HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-12-02; Design Review Board; Resolution 2001
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DESIGN REvlEw BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 200
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REMEW BOARD OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA DENYING A
THRU WINDOW TO THE EXISTING POLLOS MARIA
RESTAURANT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE
WEST SIDE OF HARDING STREET BETWEEN CARLSBAD
CASE NAME: POLLOS MARIA
REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT AMENDMENT TO ADD A DRIVE-
VILLAGE DFUVE AND OAK AVENUE IN SUB-AREA 7.
CASE NO: RP 84-04(A)
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and
referred to the Design Review Board; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Design
Review Board did, on the 2nd day of December, 1992, hold a duly noticed public hearing
to consider said application on property described as:
Lots 25 and 26 in Block 57, according to Map No. 775 in the
City of Carlsbad, filed in the office of the County Recorder,
February 15, 1894.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Design Review Board
considered all factors relating to RP 84-04(A).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Design Review Board
as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
€3) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design Review
Board DENIES RP 84-04(A), based on the following findings:
....
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
....
....
....
....
....
....
The proposal is not consistent with the goals and objectives of the Village Design
Manual and Sub-Area 7 because the project site is not large enough to support the
drive-thru window and associated parking and circulation redesign. The project
would create onsite vehicle congestion and de onsite pedes~ circulation.
The project does not meet all the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The
existing restaurant use is one parking space short as approved with the original
permit, RP 84-04. This proposal involves the addition of a ninth, handicap space
as shown on the Site Plan, Exhibit "A", dated December 2, 1992. However, this
space would be potentially blocked by the drive-thru queuing line. in addition,
tandem parking is proposed which is not allowed by the Zoning Ordinance in this
case.
The engineering analysis by City staff indicates that points of traffic conflict have
been created through onsite circulation design. The proposal converts an existing
two-way circulation access off a public street (Harding Street) into a one-way
circulation design with access off the rear alley. Therefore, the access to Harding
Street would be an exit only and the only entrance to the site would be by the rear
alley which is unacceptable.
There would not be enough space available to comply with the standard of allowing
for a minimum of 4 standard sized cars to wait before the order box since the site
plan shows 4 compact sized cars touching bumper to bumper.
There would not be enough space available to comply with the standard of allowing
for a minimum of 2 standard sized cars to wait between the order box and pick up
window since the site plan shows 2 compact sized cars touching bumper to bumper.
The parking lot shown on the site Wiu not adequately function for 8 cars since
tandem parking is proposed and the project's redesign creates onsite vehicle and
pedestrian congestion.
DRB RES0 NO. 200 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 2nd day of December, 1992
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: NOBLE, ERWIN, SAVARY, ROWLETT
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: GONZALES
ABSTAIN: NONE
DESIGN RES8EW BOARD
ATTEST:
EVAN A& BECKER
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DRB RES0 NO. 200 -3-