HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-11-06; City Council; Resolution 78031
2
3
4
E *
E
r I
E
$
l(
1:
1;
1:
1.
1
1
1
1
1
2
City of Carlsbac
3. Th
PASSED
City Council of
November
A RESOL
CARLSBA
BETWEEN
INC. FC
REPORT
PROTECT
The Cit
hereby resolve i
1. The
WESTEC Services,
Report for the (
copy of which is
reference as Ex1
2. Thc
21
22
23 ii
AYES :
NOES :
ABSENT
24 11 25 I~ATTEST:
28 (SEAL) I1 ll
RESOLUTION NO. 7803
JTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
1, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT
< PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
?OR THE CARLSBAD STATE BEACH BLUFF
CON - PROJECT NO. 3185
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AND WESTEC SERVICES,
1 Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does
5 follows:
t an agreement between the City of Carlsbad and
Inc. for preparation of an Environmental Impact
arlsbad State Beach Bluff Protection Project, a
attached hereto and incorporated herein by
ibit A, is hereby approved.
Mayor of the City of Carlsbad is hereby authorized
execute said agreement for and on behalf of the
s resolution supercedes Resolution No. 7772.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
the City of Carlsbad held the 6th day of
, 1984, by the following vote, to wit:
Council Mmhrs Casler, Lewis, Kulckin, CHick and Prescott
None
None
CASLER, Mayor
3
*
c
RECITALS
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEM NT is made this yfA day of fclod, , 1984,
between the CITY OF I CARLSBAD, a municipal corporation of the
State of California,l hereinafter referred to as CITY, and WESTEC
SERVICES, INC. hereibafter referred to as CONSULTANT.
city must prepare an( Environmental Impact Report. The proposed
project is identifie as the construction of a seawall the design d
alternatives and ications for which are being prepared by
Woodward-Clyde Civil Engineers. The subject
property is located est of Carlsbad Boulevard between Oak Avenue
and Agua Hedionda La oon, and more precisely shown on the plat
marked Attachment "1 ', attached hereto and made a part hereof;
and I
WHEREAS, th$ Consultant has the qualifications to pre-
pare the required En ironmental Impact Report; and
WHEREAS, it Y is understood that the Consultant shall be
an independent contr ctor of the city;
NOW, THEREF i RE, in consideration of their mutual conve-
nants and conditions; the parties hereto agree as follows:
(1) DUTIES OF THE CC~NSULTANT
Consultant shall prepare an Environmental Impact Report for
the subject project in accord with the California Environ-
mental Quality ct as implemented by the State Guidelines
and by City in itle 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and
its implementin resolutions. In carrying out this
obligation the lonsultant's duties shall include the l I
following: I EXHIBIT "A"
associated
necessary
analy$is
appear
prepa
Report.
Planning
-2-
with the scope of work; (2) make all
and required laboratory tests and
associated with the scope of work; (3)
and be prepared to answer questions and
'e testimony on the final Environmental Impact
at up to four public hearings before the
Commission and the City Council prior to
5-
preparinq
submit
check
specifications for the proposed seawall. Before
the draft report, the Consultant shall
five copies of a preliminary report (screen
EIR) to the Planning Director for staff
.
cant
report.
agreerent
facto
(a) Consultant
written
quent
attac
appl i
Consu
ring
draft
(c) Consu
possi
facto
the p
tors
Direc
b.he feasibility of continuing with the
The objective of this subsection of the
is to minimize the cost if these adverse
s exist.
shall prepare and file with the city a
responses to all comments received subse-
to public notice that the draft
envirolnmental impact report has been filed.
led hereto and made a part hereof and with
:able state law and city ordinances. The
.tant shall submit to city fifty copies (in 3
)inders) plus a reproducible master of the
EIR to the city.
.tant shall attempt to determine as soon as
)le in his study of the area involved, those
-s which could severely inhibit or prohibit
-oposed project. If it appears that such fac-
ire present, he shall so inform the Planning
.or who in turn will discuss with the appli-
-3-
DUTIES OF THE
(a) The City
vided for
(b) The City
cument,
related tq)
(c) The City
by the
( 3) TERMINATION OF !AGREEMENT
CITY
will make payment to the Consultant as pro-
in this agreement.
will make available to the Consultant any do-
s:udies, or other information in its possession
the proposed project.
will review the Preliminary Report presented
Corsultant within fourteen working days of their
The city may te minate this agreement at any time by giving
written notice o the Consultant of such termination and
specifying the ffective date thereof, at least fifteen days
prior to the ef ective date of the termination. In event
of termination 11 finished or unfinished documents and
mental
the draft
and is
other materials 1 prepared pursuant to this agreement shall
Impact Report subsequent to public notice that
Environmental Impact Report has been filed
available for public review.
become its prop rty. Upon termination for reasons other
than breach of his agreement City shall pay Consultant the
reasonable valu f of the services completed to the date of
notice of termidation.
-4-
( 4 ) RELEASE OF
Any reports,
bled by the Codsultant under this agreement shall not be
INFORMATION BY CONSULTANT
iriformation or other data, prepared or assem-
made available (to any individual or organization by the con-
sultant without!
(5) OWNERSHIP,
the prior written approval of the city.
PUBLICATION, REPRODUCTION AND USE OF ENVIRON-
All documents and materials prepared pursuant to this agree-
(6) PAYMENT I
ment are the
unrestricted
The Consultant bill be paid a maximum of $ 19,330 dollars
property of the city. The city shall have the
authority to publish, disclose, distribute and
for all work ne essary to carry out the requirements of this
agreement. Act a1 payment shall be based on the cost of the
otherwise use,
other materials
in whole or in part, any reports, data, or
prepared under this agreement.
Consultant shal be paid sixty percent of the compensable
services comple'ed within 15 days after receipt of his
invoice for the i completion of the draft Environmental Impact
report based on
and "3" on file
Report in accor ance with Paragraph 1 above. The Consultant
will be paid tw nty-five percent upon acceptance by the city
the costs as set forth in Attachments "2"
at the Land Use Planning Office. The
of the response
fifteen percent
I -5-
to comments from the Consultant, the final
will be paid not to exceed the maximum
amount provide in this agreement within thirty days after
receipt of inv ice, to be submitted after the certification
of the Environ ental Impact Report by the City Council or if
the City Counc I 1 has not held a public hearing to consider
the certificat on of the Environmental Impact Report within
the time limit specified by Title 19 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code I after the expiration of said time limit
whichever is e rlier. If the final amount is paid prior to I
certification
Consultant sha
certifiable re
the City. (7)
Time is of the
agreement. It
ditions may delay
tant will be
essary to
The Consultant
df the Environmental Impact Report the
1 do any work necessary to produce a
tort, without delay or cost upon direction of
TIME OF COMPLETION
essence in carrying out the terms of this
is understood that inclement weather con-
the completion of field work. The Consul-
allowed as many additional days as are nec-
compensate for days lost due to inclement weather.
hall submit to the city five copies of the
I -6-
(8) LIMITS OF THE
The limits of
ment is in the
be sufficient
performed hereLnder
the event at ar.y
sum may not be
the Planning
incur any
appropriate ame
(9) CHANGES IN WORK
If, in the cour
the Consultant
cate that a cha
ranted, the Con
the contract.
in the followin
changes shall b
inform them of
of estimated ch
reaching mutual
agreement shall
City Council.
ineffective or
Changes requiri
bBLIGATION
':he obligation of the city under this agree-
sum of $ 19,330 which amount is estimated to
to compensate the consultant for all services
during the terms of this agree-ment, In
time it appears to the Consultant that said
sufficient, he shall immediately so notify
Director. He will not perform any work or
obligation beyond said sum of $ 19,330 without
dment to this agreement.
e of this contract, changes seem merited by
r the City and informal consultations indi-
ge in the conditions of the contract is war-
ultant or the City may request a change in
uch changes shall be processed by the City
manner. A letter outlining the required
forwarded to the City or Consultant to
he proposed changes along with a statement
nqes in charges or time schedule, After
agreement on the proposal, a supplemental
be prepared by the City and approved by the
uch supplemental agreement shall not render
nvalid unaffected portions of the agreement.
g immediate action by the Consultant or the
-7-
City shall be
principal of
action and follow
such work.
The lump sum
adjusted for c$anges, either additive or deductive, in the
brdered by the City Manager, who will inform a
t:ie Consultant's firm of the necessity of such
up with a supplemental agreement covering
anounts detailed in this agreement shall be
scope of work. 1
Consultant will
and losses
(10) HOLD HARMLESS
reimburse the City for all costs, expenses
incurred by it in consequence of any claims, de-
The Consultant~will indemnify the City against and hold it
by a person
this agreement.
harmless from and any cost, expense, or liability for
damages on acc of injury or death to persons or damage
to property re from or arising out of or in any way
arising out of the performance by Consultant of
connected with the performance by consultant of this agree-
ment, includin the defense of any action arising therefrom.
( 11 ) MAINTAIN INSURAXCE
Consultant shall, at all times that this agreement is in
mands and causeis of action which may be brought against it
effect cause to be maintained in force and effect an
insurance polic or policies which will insure and indemnify
both City and C nsultant against liability or financial loss
I -8-
resulting from1 injuries occurring as a result of any acts or
himself out as
city by reason
activity of Co sultant. The liability under such insurance
policy shall b not less than $100,000 for any one person
nor claim to be an officer or employee of the
hereof, and that he will not by reason
injured or $3O(l,OOO for any one accident and $50,000 for
right or privilege
the City including,
property damag The policy shall be written by a
responsible co pany or companies to be approved by City, and
shall be nonca celable except on ten days' written notice to f
applicable to an officer or employee of
but not limited to, workmen's compensa-
City. Such po icy shall name City as co-assured and a copy
of such policy shall be filed with the City.
(13) ASSIGNMENT OF
( 12 INDEPENDENT CO~TRACTOR
C3NTRACT
Consultant in dccordance with his status as an independent
contractor, codenants and agrees that he will conduct him-
self consistent/ with such status, that he will neither hold
hereof, make anly claim, demand, or application to or for any
tion coverage, iunemployment insurance benefits, social se-
curity coveragel, or retirement membership credit.
of or any due or to become due thereunder without the
prior nsent of the City.
I -9-
( 14 ) SUBCONTRACTING 1
If the Consultant
performed under
shall be fully
omissions of its
directly or
is for the acts
by it. Nothing
contractual
sultant and the
contractor and
s&.,all subcontract any of the work to be
this contract by Consultant, the Consultant
responsible to the City for the acts and
subcontractor and of the persons either
indirectly employed by its subcontractor, as it
and omissions of persons directly employed
contained in this contract shall create any
relationship between any subcontractor of Con-
City. The Consultant shall bind every sub-
very subcontractor of a subcontractor by
attorney, engin er or inspector of or for the City who is
authorized in s ch capacity and on behalf of the City to
specifically
question approved
( 15) PROHIBITED INTEREST
No official of
on behalf of thg
or to take part
ing any architectural,
tion, or materie.1
tion with the
ectly or indireatly
I -10-
nozed to the contrary in the subcontract in
in writing by the city.
':he City who is authorized in such capacity
City to negotiate, make, accept or approve,
in negotiating, making, accepting or approv-
engineering, inspection, construc-
supply contract or subcontract in connec-
ccnstruction of the project, shall become dir-
interested personally in this contract
exercise any e.
tions in mnnel
shall become d
in this contra
( 16 ) VERBAL AGREEME'
No verbal agre
or employee of
execution of t
the terms or o
agreemefit or CI
additional pay
contract.
:ecutive, supervisory or other similar func-
ition with the performance of this contract
.rectly or indirectly interested personally
:t or any part thereof.
IT OR CONVERSATION
merit or conversation with any officer, agent
the City, either before, during or after the
lis contract, shall affect or modify any of
)ligations herein contained, nor such verbal
tnversation entitle the Consultant to any
lent whatsoever under the terms of this
-11-
IN WITNES
this agreement on
ATTEST:
.- APPROVED AS ,TO ,FOR
Assistant! City Att
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed
Le day and year first above written.
CITY OF CARLSBAD, a Municipal
Corporation of the State of
California
BY MARY CASWR Mayor U
$,
+ City lerk
i
rney
-1 2-
t i 1 '2
366
3
4
I
,362
I
I
I I .
(61 9) 294-9770
84-800-E
September 27, 1984
Land Use Planning Offi
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Attn: Michael Howes 1
Dear Mr. Howes: I
I'm writing at
Services met with Associates yesterday to discuss the possibility of
reducing our cost to and Final EIRs for the Carlsbad Seawall Project.
to the City (9/17/84), we were unaware
project area would be available to us
Engineering Study and Project Desiqn
as a follow-up to our telephone conversation. WESTEC
At the time we
that some
As I indicated on the telephone, the availability of site specific geologic informa-
tion will reduce our effo t somewhat in the areas of literature review, geologic mapping
and the preparation of b uff and beach cross sections. This will enable us to reduce our
total costs by $400.00 described in our
the EIR process preliminary
t a total of $19,330.00 ($19,730.00 - $400.00) for all tasks (9/17/84) to the City. It should be emphasized that a valuable third-party review of the appropriateness of the in addition to an analysis of its subsequent effects on the
environment.
Please forward all contractual information to our office as soon as possible. We are anxious to begin wo k on this challenging project. It will be necessary for the City
to provide WESTEC wit the Preliminary Engineering Study and Project Design along
with the notice to proc ed. Our project schedule is dependent upon receipt of this
information which will s rve as the project description and the basis of our analyses. i
I J Project Manaker
San Diego. CA Venturai CA Brawley, CA Phoenix. A2 Philadelphia. PA Washington, D C 17
Submitted To:
City of Carlsbad Land Use Planning Office
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Submitted By:
WESTEC Services, Inc.
3211 Fifth Avenue
San Diego, California 92103
September 17, 1984
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Title
I
I11 SCHEDULE
3.1 Schedule
3.2 cost
1.1
AND COST
1.2
tanding of the Project
Under the Contract
11
2.1
2.2
IV
4.1
V
5.1
5.1.1
5.1.2
5.1.3
5.1.4
5.1.5
5.1.6
5.2
5.2.1
5.2.2
5.2.3
AND REFERENCES
Page
i
1
2
9
9
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
14
15
15
16
16
i
Section
VI
6.1
6.2
v I1
7.1
7.2
Number
1
Points
Letter
A
B
of Contact
Authorization
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Title
EXPERIE CE
WEST i C Services
Project
Leightbn and Associates
TABLE
Title
Team Contributions
Resumes
Project Er erience
APPENDICES
Title
Page
20
20
20
22
22
22
Page
11
Page
A- 1
B- 1
ii
SECTION I
INTRODUCTION
provide the expertise
logical impacts associated
1.1 UNDERSTANDING
The 4000-foot
Lagoon in the City of
needed to properly evaluate the key issue of coastal geomorpho-
with the project.
OF THE PROJECT
.seawall would be built between Oak Avenue and Agua Hedionda
Carlsbad. The purpose of the seawall is to protect Carlsbad
I 1
1.2 RESPONSIBILWS
WESTEC Services'
0 Attendance
meetings
requested
e Preparation
2
UNDER THE CONTRACT
responsibility under the contract wili include the following:
and presentations at a maximum of two public scoping
only if prior to preparation of the Draft EIR (optional:
by City).
of Draft and Final EIRs which are acceptable to the City
SECTION XI
SCOPE OF WORK
probable long-term and
CEQA. The EIR will provide
ect alternatives which codd
of the project.
2.2 TECHNICAL
Based on informition
ning Office Of the City
Cm-"SSiOn, our familiarity
well as our previous
the following technical
the EIR. Primary emphasis
those issues which could
In addition, WESTEC will
Preparation. Other
surate with their potential
Our analysis will
term effects of the seawal-.
short-range effects of the proposed project in accordance with
an evaluation of all feasible mitigation measures or Proj-
be used to reduce or eliminate potential adverse impacts
APPROACH
given in the RFP, conversations with the Land Use Plan-
df Carlsbad and the staff of the Sari Diego Region Coastal
with the City of Carlsbad and with the project area7 as
experience with similar projects, WESTEC Services has developed
approach. We have identified issues which should be included in
has been given to those issues identified in the RFP and to
involve significant environmental impacts, as discussed below.
address any issues identified in response to the Notice of
envircnmental issues will be analyzed in a level of detail commen-
level of impact.
focus on impacts resulting from construction and the long-
A development plan is not available at this time; however,
3
it is assumed that a detailed
consultant. The analysis
impacts associated with the
tives. The EIR will also
approach to the identified
0 Coastal
Leighton ard
EIR. The primary methoc
review of available geomor?hic,
subject site. All appropriate
project description will be available for use by the ElR
will focus heavily on the significant, long-term environmental
seawall and recommended mitigation measurw and alterna-
WESTEC's describe effects found not to be significant.
ziignificant issues is described below:
Ge~morpholoay/CoastaI Processes
Associates will conduct the analysis for this POrtion Of the
involved in the investigation will include an analysis and
geologic, soils and hydrogeologic data Frrinent to the
and pertinent data will be transferred to 0 base map. A
will be addressed. Possib
where appropriate.
4
e mitigation measures and/or alternatives will be provided,
also be addressed. A WESTEC
ing Department and Caitrans
related impacts.
e Land
5
analyst will consult with the City of Carlsbad's Engineer-
to arrive at suitable mitigation measures for construction-
Use/Coastal Act Compatibility
points, including Tamara1
the beach. The impacts
term beach use will be ai
term effect of sand loss
Mitigation measures will
0 Other Re
The Dra:
State CEQA Guidelines a
including, but not limite
Section.
0 Project P
This sect
to the "no project" alter
meet the project objectii
access and drainage modi
ing materials and a disco1
:, Cherry and Pine Avenues, as well as the many footpaths to
E seawall construction on beach access, temporary and long-
.lyzed. It is conceivable that the seawall could have the long-
)r accretion which would affect recreational opportunities.
3 recommended.
Aired Sections
EIR will contain all sections required by Article 9 of the
j as shown in the RFP tentative Draft EIR table of contents,
to, a Summary, Project Description and Cumulative Effects
:ernatives
In of the Draft EIR will receive major emphasis. In addition
itive, the EIR will address feasible alternatives which could
s. These alternatives could include restrictions on pedestrian
cations/improvements, alternative seawall designs and build-
inuous rather than continuous seawall.
6
3.1 SCHEDULE
Prior to comme
7
SECTION IU
SCHEDULE AND COST
icing with the EIR analysis, WESTEC Services will participate
in a maximum of two pub..ic
is not clear whether the
will be prepared and three
6 weeks of official
scoping meetings, if requested by the City. At this time it
City will conduct scoping meetings. The preliminary Draft EIR
copies submitted for review by the City of Carlsbad within
This schedule commitment (and the cost notification to proceed.
within 2 weeks.
3.2 COST
The estimated
$19,730.00. The fee
Draft EIR, integration of
the Draft EIR in 3-ring
cost for preparing the EIR for the proposed project is
incl-ldes preparation and submittal of 3 copies of the preliminary
modifications requested by the City, submittal of 50 copies of
bi.nders (including 1 reproducible copy), response to public corn-
Draf
Ar
GE
Fina.
Hear
T
EIR lysis by WESTEC Services $ 9,762 technical Analysis 6,600
COST ESTIMATE
EIR 2,192
1gs (4) 1,176
,TAL: $19,730
8
SECTION N
PERSONNEL
content and scope of
preparation. He has had
variety of project types,
complex controversial studies.
Mr. Kingery is also responajible
environmental documents
10 years of geological anc
advice and direction to
environmental studies
WESTEC Services w 11 provide a highly competent, experienced management team
to complete the EIR. Th staff of WESTEC Services is fully aware and accustomed to
the level of detail and for at that environmental studies must meet to satisfy require-
ments of the California Members of WESTEC's project
team have had a wide ra ge of experience in environmental studies, and are familiar
with a variety of local and regional projects.
4.1
nvironmental Quality Act.
PROJECT TEAM
Environmental c nsulting services for the proposed project will be provided
largely by members of WE TEC's in-house staff. All of the team members have exten-
sive experience in environ ental planning and analysis. Mr. Frank Kingery will serve as
Senior Project Manager to provide overall project direction and quality assurance.
Mr. Kingery serves as W' E STEC Services' California registered Geologist. He will
attend any scoping meetin s and public hearings for the project. Mr. David Claycomb
will serve as Project Man ger and will be responsible for the day-to-day direction of
the project team. A sum I ary of the qualifications and pertinent experience for key
I
environmental documents through public review and final report
direct managerial and analytical experience with a wide
and has worked with a broad range of agencies to complete
Some of his management experience has included EIRs.
for the geology and hydrology elements of the firm's
Imd is a California Registered Geologist. Based on over
environmental studies experience, he provides technical
Geotechnical and
direqted by Mr. Kingery have been completed for both private
Eqvironmental Division staff as required.
9
ing and Repair Facility
includes management of
nia cities and over 3 years
sioner and Chairman of
nated the preparation of
nd the Woodley Island Marina project. Other related work
the preparation of Local Coastal Programs for several Califor-
experience as a City of Arcata, California Planning Commis-
the Planning Commission. Mr. Claycomb has recently coordi-
several large-scale complex EIRs for the San Diego Unified
I 10
Mr. Artim
and Associates and conduct
mitigations. Mr. Artim has
a variety of land use
soils, geology, seismicity
ongoing sea cliff recession
Diego since 1969 which
migration of beach sands
local field exploration and
methodologies used in
photography analysis;
33
will manage the engineering geologic evaluation for Leighton
the analysis of the project setting, possible constraints and
over 16 years of experience in geotechnical assessments for
prcljects and has been at the forefront of understanding of the
of western San Diego County. He has personally conducted an
study on the San Diego County coast from Oceanside to San
includes the transgression and regression as well as lateral
In addition, he is experienced in all phases of regional and
seismic investigations. He is highly knowledgeable of the
field investigations including field mapping; profiles; aerial
relnote sensing techniques; and geologic and environmental
impact report preparatior
ment Advisory Board from
ologist-Leighton Associates
Name ' -
Frank Kingery SC
David Claycomb P
Stephen Lacy SC
Terry Jacques E
Ernest R. Artim C
Dorian E. Mills G
Mr. Artim served on the City of San Diego Land Develop-
1978 to 1982.
Table 1
'ROJECT TEAM CONTRIBUTIONS
Title
Percent of
Analysis Effort
15
25
5
20
20
15
11 31
5.1 WESTEC SERW
W ESTEC Servicc
rience for the preparatior
0 Direct E
Car Is bad
0 Direct e
coastal a
nia.
0 A major
and relatc
0 Direct ex
5.1.1 Corporate Pra
WESTEC Sen
government and industry
time, the firm has comp:
nia, Arizona, Oregon, Ne1
WESTEC Serv
time employees. Enviror
ters in San Diego and fro
Las Vegas, Nevada; and P
A two-fold pt
ronmental consulting cap
scientific and technical
full-time employees with
agement controls in the
participation/review in tl
shown in the repeat busin
5.1.2 Analytical Ap]
WESTEC Sen
field data and impact ani
complete and well docur
SECTION V
3ALIFICATIONS AND REFERENCES
5, INC.
offers the following combination of qualifications and expe-
>f the EIR.
perience with preparation of environmental reports in
Id north San Diego County.
Erience with analysis of environmental issues involving
I marine oriented development projects throughout Califor-
Insultant for the preparation of environmental impact reports
surveys in the southwest United States.
2rience with CEQA guidelines.
le
:es was established in 1972 to meet the growing needs of
3r environmental analysis and planning services. Since that
ted over 1200 environmental and planning studies in Califor-
da, Idaho, Utah and New Mexico.
es is staffed with a multi-disciplinary team of over 200 full-
iental services are provided out of the corporate headquar-
regional offices located in Ventura and Brawley, California;
ladelphia, Pennsylvania.
osophy has prevailed in developing WESTEC Services' envi-
dities. First, the company is dedicated to building a staff of
tperts who, to the greatest extent possible, are long-term,
most-graduate degrees. Second, the firm applies strict man-
eas of task assignment, scheduling, budget, and management
! final output. Evidence of the success of these policies is
,s conducted with virtually all of our major clients.
oach
:es' analytical approach is based on the following premise:
pes prepared at the environmental assessment level must be
mted to insure that they will withstand the scrutiny of the
-
-
12
required agency and pub1
trial and commercial
and environmentally
nificant adverse impacts
offers the capability to
opment monitoring progrz.ms.
WESTEC Services in
in subsequent project
in significant impacts to
lifornia Department of Transportation
Port District
c review. In addition, our experience with residential, indus-
devetlopmen t projects allows us to formulate economically feasible
acceptable mitigation measures and/or alternatives should any sig-
3e associated with any project. Therefore, WESTEC Services
conduct both pre-development impact analyses and post-devel-
Environmental inventory or baseline data developed by
numerous studies throughout the western states have been utilized
plarning and design to avoid what would otherwise have resulted
environmental resources.
13
WESTEC Serv.ces
ronmental and energy
have resulted in the
reviewing authorities, the!
more, WESTEC Services
documents on time and
5.1.4 Facilities
The corporate
vices is located at 3211
facility houses professional
tems Divisions in addition
areas, reference library,
tem.
5.1.5 Clients
has demonstrated the capability to manage complex envi-
These studies
generation of reports which meet the needs of the permitting and
Further-
has earned an excellent reputation for the delivery of these
studies requiring a multi-disciplinary approach.
applicant, and private environmentalist concerns.
within budget.
headquarters and principal operating facility of WESTEC Ser-
Fifth Avenue, San Diego, California. This 15,000 square foot
staff of WESTEC Services' Environmental, Energy, and Sys-
to the clerical and graphic arts departments, conference
laboratory space for development projects, and computer sys-
project experience applicable to City of Carlsbad's needs
an Bernardino
Mr. Allen M. Jones
Environmental Quality Division
Planning Department
City of San Diego
202 "C" Street, MS 5A
San Diego, CA 92101
(619) 236-5775
Developers, Inc.
The willia+ Lyon Company
Developers
Shape11 Indptries of San Diego
Mr. Tomas E. Firle
Environmental Management
Unified Port District 3165 Pacific Highway
San Diego, CA 921 12
(619) 291 -3900
5.1.6 References
Public Agencies
Mr. Werner von Cundell
Coordinator Planning Director
City of Oceanside
Community Development Center
320 N. Home Street
Oceanside, CA 92054
(6 19) 439-7272
Mr. Doug Reid
Environmental Review Coordinator
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 92010 (619) 575-5009
14 34
Private Firms
vices for this project. In
southern California, the f
Mr. Mike Ryan
Daon Corporation Daon Centre
404 1 McArthur Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92660 (714) 752-7855
the 20 years Leighton and Associates has been consulting in
'rm has developed an expertise in evaluations for Environmen-
AVCO Community Develo ers, Inc.
Mr. Gary Copson, or
Mr. H.L. Troutman
16770 West Bernard0 Driv
San Diego, CA 92127 I (619) 277-2132
Mr. Keith Johnson
The Fieldstone Company
8340 Clairemont Mesa Blvd.
Suite 21 1
San Diego, CA 92 11 1
(619) 565-4172
Mr. Lou Lightfoot
Louis N. Lightfoot & Associates
708 Fourth Street
Oceanside, CA 92054 (619) 722-1924
15
this project. The firm has
study as described below:
0 Coastal
Their
studies along the southern
assessment studies to
Mr. Ernest R. Artim, ChFf
ongoing sea cliff recessior
sion as well as lateral
0 Geochemical
Key
ous projects involving
16
experience in each of the areas of expertise needed for this
and Bluff Study Experience
personnel have conducted numerous geotechnical assessment
California coastal area. These studies have ranged from EIR
investigations of design work for stabilization of sea cliffs. Also,
Engineering Geologist at San Diego, has conducted an
study since 1969 which includes the transgression and regres-
migration of beach sands (see Appendix A).
Effects of Groundwater Fluctuation on Beach Sands
personnel with Leighton and Associates have performed numer-
evaluations of fluctuating groundwater tables and the potential
investigations, whether it be for single-story structures, seawalls, or for heavy founda-
changes in conditions.
Their
plete investigations which
parameters based upon
liberal estimations. This
reduce the potential for the
5.2.2 Facilities
general investigative philosophy is to make thorough and com-
allow them to address and evaluate site conditions and soil
re..listic conditions rather than through overly conservative or
?hilosophy and resultant product reports often significantly
development of soil problems.
County of
County of
County of
County of
San Bernardino
San Diego
San Mateo
Ventura
17
E.S.I. Land
Edaw, Inc.
Technology
a1 Impact Profiles
onsulting Engineering, Inc.
Group
VTN
Private Developers
Boise Casciade
Broadmoor
Condor
Criterion
Crocker
Dart Indw'ries
Corporation
Homes
International
Development
Lad Company
18
0
Kaiser
John D. I
Mission V
Mobil Oil
Pardee C
Shape11 Ir
Trammel
Union Oil
Watt Indub
usk & Son
iejo Company
t ries
mstruction Company
dustries
Crow
Company
19
SECTION VI
EXPERIENCE
6.1 WESTEC SERVICES
WESTEC Servicebs
EIR for the Seawall
0 Prepared
tive exarrples
0 Direct
EXPERIENCE
has an experience base particularly suited to preparing the
Development project. The firm has:
numerous EIRs for coastal development projects. Representa-
include Sunset Cliffs Stabilization Project EIR
experience involving project with similar issues:
20
- sc
- Se
- Se
- so
- Tc
0 Other Ne
- C< - Hi
- Dt
- Se
- Ct
Sipps Institution Sea Wall
i Bluff Properties, Leucadia
i Wall Failure, Del Mar
ana Beach Post Development Study
rrey Pines Park Coastal Bluffs, City of San Diego
irshore (Marine/Freshwater) Facility Projects:
lony Cove Bluffs Stabilization Report, San Clemente, CA
itorical Analysis of Coastal Erosion, Sand City, CA
ep Submergence Pier, Submarine Base, San Diego, CA
iwall Bulkhead, Minoo Island, Iran
annel Bulkhead (2 miles long), Linda Isle, Newport Beach, CA
wall Bulkheads, Capistrano Beach, CA
Biology Laboratories, Catalina Island, University of
-
-
California and North American Rockwell
21
SECTION VII
STATEMENT OF OFFER
Any additional informati
directed to Frank A. Kin,
7.2 AUTHORIZATN
Submittal of th
vices, Lnc. to the servil
period of 60 days. All
exceed $19,730.00. We u
vices, Inc. will enter intc
terms of our contractual
W ESTEC Servic
contract with an applicz
the proposed project. N
between WESTEC Servic
Respectfully submitted,
Vice Pres iden t, Envir onn WESTEC Services, Inc.
'ACT
ervices, Inc. be selected to prepare the EIR for the proposed
iduals are authorized to negotiate and contractually bind the
-
ael W. Wright
jident, Executive Vice President
mental Division WESTEC Services, Inc.
Services, Inc. :h Avenue
Mr. William R. Eldredge
321 I Fifth Avenue San Diego, CA 92 103
0, CA 92103 (619) 294-9770
-9770
requested during the period of proposal evaluation should be
ry.
I
proposal to the City of Carlsbad hereby binds WESTEC Ser.?
j and commensurate compensation described herein for a
rk shall be performed on a time-and-materials basis not to
erstand that upon acceptance of this proposal, WESTEC Ser-
ontract negotiations with the City which will define the final
;reemen t.
, Inc. does not currently hold, nor does it expect to hold, a
or property owner who would be substantially affected by
:ontractual arrangements exist now, or are expected to exist
Inc. and any person or individual that would be so affected.
ita1 Division
22