HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983-01-18; City Council; Resolution 71191
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 7119
A RESOLITION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE MAP CT 80-9(A), INCLUDING PUD-ZO(A) AND CP-60, STJaTECT TO CERTAIN
CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act provides tha a
Lentative subdivision map may not be approved unless it is consistent with all
lpplicable general and specific plans; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 15th day of July,
1980, adopted Resolutions No. 6233, 6234, and 6235 approving, with conditions,
rentative Map CT 80-9, Condominium Permit CP-60 and Planned Unit Development
?UD-ZO; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 3rd day of
Vovember, 1981, adopted Resolution No. 6720 amending Tentative Map CT 80-9(A)
and Planned Unit Development PUD-ZO(A), Council has found that public facilities
are inadequate; and
WHEREAS, said Tentative Subdivision Map will expire on January 15, 1983,
and the applicant has requested an extension of time which cannot be approved
unless the subdivision can be brought into conformity with the general plan;
and
WHEREAS, 'the addition of certainmnditionsof approval to the subdivision
will allow it to be found to be in conformity with the general plan and the
developer has requested the imposition of such conditions and agreed to comply
with them; and
WHEREAS, The approval of an extension of Tentative Map CT 80-9(A) subject
to such conditions, in lieu of denial of the map, will allow the project to go
forward avoiding the unnecessary delay to the City and to the Developer involved
with denial and the new application which would then be approved subject to the
4
__
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
1c
11
12
12
14
1:
1E
17
1€
15
2c
21
2;
2:
24
2:
2E
27
2E
0
same set of conditions; and
llrHEREAS, both the Developer and the City wish to extend Le map subject
:o the additional condition;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad,
Zalifornia, as follows:
A.
B.
That the above recitiations are true and correct;
That Tentative Map CT 80-9(A), PUD-20, and CP-60 are hereby extended
For one year from January 15, 1983 to January 15, 1984, subject to the execution
md fulfillment of all the conditions of Resolutions No. 6233, 6234, 6235, 6720
md 6752, and the following additional condition:
(1) This approval is expressly conditioned on the payment by the applicant
of a public facilities fee as required by City Council Policy No. 17, dated February 24, 1982, and effective April 2, 1982, on file with the City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference, and according to the agreement executed by the applicant for payment of said fee. If said
fee is not paid as promised, this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and the project cannot proceed and this approval shall be void.
That the agreement for waiver of prohibition against the imposition of
:onditions upon the approval of an extension of a tentative subdivision map dated
JanUary 6, 1983 between The Woodward Carp anies and the
3ty of Carlsbad, marked Exhibit A and attached hereto, is approved and the May01
is authorized to execute such agreement on behalf of the City.
C.
D. That this extension is approved in reliance upon said agreement. Any
legal challenge to or failure to perform said agreement or the conditions of this
resolution shall render this approval void and the map shall not be final.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of tl
ity of Carlsbad, California, held on the 18th day of January , 1983, by
the following vote, to wit:
///
///
/// .r
27
28
AYES:
NOES : None
ABSENT: None
Council ers Casler, Lewis, Kulchh, Chick and Prescott
,TEST :
..
AGREEMENT FOR WAIVER OF PROHIBITION
AGAINST TEE IMPOSITION OF CONDITIONS
UPON THE APPROVAL OF AN EXTENSION OF
A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
I
' This Agreement is made this 6th day of January
19 - 83 between the City of Carlsbad, a municipal corporation,
(hereinafter called "City" ) an6
a Individual (hereinafter called "Subdivider"] I The Woodward Companies
\
RECITALS
i
1.- Government Code Section 66452.6(e) and Carlsbad .. Municipal
Code Sections 20.12.110 and 10.24.180 permit Subdividers to
request and City to approve, conditionally approve or deny
extensions of time for the expiration of tentative maps or
tentative parcel maps (hereinafter collectively called
"Tentative Subdivision Maps").
* 2. El Patio v. Permanent Rent Control Board, - 110 Gal. App.3d
- 975, modified 111 Cal. App 3d 788 (1980) indicates that the
Government Code (Subdivision Map Act) may not authorize City
to impose new conditions; i.e., those which were not
imposed on the tentative subdivision map, upon the
extension of the time for expiration of a tentative
discretion to approve or deny such extensions.
.I !. ' I ,.
L.
3. Government Code Section 66452.6(d) and Carlsbad Municipal
Code Sections 20.12.100(d) 2nd 20.24.160 provl -de that
expiration of a tentative subdivision map shall terminate
all proceedings and that no final map or parcel map for any
. property covered by the tentative subdivision map shall be
- filed without first processing a new tentative subdivision
4.-- -.
map
Subdivider has requested City to approve the extensioin of
time for Tentative Subdivision Map No. CT 80-9(A)
c
which was initially approved on June 11, 1980 -
5. Since the approval of said Tentative Subdivision Map, City
has conducted studies which show that the-.construction of
certain drainage facilities or thoroughfares are essential
to protect and provide for the health, welfare, and'safety
b
of all of the present and future residents of City,
including those who will reside in said subdivision.
Since the approval of said Tentative Subdivision Map, City
has adopted a major drainage fee or major thoroughfare fee
-
- 6.
or both to provide the funds to construct the necessary
drainage facilities and thoroughfares.
Since the approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map, City
has conducted studies which show the need to establish a
public facilities fee in order to provide for public
facilities to protect the public health, safety and welfare
*7.
.
_.,_
of the present and future residents of City and to ensure
2.
.*
8.
9.
10.
TI.
.j ._
that public facilities 'to serve the development will be
available concurrent with need as required by City's
general plan. Developer agrees to pay said fees and has
executed a contract which is on file with the City Clerk to
that effect. ..
Because the original approval of said Tentative Subdivision
Map occurred prior to the adoption of the aforementicned
fees, City did not condition the approval of said Tentative
Subdivision Map with the payment of said fees.
Since the initial approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map
4
b there may have been changed circumstances which recjuire
additional conditions of approval on the extension of the
Tentative Subdivision Flap to protect the public health,
safety, and welfare, to mitigate affects on the environment
or to enslire consistency of the extended map with the City's
general plan and Municipal Code.
City arguably may not, without the volcrntary consent of
Subdivider, impose upon the extension of said Tentative
Subdivision Map conditions requiring payment of the fees
mentioned above or conditions necessary to protect the
public health, safety or welfare, or the environment or
ensure consistency with the general plan or Municipal Code.
Without such voluntary consent of Subdivider to the
inposition of conditions City may be required to dcny
Subdivider's request for extension to ensure that the
public health, safety and welfare or the environment are
* 3,
7
. f' * . .. *. @
12.
13.
protected or that the general plan or Municipal Code
requirements are satisfied.
said Tentative Subdivision Map without assurances that the
Approval of the extension of
fees mentioned above would be paid for said subdivision
would be contrary to the best interests of the City and
would threaten the City's ability to protect and provide
for the public health, safety, and welfare. Subdivider
agrees that it is in the best interest of City and
Subdivider that City be able to protect the public health,
safety and welfare, or the environment or ensure consistency
with the general plan or Municipal Code by the imposition
of conditions on the extension of tentative subdivision
maps.
Subdivider realizes that denial of the requested extension
could result in the expiration of the tentative subdivision
map. Subdivider would then be required to incur
substantial costs and time delays in processing a new
tentative subdivision map approval of which would be
subject to new conditions necessary to ensure consistency
of the tentative subdivision map with the Subdivision Map
Act, the California Environmental Quality Act, Titles 19,
20 and '21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, the City's
General Plan and to protect the public health, safety and
welfare.
City has reviewed the Subdivider's request for an extension
of time for said tentative subdivision map and finds that:
granting thc request subject to certain conditions will not
4.
e
be contrary to the public health, safety, and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals and of the
mutual convenants set forth herein, City and Subdivider asree as
follows:
1. City agrees to extend Subdivider's Tentative Subdivision Map
for one year subject to whatever new or revised conditions the
City in its sole discretion deems appropriate.
Subdivider knowingly and voluntarily waives any and all rights to
the unconditioned extension of Tentative Subdivision Map No. CT 80-9.(A)
Subdivider knowingly and voluntarily consents to the ixpositioz.
of a condition of approval of the extension of Tentative
2.
3.
Subdivision Map N0.m 80-9 @)which requires payment of any fees
which may be in effect at the time of approval of the final
subdivision map for said subdivision or any portion thereof an5
to the followj-ng additional conditions:
This approva: is expressly conditioned on the payment by
the applicant of a public facilities fee as required by
City Council Policy No. 17, issued 2/24/82 and effective
4/2/82, on file with the City Clerk and incor2orzted hersir.
by reference, and according to the agreement executod by
paid as promised, this application will not be ccnsistent
with the General Plan and the project cannot proceed and
this approval shall be void.
., , the applicant for payment of said fee. If said fee is not
4. The provisions of Carlsbad Municipal Code Sections 20.12.110
and 20.24.180, as appropriate, shall govern extension of the
map which is the subject of this ayreeinent. *
5. If this agreement is for an extension of a tentative subdivisicn
map for a minor subdivision, the appeal of the City Engineer's
approval, or conditional approval, of the extension by any party
shall void this agreement unless
5.
-
- the agreement is subsequently approved by the City Council.
Any action by Subdivider to challenge the legality of this
. agreement or any failure by Subdivider to pay the fees and
r6.
.-
-comply with any other conditions applicable to the
extension shall void the approval of such extension. The
map shall not final and the development shall not proceed
until a new tentative subdivision map has begn approved.
..
CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal ATTEST: corporation .- .I
BY yz&+h!i& ' - U! b/K- MAYOR (ME;(jlor Subdivisions)
CITY ENGINEER (Minor Sub- ALETHA r,. RAUTENKIUNZ,
City Clerk
~ divisions } . .--
- SUBDIVIDER
sident)
C m 0 .- L
a e +,
.- u.
v- 0 0 rn
hn~~n17m? TO FORM:
.. 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )ss.
COUNTY OF-. Oranqe 1
On January 6, 1983 ,before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for
said State, personally appeared -__ Scott E. Woodward
f execution by
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satis- 31
propri a t e)
factory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) islare sub-
scribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that WTKW f'UL18LK: - CAL1FWA
PRINCIPAL OFFICE I
G-m he/she/they executed the same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(This area for official notarial seal)