HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-08-06; City Council; Resolution 2002-2381
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-238
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. SDP 96-01(B) AND COASTAL
EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING
PERMITS FOR 20 HOTEL UNITS AND 1,600 SQUARE FEET OF
MEETING SPACE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5805 ARMADA
DRIVE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 13.
CASE NAME: GRAND PACIFIC PALISADES RESORTS
CASE NO.: SDP 96-01(B)/CDP 96-02(B)
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does hereby resolve as
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMENDMENT NO. CDP 96-02(B) TO
follows:
WHEREAS, on May 15, 2002, the Carlsbad Planning Commission held a duly
noticed public hearing to consider a proposed Site Development Plan Amendment and Coastal
Development Permit Amendment to extend the deadline for the issuance of building permits for
20 hotel units and 1,600 square feet of meeting space for the existing Grand Pacific Palisades
Resort, and adopted Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5143 and 5144 recommending to
the City Council that the Site Development Plan Amendment and Coastal Development Permit
Amendment be approved; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on the 6th
day of August , 2002 held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the
recommendation and heard all persons interested in or opposed to the SDP 96-01(B) and CDP
96-02(B).
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the recommendation of the Planning Commission for the approval of
Site Development Plan Amendment 96-01(B) and Coastal Development Permit Amendment 96-
02(B) is approved and that the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission contained
in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 5143 and 5144 on file with the City Clerk and
incorporated herein by reference, are the findings and conditions of the City Council.
....
. . ..
. . .. a
1
2
3
4
5
6
I
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22(
23
24
25
26
27
28
3. This action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the City Council.
The Provisions of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, “Time Limits for Judicial
Review” shall apply:
“NOTICE TO APPLICANT”
“The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is
governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been
made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code
Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be
filed in the appropriate court no later than the ninetieth day following the
date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days
after the decision becomes final a request for the record of proceedings
accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the
estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which such
petition may be filed in court is extended to not latter than the thirtieth day
following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or
mailed to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written
with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive,
request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed
Carlsbad, California 92008.”
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the 6th day of August ,2002, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Finnila, Nygaard, and Hal:
NOES: None A
AlTESTj?
, \
4ORRAIN M. WOOD, City Clerk
(SEAL) 1
tesolution No. 2002-238
-2- 3