HomeMy WebLinkAbout1964-03-17; City Council; Resolution 9951
2
z
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
.2 3
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
RESOLUTION NO. 995
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD DENYING THE REQUEST FOR RECLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, FROM ZONE R-1 TO ZONE C-1.
WHEREAS, on January 28, 1964, Nelson E. and Ida M. Westree applied
for a reclassification from Zone R-1 to Zone C-1 on property located at the
Northeast intersection of Las Flores Drive and Pi0 Pic0 Drive in the City of
Carlsbad; and
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing of the proposed reclassification
was published on the 30th day of January, 1964; and
WHEREAS, on the 11th day of February, 1964, the Planning Commission
of the City of Carlsbad held and conducted a duly advertised hearing on said
proposed reclassification; and
WHEREAS, at said meeting of the Planning Commission, Resolution No.
334 was adopted wherein the request €or reclassification was denied; and
WHEREAS, on the 12th day of February, 1964, a written appeal was
received by the City of Carlsbad from N. E. Westree, which appeal in effect
requested the City Council to consider the action of the Planning Commission
in denying the request for reclassification of the above-mentioned property; and
WHEREAS, on February 20, 1964, notice of a public hearing on said
appeal was published; and
WHEREAS, on March 3, 1964, a public hearing was held in the City Hall
2960 Pi0 Pic0 Drive, Carlsbad, California, at 7:30 P. M., at which time the
appeal was considered by the City Council and evidence and arguments were
presented by all interested parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Carlsbad that the findings of the Planning Commission in denying the
request for reclassification be affirmed and that the appeal therefrom by
applicant be denied for the following reasons:
I
4
I
4
I
t
!
1(
1:
1:
1:
1L
1:
le
17
1E
1s
2c
21
2%
.2 3
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
1.
2.
That the property is close to well established R-1 residences.
That the U.S. 101 Freeway plans are not firm so we do not know the
location of the future off-ramp.
3. That although there is an off-ramp, there is no need for this rezoning
since the improvements of the highway are some time in the future.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that for the foregoing reasons the appeal
is hereby denied.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby directed
to cause a copy of this resolution to be mailed to the appellants, and a copy of
this resolution to be attached to the Planning Commission file and returned to
the Planning Commission for permanent filing.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Carlsbad held on the 17th day of March, 1964, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Cmn. McPherson , Bierce, Guevara, Neiswender and
Hughes. NOES: None
ABSENT: None
of the City of Carlsbaa, Carlsbad, California
"
iTTEST:
Xty clerk
SEAL)
-2 -