HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-05-20; City Council; Resolution 97-670I It 0 w
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 97-670
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. SDP 96-14 AND COASTAL
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. CDP 96-16 FOR A LEGOLAND
THEME PARK WHICH INCLUDES THEME PARK
ATTRACTIONS, RETAIL, FOOD AND BEVERAGE SERVICE,
ASSOCIATED SUPPORT FACILITIES, AND PARKING ON
129 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD EAST OF ARMADA DRIVE
AND WEST OF FUTURE HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD WITHIN
PLANNING AREA 4 OF THE CARLSBAD RANCH SPECIFIC
PLAN IN THE COASTAL ZONE AND LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 13
CASE NAME: LEGOLAND Carlsbad
CASE NO.: SDP 96-14/CDP 96-16
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resol
follows:
WHEREAS, on April 16, 1997 the Carlsbad Planning Commission held 2
noticed public hearing to consider a proposed Site Development Plan and Coastal Develo
Permit for a LEGOLAND Theme Park on 129 acres of land, and adopted Resolutions 402
4084 recommending to the City Council that the Site Development Plan and C
Development Permit be approved; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on 20th day of ,
May , 1997 held a public hearing to consider the recommendation and heard all p
interested in or opposed to SDP 96-14 and CDP 96-16; and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study was prepared for the project and it was dete.
that the project was in Prior Compliance with the Program Environmental Impact Repol
94-01) certified, for the Carlsbad Ranch Specific Plan Amendment and related applicatic
January 9,1996 by the City Council,
ll w w
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Cit
Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of
Development Plan 96-14 and Coastal Development Permit 96-1 6 is approve(
that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission containe
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4083 and 4084 on file with the City (
and incorporated herein by reference, are the findings and conditions of the
Council.
“NOTICE TO APPLICANT’’
“The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is govern
Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made applicable in the C
Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper se
judicial review must be filed in the appropriate court no later than the ninetietl
following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten day:
the decision becomes final a request for the record of proceedings accompanied I
required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation 0:
record, the time within which such petition may be filed in court is extended to not
than the thirtieth day following the date on which the record is either personally del;
or mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request j
preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, C
Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008.”
...
...
...
*..
...
...
...
...
...
-2-
l e m
1
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the C 2
EFFECTIVE DATE: This resolution shall be effective upon its adoption.
3 Carlsbad on the 20th day of May 1997, by the following vote, to wit:
4
5
6
7
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Nygaard, and Hall
NOES: None
ABSENT: Council Member Kulchin
8
9
10
11
l2 I ATTEST:
stant City Clerk
(SEAL)
- -3-