HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-09-06; Design Review Board; Resolution 324Exhibit 1
1 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 324
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD OF THE
3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
ADOPTION OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A ZONE
4 CODE AMENDMENT AND LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
AMENDMENT THAT INCORPORATES AMENDMENTS TO
5 THE VILLAGE MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN MANUAL
6 AND CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 65 -SIGNS ON PUBLIC
PROPERTY TO CLARIFY AND/OR REVISE POLICIES
7 PROVIDING FOR CONSISTENCY AND/OR REVISE ONE OR
MORE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT
8 PROJECTS LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE
VILLAGE AREA, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, TO ASSIST
IN THE CONTINUED FACILITATION OF THE
10 DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH QUALITY REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS.
11 CASE NAME: VILLAGE MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN
MANUAL AMENDMENTS
12 CASE NO.: ZCA95-10(A)/LCPA 95-10(A)
13
14 WHEREAS, Carlsbad Redevelopment Agency, "Applicant," has filed a verified
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property within the legal boundaries of the
Village Redevelopment Area ("the Property"); and
17
18 WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was prepared in conjunction with said
project; and
20 WHEREAS, the Design Review Board did on the 6th day of September, 2007,
21
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
22
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
£J
24 and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, and
25 considering any written comments received, the Design Review Board considered all factors
relating to the Negative Declaration.
27
28
1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Design Review
2 Board as follows:
3
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
4
<. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Design Review
Board hereby RECOMMENDS ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration,
6 Exhibit "ND," according to Exhibits "NOI" dated July 23, 2007, and "PIP dated
June 29, 2007, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following
7 findings:
8 Findings:
9 1. The Design Review Board of the City of Carlsbad does hereby find:
10
a. it has reviewed, analyzed, and considered the Negative Declaration for Village
Master Plan and Design Manual and Zone Code Amendments - ZCA 95-
10(a)/LCPA 95-10(a), analyzing the environmental impacts therein identified for
this project and any comments thereon prior to RECOMMENDING
13 APPROVAL of the project; and
14 b. the Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelines and the
Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad; and
c. it reflects the independent judgment of the Design Review Board of the City of
17 Carlsbad; and
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB RESO NO. 324 -2-
d. based on the EIA Part II and comments thereon, there is no substantial evidence
2 the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
3 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of the Design
Review Board for Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Area, held on the 6th day of September,
2007, by the following vote, to wit:
6
AYES: BAKER, LAWSON, SCHUMACHER AND WHITTON
7
NOES: NONE8
9 ABSENT: NONE
10 ABSTAIN: NONE
11
12
13 A^JHONVLAWSON, Chairperson
DESIGN jfeviEW BOARD
14
15
,, ATTEST:lo
17
18 DEBBIE FOUNTAI
Housing and Redevelopment Director
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DRB RESO NO. 324 -3-