HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-08-14; City Council; Resolution 90-297a. I/ v 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
21
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 90-297
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, EIR 86-5,
FOR A PROJECT GENERALLY INCLUDING
RESTORATION OF TIDAL FLUSHING TO BATIQUITOS
LAGOON THROUGH DREDGING AND CONSTRUCTION
OF A TIDAL INLET STRUCTURE.
CASE NAME: BATIQUITOS LAGOON ENHANCEMENT
PROJECT.
APPLICANT: PORT OF LOS ANGELES
CASE NO: EIR 86-5
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Muni(
Code, the Planning Commission did, on July 18, 1990, hold a
noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider
request: and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all pe:
desiring to be heard, and considering any written corm
received, the Planning Commission considered all factors reli
to the Master Plan; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the
Council of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and corrc
2. That the findings and conditions of the Pla
Commission Resolution No. 3072, including a statemen
overriding consideration and supportive findings on file wit
City Clerk and incorporated herein by reference constitutl
findings of the City Council in this matter and that
Environmental Impact Report, EIR 86-5, is certified and appr
except as follows:
...
c w *
The City Council of Carlsbad, California sel
1 Alternative Mitigated A as the preferred enhancement alterna
2
3 continuously tidal inlet than does Mitigated B.
for permit application purposes for the following reasons:
1. Mitigated A has a greater potential to mainta
4 2. Mitigated A retains the existing wildlife hab values
5 3. Mitigated A maximizes the aerial extent of w
6 surface at all tidal conditions therefore it creates a vi resource that is desired by the community.
7 4. Mitigated A maximizes the amount of dredged
8
9
that would be available for nourishment of the regions seve
eroded coastline.
If during permit review by either the Corps
10 Engineers of the California Coastal Commission it is detem
Council finds that Mitigated Alternative B is 11
that alternative Mitigated A cannot be permitted, then the
is amended to replace IMitigated BIB with IMitigated A.@I foregoing, Section D of Planning Commission Resolution No. 13
the need for further review by the City Council. Subject tc
implementation as recommended by the Planning Commission wit 12
environmentally acceptable and that it shall be approved
14
15
l6 14th day of
17
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meetin
the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on thl
, 1990, by the following vote August
wit:
18
19
20
21
22
AYES : Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Larson, Mamaux an
NOES : None
ABSENT : None
Pettine
23 11 ATTEST:
24 dtda6L &?&
25 ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Cler$
26
27
28
(SEAL)
2
11