HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-12-19; City Council; Resolution 30363.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
RESOLUTION NO. 3036
A RESOLUTION OF THE CARLSBAD CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING PRECISE ALIGNMENT OF ELM AVENUE AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN
The Carlsbad City Council does hereby resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, said Planning Commission did on the 10th day of October, 1972
hold a duly advertised public hearing as prescribed
amendment to the Circulation Element of the General
precise alignment of Elm Avenue, Easterly of El Cam
boundary of the proposed "Tang1 ewood" Development.
by law to consider an
Plan by declaring the
no Real to the easterly
WHEREAS, said Planning Commission has found the following facts
exist: I.
that Alignment I'D" as shown on Specific Plan/Tentative Map,
would be in the best interest of the City of Carlsbad for the
That the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council
following reasons:
a. existing ravines. That it does not require large earth fills across
b. with road centerline predominently along existing property lines or making use of existing Appian Way right of way.
That it provides access to most parcels in the vicinity
c. That it can be extended eastward with minimum earthwork.
, d. That it provides good sight distance.
WHEREAS, that on November 8, 1972 Council deferred all matters
relating to alignment of Elm Avenue to December 19, 1972 to Planning
Commission to hear the final E.I.R. prior to Council action.
WHEREAS, said Planning Commission did on the 7th day of December
hold a duly advertised public hearing to consider a Final Environmenta
Impact Report submitted by Larwin-San Diego, Inc., on property located
1972
easterly of El Camino Real between the extensions of Elm Avenue and Marron
Road, for a 506-lot residential development and alignment of Elm Avenue.
WHEREAS, said Planning Commission has found the followfng fact to
exist:
1. That the Larwin "Tanglewood" Development and the Alignment D of
Elm Avenue Extension do not, in themselves, represent a significant
* f . I-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
environmental impact, (Ref. Resolution #862)
2.
and amendment to the circulation element of the General Plan.
MOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council does hereby adopt:
Resolution No. 861, recommending precise alignment of Elm Avenue
(a) Final environmental impact report.
(b) Adopt, per exhibit "A" (Specific Plan/Tentative Map), in-
corporated herein, as the alignment of Elm Avenue and
amending the Circulation Element of the General Plan.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council
held on the 19th day of December, 1972 by the following vote, to wit;
AYES: Counci lmen Dunne , NcComas , Lewis, Chase and Frazee.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: 140 ne.
Mayor
ATTEST :
Ci€y Q'lerk
-2-