HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-07-19; Design Review Board; Resolution 2271
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
2c
21
24
22
24
2f
2(
2;
2(
DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 227
A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A COASTAL
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW A RELOCATION AND
REMODEL OF AN EXISTING MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING FROM
660 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE TO 2963 MADISON STREET.
CASE NAME: PARKER OFFICE RELOCATION
CASE NO. CDP 95-01
AI": 203-304-15
WHEREAS, Oakley Parker ("Developer") has filed a verified application
with the Housing and Redevelopment Department of the City of Carlsbad which has been
referred to the Design Review Board; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Coastal
Development Permit as provided by Chapter 21.81 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Design
Review Board, on the 19th day of July, 1995, did hold a duly noticed public hearing to
consider said application on property described as:
Lots 25 and 26 in Block 38 of the Town of Carlsbad, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 775,
filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, February 15,
1894.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing upon hearing and considering all
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Design Review
Board considered all factors relating to Coastal Development Permit 95-01.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Design
Review Board as follows:
1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1E
1E
2c
21
2;
2:
24
2!
2r
2'
2
DRB Resolution No, 227
Page 2
2. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design
Review Board hereby APPROVES a Coastal Dedevelopment Permit,
CDP 95-01. based on the following findings and subject to the
following conditions :
FINDINGS
1. The Design Review Board finds that the subject project will have no
significant impact on the environment and has approved a Negative
Declaration for the subject project.
2. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the various elements
of the Local Coastal Program and the General Plan because it assists in the
effort to create a distinct identity for the Village Redevelopment Area by
encouraging activities that traditionally locate in a pedestrian-oriented
downtown area, including offices (general and medical), restaurants and
specialty retail shops.
3. The project is consistent with the City-wide Facilities and Improvements Plan,
the applicable local facilities management plan, and all City public facility
policies and ordinances since:
a) The project has been conditioned to ensure that building permits will
not be issued for the project unless the District Engineer determines
that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur within the
project unless sewer service remains available, and the District
Engineer is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities
Element of the General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to
sewer service for this project.
b) All necessary public improvements have been provided or are required
as a condition of approval.
c) The Developer has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an
appropriate condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that
contract and payment of the fee will enable this body to find that
public facilities will be available concurrent with need as required by
the General Plan.
4. The project has been conditioned to pay any increase in public facility fee, or
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by the Local Facilities Management Plan
prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will
ensure continued availability of public facilities. ....
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2?
2L
2f
2f
2;
21
DRB Resolution No.=
Page 3
5.
6.
7.
8.
The project is consistent with the Carlsbad Village Area Redevelopment Plan
and the Village Design Manual because it will continue to provide for an
encouraged use within Subarea 1 of the Village Redevelopment Project Area
and will make a key location within the Village available for future
commercial development. The uses allowed in this area are the same as those
allowed within the C-1, C-2 and R-P zones, with medical offices permitted by
right.
This project has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as
part of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1.
The project is in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code as demonstrated by the processing of the appropriate
discretionary permits, maintenance of compatibility with surrounding land
uses, and the provision of adequate parking and landscaping.
The Design Review Board has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the
Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby fmds, in this case, that the
exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to
the project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough
proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
CONDITIONS:
1. The Design Review Board does hereby approve the Coastal Development
Permit, CDP 95-01, for the project entitled "Parker Office Relocation"
(Exhibit "A" - "D" is on file in the Housing and Redevelopment Department,
dated June 5, 1995), subject to the conditions herein set forth. Staff is
authorized and directed to make or require the Developer to make all
corrections and modifications to the Coastal Development Permit documents,
as necessary to make them internally consistent and conform to the Design
Review Board's final action on the project. Development shall occur
substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Any proposed development
substantially different from this approval shall require an amendment to this
approval.
....
....
....
....
....
I I.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB Resolution N0.Z
Page 4
2. Approval of CDP 95-01 is subject to approval of RP 95-01. CDP 95-01 is
subject to all conditions contained in Design Review Board Resolution No.
226 dated July 19, 1995 for RP 95-01, the Parker Office Relocation Project.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Design
Review Board of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of July, 1995 by the
following vote to wit:
AYES: Noble, Savary, Marquez, Vessey
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Welshons
ABSTAIN: None.
DESIGN REV@W BOARD
AT: .#
EVAN E. BECKER, HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR