Carlsbad 96-1076 7/5/96 . PLANS Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, (619) 560-1468. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with Title 24 and the 1994 UBC, UMC and UPC and the 1993 NEC. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2. . REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION EXPANS ION/EPDXY ANCHORS DESIGNER-SPECIFIED OTHER . FIRE PROTECTION 6. Show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup: Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms. (master bedroom, existing bedrooms) On each story. When sleeping rooms are upstairs, at the upper level in close proximity to the stair. NOTE: Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in all sleeping areas of the unit. Section 310.9.1. Carlsbad 96-1076 7/5/96 . GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): a) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. (windows at master bedroom next to the door, window 3040 at family room next to the door.) . ROOFING Specify deck material and application. Chapter 15. Specify I.C.B.O. or U.L. approval number for deck materials, Specify minimum 1/4 inch per foot deck slope for drainage or design to support accumulated water. Sections 1506.1 and 1605.6. Provide skylight details to show compliance with Sections 2409 and 2603.7, or provide I.C.B.O. approval number. Show attic ventilation. Minimum vent area is 1/150 of attic area (or 1/300 of attic area if at least 50% of the required vent is at least 3 feet above eave vents or cornice vents). Show area required and area provided. Section 1505.3.(if applicable) Note on the plans: "Attic ventilation openings shall be covered with corrosion-resistant metal mesh with mesh openings of 1/4-inch in dimension." Section 1 505.3.(if applicable) . FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1 804.(Check with city.) Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in seismic zones 3 and 4. This does not apply to detached, single- story dwellings. Section 1804.5 Per soils report, note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and note the allowable bearing value. Section 1804.3. Carlsbad 96-1076 7/5/96 17. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that:(if applicable) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 18. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report). 19. Note on plans that surface water will drain away from building and show drainage pattern and key elevations. Section 1804.7. 20. If required, show size, embedment and location of hold down anchors on foundation plan. Section 106.3.3. 21. If hold downs are required, note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation inspection. Section 108.5.2. 22. The detail N6 indicating ICBO 4945 anchors will be used. The report 4945 requires minimum edge distance. Please check the edge distance requirements. Clearly specify on the foundation the location of this detail. . FRAMING 23. Show double top plate with minimum 48" lap splice. Section 2326.11.2. 24. Detail all post-to-beam and post-to-footing connections and reference the detail to the plan. Section 2324. 25. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. 26. Show clearance between top plate of interior partitions and bottom chord of trusses. (To ensure nonbearing condition between supports as designed). 27. Provide calculations for main vertical and horizontal framing members and footings. Section 106.3.3. 28. Provide calculations for lateral loads, shear panels, shear transfer and related. Section 106.3.3. Carlsbad 96-1076 7/5/96 Show on the plans all structural requirements developed in the structural calculations. Section 106.3.3. The complete structural reviewed will done after the structural calculations were submitted. Detail shear transfer connections for the interior shear wall to the roof sheathing. Section 2314. Show location of attic access with a minimum size of 22"x30", unless the maximum vertical headroom height in the attic is less than 30". Access must be provided to each separated attic area, shall be located in a hallway or other readily accessible location and 30" headroom clearance is required above the opening. Section 1505.1 .(if applicable) Note on the plans that "all weather-exposed surfaces shall have a weather-resistive barrier to protect the interior wall covering and that exterior openings shall be flashed in such a manner as to make them weatherproof'. Section 1402. . MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) Show I.C.B.O. approval number for prefab fireplace. Show height of chimney above roof per I.C.B.O. approval or Table 31-B. Note on the plans that approved spark arrestors shall be installed on all chimneys. UBC, Section 3102.3.8. Note on plan: Gas vents and noncombustible piping in walls, passing through three floors or less, shall be effectively draft stopped at each floor or ceiling. UBC, Section 711.3. ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the service panel and the location of any sub-panels. If service is over 200 amps, submit single line diagram, panel schedule and load calculations. Note on the plans that receptacle outlet locations will comply with 1993 NEC Art. 210-52(a). Show on the plan that ground-fault circuit-interrupter protection complies with 1993 NEC Art. 210-8, which reads as follows: Carlsbad 96-1076 7/5/96 All 125-volt, single-phase, 15- and 20- ampere receptacles installed in bathrooms and outdoors. . PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 40. Provide a note on the plans: In showers and tub-shower combinations, control valves must be pressure balanced or thermostatic mixing valves. UPC Section 410.7 41. New water closets and associated flushometer valves, if any, shall use no more than 1.6 gallons per flush and shall meet performance standards established by the American National Standards Institute Standard A112.19.2. H & S Code, Section 17921.3(b). . ENERGY CONSERVATION 42. All energy items shown on the plans must be in agreement with the information shown on the properly completed Form CF-IR. The glazing area on the energy calculations appears did not match the plan on the rear. Please check. Are all walls have R-13insulation(include the existing walls)? The package D requires 20% thermal mass area. Please identify on the plan the thermal mass area.(tile or vinyl) 43. Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in bathrooms. 44. Provide a note on the plans stating "All new glazing (fenestrations) will be installed with a certifying label attached, showing the U-value." . CARLSBAD S.F.D. & DUPLEX SUPPLEMENT 45. Show on the Title Sheet on the plans, the information required by the attached Developmental Services Sheet 112383. 46. All new residential buildings, including additions, require a soils report. Please submit two copies. Exception: If a room addition is limited to one story and 1000 sq. ft. in area, then a soils report is not required. Esgil Corporation will advise the City to place their soils notice stamp on the plans. Carlsbad 96-1076 7/5/96 MISCELLANEOUS To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes 13 No U 49. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact David Yao at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES 'JILDING OEPART)ANT €••.. 12"DO ELL( AVENUE CARLS _a O CA Vc4- -, itp of Carl5bab THE 1FOT1O USTED BELOW MUST BE SHOWN O THE T1T'_E SHEET CF THE ?LS FOR YOUR SWGLE FAMILY D'ELLIG Site Address Legal Description Assessor's Parcel NL:.ber Quantity of Grading in cubic yards Contact Person - Hama and daytime Phone Humber Circle any Planning Conission or City Council Action oh this Property: Variance ) Conditional Use Permit, Tract or Parcel Map, Zone Change, Planned Development, Redevelopment Permit, Specific Plan, Site Development Plan PLAN CHECK NUMBER cd 112383 Table 3-Z7: Prescriptive Packages for Climate Zone 7 Package Package Package Package Package Component A B. C D E BUILDING ENVELOPE Insulation Minimums: Ceiling R-19 R-30 R-38 R-30 R-30 Wall1 R-13 R-13 R-21 R-13 R-13 "Heavy" Wall (R-1.7) (R-1.4) N/A (R-2.44) (R-2.44) "Light Mass" Wail [R-4.0] [R-3.5) N/A N/A N/A Slab Floor Perimeter NR R-7 R-7 NR NR Raised Floor R-13 R-13 R-21 R-193 R-19 FENESTRATION Maximum U-Value12 1.10 6.65 0.50 0.75 0.75 Maximum Total Area NR 14% 14% 20%',20% Maximum Total Nonsouth Facing Area 9.6% NR NR NR NR Minimum South Facing Area 6.4% NR NR NR NR SHADING COEFFICIEN14 South Facing Glazing NR NR 0.66 0.66 0.66 West Facing Glazing NR NR 0.66 0.66 0.66 East Facing Glazing NR NR 0.66 0.66 0.66 North Facing Glazing NR NR 0.66 0.66 0.66 THERMAL MASS REQ NR REQ () 5% INFILTRATION CONTROL Continuous Barrier NR NR NR NR NR Air-to-Air Heat Exchanger NR NR NR NR NR SPACE HEATING SYSTEM6 Electric Resitance Allowed NO NO YES N0 NO If Gas, AFUE= 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% If Heat Pump, Split System HSPF8 = 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Single Package System HSPF = 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 SPACE COOLING SYSTEM If Split System A/C, SEER = 10.0 - 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 If Single Package AC, SEER9 = 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.7 DOMESTIC WATER HEATING TYPE System must meet budget. Meets Meets Meetst° Meets Meets see §151(b) and 151(f)(8) Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget LEGEND: NR = Not Required; N/A = Not Applicable; REQ = Required See notes following Table 3-Z16. Prescriptive Packages Revised January 1992 3-27 Carlsbad 964076 7/5/96 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1076 PREPARED BY: David Yao DATE: 7/5/96 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2778 Galicia Way BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R_3/U-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N [BUILDING PORTION L BUILDING AREA (ft.2) VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE ($) living addition 1654 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 155,476.00 (per City) fl 199 UBC Building Permit Fee j Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 835.50 199 UBC Plan Check Fee U Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 543.08 Type of Review: Complete Review U Structural Only Hourly Repetitive Fee Applicable LI Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 434.46 Comments: . -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fire Services Review: LI Complete Review fl Suppression System LI Fire Alarm fl Other: Esgil Fire Services Review Fee: $ Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 • ' -'•---.•- F' I •- '• F' •-" '+, I • • • •$ F City"". of Carlsbad - -• .1II.IdIiL!.'I.111.irI.lU BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE:D —7T 9,. . PLANCHECK NO. CB 9 BUILDING ADDRESS: ,77'- - PROJECT DESCRIPTION: fx2A 2e-ib 7 ,'2,-J--- ASSESSOR's PARCEL NUMBER: 2 /t, -At - EST. VALUE F - - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DENIAL APPROVAL Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked The item you have submitted for review has been' with E. Make necessary orrections to plans or approved. The approval is based on plans,, information specifications for-compliance with applicable codes and and/or specifications provided in your submittal; standards: Submit corrected plans and/or specifications therefore any changes to these items after this date; to this office for review. . including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can By: __' Date:___________ result in suspension of permit to build ' F ii A Right-of-Way permit is required -, prior to By: Date: • construction of the following improvements: - '•F. By - ' Date ATTACHMENTS , - 'ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON L..J Dedication Application b r1 F, . -F' ' •''!-' ..' - - - Li Dedication Checklist - • F, - ''• - ':' . - - U Improvement Application Improvement Checklist NAM?'7/4.' Future Improvement Agreement - City of Carlsbad El Grading Permit Application • ADDRESS 2075 Las Palmas Dr Carlsbad CA 92009 Grading Submittal Checklist PHONE (619) 438 1161 Ext. Right of Way Permit Application F ' Right of Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet .. ' 0 Sewer Fee Information Sheet A-4 P:\D0QS\CHKLST\8P0001.FRM F • REV 04/30/96 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 1st,/ 2nd" 3rdv' III" 0 0 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan d r a w n t o s c a l e . S h o w : North Arrow D. Property Lines Easements Existing & Proposed Structures E. Easements Existing Street Improvements F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets D"D 0 2. Show on site plan: Drainage Patterns C. Existing Topography Existing & Proposed Slopes 0 3. Include note: Surface water to be directed aw a y f r o m t h e b u i l d i n g f o u n d a t i o n a t a 2 % gradient for no less than 5' or 2/3 the distance t o t h e p r o p e r t y l i n e ( w h i c h e v e r i s l e s s ) . ' [Per 1985 UBC 2907(d)5]. On graded sites, the top of any exterior fo u n d a t i o n s h a l l e x t e n d a b o v e t h e e l e v a t i o n of the street gutter at point of discharge or th e i n l e t o f a n a p p r o v e d d r a i n a g e d e v i c e 0(/0 a minimum of 12 inches plus two percent" (per 1 9 9 0 U B C 2 9 0 7 ( d ) 5 . ) . 0 4. Include on title sheet . Site address Assessor's Parcel Number Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenan t i m p r o v e m e n t p r o j e c t s , i n c l u d e : T o t a l building square footage with the square foota g e f o r e a c h d i f f e r e n t u s e , e x i s t i n g s e w e r permits showing square footage of different u s e s ( m a n u f a c t u r i n g , w a r e h o u s e , o f f i c e , etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION P\00S\CHQS1'BP0001,FRM Page 1 of 4 - BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE lstv' 2ndV 3rdV 0 0 0 5. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Co n d i t i o n s o f a p p r o v a l f o r Project No. Conditions were complied with by: Date:___________________ DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS D 0 0 6. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the buildi n g s i t e a n d a n y s t o r m drain or utility easements on the building site is required for a l l n e w b u i l d i n g s a n d for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ -pursuant to Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engi n e e r o r L a n d S u r v e y o r prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 - 1 / 2 " x 1 1 " p l a t m a p and submit with a title report. All easement documents must b e a p p r o v e d a n d signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. A t t a c h e d p l e a s e f i n d a n application form and submittal checklist for the dedication p r o c e s s . P r o v i d e t h e completed application form and the requirements on the che c k l i s t a t t h e t i m e o f resubmittal. Dedication completed by Date:___________ IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS O 0 0 7a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent t o t h e b u i l d i n g s i t e m u s t b e constructed at time of building construction whenever the v a l u e o f t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n exceeds $ -pursuant to Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements- required as.follows: Please have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriat e i m p r o v e m e n t p l a n s a n d submit them together with the requirements on the att a c h e d c h e c k l i s t f o r a separate plancheck process through the Engineering Depart m e n t . I m p r o v e m e n t plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and f e e s p a i d p r i o r t o issuance of permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal c h e c k l i s t f o r t h e p u b l i c improvements requirements. Provide the completed app l i c a t i o n f o r m a n d t h e requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Improvement Plans signed by: 0 Date: P:\DOCS\CHKLST\6P0001 .FRM Page 2 of 4 REV 04/30/96 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1st-v/ 2nd/ 3rd/ 0 0 0 7b. Construction of the public improvements ma y b e d e f e r r e d p u r s u a n t t o c o d e S e c t i o n 18.40. Please submit a recent property title repo r t o r c u r r e n t g r a n t d e e d o n t h e property and processing tee of $ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This a g r e e m e n t m u s t b e s i g n e d , n o t a r i z e d and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Bui l d i n g Permit. Future public improvements required as follows:__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Improvement Plans signed by: Date:__________ O 0 0 7c. Enclosed please find your Future Improveme n t A g r e e m e n t . P l e a s e r e t u r n s i g n e d a n d notarized Agreement to the Engineering Departmen t . Future Improvement Agreement completed by: &/C3 Date: 0 7d. No Public Improvements required. SPE C I A L N O T E : D a m a g e d o r d e f e c t i v e improvements found adjacent to building site mu s t b e r e p a i r e d t o t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n o f the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. O 0 0 8a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan t o m a k e a d e t e r m i n a t i o n o n g r a d i n g requirements. Include accurate grading quantiti e s ( c u t , f i l l i m p o r t , e x p o r t ) . O 0 0 8b. Grading Permit required. A separate gradi n g p l a n p r e p a r e d b y a r e g i s t e r e d C i v i l Engineer must be Submitted together with the co m p l e t e d a p p l i c a t i o n f o r m a t t a c h e d . NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and ro u g h g r a d i n g a p p r o v a l o b t a i n e d p r i o r to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: 02//0 0 8c. No Grading Permit required. P\D S1\8OO1.F$ Page 3014 ndvh' 3rd,/ V' El 0 U BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, trees, driveways, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for A separate Right-of-Way permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following: A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a Permit. I 'O . U Industrial waste permit accepted by: Date: ,.0 -. PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. GB 96 -- 10? L Address 277 L Planner David Rick Phone (619) 438-1161 ext. 4328 (Name) APN: 2i-2.3o-O?--- Type of Project and Use: CM1 Zone: R- Facilities Management Zone:_______________ CFD (in/out) #___________________________ circle (If property in, complete SPECIAL TAX CALCULATION WORKSHEET provided by Building Department) Legend - (0.0 Item Complete © Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES NO (" V TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval Discretionary Action Required: YES (Ii . - 0• APPROVAL/RESO. NO.._ PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: NOTYPE I DATE '..... 1 Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval,__________________________________________________ J California Coastal Commission Permit Required: YES ____ NO V DATE OF APPROVAL: San Diego Coast District, 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 521-8036 Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval O 0 Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO ._- (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993). Site Plan: I2D 0 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, propetfy lines, easements, existing and proposed dfrUâtures,cstreets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensioned setbacks and existing topographical lines. . 7' I2 0 0 2. Provide legal description of property, and assessor's parcel number. / Zoning: 1. Setbacks: .. - Front Required Shown 2 c)' Int. Side: Required 4.5' Shown C' Street Side: Required "t Shown A41r Rear: Required 13' Shown t!' 0 2. Lot Coverage: Required 410A Shown Z If 0 0 3. Height: - Required 3' MAIS Shown 25 / 0 4. Parking: Spaces Required 2 Shown 2 Guest Spaces Required —Shown it1T) 0 0 Additional Comments _ ,j. . ' b, 5ei- be.ck5 *'..L rufQo eJ'y4i)- i s-' &I62, 4t.c a-€,,. i,ii k.-1) .4 I) 1'7I 4:eL# -F/...r c.f i4 cg sE. pr'.,61PJ. DATE K:\ADMiN\COUNTER\PLANcK. FRM 1-17-96 ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY P.O. BOX 1932 • EL CAJON, CALIFORNIA 92022-1932 TELEPHONE (619) 447-4747 ROBERT CHAN, P.E. July '8, 1996 James .R. Cummings Architectural Communications 2926 5th Avenue . Sari Diego, Ca. 92103 Subject : Project No. 96-1141C1 Limited Soil Investigation Proposed Additions to Existing Residence Proposed Addition. to 'Existing.. Residence 2778 Galicia Way Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Cummings In accordance with your request, we have performed'a limited soil. investigation of the proposed additions on subject property, more specifically referred. to as being Lot 268 of La Costa South. Unit' No. 2, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California. It is our. understanding that the proposed additions will consist of a new two story addition in the rear,, northeast corner of the structure, and second story additions over portions of the exist- ing residence. The purpose of.thi.s. report is to present our engineering evalua-' tion of the site, and our engineering recommendations relative to the proposed development thereon. In order to accomplish this purpose, the undersigned visited :the . .. site on July:8., 1996., reviewed the topography.and general site conditions, classified .the surface and near-surface soils, and ob- tamed, samples for laboratory—testing—and anlaysis.. . In addition, the Final Report on Compacted Filled 'Ground for subject subdivi— sion prepared by Benton. Engineering, Inc. was reviewed One exploratory boring was excavated on the site with a 'small .portable auger to a maximum .depth of.3,feet below, existing ground surface.. The location of the boring is shown on 'Figure No. 1, entitled., "Approximate Location.-.of.. Exploratory Boring". Project No. 96-114'7G1 James R. Cummings 07/08/96 Page 2 1. From.the. site inspection and report review, it was determined that :. a. Subject property is a trapezoidal-shaped site of approxi- mately 0.25. acres, located on the north side of Galicia Way. The lot is a part of La Costa South'Unit No. 2, and as such, was developed in the early 19701 s. b. The geotechnical engineering, firm of record was Benton Engineering, Inc. who prepared the Soil Investigation Report for the subdivision, and provided geotechnical engineering services during development. C. The site currently, consists of a. level building pad at street level. .The, front, southeasterly portion consists of natural soils; while the rear, northwesterly portion consists of fill soils. Maximum depth of fill is on the order of 14 feet.. along the rear of the property. A 20-foot high fill slope is -ob- served beyond the rear property line. The soils as encountered in the boring consist of .light tan silty fine sands. According to the above-mentioned.Repor.t by Ben- ton Engineering, Inc., some of the soils on site are expansive. No drainage courses will be interrupted by the proposed construction, and no seeps., or springs, were observed during our site inspection.. . 2. It is our conclusion.,'that.: the proposed addition can b& con- structed without failure or detrimental foundation...rnovement occur- ring as a result of structural loads imposed upon the soils from the development as presently contemplated, and without unduly in- fringing the rights of those who control the adjacent properties and public rights-of-way, if. the conditions set forth below, are followed : . . - a. . I.t is recommended 'that a safe allowable soil bearing value of 2,00.0 .pounds per square foot be .used in the design and checking_—? of foundations, 12' inches in minimum horizontal dimension, and em- bedded at least 18 inches into'the competent natural or compacted fill sols. , Project No. 96-1147G1 James R. Cummings 07/08/96 Page 3 b. It is recommended tha.t..all new continous foundations b7 reinforced with 2 #5 rebars; one rebar placed near the top, and the other near the bottom of the foundation. C. It is recommended that the concrete slab.be at least 4 inches..in. thickness,. and be reinforced with 6x6-10/10 welded wire fabric, located at mid-height of slab. The slab should be under- lain by 4 inches of clean sand,.-with a moisture barrier within living areas. New foundations should. be placed at least 7 feet back from. the. face of the existing fill slope along the rear of the ' property. . Foundations placed closer t.o the top of slope than 7. feet should be deepened such that the outer face of foundation at the bottom is at least 7 feet back from the face of slope at that level. It is recommended that the new foundation. .trench excava- tions -be inspected by our firm to ensure proper embedment i.nto " competent material,, and to verify that the soil type encountered. are.similar to those presented in this report. It is further recommended that .the. proposed addition be. constructed In strict compliance with the approved plans and ap- plicable regulations, except where items 2(a) to (e) above are more stringent. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Should you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to.contact our office. Figure No. 1 is a.-part,-of this report. . espec tf=TUCHNOLOGY mitted, ALLIED E ft . r'1 APPROxfi47r tD477DN l i... .. OF- LT,9ZRA7zWy I IS SAW I B-I -4PP&OXIAM-Tf LOCA77oAt or fXPO1t47?WY 96plipm; F7guA' NO. .1 PA2.JL T NO 9 -f!47a1 1 .. ..• . . . BENTON ENGINEERING, tNC - - APPLIED 8011. MECI4ANIC8 - FOUNDATIONS 0 6711 CONVOY COURT .. :. $AN DIIaO CAUPONNIA 621ft October 3,. .1977..... .' .+K'LKF"0;N9 17146 .665-19 Mr. Steve John. . 0 .. 1091 Neptune . . . .:.:.. .- .- . Leucadua, California 92024 Sub1ect' Project No, 77-9-28M p 00 .............. MEfuiri e CFits i:Sbgrade...Soils . ..........:, Lot 263 2 . . La Costa South Unit.,No 4 - Carlsbad, California Dear Mr.. John:0• 0 . . . : This is to report the results of tests to determine the moisture contents of the soils in the, grade in the proposed build ing. area .a.tthè....sUbIec.t...stti!n Car lsbad.....California. . ......0 W. . '. The- soil samples were obtained on September 30, 1977 and the results of the moisture determinations are presented as follows: . : .... .... .... ..:':. .. .. ., ..0,• Depth of Sample Moisture . ... . Approximate. ... . ............ BeI. ...x,isfing . - .....Con Content...., -- Location of Samples Grade In. Feet % dry Westerly portion of proposed 1.0 19.8 - . . building area . . . . .2,0 16,8 . . . 3.0 16.5 Easterly portion of proposed 1.0 19.6 building area . 2.0 20.8 3.0 .19113 . . It is concluded from the field observations of the various soil types and the final results...D the moisture determ inations that the soils in the upper three feet below Finished grade locations sampled have been sufficiently moistened to minimize the potential ccponsici f I! soils as recommended in our report under Prbject No. 69-11-13D, dated February 24, 1970" . . . . . 0 . ..... . .. . Respectfully submitted, Reviewed by .................................... ::".:-- 0 ..........H . Shu, iviEngineer. BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. RICIE, No. 19913' R.C. Remer. . Distr. (2) Addressee . '• (1) City of Carlsbad, Building Dpartmer BENTON ENGINEERING, INC ... . APPUKD•OII. MECHANICS - OUNDATIOP45 . . •11. • • 04I V. CAJON 2OULEVARD . IAN DIEGO. CAUeNA.I2115 . . •• . . . .•.. . •. . . . .. . . • : :.. .. •. .. . . .• PkIUPHENXlN!N7ON L 'viA v# SAN DiEbi l.584 .uIDV4T. CIVIL KNUtNi(N;. ..• ..February IT/V . t. iia* aøo.Dam 4. :! . .i . :. • . . . Raricho La Cosl'a, Inc. • •.'• . . • . . . . . . .. : ...4J,RouteJ, Bizii 2550 :: •. . ..: . ... .. ., .• . !rcIrdI, California 92024 : .::; . •:.. •. . . • .. . . .. .. :.proI.ctNo. 69.u11_13D(L5547) . .. . • . . - Final Report on - Compacted Piled Ground . ; Loft 260 to 268, IncIusIv*00 Lots AV .-. . . . .. ... — g' 276. :iZ',ve VLI 30.3. to 309t Inclusive '7ttøf &1~4S? . I '' 'and Lot 322 LoCost SouhUnR No. 4 Dlogo CountyTY1a Gentleman:, * ' This Is 10 report the results of tests and observations made In order to Inspect the *compaction qf filled ground placed on certain areas of Loft 260 to 26, TncIusve, 274, 276 and 277, 279 to 284, 16dus1v, 289 to 301, Inclusive, 303 to 309, Inclusive, and 322, of La Costa South Unit .... 4;sa Dlógó County, California. The fills viere placed duritv the period- between December 41 jr 1969 and February 4, 1970, The approximate areas and depths of filled ground placed under our inspection In accordance with h. approved specifications are shown on the attached Drawing No, 1, entitled "Location of Compacted FIII.d Ground The gradirg plan used for the placement of filled ground was . propar 'id byRick mart rg Company and approved November 18, 1969. H . .,. .. . . .... • . •. . . The approximate locations at which the tests were taken and the find test results are presented pces 4-to 10, inc1usIve under the "Table of Test Results " The laboratory determinations of the maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the major fill materials are 11"iresented on page U,ur,der Ihe "Laboratory Test Results." Some of the maximum .dryderisiHai JJIshown In the "Table of Test Results" were combinations of these. The tests were taken durk !va th.wv.Idy periods Indicated below Test Number Week Endtr • • . • • • • •. 1 to 13, Inclusive, December 13, 19&9 14 to 98, inclusive December 200 1969 99 to 13, inclusive December 27, 7969 - Project No 69-11-13!) -2- February 24, 1970 La Costa South Unit No. 4 . . . . Test ,mber . Week Er1r S.. :1. ...-.136 to 182, Inclusivei Jaric*ty 3, 1970 . .183 .. . . . January 101 1970 •: -184 to 186, indutive January 171 1970 .... ..........187218, Inclusive' .. .Jaa4, 190 ,. . . . 219 +0232, Inclusive . . . January 31,. 1970 . . •. . :. 233 to 237, inclusIve February 7, 1970 + The flncil results of tests and c6ervai4oni indicate that the compacted filled ground h been placed at 90 percent of the maximum dry density or greater. It hat been determined that the fitl materials, compacted to 90 percent of the maximum dry density, have a safe bearing- value fat least 2000 pounds per square foot for one foot wide conflnuous footJrs founded at a minimum depth and placed five feet or more Inside the top of compacted filled ground slopes. If Fooflrs are piccid closer to the exposed slopes than 5 feet Inside the top of compacted filled 4. goultopu, thise should be deepened one foot below a 1 1/2 horizontal to 1 verfical line fed pro jad cutword and downward From a point 5 feet horizontally Inside the top of compacted filled ground slopes. Test, Indicate that the compacted filled ground is adequate to satlsfczc- torily support one or two story wood frame dwelIl,s designed for the recommended beartrG value, without detrimental settlements. - In our report of the original Investigation coaductàd at this subdivWon, (Project No. 69-3"24BC dated May 22, 1969), stated that some "expansive" soil, existed on the site ond'f they were allowed to rernOn In the upper 3 fist below finished grOde soMe oF the lots would require1 .. ;. JJJ .. • specially designed footings and slabs. We further stated that .these' lots would be listed upon th completion of grading The lotS where expansive soils were observed to remain within the upper 3 . foot, are tabula at . . • Type A' Lot 287 ...... Type B: . Lots 268,273 and 274, 280 to 285, inclusive, 289 to 301, Inclusive, àrd 303 to307, Inclusive It Is that the following *paclal design precautions be taken for the house t6-be ...... constructed on the 'above "Ilsted lots in order to minimize the effect of the expansive salk: Type A Lots 1, Isolated Interior piers should not be used. Continuous footings should be used throughout, and these siouId be placed at a minimum depth of two. feet .below.. th* lowest adjacent exterior final groundsurfOc.... . . ...... 2....... RiInforce and Interconnect continuously with' steel bars all interior and exterior . ............- footing #4.bers Inches above the bottom -of all.:feottngs and two14 ban placed 1 1/ Inches below the tap of the stems of the foot1,s. I IDENTON ENGINEEFANG, INC - Project- No 69-1 1-I3D -3- February 24,:1970 La Cos rSouth Unit No. 4 . . . . ... . . (Cont Ii ... . 3 Use raised wood flOors that span betweenconflrjous Footings, or roinforceal... concrete sibs with 6.x 6 - 10/10 wøv.nwlre fabric and provide a minimum of 1 4 Inches of clean sand beneath all concrete slabs. Provide a moisture barrier . ... .2.Inchu below slabs under livirg areas. . . .. . .........,.,,4.• 'Seporategaris!abs from perimeter fooHrs by 1/ Inch thickness of cortsfruc-' Hon felt or equivalent, to allow Irdependent movement of garage slabs reiafivø to perimeter foot1rs . . : Provide positive drainage áy from all perimeter footirgi to a horizontal dlsfäñes I of at Jeost 6 fist outside the house waiIs TypellLoh - Thos. IohA1%ted,on.pqge 2 as Type B lots shouid.foliow all. thi above-listed recommendat1or .y4th:..$he.Pwo.foiIow1r exceptions: . . . .•. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 1. The continuous footIrs may be placed at a minimum depth of 18 riches below .................the Iost adiacent ,xterlor flnaLgraund surfaci thr than e t WO feet ;.I..:........... ..........:,Lrecommended ..for Type Mots. . 2 Sir" 14 14 bars placed as directed (above) near tops and bottoms of all Interior and exterior fooflrQs.may be substitWed for the two 14.6ars recornmended.for• .......... .......... .. ;... .. . 'IypeAlots. . . . . . . . Rlecomme.nd'ailons 3 to 5, Inclusive, as i1ted for Type A lots, are applicable to the Type B lots 1. 5 also, The safe'-bearing value for footings on natural ground Is 1795 pounds per square foot. ReipecfMly submitted, 1. . •BENTQN•ENGI NEERING,...I NO. . . .. . .. . . . . ...... f11P H. Benton, C1vIlElneer .,. .. .. . ., •. . .. I Disfr: (4) Mdr.uee .. . . . . . 7 RtckErg1ns.rrç Company . . . San Diego County Building Inspection . 1' ........ Vista Office - ... . . . . . . . (2) Rancho La Costa, Inc. Attention: Mr.. Burn LKromer.. ., . ... .. -........................................ARRNTON kNaINURING, INC. •. .. . .-. Project No. 69-11-130 . . 4- .". ..Mory24, 1970 Ra'ñ'do.LaCosta South Unit No. 4 TABLEOF TEST P5J11S !.L...............- .... - .Approx-...... NO . Maximum . ... ..Ima . of Fill .. laid . Dry Dry .... . ... .. . . Teit at Teat Moisture D.risfly Drt1y '. .. P.ràerit No. ' Lot No. in. Fist . . % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft compaction ... .'...... .. .: 1 261 2 104 . 102.8 113.9 90.3 261 4 .. 13.9 . . 106.7 115.0 ' 92.8 : 3...... ....260 ............'2 156 102.0 . , 112.0 ,...91..1............ 4 261 6 16.4 106.2 113,9 93.4. 5 . 260 '4 •,:16.4. . 105.2 1.11.5 944 H ....... 266 2 14.5 103.5 111.5 92.8 7 267 . 2 . 15 .0 108.1 112.3 .' 962 . . .. 8 75 . .4 ' 129 109.2 113.9 . . 96.0 . .... 9 4 14,1 108,3 .113.9 933 ' ' .10 266 . 6 ' 14,4 108.0 . 113.1 .95.5 1V 265 ....8 17.5.103.6 111.5 93.0 267 . 102.7 . 110.6. 92.9 . ..........12 .1.3 ...,6610 183 103.2 1.10.6 93.5...:,. 14 267 8- 15.6 106.6 113.0 944 15 265 12 15.6 105.3 112.0 94.0 . . . 16 .266 14 17.9 103.0 . 110.8 93.1 17 : 265 16 16,4 106.0 112.0 94.6 w.• 267 12 16.6 104,3 110.6 94.4 19 260 6 14.4 . 108.6 113.0 96.1 .. . 20 '261 .., B 15.0 107.2 . 114.7 93.6 .21 266 18 . 17.0 107.7 111.0 97.0 . . 22 260 - 8 - 15.1 109. 1 113.1 96.6 23 260 10 11 3 107 0 116 0 92.2 . ......................24 ..........26.1.........:...... 12.,..............12.3 . 109.7 115.5 95.0 . E .......... 25.... .......262 2 89 ......9 1171 92;1......H. •' 26. 264 . .. 2 11.2 108.6 117.1 92.7 I............... 27'T' 265........ ""'2O..............17,5.':............1Q698 1.15.0 ., 92.9 ...... •. 28 266 .22 12.2 105.8 114.0 ... 92.8 29 .267 16 15.1 107.2 115.0 93,2 .264 6 11.5 108,2............113.1......... -"95;B'-........................................... -""31 31 260 12 33 .. 104.6 ......112.3 '93.1 32 262 6 126 107.1 113.1 94 7 J 33 263 4 123 108.1 113.0 95.7 34 260 14 13,0 106.9 113 1 946 35 267 20. 10.4 . 104.0 114.7 .90 .7 ..... . ............. 36 265 24 13.4 109.0 1147 95.2 37 - -268 4 11,8 - 105.8 114,0 92.8 38 266 26 11.6 107.2 113 1 949 39 260 16 11.4 ' 108.1 114.7 94.4 . 40 I ......................:.. 260 18 14.2.. .,....". . . .107.2::..........114.0....94.1 ...'.. .................. . . . .................................. . .DNTON KNOINEERING, INC. . 05 February 24-107b. TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) I- .. Approx-' pin - Maximum u tmte of 1111 Mild Dry Dry - I T.zt Location at Test Moisture DerII'y Domity Percent No. Lot No. In Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft Compaction 1 .4 1 -261 20 11,0 104.9 112,3 93.4 .. . 42 262 10 13 6 109.1 115,0 9499 43 263 8 12.3 9.9 107,9 105.7 114.0 113.9 94.6 929 44 I 44 264 10 - 45 265 28 11.8 109.4 116.0 _914.3 46 - 267 24 1.0.1 106.6 114,0 93-.0 47 268 8 10.0 109.3 115.0 95.1 48 266 30 10.2-105.4 114.0 92 5 i 49 265 32 11,0 106.9 114.0 93,8 I " 50 260 18 10.4 .108.1 114.0 94 9 51 - 261 24 115 107.1 114.0 94.0 :. 52 . 260 . 20 15.9 . . 106.8 112.3 95.1 I 53 260 22 12.3 108.1 112.3 96.3 54 260 24 15.0 110.0 112.3 98.0 55 262 14 13.6 110.3 112,3 98.3 56 263. 12 10.8 107.9 116,0 93.0 57 264 14 13.2 109.0 114.0 95.6 1 .......59 58 . -266 34 11.9 104.5 113.9 91.8 • ' .......267 .. . 20 -. 12,7 . 106.7 115.0 92.7 60 268 12 12.0 109.5 115,0 95 2 260 26 118 . 104.9 114.0 • 92.0 . . . .62 .261 . 28 12.1 . . 105.7 .. .114.9 92.7 .. .... . .63. :;.;..,260 ..............28 . .105 . . 103.0 .1.12.3 91.7........ 1 64 263 16 10.3 105.3 113.9 92 7 65 262 18 . . 108 104.6 . 113.9 92.0 : ...... . ....... :'. :66. .264 '18 . 105.8 113.9 93.0 67 265 36 12.4 106.9 114.0 93.8 I : 68• .266 38 . 10.91 .105.5 115.0 91.9 . .. . 69 167 32 12.3 106.3 1140 933 1 70 268 16 12.6 108.3 114.7 94.5 . 71...40 12.8 ' 107.2. 113.9 .94.3 ...72. .260 .30. .11.9 .104.5. .114.0 - 91.7 • .73 261 32 12.3 107,1 1140 94.0 . .........................74.. ......... 263.. ......... ..........20-.-...............11.2...... 104..3 114.0 . 91.6 75 •. .262 . 22 12.0 106.9, . 114.0 93.8.............•. 76 .264 . 22 12.5 105.5 114.7 92.1 .77 266 42 11.4 106.8 114.0 . 937 78 268 . 20 12.6 108.3 117.1 - 92.6. 79 . 32 12,4 107.1 115.5 92.7 . 267 . 260 ...36...............12;8.........i.2 . 113.9 943 :. .....................:_....:: .......................................... wreN NOINfIN. INC. - Protect No 69-dl-13D I . 'Ranho Lo Costa South Unit No. 4 pro jectfT6913D -6- Rancho La Costa South Uhit No. 4 February Z4 by/U Apprax Depth mats of Fill Test LoctiOn ....at Test No Lot No In Feet TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CON Maximum. Field Dry Dry Moisture Delfltty Density % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft Percent Compaction 81 265 .. 44 13.4 105.7 1147 92.2 82 266 46 13.3 104.6 112.3 . 93.2 83 267 . 40 13.0 105.8 113.9 93.0 ....... $4. .265 . 48 .11.2 104.0 113.9 91.4 85. 266 34 15.3 110.0 114.0 . 96.5 ..............................86............261 34 107.4 115.0 93.5 87 266 50 15.0 104.....113.1 . 92.6................. .88 265 52 169 . 106.7 116.0 92.0 89 : 268. 24 13.2 107.1 . 114.7 935 . 90 267 44 14.7 1046 114.7 91.2 91 266 54 14.9 107.0 116,0 92.2 .1 92 265 56 . 14.6 114.9 117.3 98.0 1 .93 263.....24 13.3 102.7 114.0 90.1 . . . ......94...........268-................28..............3 107.0 114.0 93.9 I 95 266 58 17,0 104.3 112.3 92.9 1 96 267 48 13.9 106.9 114,7 . . 93.3............. ........ .97 ..........265 60 16.2 P105.1 112.3 . . 936 - 98 268 30 15.6 104.5 114.0 91.7 . I 99 267 50 15.4 108.9 112.3 97,0 ibo .266.................60 ..........11.3.......107.7 117.1.. ..... 92.0 . I 101 .265 62 . 12.7 . 107.2 114.0 94.0 .1. .102 264 26 13.6 ............. 112.3.................90.9........................................................ 262 ......24 12.1 •. 106.5 112.3 94.8 . 13 104 301. . 2 12.6 116.8: 117.1. ........997 . . . .4 13,1 113.6 117.1 97.0.. . 106 301 6 12.3 110.1 117.1 94,0 I 1W LaGran 4 12.5 109,3 117.1 93.4 Via Street . S..............................-0290 . . 1. .108 290 2 12.4 . 110,8 117.1 94.6 109 ........36 .260 15.1 104.4 112.3 .93.0 110 . 261 . 36 10.3. . 112.3 .94.6 I 111 292 . 2 15.4 105.4 114.0 925 112 309 2 12.1 105.0 116.0 90.5 .. . 113. Modrtl.fla 3 . 12.7 . 106.2. 116.0 91,7 Vey . . 114 307 . 2 .11 .1. . .108.7 117'. 1 92.8 115. .305:. .......- 2 .......... . .12•3 . 1.9 .934.. .. . ....... 116 I 308 ...13.2 . 108.0 112.3. 96.1 ......... DNTONENOINEtRING INC - - - 1. Protect No 69-11-13D . . -7..- Rancho La Costa South Unit No. 4 " February 24, 1970 . I . . . . TABLE OF TEST RESULTS .(CONT.) . ...:. '" Depth ••' . . Maximum . I.......... . Imate.......ofFHI Field Dry 'Dry'.' '. : Test Location at Test Moisture Demity Density Percent . . No. Lot 'No. In Feet ... % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/co ft .. Compaction . :4 117 I ...13 306 4 . 13.3 ...................................................... 105.1 112.3 936 118 309 6 12.4 106.1 112.3 94.4 . . .119 293 . 4 15.2 104.1 112.3 92.7 . • • ':.,:"' 120 ' 292..::.. 6 ' 13.9 1051 112.3 93.6 '. . . 121 309 5 13.9 102.0 112.3 90.8 122 292... •'.8' 13.1 1033 112.3 ' 92.2'" ......... '. 123 308 81 140 106.8 114.0 937 124. 309 .10 13.2 106.3 . 114.0 93.4 . 125 292 10 12.2 104.7 114.0 92.0 I 126 309..:: 12 10.4 1.02.6 112.3 91.3 : :1 127 308 ' 10 14,1 105.8 1.14.0 92.8 1 128 307 6 141 109.8 1140 963 129 309.. 14 11.0 102.6 112.3 91.3 130 292 12 13.5 106.1 114.0 93 1 ik LI ': 13.1 294 2' .........105.4 112.3 . ' . 939 ' . 132 ' 293 -" . ' 8 14.4' ' 105.9 112.3 ' '"94.3" 133 292 14 13.6 103.1 112.3 91 8 'I - ..... .." 134295....:,.............4..............13.9...................1036 ' ' 112.3.' : .92,3. ..........' , , ' ...........135......296......-'2 ......... 10.5 . 1052 114.7........91.8 136 298 2 117 104.1 112.3 ................. ...........1' 300 ' 2 12.4 '104.4" 1123...................93'.'0 .............."" .138 300 ........4 , . .11,4 . 103.0 114.0 ' 90.3 L ' 139' "299 . 4" 12.2'. ' '105.6 ' 114.0 '92.6 I 140........300...... 6 ' 12.1 ' 106 .6---.. 114.0, 93.5' 141 '' 282 ' .2 13,,1 101.8 . 112.3, 90.7 .142 294: ' 4 15.1 10.9 112.3 96.1 143 296 4 13.5 . 108.2' 117.4 92.2 ..................A," .20.,.........4 13.6 108.1 . 114.0 94.9 145 282 6 125 101.6 112.3 .90.3 '146 •. 283 . .-... , 2 13.9 " 105.6 114.0 92.7 . . 147 , ' La Grain 2 . 13.7 ' . 104.1 114.0 '91.4 Via Sfr.lt Opp'284 . . . . . 148 ' 283 . , . 4 10.9 101.9 112,3 90.7 . 149 La Gran 2, " 12.5 ' . 105.2 ' 113.0 93.2 ' Via 'Street. Opp. 282 ':' 150' ". tàGróñ '4 ' 11.3 ' . 11. ' 109.2 114.7 95.3 . I . ' ' Via Street. Opp. .283 .... ...... tNON 2NOINRIMO, INC. Proeflo. 69-11-13D . . . . . February 24, 1970 • Ranch a La Costa South U nit No. 4 . ... I ......... . - TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.J. . :Appx- . . Depth . . . Maximum. : . of Fill Field Dry Dry . I. . Tsst Locãtlofl at Test Moisture Dor.lty . Density Percent No Lot No. In Feet, % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu Ft Compaction 151 301 8 12.9 109.2 117.1 93.2 : 152 291 4 .13.4 .. 109.0 114.0 .95.7 .... • 153 . 301.. 10 10.9 110.6 115.0 96.1 154 .. La Gran . 8 .. 12.7 10.9.9 115.0 95.6 Via Strut . . . . 1' 155 . ..................................Opp;289............................................................ 301 12 142 109.1 117.3 93.0 .156 290: .6 12.6 .1078 117.1 92.0. 157 301. 14 . 18.7 106.4 117.1 90.9 158 La Gran 12 :15.2 108.0 117,3 92.0 ... . Via Street .........................Opp. 290 :• .5.. 159 30 16 11 .9 . 103.2 112.3 .92.0 160 161 291- 301 8 18 11.2 11.3 106.6 103.0 112.3 112.3 94.9 91.7 162 .La Gran 16 103 . 106.6 . 114.7 930 . ............. Via' street Opp, 289 . . . 163 ff 303 ...............2.............9.2.....................102.8 ......114.0. : .90.2. 164 165 290 301 10 20 10.5 13,3 107.0 103.6 117.3 112.3 91.2 922 166 . 284 2 15.0 103.2 114.0 90.5 167 LaGran.......4 VlaStràet . 13.3 . . .....5 105.3 ............ . 112.3 . 93 . . .5 .....Opp. 285 . . . . . . . . ... 168 ..LaQran . Via Street 13.9 S. 105.4 . .. 114.7 .92,0 Opp. 284' . . . . . .......................169..............LaG :8 via street 13.6 . 103.5 112,3 .92.1 Opp;283 .. . . .. . 170. 283 6 . 13.7. . 1067 114.9 93.0 J 17). 282 8 12.4 108.5 112.3 96.6. .. . 172 300 . . . 10 . 133 . 109.8 114.9 955 173 284 . 6 12.2 109.2 114.0 95.8 174 283 8 6.8 103.8 114.7 90.6 S. 299, . 6 .12.2 . .106.5 112.3 94.8 176 ...297..............2 .147 . 107.0.... 115.0............93.1 ............... . • 177 284 : 8 .17.2 ... 106.6 114.9 .92.8 .: . .. . . . . . N40N !NG1NIE!ING. INC . . Project No. 69'111"13D . .9 , . February 24, 1970 U Rancho La Costa South Unit No. 4 . . '. . . III TABLE OF TEST RESULIS(CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum Imati of Fill Field iDryk Dry Test Location at lest Moisture 4 Dentty Deti$y. Percent No. Lot No In Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft Compaction 1 178 LaGran 8 15.0 105. 6. 114.0 927 Via Street i4tt - Opp. 285 179 LaGron 10 13,3 103.2 112.3 92.0 I Via Sheet , 180 Opp. 284 283 10 12.1 106.9 l 117 3 91.1 181 LaGran 12 144 Al2.3 944 a - I Via Shelf Opp. 284 . . ....... . . : 182 LaGrart W. 13.1 106.6 117.3 90.9 I Via Sheet I - 0,284 183 322 2 12.1 101.2 112.3 90.1 1 184 301 22 13.4 1218 112.3 91.6 185 291 12 12.8 105.8 114.7 92,2 .186 282 10 16.5 108.3 : 114.7 945 187 281. 2 14.8 .. 104.3 114.0, .91.6 • 188 281. 4 17.0. 114.0 90.3. .189 301 . 24 13.4 .103.8..: 114.0 . .91.1 190 '. 281 . 6 .' 15.2. :.105.2,,:', 113.2 930 .......... 191 281 8 16.3 111.0 115.0 96,5 192 291 13' 13.9 110.1 114.0. 965 I 193 290 12* 17.1 108.1 115.6 93.6 S 2' "16.7 103.3; : 114.0 90.7 195 -2T84 11* 15.2 108.4 117.4 92.4 196 283 12* 14.2 103.0-6'.115.0 90.1 .•.• 197 ....300 . . 12' .17.2 106.2,:.. 114.0 93,2 S.. 198 299 8' 145 108.2 113.2 95.6 199 298 4* 12.7 112.1 117.3 95.5 200 297 4' 13.2 113.9 117.4 970 .201. '' 296 . 5.' :17.0 . .• 112,2.. 114.0 98.5 I 202'. 295 ,'.. '5* ' 16.9 . 1061 113,0 94.0 203 294 . 6* 16.7 . : 108.5': ...' 114.0 95.2 204 293' 10*. 14.3 111.7' ,'. 1.14.0 '' 980 I.. 205' 292. . .15* 15.8 .101.7.. .113.0 90.0 . . 206 '309 . 15' . 17.8 .. 105.9' . 115.0 .92.1 I 207 208 . 308 . 307 . 12 7* . 15.7 15.1 . 109.1 " 1W..0'. 113.2 113.2. 96.3. 945 1 * Finished Grade EMTON ENOINflTN. iNC. Project No. 69--11-13D : 'i0 February 24, 1970 I Rancho'Lo Costa South Unit No; 4 '.. . TABLE OF TEST RESULTS çONT.) I , Approx Depth Maximum T est imate or FIJI Field Dry Dry. I Location al Test Moisture Detiiy DerI$y Percent No Lot No, In Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft Compaction 209 306 6* 14.5 1115 115.0 97.0 210 263 26 190 105.3 1132 930 i.t 211 Madrtlena 5* 15.4 108.5 115.0 94.4 Way Opp". 291 212 La Gran 2 * 13 .9, 107.5 114.0 94 *.*4''. Via Street op','297 313 La Gran 6* 17.1 105.3 113,2 93.0 Via Strut Opp. 282 214 'La Gran 15* 14.0 105.6 113.2 93.3 Via Strut Opp. 299 215 La Gran' 4 11.8 109,4 1150 - 95.2 u. ,. . Vt. Strut . . . . . . Opp28B - 216 . La Gran . 20* 12.6 . 111.4 115.0 97.0 Via Strernt Opp. 290 217 La Gran 5* 11.6 105,8 1123 94.1 Via Strut . . Opp'* 291. .;. 218 277 ':. 2 * 16.5 107.4 114.0 . 942 219 , 267 51 13.3 107.6 114 0 94A "264''"': 28* 16.3, 110. " 3' 114.0" 96.9 221 268 32* 15.4 110.7 1140 971 222": "322 4 14.4 ' . 109.2 112.3 97.2 20 ' .113.2 , 92,7 • 224 260 37* 1.2.1 1091 1130 96.6 225 'J .37•' 13.6'•" 'iot'.b '112.3 •" 90.0 226 . :262 25 13.1 109..9...........1.14..0......_..-96..5.-.......-.....- .227 265 64* 14.4 104.9 113.0 ,,92.9 228 266 '62's 139 107.9 114.0 94.6 229 274 2* 13.3 113.1 ' 115.0 ' 98.4 -jo ':"'28j. "': .10* 130 111.5 113.2: 98'05' 231 280 ... 2* 12.0.. ' 110.5 114.0. 96.9 232 303' '' . 4* . 14.0 110.8 115.0 ' 96.3 233 : 4* 10.6 102.5 113.2 90.5. ......................................3'."' . 1 ' 12.2 105.7 113.2 ' , 93.4 235 301 25* ' 11,0 109.6 114.0 96.2 .236'' ' 282 12* . ,. 14.2 '' 108.7 114.0 , 95.4 2' 279 ' 2 . 13,1,, 110.4 114.0 97.0 nIth*d Gd. : ENTON rNINeFrNG, INC. . AM 619411- bibUiu1;1 . Project No. 69-11-13D -11-' February 24, 1970."*' La 'Costa'South-Urdt No.4....... I. ..:''' •' . . LABORATO RY TEST RESULTS The maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the major fill materials as deter- I mined by the A. S. TA, D 1557-58T method, that uses 25 blows of .a. 10 pound hammer faiIlr from a h.,ght of 18 Inches on each of 5 layers In a 4 inch diameter 1/30 cubic foot compaction * cyllnder, are presented as foilok.s' Maximum - Optimum MOIs- ,.,4:', Dry Density 'lure Content Soil Type.- lb/cu ft -% dry wt I Yellow-&- 112.3 138 r t-Red-brown sits>' fine tomecflum sand (topsoil 117.1 12.6 4? Olive-green silty clay 110.6. 15.7 .4 Lightgroy-.brown silty clay with yellow streaks 109 2 and cloystone chunks Gray-brown slightly silty fine sand 1 13.9 13 3 Gray-brown fin' sandy clay 117.4 ...13.1 Light gray very fine to Fine sand 114 0 14 2 '1' :" . ... . .. ...., a . • . • £47, TL' L7- c . ( iIlE... .... -- •. ....:: • . • - .- • . LI. JAMES M CUMMINGS FAX 2705510 PAGE 02 C[RTIrICAT[ Of COMPLIANCE CITY OF CARLSBAD Plan Check No. tR WO7 , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DR., CARLSBAD, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to verify that the project applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for the projects shall be issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate school district and returned to the City of Carlsbad Building Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT: Carlsbad Unified San Marcos Unified 801 Pine Avenue 1290 West San Marcos Blvd. Carlsbad CA 92009 (434-0661) San Marcos CA 92024 (744-4776) Encinitas Union _____ San Dieguito Union High School 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd. 710 Encinitas Boulevard Encinitas CA 92024 (944-4300) Encinitas CA 92024 (753-6491) Project AppIicaG27 (c C'JM' C/LJt3At> APN:--Q2tj) Project Address: RESIDENTIAL: SQ. FT. of living area fb5'1 1'b+ iing units SQ. FT. of covered area SQ. FT. of garage area COMMERCIALkMDU Prepared by .AREA Date 4 bvm,~ FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the School District) Applicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080 Project is subject to an existing fee agreement Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. (other school fees paid) Other Residential Fee Levied: $i47 .4r' based on i(5.4 _sq. ft. @ , Comm/Indust Fee Levied: $ — based on ft. @ School al ERIC J.HALL / Date Li JAMES M CUfIMINGS FAX 27e551e PAGE e3 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE .' .. CITY OF CARLSBAD •4 (R 1I7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. .' - 2075 LAS PALMAS DR., CARLSBAD, CA 92009 . ........... (619)438-1161 This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and tóverify that the project applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for the projects shall be issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate school district and urned t& the City of Carlsbad Building Department. T, _05 _1 -5 ~-7 4 E-<, SCHOOL DISTRICT: . . . . Carlsbad Unified San Marcos Unified 801 Pine Avenue .. .. , ) . ...1290 West Sn Marcos Blvd. Carlsbad CA 92009 (434-0661) / . I . T San MarcosCA .92024(744-4776) , i icx lfw br'f _____ Encinitas Union (i O'(' San Dieguito Union High School 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd. 710 Encinitas Boulevard Encinitas CA 92024 (944-4300) Encinitas CA 92024 (753-6491) Project Applicant: NL,'Ik .. . . -. ____ Project Address: RESIDENTIAL: . SQ. FT. of living area Ib~? units -. SQ. FT. of covered area . SQ. FT. of garage area COMMERCIA DLJS L: S . . AREA . . . . .1 Prepared by . Date_______________ FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the School District) AppIuant has ccmpl;ebd .uith fcii rcqtirqrnrl ,ne4cir ( ,rrmc,nt Cnc1c .10Rfl Project is subject to an existing fee agreement - Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 .. - Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. (other school fees paid) Other Residential Fee Levied: $ \çb .1O based on 145q sq. ft. @ fl- Comm/lndust Fee Levied: $_____________ based on sq. Ft. 0