The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2909 CANDIL PL; ; CB971800; PermitPermit No: CB971800 Project No: A9702306 Development No: Suite: BUILDING PERMIT 09/30/97 08:49 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 2909 CANDIL PL Permit Type: RESIDENTIAL BLDG REPLACEMENT Parcel No: 215-491-35-00 Lot#: Valuation: 734,625 Cons~€ruW r-±»RT Occupancy Group: Referenced: Statfecs': Description: FIRE REPLACE-8541 SF+1124 GAR-t- Applied: 07/03/97 : 1721 SF DECKS Apr/Issue: 09/30/97 Entered By: RMA Appl/Ownr : CIMA, BILL 760 722-6977 1947 SOUTH PACIFIC ST OCEANSIDE CA 92054 *** Fees Required *** _^^HS^^^»»S Collected & Credits *** Fees : Adjustments: Total Fees; Fee description Enter Building Perj Enter Plan Check Enter Strong Moti * BUILDING TOTAL Enter "Y" for Plu Each Plumbing Fixt! Each Building Sewe Each Install/Repai Each Water Heater a Gas Piping System Each Vacuum Breaker * PLUMBING TOTAL Enter "Y" for Electric Iff Single Phase Per AMP * ELECTRICAL TOTAL Enter 'Y' for Mechanical Issue Fee> Install Furn/Ducts/Heat Pumps > Each Install Fireplace > Each Exhaust Fan > * MECHANICAL TOTAL 9. 00 6 . 50 6. 50 . 00 1,736.00 3,380,00 Ext fee Data j£S.3*1wfc'f'mo;-,fcs«i m^ Pff i'o iO iO ;5 iO .0 .0 2745. 1784. 73. 4602, 20. 238. 15. 7. 14. 7. 14. 315. 10. 83 . 93. 15. 45. 19. 26. 106. 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 50 00 00 Y Y Y CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760)438-1161 OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. Plan blc. Deposit Valida Date Unit No. . Phass "*W I Ir * of units ^ C^rifboJ, £*Jk*b (*u*4y ft* A &< . Brooosed Use"7 TT' «f Stories i T-O/M _#pf Bedroomsm~ State/Zip Telephone # Fax* (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemptiorv-Any vj^Utjeh o^Section 7031xS*y any applicant for/6 permit subjects the Applicant ;to y civil penalty of npj more thar> five h^Mdred dollars [£500J}. 'Z&Z? Name v *7*"7^r-7 xS~*7 Address State License # L-, C •/ £~4J f License Class Designer Name Address State License # B City State/Zip . yTelepbOne/# City Business License # AA&6£6€V 7?A /- ' 7 7 't'V City State/Zip Telephone Workers' Compensation Declaration: E hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: D I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. Q I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required tay Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$1001 OR LESS) Jl CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars (*100.000). iprftddttion to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for In Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE ////Vl L<t^-*^DATE I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason:fitH. '< as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). Q I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sac. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractors! licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). D I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. Q YES QNO 2. itfhava / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNiH SIGNATURE Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? D YES D NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Q YES Q NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Q YES Q NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. I hereby affirm that th LENDER'S NAME is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). C&J- LENDER'S ADDRESS £ O»- I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the CltV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced withia'365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the wor> is conjjrjflncejnor a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance Final Building Inspection i-•:•-••• ^-u :•-> NOV23I999 Dept: Building Plan Check #: Permit*: Project Name: Planning CMWD StUte Fire Date:11/23/99 Address: CB971800 FIRE REPLACE-8541 SF+1124 GAR+ 1721 SF DECKS 2909 CANDIL PL Permit Type: RREPLACE Sub Type: Lot: Contact Person: RON Sewer Dist: LC Phone: 6 1 95488937 Water Dist: CA *K — -tot- Inspected /V)\\j By: ^JlLJ'is Inspected Bv: Inspected Bv: Comments: Date , / / - inspected: (1/29/9? Date Inspected: Date Inspected: Approved: Approved: Approved: Disapproved: v Disapproved: Disapproved: City ^ Carlsbad final Building Inspection Dept: Building Plan Check fr. Planning CMWD St Lite Fire Date:11/23/99 Permits: Project Name: Address: Contact Person: Sewer Dist: Inspected Bv: NS.CIW Inspected' Bv: Inspected Bv: CB971800 Permit Type: RREPLACE FIRE REPLACE-8541 SF+1124 GAR+ Sub Type: 1721 SF DECKS 2909 CANDIL PL Lot: RON Phone; 6195488937 LC Water Dist: CA Date AW ON Inspected: J 2 -L •<& Approved: iX Date Inspected: Approved: Date Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: Disapproved: Disapproved: Comments: Inspection List Permit* CB971800 Type: RREPLAC Date Inspection Item Inspector Act 12/6/1999 89 11/23/199989 11/22/1999 14 11/22/199989 9/17/1999 22 9/17/1999 23 9/15/1999 23 9/8/1999 19 9/8/1999 92 9/7/1999 19 6/14/1999 17 6/14/1999 18 5/28/1999 16 5/27/1999 16 5/21/199984 5/19/1999 14 5/19/1999 24 5/19/1999 34 5/17/1999 14 5/5/1999 14 4/19/1999 18 4/16/1999 13 3/31/1999 13 3/29/1999 11 11/23/1998 11 11/23/1998 15 11/19/1998 15 11/17/1998 15 9/8/199811 9/8/1998 11 9/3/1998 11 9/2/1998 11 9/1/1998 11 7/16/1998 11 7/15/1998 11 7/13/1998 14 7/10/1998 11 7/7/1998 11 6/17/1998 18 6/17/199865 5/12/1998 66 5/12/199867 5/7/1998 17 Final Combo Final Combo Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin Final Combo Sewer/Water Service Gas/Test/Repairs Gas/Test/Repairs Final Structural Compliance Investigation Final Structural Interior Lath/Drywall Exterior Lath/Drywall Insulation Insulation Rough Combo F rame/Steel/BoIti ng/Weldi n Rough/Topout Rough Electric Frame/Steel/Bo Ittng/Weldin Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin Exterior Lath/Drywall Shear Panels/HD's Shear Panels/HD's Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Roof/Reroof Roof/Reroof Roof/Reroof Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Exterior Lath/Drywall Retaining Walls Grout Veneer/Brick/Stone Interior Lath/Drywall - PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS DH DH PS TP PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS SP SP PS PS PS RB PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS Rl CO we CO CO AP CO CO CO CA AP AP AP PA AP CO AP AP CA CO AP CO AP AP we AP CO CO AP AP CA CA CA AP CO CA AP CA we CO AP we we FIRE REPLACE-8541 SF+1124 GAR+ 1721 SF DECKS Comments OK TO RELEASE ELEC WATER LINE OK CANNOT FIND GAUGE ROOL FOR WED 9/8/99 SEE NOTICE ATTACHED BYRON ENTRY OK TO WRAP (PARTIAL-NO WRAP ENTRY AREA) OK TO POUR STOOP/REVEIVED SOILS REPORT ADVISED BOB REV TO GO TO GAPSINOSB&16DINSTR SEE NOTICE ATTACHED SEE INSPECTN RESULT FOR SIZE OF FTG 30"+30"+24"D BY BOB GOODBODY BY BOB GOODBODY BY BOB GOODBODY GARGAGE & COPPER UFER ND COPPER GROUND 400 AMP BY BOB PIER FOOTING AT GARAGE BY BOB WATER PROOFING COMPLETE Monday, December 06,1999 Pagel of 2 5/7/199866 Grout PS AP 4/23/1998 12 Steel/Bond Beam PS AP 4/23/1998 68 Fireplace/Tie Straps PS WC 4/8/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS AP 4/2/199811 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS CO 3/26/199821 Underground/Under Floor PS WC 3/26/1998 21 Underground/Under Floor PS AP 3/25/199811 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS CO 3/24/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS AP 3/24/199821 Underground/Under Floor PS CO 3/23/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS NS 3/23/1998 21 Underground/Under Floor PS NS 3/19/1998 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS CO 1/23/1998 13 Shear Panels/HD's PS WC 1/23/1998 62 Steel/Bond Beam PS AP 1/22/1998 62 Steel/Bond Beam PS CO 1/7/1998 12 Steel/Bond Beam PS AP 1/2/1998 21 Underground/Under Floor PS AP 12/31/1997 21 Underground/Under Floor PS NR 12/9/1997 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PS PI 12/8/1997 12 Steel/Bond Beam PS CO 10/14/1997 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PK CA 8-0 HIGH 1ST LI FT 4-0 ALL DOWN STAIRS RAIN NOTED ON PLANS NEED LONGER HD BOLT LOWER LEVEL LOWER LEVEL LOWER PIER NOTED ON PLAN NOT PER DETAIL BY OWNER Monday, December 06,1999 Page 2 of 2 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 1/18/2000 Permit# CB971800 Title: FIRE REPLACE-8541 SF+1124 GAR+ Description: 1721 SF DECKS Inspector Assignment: PS 2909 CAN OIL PL Lot Type: RREPLACE Sub Type: Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT CIMA, BILL Owner: CIMA WILLIAM M&SAUNDRA L Remarks: Phone: 7604381687 Inspector: Total Time:Requested By: SANDRA Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Ac omments Associated PC Inspection History Date Description Act Insp 12/6/1999 89 Final Combo CO PS 11/23/1999 89 Final Combo CO PS 11/22/1999 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding WC PS 11/22/1999 89 Final Combo CO PS 9/17/1999 22 Sewer/Water Service CO PS 9/17/1999 23 Gas/Test/Repairs AP PS 9/15/1999 23 Gas/Test/Repairs CO PS 9/8/1999 19 Final Structural CO PS 9/8/1999 92 Compliance Investigation CO PS 9/7/1999 19 Final Structural CA PS 6/14/1999 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP DH 6/14/1999 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP DH 5/28/1999 16lnsulation AP PS 5/27/1999 16 Insulation PA TP 5/21/1999 84 Rough Combo AP PS 5/19/1999 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CO PS Comments OK TO MOVE IN OK TO RELEASE ELEC WATER LINE OK CANNOT FIND GAUGE ROOL FOR WED 9/8/99 SEE NOTICE ATTACHED City of Carlsbad Inspection Request For: 5/27/99 Permit# CB971800 Title: FIRE REPLACE-8541 SF+1124 GAR+ Description: 1721 SF DECKS Type: RREPLACE Sub Type: Job Address: 2909 CANDIL PL Suite: Lot Location: APPLICANT CIMA, BILL Owner: CIMA WILLIAM M&SAUNDRA L Remarks: Inspector Assignment: PS Phone: 6195488937 Inspector: Total Time: CD Description 16 Insulation Requested By: RON Entered By: CHRISTINE Act Comments Inspection History Date 5/21/99 5/19/99 5/19/99 5/19/99 5/17/99 5/5/99 4/19/99 4/16/99 3/31/99 3/29/99 11/23/98 11/23/98 11/19/98 11/17/98 9/8/98 9/8/98 9/3/98 9/2/98 9/1/98 7/16/98 7/15/98 7/13/98 7/10/98 7/7/98 Description 84 Rough Combo 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 24 Rough/Topout 34 Rough Electric 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 13 Shear Panels/HD's 13 Shear Panels/HD's 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 15Roof/Reroof 15Roof/Reroof 15Roof/Reroof 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piere 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldrng 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act AP CO AP AP CA CO AP CO AP AP we AP CO CO AP AP CA CA CA AP CO CA AP CA Insp PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS SP SP PS PS PS RB PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS Comments BYRON ENTRY OK TO WRAP (PARTIAL-NO WRAP ENTRY AREA) OK TO POUR STOOP/REVEIVED SOILS REPORT ADVISED BOB REV TO GO TO GAPSINOSB&16DINSTR SEE NOTICE ATTACHED SEE INSPECTN RESULT FOR SIZE OF FTG 30"+30"+24BD BY BOB GOODBODY GARGAGE & COPPER UFER ND COPPER GROUND 400 AMP BY BOB PIER FOOTING AT GARAGE BY BOB .w CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE.r/z ?/f 9 LOCATION. PERMIT NO. (760)438-3550 2075 LAS PALMAS DfflVE TIME /A/ FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 438-3101. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? UJ Y|S FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT ^/T/--//^/ PHONE BUILOtNG INSPECTOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER City of Carlsbad Inspection Request For: 4/19/99 Permit* CB971800 Title: FIRE REPLACE-8541 SF+1124 GAR+ Description: 1721 SF DECKS Inspector Assignment: PS 2909 CANDIL PL Lot Type: RREPLACE Sub Type: Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT : CIMA, BILL Owner: CIMA WILLIAM M&SAUNDRA L Remarks: "WRAP INSPECTION" Phone: 6195488937 Inspector: Total Time:Requested By: RON Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall Act Comments /I? Inspection History Date Description 3/31/99 13 Shear Panels/HD's 3/29/99 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 11/23/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 11/23/98 15Roof/Reroof 11/19/98 15Roof/Reroof 11/17/98 15Roof/Reroof 9/8/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 9/8/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 9/3/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 9/2/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 9/1/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 7/16/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 7/15/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 7/13/98 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 7/10/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 7/7/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 6/17/98 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 6/17/98 65 Retaining Walls 5/12/98 66 Grout 5/12/98 67 Veneer/Brick/Stone 5/7/98 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 5/7/98 66 Grout 4/23/98 12 Steel/Bond Beam Act AP AP we AP CO CO AP AP CA CA CA AP CO CA AP CA we CO AP we we AP AP Insp SP SP PS PS PS RB PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS Comments OK TO WRAP (PARTIAL-NO WRAP ENTRY AREA) OK TO POUR STOOP/REVEIVED SOILS REPORT ADVISED BOB REV TO GO TO GAPS IN OSB & 16D IN STR SEE NOTICE ATTACHED SEE INSPECTN RESULT FOR SIZE OF FTG 30"+30"+24HD BY BOB GOODBODY GARGAGE & COPPER UFER ND COPPER GROUND 400 AMP BY BOB PIER FOOTING AT GARAGE BY BOB WATER PROOFING COMPLETE 8-0 HIGH 1ST LIFT 4-0 NOTICECITY OF CARLSBAD " w ^^ " " ^^ •""• (760)438-3550 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE DATE 7- TIME LOCAT.QN PERMIT NO. FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 438-3101. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? L-J YES RDR-RJRTHEajNFORMATION, CONTACT PHONE BUILDING INSPECTOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER City of Carlsbad Inspection Request For: 3/29/99 PermiW CB971800 Title: FIRE REPLACE-8541 SF+1124 GAR+ Description: 1721 SF DECKS Inspector Assignment: PS 2909 CANDIL PL Lot Type: RREPLACE Sub Type: Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT : CIMA, BILL Owner: CIMA WILLIAM M&SAUNDRA L Remarks: Phone: 6195488937 Inspector: Total Time: CD Description 11 Ftg/Foundat ion/Piers Requested By: RON Entered By: CHRISTINE Act Comments Inspection History Date Description 11/23/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 11/23/98 15Roof/Reroof 11/19/98 15Roof/Reroof 11/17/98 15Roof/Reroof 9/8/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 9/8/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 9/3/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 9/2/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 9/1/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 7/16/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 7/15/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 7/13/98 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 7/10/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 7/7/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 6/17/98 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 6/17/98 65 Retaining Walls 5/12/98 66 Grout 5/12/98 67 Veneer/Brick/Stone 5/7/98 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 5/7/98 66 Grout 4/23/98 12 Steel/Bond Beam 4/23/98 68 Fireplace/Tie Straps 4/8/98 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act we AP CO CO AP AP CA CA CA AP CO CA AP CA we CO AP we we AP AP we AP Insp PS PS PS RB PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS Comments ADVISED BOB REV TO GO TO GAPSINOSB&16DINSTR SEE NOTICE ATTACHED SEE INSPECTN RESULT FOR SIZE OF FTG 30"+30"+24"D BY BOB GOODBODY GARGAGE & COPPER UFER ND COPPER GROUND 400 AMP BY BOB PIER FOOTING AT GARAGE BY BOB WATER PROOFING COMPLETE 8-0 HIGH 1ST LIFT 4-0 ALL DOWN STAIRS C1ma P.01 APEX GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. Consulting Engineers and Geologists Feb. 14, 1999 Job No 363-G DCN. 99R-039 MEMORANDUM Subject: Field Inspection Report Checking for Compaction of DG for the entry stoop area and steps Cima Residence 2909 Candii Place Carlsbad, CA On February 1, 1999 \ inspected the prepared pad area for the entry stoop of \\ .<_: subject residence. The material consisted of well compacted decomposed granite (DG). The material was checked for compaction by probing. Based on our observations, it was our opinion that the materials exposed were suitable to support the steps and entry stoop slab. The inspectec utua and our understanding of the proposed improvements at the entry are shown in the attached Figure 1. We have recommended to the homeowner that the bottom of the proposed excavation, (to construct a ring wall), should be compacted before placing concrete. We have not reviewed the structural details for the ring wall or the steps, because it was net within our scope of work. Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either expressed or implied. Sincerely yours, -"^ £~R.^ ^/ t^f-^ V^^^.--^-v^^-^- *v"i_^ ^ \ few# 000709 1 £ Dr. Balakrishna Rao, RGB, RGE Encl: Figure 1. cvp f-u< >0 ••'*» ' - Feb--21-99 1S;O7 Bill and Saundra C Irna 619 722 1991 P. 02 jfl en OcoO c UJ _.\\^SK\\NN CO enc o: cg•*--oOJCO a a) UJcc a.OO CO >-cc\~~z. UJ UJozUJo COLUcc o DC CD O)a> u_ CD CO z: CD rf O X O.< X o O z LU g h~ uj2° UJ oCO o CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB971800 FOR 11/23/98 DESCRIPTION: FIRE REPLACE-8541 SF+1124 GAR+ 1721 SF DECKS TYPE: RREPLACE JOB ADDRESS: 2909 CANDIL PL APPLICANT: CIMA, BILL PHONE: CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: REMARKS: C/BOB GOODBODY INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: DID NOT SAY WHAT TYPE OF INSPECTION WAS NEEDED. NOT UNDERSTAND INSPECTOR AREA PS PLANCKf CB971800 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE VN STE: LOT: 760 722-6977 OR I DID TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT# TYPE STATUS CD CB940308 RAD EXPIRED LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 111998 Roof/Reroof 111798 Roof/Reroof 090898 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 090898 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 090398 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 090298 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 090198 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 071698 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 071598 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 071398 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 071098 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 070798 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 061798 Retaining Walls 051298 Grout 050798 Grout 042398 Steel/Bond Beam 040898 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 040298 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032698 Underground/Under Floor 032598 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032498 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032498 Underground/Under Floor 032398 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032398 Underground/Under Floor 031998 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012398 Steel/Bond Beam 012298 Steel/Bond Beam 010798 Steel/Bond Beam 010298 Underground/Under Floor ACT CO CO AP AP CA CA CA AP CO CA AP CA CO AP AP AP AP CO AP CO AP CO NS NS CO AP CO AP AP INSP PS RB PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS COMMENTS GAPS IN OSB & 16D IN STRAPS SEE NOTICE ATTACHED SEE INSPECTN RESULT FOR COMME SIZE OF FTG 30"+30II+24"DEEP BY BOB GOODBODY BY BOB GOODBODY BY BOB GOODBODY GARGAGE & COPPER UFER ND COPPER GROUND 400 AMPS BY BOB PIER FOOTING AT GARAGE BY BOB WATER PROOFING COMPLETE 8-0 HIGH 1ST LIFT 4-0 ALL DOWN STAIRS RAIN NOTED ON PLANS NEED LONGER HD BOLT LOWER LEVEL LOWER LEVEL 0210X0.0,0.0 .0.g .0.0.0.„ 000000000000 P . 01 CASA Engineering 7950 Silvciton Ave. Suite 210 San Diego C A 92 126 Fax(619)695-3367 Date 11*17-98 Project:Cima Residence Carlsbad, CA Please use for roof diaphragm OSB Rated Sheathing 32/16 15/32" In case you have any question, Please call me @ (619)695-27 b \ Kamel Zayat CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB971800 FOR 11/17/98 DESCRIPTION: FIRE REPLACE-8541 SF+1124 GAR+ 1721 SF DECKS TYPE: RREPLACE JOB ADDRESS: 2909 CANDIL PL APPLICANT: CIMA, BILL PHONE: CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA p PLANCK* CB971800 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE VN STE: LOT: 760 722-6977 REMARKS: C/BOB SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS-- CD LVL DESCRIPTION 15 ST Roof/Reroof PERMIT* CB940308 TYPE RAD STATUS EXPIRED ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 090898 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 090898 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 090398 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 090298 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 090198 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 071698 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 071598 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 071398 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 071098 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 070798 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 061798 Retaining Walls 051298 Grout 050798 Grout 042398 Steel/Bond Beam .,040898 Ftg/Foundation/Piers '040298 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032698 Underground/Under Floor 032598 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032498 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032498 Underground/Under Floor 032398 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032398 Underground/Under Floor 031998 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012398 Steel/Bond Beam 012298 Steel/Bond Beam 010798 Steel/Bond Beam 010298 Underground/Under Floor 123197 Underground/Under Floor 120997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT AP AP CA CA CA AP CO CA AP CA CO AP AP AP AP CO AP CO AP CO NS NS CO AP CO AP AP NR PI INSP PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS COMMENTS SEE INSPECTN RESULT FOR COMME SIZE OF FTG 30II+30II+24"DEEP BY BOB GOODBODY BY BOB GOODBODY BY BOB GOODBODY GARGAGE & COPPER UFER ND COPPER GROUND 400 AMPS BY BOB PIER FOOTING AT GARAGE BY BOB WATER PROOFING COMPLETE 8-0 HIGH 1ST LIFT 4-0 ALL DOWN STAIRS RAIN NOTED ON PLANS NEED LONGER HD BOLT LOWER LEVEL LOWER LEVEL LOWER PIER NOTED ON PLANS CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE / / / / NOTICE LOCATION PERMIT NO. (760)438-3550 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE TIME L£* /, A/, " FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 438-3101. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT £ YES BUILJ PHONE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB971800 FOR 09/08/98 DESCRIPTION: FIRE REPLACE-8541 SF+1124 GAR+ 1721 SF DECKS TYPE: RREPLACE JOB ADDRESS: 2909 CANOIL PL APPLICANT: CIMA, BILL PHONE: CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PS PLANCK* CB971800 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE VN STE: LOT: 760 722-6977 REMARKS: C/BOB/ SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR 4 PIER FOOTINGS TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT* TYPE STATUS CD 11 CB940308 RAD EXPIRED LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers DATE 090398 090298 090198 071698 071598 071398 071098 070798 061798 051298 050798 042398 040898 040298 032698 032598 032498 032498 032398 032398 031998 012398 012298 010798 010298 123197 120997 120897 101497 ***** INSPECTION HISTORY *****f* DESCRIPTION Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Retaining Walls Grout Grout Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Under Floor Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Under Floor Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Under Floor Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Steel/Bond Beam Steel/Bond Beam Underground/Under Floor Underground/Under Floor Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT CA CA CA AP CO CA AP CA CO AP AP AP AP CO AP CO AP CO NS NS CO AP CO AP AP NR PI CO CA INSP PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PK COMMENTS BY BOB GOODBODY BY BOB GOODBODY BY BOB GOODBODY GARGAGE & COPPER UFER ND COPPER GROUND 400 AMPS BY BOB PIER FOOTING AT GARAGE BY BOB WATER PROOFING COMPLETE 8-0 HIGH 1ST LIFT 4-0 ALL DOWN STAIRS RAIN NOTED ON PLANS * y 'L/> NEED LONGER HD BOLT LOWER LEVEL LOWER LEVEL LOWER PIER NOTED ON PLANS NOT PER DETAIL BY OWNER APEX GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. Consulting Engineers and Geologists August 31, 1998 Job No.: 363-G DCN:98R-218 MEMORANDUM Subject: Field Inspection Report Foundation excavations for columns Cima Residence 2909 Candill Place Carlsbad, California on August 31, 1998, I have inspected the materials exposed in the footing excavations for the four columns at the subject residence. Based on the resistance to penetration of a steel probe, it is our opinion that the materials exposed are suitable to support the footings designed in accordance with the recommendations presented in our geotechnical investigation report dated January 8, 1997. Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either expressed or implied. Sincerely yours, Dr. Balakrishna Rao, RCE, RGE 9853 Pacific Heights Blvd., Suite A San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (619) 625-2420 Fax: (619) 625-2425 CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB971800 FOR 07/16/98 DESCRIPTION: FIRE REPLACE-8541 SF+1124 GAR+ 1721 SF DECKS TYPE: RREPLACE JOB ADDRESS: 2909 CANDIL PL APPLICANT: CIMA, BILL CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: C/BOB/ AM PLEASE SPECIAL INSTRUCT: UFER GROUND INSPECTION. CONCRETE POUR SCHEDULED INSPECTOR AREA PS PLANCKtf CB971800 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE VN STE: LOT: PHONE: 760 722-6977 PHONE: PHONE: INSPECTOR . PLEASE INSPECT AS EARLY AS POSSIBL TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT# CB940308 TYPE RAD CD 11 LVL DESCRIPTION ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers STATUS EXPIRED ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 071398 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 071098 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 070798 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 061798 Retaining Walls 051298 Grout 050798 Grout 042398 Steel/Bond Beam 040898 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 040298 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032698 Underground/Under Floor 032598 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032498 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032498 Underground/Under Floor 032398 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032398 Underground/Under Floor 031998 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012398 Steel/Bond Beam 012298 Steel/Bond Beam 010798 Steel/Bond Beam 010298 Underground/Under Floor 123197 Underground/Under Floor 120997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 120897 Steel/Bond Beam 101497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT CA AP CA CO AP AP AP AP CO AP CO AP CO NS NS CO AP CO AP AP NR PI CO CA INSP PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PK COMMENTS BY BOB PIER FOOTING AT GARAGE BY BOB WATER PROOFING COMPLETE 8-0 HIGH 1ST LIFT 4-0 ALL DOWN STAIRS RAIN NOTED ON PLANS NEED LONGER HD BOLT LOWER LEVEL LOWER LEVEL LOWER PIER NOTED ON PLANS NOT PER DETAIL BY OWNER APEX GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC (Formerly Middlelon-Rao, Inc.) Consulting Engineers and Geologists July 13, 1998 Job No.: 363-G DCN: 98R-180 SITE INSPECTION REPORT. Area inspected: Garage footings Date of inspection: July 13, 1998 Method used: Probing JOB NAME: CIMA RESIDENCE have inspected the materials exposed in the footing excavations for the garage. The material consists essentially of dense decomposed metavolcanic rock in the northern#*'**GEillt*evu**<Cct** i&*v excavation and compacted fill derived from this rock in the souhcrn excavation. Based on the resistance offered to the penetration of a 1/2 inch probe, it is our opinion that the exposed materials at the base of the excavation are suitable for support of footings designed in accordance with the recommendations presented in the geotechnicat investigation report for the project, dated January 8, 1997. Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either expressed or implied. Dr. Balakrishna Rao, RCE, RGB 6650 Flanders Drive, Suite K San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (619) 625-2420 Fax: (619) 625-2425 APEX GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC (Formerly Middleton-Rao, Inc.) Consulting Engineers and Geologists July 13, 1998 Job No.: 363-G DCN:98R-181 SITE INSPECTION REPORT. JOB NAME: CIMA RESIDENCE Area inspected: MIRADRAIN installed on retaining walls Date of inspection: July 13, 1998 Method used: By discharging hose-water into the drain pipe through a clean out I have inspected the drains installed on the face of the retaining walls. The wall was already waterproofed at the time of our site visit. Miradrain was installed over the waterproofed wall surface and backfilled with compacted decomposed metavlocanic rock. Compaction was achieved by vibratory wackers. Clean outs have been provided at turns of the drain lines as per our recommendations. We allowed water to enter into one of the clear>outs and observed that it drains out readily at the open end of the drain. As long as the open ends are kept clean and open, the drain pipe is expected to perform satisfactorily. The installed drains meet with the purpose and recommendations given in the soils report dated January 8, 1997. Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of afl other warranties either expressed or implied. Dr. BalaKrishna Rao, RCE, RGE 6650 Flanders Drive, Suite K San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (619) 625-2420 Fax: (619) 625-2425 CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB971800 FOR 07/10/98 DESCRIPTION: FIRE REPLACE-8541 SF+1124 GAR+ 1721 SF DECKS TYPE: RREPLACE JOB ADDRESS: 2909 CANDIL PL APPLICANT: CIMA, BILL PHONE: CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PS PLANCK* CB971800 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE VN STE: LOT: 760 722-6977 REMARKS: C/BOB/ SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR COLUMN POST FOOTING TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS-- CD 11 PERMIT* TYPE CB940308 RAD CB973707 ELEC LVL DESCRIPTION ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers STATUS EXPIRED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 070798 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 061798 Retaining Walls 051298 Grout 050798 Grout 042398 Steel/Bond Beam 040898 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 040298 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032698 Underground/Under Floor 032598 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032498 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032498 Underground/Under Floor 032398 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032398 Underground/Under Floor 031998 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012398 Steel/Bond Beam 012298 Steel/Bond Beam 010798 Steel/Bond Beam 010298 Underground/Under Floor 123197 Underground/Under Floor 120997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 120897 Steel/Bond Beam 101497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT CA CO AP AP AP AP CO AP CO AP CO NS NS CO AP CO AP AP NR PI CO CA INSP PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PK COMMENTS BY BOB WATER PROOFING COMPLETE 8-0 HIGH 1ST LIFT 4-0 ALL DOWN STAIRS RAIN NOTED ON PLANS NEED LONGER HD BOLT LOWER LEVEL LOWER LEVEL LOWER PIER NOTED ON PLANS NOT PER DETAIL BY OWNER (Formerly Middleton-Rao, Inc.) Consulting Engineers and Geologists CIMA RESIDENCE 2909 CANDIL PLACE, CARLSBAD MEMORANDUM: JULY 8, 1998 JOB NO.: 363-G DCN:98R~170 I have inspected the compacted decomposed granite placed in the driveway Gc area of the subject building. Based on the resistance to penetration of the probe, it is our opinion that the material has been compacted sufficiently to support the drivowa and complies with the recommendations presented in our geotechnical investigation report dated January 8, 1997, Our service consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either expressed or implied. 6650 Flanders Drive, Suite K San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (619) 625-2420 Fax: (619) 625-2425 DATE PERMIT* JOB ADDRESS DESCRIPTION TIME ARRIVE: CODE DESCRIPTION j INSPECTOR PLAN CHECK* TIME ACT COMMENTS APEX GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. Formerly Mlddleton-Rao, Inc. 9715 Carroll Center Road SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92126 (619) 271-9780 TO 12. - DATE JOB NO. ?<^~<^ PROJECT _ x, / <L rw (^ /(<**<? frf^t* f e* LOCAT.ON Z^<?^>/,^/V / />/ ^ {^sxy /<J#& s* CONTRACTOR WEATHER OWNER f TEMP . at A M 0 at P.M. PRESENT AT SITE THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: _ I have inspected the materials exposed in the footing excavations for the _ subject building(s). The materials consist essentially of /<-if r as anticipated in our 1 y • /i-v*V./) /.ttfsr /'investigation report. Accordingly, it is our opinion that the.footing excavations have been carried to the proper depth and that the materials exposed are suitable for the support of footings designed in accordance with the recommendations presented in the / investigation report for the project dated tj&/rt&t*ar\j 0i Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and .practices. This warranty is in lieu of q|| other warranties either express or jjppUed. .... COPIES TO SIGNED CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB971800 FOR 04/08/98 DESCRIPTION: FIRE REPLACE-8541 SF+1124 GAR+ 1721 SF DECKS TYPE: RREPLACE JOB ADDRESS: 2909 CANDIL PL APPLICANT: CIMA, BILL PHONE: CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: REMARKS: C/BOB/ SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR AREA PS PLANCK* CB971800 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE VN STE: LOT: 760 722-6977 INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT* TYPE CB940308 RAD CB973707 ELEC CD 11 LVL DESCRIPTION ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers STATUS EXPIRED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 040298 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032698 Underground/Under Floor 032598 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032498 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032498 Underground/Under Floor 032398 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 032398 Underground/Under Floor 031998 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012398 Steel/Bond Beam 012298 Steel/Bond Beam 010798 Steel/Bond Beam 010298 Underground/Under Floor 123197 Underground/Under Floor 120997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 120897 Steel/Bond Beam 101497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT CO AP CO AP CO NS NS CO AP CO AP AP NR PI CO CA INSP PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PK COMMENTS RAIN NOTED ON PLANS NEED LONGER HD BOLT LOWER LEVEL LOWER LEVEL LOWER PIER NOTED ON PLANS NOT PER DETAIL BY OWNER (Formerly Middleton-Rao, Inc.) Consulting Engineers and Geologists April 3, 1998 Job No.: 363-G DCN: 98R-080 MEMORANDUM: SUBJECT:INSPECTION OF SLAB AND FOOTING AREAS CIMA RESIDENCE, 2909 CANDIL PL., CARLSBAD During my site visit on April 2, 1998 the following was noted: Because of the rain, footing excavations were filled with water. The contractor had taken action to pump the accumulated water. A thin layer of silt and clay washed down from the side slopes was noted at the base and the contractor was advised to remove this thin layer. The footing areas were probed. The materials consist essentially of very dense decomposed metavolcanic rock as anticipated in our geotechnical investigation report. Accordingly, it is our opinion that the footing excavations have been carried to the proper depth and that the material (when cleaned out) is suitable for the support of footings designed in accordance with the recommendations presented in the geotechnical investigation report dated January 8, 1997. Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either express or implied. We have also recommended that all re-entrant corners for the slab be adequately reinforced with additional diagonal bars. This has been brought to the attention of the contractor. This work was under progress at the time of our site visit. (jut-*-*2— Dr. Balakrishna Rao, RCE, RGE 6650 Flanders Drive, Suite K San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (619) 625-2420 Fax: (619) 625-2425 CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB971800 FOR 01/07/98 DESCRIPTION: FIRE REPLACE-8541 SF+1124 GAR+ 1721 SF DECKS TYPE: RREPLACE JOB ADDRESS: 2909 CANDIL PL APPLICANT: CIMA, BILL PHONE: CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PS PLANCK* CB971800 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE VN STE: LOT: 760 722-6977 REMARKS: C/BOB/ AM PLEASE INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: POURING CONCRETE IN THE PM TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS— CD 12 PERMIT* TYPE CB940308 RAD CB973707 ELEC LVL DESCRIPTION ST Steel/Bond Beam STATUS EXPIRED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 010298 Underground/Under Floor 123197 Underground/Under Floor 120997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 120897 Steel/Bond Beam 101497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT INSP AP PS NR PS PI CO CA PS PS PK COMMENTS LOWER LEVEL LOWER PIER NOTED ON PLANS NOT PER DETAIL BY OWNER APEX GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. Formerly Middleton-Rao, Inc. 9715 Carroll Center Road SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92126 (619) 271-9780 TO TE/-7- V CONTRACTOR WEATHER OWNER TEMP. at PRESENT AT SITE THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: _ I have inspected the materials exposed in the footing excavations for the_ subject building(s). The materials consist essentially '*^ ' r>/ A M P.M. \/0 A as anticipated in our investigation report. Accordingly, It is our opinion that the^footing excavations have been carried to the proper depth and that the materials exposed are suitable for the support of footings designed in accordance with the recommendations presented in the ngs /c*VT , I' investigation report for the project dated 0 Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either express or implied. » COPIES TO FEU; SIGNED #&L Jfc-*^ CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB971800 FOR 03/24/98 DESCRIPTION: FIRE REPLACE-8541 SF+1124 GAR+ 1721 SF DECKS TYPE: RREPLACE JOB ADDRESS: 2909 CANDIL PL APPLICANT: CIMA, BILL PHONE: CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: INSPECTOR AREA PS PLANCK# CB971800 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE VN STE: LOT: 760 722-6977 REMARKS: C/ROLL OVER FROM MON SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS— CD 11 21 PERMIT! CB940308 CB973707 TYPE RAD ELEC LVL DESCRIPTION ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers PL Underground/Under Floor STATUS EXPIRED ISSUED ACT COMMENTS ft-? ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 031998 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012398 Steel/Bond Beam 012298 Steel/Bond Beam 010798 Steel/Bond Beam 010298 Underground/Under Floor 123197 Underground/Under Floor 120997 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 120897 Steel/Bond Beam 101497 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT CO AP CO AP AP NR PI CO CA INSP PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PS PK COMMENTS NEED LONGER HD BOLT LOWER LEVEL LOWER LEVEL LOWER PIER NOTED ON PLANS NOT PER DETAIL BY OWNER APEX GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. Formerly Middleton-Rao, Inc. 9715 Carroll Center Road SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92126 (619) 271-9780 TO DATE JOB NO. PROJECT LOCATION CONTRACTOR 4-OWrtER WEATHER TEMP. at P.M. PRESENT AT SITE THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: I have Inspected the materials exposed in the footing excavations for the subject building(s). The materials consist essentially of ife r~v/ l<A as anticipated in our f-jAl iinvestigation report. Accordingly, it is our opinion that theMTOOtinqfexcavations^have been carried to the proper f^ -,^ depth and that the materials exposed are suitable for the support of footings designed in accordance with the recommendations presented in the /^7g/9 investigation report for the project dated i/7/T/ Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. _ This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either express or implied- COPIES TO SIGNED DAVID A. POPIELA 1492 RINCON VILLA DR. ESCONDIDO. CA. 92027 •[f&Y /* /•/ 25/Jpflttdreu iL-flA/g */ r/. •Mi fn Cm'J.f4«rtfTyp<.Cf de.Kte.1 I ?-/&&&/hintfy. - e? 3 El*frf?vd*;AU'5- £7* r-// -43 6- si-eel gntrtjyfciRyg?rMw?li 2< iN&PtCTOR PAV!DA. OF COMPLUNCI i ffiUIV CIRrifY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL Of THE ABOVE R£PORT£D WORK :>t£SS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THEivvwmrn TTIIH in*, DATE OF REPORT / <^ - REGISTER NVMBER^^ 7 . 3 DAVID A. POPIELA 1432 RINCON VILLA DR. CSCONDIDO, CA. 92027 JfttAfi JilP/, C WM> HdlBl u Cctitr M»C I (Type Gr 4e. Etc)Arttfttct E L ;AyS' ^"^o T-// NOTE ex INSPICTOR PAVIDA.POEJELAw CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE IHEKEBY CIRTIFY1HATI HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS A SPtCIFTTlONt. DATE OF REPORT *? ~ 3 &~ REGISTER NTMBEtt5,.#, DAVID A. POPIBtA 1432 RINCON VILLA DR. ESCONDIDO, CA. 92027 Cctitr. Mat' 1OVM. Gr dt, Itc.1 'b*s^ NOTE; BWtCTOt DAVID A. POFJELA CERTIFICATE Of COMPLIANCE I HEREBY GRIIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK CN'LESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVT FO17ND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE /VfPUOVTO PLANS A SPECtmiONS. DATE Of REPORT ? "" REGISTER < , —. DAVID A. POPIELA 1432 RINCON VILLA DR. CSCONDIDO, CA. 92027 C«itr. Mi!' f rrret. Gr de. Iic.1 MM Bt«.ftoi W.rt. g .4WS- NOTE; iNSfKCTOR DAVID A. POPJELA ^ CIRTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY C1KTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I HAVE FOUND IWS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THEAffROVID PLANS A SPtCIFTTIONl DATE OF REPORT ftwr Or fro^ *••«>« fig i Vg fe DAVID A, POPIBLA 1492 RINCON VILLA DR. ESCONDIDO. CA. 92027 JS±wet* garni j^Z^H*Kfcy^ ArttttcctOr -ll O-n t> G- D/r t^ibSiSAe ^ J^A^^a^L £*&^^ &rz&. '^^ cm> ^te&svn- A^itq&s* st^L NOTE; nwiCTOR PAV1P A. POPIELA CtRTIFICAU OF COMPLKANCITHAT i HAVE OVSPECTID ALL or TO ABOVT REPORTED WORK DATE OF REPORT 5SKiv«£/7£ DAVIDA.POPIELA 1452 KINCON VILLA DM. ISCONOIDO, CA. 92027 J.J Cmtr M»f I fTVM. GrW«. lie.) LJt - 7u £>tktoi ftcoorttd Wo .U. C. NOTI. DAVID A. POPJELA CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE IHEREBY CIHTITY THAT IBAVE CNSPECITD AIL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK CNIW OTKFRWISE NOTED I HAVE FOfND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH HO A JPEClFITtONS. DATE OP REPORT EsGil Corporation frofcssionaffPfan Review 'Engineers DATE: September 29, 1997 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad OTO\NREVIEWER FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-1800 SET: IV PROJECT ADDRESS: 2909 Candil PL PROJECT NAME: Cima SPD The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Jim Statser Telephone #: 753-2629 Date contacted: 9/29/97 (by: re) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: 1. Each sheet of the architectural plans must be signecf 2. A special inspection "program" (per UBC Sec. 106.3.5) must be submitted to the building department prior to the issuance of a building permit. By: Kurt Culver for S. Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D CM D EJ D PC 9/23/97 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 * (619)560-1468 * Fax (619) 560-1576 -1 c EsGil Corporation Professional!? fan %eview 'Engineers DATE: September 18, 1997 Q AEaUQANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad D PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 971800 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 2909 Candil Place PROJECT NAME: Residence for Bill and Sandra Cima SFD The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: James Statser 746 Edelweiss Lane, Olivenhain, CA 92024 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D CM El EJ D PC 9/8 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 * (619)560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 971800 III September 18, 1997 c RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2909 CandU Place DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 9/8 REVIEWED BY: Sergio Azuela PLAN CHECK NO.: 971800 SET: III DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: September 18, 1997 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: Esgil Corp. or to the bldg. dept. of the juris. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? QYes QNo Carlsbad 971800 III September 18, 1997 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (619)438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. All sheets of plans shall be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. 7. Applicant shall provide a "Special Inspection Program" to the Building Official. This correction shall be resolved by the Building Department. 20. Two exits are required from the roof deck and also two exits are required from the third floor. Clearly show them on plans. Note that exits shall be separated at least by a distance equal to half of the maximum diagonal distance of the area served. The area of the "Ellipse" is given by the following formula: A= 0.7854 d D where D is the minimum pole distance and d is the maximum pole distance. In your case D = 21 feet and d = 31 feet, therefore the area is A = 511 SF. Please revise the plans dimensions (try 20' X 30') or provide two exits. 23. Provide construction details, specifications and cross reference from details to plans for each stairway. Please specify on plans the rise and run for the stairways at the Garage, on the Upper floor to the Roof Deck and for the exterior stairways. Also provide complete drawing details and specifications for the exterior stairway shown at the Deck between Nook and Living. 24. Provide construction details, specifications and cross reference from details to plans for each stairway. One detail for handrail is adequate, however, cross reference from the detail to the plans shall be provided to each one of the stairways. c Carlsbad 971800 III September 18, 1997 44. Clearly show on plans the stud size and spacing as recommended in the structural calculations. The structural calculations recommendations in regards to the use of 2X6 studs @ 16" o.c. is for more than just the walls on the basement, please show the size and spacing for all the stud walls that exceed 10' height. 64. No calculations were provided. See original correction list and provide the structural calculations as required. • Provide calculations for all steel framing connections. 66. Provide complete construction details for the required one-hour shaft at the elevator shaft, according to Section 711. Also provide ventilation for the elevator shaft according to Section 3004, Revise the plans to remove all glazing from the elevator. If you have any questions, please contact Sergio Azuela of Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. EsGH Corporation Profcssionaf &(an Xgoiew 'Engineers DATE: August 28, 1997 P APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 97180O SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2909 Candil Place PROJECT NAME: Residence for Bill and Sandra Cima SFD The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: James Statser 746 Edelweiss Lane, Olivenhain, CA 92024 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed, Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D CM D EJ D PC 8/19 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 * (619)560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 971800 II August 28, 1997 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2909 Candil Place DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 8/19 REVIEWED BY: Sergio Azuela PLAN CHECK NO.: 971800 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: August 28, 1997 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law, A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: Esgil Corp. or to the bldg. dept. of the juris. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? QYes QNo Carlsbad 971800 II August 28, 1997 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (619) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. All sheets of plans shall be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. 6. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2. • REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS - FIELD WELDING YES FRAMING CONNEC. - SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUND. INSP. PLEASE INCLUDE THE SOILS INSPECTION ON YOUR NOTE OF SHEET At 7. Applicant shall provide a "Special Inspection Program" to the Building Official. This correction shall be resolved by the Building Department. Carlsbad 9718OO II August 28, 1997 8. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items that will have a deferred submittal (spiral stairway). Additionally, provide the following note on the plans, per Sec. 106.3.4.2: "Submittal documents for deferred submittal items shall be submitted to the architect or engineer of record, who shall review them and forward them to the building official with a notation indicating that the deferred submittal documents have been reviewed and that they have been found to be in general conformance with the design of the building. The deferred submittal items shall NOT be installed until their design and submittal documents have been approved by the building official." 10. Provide a smoke detector at the corridor giving access to the master bedroom, smoke detector shall be near to the stairway landing. 19. b) Windows L1 and M13 shall be safety glass. c) Windows M23, M18, M17, M16, M27, M15, M8, U23 and U15 shall be safety glass. 20. Two exits are required from the roof deck and also two exits are required from the third floor. Clearly show them on plans. Note that exits shall be separated at least by a distance equal to half of the maximum diagonal distance of the area served. 22. Provide complete construction details, specifications and cross reference from details to plans for all guardrails (interior and exterior). See original correction list. Each and every one of the guardrails shall be clearly identify on plans cross sections and elevations. 23. Provide construction details, specifications and cross reference from details to plans for each stairway. 24. Provide construction details, specifications and cross reference from details to plans for each stairway. 25. Provide construction details, specifications and cross reference from details to plans for each stairway. 26. Provide construction details, specifications and cross reference from details to plans for each stairway. 27. Include the spiral stairway in the list of deferred submittals or provide the required information. See original correction list. 28. Tile over roof slopes less than 3:12 is considered a decorative material and it shall be installed over an approved roofing system. Show it on plans for all crickets. Also show the approved decking material over the roof deck. See original correction list for corrections 28 and 29. Carlsbad 971800 II August 28, 1997 30. Provide construction details, specifications and cross reference from details to plans for roof drains and overflows. 31. If the floor joists are spaced® more than 16"o.c. the ceiling shall be protected with at least 2 layers of 5/8" type "X" gypsum board. Please clearly show on plans the floor joists spacing and the fire protection as required (for the Garage on the first floor). 37. I can't find the note. Please clearly show the note as required on the original correction, for the soils classification and the allowable bearing value. 41. Provide dimensions on detail 11/S6, also show the reinforcement size and spacing. 42. No response was provided for this correction. See original correction list. 44. Clearly show on plans the stud size and spacing as recommended in the structural calculations. 45. Clearly show on plans 2X6 @ 16" o.c. or 3X4 @ 16" o.c. at the first floor bearing walls. See original correction list. 46. No response was provided for this correction. See original correction list. 48. Please show the size and type of the FAU's on the plans. 49. Please show the required concrete slab under the FAD at the Crawl Space. See original correction list and UMC Section 320. 50. No response was provided for this correction. See original correction list. 54. Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the service panel and the location of any sub-panels. If service is over 200 amps, submit single line diagram, panel schedule and load calculations. 61. No response was provided for this correction. See original correction list. 63. Provide construction details specification and cross reference from detail to plans to show full compliance with the attached Policy 84-35. See original correction list. 64. No calculations were provided. See original correction list and provide the structural calculations as required. Carlsbad 971800 II August 28, 1997 65. Please show the grid lines on plans and identify the frames on the plans at their location. 66. Provide complete construction details for the required one-hour shaft at the elevator shaft, according to Section 711. Also provide ventilation for the elevator shaft according to Section 3004. If you have any questions, please contact Sergio Azuela of Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. CITY OF CARLSBAD POLICIES AND PROCEDURES NUMBER: 84-35 SUBJECT: Roof Drains EFFECTIVE: 3/1984 SECTION: BUILDING DEPARTMENT SUPERSEDES: 4/1978 PURPOSE: BACKGROUND; POLICY: Aid in property damage prevention caused by plugged rain drains. Overflow drains to serve as an indicator. Inspection of damaged and ruined property during heavy rains indicated to the Building Department that foliage and debris was stopping up the main roof drains. The water level would rise to the overflow drain level then the debris would float to and stop up the overflow drains. The water would rise to the level of flashings or roof jack then the water would pour down through the structure. It was concluded that if the owner, occupant or maintenance personnel could become aware of a roof drain stoppage, immediate action could be taken to clear the roof drains. ROOF DRAINS - SECTION 3207 (c) OVERFLOW DRAINS AND SCUPPERS. Where roof drains are required, overflow drains having the same size as the roof drains shall be installed with the inlet flow line located 2 inches above the low point of the roof, or overflow scuppers having three times the size of the roof drains may be installed in adjacent parapet walls with the inlet flow line located 2 inches above the low point of the adjacent roof and having a minimum opening height of 4 inches. Overflow drains shall be connected to drain lines independent from the roof. Overflow drains shall terminate so the overflow drains will also serve as an indicator of a roof drain problem. Overflow drains shall terminate in an area where it will be readily visible and will not cause damage to the building. RECOMMENDED TERMINATION LOCATION: 1. Where roof drains terminate through a wall, overflow drains will terminate a minimum of 12 inches above the roof drain. 2. When roof drains will terminate a minimum of 12 inches above ground floor level in a readily visible location which will not cause structural damage to the building. 3. When conditions of design dictate that both roof drains and overflow drains be underground, and determined by the Building Official, this condition exists. The Building Official may approve a secondary overflow with a minimum of 2 inch pipe size, piped from an inverted tee in the overflow drain to an outside, readily visible location, which will not cause structural damage to the building. Initiated By;Approved By: CITY OF CARLSBAD POLICIES AND PROCEDURES DUMBER: 80-8 SUBJECT: WATERPROOFING BELOW GRADE EFFECTIVE: 9/23/80 SECTION: BUILDING DEPARTMENT SUPERSEDES: PURPOSE: TO ESTABLISH A UNIFORM POLICY FOR WATERPROOFING BELOW GRADE MASONRY WALLS. POLICY: The Building Department requires approval in advance of any method of waterproofing below grade masonry walls except the one shown below. THE FOLLOWING METHODS ARE APPROVED. 1. Three layers hot niop and felt. 2 Johns-Manville mertirane waterproofing system. 3. U.S.G. "Supertite" system 4. Thoroseal5. Flintkote "Yellow Jacket". GRADE INTERIOR FINISHED FLOOR t/2" GRAVEL (MtN. 4" DRAIN PIPE (PERFORATED OR OPEN JOINT). DRAIN PIPE SHALL SLOPE TO FINISHED GRADE AT 1/8" PER FOOTMIN. initiated By:-Approved By: ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc. 5360 WORKMAN MILL ROAD • WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90601-2299 A subsidiary corporation of the International Conference of Building Officials EVALUATION REPORT Copyright © 1996 ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc. ER-4660 Reissued June 1,1996 Filing Category: ROOF COVERING AND ROOF DECK CONSTRUCTION—Roof Covering (202) EAGLE AND EAGLELITE CONCRETE ROOFING TILES EAGLE ROOFING PRODUCTS 3546 NORTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE RIALTO. CALIFORNIA 92376 1. Subject: Eagle and Eaglelite Concrete Roofing Tiles. II. Description: A. General: 1. Eagle conventional weight concrete roof- ing tiles are produced in high profile (Capistrano), low profile (Malibu), and flat profile styles with either smooth (Bel Air), or textured (Ponderosa) surfaces. Ridge and rake trim units are produced to match each product. The tiles are composed of Portland cement, sand, and proprietary addi- tives. Mineral coloring oxides are added or are mixed with port land ce- ment and water for surface application following extrusion. Units are cured under controlled temperature and humidity conditions. Tiles are 17 inches (432 mm) long, 123/8 inches (315 mm) wide, and nominally 1/2 inch (12.7 mm) thick. They are manufactured in either flat or profile style withfyj-inch (19 mm) interlocking sidelaps designed to resist surface wa- ter penetration and maintain proper alignment. All tiles have continuous protruding head lugs on the underside, which provide for mechanical at- tachment over wooden or metal battens, or provide a stable foundation for nail attachment to solid decking. Two nail holes are provided in each tite for use where half tiles are needed. Approximate installed dry weights with 3-inch (76 mm) head laps are 9.5 psf (46 kg/m2) for Capistrano tiles, 9.5 psf (46 kg/m2) for Malibu tiles and 10.0 psf (49 kg/m2) for Ponderosa and Bel Air tiles. 2. Eaglelite™ Tiles are produced in the same size, manner and shapes as conventional weight field tile except for substitution of lightweight ag- gregates and additives for sand. Approximate installed dry weights with 3-inch (76 mm) head laps are 5.7 psf (28 kg/m2) for Capistrano tiles, 5.5 psf (27 kg/m2) for Malibu tiles and 7.0 psf (34 kg/m2) for Ponderosa and Bel Air tiles. B. Installation—New Construction: 1. Sheathing: Sheathing must be structurally adequate to support the loads involved but not less than solid sheathing boards of nominal 1-inch-thick (25.4 mm) or minimum1/2-inch-thick (12.7 mm) plywood or nominal 1-inch (25.4 mm) spaced sheathing or other decking material recognized in an ICBO ES evaluation report or by the Uniform Building Code and approved by the local building official. 2. Underlayment: One layer of minimum Type 30 asphalt-saturated or- ganic felt is carried over or under hip and ridge nailer boards and laced through valleys. When installed over spaced sheathing, an underlayment recognized specifically for this type of use in an ICBO ES evaluation report must be installed with 6-inch (152 mm) side and head laps. 3. Battens: Nominal 1-inch-by-2-inch (25.4 by 51 mm) wood batten strips are required where pitches fall below 4:12, in order to minimize membrane penetration, and, where pitches exceed 7:12, to provide posi- tive tile anchoring. Battens are nailed to the deck with 8d corrosion-resist- ant box nails at 24 inches (610 mm) on center, or No. 16 gage by7/!6-inch-crown (11.1 mm) by 2-inch-long (51 mm) corrosion-resistant staples on 12-inch (305 mm) centers, allowing a Vj-Inch (12.7 mm) sep- aration at batten ends. Tiles installed on roof slopes of less than 3:12 are considered decorative cmiy and must be applied over an approved roof covering, subject to local building official approval. On roof slopes of 2:12 to below 3:12, an approved built-up roof is installed over solid decking In compliance with Table 15-D-1 of the code. Nominal 3/8-inch (9.5 mm) decay-resistant wood lath strips, installed ver- tically, are nailed to the built-up roofing or deck from eave to ridge at 24 inches (610 mm) on center. The entire deck is then hot-mopped. Horizon- tal nominal 1-inch-by-2-inch (25.4 by 51 mm) battens are then nailed through the vertical battens into deck at proper coursing, not exceeding 14 inches (356 mm) on center. Where attaching tiles to horizontal battens, nails shall penetrate the full thickness of the battens but not the roof mem- brane. Where roof slopes fall between 3:12 and 4:12, underlayment may be as described above, or a single-layer, Type 90, granular-surfaced, asphalt roll roofing, two layers of Type 30 felt installed shingle fashion, or other approved singie-ply system installed per coae or HJBU evaluation report.-^c^^^j^—jB£^-^rf-^^^il^^^iis*i.**fcrt».*isB^SMi*p^*"***«*ip'ija»»iftti^;jattens measuring nominal i men (25.4 mm) bySinches (51 mm) are nailed horizontally at proper coursing, maintaining allowances for drain- age every 48 inches (1219 mm). Battens installed on roof slopes of 4:12 to 21:12 shall be nailed to deck at no more than 24 inches (610 mm) on center, and shall have provisions for drainage by providing a 1/2-inch (12.7 mm) separation at the batten ends every 4 feet (1219 mm), or by shimming with moisture-resistant, nominal 3/8-inch (9.5 mm), decay-resistant wood lath strips or 2-inch- square shims, cut from asphalt shingles, placed between the battens and deck to provide drainage beneath the battens. Horizontal batten place- ment shall not exceed 14 inches (356 mm) on center. Nose end tiles installed on slopes exceeding 18:12 must be secured with a clip or an ap- proved adhesive 4. Eave: Metal eave closure strips must be installed when using Eagle Capistrano tiles. The use of eave closures with Malibu tiles is an aesthetic option. Eave riser strips of wood or metal must be installed at eaves when using Eagle Bel Air, Malibu or Ponderosa tile. Eave closures and/or eave risers elevate eave tiles to the proper height, block wind, fire, snow, ver- min, or birds, and allow drainage of moisture accumulated beneath the tiles to escape through weep holes in metal or slots in wood. 5. Fastening: Tiles are attached in accordance with Tables 15-D-1 and 15-D-2 of the code. All tile nails are minimum No. 11 gage corro- sion-resistant steel having a minimum 5/ie-inch (7.9 mm) head and suffi- cient length to penetrate % inch (19 mm) into framing battens or through the thickness of the sheathing, whichever Is less. Nailer boards of suffi- cient height to adequately support hip or ridge tiles are nailed into framing every 48 inches (1219 mm) with 20-penny steel nails or are secured using galvanized steel strapping or special galvanized steel attachment devices at 48 inches (1219 mm) on center. Each Eaglelite tile must be attached in accordance with Chapter 15 of the Uniform Building Code.. Evaluation reports of ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc., are issued solely to provide information to Class A members of ICBO, utilizing the code upon which the report is based. Evaluation reports are not to be construed as representing aesthetics or any other attributes not specifically addressed nor as an endorsement or recommen- dation for use of the subject report. This report is based upon independent tests or other technical data submitted by the applicant. The ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc., technical staff has reviewed the test results and/or other data, but does not possess test facilities to make an independent verification. There is no warranty by ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc., express or implied, as to any "Finding" or other matter in the report or as to any product covered by the report. This disclaimer includes, but is not limited to, merchantability, Page 1 of 4 Page 2 of 4 ER-4660 When attaching tiles to overhang areas where the nail points may be vis- ible from underneath the sheathing, nominal 1-inch-by-2-inch {25.4 by 51 mm) wood batten strips are nailed through the sheathing into rafters with one 8d nail in each rafter. Tiles are nailed into batten strips with mini- mum No., 11 gage nails of sufficient length to penetrate through the full thickness of the batten. 6. Trim Tile: Each hip or ridge tile is secured to nailer boards with one nail at the head end and a dab of roofers mastic or other permanent adhe- sive placed over the nailing area to secure succeeding tile. As an aesthetic option, mortar may be used at hip and ridge ends or to fill open areas be- neath hip or ridge trim. All rake tiles are attached with two nails into the barge board. 7. Flashings: Valley metal should be copper or minimum No. 28 gage galvanized steel formed with a 1-inch-high (25.4 mm) splash diverter in the center and both longitudinal edges turned inward approximately V2inch (12.7 mm) at 30-degree angles. Succeeding valley metal sections should overlap a minimum of 4 inches (102 mm) and be attached with clips or nails bent over the edges—not penetrating the metal. All exposedfield- or roof-to-wall flashing for Eagle Capistrano or Maltbu tiles must be malleable metal. Standard galvanized iron flashings may be used with Eagle Ponderosa or Bel Air tiles. In all cases, double flashing of pipe or vent penetration is required. 8. Broken Tile Replacement: The broken tile is first removed. If bat- tens were used originally, existing nails, if any, are cut and new tile in- serted. If no battens were used, a 6-inch-by-6-inch-by-1/2-inch (152 mm by 152 mm by 12.7 mm) plywood piece is nailed to the deck to act as a batten. The new tile is then inserted. 9. Special Environmental Conditions: In areas subject to wind-driven snow or roof-ice buildup, underlayment as required in Table No. 15-D-2 of the code is initially applied. Nominal 1-inch-by-4-inch (25.4 by 102 mm) wood counter-battens are nailed vertically over rafters to deck at 24 inches (610 mm) on center. Nominal 1-inch-by-4-inch {25.4 by 102 mm) battens are nailed horizontally at proper course intervals. All tiles are nailed through horizontal battens with hot-dipped galvanized nails. In areas where winds exceeding 80 mph {129 km/h) exist, directions in Table 15-D-2 of the code are followed. C. Reroofing: Eagle Tiles provide a Class A roof when installed over ex- isting asphalt shingle roofs. Care should be taken to ensure both horizon- tal and vertical alignment on the roof. Foreign matter must be cleaned from all interlocking areas. Cracked or broken tiles must be removed from the roof. Damaged or rusted flashing should be replaced. Existing framing must be adequate for the additional load. Structural data verifying ade- quacy should be submitted to the building official. The existing roof should be inspected In accordance with Appendix Chapter 15, Section 1515, of the code. When reroofing wood shake roofs, existing shakes must be removed and solid decking and tile installed, as with new construction. When installed over existing spaced sheathing boards, un- derlayment complying with the code or an underlayment recognized spe- cifically for this type of use in an ICBO ES evaluation report, installed with or without battens, may be used. One layer of Type 30 felt or approved equal underlayment must be installed on the roof prior to application of tile. In lieu of this underlayment's being provided, the building official may determine that the existing roof covering provides the required underlay- ment protection. Minimum allowable roof slope is 3:12. Details not covered under this section are identical to those described under "New Construction." Fas- teners must be of sufficient length to penetrate through the roof sheathing or a minimum of 3/4 inch (19 mm) Into the structural framing, whichever is less. Wood battens must be Installed in accordance with Section II B 3 of this report, and may require predrilling to prevent splitting. D. Roof Classification: Eagle Roofing tile installations are recognized by the code as Class A and have passed required tests to gain Class A rec- ognition when installed over existing asphalt shingles. E. Identification: The name EAGLE and the evaluation report number 4660 are imprinted on each tile. A tag on each shipping pallet lists the pro- ducing plant location, product identification and the installed weight. Each Eaglelite tile is identified by product name on a tag and a light-colored strip across the headlap area. III. Evidence Submitted: Results of tests in accordance with ICBO ES Acceptance Criteria for Special Roofing Systems dated July 1995, instal- lation instructions, and quality control manual. Findings IV. Findings: That the Eagle Concrete Roofing Tiles described in this report comply with the 1994 Uniform Building Cotfe™ as a Class A roof covering, subject to the following conditions: 1. They are manufactured, identified and installed in accordance with this report and the manufacturer's instructions. 2. They are manufactured at the Eagle Roofing Products facility lo- cated in RIalto, California. This report Is subject to re-examination In two years. Page 3 of 4 ER-4660 BEL AIR Tito Application Details Do nol nMt through flwMng Undorlaynwrri carried owr or under hdgj n*»ft ~ Alternate melalwind-rein block Band* optional between 4:lf E»v» cloeure Ilrlp TYPICAL RIDGE DETAILS NMi: Mp f»U*r bttnM *ra to b* of Mimetont Iraigtit la rmtolBln even ptane of trim We*. Height at nailerbaud* iMU very Oat to rool pitch fad type at 111*. AddWonalBrrolfM rreeomm. gotten* required betox I'M Un4«UynMnlor under Hip ruilM1 bavtfl* TYPICAL HIP DETAILS CAPISTRANO OR MALtBU • E*v»drip«rip TYPICAL VALLEY PLASHING DETAIL Counter flnNng Undvrlaynitnt BMndud Q J. p«i (Inning. Carry M *•<• In* or tramfer lolap o( OH wflh n*ilM* RW FLASHING ABUTTING WALL Salwiln motar'i mtiilo Son aluminum or other HeilWe type • fleinlng with minimum !• tklrt, Aflli to trtt oitn roolerk maetM FLASHINGS — PIPE VENT OTHER THRU-ROOF PROJECTIONS Mrlunv. ate.) MCMd 4' wtdU UndwkynuM FLASHING DETAILS CAPISTRANO OR MALIBU Page 4 of 4 ER-4660 U*ul drip (trip U*ttlMv*r<**r Application Details Bitten* required onHal pHcMi below 4rll wilc*l court** INSTALLATION AT EAVES AND FIELD Und*rl*ym*n1 tinted ovw orunder ridg* n*H*f Mdg*>uli*rMb*o(*umcMm heightmMnUin*v*npt*n*o<rldg*lttn Apply eonUnuou* b»dof ippraoMm*Uic M ov*rl*p•ru* On* 10-pmny Ml CutlMU Pro*44* minimum ]• hudlip •utt nk* til** to feW court* i FMMry DntoKvd birtt end. Cut oft h«M *nd ol tint nk* UM. TWo10-pwn>Y mil* p*r nU trim TYPICAL RIDGE AND GABLE END Apply ewitlnuoin b*Ml of rooMf*' m»Ue it ov«rt*p arm On* 10-pMinr run p« Np HI* HIP TRIM DETAIL NoU: Mlp Mtfor bowtft BM to to mfnttin •»•> plin* (rf trim MM. HrtgW of nltorftoird* wffi v*ry du* to roof pitch md typ« ot Bto BMMni opUamt Not*; In cm* «ib|*et to root Ic* bKk-up, buwitaon pttcIMt I*** Hun *!« not nconnn*nd*d Note Hip nM)« bovd* •(• to b* e( nifliOta nwlnuin «nn ptan* ol trim IBM. H*igM of nWI«bo*R>* •« very du* to reo< plteh *na typ* ol IN* Bud at root*r* nuittOMrttpping trtu brry und*rt*ym«it overor undtf Np ulter Groui *nd mdoHire TYPICAL HIP DETAILS BEL AIR OH PONDEROSA STEP1 STEP 2 STEPS Crimped *dg* VENT FLASHING Undwliynwm UnMrtaymtnl Comlnuou* p*n HMnNig/— Omrry ov«f top 0' 111* ••cur* tl*p llHhlng laUMinth*fipio*Mnwftn' nwBtie. CONTINUOUS FLASHING STEP FLASHING EsGil Corporation Professional fPfon fyvie-u) Engineers DATE: July 11, 1997 a APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 971800 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2909 Candil Place PROJECT NAME: Residence for Bill and Sandra Cima SFD The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: James Statser 746 Edelweiss Lane, Olivenhain, CA 92024 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: , Esgil Corporation D GA D CM D EJ D PC 7/3 trnsmtldot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (619)560-1468 * Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 971800 July 11, 1997 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 971800 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2909 Candil Place FLOOR AREA: Dwelling 8541 SF Garage 1124SF Decks 1721 SF REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 7/3/97 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: July 11, 1997 STORIES: 2 + basement + roof deck HEIGHT: 35 FT (estimated) DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 7/3 PLAN REVIEWER: Sergio Azuela FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with Title 24 and the following model codes: 1994 UBC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UPC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UMC (effective 2/23/96) and 1993 NEC (effective 12/28/95). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copvl where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 1, GENERAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC) r3forw.dot Carlsbad 971800 July 11, 1997 • PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (619) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). 3. Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). 4. Specify on the Title Sheet of the plans the gross floor area of each element of this project, including dwelling, garage, carport, patio, deck and balcony. Section 106.3.3. Provide a complete breakdown of the floor areas by story. Also including the floor area of the basement. 5. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with Title 24 and the 1994 UBC, UMC and UPC and the 1993 NEC. 6. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2. » REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS • FIELD WELDING YES FRAMING CONNEC. Carlsbad 971800 July 11, 1997 7. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. 8. On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items that will have a deferred submittal (Except for trusses). Additionally, provide the following note on the plans, per Sec. 106.3.4.2: "Submittal documents for deferred submittal items shall be submitted to the architect or engineer of record, who shall review them and forward them to the building official with a notation indicating that the deferred submittal documents have been reviewed and that they have been found to be in general conformance with the design of the building. The deferred submittal items shall NOT be installed until their design and submittal documents have been approved by the building official." 9. Clearly show the maximum building height based on the definition in Section 209. Plot the finish grade (as defined) on the elevations and dimension the distance to the floor above, for story determination. Also clearly show on plans that the basement is not a story, according to the FIRST STORY definition in Section 220. • FIRE PROTECTION 10. Show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup: a) Inside each bedroom. b) Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms. c) On each story. d) In the basement, if part of the dwelling unit. e) When sleeping rooms are upstairs, at the upper level in close proximity to the stair. f) In rooms adjacent to hallways serving bedrooms, when such rooms have a ceiling height 24 inches or more above the ceiling height in the hallway. • NOTE: Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in all sleeping areas of the unit. Section 310.9.1. • GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS 11. Sleeping rooms shall have a window or exterior door for emergency escape. Sill height shall not exceed 44" above the floor. Windows must have an openable area of at least 5.7 square feet with the minimum openable width 20" and the minimum openable height 24". The emergency door or window shall be openable from the inside to provide a full, clear opening without the use of separate tools. Section 310.4. Provide complete window schedule. 12. Basements in dwelling units shall comply with the above (even if not designated as sleeping rooms). Section 310.4. Carlsbad 971800 July 11, 1997 13. Window area must be at least 1 /10 of the floor area and a minimum of 10 square feet per Section 1203.3. 14. Openable window area in habitable rooms must be 1/20 of the floor area and a minimum of 5 square feet. In bathrooms, laundry rooms and similar rooms, 1/20 of area is required and minimum is 1.5 sq. ft. Section 1203.3. 15. Provide mechanical ventilation capable of providing five air changes per hour in bathrooms, water closet compartments, laundry rooms and similar rooms if required openable windows are not provided. Section 1203.3. Specify on plans for exercise bathroom. 16. Note that the discharge point for exhaust air will be at least 3 feet from any opening which allows air entry into occupied portions of the building. Section 1203.3. 17. Ductless fans cannot be used in bathrooms if a tub or shower is present. Section 1203.3. 18. Show that ceiling height for habitable rooms is a minimum of 7'-6". Section 310.6.1. Show it on plans at the Master Loft. 19. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): Clearly show it on plans for each door or window that is required to have safety glass. a) Fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors other than wardrobe doors. b) Doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools, saunas, steam rooms, bathtubs and showers and in any portion of a building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and drain inlet. c) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. d) Individual fixed or operable panels, other than those locations described above, that meet all of the following conditions: ' i) Exposed area of an individual pane is greater than 9 square feet, and: ii) Exposed bottom edge is less than 18 inches above the floor, and: iii) Exposed top edge is greater than 36 inches above the floor, and: Carlsbad 9718OO July 11, 1997 iv) One or more walking surfaces are within 36 inches horizontally of the plane of the glazing. e) Walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of the bottom and top of stairways where the bottom edge of the glass is less than 60 inches above a walking surface. • EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 20. Floors above the second story shall have not less than 2 exits. Two exits are required from the occupied roof deck. Only one of the two required exits may be through one or more adjoining rooms, the second exit shall be directly to outside. Exceptions: 1. Occupied roofs may have one exit if such occupied areas are less than 500 square feet and located no higher than immediately above the second story. 2. When the third floor within a unit does not exceed 500 sq. ft., only one exit need be provided. Section 1003.1. 21. Required exit doorways shall be not less than 36" in width and not less than 6'8" in height. Section 1004.6. 22. Guardrails (Section 509.1): a) Shall be installed at all unenclosed floor and roof openings. b) Shall be installed at open and glazed sides of landings and ramps. c) Shall be installed at balconies or porches more than 30" above grade or floor below. d) Shall be installed on roofs used for other than service of the building. e) Shall have a height of 36". f) Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-B. g) Openings between railings shall be less than 4". The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a guardrail at a stair shall be less than 6". 23. Provide stairway and landing details. Sections 1006.3, 1006.15 and 1006.2. a) Maximum rise is 7" and minimum run is 11". When the stairs serves less than 10 occupants, or serves an unoccupied roof, rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum. b) Minimum headroom is 6'-8". c) Minimum width is 36". Carlsbad 971800 July 11, 1997 24. Handrails: a) Handrails are required on each side of stairways. Stairways less than 44" wide or stairways serving one dwelling unit may have one handrail (if not open on both sides). b) Private stairways (1 tenant) need only have a handrail on one side if 30" or less in height. c) Stairways having less than four risers and serving one individual dwelling unit need not have handrails. d) Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and be continuous. e) Except for private stairways, at least one rail shall extend 12" beyond top and bottom risers. f) All stairs shall have handrails terminating in a newel or safety post. Section 1006.9. 25. The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. Section 1006.9. 26. Provide spiral stairway details, per Section 1006.6: a) Minimum run is 7-1/2 inches measured at a point 12 inches from where the treads are the narrowest. b) Maximum rise is 9-1/2 inches. Maximum clear opening between risers is 4 inches. c) Minimum headroom is 6 feet 6 inches. d) The tread must provide a clear walking area measuring at least 26 inches from the outer edge of the supporting column to the inner edge of the handrail. 27. Provide I.C.B.O. Research Report and number for metal stairway, or submit plans and calculations and approved fabricator registered with the building department or note that the stairway fabrication plans shall be submitted to and approved by the building official prior to installation. • ROOFING 28. Specify roof material and application. Chapter 15. 29. Specify on the plans the following information for the roof materials, per Section 106.3.3: a) Manufacturer's name. b) Product name/number. c) ICBO approval number, or equal. Carlsbad 971800 July 11, 1997 30. Show roof drains and overflows. Sections 1506.2 and 1506.3. Show size on plans. • GARAGE AND CARPORTS 31. Garage requires one-hour fire protection on the garage side of walls and ceiling common to the dwelling. Table 3-B, Section 302.4. 32. All elements supporting floor above garage, including walls supporting floor joists, must have one-hour fire-resistive protection on the garage side. Section 302.2. 33. Show a self-closing door, either 1-3/8" solid core or a listed 20 minute assembly, for openings between garage and dwelling. Section 302.4. 34. Doors may open into the garage only if the floor or landing in the garage is not more than one inch lower than the door threshold. Section 1004.9. Clearly show it on plans. • FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 35. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. 36. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in seismic zones 3 and 4. This does not apply to detached, single- story dwellings. Section 1804.5 37. Per soils report, note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and note the allowable bearing value. Section 1804.3. 38. If cut or fill slopes exist, show distance from foundation to edge of cut or fill slopes and show steepness and heights of cuts and fills. Chapter 18. 39. If required, show size and embedment of hold down anchors on foundation plan. Section 106.3.3. 40. If hold downs are required, note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation inspection. Section 108.5.2. '41. Show on the plans details for stepped footings steeper than 1:10. Section 1806.3. Carlsbad 971800 July 11, 1997 42. Show minimum underfloor ventilation equal to 1 sq. ft. for each 150 sq. ft. of underfloor area. Openings shall be as close to corners as practical and shall provide cross ventilation on at least two approximately opposite sides. Section 2317.7. • FRAMING 43. Show or note fire stops at the following locations per Section 708: a) In concealed spaces of stud walls and partitions, including furred spaces, at the ceiling and floor levels and at 10 foot intervals both vertical and horizontal; b) At all interconnections between concealed vertical and horizontal spaces such as occur at soffits, drop ceilings and cove ceilings; c) In concealed spaces between stair stringers at the top and bottom of the run and between studs along and inline with the run of stairs if the walls under the stairs are unfinished; d) In openings around vents, pipes, ducts, chimneys, fireplaces and similar openings which afford a passage for fire at ceiling and floor levels, with noncombustible materials. e) At openings between attic spaces and chimney chases for factory-built chimneys. 44. Show stud size and spacing. Maximum allowable stud heights: Bearing wall: 2 x4 and 2 x 6 max. 10'; Non-bearing: 2x4 max. 14', 2x6 max. 20'. Table 23-I-R-3. Provide structural calculations for all bearing wall that exceed the 10' height, and show the calculations recommendations on the plans. 45. Studs supporting two floors, a roof and ceiling must be 3 x 4 or 2 x 6 at 16" o.c. Table 23-I-R-3. Clearly show it on plans for all bearing stud walls at the basement. 46. Note on the plans that an A.I.T.C. Certificate of Compliance for glued laminated wood members shall be given to the building inspector prior to installation. Section 2305. 47. Per UBC Section 2343.6, provide the following note on the plans if trusses are used: "Each truss shall be legibly branded, marked or otherwise have permanently affixed thereto the following information located within 2 feet of the center of the span on the face of the bottom chord: a) Identity of the company manufacturing the truss. b) The design load. c) The spacing of the trusses." Carlsbad 971800 July 11, 1997 • MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 48. Show the size and type of all heating and cooling appliances or systems. Show it on plans. 49. Show details to comply with LJMC Section 320 for furnace under the floor furnace. 50. Specify on the plans the following information for the fireplace(s), per Section 106.3.3: a) Manufacturer's name. b) Model name/number. c) ICBO approval number, or equal. d) Show height of chimney above roof per I.C.B.O. approval or Table 31-B. 51. Note on the plans that approved spark arresters shall be installed on all chimneys. UBC, Section 3102.3.8. 52. Note on plan: Gas vents and noncombustible piping in walls, passing through three floors or less, shall be effectively draft stopped at each floor or ceiling. UBC, Section 711.3. 53. Provide dryer vent to outside. The maximum length is 14 feet with two 90-degree elbows. UMC, Section 504.3.2. • ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 54. Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the service panel and the location of any sub-panels. If service is over 200 amps, submit single line diagram, panel schedule and load calculations. • PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 55. Show T and P valve on water heater and show route of discharge line to exterior. UPC, Section 608.5. 56. Show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces. Provide two straps (one strap at top 1/3 of the tank and one strap at bottom 1/3 of the tank). UPC, Section 510.0 • CARLSBAD S.F.D. & DUPLEX SUPPLEMENT 57. For gas piping under slabs that serve kitchen island cooktops, see the attached Policy 91-46 for special sleeve and clean-out requirements. Carlsbad 971800 July 11, 1997 58. New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. Note that two roof jacks must be installed where the water heater is in the one story garage and directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No. 8093). 59. Note that two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093). 60. All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (city policy). 61. Incorporate the waterproofing details, on the attached Policy 80-8, where interior living space occurs below grade at the masonry wall(s). 62. All new residential buildings, including additions, require a soils report. Please submit two copies. Exception: If a room addition is limited to one story and 1000 sq. ft. in area, then a soils report is not required. Esgil Corporation will advise the City to place their soils notice stamp on the plans. 63. Overflow roof drains shall terminate in an area where they will be readily visible and will not cause damage to the building. If the roof drain terminates through a wall, the overflow drain shall terminate 12" minimum above the roof drain. Policy 84-35. • MISCELLANEOUS 64. Provide calculations for all steel framing connections. 65. Provide elevations for allsteel frames and cross reference the elevations to the framing plans. 66. Provide complete construction details for the required one-hour shaft at the elevator shaft, according to Section 711. Also provide ventilation for the elevator shaft according to Section 3004. 67. Clearly identify the side elevations provided on sheet A7, according to their orientation as the elevation provided on sheet A6. 68. Please provided clearer copies of the structural plans some of the members identification are not readable. See sheet S3. Carlsbad 971800 July 11, 1997 To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes Q No a The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: '2^O^ C^^a.tl / / PLAN CHECK NUMBER: tfOQ OWNER'S NAME: I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special Inspector). certify that I, or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special inspectors) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 for the construction project located at the site IJsted above, UBC Section 106.3.5. Signed I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as required by UBC Section 106,3.5 for the construction project located at the site listed above. 1. List of work requiring special Inspection: $$ Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection S" Field Welding D Structural Concrete Over 2800 PSI d High Strength Bolting D Prestreesed Concrete Q Expansion/Epoxy Anchors D Structural Masonry d Sprayed-On Rreprooflng D Designer Specified D Other 2. Namefs) of Indtvldual(e) or flrrm» responsible for the special Inspections listed above:f\ A. B. c; 3. Duties of the special Inspectors for the work listed above: A. B. C. Special inBfMota* «n«ll ohaok In wtth IN CHy and praMnt their eradantteta for approval nriortn beginning work on tha Job slta- SIP 4B97 Carlsbad 971800 July 11, 1997 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: Sergio Azuela BUILDING ADDRESS: 2909 Candil Place BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3 & U-l PLAN CHECK NO.: 971800 DATE: July 11, 1997 Residence for Bill Cima SFD TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION Dwelling Garage Decks Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE BUILDING AREA (ft-2) 8541 1124 1721 8541 VALUATION MULTIPLIER 78.00 22.00 11.00 2.90 VALUE ($) 666,198 24,728 18,931 24,768 734,625 S3 1991 UBC Building Permit Fee D Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 2,744.50 Kl 1991 UBC Plan Check Fee D Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 1,783.93 Type of Review: ^ Complete Review C] Structural Only d Hourly O Repetitive Fee Applicable D Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 1,427.14 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 City of Carlsbad Engineering Department DATE:~ T7 BUILDING ADDRESS: BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO.: C*&3L4>6t / PROJECT DESCRIPTION: _ C ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:-4-3 V '- ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: EST. VALUE: DENIAL Please see. the. attached report of deficiencies marked with Js^Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By:Date: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENG'NEFRING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: Bv: l-Date: ATTACHMENTS Dedication Application Dedication Checklist Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist Right-of-Way Permit Application Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: Michele Masterson City of Carlsbad Address: 2075 Las Palmas Dr.. Carlsbad. CA 92009 Phone: (619)438-1161. ext. 4315 A-4 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-O894 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST Q SITE PLAN 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: QR Q "-A. North Arrow*/^ D. Property Lines' B. Existing & Proposed Structures^ E. Easements i^* .^™ C. Existing Street Improvements t^ F, Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets. (544«^ *,.„** -~- / G. Drivreway Q 2. Show on site plan:^J^-a^^ A. Drainage Patterns — 1. Building pad surface drainage* must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography 3. Include on title sheet: A. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. Q Q Q 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: \\LASPALMAS\SVS\LlBRARY^NO\WORD\DOCSlCHKLS-nBuSdlno PUncheck Cfcbt BP0001 Form MM.doc Rev. 12/20/M BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 4STV 2ND/ 3Rtw Q Q Q 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 1/2" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS Q Q 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please ftnd an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: Q Q 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: \>LASPALMAS\SYSVJBRARY\ENOWORO\DOCSVCHKLSInB(jlUinD Ptottwck Cktot BP0001 fom MM .doeRev. 12/28*96 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST st/ Q Q Q 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: Please return Q Q 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. ly XJ » DING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 1 1 .06.030 of the Municipal Code. 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). •-•^^^CU^ {AJtJE&JSU^UC CO OM. I tsUl^ <-J~J OS-<^ * 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared py a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Q Q Q Grading Inspector sign off by:Date: 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) Q 7d. No Grading Permit required. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS Q Q 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: \\LASPALMAS\8YS\LIBRARYlENG\WORDCOCS\CHKLST\eulWlno PtancMck CWsl BP0001 Form MM.dOc Rev. 12/26/M BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST *St Q nnd/ Q Q 3ni/ Q Q 9. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. 10. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a Permit. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: rj Q Q 11. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. 12. Q Required fees are attached No fees required 13. Additional Comments: \\LASPALMAS\SYS\LIBRARY«NG<WORD\IX«S\CHKLSTlB«WlnQ POnchM* CMM BP0001 F«m MM docRev. 12/26/96 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB Address Planner _Greo Fisher APN: Phone (619) 438-1161, extension 4328 Type of Project and Use: Zone: r —- Facilities Management Zone: CFD (in/firt) Legend (If property in, complete SPECIAL TAX CALCULATION WORKSHEET provided by Building Department.) Item Complete ) Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES NO Y TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval . Discretionary Action Required: APPROVAL/RESO. NO. ^ PROJECT NO. YES _ NO (/ TYPE DATE f OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval I I Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Camino Det Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status {Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): \ __ Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. \ \ K Inciusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Date Entry Completed? YES NO Site Plan: 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines. 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front: Int. Side: Street Side Rear: 2. Accessory Front: Int. Side: Street Side Rear: 3. Lot Covera 4. Height: 0 5. Parking: \ G Additional Cor ^f f~ i t* r '""" Required Required : Required Required I Structure Setbacks: Required Required : Required Required ge: Required f _ Required Spaces Required jest Spaces Required nments t5ui' IO VQ^ ( "V(1O DA'fC^S - /) #& Shown ~Z_s& /Of Shown jo ' Shown — - 3-0 ' Shown ^^7^ f / A ^ Shown ///// . Shown / ^/ Shown Shown y / i/A U/-1)/ / t/s7r£= ftS/C/ Shown *— 7°/6i f /_ e ^ / ^K2^-<" f ^ J>^ Shown //^r5 f ~ C~- Shown -? — — ~~~~~ Shown — — /T£/7^i / £ \£t £Q& $ D^e/Z- QA/"/Kf ^ 3- / ' ^) Ot/et. ^W/^/V &x>toj$*falctfiw\ tyfc (7) ,$t$45&. P&Wfi%_, *^£&ffy(S f> " f$^ <ffa fytA 04-&f/t 'g/rffy/c/te/ti/sfcc £?{?&>$ 3^*^$$i$~*ft8 *"&&£- Ve^'q**^ 7/pJr? /vo lofr'MiMt. ' OK JTO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER JJ ,^7^L DATE iVlot$«p iw Oul-O7-97 OS: 57 B1 11 and Saundt-a Cima 619 722 1991 P.O1 Fi£CF:!V£0 JAN 3 11997 ;7V OF CARLSGAD Hofman Planning Associates January 31,1997 Michael Holzmiller City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, C A 92009 Subject: Reconstruction Of The Cima Residence At 2909 Candil Place Dear Michael: This letter is to confirm the information that you gave me regarding the height limitations for the reconstruction of Mr. and Mrs. Cima's home which was destroyed in the recent Harmony Grove fire. Since the Cima's lot and all of the surrounding lots are 0.5 acres in size or larger, they will be able to rebuild their home up to 35 feet in height as measured by current standards. If they choose to reconstruct with a flat roof or a portion with a flat roof, the flat roof portion may be constructed at up to 29 feet in height. If this letter accurately reflects our conversation of January 30, 1997, please sign below. We appreciate your cooperation in this matter. This confirmation will greatly assist Mr. and Mrs. Cima to begin the reconstruction of their home. Sincerely, Mike Howes I agree that the above is true and correct Michael Holzmiller date 21.04.061 wing-walls, planter walls or grade-separation retain- ing walls. (Ord. NS-180 $ 2, 1991) 21.04.065 Building height (a) The height of a building shall be measured as follows: (1) "Building height" means the vertical distance of a structure measured from the more restrictive (lowest) of finished or existing grade. The vertical distance is measured from all points at grade along and within the building coverage to the high- est point of the structure directly above that point of measurement (2) "Existing grade," for the purposes of measuring building height, means the ground level elevation which existedon or before August 1,1991 * and prior to any grading or other site preparation related to, or to be incorporated into, a proposed new development or alteration of existing develop- •™-*^^^,^.., ^ ^ ty is developed or improved in accordance^with1 •"•» . r . r -. -,*..<, „ - »grading plans which implement the approved discre* tionary permit for nondiscretionary permits where retaining walls, fill or other grading are utilized to create finished grade higher in elevation than exist- ing grade as defined in this subsection and as deter- mined by the planning director, then existing grade shall be used in the determination of building height (3) Building height measurements include basements and other subterranean areas that are above existing grade. In the case of basements, cellars and underground parking, building height is measured from existing grade, excluding the area below existing grade. (4) Building height is measured to the peak of the structure. Per Section 21.46.020 of this title, roof structures specifically for the housing of eleva- tors, stairways, tanks, ventilating fans or similar equipment required to operate and maintain the building; fire or parapet walls, skylights, architectur- al towers, flagpoles, chimneys, smokestacks, wire- less masts and similar structures may be erected above the height limits prescribed in this title, but no roof structure or any other space above the height limit prescribed for the zone in which the building is located shall be allowed for the purpose of providing additional floor space, or be taller than the minimum height requirement to accommodate or enclose the intended use. (Ord. NS-204 § 2, 1992: Ord. NS-180 § 3, 1991: Ord. 9667, 1983: Ord. 9498 § 1, 1978: Ord. 9141 § 1: Ord. 9060 § 212) 21.04.070 Building, main. "Main building" means the principal building on a lot or building site designed or used to accommo- date the primary use to which the premises are devoted; where a permissible use involves more than one structure designed or used for the primary pur- pose, as in the case of group houses, each such permissible building on one lot as defined by this title is construed as comprising a main building. (Ord. 9060 § 213) 21.04.075 Building site. "Building site" means: (1) The ground area of one lot; or (2) The ground area of two or more lots when used in combination for a building or group of buildings, together with all open spaces as required by this title. (Ord. 9060 § 214) 21.04.080 Business or commerce. "Business" or "commerce" means the purchase, sale or other transaction involving the handling or disposition of any article, service, substance or commodity for livelihood or profit; or the manage- ment of office building, offices, recreational or amusement enterprises; or the maintenance and use of offices, structures and premises by professions and trades rendering services. (Ord. 9060 § 215) 21.04.085 Cellar. "Cellar" means that portion of a building between floor and ceiling which is wholly or partly below grade and so located that the vertical distance be- tween the ceiling and the average adjoining ground (Ciriibtd 1-93}546 21.04.030 21.04.030 Apartment. "Apartment" means a room, or a suite of two or more rooms in a multiple dwelling, occupied or suitable for occupancy as a residence for one family. (Ord. 9060 § 205) 21.04.035 Apartment house. "Apartment house" means a building or a portion of a building, designed for occupancy by three or more families living independently of each other, and containing three or more dwelling units. (Ord. 9060 § 206) 21.04.036 Aquaculture. "Aquaculture" means that form of agriculture devoted to the propagation, cultivation, maintenance, and harvesting of aquatic plants and animals in marine, brackish, and fresh water. "Aquaculture" does not include species of ornamental marine or freshwater plants and animals not utilized for human consumption or bait purposes that are maintained in closed systems for personal, pet industry, or hobby purposes. This definition specifically excludes hy- droponics. (Ord. 9809 § 1, 1986) 21.04.040 Automobile wrecking. "Automobile wrecking" means the commercial or noncommercial dismantling or wrecking of used motor vehicles or trailers or the storage, sale or dumping of dismantled or wrecked vehicles or their parts. (Ord. 9060 § 207) 21.04.041 Bar or cocktail lounge. "Bar or cocktail lounge" means any establishment serving an alcoholic beverage, not meeting the re- quirements of a bona fide public eating establish- ment as defined in Section 21.04.056. (Ord. 9527 § 2 (part), 1979) 21.04.045 Basement "Basement" means that portion of a building between floor and ceiling which is partly below and partly above grade as measured along the exterior (immediately outside of "building coverage") perim- eter of the structure but so located that the vertical distance from exterior grade to the adjacent interior floor below is more than the vertical distance from exterior grade to adjacent interior ceiling. This defi- nition must apply to a minimum of fifty percent of the perimeter of building coverage for a structure to qualify as a basement. The portion of a basement that is below existing grade is not included in the measurement of building height (as defined in Sec- tion 21.04.065). (Ord. NS-204 § 1, 1992: Ord. NS- 180 § 1, 1991: Ord. 9060 § 208) 21.04.046 Bed and breakfast uses. "Bed and breakfast uses" means an historical or architecturally significant building which is located in a scenic or other environment with a distinct character which has no less than three and no more than eight attractively decorated lodging rooms, and one common room is available for social interaction where short-term lodging and primarily breakfast meals are provided for compensation. "Bed and breakfast uses" does not include rest homes, con- valescent homes, hotels, motels, boarding houses or lodging houses. (Ord. NS-81 § I, 1989: Ord. 9800 § 1, 1986) 21.04.048 Biological habitat preserve. "Biological habitat preserve" means any area which is designated and accepted by a federal, state or local agency as a permanent or temporary sanctu- ary, reserve or protected area for biological species of any kind. (Ord. NS-322 § 1, 1995) 21.04.050 Block. "Block" means all property fronting upon one side of a street between intersecting and intercepting streets, or between a street and a railroad right-of- way, waterway, terminus or dead-end street, or city boundary. An intercepting street shall determine only the boundary of the block on the side of the street which it intercepts. (Ord. 9060 § 209) 21.04.055 Boardinghouse. "Boardinghouse" means a building with more than four guest rooms where lodging and meals are (Carlsbad 8-96)544 APEX GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. (Formerly Middleton-Rao, Inc.) Consulting Engineers and Geologists August 20, 1997 JobNo.:363-G DCN: 97R-246 Mr. Bill Cima 1947 South Pacific Street Oceanside, California 92054 SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO ITEMS OF WORK IDENTIFIED BY THE ENGINEERS OFFICE OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD CIMA RESIDENCE 2909 CANDIL PLACE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Dear Mr. Cima: At your request we are providing the following explanations in response to the Items raised by the City of Carlsbad: Item 35: Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. Response to address Item 35: Cima residence was damaged by the Harmony Grove Fire. At the request of USAA Insurance Company Apex Geotechnology Inc. performed a site investigation and prepared a soil report dated January 8, 1997. The report includes foundation design recommendations and requirements for removal of damaged foundations. Item 36: Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in seismic zone 3 and 4. This does not apply to detached, single story dwellings, Section 1804.5 Response to address Item 36: The subject site is underlain by very dense metavolcanic formational materials and the depth to ground water is likely to be in excess 6650 Flanders Drive, Suite K San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (619) 625-2420 Fax: (619) 625-2425 of 100 feet, therefore, there is no potential for liquefaction at this site. Item 37: Per soils report, note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and note the allowable bearing value. Section 1804.3 Response to address Item 37: During the removal of the previous foundations Apex Geotechnology, Inc. obtained two representative soil samples from the site. We have performed two expansion index tests on representative samples of the on-site soils. The results of our expansion index tests are presented on the attached Table 1. The expansion potential of all the samples tested is considered to be "very low". If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Sincerely yours, Dr. Balakrishna Rao, RCE, RGB Principal Engineer TABLE 1 EXPANSION INDEX TEST RESULTS Sample Expansion Expansion No. Index Potential 1 7 very low 2 1 very low (Formerly Middleton-Rao, Inc.) Consulting Engineers and Geologists r r !D JAN , 9 1997 San Dfeoe Branch Office r r r LIMITED SOIL INVESTIGATION CIMA RESIDENCE 2909 CANDIL PLACE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Prepared for USAA Property & Casualty Insurance 480 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 105 San Diego, California 92108 r r r r r r r Project No. 14-18996-V Januarys, 1997 6650 Flanders Drive, Suite K San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (619) 625-2420 Fax: (619) 625-2425 [ (Formerly Middleton-Rao, Inc.) Consulting Engineers and Geologists January 8, 1997 r r* r r r ( r r r JobNo.:14-18996-V DCN: 97R-009 USAA Property & Casualty Insurance Company 480 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 105 San Diego, Ca 921 08 ATTN: MR. JACK CLINE SUBJECT: LIMITED SOIL INVESTIGATION CIMA RESIDENCE 2909 CANDIL PLACE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA MEMBER NO.: 860-727 Dear Mr. Cline: In accordance with your request we have completed our limited soil investigation for the reconstruction of the subject home located in Carlsbad, California. The accompanying report presents the results of our field investigation and engineeringri r r r r r r• analyses of the subsurface conditions at the site, and presents our conclusions recommendations pertaining to the geotechnical aspects of site development. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions, or can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, A * CT . j 1 nOjuu^lu^-^( Francis O. Moreland, RG ^**B?^?'w*^In.a ^ao> ^^' ^E Senior Geologist .^^V^MffvfefWSpgineer f&/^^^V\(§/*r w|k RD/CHM 1 83 I # °00709 ] SIBR/FOM Hcc I rvn *, . J II Addressee^ \\jA ^PJIiL^T^//miUI 0OOOO ^Ol Vk -^J \ -- — / 'II \^^ss^^/6650 Flanders Drive, S^*^£^Wblego, CA 92121 Tel: (619) 625-2420 Fax: (619) 625-2425 and if we )i ^^» r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 3 SCOPE 1 4 SITE CONDITIONS 2 4.1 Surface 2 4.2 Subsurface 2 4.3 Ground Water 4 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 5.1 Earthwork 5 5.1a Clearing and Stripping 5 5.1b Treatment of Existing Fills 5 5.1c Treatment of Loose, Disturbed Surficial Soils 6 5.1d Excavation 6 5.1e Subgrade Preparation 7 5.1f Material for Fill 7 5.1g Compaction 7 5.1h Trench Backfill 8 5.1 i Drainage 8 5.1j Construction Observation 9 5.2 Foundations 10 5.2a Footings 10 5.2b Concrete slabs-on-grade 11 5.2c Lateral Loads 12 6 LIMITATIONS 12 FIGURES APPENDICES r r r r r r r r r r r r r USAA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE January 8, 1997 Project No. 14-18996-V Page 1 LIMITED SOIL INVESTIGATION CIMA RESIDENCE 2909 CANDIL PLACE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 1 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our limited soil investigation for the proposed reconstruction of the Cima residence on a previously graded lot located in Carlsbad, California (see Figure 1, Vicinity Map). The purpose of our evaluation was to assess the surface and near surface soil conditions at the site, and to provide recommendations regarding the soil and geotechnical engineering factors influencing the design and reconstruction of the proposed residence. 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION It is our understanding that the subject home, which was destroyed during the [ recent Carlsbad fire, is to be reconstructed on essentially the same building footprint. The original structure was a two-story home of wood-frame construction with raised-woodr( floors. We anticipate that the new home will be of similar construction and size. Building loads are expected to be typical for this type of relatively light construction. SCOPE The scope of work performed in this investigation included a site reconnaissance, subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis of the field and laboratory data and the preparation of this report. The data obtained and the analyses performed APEX OEOTOCHNOLOOY, INC. r r r r r r r r r r USAA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE January 8, 1997 Project No. 14-18996-V Page 2 were for the purpose of providing design and construction criteria for minimal site earthwork, building related foundations, and slabs-on-grade. 4 SITE CONDITIONS 4.1 Surface j The subject property is situated within the coastal foothills of northern San Diego County. The site is roughly rectangular in shape with a plan area of about 2 acres. The lot slopes gently to the east and is bordered by open space to the east, Candil Place to the west, an undeveloped lot to the north and a residential property to the south. Debris from I the original structure has been removed from the site and the lot is currently occupied by the structure foundations, hardscaping and a pool. The original grading for the site [ appears to have been minor, with up to about 4 feet of fill beneath the driveway and r garage and minor cuts and fills in the pool area. The stem wall foundations for the t primary residence appear to have been constructed in natural fonmational material and are — of stepped construction. The surface soil existing within the raised floor area of the I residence appears to consist of natural weathered material with little or no fill. Vegetation r- on-site generally consists of landscape shrubbery. r 4.2 Subsurface A subsurface investigation was performed using a truck-mounted, continuous- flight F auger drill to investigate and sample the subsurface soils. Two exploratory borings were drilled on December 5,1996 to a maximum depth of 11 feet at the approximate locations F shown on the Site Plan, Figure 2. Difficult drilling conditions and refusal were met at this APBXOEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. r r r r r r r r r r USAA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE January 8, 1997 Project No. 14-18996-V Page 3 r depth. Logs of the borings and details regarding the field investigation are presented in [" Appendix A. Details of the Laboratory testing and the laboratory test results are presented in Appendix B. The materials encountered in Boring 1 generally consisted of loose, moist, clayey, fine to I medium sand with moderate gravel and cobbles (fill) to a depth of 2 feet, underlain by dense to very dense.clayey/sandy gravel with cobbles (decomposed metavolcanic rock) j to the maximum depth explored of 4 feet. Refusal was encountered on very dense metavolcanic rock. In Boring 2, the materials encountered consisted of medium dense, [ moist, clayey, fine to medium sand with moderate gravel and cobbles (fill) to 4 feet, underlain by very dense, moist, clayey/sandy gravel with cobbles (decomposed metavolcanic rock) to the maximum depth explored of 11 feet. Refusal was encountered on very dense metavolcanic rock. It should be recognized that because of the limited access at the site the borings were advanced in the vicinity of the garage where some fill was encountered. Hand excavation with a post hole digger and shovel within the foot print of the home indicated the existance of clayey sand/sandy clay weathered surface soil material underlain by metavolcanic formationat material within a depth about 1 to 1.5 feet. Fill thickness, if any, under the foot print of the home is negligible. r The boring logs and related information depict subsurface conditions only at the specific locations shown on the site plan on the particular date(s) designated on the logs. Subsurface conditions at other locations may differ from conditions at these boring locations. Also, the passage of time may result in changes in the subsurface conditions due to environmental changes. APEX OEOreCHNOLOOY, INC. r r USAA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE January 8, 1997 j Project No. 14-18996-V Page 4 4.3 Ground WaterrFree ground water was not encountered in any of the exploratory borings drilled at P the site and no surface seeps were observed. It must be noted however, that fluctuations in the level of ground water may occur due to variations in ground surface topography, subsurface stratification, rainfall and other possible factors which may not have been evident at the time of our field investigation.r 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONSr r From a soil engineering standpoint, it is our opinion that the site is suitable forr r reconstruction of the subject residence, provided the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are incorporated into the design and construction of this project. r The primary feature of concern at the site is the potential presence of loose soils in the foundation portion of the site resulting from disturbance caused by the removal of | the existing foundation. In order to minimize the possibility of damage to the proposed new residence due to excessive settlements resulting from compression of these loose, j disturbed soils, it will be necessary to remove the existing foundations and extend the excavation to a depth of about 6 inches below the base of the existing stemwalls. The I new footings and stemwalls may be deepened to a depth sufficient to ensure that the p minimum embedment depth is achieved in undisturbed formational material. Within the garage and driveway areas, the presently existing fill soils should be excavated and r recompacted to meet the compaction requirements specified in 5.1 g below. | Detailed earthwork and foundation recommendations are presented in the following r r AKX OBOTECHNOLOOY. INC. r r r USAA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE January 8, 1997 Project No. 14-18996-V Page 5 r paragraphs. We recommend that a geotechnical engineer (preferably Apex I Geotechnology, Inc.) be retained to review the final plans and specifications as they are developed and to observe the site earthwork and installation of foundations.r _ 5.1 Earthwork 5.1 a Clearing and Stripping I The site should be cleared of the old foundations, any trash or debris and stripped of any surface vegetation that may be present at the time of construction. Prior to any I filling operations, the cleared and stripped materials should be disposed of off-site. r[ 5.1 b Treatment of Existing Fills ri Fills present in the proposed building area are likely to be relatively minor, p consisting primarily of shallow near surface weathered soils. In order to provide ' foundation support for the proposed garage and driveway slabs , we recommend that any r existing fill material that remains after the removal of slabs and foundations has been completed be removed and recompacted. The areal extent of the removal and P recompaction should extend a minimum of 5 feet from the new foundation lines. The recompaction work should consist of a) removing all existing fill material down to firm p natural ground, b) scarifying, moisture conditioning, and compacting the exposed subgrade soils, and c) replacing the fill material as compacted structural fill. The areal P extent and depth required to remove the fills should be confirmed by our representative during the excavation work based on his examination of the soils being exposed. Any J unsuitable materials (such as oversized rubble and/or organic matter) should be APEX OECrTECHNOLOOY, INC. r r USAA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE January 8, 1997 [ Project No. 14-18996-V Page 6 r r r r r r r r r r r r selectively removed as directed by our representative and disposed of off-site. 5.1c Treatment of Loose, Disturbed Surficial Soils Loose, disturbed surficial soils are likely to be generated during the removal of | existing footings and foundations. In order to provide foundation support for the proposed new residence, we recommend that any existing loose material that remains after the [ necessary site excavations have been made be removed and recompacted. In slab-on- grade portions (in garage and driveway areas) of the proposed residence the areal extent of the removal and recompaction should extend a minimum distance of 5 feet outside of the new foundation lines. In raised-wood portions of the proposed residence the removal and recompaction may be restricted to an area extending 1 foot to either side of proposed P interior and exterior stem walls. The recompaction work should consist of a) removing ! all soils to a depth 6 inches below the existing footing depth, b) scarifying, moisture conditioning, and compacting the exposed subgrade soils, and c) replacing the excavated material as compacted structural fill around the stemwall footings. The areal extent and depth required to remove the loose surficial soils should be confirmed by our representative during the excavation work based on his examination of the soils being exposed. Any.unsuitable materials (such as oversized rubble and/or organic matter) should be selectively removed as directed by our representative and disposed of off site. 5.1d Excavation Based on the results of our exploratory borings and our experience with similar [ materials, it is our opinion that the on-site materials can be excavated using heavy earthmoving equipment. Contractors should not, however, be relieved of making their own independent evaluation of the excavatability of the on-site materials prior to submitting APEX OEOTECHNOUXJY. INC. r r USAA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE January 8, 1997 [ Project No. 14-18996-V Page 7 their bids.r r 5.1 e Subgrade Preparationr After the site has been cleared and stripped of fill soils, the exposed subgrade soil in those areas to receive fill, (in garage and driveway area) should be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, moisture conditioned and compacted to the requirements of Item 5.1g, [ "Compaction". r[ 5.1f Material for Fill r [ All existing on-site soils with an organic content of less than 3 percent by volume are suitable for use as fill. Imported fill material should be a low-expansion potential [ (U.B.C. Standard, Expansion Index of 30 or less), granular soil with a plasticity index of 12 or less. In addition, both imported and existing on-site materials for use as fill should not ! contain rocks or lumps over 3 inches in greatest dimension and not more than 15 percent P larger than 2 inches. No more than 25% of the fill should be larger than 1/4 inch. All ! materials for use as fill should be approved by our representative prior to filling.r1 5.1g CompactionrAll structural fill should be compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 P percent based upon ASTM Test Designation D 1557-91. The upper 6 inches of subgrade soil beneath pavements should be compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 95 [ percent just prior to placement of the aggregate layer. Fill material should be spread and compacted in uniform horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches in uncompacted thickness. I Before compaction begins, the fill should be brought to a water content that will permit APEX OEOTECHNOLOGV, INC. r r r USAA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE January 8,1997 I Project No. 14-18996-V Page 8 r proper compaction by either: 1) aerating the fill if it is too wet, or 2) moistening the fill with F water if it is too dry. Each lift should be thoroughly mixed before compaction to insure a uniform distribution of moisture. We recommend maintaining the soil at a moisture [ content approximately 1 to 2 percent above optimum prior to compaction. I 5.1h Trench Backfill Pipeline trenches should be backfilled with compacted fill. Backfill material should P be placed in a lift thickness appropriate to the type of compaction equipment utilized and compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 90 percent by mechanical means. In [ pavement areas, that portion of the trench backfill within the pavement section should conform to the material and compaction requirements of the adjacent pavement section.r Our experience has shown that backfills for even shallow, narrow trenches (such I as for irrigation and electrical lines), which are not properly compacted, can result in p problems, particularly with respect to shallow ground water accumulation and migration. P 5.1i Drainage Positive surface gradients should be provided adjacent to the new residence and roof gutters and downspouts should be installed so as to direct water away from the [ foundations and slabs toward suitable discharge facilities. Ponding of surface water _ should not be allowed, especially adjacent to the reconstructed residence or on I r r pavements. APEX OBOTECHNOLOOY. INC. r r USAA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE January 8, 1997 [ Project No. 14-18996-V Page 9 The presently existing driveway and garage slabs are located at an elevation lower P than the adjacent roadway. This condition tends to drain the surface water from rain andi other sources towards the residence. A catchbasin has been provided to the north of the | driveway slab with a pipe from the catch basin leading in a northeasterly direction. We do not know the point of discharge for the accumulated water. A careful evaluation of this ( drainage is required and the discharge location should be acceptable to the City of p Carlsbad. f~ In addition, all planters near buildings or adjacent exterior slab-on-grade should be provided with closed drainage systems with subdrains leading to free outlets. Trees p should not be planted closer than 1/2 the mature drip line diameter from buildings and adjacent exterior slabs.r 5.1j Construction Observationr — Variations in soil conditions are possible and may be encountered during f construction. In order to permit correlation between preliminary soil data and actual r conditions encountered during construction and to aid in evaluating conformance with the plans and specifications as originally contemplated, it is essential that we be retained to F perform on-site review during the course of construction. [ All earthwork should be performed under the observation of our representative to assure proper site preparation, selection of satisfactory fill materials, as well as placement ( and compaction of the fills. Sufficient notification prior to earthwork operations is essential P to make certain that the work will be properly observed. APEX GEOTECHNOLOOY. INC. r r r r r r r r r r r r USAA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE January 8, 1997 Project No. 14-18996-V Page 10 5.2 Foundations 5.2a Footings We recommend that the proposed building(s) be supported on conventional individual-spread and/or continuous footing or stem wall foundations bearing on undisturbed natural soil and/or well compacted fill material. All footings or stem wall foundations for one-story buildings should be founded at least 12 inches below the lowest adjacent finished grade. Footings or stem wall foundations for two-story buildings, should be founded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finished grade. The stem wall footings should.be deepened to a depth sufficient to ensure that the footings extend into ! undisturbed formational material or at least 6 inches below the presently existing base of _ the stemwalls. Independent floor support columns should be founded a minimum of 12 I inches into undisturbed natural material and be a minimum of 12 inches in diameter. P Footings located adjacent to the tops of slopes should extend sufficiently deep so as to I meet current UBC set-back requirements or the modified requirements issued by the City of Carlsbad. Footings located adjacent to utility trenches should have their bearing surfaces situated below an imaginary 1-1/2 to 1 plane projected upward from the bottom edge of the adjacent utility trench. At the recommended depths, footings may be designed for allowable bearing pressures of 2000 pounds per square foot (psf) for combined dead and live loads and 2500 psf for all loads, including wind or seismic. The footings should, however, have a minimum width of 12 inches. All continuous footings should contain top and bottom reinforcements to provide structural continuity and to permit spanning of local irregularities. We recommend that a minimum of two No. 4 top and two No. 4 bottom reinforcing bars be provided in the footings. In order for us to offer an opinion on whether the footings are APEX OEOraCHNOLOGY. INC. r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r USAA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE January 8, 1997 Project No. 14-18996-V Page 11 founded on soils of sufficient load bearing capacity, it is essential that our representative inspect the footing excavations prior to the placement of reinforcing steel or concrete. 5.2b Concrete slabs-on-grade Based on the presently existing conditions, Concrete slabs on grade will be required only for the driveway and the garage floors. Concrete slabs-on-grade may be supported directly on low-expansion potential compacted fill soil and/or firm undisturbed low- expansion potential natural soil. Slab reinforcing as well as slab thickness should be designed in accordance with the anticipated use of and loading of the slab. As a minimum, however, we recommended that the slabs should have a thickness of 5 inches and be reinforced with No. 4 bars spaced 15 inches apart to minimize hairline cracking of the slabs due to concrete shrinkage. We recommend that adequate joints be provided at appropriate locations to reduce the potential for cracking of slabs. The reinforcing bars should be supported on small concrete block chairs or equivalent prior to placement of concrete. It has been our experience that wire fabric, if used, will be displaced during placement of the concrete, is not always effective, and often results in the wire fabric being positioned at the bottom of the slab. Therefore, we do not recommend the use of wire fabric. All reentrant corners of slabs and foundations should be provided with diagonal reinforcements in accordance with the recommendations provided by the American Concrete Institute. We recommend that a 10 mil PVC moisture barrier be provided beneath slabs. The membrane should be sandwiched between two layers of sand, 2 inches in thickness. Joints of PVC sheets should overlap a minimum of 2 feet. The sand should be lightly I moistened just prior to placing the concrete and should have a minimum sand equivalent of 30. APEX OEOTECHNOUX3Y, INC. r USAA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE January 8, 1997 j Project No. 14-18996-V Page 12 5.2c Lateral Loads r Lateral load resistance for structures supported on footing foundations may be F developed in friction between the foundation bottoms and the supporting subgrade. An allowable friction coefficient of 0.30 is considered applicable. An additional allowable [ passive resistance equal to an equivalent fluid weight of 240 pounds per cubic foot acting against the foundations may be used in design provided the footings are poured neat j against the adjacent undisturbed native soils and/or compacted fill materials. These lateral resistance values assume a level surface in front of the footing for a minimum j distance of 5 times the embedment depth of the footing and any shear keys and are based on a factor of safety of 2.0.r 6 LIMITATIONS The recommendations presented in this report are specifically issued for the [ proposed reconstruction of the Cima residence. Our office should be notified of any P changes in the proposed development for further recommendations, if necessary, based E on our review. As grading and foundation plans are developed we should be retained to review them for conformance to our recommendations. We also recommend that our office review any other plans which may affect the geotechnical conditions on-site such as landscaping, irrigation, plumbing, or other similar type plans. We should also be considered for review of any future development plans, including building additions. In order to develop specific recommendations for future additions, additional subsurface exploration could be required. r r r r r r The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on our evaluation of the subsurface materials encountered on-site, our understanding of the APEX OEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. r r ( [ ( r- r r r r r r USAA PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE January 8, 1 997 Project No. 14-18996-V Page 13 r proposed development and our general experience in the geotechnical engineering. If f significant variations in the geotechnical conditions are encountered during construction our office should be consulted for further recommendations. The satisfactory performance of the site is also dependent on proper maintenance. Proper maintenance includes, but is not limited to, providing and maintaining good drainage away from structures and slopes, establishing good vegetation cover on the slopes and avoiding excess irrigation. [ Significant variations in geotechnical conditions may occur with the passage of time due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, ! changes in the state of the practice may occur as a result of legislation or the broadening r of knowledge. Accordingly, the conclusions and recommendations presented in this ! report should be reviewed and updated, if necessary, after a period of two years. rI Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principals and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties either express or implied. APEX OEOIECHNOLOOY. INC. r r FIGURESr r r r r r r r r r r r r r r APEX GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. JtTOS Approximate Scale (feet) 0 2,400 4,800 9,600 N APEX GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS VICINITY MAP CIMA RESIDENCE Job No. 14-18996-V Date JAN. 1997 Drawn by FOM Figure 1 tfCOg wMo E O)Ifr£<Q2trs!»* "«'0!E5 M~ncr ^^CO0>Q.O Icaw a. 10-^ §DO"— ££ On -PE *t-p_<& "C *i \ . 1 I s.0StoE'! n. * •*• O ^, "5UJg HSOgiu O i r ' APPENDIX A BORING LOGSr r r r r r r r r r r r r r r APEXGEOICCHNOLOGY.INC r BORING LOG JOB NAME: CIMA RESIDENCE DATE: 12-5-96 BORING: B-l LOGGED BY: FOM TOTAL DEPTH: 4 FEET JOB NUMBER: 14-1B896-V DEPTH IN FEET _5 .10 .15 .20 .25 S Y M — —..... —"".".". SAMPLE C DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS 0 TO 2 FT. : MOIST , CLAYEY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND ( SC ) WITH MODERATE GRAVEL AND COBBLES (FILL) 2 TO 4 FT. : MOIST . CLAYEY/SANDY GRAVEL (GO WITH COBBLES (DECOMPOSED METAVOLCANIC ROCK) BOTTOM OF BORING: 4 FEET MET REFUSAL ON VERY DENSE METAVOLCANIC ROCK COLOR REDDISH BROWN REDDISH BROWN CONSIST. LOOSE VERY DENSE r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r BORING LOG JOB NAME: CIMA RESIDENCE DATE: 12-5-96 BORING: B-2 LOGGED BY: FOM TOTAL DEPTH: 11 FEET JOB NUMBER: 14-18896-V DEPTH IN FEET .5 JLO S Y M .""." .... -"-" —.... •"" "•"•"" SAMPLE B C SP 83/10" DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS 0 TO 4 FT. : MOIST , CLAYEY , FINE TO MEDIUM SAND ( SC ) WITH SCATTERED GRAVEL (FILL) 4 TO 11 FT. : MOIST . CLAYEY/SANDY GRAVEL ( GC ) WITH COBBLES ( DECOMPOSED METAVOLCANIC ROCK) BOTTOM OF BORING: u FEET MET REFUSAL ON VERY DENSE METAVOLCANIC ROCK COLOR REDDISH BROUN REDDISH BROWN CONSIST. LOOSE VERY DENSE r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING Classification: During subsurface explorations soil samples were visually and texturally classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Soil Classifications are indicated on the boring logs. Field Moisture Contents: Soil samples were obtained in the field at various depths to determine their moisture content. The results of these tests are presented in Table B-1. In-Place Density: In-place density tests were performed on ring samples recovered from the borings. The results of these tests are presented in Table B-2 Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content: The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of selected soil samples were evaluated in accordance with ASTM D 1557-91. The results of these tests are presented in Table B-3. Particle Size Distribution: Gradation tests were performed on selected samples of soil. The material was first washed through a No. 200 mesh. A sieve analysis was then performed on the oven dry material retained on the No. 200 sieve. The gradation test results are presented on Figures B-1 and B-2. Direct Shear Tests: A series of two direct shear tests was performed on samples of the subsurface soils recovered with a California sampler. The samples were sheared at a constant rate under various surcharge pressures; failure was taken at the peak shear stress. The results of these tests and the resulting strength envelopes are presented in Figures B-2 and B-3. The test results show the condition of the fill. Undisturbed samples could not be recovered from the formational material which will support the stem walls of the primary residence. Appropriate design parameters (based on our experience) were used to develop our recommendations for allowable bearing pressures. APEX OEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. r TABLE B-1 FIELD MOISTURE CONTENTS Boring No. B-2 B-2 Sample Type SPT SPT Depth Ft. 5 8.5 Moisture Content (%) 14.3 10.5 r r r I. Boring r NO.Ii , B-1 I B-2 IN-PLACE DRY Depth Ft. 2 3 TABLE B-2 DENSITY (RING SAMPLES) Natural M. C. (%) 14.0 14.0 Dry Density (pcf) 109.6 106.0 r r r r APEXOEOTeCHNOLOOY, INC. r TABLE B-3 r . MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY r Boring Depth Maximum Dry Optimum Moisture 1 No. Ft. Density (pcf) Content {%) r B-2 0-4 120.3 14.0 B-2 5-9 122.5 13.0r r r r r r r r r r r APEX OEOTECKNOLOaY, INC. r IN t t 1 J I 1/4 I/I UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (ASTM D 422-72) U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZES 1/44 | 19 U ]• M 4t M M 10 100 NO 171 n 100 M 1.0 0.1 OJ PARTICLE SIZE IN MILLIMETERS .01 .001 .001 Oft A VCt. COANSC PINK mANi> COAflCK MEDIUM 1 FINE SILT AND CLAY KEY SYMBOL OOFIING NO. B-2 SAMPLE DEPTH ((••I) 0-4 ELEV. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYMBOL sc SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Clayey Sand with Gravel APEX GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS GRADATION TEST DATA CIMA RESIDENCE Job No. 14-18996-V Date Drawn by Figure JAN. 1997 BR B-1 MO M •0 MT PADlMCS S 340 10 10 0 t 1 ) n-hn i rf-rl 1/4 1n H i Uh /4 rl JIFIED • 1 1 +-I-H- SOILC (A U. S. ST 14 14 *^=-J* -^, LASSIFI STM O 42! ANDARO S M » 40 » _ ^==— ^ cn:£ ji CAT E-721 tCVE t »M M -rEi ONS^ IIZES 100 K ii4n fST • 11 rr~ i EM i T — r-Tn~r-TTTT"r 100 M tO.O 1.0 1.0 0.1 *•' •« -A) .001 •» PARTICLE SIZE IN MILLIMETERS CO . OMAVCL COANCI FINE • AND coAnsc HCOIUM 1 FINK •ILT AND CCAV KEY SYMBOL BORINO NO, B-2 SAMPLE DEPTH (IMI) 5-9 ELEV. (loot) UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYMBOL GC SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Clayey/Sandy Gravel APEX GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS 0 10 » M O 40 40 19 M to 1 100 1 01 GRADATION TEST DATA CIMA RESIDENCE Job No. 14-18996-V Date f JAN. 1997 Drawn by BR Figure B-2 r 2500 -i 2000 - u.wQ. 1500 - 1000 - CO 500 - BORING NO: B-2 DEPTH: 3-FT.(Fill) 0.00 1 I I 0.10 0.20 DISPLACEMENT, IN. NORMAL STRESS: 3,870 PSF Initial Moisture Content 14% Dry Density: 109 pcf. Final Moisture Content: 26.6% NORMAL STRESS: 1,935 PSF Initial Moisture Content 14% Dry Density: 193 pcf. Final Moisture Content 26.8% I 0.30 APEX GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. GEOTECHNlCAL CONSULTANTS RESULTS OF DIRECT SHEAR TESTS CIMA RESIDENCE Job No. 14-18996-V Date JAN. 1997 Drawn By B.R. Figure B-3 4000 -i COCOiu 0) O XCO 3000 - 2000 - 1000 - BORING NO: B-2 DEPTH: 3-FT.(FMI) I I I I I I 1000 2000 3000 NORMAL STRESS, PSF 4000 APEX GEOTECHNOLOGY, INC. GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS STRENGTH ENVELOPE CIMA RESIDENCE Job No. 14-18996-V Date JAN. 1997 Drawn By B.R. Figure B-4 .fffi7 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE CITY OF CARLSBAD Plan Check No COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DR., CARLSBAD, CA 92009 (619)438-1161 This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to verify that the project applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for the projects shall be issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate school district and returned to the City of Carlsbad Building Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT: Carlsbad Unified 801 Pine Avenue Carlsbad CA 92009(434-0661) Encinitas Union 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd. Encinitas CA 92024 (944-4300) Project Applicant: Project Address: RESIDENTIAL: San Marcos Unified 1290 West San*Marcos Blvd. San Marcos CA 92024 (744-4776) San Dieguito Union High School 710 Encinitas Boulevard Encinitas CA 92024 (753-6491) CM&l SQ. FT. of living area n_ " "number of dwelling >Q. FT. of covered area COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL:* SQ, ET, AREA Prepared byi units SQ. FT. of garage area _ Date FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the School District) Applicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080 Project is subject to an existing fee agreement Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. (other school fees paid) Other ^^^_^_^^__ Residential Fee Levied: $ Comm/lndust Fee Levied: $ based on based on sq.ft. sq.ft. School District Official Title Date CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE CITY OF CARLSBAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS tffc,'tARLSBAD, CA 92009 (619)438-1161 Plan Check No/ffi7 IffiD This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to verify that the project applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for the projects shall be issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate school district and returned to the City of Carlsbad Building Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT: Carlsbad Unified 801 Pine Avenue Carlsbad CA 92009(434-0661) _l Encinitas Union 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd. Encinitas CA 92024 (944-4300) Project Applicant: Project Address: RESIDENTIAL: A San Marcos Unified 1290 West San*Marcos Blvd. San Marcos CA 92024 (744-4776) San Dieguito Union High School 710 Encinitas Boulevard Encinitas CA 92024 (753-6491) SQ. FT. of living area _£L_ number of dwelling \SQ. FT. of covered area COMMERCIAL/INDSTRIAL:, SO, FX AREA Prepared by units SQ. FT. of garage area _ Date FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the School District) Applicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080 Project is subject to an existing fee agreement Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. (other school fees paid) Other _____ Residential Fee Levied: $ (0IOI .7-*-* ' - Comm/lndust Fee Levied: $ based on 3 3/jk 7* based on sq.ft.® sq.ft.® School District Official Title Date L :-?^-v:r?"r.T/:;»r.c:t T^-^r;-?7 jr^s'-^r'-.~"^\'a"--r^'f [''if.:m;*\JFz£-~-m'~*"trrv+f* ""J'.' ' t'^Tj^ir^"•f. .!-' * L-L T .»l^.i^^^,1irVr'v-,"->"Hr-.^.* r'-i " 'J-V-'/;-^ LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT is entered into by and between the LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT(organized and existing under Division 12 of the Water Code), Carlsbad, California, hereinafter called the "District", and BILL AND SANDRA CIMA, hereinafter called the "Owner". Recitals. The Owner wishes to construct improvements over a portion of District sewer easements which contain sewer facilities. Located at 2909 Candil Place, APN 215-491-3500. The District is willing to allow such construction upon the terms and conditions contained in this License Agreement. IT IS THEREFORE, AGREED BETWEEN THE OWNER AND THE DISTRICT AS FOLLOWS: 1. CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS. The District hereby grants a license to the Owner to construct a portion of a retaining wall, as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, over a portion of the District's easement. The improvements shall be constructed in accordance with plans submitted to the District, which plans must meet with the approval of the District. No changes may be made in the approved plans without the consent of the District. No other additional or different facilities may be constructed within the District's easement other than the facilities indicated on Exhibit "A". The District shall be allowed to inspect the improvements during all stages of construction. No inspection shall be available on the weekends or holidays, unless approved by the District. The District shall be notified a minimum of 48 hours prior to commencement of construction. 2. FEES AND PERMITS. The Owner shall obtain, at their expense, all necessary permits required by the City, County, State or other public agency in connection with construction. 3. GUARANTEE. Owner shall, and hereby does, promise and guarantee that the construction and maintenance of the improvements will not damage or harm in any manner the District's sewer facilities within the District's easement and should any such damage or harm occur, the Owner agrees to repair or replace any such damaged facilities without expense to the District. 4. WORK BY DISTRICT WITHIN EASEMENT. If it becomes necessary, in the District's sole discretion, to excavate or perform any work within the portion of the District's easements occupied by the improvements in order to inspect, test, maintain, repair, or replace the District's sewer facilities, the Owner agrees to remove(at the Owner's sole expense) all of the improvements constructed by the Owner within the District's easement to the extent required by the District to accomplish the work. In the event the Owner does not remove said improvements after receiving ten days written notice from the District, the District may remove such improvements immediately without notice and the Owner shall be liable to the District for the cost of removal. Upon completion of the work, the Owner may replace the improvements in accordance with plans approved by the District and at the Owner's sole expense. The District shall not be responsible or liable for damage to improvements within the easement by reason of such inspection, tests, maintenance, repair, or replacement, or by reason of any failure of the District's facilities therein, including settlement of backfill. In the event of an emergency in which the District determines that it is necessary to immediately access it's facilities, the District may do so immediately without giving ten days written notice. In such event, the District shall attempt to give that notice to the owner which is practical under the circumstances, by telephone or otherwise, but shall retain the right to immediately remove Owner's improvements at Owner's risk and expense. 5. ASSIGNMENT. The provisions of this License Agreement may not be assigned by the Owner without the prior written consent of the District. At the option of the District, successors in interest of the Owner's title to the property affectd by this License Agreement. The terms and conditions of this License Agreement shall be binding upon and insure to the benefits of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have entered into this License Agreement as of this j_ day of Q**^*f, 1997. LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT OWNER Genenai Manager 2909 CANDIL PLACE APN 2^-491-3500 EXIHIBIT A ••** Date: 23 January 1997 To: Planning Director From: Principal Building Inspector Re: 2909 Candil Place Reconstruction I have researched the matter as requested by Hoffman Planning Associates regarding the above address. The previous home was, according to a local architect familiar with the house (Ed Ebright) and our records, approximately 30 feet tall with a lookout appurtenance that extended above the main roof. But, the owner is proposing a completely different house plan according to Ebright, so the issue of how high the old house was is moot. In that the surrounding neighborhood is comprised of lots in excess of 20,000 square feel, R-l 20,000 zoning allows 35* high structures, and the existing OCR's allow 35' high structures, I would recommend the owner be allowed to construct a home along the zoning allowance for R-1,20,000 lots. PATRICK KELLEY Principal Building Inspector attachment • Page 1 Hofman Planning Associates Planning Project Management Fiscal Analysis January 21, 1997 Michael Holzmiller 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad Ca. 92009 RE: RECONSTRUCTION OF A HOME AT 2909 CANDIL PLACE Dear Michael: This letter is a follow up to our conversation last week regarding the reconstruction of the Cima residence at 2909 Candil Place which was destroyed by the Harmony Grove fire last year. When we met, I explained that the Cima family would like to reconstruct their home to have two stories with a maximum height of 35'. During our meeting we determined that their property was located in La Costa North Estates. The City files appeared to provide very little information regarding allowable setbacks and building height. Based on your suggestion that I provide a letter explaining the proposed request, I have been able to find that following information. Reconstruction in coniforniflncp w<th the destroyed The City Council recently approved a resolution which allowed destroyed structures to be reconstructed in conformance with what existed on the property before the fire, regardless if it was in conformance with current ordinance requirements. To the best of the Cima's knowledge their home was approximately 35 feet in height. They do not have a copy of the original building plans, nor do they know where to obtain a copy of these plans. The original home was constructed in the late 1970' s, remodeled in the early 1980's and bought by the Cima family in 1990. In addition, there are a number of the other existing homes in the vicinity that appear to be 35 feet in height. TV^Irrirm n i Accompanying this letter is a copy of the above mentioned document given to me by Mr. Cima. Section 1 of Article IV allows residential buildings to be constructed up to 35 feet in 2386 Faraday Avenue • Suite 120 * Carlsbad • CA 92008 - (619)438-1465 • Fax: (619)438-2443 height with two stories. This document also provides information regarding setbacks for the La Costa North Estates. You mentioned having concerns about what development standards to use when approving building plans in this area. I believe that this document provides the information that you need, since the existing homes were approved by the City and built in conformance with these requirements. The setback and building height limitations established for the La Costa North Estates are basically the same as would be required in the R-l-20,000 Zone. In addition, the lots in this area are all in excess of 20,000 square feet in size and the area has an RL 0-1.5 dwelling units per acre General Plan designation which mandates that all lots be at least 20,000 square feet in size. Even though this area is Zoned P-C, it functions as an R-l-20,000 neighborhood. The Building Height section of the R-l Zone allows single family residences in the R-l-20,000 zone to be 35 feet in height. "MaTimiim height rrf a flflt mqf v$ Based on the information attached to mis letter and attachments, I believe that the Cima family should be able to build a new two story, 35* home on their property. The height of the new structure would be measured by the current method of determining building height, Section 21.04.065 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Section 21.10.020 requires that flat roofed homes on lots less than 20,000 square feet size to have a maximum height of 24', which is 6' less than the 30' allowed for a pitched roof. However, the ordinance does not mention a maximum for a flat roof in a large lot area that is allowed to have 35* high pitched roofs. Mr. Cima would tike to know if a flat roof in this area could be 29' high which would be 6* lower than the 35* allowed for a pitched roof. He is considering making a portion of the roof on the proposed new house flat and needs to know what the height limit would be. The Cima family is anxious to have an architect start preparing the plans for the construction of their new home, but need to get a staff detenmruUion regarding building height. We are looking forward to your response on this issue. Sincerely, Mike Howes cc Bill Cima attachments Owner CoOwner tfllte Mail Xfered Price Loan Amt VestType Lender Land Use Zoning Plat MapNumb Legal Census Bedrooms Bathrooms Units Pool Owner CoOwner Site Mail Xfered Price Loan Amt VestType Lender Land Use Zoning Plat MapNumb Legal Census Bedrooms Bathrooms Units Pool 1 maaosHsma / ama mm :Cima William M & Saundra L ; :2909 Candil PI Carlsbad 9200ft :2909 Candil PI Carlsbad Ca 92009 : 10/01/92 Doc # : 623994 :S530,000 FULL Deed :Grant Deed :$424/000 Loan :Conventional : Joint Tenant IntTy : Adjustable :Bank Of America till Res, Single Family Residence :1 R-l, Single Family Residential : CARLSBAD TCT#75-04 : 008302 : CARLSBAD TCT#75-04 LOT 7 :Tract : 200 . 11 Block: 3 :5 View :Yes : 4 . 50 Garage Sp J'S' -*-* ™v^-» :1 Bldg SqFt (:4,796 . :Yes Xs / • £a&V3.OSQMa / SmM UlOt :Sudweeks Don R & Janice L : :2907 Candil PI Carlsbad 92009 :2907 Candil PI Carlsbad Ca 92009 :06/28/89 Doc # :341690 : Deed : : Loan : : IntTy : : :111 Res, Single Family Residence :1 R-l, Single Family Residential : CARLSBAD TCT#75-04 : 008302 : CARLSBAD TCT#75-04 LOT 8 :Tract:200.11 Block:3 : 4 View : Yes :4.50 Garage Sp :3 :1 Bldg SqFt :5,007 :No Parcel Land Struct Other Total Exempt Type % Imprv % Owned TaxArea 95-96 Tx MapGrid Phone Owner Tenant :215 491 35 00 :$146,549 :$424,969 :$571,518 :$7,000 ; Homeowners ;74 :100 ; 09075 :$5,974.24 11127 H7 :619-438-1687 Year Built Acres LotSqFt :1983 :.90 :39,204 Parcel Land Struct Other Total Exempt Type % Imprv % Owned TaxArea 95-96 Tx MapGrid Phone Owner Tenant :215 494 01 00 ;$275,000 ;$300,000 ;$575,000 ;$7,000 : Homeowners 52 :09075 :$6,072.98 :1127 H7 Year Built Acres LotSqFt :1985 :.84 :36,590 The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. •X* '' *•^'* Ifc*^^1v>bi1i-LU LU * U. O , •«. i- LU X 3 si J oJ i-0 D -= 0 1 ^t 3 0 C O J \n I Q :c>L t J *L ' /Ulua. az 5 z P DC L U ZU.ccOecuu• za:OO inoc.o « c£ CL IL C u^^ Z ia -H JiJX 8 ao or.Uli- XUl -J JUCTURAirt Z ONSTRUCTICu UJCL X toIO -J MG"•^Uo1 (N_ CO t 3C O -* (1 eU. > JCu CL ^ SI DU 2 •-#• * > 2 CLO*1tt1 X X 5 i UJ « T ^ JQDO A oCO T) D•o a IO 3 < 0 f E 3a. -^ o_o u. ^ a£ if ^> a ^5tn V m u e U | Standard3 r •> I*5]£;J3ty*vV — TJ X c U J t-UJo Xuh- * •<aat * ^ T) s CO «• ^1 *• CO •o -s -vcDj> e 1£%>—v — c ^ 'MJ U _e ^Z ot .c * N QUJ "oCUJ V >. T) 0 * -S 'a(O •'i H ^1•— — a c5 •m ^ 4 O, , ' . c a u CO Ul CL ^- tt?3J*01 - - ,* ou. • a•i < C A .. •• ,• M *e o ^ CD a.E •n FOUNDATION"7 V) UJ UJ•fl ^ fl 5 «5 X --» i ity Ml *•^ C (9 •fl 1- ffl •1 J.r* M '-1 D ul >s • •u g L> > V ji/) X tfti«^l>oiwi — B oCO CO or -j E • j( CO u e(J a * — 3 3 >. aa. X c GOU • c e -^ i j«u m 3O fl*p(*ej- — 1 . * c .9 -2 *Sot J7 OO i T)O 0 fiia CO CO c CO "c * E £ I- ^ ft Z * c U. •-u (J •n. U IT ttjvi«.i.V3 — e * A (V G X "E o X O J 1 .cMOa£ 1 £ 3 TlCO D O •4 ^x a E "S X -r o. EoU j VI >^•» U V a w ^X \ 0 c K ~ u 1 11- C ) * ^i« *J 5 > 2 i I •) •*< j _l<h-QE<fi i i < i . i > < * < ai^FIXTURE.M Z u. oZ £ s:u: o Ul o 1- nooo BC X oz a a-« t,ILU.UU n TION RECORL> £K 1- O U "cECao10-DeaKB|*. . o 1L. 1 C o w cU | U. .c n ce * : .i5 *3 PX.K^J|j—fNt—Wanf I ^-o «i PIB U -J c a. | -oc U trt JP a ^j a E U w IfCu^ G AmountU. 0Z •M 'f-X--<£J-^ j_ % > - * O 0 vS 0 >fl 0 0 •4 Q Q M) fi rr er ? •n ^ ^i« KVH^tinM 4N*. « •« - ^. "Jf Ov <J ^J 3< 1 ^> <s- ua. ^ d*A ? J I ^ <£ J5 S z-**•SX_joz z 2 . 1 a. UlQC3U.a.«31\u9OCU o *O X **>caOMUUlX D |^»5*•z•s1Jl«K„ • o u c Jt K c e=>UU U c oI3U U C O=»U («5 u, O W rO 0o*«> OQ <1 *-* M OoO ( Oo S 3 E g 7 $ C) O61«0s -ft. 8 r Rni-r-> mO v* CAHXCn c»m CA ncAO 3* z' o [ Xozr-b|OS3 f - 3 4 zoXroo\ys! % - o -4 • \t\ *"r^ Cf w' 0 fi0 v\\\ K \^ ^v\ \ « i\ iv\ .y\ v\ ^( .f >'•. ^ IV\ •o''+* -a n A s \\ 0<l'e _.f-1-h-fl 4ft -• - * f V OJf* k))r* o •is ** '• •\\ V*OvS*& N S T O_ N -4 \*\ (** G* \ X C>i§1»* •*if <_i os. PC i •* c if ?Sc 0 bJk >* pcS3. o J " k *• OC o >H'aDabj%o lA •O -A ^r ^ ^<. N i* \ ^ o 0 •9 i. -1 0 5 HL O O •* 2 3 S3 mX m O S o i o 5 < S , f CO ffi r m H fflCO -AYtii!, I/isK&^ cr •^ 7 P r H •n Z ^\»T1C.?L.9A~f<na •jp*Nftt'ItXi•* l^ ^ •oi|S0luo0-fi^& 3 -£ ^ ft fe 6 C ^ L •^ > > * ^ U ~0ZpTI>OIf» at 9 •94» r n 1 i 3 I — — COC0. ! 2-3); K•jr •n * T 1 COs S" p n » TI f fll " J L ft H D O Ui"Ty oj iX(_ozmooTJO nnTIn »nD O9 *aooD 5 z ma n. E i COX TI X COX i cyVS'x"1^f ffa f BT V CO CD . - O S GO * 4 (A * CD H Om F > 1s g x *r? c? ?. §> 3 ^ ? ? TI CO 3" sr o2.i D 0si « In i" >^ -nScSI•oS^D q TI 1 £z CO* d3T i-»* fi CD 5* CO O !3t )C CO 5* g r- 3 2. Oi.a3'jr ! n S- Ia 0 r o TJ =f 3 c. X fnCO : 3 F1" * CD SJT CD CD btoSJ^V?§vTJ CO OB O O I a V -n Is p o 3 5 CO -K cmm5Z•nOC§oCO D 3T CO £ Vi x" s1 5 0£ TJ a a1 = X -4m CO * 14 o s a1 5 if o ^ vs?oHECO1> 1 £ ft o m i. 51 v H V z»* TI 3 If C X, 1fs-aCO < » CO CO1 5 m . X o X m CO ma f — -\ ^IX)^O^--t/§a. r? p CO •*• CO ^ ; : X6' 5 TI -• v«, •o 3 2 COcrCOS3.aaff - ya cr f Ss m H TI > X X rs h •^ J fc c 5-fVTI S-" As? § TT S V TIOi •w S I" 3rnj n - M s>8- a_ 0- = 4 OjCOXTJPto§ ^1 X .<" m mJi OTJ TJ 8 TI I 1 ?•A S Jn ^ Ttn2O 5* •n ^O CO •n § Z to ^mxoX 2 eg * a'- oz o•w- 'Vc ra T & '< •• ."•*/ ;.•( ^' \ r «c ?z aH f* JccrM, G1 =m >1 go m S "- si'. ^SJr^i i VS •j \ ' r r^l SS* 1 • • 1 v her SalSales CondCE-W K CO "H"uiUlQ UlUl H <OCo RTRANSACTION RESCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES= 553 COMPUTATIONS* *- n\ —••• V ^+1 t/ *»• nl.•+jK HARMONY FIRE PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION PROPERTY ADDRESS X^ 0 f rAMDl I ft NAME TELEPHONE H ?.&Z-^»77 W FAX MAILING ADDRESS ^ Met*^J9 fic&l*^ c/xJ U f 1*lp_ 1) ** ^ o^ (T0 (T BUILDING PERMI 04/07/98 14:58 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 2909 CANDIL PL Suite Permit Type: PLAN CHECK REVISION Parcel No: 215-491-35-00 Lot#: Valuation: 0 Occupancy Group: Referenced: Description: REVISION-REIVED FOOTING DETAIL Appl/Ownr : GOODBODY BOB 1947 SOUTH PACIFIC ST OCEANSIDE CA 92054 *** Fees Required *** 760 T PCR No: PCR98043 Project No: A9702306 Development No: 5798 04/07/98 0001 01 02 C-PRHT 55-00 Construction Type: NEW Status: ISSUED Applied: 04/02/98 Apr/Issue: 04/07/98 Entered By: JM 722-6977 Fees : Adjustments: Total Fees: Fee .description Plan Check Revision 55 Collected & Credits * * * . 00 .00 55.00 Ext fee Data 55.00 DA'i CLEARA: ^ CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Patmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760)438-1161 1.RMATON FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. EST. VAL Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By Date ~ Address (include BIdg/Suite *) Legal Description Assessor's Parcel * DescnetiB/1 of WoYk ~ a. MS!^fttimto«n»*ifi Name 3. APPUCANT Q Contractor Business Name prt thto sddress) Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total * of units Existing Use Proposed Use f / •SO. FT. / /*" fbt&tories * of Bedrooms 1(0111 ^* '"" " "* " Address City State/Zip D Agent for Contractor ^Qajg/jj^'^QAg^:^ "- * of Bathrooms Telephone * Fex * Name 4. PROPERTY OWNER Address City Stats/Zip Telephone* Name Address City State/Zip Telephone* S. CONTRACTOR - COMPANY NAME' """"" —™^--^^ •^™?r;-™^^ -- • •- r~T. -, (See. 7031.5 Business end Professions Code: Any City or County which requires s permit to construct, attar, Improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, alao requires the applicant for such permit to Me a signed statement thet he to licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Lew (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he Is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by sny applicant for a permit subject* the applicant to a civil penalty of not more then five hundred dottara I*500|). Name State License f Address License Clsss City State/Zip Cltv Business License * Telephone f Designer Name State License * Address City State/Zip Telephone 6. WORKERS' COMPENSATION " ' " " " " " """ ".'"' •*'";-*-•-= —--r——-~:^t?"™ Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: D I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to serf-Insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. Q I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation Insurance carrier end poHcv number are: Insurance Company Policy No.Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS 1*100) OR LESS) Q CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which thto permit to issued, I shaU not employ any person hi any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage to unlawful, and shell subject en employer to crknlneJ penalties end eh* fines up to one hundred thousand doiars (•100.000). tn addition to the cost of compensation, damages es provided for bi Section 3706 of the Labor code. Interest end attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE 7. OWNER4UILDER DECLARATION • "'• ' " ' . """"^ "'• '*' '-.*"' "•"•""" -wt"^W^ I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Lew for the following reason: O I, as owner of the property or my employees with weges es their soto compensation, wifl do the work end the structure to not intended or offend for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Lew does not apply to en owner of property who builds or Improves thereon, end who does such work himself or through hie own employees, provided that such Improvements era net Intended or offered for sale. If, however, the budding or Improvement to sold within one veer of completion, the owner-builder wit have the burden of proving that he did not buHd or Improve for the purpose of sale). Q I, as owner of the property, em exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the prefect (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to en owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects wtth contractorta) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Lew). D I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for thto reason: 1. I personeHy pten to provide the major labor snd meterieto tor construction of the proposed property improvement. D YES QNO 2. I (have / have not) signed en application for s buBdfng permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction llndudo name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person u eoordmate, supervise end provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persona to provide the work todtoeted Ondude neme / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE 'COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR J*W^^ to the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, ecutery hazardous meterieto registration form or risk menegement and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner HazardoiM Substance Account Act? D YES Q NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the ek poHutta control district w sir qiialty Q YES D NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? O YES D NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A RNAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY HOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPUCANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. fc*~ CON'SlTOCTWM'lJNDiNQ'AC^C^''1^ r •• !" ; .••••>-,.-'*•.•• I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work tor which thto permit to Issued (Sec. 3097(1) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I have reed the application end state that the above Information to correct and that the Information on the plans to accurate, t egree to comply with ad City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE. INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY M ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit Is required for excavations over S'O" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories In height. EXPIRATION: Every permit Issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by Kmrtstion and become nuH end void If the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 ctoys from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work Is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform BuHding Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE WHITE: FHe YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance EsGil Corporation In fartners/iip witfc government for 'Building Safety DATE: April 7, 1998 a APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Q PLAN REVIEWER Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 97180O PCR 98043 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2909 Candil Place PROJECT NAME: Cima SFD (Foundation and Framing plan revision) The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Bob Goodbody Telephone #: in person Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: Only one set of plans were provided (sheets A2, S2, S3 and S4). Applicant shall provide one additional set of these sheets to the City. By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D CM D EJ D PC LOG tmsmtLdot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 + (619)560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 03/25/1999 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: Project Title: City of Carlsbad Building Permit Permit No:PCR98209 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 438-3101 2909 CANDIL PL CBAD PCR Sub Type: 2154913500 Lot#: $0.00 Construction Type: VN Reference #: REV.ENTRY.MASTER BATH,LOFT, DECK AND BEDROOM #2 Status: Applied: Entered By: Appr/lssued: Inspect Area: ISSUED 11/02/1998 BT 03/25/1999 Applicant: BOB GOODBODY 1975 RIVERA DRIFIC ST 92084 438-1687 Total Fees: $1,090.0 Description Plan Check Revision Owner: LLIAM M&SAUNDRWtf 03/25/99 0001 01 02 C-PRMT 1090-00 ceDue: $1,090.00 Fee 1,090.00 FINAL APPROVAL Inspector:Date:Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition* of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3,32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (760) 438-1161 PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palmes Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (760)438-1161 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO.' EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit Validated Bv Date Address linetud* BUg/Suite *)Buamoai mm* tot thto Legal Description Lot No.Subdivision MomoMumbor.Unit Mo.Phase No.Tout * of units Assessor's Parcel *Existing Use Proposed Use Name ' ' Addreis s s ctty APPLICANT O Contractor D Agent for Contractor D Owner Q Agent for Owner Name 4. PHOPERTY OWNER Address City State/Zip Telephone * (See. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code; Any City or County which require* * pormit to construct alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the appttcem for such permit to Me a signed statement that he to Hcanasd pursuant to tha provtoiona of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Busmoaa and Prefeeaions Code) or that he to exempt therefrom, and tha bears for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permrt subjects the applicant to • dvft penalty of not more than five hundred dollars )*SOOI). Name State License i Addraai UcanaaClau City Stno/Zto Crtv •uainoaa Ueonao 9 Designer Name Address Crty Stan/Zip State License * _ «. WORKERS'COMPENSATION " •""""-/ " -'-"— — ; "' ;" Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one Of tha foUowing deetorationa: 0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to sofMneure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Cods, for the performance rf the work for which this permit to issued. Q I have and wilt maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work tor which thto pormit to issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and pottey number era: Insurance Company __ . __. . _. __... __. Policy No. Expiration Dote (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS 1*1001 OR LESS) Q CERTIRCATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for whteh thto permit to issued, I shod not employ any parson in any mormor so os to bscoma subject to the Workers' Compensation Lews of CaJifornto. WARNING: Failure to aaoura workers' compensation Beverage to unlawful, end anal subject an employer to eriminel paneaMee end oh* tinee up to one hundred thousand deters (MOO.OOO). In addhton to tha oost of compensation, damegea ea presided tar hi Section 37O6 off the Labor code. Interest and eteemey'e fees. SIGNATURE DATE 7. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION ' - ? ' " •:-r;**#v-- ..<.«•;• • . - 1 hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Lew tor tha foftowtng reason: D >' " owner of the property or my employees with wages as their ooto compensation. wW do the work and tho structure to not intended or offend for aoto 1S«c. 7O44, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's, License Lew does not apply to on owner of property who buHda or improve* theteon, and who does such work himself or through hto own employees, provided that such improvements are not Intended or offered for aeto. If, however, the budding or Improvement to sold within one year of completion, the owner-buHder wHf have tha burden of proving that he dW not buHd or Improve for the purpooa of aoto). D I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Lew does not apply to an owner of property who buHds or improves thereon, end contracts for such protects with contractor Is) fcoanasd pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). D I am exempt under Section _________ BusineaB and Professions Coda for thto reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor end materials for construction of the proposed property Improvement. Q YES Q**0 2. I (have / have not) signed an application tor a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I hsve contracted with the following parson (firm) to provide the proposed comtrueUon (include name / address / phone number / contractors pconae number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, •upervtoe and provide the motor work Include name / addraos / phone number / contractors license number): 5. l will provide some of tha work, but I hove contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work fnefeotod (include none I addrees / phone number / of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE _________________--_«-______„_, DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR «Ir»JW«lBiri«£ «W^ ts the applicant or future building occupant required to submit e buainoaa plan, acutely heiarrjflut materiel program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 2S534 of the PrastevTenner Haiarrfow Substance Account Act? region or ntk YES D NO is the spplicant or future building occupant required to obtain a pormfl from tho air pollution control district or air quality management district? D YES Q Is tha facility to be constructed wrthin 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Q YES D NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIRCATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. a. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY " """ ~i*-~:-vr*'~**>~~—-".~" — ,-,.„—.„ _.„_. ,„ . I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for tha performance of tha work for which thto pormit to tosued (Sac. 3097(0 Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS. •9. NO APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify thst I hsve read the application and state that the above information to correct and that the Information on the plena to accurate. | agrae to comply with ell r,t« ™4iMW« .^ «..« , --- ^ ---- •_.« --- ,„ . . - - wmoftae representative* of the Cltt of Cartobad to enter upon the above mentioned KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES. SAID CITY M CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. :'»n or construction of structure* over 3 stories in height. of tNatode shad expire by limitation and become null and void if the building o> City ordinances snd State tows relating to building construction. I property <or inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WlffCH MAY m ANY WAY OSHA: An QSHA permit ts required lor ex EXPIRATION: Every permrt issued by the/Buildin work autnortxed by such permit is or abandoned at any time after thelworkyl i from tha date I of 180 permit o tf the budding or work authorized by such permit is suspended tion 106.4.4mtform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE WHITE: FHe YELLOW. AiJpfiaSnT/fWK:F EsGii Corporation In Partners/tip witn government for Quitting Safety DATE: March 24, 1999 Q JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-180O PCR98209 SET: IV PROJECT ADDRESS: 29O9 Candill Place PROJECT NAME: Cima SFD Plan Changes (addition and remodel) The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. [~] The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. f~| The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. [~1 The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. | | The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone#: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: All sheets of plans shall be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D MB n EJ D PC 3/17 tmsmtLdot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 + (619)560-1468 4 Fax (619) 560-1576 EsGll Corporation 2» fartners/iip witH Government for ftuibting Safety DATE: March 9, 1999 . p APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-18OO PCR98209 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 29O9 Candil Place PROJECT NAME: Cima SFD Plan Changes (addition and remodel) The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Kamel A. Zayat 7950 Silverton Ave., Suite 210, San Diego, CA 92126 X| Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA n MB D EJ D PC 2/25 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 *• San Diego, California 92123 4 (619)560-1468 + Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 97-1800 March 9, 1999 PCR98209 III RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PCR982O9 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2909 Candil Place DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 2/25 REVIEWED BY: Sergio Azuela PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-1800 SET: III DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: March 9, 1999 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: Esgil Corp. or to the bldg. dept. of the juris. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? QYes QNo Carlsbad 97-180O PCR98209 III March 9, 1999 I. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. IN ADDITION TO THE REVISE PLANS REQUIRED. PLEASE REQUEST TO THE CITY, THAT ESGIL GET THE APPROVED SET FROM THE CITY. COMPARISON BETWEEN THE PROPOSED NEW PLANS AND THE APPROVED PLANS IS ESCENTIAL FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE NEW PROPOSED PLAN CHANGES. 4. Clearly show on plans the type of windows for the following windows: 4030 at the Bathroom in Bedroom #2 and for the window adjacent to 6080 ALSL in Bedroom #3. Also clearly show compliance with the emergency exit requirements at the basement rooms under Bedroom # 1, Family Room and Entry. These rooms shall be clearly shown "UNHABITABLE SPACE" on plans or shall be provided with the required light and ventilation. 6. No response was provided for this correction. Original correction is still applicable. Please clearly show safety glazing at the following windows: 160X8 ALSL (S) PUB, window adjacent to M/C door @ Bedroom # 1. 5050 adjacent to M/G door in Bedroom # 1. 8O10 XQ @ Bodroom ff 2 and 3060 right of Entry door (adjacent to stairway). II. No response was provided for this correction. Original correction is still applicable. Please clearly show on plans the minimum tread dimensions for the winding stairway (stairway to Master Bedroom Loft). See original correction list. 22. Floor Joist size and spacing is still missing under the stairway at the right of the Entry door. See original correction list. Please clearly show the FJ under the stairwavdf an floor opening is being proposed the framing information around the opening and the guardrail shall be shown on olansL Carlsbad 97-18OO PCR98209 III March 9, 1999 • FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS • The existing Foundation Plan shall be modified to reflect all proposed changes. Additional corrections may follow. Please provide the modified Foundation plans. FOUNDATION NEW PLANS WILL BE RECHECKED VS. THE ORIGINAL APPROVED FOUNDATION PLAN. ADDITIONAL CORRECTIONS MAY FOLLOW. If you have any questions in regards to these remaining corrections please call Sergio Azuela at ESGIL Corporation (619) 560-1468. EsGil Corporation IB Partners/tip vfitfi government for Quitting Safety DATE: January 27, 1999 Q APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad "Q-PCAN REVIEWER Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-18OO SET II(REV2) PROJECT ADDRESS: 2909 CandU Place PROJECT NAME: Cima SFD Plan Changes (addition and remodel) I I The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to; Bob Goodbody 1975 Riviera Dr., Vista, CA 92084 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. I I Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 1/21 tmsmtldot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 > San Diego, California 92123 + (619)560-1468 4 Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 97-18OO II(REV2) January 27, 1999 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-1800 PROJECT ADDRESS: 29O9 Candil Place SET: II(REV2) DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: ESG1L CORPORATION: 1/21 January 27, 1999 REVIEWED BY: Sergio Azuela _____ FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: Esgil Corp. or to the bldg. dept. of the juris. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? QYes QNo Carlsbad 97-18OO II(REV2) January 27, 1999 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments, 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). Please also note that a wet signature will be required on the structural plans (from the structural engineer of records). 4. Clearly show on plans the type of windows for the following windows: 4030 at the Bathroom in Bedroom #2 and for the window adjacent to 6080 ALSL in Bedroom #3. 6. Please clearly show safety glazing at the following windows: 160X8 ALSL @ PUB, window adjacent to M/C door @ Bedroom # 1, 5050 adjacent to M/G door in Bedroom # 1, 8040 XO @ Bedroom # 2and 3060 right of Entry door (adjacent to stairway). 10. Please clearly show on plans the handgrip cross section dimensions. See original correction list. 11. Please clearly show on plans the minimum tread dimensions for the winding stairway (stairway to Master Bedroom Loft). See original correction list. • FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS > The existing Foundation Plan shall be modified to reflect all proposed changes. Additional corrections may follow. Please provide the modified Foundation plans. Carlsbad 97-180O II(REV2) January 27, 1999 21. The information requested in the original correction was not provided. Please revise the plan elevations to show the new revised conditions as requested in the original correction. See original correction list. 22. Floor Joist size and spacing is still missing under the stairway at the right of the Entry door. See original correction list. 23. Please provide new lateral calculations for the Moment Frame on grid line F and please provide structural calculations for the beam to column connection. See original correction list. If you have any questions in regards to these remaining corrections please call Sergio Azuela at ESGIL Corporation (619) 560-1468. jj. Corporation In 'Partners/tip uHtfc government for Quitting Safety DATE: December 18, 1998 a lAPPLIANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad CTPLANREVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-180O PCR982O9 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 29O9 Candil Place PROJECT NAME: Cima SFD Plan changes (Addition and Remodel) I I The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. I I The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. I I The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. IXI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. I I The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. IXI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Bob Goodbody 1975 Riviera Dr., Vista, CA 92084 IXI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 12/9 tmsmldot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 * (619)560-1468 * Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 97-1800 PCR982O9 December 18, 1998 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-180O PCR982O9 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 29O9 Candil Place FLOOR AREA: Dwelling 7,007 + SF STORIES: 2 + basemnt + roof deck Deck 1,956 + SF Garage 1,159 SF HEIGHT: REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 11/2/98 ESGIL CORPORATION: 12/9 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER: Sergio Azuela COMPLETED: December 18, 1998 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with Title 24 and the following model codes: 1994 UBC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UPC (effective 12/28/95), 1994 UMC (effective 2/23/96) and 1993 NEC (effective 12/28/95). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a COPY) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked UP list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 1, GENERAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC) rSforw.dot .Carlsbad 97- 180O PCR98209 December 18, 1998 • PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGii Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). 3. Specify on the Title Sheet of the plans the gross floor area of each element of this project, including dwelling, garage, carport, patio, deck and balcony. Section 106.3.3. • GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS • Clearly specify on the plans the type of windows for all new windows, also specify safety glazing for those windows requiring to have safety glazing: as well as for the new doors that have glazing. 4. Openable window area in habitable rooms must be 1/20 of the floor area and a minimum of 5 square feet. In bathrooms, laundry rooms and similar rooms, 1/20 of area is required and minimum is 1.5 sq. ft. Section 1203.3. Clearly show it on plans for the Bathroom at Bedrooms 2 and 3 , as well as for the Master Bathroom on the second floor. 5. A mezzanine is an intermediate floor and may not have a floor area exceeding 33 1/3 percent of the total floor area in the room below. The mezzanine floor must have a clear height of 7 feet, above and below, and must have the long side open to the room below except for posts and protective walls or railings not exceeding 44" in height. Section 507. Clearly show all dimensions at the modified loft, to show compliance with these requirements, or provide two exits from the loft. Carlsbad 97-18OO PCR98209 December 18, 1998 6. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): a) Fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors other than wardrobe doors. b) Doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools, saunas, steam rooms, bathtubs and showers and in any portion of a building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and drain inlet. c) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. d) Walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of the bottom and top of stairways where the bottom edge of the glass is less than 60 inches above a walking surface. * EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 7. Floors above the second story shall have not less than 2 exits. Exceptions: 1. Occupied roofs may have one exit if such occupied areas are less than 500 square feet and located no higher than immediately above the second story. 2. When the third floor within a unit does not exceed 500 sq. ft., only one exit need be provided. Section 1003.1. This correction will be rechecked after the dimensions for the Master Bedroom Loft are shown on the plans. 8. Guardrails (Section 509.1): a) Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-B. 9. Provide stairway and landing details. Sections 1006.3,1006.15 and 1006.2. a) Maximum rise is 7" and minimum run is 11". When the stairs serves less than 10 occupants, or serves an unoccupied roof, rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum. b) Minimum width is 36". • Clearly show dimensions on plans. 10. The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. Section 1006.9. -Carlsbad 97-1800 PCR98209 December 18, 1998 11. Provide details of winding stairway complying with Section 1006.4: a) Minimum tread is 6 inches at any point and minimum 9 inches at a point 12 inches from where the treads are narrowest. b) Maximum rise is 8 inches. c) Minimum width is 36 inches. • Clearly show it on plans for the stairway at the Master Bedroom Loft. • FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS • The existing Foundation Plan shall be modified to reflect all proposed changes. Additional corrections may follow. • FRAMING 12. Provide framing sections. All previously provided sections shall been updated to match the proposed plan changes. Section 106.3.3. • MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 13. Specify on the plans the following information for the fireplace(s), per Section 106.3.3: a) Manufacturer's name. b) Model name/number. c) ICBO approval number, or equal. d) Show height of chimney above roof per I.C.B.O. approval or Table 31-B. 14. Note on the plans that approved spark arresters shall be installed on all chimneys. UBC, Section 3102.3.8. • ENERGY CONSERVATION 15. Provide plans, calculations and worksheets to show compliance with current energy standards. 16. The regulations require a properly completed and properly signed Form CF-IR to be either imprinted on the plans, taped to the plans or "sticky backed" on the plans, to allow the building inspector to readily compare the actual construction with the requirements of the approved energy design. 17. All energy items shown on the plans must be in agreement with the information shown on the properly completed Form CF-IR. • MISCELLANEOUS 18. Since the floor area at the second floor is exceeding 3000 SF two exits shall be provided from the second floor. Carlsbad 97-1800 PCR98209 December 18, 1998 19. Please clearly show on the roof plan the continuation of the of valley lines at the roof area over the Bedroom 2. 20. Please complete the floor plan layout at the second floor on the bridge close to the stairway landing. See sheet A4. 21. AH proposed plan changes shall be clearly shown at all sheets of plans and drawing that are impacted by the proposed change. As an example, please see the West/North Elevation on sheet A6. The new proposed deck above the entry shall be clearly shown. 22. Please clarify and complete the framing information over the Study and Entry area under the stairway on sheet S3. 23. Please clarify why? The beam W 16X36 was change to a W 12X87 at the Moment Frame 23/S6. See floor framing over the Kitchen area on sheet S3. 24. It appears that the Moment Frame 24/S6 on the left side of the Living Room is receiving additional concentrated loads at the first floor from beam MBB4. Please review it's adequacy and also review the member size and type(sheet S3 shows TS 14X6X1/2 while sheet S/6 shows W 12X50). 25. Additional corrections may follow. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes Q No Q \ The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 97-1800 PCR982O9 December 18, 1998 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PCR982O9 PREPARED BY: Sergio Azuela BUILDING ADDRESS: 29O9 Candil Place BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3&U-1 PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-1800 DATE: December 18, 1998 Cime SFD plan changes PCR98209 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION Time Air Conditioning Firo Sprinkloro TOTAL VALUE BUILDING AREA (fc*> 10hrs. VALUATION MULTIPLIER $87.15/hr. VALUE $871.50 $871.50 I3 1991 UBC Building Permit Fee Q Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ ^ 1991 UBC Plan Check Fee Q Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ Type of Review: Kl Complete Review Q Structural Only £3 Hourly n Repetitive Fee Applicable £] Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 871.50 Comments: 10 hrs. @ $ 87.15/hr. = $ 871.50 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS PERMIT NUMBER CB ADDRESS DATE RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR « $10,000.00) TENANT IMPROVEMENT PLAZA CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD COMPANY STORES VILLAGE FAIRE COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING OTHER PLANNER DATE ENGINEER DATE Docs/Misfortra/Piannino Enoln«efino Approvals CASA ENGINEERING Structural Design & Analysis 7950 Silverton Ave. Suite 210 San Diego, CA 92126 TEL (619) 695-2761 FAX (619) 695-3367 CITY COMMENTS FOR CIMA RESIDENCE PROJECT: Structural Design & Calculations For A Building CAS A ENGINEERING 7950 SUverton Ave. Suite 210 San Diego. CA 92126 Tel. (619) 695-2761 Fax (619) 695-3367 Structural Calculation Table of Contents P1-P17 Carlsbad 97- 18OO II(REV2) • VJ January 27, 1999 1 . Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1 . Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 438-11 61 . The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2, Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGii Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). Please also note that a wet signature will be required on the structural plans (from the structural engineer of records). 4. Clearly show on plans the type of windows for the following windows: 4030 at the Bathroom in Bedroom #2 and for the window adjacent to 6080 ALSL in Bedroom #3. 6. Please clearly show safety glazing at the following windows: 160X8 ALSL @ PUB, window adjacent to M/C door @ Bedroom # 1 , 5050 adjacent to M/G door in Bedroom # 1 , 8040 XO @ Bedroom # 2and 3060 right of Entry door (adjacent to stairway). 10. Please clearly show on plans the handgrip cross section dimensions. See original correction list. 1 1 . Please clearly show on plans the minimum tread dimensions for the winding stairway (stairway to Master Bedroom Loft). See original correction list. • FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS The existing Foundation Plan shall be modified to reflect all proposed changes. Additional corrections may follow. Please provide the modified Foundation p/ans. 51 fr« fbuNP4rf«N PUN fUt? Carlsbad 97- 18OO II{REV2) January 27, 1999 21 . The information requested in the original correction was not provided. Please revise the plan elevations to show the new revised conditions as requested in the original correction. See original correction list. 22. Floor Joist size and spacing is still missing under the stairway at the right of the Entry door. See original correction list. S|5g Hdf£ o\A $3 • 23, Please provide new lateral calculations for the Moment Frame on grid line F and please provide structural calculations for the beam to column connection. See original correction list. If you have any questions in regards to these remaining corrections please call Sergio Azuela at ESGIL Corporation (619) 560-1468. CASA ENGINEERING TWO aLVBTTONAVE BUTE 20C aANDEQO,CA82B6 1EU6IMM6-27M JOB NAME...Q^, SHEET.t^..OF BY L/nl L ^-r...J(rr..... 0300.00047 RISA-2D (R) Version Job Pag i Date Units Opt ion : US Standard AISC Code Checks : 9th Edition ASD Shear Defor mat ions No PHDelta Effects : No Redesign : No Edge Torees : No I.Fn : 1.333 Node No 1 2 D 4 5 6 7 S 9 10 Mater ial Label STEEL ST1 Sec t i on Label Tl T2 Wl W2 X --Coord Y--C — ( ft) ( 0.00 0 -27. 00 0 0. 00 12 -27. 00 12 -24.00 12 -14. 00 1 2 -24.00 25 -14. OO 25 -24,00 3£ -14.00 36 El ast ic Modulus a-"" *— -i "\•-, 5 1 .' 29000.00 2900O. OO Database Shape TU10X1QX6 TU6X6X6 W 12X87 W12X22 oord X--d ft) <in,K . 00 .00 . 00 . 00 . 00 .00 . 00 .00 . 00 . 00 Poisson' s Rat i o 0- 30000 0. 3OOOO Matl. Set STEEL STEEL STEEL STEEL B o u n d a r y C o n d i t ions of Y-dof Rota /in) ( i n f K/ i n ) ( r 9 K- R R R R Thermal Weight Coef f ic ient Density (" C" 'l — _„ f I-' / f 4- O 'i_ ^ j- i — - ],_ P.. / T 1, o .- 0. 65000 0. 490 0. £5000 On 490 Area Moment of Inert ia 14.10 214. OOO 8. OS 41 .£00 25.60 740.000 6.43 156. 000 t i on ft/r :>-—- R R Yield (F 36 „ 46. As Coef 1 . 20 1, 20 1 . 20 1 . 20 Tamp f p- •; ... . 0 .. OC 0 ., 'X1 0., O'"'- O , no- 0 . CO 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 „ OO 0 '"''• !"' 0 : 00 Stres? y>n \ __ JP .' 000 OOO y/y RISA-2D CR) Version 03 0300.00047 Job Page. Date No 1 2<ni,j cl 5 6 7 9 3 10 11 I Node 1 •\.< •~> V-J 4 5 5 6 7 7 9 3 J Node »3O £1 ~ & cr ~ & -j 8 q — o - 10 10 Sec t i on Tl Tl Wl Wl Wl T2 T2 W2 T2 W2 T2 I Releases J End Offsets x y 2 x y z Sec Sway I J Length ^ in.t (. in ) C ft .' i ••> or' 1 2 ,. 00 :!. 4 , 00 3 . OO 10. or* 1 3 „ OO 1 3 , r*O i o , oo 1 1 , 00 10., 00 1 1 „ 00 No & 7 B OjI? 10 11 I Node 4 5 5 & 7 7 9a J Node 4 6 5 6 7 3 8 CJ 10 10 Unbraced Lengths Lb-in Lb-out Lc ( ft > ( ft) C ft > K Factors In Out Bend ing Coef '• Cm Cb BLC No. Basic Load Case Descr iption Load Totals Nodal Point Dist 1 LOAD 2 SEISMIC Nodal Loads, BLC Is LOAD 4 1 Node Number 9 10 8 £ Global X ( (,.;••) 0. 000 0 . OOO 0 . 000 0,, 000 Global Yf i ..• -. -2. 5GO 2.760 -10.027 -6. 240 Moment CK-f t !> 0. OOO O. 000 0. 000 0 ., OOO RISA-2D (R) Version 3.03 0300.00047 Job_ Date Member Point Loads,BLC 1: LOAD Memb I J No Node Node Direct ion Magnitude Loc at i on 5 5 Member Memb No 8 5 - S ^ — Ci_J O Distr ibuted I J Node Node "7 .— Q/ — o Y Y Loads, BLC 1: LOAD Start Dir Magnitude f i..-1 / -F 4- FT i'.. r-.. / i \, , r .' Y -0.080 -8. 216 -0. 150 End Maqn i tude •— (i</ft,r:j- -0 . 080 Start Locat ion ••• ( f t ) '" 0. 000 5 . OH o 3-50C End L o c a t i o n ( ft .' 10, OOO Nodal Loads, BLC 2s SEISMIC Lo No 1 o T?w Node Number o T 4 ad Comb in at ion Descr ipt ion LOAD SEISMIC L+S 61 obal X 61 obal Y Moment 2 . 0 1 0 0 . 000 0 . 000 0 . 5 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 1. 147 0. 000 O.OOO Self Wt BLC BLC BLC BLC BLC W cr Dir Fac Fac Fac Fac Fac Fac DYNA S '-,J 1 1 2 1 11 21 Dyn am i c An alys i s Dat a Number of modes (frequenc ies) Basic Load Case for masses BLC: mass direction of action Acceleration of Gravity None X only 32. 20 ft/sec**: Load Combination is 1 Nodal Displacements LOAD Nodes 1 o 4 Global X — (in)— — 0.OOOOO ••-o,, ooooo 0= O2284 0,, 02554 Global Y •—(in) -0.OOOOO -0.OOOOO -0.0042G -0.OO657 Rotat i on •—(rad)— --0. OOOOO 0„OOOOO 0.00325 0300.00047 RISA-2D <R> Version Date Node 5 6 7 8 9 10 Load Comb inat ion React ions Global X .—»«-/* n r\ > ~ _- ~~ _. «« -*. i n.' 0.02523 0.02429 0.42132 O.42090 0.80258 0.80262 is 1 LOAD Gl obal Y / - _ 'i\ i n ,* — -0. 16022 -0,501.66 -0. 16224 -0.51038 -0. 16369 -0.51194 Rot at ion •- *. r a d .' ••- -0. O04 4 2 0. OOO02 -0. 00269 --0. 00307 -0. 00293 -0. 00287 Node 1 Totals Load Comb in at ion is 1 Member End For res Global X -6.41384 6.41 384 o.ooooo Global Y 12.09152 18.66148 30. 75300 Moment 1 \ T \r .' 26.79445 -24.33152 LOAD No 4 5 6 7a 9 10 11 J 4- 6- 7- 7- 9- 8- _J 6 7 S 8 9 10 10 Axial 12.09 1S. 66 6, 6, 41 41 81 05 10 67 56 06 76 Load Comb i n ati on is 1 AISC Code Checks i fc.no "~" *•• C.IILJ Shear -CIOs — 6 i '~i 18 15 -0 0 0 0 0 -0 .41 .41 .09 .66 .61 .60 ,60 .48 .06 .00 .06 Moment -CK-ft) 26. -"24 . -5O. 52. 1. ~5. 5. ,*! it 0. — o 0. Axial 79 33 17 58 65 05 92 27 54 17 51 - 1 1< ') -~~\f? -18. -6. "6 a er «T1 .... 1 O1 VJ . —0 -2. 0._...•">,£_ . — - 09 66 41 41 81 05 10 67 56 06 76 Shear cio- — S . 6. 12. -18. -7. 0.o. 0. /-) -0. 0. 41 41 09 66 25 60 60 ooW *- 06 00 06 LOAD Moment -f K-f t V—••• 50. 17 —52.?9 -119.11 3 „ 40 113.19 -2. 81 Cj,;J. 17 21. -0.21 Nodes No 1 2 0 4 I •i •-•._ 3- 4 J i~ii-j 4 F. CT Max OB 0. 0,o „ imum to •..?; to 2 6836 5747 2367 0. 0. 0. 0. 0 3603 3558 2500 2367 0 0 0 0 Member 1/4 n 1 uO .If wJ . 1288 . 0509 . 17G9 Quarter Points 1 0 0 *~1 0 / 2 .1821 . 2345 .1761 . 1170 3/4 0, 4O91 0.4616 0. 3752 0. O572 O. 0, 0,, 0 n L r r> r. •">\.j ,_j LJ ^- G886 5742 ' 02S4 Shear 0. 0594 0 . 0594 O. i. 3O1 0 „ 2O O8 0300.00047 RISA-2D CR) Version 3.O3 Job__ Date -••• - No 5 6 "7 3 9 10 11. Load Nodal Nodes I J 5- S 5- 7 6- 3 7- B "7— Q 9- 10 3" 10 Memb er Quar t er Po i n t s Maximum 0.4953 0 .2066 O *""i j *— i rrr. . O 1 O.-J 0.0913 0.0377 0 . 0070 0. 0378 Comb in at ion is 2 : Displ Node Load React 1 2 3 4 5 6 •j 8 9 1O acements Gl o 0.01.88 0 0 . 2066 0 O . 3 1 35 0 0 . 09 1 3 0 0.0377 0 0 . 0058 0 0.0378 0 SE I SM I C 1/4 . 1717 . 1350 .2419 . 0586 .0312 .0061 fl *3 1 O B IJ *2 1 w obal X \ i. n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Comb inat i on is 2 i ions Node Tot Load 1 2 al s Comb in Member End No No I 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 des J 3 .... 4 6 j.' Gl< ^ *.. >_.»*_.«, -™—~ — ^. . 00000 « 00000 . 03675 . 08754 . 08754 . 08733 . 53024 . 53003 .81354 . 8 1 290 SEISMIC obal X 1 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 /2 3/4 .3386 0.4176 .0634 0.0537 . 1703 0.0987 . 0430 0. 0444 .0247 0.0182 . 0064 0. 0067 . 0248 0. 0204 Global Y 1 1 1 .' ~-0. 00 OOO 0. 00000 -0. 00098 0. 00098 -0.02096 -0., 06797 -C. 01 347 -0, 07046 -0.01782 -0. 071 11 Global Y — ^ r-.. .' "••• • • ~ -2.59276 at ion is ', Forces Axial CK) --- 2.79 -2.79 2 „ 59 0. OS j. i. oi-j . ===== . 06424 „ 6570O SEISMIC I r™ —. .j ~~ _ ~~ .hnu Shear — CK> 2. 59 1 . 06 -2. 79 2, 79 Momen t -•(K-ft 14 8 -16 -4 *\ ttfff , . 70 . 62 . 42 . 15 2.78897 -2, 73897 0. 00000 Axial S! — — (i-o — -2.79 2 „ 79 2- 59 0.03 L 0. 4958 0. 1253 0. 1687 0. 0627 0. 0243 0. 0070 0.0269 Shear o ,, o „ 0. o,, i'-l f"l o „ 1630 OO9 009 o o 0 1 0K' 001 Of'tHI 00 1 o Rot at ion_ f „ _ ,_i •. _\ r <a Li .• — O -0. 0. -0. -0. -0- -0. -0.•— o ~-O Moment C L-- __ f +- 'I*. T-: T T» .' 1 4 . 8. 23. -End =~~ (j,;;) -2.59 ••-1.06 2. 79 2. 79 00000 00000 OOO24 OOO62 O0062 00005 00109 001 15 0007S 00075 69307 52366 32 1 74 Moment -CK---Hk )_..„ 16., 42 4. 15 _„•-'-• -..,- ;:, c.' i _ 2l •> ? RISA--2D (R) Version 3.03 0300. 00047 ====== No No I 5 5 6 5 7 6 8 7 9 7 10 9 11 8 Load AISC No 1 '2. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Load Nodal ======== des J 6 — 7 o __ o s — - 1 {*") - 10 Comb in at = = = = = = = = : Axial \ * •. .* 1.26 -3.74 3.74 0. 34 - 1.16 0 „ 99 1.16 i on i s 2 ==-========= ssss T-~PnH =====— •— * J. E.LI IUI — •— "— Shear / 1.' 'i ; \. r--. .' 0.95 1. 18 1 . 33 •••2. 58 1 . 02 - 1 . 1 6 0. 99 SE I SM I C ========= Moment S 1." ... f i. >. ...'-. i1-. T \, -3 7 o j. j:i. 5 -5 5 .74 ,,96 . 36 ========= Axial f. f\ .' --------- Job Paqe ======== Shear -1.26 3. -3. 74 74 . 71 -0,34 , 34 .84 . 16 1. 0. •( 16 99 16 \ I': J -0.95 ™ 1 . 13 - 1 . 33 2. 58 1.02 1. 16 -0*99 /3\ ^^ ======= Moment O^ £ &* *\•..— ft .' 13,, 7B "7 - ! 3 e 5,. -5- 5. == 23 07 Q,;l 1 f i f?<* 77 77 Code Checks Modes I J i .... r* 2- 4 3- 6 4- 5 5™ 6 5- 7 6- 8 •7 ~ a/ o 7- 9 9- 10 8- 10 Combinat Displac |\J ri H f=- 1.-, ttV er 1" 7 8 9 10 Maximum 0.2039 0. 1109 0. 1 121 0.0182 0.0593 0.3115 0.3687 0.4527 0.2195 0.2194 0 » ji .t. So i on is 3 ements Glo / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 « bal in ) 0. ~0. 0. 0. 0. o 0, 0. 1.1. 0 .1836 0 . 1109 0 . 0829 0 .0179 0 .0186 0 .3115 0 . 3687 0 . 4395 0 .2012 0 .2194 0 .1960 0 L+S X 00000 00000 1 095G 1 1 308 1 1.276 1 1 1 62 95157 95092 61612 61552 Member .1. / "T ,.0918 .0732 . 0369 . 0089 . 028S . 1719 .2112 .2199 . 0994 . 1206 . 0965 Quarter Points 1/2 3/4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Glo( - 0203 0 . 0356 0 . 0203 0 . O003 0 „ 0389 0 . 0323 0 . 0537 0 . 0 1 36 0 .0158 0 .0218 0 .0193 0 bal Y 3 O * ' """ "*" -o.ooooo -0. OOOOO 0.00524 -•0. O0559 -0. 18118 -0,. 56963 -0. 18071 0.58084 -0. 18.150 -0.58305 .1121 . 0204 „ 0662 . 0093 .0491 . 1502 . 1598 . 2332 . 1176 . 1181 .1188 L 0 . 2O39 0.0581 0 . 1121 0.0182 0. 0593 O. 2893 0.3173 0.4527 0.2195 0.2169 0 .2183 _. Shea 0. 02 v 40 0. 0099 0 -, O?O '"'• 0 „ 03 CO o.o:! 0.01 0. 02 03 9? Of 0, 0560 0 ,. 0 1 On 0^: 0. 01 ._ — is; "7 '57 Rot at ion trad) -0. u. 0. -0. -0.o. -0 =o,, -o. ._ 00000 ooooo 00349 00455 OO5O5 00004 O0378 00422 O0369 00362 RISA-2D (R) Version 3.03 0300-00047 Job Date Load Comb in at ion React ions s Nod e """ ~" "~ Total 1 f-'. S Load Combinat Member End Fc Glo ion is 3 <rces bal X { \-f *\ -... — — -— — " -9. OOG60 5.34960 -3.S5700 : L+S Gl obal Y (• LS -j . ._ ... _ 14.88049 15.87251 30. 75300 Nodes II~~II~~II~ ilE~d~ ====«=—= «"" "====«====,«" No 1 ~j£ 3 4 KT G 7 8 9 10 11 I _ Lu AI No 1 2 3 4 5 G 7 8 9 10 1.1. I i — 2—*?„ 4- •3 •"" 5- 6- "7™ 7_ 9- 8- ad Co J o 4 G 5 G 7 8 8 9 10 10 mb inat SC Code Che No I 1 2~~ O— . 4- •-t 5- G 7- ~r O_H des J ~~3 '••f S 5 6 ~r 8 S 3 10 10 Axial . — f L-" ') — 14.88 15.87 9.01 G.50 7.07 -0 . 69 16.84 1.01 1 . 40 0 . 93 3.92 ion is 3 cks Maximum 0.3401 0.6295 0.58S3 0. 2192 0 . 555 1 0. 1G98 0. G822 0.51 55 0 . 2289 0.2239 0.2302 Shear f if -5— • "~ I. f:. I 9.01 -5. 35 -i4.es 15.97 1G.57 0.57 1.94 • 2. 10 1.08 -1.16 0. 93 : L+S 0 . 0 . 5433 0.2439 0.3328 0 . 2 1 92 0. 0233 0 , 1 102 0. G822 0 . 3759 0.2241 0,2239 0. 19G3 Moment f i..-_ JT4- 'I 41. - 1 5 . -66. 48. •" j^I . 2. 15. --10. E?_ -6. 4» Member 1/4 0.2251 0 . 06 1 4 0.0879 0. 1GS3 0 . 2004 0. 0422 0.4531 0. 1890 0 . 1 1 58 0. 1254 0. 1039 49 7G 53 44 10 92 27 43 88 01 G5 A Quarter 1/2 0. 0. 0 ,. 0. o. o. o. 0 = 0. 0. 0. '""•rr"1-!J^. *~r J^, f 2508 19&4 1174 O"7"7cri..j / / O O338 224O 0566 01.23 02G9 O442 xialf i ..- \ -14.88 -15.87 -9.01 -G.50 -7.07 0 . 69 -IS. 84 -1.01 -1.40 -0.93 -3.92 Points 3/4 0.5212 0.4401 0.4413 0 . 06 G 5 0.4668 0.1018 0 . 2568 0. 2775 O. 120G 0. 1 10O 0. 1372 Momen t a.' f 4- '\ _T L- 41 -15 25 J-End === ShearJ-K-- -j -9.01 5.35 1 4 . SB -15=87 -S. 20 -0 . 57 - 1 . 94 •-• Of; -1.08 1. 1G -0.93 L 0.8401 O.G295 O.G8G3 0 „ 0 1 5G 0.5551 0. 1698 Oa 4850 0. 51.55 0. 2283 0. 2085 0. 2302 / . 49252 7"=;"7oe=; . 73466 1=:=^=^; = = = Moment (• I;' ~\ I *, _., 1 1 ... S 0 o o 0 0 0 r. A f"i 0 0, , f -1- '} •-1 ^-' ,' 66. 59 -48.44 41.74 -0 ., 82 26. 47 4 , 55 9. 89 •14- 54 6 . 0 1 --5, 56 5,56 hear . 083*1 „ 0495 1 AOI IT no 1 TP^ „ OOR9nocja nf.--'Q ,. O1G7 „ 0251 , 0143 CASA ENGINEERING 7850 aLVEFTTON AVE SWTE 210 SAN DECO.CA 82126 THj(ei9)e95-2761 RYUl DATF *'/o , v le CASA ENGINEERING 7»50 SLVBTTON AVE 8UTE 210 SAN OEGO.CA 92126 FAX(0»)«5-3367 JOB NAME SHEET<£)..OF, BY DATE CASA ENGINEERING 7950 8LVBTTON AVE SUITE 210 SAN DEGO.CA 02126 TEUe»)e95-276l FAX<e»)695-Q367 JOB NAME SHEET©..OF. BY DATE It" / V- II IL CASA ENGINEERING 7950 SLVBTON AVE 8UTTE 210 SAN DEOO, CA 92126 FAX(6W)095-3367 JOB NAME BY DATE C-ASA ENGINEERING 7950 SILVERTON AVE. SUITE 2t.O SAN DIEGO CA 92126 TEL (6195695- Job number, ..-sCIMA RESIDENCE 2761. Date,time.. . . .:02-22-1999 09! Reference :FLOOR JOIST FOR 44:57 BED ROOM #3 -ASE A B C D E F Wood Mater ial De sign Sec t i on MATERIAL PROPERTIES SIT ,-ii i -iH 1 ea Rear-i H i r~, n CJ+- y cacie: f fiv WrH~iHM i -L '_' W irf L J J. tf £3 fcr 1 1 LJ J, 1 i LJ Cj \( r tS =9 33 I '-* I v» •_"—' u ml ,-.i >J2H 1 S3 QHra 3i^ CH- v £ac- «: f fif Ulf (l~iHJ. '_'w-d3C.Ji fcr tjn&tsr C3t r Sr?:^ J Uf w_"_'tj Modal us of El ast ic ity for Wood All i-,i i^hlra RcsriHirvn C^-l-vfac:c; f c\v t^.L B.H J. .1, '-' W cs U 4. t_ CJ t ; I \ U A 1 I y C3 I, r tr ->::-• ' - ' -J » •-- « *- • M l f-ju/^hps 1 *"5hp»j'si V ^t" v o«^«i f r'iV~ f-i . 1 . B »J- (^-[ TV t.A i. j ^7^ J. v»J * ( d? <;Tt 1 i^J L- ' »sr i> ~J l '•-.' ' -J • '»— • *-*• » Mt~irli 1 1 i i<=i r"i f FT ^i c;+' i i- •! 1- v f TiT iji » I . E* -^.' ^ *^l .k ^l ;l-i '-,' ! 1_ i t^ -i> \/ J. »_ J. v ¥ ' — ' "* " •— « •« " DIMENSIONS: U i eaf t* P^nt" i 1 PVf^v ^DAnL^. t^ 1 w *—• <;,T l i V J. J. CJ V fc7 * i-J ^— ' &* ' i L2 Beam Span L3 Right Cantilever Span Max. Def. Lmax./24Q Y/YES N/NO. . . . Max. Def. L max. /360 Y/YES N/NO. . . . Max . Def 1 ec t i on Taper Sec t i on Ver t i c al /Hor i z ont al Linear loads XI X2 PI FEET FEET PLF 0 16 SO IS 20n5 26™SB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 (psi '' . . . . 1000 f osi "J 16OOOOO (psi 1 3000 c' ps i *i .»..„»,.....» 206 (psi ^ . IBuuoou f feet 'J O f feet *>.....«.....« 36 t in«"hs'i . . . . O „ ,. „ .......,.,.„ f") / O P2 PLF 80 2G.&& 0 0 0 0 CASE A B C D E F COMB! Com, 1 Po i n t 1 oad X FEET 0o 0 0 s 0 B P POUND 0 0 0 0o 0 LINEAR LOAD D 0 E POINT B C 0 0 0 LOAD D 0 0 0 O E F CASA ENGINEERING "7950 SILVERTON SAN DIEGO CA 9:2 Job number . . . . : Date, t ime. . . . . s Rc?f er encea „..= *,: •**## Summary An Moment Max. *„ ft Moment Min. *. ft Shear Max . 1* Shear Min,, # Reac t i on Le ft * Reac t i on Right* Sec. Max- 1 „ 38 13337 2 -4154903 3 ,,6163353 4 . 35431 41 5 . 65SS476 AVE. SUITE 210 :126 TEL (61 9) 895-278 1 CIMA RESIDENCE 02-22-1999 09s 45s 02 FLOOR JDIST FOR BED ROOM alysis *** 3 Value Locat. ft. 3 2426.813 7.79 3 -268.6745 16,0105 3 621.4892 0 3 -658.0709 15,99 3 623. 1292 3 776.340S 3 .~._~. T^C^ -f 1 .-^ .— 4- -, •'". *", (' -i r-i .— 1™, i-;i— 't ...- ..."US? T .!, (5fi_ T, -L L'll \ 1 n*~ i IfS--1 .' Locat . Min . 7.8925 -.32S0843 7.3925 --.3519771 7.8925 -,5:721522 7.8925 -,3001481 7.3925 -.5581227 *3 Sect ion 1 2x12 2 3x10 3 4x8 4 6X8 5 8X6 Locat. 20 ,,5 20 . 5 20 . 5 20 . 5 20 . 5 #**# Com. 1 Analysis *#•*# 3 Moment Max.*. ft Moment Minn*,, ft Shear Max, 1* Shear Min , * Reaction Left * React ion Right* Sec . Mw~x . 1 , 3349337 2 .4154983 3 ,8163853 4 .3543141 5 „ 658B476 Value Locat. ft. 3 2425.313 7.79 3 -263.874 .16. 01 05 5 6"""i H '"f O •"!? """i f"\ **.^: j, . H o :? jL. J o -656.07C9 15.99 3 523.1292 -3 776.8408 3 --• Def 1 ec t i on ( iric hes -s Locat. Min, 7 „ 3925 - , 3260843 "7 DOO^ -. T5; 1 Q~7"7 1/.CI^^>J ' . « J *.-•' i J -' -' A 7.8925 -.5221522 7.8925 -.300 1461. 7,8925 -.5581227 Sect ion 1 2x12 2 3x10 3 4x8 4 8X8 5 8X8 Loc at . '~'O „ 5 20. 5 20 . 5 20 . 5 20,. 5 Bending psi Stress Locat . 920,3911 7.79 818. 8556 7 . 79 949.7338 7.79 564.7855 7.79 770. 152 7.79 Sh&ar (psi) Stress Locat . 58- 31741 15= 99 42.55595 15. 99 38.78251 15.99 23.85712 15.99 23 . 857 12 15. 99 Bend ing psi Stress Locat . 920.3911 7.79 816.3556 7.79 949,7835 7 ,,79 i— *- J •—-,-•.*—--*- -^ Ti~r*•* £. (-1 ,'VJ1— .*". / / "~* 770,, 152 7,79 — Shear (psi) Stress Locat. 5S.31741 15.39 42.55595 15.99 38.78251 15,, 99 23. 8571 2 15. 99 23 . 857 12 15" 99 CASA ENGINEERING 7950 3ILVERTON AVE, SAN DIEGO .Job number Date,t ime. Referan.ce. . SUITE 210 92126 TEL. (619)695-2761 .:CIMA RESIDENCE -:02-22-1999 09:45:29 „:FLOOR JOIST FOR BED ROOM #3 **** Com.2 Analysis **** Moment Max. #. ft Moment Min.#. ft Shear Max - # Shear Min. # React ion Left tt R s? a c t i o n R i g h t # Sec. Max, 1 . 3948878 2 .4100669 3 „ 5635499 4 . 7349448 5 ,,5716239 Value 715,2243 -268.6745 193.788 -227 . 8068 1 ''14 .. ^""^"i? 3--G, 0403 Ps 1 .1. s*c t \ on Locaf . 7.708 7, 70S 7 . 708 7.708 7 ,,708 Locat. ft . 7.3595 16.0105 0 1 5 . 99 '. .L 1 1 1_ h e s ) Min, -.2722404 -,282705 -.3885181 -.5066799 -,3940847 3 Section 5 1 1x10 3 2 2x8 ../ c- ••-• X tv 3 4 4x5 3 5 5X5 3 Locat. 20.5 20.5 20 „ 5 20,5 20.5 7.-?—f .' H 7 „ T 3595 3595 <"> f^ ,... £—%j._j :rJ O*=!QcrO i. J j tJ 3595 Bending psi Stress Locat 802.4723 653.1418 680.9409 725.5771. 565,, 1155 Shear Stress 49.25553 31.42163 24.85165 21.69589 J.D 16.87458 15, 99 ,99 99 99 QQ CIMA RESIDENCE La Costa Climate Zone 7 Bob Goodbody Plans for Cima Residence have been reviewed. The following Title 24 energy report demonstrates compliance with California's Title 24 energy code for new residential projects. Mark Gallant, CBPE Compliance Method - MICRO PAS v4.5 January 15,1999 Haynal and Company, Inc. 425 W. 5th Ave, Ste. 201 Escondido, CA 92025 (760) 743-5408 Contractor's License #649028