HomeMy WebLinkAboutAD 86-03; Mennen, Julia and others; 1992-0022665; Assessment District Related DocumentAfter Recordation Retum to:
City Engineer
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
2167
DOC II 1992-0022665
15-JAN-1992 11=52 m
OFFICIAL RECOFlDS
SAH 0IE60 COyHTY'"RECOR[iER'S OFFICE
AHHETTE EUAHS, COUHTY RECORDER
RF:
AF!
fiF;
6.00
7 AA
I a VV
FEES:
STREET SUPERINTENDENT/TREASURER
DIVISION OF LAND AND ASSESSMENT
"IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911"
DIVISION 7, STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
REQUISITES OF APPLICATION
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. N/A
IMPROVEMENT OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-3
APPLICATION:
The undersigned are all the owners and interested parties in that certain parcel of real
property identified as Assessment No's. 11 and 12 in that certain assessment diagram and
roll issued for the improvement of the district designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 86-3
pursuant to proceedings adopted by the goveming body, which said assessment diagram
and roll was recorded in the Office of the Superintendent of Streets. The imdersigned
hereby make this application to the Superintendent of Streets and the Treasurer for the
division and modifications of the above mentioned assessment, and request that the unpaid
balance of this assessment be apportioned to the present division of the property affected,
and that bonds be issued accordingly tc each of the respective parcels, all pursuant to the
provisions of Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomia.
A description of original Assessment No's. 11 and 12 is as shown on Exliibit "A" attached
hereto.
The imdersigned owners and interested persons hereby request that the above described
Assessment No's. 11 and 12 be modified and improvement bonds be issued accordingly to
each of the respective parcels as shown hereon.
The within application os assessment modification is hereby made because the original
parcel assessed under Assessment No's. 11 and 12 has been divided.
DATE
2168
LEGAL OWNERS AND INTERESTED PARTIES
\ i-G-Q o
I hereby certify that the hereinabove application and consent for assessment segregation and
amended assessment was duly filed in my Office on the 11 day of NO^^^BE^
I hereby reapportion said Assessment No. X ^ I ^ as follows:
New
Assessment
Number
Legal
Description
Segregated
Amount of
Additional
Amount per
Section 6458
liiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
No.
Bond
23 Pel B, MS 790 13,024.94 10.00 13,034.95
24 Pel C, MS 790 12,853.52 10.00 12,853.51
25 Pel A, MS 790 0.00 0.00 0.00
(L/.Jif-aiULjL
SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS ^/
As legal owner of Assessment No.
of the assessment.
^ / I hereby consent to the modification
LEGAL ASSESSMENT AND BONDHOLDER
2169
I, the appointed SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS, submit herewith the following "Report:
for approval and final confirmation, and do hereby set for the total costs and expenses of the
improvements and assess said costs against the parcels within the boundaries of the Assessment
District in direct proportion to the benefits received.
The costs to be assessed are set forth as follows with a detailed breakdown on the following
pages:
I. CONSTRUCTION $161,600.19
II. INCIDENTAL EXPENSES 65.425.50
III. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION AND INCIDENTAL EXPENSES .... 227,025.69
IV. CONTRIBUTION 18,883.98
V. BALANCE TO ASSESSMENT 208,141.71
The parcels and properties to be assessed are generally set forth as follows:
Assessment
Number
Tax Code
Parcel
Amount of
Assessment
1 156-230-37 $ 0.00
2 156-230-38 0.00
3 156-230-41 26,256.96
4 156-230-42 26,285.50
5 156-230-49 26,071.27
6 156-230-50 26,007.00
7 156-230-52 25,921.31
8 156-230-59 19,708.77
9 156-230-60 32,112.44
10 156-230-62 0.00
11 156-230-63 13,024.92
12 156-230-64 12,853.54
The district costs have been spread to each parcel in relation to the benefits received. This has
been based on the front footage of each parcel in accordance with previous presentations to the
City Council.
The three parcels receiving a zero assessment have exercised their option to construct the
improvement themselves and thus the City's contractor did not complete any work along those
parcels. A portion of the cost to initiate the District and to prepare the plans, however.
- *
T " 2170
benefitted these parcels. This cost ($18,883.98) has been shown as a City contribution to the
district. This "contribution" is offset by permit fees which were paid by the three property
owners who completed their own frontage improvements.