The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2855 CARLSBAD BLVD; ; CB961141; Permitu> Permit No: CB961141 Project No: A9601622 Development No: BUILD ING PERMIT 02/26/97 Uti:U2 Page 1 of l I Job Address: 2855 CARLSBAD BL Suite: Permit Type: COMMERCIAL BUILDING 287102/26/97000101 02 Parcel No: 203-231-01-00 Lot**; C-PRHT 33376-00 Valuation: 16,725,838 Construction Type: 'NEW Occupancy Group: Reference*: Status: ISSUED Description: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 Applied: 06/21/96 : CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP Apr/Issue: 02/26/97 Entered By: MDP Appl/Ownr: SOFER, JACOB 408 295-5446 60 PIERCE AVENUE SAN JOSE, CA. 91803 *** Fees Required *** *jtJMMflHBHfibA£. Collected & Credits *** Fees : Adjustments: Total Fees: Fee description Building Permit Plan Check Strong Motion Fee * BUILDING TOTAL Enter "Y" for Plumb Each Plumbing Fixtu Each Building Sewer Each Roof Drain Each Install/Repair W Gas Piping System Each Vacuum Breaker * PLUMBING TOTAL Enter "Y" for Electric Is Three Phase 480 Per AMP * ELECTRICAL TOTAL Enter 'Y' for Mechanical Issue Fee> Install Furn/Ducts/Heat 'Pumps Each Exhaust Fan Each Hood Each Boiler/Compressor * MECHANICAL TOTAL PLDA A .00 39,500.00 33,376.00 Ext fee Data to 15 HP > 2.30 34992. i 22745. [ 3512. 1 61249. I 20. f 4046. ' 15. 42. / . 28, 14. 4172. 1 0 .iood. 1010. isj. 360, 97. 19. 33. 525. 5920. 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 50 50 00 00 00 Y Y Y H IK FINAL JPPROYf DATE./4 CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 PERMIT APPLICATION City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las Palnas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 1. PERMIT TYPE From List 1 (see back) give code of Permit-Type: For Residential Projects Only: From List 2 (see back) give Code of Structure-Type: Net Loss/Gain of Dwelling Units PLAN CHECK NO. >~ ( ( PLAN CK DEPOSITS 1 9.. 500 . VALID. BY__ C*i DATE 2. PROJECT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Address BLDG. #1 2855 CARLSBAD BI_W.dn*l?DSlBim #1 PARCEL C (VACANT) Nearest Cross Street LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.Phase No. CHECK BELOW IF SUBMITTED: Kl 2 Energy Calcs El 2 Structural Gales Kl 2 Soils Report Addressed Envelope ASSESSOR'S PARCEL EXISTING USE PROPOSED USE DESCRIPTION OF WORK , , BLDG.#1 = 277,016 - 81649 (SNF) = 195,367-SFAND BLDG. #2 = 1363** SF SQ. FT.# OF STORIES # OF BEDROOMS # OF BATHROOMS 3. (JUNIALl FEK5UN (.u ailferent from applicant) NAME (last name first) JACOB SOFtR SAN QCON STATE ADDRESS 60 PIERCE AVENUE 10 DAYTELEPHONE40b-295-54A6 4. APPLICANT D CONTRACTOR NAME (last name first) CITY O AGENT FOR CONTRACTOR ADDRESS STATE I_| OWNER a AGENT hOK OWNER 2312 SOUTH FREMONT AVE. ZIPCODE 91803 DAY TELEPHONE 818-570-5600 5. PROPERTY O NAME Oast name first) CAL|FORN1A LUTH1ERAN HOMES ADDRESS 2312 SOOTH FREMONT AVE CITY ALHAMBRASTATE C A ZIPCODE 91803 DAY TELEPHONE ' NAME (last name first) DPR CONSTRUCTION INC. ADDRESS 6333 GREENWICH DRIVE, SUITE CITy SAN DIEGO STAT£CA ZIpCQDE 92122 DAYTELEPHONE 619-597-7070 STATE LIC. # LICENSE CLASS CITY BUSINESS LIC. # 170 UEMUNtK NAME (last name tirstj ROBERT y> DO[_TON AlJUKhSS £Q P|ERCE AVE . CITY SAM JOSE STATE CA ZIP CODE 95110 LIC. 7. WORKERS' COMPENSATION Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to self-insure issued by the Director of Industrial Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, Lab. C). INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO.EXPIRATION DATE Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. SIGNATURE DATE 8. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION (Jwner-Builder Declaration: I hereby attirm that 1 am exempt trom tneContraclors License Law tor the lollowing reason: I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY: Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? D YES D NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? D YES D NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Q YES P NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED AFTER JULY 1,1989 UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 9.._ txJNirmucrnuN LENLHNCJ AGENCY ~~~ I hereby"attirm that there is a construction lending agency tor the performance ot the work tor which this permit is issued (Sec 3097(i) Civil Code)7~ LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS 1O. AFPI1CANI CUUIMCAIION 1 certiry that I nave read the application and state that the above inlormation is correct. 1 agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSIIA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. Expiration. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 303(d) Uniform Building Code). APPLICANTS SIGNATURE DATE: WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance DEPT: BUILDING FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION FIRE PLANNING PLAN CHECK*: CB961141 PERMIT*: CB961141 PROJECT NAME: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL CONTACT PERSON/PHONE*: C/DPR/DIANA/720-7031 SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA DATE: 05/07/98 PERMIT TYPE: COM INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING CMWD ST LITE PLAN CHECK*: CB961141 DATE: 05/07/98 PERMIT*: CB961141 PERMIT TYPE: COM PROJECT NAME: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL :vi.;Y *W CONTACT PERSON/PHONE*: C/DPR/DIANA/720-7031 SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA INSPECTED DATE BY: LJ. naJt*J~> INSPECTED: 7-/-#? APPROVED VC DISAPPROVED _ INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING CMWD ST LITE PLAN CHECK#: CB961141 DATE: 05/07/98 PERMIT*: CB961141 PERMIT TYPE: COM PROJECT NAME: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL CONTACT PERSON/PHONE*: C/DPR/DIANA/720-7031 SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA Mini IV APPROVED * DATE INSPECTED: (HI / */ APPROVED " DISAPPROVED DATE INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING CMWD ST LITE PLAN CHECK*: CB961141 DATE: 05/07/98 PERMIT*: CB961141 PERMIT TYPE: COM PROJECT NAME: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL CONTACT PERSON/PHONE*: C/DPR/DIANA/720-7031 SEWER DIST: CA WATER DIST: CA 7/i /<=* ¥: // // f O INSPECTED /} / , DATE BY: <~w\-^ INSPECTED: // '/ JO APPROVED " DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FINAL INSPECTION CHECKLIST ROUTING BLDG >( M. HARDY PLANNER L BLACK_ M BLACK_ M. HARDY BLDG Projec Addre. Projec Contac t Name:Care Facility. 82. 576 Garage, 1 8, 468 OSHP Plan Check No. CB961 141 >s: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. Proiect Number: N/A t Plannei t Person : Anne Extension 4477 Phone No. Drawing No. Inspections 1st 2nd Approved Final Inspection Items All Items below Conform with Approved Site Plan 1 . Project Planner confirms conditions are met 2. Building elevations 3. Building materials 4. Building colors 5. Rooftop equipment screens 6. Fence/wall height, location, and materials 7. Size, number and location of parking spaces compact, regular, handicap 8. Outdoor recreation facilities 9. Employee eating areas 10. Trash enclosure and location 1 1 . Pavement treatment 12. Street Addresses and mailboxes 1 3. Landscaping installed (under separate contract) LIST BELOW ANY ADDITIONAL ITEMS REQUIRING SPECIAL ATTENTION BY MIKE BLACK:f< 14- ^}L&L^^ td~ -^uB^C^Ji^hu^ a^Jj 15. /fr^±&£_ ^J^^/^uUL^l^ l^H^_ 16- JUL. LKJ&^£^ l^d^ -to" 17-^i£&-<!U^e~ v^ *gJLAsr%-~<is?v<^ _ 18- ^L^yL^J £$jJ@_M — ^W^ fi^t^^^y^. k Project complies with all conditions, including above-listed items. Finatf inspection is compleie. Q^Ltj^^ ** 7/1/7? Mike BlacI^ ([""* ^ Date ' ' (H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\Final Insp Check)05/07/98 01/19/1998 03:31 17687293274 NEAUCBTS PAGE 81 Construction lac. TO Paul York City of Carlsbad Building Department FROM: Whitney Dorn DPR Construction., Inc DATE January 19, 1998 RE7.: Meter Release Carlsbad By The Sea DPR Construction Inc. has requested a meter rclea.se for the new construction of the Carlsbad By The Sea Professional Care Facility at 2835 Carlsbad Boulevard, Carlsbad, CA 92008. The meter is to be used for temporary construction and testing purposes only. The building will not be occupied until the final signoff from the proper authorities such as the city of Carlsbad, DPR Construction Inc. Field Office 2855 G»rt*ad Boulevard, Carlsbad, California. 92008 (760) 720-7031 CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 07/07/98 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK# CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: REMARKS: C/DPR/DIANA/720-7031 AM PLEASE SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: INSPECTOR —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 FA970008 WM980018 CB973802 TYPE ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC FALARM WMETER ELEC CD 19 29 39 49 LVL DESCRIPTION ST Final Structural PL Final Plumbing EL Final Electrical ME Final Mechanical STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE 070298 063098 062998 062498 062298 060598 060398 052998 052898 052298 052198 052098 051898 050898 050798 DESCRIPTION Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo ACT CO NR NR NR NR NS NR NR NR NS NR NR PA NR NR INSP PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY COMMENTS WHERE IS JOE? NO CONTRACTORON SITE UNITS 2C SOUTH CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 07/02/98 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 PHONE: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK# CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: C/DIANA/ AM PLEASE SPECIAL INSTRUCT: SEE CAREY OR JOSEPH INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS— CD 19 29 39 49 PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 FA970008 WM980018 CB973802 TYPE ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC FALARM WMETER ELEC LVL DESCRIPTION ST Final Structural PL Final Plumbing EL Final Electrical ME Final Mechanical STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DAEE 062998 U62498 062298 060598 060398 052998 052898 052298 052198 052098 051898 050898 " 798 98 DESCRIPTION Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo ACT NR NR NR NS NR NR NR NS NR NR PA NR NR NR CA INSP PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY COMMENTS WHERE IS JOE? NO CONTRACTORON SITE UNITS 2C SOUTH CA BY PY CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPAfiTMEN DATE LOCATION NOTICE (760) 438-3550 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE TIME 2ys^s" c#;cysAo PERMIT NO. I (& ~ * ' *~j T FO FO i 1 i r. \J :ALL( ftORM/ BUILDING INSPECT 0) 438-3101. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? , CONTAC YES PHONE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 04/30/98 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK* CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: REMARKS: C/DPR/720-7031 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR -ft TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS— CD 19 29 39 49 PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 FA970008 WM980018 CB973802 TYPE ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC FALARM WMETER ELEC LVL DESCRIPTION ST Final Structural PL Final Plumbing EL Final Electrical ME Final Mechanical STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 042398 Gas/Test/Repairs 042298 Gas/Test/Repairs 042198 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 042198 Gas/Test/Repairs 042098 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 042098 Gas/Test/Repairs 041698 Fraxae/Steel/Bolting/Welding 040998 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 033198 Interior Lath/Drywall 032698 Interior Lath/Drywall 032498 Interior Lath/Drywall 032498 Interior Lath/Drywall 032098 Interior Lath/Drywall 031998 Interior Lath/Drywall 031898 Interior Lath/Drywall ACT AP AP NS NS NS NS NS CA NS NS NS NR AP AP AP INSP PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PK PK PY PY PY COMMENTS 4 B N & S CORRIDOR 4 B S CORRIDOR 4TH S & N CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 03/11/98 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS:2855 CARLSBAD BL STE INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK* CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR; OWNER: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: PHONE: PHONE: 408 295-5446 INSPECTORREMARKS: C/DPR/720-7031 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: SEE JOSEPH BEESON FOR CODE 17 INSPECTION COMML ENTERPR REQUIRES CODE 18 INSPECTION TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 FA970008 CB973802 TYPE ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC FALARM ELEC CD 17 18 LVL DESCRIPTION ST Interior Lath/Drywall ST Exterior Lath/Drywall STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 030998 Interior Lath/Drywall 030998 Fixtures 030698 Interior Lath/Drywall 030498 Interior Lath/Drywall 030298 Interior Lath/Drywall 022798 Interior Lath/Drywall 022598 Interior Lath/Drywall 022598 Exterior Lath/Drywall 022398 Interior Lath/Drywall 022398 Exterior Lath/Drywall 022098 Interior Lath/Drywall 021998 Interior Lath/Drywall 021798 Interior Lath/Drywall 021798 Interior Lath/Drywall 021398 Interior Lath/Drywall 021198 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 021198 Interior Lath/Drywall 021098 Interior Lath/Drywall ACT NS NS AP AP AP PA AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP NR AP AP AP INSP PY PY PY PY PY PK PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY COMMENTS CORRIDOR 3 B N & S ELEV SHAFTS&CORR LIDS 2&3 N&S 2B N&S CORR LIDS & STAIR WELL ELEVATOR SHAFT BLDG C ENTRY 4 B NORTH 4BN STREET SIDE 4BS COURTYARD SIDE/ 4BN FIRST 2 STREET SIDE GARAGE LEVEL SOFFIT @ STAIRS 4BS STREET SIDE 4BN LIDS & DROPS CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 03/10/98 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK* CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: REMARKS: C/DPR/720-7031 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: SEE JOSEPH BEESON TOTAL TIME: INSPECTOR —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT # RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 FA970008 CB973802 TYPE ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC FALARM ELEC CD LVL DESCRIPTION 17 ST Interior Lath/Drywall STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 030698 Interior Lath/Drywall 030498 Interior Lath/Drywall 030298 Interior Lath/Drywall 022798 Interior Lath/Drywall 022598 Interior Lath/Drywall 022598 Exterior Lath/Drywall 022398 Interior Lath/Drywall 022398 Exterior Lath/Drywall 022098 Interior Lath/Drywall 021998 Interior Lath/Drywall 021798 Interior Lath/Drywall 021798 Interior Lath/Drywall 021398 Interior Lath/Drywall 021198 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 021198 Interior Lath/Drywall 021098 Interior Lath/Drywall 021098 Interior Lath/Drywall 020598 Interior Lath/Drywall 020398 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding ACT AP AP AP PA AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP NR AP AP AP AP AP NR INSP PY PY PY PK PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY COMMENTS CORRIDOR 3 B N & S ELEV SHAFTS&CORR LIDS 2&3 N&S 2B N&S CORR LIDS & STAIR WELL ELEVATOR SHAFT BLDG C ENTRY 4 B NORTH 4BN STREET SIDE 4BS COURTYARD SIDE/ 4BN FIRST 2 STREET SIDE GARAGE LEVEL SOFFIT @ STAIRS 4BS STREET SIDE 4BN LIDS & DROPS 3B N COURTYARD SIDE 3 B NORTH 4 B SOUTH WALLS&LID CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT! CB961141 FOR 02/11/98 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK* CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: REMARKS: C/DPR/720-7031 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: SEE JOSEPH BEESON INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS- CD LVL DESCRIPTION PERMITfl RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 FA970008 CB973802 STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS 14 ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 020598 Interior Lath/Drywall 020398 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 020298 Interior Lath/Drywall 013098 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 013098 Interior Lath/Drywall 012898 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 012798 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 012398 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 012398 Gas/Test/Repairs 012298 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 012298 Gas/Test/Repairs 012298 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 012198 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 012198 Rough Electric 012098 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 012098 Gas/Test/Repairs 011998 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011998 Gas/Test/Repairs 011998 Rough Electric ACT AP NR AP PA AP PA PA AP AP PA NR AP PA AP PA CO PA NR PA INSP PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY COMMENTS 3 B NORTH 4 B SOUTH WALLS &LID 3 B SOUTH COURTYARD CORRIDOR 1, 2 & 3 OK TO ROCK 3 B SOUTH 11 CORRIDOR 4 B N&S DRYWALL & SHEAR@CORRI 2BN DRYWALL 2 B NORTH DRYWALL/ 3 BN DRYWAL START TEST BOILER VENT 3&2 C SO OK TO CO 3 B SOUTH LIDS & DROPS METER IB NO INK IN GAUGE 2 B N & S DRYWALL LIDS 4 B N SHEAR WALL 15 LINE CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB961141 FOR 02/10/98 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK* CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: REMARKS: C/DPR/720-7031 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: WOOD FRAMING - SEE JOSEPH TOTAL TIME: INSPECTOR —RELATED PERMITS —PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 FA970008 CB973802 TYPE ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC FALARM ELEC STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 14 ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 020598 Interior Lath/Drywall 020398 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 020298 Interior Lath/Drywall 013098 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 013098 Interior Lath/Drywall 012898 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 012798 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 012398 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 012398 Gas/Test/Repairs 012298 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 012298 Gas/Test/Repairs 012298 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 012198 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 012198 Rough Electric 012098 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 012098 Gas/Test/Repairs 011998 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011998 Gas/Test/Repairs 011998 Rough Electric ACT AP NR AP PA AP PA PA AP AP PA NR AP PA AP PA CO PA NR PA INSP PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY COMMENTS 3 B NORTH 4 B SOUTH WALLS&LID 3 B SOUTH COURTYARD CORRIDOR 1, 2 & 3 OK TO ROCK 3 B SOUTH 11 CORRIDOR 4 B N&S DRYWALL & SHEAR@CORRI 2BN DRYWALL 2 B NORTH DRYWALL/3 BN DRYWAL START TEST BOILER VENT 3&2 C SO OK TO CO 3 B SOUTH LIDS & DROPS METER IB NO INK IN GAUGE 2 B N & S DRYWALL LIDS 4 B N SHEAR WALL @ 15 LINE CITY OF CARLSBADINSPECTION REQUESTPERMIT* CB961141 FOR 01/23/98DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHPTYPE: COMJOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE:APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446CONTRACTOR: PHONE:OWNER: PHONE:REMARKS: C/DPR/720-7031 INSPECTORSPECIAL INSTRUCT: WOOD FRAMING - SEE JOSEPH BEESON A.AND C INSPECTOR AREA PYPLANCK* CB961141OCC GRPCONSTR. TYPE NEWLOT: TOTAL TIME: EED - GAS AT A, B —RELATES) PERMITS—PERMIT* TYPE STATUS RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 FA970008 CB973802 ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC FALARM ELEC ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD 14 23 LVL DESCRIPTION ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PL Gas/Test/Repairs ACT COMMENTS INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE 012198 012198 012098 012098 011998 011998 011998 011698 011698 011598 011598 011598 011498 011398 011298 011298 011298 010998 DESCRIPTION Frame/Steel/Boltinc* Rough Electric Frame/Steel/Bo] Gas/Test/Repa4 Frame/Steel/T Gas/Test/Rem^| Rough Elect Frame/Stee Rough Ele^« Frame/Ste Frame/St« Rough El Frame/Stt \c Frame/St€ Frame/Stev Rough Elec((\l Frame/Stee. ^ COMMENTS 3 B SOUTH LIDS & DROPS "TER IB X IN GAUGE "' S DRYWALL LIDS > ^AR WALL @ 15 LINE COURTYARD LIDS STREET SIDE DRYWALL 1ST LAYER LID DND 4BN RC OK HEAR WALL & CORRIDO 4B S TICE ATTACHED IN UNITS CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 01/22/98 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK* CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: REMARKS: C/DPR/DIANA/720-7031 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: SEE JOSEPH BEESON & C. INSPECTOR A.O. REED FOR RElNsPECTION OF GAS IN A, B TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS-- CD 14 23 PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 FA970008 CB973802 TYPE ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC FAIARM ELEC LVL DESCRIPTION ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PL Gas/Test/Repairs STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 012098 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 012098 Gas/Test/Repairs 011998 Frame/Steel/BoIting/Welding 011998 Gas/Test/Repairs 011998 Rough Electric 011698 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011698 Rough Electric 011598 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011598 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011598 Rough Electric 011498 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011398 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011298 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011298 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011298 Rough Electric 010998 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 010998 Interior Lath/Drywall 010998 Interior Lath/Drywall ACT PA CO PA NR PA PA PA PA PA PA PA NR PA PA CO PA PA PA INSP PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY COMMENTS NO INK IN GAUGE 2 B N & S DRYWALL LIDS 4 B N SHEAR WALL @ 15 LINE 2 B NORTH COURTYARD LIDS METER 1A 2 B SOUTH STREET SIDE DRYWALL 3 B SOUTH 1ST LAYER LID NEED H20 BOND 2BN LIDS 4BN RC OK 4B N & S SHEAR WALL & CORRIDO AND RC AT 4B S SEE CO NOTICE ATTACHED 4 BS R C IN UNITS 2 BS LIDS & WALL DRYWALL 2 BN WALLS & LID DRYWALL CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT! CB961141 FOR 01/21/98 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 PHONE: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK# CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: C/DPR/720-7031 INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: WOOD FRAMING - SEE JOSEPH BEESON NEIL ELECTRI 480 VOLT SWITCH GEAR RELESAASE ^REQUIRES TOTAL TIME: — RELATED PERMITS — CD 14 34 PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 FA970008 CB973802 TYPE ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC FALARM ELEC LVL DESCRIPTION ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding EL Rough Electric STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS 3 Mj ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 011998 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011998 Gas/Test/Repairs 011998 Rough Electric 011698 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011698 Rough Electric 011598 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011598 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011598 Rough Electric 011498 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011398 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011298 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011298 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011298 Rough Electric 010998 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 010998 Interior Lath/Drywall 010998 Interior Lath/Drywall 010998 Interior Lath/Drywall 010898 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding ACT PA NR PA PA PA PA PA PA PA NR PA PA CO PA PA PA PA PA INSP PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY COMMENTS 2 B N & S DRYWALL LIDS 4 B N SHEAR WALL @ 15 LINE 2 B NORTH COURTYARD LIDS METER 1A 2 B SOUTH STREET SIDE DRYWALL 3 B SOUTH 1ST LAYER LID NEED H20 BOND 2BN LIDS 4BN RC OK 4B N & S SHEAR WALL & CORRIDO AND RC AT 4B S SEE CO NOTICE ATTACHED 4 BS R C IN UNITS 2 BS LIDS & WALL DRYWALL 2 BN WALLS & LID DRYWALL 3 BS 1ST LAYER LIDS INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK# CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 01/20/98 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: REMARKS: C/DPR/720-7031 INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: WOOD FRAME - SEE JOSEPH AO REED REQUEST^ fNSPEC OF GAS SYSTEM IN A, B & C - SEE CHRIS OR JIM / TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT* TYPE RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 SEb60148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 ASS70051 AS970058 FA970008 CB973802 ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC FALARM ELEC STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD 14 23 LVL DESCRIPTION ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PL Gas/Test/Repairs ACT COMMENTS Pfr *^T7TfcUy ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 011698 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011698 Rough Electric 011598 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011598 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011598 Rough Electric 011498 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011398 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011298 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011298 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011298 Rough Electric 010998 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 010998 Interior Lath/Drywall 010998 Interior Lath/Drywall 010998 Interior Lath/Drywall 010898 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 010698 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 010698 Exterior Lath/Drywall 010298 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding ACT PA PA PA PA PA PA NR PA PA CO PA PA PA PA PA CO CO NR INSP PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PD PD PD COMMENTS 2 B NORTH COURTYARD LIDS METER 1A 2 B SOUTH STREET SIDE DRYWALL 3 B SOUTH 1ST LAYER LID NEED H20 BOND 2BN LIDS 4BN RC OK 4B N & S SHEAR WALL & CORRIDO AND RC AT 4B S SEE CO NOTICE ATTACHED 4 BS R C IN UNITS 2 BS LIDS & WALL DRYWALL 2 BN WALLS & LID DRYWALL 3 BS 1ST LAYER LIDS CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 01/19/98 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS:2855 CARLSBAD BL STE INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK# CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: PHONE: PHONE: 408 295-5446 REMARKS: C/DPR/720-7031 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: FRAMING - SEE JOSEPH INSPECTOR NEIL ELEC REQUIRES RE-INSP OF SWITCH GEAR. AO REED FOR GAS SYSTEM INSP FOR BLDG A,B & C TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 £3970051 AS970058 FA970008 C 3973802 TYPE ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC FALARM ELEC CD 14 23 34 LVL DESCRIPTION ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PL Gas/Test/Repairs EL Rough Electric STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS fft- ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 011598 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011598 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011598 Rough Electric 011498 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011398 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011298 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011298 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 011298 Rough Electric 010998 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 010998 Interior Lath/Drywall 010998 Interior Lath/Drywall 010998 Interior Lath/Drywall 010898 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 010698 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 010698 Exterior Lath/Drywall 010298 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 010298 Exterior Lath/Drywall ACT PA PA PA PA NR PA PA CO PA PA PA PA PA CO CO NR PA INSP PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PD PD PD PD COMMENTS 2 B SOUTH STREET SIDE DRYWALL 3 B SOUTH 1ST LAYER LID NEED H20 BOND 2BN LIDS 4BN RC OK 4B N & S SHEAR WALL & CORRIDO AND RC AT 4B S SEE CO NOTICE ATTACHED 4 BS R C IN UNITS 2 BS LIDS & WALL DRYWALL 2 BN WALLS & LID DRYWALL 3 BS 1ST LAYER LIDS NOTED ON CARD CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 01/12/98 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK* CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: REMARKS: C/DPR/720-7031 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: SEE JOSEPH BEESON INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 FA970008 CB973802 STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 14 ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding .•ll'IJJll J. iJ //?/!/& ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 010898 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 010698 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 010698 Exterior Lath/Drywall 010298 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 010298 Exterior Lath/Drywall 123197 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 123197 Shear Panels/HD's 123097 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 123097 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 122997 Rough/Topout 122497 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 122397 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 122297 Rough Electric 122297 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 121997 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 121997 Rough Electric 121897 Shear Panels/HD's 121897 Frame/Steel/BoIting/WeIding 121897 Sewer/Water Service ACT PA CO CO NR PA PA PA AP AP AP PA NS AP AP AP AP AP AP AP INSP PY PD PD PD PD PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY COMMENTS NOTED ON CARD 3 B N & S 3 B N S WALLS & LIDS 3 C N WALLS & LIDS 4 B N & S 3C SOUTH(S) 3C S SHEAR 2 C NORTH LIDS B 2 NORTH R.C. 4 B 4 B 3 B NORTH TO ROOF CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE 438-3550 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE TIME. PERMIT NO £ B* FOR INSPECTION CALL 438-3101. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? I I YES .FOR FURTHER t|lFORMAT!ON, CONTACT •JG INSPECTOR PHONE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 01/09/98 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK# CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: 408 295-5446 REMARKS: C/DPR/DIANA/720-7031 INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: SEE JOSEPH BEESON - DIANA SAID NO ONE HAS INSPECTED FOR EE DAYS! TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS —PERMIT # RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 FA970008 CB973802 TYPE ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC FALARM ELEC CD 14 LVL DESCRIPTION ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE 010.698 010698 010298 010298 123197 123197 123097 123097 122997 122497 122397 122297 122297 121997 121997 121897 121897 121897 121797 DESCRIPTION Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Exterior Lath/Drywall Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Exterior Lath/Drywall Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Shear Panels/HD's Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough/Topout Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough Electric Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough Electric Shear Panels/HD's Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Sewer/Water Service Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding ACT CO CO NR PA PA PA AP AP AP PA NS AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP INSP PD PD PD PD PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY COMMENTS NOTED ON CARD 3 B N & S 3 B N S WALLS & LIDS 3 C N WALLS & LIDS 4 B N & S 3C SOUTH(S) 3C S SHEAR 2 C NORTH LIDS B 2 NORTH R.C. 4 B 4 B 3 B NORTH TO ROOF 2 B & C CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB961141 FOR 01/08/98 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK* CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: REMARKS: C/DPR/720-7031 SEE JOSEPH SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT # RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 FA970008 CB973802 TYPE ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC FALARM ELEC STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION 14 ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 010698 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 010698 Exterior Lath/Drywall 010298 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 010298 Exterior Lath/Drywall 123197 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 123197 Shear Panels/HD's 123097 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 123097 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 122997 Rough/Topout 122497 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 122397 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 122297 Rough Electric 122297 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 121997 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 121997 Rough Electric 121897 Shear Panels/HD's 121897 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 121897 Sewer/Water Service 121797 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding ACT CO CO NR PA PA PA AP AP AP PA NS AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP INSP PD PD PD PD PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY COMMENTS NOTED ON CARD 3 B N & S 3 B N S WALLS 3 C N WALLS & 4 B N & S & LIDS LIDS 3C SOUTH(S) 3C S SHEAR 2 C NORTH LIDS B 2 NORTH R.C. 4 B 4 B 3 B NORTH TO ROOF 2 B & C CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 12/11/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: REMARKS: C/DPR/DIANA INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: WOOD FRAMING - SEE JOSEPH BEESON INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK* CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: WASTE AND VENT FOR A.O.REED 3 THRU ROOF BLDG B SEE CHRIS/JIM TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 KA970008 CD 14 LVL DESCRIPTION ST STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS .me/steel/Bolting/Weldingkp ' ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 120997 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 120997 Sewer/Water Service 120997 Walls 120897 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 120897 Steel/Bond Beam 120897 Sewer/Water Service 120597 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 120497 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 120397 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 120397 Rough/Topout 120397 Interior Lath/Drywall 120297 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 120297 Rough Combo 120197 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 112697 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 112597 Rough Combo 112597 Rough Combo 112497 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 112497 Rough/Topout 112197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT PA PA PA NR PA PA PI NS PA PA PA NS NS PA NR PA PA NR PA AP INSP PY PY PY PK PK PK PK PK PY PY PY PY PY TP PK PK PK PK PK PK COMMENTS 3RD FLR B/2ND FUR NORTH 3 & 4 FLOOR B SOUTH COURTYARD RADIUS WALL @ ENTRY TO B DWV B-WOUTH-3RD FLOOR PARTIALS @ VARIOUS 1 NORTH 4TH FLOOR 2 & 3 FLOOR NORTH SOUTH LIDS 3RD FLR SOUTH C RAINED OUT COR LID 1ST FLR, NO C COR WALLS 3RD FLR, SOUTH C BLDG B SO SIDE LEVEL 1 & 2 RAMP RET WALLS-CHRISTIANSEN CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE LOCATION. PERMIT NO n / 438-3550 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE TIME. FOR INSPECTION CALL 438-3101. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, YES (RECTOR PHONE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 11/20/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: STE: 408 295-5 INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK* CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: REMARKS: C/DPR/720-7031 INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: CODE 14 SEE OLAN OR JOSEPH BEESON AO REED 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR, B, SOUTH FOR WASTE AND VENT TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PL Underground/Under Floor ACT COMMENTS t&vx/z. ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 111797 Interior Lath/Drywall 111797 Rough Combo 111497 Interior Lath/Drywall 111497 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 111397 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 111297 Exterior Lath/Drywall 111297 Interior Lath/Drywall 111297 Rough/Topout 111297 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 111097 Sewer/Water Service 111097 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 110797 Rough/Topout 110797 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 110797 Rough Electric 110797 Frame/Steel/BoIting/WeIding 110697 Rough/Topout 110697 Interior Lath/Drywall 110697 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 110597 Exterior Lath/Drywall ACT PA PA PA PI NS PA PA PA PA NS NS PA PA PA PA PA NR PA PA INSP PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK COMMENTS NOTED ON CARD NOTED ON CARD ONGOING WORK CORRIDOR LIDS RAINED OUT ONGOING ONGOING 3RD FLOOR H20-C-3RD FLR SOUTH 2ND FLOOR LIDS-C-N SIDE RESET FOR 11-12-97 RESET FOR 11-12-97 H20 @ B-2ND FLOOR SOUTH LIDS - BLDG C 1ST FLOOR BLDG B,2ND FLR, N-SIDE WALLS OK TO ROCK 1ST FLR C IN BLDG C SOUTH CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 12/10/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: REMARKS: C/DPR/DIANA/720-7031 INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: WOOD FRAMING-SEE JOSEPH BEESON INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK# CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: TOTAL TIME: — RELATED PERMITS — CD LVL DESCRIPTION PERMIT # RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 FA970008 STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS 14 ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding T A ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 120897 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 120897 Steel/Bond Beam 120897 Sewer/Water Service 120597 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 120497 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 120397 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 120397 Rough/Topout 120397 Interior Lath/Drywall 120297 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 120297 Rough Combo 120197 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 112697 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 112597 Rough Combo 112597 Rough Combo 112497 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 112497 Rough/Topout 112197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 112197 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 112197 Rough Combo 112097 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding ACT NR PA PA PI NS PA PA PA NS NS PA NR PA PA NR PA AP PA NR PA INSP PK PK PK PK PK PY PY PY PY PY TP PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK COMMENTS RADIUS WALL 6 ENTRY TO B DWV B-WOUTH-3RD FLOOR PARTIALS @ VARIOUS 1 NORTH 4TH FLOOR 2 & 3 FLOOR NORTH SOUTH LIDS 3RD FLR SOUTH C RAINED OUT COR LID 1ST FLR, NO C COR WALLS 3RD FLR, SOUTH C BLDG B SO SIDE LEVEL 1 & 2 RAMP RET WALLS-CHRISTIANSEN ROOF BLDG B CORRIDOR BLDG C-NORTH-1ST LEV CORRIDOR C SOUTH 1ST FLOOR CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 11/06/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: REMARKS: C/DPR/720-7031 INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: LIDS AND WALLS 1ST FLOOR SEE JOSEPH B. AO REED - WATER IN BLDG B, 2ND FLOOR INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK# CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC CD 14 17 22 LVL DESCRIPTION ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding ST Interior Lath/Drywall PL Sewer/Water Service STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 110497 Interior Lath/Drywall 110497 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 110397 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 103197 Exterior Lath/Drywall 103197 Interior Lath/Drywall 103097 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 103097 Rough Combo 103097 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 102997 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 102897 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 102497 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 102397 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 102297 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 102197 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 102097 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 101797 Rough Electric 101797 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 101697 Rough Electric ACT PA PA NS PI PI PA PA CO NS PA PA PI PI NS PI PI PI PI INSP PY PY PK PK PK PK PK PK PY PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK COMMENTS C SOUTH SIDE 1ST FLR RESET FOR 11-4-97 PRELIMINARY LATH INSPECTION PRELIMINARY LATH INSPECTION 3RD FLOOR - BLDG B 1ST FLOOR-S SIDE BLDG C OK RO OK TO ROCK S SIDE, SOUTH WING OK TO ROCK 2ND FLR LIDS S-SID METAL FRAMING SOME INTERIORS 3RD FLOOR ELEC CLOSETS CEILINGS ATTICS FEEDERS ON FIRST LEVEL BLD C CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 10/08/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: REMARKS: C/DIANA/DPR/720-7031 INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: FLOOR NAILING-SEE JOSEPH BEESON 14 INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK* CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION 14 ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding ACT COMMENTS «A ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 100397 Rough/Topout 100397 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 100297 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 100297 Rough Electric 100297 Rough/Topout 100297 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 100297 Rough Electric 100297 Shear Panels/HD's 092997 Roof/Reroof 092997 Rough/Topout 092597 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 092597 Rough Combo 092497 Roof/Reroof 091997 Roof/Reroof 091997 Gas/Test/Repairs 091597 Rough/Topout 091197 Shear Panels/HD's 091197 Rough/Topout 091097 Shear Panels/HD's 090997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT NS NR PA PA PA PA NR NR PA PA PA NR AP PA PA PA PA PA NS P^ INSP PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PY PY PY PK PK PK PK PK PK PK COMMENTS NOT INSPECTING BLDG A FLOOR STILL NOT NAILED DWV 3RD FLR BLDG C S SIDE FLOOR NAILING OK TO START LATHING 3RD FLOOR DWN-N SIDE-BLDG C BLD C NORTH SIDE REF S-SIDE 3RD FLR BLDG C DWV N-SIDE 2ND FLR BLDG C N SIDE 2ND FLOOR-BLDG C 2ND FLR W. SIDE C BLDG SEE NOTICE 9-11-97 PATIO SUB CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 09/11/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS:2855 CARLSBAD BL STE INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK* CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: PHONE: PHONE: 408 295-5446 INSPECTORREMARKS: C/DPR/720-7031 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: 13 FOR 2ND FLOOR, C 24 FOR A.O. REED @ C, NORTH, SEE CHRIS TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT! RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD 13 24 LVL DESCRIPTION ST Shear Panels/HD's PL Rough/Topout ACT COMMENTS 7 // ', 7 INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 090997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 090997 Rough/Topout 090897 Rough/Topout 090597 Gas/Test/Repairs 090597 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 090497 Gas/Test/Repairs 090297 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 082997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 082897 Rough/Topout 082797 Rough Electric 082697 Interior Lath/Drywall 082597 Interior Lath/Drywall 082597 Sewer/Water Service 081997 Interior Lath/Drywall 081997 Underground/Under Floor 081597 Interior Lath/Drywall 081497 Interior Lath/Drywall 081397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 081397 Interior Lath/Drywall ACT PA PA PA PA PA PA NS PA PA NR PA NR NR PA PA NS PA NS NS INSP PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PY PK PK PK PK PK PY PY PD PD PD PD COMMENTS PATIO SUB DWV 2ND FLR S.SIDE BLDG C COM DWV BLDG C-SO SIDE-2ND FLOOR BLDG C SOUTH SIDE 2ND FLR DWV BLDG C SOUTH SIDE 2ND FLR DWV DWV BLDG C SO SIDE, 2ND FLR, APP'D BY OSHPD INSPECTOR DECK H2 O BLDG C:S SIDE ON-GOING BLDG. C COULD NOT LOCATE EITHER FORMA SOUTH SIDE C 24" AT CEILING NORTH SIDE C WATER LINES CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE, NOTICE LOCATION. PERMIT NO.. 438-3550 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE TIME. / /f &s FOR INSPECTION CALL 438-3101. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? FOR FURJBEfirfNFQRMATION, CONTACT YES PHONE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 09/09/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS:2855 CARLSBAD BL STE INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK* CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: PHONE: PHONE: 408 295-5446 REMARKS: C/KATHY/DPR/720-7031 INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: AM PLEASE. AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE. BLDG A & C. TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS— CD 11 24 PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC LVL DESCRIPTION ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers PL Rough/Topout STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 090597 Gas/Test/Repairs 090597 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 090497 Gas/Test/Repairs 090297 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 082997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 082897 Rough/Topout 082797 Rough Electric 082697 Interior Lath/Drywall 082597 Interior Lath/Drywall 082597 Sewer/Water Service 081997 Interior Lath/Drywall 081997 Underground/Under Floor 081597 Interior Lath/Drywall 081497 Interior Lath/Drywall 081397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 081397 Interior Lath/Drywall 081297 Interior Lath/Drywall 081197 Interior Lath/Drywall 080897 Interior Lath/Drywall COMMENTS BLDG C SOUTH SIDE 2ND FLR DWV BLDG C SOUTH SIDE 2ND FLR DWV DWV BLDG C SO SIDE, 2ND FLR. APP'D BY OSHPD INSPECTOR DECK H2 O BLDG C:S SIDE ON-GOING BLDG. C COULD NOT LOCATE EITHER FORMA SOUTH SIDE C 24" AT CEILING NORTH SIDE C WATER LINES CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 08/07/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK* CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: REMARKS: C/DIANA/720-7031 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: DRYWALL AT C. INSPECTOR SEE JOSEPH. TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC CD LVL DESCRIPTION ST Interior Lath/Drywall T Interior Lath/Drywall STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 080597 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 080597 Interior Lath/Drywall 080597 Rough/Topout 080497 Interior Lath/Drywall 080497 Gas/Test/Repairs 080197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 080197 Interior Lath/Drywall 080197 Rough Electric 073197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 073197 Interior Lath/Drywall 073097 Interior Lath/Drywall 072997 Interior Lath/Drywall 072897 Interior Lath/Drywall 072497 Shear Panels/HD's 072497 Insulation 072497 Interior Lath/Drywall 072297 Interior Lath/Drywall 071897 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 071897 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding ACT NS PA NS PA PA PA NS PA NR PA NS PA PA PA PA PA PA NS PA INSP PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK COMMENTS BLDG A-DID NOT INSPECT 1ST FLOOR LIDS-NORTH SIDE C ONGOING LIDS 1ST FLOOR C-SOUTH SIDE 2ND FLOOR DECK STEEL-A BLDG BLDG C 2ND FLOOR DECK STEEL-A BLDG 1ST FLOOR LIDS & REPS 1ST FLOOR LIDS 1ST FLOOR LIDS BLDG."C" BLDG C BLDG C FIRST FLOOR LID-BLDG C (SOUTH DID NOT INSPECT BLDG A 1ST FLR JOISTS COMPLETE CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 08/05/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE2855 CARLSBAD BL APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: C/DPR/720-7031 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: SEE JOE AT C INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK# CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT# RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 PHONE: PHONE: PHONE: 408 295-5446 INSPECTOR TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD 11 17 24 LVL DESCRIPTION ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers ST Interior Lath/Drywall PL Rough/Topout ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 080197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 080197 Interior Lath/Drywall 080197 Rough Electric 073197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 073197 Interior Lath/Drywall 073097 Interior Lath/Drywall 072997 Interior Lath/Drywall 072897 Interior Lath/Drywall 072497 Shear Panels/HD's 072497 Insulation 072497 Interior Lath/Drywall 072297 Interior Lath/Drywall 071897 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 071897 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 071797 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 071197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 071197 Steel/Bond Beam 071197 Shear Panels/HD's ACT PA NS PA NR PA NS PA PA PA PA PA PA NS PA PA PI PI NR INSP PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK COMMENTS 2ND FLOOR DECK STEEL-A BLDG BLDG C 2ND FLOOR DECK STEEL-A BLDG 1ST FLOOR LIDS & REPS 1ST FLOOR LIDS 1ST FLOOR LIDS BLDG."C" BLDG C BLDG C FIRST FLOOR LID-BLDG C (SOUTH DID NOT INSPECT BLDG A 1ST FLR JOISTS COMPLETE JOIST S/SIDE BLDG C BLDG A BLDG A CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 07/17/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: REMARKS: C/DIANA/720-7031 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: STE: 408 295-54 INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK* CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT# RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 AS970058 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC ASC STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 14 ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 071197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 071197 Steel/Bond Beam 071197 Shear Panels/HD's 071197 Gas/Test/Repairs 070897 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 070797 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 070797 Gas/Test/Repairs 070297 Compliance Investigation 070197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 070197 Rough/Topout 063097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 063097 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 062797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 062797 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 062797 Rough/Topout 062697 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 062697 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 062597 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 062597 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 062497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT PI PI NR PA PA PA PA PI NS PA PA PA NR NR PA NS PA PA PA NR INSP PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK COMMENTS BLDG A BLDG A BLDG C BLDG A/SEE INSP NOTES FLOOR NAILS/N SIDE BLDG C NORTH SIDE BLDG C CONSULTED W/FRAMER BLDG A-DECK STL-DID NOT INSP BLDG DWV&SD-NEED PLANS REV 1ST FLOOR WASTE/BLD C DID NOT INSPECT-A BLDG SEE INSP NOTES. LEFT NOTICE LEFT NOTICE SEE INSP NOTES CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 07/08/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-54 PHONE: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK* CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: R/720-7031 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS —PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC CD LVL DESCRIPTION 11 ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS . INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 070297 Compliance Investigation 070197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 070197 Rough/Topout 063097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 063097 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 062797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 062797 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 062797 Rough/Topout 062697 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 062697 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 062597 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 062597 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 062497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 062397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 061197 Compliance Investigation 061197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 061097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 061097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT PI NS PA PA PA NR NR PA NS PA PA PA NR PI CO CO CO PA PA NR CO INSP PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK COMMENTS CONSULTED W/FRAMER BLDG A-DECK STL-DID NOT INSP BLDG DWV&SD-NEED PLANS REV 1ST FLOOR WASTE/BLD C DID NOT INSPECT-A BLDG SEE INSP NOTES. LEFT NOTICE LEFT NOTICE SEE INSP NOTES BTM REBAR (16-19)(G.9-P) LEFT MEMO RE REV6DPR OFFICE SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE NOTES CLOSURE STRIP BLDG B 20% COMPLETE 9:30 AM 1ST FLR A POURED W/O INSP Date: 8 July 1997 To: DPR Construction From: Principal Building Inspector Re: Revisions to Approved Plans Returned attached are the 81/£ X11 transmittals left with the City on 7-3-97. In order to process revisions to the approved plans, and as noted in my memo to your company dated 6-11-97, please revise the original tracings where changes are desired and submit three new sets of those blue lines for plan check revisions along with all related calculations or other documentation. When the blue lines are approved, and an hourly plan check revision fee is paid, they will be inserted into the owner's, City's, and Fire Department's approved plans. The revised, full sized, floor joist plans will be transmitted to the City's plan checkers for review. No action is being taken by the City or EsGil on the attached returned revisions. PATRICK KELLEY Principal Building Inspector Fire Department Pagel CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 06/27/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-54^6 PHONE: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK# CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: R/DIANA/720-7031 INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: PLEASE GO TO TRAILER/YOU NEED TO SEE SOMEONE DIFFERENT FOR EACH TYPE OF INSPECTION TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS— CD LVL DESCRIPTION 11 14 24 PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PL Rough/Topout . -C ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 062597 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 062597 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 062497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 062397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 061197 Compliance Investigation 061197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 061097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 061097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060397 Underground/Under Floor 060297 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060297 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 052397 Underground/Under Floor 052197 Underground/Under Floor 051997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 051997 Underground/Under Floor 051997 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding ACT PA PA NR PI CO CO CO PA PA NR CO CO NR NR PA AP NR PA NR INSP PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PY PK PK PK COMMENTS LEFT NOTICE LEFT NOTICE SEE INSP NOTES BTM REBAR (16-19)(G.9-P) LEFT MEMO RE REV@DPR OFFICE SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE NOTES CLOSURE STRIP BLDG B 20% COMPLETE 9:30 AM 1ST FLR A POURED W/0 INSP 1ST FLR A POURED W/O INSP UTL ELCTRCN/TRLR/UNK TYPE INS UTL ELCTRCN/TRLR/UNK TYPE INS NO PER PLAN BLDG A UTL KEVIN NEAR POOL-A BLDG SEE INSP NOTES CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT! CB961141 FOR 06/26/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS:2855 CARLSBAD BL STE INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK# CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: SOFER, JACOB REMARKS: R/KEVIN/720-7031 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS— PHONE: PHONE: PHONE: 408 295-5446 INSPECTOR 4f PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD 11 14 LVL DESCRIPTION ST Ftg/Founda-Lion/Piers ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 062497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 062397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 061197 Compliance Investigation 061197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 061097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 061097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060397 Underground/Under Floor 060297 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060297 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 052397 Underground/Under Floor 052197 Underground/Under Floor 051997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 051997 Underground/Under Floor 051997 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 051497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 051297 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 050997 Underground/Conduit-Wiring ACT NR PI CO CO CO PA PA NR CO CO NR NR PA AP NR PA NR AP CO PA INSP PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PY PK PK PK PK PK PK COMMENTS SEE INSP NOTES BTM REBAR (16-19)(G.9-P) LEFT MEMO RE REV@DPR OFFICE SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE NOTES CLOSURE STRIP BLDG B 20% COMPLETE 9:30 AM 1ST FLR A POURED W/0 INSP 1ST FLR A POURED W/O INSP UTL ELCTRCN/TRLR/UNK TYPE INS UTL ELCTRCN/TRLR/UNK TYPE INS NO PER PLAN BLDG A UTL KEVIN NEAR POOL-A BLDG SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES POUR STRIP POURED W/O INSP U.G. PVC CONDUIT CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 06/24/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCKf CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: 408 295-5446 REMARKS: R/KEVIN/720-7031 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT# RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION 11 ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 061197 Compliance Investigation 061197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 061097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 061097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060397 Underground/Under Floor 060297 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060297 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 052397 Underground/Under Floor 052197 Underground/Under Floor 051997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 051997 Underground/Under Floor 051997 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 051497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 051297 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 050997 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 050997 Underground/Under Floor 050897 Underground/Under Floor 050897 Underground/Conduit-Wiring ACT CO CO CO PA PA NR CO CO NR NR PA AP NR PA NR AP CO PA PA NR NR INSP PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PY PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK COMMENTS LEFT MEMO RE REV6DPR OFFICE SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE NOTES CLOSURE STRIP BLDG B 20% COMPLETE 9:30 AM 1ST FLR A POURED W/0 INSP 1ST FLR A POURED W/O INSP UTL ELCTRCN/TRLR/UNK TYPE INS UTL ELCTRCN/TRLR/UNK TYPE INS NO PER PLAN BLDG A UTL KEVIN NEAR POOL-A BLDG SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES POUR STRIP POURED W/O INSP U.G. PVC CONDUIT SEWER & STORM DRAIN SO SIDE CONSULTED 1/2 HOUR CONSULTED 1/2 HOUR CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 06/23/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS:2855 CARLSBAD BL STE INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK* CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: R/KEVIN/520-6067 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS— PHONE: PHONE: PHONE: 408 295-544 INSPECTOR PERMIT! RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD 11 14 LVL DESCRIPTION ST Ftg/Founaation/Piers ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 061197 Compliance Investigation 061197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 061097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 061097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060397 Underground/Under Floor 060297 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060297 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 052397 Underground/Under Floor 052197 Underground/Under Floor 051997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 051997 Underground/Under Floor 051997 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 051497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 051297 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 050997 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 050997 Underground/Under Floor 050897 Underground/Under Floor ACT CO CO CO PA PA NR CO CO NR NR PA AP NR PA NR AP CO PA PA NR INSP PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PY PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK COMMENTS LEFT MEMO RE REV@DPR OFFICE SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE NOTES CLOSURE STRIP BLDG B 20% COMPLETE 9:30 AM 1ST FLR A POURED W/0 INSP 1ST FLR A POURED W/O INSP UTL ELCTRCN/TRLR/UNK TYPE INS UTL ELCTRCN/TRLR/UNK TYPE INS NO PER PLAN BLDG A UTL KEVIN NEAR POOL-A BLDG SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES POUR STRIP POURED W/O INSP U.G. PVC CONDUIT SEWER & STORM DRAIN SO SIDE CONSULTED 1/2 HOUR UNSCHEDULED BUILDING INSPECTION DATE (* V/ 'f f INSPECTOR TIME ARRIVE: -— TIME PERMIT # PLAN CHECK* JOB ADDRESS DESCRIPTION CODE DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS // ./ /p City of Carlsbad Building Department Date: 11 June 1997 To: DPR Construction From: Principal Building Inspector Re: Revisions to Accessible, Adaptable Showers Attached and herein returned to your care are the 8 % X11 sheets submitted yesterday for revisions to the showers in the dwelling units. If the owner desires to modify the approved plans, the Architect must revise the original tracings of all the affected sheets and submit three new sets of the affected blue lines for a plan check revision. Technically, the attached drawings do not meet the specification detailed in UBC Section 1109A..8 and Figure 11B-2A in the State Access Regulations. The backing for grab rails must be installed continuous in the walls of adaptable showers 32-38 inches above the floor. Additionally, the shower fixtures must be oriented to comply with the requirements in Figure 11B-2A. The seat must be opposite the shower controls and the grab rails must be adjacent to (next to) and opposite the seat. A two inch threshold exceeds the Vz" maximum allowed by the Code. Please have the appropriate blue line sheets modified for further review. When they are approved they will replace the current sheets in the approved plans in the Owner's, City's, and Fire Department's set of approved plans. PATRICK KELLEY Principal Building Inspector Pagel 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 * (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894 PROJECT lA£iSfrA^ SV THer ^€A PAGE _ I OF I DATE v/siir FOTONi SCAT IC,V-?c,u oc \ DPR Exists to Build Great Things wan Feb 4 ''H7 Ii.r:i P. U3-U4 The Steinberg Group 60 Pierce Avenue San Joie. OUrornivVf tin Project Title: Till FVojeci No. Rcr. 1 Drawing No: CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 06/10/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 PHONE: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCKtf CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: R/KEVIN/ SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS — CD LVL DESCRIPTION PERMIT! RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED 11 ST Ftg/Foundatio ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 060497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060397 Underground/Under Floor 060297 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060297 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 052397 Underground/Under Floor 052197 Underground/Under Floor 051997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 051997 Underground/Under Floor 051997 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 051497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 051297 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 050997 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 050997 Underground/Under Floor 050897 Underground/Under Floor 050897 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 050797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 050697 Steel/Bond Beam 043097 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 042997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 042897 Underground/Under Floor ACT NR CO CO NR NR PA AP NR PA NR AP CO PA PA NR NR NS AP AP AP AP INSP PK PK PK PK PK PK PY PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PY PY PY COMMENTS 20% COMPLETE 9:30 AM 1ST FLR A POURED W/O INSP 1ST FLR A POURED W/O INSP UTL ELCTRCN/TRLR/UNK TYPE INS UTL ELCTRCN/TRLR/UNK TYPE INS NO PER PLAN BLDG A UTL KEVIN NEAR POOL-A BLDG SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES POUR STRIP POURED W/O INSP U.G. PVC CONDUIT SEWER & STORM DRAIN SO SIDE CONSULTED 1/2 HOUR CONSULTED 1/2 HOUR ON CALL SLIP BLDG B SLAB UPPER SLAB BLDG B CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST .<MIT# CB961141 FOR 06/03/97 ASCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS:2855 CARLSBAD BL STE INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK# CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: PHONE: PHONE: 408 295-5446 REMARKS: R/KEVIN/ SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: INSPECTOR —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT# RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION 11 ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 052397 Underground/Under Floor 052197 Underground/Under Floor 051997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 051997 Underground/Under Floor 051997 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 051497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 051297 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 050997 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 050997 Underground/Under Floor 050897 Underground/Under Floor 050897 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 050797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 050697 Steel/Bond Beam 043097 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 042997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 042897 Underground/Under Floor 042897 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 042897 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 042297 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 041797 Underground/Under Floor 041697 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT PA AP NR PA NR AP CO PA PA NR NR NS AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP INSP PK PY PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PY PY PY PY PY BK PY BK PER PLAN BLDG A UTL KEVIN NEAR POOL-A BLDG SEE INSP NOTES SEE__INSP NOTES POUR STRIP^POURED W/0 INSP U. G. ~PVC~~CONDUI7F~~— SEWER & STORM DRAIN SO SIDE CONSULTED 1/2 HOUR CONSULTED 1/2 HOUR ON CALL SLIP BLDG B SLAB UPPER SLAB BLDG B UFR BLDG A SEE INSP NOTES 6 BLD STUB OUTS SEE INSP NOTES CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 06/09/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-54 PHONE: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK# CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: R/KEVIN/720-7031 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC CD LVL DESCRIPTION 11 ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS trr ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 060497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060397 Underground/Under Floor 060297 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 060297 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 052397 Underground/Under Floor 052197 Underground/Under Floor 051997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 051997 Underground/Under Floor 051997 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 051497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 051297 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 050997 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 050997 Underground/Under Floor 050897 Underground/Under Floor 050897 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 050797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 050697 Steel/Bond Beam 043097 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 042997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 042897 Underground/Under Floor ACT NR CO CO NR NR PA AP NR PA NR AP CO PA PA NR NR NS AP AP AP AP INSP PK PK PK PK PK PK PY PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PY PY PY COMMENTS 20% COMPLETE 9:30 AM 1ST FLR A POURED W/0 INSP 1ST FLR A POURED W/O INSP UTL ELCTRCN/TRLR/UNK TYPE INS UTL ELCTRCN/TRLR/UNK TYPE INS NO PER PLAN BLDG A UTL KEVIN NEAR POOL-A BLDG SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES POUR STRIP POURED W/O INSP U.G. PVC CONDUIT SEWER & STORM DRAIN SO SIDE CONSULTED 1/2 HOUR CONSULTED 1/2 HOUR ON CALL SLIP BLDG B SLAB UPPER SLAB BLDG B CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 06/02/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS:2855 CARLSBAD BL STE INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK* CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: PHONE: PHONE: 408 295-544 REMARKS: R/ROD/729-3286 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: ONE HALF OF "A" BLDG INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS— CD 11 31 PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 AS970051 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC ASC LVL DESCRIPTION ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers EL Underground/Conduit-Wiring STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 052397 Underground/Under Floor 052197 Underground/Under Floor 051997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 051997 Underground/Under Floor 051997 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 051497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 051297 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 050997 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 050997 Underground/Under Floor 050897 Underground/Under Floor 050897 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 050797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 050697 Steel/Bond Bean 043097 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 042997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 042897 Underground/Under Floor 042897 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 042897 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 042297 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 041797 Underground/Under Floor ACT PA AP NR PA NR AP CO PA PA NR NR NS AP AF AP AP AP AP AP AP INSP PK PY PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PY PY PY PY PY BK PY <'' NO PER PLAN BLBG A UTL KEVIN NEAR POOL-A BLDG SEE INSP NOTES JPQUR__STRIP_PQU^EP w/o INSP U.G. PVC CONDUIT SEWER & STORM DRAIN SO SIDE CONSULTED 1/2 HOUR CONSULTED 1/2 HOUR ON CALL SLIP BLDG B SLAB UPPER SLAB BLDG B UFR BLDG A SEE INSP NOTES 6 BLD STUB OUTS CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 05/19/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-54*6 PHONE: PHONE: APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: R/KEVIN/520-6067 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: NSPECTOR INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK* CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS— CD 11 21 LVL DESCRIPTION PERMIT* 'DTjTu^jC f\ O T OXvW 7O-U A X ^ RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC 4-- ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers PL Underground/Under Floor STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 051497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 051297 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 050997 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 050997 Underground/Under Floor 050897 Underground/Under Floor 050897 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 050797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 050697 Steel/Bond Beam 043097 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 042997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 042897 Underground/Under Floor 042897 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 042897 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 042297 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 041797 Underground/Under Floor 041697 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 041697 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 041697 Underground/Under Floor 041097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 041097 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 040997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT AP CO PA PA NR NR NS AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP INSP PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PK PY PY PY PY PY BK PY BK BK BK BK BK PY COMMENTS SEE INSP NOTES POUR STRIP POURED W/O INSP U.G. PVC CONDUIT SEWER & STORM DRAIN SO SIDE CONSULTED 1/2 HOUR CONSULTED 1/2 HOUR ON CALL SLIP BLDG B SLAB UPPER SLAB BLDG B UFR BLDG A SEE INSP NOTES 6 BLD STUB OUTS SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 05/14/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: REMARKS: RS/KEVIN/ SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK* CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS— CD LVL DESCRIPTION PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED 11 ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers 61 MA Footing 4 ACT COMMENTS fiv/i ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 051297 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 050997 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 050997 Underground/Under Floor 050897 Underground/Under Floor 050897 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 050797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 050697 Steel/Bond Beam 043097 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 042997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 042897 Underground/Under Floor 042897 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 042897 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 042297 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 041797 Underground/Under Floor 041697 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 041697 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 041697 Underground/Under Floor 041097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 041097 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 040997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 040897 Walls ACT CO PA PA NR NR NS AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP INSP PK FK PK PK PK PK PK PY PY PY PY PY BK PY BK BK BK BK BK PY BK COMMENTS POUR STRIP POURED W/O INSP U.G. PVC CONDUIT SEWER & STORM DRAIN SO SIDE CONSULTED 1/2 HOUR CONSULTED 1/2 HOUR ON CALL SLIP BLDG B SLAB UPPER SLAB BLDG B UFR BLDG A SEE INSP NOTES 6 BLD STUB OUTS SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES BLDG "B" COL LINE #9 PRE GROU CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMITfl CB961141 FOR 05/12/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: REMARKS: BJN/KEVIN/520-6067 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCKfl CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 AS970030 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC ASC CD LVL DESCRIPTION 11 ST Ftg/Foundat .ion/Piers STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 050897 Underground/Under Floor 050897 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 050797 Ftg/Foundation/Pisrs 050697 Steel/Bond Beam 043097 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 042997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 042897 Underground/Under Floor 042897 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 042897 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 042297 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 041797 Underground/Under Floor 041697 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 041697 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 041697 Underground/Under Floor 041097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 041097 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 040997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 040897 Walls 040497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 040497 Rough Electric 040497 Steel/Bond Beam 040497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT NR NR NS AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP INSP PK PK PK PK PY PY PY PY PY BK PY BK BK BK BK BK PY BK BK BK BK BK COMMENTS CONSULTED 1/2 HOUR CONSULTED 1/2 HOUR ON CALL SLIP BLDG B SLAB UPPER SLAB BLDG B UFR BLDG A SEE INSP NOTES 6 BLD STUB OUTS SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES BLDG "B" COL LINE #9 PRE GROU SEE NOTES BLDG C BLDG C - SEE NOTES COL LINE 1-9 BLDG "C" CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB961141 FOR 05/06/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 PHONE: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA BK PLANCK! CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: BJN/KEVIN/520-6067 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS —PERMITfl RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 A ^6961523 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS DEMO STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSU ISSUED G CD 11 12 LVL DESCRIPTION ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers ST Steel/Bond Beam ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 043097 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 042997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 042897 Underground/Under Floor 042897 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 042897 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 042297 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 041797 Underground/Under Floor 041697 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 041697 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 041697 Underground/Under Floor 041097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 041097 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 040997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 040897 Walls 040497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 040497 Rough Electric 040497 Steel/Bond Beam 040497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032897 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032897 Steel/Bond Beam 032797 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding ACT AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP INSP PY PY PY PY PY BK PY BK BK BK BK BK PY BK BK BK BK BK PY PY BK COMMENTS BLDG B SLAB UPPER SLAB BLDG B UFR BLDG A SEE INSP NOTES 6 BLD STUB OUTS SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES BLDG "B" COL LINE #9 PRE GROU SEE NOTES BLDG C BLDG C - SEE NOTES COL LINE 1-9 BLDG "C" SOUTH WALL @ 10-12 LINE SOUTH WALL @ 10-12 LINE SEE INSP NOTES CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 04/28/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA BK PLANCK# CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: REMARKS: RS/730-3325/ A.M. PLEASE SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: INSPECTOR —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT! RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 CB961523 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC DEMO STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD 21 31 LVL DESCRIPTION PL EL Underground/Under Floor Underground/Conduit-Wiring ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 042297 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 041797 Underground/Under Floor 041697 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 041697 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 041697 Underground/Under Floor 041097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 041097 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 040997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 040897 Walls 040497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 040497 Rough Electric 040497 Steel/Bond Beam 040497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032897 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032897 Steel/Bond Beam 032797 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 032697 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032597 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 031797 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 031797 Rough Electric ACT AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP INSP BK PY BK BK BK BK BK PY BK BK BK BK BK PY PY BK BK BK PY BK BK COMMENTS SEE INSP NOTES 6 BLD STUB OUTS SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES BLDG "B" COL LINE #9 PRE GROU SEE NOTES BLDG C BLDG C - SEE NOTES COL LINE 1-9 BLDG "C" SOUTH WALL @ 10-12 LINE SOUTH WALL @ 10-12 LINE SEE INSP NOTES SEE NOTES RAMP UPPER SECTION BLD B/COL LN 9-15/1ST FL DECK BLD B/1ST FLOOR-DECK CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB961141 FOR 04/22/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA BK PLANCK# CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: REMARKS: RS/RON/729-3286 INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: REQUESTING A.M. INSPECTION * * COLUMN 17.4 DJ. ~h> TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS —PERMIT* RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 CB961523 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC DEMO CD LVL DESCRIPTION 31 EL Underground/Conduit-Wiring STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 041797 Underground/Under Floor 041697 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 041697 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 041697 Underground/Under Floor 041097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 041097 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 040997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 040897 Walls 040497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 040497 Rough Electric 040497 Steel/Bond Beam 040497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032897 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032897 Steel/Bond Beam 032797 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 032697 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032597 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 031797 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 031797 Rough Electric 030797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 030397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP INSP PY BK BK BK BK BK PY BK BK BK BK BK PY PY BK BK BK PY BK BK BK BK COMMENTS 6 BLD STUB OUTS SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES BLDG "B" COL LINE #9 PRE GROU SEE NOTES BLDG C BLDG C - SEE NOTES COL LINE 1-9 BLDG "C" SOUTH WALL @ 10-12 LINE SOUTH WALL @ 10-12 LINE SEE INSP NOTES SEE NOTES RAMP UPPER SECTION BLD B/COL LN 9-15/1ST FL DECK BLD B/1ST FLOOR-DECK BLD A/COL LN 17-18 ON A.3 & N SMALL PICKUP AREAS BLDG B SLA CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 04/04/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE, 18 , 468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: RS/KEVIN/720-7031 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR AREA BK PLANCK# CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: PHONE: PHONE: PHONE: 408 295-5446 INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT! RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 CB961523 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC DEMO STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS PL ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 032897 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032897 Steel/Bond Beam 032797 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 032697 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032597 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 031797 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 031797 Rough Electric 030797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 030397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 022797 Walls 022697 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 020797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 013197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 013197 Rough/Topout 012997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP INSP PY PY BK BK BK PY BK BK BK BK BK PY PY PY BK PY BK PY PY PY PY PY COMMENTS SOUTH WALL @ 10-12 LINE SOUTH WALL @ 10-12 LINE SEE INSP NOTES SEE NOTES RAMP UPPER SECTION BLD B/COL LN 9-15/1ST FL DECK BLD B/1ST FLOOR-DECK BLD A/COL LN 17-18 ON A.3 & N SMALL PICKUP AREAS BLDG B SLA SLAB SEE NOTES SEE NOTES LASER SCREED/SEE NOTES SEE NOTES SEE NOTES STORM DRAIN/SEE NOTES 5-7 @ A & M K-F CLMN/ELEV #3 FTG SEE INSP NOTES CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT^ CB961141 FOR 03/27/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS:2855 CARLSBAD BL STE INSPECTOR AREA BK PLANCKtf CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: SOFER, JACOB REMARKS: RS/ SPECIAL INSTRUCT: PHONE PHONE; PHONE: 408 295-5446 INSPECTOR TV/flrag TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS —PERMIT! RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 CB961523 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC DEMO STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 14 ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 032597 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 031797 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 031797 Rough Electric 030797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 030397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 022797 Walls 022697 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 020797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 013197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 013197 Rough/Topout 012997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011797 Footing 011597 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP INSP BK PY BK BK BK BK BK PY PY PY BK PY BK PY PY PY PY PY BK PY PY PY COMMENTS SEE NOTES RAMP UPPER SECTION BLD B/COL LN 9-15/1ST FL DECK BLD B/1ST FLOOR-DECK BLD A/COL LN 17-18 ON A.3 & N SMALL PICKUP AREAS BLDG B SLA SLAB SEE NOTES SEE NOTES LASER SCREED/SEE NOTES SEE NOTES SEE NOTES STORM DRAIN/SEE NOTES 5-7 @ A & M K-F CLMN/ELEV #3 FTG SEE INSP NOTES MASONRY WALLS CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 03/26/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS:2855 CARLSBAD BL STE; INSPECTOR AREA BK PLANCKtf CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: SOFER, JACOB REMARKS: BJN/KEVIN/520-6067 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: PHONE: PHONE: PHONE: 408 295-5446 INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS— CD 11 PERMIT! RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 CB961523 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC DEMO STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED LVL DESCRIPTION ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT COMMENTS LtJJfer'A ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 032097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 031797 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 031797 Rough Electric 030797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 030397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 022797 Walls 022697 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 020797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 013197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 013197 Rough/Topout 012997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011797 Footing 011597 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP NR INSP PY BK BK BK BK BK PY PY PY BK PY BK PY PY PY PY PY BK PY PY PY PY COMMENTS RAMP UPPER SECTION BLD B/COL LN 9-15/1ST FL DECK BLD B/1ST FLOOR-DECK BLD A/COL LN 17-18 ON A.3 & N SMALL PICKUP AREAS BLDG B SLA SLAB SEE NOTES SEE NOTES LASER SCREED/SEE NOTES SEE NOTES SEE NOTES STORM DRAIN/SEE NOTES 5-7 @ A & M K-F CLMN/ELEV #3 FTG SEE INSP NOTES MASONRY WALLS RAIN OUT CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 03/25/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS:2855 CARLSBAD BL STE INSPECTOR AREA BK PLANCK# CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: RS/520-6067 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: PHONE: PHONE: PHONE: 408 295-5446 INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT# RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 CB961523 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC DEMO STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION 11 ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT COMMENTS R Uft l v>-d«gj~2.* " ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 032097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 031797 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 031797 Rough Electric 030797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 030397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 022797 Walls 022697 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 020797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 013197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 013197 Rough/Topout 012997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011797 Footing 011597 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP NR INSP PY BK BK BK BK BK PY PY PY BK PY BK PY PY PY PY PY BK PY PY PY PY COMMENTS RAMP UPPER SECTION BLD B/COL LN 9-15/1ST FL DECK BLD B/1ST FLOOR-DECK BLD A/COL LN 17-18 ON A.3 & N SMALL PICKUP AREAS BLDG B SLA SLAB SEE NOTES SEE NOTES LASER SCREED/SEE NOTES SEE NOTES SEE NOTES STORM DRAIN/SEE NOTES 5-7 @ A & M K-F CLMN/ELEV #3 FTG SEE INSP NOTES MASONRY WALLS RAIN OUT CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 03/20/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: OSHP 2855 CARLSBAD BL APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: SOFER, JACOB REMARKS: BJN/KEVIN/520-6067 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT# RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 CB961523 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC DEMO STE INSPECTOR AREA BK PLANCKtf CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: CD 11 LVL DESCRIPTION ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers PHONE PHONE PHONE 408 295-5446 INSPECTOR STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 031797 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 031797 Rough Electric 030797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 030397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 022797 Walls 022697 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 020797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 013197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 013197 Rough/Topout 012997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011797 Footing 011597 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP NR AP INSP BK BK BK BK BK PY PY PY BK PY BK PY PY PY PY PY BK PY PY PY PY BK COMMENTS BLD B/COL LN 9-15/1ST FL DECK BLD B/1ST FLOOR-DECK BLD A/COL LN 17-18 ON A.3 & N SMALL PICKUP AREAS BLDG B SLA SLAB SEE NOTES SEE NOTES LASER SCREED/SEE NOTES SEE NOTES SEE NOTES STORM DRAIN/SEE NOTES 5-7 @ A & M K-F CLMN/ELEV #3 FTG SEE INSP NOTES MASONRY WALLS RAIN OUT SEE NOTES CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB961141 FOR 03/17/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS:2855 CARLSBAD BL STE INSPECTOR AREA BK PLANCKtf CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: BJN/KEVIN/720-7031 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: PHONE: PHONE: PHONE : 408 295-5446 INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT # RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 CB961523 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC DEMO STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD 14 34 LVL DESCRIPTION ST Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding EL Rough Electric ACT COMMENTS Af ' ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 030797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 030397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 022797 Walls 022697 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 020797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 013197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 013197 Rough/Topout 012997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011797 Footing 011597 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 010997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP NR AP AP INSP BK BK BK PY PY PY BK PY BK PY PY PY PY PY BK PY PY PY PY BK PY COMMENTS BLD A/COL LN 17-18 ON A.3 & N SMALL PICKUP AREAS BLDG B SLA SLAB SEE NOTES SEE NOTES LASER SCREED/SEE NOTES SEE NOTES SEE NOTES STORM DRAIN/SEE NOTES 5-7 @ A & M K-F CLMN/ELEV #3 FTG SEE INSP NOTES MASONRY WALLS RAIN OUT SEE NOTES COLUMNS 3-8 F-K CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB96H41 FOR 03/07/97 DESCRIPTION: 278,710 SF BUILDING, 177,666 CARE FACILITY, 82,576 GARAGE,18,468 OSHP TYPE: COM JOB ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL STE: APPLICANT: SOFER, JACOB PHONE: 408 295-5446 CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA BK PLANCKtf CB961141 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW LOT: REMARKS: MW/KEVIN/520-6067 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT# RW960212 RW960225 RW970032 RW950010 SE960148 FS970004 AS970011 CB961523 TYPE ROW ROW ROW ROW SWHM FIXSYS ASC DEMO STATUS ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION 11 ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 030397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 022797 Walls 022697 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 021197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 020797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 013197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 013197 Rough/Topout 012997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012797 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012197 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011797 Footing 011597 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011397 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011097 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 010997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 010897 Retaining Walls 010697 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP NR AP AP AP AP INSP BK BK PY PY PY BK PY BK PY PY PY PY PY BK PY PY PY PY BK PY PY BK COMMENTS SMALL PICKUP AREAS BLDG B SLA SLAB SEE NOTES SEE NOTES LASER SCREED/SEE NOTES SEE NOTES SEE NOTES STORM DRAIN/SEE NOTES 5-7 @ A & M K-F CLMN/ELEV #3 FTG SEE INSP NOTES MASONRY WALLS RAIN OUT SEE NOTES COLUMNS 3-8 F-K SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES 01/22/98 THU 16:15 FAX 7607207037 DPR - CBTS Date: I/**/19 Approx. Time •g tt of pases, inet, cover To: jVanw Company Facsimile ffumbtr From: Mun Leu, ext 27 re: cc: / - / iAt*4 j0 f^> 0 /^ s < r - Olympic Boulevard, 5te. 295 Los Angeles, CA 90064 (310) 445-9588 (310) 445-1488 fax 01/22/98 THU 16:15 FAX 7607207037 DPR - CBTS @002 January 22, 1998 Mr. Pat Kelly City of Carlsbad Building and 2075 Los Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009- Safety Department 157 S Re:Carlsbad By The Job Number 93-Q25 Sea - Electrical Panel Locations Dear Mr. Kelly: The inspector in the field has bought up that we have a number of electrical panels located in closets that may be a violation of the 14EC, section 240-24(d). Per our review of the NEC and its inteipietation manual, the intent of the c xle is to keep "easily ignitabfe materials" away from the panels. The panel locations in question are L L the walk-in closets, and behind die door location as shown. This fulfills the intent of the code, as a clear space is kept in front of the panel due to the door location, and no combustibles can be stored directly in front of the panel location. We can also add a solid panel between the clothes closet area and the panel to help ensure that this area be kept open. Please see the attached plan drawing and the attached >JEC excerpts. The workspace requirements for a 3-sq. ft of clear work space in front of the electrical panel per NEC Article 110-16 is also being met by this location. This electrical panel location follows the intent of the code, as there will be no c othcs or other items stored directly in front of these panels. We will need you completion of this project contact me. Sincerely, concurrence with this position as soon as possible in order to proceed with the If you have any additional comments or questions, please do not hesitate to Mun C. Leu A1A The Steinberg Group W/encl. cc.Steve Harrison, THC Can Williams, DPR Joe Bccson, DPP Mike Peterson, City of Carlsbad 01/22/98 THU 16:15 FAX 7607207037 DPR - CBTS El 003 -3 MC CABLE 01/22/98 THU 16:15 FAX 7607207037 DPR - CBTS 70-98 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE (4) The tap conductors are suitably protected from physical damage. (m) Outside Feeder Taps. Outside conductor? tapped to a feeder or connected to a transformer secondary shall be permitted to be protected by complying with all of the fallowing conditions: (1) The conductors are suitably protected from physical damage, (2) The conductors terminate at a single circuit breaker or a single set of fuses that will limit the load to (he ampacity of the conductors. This sin- gle overcurrent device shall be permitted to supply any number of addi- tional overcurrent devices on its load side. (3) The nveicurrem device for the conductors is an integral pan of a disconnecting means or shall be located immediately adjacent thereto. (4) The disconnecting means for the conductors arc installed at a readily accessible location either outside of a building or structure, or inside nearest the point of entrance of the conductors. (n) Service Conductors. Service-entrance conductors shall be permitted to be protected by overcurrent devices in accordance with Section 230-91. 240-22. Grounded Conductors. No overcurrent device shall be con-nected in scries with any conductor that is intentionally grounded. •Exception No~l: Where die avercurrent device opens al( conductors of the circuit, including the grounded conductor, ami is so designed dial no pole can operate independently. Exception No. 2: Where required by Sections 430-36 and 430-37 for motor overload protection. 240-23. Change in Size off Grounded Conductor. Where a change occurs in the size of the ungrounded conductor, a similar change shall be permit- ted to be made in the size of the grounded conductor. 240-24. Location In or on Promises. (a) RaatiHy Accessible. Overcurrcnt devices shall be readily accessible. Exception. No. 1: For busways as provided in Section 364-12. Exception No. 2: For supplementary overcurrent protection as described in Section 240-10. Exception No. 3; For service overcurrent devices as described in Sec- tion 230*92. (b) Occupant to Have Ready Access. Each occupant shall have ready access to all overcurrcm devices protecting the conductors supplying that occupancy. Exception-- In a midtiplc-occuptuKy building where electric service and electrical maintenance are provided by the building management and 01/22/98 THIT 16:16 FAX 76072 7037 DPR - CBTS ARTICLE 2*01_ OVEflCURRENT PROTECTION 0005 '70-99 wtiere these are under continuous building management supervision, the service overcurrent devices and feeder overcurrent devices supplying more than one occupancy shall be permitted to be accessible to authorized man- agement personnel onfy. (c) Not Exposed to Physical Damage. Qvercutrent devices shall be located where they will not be exposed to physical damage. (FPN)r See Section 110-11, Deteriorating Agents. (d) Not In Vicinity of Easily Ignffible Material. Overcurrem devices shall not be located in the vicinity of easily ignitifale material such as in dothcs closets. (e) Not Located in Bathrooms. In dwelling units and guest rooms of hotels and motels, branch-circiiTt overcurrent devices shalfnot be located in bathrooms as defined in Section 210-8. C. Enclosures 240-30. General. Overcuircnt devices shall be enclosed in cabinets or cutout boxes. Exception No, 1: Where a pan of an assembly that provides equivalentprotection. Exception No. 2: Where mounted on open-type switchboards, panel- boards, or control boards that are in rooms or enclosures pte from damp- ness and easily ignitibte material and accessible only to qualified personnel. Exception No. 3: The operating handle of a circuit breaker shall be per- mitted to be accessible without opening a door or cover. 240-32. Damp or Wet Location*. Enclosures for overcuuent devices in damp or wet locations shall comply with Section 373-2(a). 240-33. Vertical Position. Enclosures for ovcrcurrent devices shall bemounted in a vertical position. Exception: Where this is shown to be impracticable and complies with Section 240-81, D. Disconnecting and Guarding 240-40. Disconnecting Means for Fuses. Disconnecting mean!; shall be provided on the supply side of all fuses in circuits of over 150 volts to ground and cartridge fuses in circuits of any voltage, where accessible to other than qualificcTpersans, so that each individual circuit containing fuses can be independently disconnected from the source of electric encrgy. Exception No. 1: A device provided for curreni-lbniiin£ On the suppty side of the service disconnecting means as permitted by Section 230-82. Exception No- 2; A single disconnecting means shall be permitted on the suppfy side of more than one set of fuses as provided by Section 430- 112 for group operation of motors and in Section 414-11 for faced electric space heating equipment- TCSTS ***** TT*?T>EC'nONS SCHEDULE (Reference Uniform Building Code, Section 1701,5) Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Owner, on the advice of the Architect or Engineer, shall compiece, sign and submit this form to the Budding Official. flarlabad Bv The Sea L_ 10/25/96 Project Name 2855 Carlsbad Date Boulevard, Carlsbad, CA project Address California Luthern Homes Testing/Inspection Agency Owner's Name Signature & Title hereby certifies that the Testing/Inspection Agency named above has been engaged to perform structural tests and Inspection during construction, as checked below, to satisfy all applicable portions of the Building Code. Prior to issuancs of an occupancy permit, the Inspection Agency shall submit a statement that alt items of designated work performed were reported. Any items checked, but not tested or inspected, and found deficient will be noted and explained. Whenever any designated items on this list are ready responsibility of the Contractor to give timely notice may be performed. REINFORCING STEEL: __TensiIe & Bond, one set per Ueat per__tons ^Inspection of Placement ___Inspection of Welding MASONRY: ^Preliminary Acceptance Tests ^Masonry Units, Wall Prisms JCSubseqyent Tests (Mortar, Grout, Field Wall Prisms) ^Inspection of Grouting ^Inspection of Placement & Grouting PRECAST CONCRETE: Reinforcing Tests ^Inspection of Reinforcing Placement X_Tendon Tests ^Inspection of Tendon Placement __Inspection of Concrete Batching ^Inspection of Panel Attch. &. Inserts ^Inspection of Panel Installation JCCompression Tests ^Inspection of Stressing/Transfer for sampling, testing, or Inspection, it shall be the to the Inspection Agency so that the required services STRUCTURAL STEEL: Sample & TestfNote specific members below) X_Shop idenl. & Wdding Inspection ,__Shop Ultrasonic Inspection __Shop Radiology X_FieId Welding Inspection X_Fietd Bolting Inspection Field Ultrasonic Inspection Field Radiology Metal Deck Welding Inspection ASPHALTIC CONCRETE: _Mix Designs ^Inspection of Batch Plants ^Core/Test Field Inspection Suitability Tests Specific Gravity __AsphaIt Content Sieve Analysis K Factors __Stabilometer Value Swell STRUCTURAL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS CQN'T PILING. CAISSONS, CAPS. TIES: JClospeciion of Reinforcinfi Placement ^Inspection of Concrete Placement Inspection of Concrete Batching UNDERPINNING: ^Inspection of Steel Fabrication inspection of Reinforcing & Forms Inspection of Concrete Placement ^Inspection of Tiebacks FILL MATERIAL: _X.Acceptance Tests JcMoisture-Density Determination JC_Fie!d Density STRUCTURAL WOOD: Inspection of Fabrication Inspection of Truss Joist Fab. iSample & Test Components __Jnspection of Glu-Iam Fab. CONCRETE, OUNTTE AND MORTAR: INSULATING CONCRETE: _jSompIe & Test __Unit Weights FIREPROOFING: __Inspection of Placement —Density Tests __*nudcaess Tests __Inspecc Batching ROOFING: ^Inspection of Placement Sample & Test ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS OR OTHER TESTS & INSPECTIONS: Plyvood Floor / Roof Nailing Plyvood Shaarvall Nailing Anchor Bolfc / Holdovn / Straps CONCRETE X X X X X X GUNFTE GROUT X X X X Y MORTAR X x X X Y Agg Tests for Designs Suitability of Afi£. Mix Designs TcstPand Baich Plant Insp. Cement Grab Samples Inspection Placing Compression Tests Cast Specimens Pick-up Samples Shrinkage Bars Yeild Check Air Check Dry Unit Weight STRUCTURAL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS CON'T PILING. CAISSONS, CAPS, TIES: JClospection of Reinforcing Placement X Inspection of Concrete Placement Inspection of Concrete Batching UNDERPINNING: __Inspection of Steel Fabrication ^Inspection of Reinforcing & Forms Inspection of Concrete Placement Inspection of Tiebacks FELL MATERIAL: ^Acceptance Tests JCMoistu re-Density Determination JCFidd Density STRUCTURAL WOOD: ^Inspection of Fabrication ^Inspection of Truss Joist Fab. ^Sample & Test Components ^Inspection of Glu-Iam Fab. CONCRETE, OUNITE AND MORTAR: INSULATING CONCRETE; __Sample & Test _Unit Weights FIREPROOF1NG: ^Inspection of Placement ^Density Tests _Thickness Tests __Iospect Batching ROOFING: ^Inspection of Placement Sample & Test ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS OR OTHER TESTS & INSPECTIONS: Plyvood Floor / Roof Nailing Plyvood Shaarvall Nailing Anchor Bolt / Holdovn / Straps CONCRETE X X X X X X GUNITE GROUT X X X X Y MORTAR X Y X X V Agg Tests for Designs Suitability of Afig. Mix Designs Test Panel Batch Plant Insp. Cement Grab Samples Inspection Placing Compression Tests Cast Specimens Pick-up Samples Shrinkage Bars Yeild Check Air Check Dry Unit Weight SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING Project Address: r a r?§5ari Romovard Project Title: Carlsbad By The Sea Carlsbad, CA _ Professional Cart Facility To owner of projects requiring Special Inspection or Testing per Section 1701, Uniform Building Code, please acknowledge and return to the City. BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED: The owner or his representative, on the advice of the responsible Project Engineer or Architect, shall complete, sign and submit the attached form "Structural Tests and Inspection Schedule" to The City Building Department for review and approval. The owner and his general contractor, where applicable, shall also acknowledge the following conditions applicable to Special Inspection and/or Testing. 1. Contractor is responsible for proper notification to (he Inspecting or Testing agency for items listed. 2. Testing laboratory only should take samples and transport them to their laboratory. 3. Copies of all laboratory reports and inspections are to be sent directly to the City by the Testing agency. 4. Inspection agency to submit names and qualifications of on-site special inspectors to the Building Department tor approval. 5. The Special Inspector is under the authority and is responsible to the Building Official. All inspection concerns and/or problems encountered are to be brought to his attention immediately. 6. Special inspectors may be required, as a minimum, to provide weekly reports to The City of all . inspection activity, 7. It is the responsibility of the contractor to review the City approved plans for additional inspection or testing requirements that may be noted. 8. BEFORE AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED: The inspection agency shall submit a statement that all items requiring testing and inspection were fulfilled and repotted. Those items not tested and/or inspected shall be noted in this statement. Copy of statement to be maintained at Ac job site for City's Building Inspector's review prior to final inspections. ACKNOWLEDGMENT BY ALL PARTIES CONCERNED .. Owner's Signature Project Engineer or Architect Signature Testing and/or Inspection Agency Signature' Approved By:_ Contractor's Signature City Plan Check Engineer Signature SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING Project Address:i?aT-?§Sa^ Brtniovard Project Title: Carlsbad By The Sea Carlsbad, CA _ Professional Car* Facility To owner of projects requiring Special Inspection or Testing per Section 1701, Uniform Building Code, please acknowledge and return to the City. BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED: The owner or his representative, on the advice of the responsible Project Engineer or Architect, shall complete, sign and submit the attached form "Structural Tests and Inspection Schedule" to Tee City Building Department for review and approval. The owner and bis general contractor, where applicable, shall also acknowledge the following conditions applicable to Special Inspection and/or Testing. 1. Contractor is responsible for proper notification to the Inspecting or Testing agency for items listed. 2. Testing laboratory only should take samples and transport them to their laboratory. 3. Copies of all laboratory reports and inspections are to be sent directly to die City by the Testing agency. 4. Inspection agency to submit names and qualifications of an-site special inspectors to the Building Department for approval. 5. The Special Inspector is under the authority and is responsible to the Building Official. All inspection concerns and/or problems encountered are to be brought to his attention immediately. 6. Special inspectors may be required, as a minimum, to provide weekly reports to The City of all inspection activity. 7. It is the responsibility of the contractor to review the City approved plans for additional inspection or testing requirements that may be noted. 8. BEFORE AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED: The inspection agency shall submit a statement that all items requiring testing and inspection were fulfilled and reported. Those items not tested and/or inspected shall be noted in this statement Copy of statement to be maintained at the job site for City's Building Inspector's review prior to final inspections. ACKNOWLEDGMENT BY ALL PARTTES CONCERNED Owner's Signature Project Engineer or Architect Signature , _ Approved By: Testing and/or Inspection Agency Signature Contractor's Signature City Plan Check Engineer Signature Project Addressira^TJRaH Hr>»l CA SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING rj Project Title:garl3bad By Trie Ssa Professional Car* Facility To owner of projects requiring Special Inspection or Testing per Section 1701, Uniform Building Code, please acknowledge and return to the City. BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED: The owner or his representative, on the advice of the responsible Project Engineer or Architect, shall complete,, sign and submit the attached form "Structural Tests and Inspection Schedule' Co The City Building Department tor review and approval. The owner and his general contractor, where applicable, shall also acknowledge the following conditions applicable to Special Inspection and/or Testing. 1. Contractor is responsible for proper notification to the Inspecting or Testing agency for items listed. 2. Testing laboratory only should take samples and transport them to their laboratory. 3. Copies of all laboratory reports and inspections are to be sent directly to the City by the Testing agency. 4. Inspection agency to submit names and qualifications of en-site special inspectors to the Building Department for approval, 5. The Special Inspector is under the authority and is responsible to die Building Official. All inspection concerns and/or problems encountered are to be brought to his attention immediately. 6. Special inspectors may be required, as a minimum, to provide weekly reports to The City of all inspection activity. 7. It is the responsibility of the contractor to review the City approved plans for additional inspection or testing requirements that may be noted. 8. BEFORE AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED: The inspection agency shall submit a statement thai all items requiring testing and inspection were fulfilled and reported. Those items not tested and/or inspected shall be noted in this statement. Copy of Statement to be maintained at the job site for City's Building Inspector's review prior to final Inspections. ACKNOWLEDGMENT BY ALL PARTIES CONCERNED Owner's Signature Project Engineer or Architect Signature Testing and/or Inspection Agency Signature Approved By:_ Contractor's Signature City Plan Check Engineer Signature STRUCTURAL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS SCHEDULE (Reference Uniform Building Code, Section 1701.5) Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Owner, on the advice of the Architect or Engineer, shall complete, sign and submit this form to the Building Official. Carlabad Bv The Saa 10/25/96 _ Project Name 2855 Carlsbad Boulevard, Carlsbad, CA Date Project Address California Luthern Homes Testing/Inspection Agency Owner's Name Signature & Title hereby certifies that the Testing/Inspection Agency named above has been engaged to perform structural tests and Inspection during construction, as checked below, to satisfy all applicable portions of the Building Code. Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit, the Inspection Agency shall submit a statement that all items of designated work performed were reported. Any items checked, but not tested or inspected, and found deficient vail be noted and explained. Whenever any designated items on this list are ready for sampling, testing, or Inspection, it shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to give timely notice to the Inspection Agency so that the required services may be performed. REINFORCING STEEL: __Tensile & Bond, one set per hear per tons ^Inspection of Placement ^Inspection of Welding MASONRY: Y Preliminary Acceptance Tests —Masonry Units, Wall Prisms ^Subsequent Tests (Mortar, Grout, Field Wall Prisms) Inspection of Grouting ^Inspection of Placement & Grouting PRECAST CONCRETE: Reinforcing Tests _Inspection of Reinforcing Placement 3£_Tendon Tests ^Inspection of Tendon Placement ^Inspection of Concrete Batching ^Inspection of Panel Attch. &. Inserts _Inspection of Panel Installation Decompression Tests Xlnspectiop of Stressing/Transfer STRUCTURAL STEEL: _ Sample & TestCNotc specific members below) X_Shop ident. & Welding Inspection ^Shop Ultrasonic Inspection __Shop Radiology XjField Welding Inspection XjField Bolting Inspection _ Field Ultrasonic Inspection — Field Radiology Deck Welding Inspection ASPHALTIC-CONCRETE: __Mix Designs _ . Inspection of Batch Plants _Core/Test _ Field Inspection __ Suitability Tests _ Specific Gravity _Asphalt Content __Sieve Analysis _ K Factors M _Stabilometer Value Swell Jeffrey L. Davis Special Inspector AWS/CWI 331 Plumosa Avenue Vista, CA 92083 619-598-9593 Education: 1975 Chaffey Community College, Rancho Cucamonga, CA General Education - No degree 1984-1985 College of Oceaneering, Wilmington ,CA A.S. Degree - Construction Technology Professional Registrations: Jan 1995 American Welding Society, Certified welding inspector Jan 1991 International Conference of Building Officials, Reinforced concrete Mar 1991 International Conference of Building Officials, Structural Masonry Jul 1991 International Conference of Building Officials, Structural Steel and welding Mar 1991 American Concrete Institute, Grade one field technician Jurisdictional Licenses: City of San Diego, City of Pasadena, City of Hemet, City of Riverside, City of San Bernardino, City of Santa Ana, City of Orange, City of La Habra, City of Las Vegas, County of Los Angeles, County of Riverside, County of San Diego, Certified by California Department of Transportation(CALTRANS) for bridge inspection. Work History: 1996-Present Certified Weld Inspection On site CWI for California Department of Transportation(CALTRANS) retrofit and new construction projects throughout District Eleven. 1996*1996 Southern California Soils & Testing Robins/May Fashion Valley Mall San Diego, California - On Site Inspector for remodel and seismic upgrade, Rosa Parks Elementary School San Diego, California - On Site CWI and Structural Masonry Inspector. 1996-1996 Twining Laboratories Performed CWI on site field inspections for Foothill Presbyterian Hospital Van Nuys, California, Glendale Seventh Day Adventist Hospital Glendale, California and Metropolitan Transit Authority - Red Line Station @ Sunset & Vine. 1995-1996 Bernard Cook and Company, On site structural Inspector on the Long Beach Veterans Administration Medical Center for base isolator installation to correct structural seismic deficiencies. 1991-1995 Wyman Testing Laboratories, Senior inspector responsible for all aspects of construction inspection in Reinforced Concrete, Structural Masonry and Structural Steel Welding. 1986-1988 Olson Construction, Crane Operator, Pipefitter and Welder. Performed all phases of pipefitting and welding on civil and commercial projects including 125' diameter digester tank with mixing guns and pump station, polymer feed building and expansion of head works and screening facilities. 1985-1986 Sony, Inc., Maintenance Mechanic and Welder. Maintained and repaired various types of production equipment and conveyor systems. 1985-1986 Solus Ocean Systems, Habitat Pipefitter and Welder (underwater). Pipefitting and welding for various government agencies. 1985 Powerplant Specialist, Inc., Pipefitter and Welder. Welding at various electrical power plants, oil refineries and steel mills. Installed natural gas stations with the final tie-in technique being the "Live Gas" process. 1976-1984 Tamco, IncJ Ameron Steel, "A" Fabricator. Required to trouble shoot all mechanical breakdowns, perform maintenance, install machinery, repair hydraulics and pneumatics. All aspects of structural fabrication including blueprint reading, lay out, fit-up and final assembly. Installation of heavy machinery and structural components. Work Experience Highlights: United States Government Projects, Balboa Naval Hospital parking structure, United States Marine Corps repelling tower. San Ysidro and Otay Mesa border crossing projects. DSA Projects, Del Mar Race Track grandstand replacement, Irvine Valley College Hart Gymnasium, Aliso Niguel High School, Wood Canyon Elementary School, Santa Ana High School, Rosa Parks Elementary School. State of California - University Projects, Cal State North ridge - engineering and data processing building, San Diego State University - chill plant facility and KPBS - Gateway building, Point Loma Nazarene College - Cooper music building. County Government Projects, San Diego County Justice Center - Lead Inspector - seventeen tiered moment frame building including three story underground parking structure. Military Service: 1975-1976 United States Navy, Cryptographic Technician. Possessing "Top Secret" and FBI background security clearance. Transmittal FROM: Mun Leu, AIA Date: [ e f 1997 RE: Carlsbad by the Sea, TSG Project #93-025 To The Attention Of:FAX Number Phone Number Q (E99) Cheryl Domnitch Eng.T Cheryl Domnitch, 1830 Bering Dr.. #32, San Jose, CA 95112 408/437-5670 408/437-9470 D (Gl) The Steinberg Group, Thuan Phan, 60 Pierce Avenue, San Jose, CA 95110 408/295-5928 408/295-5446 D (G2) Carlsbad by the Sea, Lloyd Rochambeau, 2855 Carlsbad Blvd., Carlsbad, CA 92008 619/729-9045 619/729-2377 D (G2) Carlsbad by the Sea, Lee Ratta, 2855 Carlsbad Blvd., Carlsbad, CA 92008 619/729-0938 619/729-2377 D (G2) Carlsbad by the Sea, Jeffrey Krutzsch, 301 Grand Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 619/729-5148 619/729-4983 D (G3) California Lutheran Homes, Gary Wheeler, 2312 S. Fremont Ave., Alhambra, CA 91803 818/570-5610 818-570-5650 D (G3) California Lutheran Homes, Jim Doyle, 2312 S. Fremont Ave., Alhambra, CA 91803 818-570-5610 818-570-5606 D (G3) California Lutheran Homes, Kevin Gerber, 2312 S. Fremont Ave., Alhambra, CA 91803 818/570-5610 818/570-5605 D (G3) California Lutheran Homes, Kari Minor, 2312 S. Fremont Ave., Alhambra, CA 91803 818/570-5610 818/570-5600 D (G3) Francoeur & Company, Bob Francoeur, 1567 Westholme Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90024 310/470-0443 213/272-1370 D (G3) The Harrison Company, Steve Harrison 4401 Manchester Avenue, Stc. 205, Encinitas.CA 92024 ..619-753-3301 619/753-2824 D.(G4) DPR Construction, Peter Nosier, 555 Twin Dolphin Dr., #260, Redwood City, CA 94065 415/592-1167 415/592-4800 g (G4) DPR Construction, Cari Williams, 2796 Carlsbad Blvd., Carlsbad, CA 92008 619/720-7037 619/720-7031 IT (G5) City of Carlsbad-Building Dept., Mike Peterson, 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, C A 92009.619/43 8-0894 619-438-1161 D (G5) City of Carlsbad-Fire Department, Colleen Balch, 2560 Orion Way, Carlsbad, CA 92008 619/929-0256 619/931-2127 O (G7) KPFF, Marc Press, 639 Front St., #200, San Francisco, CA 94111 415/989-1552 415/989-1004 D (G7) KPFF, Tim Heiman, 639 Front St., #200, San Francisco, CA 94111 415/989-1552 415/989-1004 D (G8) TKG. Joe Ross, 4370 LaJolla Village Dr., #120, San Diego, CA 92122 619-597-0565 619-597-0555 D (G9) TKG, Larry Cheatham, 4370 LaJolla Village Dr., #120, San Diego, CA 92122 619-597-0565 619/597-0555 D (G9) TKG, Kent Johns, 4370 LaJoila Village Dr., #120, San Diego, CA 92122 619-597-0565 619/597-0555 D (GlO)O'Day Consultants, Chuck Collins, 7220 Avenida Encinas, #204, Carlsbad, CA 92009 619/931-8680 ' 619-931-7700 D (G12)Charles M. Sailer Associates, Christina Miyar, 130 Sutter St., San Francisco, CA 94104 415/397-0454 415/397-0442 D (G13)SWA Group, Corazon Unana, 2200 Bridgeway Blvd., Sausaliio, CA 94965 415/332-0719 415/332-5100 D (G14JRMW, Terry de la Cuesta, 40 S. Market Street, 4th Fir. San Jose, CA 95113 408/294-1747 408/294-8000 D (G15)Marshall Associates, Ron Sandusky, 350 California St., #1780. San Francisco, CA 94104 415/677-1210 415/677-1200 D (G18)EsGitCorp, Curt Culver, 9320 Chesapeake Dr., #208, San Diego, CA 92123 619/560-1576 619/560-1468 D (G18)Brown& Sanchis. Julie Brown, 17485 Monterey Rd., #304, Morgan Hill, CA 95037 408/778-1733 408/778-0633 D (G28)Horton-Lees Lighting, Janet Nolan, 1011 Keamy St., San Francisco, CA 94133 415/986-2576 415/986-2575 D (G3 I )Motivational Systems, Inc., David Cowan, 2200 Cleveland Ave., National City, CA 91950... 619/474-0678 619/474-8246 D,(G32)General Hdwre & Bldrs Supply, Dennis Neves, 80 Chemical Wy. Redwood City, CA 94063 415/365-6540 415/368-2885 D Attached D Under separate cover D Originals D Submittals D Reproducibles JQ Correspondence D Prints D Specifications D Computer Files D Other Copies Date Description Viiv^l ./ UU 4- D Al \our request D For your information Q For your use D With comments noted D Reviewed as noted HfFor your approval D For review and comment D Other (Record) Remarks The Steinberg Group- 11835 West Olympic BIvd.,Stc. 298 - Los Angeles, CA 90064 - 310/445-9588 - 310/445-1488 (FAX) b „,« o- dt-O/doo1 it 111 m i ft 11 u I' • CORP Northwest 7lfth St. • Miami, FL VI11'6 J-&00-OH VlNTL FAX &QSI 477-410fl Oct'.'ber 30, 13y7 To: Mr, Mun Leu Steinberg Group Los Angeles, California Re : C^rlsbed By The Sea Carlsbed, Cal-if 01. nia This ig to certify that all exterior stucco accessories, manufactured by Vinyl Corp., are produced from Georgia Gulf exterior grade lead free raw materials, that meet or exceed A.S.T.M. 1784. Geoigia C?ulf 7055 meet sHJLj94/ with a V-0 rating. 1 have included Cor your review the test rV&ults of the Georgia Gulf compounds thai we use. Sincerely // -tfahriel F. B Execu^iv-a Vice President. GeoralQ PVC 56505-B foil 0/fla Box 70765-6629 October 29 J 997 Mr. Gftbriftl Bifano Vinyl Corporation 82555 N.W. 70th St. Post-it* Fax Note 7671 Jt" Phenc* Fax (305) 477-4108 Dear Oabe, Attached are copies of Georgia Udf data sheets for 7055 and underwritten Jaboratories VL. 94 (vertical burn test). As you see, Georgia Gulf 7055 nL the U J, 94 test with a VO aft* By definition, to product does not continue to burt when 1^e fire source u removed. exterior ., yellow card E 53006(R) also attached. dollars to generate this additiona data, wmens o to an outside kb to bm buildings. resifltanc e| coupled with these resistance to burn characteristic wdrtiffiieM material of choice for the dry wail stucco accessary Best Regards Roland K, Loy Sr. Technical Engineer «;Si997\rkl\biUno.iir LEADERSHIP QUAi-HY PVC RE5WS AW i , uc t V *. V S, ( 7055.1 7066 la a special purpow rigid PVO extrualon compound designed for eppMcet lent 'requiring the following propart1«»; wuthorabimy Toughness Durability UL Rating Ch«m1c«l of Processing roaartlea C«TI Classification Specific Gravity Method 0-4216 Typical Value? 1-432-33-00 1.43 T«n»11« T«n«11f Yield, p«1T«n»1l« Hodulua, pal HwJulus Notched Izod Impact Stren9th Cvi") Impiot Strength (1/4*) Short D Hardneas Reekwtll R Hardness Drop Dart Iftptct (1) A8TH 0-838 A9TH D-63S A8TO P-710 ASTH D-790 A3TM 0-258 ASTM Ihl^ MTH 0-2340 A8TM D-T85 ASTM D-4228 80 ft-lbae.ooo 574,000 11,000 p«1 396,000 P91 11 ft-lbs/m ie ft-lba/1n 90 109 3.5 In Ib/mil H«at C'F) 'C at Z64 U.L. Rating Racetmnd Ntlt Co»ff<ei«nt of Thermal ixpanslon (1) H.25 Tup, Prooodur* A ASTN 0*648 undarwrltert Laboratory ASTH (UO) 71 Meets UL 04 V-0 360 $.$10"1 in/In "F 030;flr 2529.39 ! I laboratories (UZ>-94) ;' 3 or tha horizontal burn test and t*et la to jnaaflir* the Gzranatrillty properties of iwtaclala ue«3 in jt»rs in response to heat an3 fimq unter controlled laboratory conditions. I*at criteriar erf 5 a coijten can not burn with c> S tawt rrqy drip flaming epfrcinens glowing o£ thg toot "VI All V2 criteria ratlr^s iitolufc EB, V2, VI, VD end 5V« the v designate vertical bum which La leaet eever« of theae wver*» Cc pjtpoeo- of 0uch as CEcctlionoM and nlnuta 3.0 Inch span for specirans t«at«5 in a thldnesg ofOB o ttrtitfLfi] bum tata 1.5 inches O.UO - .300 indh. o Ma^ojoim tucn rate o£ 3.0 inches par minute OWE 3.Q inch span for spsdin^ns having a thickness Issfi than 0.120 inch«a. o Ceaw bo turn before the fierce roochca the 4.0 inch refor-snoe mark-pass V2 o NO Hpjdmoia nay burn foe ror« than 30 eecooda affc^r either aEpliaation. of tho fl^ma toot. o Total flanlng caifcuatiorv 1-tme mqy not «xoeed 23Q s^aonfla for the 10 flanc applications for o»ds oc canbcwtlon up to the holding particles Which ig^ita dry a^rgical cotton placed la inohoa th» cortaishicn which for morn than 60 eooxdo afhar Uio eecorri irbedrjen not frip flaming o M3 ffpecdren may turn wltt fifth flam?. o cfo specimen may drip portiblas. VO o Speclntna may not bum Cor (tore than 10 seconds after eithar cf tvro flasns o ittal flaring oo±usticn t:jna may not exceed W) TOO. for any of the 10 flame agplications for eacfa e«t of 5 specimens. c Specimens w not <2ri£f filng o tto epeclmns may show glw;.ng corrbuetion for mora than 30 SV a sanples arft cwen ag«d bato.ra this test can be run at 7Q*C £or 7 seven days, gkwi/ig £or than 60 In the vortical turn teata VO,fl, V2 4«Edit»a atovt, the fiame is hold unfet th« the £La5tiC OAoas turning {If it burns)/ the flirc la iTmediately tha SV , tho £iame is If you have gaootiona About UL-94 or cur tttdmicztl oarvica tho foe 10 for an for 3 oecoods,for 5 seconds foe 5 foil repetitions on «adl or any other HL ragulrwcnts ocntact your local tecfuiical . - . , - u. . .I«.LI^ iMriirr).wARR^rlrirsorMci<:;,;.M1f >AIM'CULAlU'lll'"-y'LV^l'll^ll'1I''jt"»'^'«HLV!JV I I T 1 'JU QMFZ2 70799 7041 In *M. *TO *f AM 0,« MV4 BO 1.DO »4VA M - 18 6ft f* » d Q — _ — BR if » 4 0 4 B 0»i •• is o i — — — CMF22Compontn CSOROIA GiULF WC BOB I 71*1PVCuf « BOIB £5 April 17. tm PVC DIVN RD PO »QX *i» . PLAOUCMINI LA m> Jrti H » •«• « H » « 0«« »/• * * T * T to* Hr I I * B I Is !? r r - r = res ••4«y,fl«v «D «6 A6•a »o toft! I? 0 C -to e o 4o — — — o — — — v .--.,.^.::-: V^;-\'^--.. -. i' — ?" •. ." .' ".* I*' " '••,,v f^',/.*1 "•"v-i^-"r'-*';>'. f"1§^^^^s^>-^-^j^-fi^?Sr*rv^*^ '-_**ivt A'^1 "iJ1 »f *\ ^- * fc" , 1SQ3 CORP PVC DtV AH *«o (RJ BO eo ADAHAB BK i.oa Mtx.ot Ofloi»o.»»1.BO • 4-tVA 64VO so 10 BO BO BO flO 50 DO flO SO »0 BO so 80 00 BO 10 *- BO' — *0 —«0 — BO »0 — — — — ~ 10 80 10BO CO BQBO 80 i*. doted JuN 15. 1*. 1««J Lobor«torlo« 11. 1MB: {Canton f ' t CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. <Jrnro°/l^ rL ENGINEERING, <^ SAN DIEGO, CA • RIVERSIDE, CA - \P 24 1 4 Vineyard Ave. 490 E. Princeknd Ct, X<P Suite G Suite 7 , X Escondido, CA 92029 Corona, CA 91719 INC. (760) 746-9806 FAX (909) 371-2168 FAX TENSILE AND BEND TEST VENTURA, CA • TRACY, CA 1645 Pacific Ave. 392 V. larch Ri Suite 105 Suite 19 Oxnard, CA 93033 Tracy, CA 95376 (805) 4864475 (209) 839-2890 (805) 486-9016 FAX (209) 839-2895 FAX ON REINFORCING STEEL LANCASTER, CA 42156 10th StW. UnitK Lancaster, CA 93534 (805) 726-9676 (805) 726-9676 FAX A 615 GRADE 60 PROJECT NAME: CLIENT NAME: Carlsbad By The Sea Multi-purpose Room D. P .R. Construction CTE JOB NO . : DATE: LAB NO. : 10-2004A 08/01/97 7001 TENSILE - YIELD AND ELONGATION DATA Bar Size 4 4 5 6 6 8 Heat No. 1473 421896 1554 71486 709712844 1671 Grade 60 60 60 60 60 60 X-Section Area, sq.in. 0.20 0.20 0.31 0.44 0.44 0.79 Yield Load,lb 12, 900 12, 000 19,600 29, 100 26,200 50, 000 Strength PSI 64,500 60,000 63,225 66,140 (59,545J 63,290 Tensile Load, Ib 19,600 20,000 30,200 46,800 37,200 81,200 Strength PSI 98,000 100,000 97,420 106,365 ^JJ4 , 545) 102,785 Percent Elongation la Sin. 13 15 13 14 16 14 BEND DATA Bar Size 4 4 5 6 6 8 Heat No. 1473 421896 1554 71486 709712844 1671 Bar Diameter In 0.500 0.500 0.625 0.750 0.750 1.000 Mandrel Diameter In Spacing Used In Results OK * OK * OK* OK * OK * OK* * Remark: Bend Test Performed at Supplier Shop and Inspected by CTE, Inc. CONFORMS TO SPECIFICATIONS DOES NOT CONFORM TO SPECIFICATIONS Tested By:JOSE FRANCO Reviewed By:MARIUS _SINCA GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTlN^PR£Mf ENGINEERING, INC. CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING>INC SAN DIEGO, CA • 2414 Vineyard Ave. Suite G Escondido, CA 92029 (760) 7464955 WftJtfWK** ™ RIVERSIDE, CA • 490 E. Princeland Ct. Suite? Corona, CA 91719 (909) 371-1890 -i (9f!9i?&Kl<>Mti>crr VENTURA, CA - 1645 Pacific Ave Suite 105 Oxnard,CA 93033 (805) 4866475 r\^5W$>W6*fti3 n TRACY, CA 392 W. Larch Rd. Suite 19 Tracy, CA 95376 (209) 839-2890 -rtWS) SJSWggiEa LANCASTER, CA 42156 10th St. W. UnitK Lancaster, CA 93534 (805) 7269676 (805) 7269676 FAX PROJECT NAME: CLIENT NAME: A 615 GRADE 60 Carlsbad by the Sea, Bldg. 2 C/o Ray Miller & Associates Cal Luthern Homes C/o Ray Miller & Associates CTE JOB NO.: 10-2004C DATE: 6/14/97 LAB NO.: 6910 PROPOSAL #: 96-3230T TENSILE - YIELD AND ELONGATION DATA Bar Size 8* Heat No. NOT SUPPLIED Grade 60 X-Section Area, sq.in. 0.79 Yield Load, Ib 64,000 Strength PSI 81, 015 Tensile Load, Ib 94,000 Strength PSI 118, 900 Percent Elongation In 8 in. 9% *EPOXY COATED REINPORCINEG STEEL BAR. BEND DATA Bar Size 8 CONFORMS Tested I Heat No. NOT SUPPLIED TO SPECIFICATIONS v: -rose. . t* Bar Diameter In 1.0 <-/ Mandrel Diameter In 5.0 DOES N01 0Reviewed By: 'NA-* Spacing Used In 7.13 ' CONFORM TO SPECIFIC* *a*~ ^2*^*~^ Results O.K. TIONS q T \ MOJECT»\ 101001 C\LU\ 01TOT.' GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION electro e to/t GROUND FAULT SYSTEM TEST REPORT CLIENT: ^ £-£ ^ £(^£C. 7 (L \ C LOCATION: ^ -?^. T r< - 2S^»^ "'i^<-££^D ^ SWITCHGEAR DESIGNATION: ^ /*?/}/ A/ ENGINEER: 12 ]-} , ^ ETI^°,B NUMBER: *- WITNESS: DATE: , ^ TEST EQUIP. ASSET # CALIBRATION DATE: T?.O - OO35 3 >o - 7 - <9~7 i FIELD DATA SWITCHBOARD MANUFACTURER SHOP ORDER NO. MAIN OVERCURRENT DEVICE MFC ^S CIRCUIT BREAKER [~~I FUSEDSWITCH TYPE MODEL/CAT, NO. CURRENT RATING *3(^>S 3"2-OC> ^fe *^M O^'-S- ^x3SO A GROUND FAULT SYSTEM MFC LJ NEUTRAL-GROUND STRAP J<] ZERO -SEQUENCE MODEL CAT. NO. "^f^/p U/J/T PICK-UP RANGE AS FOUND SETTING ^z^ AS LE FT SETTI NG ,/jrA PICKUP -7/-,'V -ite?^'' J PICKUP ZoV '(*"-CIIRHPWT *^t-' A> TI^^-'OUT rURRFN-r^—'^ TIM 1 1NSPECT1O SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS MAIN BONDING JUMPE ty '' ">< ^* '/}(, 5 PER PHASE ^V '' X <2 // <L NEUTRAL-GROUND LOCATION (LJCORRECT 1 1 INCORRECT | | CORRECTED BY CONTRACT MONITOR/TfcST PANEL OPERATION 1 « U t C fl"76 **L OTHER £3 CORRECT 1 1 INCORRECT L7J CORRECTED UL NO. / \ ~V-, rv <••> & - 3 ^ -?//,-£: (3 or ^' )IL.) — i^jC ->t~J \-^ -/ - ' < ^ <-•' \^ *** (-J i : / R. ^_ *7T> ' £.f"^ C- r^ '"S SYSTEM VOLTAGE VOLTAGE HATING VfiOX/27 7 toG ^/^^ R. riME RANGE ( SENSOR/C.T. , J2-7 SETTINGS SUPPLIED BY N i R GROUND ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR -5/C^ Kl AWG | ) MCM CONTROL POWCR TRANSFORMER 3 R K/ A VA A •J> ELECTRICAL TESTS BREAKER/SWITCH REACTION TIME IRTI FtEoucbo vt H/ #\ LJ SECONDS [~~] CYCLES K/Yi PICK-LtP^UR^RENT . / . tj /^ PICK-UP CURRENT MINUS 25% f"t£; QBpR!? AMPS 1 I NO TRIP (CORRECT) SYSTEM NEUTRAL INSULATION RESISTANCE TO GROUND ^ ^O MEGOHMS PRIMARY CURRENT PERCENT AMPERE-TURNS PICK-UP TIME-CURRENT ___ _ CALIBRATION k VO X cS ~ 1 t~oC> 2.O& /^ TCCTC -^.C7^^i2.' y^zo 3^0% REMARKS \ r ' — [^ Ni^^T/^/lC^ ^^/^-^^ '/*— ' /" 3LTAGE TEST (55% RATED VOLTAGE) [_] CORRECT K] INCORRECT 2- AMPS) LJ TRlf (INCORRECT) OTHER TOTAL REACTION RELAY MFGR. TIME TIME TIME TOLERANCE ,7V — ,7V ±10% 5-9 — y3-^ 1;0^ *>0ts1/*-/ry Ca^/^cT. 'N - 3£os/} GFSTR/90 C1990 ETI PAGE OF N ^ VA I kAt?N N O ouo x13DN M -0 N O ?r ?smCM v\ tf N%g6V X. J O o. TV * I•o 2 w C £ m ^! *s 5 6m 5 Sz a -< zo •"o -( 2O fir vw n a a l«s 1 0 2•n &m 2 «jj m -, < ^ o *b uv \*ser o £> X » 0 w m §3 m .I/w X w m OI 33 CO -H 33 SO33 -H EsGil Corporation Professional tPfon %evieu) "Engineers DATE: February 6, 1997 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad T3 PLAN KhVIEWER Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 SEJ-.IX PROJECT ADDRESS: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad By The Sea The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building and fire codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck, The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Mun Leu Telephone #: Date contacted: 2/5/97 (by: mtg) /^r Fax #/ Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: 1. The designer stated that^he City would allow the elevator to be located in an exit passageway, as shown on the plails. Please verify this. 2. The plans show that a portion of the project in on public property. Special permission from the City is required. By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D CM D EJ D PC log tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 + (619)560-1468 4- Fax (619) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation Professional $ 'fan ^evieif 'Engineers DATE: January 29, 1997 Q APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Q PLAN REVIEWER Q FILE PLANCHECKNO.: 96-1141 SET: VIII PROJECT ADDRESS: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad By The Sea The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *AAA*XAAXJ- codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of this transmittal has been sent to: faxed to: The Steinberg Group Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Mun Leu Telephone #: (310) 445-9588 Date contacted: 1/29/97 (by: kc) Fax #: (310) 445-1488 Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: Esgil Corporation is awaiting two sets of final plans, properly signed. By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D CM D EJ D PC 1/24/97 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619)560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation Professional $ '/an 'RfViev) 'Engineers DATE: January 21, 1997 OAEEUCANT" JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Q PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLANCHECKNO.: 96-1141 SET: VII PROJECT ADDRESS: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad By The Sea The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ********** codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: faxed to: The Steinberg Group Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Mun Leu (message left) Telephone #: (310) 445-9588 Date contacted: 1/21/97 (by: kc) Fax #: (310) 445-1488 Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: Building 1 only. By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D CM D EJ D PC 1/14/97 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 * (619)560-1468 * Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 96-1141 VII January 21, 1997 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 1/14/97 REVIEWED BY: Kurt Culver PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 SET: VII DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: January 21, 1997 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? QYes QNo Carlsbad 96-1141 VII January 21, 1997 4. Many sheets of the plans still aren't signed. 16. Conventional wood trusses are still specified on sheets SA2.1.8, SA2.1.10 and SA2.1.11 at the balcony areas. Either revise these to omit the trusses, or show appropriate fire protection for those trusses (i.e., two layers of 5/8" Type X drywall, per UBC Table 7-C, Item 21-1.1). 35. B. Provide the written clarification previously requested. 38. Esgil Corporation will verify that the City has resolved this issue. 74. Esgil Corporation will verify that the City has resolved this issue. 76. Interior passage doors shall have landings on each side not less than 44" in depth. Please review Units K, L2 and J2. Some doors don't comply. 81. Esgil Corporation will verify that the City has resolved this item. If you have any questions, please contact Kurt Culver of Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. EsGil Corporation 'ProfessionattPCan Review* "Engineers DATE: November 21, 1996 a APPLICANT g^juljs) a FIRE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 SET: VI PROJECT ADDRESS: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad By The Sea The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ********** codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. X] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: faxed to The Steinberg Group (310) 445-1488 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. X] Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Mun Leu Date contacted: 11/21/96 (by: fax) Telephone #: X] REMARKS: Building 1 only. By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation n GA D CM Q EJ D PC 11/14/96 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4- San Diego, California 92123 + (619)560-1468 4 Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 96-1141 VI November 21, 1996 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 11/14/96 REVIEWED BY: Kurt Culver PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 SET: VI DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: November 21, 1996 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? QYes QNo Carlsbad 96-1141 VI November 21, 1996 NOTE: Please submit two complete sets after the following outstanding corrections have been resolved. 4. All sheets of the plans must be signed/sealed. 16. The balcony areas of the units have prefabricated wood trusses (not TrusJoists). Please provide the basis of approval for their rated construction. Please notice that UBC Table 7-C, Item 21-1.1 requires two layers of 5/8" Type X drywall. 35.' B. Written clarification from Charles Salter Associates is required: Their 1994 report requires that certain units have closed windows and thus outside air ventilation is required. The unit numbers given in their report, though, don't seem to match the unit numbers shown in Steinberg's plans. Please provide written clarification. 38. Esgil Corporation will verify that the City has resolved this issue. 74. Esgil Corporation will verify that the City has resolved this issue. 76. There are still many issues associated with Title 24 that must be shown on the plans. Below is a partial list of them. Please review Title 24. For the following items, please provide a clear, itemized response for each one (do not respond by saying, "See Plans," or, "In Specifications"): INSIDE THE UNITS INTERIOR PATHS OF TRAVEL All interior doors shall have a level area on the swing side of the door that extends 18" past the strike edge of the door. DIMENSION THIS FOR THE ENTRY DOOR OF UNIT B, AND ELSEWHERE. Interior passage doors shall have landings on each side not less than 44" in depth. QUITE A FEW DOORS DON'T COMPLY. Interior passage doors shall have hardware centered between 30" and 44" above the floor, and be openable with a single effort by lever type hardware. Carlsbad 96-1141 VI November 21, 1996 KITCHENS Base cabinets directly under the kitchen sink counter area, including toe board and shelving shall be removable without special knowledge or tools. Finish flooring shall be provided on the floor beneath the counter top. IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THE REMOVABLE CABINETS AT DETAIL 23/A9.6 COMPLIES WITH THE ABOVE. Kitchen sink faucet controls and operating mechanisms shall be operable with one hand and shall not require tight grasping, pinching, or twisting of the wrist. BATHROOMS The following provisions must be complied with if the "All Bathrooms Option" is used: Bathroom entrance doorways shall have an 18 inch clear space to the side of the strike edge of the door on the swing side of the door. Sufficient maneuvering space must be provided for a peroon using a wheelchair to enter and close the door, use the fixture, reopen the door and exit. Where the door swings into the bathroom, there must bo a clear space 30 inch x 48 inch within the room to position a wheelchair clear of the path of the door as it is closed. There shall be a minimum clear space 48-inches parallel by 30-inches perpendicular to the side of a bathtub or bathtub-shower combination measured from the foot of the bathtub (where the controls are located) which may include maneuverable area under the lavatory. If a shower is the only bathing facility provided, the stall must measure at least 42 inches wide by 48 inches deep with an entrance opening of at least 36 inches. When a threshold is used, it shall be a maximum of 1/2 inch in height and have a beveled or sloped angle not exceeding 45 percent from the horizontal. Maximum slope of the shower floor must be 1/2 inch per foot in any direction and shall slope toward the rear to a drain located within 6 inches of the rear wall. The floor must be of Carborundum or grit-faced tile or of material providing equivalent slip resistance. The water closet shall be located in a space 36 inches in width with 48 inches of clear space in front or 48 inches in clear width with 36 inches of clear space in front. This space may include maneuverable space under a lavatory, arranged so as not to impede access. Water closet seats must be at least 15 inches above the floor. Carlsbad 96-1141 VI November 21, 1996 Water closet controls shall be operable with one hand and shall not require tight grasping, pinching or twisting on the wrist. The force required to activate controls shall be no greater than 5 Ibs. Lavatory faucet controls and operating mechanisms shall be operable with one hand and shall not require tight grasping, pinching or twisting of the wrist. The force required to activate controls shall be no greater than 5 Ibs. Lever-operated, push type and electronically controlled mechanisms are examples of acceptable design. Self-closing valves are allowed if the faucet remains open for at least 10 seconds. Controls to the flush valves shall be mounted on the wide side of toilet areas no more than 44 inches above the floor. Walls must be reinforced to support grab bars. Where mirrors and towel fixtures are provided, at least one of each shall be accessible. Only one bathroom needs to be accessible, provided that it complies with the above requirements and the following additional provisions and all other bathrooms and powder rooms within the unit are on an accessible route with usable entry doors: When both tub and shower fixtures are provided, at least one shall be made accessible. When two or more lavatories in a bathroom are provided, at least one shall be made accessible. Toilets shall be located in a manner that permit a grab bar to be installed on one side of the fixture. In locations where toilets are adjacent to walls or bathtubs, the center line of the fixture must be a minimum of 1'6" from the obstacle. The other (non-grab bar) side of the toilet fixture must be a minimum of 1 '6" from the finished surface of adjoining walls, vanities or from the edge of a lavatory. Vanities and lavatories shall be installed with the centerline of the fixture a minimum of 1 '6" horizontally from an adjoining wall or fixture. The top of the fixture rim shall be a maximum of 2'10" above the finished floor. If knee space is provided below the vanity, the bottom of the apron must be at least 2'5" above the floor. If provided, full knee space shall be at least 1V deep. Hot water and drain pipes under lavatories shall be insulated or otherwise covered. There shall be no sharp or abrasive surfaces under lavatories. Cabinets under lavatories are acceptable provided the bathroom has space to allow a parallel approach by a person in a wheelchair. If parallel approach is not possible, any cabinets would have to be removable to afford the necessary knee clearance for forward approach. Carlsbad 96-1141 VI November 21, 1996 SWITCHES. ELECTRICAL OUTLETS AND CONTROLS The center of the grip of the operating handle of switches used to control light switches, thermostats, and other environmental controls shall be located no higher than 48 inches and no lower than 15 inches above the floor. If the reach is over an obstruction (for example, a kitchen base cabinet) between 20 and 25 inches in depth, the maximum height is reduced to 44 inches for forward approach, or 46 inches for side approach provided the obstruction is no more than 24 inches in depth. Obstruction may not extend more than 25 inches from the wall beneath a control. The center of 30 amperes or less electrical outlets must be installed no higher than 48 inches and no lower than 15 above the floor. If the reach is over an obstruction, comply with the same requirements specified above. The center of fire alarm initiating devices shall be located 48 inches above the level of the floor, working platform, ground surface, or sidewalk. 77. The disabled parking STILL does not comply: The parking stalls are located such that persons would have to pass behind parked cars of other persons. THIS IS PROHIBITED. See A2.1.7, A2.1.10, etc. The loading/unloading zones are still on the wrong side on sheet A2.1.8. 81. Esgil Corporation will verify that the City has resolved this item. If you have any questions, please contact Kurt Culver of Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. EsGil Corporation ^Professional'tPfkn %eviewf 'Engineers DATE: November 6, 1996 a APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Q PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 SET: IV PROJECT ADDRESS: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad By The Sea The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ********** codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. X] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: faxed to The Steinberg Group (408) 295-5928 X Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone*: X REMARKS: Building 1 only. By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation GA CM EJ PC 10/30796 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 4 (619) 560-1468 4 Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 96-1141 IV November 6, 1996 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 10/30/96 REVIEWED BY: Kurt Culver PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 SET: IV DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: November 6, 1996 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? UYes QNo Carlsbad 96-1141 IV November 6, 1996 4. All sheets of the plans must be properly signed. 16. (e) No response was received for this correction (item "e") from the previous list. 19. In the original list, the question was raised whether dropped ceilings in the units were below the fire-rated membrane (correction 27). The response indicated that the dropped ceiling framing was within the fire-rated membrane, and thus fire- retardant treated lumber was not required. Now the response to correction 19 states that the dropped ceilings are NOT rated. As such, fire-retardant treated lumber must be used for them. Provide detailing on the plans. Once this correction is resolved, the issue of fire dampers will be reviewed. 29 (c) Storage is still shown on sheet A2.1.10. 35. A. The response to this correction referred to sheets A3.6 and A3.7. Why?? The previous list requested information as to where the special window call outs are shown. Please review the acoustical analysis and provide a clearer response. B. No response was received for this correction (item "B") from the previous list. 38. A. Esgil Corporation will verify with the City that the elevator will be allowed in the exit passageway. 56. Window H3 was NOT revised. 62. Unit P was not revised. 64. (c) Show that window H9 (at Room 153) has tempered glass. 74. Submit the program to the building official. 76. AU of the units must be made to comply (not a percentage). This will require larger kitchens, bathrooms, etc. 77. From the referenced list: Carlsbad 96-1141 IV November 6, 1996 3. The plans are still wrong (sheet A2.1.8). Also, the arrangement of the parking stalls now is such that wheelchair persons will have to go behind others' parked cars. This is prohibited. 7. Please indicate the specific sheets/details that show the requested information. Additionally, sheet L2.12 still isn't included. 81. Obtain City approval. 90. (a) No additional information was submitted to clarify the requested hardware. 100. The 24" o.c. framing is still shown on sheet SA2.1.10, etc. 104. No responses to any of the outstanding plumbing/mechanical/energy corrections were received! They all remain outstanding. If you have any questions, please contact Kurt Culver of Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. EsGil Corporation TrofessionaC fCan H^evievf 'Engineers DATE: October 29, 1996 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 FDN SET: IV PROJECT ADDRESS: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad by the Sea ( Foundation-Only Permit The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes. X] The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. -.-£The check list transmitted herewith IS for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: il Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: X] REMARKS: The enclosed "Request for Building Permit for Partial Building Construction" form should be completed, signed and returned to Esgil Corporation. These plans are for the foundations only of this building. By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA n CM n EJ Q PC 10/25/96 trnsmti.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 4 (619)560-1468 4 Fax (619) 560-1576 REQUEST FOR BUILDING PERMIT FOR PARTIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION To: Building Official, jurisdiction of: Pursuant to the provisions of the 1994 edition of the Uniform Building Code, Section 106.4.1, the undersigned requests that a building permit be issued for: ^^{{l " for the proposea building to be located at: and identified as Plan Review Number: C.£> *l£- I (Hi Acknowledgment is made that plans for the entire structure are not complete and/or that the plan review has not been completed. We recognize that proceeding with partial construction at this time is entirely at our own risk, with no assurance that the permit for the entire building or structure will be granted. We further absolve the jurisdiction of: and Esgil Corporation, and officers and employees thereof, of all responsibility for the issuance of a partial permit and further agree that any work performed under this permit will be removed or otherwise corrected to be in accord with the requirements of the final approved plans when a permit for the entire building or structure is granted. It is agreed that neither the jurisdiction of: C . nor Esgil Corporation, and officers and employees thereof, will be liable for expenses incurred as a result of removal or correction of work which may be necessary to comply with the final approved plans. Signature: Date: Owner Date: Engineer/Architect Date: Contractor f:\pending\parpermt.doc 12/28/95 EsGil Corporation Professional '£fan y^eviev^ Engineers DATE: October 9, 1996 a AgEUgANT ;ar"jylis> a FIRE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 SET: HI PROJECT ADDRESS: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad By The Sea The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ********** codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: faxed to the Steinberg Group (408) 295-5928 X Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: V REMARKS: Building 1 only. By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation GA CM EJ PC 9/30/96 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 4 (619)560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 96-1141 October 9, 1996 III RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 9/30/96 REVIEWED BY: Kurt Culver PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 SET: III DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: October 9, 1996 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? QYes QNo Carlsbad 96-1141 III October 9, 1996 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (619) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 4. All sheets of the plans must be properly signed. 9. B. Detail 14/A8.2 (as stated in response to this correction) is not on the plans. 10. The following are examples of the clarification necessary on the plans in the vicinity of the area separation wall terminations: A. On sheet A2.1.18, a portion of the roof is too close to the termination of the area separation wall. Additional fire protection must be shown. This seems to be indicated on sheet A0.4, but the actual fire protection isn't shown on sheet A2.1.18. B. Sheet A0.4 calls for 3/4-hr, protection at the ends of the area separation walls, but this isn't shown on sheet A2.1.15 (Line 16). C. On sheet A2.1.17, the deck of Unit B is close to the area separation wall. Please submit the justification to show that the window of Unit J (sheet A2.1.16) need not be fire protected. D. On sheet A2.1.16, the fire rated doors in proximity to the area separation walls should be 3/4-hr rated (not 20 minute rated). Please revise. Additionally, check the door "type." E. A few of the above items also apply at the second level. F. Doors 257/258 are shown on sheet A2.1.12. Show their fire rating in the door schedule. G. Based on the framing condition shown on sheet SA2.1.8, additional fire protection is required in that vicinity where shown on sheet A2.1.14. H. Show additional fire protection in the vicinity of the balcony of Unit B on sheet A2.1.11. I. See elsewhere. Carlsbad 96-1141 III October 9, 1996 16. (b) Regarding the NER report: Specify which "assembly" was chosen. It appears that Assembly E6 is used. It requires a special brand of insulation to be shown. If the UL assembly is used instead: 1. It requires 3/4" floor plywood (not 5/8" as shown). 2. The resilient channels must be larger. 3. The UL assembly requires a special arrangement for the insulation. This must be shown. (c) For the UL excerpt shown on the plans, please cross out the "systems" that do not apply. (e) Provide the basis of approval for the wood trusses shown on the plans. 19. Please clarify which sheets show the required fire dampers. Additionally: The mechanical response to this correction stated that the furred ceilings were non- rated; the architectural response to correction 27 from the original list stated that the dropped ceilings were fire rated. Who is wrong? 29. (c) Storage areas are prohibited. No ICBO interpretation to the contrary was provided. 31. The overall area of the dining, etc. exceeds 4500 sq. ft., so that room is an A-2.1 occupancy. The original correction remains. 34. The response to this correction referred to sheet A9.4. There are no details there showing how sound ratings are maintained at penetrations. 35. A. Where do the plans call for the special types of windows indicated in the acoustical analysis? B. Specify which sheets of the plans show mechanical ventilation which can provide outside air to the occupants in the critical rooms. 38. A. (i) Elevators are prohibited in exit passageways. (ii) Door 233A was added on the floor plan, but it is not in the door schedule. B. Panic hardware is not shown where requested. 42. Hardware 6 is not panic hardware. There are many doors that do not show panic hardware where required. See correction 79 from the original list! 47 (a) Obtain City approval. (b) The radius shown is an oblong radius. The actual radius from the convergence point of the radii shown is closer to 6 feet, which doesn't comply with the Code. 48. A complying landing must be shown on each side of each gate. Carlsbad 96-1141 III October 9, 1996 55. Room 102 was not revised. See 155B, etc., etc. Some revised/added doors have their hardware specified as "?". Please revise this. 56. "Fire rated" is insufficient to designate the windows. Show that they are 3/4-hour fire resistive assemblies. Also, see Window H3 at Room 108. See correction 79 from the original list. 62. At Units K, P, etc., the floor plans seem to show bi-fold doors that may block the light/ventilation. This is prohibited. 63. Mechanical ventilation is required in the laundry of Unit P, even if louvered doors are installed. 64 (c) See Window V2, etc. Additionally, what is the window between Rooms 153 and 149? 73. Please make the changes on the plans requested in the 10/1/96 letter. 74. Submit the "program" to the building official. 76. For apartments, all units must comply. This requires larger kitchens, larger bathrooms, removable cabinets, adjustable counter tops, etc. The designer should contact the plan checker to discuss this. 77. From the referenced list: 3. The plans are still wrong. 7. Sheet L2.12, as stated in the response to this correction, wasn't included. Additionally, the landscape drawings say to look at the architectural plans for such things as rails size/height, etc. A specific detail should be referenced. 81. Obtain City approval. 90. (a) Provide additional information for the hardware specified, to show that the doors will be openable from the inside without the use of a key, special knowledge or effort. Additionally, clarify the hardware for door 115. 91. The response to this correction stated, "Door type TT is not used at fire door location." What about Door 214A, etc., etc.?? Carlsbad 96-1141 III October 9, 1996 100. The UL assembly referenced in response to this correction is for TrusJoist product only (not for 2x framing). Per UBC Table 7-C, two layers of drywall will be required unless the framing is changed to 16" o.c. 104. See below for outstanding PME corrections. If you have any questions, please contact Kurt Culver of Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. • PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS 4 PLAN REVIEWER: GlenAdamek 1. The City of Carlsbad Building Official to review evidence of Health Department approval. • PLUMBING (1994 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 2. Correct the water line calculations for the 4 inch water line. Water lines are undersized. Please review. UPC Section 610.0 A. As per UPC, Section A6.1 The maximum velocity within in the piping is 10 feet per second. Please correct. B. As per UPC, Standard IS 3, Section 610.0 the maximum design velocity should be between 5 to 8 feet per second. Please correct. 4. The 1-1/4 inch gas line from the gas meter to the first branch of the system is undersized for total 7,240 CFH gas demand and the 500 foot developed length from the gas meter to the most distant gas fixture. Not the closest fixture, as used. Please correct. 14. Detail 1 on sheet A9.2 is not a fire rated enclosure around the combustion air ducts. Please correct details of the fire rated enclosures around the combustion air ducts as per the notes on sheets M2.1.3, M2.1.5, M2.1.8, and M2.1.12. Please correct to show how combustion air is routed to water heater rooms without passing through construction requiring fire dampers. Water heater rooms must be separated from the rest of the building with a one hour fire separation as per UBC, Section 302.5. Carlsbad 96-1141 III October 9, 1996 • MECHANICAL (1994 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 19. Correct the laundry ventilation. A. For Unit N and Unit Q1 the louvered doors are not shown to provide a minimum of 100 square inches of ventilation opening into closet containing a clothes dryer (at the washer/dryer units within dwelling units). UMC, Section 908.2 B. The plans show a new Residential Laundry Room # 104. 1. Show how combustion air is routed to new Residential Laundry Room #104 without passing through construction requiring fire dampers. 2. Show the fire dampers for the supply air, exhaust fan, and dryer vent openings. 20. Correct the dryer exhaust venting. A. For the dryers within each dwelling unit, provide dryer vent to outside. The maximum length is 14 feet with two 90-degree elbows. UMC, Section 504.3.2. Please correct. B. For the dryers in Laundry Room # 137F and new Residential Laundry Room # 104, provide the manufacturers installation data for combining the dryer exhaust ducts into a common duct system. UMC, Section 504.4. 22. Show all the required fire dampers at duct openings in fire rated ceiling membranes. See Item #16 of the list by Kurt Culver, Correct details 3, & 8 on sheet M3.1.2 to show the required fire damper. Also, at upper must spaces with exhaust ducts up through the roof, show the required fire dampers or fire rated shafts. 24. Provide complete kitchen hood plans, details, and calculations to show compliance with UMC, Chapter 5, Part II A. The exhaust fan sizing calculations for kitchen hoods # 42 section 1, and # 87 are undersized. As per the Gaylord Master Engineering Data Sheet's, 'For ventilators covering a variety of equipment always use the highest CFM/Lin. Ft. to determine the total CFM.1 Not the CFM/Lin. Ft. for each of the variety of equipment for the length of each of the variety of equipment. Please correct. UMC, Section 508.7 B. Provide construction details of required fire rated grease duct enclosure and hood enclosure. UMC, Sections 507.6, and 508.4.1 The Detail 21 on sheet A9.3 does not show the kitchen hoods. C. Show electrical interlocking switch for EF-3, EF-4, AH-3, CVB-27, and CVB-28. EF-3 is 11,000 CFM, EF-4 is 600 CFM, for a total of 11,600 CFM. AH-3 is rated at only 8,800 CFM. Please correct. Each room Carlsbad 96-1141 III October 9, 1996 provided with a kitchen exhaust system shall have air supplied to the room equal to the amount of air to be exhausted. The exhaust and make- up air systems shall be connected by an electrical interlocking switch. UMC, Section 402.4 D. The fire-rated grease duct and/or hood enclosures must extend from the point of penetration of the ceiling up to the roofing. The ceiling or hood enclosure must be over the hood. UMC, Sections 507.6, 508.4, and 508.4.1 The Detail 21 on sheet A9.3 does not show the ceilings and kitchen hoods. E. The fire-rated grease duct enclosures must be sealed around the duct at the point of penetration of the ceiling. UMC, Section 507.6 The Detail 21 on sheet A9.3 does not show the ceilings and kitchen hoods. F. A complete kitchen hood system plan review will be done when complete hood system plans, details, and calculations are provided. NEW The plans now show Heat-N-Glo gas fired decorative fireplaces. The mechanical plans do not show the units and venting systems. On the mechanical plans detail the direct-vent system for the corner unit and the B vent from the other units. Detail the flue (vent) termination's as per UMC, Section 806. Minimum 8 feet from the wall or above the wall. No response. • ENERGY CONSERVATION 25. Correct the occupancies used in the COMPLY 24 energy design. The High-Rise Residential occupancy must be used only for the dwelling units. Not for the Corridors, and non-residential areas. Please correct. 26. Do not include the I- occupancy areas in the lighting energy design (LTG- forms). No Section 2.1.2 of Title 24, Part 6 as noted on sheet E1.2? 27. Provide the installed lighting calculations on the LTG-2 forms. No Section 2.1.2 of Title 24, Part 6 as noted on sheet E1.2? 28. Correct the allowed lighting power level for corridors, restrooms, and support areas. Only 0.8 watts per square foot are allowed, not 1.8. No Section 2.1.2 of Title 24, Part 6 as noted on sheet E1.2? 29. Complete energy plan check will be done when complete, corrected energy designs are provided. Note: If you have any questions regarding this plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. EsGil Corporation Professional'ffan Review 'Engineers DATE: September 13, 1996 a APPLICANT a FIRE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad ^TT^LAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad By The Sea The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ********** codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. IX] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: faxed to the Steinberg Group (408) 295-5928 X Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: X REMARKS: Building 1 only. By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation GA D CM n EJ ID Gp D PC 9/3/96 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619) 560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 96-1141 II September 13, 1996 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 9/3/96 REVIEWED BY: Kurt Culver PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: September 13, 1996 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? QYes QNo Carlsbad 96-1141 II September 13, 1996 4. All sheets of the plans must be properly signed. 6. On sheet A0.4, correct the occupancy classification shown at the 4th level for "Bldg.2." 8. Add the note shown in quotes from the original list to sheet AO.IAof the plans. 9. A. Even with the area separation wall, the occupants in the corridor serving the "R" occupancy portion (sheet A2.1.10) must still have an occupancy separation between the garage and the corridor. Please show an appropriate fire rating on the plans. B. Provide a detail similar to 12/A9.1, showing how the area separation wall terminates at the roof. C. On sheet A7.1.11, please clarify why the double layer of drywall is only shown in certain areas. 10. The horizontal extent of the area separation walls in unclear. This has an effect on rated walls/openings in the vicinity of the horizontal termination. The plans must be made much clearer in this regard. 16. (b) Please provide an excerpt from the NER report, with the specific listed assembly underlined. (c) Please place an excerpt from the UL listing directly on the detail. (d) Specify the manufacturer's name and ICBO number. Additionally, specify on the plans the need for special inspection. 19. No response was received for this correction. 29. (b) See door 163 on sheet A2.1.9 along Line 16. Also, please review comment 79 from the original list! (c) Per ICBO interpretation, storage areas should not be shown in the S-3 occupancy. 31. On sheet A2.1.12, the amount of B occupancy seems to require an occupancy separation between it and the A2.1 occupancy. 33. Per the NER report, the assembly shown at detail 15/A9.1 has an IIC rating of only 45! Carlsbad 96-1141 II September 13, 1996 34. Show details on the plans, showing how penetrations of SOUND assemblies will be sealed with an acoustical treatment. 35. The note on the plans is unclear. Is the project in a noise critical area or not?? If so, provide an acoustical report. 36. Show the maximum travel distances for the various areas on the exit plans. 38. A. Corridor 233 must be constructed as an exit passageway (since it serves as an exit from the courtyard). As such, the openings into it are very limited and require a higher fire rating. Please revise the plans. B. Show panic hardware on the doors serving along the exit from the courtyard. 42. Some doors on the plans don't show panic hardware. See door 100A, etc., etc. Please read comment 79 from the original list. 43. Please see door 141. etc. Please read comment 79 from the original list. 47. (a) Since firefighters must use the stair to access the roof, please justify the winders shown. (b) The inner radius of the circular stair must be twice the width of the stair. Please revise the plans. 48. Sheets A2.1.32, etc. were not corrected. 49. See sheet A2.1.33. Please read comment 79 from the original list. 50. (c) Where do the plans specify the special requirements for the doors? 55. See Room 146. See Room 102. Please read comment 79 from the original list. It is up to the designer to correct the many deficiencies. It is NOT the plan checker's responsibility to point out every single one of them! 56. Where do the plans show a %-hr. fire rating? Also, some of the windows on the plans don't have a call out, so they cannot be referenced in the window schedule. Carlsbad 96-1141 II September 13, 1996 58. See Corridor 233 on sheet A2.2.12. See Corridor 146 (measured to Line 9) on sheet A2.1.19. Please read comment 79 from the original list. It is up to the designer to correct the many deficiencies. It is NOT the plan checker's responsibility to point out every single one of them! 60. Show exit signs in the garage, meeting rooms, courtyard, at door 141, etc. Please read comment 79 from the original list. 61. Provide a DIMENSIONED elevation of the exterior portion of the deck at Studio V, etc., showing that the longer wall is 65% open. 62. The kitchens at Units K, P, etc. don't appear to be open enough. Provide a dimensioned interior elevation, showing cased openings that satisfy the Code. 63. See Unit P. 64. (c) Show in the window schedule which windows will have tempered glazing. 73. The letter was not submitted. 74. Submit the "program" to the building official. 76. The designer must submit a clearer response to this correction. Please cite the applicable State law sections (give excerpts) that support the design approach. Also, show which provisions apply to the kitchens/restrooms of the units. Additional corrections will follow at that time. 77. From the referenced list: 3. The plans still show the loading/unloading zones on the wrong side. 7. Please give the exact sheet numbers that show ramp information (such as slopes, handrail call outs, etc.). 12. Revise 2/A9.4. 13. Revise Room 103. Carlsbad 96-1141 II September 13, 1996 81. Obtain City approval. 82. Please provide a note on sheet A2.1.9 of the plans at Room 139, indicating if hazardous materials will be present. 83. On sheet A2.1.22, why is detail 13/A8.1 referenced at the area separation wall?? This is only one example of the many incorrect references shown on the plans. 90. (a) Please provide a clearer response to this correction. Additionally, justify that Door 115 complies with the required hardware provisions from the Code. 91. See door type "TT." 99. Where do the plans show a larger size for the interior headers? 100. The framing plans still show 24" o.c. for the framing members. Please revise this. 102. Provide a copy of the L.A. City approval. Doesn't that approval apply on a one- time-only basis? 104. See below for the outstanding PME corrections. If you have any questions, please contact Kurt Culver of Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. + PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS * PLAN REVIEWER: Glen Adamek 1. Provide evidence of Health Department approval. • PLUMBING (1994 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 2. Provide calculations for the total water demands (fixture units). Water lines are undersized. Please review. UPC Section 610.0 A. Sheet P4.1.6 shows total 2,860 fixture units, and only 18 fixture units to laundry with two washing machines and one laundry tube (24 fixture units as per UPC, Table A-2). Carlsbad 96-1141 II September 13, 1996 B. Sheet P4.1.6 shows 2,860 fixture units water demand on the 4 inch water line. The Pipe Sizing Chart on sheet PO.1.2 shows 2,480 fixtures can be on a 4 inch water line. Please correct. C. Many of the water lines shown on sheet P4.1.6 are undersized as per Pipe Sizing Chart on sheet PO.1.2. 3. On the plumbing plans at the water connection to carbonator show the required listed reduced pressure principle backflow preventer as per UPC, Section 603.3.12. Also, the cut sheet provided for the RP valve does not show the valve is approved for required protection for connection to carbonators. 4. The 1-1/4 inch gas line from the gas meter to the first branch of the system is undersized for total 7,240 CFH gas demand and the 500 foot developed length from the gas meter to the most distant gas fixture. Please correct. 5. Correct the drain, waste and vent plans to comply with UPC, Section 710.1. Fixtures with flood rim levels above the elevation of the next upstream manhole cover of the public sewer serving the fixtures shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Clearly show on the plans the elevations of the next upstream manhole cover of the public sewer serving each building sewer line and the elevations of flood rim levels of fixtures. 6. Provide the clothes washer manufactures sizing data for the trench drain size for receiving the waste of the four clothes washers. 8. Provide sizing of the floor sink basin for pool equipment back wash, or show a 4 inch standpipe for back wash drainage. 9. Provide data on the Heat. Cable Circuits on the hot water piping. This looks like an electric water heater. This may not be allowed in the energy design. Please review and provide data from the CEC to show compliance for use of the Electric Heat Cable on the hot water recalculation lines. 10. Please correct the total waste fixture units, on the plumbing plans, for the increased fixture units for washers in groups of three or more are rated at six fixture units each. Many of the fixture units do not total correctly. On sheet P4.1.3 the incorrect line was upsized. UPC, Table 7-3 footnote. 14. Provide details of the fire rated enclosures around the combustion's air ducts as per the notes on sheets M2.1.3, M2.1.5, M2.1.8, and M2.1.12. Correct sheet M2.1.5 showing the combustion air duct for both water heater rooms opening into required fire rated corridors. Please correct to show how combustion air is routed to water heater rooms without passing through construction requiring fire dampers. Water heater rooms must be separated from the rest of the building with a one hour fire separation as per UBC, Section 302.5. Carlsbad 96-1141 II September 13, 1996 15. Detail shower drain 48 inches minimum from threshold at entry into the shower stall for wheel chair access. UPC Section 410.3 16. The City Engineer to review draining rainwater drainage from deck to sump pump system in the basement garage. • MECHANICAL (1994 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 19. Provide a minimum of 100 square inches of ventilation opening into closet containing a clothes dryer (at the washer/dryer units within dwelling units). UMC, Section 908.2 Also correct the plans for the Res. Laundry # 119 to show how the required fire rated separation is maintained. Correct the Combustion Air Openings and show the fire dampers for the supply air, exhaust fan, and dryer vent openings. 20. Show dryer exhaust duct cleanouts for 5 inch dryer ducts or dryer ducts with more than two 90-degree elbows. UMC, Section 609.4 Provide the manufacturers data on the dryers in both laundry rooms for the requirements for the venting systems. The dryer's make and model numbers are not shown on the plans. (As per UMC, Section 504.3.2 the maximum length for dryer vent to outside is 14 feet, with two 90-degree elbows.) 21. Apply in writing to the City of Carlsbad Building Official, for approval for the use of the alternate ventilation system design (14,000 CFM for each operating vehicle) as per UBC Section 1202.2.7 22. Show al the required fire dampers at duct openings in fire rated ceiling membranes. Correct detail 3 on sheet M3.1.2 to show the required fire damper. Also, at upper must spaces with exhaust ducts up through the roof, show the required fire dampers or fire rated shafts. 23. Please correct the bathroom exhaust fans and dryer vents discharge locations. Environmental air duct exhaust must be 3 feet minimum from openings into the building. UMC, Section 609.10. plans show discharge within 3 feet of openable doors and windows. 24. Provide complete kitchen hood plans, details, and calculations to show compliance with UMC, Chapter 5, Part II A. Provide exhaust sizing calculations for each kitchen hood. UMC, Section 508.7 B. Show required cleanouts for grease duct on hood. UMC, Section 507.5 C. Detail grease duct discharge clearances as per UMC, Section 507.11, (Minimum of 10 feet from parapet wall and air intake of HVAC unit.) Carlsbad 96-1141 II September 13, 1996 D. Provide construction details of required fire rated grease duct enclosure and hood enclosure. UMC, Sections 507.6, and 508.4.1 E. EF-3 is 11,000 CFM, EF-4 is 600 CFM, for a total of 11,600 CFM. AH-3 is rated at only 8,800 CFM. Please correct. Each room provided with a kitchen exhaust system shall have air supplied to the room equal to the amount of air to be exhausted. The exhaust and make-up air systems shall be connected by an electrical interlocking switch. UMC, Section 402.4 F. The fire-rated grease duct and/or hood enclosures must extend from the point of penetration of the ceiling up to the roofing. The ceiling or hood enclosure must be over the hood. UMC, Sections 507.6, 508.4, and 508.4.1 G. The fire-rated grease duct enclosures must be sealed around the duct at the point of penetration of the ceiling. UMC, Section 507.6 H. A complete kitchen hood system plan review will be done when complete hood system plans, details, and calculations are provided. NEW The plans now show Heat-N-Glo gas fired decorative fireplaces. The mechanical plans do not show the units and venting systems. On the mechanical plans detail the direct-vent system for the corner unit and the B vent from the other units. Detail the flue (vent) termination's as per UMC, Section 806. Minimum 8 feet from the wall or above the wall. • ENERGY CONSERVATION 25. The water heater design calculations are not included in the energy design calculations. Please provide. See Item # 9 in the Plumbing List above. Also, provide data for use of the heating and cooling indoor design temperatures of 38 degrees F and 83 degrees F used in the energy design, See part 3 of 3 of PERF-1 form. 26. Do not include the I- occupancy areas in the lighting energy design (LTG- forms). No sheet E1.2 in the plan packages. 27. Provide the installed lighting calculations on the LTG-2 forms. No sheet E1.2 in the plan packages. 28. Correct the allowed lighting power level for corridors, restrooms, and support areas. Only 0.8 watts per square foot are allowed, not 1.8. No sheet E1.2 in the plan packages. 29. Complete energy plan check will be done when complete corrected energy designs are provided. Carlsbad 96-1141 II September 13, 1996 30. On the plans clearly show the wall and roof insulation locations, thickness, and R-values, as per the energy design. 31. Provide a note on the plans stating "All new glazing (fenestration products) will be installed with a certifying label attached, showing the U-value." 32. Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in kitchen(s) and bathrooms. Please correct. No sheet E1.2 in the plan packages. 33. Show the daylit areas and required daylit area lighting controls for lighting in daylit areas. Title 24, Part 6, Section 131(c). No sheet E1.2 in the plan packages. 35. The completed and signed Certificate of Compliance forms, (PERF-1, ENV-1, LTG-1, and MECH-1) must be imprinted on the plans. Note: If you have any questions regarding this plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. EsGil Corporation Professional yCan 'Re-view 'Engineers DATE: July 16, 1996 a APPLICANT a FIRE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad O~PtANREVlEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 SET; I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad By The Sea The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes. | | The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ********** codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. | | The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. | | The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. [X] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: The Steinberg Group 60 Pierce Ave. San Jose 95110 Attn: Jacob Sofer Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed, | | Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: ^ REMARKS: Building 1 only. By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation |3 GA D CM [x] EJ n GP D PC 6/24/96 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619)560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST MULTI-FAMILY PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad OCCUPANCY: R2/I1.1/B/A2.1/S3 USE: Care Facility/Parking TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: II&V-lhr./I-F.R. ACTUAL AREA: 278,710 ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: to be STORIES: 3 + B determined HEIGHT: ~4O' SPRINKLERS?: Yes OCCUPANT LOAD: to be determ. REMARKS: 11.1 to be reviewed by OSHPD. DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 6/21/96 ESGIL CORPORATION: 6/24/96 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER: Kurt Culver COMPLETED: July 16, 1996 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with Title 24 and the following model codes: 1994 UBC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UPC (effectivel2/28/95), 1994 UMC (effective 2/23/96) and 1993 NEC (effective 12/28/95). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 16, R-1 GENERAL WITHOUT ENERGY OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC ) Mforw.dot Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 • PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, (619) 560-1468. 2. Provide a sheet index. 3. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with Title 24 and the 1994 UBC, UMC and UPC and the 1993 NEC. 4. All sheets of the plans and the first sheet of the calculations are required to be signed and sealed by the licensed architect or engineer responsible for their preparation. 5. Show on the Title Sheet all buildings, structures, pools, walls, etc. included under this application. Any portion of the project shown on the site plan that is not included with the building permit application filed should be clearly identified as "not included" on the site plan or Title Sheet. 6. Provide a Building Code Data Legend on the Title Sheet. Include the following code information for each building proposed: * Occupancy Groups 4 Description of Uses (including the level of care to be provided) 4 Types of Construction i Sprinklers: Yes or No * Stories * Height * Floor Area (with break down per area) * Occupant Load (per area and total) 4 Justification to exceed allowable area in Table 5-B. 4 Justification to exceed allowable height or stories in Table 5-B. 7. Specify on the Title Sheet of the plans the gross floor area of each element of this project, including dwelling, garage, carport, patio, deck and balcony. Section 106.3.3. 8. On the cover sheet of the plans, add to the list of deferred approvals any structural elements. Additionally, provide the following note on the plans, per Sec. 106.3.4.2: "Submittal documents for deferred submittal items shall be submitted to the architect or engineer of record, who shall review them and Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 forward them to the building official with a notation indicating that the deferred submittal documents have been reviewed and that they have been found to be in general conformance with the design of the building. The deferred submittal items shall NOT be installed until their design and submittal documents have been approved by the building official." • AREA SEPARATION WALLS 9. Per previous discussions, area separation walls will be used for this project. The plans don't identify them at all. Please show the location of the area separation walls, and show proper terminations. Additionally, show all detailing associated with area separation walls. Further corrections will follow at that time. 10. If area separation walls do not extend to the outer edge of horizontal projections, (balconies, roof overhangs, canopies, marquees and architectural projections), and the projecting elements contain concealed spaces, the wall shall extend through the concealed spaces to the outer edge of the projecting elements, the exterior walls, and projecting elements above (whether they contain concealed spaces or not) must be of one-hour construction on each side of the area separation wall for a distance equal to the depth of the projecting elements. Walls supporting the exterior walls must be one-hour. Openings in the one-hour walls must be protected with three-fourths-hour assemblies. Section 504.6.3. 11. Two-hour area separation walls may terminate at the roof sheathing, provided: i) Openings in the roof shall not be located within 5 feet of the area separation wall. • BUILDING HEIGHT/STORIES 12. Clearly show the maximum building height based on the definition in Section 209. 13. Clearly show if the lower levels are basements or stories, based on the definitions in Section 203 and 220. 14. Plot the finish grade (adjacent ground level) on the elevations and dimension the distance to the floor above for story determination. See definition of grade, Section 208. • FIRE-RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION 15. Clearly label and identify on the plans the fire-resistive corridors, area separation walls, shafts, occupancy separation walls and floors, exit passageways, exit courts and exit enclosures, along with their hourly ratings. Section 106.3.3. Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 16. Provide details of the one-hour fire-resistive construction. Include roof/ceiling assemblies, floor/ceiling assemblies, wall assemblies, column and beam assemblies, etc. a) The plans are very lacking in cross-referencing all details necessary to show one-hour construction. Additionally, there are quite a few members that don't appear to have fire protection shown. Please thoroughly review the plans. b) The NER report referenced at 10/A9.1, etc. requires a specific type of insulation if a single layer of drywall is to be used. Either show two layers of drywall, or comply FULLY with the NER report. c) The L525 listing at 22/A9.1 contains specific requirements that should be noted on the plans. Please review. d) Show the manufacturer/ICBO #/thickness for the spray-on fireproofing. Additionally, note the need for special inspection for its installation. e) The above are only examples of the deficiencies on the plans regarding fire-resistive construction. The designer should research the subject thoroughly and revise the plans as necessary. 17. Fire-resistive exterior wall construction shall be maintained through attic areas or other areas containing concealed spaces. Section 709.3.1. a) See5/A8.5, etc., etc. 18. Detail how one-hour fire-resistive wall construction is maintained at built-in wall fixtures and behind mailboxes, fire extinguisher cabinets, electric panels exceeding 16 square inches in area, etc. Section 709.7. 19. Detail how fire-resistive wall and ceiling protection will be maintained at all duct penetrations such as at bathroom and kitchen hood fans, laundry room fans and dryer vents. Also detail recessed light fixtures. Sections 709, 710. 20. Smoke dampers shall be installed per Section 713.10 at all ducted or unducted air openings at penetrations of: a) Area or occupancy separation walls. b) The fire-resistive construction of corridors, or horizontal exit walls. c) Shaft enclosures. d) Smoke barriers. e) Elevator lobbies required by Section 3002. f) Areas of refuge. 21. Fire dampers shall be installed per Section 713.11 at all ducted or unducted air openings at penetrations of: a) Ceilings of fire-resistive floor-ceiling assemblies or roof-ceiling assemblies. b) Building exteriors required to have protected openings by Section 503. c) Area or occupancy separation walls. d) The fire-resistive construction of corridors, or horizontal exit walls. e) Shaft enclosures. Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 22. Provisions in Chapter 7 require special treatment of penetrations at fire-resistive assemblies. Provide typical details on the plans showing how the fire-resistive integrity will be maintained at the following conditions (Include the manufacturers' names and ICBO numbers (or equal) for any sealant): THROUGH-PENETRATIONS (through the entire assembly): Fire-resistive bearing walls and/or walls requiring protected openings shall have penetrations protected with through-penetration fire stops having an F-rating, T-rating or complying with UBC Standard 7-1, depending on their locations, sizes and combustibility. Fire resistive floor/ceiling assemblies shall have penetrations protected with through-penetration fire stops having and F-rating, T-rating or complying with UBC Standard 7-1, depending on their sizes, combustibility and whether the penetrations are in walls above. MEMBRANE-PENETRATIONS (through only one side of an assembly): Fire-resistive walls (whether bearing or not and whether requiring fire protected openings or not) shall have penetrations protected with membrane-penetration fire stops having an F-rating or complying with UBC Standard 7-1, depending on their size and combustibility. Limited steel electrical outlet boxes (not exceeding 16 sq. in., nor more than 100 sq. in. for any 100 sq. ft. of wall) require no protection. Fire-resistive ceilings shall have no penetrations, except for noncombustible sprinkler pipes and steel electrical outlet boxes as described above. NOTE: The plans should indicate the various fire-stop ratings required for all penetrations. 23. Clearly identify location and hourly fire-resistive rating of vertical shafts on the plans. Provide construction details showing location of fire dampers and how fire resistivity will be maintained at floors and roofs. Section 711. 24. Section 711 contains certain shaft exceptions. Please notice that these do not apply to I occupancies. As such, the designer should pay close attention to the shaft requirements coming out of the I occupancy (since they impact the non-l occupancy areas). 25. Detail column fire protection and specify column impact protection in garage areas per Section 704.2.5. As a minimum, show a 22 ga. steel jacket around each column to a height of 3 feet above the ground for impact protection. 26. Structural members such as beams supporting more than one floor or roof must be individually fire protected. (Section 704.2.6) Detail required protection. Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 27. Detail all furred ceilings as required in Section 803. Show fire-retardant treated wood where necessary. • OCCUPANCY SEPARATION 28. Storage or laundry rooms that are within Group R, Division 1 occupancies, that are used in common by tenants, shall be separated from the rest of the building by not less than one-hour fire-resistive occupancy separations. Section 310.2.2. Show one-hour doors there. 29. An S-3 occupancy in the basement or first story of a building housing a Group B, Group A, Division 3, Group M or Group R, Division 1 occupancy may be classed as a separate building. The building above may also be considered a separate and distinct building for the purpose of area limitation, limitation of number of stories and type of construction ONLY if the conditions of Section 311.2.2.1 are met: a)- S 3 is Typo I construction. b) S-3 is separated from the uses above by a three-hour occupancy separation. See door 163, etc. ! c) S-3 is restricted to passenger vehicle storage, entry lobbies and mechanical equipment rooms (no storage, recreation room, etc.). Exception: Group A, Division 3, Group B (office and drinking/dining) and Group M (retail) occupancies may be below the 3-hour separation, provided the entire area below the 3-hour separation is protected throughout by an automatic sprinkler system. d) The maximum building height does not exceed the limits in Table 5-B for the least type of construction. 30. All openings in floors forming a three-hour separation shall be protected by vertical enclosures above and below the opening. The walls of such enclosures shall be not less than two-hour fire-resistive construction, and openings therein shall be protected by a one and one-half-hour assembly. Section 302.3 (see the exception therein). 31. A 1 -hour occupancy separation is required between the A2.1 occupancy and the B occupancy. Table 3-B. See the second level. 32. The occupancy separation between the A and I occupancies requires special attention. Please detail all penetrations. • SOUND TRANSMISSION 33. Wall and floor/ceiling assemblies separating dwelling units from each other and from common space (such as corridors, laundry rooms, common garages, service areas, etc.) must have a listed rating of STC 50 and IIC 50. Show the location of Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 and provide details of the listed wall and floor/ceiling assemblies, and indicate the listing agency and listing number for the tested ratings. Justify the sound rating at 15/A9.1,etc. 34. Show how penetrations of assemblies for piping, electrical devices, recessed cabinets, bathtubs, soffits or heating, ventilating or exhaust ducts shall be sealed, lined or insulated or treated to maintain the required sound ratings. 35. The Title Sheet or Site Plan should clearly indicate if any portion of the project is in a noise critical area (CNEL contours of 60 dB) as shown on the City or County's General Plan. If no portion of the project is within a noise critical area, provide a note on the Title Sheet stating: "This project is not within a noise critical area (CNEL contour of 60 dB) as shown on the General Plan". • EXITS 36. Provide an exit analysis on the plans. Provide a reduced scale floor plan at each level, showing exiting arrows, occupant counts at various areas, travel distances, etc. A complete exit plan review will be made at that time. 37. Exits should have a minimum separation of one-half the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the building or area served. Section 1003.3. a) When Rooms 100/158 (sheet A2.1.9) are open to each other, their exits are not properly separated. b) The combination of Rooms 154/155 requires two exits. The overall diagonal includes the restrooms. As such, the exits are not properly separated. c) Review other areas. 38. In areas where the occupant load exceeds 50, two exits are required. See the courtyard area. Table 10-A. Additionally, sheet A2.1.12 will be reviewed after an exit analysis is provided. There appear to be non-complying exits shown. 39. In areas where the occupant load is at least 10, two exits are required. Table 10-A. For the larger units, it appears that two exit doors will be required. For occupant load purposes, the balconies associated with those units shall be assumed to be simultaneously occupied. 40. No point in the building shall be more than 150' (200* if sprinklered) from an exterior exit, horizontal exit, enclosed stairway or exit passageway, measured along the path of travel. This may be increased a maximum of 100' when the increased travel distance is the last portion of the travel distance and is entirely within a l-hour corridor. Section 1003.4. Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 41. Exit doors should swing in the direction of exit travel when serving any hazardous area or when the area served has an occupant load of 50 or more. Section 1004.2. See Door 141, etc. 42. Exit doors from Group A occupancies shall not be provided with a latch or lock unless it is panic hardware. Chapter 10. 43. All doors and gates, within the exit path from Group A occupancies to a public way, shall not be provided with latches or locks unless they are equipped with panic hardware. Chapter 10. 44. When additional doors are provided for egress purposes, they shall conform to the width, swing and hardware provisions in Chapter 10. Sections 1004.3 and 1004.6. 45. Double acting doors are not allowed when serving a tributary occupant load of more than 100, or when part of a fire assembly, or part of smoke and draft control assemblies or when equipped with panic hardware. Section 1004.2. 46. Walls of exit passageways shall be without openings except exits and shall have walls, floors and ceilings of the same fire-resistance required for the building, with a minimum one-hour fire-resistive construction. Exit openings in the walls shall be protected by a three-fourths hour assembly. Section 1010.4. • STAIRWAYS AND ELEVATORS 47. Winding and spiral stairways are permitted only in residential occupancies. Section 1006.4 and 1006.6. a) Justify the winders for the stair leading to the roof on sheet A2.1.31. b) Justify the winders on sheet A2.1.44. 48. Stairways from upper levels which extend below the level from which egress from the building is provided, shall have an approved barrier to preclude exiting into such lower levels. Section 1009.5. A complying landing must be shown on each side of these barriers (gates)! 49. Stairway riser must be four inches minimum and seven inches maximum and minimum run shall be eleven inches. Section 1006.3. See sheet A2.1.32 I! 50. Stairways should be enclosed as specified in Section 1009: a) Two-hour fire-resistive walls are required in buildings of Type I and ll-F.R. construction and in all buildings four or more stories in height, and one-hour elsewhere. b) Only exit doors are allowed to open into exit enclosures. Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 c) Doors should be labeled one and one-half hours or one-hour fire assemblies, and noted that the maximum transmitted temperature end point shall not exceed 450 degrees (F) above ambient at the end of 30 minutes of the fire exposure specified in UBC Standard 7-2. d) Exit enclosures should include a corridor on the ground floor extending to the exterior (see exception). Fire-resistive construction should be as required for the exit enclosure, including protected openings. Only exit doors are permitted to open into the corridor. Stair 4, etc. 51. Show or note that elevators comply with Chapter 30, UBC. 52. Provide a smoke detector at each lobby or entrance area. Section 3003.2. 53. Specify elevator shaft vents where elevators extend through more than two floor levels. Section 3004. • CORRIDORS 54. Corridors serving ten or more occupants in R-1 or thirty in other occupancies shall have walls and ceilings of one-hour construction. Section 1005.7. Clarify the corridor system on sheet A2.1.12. 55. One-hour fire-rated corridors shall have interior door openings protected by tight- fitting smoke and draft control assemblies rated 20 minutes, except openings in interior walls of exterior exit balconies. Doors shall be maintained self-closing or be automatic closing by action of a smoke detector per Section 713.2. Doors shall be gasketed to provide a smoke and draft seal where the door meets the stop on sides and top. Section 1005.8.1. Check all the corridor doors. Some are not shown as rated. 56. Total area of all openings, except doors, in any portion of an interior corridor, shall not exceed 25 percent of the area of the corridor wall of the room which it is separating from the corridor. Such openings shall be protected by fixed glazing listed and labeled for a fire-protection rating of at least 3/4-hour. Section 713.9. 57. Provide a complete architectural section of the corridor, and exterior exit balcony, showing all fire-resistive materials and details of construction for all floor, walls, roof and all penetrations. Section 1005.7. At B/A4.1.2 (for example), show SOLID blocking above the corridor walls (detail 21/A9.1 is referenced there). 58. When two exits are required, dead end corridors and exit balconies are limited to 20 feet. Section 1005.5. There are MANY cases on the plans that do not comply. Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 59. Elevators serving more than two stories shall not open into required one-hour exit corridors unless protected by an approved smoke/draft control door system. Section 1005.10. Provide the basis of approval for the system shown. • EXIT SIGNS 60. Exit signs are required whenever two exits are required. Show all required exit sign locations. Section 1013.1. See the areas identified earlier in this list. • GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS 61. Required windows shall not open into a roofed porch unless the ceiling height is at least 7 feet, the longer side is at least 65% open, and the porch abuts a street, yard or court. Section 1203.1. For the units, show how the 65% provision is satisfied. 62. At least 1/2 of the common wall must be open and have an opening not less than 25 sq. ft., nor one tenth of the floor area of the interior room, if light and ventilation is being supplied from an adjacent room. Section 1203.1. There are numerous units where the kitchens don't comply (particularly Unit K). 63. Provide mechanical ventilation capable of providing five air changes per hour in bathrooms, water closet compartments, laundry rooms and similar rooms if required openable windows are not provided. Section 1203.3. 64. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): a) Fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors other than wardrobe doors. b) Doors and enclosures for bathtubs and showers and in any portion of a building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and drain inlet. c) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 d) Individual fixed or operable panels, other than those locations described above, that meet all of the following conditions: i) Exposed area of an individual pane is greater than 9 square feet, and: ii) Exposed bottom edge is less than 18 inches above the floor, and: iii) Exposed top edge is greater than 36 inches above the floor, and: iv) One or more walking surfaces are within 36 inches horizontally of the plane of the glazing. 65. Guardrails (Section 509.1): a) Shall be installed at all unenclosed floor and roof openings. b) Shall be installed at open and glazed sides of landings and ramps. c) Shall be installed at balconies or porches more than 30" above grade or floor below. d) Shall have a height of 42". Within individual dwelling units and guest rooms, guardrails may be 36" high. This does not apply to balconies. e) Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-B. f) Openings between railings shall be less than 4". The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a guardrail at a stair shall be less than 6". 66. Show I.C.B.O. approval number for prefab fireplace. Show height of chimney above roof per I.C.B.O. approval or Table 31-B. 67. Note on the plans that approved spark arresters shall be installed on all chimneys. UBC, Section 3102.3.8. • ROOFS AND DECKS 68. Specify ICBO, UL or other recognized listing approval number for roof materials. 69. Specify ICBO, UL or other recognized listing approval number for deck surfacing materials. 70. Show deck drains and overflows. Section 1506. No overflow is shown at 24/A8.4. 71. Provide skylight details to show compliance with Chapter 24 and Section 2603.7 or provide ICBO or other recognized approval listing. Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 • FOUNDATION 72. The soils report gives two allowable soil bearing values. The calculations used the 4000 psf value. Please justify this. 73. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans, (required by the soil report). • FRAMING 74. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. 75. In seismic zones 3 or 4, if a structure is defined in Table 16-K as Occupancy Category 1, 2 or 3. note on the plans that "Structural observation by the engineer/architect shall be performed. A statement in writing shall be given to the building official, stating that the site visits have been made and whether or not any observed deficiencies have been corrected to conform to the approved plans and specifications". • TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS 76. Please clarify how it was intended that this project comply with the Title 24 disabled access provisions. Some units have no kitchens and are thus similar to hotel units. Some units have kitchens and are thus dwelling units. Two different State agencies cover these two different types of units. The designer should provide a very detailed response to this correction, explaining how compliance is shown. Additional corrections will follow. 77. Please see the general disabled access list at the end of this list. • MISCELLANEOUS 78. In California, residential care facilities for the elderly must comply with the special "R-2" occupancy provisions in Title 24. a) Per Sec. 310.2.3, show the locations of the smoke barriers. Additionally, show how the provisions of Sec. 905.2.3 are satisfied. b) Please clarify if there will be any R2.1 use on the third story. If so, see Sec. 506, Item 6. Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 79. Throughout this correction list, examples of the cited deficiencies were given. It is very important that the designers understand there are many more examples of deficiencies for a given Code issue. It is not the plan checker's responsibility to identify every single detail, every single door, etc. that needs to be corrected. When the designers respond back to each correction from this list, please specify where the corrections occurred, including those areas not identified in the example given in the correction. 80. The architectural plans are substantially incomplete. Fill in all reference bubbles, complete all notes/details, provide legends, etc., etc. A complete plan review cannot be performed until complete plans are provided. 81. Obtain City approval for the work shown to be constructed on public property. 82. Please clarify the types/quantities of hazardous materials in Room 139. 83. Why do the walls on sheet A2.1.10 refer to detail 11/A9.3? This is an example of incorrect details and sections referenced on the plans. 84. Show the maximum thickness of earth on top of the garage slab (corresponding to the thickness assumed in the structural calculations). 85. Provide the ICBO #, or equal, for sliding door 221. 86. Clarify the note on sheet A2.1.15 that refers to the Dining portion open to the 4th level. How is the occupancy separation maintained? 87. Design the framing at Room 334 for a higher live load. 88. Window J (noted on sheet A2.1.23 at "Off-Din") isn't in the window schedule. 89. Justify the louvers shown in fire rated doors, as noted in the door schedule. 90. In the door schedule, provide additional information for the following: a) "Controled Access" doors. b) "Special Fire Rated Door Assembly" doors. 91. Fire rated door 155B is shown as door type "NN" in the schedule. Justify this for the amount of glass shown for door type "NN." See also door type "TT." 92. Justify using door type "B" (a slider?) as a fire rated door. Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 93. Complete sheet A8.6, etc. 94. Justify the use of wood in the Type II portion, such as shown at 5/A8.7. 95. Provide solid blocking to complete the rated construction through the floor areas, such as at 8/A9.1, etc. 96. For 2 hr. construction, show four solid blocks in the floor system at 12/A9.1. 97. Sheet SS2.1.2 (as referenced on sheet SS2.1.1) wasn't included in the plans. 98. On sheet SA2.1.6, etc.: a) Shade all bearing walls. b) Clearly show posts/columns below all beams. 99. On sheet SA2.1.10, the normally scheduled header appears to be inadequate at the interior bearing walls (Line M", etc.). 100. The framing plans show 2x's at 24" o.c. The referenced listing for the fire assemblies given in the architectural plans requires 16" o.c. 101. The ledger connection at 10/SA7.2 appears to be inadequate. Please justify it. 102. Provide the basis of approval for the MBR tie downs (from a recognized source). 103. Regarding the structural calculations: a) The plans don't show the correct "final force" from sheet C-15 (Vol. I). b) On sheet D-3, please show where the hold down force came from. c) Where do the plans show the rebar as stated on sheet D4? d) Show on the plans the TJI 35C's from sheet F7. e) Sheet F7 calls for a 4x8 header for the 5' opening. The typical schedule on the plans shows a different size. f) Justify the Rw shown on sheet G12. g) The overturning moment on sheet H16, etc. should be computed from the BOTTOM of the footing. Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 h) In the apartment building, some of the shear walls don't stack. Please check the end condition of those shear walls to ensure the beam/header below can resist the t forces. 104. See the next sheets for plumbing/mechanical/electrical/energy corrections. 105. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. 106. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. • Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes Q No a 107. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kurt Culver at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. • PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS * PLAN REVIEWER: Glen Adamek 1. Provide evidence of Health Department approval. • PLUMBING (1994 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 2. Provide complete water line sizing calculations, including the water pressure, pressure losses, water demands, and developed pipe lengths. Note the water fixture units for washing machines have changed in the 1994 UPC. Please review. UPC Section 610.0 3. Detail the required listed reduced pressure principle backflow preventer as protection of water connection to carbonator. UPC, Section 603.3.12 4. The 1-1/4 inch gas line from the gas meter to the first branch of the system is undersized for total 7,240 CFH gas demand. Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 5. Correct the drain, waste and vent plans to comply with UPC, Section 710.1. Fixtures with flood rim levels above the elevation of the next upstream manhole cover of the public sewer serving the fixtures shall not discharge through the backwater valve. The plans show all fixtures drain through the backwater valves. 6. Provide the clothes washer manufactures sizing data for the trench drain size for receiving the waste of the four clothes washers. 7. Detail how floor drain trap seal is to be maintained. UPC Section 1007.0 (floor drain trap primers). 8. Provide sizing of the floor drain for pool equipment with only a 2 inch trap and drain. 9. Provide data on the Heat. Cable Circuits on the hot water piping. This looks like an electric water heater. This may not be allowed in the energy design. Please review. 10. The laundry boxes (LB), clothes washer hook-ups are not shown on the Sewer and Vent Diagrams. Please correct. Note washers in groups of three or more are rated at six fixture units each, as per UPC, Table 7-3 footnote. 11. Food waste disposal unit and dishwasher shall not be connected to or discharged into any grease interceptor or grease trap. UPC, Section 1013.0 12. Show the required foot vent cleanout for the island vent system in detail 3 on sheet P5.1.3. 13. In the S-3 garage floors shall drain to an approved oil separator or trap discharging to sewers in accordance with the Plumbing code. UBC Section 311.2.3.1. 14. Detail how combustion air is routed to water heater rooms without passing through construction requiring fire dampers. Water heater rooms must be separated from the rest of the building with a one hour fire separation as per UBC, Section 302.5. 15. Detail shower drain 48 inches minimum from threshold at entry into the shower stall for wheel chair access. UPC Section 410.3 16. The City Engineer to review draining rain water drainage from deck to sump pump system in the basement garage. Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 • MECHANICAL (1994 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 17. Detail disposal sites of main condensate drainage from air conditioning units. UMC Section 310 18. Detail overflow (secondary) condensate discharge from air conditioning units that are in a ceiling space to readily observed locations. UMC Section 310.1.1 19. Provide a minimum of 100 square inches of ventilation opening into closet containing a clothes dryer. UMC, Section 908.2 20. The maximum length for dryer vent to outside is 14 feet, with two 90-degree elbows. UMC, Section 504.3.2 (Show duct cleanouts for ducts with more than two 90-degree elbows. UMC, Section 609.4.) 21. Provide calculations to show the S-3 parking garage exhaust ventilation is capable of exhausting a minimum of 1.5 CFM per square foot of gross floor area. UBC Section 1202.2.7 22. Show al the required fire dampers at duct openings in fire rated ceiling membranes. Correct detail 3 on sheet M3.1.2. Also, at upper must spaces with exhaust ducts up through the roof, show the required fire dampers or fire rated shafts. 23. Detail the exhaust outlet clearances as per UMC, Section 609.10. a) Garage exhaust discharge 3 feet minimum from exterior walls and roof, and 10 feet minimum form openings into the building. b) Environmental air duct exhaust must be 3 feet minimum from openings into the building. 24. Provide complete kitchen hood plans, details, and calculations to show compliance with UMC, Chapter 5, Part II a) Provide exhaust sizing calculations for kitchen hoods. UMC, Section 508.7 b) Provide grease duct air velocity calculations. Minimum 1,500 fpm and maximum 2,500 fpm. UMC, Section 507.8 c) Show required cleanouts for grease duct on hood. UMC, Section 507.5 d) Detail 1/4 inch per foot slope on grease duct back to hood. UMC, Section 507.4 e) Detail grease duct discharge clearances as per UMC, Section 507.11, (Minimum of 10 feet from parapet wall and air intake of HVAC unit.) Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 f) Provide construction details of required fire rated grease duct enclosure and hood enclosure. UMC, Sections 507.6, and 508.4.1 g) Each room provided with a kitchen exhaust system shall have air supplied to the room equal to the amount of air to be exhausted. The exhaust and make-up air systems shall be connected by an electrical interlocking switch. UMC, Section 402.4 h) The fire-rated grease duct and/or hood enclosures must extend from the point of penetration of the ceiling up to the roofing. The ceiling or hood enclosure must be over the hood. UMC, Sections 507.6, 508.4, and 508.4.1 i) The fire-rated grease duct enclosures must be sealed around the duct at the point of penetration of the ceiling. UMC, Section 507.6 j) Clearly show the material used to construct the hood and exhaust duct. UMC, Sections 508.2 & 507.3 k) A complete kitchen hood system plan review will be done when complete hood system plans, details, and calculations are provided. • ENERGY CONSERVATION 25. Provide plans, calculations and worksheets to show compliance with current energy standards. Provide the completed ENV-, LTG-, and MECH- forms showing energy compliance. 26. Do not include the I- occupancy areas in the lighting energy design (LTG- forms). 27. Provide the installed lighting calculations on the LTG-2 forms. 28. Correct the allowed lighting power level for corridors, restrooms, and support areas. Only 0.8 watts per square foot are allowed, not 1.8. 29. Complete energy plan check will be done when complete corrected energy designs are provided. 30. On the plans clearly show the wall and roof insulation locations, thickness, and R-values, as per the energy design. 31. Provide a note on the plans stating "All new glazing (fenestration products) will be installed with a certifying label attached, showing the U-value." 32. Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in kitchen(s) and bathrooms. Please correct. Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 33. Show the daylit areas and required daylit area lighting controls for lighting in daylit areas. Title 24, Part 6, Section 131(c). 34. Detail required exterior lighting controls. "Exterior lighting controlled from a lighting panel within the building shall be controlled by a directional photocell or astronomical time switch that automatically turns off exterior lighting when daylight is available." 35. The completed and signed Certificate of Compliance forms, (PERF-1, ENV-1, LTG-1, and MECH-1) must be imprinted on the plans. Note: If you have any questions regarding this plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. 4 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW * 1993 NEC * PLAN REVIEWER: Eric Jensen 36. Detail required placards on prints. A placard is required at the electric service room detailing the location of the emergency generator (NEC 700-8(a). Additionally, placards are required at the two services, Service 1 of 2, Service 2 of 2. 37. Review detail 2 on sheet E6.1.1 and see if that's where you really want to put the panelboard and kitchen outlets. 38. In a dual basin bathroom both basins are now required to have an accessible outlet. (Thanks to a code change NEC 210-52(d)). Please revise unit floorplans where applicable. 39. Why does the detail 1 on sheet E6.1.6 show two panelboards in one unit? One panelboard is in a clothes closet no less. 40. I can't correlate the UL firestop numbers with the UL Fire Resistive Volume 2 directory. Please revise the numbers to current systems. 41. Finish panelboard identification on the single line diagrams. 42. Provide grounding and bonding details for the service. 43. For the residential system, the units, provide a service load calculation fro the distribution boards. Why are the overcurrent devices identified as three pole on Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 the single line and single phase on the panel schedule? Include the circuiting for the unit panelboards from the distribution boards. 44. Provide transformer ventilation where necessary. Transformers T-PP1B, T-ECP, T-ELP.TDB-4, and T-SP all do not show adequate ventilation. 45. Air handling ducts are shown installed over DB, ELL1, and PP2A. This is a violation of NEC 384-4. 46. Identify the rooftop mounted 120 volt convenience outlets as GFI protected. 47. Detail all transformer grounding: grounding conductor size and location of electrode (closest cold water or effectively grounded building steel). 48. Identify the lighting home runs on Sheet E3.1.1 (residential area). 49. Why is there a grounding symbol on the emergency generator? Is the transfer switch a three pole or four pole transfer switch? 50. Detail emergency lighting to the generator location. The stairway and rooftop seem devoid of any emergency lighting (almost). Is the emergency lighting to the generator location a battery-back up style of fixtures or supplied off of the generator? 51. Detail the means of identification at each branch circuit panelboard for the color code used for conductor identification. I'm a little concerned that your specification standard identifies "A" phase as orange and "B" phase as brown. There is no code required standard, however, common wiring practice is A phase Brown, B phase orange. Note: If you have any questions regarding this electrical plan review list please contact the plan reviewer listed above at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT NON RESIDENTIAL TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 1. Show, or note that at every primary public entrance, and at every major function area along, or leading to, an accessible route of travel, there is to be a sign displaying the international symbol of accessibility. Signs are required to indicate the direction to accessible building entrances and facilities, per Sections 1117B.5.7and 1127B.3. 2. Revise plans to show that stairways that occur outside a building comply with Section 1006 as follows: a) Have the upper approach and all treads marked with a strip of contrasting color as follows: i) >2" in width. ii) Placed parallel to and £1" from the nose of the step or landing. iii) The strip is required to be as slip resistant as the treads of the stairs. b) Treads shall be: i) Smooth, rounded or chamfered exposed edges. ii) Have no abrupt edges at the nosing projecting £1 !4" past the face of the riser above. iii) Open risers are not permitted. DISABLED ACCESS PARKING SPACES 3. Revise site plan to show that accessible spaces comply with Section 1129B.4.1 as follows: a) Single spaces shall be 14'0" wide and outlined to provide a 9'0" parking area and a 5'0" loading and unloading area on the passenger side of the vehicle. The zone is on the wrong side on sheet A2.1.8, for example. 4. Accessible space(s) are to be located such that disabled persons are not required to wheel, or walk, behind parked cars other than their own, per Section 1129B.4.3. See sheet A2.1.10, for example. 5. Show or note on the plans that the accessible parking spaces are to be identified by a reflectorized sign, permanently posted immediately adjacent to and visible from each space, consisting of: a) A profile view of a wheelchair with occupant in white on dark blue background. b) The sign shall >70 in2 in area. c) When in the path of travel, they shall be posted >80" from the bottom of the sign to parking space finished grade. d) Signs may also be centered on the wall of the interior end of the parking space >36" from the parking space finished grade, ground or sidewalk. e) Spaces complying with Section 1129B.4.2 shall have an additional sign "Van-Accessible" mounted below the symbol of accessibility per Section 1129B.5. f) In addition, each accessible space is required to be marked with the international symbol of accessibility. Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 6. Show, or note, that an additional sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place at each entrance to off street parking facilities, or immediately adjacent to and visible from each stall or space. The sign shall be >17" x 22" with lettering not^1" in height. Per Section 1129B.5 required wording is as follows. "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at or by telephoning PEDESTRIAN RAMPS 7. Show that any path of travel with a slope >1:20 (5%) complies with pedestrian ramp requirements, per Sections 1023.3 and 1007.1a. Which sheets of the plans show all the provisions for ramps (slopes, landings, handrails, etc.)? DOORS 8. Show or note that all hand-activated door opening hardware meets the following requirements, per Section 1004.3.1: a) Is to be centered >30" but <44" above floor. b) Latching, or locking, doors in a path of travel are operated with a single effort by: i) Lever type hardware. ii) Panic bars. iii) Push-pull activating bars. iv) Or other hardware designed to provide passage without the requirement to grasp the hardware. SPECIAL HAZARDS 9. Provide details or interior elevations to show that objects projecting from walls with their leading edges comply with Section 1121 B.1: a) >27" but <80" above finished floor protrude <4" into walks, halls, corridors, passageways or aisles. b) ^27" or >80" above finished floor may protrude any amount. c) Freestanding objects mounted on posts or pylons may overhang <12" into the walk, hall, etc. if £27" but ^80" above ground surface or finished floor. Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 10. Plans show that walk crosses, or adjoins, a vehicular way and walking surfaces are not separated by curbs or other elements. Revise plans to show that the boundary is defined, per Section 1024.5, by a continuous detectable warning which is: a) >36" in width. b) The surface is to consist of raised truncated domes in a staggered pattern with: i) A diameter of nominal 0.9" at the base. ii) Tapering to 0.45" at the top. iii) Height of 0.2". iv) Nominal o.c. spacing of 2.35". STAIRWAYS AND HANDRAILS 11. Revise plans to show that handrails are provided on each side of the stairs, per Section 1006.9.1. See sheet A2.1.31, for example. 12. Provide sections, details or notes to show that handrails are to be located >34" but £38" above nosing of treads, per Section 1006.9.2.1 a. See 2/A9.4, etc. SINGLE ACCOMMODATION FACILITIES 13. Revise plans to show a sufficient space in the toilet room for a wheelchair to enter the room and close the door, per Section 1115B.7.2. The space is required to be: a) >30" x 48". b) >60" diameter. q) A T-shaped space as shown in Figure 11B-12(a)and (b). d) Doors are not permitted to encroach into this space. See sheet A2.1.40. • GENERAL ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS • SIGNAGE 14. Where permanent identification is provided for rooms and spaces, raised letters shall also be provided and shall be accompanied by Braille. Section 1117B.5. 15. Provide a note on the plans stating that the signage requirements of Section 1117B.5 will be satisfied. • ALARMS 16. Provide a note on the plans stating that the visual and audible alarms will comply with the provisions of NFPA 72G End Carlsbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: Kurt Culver BUILDING ADDRESS: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R2/B/A2.1/S3 PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 DATE: July 16, 1996 Building 1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTlON:II&Vlhr./I BUILDING PORTION Care Facility Garage Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE BUILDING AREA (ft.2) 177,666** 82,576 ** OSHPD portion not included 177,666 260,242 VALUATION MULTIPLIER 73.50 32.50 2.90 1.80 VALUE ($) 13,058,451 2,683,720 515,231 468,436 16,725,838 El 1991 UBC Building Permit Fee n Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 34,991.50 1^1991 UBC Plan Check Fee G Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 22,744.48 Type of Review: 13 Complete Review G Structural Only G Hourly G Repetitive Fee Applicable n Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 18,195.58 Comments: Fire Services Review: G Fire Alarm Q Complete Review D Other: G Suppression System Esgil Fire Services Review Fee: $ Comments: Fire Services review done separately. Separate billing to follow. Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 FEB. 11 '97 (TUE) 10,04 ESOIL CORPORATION 619 560 1576 PAGE. EsGil Corporation Professional Ftan Revtew Enginears FAX TRANSMITTAL Date: ,2/11/91- Time Sent: To: ^Pf=TtgeSO.J Number of Pages Being Transmitted: (Including FaxTransmittal) From: Phone #: Fax#: Remarks: 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 ^ San Diego, California 92123 + (619)560-1468 4 Fax (619) 560-1576 FEE. 11 ' 97 (TUE) 10:04 ESGIL CORPORATION 619 560 1576 PAGE. 2X3 CarUbmd 96-1141 July 16, 1996 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: CarUbad PREPARED BY: Kurt Cuhrer BUILDING ADDRESS: 2856 Carl.bad Blvd. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R2/B/A2.1/S3 PLANCHECKNO-: 96-1141 DATE: July 16, 1996 Building 1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTlON:Iia»Vlh*./I BUILDING PORTION Care Facility Garage Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE BUILDING AREA (ft.2) 177,666** 82,576 "OSHPD portion not included 177,666 260.242 VALUATION j VALUE MULTIPLIER ($) 73.50 32.50 2.90 1.80 13,058,451 2,683,720 • 515,231 468,436 16,725,838 E3 1991 UBC Building Permit Fee P Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 34,991.50 E3 1991 UBC Plan Check Fee D Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 22,744.48 Type of Review: [2 Complete Review Q Structural Only Q Hourly C] Repetitive Fee Applicable p Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 18,195.58 Comments: Fire Services Review: D Fire Alarm D Complete Review Q Suppression System D Other: Esgil Fire Services Review Fee: $ Comments: Fire Services review done separately. Separate billing to follow. Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doo 5196 FEB. I". '97 (TUE) 10:05 ESGIL CORPORATION 619 560 1576 PAGE. 3/3 CurUbad 96-1141 July 16, 1996 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST MULTI-FAMILY PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad OCCUPANCY: R2/U.1/B/A2.1/83 U^J^mJPmHOMy/IMyr TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: n&V-llu,/I-F.ltrx'^ACTUAL AREA: 278,710 ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: to be STORIES: 3 + B determined HEIGHT: -40' SPRINKLERS?: Yes OCCUPANT LOAD: t o be deter m. REMARKS; 11.1 to be reviewed by OSHPD. DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 6/21/96 ESGIL CORPORATION; 6/24/96 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER; Kurt Culver COMPLETED: July 16, 1996 _ __ ____ FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department, You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments, Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with Title 24 and the following model codes: 1994 UBC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UPC (effectivel2/28/95), 1994 UMC (effective 2/23/96) and 1993 NEC (effective 12/26/95). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. AH items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106,4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed UP the recheck process, please note on this list for a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. Plan sheet number, specification section, Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised Plans. LIST NO. 16. R-1 GENERAL WITHOUT ENERGY OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC) City of Carlsbad Engineering Department DATE: BUILDING ADDRESS: £$ S^ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO.:CB ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL EST. VALUE: DENIAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conform a nee with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. D A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked with^C,Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By: By: By: Date: Date: Date: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: ATTACHMENTS D Dedication Application D Dedication Checklist Q Improvement Application D Improvement Checklist D Future Improvement Agreement D Grading Permit Application D Grading Submittal Checklist Q Right-of-Way Permit Application Q Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet U Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: Michele Masterson City of Carlsbad Address: 2075 Las Pa I mas Dr.. Carlsbad, CA 92009 Phone: (619)438-1161, ext. 4315 A-4 U>5PAUMSWYSU.IDKAKV\B<QWVOIIOUXX»CHKLarnttJWno Phnotodt CUM BP0001 Form M**x> 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-O894 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN Q Q Q 1 . Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: A. North Arrow D. Property Lines Easements B. Existing & Proposed Structures E. Easements C. Existing Street Improvements F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets Q Q Q 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns B. Existing & Proposed Slopes C. Existing Topography Q Q Q 3. Include note: "Surface water to be directed away from the building foundation at a 2% gradient for no less than 5' or 2/3 the distance to the property line (whichever is less)." [Per 1985 UBC 2907(d)5] On graded sites, the top of any exterior foundation shall extend above the elevation of the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet of an approved drainage device a minimum of 12 inches plus two percent." [Per 1990 UBC 2907(d)5] Q Q Q 4. Include on title sheet: A. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION Page 1 of 4 O:\L1BRARnENQ\WOftDiDOCStCHKLSnBulktng Ptanetwc* CMM BP0001 Form MM.doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE Q Q Q 5. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. Conditions were complied with by: Date: DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS Q Q Q 6. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ , pursuant to Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 y* x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 7a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ , pursuant to Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Please have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist for a separate plancheck process through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: Page 2 of 4 Q:U.lBRARY>EMGWVOROMXX;StCHKLSnBuHdnB PtanchM* CUrt BP0001 Form MM doe BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST A st/ 2"^ 3rd' Q Q Q 7b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: Improvement Plans signed by: Date: Q Q Q 7c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: Q a Q 7d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the Citv Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. Q Q Q 8a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). Q Q Q 8b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: 8c. No Grading Permit required. Page 3 of 4 QUIBIURY\ENQWiraotOOCaCHKLSnUklng Ptandwc* CMrt BP0001 Form Mhtdoe BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 3ld/ Q 9. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, trees, driveways, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for _ A separate Right-of-Way permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following: 10. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. 11. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a Permit. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: Q Q Q 12. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. Page 4 of 4 City of Carlsbad Engineering Department December 2, 1996 ADL Planning Tony Lawson 5962 La Place Court, Ste. 205 Carlsbad, California 92009 CARLSBAD BY THE SEA - MAIN FACILITY (CB961141) Prior to building permit approval the following Engineering Conditions of approval for RP 94-06 must be complied with: Condition #27. Site plan must show the approved NPDES requirements shown on Substantial Conformance Exhibit. Condition #28. Prior to building permit approval improvements plans must o be bonded. Condition #29. Please provide testing and report of contaminated soils. Additional Items: Process the Encroachment Agreements prior to building permit approval. If you have any questions please contact me at 438-1161, ext. 4315.\^A r _ MICHELE MASTERSON Engineering Technician 2O75 Las Palmas Dr. - Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-O894 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING REVIEW SECTION FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. ff\ O(_ i /V_ F~ ~d C r ( [' -f- <-f Calculation based on building plancheck plan submrttal. * Address:^ Ctrl&ba.C/T/T<?Bldg. Permit No &. CLo J I Prepared bv:Date: /c? 6 /^Checked by:Date: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. ^ e /c. JMI}^— <;ee~ J8* ^^° Types of -Ser-Ft^Units: Pcttffi' APT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use:CQ04 r-g.fr c*. he Sq. R./Units: &7Srf EDU's, Total EDU's: ADT-s: Total ADTs FEES REQUIRED: PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE REQUIRED D YES D NO (See Building Department for amount) WITHIN CFD: D YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee, D NO reduced Traffic Impact Fee) »PARK-IN-UEU FEE FEE/UNIT: PARK AREA:. X NO. UNITS: RAFRC IMPACT FEE ADTs/UNITS:FEE/ADT: =$ =$_ fi BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE ADTs/UNITS: 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE SQ.FT.: . SEWER FEE PERMIT EDU's: BENEFIT AREA: EDU's: X FEE/ADT: ZONE: X FEE/SQ.FT.: =$_ =$_ X FEE/EDU: DRAINAGE BASIN:_ X =$ 6. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA A FEE/EDU:_ HIGH /C =$_ /LOW ACRES: 3.* 3O X FEE/AC^? > . SEWER LATERAL ($2,500 DEPOSIT) TERFEE^--* EDU's: =$ TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $ (0 O) *NOTE: Thla calculation aheet la NOT a comptote list of all feea which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. P:\DOCS\MISFORMS\BP0002.FRM REV 01/04/95 UMffs W/OUl"Ifiie^ j-JX' kO - Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) EJ CD CH Site Plan: 1 • Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines. 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. n n n n an n n n Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front: Int. Side: Street Side: Rear: 2. Lot Coverage: 3. Height: Required Required Required Required Required Required 4. Parking: Spaces Required Guest Spaces Required Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown itional Comments ft ^/-O - >v*~*B-6-0--*-*L^GZZ&. mrtL^*., t»-u«J-*-. W lOK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTOXOMPUTER JRN.10.1997 12:15PM CHfiRLES M SfiLTER RSSOC INC NO.110 P. 1/1 Charles M Salter Associates Ino Consultants in Acoustics & Audio/Visual System Design Telephone: 415.397.0442 FAX: 415.397.0454 Date: December 12, 1996 Pages: 1 To: MunLeu, TSGJoe Ross, TKG " 619.597.0565 From: Cristina Miyar Subject: City Noise Requirements Conformance Carlsbad by the Sea - Acoustical Consulting CSA Project: 94-175 We have reviewed the Coordination Set Mechanical Drawings dated 8 November 1996, We are pleased to report that rooftop equipment noise will meet city noise requirements. Our calculations assume an 8' high sound-absorbing sound-blocking barrier at the edge of the roof along Carlsbad Boulevard. The barrier assembly should have a minimum density of 4 lbs./sq. ft. with sound absorbing material on the equipment side. The assembly needs to be airtight and the sound absorbing material must be weatherproof. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Cristina Miy Consultant £ £ £nj ra n ODD PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. Phone (619) 438-1 1 61 , extension </</'7"7y APN: Type of Project and Use:_ Zone: ]/— /C//v (-^Facilities Management Zone: {__ CFD (i, CircfirOne (If property in, complete SPECIAL TAX CALCULATION WORKSHEET provided by Building Department.) | Legend x hem Complete Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES ^ NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions at approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval Discretionary Action Required: YES * APPROVAL/RESO. NO. «A 3 Q DATE PROJECT NO. _£ f NO TYPE OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval $-3t£ I 3 - C NO Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES If NO, proceed with checklist; if YES, proceed below. Determine status {Exempt or Coastal Permit Required): If Exempt, proceed with checklist; if Coastal Permit required, hold building permit until Coastal Permit issued. Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: NO Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. Mum CLIP Hinges with 100° Opening Specification Formula Minimum Reveal Table Abbreviations 1. Lh.-u.-rmine hinge .urn stylo to be used. 2. Determiiu.' side p-mel width (W), reveal (K) antl dour thickne^ (T). ;i. Consul I ihe induMtcd Appendix to find bunatf disi.mce (B) and mounting plate height (II). 4 Ci o^s-ivkTemv1 he (B> -ind (T) values on tlu- Mbli? at ri^ht lu find the minimum ieve.at needed tor the application. 5. The ivvetil (K) from stc-p 2 must be larger th.iii (In.- nuniiniini reveal. 11 not, try .1 ilitti-JYiit lunibin.itum oi I'i') iind (Kl val- ues or try -i hin^r with .1 different open- Lllvi .ih-.ik1. B\T 3 4 5 6 16 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 18 0.8 0.8' 0.8 0.8 19 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 20 1.3 1.3 1.3 u 22 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.D 24 3.5 3.2 3.0 2.8 26 5.-1 4.7 4.4 4.1 Note: Minimum rmvil> JiMjr^ itrt'/KJ f/lt'M! HflOf rmvil> ^/n.v'-r ,I/Y I. tli'A' fn-lu'ii (/ir k'lii) I'll t'uniHIlilll >;; lltrtf crtiitkt'J B = Boring distance D - Cup depth 8 = Reveal T = Door thickness W - Side panel wkJlh X = Fixed distance AD = Arm depth projection AS - Arm side projection DP = Doof protrusion LO tL'chnii.iI without no- Httlf Overlay/Twin Appiication Inset AD_ X 20 10.7 OP.—i— 8 a/ Ho. H70-23H B7I-2SH UPC Screw-On fiess-in Desc.No. Fret SWMHJ B70-2B5 Sdl-Ctw-mg B71-265 Fwe Swing ' B70-2GB B7J-3E8 UK Press-In Utic. No, htfi: Srtiliy B70-2/5 '-.-it Ctuanij B71-275 wnig U7U-27B H-Lteniy B7l-27a UPC Screw-On .Press-In Desc. fiee Swing Seit-Closing Free Seil-CloSiAfl -1'- ^rt-\vs on |>.it;c I1**- -t--t-00SJ.ST6.STS - ww "TS":"SQ 232 HINGES Mum Adapter Plates For Face Frame Mounting w/Cl.lP Hinges 12.5 Invurt-.idjpti'r platy tuliioclrainc witii2ivlu. 7x%"vvoodi>t:ivu->sp,t on f,itv frame cabinets with CUP 100, 110, 125, 125+ imJ 17U hin; No. B17S-C60-V2 Overlay Tables 100°, 110° & 125" ; H ."5-iTim iipdfl ana 12.5mm from edge. Achieve 13mm C^V) overlay M 0 I N I 15 1 10 ' 1,' — ; - | • ;• -: _£' 11 12 1_JI U j 6 I b_[ y_! 10 , M '_ \ l 125°+ tiin^s VVilli 21mm MJ\, GwrUy HXI 0 tfi A = IH aiHse'rfu-- j.. -1 I .- . J . ; 14 15 It 17 1t) 19 3 i 11 12:13 i 14 MS^^ . ,_ . ta_^ i 1 6 i e y.^ ii .^- x - n UHC Htmm 03 SB 6S T S City of Carlsbad 95310 Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Alarm System Date of Report: Monday, February 24,1997 Reviewed by: Contact Name Jacob Sofer Address 60 Pierce Av City, State San Jose CA 95110 Bldg. Dept. No. 96-1141 Planning No. CUP94-10 Job Name Carlsbad by the Sea Job Address 2855 Carlsbad Ste. or Bldg. No. [>3 Approved - The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. D Disapproved - Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1 st 2nd 3rd Other Agency ID CFD Job# 95310 File# 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 * (619) 931-2121 EsGll Corporation ProfessionaC Tfan Review 'Engineers DATE: 7/22/96 Q APLJCANT a FIRE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Fire J Q PLAN REVIEWER Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141(CBC and CFC Review) SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad By The Sea The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's *********** codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's ********** codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. | | The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. X] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. X] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: MR. Jacob Sofer, The Steinnberg Group, 60 Pierce Ave. San Jose, CA 95110 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: 408-295-5446 REMARKS: By: GARNER PALENSKE, P.E. Enclosures: Esgil Corporation ] GA D CM D EJ n GP n PC 6/24/96 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619)560-1468 * Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad Fire 96-1141 7/22/96 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST FIRE SERVICES REVIEW PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 OCCUPANCY: R-2.2, R-2.1, A-2.1, B TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: Il&V-lhr. FIRE SPRINKLERS ?: Y REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 7/22/96 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Fire USE: Senior Care Facility OCCUPANT LOAD: ? DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 6/24/96 PLAN REVIEWER: GARNER PALENSKE, P.E. Foreword: Please read: This plan review is limited to the fire and life safety requirements found within the 1994 California Fire and Building Codes (CFC. and CBC. respectively). Review for other Code requirements, such as land use issues, structural safety, disabled access, etc., are not included in this review. Present California law mandates that all buildings within the State of California are governed by the Building Standards contained within the California Building and Fire Codes. Amendments made by the State of California are applicable to occupancies under the jurisdiction of the State Fire Marshal. Enforcement of these requirements has been delegated to the local fire authority (see adoption and enforcement matrix in the CBC). The items addressed herein need clarification, modification, or change. All items shall be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes. To speed up the recheck process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet, specification, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked-up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad Fire 96-1141 7/22/96 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Fire PREPARED BY: GARNER PALENSKE, P.E. BUILDING ADDRESS: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: varies PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 DATE: 7/22/96 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: Il&VIhr. BUILDING PORTION Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE BUILDING AREA (ft.2) VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE ' ($) 16,725,838 Fire Services Review: Fire Alarm Complete Review Other: Suppression System Esgil Fire Services Review Fee: Comments: (20% Of 1994 UBC Building Permit Fee) $ 9651.67 macvalue.doc 5196 Carlsbad Fire 96-1141 7/22/96 Plan Review Checklist Please make all corrections on the original tracings and resubmit two sets of revised drawings to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego CA 92123. 1. Show the location of the area separation walls, and show proper terminations. Additionally, show all detailing associated with area separation walls. Further corrections will follow at that time. 2. If area separation walls do not extend to the outer edge of horizontal projections, (balconies, roof overhangs, canopies, marquees and architectural projections), and the projecting elements contain concealed spaces, the wall shall extend through the concealed spaces to the outer edge of the projecting elements, the exterior walls, and projecting elements above (whether they contain concealed spaces or not) must be of one-hour construction on each side of the area separation wall for a distance equal to the depth of the projecting elements. Openings in the one-hour walls must be protected with three-fourths-hour assemblies. CBC Section 504.6.3. 3. Two-hour area separation walls may terminate at the roof sheathing, provided openings in the roof shall not be located within 5 feet of the area separation wall. 4. Clearly show the maximum building height based on the definition in CBC Section 209. 5. Clearly show if the lower levels are basements or stories, based on the definitions in CBC Section 203 and 220, 6. Plot the finish grade (adjacent ground level) on the elevations and dimension the distance to the floor above for story determination. See definition of grade, CBC Section 208. 7. Clearly label and identify on the plans the fire-resistive corridors, area separation walls, shafts, occupancy separation walls and floors, exit passageways, exit courts and exit enclosures, along with their hourly ratings. Carlsbad Fire 96-1141 7/22/96 8. Provide details of the one-hour fire-resistive construction. Include roof/ceiling assemblies, floor/ceiling assemblies, wall assemblies, column and beam assemblies, etc. a) The plans are very lacking in cross-referencing all details necessary to show one-hour construction. Additionally, there are quite a few members that don't appear to have fire protection shown. Please thoroughly review the plans. b) The NER report referenced at 10/A9.1, etc. requires a specific type of insulation if a single layer of drywall is to be used. Either show two layers of drywall, or comply FULLY with the NER report. c) The L525 listing at 22/A9.1 contains specific requirements that should be noted on the plans. Please review. d) Show the manufacturer/ICBO #/thickness for the spray-on fireproofing. Additionally, note the need for special inspection for its installation. The above are only examples of the deficiencies on the plans regarding fire- resistive construction. The designer should research the subject thoroughly and revise the plans as necessary. 9. Detail how one-hour fire-resistive wall construction is maintained at built-in wall fixtures and behind mailboxes, fire extinguisher cabinets, electric panels exceeding 16 square inches in area, etc. 10. Detail how fire-resistive wall and ceiling protection will be maintained at all duct penetrations such as at bathroom and kitchen hood fans, laundry room fans and dryer vents. Also detail recessed light fixtures. 11. Smoke dampers shall be installed per CBC Section 713.10 at all ducted or unducted air openings at penetrations of: a) Area or occupancy separation walls. b) The fire-resistive construction of corridors, or horizontal exit walls. c) Shaft enclosures. d) Smoke barriers. e) Elevator lobbies required by Section 3002. f) Areas of refuge. 12. Fire dampers shall be installed per CBC Section 713.11 at all ducted or unducted air openings at penetrations of: a) Ceilings of fire-resistive floor-ceiling assemblies or roof-ceiling assemblies. b) Building exteriors required to have protected openings by Section 503. c) Area or occupancy separation walls. d) The fire-resistive construction of corridors, or horizontal exit walls. e) Shaft enclosures. Carlsbad Fire 96-1141 7/22/96 13. Provisions in CBC Chapter 7 require special treatment of penetrations at fire-resistive assemblies. Provide typical details on the plans showing how the fire-resistive integrity will be maintained at the following conditions (Include the manufacturers' names and ICBO numbers (or equal) for any sealant): THROUGH-PENETRATIONS (through the entire assembly): Fire-resistive bearing walls and/or walls requiring protected openings shall have penetrations protected with through-penetration fire stops having an F-rating, T-rating or complying with UBC Standard 7-1, depending on their locations, sizes and combustibility. Fire resistive floor/ceiling assemblies shall have penetrations protected with through-penetration fire stops having and F-rating, T-rating or complying with UBC Standard 7-1, depending on their sizes, combustibility and whether the penetrations are in walls above. MEMBRANE-PENETRATIONS (through only one side of an assembly): Fire-resistive walls (whether bearing or not and whether requiring fire protected openings or not) shall have penetrations protected with membrane-penetration fire stops having an F-rating or complying with UBC Standard 7-1, depending on their size and combustibility. Limited steel electrical outlet boxes (not exceeding 16 sq. in., nor more than 100 sq. in. for any 100 sq. ft. of wall) require no protection. Fire-resistive ceilings shall have no penetrations, except for noncombustible sprinkler pipes and steel electrical outlet boxes as described above. NOTE: The plans should indicate the various fire-stop ratings required for all penetrations. 14. Clearly identify location and hourly fire-resistive rating of vertical shafts on the plans. Provide construction details showing location of fire dampers and how fire resistance will be maintained at floors and roofs. 15. CBC Section 711 contains certain shaft exceptions. Please notice that these do not apply to Group I occupancies. As such, the designer should pay close attention to the shaft requirements coming out of the Group I occupancy (since they impact the non-l occupancy areas). 16. Detail column fire protection and specify column impact protection in garage areas per CBC Section 704.2.5. As a minimum, show a 22 ga. steel jacket around each column to a height of 3 feet above the ground for impact protection. Carlsbad Fire 96-1141 7/22/96 17. Structural members such as beams supporting more than one floor or roof must be individually fire protected. Detail required protection. 18. Detail all furred ceilings as required in CBC Section 803. Show fire-retardant treated wood where necessary. 19. Storage or laundry rooms that are within Group R, Division 1 occupancies, that are used in common by tenants, shall be separated from the rest of the building by not less than one-hour fire-resistive occupancy separations. CBC Section 310.2.2. Show one-hour doors there. 20. An S-3 occupancy in the basement or first story of a building housing a Group B, Group A, Division 3, Group M or Group R, Division 1 occupancy may be classed as a separate building. The building above may also be considered a separate and distinct building for the purpose of area limitation, limitation of number of stories and type of construction ONLY if the conditions of CBC Section 311.2.2.1 are met: S 3 is Typo I construction. b) S-3 is separated from the uses above by a three-hour occupancy separation. See door 163, etc. ! c) S-3 is restricted to passenger vehicle storage, entry lobbies and mechanical equipment rooms (no storage, recreation room, etc.). Exception: Group A, Division 3, Group B (office and drinking/dining) and Group M (retail) occupancies may be below the 3-hour separation, provided the entire area below the 3-hour separation is protected throughout by an automatic sprinkler system. d) The maximum building height does not exceed the limits in CBC Table 5-B for the least type of construction. 21 . All openings in floors forming a three-hour separation shall be protected by vertical enclosures above and below the opening. The walls of such enclosures shall be not less than two-hour fire-resistive construction, and openings therein shall be protected by a one and one-half-hour assembly .CBC Section 302.3 (see the exception therein). 22. A 1 -hour occupancy separation is required between the A2.1 occupancy and the B occupancy. Table 3-B. See the second level. Carlsbad Fire 96-1141 7/22/96 23. The occupancy separation between the A and I occupancies requires special attention. Please detail all penetrations. 24. Provide an exit analysis on the plans. Provide a reduced scale floor plan at each level, showing exiting arrows, occupant counts at various areas, travel distances, etc. A complete exit plan review will be made at that time. 25. Exits should have a minimum separation of one-half the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the building or area served. CBC Section 1003.3. a) When Rooms 100/158 (sheet A2.1.9) are open to each other.-their exits are not properly separated. b) The combination of Rooms 154/155 requires two exits. The overall diagonal includes the restrooms. As such, the exits are not properly separated. c) Review other areas. 26. In areas where the occupant load exceeds 50, two exits are required. See the courtyard area. CBC Table 10-A. Additionally, sheet A2.1.12 will be reviewed after an exit analysis is provided. There appear to be non-complying exits shown. 27. In areas where the occupant load is at least 10, two exits are required. CBC Table 10-A. For the larger units, it appears that two exit doors will be required. For occupant load purposes, the balconies associated with those units shall be assumed to be simultaneously occupied. 28. No point in the building shall be more than 150' (200' if sprinklered) from an exterior exit, horizontal exit, enclosed stairway or exit passageway, measured along the path of travel. This may be increased a maximum of 100' when the increased travel distance is the last portion of the travel distance and is entirely within a l-hour corridor. CBC Section 1003.4. 29. Exit doors should swing in the direction of exit travel when serving any hazardous area or when the area served has an occupant load of 50 or more. CBC Section 1004.2. See Door 141, etc. 30. Exit doors from Group A occupancies shall not be provided with a latch or lock unless it is panic hardware. Carlsbad Fire 96-1141 7/22/96 31. All doors and gates, within the exit path from Group A occupancies to a public way, shall not be provided with latches or locks unless they are equipped with panic hardware. 32. When additional doors are provided for egress purposes, they shall conform to the width, swing and hardware provisions in CBC Chapter 10. CBC Sections 1004.3 and 1004.6. 33. Double acting doors are not allowed when serving a tributary occupant load of more than 100, or when part of a fire assembly, or part of smoke and'draft control assemblies or when equipped with panic hardware. 34. Walls of exit passageways shall be without openings except exits and shall have walls, floors and ceilings of the same fire-resistance required for the building, with a minimum one-hour fire-resistive construction. Exit openings in the walls shall be protected by a three-fourths hour assembly. CBC Section 1010.4. 35. Winding and spiral stairways are permitted only in residential occupancies. CBC Sections 1006.4 and 1006.6. a) Justify the winders for the stair leading to the roof on sheet A2.1.31. b) Justify the winders on sheet A2.1.44. 36. Stairways from upper levels which extend below the level from which egress from the building is provided, shall have an approved barrier to preclude exiting into such lower levels. Section 1009.5. A complying landing must be shown on each side of these barriers (gates)! 37. Stairway riser must be four inches minimum and seven inches maximum and minimum run shall be eleven inches. See sheet A2.1.32 . Carlsbad Fire 96-1141 7/22/96 38. Stairways should be enclosed as specified in CBC Section 1009: a) Two-hour fire-resistive walls are required in buildings of Type I and II-F.R. construction and in all buildings four or more stories in height, and one-hour elsewhere. b) Only exit doors are allowed to open into exit enclosures. c) Doors should be labeled one and one-half hours or one-hour fire assemblies, and noted that the maximum transmitted temperature end point shall not exceed 450 degrees (F) above ambient at the end of 30 minutes of the fire exposure specified in UBC Standard 7-2. * d) Exit enclosures should include a corridor on the ground floor extending to the exterior (see exception). Fire-resistive construction should be as required for the exit enclosure, including protected openings. Only exit doors are permitted to open into the corridor. Stair 4, etc. 39. Provide a smoke detector at each lobby or entrance area. CBC Section 3003.2. 40. Specify elevator shaft vents where elevators extend through more than two floor levels. CBC Section 3004. 41. Corridors serving ten or more occupants in R-1 or thirty in other occupancies shall have walls and ceilings of one-hour construction. CBC Section 1005.7. Clarify the corridor system on sheet A2.1.12. 42. One-hour fire-rated corridors shall have interior door openings protected by tight- fitting smoke and draft control assemblies rated 20 minutes, except openings in interior walls of exterior exit balconies. Doors shall be maintained self-closing or be automatic closing by action of a smoke detector per CBC Section 713.2. Doors shall be gasketed to provide a smoke and draft seal where the door meets the stop on sides and top.. Check all the corridor doors. Some are not shown as rated. 43. Total area of all openings, except doors, in any portion of an interior corridor, shall not exceed 25 percent of the area of the corridor wall of the room which it is separating from the corridor. Such openings shall be protected by fixed glazing listed and labeled for a fire-protection rating of at least 3/4-hour. Carlsbad Fire 96-1141 7/22/96 44. Provide a complete architectural section of the corridor, and exterior exit balcony, showing all fire-resistive materials and details of construction for all floor, walls, roof and all penetrations. At B/A4.1.2 (for example), show SOLID blocking above the corridor walls (detail 21/A9.1 is referenced there). 45. When two exits are required, dead end corridors and exit balconies are limited to 20 feet. There are MANY cases on the plans that do not comply. 46. Exit signs are required whenever two exits are required. Show all required exit sign locations. CBC Section 1013.1. See the areas identified earlier in this list. 47. Elevators serving more than two stories shall not open into required one-hour exit corridors unless protected by an approved smoke/draft control door system. Provide the basis of approval for the system shown. 48. Provide the following notes on the plans: a) All interior finishes shall comply with Chapter 8 of the C.B.C. (In addition, specify the type of finish by area). b) Placement and spacing of fire extinguishers shall comply with U.F.C. Standard 10-1. c) Occupant load signs shall be posted in a conspicuous location. d) All exits shall be lighted with at least a one-foot candle at floor level. e) Separate sources of power shall be provided for exit illumination. f) All plans for fire suppression and detection plans shall be submitted to Carlsbad Fire Department prior to installation. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact GARNER PALENSKE, P.E. at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. O3ZJ Consulting Engineers SUPPLEMENTAL STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS Carlsbad By The Sea Apartments CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Header Calcs Page F34-36 Prepared for The Steinberg Group September, 27,1996 639 front Street, Suite 200 San Francisco, California 94111 (415) 989-1004 Fax (415) 939-1552 Setttle Portliml San Franciico Los Angeles $*n Diego Phoenix Consulting Engineers 639 Front Street. Suite 200 San Francisco, California 94111 (415) 989-1004 Fax (415) 989-1552 locoHon c««nt L-U*4# A- Consulting Engineers 639 Front Street, Suite 200 San Francisco, California 94111 (415) 989-1004 Fax (415) 989-1552 locotkxt dot* X» no. -st Consulting Engineers 639 Front Street, Suite 200 San Francisco, California 94111 (415) 989-1004 Fax (415) 989-1552 piofrct locanon dot* job no. -r-f fl-e- r o STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS Carlsbad By the Sea CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: The Steinberg Group Sail Jose, California June 17, 1996 VOLUME III r Tfo r r r Consulting Engineers STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS Carlsbad By the Sea JUNE 17,1996 KPFF #94314 CARLSBAD, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS r r r r r r r* - r r Volume I: Calculations-Vertical Description of Project Loads & Design Information Slab Design Apartments: Parts B & C, Level 1 (P/T) Apartments: Part C, Level 2 (P/T) Miscellaneous Reinforcing Columns and Spread Footings Vertical Analysis of Timber Framing Volume II: Calculations-Lateral Lateral Analysis at Podium ETABS Design Loads Retaining Walls Shearwall Footings Shearwall Reinforcement Foundations - Strip Footings Lateral Analysis of Timber Framing Design Loads Diaphragm Design Shearwall Design & Holdowns, Part B Shearwall Design & Holdowns, Part C Holdown Forces, MBR Design Braced Frame Design i. Al Bl Cl Dl El Fl Gl HI II Kl LI Ml Nl PI Qi Rl SI r 639 Front Street, Suite 200 San Francisco, California 94111 (415) 989-1004 Fax (415) 989-1552 Seattle Portland San Francisco Los Angeles San Diego Phoenix Cairo Continued. r r r r Consulting Engineers STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS Carlsbad By the Sea CARLSBAD, CA JUNE 17,19% KPFF #94314 r r r r r r r r TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Volume III: Computer Output ETABS - Apartments, Parts B & C Description of Model Echo File Eigenvalue File Structure File Frame Output Files (Positive, Negative) Prepared for: The Steinberg Group June 17,19% Page XA1 XB1 XC1 XD1 XE1 KPFF Consulting Engineers 639 Front Street, Suite 200 San Francisco, CA 94)11 (415)989-1004 FAX-989-1552 r r r 639 Front Street, Suite 200 San Francisco, California 94111 (415) 989-1004 Fax (415) 989-1552 Seattle Portland San Francisco Los Angeles San Diego Phoenix Cairo ,.t. ,ur r r r r r Volume III:r r Carlsbad By the Sea Apartments - Parts B & C r r r r r r Computer Output r rI< r r r r XA1: Apartments - Parts B & C r Description of Model i r r r rt r r r r r r r~ #94314 1 XA-Z f" DESCRffTION OF MODELi The computer program ETABS, by Computers and Structures, Inc. (CSI) of Berkeley, California, was used to analyze the structure subjected to dynamic and static lateral loads. The shearwalls are modeled using gross section concrete properties. Any interior columns or other structural elements which do not participate in the lateral force resisting system of die building (secondary members) have not been included in the model (with the "" exception of their mass) and are analyzed separately. Story seismic weights are generated from the input building i mass segments. f~ Only the podium level is modeled in ETABS. The wood-framed structures above have been analyzed separately, and their corresponding cumulative lateral shears are given as an equivalent mass at the podium diaphragm level. ETABS assumes a rigid (in-plane) diaphragm at the podium level, which is a valid assumption for a concrete I"" slab. Four separate models were used. "CBS-APT4" captures the effects of the positive X-direction while I "CBS-APT5" looks at the negative X-direction. "CBS-APT6" examines the positive Y-direction and "CBS- APT?" investigates the negative Y-direction. The total response spectrum base shear for each model was then r~ scaled to the appropriate expected static base shear using a scale factor in ETABS. r r r r r All ETABS input and output units are in kips and inches. r r r r r r r r r r XBl: Apartments - Parts B & C r r Echo File r r r r r r r r r r 3V) I 5 S-- - ^B * j. .£ 2: 5I 8 '. I. , .: JJ ii5 SB1: :*«« a1**! .1 a* a -J I Sg ?s n § ii &n«c m->o-3 MI ?!HI HIs sr- -*S OOS« - 3IA I ?ss SB? 8 £ £ - -5P P § &ffl KSS^ niM -»o^ M 8 M sl 5 -8 2 Si Sui ui ** *• ui w N MO?6 c cj; "" CC C C CC CC2 SeS ?a M £ «a MM Sfl a 5 2 Bo aHI Hf HI ffl HI HI HI 5 Q ._ jg>*"C » 4kB> Cj _ M —O? Q -.^ *-W -• IM -• § 2 §§ §2 §§S!2 3 | I U •^3 E «*C!s •I vi;§ k! OOS— N• • m x.S858 o e e o o o o w 8 « S 5i S 3 -*o«o 004)0 oooao OOMO S$g ;;' • ei8S8 o e o o bo oo PS? o Sfi? -* -• O -• 0 sa? o o o o o o ru ru2 2•^ .^M Mm mfo ^oo nS 1iSSS*-—ruujuiruss?£*-*-Ul «O — « -oUl -* oooo oooooooo O 0§ § ^J -O -* £•O 0 0 O b ba o K *:^* y**— r~ r*-* -*Or* r-n n o TI^ *^ G oM W -t 30« C TON .*O-^ ytgo 00 Q >O O 2C -4-« -H O-l m*--•iviuluirux mSSSSS0, -—£« ** WX T|Ul <OK> 30• • m c» ^ w 258 m j- r-5x *~oooox— ru OOOOZQoooo-*3B <AXo ox — § oil B "*l !^ ^>O X O ^C*l ^•NJ omr- -* Q ~. p pjESo o*>o o^p- o— OOto> uiui *- *- uiui ruru — » — «c?r~on nn nn oo on oopM (/) (/)(/) (/)M MM M W MM-4m TO m fn fn m m in TO TO rrt m ^PJ-* IM-* tu-* is)_» (sj_* M —*O — *OO OO OO OO OO OO T»Si?s? s%s? s?s° i°s% s%$? s%i^^iXo ui o o ooruoo oorv— *-^ oaivj— »^ ODIUOO ouioox?^10^^*4^^ &- OB ^O 00 ^K ^O O O O^^OOO O^O&'OOV ^J O^ ^4 C^ K O MXoo oo oo oo oo o °E* Ul O UIO Ul O UIO UIO Ul O>O*• •* o — * o -* o ^ o^ *- -*»» _. 5x-•^OOO ^^**^^ OO^4^ OO^OB OO**JOO OO^OOX^4 OOOO OtOUI'O Ul — »L*I-* MtVO^ OUIOOB OO-^O-^S MXOO OO OO OO OO O OS— oo oo oo oo oo o &£B u* o r\?~* uio *^ o *^ -* wi oox ^O VJ1 •!"" ^3 U4 *"" V) ^h 1^ *3 **" ^" O ^o.*. -o LNI w -^ *--j ow -o *^mi- i§Ho S o oo oo bo bo o o2>IM QviH ^U4 5* «J4 OUI W> U(-lr~ ^5 5 S §m m 2 ru -»o— i OO 00 Qo o tie=4 -H O-< O O D O 35 CXTSxi5-i-t — -o^ t\J ru W — SiE I"b*sib2ouio^Jo-.* U4 ^3 f/V XUl 4^ Z S* mu.8 *<>> om so Jo PPPpS— boooKoOOOO-ISB o oS2 G> ^7^9 3O o oox s ss? _.saeo) i ill gfs-nSn>r-mmr-r~mSI—•.^ * n £ m c r~ ru 5 iomM ^ — *r-TO TO m ru ac ^| m ? w So «> -o•^ 3Q ^C"~ •"£2 n?f £ SCJ w 7*oo £-*-< *->TO (5-*M TO^ <O> i'TO It2 3iX S u •o I £ m >00 **s r~m n ?-oD >"° SUl xut §2 g •-•w o ° & 25 £ 1 ^ w.* 3>m u -(w m"2 S « i'm A 2 S "^ S X1o•-4yo** •Dii TOgM Tl r~m osr« -o r+ nrUl oUls^MOs•oo>fuw=jir>n ig_3 Ul XTX 11 Ul O •x I K [>» L« \JUl T.r~ | ? V) i•o 71 i ^Bs Sr\>oie* >w x> rn £. • _• mt_ r- -H UIQO ZQ M "•roovno-iJE < ro ->i V>X ~n O o b o b m o S xe-rj2 2 8 3 =g ?M in -4 90 «o 55n«!O) CD Q >q o •oc -•-I -t O-l—I-H -H-H — t) r-pa£ 2m 82 S sr»2TJ n 2 2 8 3 =s(A W) —I * OO o o 2C -»-H -4 (5-Hiis«5l i m m AS€? ^^ to *" i «E X Sacvi oSo• mac o o-*i- sm m 3 <">— <i mw -»o-« Mn on Q *O O 2C -»-H -H O-«sa: 3>m to•o-H OT ITIwio« « ms_ i— -<ODO^OZQ ^ *•"^3P'O-*-<SS <m £ 2 oox So>mr- i t)o> >TJ O o o-«r- •- JO Tl 2 S 8 S Sg S«> w -t 36 eio 5m m 5 rj S— c m «B> cIM —O-H M —-< ?• ' S —Q > • -* -•' P 2C -< ^ * 31 -« .o^ _ fcm 35 S ?-• ut 0 (MA-s| UIK ooooX« o>« • * • nt zSoooxoOOO-H* P PS2S S£8 •n^0 OgS 8 8S? P ?lio i?"5 S/* rnwi ti So I xe- \5S52Sri Q 3 *• w ci> c 6 z> ov> vi -t X s>o 3m m T o 6>—C m *» cW -»O^ W -•-< "—rt.85 'S 5O o 2•H -t Oui *• OX <uiouioz> m-•ooozO -* ooool— s g Si g S *»i J I J> Lri €/>—. X «£(/)T U 3D m **— >3- > 500<Q Zr» tl IAZ:r° _S*i* *^ ^IBQt~ '-<*-cnn «*w. — «*«• B> M g _S £ — » -* O ^ l~ 2283Wl to -4 »ni HI ^ o-•e mrvi —o— « <n 0 DO Q >S 3 3^ ~*_i^ Zj_^ S^ i— S%SS55 <• S »-. v^^*^??*s ^** Ofl <5 ^^ O JC ^O9 ^fl *>J *^ 3» ^* Hi ssssisi ^ •M ^4 Or X ^* 3D ? SS2 S X r- ooooS— ro bbbbzooooo— t* WIXO O5C — s sii o Og5 b bn>o omr- g peco 0 OXO• mXSO3E >0-11- $— _.Sr-S S 8M M -1m in 2IV -»O-tS0 OS Soooozc?SHsJeif-t-iUlo 5oS5o • • rn ^O OO3EQ OCAS a * m c_M>OU4 ^*« ?O ft Bxoox — boKQOOOO-I* (AX • mxo>oO O3BX) pgx bn>O OfH ^ ^ OXQ• mX o 5-ti- S i^l Ul *• *^ MM N MOP 55 55 S 5 2 £ 8(A(A V)CA & *2 tAtft— 1iti nr 01 ftt cnffi irtni^ ftj -^ (HJ •** f*J — * fVI ^* ^J ^4 O S OO OO OO -aS i?s% i?i? i%i% $%s%^^ ^S^u, IgKJ*.^ ^W^^ 38*1*15 SiSoSt SK5i5: SIKKS S!gSa58 MXO O O O O O O O3C>. t • t > • . me.liA O ^K ^p {^ (3 U1 O. J^ QOt & O & O 9> W) ^^I3D ixoo-jo oo-go ooeeo oooooS — •^J (^ *«*| O Vl^dCD^^ ^" O ^* O ^jt ip Cf*^? ^ O UIKo o o o o o o °S"~ ~* ^ O & O & O ^3O« *o -» -* o — o f« -*2>< O0 4^ m ^* ^r\ iA ^* 9* O ^o on w ro w ro ch wmr- iXtO o o o o o o o pjjjs1> o — b — b 1* OK> E § <-TlR(A>-Hm$r~mmr*X •n im r~r- — g ^ 30f}mw 5^ r- ^m r- •* i%P •V Sn «— » 5r-r- -nO W)"•00 Oz£ SO w 3tn*0 c_t —i —>m S-ICA m(A m 3> a• -••_ a^3 (0M a!^io 5 1 f m > (A m osr II* x- SB 5 ^ ? TlOU) — 0 O Hv Qj £^ ^* -^ r^p^ »m 2'TJ— i trt m •a n8(fr-i•— w m *^ i^y 3D •0 I X HIiTI m 1 •sifT HIo. -n ZM Sos^ISM21^It D(A *•o•^ 3O X ^111 w o ** o N, _A ^M •n [ • nBM n E WBI * £ £—T- 1—ro ro -» — «Or- r-e o O p O -n> > > e ot/> V) W »fl -t 3Dni ni m m ^ o— c mro -» ro -»O-H MS S § § -08 5-t -1 — 1 -t O-*-I^-H-« _I_«_(_(B-T> r-iSS? XSXTJSS Sm*SM *-_*«-ro-*> _.*^INJ-. r-uiroui-* uiroui^x mW-*OM UI-*OUIQX <Oi-oui-* ot<oui-»x> mUIOMBOK UIC»>COO>>ZQ -»OO^Ut OO<OUl-f3BUl Ul *O? nj pa row>i TIo^ ui Oh wac> JD ui « Ul «>Q S08 M OB row* m c>r- Sx ""OOOQ ooooat— ro oooo oooozooooo oooo-** tnxo o o oz— o b b b>oO O O OJO3O -» -k i> ->-n>ui *-. o -f-QX S O Q9 OC1>ro 3F romr- Sx</> p p p p*g b b b bz>o o o 0-11- Q— ooo> uiui *-*» w w roro -• —or-S £ £2 S? £5 £2 £ £ 8ttt/1 V>l/> V) t/> V* V) V* V) V) t/1 -Hffi m rnni ni in infn Fti HI ni HI ^^j -* fo -i i\j -* to -* po -* ro -Jo-<Oil Q3 CDO9 DOQD CD 09 00 03D Ooo oo oo oo °S oo gei?Si XTJSl 1%^ I?S? ST]STJ I ? i 1 5 5Xuiro wro wro uiro uiro uiro ox^••ororo uioaro-* uioaro-* w«ro-> wwro— «-<ororoz>-JO9-»rO CT--»O-O •%JUIO'O -SUIO^O O^-*O>O -J»-»IVJZQ-^i^Oa-* UI-»-JO* «-«O<** •O-'O**- Ul-*^4t> -g*-08-»— I* OTXoo oo oo oo oo o os> S O fO f- O f- O ^ P *^ O>QUl *- W i- OJ ^ Ul »•&! ON W»30 O x-•O-vJO ->Ot>->J OOO>-s| OOOO» -»OOOB -"O09OX- UtO<OO -.-slW-sJ QKUlf OB OB«>-UI-> UIUIQKUI QKOUIOZOOBoroo oov-go fsj-o^-o ro<ouiui -«*-w*> *-o--o-** (HXOO OO OO OO OO O OS— OO OO OO OO O O O O>Q_» ui -• ui oui -» ui _» ui -» 0^30:0 _. -» -- Tl>roo o>-» ui o *- o o -. ui oox fooo *o»ro -»ui ^iw ;pjy rrfS'GSroN roo^ ro ui ** ui NO* u* romr- SI-oo oo oo oo oo o oxo _. o -*o -*o -«o -«P i P*,*oro oro oro oiv> oro o ro-*r- c>— r--• —or- S S 8(fl M -tm m 2 ro -*O-H §n oo -PC-i -I O-i Q Q QOZCaiT5STj-i^ _. >o*• ^ —01 t I —O> *- QXd% r^ - ^^ V S^* °s.. • . . mt_kO<OOZQuto*-o-*» ro ulvixUl <OX>• m«-S 2S8 S*oooox« bbobzoOOOO-43O MX0 OZ«§ gss T1>p pgx b bn>o omr- -4 X«l o o±S b bz>o o^r- 3X^iSornUl>—it~mSf-l~mSr- X ^1 m E r- ro r~r- §X 8M > — * m £ m £"1ro ae •ti S m tr- Ul S o w> TJ"•3D Tlr~ r~ TIO M— OJ OK> 0no 3*tn c3-< ,-^i -i —x 3> m uTJ-i w> mMm 3> £• -—s iivi n•- w^i-<o 30 TJ3DSX) rn-« 09(A Tl r—m o5T1 TJ-ssr»m p1 S"".^Ul ODO »O TJ-•3O Tlr- r~ -tiOV)— <n oZ> 0 n 3«ea c_»^ r~ x 3 4jm *— » V> m78 a 1 27 9o ™vt "i*^ w^ £ -< o so TJ i i m QB(A m o ?. -o tt ^"SR ^^ i^ oUlrooi&>wutTl^| r>n >TJ > Tl OX TJ 0 h Ul oUl•s.roo•sS S fTJ4j| Tl ^ * nOH(A >TJ »• TlJOX TJ VQ|h C* i 5 5 g° 5— I- r- —so -n-»or- (— r-i— ~nSo T* "• S> n<= 2 *£ 2w> -H * no 5oo Q >o -oe -•-i O^ __ £ 2 OX 30 — i tlS>o _ _ OM G G S "** ""TO n ffl m 3 o B—c m «n cfO JO-H M -*^ i— an o > i -H —,o o T»C -* x 3-i -i o-« >m a~< —«—• -j — ^ i~ "Ozc fn —^ <A ni "* m w> <2 — at '3'o o _ c 5 if K SS? 3 S ooooZ— «- OOOOKQooo5-*36 O O>Qo o»* o °fi><§ ssF P PffiS £ £s e s s iM -to—I V)S on Q >- s s§ -353351 iMrvioao• • -wo u» o ox o _n>o omi—I c c woat 5 £> e n a ~n *• CD osi e o E> gM vi -t s no 3m m-S S *« 1M -*O^ M -*-< *- o -we -* m —4 M mSum 3> « S a> Sx < woox> m —ro • « m (- r- -H S QOOKQ N *-050-49D < _!« w• . mKOOKQ M:PS;ox -w>°S—oo>o omi- 0 PJ -»<CB DOO O S 3 -co<g zg50_ "? *»jOQWlttj*o-S5?:3 e>HX 5 t m £ £m oox —• • rnzooaeooooo-»* 1 S5? n r> Q -«> > C oOT M -4 3D™ ™ss g OB 9 Q » S S 35 -• rv> p* — & x^ ut S*-MOOOX> £ «-os nx> o06 -«</> m«2 2 OOU1O-I MX g oox. JO — M (A -Im ffl ^ rts m DW1'00riS2283 Sfoo m o > • -i —QQ5C-* -=.3O± >l"-5 f~ ^acc m -n-«-H <: MIHI ** *- (Sac!> mi01 uix OOOOX« -M O O* —s sss I M A »w*t#*»v»*»»w C»M»*» MM • M •*«»«•*S S $|M *K » «« oM•vMO•xi LJ «t«8wl»5» KM 3*8* | 5g8S O O Q Tl — 09 O> > J= o ac> ou> v> -* io oo 5gC -I X 3I~T> I- -Oi z c m —to m-•* tt> X ni m Aw i QX < p -»p OOOX^ m ^ COO* « i m«_ i— —iMOOO-lSo ~* < OOOO— ( P|i O O-«r- I ? § i 2 S t/> Mm m S S S S(/> tn vt y>n m ftl m OD 09 Q O O 2*=-I -t O-i M -* ro -» M -» M -»(?• oo o g So o o g! O -»•< i-tn *+V) i -4 —. ^ ^ * 3> >m <fi-I TJ^</> mr- c/>m 3 r- p -i S § " 3C -n w;o jo OOOOX— M ooooaco O O O O O O O O3C>• • • • • • me- -•OOOO OO-MO OO-^IO OO-JOX— I- 1-*OOO »O<)Q V-O^IO ^OUIOZQ NIO MONO OO->O -OOOO-1* o o o o o o o oac — •^ ^K ^* ^K ^3 ^K ^* ^K 5P PV _. p -• O -• O Wl <O MUl <O -* s ?8| I o o o o o o o _* o -* o '-* o —w -M M -g r\j -M N r1 s i ro i\>2 2M Vtm mfu ^*O» DO3-3-,*--»^* ** ^* ruf«JMO-OJ«OO*-*JWIMCKUIOV*U OB Ul UJ OOOO OOOOOOOO o o§ g o o» o o o oo o 5 5— F F— —or- r-n o o TI> > C Ov> vt -t 35m rn "g otXJ *— O "^ <A1 § si 5ssssil |*--*_**--»M3C m<0 OH **J Oa JE ? mUl 0^ ™^ *^ Z O *•*W O* Ul O1 *4 36 X •s -a"*? •" • • m £ 5ui V*>o £^ &yo yo rti | f r~ •- Mssssss MX * * S zo o>oO O3O JO Ut Tl» N on>-j 3omr- —is ZM P Ps 2g S3? o— oCN o* uiui *• *• OIM iviru — • -* o r~22 22 22 22 22 228€/></> C/1C/1 C/)C/1 <A t/t C/ICA <rt f* — IHI n* nifti nini mfti nirn HI HI 3M ^* M u* ro ^** r**j ^* ro — * ^^ -^^3^O O O O OO O O O O OO "OCi^il iiil lili i%i§ $?i? slii^iyUN WfO OltS> Wro OITM UltM Q?*-^^o f\>-^oo i\j-joo M-NOO CJ--JOO *^-oool>oias;^ as^^ Srtss asas as^ KS^^SOO OO OO OO OO O 03-> f* ^3 £*• ^3 '^ CJ ^^ C* ^"" ^^ **"• O->*6 ox SSoMg SoiS5 ag"iS f:$K2 J!3?S 2:§8:§5S VIZOO OO OO OO OO O C?3J"" oo oo oo oo °° ° Q>Q— OK _» ui -» Ul -• ?- _» J. o UUO* — • o oo ** o ** o mo w ^S** l> *•• O4 O) Ul *^ ™» *» £• O» — • *-O>^i i/i ui ^^ ro o ui ^3 o^ ^^ 0^ ^^ rfl ^™ •Hs§H ______ _ _ O oo oo oo oo oo o oz>uiru UIMJ uiro utru vni*j ui I\J-H^ -1 228W Vt — 1rfl m 3 M — »O ^ On CD O O O "PC•H *H O ^ 53,ui ro Xro *o H5 ^looo-t* — *",»._^^ 04 y ?. . mc_ 3s O^TQ 35 oopoS— bbbbaeooooo-** vtxO O^ "• • mzo e»oo o»* o oo5• • yo ••*o oo>O omr- IS "•• P PSS S S3? gf*cTC*gomw-^mr-r-rtir-_ X TO C r—r— ru I Somvt 5 r-m r- r-m S ru K T|^o Snt r- S> 5— X -nr-r- T«O vt1—00 O06 5•^ *^ ^"^>= 2*-«w mz ?m nG i^^S9 * •o i 5 m >00M r-m n STt-o r* ffl • SM 5S § r™ ^ ^^ •^01 O B25 c. ^ TJ z" Sm A2 3 S 9 ^3••^» ii»»H» >!00<n m 1,D >•5S ^nS^ oVhoos^S*•^*••DO^— 'B'• D i-H D 9 ^ Ul O ^ I yi. o> » •tt [ •• n00vt >•o-< 36 «a Oh O O O -n> > C Q'=203 OJ QO O "DC M -•-< •--IM m"5 £» —£ 5 I r OM2285 zg ?w w —i 36 oO 5ni m 3 ^ w— C nt «m cM -»O-( M -•-< ^ -H -• O^ £1 X?S?-<-l < Ml S U1IV) QvOOJOZ ffl ftl tQ? S 3 IVJ •- S OOOOX— 4- OOOO-I MX S o oox o on>o omi- xo- sees s? s« « -t * no 5TO ni 2 O fi— c m %ra c— • </) i_< Xf** *i 3^ rn (a— T) r- t>KC m -i M mrri ^ uSoo fM«N x_ m-^^i5 S fc OOOO-H * o 25 o >oo on jo a gxt JO —i:? § Si-n O i S n rj o TI —OB o fn ni ^ o w Sc m ** c Q P SC -» x^ >m"2 C "9xc m -t«-t-t < Mm •o -s| M OOOO*— U1• • • • m zOOOOXQoooo-** o ogx o pn> SXW o oSo• « ffl Ko 2 m $S -»tn ^ At -e n Q T« "- in> C o f>IA (A -H 3O OO sQQQQZC m —ICA mX^5xTS-«-< < «m 5g 3 P?*Z_OOEOOOOO-I* PS —— 22 £o oni^ | Pli 1 m OCATt "• CD O n nn? *" c I a X) 00005 s . 3 8 00 00 Q >O O T»C -H-I -t O-tSSSS XE-27sMOn p Q -n —i> > c o E;wi en -H * «iro m ^ o(A -->-< •-« OSC —• m«S£S P pa 2O or»o omr- s 1 XE1: Apartments - Parts B & C Frame Output (Positive, Negative) STATE OF CALIFORNIA - THE RESOURCES AGENCY PETE WILSON, Governor DEPARTMENT of CONSERVATION DIVISION of MINES & GEOLOGY 801 K Street, MS 12-31 Sacramento, CA 95814-3531 telephone (916) 323-4399 fax (916) 445-3334 May 2, 1996 Mr. Terence Fong, RSE Facilities Development Division Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development 1600 Ninth Street, Room 420 Sacramento, California 95814 Subject; Engineering Geology Review of Geotechnical Report Carlsbad-by-the-Sea Skilled Nursing Facility California Lutheran Homes, Carlsbad, San Diego County OSHPD Project No. HS-941820-37 In accordance with your request we have performed an engineering geology and seismology review of the following consulting report: Wagner, R.K., CEG 1612; and Franzone, J.G., RCE 39552, 1994, Geotechnical Investigation, Carlsbad-by-the-Sea, California Lutheran Complex, Carlsbad, California: Leighton and Associates, Inc., Irvine, Leighton Project No. 4940285-01, unpublished consulting report dated June 30, 1994, 19 pages and appendices, one ozalid plate. Our CDMG review consisted of readjng the Leighton report, a telephone discussion with Mr. Randall K. Wagner, Project Geologist; preparation of a geology bibliography for the Carlsbad area, and review of Chapters 16, 18 and A-33 of the 1995 edition of the California Building Code. Based on our review we offer the following comments regarding this geotechnical report: 1. The report is geologically approved and meets or exceeds Title 24 standards. The grading permit is ready to be issued by OSHPD. The engineering geologist and registered geotechnical engineer should review the latest grading plans and issue a brief letter that they have approved the final grading plans. 2. For future reference, the engineering geologist should utilize the terminology of 1995 California Building Code, Chapter 16 for both the "upper bound earthquake" (10 percent chance of exceedance in 100 years, with a statistical return period of 949 years) and the "maximum probable earthquake" (10 percent chance of exceedance in 50 years, with a statistical return period of 475 years). 3. Leighton reports Peak Ground Acceleration at Carlsbad of 0.47gH from a Mw=6.9 earthquake on the Rose Canyon Fault Zone. For future reference, the distance in kilometers should be listed, as well as the precise latitude and longitude to 3 decimal places (not minutes and not seconds). This ground motion is acceptable for design purposes. This PGADBE = 0.47gH is enveloped by the Normalized Response Spectra, Figure 16-3 of 1995 California Building Code, so that Code values prevail for structural design purposes. Engineering Geologic Review of Carlsbad-by-the-Sea Skilled Nursing Facility OSHPD #HS-941820-37 May 2, 1996 4. Carlsbad is within 1995 CBC Seismic Zone 4 and this value should always be clearly stated. 5. The site can be best characterized as 1995 CBC subgrade = Sj and this determination should always be stated using Table 16A-J for Site Coefficient, yielding an S factor = 1.0. 6. In our attached geology bibliography, we list several new seismology reports that have been published since this 1994 report was prepared. 7. Since there is a possibility that an abandoned gasoline tank might be found during grading operations, all parties should be ready for this. If an old tank is found, the Geotechnical Engineer should write an in-grading letter report explaining proper grading operations and close field supervision will be necessary. If applicable, the Geotechnical Engineer should describe this special operation in his final grading report. The California Division of Mines and Geology appreciates the opportunity to assist the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development with review of the Carlsbad-by-the-Sea Skilled Nursing Facility. If you have any questions, please telephone me at (916) 323-4399. Respectfully submitted, Robert H. Sydnor Senior Engineering Geologist RG 3267, CEG 968, CHG 6 cc: Randall K. Wagner Robert Weinberger attachments: Geologic Bibliography for Carlsbad Supplemental Geologic References for Carlsbad-by-the-Sea California Lutheran Homes; OSHPD Project No. HS-941820-37 Carlsbad, San Diego County prepared in May 1996 by the California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology in cooperation with the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development Association of Engineering Geologists, 1993, Preparation and review of engineering geology / seismicity reports for hospital and school sites in California: AEG-CDMG- OSHPD. (Workshop held 2-27-93 in southern California, and 3-13-93 in northern California, 3-ring binder notebook for workshop on Title 24, three-inches thick, various pagination for booklets and four collated sections: Background, Code Requirements, Review Considerations, and Site Specific Considerations) ASTM, 1995, ASTM Standards in Building Codes, 32nd edition: Philadelphia, American Society for Testing and Materials, Publication No. 03-002595-10, 4 volumes, 7,000 pages, 1,300 standards. (These ASTM standard test methods tie directly to tests required by 1994 Uniform Building Code and 2995 California Building Code for schools under California Administrative Code Title 24.) ASTM, 1995, Soil and Rock: Philadelphia, American Society for Testing and Materials, vol. 4.08 for ASTM test methods D-420 to D-4914 (981 p.); and vol. 4.09 for ASTM test methods D-4943 to D-5641 (625 p). (These two volumes cover most geotechnical and engineering geology tests applicable for grading and foundation work.) ASTM, 1992, ASTM standards on soil compaction: American Society for Testing and Materials, 192 p. (26 standard tests selectively collated from ASTM Standards Volume 4.08, Soil and Rock, 1,464 p.) Boore, D.M., Joyner, W.B., and Fumal, T.E., 1993, Estimation of response spectra and peak accelerations from western North American earthquakes; an interim report: U.S. Geological Survey; Part 1, Open-File Report 93-509, 72 p.; and Part 2, Open-File Report 94- 127, 40 p. California Code of Regulations, Title 24, 1995 California Building Code, 3 volumes. (Reference is made to Chapter 16, Division III, Earttjquake Design,- Chapter 18, Foundations and Retaining Walls; and Chapter A-33, Excavation and Grading. Title 24 applies to public schools (permit from DSA) and hospitals (permit from OSHPD). CDMG, 1986, Guidelines for preparing engineering geologic reports: California Division of Mines and Geology, CDMG Note 44, two-page checklist. (A useful general checklist prepared by the State Geologist.) Goter, S.K., Oppenheimer, D.H., Mori, J.J., Savage, M.K., and Masse, R.P, 1994, Earthquakes in California and Nevada: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 94-647, map scale 1:1 million, (an excellent new map showing regional seismicity on a colored relief base) Greene, H.G., and Kennedy, M.P., 1987, Geology of the inner-southern California Continental Margin: California Division of Mines and Geology, California Continental Margin Geologic Map Series, Area 1, 4 map sheets, scale 1:250,000. (covers the Rose Canyon - Newport fault system) Hart, E.W., 1994, Fault-rupture hazard zones in California: California Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 42, 1994 revised edition, 34 p. (This is the official publication to cite in an Environmental Impact Report regarding the presence or absence of Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones in a particular area.) Jennings, C.W., 1994, Fault activity map of California and adjacent areas: California Division of Mines and Geology, Geologic Data Map 6, scale 1:750,000. (Faults are color-coded by recency of movement.) Lindvall, S.C., and Rockwell, T.K., 1995, Holoceneactivity of the Rose Canyon fault zone in San Diego, California: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 100, no. B12, p. 24,124-24,132. Petersen, Mark D., and Wesnousky, S.D., 1994, Fault slip rates and earthquake histories for active faults in southern California: Seismological Society of America Bulletin, v. 84, no. 5, October 1994, p. 1608-1649. Petersen, MJD., Cramer, C.H., Bryant, W.A., Reichle, M.S., and Toppozada, T.R., 1996, Preliminary seismic hazard assessment for Los Angeles, Ventura, and Orange Counties, California, affected by the 17 January 1994 Northridge Earthquake, in Teng, T-L, and Aki, K., editors, Special Issue on the Northridge, California Earthquake of January 17, 1994: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 86, no. IB, p. S247- S261. Reiter, Leon, 1990, Earthquake hazard analysis: Columbk University Press, 254 p. (explains current methods) SSC, 1992, The commercial property owners's guide to earthquake safety: Seismic Safety Commission, State of California, 32 p. booklet. (Available for purchase at $3.25 from SSC at 1900 K Street, Suite 100, Sacramento, CA 95814-4186 or telephone 916-323-4213.) Trciman, J.A-, 1993, The Rose Canyon Fault Zone, southern California: California Division of Mines and Geology, Open-File Report 93-2. Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities, 1995, Seismic hazards in southern California: probable earthquakes, 1994 to 2024: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 85, no. 2, p. 379-439. (a comprehensive study by a blue-ribbon panel which uses probabilistic seismic hazard mapping for all of southern California, including the San Diego area.) compiled on May 2, 1996 for the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development by Robert H. Sydnor, RG 3267, CHG 6, CEG 968 Senior Engineering Geologist California Division of Mines & Geology (916) 323-4399 TONY V. SAWYER (619) 464-6242 • FAX (619) 464- 4516 Consulting Hydrogeologist 2545 Glebe Road • Lemon Grove • CA 91945 December 23, 1996 Project Number 1106D5-1 Ms. Beatrice Griffey Department of Environmental Health Site Assessment and Mitigation Division 1255 Imperial Avenue San Diego, California 92101 SUBJECT: SITE CLOSURE Carlsbad By The Sea 2855 Carlsbad Boulevard Carlsbad, California 92008 Establishment #H36613 Dear Ms. Griffey: Attached you will find the final laboratory reports with QA/QC data for the analyses performed during remediation at the subject site. These reports indicate that the analyses meet current laboratory quality standards. Also included are the manifests for the contaminated soil that was removed from the site. As stated in my report of November 27, 1996, all soil on the site found to have petroleum hydrocarbon contamination exceeding 100 mg/kg was excavated and stockpiled. The size of the stockpile was estimated to be 65 cubic yards. The amount of contaminated soil transported from the site was weighed and found to be 125.57 tons. Assuming the soil weighed 120 pounds per cubic foot, this works out to be 78 cubic yards. Considering that contaminated soil exceeding 100 mg/kg has been removed from the site and that there is no evidence that groundwater contamination has occurred, I hereby request that closure be granted for the subject site. If you have any questions regarding this project, please feel free to contact me at (619) 464-6242. Sincerely, K /f^^r^. - , TonvX. Sawyer, RG43^CHG0040 Consulting Hydrogeologist Registered Geologist * Certified Engineering Geologist • Registered Environmental Assessor Mr. Sonny RosenaJ Alternative Disposal 2674 Via AHda Fallbrook, CA 92028 SUBJECT: DATA REPORT - FENCED VACANT LOT - 2855 CARtSBAD BOIJtJRVARP* CARLSBAD, CA - ALTERNATIVE DISPOSAL PROJECT rr-:c; Project?.* 96 i Mr. Rosenal: cate ttmi enclosed a data report tor the above referenced location. Soil samples were snrlyxed ;n •n-G's OQHR certified mobile laboratory (CERT #1745). Project Summary TAG Allowing analyses were conducted: * i soil for -:otal petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) by DOHS Modified EPA Method 80 1 5 * 1 4 soils for total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) by EPA Method 418.1 The samplus were received chilled in appropriate containers with appropriate labels, «jals, and chuin-of- ci;stody documentation. Project '['lie retmlts for all analyses and required QA/QC analyses are summarized in the enclosed tables. Ml ctilibration&, hlanky, surrogate^ and spike recoveries fulfill quality control criteria. TF-G apprtxiaces the opportunity Ui provide analytical services to Alternative Disposal on this project, if you have any questions relating to this data or report, please do not hesitate to contact us Sincere ly. MM. -Shcri Hartman President, PEtJ, Inc. ^32 NORfMCEDROS AVENUE »SOLANA BEACH. CA 92075 • 619-793-CW01 *> FAX619-793-040« ALTERNATIVE DISPOSAL PROJECT #2885 FENCED VACANT LOT 2866 CARLSBAD BOULEVARD CARLSBAD, CA T6G Project #S61M5W1 TRPH (EPA Mathcd 418.1) & TPH (DOHS EPA Method 8015 Modified) ANALYSES OF SOtLS SAMPLE NUMBER METHOD 3LANK 1 2 o 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 SP-1 SP-2 SP-3 SP-4 DETECTION LIMITS * SAMPLE HAS BEEN DILUTED 10 TIMES ND INDICATES NOT DETECTED AT LISTED DATE ANALYZED 11/15/96 11/15/96 11/15/96 11/15/98 11/15/96 11/15/86 11/15/98 11/15/96 11/15/96 11/15796 11/16/96 11/15/B6 11/15/96 11/1S/B6 11/16/96 DETECTION LIMITS TRPH (mg/kg) ND -'9 T1 ND 2,8;>5 * U 12 MO £6 ND NO 3.570 * 270 1,045 " 2,928 ' 10 TPH-EXT C1Q-C2ti (mg/kg) ND „ „. 3,085 _ „. —., __ — " .. — •- 10 ANALYSES PERFORMED ON-SfTE IN TEG'S CA DOHS CERTIFIED MOBILE LABORATORY (CERT 1f 17-35; ANALYSES PERFORMED BY; MS. KATALlN LOVAS DATA REVfEWCD BYr: *, / Lab name: TEG Fixed Client ALT. DISPOSAL. Method: TPH by modified EPA 8015 Lab ID: 961115W1 Dwcriptfon: Channel 1-FID Sample:*! Operator Autownpfer -SAQOfliV 50.000mV •Component 3ASOUME DIESEL'^ Rahmtton Area 1233 5.084 1,516 24723.163 13.266 3084.499 Extefnal Unite 0,00 0.00 MG«Q O.OOMGACG 27813 s'i | 5 Sn. 8oo£o 11$1o s * 33- >:o ^ !^S ^RfWJTiALCALtB DAVEBRArn)S VEIWN s 1 S(fl £&ain 1 *—tXOa.QJ C£.o a ^ >_j ^^?t£tySBss^ffiaCD< ^P ak ^uJ Q- O -<, to_l oCO *V_E_ £ *\ Ss..u <o31 r> Qj:^ Q.W Xf. 5 /? LLJ *a.CO X£ 1§5*; 35* %— •^Si £S as<t- 4faQ 2 CO g 35 'g1 > a. < a>5P a CL Q£ Q i^o!JJ QC•^&^ O a §o 15) a ew -=• toS oUJa; 2S N« p ^SPKCONC(mgflcg)oz oa. S Oo f:•r-i- 1asu)r-5^in^^ ^i!_ r^v>< ^<C i s # CO NJ *- «« o *r» L•£. COLL a:as8LQ {£. LU1-<02hterjQ HI Q_w >Siaf £5!UJ M fe as? n^ 3 — <x a H * £ ^ S 5 ^ w § S P n K t1— t-J u_ CD- z ^y wD 2 iO LL! F Q. 2 !CEf^TRAT=OW S.°!K!YZED CONCENTRAIT RECOVERY OF SPERCENT DIFFERE* J * mO < LU W 0 5 0 >, < K 5i MI ^r ^0^5O % f\ aO O O , ^«SSw s s« a y^.m•*P.^ *B ^>_ K § a H i i s s U- * Ft£UJO COX TEG'S CA DOTAUN LOVAS\/x /ORMED ON-SITE INORMED BY: MS. KABY:/->U. LL. QSo: rnLlJ SCL a. Q ||1 •^ *T .<^j _j <r< < PZ Z << < Q Del Mar Analytical MSI AHMtJWt., MM, CA «5714 •IfttttlK* MX»t«7>*1B4S i. inc. 267-4 Vl« Altai* PaHbn»<CA 92028 Attention: $onny ROMM^ 2ft, iwaAn*lyz«t N0¥ 28, IMS RApMtM: Mov 28, 10«6 Mrtrix: POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS by HPLC (EPA 38BW8310) Dotttfton Umft aumpto Mtf'KO (ppb) Aowiaphthytone. ChryMne,, Fhiortntt *ndano<1 NtphtfialwwPhwu Pyrene 20 50 6.0 5.0 5.0 8.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 8.0 5.06,0 5.0 30 5.0 G.O N.D. N,D. N.D. N.D. N.D, N.O. N,D. N,D, N.D. N.D, N.D. N.D, N_D. N.O, MO, ML MAK ANALYTICAL (ELAP «11««) w Del Mar Analytical am MM AM. Mnt. CA S37U 101 * ft. Cn% 6f,, iCQ5 O«vHMi*y, Uk c-l r. ARftnutiv* Diiposal, inc. A 9202* AtUnffon: Sonny Res«n«l Cttmt PrtjMt 10: TEO Project «96»1 18W1 86lll*4 cemaos Samptad: Nov 13, 19BO RMtthMd: Nov M, iau BidmcMk Nov 3ft, 1M6 AiutyzKt: NOV », 1tt96 Reported; Nov 28, 19M POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBON* by HPLC (SPA 3550/8310} Anilyte Detection Umtt Sample Reeutt ON*) N.D. S. Pycene DEL MAH ANALYTICAL <8LAP *HUI) Carlsbad By The Sea Contaminated Soil Export Recap Date of TransportiWeighmaster Certificate No. 27-Nov 151238 2?-Nov 151256 27 Ncv None 27-Nov None 29-Nov 151284 Gross ' 36.58 38.5 47.35 46.08 31.23 Tare 14.63 14.63 14.63 15.65 14.63 Net Weight. Cummu.ative {Total} 21.951 21.95 £3.87! 45.82 32.72 78.54 30.43 108.97 16.6 t25.57 2855 Carlsbad Boulevard Carlsbad, CA 92008 NON-HAZARDOUSWASTIMANIMST Carlsbad By The s«*U2859 C*rUd Blvd. 7, Tmmn*'fw 2 Cwiconv Nmna Shave9310 Friara Ko«dSun 0±«so, CA 92108 ft 4, t)Ht<Mi HMwJirf Mil.-vc()«tti ano A If uadcliverabl*, return to geiterata Otqr Itor ; L L C*hi+ttOrign nt racnpl of *«)• matvrldi cnnnd by rhli ManlUw M*.«pt at iwi*d in U»m OR1GWAL- RCTURN TO GCNIWATOR NON'HAZAXDOUS C*ri»bad By Th« Sft*2833 C*rUMd Slvtl. fib<nr*y wvaro* 9310 friars Road£an Diao, CA 92108 Hondttn^ CWw »*i Wiunt UdBd Abom« If uft4cli.vftable, cotuta to gcn«ratoy. ORIGINAL - PlETURM TO GENERATOR NON-HAZAftDOUSWASTE MANIFEST wov• 9310 Friars RoadSan Die30,, CA. 9ZiOt3 • 0. AcMi/wnet 0«icriAiiuAi !»/ Material* Utttd Abavt B. Hwt^BiM Codn *«? Wait** litltd Afaw* , ratara cu IT. TrgrMpM*^ 1 AcVftowMigjr«iB»nr oj K«» OR1QINAU - RETURN TO GENERATOR NON«HAZAKDOUSWAST1 MAMIF1ST CnrUbBtl 3 'Kb* ***«d Blvd. u Ck ^*p \ ; 7. iVamportitr i CompsrY Nniwt P«»i<i<iai«4i Foo'ity S*b*i Bnvi.ronimr.rssJ • >3JQ FrUn Road92108 If undaliv*r«bl«, ttftuca cu gcu«catt>v. amorcettcy ORIGINAL - RgTURN TO OENeHATOR NON-HAZAXDOUSWASTIMAMinST i C*rL»l»*d By Th*853 Cmrl«6»<i Blvd. .--tt3Z< 1 * »*MH>dwd Faulty Nam* and Stic Actdr*»» Stun»y1 >310 rran RoadSan Diego, CA, 92108 teiepbone 519-723-3871 ot f*»i|6l of w«tt* RtatvMl COVtrrt by Ihh manX«i «t*)rt ai natua In Hera ^. ORIGINAL - RiTUKN TO GENERATOR ao a a a a 3ta i3 5 o ff*< -< < •< Fo •*•" •• 5*8 V \ X OT TONY$V. SAWYER (619) 464-6242 • FAX (619) 464- 4516 Consulting Hydrogeologist 2545 Glebe Road • Lemon Grove • CA 9/945 Carlsbad By The Sea 2855 Carlsbad Boulevard Carlsbad, California for Alternative Technology, Inc. 2674 Via Alicia Fallbrook, California 92028 November 27,1996 Registered Geologist • Certified Engineering'Geologist • Registered Environmental Assessor INTRODUCTION In an effort to evaluate and remediate the soil contamination at the subject site, a preliminary subsurface investigation was performed. This investigation consisted of the excavation of backfill and native soil from the area of the former heating oil storage tank location, segregation and stockpiling of removed soil, collection of soil samples from the excavation and stockpile, analysis of the samples by both a mobile and a fixed laboratory, and preparation of this report. SITE DESCRIPTION AND HISTORY The subject site is located at 2855 Carlsbad Boulevard in the city of Carlsbad (see Figure 1). It is owned by California Lutheran Homes, 2312 South Freemont Avenue, Alhambra, Ca. 91803 and was the site of a retirement home. The site is more specifically referred to as Assessor's Parcel Number 203-231-0100 and Establishment Number H36613. The site has currently been razed in preparation for construction of a new retirement home. During the course of site demolition, two underground heating oil storage tanks (USTs, 3500 gallon and 1600 gallon capacity) were removed from the site on October 1, 1996. Analysis of soil samples collected at the time of tank removal revealed that elevated levels of Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TRPH) were found at the west end of Tank #1 (3500 gallon) at eleven feet below the ground surface. The samples from the excavation for Tank #2 (1600 gallon) were below 100 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) of TRPH. It is not known when the heating oil release from Tank #1 occurred, or how much product was released. GEOLOGY The site lies in the north coastal portion of San Diego County where relatively young marine terrace deposits older marine and non-marine sedimentary rocks. The terrace materials are primarily lightly cemented fine to medium sands, with iron oxide staining in Contamination Remediation Report 1106D5-1 Page 1 Copyright O 1996 by Tony V. Sawyer, Consulting Hydrogeologist the upper portion of the unit. The topography of the area slopes down to the west toward the ocean. Carlsbad Boulevs ~d Christiansen Way Former tank location Former building location Stockpile location Vicinity Map (not to scale) Christiansai \GrandAve Way Scale 1" = 60' Figure 1 - Site and Vicinity Map Contamination Remediation Report 1106D5-1 Copyrigit O 1996 by Tony V. Sawyer, Consulting Hydrogeologist Page 2 SITE HYDROGEOLOGY Groundwater at the site was not encountered during the course of excavation, which had a maximum depth of nine feet below pad grade. Pad grade is up to eleven feet below the original ground surface, at an elevation of 47 feet above mean sea level (MSL), No wells exist on the site, so the actual depth to groundwater is not known. As the site is within 500 feet of the ocean, it is believed that groundwater underlies the site approximately 50 feet below original ground surface. The site lies within the Carlsbad Hydrographic Subunit. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS Exploratory work was performed on November 15, 1996 in an attempt to delineate the extent of contamination at the site and to obtain samples from the sidewalls and bottom of the excavation in the former location of the storage tank. This work consisted of excavating soil based primarily upon visual and olfactory indicators, sampling soil from the excavation, testing of the samples by a mobile laboratory, and further sampling. The excavation was extended to a maximum depth of 9 feet below pad grade and up to 18 feet below the original ground surface. A streak of discoloration was observed extending vertically downward in the area where the highest levels of contamination had been previously observed. Excavation was performed to follow this streak and samples were collected where the streak terminated (S-8) and an additional two feet below that point (S- 9). A total of ten samples were obtained from undisturbed native ground in the bottom or sidewalls of the excavation. Sample locations are shown on Figure 2. Samples were obtained by hand from either the excavation or the bucket of the backhoe. Samples were placed in clean glass jars supplied by the mobile laboratory (Transglobal Environmental Geochemistry (TEG)) and marked with the sample information. Contamination Remediation Report 1106D5-1 Page 3 Copyright O 1996 by Tony V. Sawyer, Consulting Hydrogeologjst o S-6 \ - S-8 S-9 o S-10 S-4 . S-7 S-5 S-l Sample location and number Excavation Former tank location N Scale 1"-10 Figure 2 - Sampling location map In order to evaluate disposal options, four additional soil samples (SP-1 through SP-4) were obtained from the stockpile of contaminated soil and given immediately to TEG for analysis. Contamination Remediation Report 1106DS-1 Copyright O 1996 by Tony V. Sawyer, Consulting Hydrogeologist Page 4 All of the samples tested by TEG were analyzed for Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TRPH) using EPA Method 418.1. The results of the analyses are shown in Table 1. Copies of laboratory analyses and chains-of-custody are contained in Appendix A. In addition, sample number S-4 was analyzed using EPA Method 8015 for an extended range of hydrocarbons, and by EPA Method 8310 for polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PNAs). The 8015 analysis revealed a total of 3085 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg, equivalent to parts per million) in the carbon range of CIO to C25. Although some of this is in the diesel fuel range, the laboratory indicates that the material is not diesel fuel. The PNA analysis was performed by Del Mar Analytical and revealed elevated levels of acenaphthene (2000 micrograms per kilogram, |.ig/kg, equivalent to parts per billion), benzo(a)anthracene (270 ng/kg), chrysene (270 ug/kg), fluoranthene (220 |ig/kg), fluorene (260 }ig/kg), and phenanthrene (480ug/kg). Ililntl^^^ S-l S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 S-8 S-9 S-10 SP-1 SP-2 SP-3 SP-4 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 6 8 6 stockpile stockpile stockpile stockpile 19 11 nd 2828 14 12 nd 26 nd nd 3570 270 1045 2928 nd - not detected above detection limit of 10 mg/kg Contamination Remediation Report 1106D5-1 Copyright O 1996 by Tony V. Sawyer, Consulting Hydrogeologist Page 5 DELINEATION OF CONTAMINATION A review of the laboratory data indicates that the contamination at the subject site consisted almost exclusively'of compounds either in the diesel range or much heavier. The laboratory data also indicates that the contamination has been removed from the site and that no contamination above the cleanup level of 100 mg/kg remains in the excavation area. STOCKPILED SOIL MANAGEMENT The soil removed from the excavation was stockpiled awaiting analysis and disposal. The volume of the contaminated stockpile is estimated to be approximately 65 cubic yards. Four samples obtained from the interior of the stockpile revealed heating oil contamination ranging from 270 mg/kg to 3570 mg/kg. Based upon these four samples, the mean concentration of heating oil contamination in the stockpile is 1953.25 mg/kg, with an upper confidence limit on that mean of 3224.0 mg/kg. Stockpile calculations are contained in Appendix B. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon the work performed at the site, the following conclusions and recommendations are presented. 1) The heating oil contamination at the site has been remediated. Laboratory results indicate that heating oil contamination was not detected at levels greater than the cleanup level for this site in the sidewalls or bottom of the excavation. 2) There was no evidence that groundwater underlying the site at depth has been impacted by contamination from the subject site. Contamination Remediation Report 1106D5-1 Page 6 Copyright O 1996 by Tony V. Sawyer, Consulting Hydrogeologjst 3) Stockpiled contaminated soil has a mean contamination level of 1953.25 mg/kg and will need to be removed from the site within ninety days of generation. LIMITATIONS The services performed on this project were conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions. No other representation, express or implied, and no warranty or guarantee is included or intended in this report, opinion, document or otherwise. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of Alternative Technology, Inc. as it applies to the subject site. Use of this report by third parties shall be solely at such party's risk. The findings of this report are representative of the conditions at the time of the investigation; however, changes in the conditions of the property could occur with time. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated, wholly or partially, by changes outside the control of this firm. Consequently, this report should not be relied upon after a period of one (1) year unless submitted to this firm for review. The opportunity to be of service is greatly appreciated. If there are any questions regarding this project, please feel free to contact our office. Reference to Project Number 1106D5-1 will ensure a prompt response to your inquiries. Respectfully submitted," V- Tony VySawyer, CHG 0040 Consuming Hydrogeologist Contamination Remediation Report. 1106D5-1 Page 7 Copyright O 1996 by Tony V. Sawyer, Consulting Hydrogeologist APPENDIX A LABORATORY ANALYSES PRELIMINARY DATA PRELIMINARY DATA PRELIMINARY DATA ALTERNATIVE DISPOSAL PROJECT # Excavation 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. Carlsbad, CA TEG Project *96l115w1 TRPH (EPA Method 418.1) ANALYSES OF SOILS SAMPLE NUMBER METHOD BLANK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7e 9 10 SP-1 SP-2 SP-3 SP-4 DETECTION LIMITS DATE ANALYZED 11/1996 11/1536 11/1536 11/15/96 11/1536 11/1596 11/1536 11/1996 11/1536 11/1996 11/1996 11/1996 11/1996 11/1996 11/1996 TRPH (mg/ka) NO 19 11 ND 2,823 14 12 ND 26 NO NO 3,570 270 1.04S 2,926 10 ND INDICATES NOT DETECTED AT LISTED DETECTION LIMITS ANALYSES PERFORMED ON-S1TE IN TEG'S CA DOHS CERTIFIED MOBILE LABORATORY (CERT #1745) ANALYSES PERFORMED BY: MS. KATALIN LOVAS DATA REVIEWED BY: DR. BLAYNE HARTMAN Page 1 of 1 11/24/98 SUN 16:40 FAX 619 793 (.,-4 TRANSGLOBAL (TEC) FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION TO: ATTN: FAX #: FROM: DATE: PHONE # TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: / SUBJECT: **T /istegf Transglobal Environmental Geochemistry ^ -432 N. Cedros Ave., Solatia Beach, CA 92075-1255 Ph: (619) 793-0401 Fax: (619) 793-0404^^; DEL MflR/CQLTGK TEL:?14-370-1046 Del Mar Analytical NOV 26'96 1* )•» Alton AM.. IMM. CA W» i * 34« w. I an St. MM t. TMPM, « 1*2*1 Afcwitttfe* DttpoMi* Inc.ID: TEG Prelect f9ei116W1 A 12020 Att*nBon; Sonny ROMOII 8§mp*« Dwcatpt Soil, *4 UbNumtar: can 1203 8ampl*d: MOV 15. 1MB toMtod; MOV 20. iwe Exlnwtod; Nov M, 1H« Anilyiad: Nov 36, 1M6 Reported: Nov », 199Q Aiulyto POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS by HPLC (EPA 3S50/8310) UmM (ppto) •00 t0,2,000200 100 200 200 200 200 RD. N,0. N.D. N.O. 2JU ^1IIP 200 200 BOO 200 Pyrtfw,.200 DEL UAft ANALYTTCAU (tLAF #1111) DEL MflR/CDLTUN TE!_:714-370-1046 Del Mar Analytical 25'9*> 12:59 No.014 P.03 i..|i\tfM,£A4?714 iT1*l3*Ho: . ii** A, MM. TU3S OW«MI Why. (MM C11. VM MHyft. CA 914M . urn Attwn«tiv« 2t74VtaAflcl« Fail&IOOk, CA 92020 AttenUon: Sonny Rosanal Extradad:Nov 25. Nov 26. Nov 2A, 1M6 Matrix: ftoU POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS by HPLC <EPA 3550/8310) D«t*«Uort LImK ••mpta Rwutt BMBO(«)pyram. Q«ilo(b)Auofwiin«na. CluyttM. PhenanthranaPyraiw <ppb) 20 SOa.Ds.a 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 20 5.0 6.0 (ppb) N.D. M.O. N.D. N.D. N.O. N.D. N.D. N.O.N.D. N.D. N.D. N.O. N.D. N.O. N.D. N.D. OCL MAX ANALYTWAl. (ILAP «1*») uberatoiy Manager .41rU by:K! 5*: oKl Re•5aII li :< ^coldU nj ^S § -0 -uN V) vfl X U Jl ro V VOA8240 SemlVol8270 [RPH 418.1 i VOA8020 rPH8015(gasolne) rPH 8015 (dteseO rPH8015{gasAdbsel) NA6KV8100 EST/PCB'sBOeO HEX Chrome Organic Lead Total Lead H Metals oUI# of containers 0 3 £ £>9 5 O. . fl>'- . 15. *5NV*roject Manaaer. 3a«/NO. Vjc\ 0' <A IX D fi i- IDO",TJQ> CO ^^ h 0)3Ocrm<I (D Q(D OOD- (D o 3" 01 5*- o-* Oc(0 OO.O •aO APPENDIX B STOCKPILE CALCULATIONS STOCKPILE SAMPLING METHOD The stockpile was subdivided into four parts, with one sample collected randomly (vertically and horizontally) from each part. Sampling locations were selected using random numbers generated by a hand-held calculator. The three digit random number was divided by 1000, then multiplied by the length, width, or height of the stockpile subdivision. The resulting numbers were the x, y, and z coordinates of the sample location. A different random number was used for each dimension and sample. A stockpile plan with sampling locations are shown in Figure B-l. Soil samples were obtained from the bucket of the backhoe or directly from the stockpile and packed into clean teflon-capped glass jars supplied by TEG, marked with the sample information, and delivered to TEG's on-site laboratory, Sampling and analysis of the stockpiled soil at the subject site was performed in conformance with EPA Publication SW-846. The statistical analysis of the stockpile data indicates that the stockpiled soil has a mean concentration of 1953.25 mg/kg with an upper confidence limit of 3224.0 mg/kg, both of which are above the regulatory limit of 100 mg/kg. It can be seen that, based upon the laboratory analyses, a sufficient number of samples were obtained to characterize the stockpile. STOCKPILE SAMPLING STATISTICS TPH (mg/kg) 3570 270 1045 2928 # OF SAMPLES 4 MEAN (mg/kg) 1953.25 SAMPLE VARIANCE 2407422.25 STANDARD DEVIATION 1551,587 DEGREES OF FREEDOM 3 STANDARD ERROR 775.79 t(0.20) 1.638 CONFIDENCE INTERVAL (mg/kg) 682.5 to 3224.0 REGULATORY THRESHOLD 100 DELTA -1853.25 MINIMUM # OF SAMPLES 1.88 O — SP-1 Sample location and number N Stockpile Scale 1"= 10' Figure B-l - Stockpile sampling location map LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnlcal and Environmental Engineering Consultants GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION, CARLSBAD-BY-THE SEA, CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN HOMES CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA June 30, 1994 Project No. 4940285-01 Prepared For: CALIFORNIA LUTHERAN HOMES 2312 South Fremont Avenue Alhambra, California 91803 3934 MURPHY CANYON ROAD, SUITE B205, SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 292-8030 • (800) 447-2626 FAX (619) 292-0771 LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering Consultants June 30, 1994 Project No. 4940285-01 To: California Lutheran Homes 2312 South Fremont Avenue Alhambra, California 91803 Attention: Mr. James Doyle Subject: Geotechnical Investigation, Carlsbad-by-the-Sea, California Lutheran Complex, Carlsbad, California In accordance with your request, we have performed a geotechnical investigation for the redevelopment of the Carlsbad-by-the-Sea complex located in Carlsbad, California. This report presents the results of our subsurface investigation and geotechnical analysis, and provides a summary of our conclusions and recommendations relative to the proposed redevelopment Based on the results of our investigation and review of the preliminary development plan prepared by ODay Consultants, the proposed redevelopment of Carlsbad-by-the-Sea is considered feasible from a geotechnical standpoint provided the recommendations outlined in this report are implemented during grading and construction. If you have any questions regarding our report, please contact this office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Respectfully submitted, LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC Randall K. Wagner, CEG If 12 (Exp. 6/30/94) Project Geologist ^%"A RKW0GF/jss Distribution:(2) Addressee (4) The Steinberg Group Attention: Mr. Bill Williams (2) O'Day Consultants Attention: Mr. Hartley Rich (3) ADL Planning Associates Attention: Mr. Tony Lawson Franzone, R or of Engineering CERTIFIED ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST 3934 MURPHY CANYON ROAD, SUITE B205, SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 292-8030 • (800) 447-2626 FAX (619) 292-0771 4940285-01 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCnON 1 1.1 Purpose and Scope of Services 1 1.2 Site Description and Proposed Development 1 1.3 Subsurface Investigation and Laboratory Testing 3 2.0 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS 5 2.1 Regional Geology 5 2.2 Site-Specific Geology 5 2.2.1 Undocumented Fill (Unmapped) 5 2.23 Topsoil (Unmapped) 5 2.2.3 Quaternary Beach Deposits (Map Symbol - Qb) 6 2.2.4 Quaternary Terrace Deposits (Map Symbol - Qt) 6 2.3 Geologic Structure 6 2.4 Ground Water 6 2.5 Faulting 7 2.6 Seismicity 7 Z6.1 Ground Shaking 7 2.6.2 Ground Rupture 7 2.63 Ground Lurching 8 2.6.4 Tsunamis 8 2.6.5 Liquefaction and Dynamic Settlement 10 3.0 CONCLUSIONS 11 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 12 4.1 Earthwork 12 4.1.1 Excavations 12 4.1.2 Removal and Recompaction of Potentially Compressible Soils 12 4.13 Fill Placement and Compaction 12 4.2 Foundation Design Considerations 13 LEIGHTW AW ASSOCIATES, IHC. 4940285-01 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 4.2.1 Foundations 13 4.Z2 Floor Slabs 14 4.2.3 Lateral Earth Pressures 14 4.2.4 Underpinning/Shoring 15 4.3 Seawall Design 15 4.3.1 Seawall Foundation 16 43.2 Seawall Pressures 17 4.3.3 Seawall Drainage 17 4.3.4 Seawall Backfill 17 4.4 T^pe of Cement for Construction 18 4.5 Surface Drainage and Lot Maintenance 18 4.6 Pavement Design 18 4.7 Construction Observation 19 Figures Figure 1 - Site Location Map 1 Figure 2 - Lateral Earth Pressures for Shoring Systems Rear of Text Table Table 1 - Major Tsunamis Recorded in San Diego County 9 Plate Plate 1 • Geotechnical Map In Pocket Appendices Appendix A - References Appendix B - Boring Logs Appendix C - Laboratory Test Results and Test Procedures Appendix D - General Earthwork and Grading Specifications -1 - LSKKTOH KHB ASSOCIATES, INC. 4940285-01 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Scope of Services This report has been prepared in accordance with your request and presents the results of our geotechnical investigation of the subject property. The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate the pertinent geotechnical conditions at the site and to provide preliminary design criteria relative to the proposed redevelopment. Our scope of services included: • Review of pertinent available geotechnical literature, geologic maps, and aerial photographs. • A subsurface exploration program consisting of the excavation, sampling and logging of 12 small-diameter exploratory borings. Logs of the borings are presented in Appendix B. • Laboratory testing of representative samples obtained during our subsurface investigation (Appendix C). • Geotechnical analysis of the data obtained. • Preparation of this report presenting our findings, conclusions and recommendations with respect to the proposed site redevelopment 1.2 Site Description and Proposed Development The Carlsbad-by-the-Sea complex is located west of Carlsbad Boulevard and north of Carlsbad Village Drive in Carlsbad, California (Figure 1). The complex encompasses three separate parcels: 1) an ocean front lot west of Ocean Street and north of Grand Avenue; 2) a 2.3-acre rectangular lot surrounded by Ocean Street, Grand Avenue, Carlsbad Boulevard, and Christiansen Way; and 3) a 0.9-acre lot bounded by Carlsbad Boulevard, Grand Avenue, Garfield Street, and existing structures to the south (see Plate 1). The beach front property which ranges in elevation from approximately 7 to 44 feet mean sea level (m.s.1.) currently is utilized as a scenic view. Existing improvements include a concrete stairway and concrete landings containing a number of bus-stop type benches. The lot is fenced off and covered with ice-plant. The large 2.3-acre site contains the Carlsbad-by-the-Sea complex which consists of bungalows on the western portion of the site and a large structure consisting of apartments, offices, meeting rooms, chapel, dining room facility and lobby on the eastern portion of the site. The bungalows which were constructed in the mid to late 1950's consist of six multi-unit single- story residences surrounded by landscaping walkways and a water foundation. The multi-story large U-shaped building on the eastern portion of the lot was built sometime in the late 1920's. Site elevations range from approximately 45 feet m.s.1. on the west to approximately 58 feet m.s.1. on the east -1- LEIBHTOHAHD ASSOCIATES, UK. -N- 2000 400O feet Base Map: Aerial Foto-Map Book, San Diego County,1986-87, Aerial Graphic* Page 7D Approximate Scale CARLSBAD-BY-THE-SEA CARLSBAD, CAUFORNA SITE LOCATION MAP Project No. 4940285-01 Dete 6/30/94 FIGURE 1 4940285-01 The small 0.9-acre lot located on the south side of Grand Avenue currently consists of a skilled nursing home/medical facility. In addition to the structure on the lot, improvements include two parking areas and garages at the southwest corner of the lot We also understand a gas station may have previously occupied a portion of this lot Site elevations range from approximately 50 to 57 feet m.s.l. Based on our understanding, the proposed development on each parcel will include the following: • The ocean front lot will consist of a one- to three-story split-level condominium complex with lowest finish floor elevations of approximately 17 feet m.s.1. on the western and 37 feet m.s.l. on the eastern portion of the lot We anticipate that a retaining wall(s) with an approximate height of 20 feet will be constructed between the two finish floor elevations of 17 and 37 feet m.s.l. • The large 23-acre lot will consist of a two- to five-story residential complex with one level of underground parking. We anticipate that the new structure will contain essentially the same type of rooms as the existing building. We also anticipate that the perimeter of the underground parking garage will consist of an approximately 10- to 20-foot high retaining wall. Based on the redevelopment plans prepared by O'Day Consultants, the underground parking garage will have a finish floor elevation of 36 feet m.s.1. Access to the underground parking garage will be off Christiansen Avenue. • The small 0.9-acre will consist of a four-story nursing home/medical facility with an underground parking garage will consist of an approximate 10- to 20-foot high retaining wall The lower most floor elevation is anticipated to be at an elevation of 40 feet nus.1 with access to the underground parking garage off Garfield Street A 10- to 15-foot high retaining wall is anticipated to be constructed around the perimeter of the parking garage. In addition to the three structures proposed on the site, other site improvements will include regrading of the lot perimeters and parkway, construction of diagonal parking spaces on Grand Avenue, parking spaces and construction of a cul-de-sac in Christiansen Avenue (including partial abandonment of the street right-of-way), placement of underground utilities, and landscaping. According to the site development plans, grading of the site will generate approximately 72,000 yards of cut material and approximately 1,000 yards of fill 13 Subsurface Investigation and Laboratory Testing Our subsurface investigation consisted of the excavation of five small-diameter borings utilizing a limited access drill rig and seven small-diameter boring logs utilizing a truck-mounted rig to a maximum depth of approximately 21.5 and 31 feet, respectively. The approximate locations of these borings are shown on the Geotechnical Map (Plate 1). Logs of the borings are presented in Appendix B. The purpose of this program was to evaluate the engineering characteristics of the onsite soils and soils anticipated to be encountered during construction. The borings were logged by a geologist who obtained representative (bulk and undisturbed) samples of the soils encountered for laboratory testing. Subsequent to field exploration, all excavations were backfilled. Several borings were attempted at the base of the slope on the -3- UIBHTQH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 4940285-01 ocean-front lot; however, due to the abundance of rounded cobbles, the limited access rig was unable to penetrate through these cobbly recent beach deposits. Laboratory testing was performed on representative soil samples and included moisture/density determinations, maximum dry density, expansion index, minimum resistivity and pH, direct shear, and soluble sulfate content tests. A discussion of the tests performed and a summary of the results are presented in Appendix C. The density and moisture content of the undisturbed samples obtained from the borings are shown on the boring logs (Appendix B). -4- WGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, OK. 4940285-01 2.0 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS Zl Regional Geology Carlsbad is situated in the coastal section of the California Peninsular Range, a geomorphic province within a long and active geologic history. This region is more specifically known as the San Diego Embayment, an area which was undergone several episodes of marine inundation and regression during the last 54 million years. This has left a thick sequence of marine and nonmarine sediments overlying the Southern California batholith. Recent tectonic uplift has lead to the formation of a bluff and a relatively thick sequence of Terrace Deposits along much of this coast line. 2.2 Site-Specific Geology Based on our subsurface exploration and review of pertinent geologic and geotechnical literature (Appendix A), the site is underlain by undocumented fill, topsoil, recent beach deposits, terrace deposits and at depth by the Santiago Formation. A brief description of the geologic units encountered during our subsurface exploration program is presented below. Undocumented Fill (Unmapped^ Minor areas of undocumented fill soils were encountered in limited areas of the site during our subsurface exploration program. These fill soils are anticipated to be the result of past grading at the site. As encountered, the undocumented fill soils appeared to be derived from native silty sands and generally consisted of light brown to dark brown, damp, loose, silty fine- to occasionally coarse-grained sand. As encountered during our subsurface exploration program, the undocumented fill soils had a maximum thickness of approximately 2.5 feet Although not encountered in our borings, undocumented fill is anticipated to greater depths in the vicinity of Boring B-12 on the northwest corner of the small 0.9-acre parcel In this area, we understand a gas station previously existed. Therefore, excavations for underground tanks are anticipated to be backfilled with undocumented fill soils. There is also the possibility that the underground storage tanks were never removed but simply abandoned. In addition because the site was previously developed, other areas of existing undocumented fill may be present on site. The extent of these areas if encountered should be evaluated during site grading. 222 Topsoil OJnmappedl Topsoil was encountered mainly in the landscaped areas of the complex and on the ocean front parcel The topsoil was found to be generally dark brown, damp to moist, loose to medium dense silty sands. The topsoil was generally 6 inches or less in thickness and contained minor amounts of decomposed organics. -5- LEIGHTOXUfD ASSOCIATES, IK. 4940285-01 2.2.3 Quaternary Beach Deposits (Map Symbol - Ob) Quaternary Beach Deposits consisting of varying thickness of beach sand and rounded gravel and cobbles are present on the western side of the ocean-front parcel These beach deposits, which sit on a platform of more resistant material, are subject to varying thicknesses and composition due to seasonal tidal variations, storm activity, and fluctuations in longshore transport and sand replenishment These deposits are considered loose and not suitable for support of structures in their present condition. Due to the abundance of rounded gravel and cobbles present at the base of the slope on the parcel, the limited access drill-rig was unable to penetrate the recent beach deposits and determine their thickness. ZZ4 Quaternary Terrace Deposits (Map Symbol - Qrt The terrace deposits which mantle the majority of all three parcels consist of light brown, orange-brown and red-brown, damp to saturated, medium dense to dense, silty fine- to coarse-grained sand. None of the borings penetrated the Terrace Deposits, however, at depth, the underlying bedrock unit is anticipated to be the Santiago Formation. Based on our professional experience in the Carlsbad area, the Santiago Formation underlying the site should consist of massive sandstone and minor lenses of claystone. Hie upper approximately 2 to 3 feet of the Terrace Deposits were found to be dry and somewhat less dense than the underlying Terrace Deposits. The upper 2 to 3 feet should be removed and recompacted in areas of near surface structural improvements. Laboratory testing (Appendix C) indicates a very low expansion potential for these soils. 2.3 Geologic Structure Based on our professional experience, the beach deposits rest unconformabry on a gently (westward) sloping platform cut into the underlying terrace deposits. The beach sands are relatively unstratified and structureless with only localized evidence of bedding. Bedding within the Terrace Deposits is anticipated to be near-horizontal with some minor development of cross-bedding. At depth, the site is underlain by bedrock of the Santiago Formation which is also a massive and generally has relatively shallow bedding attitudes that dip on the order of 5 to 10 degrees to the west 2.4 Ground Water Ground water was not encountered during our subsurface investigation. We anticipate that ground water is at or slightly above mean sea level within the limits of the site. As a result, the ground water table should not be a constraint to development However, localized seepage conditions may result due to irrigation. -6- LEIGHTOKAHD ASSOCIATES, OK. 4940285-01 2.5 Faulting Our discussion of faults on the site is prefaced with a discussion of California legislation and state policies concerning the classification and land-use criteria associated with faults. By definition of the California Mining and Geology Board, an active fault is a fault which has had surface displacement with Holocene time (about the last 11,000 years). The State Geologist has defined a potentially active fault as any fault considered to have been active during Quaternary time (last 2,000,000 years). This definition is used hi delineating Earthquake Fault Zones as mandated by the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act of 1972 and as subsequently revised in 1974,1975,1976,1979,1990,1991,1992, and 1993. The intent of this act is to assure that unwise urban development does not occur across the traces of active faults. Based on our review of the Alquist Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones, the site is not located within any Earthquake Fault Zone as created by the Alquist-Priolo Act (Hart, 1992). Our review of available geologic literature indicated that there are no known active, potentially active, or inactive faults that transect the subject site (Appendix A). The nearest known active fault is the Rose Canyon Fault Zone mapped by the California Division of Mines and Geology as being approximately 2 to 3 miles offshore to the southwest (Jennings, 1975 and 1992). 2.6 Seismicitv Hie subject property can be considered to lie within a seismically active region, as can all of southern California. Seismic hazards that may affect the site include ground shaking, ground rupture along a pre-existing fault, ground lurching, tsunamis, liquefaction and dynamic settlement The seismic hazards affecting the site are discussed below. 2.6.1 Ground Shaking The seismic hazard mostly to impact the site is ground shaking resulting from an earthquake on one of the major regional active faults. Due to the close proximity of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone to the site, the most significant ground shaking from one of the active regional faults will occur on the Rose Canyon Fault Zone. A maximum credible earthquake of moment magnitude 6.9 on the Rose Canyon Fault Zone could produce a peak horizontal ground acceleration of 0.47g. For design purposes, an effective ground acceleration of 0.40g based on Uniform Building Code criteria (ICBO, 1991) may be assumed for the anticipated duration of ground shaking. 2.63, Ground Rupture Ground rupture generally is considered to occur along pre-existing fault strands. Since no active faults have been mapped crossing the site or hi the general vicinity of the site, ground rupture is considered unlikely. -7- LEISHTOHAHD ASSOCIATES, OK. 4940285-01 2.6.3 Ground Lurching Soil lurching refers to the rolling motion on the surface by the passage of seismic surface waves. Effects of this nature are likely to be significant where the thickness of soft sediments vary appreciably under structures. Due to the presence of relatively dense material on the three parcels (with the exception of the recent beach deposits), damage to the proposed structure should not be significant 2.6.4 Tsunamis A tsunami is a sea wave generated by a submarine earthquake, landslide or volcanic activity which displaces a relatively large volume of water in a very short period of time. A number of factors at the originating point such as earthquake magnitude, type of fault, depth of earthquake focus, water depth, and the ocean bottom profile all contribute to the size and momentum of a tsunami (lida, 1969). In addition, factors such as the distance away from the originating point, coastline profile (including width of the continental shelf) and the angle of which the tsunami approaches the coast also determines the size and severity of a tsunami. There have been over 500 tsunamis reported within recorded history, most of them occurring within the Pacific Ocean. Extremely large tsunamis have been occurring somewhere in the Pacific Basin at an average rate of one per every 12 years. Table 1 presented below shows a number of great tsunamis and their effects on the San Diego County coastline. Interestingly, the great tsunamis represent each of the major generating zones within the Pacific Basin (Joy, 1968). -8- LEIGHTONAHD ASSOCIATES, OK. 4940285-01 Table 1 Major Tsunamis Recorded in San Diego County* Event/Location Hawaii Prince William Sound, Alaska Southern Chile Aleutian Islands Kamchatka Aleutian Islands Sanriku, Japan Cape Arquello, California** Date 11/29/75 3/27/64 5/22/60 3/9/57 11/5/52 4/1/46 3/3/33 11/4/27 San Diego Arrival Time(hr.) NA +&2 +14 +6.9 +9.6 ? ? ? Wave Height (ft) 0.4 3.7 4.6 15 23 13 unknown 0.02 LaJoJIa Arrival Tune(hr.) N/A +5.8 + 14 +6.6 +9.6 +6^ ? +0.98 Wave Height (ft-) 1.0 22 33 2,0 0.8 1.4 0.25 0.02 * modified from Joy, 1986 and McCuUoch, 1985 ** This is the only wen documented locally generated tsunami in California history. Tsunami studies performed for Southern California indicate that tsunami wave heights and runup elevations experienced along the San Diego County coastline during the last 170 years (including the values presented in Table 1) have fallen within the normal range of the tides (Joy, 1986). Southern California is not only favorably oriented (i.e. not directly in line with any of the major originating tsunami zones), it has a relatively wide (about 140 miles) and rugged continental shelf or borderland which acts as a diffuser and reflector of remotely generated tsunami wave energy (Joy, 1968). In addition, the existing geologic and seismic conditions (such as the abundance of strike-slip faults and the scarcity of large submarine earthquakes) along the coastline also tend to minimise the likelihood of a localized tsunami Recent studies of potential tsunamis that may affect the Southern California coastline, indicate the height of the 100-year tsunami at the subject site is estimated to be approximately 5 feet (McCuUoch, 1985). Based on the minimal height of the 100-year tsunami, knowledge of the effects of remotely generated tsunamis and the favorable geologic and seismic conditions along the coastline, there is tittle potential for catastrophic damage along the San Diego County coastline. However, minor problems such as flooding of low-lying coastal areas and material damage to some water front structures may occur as the result of tsunamis (especially in conjunction with storm surges, high waves, and/or high tides). -9- LftSHTOH 4MB ASSOCIATES, HfC. 4940285-01 Liquefaction and Dynamic Settlement Liquefaction and dynamic settlement of soils can be caused by strong vibratory motion due to earthquakes. Both research and historical data indicate that loose, saturated, granular soils are susceptible to liquefaction and dynamic settlement while the stability of silty clays and clays is not adversely affected by vibratory motion (Seed, 1982). Liquefaction is typified by a total loss of shear strength in the affected soil layer, thereby causing the soil to flow as a liquid. This effect may be manifested by excessive settlements and sand boils at the ground surface. The Terrace Deposits are not considered liquefiable due to their high density and the lack of a near-surface ground water table. However, the loose and granular recent beach deposits may be liquefiable in its present state. Liquefaction is not anticipated to be a constraint to site development provided the recommendations of this report are followed. -10- LEIGHTQH AND ASSOCIATES, OK. 4940285-01 3.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of our geotechnical investigation at the subject site, it is our opinion that the proposed redevelopment is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, provided the following conclusions and recommendations are incorporated into the project plans, specifications, and during site construction. The following is a summary of the geotechnical factors which may effect development of the site. • The existing onsite soils appear to be suitable material for use as fill provided they are relatively free of rocks larger than 6 inches in maximum dimension, organic material and debris, • Ground water was not encountered on the site, nor is it anticipated to be a significant factor during site grading and subsequent development • Active, potentially active, or inactive faults are not known to exist on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. • The main seismic hazards that may affect the site include ground shaking and tsunamis hazards. • The maximum anticipated bedrock acceleration on the site due to a credible earthquake on the Rose Canyon Fault Zone of moment magnitude 6.9 is estimated to be 0.47g with an effective ground acceleration of approximately 0.40g. • Due to the relatively dense nature of the Terrace Deposits, the potential for liquefaction and dynamic settlement of the site is not considered significant However, if high tides or storm conditions (which result in the saturation of the relative loose beach deposits) occur concurrently with a seismic event, liquefaction of the recent beach deposits may result • Only minor areas of undocumented fill were encountered. However, because the site was previously development, some localized areas of undocumented fill should be anticipated. In areas of underground parking, the planned excavation will likely remove undocumented fills. Other areas should be evaluated during grading. • Laboratory test results and our experience with similar materials on nearby sites indicate the soils present on the site have a negligible potential for sulfate attack on concrete, a moderate to possibly heavy corrosion potential and possess a very low expansion potential -11- LEIGHTOK AND ASSOCIATES, OK. 4940285-01 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Earthwork We anticipate that earthwork at the site will consist of site preparation, excavation of cut material, fill placement, footing excavations, and trench excavation and backfill. We recommend that earthwork on site be performed in accordance with the following recommendations, the City of Carlsbad grading requirements, and the General Earthwork and Grading Specifications (GEGS) included in Appendix D. In case of conflict, the following recommendations shall supersede those in Appendix D. 4.1.1 Excavations Excavations of the onsite materials may generally be accomplished with conventional heavy-duty earthwork equipment It is not anticipated that oversized rock will be generated during grading. Due to the relatively loose and cohesionless nature of the recent beach deposits, temporary excavations such as utility trenches, excavations for shore protection, caissons, retaining walls, etc. with vertical sides in this unit may not be stable for the period required to construction the utility. In accordance with OSHA requirements, all excavations between 5 and 20 feet should be shored and/or laid back to a maximum inclination of 1:1 (horizontal to vertical) if workers are to enter such excavations. Portions of excavations deeper than 20 feet, or excavations in fill soils should be no steeper than 1.5:1 (horizontal to vertical). 4.1.2 Removal and Recompaction of Potentially Compressible Soils In general, topsoil, undocumented fill, recent beach deposits, and weathered Terrace Deposits not removed by the planned grading should be removed, moisture-conditioned as needed to obtain a near-optimum moisture content, and then compacted prior to placing any additional fill or improvements. All removal bottoms should be observed by the geotechnical consultant prior to the placement of fill soils. Removal depths in the Beach Deposits at the western boundary of the western lot could not be evaluated due to abundant cobbles, accordingly, removal depths in this area should be evaluated during grading. 4.13 Fill Placement and Compaction Hie onsite soils are generally suitable for use as compacted fill provided they are free of organic material, debris, and rock fragments larger than 6 inches in maximum dimension. All fill soils should be brought to near-optimum moisture conditions and compacted in uniform lifts to at least 90 percent relative compaction based on the laboratory maximum dry density (ASTM Test Method D1557-91). The optimum lift thickness required to produce a uniformly compacted fill will depend on the type and size of compaction equipment used. In general, fill should be placed in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in -12- LEIGHTOH AMD ASSOCIATES, UK. 4940285-01 thickness. Retaining wall backfill soils which support structural improvements or are in excess of 15 feet in height should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent (based on ASTM Test Method D1557-91). Placement and compaction of fill should be performed in general accordance with the current City of Carlsbad grading ordinances, sound construction practice, and the General Earthwork and Grading Specifications presented in Appendix D. 4.2 Foundation Design Considerations The proposed foundations and slabs of the multi-story structures should be designed in accordance with structural considerations and the following recommendations. The following recommendations are based on the assumption that soils in the upper 3 feet from finish grade on the site will have a very low expansion potential. 4.2.1 Foundations Hie proposed structures (up to the anticipated height of five stories including the underground parking garage) may be supported by conventional, continuous perimeter, or isolated spread footings extending a minimum of 18 inches for one- and two-story structures and 24 inches for structures over two stories. The minimum footing depths should be measured from the lowest adjacent compacted soil grade (or slab subgrade for areas covered with hardscape or slabs). At this depth, footings may be designed for a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) if founded into properly compacted fill soils. Footings founded in competent Terrace Deposits may utilize an allowable-bearing capacity of 4,000 psf. These bearing capacities may be increased by 500 psf for each additional foot of embedment to a maximum of 500 psf above the original value. The allowable pressure may be increase by one-third when considering loads of short duration such as wind or seismic forces. The minimum recommended width of footings is 15 inches for continuous footings and 24 inches for square or round footings. Footings should be designed in accordance with the structural engineer's requirements and have a minimum reinforcement of four No. 4 rebars (two top and two bottom). The footing may be designed for passive pressure of 350 pounds per square foot per foot of depth. A coefficient of friction against sliding between concrete and soils of 035 may be assumed. Hie lateral pressure may be resisted by a combination of passive pressure and the friction force, provided the passive pressure does not exceed two- thirds of the total resistance. Care should be taken when removing topsoil adjacent to existing footings to allow enough lateral soil resistance for lateral stability and not to undermine these footings. -13- LflGHTONAHD ASSOCIATES, OK. 4940285-01 4.Z2 Floor Slabs The floor slab should be at least 4 inches in thickness and be reinforced with 6x6-10/10 welded wire mesh at slab midheight. Considering the inherent difficulty in placing wire mesh at slab midheight, we offer an alternate reinforcement of No. 3 rebars at 18 inches on center (each way) or No. 4 rebars at 24 inches on center (each way) placed at midheight in the slab. Slabs should be underlain by a 2-inch layer of clean sand over a 6-mil moisture barrier. Care should be taken not to perforate the moisture barrier. All penetrations through the barrier should be appropriately sealed and all laps spliced We recommend control joints be provided across the slab at intervals not exceeding 15 feet. Isolated spread footings should be structurally isolated from the floor slab for garage areas. The potential for slab cracking may be reduced by careful control of water/cement ratios. The contractor should take appropriate curing precautions during the pouring of concrete in hot weather to minimize cracking of slabs. We recommend that a slipsheet (or equivalent) be utilized if grouted tile, marble tile, or other crack- sensitive floor covering is planned directly on concrete slabs. The floor covering installer should evaluate the vapor drive through the slab if moisture sensitive floor coverings (such as wood parquet, etc.) are proposed. 4.2.3 Lateral Earth Pressures The recommended lateral pressures for the site soils and level or sloping backfill are as follows: Equivalent Fluid Weight (pcf) Conditions Active At-Rest Passive Level 35 55 350 2:1 Slope 55 65 150 (Sloping Down) To design an unrestrained wall, such as cantilever wall, the active earth pressure may be used. For a restrained retaining wall, such as a basement wall, the at-rest pressure should be used. For large walls, it may be more cost-effective to use a trapezoidal earth pressure distribution as presented on the lower half of Figure 2. Passive pressure is used to compute lateral soil resistance developed against lateral structural movement Further, for sliding resistance, the friction coefficient of 035 may be used at the concrete and soil interface. In combining the total lateral resistance, the passive pressure or the frictional resistance should be reduced by 50 percent Wall footings may be designed hi accordance with structural considerations. Hie passive presistance value may be increased by one-third when considering loads of short duration including wind or seismic loads. The horizontal distance between foundation -14- LEIBHTOH AMD ASSOCIATES, UK. 4940285-01 elements providing passive resistance should be a minimum of three times the depth of the elements to allow full development of these passive pressure. The total depth of retained earth for design of cantilever walls should be the vertical distance below the ground surface measured at the wall face for stem design or measured at the heel of the footing for overturning and sliding. All retaining structures should be provided with a drainage blanket or drains (see Appendix D) and appropriately waterproofed. Surcharge loading effects from adjacent structures should be evaluated by the geotechnical and structural engineers. 4.2.4 Undcrpinning/Shorinp We recommend that all construction cut slopes be cut back at an inclination of 1:1 for slopes less than 20 feet in competent Terrace Deposits or 1.5:1 (horizontal to vertical) for the portions of slopes greater than 20 feet or slopes in fill soils. All slopes should also be excavated in accordance with OSHA requirements. If steeper construction cut slopes are desired in certain areas, temporary shoring may be used. Unshored cut slopes should not be constructed within a 1:1 plane down from the outside base of adjacent footings. A qualified shoring contractor should be consulted to provide construction shoring/underpinning recommendations as necessary, including the surcharge loading of adjacent structures. However, preliminary shoring recommendations are presented in Figure 2. Additional design criteria may be provided, as needed, for the shoring contractor. The results of our analyses for cast-in-place piers to be used in shoring/underpinning are provided below: Allowable Bearing Capacity: 5,000 psf Minimum Embedment into Terrace Deposits: 5 feet Allowable Friction Resistance: 400 psf It is our opinion that settlement of properly installed piles designed in this manner should be negligible. However, we suggest that the footings of adjacent structures be monitored and photo documented during construction by the project civil engineer or qualified surveyor. Please note that the purpose of our analysis was to provide preliminary design rough estimates only. Actual underpinning design should be performed by a qualified contractor. We recommend that final project drawings be reviewed by this office prior to construction. 4.3 Seawall Design We understand that as part of the development of the ocean front lot, a seawall may be constructed. The seawall should be designed in accordance with structural considerations and the following recommendations: -15- LEI6HTONAHD ASSOCIATES, UK. 4940285-01 4.3.1 Seawall Foundation a) Foundation Hie wall may be founded on a continuous footing at a minimum depth of 3 feet below the top of the Terrace Deposits which is anticipated to be within 10 feet of the existing ground surface. However due to the abundance of cobble, the actual depth to the Terrace Deposits underlying the Recent Beach Deposits was not determined during our subsurface investigation. Should potentially credible, blocky or weathered materials be encountered during excavation it may be necessary to deepen the footing by as much as an additional 1 to 2 feet An alternative to a continuous footing would be a pier supported wall. b) Allowable Bearing Capacity Provided the wall is founded at least 3 feet into bedrock, the foundation may be designed for a maximum allowable bearing capacity of 5,000 pounds per square foot This value may be increased by one-third for short-term loads. Piers may use an allowable bearing of 5,000 psf for a minimum embedment of 5 feet into the Terrace Deposits. c) Lateral Bearing Value An allowable uniform lateral bearing value of 2,500 pounds per square foot may be assumed for passive resistance to horizontal forces provided the foundation or pier is poured tight against undisturbed bedrock of the Terrace Deposits. d) Friction Factor An allowable friction factor 035 may be assumed between the concrete and bedrock. e) Excavation of Bedrock Excavation for the seawall foundation may require the use of heavy trenching equipment Prior to excavating the bedrock it will be necessary to strip the beach sand and cobbles (which will be at the lowest level during the winter and spring months) and possibly utilize dewatering techniques or other methods to minimize saturated sand from flowing into the excavation. f) Qcaning of Foundation Excavations Foundation excavations should be reasonably dry and free of loose materials prior to pouring concrete. It will be the contractor's responsibility to protect the excavations from sea water infiltration during construction. -16- LEKHTOH ANB ASSOCIATES, IHC 4940285-01 g) Foundation Inspection All foundation excavations should be inspected by the soils engineer to ensure competency of foundation materials and consistency of geologic conditions influencing the stability of the wall. 4.3.2 Seawall Pressures The sea-wall should be designed for lateral pressures resulting from a saturated backfill condition. On the condition that the wall will be backfilled with selected non- expansive sandy soils, the following design values may be applied: a) Level Backfill Active equivalent fluid wall pressure equal to 80 pounds per square foot per foot of depth may be utilized. This value is applicable provided the backfill is level behind the wall for a horizontal distance no less than the height of the wall b) 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) Sloping Backfill Active equivalent fluid wall pressure equal to 105 pounds per square foot per foot of depth may be utilized. 4.33 Seawall Drainage The wall should be drained by a continuous blanket of filter rock placed behind the wall having a minimum width of 2 feet and extending to within 2 feet of the top of wall. Class 2 Permeable Material (Caltrans Specifications) or an equivalent is recommended as a suitable filter material The water should be discharged through weep-holes placed in the wall at frequent intervals or by perforated, non-corrosive pipe (6-inch diameter minimum) drained to suitable outlets. Weepholes should be set at various elevations at the wall face and at least 1 foot above high beach sand levels. 43.4 Seawall Backfill Wall backfill should consist of non-expansive sandy soils such as the native beach sands, sandy Terrace Deposits, or imported sand. If it is desired to use the onsite Terrace Deposits as backfill, this office should be consulted since portions of these materials may not meet the recommended requirements. -17- LEIGHTOHAKO ASSOCIATES, OK. 4940285-01 Wall backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum density as determined by ASTM Test Method D1557-91. Free-draining, granular soils may be compacted by jetting provided the materials have a sand equivalent of greater than 30 and are approved by the Soils Engineer. 4.4 Type of Cement for Construction Tests performed on representative soils at the site indicate soluble sulfate contents are considered negligible based on the Uniform Building Code criteria (ICBO, 1991). Therefore, the foundation and slab can be constructed with normal Type II cement (or equivalent). The seawall and piers supporting the structure on the ocean-front lot should be designed to be hi contact with sea water. 4.5 Surface Drainage and Lot Maintenance Surface drainage should be controlled at all times. Positive surface drainage (such as drainage swales or area drains) should be provided to direct surface water away from all structures toward the street or other suitable collective drainage facilities. Surface waters should not be allowed to pond adjacent to footings. 4.6 Pavement Design Final pavement recommendations should be provided based on R-value testing of roadway subgrade soils as final grades are achieved. For planning purposes, we have assume the sandy onsite soils will have an R-value of 35. Utilizing assumed traffic indices of T.I. = 5.0, T.L = 6.0, and T.I. = 7.0. The actual traffic index should be evaluated by the project architect/civil engineer for the anticipated traffic loads. The following structural pavement sections can be assumed for planning purposes. Traffic Index T.L = 5.0 T.I. = 6.0 T.L = 7.0 R-Value £> "~" JJ R = 35 R = 35 Structural Pavement Design 3 inches of asphalt concrete over 5 inches of Caltrans Class 2 base 4 inches of asphalt concrete over 5.5 inches of Caltrans Class 2 base 5 inches of asphalt concrete over 6.5 inches of Caltrans Class 2 base -18- LEIGHTOK MO ASSOCIATES, OK. 4940285-01 The upper 12 inches of subgrade soils should be scarified, moisture conditioned and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative compaction based on ASTM Test Method D1557-91. If fill is required to reach subgrade design grade, fill placement should be performed in accordance with the recommendations presented in Section 4.1. The aggregate base material should be compacted to 95 percent relative compaction. 4.7 Construction Observation The recommendations provided in this report are based on subsurface conditions disclosed by widely-spaced borings and geotechnical analysis. The interpolated surface conditions should be checked in the field during construction by a representative of Leighton and Associates. All grading operations should be observed by a representative of this firm so that construction is performed in accordance with the recommendations of this report Grading plans and final project drawings should be reviewed by this office prior to construction. -19- LIIGHTOH AMD ASSOCIATES, INC. Cantilever Shoring System Line Load Q (pounds) Surcharge Pressure P (psf) y 0.1 0.6H 0.3 0.6H 0.5 0.56H 0.7 0.43H 35H (psf)0.5P (psf) Tie-Back Shoring System P (psf) \' \' \ Q. (pounds) esistance behind this line Tie Back=400 psf Bond Stress Minimum 5' depth for supporting piles- J - 0.5P (psf)30H (psf) y(feet): LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES FOR SHORING SYSTEMS Project No. 4940285-01 Scale Not-to-Scate Engr./GeoL JGF / RKW Drafted By fw Date 6/30/94 JULd 1042 889 Rgure No. 2 4940285-01 APPENDIX A REFERENCES Eisenberg, L.I., 1985, Pleistocene Faults and Marine Terraces, Northern San Diego County in Abbott, P.L., Editor, On the Manner of Deposition of the Eocene Strata in Northern San Diego County, San Diego Association of Geologists, Field Trip Guidebook, pp. 86-91. Garcia, AW. and Houston, J.R., 1974, Tsunami Run-up Prediction for Southern California Coastal Communities, USA in Tsunami Research Symposium 1974: Royal Society of New Zealand, Bulletin 15. Hannan, D.L., 1975, Faulting in the Oceanside, Carlsbad, and Vista Areas, Northern San Diego County, California m Ross, A and Dowlen, R.J., eds., Studies on the Geology of Camp Pendleton and Western San Diego County, California, San Diego Association of Geologists Field Trip Guidebook, pp. 56-60. Hart, E.W., 1992, Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alquist-Priolo Special studies Zones Act of 1972 with Index to Special Study Zones Maps: Department of Conversation, Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 42. lida, K., 1969, The Generation of Tsunami and the Focal Mechanism of Earthquakes m Tsunamis in the Pacific Ocean: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Tsunamis and Tsunami Research, University of Hawaii; East-West Center Press. International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO), 1991, Uniform Building Code. Jennings, C.W., 1975, Fault Map of California: California Division of Mines and Geology, Geologic Map No. 1, Scale 1:750,000. , 1992, Preliminary Fault Activity Map of California: California Division of Mines and Geology, Open File Report 92-03, Scale 1:750,000. Joy, J.W., 1968, Tsunamis and Their Occurrence Along the San Diego County Coast Prepared for the Unified San Diego County Civil Defense and Disaster organization: Westinghouse Ocean Research Laboratory. Leighton and Associates, 1992, City of Carlsbad Geotechnical Hazards Analysis and Mapping study, 84 Sheets, dated November, 1992. , In-house Unpublished and Unpublished data. Lindvall, S.C, Rockwell, T.K., and Lindvall, CE, 1990, The Seismic Hazard of San Diego Revised: New Evidence for Magnitude 6+ Holocene Earthquake on the Rose Canyon Fault Zone: Proceedings of Fourth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Volume 1, pp. 679-688. A-l 49402854)1 APPENDIX A (Continued) McCulloch, D.S,, 1985, Evaluating Tsunami Potential in Ziony, ed, 1985, Evaluating Earthquake Hazards in the Los Angeles Region - An Earth-Science Perspective: U.S. Geological Survey, professional Paper 1360, pp. 375-413. Nielsen, R.C., and Moffatt, G.E., Architects and Engineers, 1958, As-built Plot Plan, Bungalow Apartment Units, Carlsbad by the Sea, Job No. 5802, Scale r=16', dated January 22, 1958. O'Day Consultants, 1994, Preliminary Site Plan, Carlsbad-by-the-Sea, Carlsbad, California, Job No. 93-1015, Scale 1"=20', dated June 1994. Reichle, MS., and Kahle, J.E., 1990, Planning Scenario for a Major Earthquake, San Diego-Tijuana Metropolitan Area: California Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 100. Seed, H.B., and Idriss, I.M., 1982, Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes, Monogram Series, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, California. Weber, F.H., Jr., 1963, Geology and Mineral Resources of San Diego County, California: California Division of Mines and Geology, County Report 3, 309p. , 1982, Recent Slope failures, Ancient Landslides and Related Geology of the North-Central Coastal Area, San Diego County, California, California Division of Mines and Geology, Open File Report 82-12, LA. Wilson, K.L., 1972, Eocene and Related Geology of a Portion of the San Luis Rey and Encinitas Quadrangles, San Diego, California. Ziony, J.I., and Yerkes, R.F., 1985, Evaluating Earthquake and Surface-Faulting Potential in Ziony, ed., 1985, Evaluating Earthquake Hazards in the Los Angeles Region - An Earth - Science Perspective: U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 1360, pp. 43-91. A-2 GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG KEY Date. Project Drilling Co. Hole Diameter Elevation Top of Hole KEY TO BORING LOG GRAPHICS Drive Weieht Ref. or Datum Sheet 1 of 1 Project No. TvoeofRig Drop in.1 evat i on 1Feet 1LU 11 o — VI U Q(0 CD / / % A * A A A * 1 • 1 // ^%>: D'V e- * 3 Vo • xix>K W"^™ LZ"LZ v o 9 x\to1]TicYr " "* > W///,$ W n3 %A. rf •1 1 % •:•: #4; r .c : #E=J_i ^"* — ? ^foff •i- ?// W v"v <uTJ 4- -1- *ozQJ^301 1-0. - |£ •>- Utc**-01 U00. a 1o i sturesntent, Xu i to~ CL CH OL-OI ML MH CL-MI ML-» CL-SC sc-5^ sw SP SM sc GW GP GM GC GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Loeeed By Sampled Bv Inorganic clay of low to medium plasticity; gravelly clay; sandy clay; silty clay; leanday Inorganic clay of high plasticity; fat clay Organic clay, silt or silty clay-clayey silt mixtures Inorganic silt; very fine sand; silty or clayey fine sand; clayey silt with low Inorganic silt; diatomaceous fine sandy or silty soils; elastic silt Low plasticity clay to silt mixture Sandy silt to silty sand mixture Sandy clay to clayey sand mixture Clayey sand to silty sand mixture Well graded sand; gravelly sand, little or no fines Poorly graded sand; gravelly sand, little or no fines Silty sand; poorly graded sand-silt mixture Clayey sand; poorly graded sand-clay mixture Well graded gravel; gravel-sand mixture, little or no fines Poorly graded gravel; gravel-sand mixture, little or no fines Silty gravel; gravel-sand-silt mixture Clayey gravel; gravel-sand-clay mixture Sandstone Siltstone daystone Breccia (angular gravel and cobbles or matrix-supported conglomerate) Conglomerate (rounded gravel and cobble, clast-cupported) Igneous granitic or granitic type rock Mettrvokanic or metamorphic rock Artificial or man-made fill Asphaltk concrete - 505A(11/77)LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG B-1 Date 6-22-94 Sheet 1 of 1 Proiect Drilling Co. Hole Diameter Elevation Top of Hole 4 In. +/- 9 Cal Lutheran/Carlsbad Pacific Drilling Drive Weight ft. Ref. or Datum 140 nounds Project No. Type of Rig See Geotechnical Mao 4940285-01 Limited Access Drop 30 in.E 1 evat i on(feet)5- 0 -5 •10 -is- -20- || 0 — - f - 10 — - IS — - 20 — - 25 — - O CD < s Notes*s "a *CO Bag-l §8 511" Q. 314- §M-OOQ. Q Mo i stureContent <X> |•~ ** • O ^jCO GM GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Logged Bv JB^)LG Sampled Bv JB RECRNT REACH DPf OSITS @ 0': Light brown, loose, damp, silty, cobbly SAND to sandy COBBLE \Rcfusal at 1.5 feet on abundant cobbles ' Total Depth - t5 Feet No Ground Water Encountered Backfilled oo June 22, 1994 - - ' - - - - - - - • 505A<11/77)LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES GEOTECHN1CAL BORING LOG B-2 — Date 6-22-94 Sheet Proiect Drilling Co. Hole Diameter 4 In. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 37 Cal Lutheran/Carlsbad Pacific Drilling Drive Weight ft Ref. or Datum Proiect No. TvpeofRie 140 pounds See Geotechntcal Map 4940285-01 Limited Access Drop 30 in. g "-•£«ffi V* in 35- 30- 25- 20- 15- 10- •£"mft S«2s o — - 5— — 10 — - - 15 •—" - 20 — - 25 — - •V) u .c0«& - '• •- c1B1J ? • •Ho *o •* o. CO ' ' +, 3 °o 21 1 28 t £H-0oav/ 31 i 0,3 3+.*. ^ 5c3 u • _ J O a^ » Q^~Co SM SP-SM GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Loeeed Bv JB^LG Sampled Bv JB TERRACR nRPOSTTS @ O1: Light brown to Uzht orange-brown.dry to damp, kxise to medium dense, silty, fine- to medium-grained SAND @ 1': Light brawn to light orange-gray, damp, medium dense, silty, fine- to medium-grained SAND; taint oxidized laminae; a few rootlets @ 5': Light brown to light orange-brown, damp, medium dense, slightly silty to silty, fine- to medium-grained SAND; faint oxidized laminae; a few rootlets - @ 10*: Light orange-brown to light brown, dampto moist, medium dense, slightly silty to silty, fine- to medium-grained SAND Total Depth - 11 Feet No Ground Water Encountered Backfilled on June 22, 1994 - - - - - - " 505A(11/77)LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES - Date 6-22-94 GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG B-3 Cal Lutheran/Carlsbad Sheet 1 of 1 Project No. 4940285-01Project Drilling Co. Pacific Drilling Type of Rig Limited Access Hole Diameter 4 in. Drive Weight 140 pounds Drop 30 in. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 31 ft. Ret or Datum See Geotechnlcal Map c •H"m«s 111 30- 25- 20- 15 10- > ^"*~ !iiQ jX °£ o — - - 5— 10— - 15 — - 20 — - 25 — O !EQ2 '.• ' ' :- 0>o-1 •.- * .L 01•1-o f o .. * Q. •v • ' 4- 3nO to ^ 39 31 3, "(JtXNC«*-01 Oa a. a 109.4 ajS « +. !A f *o"c 4*P Qo 16 L)_w •WP * Q^Jww SM SP-SM SP GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Logged Bv JB/DLG Sampled By JB TERRACE DEPOSITS/FIU/?)@ O1: Light brown, damp, loose to medium dense, silty, fine- to medium-grained SAND; uniform, with occasional rounded, fine gravel @1': Caving; water added to sustain upper portion of bole TERRACE DEPOSITS @2': Denser, slower drilling @ 5': Light brown to orange-brown, damp to moist, medium dense, silty toslightly silty, fine- to medium-grained SAND @10*: Same as above - todean, fine- to medium-grained SAND; uniform Total Depth - 1&5 Feet No Ground Water EncounteredBackfilled on June 22, 1994 • - - 505A(11/77)LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES Date 6-22-94 GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG B-4 Cal Lutheran/Carlsbad Sheet 1 of 1 Project No. 4940285-01Project Drilling Co. Pacific Drilling T^peofRig Limited Access Hole Diameter 4 in. Drive Weight 140 pounds Drop 30 in. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 22 ft. Ret or Datum See Geotechnlcal Man E 1 evat i on<feet> |20 15- 10 5 0 -s- fl0$ 0 — - 5 — - 10 — 15 — - 20 — 25 — V\ — O :L ~ • T y • • • . i Ul01 o *o tl1 0) • 2 i i - - s§!"• 03 Jj Q. 37 28 1C ew o 110.4 Mo i stureContent <X)7.5 * « * * f^ 9 SM SP-SM SP SP-SM GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Logged Bv JB/DLG Sampled Bv JB @W: Ijmdscapmgandtopsoa TERRACE DEPOSITS @ 6": Brown to light orange-brown, moist to damp, medium dense, silty, fine- to nwdium-gruned SAND @ 5*: Light orange-brown to brown, damp, medium dense, silty to slightly silty, fine- to medium-grained SAND; a few occasional fine gravels - @ 10*: Orange-gray to orange-brown, moist, medium dense, slightly silty to silty, fine- to medium-grained SAND; root hairs @ 15*: Light gray to light gray-brown, moist, medium dense, slightly silty, fine- to medium-grained SAND - @20*: Light gray to brown, damp to moist, medium dense, slightly rilty to silty, fine- to meoium-grained SAND; laminated Total Depth • 21.5 Feet No Ground Water Encountered Backfilled on June 22 1994 - - 505A(11/77)LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG B-5 — Date Project 6-22-94 Sheet 1 of 1 ct ngCo. Diameb tionTo] er 4 In. p of Hole +/- 53 Cal Lutheran/Carisbad Pacific DrilliniE Drive Weight ft Ref. or Datum Project No. TvpeofRip 140ix>ands See Geotechnlcal Map 4940285-01 Limited Access Drop 30 in. o~ 181- Ul SO- 45 40 35 30 25 ^ I! o — - f - 10— - 15— - 20— - 25— - •an — O 0« CD - • - - L; -I f ^ o 01 a CO • ' •i- Jg ° " 24 , •H c£at oQ5 fa 104.7 ^gi.VS^11of ^™ o° « • 8(0 _co o^ SM SP-SM GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Loeeed Bv JB/DLG Sampled Bv JB , @ 0-6": Landscapmg and Tojxoil TF.RRAGE DEPOSITS@ 6": Brown to light brown, moist, loose, silty, fine- to medium-grained SAND - @ 5': Brown to light brown, moist, \oote, silty, fine- to medium-grained SAND ' @ 10*: Same as above; material becomes more dense - @15': Light brown and orange-brown, moist, medium dense, slightly silty, to silty, fine- to medium-grained SAND with lamination ToUl Depth - 163 Feet No Ground Water Encountered Backfilled on June 22, 1994 • - • - 505A(11/77)LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES - Date 6-21-94 Project Drilling Co. Hole Diameter Elevation Top of Hole +/- 53. GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG B-6 Cal Lutheran/Carlsbad Pacific Drilllne Sheet 1 of 2 Project No. 4940285-01 Type of Rig 8 in.Drive Weight ft Ref. or Datum 140 rounds See Geotechnlcal Map Limited Access Drop 30 in. c 15* $tu so- 45- 40- 35- 30- 25- ii o — - 5 — - 10 — - 15 — - — 20— - 25 — U 40^J& '.-• • •'. '••• • •'. '•••'. ••••'. •••-'. ••••'. •• •'. ••••'. •'••'. 01 O i tl1 CO 11 2 ' Bag-1 *1™ ' +- I1*- 18 22 • « •*- SooZL 4 110^ 106.0 123J 102.9 ^01^5 °c o 7.5 7.7 43 » » _5 • <8^ SM SP GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Lo£ged Bv JQ/DLG Sampled Bv DLG PAVBMEPfT SP/mON @0-2'; Asphalt @ 2--1CT: DC base, light brown, damp, loose, silty SAND TBRRACP. nppnsrrs @ 2': Red-brown, damp, medium dense, fine-grained SAND @5': Red-brown, damp, dense, fine-grained SAND - @ 10*: Light red-brown, damp, dense, fine-grained SAND - - - " @20*: Same as above - m - 505A{11/77)LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG B-6 Date 6-21-94 Project Drilling Co. Hole Diameter 8 in. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 53 Sheet 2 of 2 Cal Lutheran/Carlsbad Pacific Drilling Drive Weight ft Ref. or Datum 140 nounds Project No. Type of Rig See Geotechnlcal Map 4940285-01 Limited Access Drop 30 in.E 1 evat 1 on<feet) |20- 15- 10- 5 o- -5 •c£ *Io£ 30 — - 35 — - 40 — - 45 — - 50— - 55 — fj\ U«2J O -'-•.'.-' 8 O •O tl a 1 §8 8^ "fcQ. 5 J 82/11- 3»*- "*<-sCM-010QQ.•^ 7 a 101,6 Mo i stureContent (X)5.6 «- *«!0"_w o3ww GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Logged Bv JR/DLG Sampled By i)LG @ 30': Light brown, damp, very dense, medium-grained SAND Total Depth - 31 Feet No Ground Water Encountered Backfilled on June 21, 1994 - ' - - . - : - • - 505A(11/77)LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG B-7 Date 6-21-94 Project Drilling Co. Hole Diameter 7 In. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 44 Cal Lutheran/Carlsbad Pacific Drilling Drive Weight ft. Ref. or Datum 140 pounds Sheet 1 Project No. Type of Rig See Geotechnical Map of 1 4940285-01 Limited Access Drop 30 in.vat i onFeet)*~ LU 40- 35- 30 25- 20- 15- •c£8 0^ 0 — - < — - 10 — _ 15— - ***M - f*f,£3™ «1 O D.10 CD 1n ^ aO \ • • . £•»-Oz — s tl (A 1L i I L2 3 I ' $8i"- 015 33 39 32 - 31*• "5^.CM-XXw7£ 117J 115.7 105^ 97^ 4,.\* S~ ft£c^a &8 6-5 5.0 2.7 *^ «« 0^ •o3<o^ — SM SP SP-SM GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Loeeed Bv JB/DLG Sampled Bv DLG x @ 0-3": Asphalt TERRACE DETO5US@ 3": Dark red-brown, damp, medium dense, alty fine SAND @ 2': Dark red-brown, damp, dense, silty fine SAND; well indurated - @ 5*: Red-brown, damp, dense, fine SAND; indurated - @10*'. Light red-brown, damp, dense, fine SAND - - - @20": Light brown, damp, dense, medium to coarse SAND - @25': Sand contains abundant rounded beach cobbles \@265': Refusal on cobbles? f Total Depth • 2&S FeetNo Ground Water Encountered Backfilled on June 21, 1994 505A(11/77)LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES 6-21-94Date Project Drilling Co. __ Hole Diameter Elevation Top of Hole +/- 54_ GEOTECHN1CAL BORING LOG B-8 Cal Lutheran/Carlsbad Pacific Drilling Sheet 1 of 2 Project No. 4940285-01 Type of Rig 8 to.Drive Weight ft Ret or Datum 140 uounds See Geotechnical Map Limited Access Drop 30 in. 5« ••-•oi?8teUJ so 45- 40- 35- 30- 25- ^"m & — — - 5 — - 10— _ 15 — - 20— : 25— - -3Q=! o £fl CD . -; . •; ;:i * ", • •'. •\ -; • s»3 ' ' • . , £ •oz E CO 1 1 1 2 ' • +. §1° 11 18 40 38 •*- C*^Sudav/a a 10Z8 119.2 1102 99^ 0)^5L?*»S £rC0O 5.8 9.4 U U W^ _5 • ^^ * o^^ SM SP SM GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Lopped Bv J^)LG Sampled Bv DLG FILL @0': Dark brown, moist, loose, silty fine SAND TRRRACR DEPOSITS @ 2': Dark red-brown, damp, loose, fine-grained SAND; abundant roots - @ 5': Red-brown, damp, medium dense, fine- to medium-grained SAND; abundant tree roots @ Iff: Red-brown, damp, dense, fine- to medium-grained SAND; scattered tree roots - - - @20': Light red-brown, damp, dense, silty SAND - - : 505A(11/77)LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG B-8 Date 6-21-94 Project Drilling Co. Hole Diameter 8 In. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 54 Sheet 2 of 2 Cal Lutheran/Carlsbad Pacific Drilling Drive Weifiht ft Ret or Datum 140 pounds Project No. type of Rig See Geotechnical Man 4940285-01 Limited Access Drop 30 in.E 1 evat i on(feet) |20 15- 10 5- 0- -5- I! 30 — - *f - 40 — - 45 — - 50— - 55 — - O !cnQ.O u> 1Ci *o 01 a idCO 4-s§I11-a fcD_ 5 J 86/11- £y^D & 106.1 Mo 1 stureContent C5i)4.8 « _ 1j o3w SM GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Loeeed Bv JE/DLG Sampled Bv DLG @30': Light brown, moist, dense, tilty SAND Total Depth - 31 Feet No Ground Water Encountered Backfilled on June 21, 1994 - - - - - - - - - - - 505AC11/77)LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES Date 6-21-94 GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG B-9 Cal Lutheran/Carlsbad Sheet 1 of 1 Project No.4940285-01Project Drilling Co. Pacific Drilling TVpe^Rig Limited Access Hole Diameter 8 In. Drive Weight 140 pounds Drop 30 in. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 58 ft Ret or Datum See Geotechnical Map fe^ Is LU 50- 45- 40- 35 30- £^8 0 — - 5 — - 10 — 15 — - 20 — - 25 — - U .CO)Q.O CD • ' ' • >-^4 ;-•:•. w01•*-o o V 0, CO 1 1 1 2 1 • •1- *0 Sfc 15 24 " 3, — ^«u °& k 1193 119^ 1083 /> f$ °C U 13.5 9.4 6.4 # Sco • * O?"*0] SM SM SP GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Lopped Bv J^DLG Sampled Bv DLG FILL ©0-2': Dark brown, moist, loose, silty fine-grained SAND TRRRACP. np.posrrs @ 2': Dark red-brown, moist, medium dense, silty SAND; abundant roots @ 5': Dark red-brown, moist, dense, medium-grained SAND; well indurated - @10*: Same as above Total Depth - 11 Feet No Ground Water Encountered Backfilled on June 21, 1994 : • : - „ • 505A(11/77)LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES 6-21-94Date Project Drilling Co. _ Hole Diameter Elevation Top of Hole +/- 56_ GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG B-10 Cal Lutheran/Carlsbad Pacific Drilling Sheet 1 of 2 Project No. 4940285-01 Type of Rig 8 In.Drive Weight ft. Ref. or Datum 140 oounds See Geotechnical Map Limited Access Drop 30 in. g^ |f ui 55 50 45 40- 35- 30- f| 0 — - - 5 — - 10 — 15— - 20 — 25 — - •w — o Q.O CD '••' ' •'. ;H '•" ' •'. .' ' • • •' ' ' * . •• " ' • . 01 •4-o o "a CO 1 l 2 ' • +;§ou. 11 17 » • 31•H CM-°2 h 105.1 102.5 101.0 102.9 ^sjiS .- •*o-tEc5 8.2 6.6 4.7 - * Sea^ * »CA jgM * O fjCO SM SP GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Logged Bv J^/DLG Sampled Bv DLG FIIJ. @0': Dark brown, damp, loose, silty fine SAND JERRACE DEPOSITS @ 2': Dark red-brown, damp, loose, fine SAND; abundant roots @5': Red-brown, damp, dense, fine SAND; saturated tree roots - @ 10*: Red-brown, daopi dense, fine SAND; locally moderately cemented,scattered tree roots - - @20": Ugbt red-brown, damp, dense, fine SAND - - - 505AC11/77}LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG B-10 Date 6-21-94 Project DriUineCo. Hole Diameter 8 in. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 56 Cal Lutheran/Carlsbad Pacific DrUUns Drive Weight ft. Ref. or Datum Sheet 2 Project No. TypeofRifi 140 pounds See Geotechnical Map of 2 4940285-01 Limited Access Drop 30 in. O/N Elevat(feet25- 20- 15- 10 5 0 ^ II 30 — - 35 — - 40— - 45 — - 50— - 55 — - ff\ U £0)Tig O 01•l-o o 01 Q- *W +- M°§ o I"" Q. Ml" ^•H c1*.01 g °5 31 Q 99.8 ^v «SL MoistuContent« * 8w CO* SP GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Logged Bv JBj/DLG Sampled Bv DLG @ 301: Light brown, damp, dense, Tine SAND Total Depth - 31 Feet No Ground Water Encountered Backfilled on June 21, 1994 - - - - - - - - . - • 505A(11/77)LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES Date 6-21-94 GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG B-11 Cal Lutheran/Carlsbad Sheet 1 of 1 Project No. 4940285-01Project Drilling Co. Pacific Drilling Type of Rig Limited Access Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight 140 pounds Drop 30 in. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 56 ft. Ref. or Datura See Geotechnical Mao o~?steu 55- 50- 40- 35- 30- •c? tila£ 0 — - - 5 — - 10 — ~ - 15 — - 20 — - 25— - U .CO)CLO<0_J tD ^ . • - - ' • • -\-^J-'.-r '.- • :• -: i I*V o £ 01 Q. 10 1 1 1 I 2 jBag-ll@5^8' - «8 10 Jj 14 1 20 (34 Dt•*- 01 QQ Q. O 103.6 111J ^2^ lls 10.9 9* 5.8 • go> # W^ SM SM SP GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Loaned Bv JB/DLG Sampled Bv DLG FIIJ. @ 0-1^': Dark brown, moist, loose, silty fine SAND TERRACE DEEQSTK@ U': Red-brown, moist, medium dense, silty fine SAND @5': Red-brawn, moist, dense, medium-grained SAND - @10*: Red-brown, moist, dense, SAND Total Depth - 11 Feet No Ground Water Encountered Backfilled on June 21, 1994 - - : • - - 505A(11/77)LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES Date 6-21-94 GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG B-12 Cal Lutheran/Carlsbad Sheet 1 of 1 Project No. 4940285-01Project Drilling Co. Pacific Drilling Type of Rig Limited Access Hole Diameter 8 in. Drive Weight 140 pounds Drop 30 in. Elevation Top of Hole +/- 56 ft. Ref. or Datum See Geotechnical Map °~ is«**•-U^u 55- 50- 45- 40 35 30- f!Q£ o —_ — - 5 — - 10 — - - 15— - 20— _ 25— - v\ — o«*ft ip r-' >? o»o •'-• -7 - . •;4 •*-o •o 01 i 1L i 2 1 Bag-ll • •*-SO0o^- CQ^j 26 64 • •*- CH-OI UQ5 a 111.9 131.7 110^ •S ^~ ftO 4.1 6.4 4.6 • * SM SP SM SP GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Loeced Bv JB/bLGcm r ^ Sampled Bv DLG - @ 0-2": Asphalt ELL@ 2": to 5": Light brown, damp, loose, cilty coarse SAND @ 2': Obstruction, possible pavetneat from former ^s station, possible tanks in '\. place ' TRRRACE DEPOSITS @ Z5': Dark red-brown, damp, dense, SAND @ 5': Dark red-brown, damp, very dense, silty SAND; moderately cemented - @10': Light red-brown, damp, dense, SAND Total Depth - 11 FeetNo Ground Water Encountered Backfilled on June 21, 1994 - - - - - - - 505AC11/77)LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES 4940285-01 APPENDIX C Laboratory Testing Procedures and Test Results Direct Shear Tests: Direct shear tests were performed on selected remolded and/or undisturbed samples which were soaked for a minimum of 24 hours under a surcharge equal to the applied normal force during testing. After transfer of the sample to the shear box, and reloading the sample, pore pressures set up in the sample due to the transfer were allowed to dissipate for a period of approximately 1 hour prior to application of shearing force. The samples were tested under various normal loads, a motor-driven, strain-controlled, direct-shear testing apparatus at a strain rate of less than 0.001 to 0.5 inches per minute (depending upon the soil type). The test results are presented in the test data. Sample Location B-3 # 1 @ 5' B-6 # 3 @ 10* B-7 # 3 @ 10* B-9 # 1 @ 2' Friction Angle (degrees) 37 36 33 43 Apparent Cohesion (psf) 110 80 90 510 Expansion Index Tests: Hie expansion potential of selected materials was evaluated by the Expansion Index Test, U.B.C Standard No. 29-2. Specimens are molded under a given compactive energy to approximately the optimum moisture content and approximately 50 percent saturation or approximately 90 percent relative compaction. The prepared 1-inch thick by 4-inch diameter specimens are loaded to an equivalent 144 psf surcharge and are inundated with tap water until volumetric equilibrium is reached The results of these tests are presented in the table below: Sample Location B-6 Bag-1 @ 17'-20' B-llBag-l@5'-8' Sample Description fine silty sand medium sand Compacted Dry Density (pcf) 108.9 114.0 Expansion Index 0 0 Expansion Potential Very Low Very Low Moisture and Density Determination Tests: Moisture content and dry density determinations were performed on relatively undisturbed samples obtained from the test borings. The results of these tests are presented in the boring logs. Where applicable, only moisture content was determined from "undisturbed" or disturbed samples. C-l 4940285-01 APPENDIX C (Continued) Maximum Density Tests: The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of typical materials were determined in accordance with ASTM Test Method D1557-91. The results of these tests are presented in the table below: Sample Location B-ll Bag-1 @5'-8' Sample Description Red-brown medium sand Maximum Dry Density (pcf) 129.0 Optimum Moisture Content (%) 7.0 Minimum Resistivity Tests and pH: Minimum resistivity and pH tests were performed in general accordance with California Test Method 643. The results are presented in the table below: Sample Location B-l Bag-1 @ r pH 5.5 Minimum Resistivity (ohms-cm) 2,600 Soluble Sulfates: The soluble sulfate contents of selected samples were determined by standard geochemical methods. The test results are presented in the table below: Sample Location B-l Bag-1 @ 1' B-6 Bag-1 @ 1T-20' B-7 # 3 @ 10' B-ll Bag-1 @ 5"* Sulfate Content (%) less than 0.015 less than 0.015 0.017 less than 0.015 Potential Degree of Sulfate Attack* Negligible Negligible Negligible Negligible Based on the 1991 editions of the Uniform Building Code, Table No. 26-A-3, prepared by the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO, 1991). C-l 2580 2000 g 1500 (0 D: 1000 500 500 1000 NORMAL STRESS "1500 2000 2500 Boring No. B-3 Sample No. 1 Depth (Ft) _ SoflTvDe 5.0 SP-SM Type nf Sample Undisturbed Friction Angle (deg.) Cohesion (psf) 37 110 DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Project No.4940285-01 Project Name Cal Lutheran/Carlsbad Date 6/29/94 Figure No. 1 2500 2000 1500 o UJ CO 1000 CO 500 "588 1000 1500 NORMAL STRESS (psf) 2000 £500 Boring No. Sample No. Type of Sample B-6 Depth (ft) Soil Type Undisturbed 10.0 SP Friction Angle (deg.) Cohesion (psf) 36 DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Project No.4940285-01 Project Name Cal Lutheran/Carlsbad Date 6/29/94 Figure No. 2 uu 2500 2000 1580 C 1000 500 ^001000I5W NORMAL STRESS Cpsf) 2000"2500 Boring No. Sample No. Type of Sample B-7 Depth (ft) Soil Type Undisturbed 10.0 SP Friction Angle (deg.) Cohesion (psf) 33 90 DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Project No.4940285-01 Project Name Gal Lutheran/Carlsbad Date 6/29/94 Figure No. 3 uu 3000 2500 2000 M-V)Q. WO) 1500 en <c CO 1000 500 "500 1600 1500 2000" NORMAL STRESS (psf) "2500 3000 Boring No. Sample No. Type of Sample B-9 Depth (ft) SoBType Undisturbed 2.0 SM Friction Angle (deg.) Cohesion (psf)510 DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Project No.4940285-01 Project Name Cal Lutheran/Carlsbad Date 6/2fl/84 Figure No. 4 LJU 4940285-01 APPENDIX D General Earthwork and Grading Specifications 1.0 General Intent These specifications are presented as general procedures and recommendations for grading and earthwork to be utilized in conjunction with the approved grading plans. These general earthwork and grading specifications are a part of the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report and shall be superseded by the recommendations in the geotechnical report in the case of conflict Evaluations performed by the consultant during the course of grading may result in new recommendations which could supersede these specifications or the recommendations of the geotechnical report It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to read and understand these specifications as well as the geotechnical report and approved grading plans. 2.0 Earthwork Observation and Testing Prior to the commencement of grading, a qualified geotechnical consultant should be employed for the purpose of observing earthwork procedures and testing the fills for conformance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report and these specifications. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to assist the consultant and keep him apprised of work schedules and changes, at least 24 hours hi advance, so that he may schedule his personnel accordingly. No grading operations should be performed without the knowledge of the geotechnical consultant The contractor shall not assume that the geotechnical consultant is aware of all grading operations. It shall be the sole responsibility of the contractor to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish the work in accordance with applicable grading codes and agency ordinances, recommendations in the geotechnical report and the approved grading plans not withstanding the testing and observation of the geotechnical consultant If, in the opinion of the consultant, unsatisfactory conditions, such as unsuitable soil, poor moisture condition, inadequate compaction, adverse weather, etc., are resulting in a quality of work less than recommended in the opinion of the consultant, unsatisfactory conditions, such as unsuitable soil, poor moisture condition, inadequate compaction, adverse weather, etc., are resulting in a quality of work less than recommended in the geotechnical report and the specifications, the consultant will be empowered to reject the work and recommend that construction be stopped until the conditions are rectified. Maximum dry density tests used to evaluate the degree of compaction should be performed in general accordance with the latest version of the American Society for Testing and Materials test Method ASTM D1557. 3.0 Preparation of Areas to be Filled 3.1 Clearing and Grubbing: Sufficient brush, vegetation, roots, and all other deleterious material should be removed or properly disposed of in a method acceptable to the owner, design engineer, governing agencies, and the geotechnical consultant D-l 4940285-01 General Earthwork and Grading Specifications (Cont'd.) The geotechnical consultant should evaluate the extent of these removals depending on specific site conditions. In general, no more than 1 percent (by volume) of the fill material should consist of these materials and nesting of these materials should not be allowed. 3.2 Processing: The existing ground which has been evaluated by the geotechnical consultant to be satisfactory for support of 511, should be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches. Existing ground which is not satisfactory should be overexcavated as specified in the following section. Scarification should continue until the soils are broken down and free of large clay lumps or clods and until the working surface is reasonably uniform, flat, and free of uneven features which would inhibit uniform compaction. 3.3 Overexcavation: Soft, dry, organic-rich, spongy, highly fractured, or otherwise unsuitable ground, extending to such a depth that surface processing cannot adequately improve the condition, should be overexcavated down to competent ground, as evaluated by the geotechnical consultant For purposes of determining quantities of materials overexcavated, a licensed land surveyor/civil engineer should be utilized 3.4 Moisture Conditioning: Overexcavated and processed soils should be watered, dried- back, blended, and/or mixed, as necessary to attain a uniform moisture content near optimum. 3.5 Recompaction: Overexcavated and processed soils which have been properly mixed, screened of deleterious material, and moisture-conditioned should be recompacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent or as otherwise recommended by the geotechnical consultant 3.6 Benching: Where fills are to be placed on ground with slopes steeper than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical), the ground should be stepped or benched. Hie lowest bench should be a minimum of 15 feet wide, at least 2 feet into competent material as evaluated by the geotechnical consultant Other benches should be excavated into competent material as evaluated by the geotechnical consultant Ground sloping flatter than 5:1 should be benched or otherwise overexcavated when recommended by the geotechnical consultant 3.7 Evaluation of Fill Areas: All areas to receive fill, including processed areas, removal areas, and toe-of-fill benches, should be evaluated by the geotechnical consultant prior to fill placement 4.0 Fill Material 4.1 General: Material to be placed as fill should be sufficiently free of organic matter and other deleterious substances, and should be evaluated by the geotechnical consultant prior to placement Soils of poor gradation, expansion, or strength characteristics should be placed as recommended by the geotechnical consultant or mixed with other soils to achieve satisfactory fill material D-2 4940285-01 General Earthwork and Grading Specifications (Cont'd.) 4.2 Oversize: Oversize material, defined as rock or other irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater than 6 inches, should not be buried or placed in fills, unless the location, materials, and disposal methods are specifically recommended by the geotechnical consultant Oversize disposal operations should be such that nesting of oversize material does not occur, and such that the oversize material is completely surrounded by compacted or densified fill. Oversize materials should not be placed within 10 feet vertically of finish grade, within 2 feet of future utilities or underground construction, or within 15 feet horizontally of slope faces, in accordance with the attached detail. 43 Import: If importing of fill material is required for grading, the import material should meet the requirements of Section 4.1. Sufficient time should be given to allow the geotechnical consultant to observe (and test, if necessary) the proposed import materials. 5.0 Fill Placement and Compaction 5.1 Fill Lifts: Fill material should be placed in areas prepared and previously evaluated to receive fill, in near-horizontal layers approximately 6 inches in compacted thickness. Each layer should be spread evenly and thoroughly mixed to attain uniformity of material and moisture throughout 5.2 Moisture Conditioning: Fill soils should be watered, dried-back, blended, and/or mixed, as necessary to attain a uniform moisture content near optimum. 5.3 Compaction of Fill: After each layer has been evenly spread, moisture-conditioned, and mixed, it should be uniformly compacted to not less than 90 percent of maximum dry density (unless otherwise specified). Compaction equipment should be adequately sized and be either specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability, to efficiently achieve the specified degree and uniformity of compaction. 5.4 Fill Slopes: Compacting of slopes should be accomplished, in additional to normal compacting procedures, by backrolling of slopes with sheepsfoot rollers at increments of 3 to 4 feet in fill elevation gain, or by other methods producing satisfactory results. At the completion of grading, the relative compaction of the fill out to the slope face should be at least 90 percent 5.5 Compaction Testing: Field tests of the moisture content and degree of compaction of the fill soils should be performed by the geotechnical consultant The location and frequency of tests should be at the consultant's discretion based on field conditions encountered. In general, the tests should be taken at approximate intervals of 2 feet in vertical rise and/or 1,000 cubic yards of compacted fill soils. In addition, on slope faces, as a guideline approximately one test should be taken for each 5,000 square feet of slope face and/or each 10 feet of vertical height of the slope. D-3 4940285-01 General Earthwork and Grading Specifications (Cont'd.) 6.0 Subdrain Installation Subdrain systems, if recommended should be installed in areas previously evaluated for suitability by the geotechnical consultant, to conform to the approximate alignment and details shown on the plans or herein. The subdrain location or materials should not be changed or modified unless recommended by the geotechnical consultant The consultant, however, may recommend changes in subdrain line or grade depending on conditions encountered. All subdrains should be surveyed by a licensed land surveyor/civil engineer for line and grade after installation. Sufficient time shall be allowed for the surveys, prior to commencement of filling over the subdrains. 7.0 Excavation Excavations and cut slopes should be evaluated by a representative of the geotechnical consultant (as necessary) during grading. If directed by the geotechnical consultant, further excavation, overexcavation, and refilling of cut areas and/or remedial grading of cut slopes (i.e., stability fills or slope buttresses) may be recommended. 8.0 Quantity Determination For purposes of determining quantities of materials excavated during grading and/or determining the limits of overexcavation, a licensed land surveyor/civil engineer should be utilized. D-4 STABILITY FILL / BUTTRESS DETAIL OUTLET PIPES 4* 0 NONPERFORATED PIPE. 100* MAX. O.C. HORIZONTALLY, 30* MAX. O.C. VERTICALLY BACK CUT 1:1 OR FLATTER SEE SUBDRAIN TRENCH DETAIL LOWEST SUBDRAIN SHOULD BE SITUATED AS LOW AS POSSIBLE TO ALLOW SUITABLE OUTLET KEY WIDTH IAS NOTED ON GRADING PLANS 16* MIN. PERFORATED PIPE NON-PERFORATED OUTLET PIPE 10' MIN. EACH SIDE CAP T-CONNECTION DETAIL 6* MIN. OVERLAP 3/4"-1-1/2* CLEAN GRAVEL <3ft.3/ft. MIN.) 4-0 NON-PERFORATED FILTER FABRIC ENVELOPE (MIRAFI 140N OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT)* SEE T-CONNECTION DETAIL 6' MIN. COVER PERFORATED PIPE 4" MIN. BEDDING SUBDRAIN TRENCH DETAIL *IF CALTRAN& CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL IS USED IN PLACE OF 3/4--1-1/2' GRAVEL, FILTER FABRIC MAY BE DELETED NOTES: SPECIFICATIONS FOR CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL U.S. Standard Sieve Size 1" 3/4" 3/8" No, No, No. No. No. 4 8 30 50 200 % Passing 100 90-100 40-100 25-40 18-33 5-15 0-7 0-3 Sand Equivalent>75 For buttress dimension*, see geotechnlcal report/plans. Actual dimensions of buttress an4 subdralnmay be changed by the geotechnlcal consultant based on field conditions. SUBDRAIN INSTALLATIONTSubdraln pipe should be installed with perforations down as depleted. At locations recommended by the geotechnica^ consultant, nonperforated pipe should be Inatalled SUBDRAIN TYPE-Subdraln type should be Acrylon trtle Butadiene Styrene (A.B.S.), Polyvlnyl Chloride (PVC) or approved equivalent. Class 126.8DR 32.5 should be used for maximum fill depths of 39 feet. Class 2OQ,8DR 21 should be ueed for maximum fill depths of 10O feet. TRANSITION LOT DETAILS CUT-FILL LOT EXISTING GROUND SURFACE AND RECOMPACT COMPETENT BEDROCK OR MATERIAL EVALUATED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT CUT LOT REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL EXISTING GROUND SURFACE . 5' MIN. a«r MIN* i it OVEREXCAVATE AND RECOMPACT COMPETENT BEDROCK OR MATERIAL EVALUATED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT *NOTE: Deeper or laterally more extensive overexcavatlon and recompaction may be recommended by the geotechnical, consultant based on actual field conditions encountered and locations of proposed improvements ROCK DISPOSAL DETAIL l--i.-n.-=,-^.-r_-^^L^-:mT KVTki "i-i-ZS^Jrj OVERSIZE WINDROW GRANULAR SOIL (S.E.2: «0):,TO DENSIFIED IN PLACE BY FLOODING DETAIL TYPICAL PROFILE ALONG WINDROW and 15 feet horizontally of slope faces. 2) Rocks with maximum dimensions areater than 4 feet should not be utilized to 3) Rock placement, flooding of granular soil, and fill placement should be observed by the geotechnlcal consultant. « ssre suss SSTJ ssw.iff vertically (as depleted). rocks. CANYON SUBDRAIN DETAILS \ BENCHING REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL SUBDRAIN TRENCH SEE BELOW 6' MIN. OVERLAP SUBDRAIN TRENCH DETAILS FILTER FABRIC ENVELOPE (MIRAFI 140N OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT)* •6* MIN. OVERLAP 6* MIN. COVER £| t Ifl 4* MIN. BEDDING 3/4"-1-1/2* CLEAN GRAVEL <9ft 3/ft. MIN.)1 6' 0 MIN. 3/4--1-1/2' CLEAN GRAVEL <9ft.3/ft. MINJ PERFORATED PIPE *IF CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL IS USED IN PLACE-OF 3/4"-1-1/2* GRAVEL, FILTER FABRIC MAY BE DELETED DETAIL OF CANYON SUBDRAIN TERMINAL DESIGN FINISH GRADE SUBDRAIN TRENCH SEE ABOVE 15' MIN.5'MIN, unuDcaeriBATcn A* at uiu PERFORATED 6' 0 MIN. PIPE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL U.S. Standard Sieve Size 1" 3/4" 3/8" No. 4 No. 8 No. 30 No. 50 No. 200 % Passing 100 90-100 40-100 25-40 18-33 5-15 0-7 0-3 Sand Equivalent>75 Subdrain should be constructed only on competent material a* evaluated by the geotechnloalconsultant. SUBDRAIN INSTALLATION Subdrain pipe should be Installed with perforations down as depicted. At locations recommended by the geoUchnlcsl consultant, nonperforated pipe should be Installed. SUBDRAIN TYPE-Subdraln type should be Acrylonltrlle Butadiene Styrene (A.B.8.), Polyvlnyl Chloride (PVC) or approved equivalent. Class 125, SDR 32.6 should be used for maximum fill depths of 35 feet. Class 200,SDR 21 should be used for maximum fill' depths of 100 feet. SIDE HILL STABILITY FILL DETAIL EXISTING GROUND SURFACE FINISHED SLOPE FACE PROJECT 1 TO 1 LINE FROM TOP OF SLOPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF KEY FINISHED CUT PAD !=Hg-COMPACTED~ OVERBURDEN OR UNSUITABLE MATERIAL PAD OVEREXCAVATION DEPTH AND RECOMPACTION MAY BE RECOMMENDED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT BASED ON ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED. 16' MIN.LOWEST r.u BENCHDEPTH (KEY) -COMPETENT BEDROCK OR MATERIAL AS EVALUATED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT NOTE: Subdrain details and key width recommendations to be provided based on exposed subsurface conditions KEY AND BENCHING DETAILS FILL SLOPE PROJECT 1 TO 1 LINE FROM TOE OF SLOPE TO COMPETENT MATERIAL EXISTING GROUND SURFACE ^^ REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL BENCH 2' MIN. KEY LOWEST DEPTH BENCH (KEY) FILL-OVER-CUT SLOPE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE t k-16' 2* ' LOWEST MIN. BENCH REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL "CUT SLOPE (TO BE EXCAVATED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT) EXISTING GROUND SURFACE- CUT-OVER-FILL SLOPE PROJECT 1 TO 1 LINE FROM TOE OF SLOPE TO COMPETENT MATERIAL CUT SLOPE (TO BE EXCAVATED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT) REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL BENCH T . inSIli ' , H—18' MIN.—H ' MIN. I LOWEST I KEY DEPTH MIN LOWEST BENCH (KEY) NOTE: Back drain may be recommended by the geotechnlcal consultant based on actual field conditions encountered. Bench dimension recommendations may also be altered based on field condition* encountered. RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL SOIL BACKFILL, COMPACTED TO 90 PERCENT RELATIVE COMPACTION* RETAINING WALL WALL WATERPROOFING PER ARCHITECT'S SPECIFICATIONS FILTER FABRIC ENVELOPE (MIRAFI 140N OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT)** 06* MIN. o OVERLAP 6 0 O * ^COMPACTED FILL; 3/4'-1-1/2' CLEAN GRAVEL 4' (MIN.) DIAMETER PERFORATED PVC PIPE (SCHEDULE 40 Oft EQUIVALENT) WITH PERFORATIONS ORIENTED DOWN AS DCPICTCD MINIMUM 1 PERCENT GRADIENT TO SUITABLE OUTLET SPECIFICATIONS FOR CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL U.S. Standard Sieve Size 1" 3/4" 3/8" No. 4 No. 8 No. 30 No. 50 No. 200 % Passing 100 90-100 40-100 25-40 18-33 5-15 0-7 0-3 Sand Equivalent>75 MIN. COMPETENT BEDROCK OR MATERIAL AS EVALUATED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT * BASED ON ASTM D1B57 **IF CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL (SEE GRADATION TO LEFT) IS USED IN PLACE OF 3/4'-1-1/2' GRAVEL, FILTER FABRIC MAY BE DELETED. CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL SHOULD BE COMPACTED TO M PERCENT RELATIVE COMPACTION* NOTE:COMPOSITE DRAINAGE PRODUCTS SUCH A3 MRAORAIN OR J-DRAIN MAY BE USED AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO GRAVEL OR CLASS 2. INSTALLATION SHOULD BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPEORCATIONa October?, 1996 Mr. Sonny Rosenal Alternative Disposal 2674 Via Alicia Fallbrook,CA 92028 SUBJECT: DATA REPORT - CARLSBAD BY THE SEA - 2855 CARLSBAD BOULEVARD, CARLSBAD, CA - ALTERNATIVE DISPOSAL PROJECT #36613-3712 TEG Project #96 1 00 1-8 Mr. Rosenal: Please find enclosed a data report for the above referenced location. Soil samples were analyzed in TEG's DOHS certified mobile laboratory (CERT #1 745). Project Summary The following analyses were conducted: • 4 soils for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) by DOHS Modified EPA Method 80 1 5 • 4 soils for total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) by EPA Method 418.1 The samples were received chilled in appropriate containers with appropriate labels, seals, and chain-of- custody documentation. Project Narrative The results for all analyses and required QA/QC analyses are summarized in the enclosed tables. All calibrations, blanks, surrogates, and spike recoveries fulfill quality control criteria. TEG appreciates the opportunity to provide analytical services to Alternative Disposal on this project. If you have any questions relating to this data or report, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, A&<v(faa>*^ Ms. Sheri Hartman President, TEG, Inc. 432 NORTH CEDROS AVENUE - SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 • 619-793-0401 • FAX 619-793-0404 a > >> z zH > >> r- P-~n , f[D m FTS CO COPERFO RPERFOR:EWED BY' ' *^ sm mO D ^ ro z ^ ^ m CO Q *S ^"< Oz > ^ > 0 \ CO O CO CO CO Q m 73H ma S O CO 1 —m CDO Ho 73-<, — .Om73H ^i V} ZazDOrrCOzc orn—mc rro _ r~ c7 IT O om-mo-i O ^1 1— - ^^^HCO iCOTi—m1COg c— FT O _i O ~* FT CO DFTFTCCZr; V o o . o H H -H H H Sm < co co z [Ii ^ M M M ^en en bi cO co<= rT) J>Z o o o o o o CO CO CO to CO C* tD CD CD CD CD CD O O) O) O) G) CD CJi- _* rn rj _ti Z Z -* O CO GO D D Z Z Z Z Z Z D D O O D D "mZ (4) Z Z Z Z D o D D D O Z CO11•^» 77"gjs >> > or~ > N mm D ,. — - ~l *"~1 CQ 33 CD7 I "*** ^ « H•3- O TJ cl V1 X d 2 kv "^ co H "3" -*• ?"2 N^ nn 2T *^ m 2- ^ CO•^ m H H73 m•a Q"m .0"a CD> ai #961001-Method 4— k Q3 00 -1 ^Oo T3 X "5oXCO mTJ 5* ^CD 3" OQ. COO — *>Ol ^oQ. =^n>a. Z 1— COmCO O*n COO w M S o 01 Q) o o Q) t" >I—-1rn z> m 3. CO 57 to a, co O" O" m 1*QJ Q) CO fl_ 'ol^'> c:CD O ? Sm Q) Q) Oa H OJCDO> CO CO a > >5 > >2 co co"Jj m m< CO COSE rn mm 73 73O ~n ~nm O OIs 73 73• s <:m m^v\ ° ° ^i /^ -^ NJf |S0 T «- w » *" §0 ?^N > os* ?\ to oB\ r UJ 3: ^S. CO CO f ^> rn d "Tlma ^oro m s:COO 73 HO 73 ~< Om * cn 73 3? S COmim __, f \ zr~ Tl *• * 7^> rn i ym g > §"^ *H "^ Of 1 1 .^^ psi rrl73 ^ (Tl 2m O "^li! Q O ?3^ < o 512 rn z rJ 9 73 0 0-n -< m z 73 ~n 73 —m co > 7\z TJ -i m 2 ^ o a 171 z z m 73 ^ 02 Q co sm J 2 :> z > m 2^ rH O X 5 i > TJ S X "^ co m 7^m z D | 73 X CO TJ 7sm oc _,io Hm 73moO m 73 m CO TPH GASOL1TPH DIESELzm Ul N)0 00 Q Ul Mcn to--4 CO _^ ^A ^ 07 ch c^ O7 NJcn TOCO O — 1. w-i _i o CD O 3? 3s o -* io '*. ^ 0^ _v t cn ui 3? 3? •^J CO(O tO 3? 3? i t_ ». _i_k roto to 3^ 3~~ H73TJX Uloo o COcn o 31- -Cx CO COUl o 0 o cn _!. Ul~-S Ul 3^i_i—io 3^-COMPOUNDCO-~s TJ3 *<e. og o *"" o "-T" CO CO O 5? Oto 2 O 0^73rn O ^CO -— CO3 o to O O 0 73mo_ CO D 73 TJ O O O73 rn o ^ 03 m TJ om o £? rnO 13< -\m > 73 CD "< £(77 ANALYSIS DTEG Project ;« ->%%o - •O _k— -i £—\CO oCOCDcn >% 73 X CO TJ rn -— w g}> H73 X CO m oc TJ O m,— ~§» COo TJo 73 CO Qi—CO o DO 73m TJo 73 -J CO sCOa DJ> T> =s O) 0)oozooTJoz—1CALIBRATIION STAND,j>33O ^NALYZED AFTER SAMPI_ES ANAL'-^tomw ARECO<;-a m m OTJmzo- MID-POINTCALIBRATION STAND33a•&ANALYZED BETl OSJm en>IPLE ANAL-<tomUl CDmO Z %DIFFDIFFERENCE, IN PERCEZCDm-i mz TI E AVERAGERFANDTHm OTIrnz zOo33 CLOSINO 33 ~" 33•nOrnmCTOR RESPONSE FACTOR FROM2 a Tl OINT CALIBRATION STA.NDARDAREA-73EA COUNTSFROM DAI'LY CALIBR/H Oz STANDARD%RSDr;NEARITY OF' MULTIPOINT CALIBR,H OZ CURVE (*/- 20% ACCEPTABLE LIN-ien ] INITIAL3- AVERAGERESPONSE FACTOR3:C31 MULTIPOINTCALIBRATION CURVm H H HTJ -a -DXXXagom m mWWWm m rnr— i— [—•n "n -nODDCO NJ -*ui in eno a o> i >ui en uio o oo o oo o oo o o en en enui in eno o o _L _i _l CD a> enui in eno o oo o oo o oo o o -j -g -J ~1 —t _1 CO (O (Oen o> en o o ok) co k>-U O COCO N) M M ^J Ul Ul eo en co(O O CO popk> to kjen di en-» A O) -V _k / * • .;5 in co co en coO) O --1M to to pop k) CO fOui co enui ea co M -* oo S? ^ P ^ ^ ^XXXo o pW CO WO 0 0r— r- r-z z zm rn mi i i~n -n -nODDCO N) — LM to K)O O Oi i iro NJ KJ 000O 0 OO O 0O 0 O ej> en atCD en eno o o en co enen en ato o oo o oo o oo o o -j -j ^i _i -V _1 <o eo ^oen en 01 popen --J enCO -J Co-g -i to NJ CO pen ^ L* co en coCO O 4*en o co pop iji Co inA co coro co o o a> -iL. ' > jn ^o o ci^ s, ^ eo en coen o co*» -J N) pop en co eneo -b. too eji -sj — 1 eo co 4*. Ol — Oo-DOCZDWOF O^ >*o ^1 5 O< z1 5 n^ mt*"OO" O C Zm q O =5> r- ^m z73 — { r- S?^0 COo 73m OTDmjo z-n z O ,0 D "Tl ^Dm o I O — — *"" oW ^D O H> mF 0< -oROJECT *CALIBRA1^H ^*<— (Oo 5z oo °> T*m-j.ooco eBen D DO m-a O73 O E Distribution: W0 YeDEH:SAM-999 (8/95) NCR Pirlite - LaboratoryHow - Contractor/Responsible Party County of San Diegolk ' SAM Department of Environmental Healtht wI .Tlffl•"§CDr0'tf\JffiF>? d 25 I oi Printed Name01 CO =3 D)rH d CD 1 Printed NameSignatureH CD < tf [ '•1 pi ! ," i5 si :> iMk 5 ^ 'J h; L-i 5 Site Identification 1U# "T/ /./-7 AT* -211 ~"1 I> «~N£DQno6 )mCD ~5r 5T RECEIVED BYo RECEIVED BY (LAB)Dcu 5T ! Company '^ CD^~-JCLP-orf_VJrv>f^— M H £ 3O <D CompanyPrinted NameCompany13 2. CDQ. -z. CD H 3(D r£-S*O!_^» -£ P•-^-2\ ^CDVJ f~~^^-~ >--<^ w J5 CD Signaturero RELINQUISHED BYDo>S"SignatureH §' CD w RELINQUISHED BYa CD* cn cn H 3J3"° K «>!=; CD D oJD O CD CD (Q o>" rn <' ® (D ® ^ W g^ 0.. =£ CD Z _ O ru V ^ ?T 13 3 S ) 3 g a 2- CD CD fe /TO ? C r~ w ^ Q 0 ^ ^Q) U O=?. to ai 9^^w r-TOTAL NO. OF CONTAINERS. / x ' / 7 X//-\\k"Vlj hf t a- A X * >c .•• -• a* 3 35 ^—V P ti > <i \^ A ^?< x ?< •. •* • \l P—•— \ ><• *x ^v x" X" — . oo"_L! Lt $ X X >s u SAMPLE NO.OHmHm LOCATIONr-cr51COCDcwCDa.'I^ ^~ k TPH r DOHS Sampler's Signature j^wv 4£ ^K^ 5s S Q.Q.CDW018~v Ar o "s L D-Reference ' ^METHOD TRPH EPA 41 8.1 BTXE (8020/602) HALOGENATED (8010/601) SOLID LIQUID GRAB COMPOSITE NO. OF COMMENTS^g.zEUCD9 \c t t ANALYSIS REQUESTEDSAMPLE TYPECONTAINERS COPY OF LAB RESULTSMUST BE SENT TO:Dept. of Environmental HealthSite Assessment andMitigation DivisionP.O. Box 85261San Dieqo, CA 92186-52613 O 3"D) 5' 2, o 0) oQ. X (DO O-1a DW <S t \ O •a Q) (Dh PERMIT APPLICATION PARTI GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STORAGE TANK FACILITY OFFICE USE ONLY EST#: PLANCKft X?T DATE RECEIVED: *?-/ 7-f (0 FEE PAID: # 3 PLAN APPROVAL: HYDRO UNIT: BENEF. USE: SEP 17 1996 A. SITE NAME:$€*• SHE ADDRESS: 3&SS &LjA City Zip 9JOO$ B. PROPERTY OWNER: Assessors Parcel No. Company rAn'4flv»/i* ~ O\Q Contact Mailing Address o?3>& S. ^r€</no»A A»C Phone (fift S70~SfeOO City Tteo^ State Zip. 24 Hr. Emergency Contact Df€.Phone (Jfcl^ C TANK OPERATOR: Company Lo\\**WVJ VAnUtl Mailing Address Phone Contact City Zip 24 Hr. Emergency Contact Cfiti&T -Phone ((Jty D. CONTRACTOR: Primary Contractor Mailing Address Phone C»ft O*3- S2?7 VJ\A "33UC.Contact c> City GaAX&naAU^ CA>JY n State Contractor License — Hazardous Substances Certificate ft Worker's Compensation Insurance Company Off E. APPLICATION SUBMTTTAL, PLAN APPROVAL, PERMIT ISSUANCE, AND REQUIRED INSPECTIONS rnCo Submit one (1) original and two (2) copies of this application package, including plan drawings with the required fee to the Department of Environmental Health, Site Assessment and Mitigation Division (SAM). 1255 Imperial Avenue, San Diego, CA 92101. Or mail to P. O. Box 85261, San Diego, CA 92186-5261. Checks should be made payable to the County of San Diego. A permit will be issued by SAM upon review and approval of the application and plans. The required fees must be submitted with the application package. Information in addition to that presented in the application package may be needed in order to obtain final approval. No work is to begin on the proposed project until a permit has been issued. The required inspections cannot be scheduled until a permit is issued. Once the permit has been issued, it is the responsibility of the permittee to notify SAM at least two (2) working days in advance to schedule each required inspection. Construction stages at which inspections are required arc indicated in each subpart of this application form (i.e., Part II, m, IV, & V). DEH:SAM-915 (Rev. 8/96)I-1 County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health PERMIT APPLICATION PART m APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CLOSE UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEM A. TOTAL NUMBER OF TANK SYSTEMS TO BE CLOSED NOTE: UST SYSTEMS INCLUDE TANK AND ALL ASSOCIATED PIPING. B. DESCRIPTION OF TANKS TO BE CLOSED: TANK NO. OO 1 CAPACITY 2.T00 DATE INSTALLED ^"ftf* TANK COMPOSITION <zreeL TANK PRESENTLY IN USE? A^O MATERIALS STORED IN TANK //Gpnite o// C. HAS THE TANK SYSTEM EVER FAILED OR LEAKED? D, REASON FOR TANKS TO BE CLOSED: W"\^L_ Meet current state/federal requirements LH Replacement of existing tanks Cj Tank system failure, briefly describe YES D NO UNKNOWN Other, briefly describe A £**• / E. PREVIOUS OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF THE TANKS: Dates Owner/Operator r>FH-SAM-<m 8/961 TTI-1 County of San Diego Dennrtmenr of Fnvironmrnfn! ib iO; iD-ti-ii'i Mi_ i CPU IM i j. vc_ st ""' . n_ .er Close* •xT- , lout •.erproof VICINITY MAP V TOTfiL P-04 o> 3 1 =f43i*i r^ P wB.£ci « "*<VU) • g W%•s5 e-'*-* 1O Ig "b J •a 3 < s cfl BUILDING PERMIT PCR No: PCR97043 10/14/97 11:13 Project No: A9601622 Page 1 of 1 Development No: Job Address: 2855 CARLSBAD BL Suite: Permit Type: PLAN CHECK REVISION 019110/14/97000101 02 Parcel No: 203-231-01-00 Lot#: C-fWT 109-00 Valuation: 0 Construction Type: NEW Occupancy Group: Referenced: Status: ISSUED Description: OPENING AT 2ND FLOOR LOBBY Applied: 08/01/97 : PERMIT CB96-1141 Apr/Issue: 10/14/97 Entered By: MDP Appl/Ownr : LEU, MUN 310 445-9588 11835 W. OLYMPIC BLVD. #1285 LOS ANGLES, CA. 90064 Collected & Credits*** Fees Required *** Fees : Adjustments: Total Fees: Fee description Plan Check Revisio 109 .S : *** .00 . 00 109.00 Ext fee Data 109.00 CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 EsGil Corporation Professional &fan Review 'Engineers DATE: August 12, 1997 a APPLICANT • JURIS. JURISDICTION: Carlsbad d PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 REV 2 (PCR 97-43( SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad by the Sea Lobby Floor Infill The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: XI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: City-approved plans Esgil Corporation D' GA D CM D EJ D PC 8/4/97 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 <* San Diego, California 92123 * (619)560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 96-1141 REV 2 (PCR 97-43) August 12, 1997 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad (PCR 97-43) PREPARED BY: Kurt Culver BUILDING ADDRESS: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 REV 2 DATE: August 12, 1997 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: BUILDING PORTION Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE BUILDING AREA 1 VALUATION (ft.2) 1 MULTIPLIER VALUE ($) G 199 UBC Building Permit Fee D Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ D 199 UBC Plan Check Fee Q Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ Type of Review: D Complete Review Q Structural Only £<] Hourly n Repetitive Fee Applicable Q Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 87.15 Comments: Revision to plans: Esgil fee = 1 hour @ 87.15/hr. Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 ARCHITECT'S SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS A/A DOCUMENT G710 (Instructions on rwerse side) Owner Architect Consultant Contractor Held Ocher C t c c PROJECT: Carlobad by the (name, address) Building 1 OWNER: California Lutheran Hoaefi TO; DPR Construction (Contractor) ARCHITECT'S SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION NO: . 10 DATE OF ISSUANCE: 3/22/97 ARCHITECT: The Steinberg Group CONTRACT FOR: $25,537.312.00 CONTRACT DATED: August 14, 1996 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 93025 The.^Pbrfc f hall be carried out In accordance with the following supplemental instructions issued in accordance with the Contrac Documents without dwige in Contract Sum or Contract Time. Proceeding with the Work In accordance wich dtcsc instruction indicates youc acknowledgement that there will be no change in ih« Contract Sum or Contract Time. Description: Enclose opening la 2nd Floor Lobby, Bldg. No~l, Pare C Add continuous 2 X 10 ledger at1 corridor valle, , ) 42- Attachments: flier* imtn lining of Jotu*x*n tbat support description.) CA-43. 4A, 45, 46 t 47 Domuns ISSUED BY: Him I^i ATA Architect sign an original A1A document which ha« ihl* caution printed In red. An original assures that changes will not be obscured as may occur when document* an reproduced. CAIJTION: AM DOCUMENT CT10 - ARCKin-CTS SUPPLr.MFKTAL INSTFtJCTIONS • 1992 EDITION • AlA* - THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OP ARCHITECT*, 17J5 WFW YORK AVENUC. N»K, WASHlNflTOW. DiC. 2OO06-5i09 WWWNGc UnB<MMMl phooxapybv vtoHM* US. eopyriyM h~* and «• MAlMt *M viobur to G71O-199 The Steinberg Group 60 Pierce Avenue Stn Joic, Calif omit 95110 408 295-5446 Project Title: CARLSBAD BY THE SEA CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Project No. 93-Q25 03-18-97 H^^ \0 Sheet Title: LEVEL 2 PARTIAL FRAMING PLAN BLOG-1. PART-C. SOUTH 6LDG SA2.1.6 Drawing No: Tbli is for cltrlfication purpowt only md doe* not affect corti uale» approved prior to commencing thU wort FOR FRAMING SEE SHT CA- && The Steinberg Group (0 Pierce Avenue San Jew* California 95110 408 295-5446 Project Title: CARLSBAD BY THE SEA CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA Project No. 93-Q25 03-18-97 > \o Sheet Title: LEVEL 2 PARTIAL FRAMING PLAN BLDG-1, PART-C, NORTH BLDG SA2.1.6 Drawing No: This It for cltrlficaUon purpose* only «nd does not iffcet costs unless approved prior to commencing thU wort ADDED STRAfe EACH SIDE OF JOIST w/ 2-"* BOLTS FILLER BLK AS REQ'DAT z PSL SIMPSON CC5K-6 OR EQUAL 51/4 OR 3!/2 PSL SEE PLAN 514x9/2 PSL BEAMPSL BEAM WHERE OCCURS SEE PLAN SCALE: r = r-oSECTION gr, A, a** The Steinberg Group (0 Pierce Avenue San Jose, California 95110 408 295-5446 Project Title: CARLSBAD BY THE SEA CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA Project No. 93-Q25 *'« 03-18-97 '• \0 Sheet Title: BLDG #1 FLOOR FRAMING DETAIL SECTION 23/SA7.2 Drawing No: 6k-Aft This It for clarification purposes only and does not affect costs unless approved prior to commencing thii wort -*v»* 3^x9J/2 PSL BEAM WHERE OCCURS SEE PLAN BENT PLATE BUCKET w/ l-3/^"* BOLT The Steinberg Group 60 Pierce Avenue S*n Joic, CtUforni* 95110 40« 295-5446 Project Title: CARLSBAD BY THE SEA CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA Sheet Title: BLDG #1 FLOOR FRAMING DETAIL SECTION 24/SA7.2 POST /ADDED STRAPS \TO ECC 51/4x91/2 PSL BEAM POST Project No. 93-Q25 03-18-97 MPi \O Drawing No: Thit Is for clarification purposes only and does not affect costs unless approved prior to commencing tbli work. FOR SILL NAILING SEE SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE CONTIN i LSI RIM BOARD FOR SPLICE LU26 HANGER WITH 16d NAILS AT 2x6 HU26-2 HANGER WITH 16d NAILS AT 2-2x6 S.A.D. 2x6 AT 16 o.c. MAX SPAN = 7'-0 FOR INFORMATION >40T NOTED 2x10 LEDGER w/ 3-16d AT 12"o.c.2x CEILING JOISTS S.A.O.BLKG UNDER OFFSET WALL SEE/ EDGE NAIL EACH ROW HEADER WHERE OCCURS CORRIDOR FRAMING AT Project No. 93-Q25The Steinberg Group 03-18-97CARLSBAD BY THE SEA CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 60 Piera Avenue Stn Joie, California 95110 40« 295-5445 Sheet Title; BLDG #1 FLOOR FRAMING DETAIL CORRIDOR FRAMING AT FLOOR 10/SA7.2 ThU ti for clarification purpotei only and doe* not affect co*U unless approved prior to commencing this wort ARCHITECT'S SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS AfA DOCUMENT G710 (Instructions on Owner Architect Cocuulcuu Contractor Field Other PROJECT: Carlab*4 by the Sea (name. address) Building 1 OWNER: California Lutheran. Eo*aa TO; DPR. Construction (Contractor) ARCHITECT'S SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION NO: 30 DATE OF ISSUANCE: 7/2/97 ARCHITECT: The Steinberg Croup CONTRACT FOR: $25.537.312.00 CONTRACT DATED: August 14, 199fi ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 93025 .iRKk f hall ,,be canted out In accordance with the following supplemental Instructions issued in accordance with die Conua Documents vlthout dionge in Contract Sum. or Contract Time. Proceeding with the W^fk In accordance with dtcsc Instiuctlo indicues youc acknowledgement (hac there •v^U be no change in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. Description: * Delete the following callouts 10 and J5/SA7.1 from smoke barrier wall on structural drawings (grid line 6/SA2.1.8). Build the smoke partitions per Arch details 2/A9.1. Corridor door partition is to close off at the floor above to form at continuous smoke barrier. 7 Attachments: None ISSUED BY: Him T^k*ATA Architect CAUTION: You should sign an original AlA document which ha« thlc caution printed In red. An original aasures that changes will not be obscured at may occur when document* are reproduced. AlA DOCUMENT GHO • ARCMirFATTS SUFPtfiMFMTAt INSTRUCTIONS • l»2 EDCHOH - AlA» THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF AWCKITBCTS. 1755 HEW YORK j^EMUC. M*:, WASHINGTON. IXC. 2OUO6.SW «MMpl»»oq9V<n0'rfoiaMlJLC.flD|VTlBMl^G71O-19' ARCHITECT'S (J_r SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS ****«__ ,t •"ifWrilttF1. rConsul tanr CftO (fnst'uccion.t on tvcurse TJ^UJ '' - otncr PROJECT: Carlsbad by eh» Sea ; ARCHITECTS SUPPLEMENTAL r, address) Building 1 INSTRUCTION MO: 2* California Lucharan Honee DATE OF ISSUANCE; 1/6/97 TO: DPR Construction ARCHITECT: The Steinberg Group (Contractor) CONTRACT FOR; 125.537.312.00 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO; 93025 CONTRACT DATED; August .1.4, 1996 r Tlie WiM-k >liiiH be •rarHe-.t -jut in MXon.Unce wirti the frVIo'wi'.ig mppkiiK-ntal instrui:ri<:»iij issued i/i accordance' wjch die OiK'umerm without Change in Contiui.c Sum or CfM'.rracr Time. Proceeding -n-irh the ^'oik iti jccordai'ite with these 'iue-? your .ii-kriuwledflemeru that there will be nr> rhange In the Contract Sum <.»r Contract Time. Description: The following "CA" partial plans and eectlon are for frafld.ng sizes and connection Jet alls regarding che 2" concrete copping ac entry lobbies / corridors near line 9. Bldg. 1, Part C for both North and South wlng- CA - 8fc CA - 87 CA. - 88 ISSUED BV: Architect Mill CAUTION: You should sign «n original AlA document which has this caution printed In red. An original assures that changes win not be obscured as may occur when documents are reproduced. AU DOCUMENT O710 • «K*,HHti..l > H'fM.hMKM.\! I:-I.>rR!.-i-T:.;.N-: • 1-^2 LCiJU''iN • ^-1'-.' • C'Vi'i THI .^:.lFRI^^-: iN-.Tin/Tt «.'F Af'-MIl fM'i n-1.' :'I:'.v f--.fr A\ r»lt'F. N'i' ''ft-^HlNOP.:". rr ;c,-,f^-r'.-^.. **•»-- 1QOO WARNING: UnltanaM phowwwlrfl vtaMM US. copyrtgm MM wv) «• «ub(*ci ih« vkWnor W • ' ——«-'«- *J ^lU-i »»^ The Steinberg Group 60 Pierce Avenue 5an Jose, California 95110 408-295-5446 Project Tide:Project No. Sheet Title: op Drawing No: 6k- This b for clarification purposes only and docs not a/fcci costs unless approved prior to commencing this work. The Steinberg Group 60 Pierce Av San Jose. California 95110 408-295-54*6 Ptojeci Title:Project No. Sheet rtUc: f-> i i r i ^- v i h-t-PLKKJ op SHT Drawing No: This is for clarification purposes only and docs not iffeci costs unless ipproved prior to commencing this woric. M" The Steinberg Group 60 Pierce Avenue San lose. Cilifonua 95MO 408-295-5446 Project Title: Sheei Tide: THE . i IO N PiDJecrNo. Drawing No: 6k- This is for clarification purposes onJy ajid doo not rffect costs unless approved prior to commencing this • I The Steinberg Group ttKeccc Jumna Sheet Tide BY lO IN tf U tarcUrvHcuioaytgpom oaly <addo^< tattffcttoitt unUit tppio^J ffriari»<o«imfa 06/04 08:32 [TI/RX NO. 2941]©005 BUILDING PERMIT 07/10/98 16:35 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 2855 CARLSBAD BL Suite: PCR No: Project No: Development No: Permit Type: PLAN CHECK REVISION Parcel No: 203-231-01-00 Lot#: Valuation: 0 Occupancy Group: Reference#: Description: REVISIONS TO FLOOR TRUSS(SSI) : CARLSBAD BY THE SEA-ORIG PC CB961141 Construction Ty Status: Appl/Ownr : MUN LEU 11835 WEST OLYMPIC BLVD STE298 LOS ANGELES CA 90064 310 445-9588 *** Fees Required ******Fees Collected & Credits PCR97038 A9601622 Applied: Apr/Issue: Entered By: EXPIRED 07708/97 RMA *** Fees: Adjustments: Total Fees: .00 .00 .00 Total Credits: Total Payments: Balance Due: .00 .00 .00 City of Carlsbad Buildina Department DATE: 05/29/98 PLAN CHECK EXPIRATION PC# PCR97038 DATE: 07/08/98 TO: MUN LEU ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL 11835 WEST OLYMPIC BLVD STE298 LOS ANGELES CA 90064 You have applied to have your plans checked on the date shown above, and you have not obtained your building permit. The provisions of Section 304(d) of the Uniform Building Code state: "Section 304(d) Expiration of Plan Review Applications for which no permit is issued within one year following the date of application shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the Building Official. In order to renew action on an application after expiration, the applicant shall resubmit plans and pay a new plan review fee." Please check the appropriate box indicating your choice and return this letter to the BUILDING DEPARTMENT. PROJECT ABANDONED. I WILL PICK UP PLANS WITHIN 10 DAYS. PROJECT ABANDONED. PLANS MAY BE DESTROYED. If you have any questions, please contact the Building Department at (619) 438-1161 extension 4331. RAENETTE ABBEY Building Department 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9 * (619) 438-1161 EsGil Corporation {Professional fPfan 'Rgvittti 'Engineers DATE: July 16, 1997 a.ABRtiCANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 REV (PCR 97-38) SET; I PROJECT ADDRESS: Carlsbad by the Sea PROJECT NAME: Shop Drawings: Floor Framing and Roof Trusses The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. XI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Mun Leu (v.M-) Telephoned: (310) 445-9588 Date contacted:! I/I-H? (by: i*. ) * Fax #•.(&&) 445-/WSJ- Mail Telephone^/ Fax*/ In Person REMARKS: 1. There are many changes required by the engineer-of-record on the Standard Structures plans (shown in pencil!). Those changes must be incorporated into the originals and new sheets printed. 2. Those final plans by Standard Structures must have all sheets properly signed (by the engineer-of-record and by the Standard Structures' engineer). 3. The stamp by the engineer that signed the Stone Truss Company calculations shows that the license has expired. By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: City-approved plans Esgil Corporation D GA D CM D EJ D PC 7/10/97 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4- San Diego, California 92123 *• (619)560-1468 * Fax (619) 560-1576 July3, 1997 Mr. Mike Peterson City of Carlsbad 2075 Los Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Subject: Carlsbad By The Sea Buildings B & C Dear Mr. Peterson: This letter serves to clarify the floor framing at levels two and three of Buildings B and C. Per the structural drawings, the truss joist system is to be designed by the joist manufacturer. Sheet SA1.1 of the approved structural drawings specifies the criteria for the design of the joists. As you are aware, the joist spacing shown on the shop drawings differs from the spacing shown on the structural drawings. The revised joist spacing is the result of using joists with a capacity greater than those originally specified on the structural drawings. This revision was discussed with and approved by KPFF. Per the requirements of the design documents, shop drawings and calculations, signed and stamped by a civil engineer licensed in the state of California, were prepared and submitted by the plywood web-joist manufacturer. KPFF has reviewed this submittal for conformance with the 1994 Uniform Building Code. Please call if you have any questions or need further information. Sincerely, Marc A. Press, S.E. Principal MP/asfo703971L.CBS KPFF #94314 : •*"No. 3054 •Vn Exp. 3/31/01 * 639 Frfat Street, Suite 200 San Francisco, California 94111 (415) 989-1004 Fax (415) 989-1552 Seatt>4 Portland San Francisco Los Angeles San Diego Phoenix 07 -(13 97 5 989 10)14 KFFF SF —-. CARLSBAD ,1-SITE July 3T 1997 Mr. Mike Peterson City of Carlsbad 2075 Los Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 Subject: Carlsbad By The Sea Buildings B & C Dear Mr. Peterson: This letter serves to clarify die floor framing at levels two and three of Buildings B and C. Per the structural drawings, the truss joist system is to be designed by the joist manufacturer. Sheet SAl. 1 of the approved structural drawings specifies the criteria for the design of the joists. As you are aware, the joist spacing shown on the shop drawings differs from the spacing shown on the structural drawings. The revised joist spacing is the result of using joists with a capacity greater man those originally specified on the structural drawings. This revision was discussed with and approved by KPFF. Per the requirements of the design documents, shop drawings and calculations, signed and stamped by a civil engineer licensed in the state of California, were prepared and submitted by the plywood web-joist manufacturer. KPFF has reviewed this submittal for conformance with the 1994 Uniform Building Code. Please call if you have any questions or need further information. Sincerely, Marc A. Press, S.E. Principal MP/as/0703971LCBS No. 3054 Exp. 3/31/01 63? fror.f Street. S-jitc 2CO .':..;n rrsxctsiu t:j',''rt"i,j S^:>1 •-•' = ' ^.M-TCC^ £ji Seattle Portland San Francisco Los Angeles San Diego Phoenix Carlsbad 96-1141 REV July 16, 1997 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: Kurt Culver BUILDING ADDRESS: Carlsbad by the Sea BUILDING OCCUPANCY: PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 REV DATE: July 16, 1997 PCR 97-38 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: BUILDING PORTION Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE BUILDING AREA I VALUATION (ft.2) I MULTIPLIER VALUE ($) D 199 UBC Building Permit Fee D Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ D 199 UBC Plan Check Fee D Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ Type of Review: Q Complete Review Q Structural Only ^ Hourly d Repetitive Fee Applicable Q Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 305.03 Comments: Floor/Roof shop drawing review: Esgil fee = 3% hrs. @ 87.15/hr. Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 PERMIT PCR No: Project No: Development No: BUILDING 09/22/98 11:54 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 2855 CARLSBAD BL Suite: Permit Type: PLAN CHECK REVISION Parcel No: 203-231-01-00 Lot#: Valuation: 0 Construction Type: Occupancy Group: Reference*: CB961141 Status* Description: "CARLSBAD BY THE SEA" REVISION Applied: : FLR JOIST,LOWER RF RIDGE,ROOF TRUSS Apr/Issue: Entered By: Appl/Ownr : MUN LEU 310 295-9588 11835 WEST OLYMPIC BLVD #298 LOS ANGELES, CA 90064 *** Fees Required *** *** Fees Collected & Credits PCR97058 A9601622 09/18/97 10/01/97 JM *** Fees: Adjustments: Total Fees: 00 00 00 Total Credits: Total Payments; Balance Due: .00 .00 .00 PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760)438-1161 1. PROJECT INFORMATION . FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit Validated Bv Date Address (include Bldg7Suite #)/ Business Name (at this address)Um'H I/O Legal Description Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.Phase No.Total # of units Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use 49 TTOT Proposed Use Workription of Koo-f 2. CONTACT PERSON (If different from applicant) w\uto SQ. FT.#of Storiess # of Bedrooms of Bathrooms Name ' VWdress * Ci :3, APPLICANT Q Contractor ; Q 'Agentlof Contractor Q Owner Q Agent for Owner CA State/Zip Telephone Fax* Name 4, PROPERTY OWNER Address City State/Zip Telephone Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # (Sec. 7031 .5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7OOO of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031 .5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars |$500l). Name State License # Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone # Address City State/Zip TelephoneDesigner Name State License # 8, /WORKERS' COMPENSATION ..V,l. .,, , ,'. Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: Q I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. Q I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date__ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100) OR LESS) Q CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure worker*' compensation coverage it unlawful, and shell subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), In addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE 7. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION ' I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: Q I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). Q I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not epply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). Q I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. Q YES QNO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR WO/WI£S«)£rV7Mi BUILDING PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Q YES Q NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Q YES Q NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1 ,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Q YES Q NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A RNAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFRCE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. «.! CONSTRUCTION lEMDlN&AC^CY S: . I: : I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after fhe^work is commencecUe< a period of 1 80 days (Section 1 06.4.4 Uniform Building Code) APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance DATE: 07/31/98 PLAN CHECK EXPIRATION PC# PCR97058 DATE: 09/18/98 TO: MUN LEU ADDRESS: 2855 CARLSBAD BL 11835 WEST OLYMPIC BLVD #298 LOS ANGELES, CA 90064 You have applied to have your plans checked on the date shown above, and you have not obtained your building permit. The provisions of Section 304(d) of the Uniform Building Code state: "Section 304(d) Expiration of Plan Review Applications for which no permit is issued within one year following the date of application shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned to the applicant or. destroyed by the Building Official. In order to renew action on an application after expiration, the applicant shall resubmit plans and pay a new plan review fee." Please check the appropriate box indicating your choice and return this letter to the BUILDING DEPARTMENT. PROJECT ABANDONED. I WILL PICK UP PLANS WITHIN 10 DAYS. PROJECT ABANDONED. PLANS MAY BE DESTROYED. If you have any questions, please contact the Building Department at (619) 438-1161 extension 4331. RAENETTE ABBEY Building Department EsGil Corporation Professional tPfan tRgviciv ^Engineers DATE: September 26, 1997 CT&REUCANT jURIS? ) JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Q--f4=AN-R£viEWER Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 REV 3 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 28S5 Carlsbad Blvd. PROJECT NAME: Carlsbad by the Sea Floor /Roof Shop Drawings The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: City-approved plans Esgil Corporation D GA D CM D EJ D PC 9/22/97 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 * (619)560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 96-1141 REVS September 26, 1997 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: Kurt Culver BUILDING ADDRESS: 2855 Carlsbad Blvd. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: PLAN CHECK NO.: 96-1141 REV 3 DATE: September 26, 1997 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: BUILDING PORTION I BUILDING AREA | VALUATION I (ft.2) 1 MULTIPLIER Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE VALUE ($) D 199 UBC Building Permit Fee D Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ D 199 UBC Plan Check Fee D Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ Type of Review: O Complete Review G Structural Only E3 Hourly G Repetitive Fee Applicable Q Other; Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 217.88 Comments; Floor/roof trusses: Esgil fee = TA hrs. @ 87.15/hr. Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 ARCHITECT'S SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS A/A DOCUMENT G710 (Instructions on reverse side) Owner Architect Consultant Contractor Field Other D IS D D PROJECT: Carlsbad by the Sea (name, address) Building 1 OWNER: California Lutheran Homes TO: DPR Construction (Contractor) ARCHITECT'S SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION NO: 46 DATE OF ISSUANCE: 9/16/97 ARCHITECT: The Steinberg Group CONTRACT FOR: $25,537,312.00 CONTRACT DATED: August 14, 1996 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 93025 The Work shall be carried out in accordance with the following supplemental instructions issued in accordance with the Contract Documents without change in Contract Sum or Contract Time. Proceeding with the Work in accordance with these instructions indicates your acknowledgement that there will be no change in the Contract Sum or Contract Time. Description: Revise roof framing at portion C due to unit K view lines. Attachments: (Here insert listing of documents that support description.) CA-149, CA-150, CA-151, CA-152. ISSUED BY: Mun Leu, AIA Architect CAUTION: You should sign an original AIA document which has this caution printed In red. An original assures that changes will not be obscured as may occur when documents are reproduced. AIA DOCUMENT G710 • ARCHITECT'S SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS " 1992 EDITION • AIA* • ©1992 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, NW., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006-5209 WARNING: Unlicensed photocopying violates US. copyright laws and will subject the violator to legal prosecution.G710-1992 -S> Q ^ sS, j« 5^ i^^1, 2t^^cv ^ ^- k A ^^N . ^i ^ $• S\ I •D o> O n*i 2 3"OQ NJ ^ I ^x(V ^in cc