Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2819 LOKER AVE E; ; CB003755; Permit
03/08/2001 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Commercial/Industrial Permit Permit No: CB003755 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 2819 LOKER AV EAST CBAD Permit Type: Tl Sub Type: COMM 0 NEW Parcel No: 2090830700 Lot#: Status: ISSUED 10/10/2000 JM 02/23/2001 03/08/2001 Valuation: $25,000.00 Construction Type: Applied: Occupancy Group: Reference #: Entered By: Project Title: DOS GRINGOS Plan Approved: ADD MEZZANINE STORAGE AREA Issued: Applicant: LEVI JASON 2819 LOKER AV EAST CARLSBAD CA 92008 760-031-8706 Inspect Area: Owner: W H C B O REAL EST LTD PARTNERSH C/0 LINCOLN PROP CO N C INC 30 EXECUTIVE PARK#100 -z,t·so r..71,,,..,1,, IRVINE CA 92614 ,., ' ' ,J,_,, Vod1 0002 O.t 02 CGF· 310,08 ~ _____________________________________________ .....;;;;:;,-, ____ Total Fees: $469.22 Building Permit Add'I Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'I Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee BTD#2 Fee BTD#3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'I Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'I Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee Inspector: Total Payments To Date: $159.14 Balance Due: $310.08 $244.83 Meter Size $0.00 Add'I Reel. Water Con. Fee $0.00 $159.14 Meter Fee $0.00 $0.00 SDCWAFee $0.00 $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $0.00 $5.25 PFF $0.00 $0.00 PFF (CFD Fund) $0.00 $0.00 License T~x $0.00 $0.00 License Tax (CFD Fund) $0.00 $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee $0.00 $0.00 Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) $0.00 $0.00 LFMZ Transportation Fee $0.00 $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $0.00 $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $60.00 $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $0.00 Master Drainage Fee: $0.00 $0.00 Sewer Fee: $0.00 $0.00 Redev Parking Fee: $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES $469.22 FINAL APPROVAL Date: f:, tf: ,t!f / Clearance: _____ _ NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which vou have oreviouslv been Qiven a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has oreviouslv otherwise exoired. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY < PERMIT APPLICATION PLAN CHECK NpL/3003755 EST. VAL. Z:too ~ CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Ck. Dep:s;c l ~j!f,,t(.f Validated By . ..J . ' 1 Date ________ .__~-'-#-=~ CA Legal Description '7 "') J7 Lot No. 2. O'J -O'a > -0 r a. 0 S Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units Asses1mr's ar5?! # " --<...£,· Existing Us!.. /, ~ r11et'tein,'-.f' vi~~~~ ~ec;._, Proposed Use Description of Work SQ. FT. #of Stories # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms Name State/Zip Telephone# Fax# Address City State/Zip Telephone # z't fl e~ t ~ ~~~, ·-AJ;;~·;i :l(~·,,-r· ·lt/o~·. : uAi"~ 4J~ · · CJr. itfioci-4 -(;e&bfs 0·/:.o·ilf c) Name Address City State/Zip Telephone# " ~ , , (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjepts the a plicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). C',S, Goo ei,\ (o fJ3(,f.~A ~,r :J:°" vr·tr ,,.tVf 5ti~ · ·o CA 121i1 ·3 .. 5s -'tio Name Address City State/Zip • Telephone# City Business License# 1 ·z.oi i.f) > 5Civi a~ · CA-1 i. I 2. ''CJ J?, '1 < State License # ----'/'----~""-=--''----- City State/Zip Telephone ;~, .':;-:vvi:>il.K~J-tj:: c6N(p~[i1$./\T.t:0N. . ..... ·-· .... -. ---.-...... ·-· ·-·- workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. ~ I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation ins;ir.ance carrier and p~licy nu~ber are: /'. • I) 5'U ~ / -, "_. :-I /_ Insurance Company Go Id t"' Z.,<;.' I l j;'hf\iifi:~h,, I'..(,.. Policy No. \..l-r 1 () .{; <.,, J l, Expiration Date (j'f LO I (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) 0 CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE______________________________ DATE _________ _ '.?;.-_',:p.w_~E.8~~1~Dl;.ll:D~.¢~Ml'JON ... ·-· _ . _ .. .._, _ -·--_____ ~..:: ~ _ .... ___ ... I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). ~ I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(sl licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section ______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application ilding permit for the proposed work. 3. l to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the w rk, but I ve hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number/ contractors license number):-+--~------------------------------------------ 5. I will provide some of the work, contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): _________ t;::!'tt:::;"?i~_;:;:::-=;---------------------+"7---,,:=:----;..-t-------- Is the applicant or future building c pant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 2 3 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES f&tl NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES ~ NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES ~ NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF'EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. ,&;,;·. _GQ.Nlfl'ijUCT.19N,l!;J:J)?l,NG.:ti_Gl,:NCY,_,_ : ... :.: ... :'... .... :. ..... .. .. :' .... : ·. ,.: · .. -W> ,VN ,, V I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME______________ LENDER'S ADDRESS ________________________ _ ls,;\.;· .A.P.l.?~ICAJ\!'.J\C!:l'IT!.flC~TlON .. :. ,, ·· . .. .. , , : . , ;., ., . , ·. . , .: , . · · .· ,-· , , . . ~-. · . ' .. I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is acdurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit~ of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required fo excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by he building fficial und r the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not comm ced within 1 O days fr. m the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenc for a perio of 180 ys (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). f / APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE -DATE 1° i / Oil -----~--------- YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 08/07/2001 Permit# CB003755 Title: DOS GRINGOS Description: ADD MEZZANINE STORAGE AREA Type:TI Job Address: Suite: Location: Sub Type: COMM 2819 LOKER AV EAST Lot 0 APPLICANT LEVI JASON Owner: Remarks: Total Time: CD Description Act Comments 19 Final Structural frf 29 Final Plumbing eve. 39 Final Electrical -f- 49 Final Mechanical Date 06/05/2001 06/05/2001 06/05/2001 06/05/2001 Description Associated PCRs PCR00045 ISSUED PCR01155 ISSUED PCR99120 EXPIRED PCR99295 ISSUED lnsRection Histor!l 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Act lnsp co RB NR RB NR RB NR RB I/<' fp Comments Inspector Assignment: RB --- Phone: 6195404516 Inspector: ----- Requested By: RUSS Entered By: ROBIN F/,,, a ,.,; . .z. '- CilJ of Carlsbad ~ : Final Building Inspection ., ... :,,... ... Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Lite;:;Eir:e";j Plan Check #: Date: 06/05/2001 Permit#: CB003755 Permit Type: Tl Project Name: DOS GRINGOS Sub Type: COMM ADD MEZZANINE STORAGE AREA Address: 2819 LOKER AV EAST Lot: 0 Contact Person: STEPHANIE Phone: 7609318706 Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA ..... , ................................................................................................................................................... . ~;:pect{:? c ,t3~ Date 6iolo1 ~pproved: __ Inspected: Approved: Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: __ Inspected Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: __ ........................................................................................................................................................... Comments: _____________________________ _ , DATE: 2/21/01 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-3755 EsGil Corporation 1.n Partnersli.ip witli. qovemment for '13uifaing Safety SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 2819 Loker Ave. East Suite 2 PROJECT NAME: New Storage Mezzanine D AP~NT c:cr;iuRIS D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially-comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. ~ The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified b~low are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have signifiqant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: ~ Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) ~#· Mail Telephone Fax In Person i:gj REMARKS: The designer stated that the existing p h travel from the handicapped parking space to the addition area and the bathrooms servi he addition area comply with all the current disabled access requirements. Please i . By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC log trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 r ' -.... ~,, ;•:. ~ I ti EsGil Corporation 'l.n Partnersliip witli (j.overnment for '13uiu£ing Safetg DATE: 1/30/01 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-3755 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 2819 Loker Ave. East Suite 2 PROJECT NAME: New Storage Mezzanine D APPLICANT ~ D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. i:gj The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is endosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. i:gj The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Dos Gringos 2819 Loker Ave. East Suite 2 Carlsbad CA 92008 D Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. i:gj Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Dos Gringos Telephone#: (760)931-8706 Date contacted: I/ 3Dfo r (by: f-AX) Fax #: (760)931-9057 Mail 'U-e1ephone D REMARKS: By: David Yao Fax~ln Person Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC Enclosures: 1/23 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 ,, , Carlsbad 00-3755 III 1/30/01 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-3755 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2819 Loker Ave. East Suite 2 SET: III DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 1/23 REVIEWED BY: David Yao FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: 1/30/01 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining ~ets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department fot routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of , Carlsbad 00-3755 III 1/30/01 the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes DNo ' ,.._ Carlsbad 00-3755 III 1/30/01 11. Provide footings or slab for concentrated loads designed for 1,000 psf soil bearing or per bearing value as determined by an engineer or architect. Chapter 18. (The calculation shows the allowable soil bearing pressure is 2000 psf at surface. Please provide soil report to justify it or use 1000 psf.) The soil report provided shows th~ allowable bearing pressure of 2000 psf is 18" below the grade. This project is using slab on grade as the support that is at surface (not 18" below grade). Provide soil report specific shows the allowable bearing pressure at surface is 2000 psf or revise the calculation using 1000 psf allowable bearing pressure. The designer stated that the existing path of travel from the handicapped parking space to the addition area and the bathrooms serving the addition area comply with all the current disable access requirements. Please verify. EsGil Corporation 1.n Partnersli.ip witli. (jovemment for '13uiUing Safety DATE: 11/27 /00 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-3755 SET: II CJ ICANT I EVIEWER CJ FILE PROJECT ADDRESS: 2819 Loker Ave. East Suite 2 PROJECT NAME: New Storage Mezzanine D D D D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. -'r The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Dos Gringos 2819 Loker Ave. East Suite 2 Carlsbad CA 92008 Esgil Corporation staff di_d not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Dos Gringos Telephone#: (760)931-8706 Date contacted: 11-Z...7'""' (by:~) Fax #: (760)931-9057 . Mail v Telephone • Fax .,,,,-In Person D REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 11/16 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 00-3755 II 11/27/00 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-3755 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2819 Loker Ave. East Suite 2 SET: II DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 11/16 REVIEWED BY: David Yao FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: 11/27/00 This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approy,al of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. 8. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. ,1 ' C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the out~tanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes ONo Carlsbad 00-3755 II 11/27/00 2_. Provide a Building Code Data Legend on the Title Sheet. Include the following code information for each building proposed: Floor Area The building code data is for the entire building not just the new area (since the . . area analysis will be for the entire building). Please show the total floor area on the plan. 4. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24 ), which adopts the 1997 UBC, UMC and UPC and the 1996 NEC. One note on the Title sheet still show the project comply with 1994 USC. Please eliminate the note. 5. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ~{ ITEM REQUIRED? MOMENT FRAME CONNECTIONS (SEISMIC ZONES 3 & 4 ONLY) HIGH-STRENGTH BOLTS DESIGNER-SPECIFIED OTHER .j REMARKS Section 1701 'of the UBC shows the high-strength bolt -A325 requires special inspection. 6. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance ~f the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. 11. Provide footings or slab for concentrated loads designed for 1,000 psf soil bearing or per bearing value as determined by an engineer or architect. Chapter 18. (The calculation shows the allowable soil bearing pressure is 2000 psf at surface. Please provide soil report to justify it or use 1000 psf.) Carlsbad 00-3755 II 11/27/00 The soil report provided shows the allowable bearing pressure of 2000 psf is 18" below the grade. This project is using slab on grade as the support that is at surface (not 18" below grade). Provide soil report specific shows the allowable bearing pressure at surface is 2000 psf or revise the calculation using 1000 psf allowable bearing pressure. 13. The computer model data appears to be the result of the computer run under different loading· condition. Provide input data for the loading and section for the moment frame. Provide input data and section data for the computer analysis.(this shall be in the input format of the computer analysis not a answer to the question) The designer stated that the existing path of travel from the handicapped parking space to the addition area and the bathrooms serving the addition area comply with all the current disable access requirements. Please verify. / EsGil Corporation '.ln Partnersfiip witfi (jovernment for 'BuiUing Safety DATE: 10/23/00 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-3755 SET:I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2819 Loker Ave. East Suite 2 PROJECT NAME: New Storage Mezzanine ~NT D PLAN REVIEWER D FILE D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. [:g] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. ~ The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Jason Levin 2819 Loker Ave. ·East #2 Carlsbad CA 92008 ~Cb G,~,~~s D Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. ~ Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Jason Levin ~epho.n,-e) Telephone#: (760)931-8706 Date contacted: \O-~oo (by:~) Fax #: (7a,d) q~ ... ctos7 Mail./ Telephone ~ Fax ./ In Person D REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 10/12 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 'Carlsbad ·oo-3755 10/23/00 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST COMMERCIAL PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-3755 OCCUPANCY: S-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N JURISDICTION: Carlsbad USE: storage ACTUAL AREA:. new storage 1344 ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: ? unlimited?STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: SPRINKLERS?: Y REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED:10/23/00 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): OCCUPANT LOAD: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 10/12 PLAN REVIEWER: David Yao This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws · regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1997 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the pl~ns does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 00-3755 10/23/00 • GENERAL 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of prints, to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeak~ Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, (858) 560~1468. • PLANS 2. Provide a Building Code Data Legend on the Title Sheet. Include the following code information for each building proposed: + Occupancy Group S-1/F-1? + Description of Use storage/manufacture + Floor Area + Justification to exceed allowable area in Table 5-B. (if applicable) 3. Provide a note with the building data legend stating that yards used for area increases shall be permanently maintained.(if applicable) 4. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24 ), which adopts the 1997 UBC, UMC and UPC and the 1996 NEC. 5. ·On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. • REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQUIRED? MOMENT FRAME CONNECTIONS (SEISMIC ZONES 3 & 4 ONLY) HIGH-STRENGTH BOLTS DESIGNER-SPECIFIED OTHER REMARKS 6. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. Carlsbad 00-3755 10/23/00 • SITE PLAN 7. Clearly dimension building setbacks from property lines, street centerlines, and from all adjacent buildings and structures on the site plan. 8. Clearly designate any side yards used to justify increases in allowable area based on Section 505.(if applicable) • BUILDING AREA 9. Provide complete area analysis to show the total floor area (new+ existing) is still within the allowable floor area. Section 504.3. • TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS 10. Provide notes and details on the plahs to show compliance with the enclosed Disabled Access Review List. Disabled access requirements may be more restrictive than the UBC. • FOUNDATION 11. Provide footings or slab for concentrated loads designed for 1,000 psf soil bearing or per bearing value as determined by an engineer or architect. Chapter 18. (The calculation shows the allowable soil bearing pressure is 2000 psf at surface. Please provide soil report to justify it or use 1000 psf.) • STRUCTURAL 12. Please show in the calculations how the redundancy was determined, per Section 1630.1.1. 13. The computer model data appears to be the result of the computer run under different loading condition. Provide input data for the loading and section for the moment frame. 14. Provide calculation to show the moment connection comply with UBC 2213.6. • ADDITIONAL 15. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. 16. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. ~-Carlsbad 00-3755 10/23/00 Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: D Yes D No 17. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact David Yao at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT NON RESIDENTIAL TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS • REMODELS, ADDITIONS AND REPAIRS 1. When alterations, structural repairs or modifications or additions are made to an existing building, that building, or portion of the building affected, is required to comply with all of the requirements for new buildings, per Section 1134B.2. These requirements apply as follows: a) The area of specific alteration, repair or addition must comply as "new" construction. b) A primary entrance to the building and the primary path of travel to the altered area, must be shown to comply with all accessibility features. c) Existing sanitary facilities that serve the remodeled area must be shown to comply with all accessibility features. · d) Existing drinking fountains (if any) must be shown to comply with all accessibility features. e) Existing public telephones (if any) must be shown to comply with all accessibility features. END OF DOCUMENT 1,-Carlsbad 00-3755 10/23/00 SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PLAN CHECK NUMBER: _____ OWNER'S NAME: I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify that I, or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special inspector(s) as required by Uniform Building Code (USC) Section 1701.1 for the construction project located at the site listed above. UBC Section 106.3.5. Signed ________________ _ I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as required by USC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at the site listed above. Signed ________________ _ 1. List of work requiring special inspection: D Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection D Field Welding Engineer's/Architect's Seal & Signature Here D Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI D High Strength Bolting D Prestressed Concrete D Expansion/Epoxy Anchors D Structural Masonry D Sprayed-On Fireproofing D Designer Specified D Other _____ _ 2. Name(s} of individual(s} or firm(s} responsible for the special inspections listed above: A.------------------------------- 8. ------------------------------- c. ---------------------------------- 3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above: A. B. C. Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site. Carlsbad 00-3755 10/23/00 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION:· Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-3755 PREPARED BY: David Yao DATE: 10/23/00 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2819 Loker Ave. East Suite 2 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: S-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: BUILDING AREA Valuation Reg. VALUE PORTION ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier Mod. storage 1344 per city 25,000 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance .. I Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance I ,.. I I Plan Check Fee by Ordinance J ... I Type of Review: 0 Complete Review D Structural Only Dother D Hourly ($) 25,000 25,000 244.831 159.141 D Repetitive Fee [ERepeats Esgil Plan Review Fee 127.311 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc City of Carlsbad , @ a ofiMlM reg &#UIMi44 a 1aa bATE: ID (( ~ ( ff1) 'BUILDING ADDRESS: BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO.: CB :3/~ LD~'i,,f:!_ Av£, YdS1" =iJ: ~ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: ,d-0"?-o<o3 -o7 EST. VALUE: d S7o-zfi} . ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. CA Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: ttached report of deficiencies ke necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By: Date: By: Date: By: Date: By: FOR OF ICIAL U'E ONLY UTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PErJITl/ ·i,,,7 {O l Date: · ATTACHMENTS D Dedication Application D Dedication Checklist D Improvement Application 0 Improvement Checklist 0 Future Improvement Agreement 0 Grading Permit Application 0 Grading Submittal Checklist 0 Right-of-Way Permit Application D Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: KATHLEEN M. FARMER City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 , Phone: (760) 602-2741 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: D Sewer Fee Information Sheet A-4 H:1w0Ro'P~LJS!li!l.lfil~tf'ai9'•~~neac>.@:arlsbad, CA 920081-7314 • (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760) 602R8!!i@@ \. Yo 3RD D y D D / D D BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 1. A. B. C. D. E. 2. A. B. ,c. D. 3. A. B. C. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North Arrow F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets Existing & Proposed Structures G. Driveway widths Existing Street Improvements H. Existing or proposed sewer lateral Property Lines I. Existing or proposed water service Easements J. Existing or proposed irrigation service Show on site plan: Drainage Patterns 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum po"sitive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. ·, Include on title sheet: Site address Assessor's Parcel Number Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION H:IWORO\OOCSICHKLSnBullding Planclled< Cklst Fonn (Generic),doc 2 Rev. 7/14/00 ,. D D D D D D BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. _______________________ _ 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: _________ _ DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and ·for remodels with a value at or exceeding $15,000, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: ________________ _ Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 ½" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by:____________ Date: ___ _ IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $75,000, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: _____________ _ Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the H:IWORD\DOCSICHKLST\Bulldlng Plancheck Cklst Fann (RIDDLE• HARVEY 7-12-00).doc 3 Rev. 12126/96 ' .,., 1ST D D D D D D D D ~D D D D D D D D D BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: ______ ._ _____ _ Date: ---- 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $280 so we may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Neighborhood Improvement Agreement will .include the following: 6c. Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: -~-------- 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) H:\WORD\OOCSICHKLSi\Bullding Planchecl< Cklst Fann (RIDDLE· HARVEY 7-12-00).doc ·4 Rev. 9/28/00 ·• 1sr 2ND 3RD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 7d .No Grading Permit required. 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway· construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: · ---------------Date: ... ------- 10. NPDES PERMIT 11 Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge. Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. quired fees are attached No fees required WATER METER REVIEW 12a. Domestic (potable) Use . Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters ·are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately b_ill the owner for the ·water used. • All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. H:\WOROIDOCS\CHKLS11Bulldlng Planchecl< Cklst Fann (Generic),doc 5 Rev. 7/14/00 1ST D D D BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST • If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. • Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter. • If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand. · (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. · Please follow these guidelines: 1. If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check tt,e recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should look like: ·-.. ~- STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) 2. If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: • Hydraulic grade line • Elevation at point of connection (POC) • Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) • Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve • Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) • Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection 3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water H:IWORD\OOCSICHKLST\Bulldlng Plan<:heck Cklst Fann (Generlc).doc 6 Rev. 7/14/00 . ' .. 1sr 2ND 3RD D D D 12c. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST service boundary, the City intends on switching these .irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) 1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. 2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. 13. Addi~Commen~L-~ ,.J ~ 4.t:ft=-~ ~f<, 7 -I . H:IWORDIDOCSICHKLSl\Bulldlng Plancheck Cklst Fonn (Generic).doc 7 Rev. 7/14/00 8· ~ .si .$ "' "' Cl Cl '-.Ii D- >->, .Q .0 ~ N 'II: ,:,! -"' t.) '-' Q) Q) ..c: .c (.) (.J C: C: "' "' a: a: PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB ~ l S-S-Address Q<zs )q LOt.8 IZ. -AV Planner Paul Godwin Phone ...._(7 ___ 6 __ 0__._)-'6 __ 0 __ 2 __ --'4 __ 6 ___ 2 __ 5 _______ _ APN: Q09 -05>?, -O 7 (--¾-025)·'. Type of Project & Use: Net Project Density: DU/AC -------- Zoning: ?-Y'Y'\ General Plan: P \ Facilities Management Zone: S CFD lin/n11tl # __ Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres: Circle One ------- (For non-residential development: Tyi:;e of land used created by this permit: ____________________ ) Legend: [8J Item Complete D Item Incomplete -Needs your action D D D Environmental Revie.w Required: YES NO TYPE ---- DATE OF COMPLETION: _______ _ Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: D D D Discretionary Action Required: YES NO TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. _____ DATE ___ _ PROJECT NO. ______ _ pTHER RELATED CASES: _________________ _ Compliance with conditions or approval? If-not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: ------------------------ D D D Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES . NO )(J CA Coastal Commission'-Auth.ority? YES NO If ··California Coastal Canii'ri1ss'iortAu'thority: Contact them at -3111 Camino Del Rio N6rt~, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst D. oo· ' -. ~ -'.· \ ,_ - lnclusionary HQUsing .Fee :req!;iir~d: YBS ___ . NO __ · (Ef.fec:tive. da~e. of foclusionarv Housir:ig-O~din!fncEl , May .2i,, _1993,) Datei l:ntry -Compl~te,d? Y!:S . . .· N·o _ . JA/P/ps;_Activity Maintenanc~renter GB#, toolbar; ScrE!ens, Housing Fees, Construct Housin~'YiN, Enter fee, UPDATE!) Site Pl.an-: t. Pr:~wid.e a fully dirn'.ensionql: site plan· drawn to scale. Shc>-vv: North arrow, property faies,. easements, eXistjr:i:g a.nd proposed ·Structures:, ·streets, existing stre.C?t if)1pr:ovemer;its, }ig_ht,-?f.:.way width, dimensional s~tbac'!<S arid ~xisting top-ogt.aphic<:11-lines. 2. Provi:de le_~al d~$-Ctfption ,Qf prop.erty·.ar:id a_ssessor'~ parcel riumbE;ir. · _ ;zoning: -. D . ·D o· 1 ·-Setb9cks: ' . . _, . ·11:1ter'ior Side;··· Stree:fSide: .:m~ar: Req~ir:ed ___,,,.....,....,.,,....------ He q aired ------'------ Required '""""""'~~----- .Required·--,--,-,-----,------,--,-- Shown Shown ---,-,---,.,...,.---,----,---,.------------------Shown -,------~---Shown LJ:. iO ·o 2. · Accessory ·structure $etb~cks': Fr..oht: ReqJ.1ireq. -~~---'-'---'--Snown ---------'--- lmterjqr, Side: Req,1.1il'ed, Shown · . .,..,,.,.-~-------,-,---,-..,...,......---,--Street Sid~: · Re.quired .· ·· · Shown: _________ _ 'R~at: · :f=Jecjqired ---,,,__--· Shown ------~-~----,---,-- Strl,!ctl;ire .sep~r.atioA: Reqqfre_~f _ Shown-'-. --'------------ -:0:·o'.0··3. . . Lot :Coverage: · l:t~qu'ited Shown --'-'------,.....,..-----,-----,-,..-,--- -Req.uir.ed --,.,.......,,-----Shown ------ ·,e-~---_J:o ., " . ,_,' o~o \. · · ··G~est Spaces -·Reqpireil __ . --'----"--~ ShowA 3. 3._7 ----~~-,---- Shown __ ...;....:......a..-,--- '., PA.TE --------,--- · H:\ADM'IN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Carlsbad Fire Department 003755 , 1635.Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Review Requirements Category: Fire Prevention (760) 602-4660 Date of Report: 0212112001 -------------- Building Plan Reviewed by: Name: Jason Levin Address: 2819 Loker Avenue East Suite 2 City, State: Carlsbad CA 92008 Plan Checker: Job #: 003755 Job Name: H & L Group, LLC Bldg #: CB003755 ------------------Job Address: 2819 Loker Avenue Ste. or Bldg. No. 2 IZ! Approved D Approved Subject to D Incomplete Review FD Job# ------ The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and/ or specifications to this office for review and approval. 1st 003755 2nd FD File# 3rd Other Agency ID I ~ -i Carlsbad Fire Department 003755 , 163,5 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Fire Prevention (760) 602-4660 Plan Review Requirements Category: Building Plan Reviewed by: Date of Report: 1011312000 ------------ Name: Jason Levin Address: 2819 Loker Avenue East Suite 2 City, State: Carlsbad CA 92008 Plan Checker: Job #: 003755 ------- Job Name: H & L Group, LLC Bldg #: CB003755 ------------------Job Address: 2819 Loker Avenue Ste. or Bldg. No. 2 D Approved D Approved Subject to ~ Incomplete Review FD Job# ------ The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and I or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and/ or specifications to this office for review and approval. 1st 003755 2nd FD File# 3rd Other Agency ID ~equfrements Category: Building Plan , Requirement: Pending 05.32 Additional Requirements or Comments Page 1 1. Provide a detail of how to exit from the mezzanine. 2. Define the type of storage and what is to be stored on the mezzanine. Requirement: Pending 05.33 Plan Revisions Please submit 3 sets of corrected plans directly to the Building Department for routing to the appropriate departments. 10/13/00 Sent By: ; 760931 9057; Dec-22-00 1:56PM; Page 1 , .... ~~ · .... l . • .. ~ ~ ~ ,.-.,.,_,,,_.__,.,_,.~~-,---"""->~•~•»~M_, _____ _ ____ ,_., .. ,.., ..... ,, ,,,_ .. _.. ........ -1,, ..... • .. • -·-------~~ /~ __ ., ___ _ /. .:.. \ • I I --~-~ _.--j 3'. j A acoil..I>/1''/~ ro 7/h 'WI-~ ~6 Jr")rt:. f fA~~s II A .l'Z ~/ fe>~ Cp,vl/iE.Alr/~NA~Cy -t:.e,A..lf.c>fl.C:4.j;> j:.c;>c..,NpA-/io'A..} e;~s ~,J ~~4.P~ f/h>o~i;, #Av,s ~ d/,v1#/c,.,kf' · ~ 7/.11 ,:::.../t<..Nc~ 0 f ~ 1A.!~ A-.«P Mt'A/,,11,f AL_ ~ f...6. 1'-'F o fZ.c£M~ CQA./~, > T n~~ Pf"..¢. 4-8>.41{ ~ ,Al I 8 ,/JcH.£> o -V ~ Af/6..Z... . NoW' ~ #.A~ bl ~t,.Ap,,c; .::>>../ ~-RA,i)e. OF s½ IN~, W/r~ Fl Aj;;:J. ~ (?>Ali.~ A 7 I a /NcHeS c)~ C.6Ni"=~ ~ GA c..# ~ A r. r/£;1(.~r::111...e 1/ ~ ~. I.£ • ,.~~ L ~A p?~AJ ;:~f' ~ · Z. · ~ }· j . 0 f>Le..4-4~ ,;c.r; 7J/t. N~~ MIEU&> T>A-7~.t:> /o-2j.qt;. ~11t~-"1 r~ ~I'-GNC, 1,v(M'ii!..,. , (Arr~e.1/.tJ>) ..._____..._...,,--.-_, _ _,~WI--..S~.,,-r:•)N,_,to-,.....;-...":ll..,..('~---~-,f'P-r>'"•'-~"""':,,-.:.•--.:"~"l~t<i:r.:-4_....,.,_"~'°-"''~"',..,,-""~'-'.,.,.n•.--l,1 .. n";tll":l.rni--;-..:t' 1/. l4- l. 1 • d ,rl;ffe, ~ f wc.;,JZ.K~ -T!.~u1t?. e. o· ~ f a,:;;.1A L tJJt;_pec.7,~ ,..Ji, /4v~ IJ>=eif A.10/6.I>. a J pt.AA/ f,.lkef . ( "'/. . . Al~,~.> f~P... 3Jif~~f!..ED.. ~tJ&MI rrAI-.· A Re. A.!>.P'E-D . c;,.,J p£-AAI ~Ht:£6/ ~ · I. Ye.TA,L 2/4·-i"".o :R.e.f~/l..> ro 5J6-f A, l.-@-. 0,ue,,r(.,) rt.At:. > ;,/Pl) L .D fl;. l # R -ro ,:Pc.TA , t. f. 7 /A~J"'.I') 1801::-0E:l.-OSl. Hi~OMS~NilOH ssn~ L~ a6ad ~badwoo <-~SO£ O£L 09L fl /f. ~ e-r c,,J,. A L '1)t;r~,l-@- 7 ,./4 .. r., o A-Np. rA4~,LL~ ' FAX# ( 760) 602-as5n TELEPHONE# ( 760) 602-211 a CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Fax To: FaJC Phone: Re: 0 Urg•nt • Comments: s1·d --~·ti 0 For Review 18O1::-OE:l..-OSl.. --£;;,. z .From: RAENETiE ABBEY Pagn.: Date: I /17/4/ CC: 0 Pl•-• Comment 0 Please Reply D Please Recycle -<JltX&~. o;-L~~ /7J i 2flc; II C/3 / J, I (,tr Hl~OMS~~I7OH ssn~ dov=vo 10 01 uer s~ a6ed !bedwoo <-~Boe oeL 09L ~=-··:w,,wq, ~cµw=-r·-=wr 14\r4A ji'*L~~f n:zug·rM½lir . ! ' ' i r-, I • I LT.J 10 -_J __ r-, ---t+J 10 --· ... ---·····-.. t ...... --- ---r - ··-· ... -· ·;-- ! .... -4. l j ... __ ,. _____ .. --·-----~--------·---........ --,. ! r-, L,~ J----0 .. -· ---.. ·---· -· I', I '--.; I .. -.. ---··-... ----· --...... -. ~~~ I --t 0 ~~~ I ' '--(J) I fflr I r mo ®~ L.-.J 0 !-I I ·'lt-r---- ~: . , Si if! . . i,_ L. .J 0 l , ..... i I I i V\I~ ~ r-, --½-+-I L-J. ) 0 j t~~~~. ·-· L....., . . t-· ............ J I f ~~;]~ <()-< -il iw!~{ cJ~r u-a ~ i-\) :-~ E:Z.. H~ll Gj~ ~ -i~ ~(ll \!\ )> h f z· CJ ' .. ·t·· : ,j I/ ; ·, i \ ! I -I } _,) l r 'i i ! I ; i i .... j~- 1 Ill le IC \~ I j ll) r I L .J 0 r-, Ii J L J 0 .. ···----- ~ ... -~ IBOf>OEl-OSl Hi~OMS~NI70H ssn~ dzt-=~o IO BI Ul:?C ~~ e6ed ~bedwoo <-~808 08L 09L 3 BEARING ON WOOD SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH MINIMUM THICK STEEL PL.ATE WASHERS UNLESS ROOF JOISTS AT MIO-SPAN AND NOT TO EXCEED I' O.C. FOR FLOOR JOISTS. 3E APPROVED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR )OF OR FLOOR MATERIALS. -!ANGERS AND STRAPS SHALL BE FULLY BOLTED JLL STRENGTH P~R MANUFACTURER'S ~ONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LATEST DUCT STANDARD PSl-8.3, AND SHALL BE -tE D.F.P.A. GRADE MARK OF THE AMERICAN ·oR THICKNESS AND GRADE, SEE PL.ANS. A MINIMUM AREA OF 8 SQ. FT. WITH A FT. :TWEEN ALL PLYWOOD EDGES PER ENDATION. ALSO START THE PLYWOOD 1 /2" SHALL BE BLOCKED WITH BLOCKING PANEL NOT'"- :> AN. BRIDGING MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF ~& -....... , \LL SUBMIT JOIST CALCULATIONS AND SHOP . ··-~, .. ') :oR REVIEW AND TO BUILDING DEPARTMENT ~ MANUFACTURING FLOOR JOISTS. ...,, :)R DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED ') ~GINEER OF RECORD, WHO SMALL REVIEW THEM ANO · 3UILDING OFFlCIAL WITH A NOTATION INDICATING . · :MITTAL DOCUMENTS HA~ BEEN REVIEWED ANO HAVE \ ;ENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE DESIGN OF THE \ D SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED ) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY ~ -.... ______..,.,.1 . _ _) 1. PORTLAND CEMENT SHALL BE TYPE I OR TYPE II CONFORMING TO ASTM C150 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: A. WALL & PAD FOOTINGS ,,._ 2500 PSI 8. CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE = 4000 PSI MAXIMUM SLUMP NOT TO EXCEED 4 INCHES. CONTINUOUS INSPECTION IS REQUIRED FOR CONCRETE WITH STRENGTH EXCEEDING 2500 PSI. 2. ALL MATERIALS, METHOD OF MIXING ANO PLACING CONCRCTE SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS or THE LOCAL BUILDING CODE OR UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, WHICHEVER IS MORE STRICT. 3. CONCRETE AGGREGATES SHALL CONFORM TO ONE OF THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS: (A) ., SPECIFICATION FOR CONCRETE AGGREGATES" (ASTM C 33). (8) "SPECIFICATION FOR LIGHTWEIGHT AGGREGATES FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE." (ASTM C 330). 4. ALL REINFORCING STEEL, ANCHOR BOLTS AND MITAL EMBEDS SHALL BE SECURELY TIED IN PLACE BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE. 5. NON-SHRINK GROUT; EMBECO OR EQUAL, 4000 PSI AT 7 DAYS. 6. ALL EXPOSED CORNERS SHALL HAVE 3/4 INCH CHAMFER, OR TOOLED EDGE ( 1 /2 INCH RADIUS ). PRECAST CONCRETE TILT-UP PANELS: 1. CONCRETE FOR TILT-UP PANELS SHALL HAVE A MINlMUM ULTIMATE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF .3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS (U.N.O.). COflfflNUOUS INSPECTION IS REQUIRED. MAXIMUM SLUMP NOT TO EXCEED 4 INCHES. PRECAST PANELS SHALL BE POURED UNDER PLANT CONTROL. CONDITIONS. 2. PRECAST WALL PANELS SHALL HAVE ATT.AJNED A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH Of 2000 PSI, ~ OffiRMINEO BY CYLINDER TESTS PRIOR TO THE ERECTION OF THE PANELS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFE AND ADEQUATE BRACES AND CONNECTIONS TO SUPPORT THE ERECTED PANELS UNTIL THE STRUCTURE ITSELF, INCLUDING THE ROOF Dll>PHRAGM AND THE PERltJETER CONCRETE POUR-STRIPS ARE COMPLETE 4. ALL PANEL THICKNESS SPECIFIED ARE GROSS THICKNESS. c..... cu :::J ..... (X) 0 ..... 0 .J>, .. .J>, I'\) "U Al C U) U) :::c: 0 r I-! :z G) U) e::: 0 Al -I :::c: --.J en 0 I --.J w 0 I w 0 (X) ..... "U 5. PRECAST WALL PANELS SHALL BE AT LEAST 18 DAYS OLD AFTER CASTING ro BEFORE CONNECTING ADJACENT PANELS. w 6. SUB CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ENGINEERED DETAILS PJ'."RTAINING TO THE ERECTION AND BRACING Of' TILT-UP PANELS. :0 (I) 0 (I) I-'· < (I) 0. .. -' 0 ..... I\) -l> ..... 0 0 Cu .. 01 (0 1l s .. -.J OJ 0 -.J Cu 0 Cu 0 (X) -' I V 0 0 3 "O Dl .0 .. 1l Dl IQ (I) I\) Cu ' ' > ,. . ····-·~·.• .. . l4 "' . PANEL BKR WIRE A LOCATION CKT SIZE SIZE TYPE J-r~ w, uJ~.s.G 1 db I;). °illl-l-AI W'IYV- lf< WI WA~1;"}+Sf 3 ~ /,).. 7JIIIN' ~7,5 Alf/t-s ;i.. J & T/,{lj,N 'iFmR.. 7 I /,,, 7H'/J· ''I= ll.9 I LV AU,.., lJ) 1-\sG"' 9 /S) /4 7H'/,¥ '5~AC<:S' 11 I 13 IS 17 19 21 .. 23 25 rr . , 'V 29 31 , 33 35 37 39 .Cl MAIN: D AMP BKR/FUSE ~MLO Q.S'O BUS: AMP .... -..... , ..... . .......... . -: .. -·· ....... ,,. ~ fo-rPA 1-.z_ 9,(01 ~')l ;)o? . ~.c,~)~(A.. 'f;bc</ )-..( c ¥-(bl ;;2.. &> 71 4'5?D /277voLTS 3 0--i-w;RE ~ KA..1.c. , B e.. II B C WIRE BKR CKT SIZE TYPE SIZE LOCATION !~NV" fr). 1J./.M d.Ci 2 J.r5 <9f:P/c6' VIN\? IL/F>tx~ /;;i._ '71-11-N ~<") 4 )_f5 ,n FRc.o - ~-s::v ¼Do /.;)_ "rl{-HtJ dD 6 J-r5 %;-1-!d'fl A)(o ff,tt:, j;). ~ ~ 8 t:rs [>0:;Duc.,ncJ ~,5cc 1/r;tt, );;).. '711/W ~ 10 )..TS fR.or:>ue,r1DAi 12 ~f'ACL::" 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 1 / .. 32 I 34 36 38 40 42 COMPUTED LOAD 7C, AMPS I f>JLA '/60/;)77 V ;)c:.DAc# "/w,~ r,'\ ,J.,D, ...... .. ·····--. . -. . . ... - . . -== & S.: 5oa v A-_,+.,. B 30 , '-I = -7 ~. 9 f½vt p s }JD1£: A-u. :rr6>ns sHD~Jf.J M£ G/!STJ:,;u~ .;. .... -"le, __ . ... •,; . s It ,_ u WALL TO WALL j2' -O" FRAME TO FRAME 31'-6" 16'-8 1/2" 14'-9 1/2" r,-, r r,-, < )> -l 0 z i., . {!) Co-v~G""e,,-re G )(/S71))~ r------i etll.Cui-rs PIJLA i 4, 3 @ AL(., LJ1tt,1)Q f<::> GTYJ-r €),le, t-LRX @ ~ ~.~ t± / ,)__ rA-1-1,v C6 PP6R..._ 1----i T.O.D. ' i----------1r·. 10'-5 3/8" CLEAR , • DECK FRAMING PLAN L, , v ' ['\ ['\ ['\ :'--. i's ' i' I'--"'U ' ' 3" CLR. I' ' N p::i (J\ • (.J1 0 : ~ ~ u, 0 ~ (.J1 (.J1 0 I' ~ ~ (J\ • ' ' _, ' _. u, I _. : _. CJ) I (.J1 ' _. CXl I (.J1 ' " ' PANEL 4 ·-.... ;. l4 K.,..,I.C. LffD /477 VOL TS _3 0--i-wlRE BKR W1RE A LOCATION CJCT SIZE SIZE TYPE J..1-5 I).) ' uJA£G#.56 1 db I-;). 'ii#I.AI ~~ J .• -f< W, (J)A~G"HSE 3 ~ /,)_ 7?111# 37S );;V'A-s 3/ 0 7?,W-N XFmR.. ~ 7 I I/) TH¥N l..).:i::,. u_j I u),4L.(_, {_;.)1-\SG"° 9 Vw /4 '7;/,;l,"I -SPA<..d II I 13 IS 17 19 21 23 - 25 27 \V 29 ' 31 33 35 37 39 41 MAIN: D AM1' BKR/FUSE ~MLO QS:O BUS: M1P ~ Po--rRA -;2-_ peoi ~')l ;}o? ' ~-D 91z-1ttW; (A. ?;boy )_f C #· {pl ;;i.. &>7/ , B C. I} B e WIRE SIZE TYTh 1¥'MV id. if/llfy l.f/M lo/'l)!)c ;;;._ -rJl.;/.t./ ~~ ¼Do /.') ifl.fl.N b %= J;) PJt)IN Q/fcc 1/oro )~ p,,t/24'/ COMPUTED LOAD I f>JLA 1fJeJ/;)77v :).D{)p..o/ 1w16 rn .1.,b, ... BKR ClCT SIZE LOCATION db 2 ~<") 4 dD 6 olo 8 ~ 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 7CJ . -- Jr5 c9f'F/c£ )J5 ,nFRc...o- J-r5· :S'fl-!f>f'J A)?:::, t-rs f'R_f) D Ul--T/CJ )_TS f R.o D UG-0 fYJ sf'AC£ ,; I AMPS - '? ....,-. ..... , tvDic, A-u. :STEms sHDwx.J ~ G)(;sr; 10~ -----· --·-· ··--• , --·""":.:J·'-------~W~A::L:::L.-!..:TO~W.:.:.A~L:.:::L__:.3~2_· -...:.0:_ .. _____________ 71, FRAME TO FRAME 31'-6" s "<-,, 16'-8 1/2" tr)£T,4l. //,Llll'J)E' TYP b p-I;;._ fT1 r fT1 -, I, 14'-9 1/2" , T.0.0. I < )> i----------~r·. -, 0 z , ~ ~ :3~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-J r.;,, I<.~""'° ~ IIJI', .. ,,.., ...... ~ ~ IICDf'Cn.C-USOll'tlt MffOO<ll'\Jlll"OSC owe T>....r JWtO~O.Jllt ~. Ol 9lT)O,A' ..::all .-TTt>t ,.,...,,,.,._ IT f'CI', NC. ~~~~~~~~~ IT l't, .C.., MQ J>< aoAJ'11"1', 10'-5 3/8" , , CLEAR , DECK FRAMING PLAN I I, 3" CLR. u, 0 : u, 0 : ~ u, : ll1 0: ~ u, : u, 0 ~ ' -' u, I -' ' ' -' 0 I u, ' u, _, ' ' (J) I u, -' co I u, .·. ' ~ . I -' -' : 01/08/2001 17:08 8582920771 LEIGHTON SAN DIEGO PAGE 13 ~11 ;:= =--;:,::; ~== -..... Leighton and Associates A GTG Company G ! 0 TECH NI C A.L CONSULTANTS To: Attention: Subject: Introduction February 13, 1998 'Lincoln Property Company 30 Executive Pat:k, Suite l 00 P.O. Box.19693 Irvine, Califomia92614-9693 Ms. Kristi DassonvUle Project No. 4960196-003 Geotecbnical Review of the Foundation Plans and Response to Plan Check Review Comments for the Proposed Mezzanine Addition, 2819 Loker A venue East, Lots 23 and 3 8 of Carlsbad Oaks East, Carlsbad Tract No. 74-21, Car)sbad, California tn accordance with your request, we have perfonned a geotechnical review of the structural foundation plans and calculations fo.t the proposed me2:zanine addition to the existing commercial structure at 2819 Loker Avenue East (Lots 23 and 38 of Carlsbad Oaks East, Carlsbad Tract No. 74-21), located in Carlsbad, California. We understand that the foundation for the proposed mezzanine addition will be constructed but the mezzanine addition will be built at a later date. The purpose of our geotechnical review is to evaluate if the structural foundation plans (Seneca, 1998a) and structural calculations (Seneca, 1997) have been prepared in general accordance with the recommendations of the project geotechnical report (Leighton, 1996). As part of our evaluation, we have also reviewed the plan cl_teck comment sheets (EsGil, 1998a and 1998b) and have addressed the review comments herein. Findings and Conclusions of Plan Review Based on our geotechnicaJ review of the structural foundation plans (Seneca, 1998a) and calculations (Seneca, 1997), it appears that the plans have been prepared in general accordance with our geotechnjcal recommendations. However the following items should be noted: The geotechnicaJ report referenced in the foundation notes on Sheet S-1 should be the As-Graded Report ofFine-Grading Operations, Project No. 4960196-003, dated December 4, 1996. 3934 Murphy Canyon Ro•d, #8205, San Diego, CA 92123•4425 (858) 292-8030 • FAX (858) 292~0771 • www.1e;gh1ongao.com 18OE:-OE:l-O9l Hl~OMS~NilOH ssn~ G e6ed !bedwoo <-~808 08L 09L d~c=vo 10 01 uer 01/08/2001 17:08 8582920771 LEIGHTON SAN DIEGO PAGE 14 4 960 I 96-003 • It should be noted that the soils report indicates the floor slab should be underlain by a minimum of 2 inches of clean sand (sand equivalent greater than 30) which is underlain by a vapor barrier (to act as a capillary break). Extreme care should be taken to insure tbe integrity of the barrier. All penetrations and laps in the moisture barrier should be sealed, Response to Plan Check.Review Comments Our response to the plan check correction comments {EsGiJ, l998a and 1998b) relative to the geotechnical aspects of the proposed site development are provided below: • ItemNo. 13 Provide notes on the foundatiorr plan listing the soils report recommendations for foundation. See the note in t.ne section above for the geotechnical report to reference. • Item No. 14 • Provide a current copy of the project soils report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. Based on our review of the as-graded report of the site grading (Leighton, 1996), it is our opinion that the geotecbnjcal recommendations presented in the report are still valid and applicable to the proposed. remodeling and future addjtioo of the me.2za.tJ..ine additlon. Two copies of the KepoJt are enclosed with this letter. ltemNo.16 Investigate the potenrial for selsmically induced soil lique/act;on and soil instability in seismic ,zones 3 and 4. Liquefaction and dynamic settlement of soils can be caused by strong vibratory motion due to earthquakes. Both research and historical data indicate that loose, saturated, granular soils are susceptible to liquefaction and dynamic settlement while the stability of stiff silty clays and clays and dense sands are not adversely affected by vibratory motion. Liquefaction is typified by a total loss of shear strength in the affected soil layer, thereby causing the soil to flow as a liquid. This effect may be manifested by e~oessive settlements and sand boils at the ground surface. Due to the lack of a pennanent shallow ground water table within the site and the relatively hard or dense nature of the on-site sandy formational materials and compacted fill soils, it is our opinion that the Jiquefactlon potential of these soils due to the design earthquake loading is considered low provided the geotechnical recommendations provided in the project soils reports are foUowed. -2- 1808-0EL.-OSL. Hi~OMS~NI70H ssn~ dgg:vo 10 Bl UBf £ a6ed !bedwoo <-~80£ O£L 09L 01/08/2001 17:08 8582920771 LEIGHTON SAN DIEGO PAGE 15 4960196-003 ltem No. 18 Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the /oW'ldation plan, grading plan and specffications have been r~iewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporared into the plans. This letter presents ou:r findings and conclusions regarding our geotechnical review of the structural foundation plans and calculations. It is our understanding 1hat no grading is proposed as part of the mezzanine addition, and therefore, grading plans have not been prevared nor reviewed. • Item No. 20 Foundation plan and details have not been completely checfced due to lack of soils report being submicted with part of the plans Additional corrections may follow upon submittal of report and recommendations. Two copies of the geotechnical report applicable to the project are enclosed with this letter. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact this office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Respectfully submitted, Attachments: Appendix A -References Two Copies of As-graded Report of Fine-Grading, dated December 4, 1996 Distribution: (6) Addressee -3 - lBOE-OEl.-09£. Hl~OMSS~I70H ssn~ dgi:::vo 10 Bl uer v e5ed !bedwoo <-~80€ oeL 09L 01/08/2001 17:08 8582'32El771 LEIGHTON SAN DIEGO PAGE l& APPENDIXA REFERENCES EsGil Corporation, 1998a, :Plan Check Comments, Office/Warehouse-Mezzanine Addition, 2819 Loker Avenue East, Plan Check No. 97-38741 dated January 9, 1998 ---, 1998b, Plan Check Co~roents, Office/Warehouse-T.l. Remodel, 2819 Loker Avenue East, Plan Check No. 97-3874, February 2, 1998 Leighton and Associates, Inc., 1996, As-Graded Report of Fine-Grading Operations, Proposed Commercial Structure, Lots 23 and 38 of Carlsbad Oaks East. Carlsbad Tract No. 74-21, Carlsbad, CaUfomia, Project No. 4960196-002, dated December 4, 1996 Seneca Stn1ctu.ral Eogineexing, Inc., 1997, Stroctural Calculation for Carlsbad Oaks Mezzanine Addition, Carlsbad, California, dated December l 0, 1997 ---, 1998a, St.ructural Plans for the Carlsbad Oaks Mezzanine Addition, Carlsbad, California., Sheets S-1, S-2, and S-3, dated January 23, 1998 ---, 1998b, Structural Plan Check Corrections, Carlsbad Oaks Mezzanine Addition, dated January 23, 1998 A-1 180E-OE:l.-09l. Hi~OMS~NI70H ssn~ dgg:vo 10 81 uer g eBed ~bedwoo <· ~80£ O£L 09L 01/08/2001 17:08 8582920771 LEIGHTON SAN DIEGO PAGE 02 s·d dil:~ ::-:~-• = Leighton and Associates A GTG Company GEOTECHNIC.AL CONSULTANTS December 4, 1996 To: Attention: Subject: Introduction WHCBO Real Estate Limited Partnership 30 faecutive Avenue Park, Suite 100 .Irvine, California 92713-9693 Mr . .Jon Kelly Project No. 4960196-002 As-Graded Report of Fine-Grading Ol)erations, Proposed Commercial Structure, Lots 23 and 38 of Carlsbad Oaks East, Carlsbad Tract No, 74-21, Carlsbad, California In accordance with your request, we have provided geotechnicat ~ices during the fine-grading operations of the proposed commercial structure o.n Lots 23 and 38 of Carlsbad Oaks East (Carlsbad Tract No. 74-21) in Carlsbad, California. The subject site, which is located northeast of the intersection of Palomar Airpon Road and El Pue.rte Street (and south of Loker Avenue East) was previously graded during the development of the Carlsbad Oaks Business Center in 1985-86 (SPGC, 1987). The fine·grading operations incJuded the removal of desiccated and potentially compressible existing fill soils on the pad, overe~ca.vation of the cut portion of the building pad, excavation of cut material, preparation of areas to receive fill, and fill placement and compaction. This as-graded report summarizes our geotec:hnical observations and field and laboratory test results completed during the fine-grading operations on the site. The 40-scale grading plans for Lots 23 and 38 of Carlsbad Tract No. 74-21, prepared by Kahr and Associates (1'ahr, 1996) was utilized as a base map to present the as-graded geotechnical conditions and approximate locations of the field density tests within the Jimits of the subject sjte. The As-graded Geotecbnjcal Map is presented as Plate 1 and is located in the pocket at the rear of this report. Summary of Fjne-Grading Operations Fine-grading of the sjtc was performed between November 12 and 30, 1996. Observation of the fine- grading operations and testing of compacted fill were performed by our field technician who was on-site under the supervision of the geotechnical engineer. Geologic observation of the building pad- overexcava.tion was also perfonned as-needed by a representative of Leighton and Associates, Inc. (Leightoo). Plate l presents the as-graded geotechnical conditions encountered during grading and the 3934 Murphy Canyon Road, #B205, San Diego, CA 92123-4425 (858) 292-8030 • FAX (858) 292-0771 • www.lelghton9eo.com 1BOE-0El.-09l. Hi~OMS~~I70H ssn~ 9 a6ed !bedwoo <-~908 08L 09L dgg:vo 10 81 uer 01/08/2001 17:08 8582920771 LEIGHTON SAN DIEGO PAGE 03 4960196-002 approximate l~tioos of tbe field density tests. Specific operations perfonned during fine grading included tbe following: • Site Preparatjon and Removals of Compressible Fill Soils Site preparation consisted of the removal and/or scarification of desiccated and potentially compressible existing till soils in the center and eastern portions of the site. Observations during site grading indicated the upper 1 to 2 feet of the existing fill soils on the pad were dry, desiccated, and potentially compressible. As a result, the fill soils in the upper 1 to 2 feet of the pad were scarified and/or removed to competent fill, mojstu~-conditioned to a near optimum moisture content, rnix~ to obtain a relatively homogeneous fill, and compacted to a minim.um 90 percent relative coropaction (based on American Standard of Testing and Materials (ASTM) test Method DlS57-91). Site p~eparations were perl'ormed in general accordance with the project recommendations (Leighton, 1996a}. • Overexcavation of the Cut Portion of the Building :Pad The cut portion of the building pad (i.e. the southwest and west portions of the building) was overexcavated a mioimum of 15 feet below the planned finish pad grade elevation and at least 10 feet outside the building limits. The ovei-excavation of tlle buUdjng pad was perl'onned to minimize tbc fill differential beneath the proposed structures by providing a minimum of 15 feet of fill beneath the building pad (Leighton, 1996c), The approximate bottom removal depths of tbe overexcavation are shown on Plate 1. Prior to fill placement, the overexcavation bottom was scarified to a minimum depth of 6 to 12 inches, moisture conditioned as neceSS8J}' and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum dry density in accordance witb ASTM Test Method D1SS7-9l. • fill Placement and Compaction After processing the elCisting flnish grade soUs on the pad and the bottom of the overexcavation area, native sandy soils were generally spread in 4-to 6-inch loose lifts, moisture-conditioned as necessary to obtain a near-optimum moisture content. and compacted to a minimwn ,:elative compaction of 90 percent of the maximum dtY density (based on ASTM Test Method D 1557-91 ). Areas of fill in which obse.vations showed nonunifonn mixing and/or inadequate or excessive moisture, were reworked and recompacted until the fill achieved a minimum 90 percent relative compaction and an adequate mojstun:: content. Compaction of the fill soils was accomplished with heavy construction equipment (including rubber-tire scrapers and compactor) and was performed under the obsexvation and testing of a representative of Leighton. • Field and Labotatory Testing Field and laboratory tests we,e perfonned in accordance with ASTM Test Methods D2922-91 and D.3017-88 (Nuclear~Gauge Method). The results of our field density tests are presented in Appendix B. The approximate locations of the field density tests are shown on the As~Graded Geotechnical Map, Plate 1. Our observations and test results indicate that the fill soils placed on the -2 - 'J:80E-0El-09l Hl~OMS~~IlOH ssn~ dvE=vo 10 Bl uer L e5ad !badwoo <-iaoe O£L 09L 01/08/2001 17:08 8582920771 LEIGHTON SAN DIEGO PAGE 04 s·d 4960196-002 site were compacted to a minimum relative compe.ction of 90 percent (based on ASTM Test Method D1557-91). Laboratory testing (including m~imum dry density/optimum moisture content and expansion index tests) wei:e performed on the fill soils in accordance with ASTM Test Method 01557-91 and U.B.C. Standard 18-21 respectively. The expansion index test results indicate the building pad fioish grade soils have a medium expansion potential. The results of our testing are presented in Appendix C. Engineering Geologic Summao: The geologic units encountered during site grading are generally similar to those described in the project geotechnical investigation report (Leighton, 1996a). The geologic units mapped within the site boundary include the Santiago Fonnation and existing documented fill (Map Symbol -Afo). The documented fill was encountered in the ea.stem portion of the site and generally consisted of slightly clayey to silty sands derived from the Santiago Fonnation. The Eocene•aged Santiago formation underlies the entire site and was encountered at grade in the southwest and west p·ortions of "the site. As encouotexed, this unit generally consisted of interbeddcd silty sandstones and minor silty claystones, The approximate location of the geologic units are indicated on the As-Graded Geotechnical Map (Figure l). Ground Water Ground water was not encountered nor anticipated during the grading operations at the site. Conclusions . Based on the results of our observations and field and laboratory test results, it is our opinion that the placement and compaction of fill soils associated with fine.grading operations at the subject site has been perfonned in general accordance with the recommendations of Leighton end Associates and the City of Carlsbad requirements. The following summarizes our conclusions regarding grading of the site: • Geotechnical conditions encounter during fin~grading were generally as assumed in our geotecbnicaJ investigation of the site (Leighton, 1996a, 1996b, and 1996c). • The existing fill soils located within the limits of grading were removed and/or scatified to a depth of 1 to ,2 feet below e"l!.isting finish grades. These soils were then moisture-conditioned, mixed, and compacted to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM Test Method D1S57·91). • The cut portion of the building pad was overexcavated a minimum of 15 feet below the planned finish pad grade elevation and replaced with compacted fill. Fill soils were derived from on-site soils, Field and laboratory test results of the compacted till soils at tbe site indicate the soils were placed to at least a 90 percent relative compaction in accordance with ASTM Test Method D1557-91. 18O8-O8l-O9l Hl~OMS~~I7OH ssn~ dv8=vo 10 01 uer a aBBd ~bBdwoo <-~aoe oeL 09L 01/08/2001 17:08 8582920771 LEIGHTON SAN DIEGO PAGE 05 s·d 4960196-002 • Expansion potential test results of the finish grade soils within the building limits indicate the fill soils have a med.ium expansion potential (per: U.B.C. Standard 18-2). Based on the results of our gcotechnical observations and field and laboratory test results, it is our opinion that the building pad is suitable for its intended use from a geotechnical standpofot. Post-grading and construction related gc:otechnical recommendations are presented below, Geotechnical Recommendations Earthwork We anticipate that future earthwork at the site will consist of site preparation, trench excavation and · backfill, and drivewa.y and parking area subgrade, aggregate'base and asphalt concrete preparation and compaction. We recommend that eanhwork on-site be perl'onned in accordance with the following recommendations and the City of Carlsbad grading requirements. • Site Preparation If addilional grading (such as fill placement) is planned on the site, prior to grading, the areas to recejve strucru,al fill or engineered structures should be cleared of surface obstructions, potentially compressible material (such as desiccated fill and weatb.ered or disturbed fonnational material, etc,), and stripped of vegetation. Vegetation and debris should be removed and properly disposed of off-site. Holes resulting from removal of buried obstructions which extend below finish site grades should be replaced with suitable compacted fill material. Areas to receive fill· and/or other surface improvements should be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches, brought to a near optimum moisture condition, and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM Test Method D1557-91). • Excavations Excavations of the on-site materials may generally be accomplished with conventional heavy- duty earthwork equipment. lt is not anticipated that blasting will be required or that significant quantities of oversized rook (i.e. rock with maximum dimensions greater than 6 to 12 inches) will be generated during future grading. However1 localized cemented zones may be encounter:ed that may require heavy ripping. tf oversized rock is encountered, it should be hauled off-site or placed in non-strUctural or landscape areas. Pue to the relatively high density characteristics and coarse nature of the on-site soils, temporaiy excavations such as utility trencbes whh vertical sides in the OJ:Jsite soils should rems.in stable for tbe period requ{rcd to construct the utility, provided they are free of adverse geologic conditions. However, in accordance with OSHA requitements, excavations between 5 .lll)d 15 feet in depth. should be shored or laid back to inclinations of ) : l (horizontal to vertical) if wotkers are to ep.ter such excavations. For ex.cavations deeper than 15 feet, specific. recommendations can be made on a case-by-case basis . • 4 ~ lBOE:-OE:l-OSl Hi~OMS0~I7OH ssn~ 6 a6ed !bedwoo <-~808 08L 09L 01/08/2001 17:08 8582920771 LEIGHTON SAN DIEGO PAGE 00 O '[ • d 4960 l 96-002 • Fill Placement and Compactio,n The on-site soils are generally suitable for use as compacted fill provided they are free of organic material, debris, and rock fragments larger than 6 to 12 inches in maximum dimension. All fill soils should be brought to near-optimum moisture conditions and compacted in uniform lifts -to at least 90 percent relative compaction based on the laboratory maximum dry density (ASTM Test Method 01557-91). The optimum lift thickness required to produce a unifonnly compacted fiU will depend on the type and size of compaction equipment used. In general, fiJI soils should be placed in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in compacted thickness. Placement and comp11Ction of fill should be performed in general accordance with the cum:nt City of Carlsbad grading ordinances, sound construction practices, and the geotechnical recommendations presented herein. • Foundation Design It is anticipated that the proposed building will utilize a combination of continuous perimeter footings and conventional interior isolated-spread footings for support of the building. The following recommendations are based on the presence of medium ~pansion potential soits (less than 90 per UBC lS-I-B) within the upper 4 feet of the finish pad grade. Footings bearing in competent natural soil materia or roperly compacted fill should extend a minimum of 18 inches below the lowest ad' acent rade. t s n s. ma: e est ne usmg an a owa e soll-bearin va ue o 2,000 pounds per sqµare foot (psf). Ibe e.Uowahlc soO-bearin~ pressure may be increased by 500 psf for each additional foot offouruiatjon embedment to a maximum..»Qoweble-bearing pressure of2,500 .PJ!. This value may be ;ncreased by one-third for loads of short duration including wind or seismic forces. We understand that a conventionally-reiofo,rced foundation system will be utilized on the site. • Conventlona11y-Reinfurced Foundation Systsu The proposed conventionalJy-reinfol"OOd foundation system should be designed in accordance with the p~mmeters presented above. ln addition, a modulus of subgrade reaction value of l 00 tons/ft-1 may also be assumed by the project structural engineer in the design of the structure~s foundation. Continuous.perimeter footings should have a minimum embedment and width of 18 and 15 inches, respectively, Continuous footings should be reinforced with a minimum of four No. S bars, two at the top and two at the bottom. lsolated spread footings should have a minimum base dimension of30 inches, minimum ernbedment ofl 8 inches below adjacent grade and reinforced in accordance with the structural engineer's recommendations. Interior column footings should be isolated from the floor slab. Slabs on gl.'Bde should have a minimum thickness of 5 inches and minimal rejnforcement consisting ofNo. 4 bars at 18 inc:hes on center. Jt should be noted that the foundation dimensions and specified reinforcement are minimums only and !!hould be designed by tbe structural engineer given the site specific soil conditions and anticipated settlement. lBOE-DEl.-OSl. Hl~OMS~NI70H ssn~ dsE=vo 10 Bluer o~ e6ed !bedwoo <-~90£ O£L 09L 01/08/2001 17:08 8582920771 LEIGHTON SAN DIEGO PAGE 07 n ·d 4960 196-002 Floor Sfab The proposed conventionally-reinforced slab should be a minimum of 5-1/2 inches thick and be underlain by a minimum of .2 inches of clean sand (SQQd equivalent greater than 30) which is in tum underlain by a 6 mil thick or greater vapor barrier. The vapor barrier sh.ould be sealed at all penetrations and laps. We recommend that the vapor barrier be also underlain by a 4--inch layer of clean sand (sand equivalent greater than 30) to act as a capillary break. Moisture vapor transmission may be additionally reduced by use of concrete additives. Moisture barriers can retard, .but not eliminate moisture vapor movement from the underlying soi)s up through the slab. We recommend that the floor coverings installer test the moisture vapor flux rate prior to attempting application of the flooring. A slipsheet or equivaJent should be utilized above the concrete slab if crack.sensitive floor coverings (such as ceramic tile, etc.) are to l>e placed directly on the concrete slab. Our experience iodicates that use of reinforcement in slabs and foundations will generally reduce the potential for drying and shrinkage cracking. However, some cracking should be expected as the concrete cures. Minor cracking is considered nonnal; however, it if often aggravated by a high cement ratio, high concrete temperature at the time of placement, small aggregate size, and rapid moisture loss due to hot, dry, and/or windy conditions during placement and curing. Cracking due to temperature and moistute fluctuations can also be expected. The use of low slump concrete (not ex.cceding 4 to 5 inches at the time of placement) can reduce the potential for shrinkage «:racking and the action of tensioning the tendons can close small shrinkage cracks. • Anticipated Settlement • Settlement of properly <:0mpacted fill h.as two components; 1) Elastic settlement of soils which occur upon application of structural loads (the majority of which typically occurs during and slightly after construction); and 2) hydroconsotidation settJement which can occur upon saturation due to water infiltration (which typically occurs over a period of many years). The recommended allowable-bearing capacity is generally based on a maximum total and differential (elastic) settlement of 3/4 inch and l/2 inch in horizontal distance of IO0 feet, respectively, upon application of structural loads and upon future soil wetting. Approximately one-half of this settlement js anticipated to occur during construction. Actual elastic settlement can be estimated on the basis that settlement is roughly proportional to the net contact bearing pressure. Slab Subgrade Presaturation The slab subgrade soiJs present on the site should be presoaked to a minimum moisture conteot of at least 18 percent to a depth of at least 18 inches. The subgrade soil moisture content should be checked by a representative of Leighton prior to slab construction. Presoakiog or moisture conditioning may be achieved in a number of ways, but based on our professional experience, we have found that minimizing the moisture loss of the building pad upon completion of grading (by periodic wetting to keep the upper portion of the pad from dryh\.8 out) and/or benning the lot and flooding it for a sbort period of time (a few days) are some of the more efficient ways . 6 - 1BOE:-OE:l-O9l Hl~OMS~NI7OH ssn~ dsi::::vo 10 01 uer ~~ a6ed ~bedwoo <-~80£ O£L 09L 01/0B/2001 17:08 8582920771 LEIGHTON SAN DIEGO PAGE 08 21·d 4960196-002 to meet the presoaking requirements. If flooding is performed, a couple of days to let the upper portion of the pad dry out and fonn a crust so equipment can be utilized should be anticipated. Lateral Earth Pressures and Retaining Wall Design Considerations The recommended lateral pressures for granular soil of low to medium expansion potential (expansion index: less than 90 per U.B.C. 18·1-B) and level or sloping backfill are presented on the following table, Lateral Earth Pressures :Equivalent Fluid Weight (pcf} Conditions Level Backfill 2: 1 Sloping Backfill Active 40 55 At-Rest 60 60 Passive 300 300 (Maximum 3 ksf) (Maximum .3 ksf) Embedded structural walls should be designed for lateral earth pressures e,<.erted on them. The magnitude of these pressures depends on the amount of deformation that the wait can yield under load. If the wall can yield enough to mobilize 1he full shear strength of the soil, it can be designed for ''active" pressure. If the watl cannot yield under the applied load, the shear strength of the soil cannot be rnobiliied and the earth pressure will be higher. Such walls should be designed for "at rest•• conditions. lf a structure moves toward the soils. the resulting resistance developed by_ the soil is the ''passive" resistance. For design purposes1 the recommended equivalent fluid pressure for each case for walls founded above the static ground water and backfilled with soils of low to medium expansion potential is _provided in the table above. The equivalent fluid pressute values assume free-draining conditions. If conditions other than those assumed above are anticipated, the equivalent fluid pressure values should be provided on an individual-case basis by the geotechnical engineer. Surcharge loading effects from the adjacent stnictures should be evaluated by the geotechnical and structural engineer. All retaining wall structures should be provided with appropriate drainage and appropriately waterproofed. The outlet pipe should be sloped to drain to a suitable outlet. Typical wall drrunage design is illustrated in Figure 1. -7 - !BOE-OEl-OSl Hl~OMS~NI70H ssn~ ~~ a6ed !bedwoo <-~808 08L 09L 01/08/2001 17:08 8582920771 Er ·d RETAINING WALL WALL WATERPROOFING PER ARCHlTECT'S SPECIFICATIONS--- FINISH GRADE NOT TO SCALE SPECtFICATtONS FOR CALTRANS CLASS Z PERMEABLE MATERIA~ U.S. Standard Sieve Size ,: Pa_ssfnq l" 100 3/4" 90-100 J/8" 40-100 No. 4 iS-40 No. 8 18 .. 33 No. 30 5-15 No. 50 0-7 No. 200 0-3 Sand Equiva 1 en t > 75 RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL raoE-OEl.-OSl. LEIGHTON SAN DIEGO PAGE 09 SQIL BACKFILL, COMPACTED TO 80 PERCENT RELATIVE COMPACTION* G/4•-1.112• CLEAN GRAVEL..,.. ,• (MIN,) PIAMETEA PERFOPATED · PVC PIPE (SCHEDULE 40 OR EQUfVALE,.T) WITH PERFORATIONS ORl~HTEO DOWN "8 QEPIQTED MINIMUM 1 PERCENT O.A.AOt&NT TO SUITABLE OUTI.ET COMPETENT BSDROCK OR MATERIAL AS EVALUATED BY TtfEl Gl!OTECHNICAL CONSULTANT *BASED ON A.8TM D1155~ **IF CAL TRANS CLA88 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL (see GRADATION TO LEPT) IS USED IN PLACE OF s1,4•~1-112• GRAVEL, FILTER FABRIC MAY BE DELETED.' CAL TAAH8 Cl.ASS 2 PeRMEABLE MATERIAL SHOULD BE COMPACTED TO 90 PERCENT RELATIVE COMPACTION* NOTE:COMPOSITE DRAINAGE PRODUCTS SUCH AS MRADRAIN OR J-DRAJN MAY BE USED AS AN ALTEFINAllVE TO GRAVEL OR CLASS 2. INSTALLATION SHOULD SE PEAFOFWED IN ACCORDANCE \MTH MANUFACTIJRER'S SPECIACATIONS. Project No. _4_..9_8..._0:;;..1_9_6_-0_0_2 __ Scale Not to Scala Engr./Geol. _..,JG""F...,/_R_,K..,_W"---__ _ Drafted By ____ E __ P_· ------ Hl~OMSS~IlOH ssn~ e~ a5ed !bedwop <-~80€ O€L 09L 01/08/2001 17:08 858:2920771 LEIGHTON SAN DIEGO PAGE 10 4960 t 96-002 For sliding resistance, the friction coefficient of 0.35 may be used at the concrete and soil interface. Jn combining the total lateral resistance, the passive pressure or the frictional resistance should be reduced by 50 percent. Wall footings should be designed in aooordaoce with structural considerations. The passive tesistance value may be increased by one-third when considering loads of short duration such as wiod or seismic loads. The horizontal distance between foundation elements providing passive resistance should be a minimum of three times the depth of the elements to allow :full development of these passive pressure. The total depth of retained earth for design of cantilever walls should be the vertical distance below the ground surt'ace measured at the wall face for stem design or measured at the heel of the footing for overturning and sliding. Wall back-cut e11:cavations less than S feet in height can be made near vertical. For back cuts greater than 5 feet in height, but less than 15 feet in height, the back cut should be flattened to a gradient of not steeper than 1:1 (horizonta) to vertical) slope inclination. For back cuts in excess of 15 feet in height, specific recommendations should be requested froin the geotechnical consultant. The granular and native back.fill soils should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (based on ASTM Test Method ll1557-9 l ). The granular fiJl sboutd extend horizontally to a minimum distance equal to one-half the wall height behind the walls. The walls should be constructed and backfilled as soon as possible after back-cut e~cavatfon. Prolonged exposure of back-cut slopes may result in some localized slotie instability. Foundations for retaining walls in competent fonnational soils or properly compaeted fill should be embedded at least 18 inches be)ow Jowest adjacent grade. At this dep1h, an allowable bearing capacity of 2,000 psf may be assumed. • Type of Cement for ConstructiQD Based on the soluble sulfate test result perfonned during our investigation (Leighton, 1996a) and our professional experience: in the vicinity of the site, the on-site soils possess a negligible soluble sulfate content. Therefore, the use of sulfate resistant cement is not warranted. • Preliminary Pavement Design Final pavement recommendations should be provided based on R--value testing of the driveway and parking area subgrade soils once final grades are achieved. The upper 12 inches of subgrade soils should be scarified, moisture conditioned and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative compaction based on ASTM Test Method 01557-91. If fill is required to reach subgrade design grade, fill placement should be perfonned in accordance with the recommendations presented in the recommendation section on earthwork (page 4). Tbe aggregate base material should be compacted to 95 percent ~Jative compaction. The above pavement sections may be reduced if the subgrade is lime-treated. For the delivery pads, truck ramps and trash enclosures, etc., we recommend 8 inches of .Portland Cement Concrete (P.C.C.) on native soils. The P.C.C. in the above pavement sections should be provided with appropriate steel reinforcement and crack-control joints as designed by the project structural engineer. Minimum reinforcement should consist of'No. 4 rebars at 18 inches (on center) -9 - lBOE-DEl-OSl Hl~OMSS~IlOH ssn~ v~ aBed !bedwoo <-~908 08L 09L 01/08/2001 17:08 8582920771 LEIGHTON SAN DIEGO PAGE 11 s1·d 4960196-002 at slab midheight which continues through all crack~control joints but not through expansion joints. If saw-cuts are used, they should be a minimum depth of 1/4 of the slab thickness and made within 24 hours of concrete placement. We recommend that sections be as nearly square as possible. A 3,000 psi concrete mix should be utilized. Asphalt Concrete (A.C.), Portland Cement Concrete (P.C.C.) and Class 2 base materials should conform to and be placed in accordance with the latest revision of the California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (Caltrans) and American Concrete Institute (ACI) codes. lf pavement Meas are adjacent to landscape areas, we recommend steps be taken to preveot the subgrade soils from becoming saturated. Concrete swales should be designed in roadway or parking areas subject to concentrated su,face runoff. Regular maintenance (such as seal coats and crack . infiJHng) is an important part of extending pavement life. Qrainage Control Positive drainage of surface water away from the building and the top of slopes toward the street, driveway or other suitable collection point is very important. No water should be allowed to pond at any locatioo. • Graded Slopes lt is recommended that any re-graded slopes within the development be planted with ground cover vegetation as soon as practical to protect against erosion by reducing runoff velocity. Deep~rooted vegetation should also be established to protect against surfi_cial slumping. Oversteepening of existing slopes should be avoided during post-grading and construction unless supported by appropriately designed retaining structures. • Construction Observation and Testins Construction observation and testing should be perfonned by the geotecbnical consultant during future excavations and foundation construction at -the site. Additionally, footing excavations should be observed and moisture detennination tests of subgrade soils should be perfonned by the geotechnical consultant prior to the pouring of concrete . • IO • 18OE-OEl-O9l Hi~OMS~~I70H ssn~ daE=vo 10 01 uer g~ aBed !bedwoo <-~80£ O£L 09L r PAGE 12 01/08/2001 17:08 8582920771 LEIGHTON SAN DIEGO s 1 • d 4960196-002 If you have any questions regarding our report, please contact this office. We appre_ciate this opportunity to be of service, Respectfully submitted, LElGlITON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ~-~t~.3/31~8) ll'roject Geologist RKW/JGF/kar Attachments: Plate 1 • As-Graded Geotcchnical Map Appendix A -References Appendix B -Summary of Field Density tests Appendix C -Laboratory Testing Procedures and Test Results Distribution: (4) Addressee (2) Reno Contracting, Attention: Mr. Craig Hueners (3) City of Carlsbad Engineering Department, Attentaon: Mr. Al Ludwig -11 - 18O8-OEl-OSl Hl~OMS~~IlOH ssn~ g~ aBad !badwoo <· ~BO£ O£L 09L dsE=vo 10 01 u~r (o/0/4u" · ?,;' ~1, &rj </ £ t-/2-~of C<k5 Jo/?o(v'O ~~ i r.c:. l0/13)<rd _ fir~_ {_j_,IJ,-..___ JO/;)-Sjep t::-~--~--:5 ~h.., 11 J-z---r/&o ts~ c.J--¼,\ /--")0-01 esi-}C1"'1rv/ v(2:J>{ 01 C\ ~ 'ill=' ~ f \~"---· ~ <;_~~ . <:t?_ @) (C..., (::>l..Vi-Jc:-{\ ~ z/t1/o1-----lfc/4£ e ~ - 1(r;/o1---!?Tl~ BI.I. 7 ( I(? l _./ 5-1< ~ --zJ-c I .,._ ---,._ ' BfGINEBINII . FIREAFPR/RlRM --====== HEALTHDEPr HAZ MAT I AIR QUAL ----O'IHERS!WER DJSTR TO FROM BLDG GRADING LETJER ~ APPLICANT APPLICANT ~:R 8Qt0CILFOf!M CfDFOIIM , ....... a.er IUICI IIIIIClCIMPIJ!IE ' (J., l 08-06-~001 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Reference #: Project Title: Applicant: City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Check Revision Permit No:PCR01155 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 2819 LOKER AV EAST CBAD PCR Lot#: 0 2090830700 $0.00 CB003755 Construction Type: NEW DOS GRINGOS-REVISE OPENINGS@ FRONT OF MEZZANINE Owner: Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: ISSUED 07/10/2001 RMA 07/23/2001 08/06/2001 RUSS HOLLINGSWORTH Total Fees:. $120.00 Plan Check Revision Fee Additional Fees Inspector: Total Payments To Date: $0.00 FINAL APPROVAL Date: _____ _ 6542 08/06/01 0002 01 02 CGP 120°00 Balance Due: $120.00 $120.00 $0.00 Clearance: _____ _ NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the ft.,l'Otest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which vou have oreviouslv been aiven a NOTICE similar to this or as ta which the statute of limitations has oreviouslv otherwise exoired. PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 FOR OFFICE USE ~ Y PLAN CHECK No,F!'f!/{ ;2/ /.5:S·· EST. VAL. __________ _ Plan Ck. Deposit ~ Validated By ~ P¼ft= Date ? Zu,/ _ 2 -f-7 1 1 Address (include Bldg/Suite #) Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Total # of units Assessor's Parcel # Existing Use Proposed Use #of Stories Name Address City State/Zip Telephone# ;afL_;J>J!!:>...P!iB'.ilY:t!iw~~!f:;~ .. -..~,: Name Address City ,.~ •.. ,.,.,,_,,, __ , State/Zip Telephone# Lt·:·.c§.b,rirra~ittq)i\£'¢~Jyi'e~rfX.:Ni@f L.~; :..<:'..:'.:c:{·, ;;:· '.:. • ': :; · · ... (Sec. 7031.5 Busin"'ess and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($5001). Name Address City State/Zip Telephone# State License # _________ _ License Class _________ _ City Business License # _______ _ Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License # _________ _ fg_:~:-,--:W.Q~~~E~f!$< )CQi°i{p,g~,_$,A;t"JP'~\: t {~ -~ ; -~-: ---~ ?<:n ,,_:• ):' •• ,:· --::,·:_", "' ~::::::~1(~?-i"~~-~-?.':\~~v~f~~;, ,\;, Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. 0 I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company __________________ ~_ Policy No.____________ Expiration Date _______ _ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) D CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE ______________________________ DATE _________ _ ~t/: '~~t!W:tJlR~~µii.;p_i!f PE.Qt.A.8.4:T:!Qri!'. ;_ ·:,i. :. :. ..., --·. :. > "" ; .i: · ..:''..'.':.-:... -. ..:.. ~Il.::...i ::.::.. : .. . I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: · o I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt und1:3r Section ______ Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted _with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4, I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number/ contractors license number): _____________________________________________ _ 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work):.~·-------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE --------------------------~ e o M ru: i: t E; TH IS' SECT ]o N:' i= b a} NON-RE .S / D .EN ,f /AL:· BU I~ DI NG ii?-.ERM i ;rs, o N t Y ·: ~ ~--, ,':J,.:' 1"·. ;, ~· Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? D YES D NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? D YES O NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES O NO IF ANY 0.F THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. i.~!'...~j;fi.~§;f,ftl.l'.CT:!<it!'J:(1;,§f)!J:>l.NG,M~N£Y:·''::.~: :, ,; . ' ,' I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). PINK: Finance ,' DATE: 7 /20/01 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad EsGil Corporation 1n Partnersli.ip Witli. {jovemment for '13uifaing Safetg PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-3755 rev(PCR0l 155) PROJECT ADDRESS: 2819 Loker Ave. SET:I PROJECT NAME: New Storage Mezzanine Opening Revision ~ The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. D The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. D The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. D The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. D The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: ~ Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. D Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax#: Mail Telephone Fax In Person D REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation . D GA D MB D EJ D PC 7/12 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858) 560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 00-3755 rev(PCR0l 155) 7/20/01 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad rev(PCR0l 155) PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-3755 PREPARED BY: David Yao BUILDING ADDRESS: 2819 Loker Ave. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: BUILDING AREA Valuation PORTION ( Sq. Ft.) Multiplier deck ooenina revised Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance / • / Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: D Complete Review D Other DATE: 7 /20/01 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: Reg. VALUE Mod. D Structural Only D Repetitive Fee =8 Repeats 0 Hourly 1 I Hour* * Based on hourly rate Comments: Esgil Plan Review Fee ($) $120.ool $96.001 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc Carlsbad Fire Department 01155 1635 Faraday Ave. CarlEibad, CA· 92008 Plan Review Requirements Category: Fire Prevention (760) 602-4660 Date of Report: _o_?/_30_12_0_0_1 _________ _ Building Plan Reviewed by: Name: Russ Hollingsworth Address: 1165 Cape Aire Ln City, State: Carlsbad CA 92008 Plan Checker: Job#: 01155 Job Name: Dos Gringos Bldg #: PCR01155 --------------------- Job Address: 2819 Loker Avenue Ste. or Bldg. No. IZI Approved LJ Approved Subject to LJ Incomplete Review FD Job# The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards .. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and/ or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and/ or specifications to this office for review and approval. 1st 01155 2nd FD File# 3rd Other Agency ID Date: • / ~~to} Project: ~(!) G/t. (/\I~ Number KL Wood Engineering Inc. 3107 W. Colorado Ave #3 l 2 Colorado Springs, CO 80904 719-471-8558 Page No I --r--: _:: ___ : .. t--~~~ J~::~:-~---1------7izz-_:t~-&.t. ~-k ,v ri:_7_/l·i------------ -_ _ ___ 1 1 , 7 I ,-! l\-(.,f]r ----- -_~: ~ • j =.:: ~·~· ;;_ J_~~':~:=·~·/--1----L--------'-7 _____ . .r-__ -=--___ _ -· A : ~---·----·-r---......__ i _ t-: -- •-: ~---~' -------=----~-_______ , "T L,--' /1;/~ ----~ ---·:··---------1----/ ----;--------------- ----'-' '---,.,...;. ~~=-==~-=--=--=--=-+;-=-~=-=-~=~i~t:_=-=-~=---=,:Vt:::_::__:-"-~=Jc=::-~=::-~~l-=~==·---_-L-----------~---1 ' ' .,-------- --------------------11----l-----1----!----------_________ i________________ ,,, -------· ---r--· --------gz:--· ----,---------, ~----- ' 'I -~::_ I_ Ill I i --·~ ---~------~ I ' .. .,_, __ ,_ " ~ -----~·· ----;---t---1---_j__i -I ---.... --- KL Wood Engineering Inc. 3107 W. Colorado Ave #312 Colorado Springs, CO 80904 719-471-8558 Page No. :2. Project: P~s 6r/UN~S Number -. __ '. ·----·-·----_J. ____ --· -·---: __ .. ----'------¼------!----------+-l ___ -·+ -------'-------77L~ cl--~ ---------1'----- : I ! -~ ----------------~---r-----+----li-------1----1----! V ' -------71 --/-:-;-/, f-,.· ,r----+----+-" l~---+----+----J----!----1 -----1,--f-l, --.• --·-··--------·---·-,._! ------t-·t---t-----1-----1------+---- / ~ -·-·--' IC MfC ' I ------~---w~o·f-~z..,,___--+-------+---+---+--1 ___ __.L/,__---;----+-----+..:......::;___+----k----1-----+---- -·-----+-1J11--~-~ +-----z;-~x 1. ,;;::[\"7"~~~~-l?bk.,, __ , ----------·--------+lf/-Z-----1--·-fo,t~ --r_ff.-, .. /12.P,r,&~ , ~-1.1...:jJ~--l---- --------r '----'-§' '--/5;f/15J --. -. ---IIJl-"3--ZiJ"{/t.z -------+-----!----1------4-----·'---------..... ·-·--jJ;r ~ 0. ll ~ <"' /.(~/ ..., __ ;__ ____ _ ----------t,11l::5-Z34~--1---"'---+-~ (!?, ?Df..'3..:z..,_;_5.J ~..&L.a-i=L=---1 -------r -------t----+----------t-----+----l----------...;. ____________ _ -. ---,--------t------1--------+-----i-----l-----l-------i----f --------t--,---t-----t----+---+----+---4-----+---1 ! -· -----·-----1----+----+----+----+----+----+'--- . -. ~--_-:. ~ ···~=----=-~=~1----------~-~-~-:-~~~~-~-:~1---------------l~--------_~~~~~~~---J~------ . ., ... ---' ----____ _;r-·----+----+------1----!----+-;' -·--- . -------------4-------, --·-----'. --.,, ~~ l ' '-·----·----'----------i----·-·-·---'-------1-----t---------l---------··,-··--··· -.. -·. ----·---------·-----I -• • -______ , I ____ ___,__ ____ ~-----.,------____ , -------.. -- ' --------·-____ __,__.,. _____________ ----- -···----· .. -----+--_, ___ , __ ; ---j ----+--------·-·------·------------,------------.... · -·i_ -------------------t---------------·-----------------------··r---·-· ' ---· ·----+-------'------!-! ---t-----+-----1------1------,,..-'---I i ,._ --------·--------------·-----· _J_ ___ ------' . ----------------- ' I ------l-----~----· _, _______ ,_ --.... -----1------1-------,J.------1-------"------------ -· . -·-~ ----+-----+,' ---+-----+----l----_,_ ____ .J_• -- ' -----------r----+---,--I ,, Date: End Connection Design Check 7/2/2001 Joist Vertical Shear on Bolts Vv = R / N R = End Reaction "' ,. ' "'' 7, • '•,. '~' . ;)' N = Numnber of Bolts in Connection Vv = 3.61 Kips Horizontal Shear on Bolts Vh = M /Y M = rotational moment Y = distance between bolts Th= 8.13 kips Design Ratio y :::, . ·©·-·-·-·-· • , ~H j I v,,i;·_-, --6-·-·-·-·- 7.22 Kips -----4.5 N= 2 M= Y= 32.51 In-Kips 4 Inches Vr = Th/Tu+Vv/Ru Dr= 1.03 Kips Page:! 3 T=C 4 X= 2.99 Inches .6667X = 1.996 Inches Y= 1.996 Inches .667X*C+YT=M 1 T= 8.14 Kips QFt= 67.5 Ksi Tu= 14.52 Kips Ok Bolts Used in Connection 9/16" Dia. A307 pFv= 36 Ksi Anet= 0.2151 Design Shear Strength Ru= 7.74 Kips Tu= 14.52 Kips Ok ! • Combined Section Properties-Rods Added to Section Page: Ag= 2.5891 0.000 2.589 Special Input Data Gage = 0.105 Area Post Face 16 Rod 2&3 Rod Dia .. [D 0.000 Post Dept 3.5 Rod 4$5 Rod. Dia. 0.000 Flange 1.2 Elem-4 Elem-1 Elem-2 Yield/Ult 55 70 Elem Area D AD Adb"2 lex J 1 2.518 8 20.144 0 91.17 2 0.000 0.105 0.000 0.000 0 3 0.000 15.895 0.000 0.000 0 4 0.000 0.105 0.000 0.000 0 5 0.000 15.895 0.000 0.000 0 2.518 40 20.144 0.000 91.17 Y= 8.000 Reinf. lxc = 91.17 ln"4 Reinf. Sxc = 11.40 ln"3 Elem-5 Un-Reinf. Ix= 91.17 ln"4 Un-Reinf. Sx= 11.40 ln"3 Rx= 5.93 In Bar needed I No Ix= 91.17 Sx= 11.40 Rx= 5.93 j PCR01155 2B19 LOKER AV EAST CBAO DOS GRINGOS-REVISE OPENINGS@ FRONT OF MEZZANINE PCR Lot# RUS5 HGl ,UNC.R\t,JQRTH I ,;-z;· CSt1~ ~ 7'"1--'~ r~/co/ ~ i/-¥-ffiu<c--~ ~ . ( UJ C() ] 7 55) . &ti J:I-;__ f)kk 7[ulo1 fJ L"'-.,::, ® .R, L.J.e,z. .-z c:.c:..d ¥"--1¥f}dv.._/ -·-----------------------------------~-- '7· '3o-O t BUILDING PLANNING ENGINEERING FIRE APPR/FORM HEALTH DEPT HAZ MAT/ AIR QUAL ------OTHER SEWER DISTR TO FROM BLOG GRADING LETTER APPLICANT APPLICANT ~1g~~:RM CFDFORM PE & M WORKSHEE BLOG FEES COMPU ~. $ ~~ ~- FOUNDATIONS ,. FqUNPATION DESIGN IS BASED ON 1997 use MINIMUM VALUES. 2. DESIGN PRESSURE IS 1000 PSF 3. SLAB, 5 1/2", 2000 PSI EXPANSION ANCHORS -CONCRETE 1. FOR ANCHORAGE IN CONCRETE THE FOLLOWING PRODUCTS MAY BE USED: A. SIMPSON SlRONG TIE WEDGE ALL (ICBO NO. 5256) B. HIL TI Kl'<lK BOLT II (ICBO NO. 4627) C. ITW RAMSET/REDHEAD lRUBOLT WEDGE ANCHOR (ICBO NO. 1372) 2. INSTALLATION: EXPANSION ANCHOR IS INSTALLED IN CONCRETE WITH A PREDRILLED HOLE OF THE SAME DIAMETER AS THE NOMINAL BOLT DIAMETER. THE DRILLED HOLES MUST EXCEED THE DEPTH OF ANCHOR EMBEDMENT BY AT LEAST ONE ANCHOR DIAMETER TO PERMIT OVERDRIVING OF ANCHORS AND PROVIDE A DUST FREE AREA. THE ANCHOR IS HAMMERED INTO THE PREDRILLED HOLE UNTIL AT LEAST SIX THREADS ARE BELOW THE SURFACE. THE NUT IS THEN TIGHTENED AGAINST THE WASHER UNTIL THE TORQUE VALUES SPECIFlED ARE ATTAINED. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SPECIAL INSPECTION IS NOT REQUIRED. STEEL NOTES 1. GRADE AND FABRICATION: ALL STRUCURAL STEEL SECTIONS AND WELDED PLATE MEMBERS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A36 UNLESS NOTED AS GR. 50 ON THE PLANS. IN l'MICH CASE THEY SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A572. STRUCTURAL STEEL TUBING SHALL CONFORM TO AS1M A-500 GRADE "B". STEEL PIPE COLUMNS SHALL BE GRADE "B" CONFORMING TO AS1M A53. ALL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY FRAMING MEMBERS ARE FABRICATED FROM ASTM A446-76 GRADE "D" (Fy = 50 KSI. MIN.) AND ARE G60 GALVANIZED. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL HA VE MILL CERTIFlCA TION. Mill. CERTIFlCA TION SHALL BE KEPT ON THE JOB SITE FOR EXAMINATION BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE CITY INSPECTOR. 2. SOL TS: ALL BOLTS SHALL CONFORM TO AS1M A307 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS. HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM GRADE 5. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLANS. ALL HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS SHALL HAVE MILL CERTIFICATION. MILL CERTIFICATION SHALL BE KEPT ON THE JOB SITE FOR EXAMINATION BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE CITY INSPECTOR. SLIP CRITICAL (SC) CONNECTIONS REQUIRE HARDENED WASHERS ON BOTH SIDES. All. OTHER HIGH SlRENGTH BOLTS REQUIRE WASHERS ON BOTH SIDES. 3. WELDS: ALL WELDING SHALL BE DONE USING E7D ELECTRODES W/ A MIN. CHARPY V-NOTCH VALUE OF 20 FT.-LBS. C 20 F. ALL 1'.-£1..DERS SHALL BE PROPERLY QUAIJFlED AND BE PRE-APPROVED. ALL WELDING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST A.W.S. SPECIFlCATIONS, NO BUZZ BOXES SHALL BE USED. WHEN 1'.-£1..DING A36 STEEL MORE THAN 1" THICK. USE LOW HYDROGEN ELEClRODES. 4. INSPECTIONS: DURING THE WELDING OF ANY MEMBER OR CONNECTION WHICH IS DESIGNED TO RESIST LOADS AND FORCES REQUIRED BY THE U.B.C. EXCEPT WHERE DONE IN AN APPROVED FABRICATORS SHOP IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1701.7 OF THE U.6.C. All WELDING BY FCP INC. SHALL CONFORM TO THE LA CITY FABRICATORS LICENSE REQUIREMENTS. THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES HAS ISSUED FABRICATORS LICENSE f1697 TO FCP INC. (EXPIRATION DATE OCT. 1 2000). THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR NEED NOT BE CONTINUOUSLY PRESENT DURING WELDING OF THE FOLLOl'IING ITEMS, PROVIDED THE MATERIALS, QUALIFlCATIONS OF WELDING PROCEDURES AND WELDERS ARE VERIFIED PRIOR TO THE START OF WORK IN PROGRESS, AND A VISUAL INSPECTION OP ALL WELDS ARE MADE PRIOR TO COMPLETION OR PRIOR TO SHIPMENT OF SHOP 1',RDJNG: A. SINGLE-PASS FILLET WELDS NOT EXCEEDING {f IN SIZE. B. FLOOR AND ROOF DECK. C. WELDED sruos WHEN USED FOR STRUCTURAL DIAPHRAM OR COMPOSITE SYSTEM. D. WELDED SHEET STEEL FOR COLD-FORMED STEEL FRAMING MEMBERS I.E. STUDS, JOIST E. WELDING OF STAIRS AND RAILING SYSTEMS. 5. REINFORCING RODS: WELDED IN COLD-FORMED STRUCTURAL MEMBERS ARE HOT ROLLED, A307, A706 GRADE 60 OR A572. BOLT TIGHTENING CONDITIONS 1. All. MACHINE BOLTS TO BE BEARING TYPE CONNECTIONS AND SHALL BE TIGHTENED TO A SNUG-TIGHT CONDITION. THE SNUG-TIGHT CDNOJ110N IS DEFINED AS THE TIGHlNESS THAT EXISTS WHEN ALL PLIES IN A JOINT ARE IN FlRM CONTACT. THIS MAY BE ATTAINED BY A FEW IMPACTS OF AN IMPACT WRENCH DR THE TIGHTENING A PERSON CAN ACHIEVE l'<lTH FULL STRENGTH WITH AN ORDINARY SPUD WRENCH. 2. ALL CONNECTIONS USE SHEAR VALUES ONLY, AND NO FRICTION VALUES REQUIRED FOR CONNECTION STRENGTH. ALL HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS TO BE BEARING ("N" TYPE) CONNECTIONS AND SHALL BE TIGHTENED BY THE iURN-OF-NUT METHOD. BOLTS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL HOLES OF THE CONNECTION AND BROUGHT TO A SNUG-TIGHT CONDITION. SNUG-TIGHTENING SHALL PROGRESS SYSTEMATICALLY FROM THE MOST RIGID PART OF THE CONNECTION TO THE FREE EDGES, AND AS NECESSARY UNTIL ALL BOLTS ARE SIMULTANEOUSLY SNUG-TIGHT. THE CONNECTION SHALL THEN BE TIGHTENED FURTHER BY THE APPLICABLE AMOUNT OF ROTATION SPECIFlED IN THE TABLE BELOW: TABLE 22-IV-E NUT ROTATION FROM SNUG-TIGHT CONDITION DISPOSITION OF OUTER FACE OF BOLTED PARTS ONE FACE NORMAL TO BOTH FACES SLOPED NOT BQLI I E~Glli BOTH FACES NORMAL BOLT AXIS & OTHER MORE THAN 1: 20 FROM (UNDERSIDE Of HEAD TO BOLT AXIS SLOPED NOT MORE NORMAL TO THE SOLT AXIS THAN 1:20 TO END OF BQ.l) (BE'IEl.£:D WASHER NOT USED) (BMl£D WASHER NOT USED) lJP TO ANO INCUJDING 1/3 1\IRN 1/2 llJRN 2/3 llJRN 4 llli\MElERS Oltf:R 4 IJIAMElERS BUT 1/2 llJRN 2/J llJRN 5/5 'lURN NOT EXCEEDING 8 Olt£R 8 DIAMETERS BUT 2/3 lURN 5/8 lURN NOT EXCEEDING 12 1 TURN ABBREVIATIONS A.B. ANCHOR BOLT F.F. FlNISHED FLOOR R l<ADIUS ALT. ALTERNATE F.J. FLOOR JOIST REINF.(G) REINFORCE(D)(ING) ARCH. ARCHITECT(URAL) F.S. FJELD SCREWING REQD.(G) REOUIRED(ING) FND. FOUNDATION REV. REVESED (B) BOTTOM FLR. FLOOR R.J. ROOF JOIST BLDG. BUILDING FT. FOOT OR FEET s.s STAINLESS S"JEEL BM. BEAM FTG. FOOTING SHTG. :;;;EATHING B.O.B. BOTTOM OF BEAM SIM. SIMILAR ABO'JE TOP OF CONC. GA. GAUGE S.0.G. SLAB ON GRADE B.S. BOUNDARY SCREWING GALV. GALVANIZED S.P.C. STANDARD PIPE GYP. GYPSUM COLUMN CL CENTER LINE (H) HORIZONTAL SQ. SQUARE CMU CONC. MASONARY UNIT SID. STANDARD CLR, CLEAR(ANCE) H.S.B. HIGH SlREN~TH BOLT STGD. !:::TAGGEREO COL COLUMN I.D. INSIDE DIAMETER sn.... STEEL CONC. CONCRETE INT. INTERIOR S.T.S.M.S. SELF TAPPING CONT. CONTINUOUS ICBO INTERNATIONAL SHEET METAL CTSK. COUNTERSINK SCREWS TEKS CONFERENCE OF S/W SHEAR WALL !!DBL DOUBLE BUILDING omCIALS DIAMETER M.8. MACHINE BOLT (T) 1'0P DET. DETAIL MAX. MAXIMUM T&B TOP & BOTTOM DIAG. DIAGONAL MECH. MECHANICAL T&G TONGUE AND DIM. DIMENSION MF MOMENT FRAME GROOVE ON DOWN MTL. METAL TG. TAPERED GIRDER d BAR DIAMETER MFR MANUFACTURER T.0.B. TOP OF BEAM MIN. MINIMUM T.O.S. ·;0p OF STEEL/ (E) EXISTING MISC. MISCELLANEOUS SLAB EA. EACH (N) NEW TS TUBULAR. STEEL ELEV. ELEVATION TYP. TYPICAL EQ EQUAL N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE EQUIP. EQUIPMENT 0/. OVER U.N.O. UNLESS NOTED E.S. EDGE SCREWING OC ON CENTER OTrlERWISE E.W. EACH WAY O.D. OUTSIDE DIAMETER (V) EXT. EXTERIOR OPNG. OPENING VERTICAL OPP. OPPOSITE WO. \'t1DE PERP PERPENDICULAR wr. WEIGHT PL PLATE x.s. [:(TRA STRONG NOTES: 1. 'THIS PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 1998 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE TITLE 24 WHICH ADOPTS THE 1997 use. UMC. UPC AND THE 1996 NEC 2. NO-SPECIAL INSPECTONS REQUIRED. DESIGN LOADS 1. FLOOR MEZZANINE 1 1/8" COMP-DECK 2.9 PSF STEa DECK 1.7 PSF STEa JOISTS 1.8 PSF STEa BEAMS 2.0 PSF MISC. 3 .. 6 PSF DEAD LOAD 12.0 PSF LIVE LOAD 125.0 PSF TOTAL LOAD 137.0 PSF SHEET INDEX S1 -S6 S1 GENERAL NOTES S2 FOUNDATION PLAN S3 DECK FRAMING PLAN S4 STANDARD DETAILS S5 STANDARD DETAILS· S6 STAIR DETAIL BY A~OVED AUG O 6 2001 City of CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPT. ~ (/) w f- 0 z _J <{ a::: w z w C) .& HO. ui ·1 ~ o-z :l ~~ uicr. w< zm zo ~z N< w :::!: a:: Cl >-~--V)~ ::)N CIOl ~<( It> A:1; c:cu C,CJ'I 12' el~ ~ti <c: 111:,c ;; ~a::O <(<C • ci~O 0 C!) •• •• 0<CW 1-0::: -0 w c, Io w .J l{) ..., <( u5coz o w .I")<( a:: Cl u co (/) a. Ganl!lral Updota RMS1ClH/ISSU£' l?i I: ~~ i! d ;; ~; §3;l'i mt i~. !:;~ 65 I;;~ QO~~ ~lie ~5i:! ~t-i ~;~:1 Hi li~i !H!~~1'l ;,.a ~~a.at; UoJ il~dfi!" gj"' !/lJ~§~ §o~ i=;r;1di~ illl~ DAT£: 9/27 /00 DRAWN BY: B.R.l. SCALE: NTS "' _.., lriR T cl, ~~ "',., ,.,.,., "'C1 e(I) if~ 1-(/) IXl <(O WO N ~OJ <(<( Cl) 0 00::: c., w • z ~Cl -o< o::: .Jm C!) (/) Cl) OJ cE o oo< ONO RRNI 3/1-4/01 D,m: ~>, ii~ 1;a "'is;i a"'~ ~sj"l'.l ~lii1,1 ~!i!~~~ !'!8w 1111:li!l~~ !~a§~ t;i;~:i I/ii= sltll!!<!i "'I? z lfil!S ~ ~i~ o:i!/lt, ~ .... a It ..• it it;;~@ ~l!m;z ,;~;s ~~;s;i ~i:i! !~!<1~ l!;5lii5i !l!i!i~!I !!~fi ~~~~~ :!j~~ t;j~~c ~~,;!,! ~111~"~ :i"'iii 15B5i!ll!l ~-(: R"'1"':,i11B~ id. ;t! "'El~~ i'il5@ ll ~ic .. ~~n :l!k'!ilijl ~~UMB~, --~ ~I: i~ ~ t:' "'\ \_)1 10 1 /2" TRANSVERSE r 0 z C) -I C 0 z )> r @@ _. -I • ..p.. (/) 77 X OJ 0 __._ X C ..p.. z X OJ 0 _,_ X )> ........._ -l _. N ........._ 0 ~ ..p.. z I m 0 ..... )> 0 -0 0 (/) r-r _.. fTl ~ L) -I )> -< z :: r )> L) -I fTl C -I z -< 0 L) C • z 0 '!r!9'l z > )> i[._ 0 ~ a.., 11 g!i 0 z 11 :r 0 o.g.; Q ... ::0 !gg. (I • :I Po-0 Hi 10 GI < g. .,.,,. IA g;i f1l '8-l!!i a iiS' ~~ ,, i~~ [fl!' 0 . o.! ::0 !i ,, if g ~0. )> n 0 0 rn 1'-7 1/2" ;o 0 0 ·1 ... ... II GI () 8,. ii~ )> 3a ~a -f if§ 0 µ. z I i I CJ CJCJCJCJ CJCJCJI ~ if f l ~t·~~~ Qi[ 3-ll -1~ !I.ifs;!~~ ls :llffl:l~'~,11111;; ~;~ 1;1:§i§11ii,~ set I ll,r•p. o.,c cl !ll. a l t i -1 (fl ::r: a I\.) 0 ..,, OI i'!i 1r.r ~ !3 pt ;:r: P. (fl 0 (fl 0 ::r: ~~ ~ a :i r., ~ :z G) ~ C ~~ .::: en (/) n, 3:: ~ ?\l [D f\_) ~ ;;ii :-- " .jl,. 0, 0, §; r:l s ~ 0 - ATmfl!>N• Df>J-DVFBfl!ID!lm«D JM!/[EmfffB THIS [IWl'INQ AND ALL l~Tl)N HEREON. ROWN ntE SCU: PROPERTY OF FCP, 'INC.. rr'G USE S PR0W?ED FOR C0NSTRUC11NC ntE fflTDI DESCRmm rN niE FCP. INC. PROP0!W. N«J SIW.L NOT, INN« WAY. BE REPUCAn:D. F'AIJUC.\Tl:D. woornm. OR USED FOR Nl'f OTHER PURPOSE: nw., l»\T STATED IN OUR /,CREDI001 Ort WTTHOUT PRIOlt WRITTDI N'PROVAL ffl' FCP1 INC. ~~~D ~Sl"~PL~tr~~~~~ "lrf l'CP, INC.. AND 1H£ JNDUSTM' • ~~~g:A~fflC~~~rJ~C~ ~ A BHORTACE EXIBTil. OR A COWPONOO 18 MIBFA!IUCATED. IT flHOUt.n BE NCITTD ON lliE. PJ.CKlNG UST &ONG WITH ND'TlflCATlON 10 FCP, INC., BmlRE lliE PROJECT COVMtNCQ. ~~~-~~~b1r~10~~~ MANNER. F~. INC. Ha#E.VEJt. WllL HOT INCUR Ntt C05TS DUE TO Alff OElAY c.lUSEll "lrf WESIHII A/ID/Off MmFAllRICA1ED CCMPONENIS, IF A COMPONENT HAS DEEN ll!SFABRl~TED. f'CP, tNC. MUSI' BE NOTJFIED tN ORDER TD oatRMINE CDRRmTIVE ACTION, f"CP, INC. WILL M.S0 NOT BE HEU> FtNNiCWLY RtSl'ONSllllt 0~ lJ.l8t£ FOR MISFABA1C,\T£D PMl!l DOE TO MISINF01114\110N SUPPLIED TO lllE CUSTOMER AND/OR DEN..ER. Arn!! A MUTIJAlLY AO!lEEll UPON COST FDR CORRECTING NN WISf'ASRICAl!ON. FCP, INC. WILL COMMENCE WTTH FABAICATJON. 1·6' -1" -{ -< L) FOUNDATION PLAN 1-1--1--1DEALER: I Cl ~ C.S. GOODALE ~ 6365-A MAR INDUSTRY DR. .. SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 f-.1==================1 ri PROJECT: DOS GRINGOS 2819 LOKER AVE EAST CARLSBAD, CA 92008 ~ 16'-2" INC. MEZZANINES, BUILDINGS, AND BARNS 23100 BAXTER ROAD Yt!LDOMAR, CA 92595 PH: (9D9) 678-4671 FAX: (909) 878-73M • • , . 10 1/2" ..... ..... ..... ' I\.) :: ..... ~ I (JI _. ' I\.)= ..... q_ I (JI = ..... 01_ I (0 ..... ' ~ , (/) :c: fT'J £::J (,j 0 .,, 0) --------------------------r, 0 ,--, ui OJ__._ 0 Nf"""mai [Tl x,--,x x --i C C ~ ~ Z . O p C. z p 0 7' ""'O r )> z , 3" ...... ' TRANSVERSK. ' 0 z §2 -t C 0 z )> ' (/) GJ 'I (/) :c: s 2 C: ;;:: Ill ~ 0 (/) 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ r:i =E 2 G) ID 2-.!;:'. ~ C: -;;:: 0) !D co 11' ?P 7 ;ti :- -.J 0 .:,. . 0) 0) I"- (I) ' 0 fT1 fTI r fTI !] < )> -l 0 z z z f11 0 :::l 0 z 'I ~ r.l ~ "-I ~ 8 _, AIIEHDON: QfAI f'.J!ttBECIPR/fNO lfflEB/lDICNQt lHlS MAWING AND AU. IHRJRMATION HEREDN. REWNN iHE SOL£ PROPERTY OF' FCP, IT'S IJJ;£ 111 l'lt(MOE!l FOR CONl!IRUCllNC l1it l1£D IN 1IIE lED. FABRICATED. OUR COMMENCES. ~1~~-~0~":1~~..¾s«\oMISJl:'J~~C:~~ w.NNER. F'CP, INC, HOWEVER, Wlll NOT INCUR Nl1 COS1S DUE TO Nl1 DflAY r..llJSE!l r,f MISSINC AND/DR MISl'/al!CATED COIIPONEN!S, IF A COMPONEIIT HAS BEEN lfflFA!l,ar>.TED, F'CP, INC. MUST BE NOTIAED IN ORDER m ocrERMINE CORRECTIVE ACTION. FCP, INC. WILL~ Nm BE HD.O ~CLW.Y RESPONSIBLE OR LWILE FOR M!Sf,mJCATED P>RTS DUE TO MISINFDRMATION ~PU~ 1&,~~~W:R~J~FC~A:ffir.:CCREEDwrtlfUPCW FABRICATION, 33'-6" O.A. FVRAME 16'-8 1/2" , , I 12'-o" , T.O.D. ___________ __,, .. ,. 10'-5 3/8" CLEAR ' A r FRAMING PLAN i C.S. GOODALE ~ 6365-A MAR INDUSTRY DR. ~ SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 pl=================! :uz PROJECT: ~n DOS GRINGOS 2819 LOKER AVE EAST CARLSBAD, CA 92008 --------~---I!·--16'-9 1/2" N INC. MEZZANINES, BUILDINGS, AND BARNS 23100 BAX'TER ROAD WILl)OMAR, CA 92595 PH: (909) 678-41571 FAX: (909) 878-7.366 I I ·-' ..)' ,,, -~--------"----"---, , , ,, , 3" CLR. ' --,, (J1 0 II (J1 0 = ~ (J1 : ' ' - (J1 0 = (J1 0 = ...... 01 ( ...... II ...... 0 ( (J1 = " -" ...... ..... = ~. . ~ .... . - :::E (D 'in j ID @ 1o h iD n D ~ TS COL. PER PLAN I STRUT~ / SEE PLAN FOR SIZE "' 6¾" @ 10· COL I TOP VIEW 4f" @ a• COL. AT BEAM SIDE HOLES FOR BOLTS TO BE )fa" LARGER IN ¢ THAN BOLT AT STRUT SIDE SIDE VIEW TS COLUMN /SEE DETAIL@ FOR SIZE (8) 1"¢ X 2¾" GRADE 5 BOLTS TYP. EACH FACE TOP COLUMN DETAIL END BEAM CORNER CONDITION zw Vl<N wJ-a::a.Vl <wo::: >wo (/) Li.. PER/Pl,AN JOIST Vl~w[' W-li:::! a: a.(/) ;;: wg§ l}jll.. I TYP. @ EA.1/8V1 1/2-12 REINF'G. ROD [ ONE REINF. ROD T&B TWO REINF. ROD T&B BEAM / STRUT SEE "REINFORCING RODS" NOTE UNDER STEEL NOTES ON SHT. S1 TYPICAL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS TOP VIEW 10GA. X 15" x 12" R: 12· WHERE OCCURS SIDE VIEW 1/8 /BEAM / SEE PLAN FOR SIZE TS COLUMN SEE DETAIL@ FOR SIZE (8) 1 "¢ X 2;}" GRADE 5 SOL TS TYP. EACH FACE END BEAM INTERIOR CONDITION TOP VIEW BM's PER PLAN ""-......: ~ j CANT. COL. JOIST SEE PLAN Fo'R SIZE DRAG-STRUT/ FLR. JOIST-_._, 31/" 7" ~.. 12 12 X X 974 x 1 OGA ~ BEAM CLIP (MARK: BC) w/ (6) ½"¢ X 1½" BEAM SEE PLAN FOR SIZE 10 GA. BENT It @ EA. STRUT SIDE VIEW GRADE 5 BOLTS != .13'1 1 '1, '· ~=t -i !,.. STRUT TO BEAM CONDITION TOP VIEW SIDE VIEW 'N 3½" x 7" x 5¾ x 10GA JOIST CLIP {MARK: JC) w/ (4) ½"¢ x 1½" A307 BOLTS BEAM INTERIOR CONDITION TOP VIEW SIDE VIEW VARIES ..,(SEE PLAN) ANCHOR 1tTYP- i[[Q cl w w ..J ·m o::m ~a~~ EA. CORNER 1 1 /2 ~ DIA. (IN.) WEDGE ANCHOR EMBED. (IN.) ICBO NO. 5/8 SIMPSON WEDGE ALL 2 3/4 ER 3631 5/8 RAM SET TRUE BOLT 2 3/4 ER 1372 5/8 HIL Tl KWIK BOLT II 4 ER 4627 COLUMN AT BASE CONNECTION DETAI TOP VIEW SIDE VIEW JOIST SEE PLAN FOR SIZE -BEAM / SEE PLAN FOR SIZE 3½" x 7" x 5¾" x 10GA JOIST CLIP {MARK: JC) w/ (4) ½"¢ x 1½" A307 BOLTS JOIST TO SINGLE BEAM {/) _J <{ 1--w 0 0 (Y <{ 0 .,~ u -z g 5 mUl z vjO:: w< zm zo <Z ~< w ::. Cl:'. 0 >-Cl:'.,- 1-N (/) ,- ::) N OOl ~<( ~o::(J <(<( • o~O Z O ('.) •. 0<:W <{8:i c.'.Jlci ....J l() I-i:5 cti<D z {I) o o~c7i "' "' o"' .;: Ill ~~ ~ 'r Ct! Cl I to CD I'-m ~ ~!. ~ -~gi ID~ ge, g~ ~ .. -9 ::i::~ ~:I: a.. u. 1- (/) CX) i:io 0 wN > en (/) <( <( 0 0::U (.;) w -.. z~o I--0< 0 0:: ....J(D w (.;) (/) --:I Ol....J 0 (/) ..--o:: 0:: 0 00 <( a. 0 NO .& ~~ PER O. NICiRN J 1+ Ol NO. RfVISIOH/=lt Mrr r -- ~ f!§ f!~a €>; ffi~ ~!! !~ ~~~i 1~~ !~a~~ ~-.. ~ ~ ~iZf ~<~ ~~@~ ~~~~ ~~ ~x~~ ~,;~ ~~i~~ ~ fi _;r; e~ ffi~9w @liif! ~x~ ~~ a~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~§ :lt:J ~ -111m a boS ~E!~$~ ~i ,~~~ f~~~ ijz:=-1 ~~~~ ;j I~§~ 51ea; ~g<~ ~~~~, ;; :i~ ~!i :i1~~ §;~i~ ~~ ~~~ i~~§ @~§§z5· 2 ~i~ ~ wie~~ ~g~~ ~~~~ ~ le El" ;,;.., r;; " 'fie t:f~ ~:ii~~~~~;~~ ~~~~ 15~11 ~t: 5 wSG ~~~c ... ~ ." ,.F." ,. ~ ~~ ;e=-~ 2~"sJ 0 ;s <55 zf3 ~O. 0 CD< ...,_ la.::11 ~~~~~ ~~~ ;3<~ ~~ ~ ~~~~! <t "-= 8!'lie !lli:ih ·\';! ~~~i3z I~~~;:. Ill~~ ;:114~ ~id :s§s~i ~1~~ !~~ s~Biffi ~~5 ~~~g8~ l~~el ii~~,~~~ i~~; §!~~~5 ~ -~~~ ~w ~ ~w:, ~~5~ < ~~~~ ~~~g~ ~p~ ~-i~B ~e~~ ~~~i8~ DATE: 9/27 /00 'I DRAWN BY: B.R.l. SCALE:N.T.S. DRAWING NUMBER: 7466 ... .r SHEET NUMBER: "" S4 SHEET 4 OF B :-. • f: TOP VIEW -= ~t! -~{ BEAM SEE PLAN FOR SIZE 14" x 6 r' x 1 OGA, SPLCE PLATE (SPL-18) ¾' SIDE VIEW ] (6) 3/4"¢ X 2¼" GRADE 5 BOLTS TYP. EACH FACE FIELD SPLICE PLATE #12 X 3/4" TEK FASTENER@ EACH DECK VALLEY TO FRAME BEARING MEMBER BELOW ~ COMP-DECK SHEATHING SEE PLAN F R THICKNESS · #9 x 1 3/l COARSE THREAD f SHARP POINT BUGLE HEAD USE (28) MIN PER 41 X 8' DECK-PAK SHEET \~~DECK ~OIST, TYPICAL ~ \_BHP STEEL DECK "B" DECK ICBO #2757 & #3056 #12 X 3/4" TEK !!'ASTENER @ 1'-0 O.C. \_ TYP. ALONG BEAMS BEAM TYPICAL DECKING CONNECTION DETAIL 1 5/8"!!1 GUARDRAIL POST E-pg;/ a6.:s~ ~{f~ NOTE: USE FENDER WASHERS AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE DECKING IS NOT BACKED BY METAL. PLYWOOD OVER PLATFORM-PAK, TYP. STRUT, TYPICAL ¾"Ill A307 M.8.'S ~~ 4" LONG w/ (2) WASHERS 4 @ EACH CONNECTION """"==~~~~~""'"'= 1 5/8"1! RAIL 1 5/8"1! RAIL 1 1/2"1! x 3 1/2" PIPE S ¾"¢ A307 M.B.'S 4• LONG w/ (2) WASHERS~ 4@ EACH CONNECTION 1/8 LAlH HEAD TEK LOCATE 4 x 4 KICKPLA TE UNDER GUARDRAIL POST BASE PLATE AND FIELD DRILL FOR BASE PLATE SOL TS END BEAM, TYPICAL FIELD DRILL FOR SOL TS NOTE: SUPPLIED 6-o• LONG RAILS 'MLL NEED TO BE FIELD TRIM WHERE NECESSARY. SECURE "8"-DECK W/ #12 x 3/4 TEK rt----------~.--.----------=:,,...-FASTENERS TO PARALLEL BEAMS AT 1r O.C. I ~~ 11 "B" STEEL DECKING, TYPICAL _ -~-------------=··-=:_ ==-~~ / _ (1 1/2 INCH NET DEPTH) ~======~::::=,,~~ff'f.9l-~*~-...... 1-+1--.~.~-~-~---:n---lQ-z--.L----~ z 0 E w er ci z ...; a. Cl) o w 0 SECURE "B" DECK W/ #12 x 3/4 TEK FASTENERS AT EACH VALLEY AND FRAME MEMBER (STRUTS AND JOISTS) INTERSECTION. T & G COMP QECK SHEETING: ATTACH TO "B DECK W #9 x 1 3/4" BUGLE HEAD TEK (28 PER FULL 4 x 8' SHEET). REFER TO FRAMING PLAN FOR COMP DECK THICKNESS STAGGER DECK-PAK SHEETS AS SHOWN, W/ LONG EDGE PARALLEL TO SPAN OF DECK Mm. . .. '=f""'----"1 M0IN ENDYDISTANCE AX C/C SPACING ___ , 2 1/2 MAX EDGE DISTANCE DECKING LAYOUT SEE PLAN FOR JOIST JOISTS MUST BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN, WITH THE OPEN SIDES FACING IN OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS FOR ALTERNATING JOISTS DECKING SEE FRAMING PLAN FOR DECK TYPE IF SUPPLIED. 1 5/8"9l GALV. POST HANDRAIL 1 5/8"9l GALV. POST 1 1/2"{!1 SLEEVES, TYP. TYP.r.i78 ~t ;-;-=--- 16 GA. KICK ff.\ ~ C,j ~I 'f ;., 6" X 6" X 3/8" 11-!K .. "\~ ~ POST BASE W/ 7/16"9l HOLES TYP. .,..__ __ ____., PT-1 END STRUT OR INTERIOR STRUT ATTACH BRIDGING TO TOP FLANG OF STRUT WITH #12 x 3/4 TEK 1 1/4 x 0.031 STEEL STRAP BRIDGING. SECURE W/ #12 x 3/4 TEK AT EACH JOIST, INTERIOR AND END STRUT. BRIDGING MUST TERMINATE ON A STRUT. PROVIDE A MIN 3/4 END DISTANCE AT END CONNECTION. (SEE PLAN FOR SPACING) JOIST BRIDGING DETAIL b] [d !E_J PT-2 PT-3 PT-4 jj3/4" END DIST AT BRIDGING TEK FASTENER cp PT-5 GUARDRAIL DETAIL @ (/) _J -<( I-w 0 0 Ct: <( 0 z <( I- (/) u z ~ 0 >-Cl:'..,... 1-N (/).,... ::,N om ~<( ~0::0 <(<( -o~O 0 (!) •• O<C~ o:: t!l I o ~ l() ~ ·mz ~I")<( 0 (.)lO C/l "' ca Q~ ;:;:~ Ca, ~ I °' I a, ~~ ~~ ~"' ~~ "'~ ~ 0, :I 01 ..... go ..... ~9 :i::~ ~~ a..,__ I-Vl(X) ~o 0 wN >Ol (/) <( <( 0 et:O (!) w -•. z~o I--O<C 0 Cl:'. _J r:n w (!) (/) ~ O]_J OC/l.--o:: 0:: 0 CX) <( 0. 0 NO CH.ANGE PER o:NR: RRNI 3/14/01 ~1)£ llll£ t ~E ~:~ ~~ I~ i~g ~~ ~~ I 8~~ ~uzl ~~i~ ~~ ~!ill~ ~~o si~@f ~1~; :~ }~~:11 8~~ §~1~~ ~M§ ~3 ~~9~ §~~ Z~z~" i0 ~,~ ;! ~~Ii ~ijB ~~;j8 ~~~$~ ,~ fjeJ 1~~~ ~~~,.g ~~~1;; ml B~g~ 2 ~S~ u~a<u i~ili ;~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~g~!~ .(i l)l~ !J!i lljmil~ ~j;.,3 ~ ~ r!,~ 1~~~~ ~~ ~:~~ ~~~§ g~§~~ ~~~~~ i ~~~~ 1~6~ 6~~0 6 ~!~11 I!!· ~:~i i~~I !~II! je~ ~ ws s~~~ ib·: ~~~~2 ~~o,~lf ~Oz .. ~~)i •ili~,a, ~ e15~ ~~~~a ~:i 1~;1 !~I~ ml~tg o~~~; ~~o ~1 r. ~Jg~ ~1!~~ ~~~~"' 2~~ ~ ~~ U -, ffi 0~ ,, !il~~S,0 • ~~ ~;;!i;l!;l · EiJ~,.. ~\i!:;pi§,; . w1;;w2i § " :, -"' !~~~, z ~ :o~~ ~~r!,~ ~,~1~1 ~~~~~ l:111. el~:11 ~~!5 b~~~s! r DATE: 9/27/00 ... DRAWN BY: 8.R.I. SCALE: NTS DRAWING NUMBER: 7466 .... ~ SHEET NUMBER: S5 \. SHEET 5 OF 6 4 ... •• it I ~ i!: Cl §: Cl < w g: "' f') . '""1t'I f') " " I' TOP STAIR ON LANDING CONNECTION USE ~2"¢ M.B. w / {2 WASHERS AND LOCK NUT TO A ACH STRINGER AND TREAD #12 x 3/4 TE STRINGER AND TREAD CONNECTION ' USE ~:Ar M.B. w/ {2 WASHERS AND LOCK NUT TO A ACH STRINGER AND TREAD ' STRINGER AND TREAD CONNECTION STAIR ASSEMBLY \ I 1/L MIN. I...Lt.AK I U rKAMt. UK WALL LINt. ON EITHER SIDE OF STAIRS DO NOT TIGHTEN BOLTS UNTIL ALL MEMBERS ARE INSTALLED! 12 F l 1° ~ ~ (/JI~ w Cl ~LL. ~o a. ~ 12" /1 5/8"¢ RAILS / POST SMOOTH AND CONTINUOUS GRIPPING SURFACE SHALL NOT BE OBSTRCUCTED BY ANY FRAMEWORK AND/OR RAILWORK 23 12 1. LOCATE ALL STAIR PARTS SUCH AS STRINGERS, TREADS, BOLTS, AND ETC. MAKE SURE ALL PARTS FOR LANDING ARE ALSO PROVIDED (IF APPLICABLE). 2. FOR NOW, CONNECT ONLY THE 2ND TREAD FROM THE TOP AND THE 2ND TREAD FROM THE BOTTOM WITH 1/2"¢ M.8. TO THE STRINGERS. MAKE SURE EACH STRINGER IS A MIRROR IMAGE OF EACH OTHER. (MARK: SL-1 AND SR-1). REMEBER NOT TO TIGHTEN THE BOLTS. REPEAT WITH ADDITIONAL STAIRS. 3. POSTION TOP OF THE STAIR TO THE MAIN FRAME. DRILL 11 /16"¢ HOLES THROUGH THE DECK AND BEAM USING THE TOP CONNECTOR AS A TEMPLATE. BOLT THE TOP CONNECTOR AS SHOWN WITH 5/8"¢ CARRIAGE BOLTS. 4. ATTACH ALL TREADS TO THE STRINGERS. MAKE SURE ALL THE TREADS ARE PROPERLY LEVELED AND PARALLEL TO THE GROUND. TIGHTEN ALL BOLTS. 5. IF APPLICABLE, USE 3/4" M.8. TO ATTACH BOTTOM OF THE STAIR TO THE LANDING. ANCHOR SOLT PER 3/S4 (MIN. 2) BOTTOM ST AIR ON SLAB CONNECTION 3/4" A325 BOLTS 6 MIN. BEARING ON LANDING .. ~ r--• I [10 X 3 1/2 X 12G STRINGER NON-SKIP DIAMON PLATE TREADS VARIES MAXIMUM STAIR RUN 12" 11· BOTTOM STAIR ON LANDING CONNECTION _J <( f--w 0 0::::: <( f-- (/) ., ~ o-z9 5 m(/) z •a:: (/) < ~m zo <Z s< :::;; 0::: a >-ct:'..--1-N VJ..-:JN Cl 0) ~<( ~o:::O << . o~O .. 8<fJ ffi 010 _.J LC) < ·co z w C/11")<( 0 OCOVJ 111 ro i; ~~ "'"' J. J, "' ~ ..... ~tj "':! <~ 'm"~ m-< om ::I GI'-" Oo '-" 09 ~ ~!ll ii: t.: I-(/)IX) <(0 wo N ~en <(<( VJ 0 00::'. {!) w - i:.: ~ ~~ 0 o:::Om w {!) ....J (/) .., 0) _.J 0 VJ .,....0::: O::'.O<Xl< 0... Cl t"IO 'en' f5>, i .. 5~ ~ f:i ~1~:21 ~;~ bib f;l I'! z~~"'" ,S!!~ 111mii1~ ;i;~ ~~L~ 31!8i ~~0~!!! ~ti ~~i!t~ !l~if;l ~~dz l!!!i~ ;s~~~i ~§d ffliil~ ts ::a ::11~=-<1 ~§~! ;~nt "'1~ !t1§0 ei~ffi I~~~~ 1::1":51 15..,llii=l!i ~ ~e1. ~~l!aii ~ ilsa h~8~5 8 ~~!5 :11~ifl~ DRAWN BY: 8.R.I. SCALE: N1S DRAWING NUMBER: 7466 SHEET NUMBER: S6 SHEET 6 OF 6