HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-12-06; City Council; Resolution 94-319Ii 0 0 Exhibit 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 94-319
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AND THE FIRM OF BOYLE
ENGINEERING CORPORATION, FOR ARCHAEOLOGICALAND DESIGN
PROJECT NO. 3219
REVISIONS OF THE LA COSTA AVENUE AND 1-5 INTERCHANGE,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad has determined that it is desirab
necessary to amend an agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the consulting firm 01
Engineering Corporation for the design revisions of the La Costa Avenue and 1-5 lnterc
Project.
WHEREAS, additional engineering services are needed to proceed with the design
La Costa Avenue and 1-5 Interchange.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlst
follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That Amendment No. 4, attached hereto as Exhibit "AI and "B", and made
hereof, is hereby approved.
Ill
Ill
I//
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
3. That following the Mayor’s signature of said Amendment No. 4, the City C
authorized and directed to forward executed copies of said amendment to the City Engine
Boyle Engineering Corporation, attention: Mr. Clark Fernon, 7807 Convoy Court, San
California, 921 1 1.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City C
held on the 6th day of DECEMBER , 1994 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Stanton, Kulchin, Nygaard, Finnila
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
- ALETHA L RAUTENKRANZ, city Clerk (SEAL)
i
0 0
AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO AGREEMENT
FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE
LA COSTA AVENUEJI-5 INTERCHANGE PROJECT
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 3, made and entered into as of the Ff4 day of
Dece t^h b e r , 1994, by and between the CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION, hereinafter referred
to as "CONSULTANT."
RECITALS
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT and CITY entered into an agreement on July 14, 1992, to
provide engineering services for the La Costa Avenue/l-5 Interchange Project, hereinafter referred
to as the 'PROJECT"; and
WHEREAS, said agreement identified a scope of work including the preparation of plans,
specifications, contract documents, and cost estimates for the PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, the parties to this aforementioned agreement desire to expand the scope of
work to include additional engineering work due to environmental restrictions and changes to the
design of the southwest on-ramp; and
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT possesses the necessary skills, experience, professional
expertise, financial abilities, and other qualifications to provide said services required by CITY;
and
WHEREAS, a supplemental scope of work and fee schedule have been negotiated and
agreed to between the parties hereto, and as shown on, Exhibit "A" and 'B" Scope of Services;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad, California, hereby finds it necessary, desirable, and in
the public interest to proceed with this Amendment No. 3 for said additional work.
1
e 0 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of dd-6rn;-
County of. a b,~,,
On MOLL 22 /494 before me, BcLT6QTc* &dk/am-, h%k~ hhk
personally appeared kaf4 t: P-JA*//
B personally known to me - OR - 0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidenc
to be the person@$ whose namew@/ar
subscribed to the within instrument and ac
knowledged to me that@/she/they execute
DAfE NAME, TITLE OF OFFICER - d~., "JANE DOE!NOTARY PUBLIC"
NA&) OF SIGNER(S)
RA BARTHOLOME pdk- Calilornla the same in @/her/their authorize
Cmm. Expires Nov 11.1995 capacity&@., and that by m/her/theI
signature(4 on the instrument the person@
or the entity upon behalf of which th
person@$ acted, executed the instrumen,
I
I WITNESS my hand and official seal.
/ SIGNATURE OF NOTARY
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevr
fraudulent reattachment of this form.
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENl
~
I E INDIVIDUAL CORPORATE OFFICER
I Amma/i~ R/~ .L/ A K/m-zw-D&aL
I fie - PESlXhi
1
I TITLE(S) TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
1 0 PARTNER(S) 0 LIMITED -
~ 0 ATTORNEY-IN-FACT ' /NUMBE~ of PA~ES' f '
I 0 GENERAL 4 IrUE.0 &A" I&.& * ?&ST a&
0 TRUSTEE(S) 0 GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
~ 0 OTHER: hh r Gel d& (& A 4 i//&~
I ' DATE OF DOCUMENT
' SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: ' NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTIN(IES)
I I 490
I Y k hrr,*r-i% Gd&
I 1 I
fl4 e4 &kAd e?&# S?&dU&
~G&R(s) OTHER THAN NA~IED ABOVE
~~~ ~~ " ~~ """_"""""
01993 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION 8236 Remmet Ave., P.O. Box 7184 Canoga Park, CA 9'
0 0
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and the mutual covenants contained
herein, CITY and CONSULTANT hereby agree as follows:
1. CONSULTANT shall provide services as outlined on the attached Exhibit "A'
and 'B".
2. CITY shall pay CONSULTANT for all work associated with Paragraph 1 above, on
a time and materials basis not-to-exceed $30,502. CONSULTANT shall provide CITY on a
monthly basis, copies of invoices sufficiently detailed to include hours performed, hourly rates,
and related activities and costs for approval by CITY.
3. All provisions of the aforementioned agreement entered into on July 14, 1992, by
and between CITY and CONSULTANT shall remain in full force and effect.
4. This Amendment No. 4 to the aforementioned agreement between CITY and
CONSULTANT shall be effective on and from the day first above written.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals.
n
Title ay& MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM ATTEST:
By: i2L"Q.k
QqaW City Attorney /'2 * 3. 9c/. City Clerk /f
0 0
Exhibit “A” - Scope of Services
Amendment No. 4
November 4,1994
LA COSTA AVENUEM INTERCHANGE
Introduction
This is the scope of services for Amendment No. 4 to the “Agreeme]
for Design Services for Improvements to the La Costa AvenueA-5
Interchange,” dated July 14, 1992, by and between the City of
Carlsbad (City) and Boyle Engineering Corporation (Boyle). City ha
requested that Boyle revise the project geometry, perform additional
right-of-way services, incorporate new Caltrans CADD standards,
eliminate seismic retrofit from the project, and revise the stage
construction.
The estimated costs for completing this work are attached as Exhibit
B. City and Boyle agree that these costs are approximate, based on o
current understanding of the additional work requested. Should the
level of effort be significantly different than anticipated, City and
Boyle agree to adjust the fee accordingly.
1. Revise Project Geometry
The City has requested the following changes to the project geomeq
A. Southbound On-Ramp - Widen the ramp on the east side
instead of the west side to avoid cultural impacts.
B. Median at Piraeus Street - Eliminate the strip median and
provide for the westbound to eastbound U-turn.
Revise the following sheets to reflect the changed geometry: Typical
Cross Section (X), Layout (L), Profile and Superelevation Diagram
(P), Construction Detail (C), Grading and Drainage Layout (G),
Drainage Profiles & Details (D), Utility (U), Stage Construction (SC
Construction Signing (CS), Pavement Delineation (PD), Electrical (I?
and earthwork sections. Recalculate earthwork quantities and other
material quantities.
Page I of 3 BOWL/
e 0 LA COSTA AVENUWI-5 INTERCHANC
Exhibit “A” - Scope of Services Amendment No. 4
II. Additional Right-of-way Services
Order Five Title Reports: Order title reports for six parcels (two are
combined into one report) in the southwest quadrant. Litigation
guarantees will be requested in the amount of $75,000 each. Boyle
proposes to order these fiom Stewart Title Insurance Company. Cos
for right-of-way engineering for the driveway relocation affecting
these parcels are not included in this amendment.
111. Incorporate New CADD Standards
Incorporate changed Caltrans CADD standards. These are standards
which are not specified in the CADD Users Manual, that was
referenced in the original contract between City and Boyle. At the tir
the CADD files for the 50 percent submittal were prepared, Boyle
could not have anticipated these changes in policy. These changed
standards are due to revisions in either:
A. Headquarters Policy: Examples include elimination of
reference files, rotation of sheet views, and leader lines.
B. District 11 Policy: Examples include line weights, font
sizes and types, text nodes, shared and nested cells, and li
types.
A more detailed list of these changes has been submitted to the City
for review.
IV. Eliminate Seismic Retrofit
Seismic retrofit is being eliminated fiom this project because Caltrar
plans to complete a column wrap project prior to this project. Remo\
the column retrofit fiom the structural plans. Coordinate with the
Caltrans Division of Structures (DOS) to determine which elements
the structure design are affected. Coordinate with Caltrans to proces:
the interchange project as a seismic retrofit project, since the bridge
widening is critical to the seismic strategy. Estimate the state’s
funding share of the overcrossing widening costs.
Page 2 of 3 BOWL
0 e - LA COSTA AVENUEn-5 INTERCHANC
Exhibit “A” - Scope of Services
Amendment No. 4
V. Revise Stage Construction
Revise the stage construction plans to combine Stages I and I1 into a
new Stage I, and combine Stages I11 and IV into a new Stage 11. Revj
Stage V to be a new Stage 111. Stage construction plans will show
bridge widening on the north and south sides of the bridge
simultaneously, with no work on the existing bridge bent.
Compensation
These tasks will be completed on a lump sum basis for a fee of
$30,502. A detailed cost breakdown is included as Exhibit “B.”
Schedule
Boyle will incorporate these changes for the 100 percent submittal dl
January 16, 1995.
SD-B99-197-33/AMD4SOS.DOC/cap/FRCF/110494
Page 3 of 3 ROlirLl
- I m - c G I I X W
w I
0 2 c 2
z
z
W
n
W z a + 0
I- 2 0 0
is
a 3 S a 2 m
u)
0 O
m
+
$
I
I
IC)
9 m
u) - 5 L
y. 0
)r c, G
a
9s 5 Gz
E$
Ll
-9 aT
@x. u1:
a3
'I -2
a9 83
e3 2
- 0 7 43- N e3 - 0 e3
- 0
e 03
- 0 (D
N e3
0-
-
7
Q) x e -
43 sr -
7
-
0
-
N 0 v
-
0
-
0
-
0
-
0 v
-
cc) 7
-
N
-i
z 0 - C E
E
-J S
a .- 8
"1-0 2% 3 ez ._ - 0 8
v) .- i5 s s v) .-
c
I
- m -
I-
I X W
w
=
I
I
0 2
I- 2 W E
2 W I 4
n
Q) 3 C
Q) 2
a? 0-5 2gz
m c,
L';
7
I $q
I Er
I 'j3 x v w; mu2 s Q!3 5t! c0 0% sa gis
0 0
0000
L .o b co
gfig NNWZ NO Z"
- m
0
.Y+ 0
-
N m
N 69
c9
18 -
- 0
tf) N r
- co 0
W €e
N!
- 0 v) a-
69 N -
-
N W m -
"
-
0
-
0 b N
-
0
-
N W
-
0
-
?
-
W m
-
m
-i
z 0
8 a
U 5
-
E
E a
8 .-
"I-0 2; e: ._
c 0 c
In s .- s In .- ~f - -
- m -
I- z z X W
I w-
0 2
I- 2 W z n 2 W E a I- 3 I-
O 2
0
Q) 3 S a k
8
(II .c,
0
(II II \ 9 I
I = (II 9 to I L s
yl 0
E ;o'
a
aw 'e 2 oe
'k: 0, e=
Ljj uw .-
@
'kg Q)" aE Er *x
03 9
0 g &w
zw-
: $% $W"
cr-
L .- In
- m
cv w
-
? ro
te
-
w 0
- 0 P) t9
- a3
-f w
e3 - 8 u)- ? t9 -
a (v -
0
-
0
-
0 (v
-
0
-
0
-
0
-
0
-
In
-
7
-i
z 0
* c E
E
U C
a .- C
"Iu 5; e: .-
c
S 0
In .- 5 3 .- In
2= I- * u
..
,
- m i+
EC I
33
w 8%.
00 e:
+ 6 y 2y-g
E : .g5 n=xz $:w z= Q)-I
to Q)3 a ~LL k0
0% 23
20
=> Q)
' -3,
F
2 m)IA
w- m3!
I- .-
0 0
.Ebw CO ;we !=!=a a 77
- m
7 69 - 0 b3
- 0 e
- 0 0
69 -
- 0 0
m e
b-
-
(0 b *- $! e -
W 0 N -
0
-
0
-
CO 2.
-
0
-
7
-
0
-
0
-
W 7
-
0
-+
z 0
4- 8 E u c 0
Q E
"Iu
c .-
2; eg .-
c 0 8
u) .- z s
c .- fn
x - -