HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-06-17; City Council; Resolution 2003-155I
L L
L
1
c
c 1
E
s
1C
11
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-155
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE SECOND ADDENDUM TO THE CARLSBAD HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN TO INCORPORATE MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION.
CASE NAME: HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN CASE NO.: HMP ADDENDUM #2 AMENDMENT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, on the 4th day 0’
February, 2003 approved a Local Coastal Program Amendment (CLPA 02-10) to appll
additional habitat conservation standards in the coastal zone and an Addendum to the Habita
Management Plan (HMP Addendum #2) to incorporate the additional standards into the HMP
and
WHEREAS, LCPA 02-10 was subsequently approved by the California Coastal
Commission with suggested modifications; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved those suggested modifications; and
WHEREAS, it is now necessary to amend HMP Addendum #2 to incorporate the
Coastal Commission’s modifications.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, does
hereby resolve as follows:
1, That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the amendments to the Second Addendum (HMP Addendum #2) are
approved as shown in Attachment “B”.
3. That staff is directed to amend HMP Addendum #2 and is authorized to
make any other necessary minor, non-substantive revisions, and to submit it to the Wildlife Agencies for final approval of the Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan along with the proposed Implementation Agreement.
...
...
...
... 8
i
i
II
1:
1:
1:
11
1:
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City c
Carlsbad on the 17th day of June, 2003, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Finnila, Kulchin, Ball, Packard
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
h
(SEAL)
Resolution No. 2003-155 -2- 9
Attachment “B”
HMP ADDENDUM #2
AMENDMENTS TO ADDENDUM #2 AS REQUIRED BY COASTAL COMMISSION
FOR CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
(underlined sections represent language to be added -
&ikee§ions represent language to be deleted)
1. The following changes should be made to policy 7-14 of the Second Addendum to
the HMP, beginning on page 8:
The following standards apply to those parcels in Zones 20 and 21 shown on Exhibit
A to this Addendum, which are located within the biological core and linkage areas
designated in the MHCP. They are in addition to the applicable, general
conservation standards contained in 7-1 through 7-1 1 and the HMP. The standards
are intended to direct development to existing disturbed areas to the maximum
extent feasible, limit impacts to native vegetation, and establish viable core and
linkage areas as designated in the HMP. In general, each property shall be allowed
to develop at least 25% of the site with appropriate mitigation as specified in 7-8
through 7-1 1. When individual properties area proposed for rezoning or
development, detailed biological information will be required to determine whether
the proposal is consistent with the HMP, subsection 7 and the standards below,
based upon the actual type, location and condition of onsite resources, and the
appropriate locations of development and preservation area. One or more wildlife
crossinqs under Poinsettia Lane of a sufficient size for larqer species shall be
provided if recommended bv the wildlife resource aqencies.
- A. B Assessor’s Parcel No. 212-120-33 (Hieatt) - No impact to vernal pools.
Minimize impact to vernal pool watersheds.
- B. e. Assessor’s Parcel No. 212-010-3 (Kirgis) - Preserve 75% of property with
development clustered immediately adjacent to Kelly Ranch.
C. €& Assessor’s Parcel No. 215-070-35 (Fernandez) - Cluster development on
disturbed areas to the maximum extent feasible. Maximum 10% impact on CSS and
SMC for access purposed.
D. & Assessor’s Parcel No. 215-040-03 (Muroya) - Cluster development on
disturbed areas to the maximum extent feasible. Maximum 10% impact on CSS and
SMC for access purposed.
1
- E. I; Assessor’s Parcel No. 212-040-50 (Emerald Point) - Development limited to
disturbed non-native grassland areas. No impacts to native habitat allowed.
- F. & Assessor’s Parcel No. 21 5-020-06 (RWSB) - Development shall be limited to a
maximum of 25% of the property, not including Poinsettia Lane construction, and
disturbed portions shall be clustered to the maximum extent feasible along lw&e#e
of the property adjacent to Cassia Lane Road and the future Poinsettia Lane
extension. ~
A wildlife corridor linkaqe oriented aenerallv north-south shall be provided
on the eastern portion of the propertv and desiqned to connect to neiqhboring
properties with existinq or potential wildlife corridor linkaqes. Impacts to native
habitat shall rewire onsite mitiqation throuqh restoration and/or creation of habitat
within the desiqnated corridor linkaqe, in addition to anv other required mitisation.
..
0 ..
- G. K Assessor’s Parcel No. 215-020-07 (Maldonado) - Development shall be
concentrated along the Poinsettia Lane extension and shall be limited to the western
half of the propertv. 4
extwsicz. No impacts to the coast oak woodland and riparian area except for
The eastern half
Poinsettia Lane extension. wt of
of the propertv is recommended for offsite mitiqation for other properties in Zone 21;
however, at minimum, a wildlife corridor linkaqe oriented qenerallv north-south shall
be provided on the eastern half of the propertv and desiqned to connect to
neiqhborinq properties with existinq or potential wildlife corridor linkaqes. The
corridor linkaqe shall include anv onsite coast oak woodland area.
.. .. .
- H. b Assessor’s Parcel No. 2150050-21 (Namikas) - Development shall be limited
to a maximum of 25% of the property, not including Poinsettia Lane construction,
and shall be clustered on the western portion of the property. No impacts to coast
oak woodland, riparian areas or wetlands except for Poinsettia Lane extension. A wildlife corridor linkaqe oriented qenerallv north-south shall be provided on the
eastern portion of the propertv, includinq the onsite coast oak woodland area, and be
desiqned to connect to neiqhborinq properties with existinq or potential wildlife
corridor linkaqes. Impacts to native habitat shall require onsite mitiqation throuqh
restoration andlor creation of habitat within the desiqnated corridor linkaqe, in
addition to any other required mitiqation.
- I.* Assessor’s Parcel No. 21 5-050-22 (Sudduth) - Development shall be limited to
a maximum of 25% of the property, not including Poinsettia Lane construction, and
shall be clustered on the western portion of the property. No impacts to coast oak
woodland, riparian areas or wetlands except for Poinsettia Lane extension. A wildlife
corridor linkaae oriented qenerallv north-south shall be provided on the eastern
portion of the propertv includinq the onsite coast oak woodland area and be
desiqned to connect to neiqhborinq properties with existinq or potential wildlife
2
corridor linkaqes. Impacts to native habitat shall require onsite mitiqation throuqh
restoration and/or creation of habitat within the desiqnated corridor linkaqe, in
addition to any other required mitiqation.
J- +-& Assessor’s Parcel No. 215-050-44, 45, 46, 47 (Kevane) - Development shall
be limited to a maximum of 25% of the property, 4 ex&w&h+ and shall be clustered on the western portion of the property. No
impacts to coast oak woodland, riparian areas or wetlands shall be allowed. e%@
fc: P- A wildlife corridor linkaqe oriented qenerally north-
south shall be provided on the eastern portion of the property, includinq the coast
oak woodland, and be desiqned to connect to neiqhborinq properties with existina or
potential wildlife corridor linkaqes. Impacts to native habitat shall require onsite
mitiqation throuqh restoration and/or creation of habitat within the desiqnated
corridor linkaqe, in addition to any other required mitiqation.
K. 8: Assessor’s Parcel No. 215-050-12 (Reiter) - Development shall be limited to
;maximum of 25% of the property, ’ , and
shall be clustered on the western portion of the property. No impacts to coast oak
woodland, riparian areas or wetlands shall be allowed extwskt. A wildlife corridor linkaqe oriented qenerally north-south shall be
provided on the eastern portion of the property, includinq the coast oak woodland,
and be desiqned to connect to neiqhborinq properties with existinq or potential
wildlife corridor linkaqes. Impacts to native habitat shall require onsite mitiqation
throuqh restoration and/or creation of habitat within the desiqnated corridor linkaqe,
in addition to any other required mitiqation.
- L. 4% Assessor’s Parcel No. 21 5-050-73 (Levantino) - Maximum 25% development
clustered on the southern portion of the property. Buffer widths may be reduced
and/or additional impacts may be allowed to the extent necessarv to obtain site
access, and/or to accommodate Circulation Road improvements identified in the
certified LCP.
2. New hardline maps shall be added for the following properties: Aura Circle (Figure
36), Roesch Property (Figure 37), Carlsbad Promenade (Figure 38), Redeemer by
the Sea (Figure 39), and Thompson-Tabata (Figure 40).
3. Text conditions for the Aura Circle hardline should be added to the second HMP
addendum at the end of page 10:
For Aura Circle (Fiqure 361, development shall be clustered on the south portion of
the property. Gradinq shall be kept entirely off the larqest area of CSS in the north
part of the site. Created slopes shall be reveqetated with coastal saqe scrub, and
existinq disturbed areas of the proiect site that are not identified for development on
the hardline map shall be used for onsite mitiqation throuqh restoration/recreation of
coastal saqe scrub. Post-development habitat area and open space shall be placed
into the HMP preserve.
4. Revised hardline preserve maps shall be added for the following properties: HUB
Park/SDG&E Property (Figure 17 - revised) and Kelly Ranch (Figure 12 - revised).
3
5. The existing Hardline Preserve map for the Kevane property (Figure 25) shall be
removed.
6. Revise Policy 7.1 3(e) on Page 8 of the Second HMP Addendum as follows:
e. The area shown as “Veterans Memorial Park Development Area” is designated
for public recreational use. It is the intent of this policy that the public park area
be developed so as to maximize public access and provide a variety of
recreational opportunities. Development within steep slopes and/or native
veqetation shall be limited to passive recreational facilities, such as recreational
trails and picnic areas. Within the proposed development areas, qradinq of
Ssteep slopes with native veqetation shall be limited
to the minimum amount necessary to
allow such uses.
..
7. Revise Tables 3, 6, 7 and 8 and Figures 6, 26 and 27 of the 1999 Draft HMP to
reflect the changes to proposed habitat impacts and preserve areas, standards
properties and hardlined properties.
8. Revise Policy 7-9 on Page 5 of the Second HMP Addendum as follows:
h. All mitigations areas, onsite and offsite, shall be secured with a conservation
easement in favor of the wildlife agencies. In addition, a preserve management
plan shall be prepared for the mitigation areas, to the satisfaction of the City, the
wildlife agencies, and the Coastal Commission. Phase I of the preserve
manaqement plan shall be incorporated into the Implementation Proqram of the
LCP throuqh an LCP amendment within one year of Commission certification of
the HMP as part of the certified LCP. Phase 2 of the preserve manaqement plan
shall be incorporated into the Implementation Proqram in the same manner within
three years of Commission certification of the HMP as part of the certified LCP.
The preserve management plan shall ensure adequate funding to protect the
preserve as open space and to maintain the biological values of the mitigation
areas in perpetuity. Management provisions and funding for mitiqation required
to address habitat impacts shall be in place prior to zsy- the impacts for which the
mitigation is required te-b&&& ‘ . At a minimum, monitoring reports shall be
required as a condition of development approval after the first and third year of
habitat mitigation efforts. ?!x
9. Add to the Planning Standards for Zone 8 on page D-65 of the HMP regarding
the Callaghan property (Planning Area L of Kelly Ranch) the following wording:
Development of the Callashan propertv shall be required to preserve Open
Space as shown on the certified Open Space Map for Planninq Area L approved
bv the California Coastal Commission as Dart of it’s action on LCP Amendment
No. 2 - 99D (Kelly Ranch).
4