The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2912 MANAGUA PL; ; CB970587; Permit, Vi4t 1 3 .:- 1 -. BU .-I.L..DiN iT Permit- No:. C970587'-. c' '.- • -e , ç. -' i ,. ' .•" -, 097 45 56 Project No A970O762 Page 1 of '1 ' ' f. DeveIbpmentNo I.. Job Address 2912MANAGUA PL Suite ' #1_TI. '#., • ..- Permit" Type RESIDENTIAL 8LDG REPLACEMENT., 4793--05/08/97 0001 01 02 Parcel No 215_494-.i.2-OOt ,Lot# C-PM1 o59 Q( Valuation 75,582 , - Construction Type NEW Occu'ancy Group Referrtce# 1 Status ISSUED .:Descr-ipt'idn: ADDING969SF'TO EX 'r • •.,Applied: 0,3/'i.4t97 FIRE DAMAGED PROPRT,1 ND STORY " 1 ,Apr/Isse ,05/08/97' Cntered y JMr ',- Appl/Ownr CALCOAST CONSTRUCTION, •619 566-6904." , "7572 TRADE sTREET Ok .':. SANDIEGO, CA 9211 #.**. U'ees Required 1***., Collected & Cred.ts **** - -- • 1/ - c • 4, • Fees: ,.. .1.,_Q-05._0p Adjustment: , I di Fee description4' I (\ .-''2. t\..iNJn'it Ext fee Dat ---------------- , Enter Buildihg Perm t > 00 ,532 00 Enter Plan Check Fe 3146..00, Enter Strng Motio F e > - 8 8 0O * BUILDING TAL 119 00 PLO ELC,MC 'INCORPORATED , •'. .11 It 1952 • 4 41 Vi" •, *. . *V - ;- •V4V . V ( •;,• - - - ' . --: ' 4.• -, I f ' 'V 1 1 ' .- TI' r - , ,, - • - -: .,-...'' -,V;.IVI. .4 • VVt*•V, 'jV -V VV• IV 35 IV IV 4 • 4 *1*- ,, •- — j •.',- TI FINALAPP R () V1\ L 41 J 1" I * 69" &L3 tI 4(.A1:'.#V! , '"- 4 -• .- - V 4 4C L E Rf2J Ci I - • . ,. - . . , - V - -V - -; - . ' .4 44 - TI I 4 TI - V 4 •* -. - IV_' ' , * 'V ..ct' - • V_.• I - - I ,_ ,. • , CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 V. •'• 'V'1•• - '. -V •VV• •V .4t'._ •. - V V - V V . - V • - • V q#- l. , V . t1 .. 1- — I ' •". — 2 .. . . . - . - .. ••., -.. -.• FOR.OFFICE USE ONLX -• PERMIT..APPLICATION - / ....PLAN CHECK NO.'Y7O55 7 '.'" .-.•. ..,.' .(' ,, .. . f .. . 7\i.,, ESTVAL'7SL-' CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT -' Plan Ck. Deposit - I. 2075 Las Palmas Dr, ad Carlsb CA 9200 . 9 - . - -.--- - -.- - ,- ------ Validated By--Jl'"......-.............. 1161' Date gl' PROJECT INFORMATION .- Address (mci de Bldg/Suite #1 -. - - ............ . __B usiness Name (at this address); ? /3.. MA,JA p IL .. - C4AL.U4 •,. .•. . . •r. '. Legal Description--------- - - Lot No. SubdivisionName/Numbe Unit No. - Phase No.- Total It of units 1 J "Ni - -. •- , . ..:.- . - •F; - .. •. • ,)'r . . fl.-. :t'-.,.: . -. - - Assessor's Parcel It - - Existing Use - - -. - Proposed Use Z 45 -- •.."-r2 i.-. -'.r TCONTACT PERSON (ufJiff in t f plit (-S'94 FAX ' ii~A cOAST OTh"cTIb 4' 77 ?ui S 14/ Name - -. - -. -. - - - . -- --,Address, . -- .. ._ City — - - - --State/Zip Telephone #.- - -Fax It -. APPLICAN Contractor E1 jenrfo Co J EA gedtJot.0-wrier - CAL CoA.T cjif 4P-.Ct -Di -<'AL/c- 94/ 'Name--- ----- - - * - - -. Addres------------. City-'- State/Zip - - Telephone It - - 4PROPERTY oWNERrL. (Sec 7031.5 Business and Professions Code Any City or County, which requires a permit to construct alter, m improve deolish 'repir ant, strmture prii'to its 'issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's LicenseLaw [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division,3 of the. Business, and, ProfessionsCodel or.that he is exempt therefrom; and thebasis.forthe. alleged .. exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by a y applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civ penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$5001). cio'i- 774 L, tName F , .' . mC.' 'Address_ .. • ii'. , --- City', , .r . - State/tip iL.. LTelephonef State Lie It ' • I 'ns Class ' ' .'bCity Bin Liere '• I !J ' 4 • •-,. . . I Designer Name ,,j- , Address ,City State/Zip,,,.— Telephone StàteLicense'# t, ' -. , . .'t. . • . -' -•• -•. 16WoRKERMNSATIoN:T Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: D - l have and will maintain.a certificate of consent toself-insurefor workerscompensation as provided by Section 3700 of.the Labor Code, for the perform e4.' lof the work for which this permit is issued. . . •t• have and will maintain workers' compensation; as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code,for the performance of the work for-which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carder and policy number are:- . --• ' ,. 4 - fl) - 'Inrance Company Policy No. su ,Expiration Date - . II.! • p4 j j .-,- • - ,--. ii (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR -ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1001 OR LESS) ------ - - • - -- CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued I shall not erploy'any person mnnymannso'as f to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. - . • -' - '• • •._,1•• ..,,,,. t. ', - 'WARNING: -Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees 1SIGNATURE - - -- -- - -- - - DATE --. I7OWNERTiitER DECLARAT1N -J I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: 'jr o ,. - . -' r , ,- 0 I, .-- ...___ --.-. ------':--'-- as owner of the property or my employees with wages as-their sole compensation, will do the work an'd the structure is not intended or offered)or sale (Sec. .7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contract&' Lic'e'nse La, ddes not applyto an owner of. property. Who build br' imrovs thir.on.and 'wIo 'does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement Js sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale).--- —'--4 • - - I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct-theprojéct (Sec. 7044, BusiRiss indProfesCions Cod:The Contractor's License Law does not apply to 'r1 owner of prop-arty who builds or improves thareoi and contracts for such projects .with contractor(s) licensed 1pursuant to the Contractor's License Law).,......_ -0 .1 am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: . . . . ,. •.. .j_•. - ,'- 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YESrDNO, - - ._ • - .. . . • - .•-. ----------•-.- . _,. -• ...• - ., .._• ._ ._..___. -. - ,2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit *- for the propos -ed work. . 1',) ' .J • I (' I ,1 .-.I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction- (includename / address / phone number /-contractors license -number): - • • * -- .' -.----- • • r-.. • ,4. 1 plan to prOvide portiorm of th work, but I hae hired thifollowing person to coordinate, supervise and providi the imiaj6r work(include name / dss/pf6rie number /contractors license number): el 5 I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / pho'ne number /,type - - ' - ........ •_* _.•• = - 1PROPERTY_ OWNER SIGNATURE ___________-_-- _--__---_- __- ___--- DATE 1cOM!LETE TH1SSECT1bN FORNONRESIDEN77AL'BUILDING PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or, risk management and prevention if under Sections 25505,'25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner HazardoUs Substance Account Act?'-'- D* YES _D N0'4-"----- )r'. iI-..__ ' ,_ -4_ ,j • . ,r - -- ..,, 4 ., 4 Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? _D _YES— D NO Is the facility, to be constructed within- 1,000 feet of the outer boundary-of a school site?- 0 YES .AO NO : - '- ' " ' -' -• '-.. - , '.'-, I i IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES :A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE , ,REQUIREMENTSOF THE OFFICE OFEMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT - !8CONSTRUCTION__LENDINGAGENCY3T JL.. J r ' It 1,1 hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for.the performance of the work forwhich thispermit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). , * LENDER'S NAME " -- ' -' LENDER'S ADDRESS _-- 9 APPLINCERTIFIcAON! -T - I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate I agree to comply with all i City ordinances amid State IawsTrelating to building constructiori I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit' of Carlsbadto énterUpon-thi above mentioned , - -property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF.'CARLSBAD AGAINST.ALL LIABILITIES, 1 JUDGMENTS,COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANYWAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY INCONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. - '1 . jf t - - - - •.-, ,- "1 • • - -- - . ' ------------- -------- ,A - * - .- - - - J-OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. -.>.--------- i - 'J .' . , '4,•.--' - , 1 ;,EXPIRATION: Every permit issued -by the-Building Official under the provisions of ths Code s hall expire... by -, limitation-and become null-and void if the building or- ,'work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the'daty'of_such.permit or,-if the building or work authorized by suchpermit is suspended It or abandoned at any time after the wor is commenced for a period f 180 da1iS,pEtion'106.4:4'Uniform -Building Code).-- APPLICANT'S' NATURE CANTSSIG DATE 3-'/,977 - - • 'WHITE: File YiOW: AppIicantPINK: Finance - -- - ' City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 06/08/2000 Permit# CB970587 Inspector Assignment RB Title: ADDING 969 SF TO EXISTING Description: FIRE DAMAGED PROPERTY, 2ND STORY Type: RREPLACE Sub Type: Phone 7604382885 Job Address: 2912 MANAGUA PL Suite: Lot Location Inspector APPLICANT CAL COAST CONSTRUCTION Owner: MELBROD GEORGE W JR&BARBARA Remarks: Total Time: 0 Requested By: MRS. MELBRAD Entered By CHRISTINE CD Description Act Comments 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 1 39 Final Electrical I . . k.. ... . 49 Final Mechanical Associated PCRs Inspection History Date Description Act !np..ments 04/26/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding WC RB 04/26/2000 89 Final Combo CO RB STILL MISSING 34-38 IN ON HANDRAILS 09/01/1999 89 Final Combo CO RB*• SEE NOTICE ATTACHED 10/29/1997 27 Shower Pan/Roman Tubs AP RB 10/28/1997 27 Shower Pan/Roman Tubs NR PK 10/28/1997 27 Shower Pan/Roman Tubs NR PK.': . 10/0211997 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP PK OK TO PLASTER 09/15/1997 l7 Interior Lath/Drywall CO PK..................... 09/09/1997 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP PK DRYWALL ONLY-SEE NOTICE 09/05/1997 17 Interior Lath/Drywall NR PK. LEFT NOTICE---,,'-'__.. 09/02/1997 16 Insulation AP PK • 08/29/1997 84 Rough Combo AP PK'_ 08/27/1997 16 Insulation • NR Pk STILL INSULATED 08/26/1997 16 Insulation CO PK INSULATED PRIOR TO FRAMI 08/13/1997 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CO NF OK TO COVER EXTERIOR ONL 08/11/1997 84 Rough Combo CO NF SEE NOTICE 0 • Inspection List S S Permit#: CB970587 Type: RREPLAC ADDING 969 SF TO EXISTING FIRE DAMAGED PROPERTY, 2ND STORY Date Inspection Item Inspector Act Comments 6/8/200089 Final Combo RB AP- 6/8/2000 89 Final Combo - ' RI 4/26/2000 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin RB WC 4/26/2000 89 Final Combo RB CO STILL MISSING 34-38 IN ON HANDRAILS 9/1/1999 89 Final Combo RB CO SEE NOTICE ATTACHED 10/29/1997 27 Shower Pan/Roman Tubs RB AP 10/28/1997 27 Shower Pan/Roman Tubs PK NR . 10/28/1997 27 Shower Pan/Roman Tubs PK NR 10/2/1997 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall PK AP OK TO PLASTER 9/15/1997 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PK CO 9/9/1997,17 Interior Lath/Drywall PK AP DRYWALL ONLY-SEE NOTICE 9/5/1997 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PK NR LEFT NOTICE .9/2/199716 Insulation PK AP 8/29/1997 84 Rough Combo PK AP 8/27/1997 16 Insulation PK NR STILL INSULATED 8/26/1997 16 Insulation . PK CO INSULATED PRIOR TO FRAMI 8/13/1997 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin NF CO OK TO COVER EXTERIOR ONL 8/11/1997 84 Rough Combo NF CO SEE NOTICE 8/7/1997 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PK NR 8/7/199734 Rough Electric PK . NR . 8/1/1997 13 Shear Panels/HD's PK PA SEE JOB CARD 8/1/1997 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PK NR 7/31/1997 21 Underground/Under Floor PK AP SUB-FLOOR FRAMING 7/28/1997 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PK NR NEED TO RE INSPECT 7/22/1997 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PK CO SEE NOTICE 7/22/1997 24 Rough/Topout PK AP 7/9/199724 Rough/Topout PK • . CO 7/3/1997 14 Frame/Steel/BbltinglWeldin PK • NR 7/3/1997 15 Roof/Reroof • PK AP • ROOF SHEATHING ONLY 6/30/1997 15 Roof/Reroof PK NR 5/14/1997 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PK AP 5/13/1997 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers PK • CO NOT ENOUGH STEEL Friday, June 09, 2000 5 5 Page 1 of 1 City of Carlsbad CEIVED Final Building Inspection Dept: Building EgiiiiAgw 7 Planning CMWD St Lite Fire EN INEERING DEPARTMENT' Plan Check , Date: ' 9/1/99 Permit #: CB970587 Permit Type: RREPLACE 'Project Name: ADDING 969 SF TO EXISTING. / Sub Type: 'Address: 2912 MANAGUA PL Lot: Contact Person: BARBARA Phone: 7604382885 Sewer Dist: LC Water Dist: CA Inspected ate Inspected:/99 Approved /Dlsapproved Inspected Date ' : Inspected: Approved: 'By:, Disapproved: Inspected ., Date By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved: Comments I 'I .1 1 4 4 .- EsGuICorporatión Professzorza[P(an Review ¶Engtneers DATE May 08, 1997 - U APPLICANT OJURIS JURISDICTION Carlsbad U PLAN REVIEWER - -, - •- DFILE* PLAN CHECK NO::-,97-587 SET III PROJECT ADDRESS 2912 Managua Place PROJECT NAME Meibrod Residence-Addition The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substartially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes LI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff S * S E - - - The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck * The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to as Esgil Corporation staff dud not advise the applicant that the1 plan check has been completed LI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Telephone # Date contacted (by ) Fax # Mail Telephone Fax In Person El 'REMARKS: By Tony Embuido ' Enclosures Esgil CorporatiOn- E]. GA El CM ElEJ -El PC- LOG ,•, S - trnsrnti.dot t * .71 S. ft - - - - - -S - - 9320 Chesapeake DriveSuite 208 • San Diego,California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619),560-1576,- - -. • 35 • - - - . -. •- .-.: S . S S - - -- - - - - .-- . • -- -Y - - S. .Es.Gil Corporation. rofessiona[an Qeview. Engineers DATE: May 06, 1997 - U APPLICANT JUR:— JURlSDlCTlON Carlsbad U N REVIEWER U FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-587 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS 2912 Managua Place PROJECT NAME: Melbrod Residence-Addition LII The planstransmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's codes The plans transmitted herewithwiIl substantialJy comply with the jurisdiction's ***AA.AA* codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. ••• 5' El The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted. for a complete recheck. The checklist transrnittedherewith is for your information.; The plans are being held at Esgil -. Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person.. The applicant's copy of the check list has been-' sent to:. - S. Cal Coast Construction: Lee Cooley. : 7572 Trade Street, San Diego, CA 92121 LII Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check.has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Lee C000ley Telephone # 566-6900 Date contacted: - • (by: .. - )i, - Fax #: 566-8096 •. •• S Maii Telephone , Fax in Person LI REMARKS By Tony Embuido Enclosures Esgil Corporation 0 GA U CM [1 EJ [1 PC 04/29/97 tmsmti dot - 5 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208• San Diego, California .92123 • .(619) 560-1468 • Fax (619) 5604576 Carlsbad 97-587 II May. 06, 1997 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO 977587 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2912 Managua Place SET II DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY • DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: ESGIL CORPORATION 04/29/97 May 06, 1997 REVIEWED BY Tony Embuido FOREWORD (PLEASE READ) This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments The following items !isted need clarification, modifibationorchange. All items must be stisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 106 4 3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the:,violation of any state, county or city law. 'A Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to ESGIL CORPORATION B To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans C The following Jtems have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews The original correction number has been given for your reference In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items D Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list..If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans Have changes been made not resulting from this list? UYes UNo Carlsbad 97-587 II May 06, 1997 2. Final set of plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Cbde) 12: Guardrails (Section 509.1): .' C) Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the ' horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-B. i). •How, is the guardrails attached to.the rim'joists and floor joists? 19. The foundation plan-does not 'comply with the soils report recommendations for. 'this project. Please review the report and modify design, notes and details as required to show., compliance: ' '• '. • ' ' ' ' ' a) Per appendix "C": isolated piers to be design by the engineer ofrecord. See original calc's on page 8 for Fl, F2, and F3. 25.' Provide correct detail based on the engineer's design on updated sheet (L4). Provide similar details or sticky back sheet L4 as part of the plans and cross reference. , '' ' ' '• ' 28. Specify all header sizes for openings-over 4' wide. Section 2326.11.6. Where's ,header 6 per design calc's.? Still can't find header 6 per response. 29. Specify correct sizes of shear panels based on design calc's. i) ' Spacing of nails and size of plywood used by design is incorrect. Omit or cross-out shear panels not used on shear wall schedule: 30. Show on the plans all structural requirements developed in the structural', calculations. Section 106.33. (See comments above'and below.) 33. 'Specify correct size and spacing for floor diaphragms. Sections 2314. a) Detail shows 5/8" plywood thickness and lumber note #3 specifies 3/4". 47. For room additions, show compliance with the energy standards. See attached.' Minimum 10% and maximum per attached.' Clarify 'yes", per response. 48 Provide fluorescent lighting(40 lumens per watt minimum) in bathrooms The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 ' Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number - of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan reviewfor your project. If you have any questions *regarding these plan review items, please contact Tony Embuido at Esgil Corporation. 'Thank you. EsGil Corporation frofessionafP(an Review Engineers DATE: March 24, 1997 - U APPLICANT .. JURISDICTION: Carlsbad - • U PAN REVIEWER - - : U FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-587 . SET: I . S PROJECT ADDRESS 2912 Managua Place '., PROJECT NAME: Meibrod Residence-Addition LI The planstransmitted herwith have been corrected where. necessaryand substantially comply With the jurisdiction's codes; - LI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply With the jurisdiction's AAAAAAAAA codes .when minor deficienciesidentified below are resolved and checked by building department.. staff. - -.• ,; LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. . • I . The check list &ansmitted herewith is for your information. The plas are bein.heId.atEsgil Corporation untilcorrected plans are submitted for recheck. S 5, LI The applicant's copy of the check list is enIosed for the ji:irisdiction to forward to the applicant -cbntact peson. - - The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to -Cal Coast Construction: Lee Cooley - •• - 7572 Trade Street, San Diego, CA 92121 LI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed • Person contacted: Lee Cooley Telephone #: 566-6900 , 7. Date contacted /L.1 (by 'i(.4) Fax # 566-8096 C.-MT1 Telephone In Person S - LI REMARKS By: Tony Embuido Enclosures: . Esgil Corporation S E1 ,GA El CM El EJ 0 Pc 03/18/97 , -: - • trnsmti dot - • 5 5 - S . . -.5- • -•5- . -. -• - •; 5•__• _• -• -. 5; 5-•. $ 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • SanDiego, California 92123 • (619)560-1468 • Fax (619) 560-1576 '- $5 V _ V Carlsbad 97-587 March 24, 1997 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 97-587 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2912 Mañágua Place . FLOOR AREA: 969-R3 . STORIES: 2 HEIGHT 4 REMARKS: Fire Dniage Building DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 3/14/97 ESGIL CORPORATION: 03/18/97 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER: Tony Ernbiiido COMPLETED: March 24, 1997 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):'. . This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained, in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections' based on laws and ordinance by the. Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments,may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. -Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with Title 24 and the following model codes: 1994 UBC (effective 12/28/95),,1994 UPC (effective 12/28/95)1,1994 UMC (effective: 2/23/96) and 1993 NEC (effective 12/28/95).. The above regulations apply to residetiaI construction,' regardless of the' code editions adopted by ordinance. . The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994,Uniforn Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. ., . . To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. - LIST NO. 1 GENERAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTS (1994 UBC) r3forw.dot - ' Carlsbad 97-587 - March 24,1997 PLANS • I Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list Submit (two sets of plans for residential projeèts). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: - 1. Deliver all correctedsétsof plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (619) 438-1161 The City will route the plans : - to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. • 2. Bring one.corrected set of plans and calcülatións/reports to EsGil - Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (619) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly tothe City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments - r - NOTE Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Cofpdration only will not be reviewed by the City Plannihg; Engineeriri and Fir Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2.-p Final set of plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their, preparation,, for plans deviating from conventional wood ,frame construction. . Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and ProfessiOns Code). 3. . Secify on the Title Sheet of the "Plans the gross floor area of each element of this project, deck and balcony. .Section 106.3.3. 4 Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply --with Title24 and the 1994 UBC, UMC and--UPC and the 1993 NEC. - 5. On the cover sheet 6f the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection,. in a format .similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2. -, • • . •' F- -. REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also' require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. T - • • . .. I - • - .( .• •t. ITEMS, . REQUIRED? • - REMARKS SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR T0 X FOUNDATION INSPECTION. - • • -• • . . - • - - • • - • • .- •- Carlsbad 97-587 March 24, 1997 6 When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit Please review Section 106.3.5. . FIRE PROTECTION 7. Show locations of permanently wired smoke detctors with battery backup: Inside each bedroom. - Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms. C) On each story. A) When sleenino rooms are unstirs at the tinnr level in close nrnimitv to the stair. NOTE Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in all sleeping areas of the unit Section 310.9.1. 8 When the valuation of a room addition or repair exceeds $1,000, or when sleeping rooms are created, smoke detectors shall be provided per the above, except that smoke detectors added at existing construction need only be battery, powered Section 310.9.1.2. . GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS 9. Sleeping rooms shall have a window or exterior door for emergency escape. Sill height shall not exceed 44" above the floor. Windows must have an openable area of at least 5.7 square feet with the minimum openable width 20" and the minimum openable height 24". The emergency, door orwindow shall be openable from the inside to provide a full, clear opening without the use of separate tools: ' Section 310.4. Note as part, of the plans. 10 Dimension on the plans 30" clear width for water closet compartments and 24" clearance in front of water closet Sect 2904 See bathroom next to bedrm #3.- 11. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): Fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors other than wardrobe doors All sliding glass doors - Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface See window, next to door. Carlsbad 97-587 March 24, 1997 EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 12. Guardrails (Section 509.1): Shall be installed at balconies or porches more than 30" above grade or floor below. Shall have a height of 36". Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-B. Openings between railings shall be less, than 4". The 'triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a guardrail at a stair shall be less than 6". 13. Handrails: ' a) All stairs shall have handrails terminating in a newel or safety post. Section 1006.9. ' 14. The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 in nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. Section H 1006.9.. 'ROOFING/DECKING , 15. Specify On'the plans the following information for the deck materials, per Section 106.3.3: Dex-o-tex. a) ICBO approval number, or equal. ' FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 16. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed' architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply .with UBC.' Section 1804: ' 17. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: ' a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and c) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." Carlsbad 97-587 .. . March 24,1997 " '' .• 18. Per toils report, note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive 'and note the allowable bearing value. Section 1804.3. V 19. The foundatiOn plan may not comply with the soils report recommendations for this project. Please review the report and modify design, notes and details as: V required to show compliance: Pending on soils report submittal. V V •V 20. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, V grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that, it has been - determined that the, recommendations in the soils report ae properly V V incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report) .21. . Noteon plahs that surface water will drain away from building and sh6' . V drainage pattern and key elevations Section 1804.7. 22. ' Show minimum 12" clearance to bottom of girders. Section 2317.3 V 23. Show minimum .underf!oor access of 18" x 24'. Section 2317.3. V 24. Show minimum underf(bor ventilation equal to 1 sq. ft. for each 150 sq. ft. of underfloor area. Opdnings shall be as close to corners as practical and shall V provide cross ventilation on at least two ap*oximately opposite sides. Section 2317.7. V 25. V Provide detail for keynote <2> on foundation plan and specify/show edge and ,end distances, -embedment, and spacing. Section. 1701.7. ' • .. . V '4 FRAMING . ' V 26 Show or note fire stops at the following locations per. Section 708 a) • In concealed spaces between stair stringers at the topand bottom of the run and between studs along and inline with the run of stairs:if the walls under the stairs' are unfinished; Note on the plans that an A.I.T.C. Certificate of Compliance for glued laminated wood members shall be given to the building inspector prior to installation. Section 2305 Specify all. headersizés for openings over 4' wide. Section, 2326.11.6. Where's - header 6 per design calc's ?, Provide calculations for lateral loads, shear panels,shear transfer 'and related at kitchen extension and floor above. Section 106.3.3. ' V 30: Show dn the plans all structural requirements developed in the structural • alculations. Section 106.3.3.' (See 'comments below.) '4 .•' ,. , V . ' • Carlsbad 97-587 March 24, 1997 . In 2-story buildings, shear panels at the first story (at least 48 inches in width) shall be located at each end or as near thereto as possible and comprise at least 25 percent of the linear length of the wall, or provide design. Section 2326.11.3 and Table 23ILW. See design calc's. on page L3. Detail shear transfer connections, including roof and floor diaphragms, to shear • walls. Section 2314. See all details on sheet SI and detail 7 on sheet S2. Clarify Simpson HGLT? Where in Simpson Catalog? Specify model # for column cap used on detail 4 sheet S2. Specify and provide detail for 4 x6 ties at roof framing plan. Corrections may follow upon resubmittal of plans: 33: Specify nail size and spacing for floor and roof diaphragms. Indicate required blocking. Sections 2314. Specify panel span rating for floor and roof diaphragms. Table 23-I-S-I. In open beam construction, provide strap ties across the beams at the ridge support. Section 2303.8. 36.. Columns and posts located on concrete or. masonry floors or decks exposed to the weather or to water splash or in basements and which support permanent structures shall be supported by concrete piers or metal pedestals projecting 1" minimum above floors unless approved wood of natural resistance to decay or treated wood is used. Section 2317.5. 37. Individual concrete or masonry piers shall project at least '8 inches above exposed ground unless the columns or posts which they support are of approved wood of natural resistance to decay or treated wood is used. Section 2317.5. 38.' If foundation cripple wall studs are less than 14" high, framing shall be solid blocking, or sheathed with plywood. Section 2326.11.5. Note on the plans that "all weather-exposed surfaces shall have a weather- : rOsistive'barrier to protect the interior wall covering and that exterior openings shall be flashed in such amanner as, to make them weatherproof'. Section 1402. . ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE)' Show on the plan the amperage of. the electrical service, the location of,the service panel and the location of any sub-panels. If service is over 200 amps, submit single line diagram, panel schedule and load calculations 41 Note on the plans that receptacle outlet locations will comply with 1993 NEC Art 210-52(a). Carlsbad 97-587 March 24, 1997 42. Show on the plan that ground-fault circuit-interrupter protection complies with 1993 NEC Art. 210-8, which reads as follows: ... All 125-volt, single-phase, 15- and 20- ampere receptacles installed in bathrooms, garages, basements, outdoors and within 6 feet of a kitchen sink. PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) Show water heater size, type and location on plans. UPC, Section 501.0. Show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces. Provide two straps (one strap at top 1/3 of the tank and one strap at bottom 1/3 of the tank). UPC, Section 510.0 Provide .a note on the plans: In showers and tub-shower combinations, control valves must be pressure balanced or thermostatic mixing valves. UPC Section 410.7 •. : : New water closets and associated flushometer valves, if any, shall use no more than 1.6 gallons per flush and shall meet performance standards established by the American National Standards Institute Standard A112.19.2. H& S Code, Section 17921.3(b). : .. ENERGY CONSERVATION For room additions, show compliance with the energy standards. See attached. 48. Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in kitchen(s) and bathrooms. • S Provide a note on the plans st.ating "All new glazing (fenestrations) will be installed with a certifying label attached, showing the U-value." . CARLSBAD S.F.D. & DUPLEX SUPPLEMENT Energy conservation design should be for Zone 7. All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (city policy). 52. All new residential buildings, including additions, require a soils report. Please submit two copies. Exception: If a room addition is limited to one story and • 1000 sq. ft. in area, then a soils report is not required.. • . •• Carlsbad 97-587 March 24, 1997 . MISCELLANEOUS To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note ordetail number,' calculation page, etc. • 54. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are nota result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: • YesU No L3 S 55. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any 5 questions regarding these plan review items, please contact.Tony Embuido at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. S ENERGY REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL ROOM ADDITIONS - CLIMATE ZONE 7 Floor Area of Room Addition COMPONENT <100 ft2 100-499 ft2 500-999 f0 >1000 ft2 INSULATION . Ceiling . R-19 R-30 -R-30 R-30 Wall R-13 R-13 . R--13 R-.13 Floor R-13 R-19 R-19. R-19- GLAZING (FENESTRATION) U-Value' 0.75' 0.75 0.75 0.75 9&of added floor area <50 sq.. ft. 20% + Removed 201 + Removed .- SHADING n/a . 66 3 .66 3 , .66 3 - THERMAL MASS n/a Req.' Req.' Req .44 SPACE HEATING • Note 45' (no electric allowed) If Gas, efficiency= ' 78%AFUE' 78%AFUE' 78%AFUE5 If Heat Pump: Split' System, efficiency= 6.8HSPF5 6.8HSPF5' 6.8HSPF5 Single Package System, eff.= . 6.6HSPF5 6.6HSPF5 6.6HSPF5 - * SPACE COOLING ' Notes If Split System, eff.= , 10.OSEER5 10.OSEER5 10.0SEER5 If Single Package, eff.= 9.7SEER5 9.7SEER5 9,.7SEER5 WATER HEATING Note 6 Note6 Note' Note 1. Please,note that some metal-frame windows may not satisfy the'U-value requirement of 0.75. For additions and alterations only, dual- g1azed"greenhouse" windows and skylights may be assumed to meet this requirement 2 20- of added floor area plus the area of any glazing removed because of the addition 3. A coefficient of 0.66 will be assumed to be provided when dual glazing is used . 4. ,If the addition will be on top of existingconstruction, and: (a)If the.addition has conditioned area below all-portions, then no thermal mass is required. If the addition will be over non-conditioned area (partially or wholly) in a building mostly of raised-floor construction (after the addition), then thermal mass is**required in theaddition (equal to 5% of the area of the addition that is over non-conditioned space).. This may be provided by showinga 2" concrete slab at hearths, countertops, etc. ' If the addition will be over non-conditioned area in ,a building 'mostly of slab-on- grade construct ion (after the addition), then no thermal mass is required. If the addition will beat the ground floor, and: (a) If the addition will be in a building mostly of raised-floor construction (after the addition),' then thermal mass is required in the addition (equal to 5% of the added conditioned footprint, area). This may be provided by showing a 2" concrete slab ,at hearths, countertops, etc. • , '(b)If the additibn will be in a building mostly of slab-on-grade construction (after the addition) , 'then thermal mass is required in the addition (equal to 20% of the a,dded ' conditioned slab-on-grade floor area) . This may be provided by covering a portion of the slab-on-grade with tile, wood, etc. 5. If the existing system will be utilized (if no additional systems are needed to provide I ' * UBC heating requirements), there are no special requirents, other than mandatory insulation for any extended ducts, etc. . 'S 6: If the total number of water heaters increases in the residence, then calculations must be submitted to show that the entire existing-plus-addition- system meets the, water heating energy budget. 9-93 - ER-RA7 Carlsbad 97-587 . March 24, 1997 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE .. JURISDICTION Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO 97-587 PREPARED BY Tony Embuido DATE March 24, 1997 BUILDING ADDRESS 2912 Managua Place BUILDING OCCUPANCY R73/U-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION V-N 41 BUILDING PORTION. BUILDING AREA VALUATION • . .VALUE (ft.2) MULTIPLIER.. Addition 969 . 94.00 . 91,086.00 Balcony/Deck- 52., . . 11.00 572.00 Air Conditioning . . .' r •- . . Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 91,65800 1991 UBC Building Permit Fee Bldg Permit Fee by ordinance $ 60350 . . ... 1991 UBC Plan Check Fee Plan Check Fee by brdinane: $ . Type of Review r Complete Review fl Structural Only Hourly LI Repetitive Fee Applicable LI Other Esgil Plan Review Fee $ 313.82 Comments: . .: ' . . . .. .' . . . . ... -. . . . . . Sheet1..of 1' - macvalue.doc 5196 * . S..-. V .. .........-., ......... ......................._....................... City of Carlsbad BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE:~hlq 7 0 PLANCHECK NO.: CB 7- 5x'7 BUILDINGXDRESS: 2/2- qCL— PROJECTDESCRIPTION: SF N. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: Zt$- L////. EST. VALUE:. 75 02 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL . . DENIAL . 1. The item you have submitted for review has been Please- se e attached report of deficiencies approved. The approval is based on plans, marked w D. ake necessary corrections to plans • information and/or specifications provided in your or speci for compliance with applicable submittal; therefore any changes to these items after codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or this date, including field modifications, must be specifications to this office for review. reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review 4 carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of -permit to build. By:K.) Date Lt/d/f A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to - construction of the following improvements: By: Date: \0 By: Date: ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO FOR ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT OFFICIAL;USEONLY. ~Ah.0 Date: ATTACHMENTS - 0 ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Dedication Application Dedication Checklist 0 0 Improvement Application •Name: David Rick 0 . Improvement Checklist City of Carlsbad Future Improvement Agreement Address: 2075 Las Palmas Dr.; Carlsbad, CA 92009 0 Grading Permit Application • ' hoe: (619)438-1161, ext. 4324 •. 0 Grading Submittal Checklist 0 •. •- 0 Right-of-Way Permit Application • 0 • • - 0 Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist • . - and Information Sheet - 00 Sewer Fee Information Sheet • 0 0 A-4 GALIB IpClst CA 9200911576. (619) 438-1161 ..FAX (619) 3'-894 .., . •. . . r BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST .. . / SITE PLAN 3RD/ 1. Provide a filly dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: ' - • . / ..- ;JA/ :North Arrow Property Lines • 4. Existing & Proposed Structures . asements Existing Street Improvements F Right-of.Way Width& Adjacent Streets Driveway widths 2. Show on site plan: .. A. rainage Patterns - .1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE-FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainae of 2% to swale 5 away from building" B Existing '& Proposed Slopes and Topography 11 3 Include on title sheet A. Site address • - . .. B Assessors Parcel Number C. Legal Description, L0 For commercial/industrial buildings' and tenant improvement projects, "include: •. total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, ? existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. . . EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER . . DESCRIPTION - DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE • • • 5. Project does not comply with the fàllowing.Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No., - : 6. All conditions are, in compliance. Date: _________________________ . • - • : • :• . . •• • ••- • • - '• --C -- I • • - •- - • • - G:LIBRARYENG\WORDDOCSCHKLSfl8ujjdb,9 PlancReck Ckisl BP000I Fomi DR.doc . • • 2 • - • -- Rev. 12I2696 -• - .• - J * . . .,w-- . . •' . . ' - BUILDING PLANCHECKCHECKLIST . / S 'DEDICATION. REQUIREMENTS . 1 ST 2ND/ 3" U. 7. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and anistorm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at.ór exceeding-s_, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. -: Dedication équired as follows: . Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or. Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 %" x 11" plat Imap and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an * S application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the, completed application form with the required checklist items .and fees to the - S Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by Date IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS I . 8a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site mu' be S constructed at time of building construction whenever the valUe of the - construction exceeds $ ., pursUant to Carlsbad Municipal Code - S - Section 18.40.040. . S , . -.•' ,- S Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public S - S improvement requirements: A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the S - appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the require ménts on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan • check process. The completed application form. and the -requirements on the S checklist must be submitted in perso'n' 'Applications by mail or fax are not S • - accepted. - Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid priôr,to issuance of building permit. - Improvement Plans signed by: - Date: -. -.' * - --:8b. Construction of'the pUblic improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad. S * Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or • current grant deed on the property, and processing fee of $ - S so - - -- we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement - S * • - must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a S • S Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows G:UBRARV/ENG/WORD\D/CS1HKjs'rr,,i,j,,g Planclreck Ckst BP0001 Form DR.doc - S - • - 5, -. - Rev. 12/29/96 • • * ... .' .. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST. nd s' 2 / 3rd/ LI 8c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement: Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: •' . . . LI LI LI 8d No Public Improvements required SPECIAL NOTE Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. - GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that nvoke.the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11 .06.030 of the Municipal Code. . .. . -. . . . . . LI .4 LI 9a. Inadequate information available on Site. Plan to make a determihation on grading .'- requirements Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export) - LI LI LI "9b. Grading Permit required.. A separate grading plan prepared by a, registered Civil Engineer .niust be submitted together with the completed application form . . attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit ..must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issunOe of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by': - . . Date: . LI . LI' 9c..Graded Pad Certification required:' (Note: Pad certification maybe required even if a grading permit is not required.) LI LI 9d No Grading Permit required MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS - .; • LI LI . 10. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required t6 do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing into public storm drain sewer and water utilities Right-of-Way permit required for 4. G UBRARV4ENG\WORD4DOCS4CHXLSTBUIng Plancheck Chist BP000I Form DR doc I Re 12/26/96 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1stl '2nd/ 3rd./ ' 11 A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance The fee is notedr in the fees section on the following page. 12. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT is required. Applicant must, complete Industrial, Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a' Permit. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: • ' Date; '' ' • 13 NPDES PERMIT Complies 'with the City's 'r'equirernent of' theNational Pollutant Discharge' EliminatiOn System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an 'acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City' Engineer -prior to issuance' of , grading or building permit,' whichever Zia occurs first U 14.;,,tIequiredfees are. attached t'No fees required . i. 15. Additional Comments: ' " ' ' •' ' ' ' • G:lLl9RARVENG\WORD1DOCSlCHKLST1Build'og Plantheck Cklst 8P000I Form OR,doc ' ' • Rev, 12126196 I/fk. /11 43 Vin Vpdc. 1' / •V .. - . :.:vI f / '/ •. . I. W$ I 1 ' R4ii 14 SO :. .: 50 rk <t 0 4cqfr / . è14 J 741 \, G# • -17 i a '' LU 4 j ,rc 18 1 At $3 89 ØRlt0) DI - ' fte 1 AN ' t gt-t.. -. •.:/ 190, •••. (. .. 5t I '.t • 'V - ' '\. .°' C, rT ,,_•i 35 \ 1-• r,. . ... .' \ SEE Ic 40 ,elip.Ii . • ( PLANNING DEPARTMENT . BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST, . oAtAPlan che 9 Address 9 (2 Planner • Phone.(619) 438-1161,'extension 4329.) ,.APN: . .i. qq Type of Pohectnd Use: ~ØIL -fA14.iy Zone: ' I Facilities Management Zone: CFD(in/t)) Cir4JeO/ (If property in, complete SPECIAL TAX CALCULATION WORKSHEET provided by Building Department.) Legend . 1tem Complete .. - ttem Incomplete - Needs your action . El Eli ,Environmental Review Required YES NO TYPE .DATEOF COMPLETION: •\. . . Compliance with conditions ofapproval? If not, state conditions which require action. ConditiOns of Approval .. .• . . .-. 1J E Discretionary. Action Requiiëf. . YES NO'Vi TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. - DATE ., . PROJECT NO. -- I. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval' If not, state", conditions which require action Conditions Of Approval. . .j . 7f .. E Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance . . . '. Project.site located in Coastal Zone? YES NO . If NO, proceed with checklist; if YES, proceed below. Determine status (Exempt or Coastal Permit Required): If Exempt, proceed with checklist; if Coastal Permit required, hold building permit until Coatl Permit issued. - . Coastal- Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO____ If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. .. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: -Follow-Up Actions: . ' . • - : -1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum - - Floor PlansL . • • ... 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. . - 4 -. I. 4 4 / E E Inclusionary Housing Fee required YES NO (Effective date ofinclusionary HousingOrdinance - May,21,' 1993.) c - t , .& " r ' SitePlan - F?] E1 LI 1 Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to"scale Show North arrow 1-. - - - . - -'- property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing Street improvements right;oway .width, dimensional setbacks and existing' topographical lin'es 2. Provide' Pr4ovidd legal description of property and assessor's pa'rc& number - - - - : Zoning , LI 1 Setbacks Fronf. Required id Shwn Int. Side: - -Required: /0'". . Show Street Side / Required ' Shown- Rear:....' - , Required 2 Lot Coverage Required Shown yo% 3 Hight Requi;ed ..Shown', LI 4 Parking:Spaces Required Shown .3 Guestaces Required r LI LI Additional Comments TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPRO V LINTO COMPUTER _ ' * : I . ,- - 4 I. /rH/prWr(olj log I 7 p q c PØODO LL . h; c/ r____ • . I •v N MQusc. • . 0 Pt 7 •( • Qk :010EOfO oO./TfO' • 41 / VV A Pii,, 'L'5Z'Loi(3 '. '• • o 1 1 • • • S 0 (\ 0 • 0 0 • • 0 • en ;e ' ( )(c, Of ES ) 0 • 19 e s?'0 5763 5/ ErLT VIL f )I17 Lr 1v p. •'p C OfCA • . ((CO & 2) ) V. . . V .. m€i rio I) ... . c41E( (oi1c TI 0 V P1 o. 71 PA- Lo eW pW V V . V . - f(-iz-- /f -i' H V • . . • ' V -q 1/ V • •' V • V •V • • .• V V V • V.. . -. V V .• V .avJ . &TP V . .. . . v • . V V.. V •' #. V /oo /7 q(L/.- V •. • 7P72. 1110 ____ V • . .2 0 0g0 V bo V ppoF lb ot'L- - Afa i7 Pt#u r'- psi czr zih!( V V. P'L I2Oo -- i-' ,U S'IL - V . - • V ilk V/iv ;5ge .. I V • 41 Eed~ sf i 61 I Fs(fOdL V Wt Ict e 4"4L,'V D /4jo1O _V . . I. . ., . . •0 DESIGNED BY DATE:. REVISIONS: THIS SIGNATURE IS TO BE A WET SIGNATURE, NOT A COPY. OES APPROVED - . 3103 FALCON STREET, SAN DIEGO, CA 92103 TEL: (619)293-3530 '•O .. 0 • - 7C . 'I-i' QJ,J •// in P_ _4, . 7 . C •-- • 1k, tloo x j q * (. 0 C . o I1O( 0 4< t#o jSE 41° OEL-' S . lb, . S 1 L'.I (usE (I°tj L . 5 3O ( - S . /Loo L • .o 1, T86-4X7oOPr JLiTa-t1') S • .5 • ft - ; osp }:_ S • S S S hc'ifr 4-1 .f)sE 4s/o~ i7 P L 0,-7 07, /o41)(1 [O S ti -- S . S S CtI4) 1[j0 0b1i0 3103 FALCON. SAN DIEGO, CA 92103 VOICE/FAX:(619)293-3530 EGF Date: 03/12/97 Page: GENERAL TIMBER BEAM DESIGN 0 hip bm BEAM DATA SPAN DATA Timber Section : 3X10 End Fixity : Pin:Pin Center Span = 12.50 ft Beam Width = 2.500 in Elastic Modulus = 1600000 psi Left Cantilever = : 0.00 ft Beam Depth = 9.25 in Beam Density = 40.0 pcf Right Cantilever = 0.00 ft Lamination Thickness = 0.00 in • Load Duration Factor = 1.25 UNURACED LENGTHS Fb - Bending =. 875 psi Beam Wt. is Added to Loads Le : Center Span = 0.00 ft Fv - Shear = 95 psi End Sheer Calc'd @ 'd distance Le : Left Cant. = 0.00 ft Fc - Bearing =. 1300 psi Le : Right Cant. = 0.00 ft APPLIED LOADS Trapezoidal Load: DL: O.0p1f @ lft, 96.0p1f @ rt LL: 0.Oplf @ Ift, 1 28.oplf @ rt from 0.00 ft to 12.50 It SUMMARY USING 2.500 x 9.250 Beam, Bending'- 66.24%, Shear = 44.01% Max. Pos Mom @ 7.15 ft= 2.37 k-ft Shear: Max. @ Left = 0.51 k Reactions... DL Maximum Max. Neg Mom @ 12.50 fp -0.00 k-ft ...used for dsgn = 0.75 k Left 0.24 k Max @ Left = 0.00 k-ft ....Area Req'd = 6.28in2 Right = .4 (0.97 k Max @ Right = 0.00 k-ft . Max. @ Right = 0.970k Max. Allow Moment. = 3.57 k-ft ....used for dsgn = 1.21 k -Deflections... lb : Max. Actual = 797.0 psi ....Area Req'd = 10.18 in2 Center = -0.11 in -0.25 in Fb : Allowable = 1203.1 psi fv : Max. Actual = 52.26 psi ....Dist =. 6.45 ft 6.500 ft Fv : Allowable = 118.8 psi ...L/Defl = 1322 607 Ck = .811(E/Fb) 5 = 31.02 Left = 0.00 in 0.000 in Cs = (LeD/B2).5 = 0.00 Bearing Req'd @ Left = 0.16 in ...L/Defl = 0 .0 Cv per UBC 2312.4.5 = 1.10 Bearing Req'd @ Right 0.30 in Right = 0.00 in 0.000 in ...L/Defl =' 0 0 -.....-ii-i-rrrriiiiiiiiirrm-iiiiiiffFFEIi111i11TI1T11T111lll] 2.37 .1•11iiir1iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiilllllllllTllllTllhlllllllll k• 1.15ft O'C)o kL 0.51 - - 0.5) kIpø 0.00 It V.I.097 kip. • 1250 It Dn8x - 0.00 ,fl. 0.00 It Ontln - -0.25 In 6.50 It 0.00 -025 1250 III 11 1 1 1 I - . . . . 0.0 2.1 4.1 6.3 8.3 10.S 12.5 FOTIADI & ASSOCIATES Melbrod Residence 3103 FALCON STREET Managua Place SAN DIEGO, CA 92103 Carlsbad, CA VOICE/FAX:(619)293-3530 EGF Date: 03/12/97 STEEL BEAM DESIGN welded at ridge i rb 2 ' c . Page: EL ECTION DATA w6x16 8 in lxx = 32.10 in4 = 0.260 in lyy = 443 1n4 = 4.03 in Sxx = 10.22 in3 = 0.405 in Syy = 2.20 in3 = 4.74 in2 r:xx 2.602 in = 16.09 # r:yy = 0.967 in = 1.61 in BEAM DATA Center Span Length = 18.00 ft AISC Section Left Cantilever = 0:00 ft Section Depth Right Cantilever . = 0.00 ft Web Thickness Unbraced Length = 0.00 ft Section Width Beam Wt. is ADDED To applied loads Flange Thickness Live Load Not Acting with Short Term Section Area Fy = 36 ksi Section Weight Load Duration Factor = 1.00 rT, y Beam End Fixity : Pin:Pin - APPLIED LOADS Concentrated Loads Dead Load = 1.00 k Live Load = 1.35k Distance To Load = 9.00 ft . . SUMMARY USING w6x16, Max Stress Ratio 55.46%, Min Defl. Ratio = 378.39 TABULAR SUMMARY OF LOAD COMBINATIONS Maximums... Actual Allowable Dead Load + Loads Placed s follows Moment = 11.2 20.2 k-ft Placed DL LL LL+ST* LL LL+ST Stress = 13.18 23.76 ksi for Max Only @Cntr @Cntr @Cants @Caots Shear = 1.32 23.51 k Stress = 0.81 14.40 ksi Moments..M+ @ Center = 11.2 5.2 11.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 k-ft Deflection = -0.571 M- @ Center = ':0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 k-ft fb/ Fb : % max = 0.555 @ Left = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 k-ft fv / Fv : % max = 0.056 @ Right = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 k-ft Mm. DL Defl Ratio = 810.91 Shears... @ Left = 1.32 0.64 1.32 0.00 0.00 0.00k Min. TL Defl Ratio = 378.39 @ Right = 1.32 0.64 1:32 0.00 0.00 0.00 k Deflection.. @ Center , = -0.571 -0.266 -0.571 -0.266 0.000 .0.000 in @ Left = 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.d00 0.000 in • . @ Right = 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000in • at 0.00 ft = 0.000 0.0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 in Reactions @ Left = 1.32 - 0.64 1.3 0.64 0.00. 0.00.k Reactions @ Right = 1.32 . 4 1.32 0.64 0.00 0.00 k 11.23 - tl.23n-k0 9.00 ft LIlIIIIIIJIII1111IOIOOI1IIIIIIIIIII111I1fIbb Ymx - 1.32 klp, e 0.00 ft IIIIIIIIIIIII0110I Y,ttln - -1.32 ktpt e 10.00 ft IIIIOIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0.00 In, 0.00 ft 0mm - -0.57 in v 9.00 it 0.00 0.0 3.0 6.0 9.0 12.0 15.0 18.0 18.00 V4.4C1 (c) 1983-96 ENERCALC FOTIADI & ASSOCIATES. KW06067 FOTIADI & ASSOCIATES S Meibrod Residence 3103 FALCON STREET Managua Place SAN DIEGO, CA 92103 Carlsbad, CA VOICE/FAX:(6 19)293-3530 EGF Date: 03/12/97 Page: TIMBER JOIST & RAFTER DESIGN framing #1 roof hdr 3 play fj fb 4 fb 5 hdr 6 kitch fb7 kitch fb8 DESIGN DATA - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7- Timber Section : 4X10 2X10 4X10 6X10 4X10 6.75x10.5 3.125x10.5 ....Depth in : 9.25 9.25 9.25 9.50 9.25 10.50 10.50 ....Width in : 3.50 1.50 3.50 5.50 3.50 6.75 3.13 Le: Unsupp ft : 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fb- Allow psi : 1000.00 1150.00 1000.00 1350.00 1000.00 2400.00 2400.00 Fv-Allow psi : 95.00 95.00 95.00 85.00 95.00 165.00 165.00 Elastic Mod. ksi : 1600.00 1600.00 1600.00 1700.00 1600.00 1700.00 1700.00 Load Duration Factor : 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Stress Ratio ->> : 0.77 0.99 0.65 034 1.00 0.70 0.70 CENTER SPAN -OK- -OK- -OK- -OK- -OK- -OK- -OK- Span Length - It : 8.50 18.00 7.00 18.00 6.50 12.00 12.00 Uniform DL pIt : 108.00 15.00 135.00 15.00 330.00 180.00 204.00 LL plf : 144.00 40.00 360.00 40.00 500.00 480.00 240.00 Point DL #: 500.00 0.00 0.00 473.00 0.00 864.00 0.00 LL #: 700.00 0.00 0.00 1260.00 0.00 1152.00 0.00 X-Dist : It 4.25 . 0.00 000 4.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 RESULTS . . Mmax @ Cntr k-in : 57.91 26.73 36.38 83.07 52.60 209.07 95.90 X-Dist ft : 4.25 9.00 3.50 4.08 3.25 5.04 6.00 REACTIONS. - Left: Dead Load #: 709.00 135.00 472.50 502.89 1072.50 1584.00 1224.00 Live Load #: 962.00 360.00 1260.00 1340.00 1625.00 3552:00 1440.00 Right: Dead Load #: 709.00 135.00 472.50 240.11 1072.50 1440.00 1224.00 Live Load #: 962.00 360.00 1260.00 640.00 1625.00 3360.00 1440.00 STRESSES -K- -OK- -OK- -OK- -OK- -OK- -0K Fb.. Allow psi : 1500.0 1265.0 1200.0 1350.0 1200.0 2400.0 2400.0 Fb.. Actual • psi.: 1160.3 1249.6 728.9 1004.1 1053.9 1685.6 1670.2 Fv.. Allow • psi : 118.75 95.00 95.00 85.00 • 95.00 165.00 165.00 Fv.. Actual psi : 68.16 49.23 .62.08 51.58 94.99 96.41 103.92 DEFLECTIONS Center... Dead Load in : -0.064 -0.224 -0.020 -0.147 -0.036 -0.123 -0.186 X-Dist ft : 4.25 9.00 3.50 -. 8.28 3.25 5:84 6.00 DL Ratio : 1587 965, 4254 1473 2174 1175 775 • Live Load in : -0.088 -0.597. -0.053 -0.391 -0.054 -0.265 -0.218. • X-Dist ft: 4.25 9.00 3.50 8.28 3.25 5.92 6.00 • LL Ratio : 1163 362 1595 553 1435 544 659 Total Defl in : -0.152 -0.821 • - -0.072 -0.538 -0.090 -0.387 -0.404 X-Dist ft : 4.25 • 9.00 • 3.50 8.28 3.25 • 5.92 . 6.00 Ratio • - : 671 263 1160 402 864 372 356 + • • • + . V4.4C1 (c) 1983-96 ENERCALC FOTIADI & ASSOCIATES, KW06067 • • S FOTIADI & ASSOCIATES * : Melbrod Residence 3103 FALCON STREET Managua Place SAN DIEGO, CA 92103 Carlsbad, CA VOICE/FAX:(619)293-3530 . EGF - Date: 03/12/97 . Page: TIMBER JOIST & RAFTER DESIGN • framing #2 . kitch fb9 alt. rb 2 DESIGN DATA --- 1 2-:-- Timber Section : ....Depth in : 10.50 10.50 ....Width . in : 10.75 5.13 - Le:Unsupp ft : 0.00 0.00 Fb- Allow • psi,,: 2400.00 2400.00 Fv-Aiiow psi : 165.00 165.00 Elastic Mod. ksi.: 1700.00 1700.00 • Load Duration Factor : 1.00 1 1.25 Stress Ratio ->> : 0.89 0.50 CENTER SPAN -,-OK- -OK- Span Length ft,: 16.50 18.00 Uniform DL Of : 234.00 12.00 LL ' pit : 432.00 16.00 Point DL # : 1224.00 1000.00 LL # : 1400.00 1348.00 X-Dist • ft: 7.00 9.00 RESULTS S - * . Mrnax @ Cntr k-in : 392.50 - 140.40 • • - X-Dist ft: 7.04 9.00 REACTIONS - Left: Dead Lod # 2635.23 608.00 • Live Load # : 4370.06 - 818.00 • • Right: Dead Load #.: 2449.77 608.00 Live Load # : 4157.94 818.00 STRESSES _______ -OK- -OK- Fb.. Allow • psi : 2221.2 2964.1 Fb.. Actual psi : 1987.0 1490.9 • - •Fv.. Allow psi : 165.00 206.25 • • Fv.. Actual . psi : 85.31 39.09 DEFLECTIONS . - Center... Dead Load in : -0.330 )-0.284 • X-Dist • ft : 8.14 900 - DL Ratio -. : 600 762 Live Load in : -0.533 z -0.382 X-Dist ft : 8.14 9.00 • / LL Ratio - : 372. 566 S Total Defl in : -0.863 -0.665 X-Dist ft : 8.14 9.00- • - . Ratio . : 229 325 • 55 -. • • • V4.4C1 (c) 1983-96 ENERCALC • FOTIADI & ASSOCIATES, KW06067 S * • • S S )(OOL d) i) Olt ' 4 rV93rv ,,)bf r4 C/7 3r /(h O1 J) o,2 0 b o C. • L ph67 /7tIJ -h'o of •s'O qoop1/ 'z.Is. 1-I • /1 • Ne i'Z/)5)cj' • : • 41 • (3 ?f U5 oO • OF Z'X°h • k • • • • / 2 • • — (izg)7 g/ /i 'i''y. • 11 2/. • ci OQ ___________ •• Q )/C& °°/7d S 111. • 11 • • • • • 1MZ.' 1U/1? ((oT) PC/voov Qo (. V /cz srq t-ip itZ- /1. - /) USE C 8d e goop / I 4Yf jp _•Tr 'cj9 ___ T fJE HP/€i o( HO4 fv • 7 'r( vI{2f iu 1uoocQ MT'jI'[o iS1 FootJ6,1tf H Iblal /Bk31t1E#j t/) J- • • I /o 1T J1Cii2 : io C9tJ)8cQec Ito • • ••g7( S aecco titj joc4çc) • I SOil4 TlSTIRN!r P.O. Box 1195 Lakeside, CA 92040 April 2, 1997 . . (619)443-0060 Cal Coast Construction 7572 Trade Street San Diego,.Càlifornia 92121 Subject: File No. 9473. 2 Project No. 2005-6 . . Update to Limited Site Investigation 2912 Managua Place S La Costa area, City of Carlsbad Gentlemen: •2, In accordance with your request, this to update our Limited Site J Investigation, dated September 24, 1986. Since our report was. ,. completed, a residence has been constructed on this site. It is (\N our understanding that the residence is presently being remodeled and new footings are to be. used for the proposôd two story addition. The recommendations presented in our previously . referenced report still apply. We anticipate that footings 24 inches in depth will be needed in order to extend.through existing loose soils. We recommend that arepresentativé of this firm inspect, the footing excavations prior to placement Of forms and. steel reinforcing to insure that adequate depth has been achieved.', If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully submitted,' S S • ; C. ................................. . _ ,... cc: (3) submitted 9931 Channel Road 1 . P.O. Box 1195 son4 TESTERS _____ • Lakeside,CA 92040 (619) 443-0060 September 24 1.986 'H'u'rder Construction 3767. Wilcox Stre'et' San Diego.., California 92106 ., Subject: Project No. 2005-6 Limited Site Investigation. • .. Proposed. residential build,R ing site Managua Place • . •. . . . ,. '' La...Costa area, City'of :Crlsbad Dear Mr. Hurder: . The attached report has been prepared to present the . results of an investigation of the soil conditions at the subject site. The investigation was undertaken to provide the soil engineering criteria for site grading and to recommend an appropriate foundation 'system for : the typof structures anticipated, for, the proposed project. •• . . In general, we found loose native' soils. .to approximately 1-foot and soils with moderately expansive • .' • - characteristics. . • . . We recommend that the' foundation for the proposed structure extend through the loose materials at 'least 12 inches into firm natural ground if recompaction of the loose soil _~~Ts not.performede Recommendations for' foundationdesign to resist expansive soils are set forth in the attached Appendix .0 and should be utilized for this 'project. • • • Respectfully submitted, . th_6/L' gena D. 'Rosenwald, P.E. RCE 25.018 . .- BDR/em • . •• : • . .. • / Hurder, 9/24/86 Project No. 2005-6 ' INTIODUCTION . . . This is to present the findings and conclusions of .a ' 'soils. investiation'fOr a single family residence to be located on the east side of' Managua Place, LaCosta area, in the City of Carlsbad. A brief. legal description of the.site is: Lot 19, 'Carlsbad Tract 75-4 'La Costa' Estates ' The objectives of this investigation were to determine the e-xisting soil conditions and physical properties of ' the soils so that engineering recommendations could be presented for the safe and economical grading of the site: and fo'r' 'the design 'of foundations for' the proposed structure. In order to accomplish these. objectives 2:exploration trenches were excavated, chunk,' undisturbed and base ' bag samples of 'the on-site soils were obtained, and laboratory tests were performed on these samples' to determine' 'the necessary criteria. 2 - VV Hurder V 9/24/86 VV Project No. 2-005-6 FIELD INVESTIGATION V V Two exploration trenches were excavated with a Case 580: backhoe on September 23, 1986, at the approximate V location shown on the attached Plate No. 1, entitled V "Location of Exploration Trenches". •The trenches were V V excavated to depths of 1.0 to 5.0 feet below the''V V existing ground surface. A continuous log of the soils encountered in the trenches was recorded at the time of excavation and. is shown in detail on Plate Nos. 2 V V V V and 3 entitled "Summary Sheet". The soils were visually and texturally classified by the V field identification procedures set forth on the attached Plate No. 4 entitled "Uniform Soil Classification Chart". Field Densities and moisture contents were taken in V ' .conforniance with A.S.T.M. D1556-64. The approximate locations of these tests are 'shown on Plate No. 1. The test results are presented on the summary sheets. V CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS V The following summarized conclusions. and recommendations V• V are based upon the analysis of all the data 'and information obtained from "our soil investigation. This V includes our visual inspection of the site; field 4 I Hurder 9/24/86 Project No. 2005-6 .: . investigations and: classification ---of the soils; laboratory tests on soil samples an'aly-zed; and -our general knowledge and experience with the soils 'native to this site. . . . .• • The site is' suitable for the proposed development. provided the recommendations set forth in this report ' are carefully, followed. The surface soils extending to approximately 1 foot in ' depth have been classified as sand ard. clay mixtures • :...• •, and, although native to the site were found to be loose and conpressible. It is our. recommeñdatior if these • ' soils are not., removed and recompacted, that foundations for the propo,sed structure extend through 'the loose • •' .• surface soils at least 12 inches into firm natural ground. ' • • .•, . •• •• • ' ,-• . We recommend that footings for the proposed structure be founded in similar material. If footings are founded • • . partially in solid rock an partially in. native or •. • • • • compacted silty sands, differential settlement will • • •.• • • occur. The rate of settlement would be based upon the • • depth of material over solid rock If footings will not . • be founded in'similar materials, we should be contacted , for recomrnendjons to minimize potential damage to • • proposed structure caused by differential settlement. . • • •• 5. • • • • . Hurde 0 9/24/86 ProjectNo. 2005-6 GRADING If grading is proposed for the subject project, the :fol1owing grading specifications should be utilized. Site Preparation: Site preparation should begin with the removal of all deleterious matter and vegetation; Areas to receive fill and/or structural loads should be - - excavated to firm natural ground. Firm natural ground is defined as undisturbed soil having an in-place density of at least 85 percent of maximum dry density.as determined in accordance with A.S..T.M. Dl557-70, Method A. The exposed ground should then be scarified to a" dep'th.Of, 12 inches, moisture conditioned and recompacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry- density at a minimum moisture content at or slightly above optimum. 0 The over-excavated soils as well as, on-site fill 0 material should then be placed in compacted layers until desired elevations are reached. - - - Remedial grading operations should extend ,'.to -a minimum horizontal distance of .five,-feet beyond the perimeter, of the improvements. This includes isolated improvements such as retaining walls. The estimated depth of removal is 1 foot below existing grade. . It i_s recommended that.remova'l within parking areas be - extended to a depth of 1.0+foot' below finished grade. In any case, the existing soils to receive fill within parking areas should be scarified to a depth of 12 inches, moisture conditioned and recompacted. 6 - - Hurder 9/24/86 ' Project No. 2005-6' on-site clean s;iJity sands, decomposed granite or equal. 'A paistic. sheeting (moisture barrier) shall be placed below the concrete floor'slab. The concrete floor slab shall be reinforced. with 6X6-10/10 steel wire mesh or 'No. 3 steel bars placed at 36 inches on center both ways. C. It'is advisable to avoid locating planter boxes ,adjacent to building foundations and/or, parking - access areas; however,, if planter'.boxes are utilized in these areas, they shall be constructed with a gravel base and/or drain with the direction of drainage waters away from the building " fOundations, footings and floor slabs to the,-'street at the 'lower level of the site. ' BEARING 'VALUE A safe allowable soil bearing value of 15.00 pounds per . ' " •. square foot may be used when desinging continuous foundations and spread footings founded a minimum of 12 inches 'into firm natural ground o'r compacted' fill soils.'' ' ' This value may be increased by'20 percent for each , • additional foot of depth and/or 'width as set forth in the Uniform Building Code, Table NQ.' 29-B. If any soil types are encountered during the grading- operation that were not tested in the investigation, -' . • 9,,. Hurder. 9/24/86 Project No.. 2005-6 additional laboratory tests will be conducted in order to determine their physical characteristics and supplementalrepor€s and recommendations will ,automatically become a part of the 'specifications. 'The trench logs and related'information depict subsurface conditions only at the specific locations shown on Plate No. 1 and.on the particular datedesignated on the logs Subsurface conditilons at other.l'ocàtions maT differ from conditions occur'ring.at" thse trench locations. 'LIMITS OF INVESTIGATION he" recommendations of this report pertain only' to the site investigated and based upon the assumption that the soil conditions do'not,deviate from those disclosed in thè trenches. If any variations or under.sirable S ' conditions are encountered during construction, or if the proposed construction will'differ from that planned S at the present time, Soil Testers should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can b given. The findings in this report have been derived in ' accordance with'current standards' of practice and no warranty, is. expressed or implied. . • S ' .. This 'report is presented with the understanding that it , S is the responsibility 'of the owner, or his agent, or . S 5' • .5.. '10. S , S , •, Hurder 9/24/86 S Project No. 2005-6 representative, to insure that the recommendations in this report are carried out in the field. Additionally, it is the responsibility of the aforementioned personnel that the information in this report is brought to the attention of the "design team", consisting of architects, engineers, etc., such that all information can be incorporated into the building plans. The findings. in this report are applicable as of the present date. However, changes in the condition of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether the changes be due to natural processes of the works of man on this property or adjacent properties. In addition, the findingsdn this reportmay become invalidated due to changes in the state of the art of changes in applicable or appropriate standards used at thistirne, whether they result fromlegislation or from the broadening of knowledge. The findings in this report may be invalidated wholly or aTtiallyby forces and changes outside ,our knowledge or control. Therefore, - this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after-a period of three years. If you have any further questions regarding this; report, 'please do not hesitate to call us. Plates Nos. lthiough 4, Page L-1,' Appendix A and Appendix C are a part of this report.,.•. - Respectfully, submitted, 5 • r enja D. Rosenwald, P.E. • • RCE 25018 • BDR/em S '• • .4 & Hurder 'Projec't No 2005-6 9/2'44/86 .4 ., -' . . .4* .44 ,.4 - '_( 2, .• ' Plate No. .4 .4 . - - I - ' '. . '.. • . .4 74 \ SUMMARY S.H'EETNO. 2 .4 NO.2 - - .- ' ' • . .4 2 .. '' ',. . •t • 'N •'' • .4.4.4.4-2 .4 4 . .' . .4, , 4. -8 '. ,2' ,._ .4 . . .4 8', . - .' . 2 V •"-2. .4 U?" -. ''' ' • .4 .4 ' I ,, '. , ' DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION-". ',,, -.4 . ',',4. 2 ', • .4k' •4 '4' .4 8.. ' ' Surface " Red/brown, loose, dry, clayey sand .4 --.4 .4 •_ - .. - 1" Granite (refusal) 44. ll"-1 5 '-6 3 '2. . .4., '.4 . - .4 '81' •.4 .'4 ' ' '1• BOTTOM OF TRENCH DUG 9/23/86 ' L'_pl - - -. .4 -.4. . .4 4 2 ' •4 .4.. ' '.4 .4 .4. 4- , .4,4, ., ..4.• .4 . ' . .4 - .4. .4 '4.4 '' 4 .4 4-. •4'. 4 ''2 44 4. ., 8 .4.- , • , .4, *'•.4 .4 .4. .4 • . 1,4 - ',. . .4.,' ' - 4 -'4 1 . I 41 P '4' '.4, . . .4''..''' 8. .4 2 '2, "8 .'4,4 • A '4 84- 4 ".4 i,."! •4, " .4- ", 1 .4 .4'l't; .;.: , 2 .4- .4' . .8 ' ,4', .4 .4 .4. . .4 - .4' .4• .4 • .4.4 4 '.4 4 .4- -' ' . . " • 4'. ' .4 . . . 'y-". -' ' - ' 4 i-. - -• .4 "4 - .4 4 .4 .1.4 '4 -, . .44. .'8_ ',, .4 .4 .' 4 • .4 ,_ .4 .4 .,, - , 8. -.. -.4 . - . r- . '',- .4 4 -. .4 .4 .',l'- 44 .•.4 . 4 •. 4 . 4 4*44* .4 . 4 _ • ' 4. I, ' 4'-. 1 4.- • ' . 84 .4 - * 4'4 ' ' .4 "-' ' - '.'-' - - '' .4 . - 4 - . ' : , , • - - " . -' .4 I'-- • • ,j • .4 4. " "I" - ,- • ''4 .44 4 1 -, • ' - _ ,"*_ 4.' 44 .4 - '.4 . .4. 4 4, . - .4 ; 4 4 • . , • , , .4.4- .4 '- 4 ' '-i? * •'4 . - . .4 4 - . - • '4 - - ' - ' 4 e' '-'''' - .4. ,- 4 "'.' - .4 -.4- . .4,44* ..''.4,#•'' . . - .4 -4 .4 .4 t_ '.4 4' S S S - - S -- 5, - 4 * - . -" 5 1 -. - -. "S ' - • - - - • -, - * - - - - - S I 4 k T. le -) - j'6' 4 - ) ;;;- - 2 '5, - - -t 4 * - • • I - * S 4 - * " • ••4• S • 5- _,• Al -. - - * •, -. •*• • - - ' . - - - - - 5- - yzEE949'- 4 4 4-5 -S- '•'•, ' * 1 55 - - S • - :- "-V - • t_4 ,_ -5- 5- 4, - - t' - -. , 9931 Channel Rd Lakeside CA 92040 SOIL trJ (619) 443 0060 TESTERS BY DATE JOB -r / ,•*1,.,S / K -- .4 7 .4' Hurder Project No.' 2005T6 9/24/86 1- - '- Plate No. 2 . r • • - 7 - 7'- - - .. • .- .7 - .. .. - 7'. .. - . - 7 .- • . 7-,- .4-4-. 4 7; -. .• z7 . :- I. )••. 4 ' '. • .4 7, SUMMARY SHEET NO. 1' . • 4 1 ..TRENCHNO.41., 7 , •. , I • ;, - . S - 4 d•7, 7 I -. 7 '4 • •• .5 - ., . 4. . •• 7 . - '.--• -- .5'. '• '-- .4' '., ' -. .,' . ..•, . - . - - I .-. -+''.!DEPTH' . 4 .- .7 1• •. F. • '4'4, ,. SOILDESCRIPTION •'- . 7 - Surface Red/brown, loose, dry, clayey, sand- . .• . . ' . '. . - '.5... - . 7-.... • ., A_._.c • .-. .7... 1 0 Red/I6wn, medium dense, danp, clayey V. - ,-' sand. . I, .7 ,'.• . '- - .4 .'c. -- • 5.'. 4Fk •. -. -•... .• 2.0 '. Tan; dense *.damp, very, silt"-fine 101.2 20,.3 • /; - '- 'to medium. sand. '4. I * ' P .. - ' • • . * - . 4. -4 , 3 0- C.0 Tan, dense, damp4, very siltyj fine to medium sand with 'rock- 5.0 1 105.0 17.9 . BOTTOM OF TRENCH DUG1. 9/23/86 4 F • 4. ., •4.•• 7, , 7* • • -p', - •. 7- - 7 . 7.7 - 4- -' 7 .' . . ,•• . '. .a ' - -- . - • .,•'.* '4 7 . 4 4 7*- .- . r__3....................... ' '.**74 I • .7* + .7 - .7 •- P - •• -._ •.•,'47._ - j . - 4 •4 - 4..'.' • ..•*l., 7 -.- . -4- 4.. '*•4• -. 7777 - - .-.,7 .'.%: .. - , . 4. . *7 ..' ._•4 - ..... 7 . .4'- 4••••. - . I 9 • , - --::-. -'- -.,- --• :.• 7.*.7,z '4.'.t 7 ,. .4-. . 7-.. •'l . . ' -4 - 4 . . . . - .. 7. - 7. .7 - -.7 7 7.. 7-i.'. i- - - - . . 4 • - .'- - - - '..~ 4 - - . . -1 - !' . 7 . 7 .4 -4 F . 7. . 7 4 1 ,- , '.7 .., ,- . .. -• '-'4- .. - - 44 4 , . 7 .., . • .7. - . .7. RIZATION _____SYHBOL GROUP GRAPH- IUt TYPICAL NAMES IDESCRIPriON f _ WELL GW M t GRADED GRAVELS, gravel-sand mixtures. Wide range in grain size . • I5.c substantial amounts of all Inrernediate particle sizes. L o- GP10 0 "I! POORLY GRADED GRAVELS, gravel-sand mixtures. Predominately one size or a rang, of sizes with some intermediate sizes misting. u >m 11 C GM SILTY GRAVELS, gravel-sand-silt mixtures. Appreciable amount VIZ of non-plastic fines. 5 - E VU ._2 GC - - CLAYEY GRAVELS, gravel-sand-clay mixtures. Appreciable. amount ID of plastic flne. 0'• sw :--.' S WELL GRADED SANDS, gravelly sands. Wide range in grain size sa o' 6 substantial amounts of all Intermediate particle sizes p POORLY GRADED SANDS gravelly sands Predominately one size W or a rang. of sizes with some intermediate sizes missing M SM Ellulil SILTY SANDS, sand-silt mixtures. Appreciable amount of -c o 3 - a tfl - non-plastic fines. - sc C - CLAYEY SANDS, sand-clay mixtures. Appreciable amount VU Ots • of plastic fines. I- ML jjflfj] INORGANIC SILTS Very Fine Sands, Rock Flour, Silty or • VS ftjjjjj Clayey Fine Sands with slight plasticity. CL INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, gravelly -- • .-- VI—..—. [(j I- D clays. sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays. 01 ORGANIC SILTS 6 ORGANIC SILT CLAYS of low plasticity. v u -O tt -- X 0 . MH INORGANIC SILTS, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy [jj.di or silty soils, elastic silts. L .. CH iNORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTlCITY.fat clays. vs 0 OH EJ ORGANIC CLAYS of medium to high plasticity. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS P T PEAT & other highly organic soils. p::.. Legend: - •: UC = Unified Classification - Sample location E Sampler penetration resistence (ft. kips/ft.) - Y Natural dry density (pcf) - M- Field moisture content ( dry wt.) WT Approximate location of water table I,— — -. — — -' . k • — -• ____________ 9345 Winr Gardens Blvd MIL ThTI SOIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS APPENDIX C' RECOMMENDED PRECEDURES RE: EXPANSIVE SOILS For soils that are expansive with respect to change in volume with change in moisture content,' there is no economical way to absolutely prevent movement if there is a change in soil moisture content. Therefore, insofar as it is practicable, a stable soil moisture content should be,-established and maintained throughout the life of the structures.. Since it is' usually not practical to maintain a completely stable soil moisture content, in order to minimize the' ,undesi:reable effects of the expansive soils on the structures, if these soils are placed or allowed to remain within the upper, three feet below finish grade, it is recommended that the following special precautions be exercised in design and construction of slabs and foundations. a. Avoid -the use of isolated interior piers where possible. Continuous footings should be used throughout and these should ,be placed at a minimum depth of 112- feet below the lowest adjacent exterior final ground surface a(l) Where isolated piers, posts, foundations and footings are proposed, then special design recommendations shall be provided by the -architect/engineer to insure adequate consideration is included to offset the undesireable effects of 'the expansive so-ils. ' ' ' '• ' ' ' b Reinforce and interconnect continuously with steel bars all interior and exterior footings with at least one #4 bar at 3 inches above thebottorn of all footings and at' least one #4 bar placed l inches below the top of the stems of'the footings. .L(l) Where excavation and recompactioñ of on-site fill materials, is not done and footings that.extend l feet into the natural soil have a, total depth in'excess of .3 feet' .measured from finish floor to bottom of footing, then special footing reinforcing and/or slab reinforcing shall be provided by the structural engineer and item (bi above, shall be modified accordingly. • C. Insofar as 'practicable, maintain the moisture at 1 to 4 percent greater than optimum in the soil below the building to a depth of 3 feet below finish grade prior to placing concrete. It is to be noted that large amount,s of moisture, should not be added immediately prior to placing the 'concrete. This will result in expansion of the soil against the uncured concrete which could cause possible damage. d. In buildings where it is practicable to permit independent movement of slabs with respect' to foundations, such as in garages and warehouses, these slabs should be separated from the foundations by - inch thickness of construction felt or equiva- lent.. Special care should be exercised to assure that the separation extends to the full depth of the thickened edges of slab and that no door stops are at-tached to the building and also bear on the slab. e Use raised self-supporting floors that span between continuous footings or reinforce all concrete slabs on grade with 6x6-10/10 welded wire fabric. Page.] of 2. Revised 9-1-82 som_TESTEIq SOIL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS Post Office Box 1195 Lakeside, California 9204C (7 14) 443-0060 APPENDIX A RECOMMENDED EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS 1. General Description. The objective is to obtain uniformity and adequate internal strength in filled ground by proven engineering procedures and tests so that the proposed structures may be safely supported. The proce- dures include the clearing and grubbing, removal of existing structures, preparation of land to be filled, processing the fill soils, filling of the land, the spreading, and compaction of the filled areas to conform with the lines, grades and slopes as shown on the approved plans. The owner shall retain a Civil Engineer qual ified in Soil Mechanics (herein referred to as Engineer) to inspect and test the filled ground as placed to verify the uniformity of compaction of filled ground to the specified 90 percent of maximum dry density. The engineer shall advise the owner and grading contractor immediately if any unsatisfactory conditions are observed to exist and --shall have the authority to reject the compacted filled ground until such time that corrective measures are taken, necessary to comply with the specifications. It shall, be the sole responsibility of the grading con- tractor to achieve the specified degree of compaction. 2. Clearing, Grubbing, and Preparing Areas to be Filled All brush, vegetation and any biodegradable refuse shall be removed, piled and burned or otherwise disposed of so as to leave the areas to be filled free of vegetation and debris. Any uncompacted filled ground or loose compressible natural ground, shall be removed unless the report recommends otherwise, Any unstable, soft, swampy, or otherwise Unsuitable areas shall be corrected by draining or removal, or both. The natural ground which is determined to be satisfactory for the support of the filled ground shall then be plowed or scarified to a depth of at least six inches (6"), and until the surface is free from ruts, hummocks, or other uneven features which would tend to prevent uniform compaction by the equipment to be used. - RECOMMENDED EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS - (contd.) After the natural ground has been prepared, it shall then be brought to the proper moisture content and compacted to not less than 90 per- centof.maximum dry density in accordance with A.S.T.M. D1557-70 method which uses 25 blows of alO pound rammer falling 18 inches on each of 5 layers in a 1+ inch diameter 1/30 cubic foot cylindrical mold Where fills are made on hillsides or exposed slope areas, with gradT ients greater than 10 percent, horizontal benches shall be cut into firm natural ground in order to provide both lateral and vertical stability. This is to provide a horizontal base so that each layer is placed and compacted on a horizontal plane The initial bench at the toe of the fill shall be at least 10 feet in width on firm undisturbed natural ground at the elevation of the toe stake placed at the natural angle of repose of design slope The Engineer shall determine the width and frequency of all succeeding benches which will vary with the soil conditions and the steepness of slope. 3.. MATERIALS AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS. The fill soils shall consist of select materials free from vegetable matter, and other deleterious substances, and shall not contain rocks or lumps greater than 6 inches in diameter. This may be obtained from the excavation of banks, borrow pits or any other ap- proved sources and by mixing soils from one or more sources. If excessive vegetation,:. rocks,'or soils with inadequate strength or other unacceptable physical characteristics are encountered, these shall-be disposed of in waste areas as shown on the plans or as directed by the Engineer. If, dur- ing grading operations, soils are found which were not encountered and test- ed in the preliminary investigation, tests on these soils shall be performed to determine their physical characteristics Any special treatment recom- mended in. the preliminary or subsequent soil 'reports not covered herein shall become an addendum to these specifications The testing and specifications for compactionof subgrade, subbase, and base materials for roads, streets highways, or other public property or rights- of-way shall be in accordance with the standards of the governmental agency having jurisdiction 14 Placing, Spreading, and Compacting Fill Materials (a) When the moisture content of the fill material is below tht specified by the Engineer, water shall be added in the borrow pit until the moisture content is near optimum to assure uniform mixing and effective compaction 4 - . Page 3 RECOMMENDED EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS - (contd.) . . When the moistue content of the fill materials is above that speci- fied by the Engineer, resulting in inadequate-compaction or unstable fill, the fill material shall be aerated by blading and scarifying or • other satisfactory methods until, the moisture content is, near optimum as specified— (c) 'After processing, the suitable, fill materials shall be placed in layers which, when compacted, shall not exceed six inches (6"). Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be throughly mixed during the spread- ing to insure uniformity of material and moisture in each layer. (d), After each layer has been placed, mixed and spread evenly,' it shall be thoroughly compacted to not less than, thedeni,ty set "forth in para- graph 2 (c) above. Compaction shaLl be accomplished with sheepsfoot roller, multiple-wheel pneumatic-tired rollers, or other approied types of compaction equipment, such as vibratory equipment that is specially desig'ned,for certain soil 'types. Rollers shall be of such, design and maintained to such 'a level that .thy will be able to compact the fill material to the specified density. Tamping fe'et of sheepsfoOt rollers shall be maintained, such that the soil wi'll be compacted 'rather than sheared by the roller. Rolling shall be accomplished while the' fill rnateril. i.s at the, specified moisture content. Rolling of each layer shall be continuous over its entire area and the roller shall make 'suffieicnt trips to insure that the specified density ,has been 'obtained. Rolling'shall be accomplished in a planned procedure such that the entire areas to be filled shall receive uniform compactive effort. (e) The surfaces of the fill slopes shall be compated by 'means of sheeps'- foot rollers or other suitable equipment.- Compacting operations shall be conti'nued until the slopes are stable and until there ,is no appre- ciable amount of loose soil on the slopes. Compact ing'of the slopes shall be accomplished by backrol.ling the slopes in increments'of 3 to 5 feet in elevation gain or by other-methods producing satisfactory results. ' - - . Page 1 RECOMMENDED EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS - (contd.) Field density tests shall be taken for, approximately each foot in elevation gain after compaction, but not exceed two feet in vertical height between tests. Field density tests may be taken at intervals of 6 inches in elevation gain if requiredby th.e Engineer. The loca- tion of the tests in. plan shall be so spaced to give the best possible coverage and shall be taken no farther apart than 100 feet. Tests shall be taken on corner and terrace lots for each two feet elevation gain. The Engineer may tàké additional tests as considered necessary to check on the uniformity of compaction. Where sheepsfoot rollers are used, the tests shall be taken in the' compacted material below the disturbed surface. No additional layers of fill shall be spread until the field density tests indicate that the specified density has been obtained. The fill operation shall be continued in six inch (6") compacted layers as specified above, until the fill has been brought to the finished slopes and grades as shown on the accepted plans. Inspection. Sufficient Anspection by the Engineer shall be maintained 'during the filling and compacting operations so that he can veri-fy that th.e fill was constructed in accordance with the accepted specifications. Seasonal Limits. No fill material shall be placed, spread, or xolled if weather conditions increase the moisturecontent above permissible limits. When the work is interrupted by rain, fill operations shall not be resumed' until field tests by the 'soils engineer indicate that the moisture content and density of. fill are as previously specified: . Limiting Values of 'Nonexpansive Soils. Those soils that expand 3.0 percent or less from air dry to saturation under, a unit load of 150'poünds per square foot are considered to be 'none'xpansive. All recommendationspresented in the attached report are a part of these specificatiohs. TRASITION LOT'DE1AILS CUT-FILL LOT GROUND . 30"MIN. OVEREXCAVATE AND RECOMPACT ------------------- 7— UNWEATHERED BEDROCKOR A - _______ MATE tI A I l ? f t I 1 r ri t# - J • IMLMrrt1uvLJDy - - -• - - -: THEGEOTECHNICALCONSULTANT1 . ; k4 4 CUT LOT : I NATURAL GROUND REMOVE - _ ..—UNSUITABLE; - - MATERIAL : MIN. 30" Ml N ALL OVEREXCAVATE AND RECOMPACT UNWEATHE RED- BEDROCK OR 4 MATERIAL APPROVED BY I ,THE'GEOTECHNICALCONSULTANT1 2: NOTE Dcper overexcavotion and reompocfjon shall be p.rformed if dcterrnined1to be nects:ary 6y the "1,-6t chnicoI cc'''lIot NR-17-97 NON 09:48 CITY OF CARLSBACONN DE FAX NO. 4380894 P.03 \\cD )7 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE CITY OF CARLSBAD Plan Check No.76157 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DR., CARLSBAD, CA 92009 619)438-1'T61 061 This form. shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to verify that the project applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for the projects shall be issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate school district and returned to the; City of Carlsbad Building Department. . LYNN SCHOOL DISTRICT: fAciht~.R ;:ic iqAt4 Y ' Carlsbad Unified . San Marcos Unified V' ' 801 Pine Avenue : •. 1290 West San Maros Blvd. Carlsbad CA 92009 (434-0661) b J,San Marcos CA 92024 (744-4776) Encinitas Union- •J-c 'J!FIL - San Dieguito Union High School. 101• 5outhRäntho5anta Fe Rd. . 710 Encinitas Boulevard Li I-t" EncinitasCA 92024 (944-4300)t13 . Encinitas CA 92024 (753-6491) Project Applicant: ( ( . APN: — Project Address: 7_gJ2.._ RESIDENTIAL: SQ. FT. of living area ?? F''1 number of dwelling units SQ. FT. of covered area SQ FT. of garage area COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL: SQ. FT. AREA A44 Prepared by . ttv&i- Date 3(I*7 t (:, b FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the School District) Applicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080 Project is subject to an existing fee agreement . . Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. (other school fees paid) Other Residential Fee Levied: S based on • sq. ft. a - CogyrVindust Fee Levied: $ based on ...........sq. ft. Scho District Official •. Title Date -" ~Q