HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-06-19; Design Review Board; Resolution 1711
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
1c
11
12
12
14
15
1€
11
1E
1s
2c
21
22
22
24
25
26
27
213
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 171
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA DENYING A MINOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT
TO ALLOW A BEAUTY SALON RETAIL USE TO BE LOCATED IN AN
EXISTING STRUCTURE ON PROPERTY GENERAUY LOCATED ON THE
WEST SIDE OF MADISON STREET, SOUTH OF CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE
AT 3055 MADISON STREET.
CASE NAME: PERL FAMILY TRUST
CASE NO: RP 91-2
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and
referred to the Design Review Board; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of
the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Design Review
Board did, on the 19th day of June, 1991, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider
said application on property described as:
Lots 25, 26 and 27 of Block 39, Map No. 1722 as recorded in the County of
San Diego, California. APN: 203.305.12.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Design Review Board considered
all factors relating to RP 91-2.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Design Review Board as
follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design Review
Board hereby DENIES, based on findings and subject to the following conditions:
....
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1. Since the beauty salon use is for a structure that has not been converted from a
residential stnmure, the previouS use had no business license and all associated
development standards cannot be met, proposed use would be inconsistent with the
goals and objectives of the Village Development Plan and Village Design Manual to
redevelop properties in an orderly hctional manner.
2. The subject property is within two Subareas (1 and 7). The portion of the property
with the proposed uses location at 3055 Madison Street is within Subarea 1. The
beauty salon use would be appropriate at the proposed location, however, the
project cannot be supported since this does not involve a replacement of a non-
conforming use and all development standards are not met.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design Review
Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of June, 1991 by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Norby, Erwin, Gonzales, Savary
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CLARENCE SCHLEHUBER, Chairman
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
ATTEST:
'-WTHY GRAHAM
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
ENM:vd:lh:m
DRB RES0 NO. 171 -2-