HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-11-07; City Council; Resolution 55811
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
1s
2c
21
22
2:
24
25
26
27
2E
RES0 UTION NO. 5581
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE AMOUNT
OF FEES TO BE REQUIRED AS A CONDITION
OF APPROVAL FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP-
MENTS WITHIN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE
SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 4.7, Division 1, Title 7 of the
Zalifornia Government Code, the City Council of the City of
Zarlsbad, California has adopted a School Facilities Dedication
2nd Fee Ordinance (Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 21.55); and
WHEREAS, Section 21.55.150 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code
?rovides that the standards for the amount of fees to be required
?ursuant to such ordinance shall be determined by the City Council
2nd set by resolution. The City Council's determination is to be
nade after consideration of recommendations from the governing
ooard of the affected school district; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is in receipt of recommendations
in regards to the amount of fees from the San Dieguito Union High
School District. Their recormendation is attached hereto as Exhibi.
"A", and is made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, the City Council fully considered the matter at their
adjourned regular meeting of October 10, 1978 at which all persons
desiring to speak on the matter were heard, after which the City
Council determined to concur in the standards as recommended by
the Board of the San Dieguito Union High School District;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Carlsbad as follows:
A. That the above recitations are true and correct.
B. That the standard for the amount of fees to be required
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
€
S
IC
I1
l!
2(
2:
2:
2:
21
2;
2(
2'
2i
s a condition of approval for residential developments within that
lortion of the City of Carlsbad, which is also within the
!oundaries of the San Dieguito Union High School District, shall
te as contained in Exhibit A.
C. This determination is based upon the City Council's
:oncurrence in the recommendations made by the Governing Board
)f the San Dieguito Union High School District, including the facts
;upporting such recommendations as contained in Exhibit A.
D. Unless the decision-making body especially determines to
:he contrary, the City Council hereby determines that the following
findings and requirements shall apply to any residential develop-
nent of fifty units or less:
1. All such developments shall be required to pay fees in accordance with the schedule in Exhibit A.
2. The City Council has reviewed that portion of the
General Plan which applies to the San Dieguito
Union High School District and finds that it provides
for the location of public schools.
That the fees to be paid shall be used for the purpose of providing interim school facilities.
That the fees to be paid for each unit bear a reason-
able relationship to the burdens placed on the School
District by such unit and that the fees will be used
to mitigate that burden.
are consistent with the City's General Plan.
3.
4.
5. That the school facilities to be funded by the fees
E. The standards adopted by this resolution do not at this
time require the dedication of land. The San Dieguito Union High
School is developing standards regarding such dedications.
the District is prepared to make their recommendation in that
regard, the City Council intends to amend this resolution to
include provisions for requiring the dedication of land as they
When
determine to be in the public interests.
2.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
15
2c
21
22
2:
24
2E
2e
27
2E
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Jity Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the
7th day of November , 1978 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES : Councilmen Skotnicki, Anear and Councilwoman
NOES: Councilman Lewis
ABSENT : Councilman Packard
Cas1 er
RONALD C, PACKARD, Mayor
ATTEST :
(SEAL)
3.
3,
.* c .I
I1
e
EGUPT
UNfORl HIGH SCHOOL D!STR116'11" --
2151 NEWCRSTLE, cmm-, CALIF OR HI^^ 92007 714-753-6491
Carl sbad City Counci'l k. Ronald C. Packard, Mayor 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008
. Dear Mr. Packard:
Attached please find a Resolution adopted'by the San Dieguito Board of Trustees regarding conditions of overcrowding in school attendance areas in the District. Enrollment in the San Dieguito District has increased over 90% during the past ten years and is expected to continue into the immediate future. The Board has moved to accommodate this growth by a combination of permanent and portable! temporary facilities that have been provided during that time. e
Voters approved a bond issue in 1971 that provided a second high school,s'n the District as well as significant additions and renovation to the only other high school in the District. to help offset the cost of providing facilities for students generated from new hausing developments. over &ten year period that have been utilized to supplement the permanent facilities
on each of the District's four school sites. The eighteen portable buildings purchased since 11974 are being financed by contributions fro3 developers.
Since 1972 the Board has encouraged developer contributions
The District has added forty-four (44) temporary buildings
In spite of the addition of new permanent and portable facilities, enrollmeat. growth in the District has continued to outstrip the District's ability to provide adequate facilities. After a thorough evaluation of future facility needs last year, the Board determined in December 9977 that placing additional portable buildings at
sltes throughout the District would place an undue strain on permanent core faciiilies, The Trustees modified the developer contribution schedule basing the rate on the estimated cost of providing permanent facilities on existing school sites taken into consideration when setting the schedule included: Factors
1.
2.
The per student costs of constructing junior and senior high schools under a State formula provided by the Office of Local Assistance The number of students generated from new housing developments within the San Dieguito Union High School District
BOAR0 OF TRUSTEES: Wllliam F. Howell Ann P. Sensibaugh . R. Qarry Shlrts Don W. Mitchell Oavld ti. Thompson
ADMINISTRATION: Willlam A. Barrier,
Bresldent Vice Prasident Clerk
Robcrt A. Morton, John L'DaWy.
Business Managor Assistant Supeetntondant Superintendent
1.
.1
I,
Letter to Carlsbad City Council September 29 1978 - Page 2
3. Capacity at each campus in the San Dieguito Union High School District
Attached is a copy of the Board's Resolution along with Board policy and background information on school construction costs. information upon request. I will be pleased to provide additional
Sincerely , -
iilliam A. Berrier Superi ntendent
bfs
cc: Hr. Paul Bussey, City Manager
Attachments
. ,*
.. . ..
.. a .
Shirts .- . On motion of Meniber Thompson seconded by Member the fol'lowing resoiution 'is adopted:
WHEREAS, for some time past there has been a continul'ng and'substantiaf increase in population within the boundaries of the Sari Diequit0 Union Hiqh School District to the extent that the school facilities of this district have become overcrowded; and
district results from construction of residential units in new housing develop- . - ments within the district; and
.. or dedications of land from the developers sf such new residential developments this district'would lot have financial. resources adequate to provide proper ed- ucational
MiEREAS, a very significant proportion of the increase ir, population in this
.- ..
. WHEREAS, in the absence of assistance in the form of financial contributions
.. . - *- - facilities for a17 the children residing Sn this district; and *.
&d*
.WHEREAS, Chapter 4-7 (comeking with Section 65970; added by Stats, 1977, . _.
Chap. 955), Division 1, Title 7 to the Goverwr" Code making provi.sion.fsr financial or other assistance by developers ta school districts if the governing board of a schcol district has made a finding that conditions of ov2rcrowding exist. in ~lii? or rriore attendance areas of the district incltrdins the specific data speci fi ed in Government Cod2 Section 63971 ; NO'IJ THEREFCRE
IT IS RESOLVED AND DFTEXMXNED that, pursuant to Government Cod? Section 65975
.. - .. .. ~
this governing board Rakes th2 following findings: . t
. -- . ' (I) Conditions OB overcrowding exist in the following attendance area? ~ .. ofthe San Diegtlito Vnion Hiuh School District which will impair .-
.- .. the norm: functiming cf educational programs in' those areas: .-
.. . . San Dieguito High School - Grades 9-12 .. ./ _- .- -. . . -. .. .- Torrey Pines High School - Grades 9-12
Earl Warren Juntcr High School - Grades 7-6 .-. ..
.- -. .. .. Oak Crest Juniclr High School - Grades 7-8
*. =r , ..
.( 2) Reasons for the condi tl'ons of overcrowding -in the above-menti cried * :: attendance areas i ncl ude fhe fol 1 owi rig :
.. CURRENT . CURRENT CAPACITY .
.. . - ENROLLMENT PERMANENT AND PORTABLE . .
..
city that
1785 1955 . * . . 1734
.- 0- 'San Dieguito High Schoal . 1943
983 .
Torrey Pines High School ' Oak Crest Junior High School .95Q *. . Earl Warren Junior Righ School . : * 630 . , 6 832 I.
In addition to the siudents presently ,enrolled, the County or the respbnsible has approved numrous developnents in each of the above namd attcndmce areas have potential for further impacting District schools. The annual increase
.. .. . 1
8. -
.* a ..
in.st'udent pcpulation has veraged approximately 4% over the past four years
'and this rate is expected to continue in the immediate future. The students currently rrnro11 ed, combined with those anti ci pated from new developments a1 ready approved has- .suited in an overcrowded condition at each of the schools listed above. .-
(3) A1 1 reasonable methods of ml" tigating conditions of overcrowding have been Mitigation .. evaluated and no feasible method for reducing such conditions exists. measures considered by the governing board of this district to reduce the overcrowded ~ condi ti ons i ncl ude the dol 1 cwi ng :
contributed financial assistance toward the cost of providing temporary use buildings. Other temporary buildings have been financed cut of the District's general fund so that each site contains a mix of.temporary and permanect facilities.
District voters approved a bond measure that provided the first phase of a new high school l"n 1974 that is seriously overcrowded in spite of the addition
a) The District has entered into agreements with developers who have
..
..
b)
of sixteen (16) portable classrooms at that site since the fall of 1995. .-
c .- ' . c) Student buricg and boundary realignments are not feasible alternatives -- at the high school level since both of the District's two comprehensive high schools are overcrowded. These alternatives have been considered at the junior high levkl; however, those cainpuses are projected to exceed capacity prior to the completion of develcpments that have already received approval from the approp-iate governmental .. .. .. . . _. -.
.. .. .. .. .
. : body. .. .
d) Such alternatives as year-round operation and double sessions have been examined by committees of parents and staff, but have been rejecteg due to what is - ".. wsidered to be a negative impact on the instructional program-
e) The District has no "surplus" real property or "low priority school facilities", therefore this is not a feasible alternative for increasing school . .
. capacity.
f) Following a coinprehensive study-by a "Facilities Cormittee", the B&rd, on June 1, 1978, identified the facilities required to keep pace with District growth. One new junior high school was called -Foreplus additional pernianent facilities on each of the District's four existing campuses. it impossible to finance new school construction through bond issues that are repal'd by a tax on property.
Additional temporary buildfngs on the sites a'dentified above would put a severe strain on existing core facilities, thereby necessitating an expansion of permanent buildings at both the high school and junior high level. appears to be the only logical alternative available to mitigate current conditions of overcrowding
growth projected for this area can only be accotnnodated by the construction of new permanent facilities. to aCCGRiinOdate future growth in the District has been exhausted.
in the Porin of financial contributions or dedications of land is necessary in order - to try to keep abreast of population growth and even with such assistance, any sign-
"icant reduction in the conditions of overcrowding will be difficult trnti'l sufficient
Passage of Proposition 13 has mGde
*
Expansion-of perinanent facilities
(4) The conditions of overcrowding in this district and the explosive population
The use of temporary use buildings/relocatable structures
Support by developers
c .
*. .,
$.
funds' can b; generated tomvide addi tionai permanent claroom buildings.
B
' BE IT. FURTHER RESOLVED APlD ORDERED that the Secretary of this Board deliver 2rtified copies of this resolution to the city councils and/or the Board of Super- visors of all cities and County within whose bouridaries the school district lies
. subdividers', and builders' 'contributions to mitigate inpact on school facilities
. to indicate the type and scale of assistance considered appropriate to meet 'the
7 -.together with copies of this District's policy on the subject of dwelopers',
needs of thjs district.
PASSED.AND ADGPTED by the Governing E&C cf the sari Dieggito Unior: Ei2h sctt00'1 . District of San Diego County, Cali'fornia. this 28th day of September 9
1978.
-. .. .. .. . .
.. .- . . ,. . ..
. .. .. .. .- . . . . . , . .. . ._: -. '
1.
I. .- . e. I 1 NEW CONSTRUCTION
* . e. 0.
Availability of Facilities
c'
.. ..
....
' ..
..
...
..
c
... -. .. ..
..
..
..
7100 3110+
..
._ .. ..
-.
. . It is the goal cf the San D-l'eguito Unicn High School District Board of Trustees to provide the best possible learning er?viror"nt for.al1 of. the students who live within the houndaries ~f the San Dieguito Union High School District,
Hopefully the District patrons and registered voters will conlincle to support the school district through the authorization of bonds for the construction of p&"nent. school facilities, hwever rapid growth within the District may require alternative
te,mporary classrooms alorq wi.th otkr solutions will be utilizsd to the inaximus extent the District hzs the financial resources to devote La this end in order tu avoid the requirenmt ti3 operate on double sessions. The Administration and Board -. of Trustees will explore every legally available avenue to secure such fundsa and/or financial assistance ta provide the space needed to maintain 8 quality ~h~citti~n~l program.
. Because a high quality educational prograrrr benefits not only students and the eomunity but also ben5fi-k land d2vefopers and builckrs by facilitating the saie of their hones, it shall be the policy of the Board to irx1ucIe propwty deve1ope~1.s
* and builders within tk class of persons from whom financia3 and Gtiler contributions will be vigorously solicited, *
discretion, to extend coopsration'to developers and builders who assist the District in the task of providing iriterin txeasures to maintain the high quality of the educational programsnd such cooperation shall be in the sam measure as the assistance provided by the developer,
The Superintendent is authorized to prepare administrative regulations that wi'l I .
(a) provide guidelines for determining the availability of school facilities lo meet . the needs of the projected enrollment and (b) s'denti.fy th2 level of developer sttpprspt:
factors to be considered are:
9. The availability of school facl'litl'es to aceammodate the projected enrol Iment,
2. 'The anticipated impact of proposed development.oa school enrol tment.
3. The timing and certainty of the deveiopep's buildirig plans'.
4.' The typa bf school facilfty needed when conditicns of overcrowding exist.
5, The provisions of local building.ordinances with regard to residential devel opmen t .
- .
.
~ .. solutions to the scheof housing prcblems on an interim basis. During this period,
. -.
- ~ -_
0 -. -. .. 1
*. .* .. . It wi'lj'be the poficy cf th2 Soard of Trustees, within the legal limits of its . .- . ( ..
b. .,
.
requl"red to mitigate canditicns of overcrowding in Dfstrict sch031~. Among the: ... .. - -- -- . _*- .I ... -.
s- ... ... ..
0. .~
.
I.
t -* ... ..
Policy ,Adopted: DecemSer 1, 1977 (effective 12/2/77) .
.. . .- .... .... .* - : =::. :<*
but does not exceed the maximum considered acceptable by the Board of Trustees .. -. e:*
to maintain a proper learning environment, interim steps are possible with . -e,
developer or other assistance toeincrease plant capacity,
....... . If the projected enrel7ment for the school is grea'ter than the curreni cibacity a-
...... .- . ---
.*. .. - .. . -I .- * . . .-*. ..... .. .. .. ..
... ... .. -.. = - : ., .-. * - .. '
... *. -. i c 2.
*. -.
I. .. 4- C' * .. .-.. - . e*. - . ._ Administrative Regulation Issued: December 1 1977 (effectivek/2/77) lj2 -* . Revised. -*
..
Cooperation with Govmmental Aqeccy Respons i b7 e for i?esid~?ntia7 Sevelopnent .
The administration is to evaluate the impact of each prbposed subdivision,. rezone, or special use pemit, to determinr? the impact that will occur on the District's iibility to provide adequate school services and facilities for area students,
. 1
to 0- . .. ... ..
. A. . Suffkient Capacl"t2 - Tf it can be'detemined that the capacity of ........
... . , enrollment, a letter of availability wii? be providsd tu the appropriate .
; -'.. :',:'. facilities will not b,o available to serve the students projectlid frqrif. i.:'.:? .*.:. - .. : -
..
..
. -" . ti?$ particular school is sufficient to accomiodate the projected . .
....... .... ....... ... .- ... ... .... .. '. . . -. :- governmenbf. agency, .... .. . . - . .-. ..-?. *..I. 9 ....... ... ... .-. _. .. ... ...: :. :-.
. t : : ::c+-
:::--..a-
. .* -.
... ... .... . ... -.. .- .... .. -. .. - .-. .. ..
. ....
..
.A
..... .. ..........
.. .. .. ,. . :;'. - .~ ,: ,'...* . - .' B. . Insufficient Capacity - PP -it is detemined that adequate services and . . --.-e ~ .-
... .... .- . . the propos& sthdivision, rezone, or special USE permit, .the admints-. . -
- .. . ,_ ._
...... .. . . -..::- . .: -*..a-
... . -- . c -.. . .. . _.- . -.- .
.... .... -..- .. -. I ... .-_.. . . tration a.iif'% so notify th2 appropriate gokrmmentai .agency, .. 4 ........ ... ... .... ... ........ - c . ._ ~ .a '
... ...... . .... :. -. ?. t .. .. -' .. .. - .. . ,,* .. - .. .. .. I I. . . . :.
.. _.
.. .. .-. .- .. - '1~'. .. Increasing ~riia~lment ~apzcity , , ..
....
... .....
..
.. ... .. - ..
#" . -
.. , *- . .. .-,:e.
D'
* r. ...* .- . ..
.. - .. -:* *--
.- . . - ., .. .. . *.
. . '._ .. .- '-2 .. " .* . . ..
.. -.
...
a. ..
* -. ._
... .* ..
. . a*' . .. ,. ..
...
.. ,
.. ..
.... .. .,
.... ... .- ._ .. *.
..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. ? *. .. ..
Administrative Regulation Issued: December 1, 1977 (effective i2/2/77) '-. 212 . - ;- .a .. :* '.
-. ...
.. .. Revised :
i ,.. .. .I r
f . -. ..
:# . ..
.... *. .. .. * v __~-- r_ln ~ P)llliF _--I__ *. 'j * - --= ----- *-- . -----"- - ,
71 00 -.
3170 3h, DIEGUITO UNlbN HIGH SCHOOL @TRICS . . .-. .... ~ .
. .. .. ..
STUDENT HOUSING CAPACITY -. FALL 1978
I.
.I. 9-12 High Schools - Regular Schedule ..
The capacity of a senior high school plant is calculated on a space utilization
factor of approximately 85% of the teaching stations at 30 students each. The abi I i ty to ful ly uti 1 i ze avai 7 able instructional space depends on such factors
as properly balanced classes and a class size average close to the maximum. .
. education classes- -.
-
-1. San Dieguito currently has 70 teaching stations ,including six physical
40 x 39 = 2100 x 85% = 1785.
... . -. _. ..
2. Torre Pines has 68 teaching stations including six physical education i -
.&judes lecture hall and 1.A. room)
. .- . 68 x 30 =. 2040 x 85% - ’8734
If. .7-5 Jgnior Highs - Regular Schedule
-. The cstpscity of a junior high plant is normally calculated on a-utilization ..
factor of 90% with 28 students’per teaching station.
1. Earl Warren noN his 33 teachjng stations.
.. *I
. .. . .. ... .. <.
_: . .
33 x 28 = 924 x 90% = 832
-I .-. .- 2. Oak Crest now’has 39 teaching stations; -. - . - --a ’
# 39 x 28 = 1092 x 90% = 983 .-
111. Exceeding Capacity - It is possible to exceed projected capacity at both tire high school or junior high level by such procedures as: -. -: A. Schedule modification - extending the school day to permit mre -
students to take’ advantage of specialized facila’ties such as shops and laboratories,
B. Facility modification - utilization of space not specifically designed for instructional pruposes areaso etco i . e. , faculty 1 ounges , storage
While both procedures Rave been utilized to increase plant capacity, they do not provide an optimum learning environment for students.
.I
. ’
.. .
e 0. SAN DIEGUITO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
3110 . .'
SUGGESTED DEVELOPER FINANCIAL AIDE FORMULA ., .. 0. .. . .. . .. . .. . . -. .. _. .- .. .- . . f . ESTIMATED COST OF PEiifiIANENT FACILITIES/STATE-!JIDE
The State Departxent of General Services, Office of LocaJ Assistance, provides
* a formula for support of school building programs in districts eligible for . . . State assistance,
foot for different types of buildinss-at the high schcol and junior high level, Although San Dieguito Union High SC~GO~ District is not eligible for this
assistance, the Pomula provides a guide for detetMning the cost of sonstfuckin~ permanent buildings under the State aid formula,.
In a report to the Legislature in 1975-76, the per pup:? costs af canstmeting permanent facilities was listed at $4,745 per pupil for high school and 53,396 It is estimated that construction costs have ir,ct-easecf .
between one and txo percent per month during the two year .pwjod since "thk . report was issued, . Therefore, the estimated per pupif cost af providing
This formula identifies an sllowable base cost per square
' ..
. -. . I.. .. -
.
.for junior high, .
.
*. permanent sekcal facilities is: 1. ...
1% pep month increase 2% per n9nth -r"ncrease
High School 5+,738 x 124% = $5,875 High School $4,738 x 148% = $7-,012 . Junior High 3,390 x 124% = $4,204 - Junior High 3,3CO x 1482 = $5,617
e. -.
'11 ~-. ESTIMATED COST OF PERMANENT FACILITIES/SAN DIEGUITO HIGH SCHCOL DISTRICY ..
' The most current State aid b-mula has been applied to the actual btlilhings in phase I and to thcse plznned for construction during phase I1 at Torrey Pices
. .- High School. An estimate has been made for provfding a complete facility for ._ . approximately 2,QQO students including site work, furnishings, and fees, Similar
criteria was developed for 7-8 junior highs developed around th2 requirements of an existing campus in the San Dieguito Union High School Bistr'ict, land is excluded from the cost estimates for providing fa'cilities at bath the .
. The estimated cost of construbtion tabulated an a per pupfl basii
The cast of
'
-. . -.. . .- .- S$ate and local Bevel. ..
S & .. fQf70WS:
-- -. *. .High School - $6,401 .. .. Junior High . 4,544
.. .. .
.. * 111. ESTIMATED STUDENTS PE2 DYELL1I:G UNIT
DWELL IN^; TYPE '. Grades 7-8 Grades 9-12 Grades 7-12
&- Single or Multi-Family, 3 QP more bedrooms -.
or equivalent rooms 0 -12 9 25 .- 37
. or equivalent rooms . *05 .I1 . . 016 Single or Multi-Family Homes, 2 bedrooms
- a. Mu1 ti-Family Homes, I bedroom or equivalent room . .02 904 . -06
.-
e
HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS MODEL
2000 STUDENTS ENR INDEX 2666.4 15 November 1977
I. BUILDINGS
A. Academic
I. Science 2. Math 3. English
4. .Language 5. Social Studies 6. Business 7. Library 8. Lecture
3. Toi-lets 10. Offices 11. Circulation
12. Subtotal .
B. Administration
1. Complete
C Voca t ional
I Metal/Wood/Auto/ Brafting/Other
. D. ' Art/Homemakinq
1 Arts/Crafts 2. Homemaking
3. . Subtotal
u
t
12,500 S.F. 9,000 S.F. 12,600 S.F,
7,200 S.F. 12,300 S.F. 7,880 S.F.
'16,200 S.F, 3,600 S.F, 1,500 S.F. 6,700 S.F. 10,400 S.F.
99,800 S.F.
$ 64.28" 37 e 26"
37 26* 37 e 26*
37 26"
43.88*
40.91* 106 72* 46.75"
35 40*
.43*11*
-
$ 803,500,
335 , 340.. 469,476
268,272 e 458,298 336 $258, 71 0,856 147,276. 7 60,080e
31 3 225
368 ,I 60
$3,576,185.
7,600 S.F. 46 0 75"
. .'19,000 S.F. 40.57"
6,000 S.F* 39 03*
5,500 S.F. 47,41*
'81,500 S.F,
E. Physical Education (no stadium, no pool)
. I. Gym/Aux. Gym 26,800 S.F. 38.37"
2. Shower/Locker 11,500 S.F. 52.26"
3. Subtotal 38,300 S.F,
*OLA Allowable Base Schedule for San Diego
$355 300 -
$770,830'
p.:
$234,184. 260,755
$494,935 n
$1,028,376,
600,990.
$1,629,306.
k: *
.I ._
1-
JR. HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS MODEL 1000 STUDENTS ENR INDEX 2666.4 15 November 1977
-_
I. BUILDINGS
1.
2. 3. 4. 5, 6. 7. 8, 3,
10. 11 e 12;
13.
General C1 assrooms Li brary/Media Center Homemaking Shops Mu1 t i-purpose Kitchen
Shower/Locker Administration/Teacher Storage
Toi 1 e ts Janitor Mec h/ Eq u 7' p /Mi s c . Circulation
TOTAL BUILDINGS
26,000 S.F.
1,860 S.F. 2,100 S.F. 3,000 S.F.
2,000 S.F.
2,000 S.F. 2,800 S.F.
900 S.F.
2,400 S.F, 18,000 S.F.
73,660 S,F.
4,600 S.Fe
5,200 SeF.
2,800 S-F,
$ 40.57" 43.88*
47-41* 40.57"
38.37* 60 53*
52.26" 46 75* 35 e 40"
306*72* 35 e 40* 35 40*
25.50
1,054,820s 201,848, -
88 9 1 83 85 5 1 97 L 115,1106 921,060. 271,752,
130 , 900 r_ 90,800, 298,816
31 ,860. 84,960, 459,000,
$3,014,306.
*OLA Allowable Base Schedule for Sari Diego
..
e
JR. HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS MODEL
ENR INDEX 2666.4 15 November 1977 page two
._ 1000 STUDENTS
11.
111.
IV D
V.
VI.
SITE
1. ParkinglStreets 2. Ma1 ks/Pavement
3. Site Utilities 4. Grading & Drainage 5. Fields
a, PE Fields be - Football c d. Track e. Misc. .
Fen c i n g / Backstops
6. . Landscaping
7. Total Site
Off-site
Y
30,000 S.F, @ 906 14,500 S.F. 1.45
176,441 80,576 L.S. k*S.
L*S.
L.S.
Fees/Testing/Inspection Q 8%
Furnishings @ 10% building cost
Land, not included
VII. Total
a, Total cost (not including land)
b. Cost per student
.-
6
L.S, L.S,
@ 60t 1.25
27,000. . * - 21,025.
85,000. 150,000 e
l 05,865 100 ,720, 20 ,ooo* 35 ;OOO 22 ,000 e
175,000.
741,610.
175,000 -
298,000.
-1.
315,000.
-0- 8
$4,543,916, ”:-
$ 43541%.
HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS MODEL
2000 STUDENTS ENR INDEX 2666.4 15 November 1977 page three
11. SITE -
A. Parking/Streets/800 cars 8- Concrete Mal ks/Pa\ri ng
C. Site Util-r'ties D. Grading/Drainage E. Fields
I, PE Fields 12.85 acres 2. Football 110,000 S.F, 3, Track (400 meters) 4, Fencing 5. Misc. 6. Subtotal
F, Landscaping
6. Misc,
. H. Total Site
111. OFF-SITE
* A. Off-Site (Unknown)
364,000 S.F. @ 9O$/SF
130,000 S.F. (3 1.45/SF LS. L.S.
@ 6Q$ (3 1-25 L.S. h*S.
L.S.
L.S.
. L.S.
8%
-
327 ,600e
9 88,500 e 1 35,000 * 260,000.
322 yi 779.
45,000. 36,000,
40,000-
140,000
583 779
240 000
40,000.
I .,'774,879.
x
320,600.
882,973. .
V. FURNISHINGs (3 10% building cost 893%229.
VI.- LAND - not included
VII. TOTAL CAMPUS COST (excl udi ng 1 and)
COST/STUDENY
$12,802,562.
$ 6,403.
0
HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS MODEL
ENR INDEX 2666.4
.. 2000 STUDENTS
15 November 1977 page two
F. Food Services '
60.53" 242,120. 74,11* 56,440. 1, KitchenlService 2, Shelter
4,000 S.F.
4,000 S.F.
$298 560 * 3. Subtotal
6, Mix,
1. Student Center 2. Lockers 3. Storage/Custodian
4. Subtotal
40.91* . 81,820-
14.1l* 84,660 35.40" 377,000.
$343,480.
2,000 S.F.
6,000 S.F. 5,000 S.F.
13,000 S.F.
HI Performing Arts Center
4. Theater Seating/ SOO/Stage/T.V* Production
. . 46.53* '8,046,925- - - 22,508 'S,F.
6,009 S-F. 42.78" 256,680. 2. Band/Choral/ Storage/Offi ces
106.7i* 160,808, 3. Toilets 1,500 S.F.
30,000 S.F. 4. Subtotal ? ,463,685. ;.
a TOTAL BUILDINGS $8,932,281
. . . .. . . ..
't