HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-09-20; City Council; Resolution 94-2701
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
90, mu?
&E& a08 Ow%
3055 dU,
9 “ou 8 a- s&g< OZJO ““50
60 >zz
a>
u->g ZdZ
E:? a01
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e 0
RESOLUTION NO. 94-270
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA GRANTING THE APPEAL, IN PART AND DENYING THE APPEAL IN PART OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR THE TEMPORARY STORAGE AND
IMPOUND OF VEHICLES IN THE PALOMAR AIRPORT
BUSINESS PARK.
APPLICANT: VEHICLES UNLIMITED CASE NO. : CUP 154-B
WHEREAS, a verified application for a conditional
permit to construct a temporary storage and impound of vehi
facility on property located at 2175 Camino Vida Roble descr
as :
Lot 15 of Palomar Airport Business Park Unit No. 1, of Map 854 recorded December 31, 1974, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California.
has been filed with the city of Carlsbad and referred to
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on June 15, 1
July 6, 1994 and July 20, 1994 hold duly noticed public hearing
prescribed by law to consider said application for Conditional
Permit CUP 154-B; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on July 20,
after hearing and considering all the evidence and testimony of
people desiring to be heard adopt Resolutions No. 3665 and
approving the Negative Declaration and Conditional Use Permit
154-B; and
WHEREAS, appeals of this approval was timely file
July 28, 1994; and
WHEREAS, on September 13, 1994, the City Council of
City of Carlsbad held a duly noticed public hearing as prescr
by law to consider said appeal and at said hearing a
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
001
Y2 ma& a08 ow2 dUU $055
(ftya: goo2 u;Sz zwmo 02" -
Swg
>-I2
m[TsQ E:: aod 60 >'%
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
l
e 0
consideration of all the evidence, testimony, and argument of t:
persons present and desiring to be heard the City Council gra:
in part and and denied in part the appeal of the Conditional
Permit 154-B,
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carl
resolves as follows:
1. That" the foregoing recitations are true and corr
2. That the appeal is granted in part and denied in
as set forth below.
3. That Condition No. 19 of Planning Commis
Resolution No. 3689 is amended to read as follows:
"Within 60 (sixty) days of approval of this
application, existing dead plants located on
the front, side and rear portions of the
property shall be replaced in kind with
mature, healthy and thriving plants to the
satisfaction of the Planning Director. The landscaping shall be maintained in a thriving condition. The intent of this condition is to
screen this facility from views from adjoining
properties. Additional trees and/or other
plants shall be planted along the rear portion
of the site to fully screen the parking area
in the property to the south. Additional
trees and/or plants shall also be planted
along the' western portion of the site to
better screen the entry to the storage area of
the site as approved by the Planning
Director. I'
4. That Condition No. 20 of Planning Commis
Resolution No. 3689 is amended to read as follows:
"The rear portion of the lot shall be striped
for 125 parking spaces pursuant to a written
plan subject to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer. The parking configuration shall
provide for and be maintained at all times to
allow an adequate driveway for access for
emergency vehicles around the entire interior perimeter of the lot. II
I ,. L
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
?a mu?
&E& uo8 0lug iUC3 $045
d->o CdZ
9 0OLL I 4- S&$<
OZJO KKZO 002 Lam pZ
00
a>
U0-l
-
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
0 0
5. That Condition No. 22 of Planning Commis
Resolution No. 3689 is amended to read as follows:
"Within 90 (ninety) days of the approval of
this permit, an approximate 120' long 6' high
decorative masonry wall shall be constructed
along the west side of the property in the
area where vehicles are stored as approved by
the Planning Director. The intent of this
condition is to provide sufficient screening
from and sufficient compatibility with
existing neighborhood properties."
6. One-third of the applicants' appeal fees shal
refunded.
7. This action is final the date this resolutiol
adopted by the City Council. The provision of Chapter 1.16 of
Carlsbad Municipal Code, "Time Limits for Judicial Review" s
apply:
"NOTICE TO APPLICANT"
The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by Code of
Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has
been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial
review must be filed in the appropriate court
not later than the ninetieth day following the
date on which this decision become final;
however, if within ten days after the decision
becomes final a request for the record of the
proceedings accompanied by the required
deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the
estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which such petition may be
filed in court is extended to not later than
the thirtieth day following the date on which
the record is either personally delivered or
mailed to the party, or his attorney of
record, if he has one. A written
1 I
3
I
b
om
<o8 $Em
JOLlJ: ~oaq
aksg >iZ
9 OnL I ai SL%a OZJO
m> SL@
duo
KK%D FS <OJ >2% 60
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/I
a e
request for the preparation of the record of
the proceedings shall be filed with the City
Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village
Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008.11
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of
City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 20th day of SEPTE
1994, by the following vote, to wit:
lOTS: Council Members Lewis, Stanton, Kulchin, Nygaard, Fin
NOES: None
ABSENT : None
ATTEST :
AL%% ,$TE@Cmlerk
1 4