Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-08-13; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; Resolution 2801 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT RESOLUTION NO. 2 8 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEWLOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIF'ORNIA TO AMEND THE CARLSBAD VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA VILLAGE MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN MANUAL TO BRING IT INTO CONFORMITY WITH COASTAL COMMISSION SUGGESTED MODIFICATIONS. CASE NAME: VILLAGE MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN MANUAL CASE NO: LCPA 95-10/1-96B WHEREAS, on December 12, 1995, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission took action to approve the new Village Master Plan and Design Manual for the Village Redevelopment Area , and on January 23, 1996, the City Council took action to submit an application for an amendment to the Local Coastal Program for the Village Redevelopment Segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Zone (and for all properties located within the Village Redevelopment Project Area) with the California Coastal Commission , including review, approval and certification of the Village Redevelopment Master Plan and Design Manual; and WHEREAS, said verified application was reviewed by the California Coastal Commission and approved, with suggested modifications; and WHEREAS, the California Coastal Commission has forwarded and the City of Carlsbad acknowledges receipt of the Commission's resolution of certification, including any suggested modifications; and WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission accepts and agrees to those modifications to the Village Master Plan and Design Manual as suggested by the California Coastal Commission; and WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission, together with the City Council, held a public hearing to hear and consider all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard on said modifications and the I -: i' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HRC Reso. No 280 Page 2 Housing and Redevelopment Commission considered all factors relating to said modifications to the Village Master Plan and Design Manual. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That this approved resolution shall serve as the record of formal action taken by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission to approve the modifications to the Village Master Plan and Design Manual as suggested by the California Coastal Commission in their resolution of certification dated April 23, 1996. C) The Village Master Plan and Design Manual, being the attachment to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission Resolution No. 271 is hereby amended to read as follows: 1. Page 2-25 is revised to eliminate the reference to timeshares after the word "hotels" in the Land Use Chart in Chapter 2, as shown in the attached replacement page number 2-25. 2. Page 2-26 is revised to add "Timeshares" as a Land Use Category, on the land use chart, and permit them, on a provisional basis, in Land Use Districts 1, 2, 3 and 4. The land use chart reflects that Timeshares shall be a prohibited use in Land Use Districts, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9, as shown in the attached replacement page number 2-26. 3. Page 2-32 is revised to eliminate the following language: "The following uses may be provisionally permitted: Commercial and Retail Businesses, Mixed Use Projects and Residential Projects. All provisional uses will be reviewed on a case-by- case basis. 'I This language shall be replaced with: "Any other use, including commercial and retail businesses, mixed use projects or residential projects, shall not be permitted without the completion of a Master Plan for the Transportation Corridor which would need to be reviewed and approved by the California Coastal Commission as a Local Coastal Program Amendment, I' as shown in the attached replacement page number 2-32. .... .... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HRC Reso. No 280 Page 3 4. 5. 6. 7. Page 2-60 is revised to eliminate the following language for Location and Development Criteria No. 4: "A clear area of at least five feet in width must be maintained for pedestrian use over the entire length of the sidewalk in front of the business. 'I This language shall be replaced with: "A clear area of at least five feet in width of linear paved sidewalk, free of all obstructions, must be maintained to allow adequate pedestrian movement on the sidewalk in front of the business," as shown on the attached replacement page number 2-60. Pages 2-60 and 2-61 are revised to replace the following statement as Location and Development Criteria No. 5: "If installed, all fixtures, barriers, railings, landscaping or combination thereof shall be in place when the cafe is in operation and shall be stationary or permanent, fixed to the sidewalk and contiguous to define the cafe boundary and may be removed when the cafe is closed"; all remaining Location and Development Criteria, following this new No. 5, and including the previous No. 5, shall be renumbered accordingly, as shown on the attached replacement pages number 2-60 and 2-61. Page 3-7 is revised to eliminate the following language under the section entitled Parking Requirements: "District is located within Zone 1 of the In-Lieu Fee Parking Program which means that properties within the District may be allowed to meet a portion of their on-site parking requirement by paying a fee. 'I This language shall be replaced with the following: "District is located within Zone 1 of the In-Lieu Fee Parking Program which means that properties east of the AT&SF Railroad Right-of-way within the District may be allowed to meet a portion of their on-site parking requirement by paying a fee, It as shown on the attached replacement page number 3-7. Page 3-17 is revised to eliminate the following language under the section entitled Parking Requirements: "District is located within Zone 2 of the In-Lieu Fee Parking Program which means that properties within the District may be allowed to meet a portion of their on-site parking requirement by paying a fee. " This language shall be replaced with the fo1lowing:"District is located within Zone 2 of the In-Lieu Fee Parking Program which means that properties east of the AT&SF Railroad Right-of-way within the District may be allowed to meet a portion of their on-site parking requirement by paying a fee. The following paragraph shall also be added 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HRC Reso. No 280 Page 4 to the subject section: "The In-Lieu Fee parking program shall only be permitted in the remaining redevelopment area west of the railroad right-of-way when it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the California Coastal Commission that 1) a bonafide fee has been established to implement such a program; 2) specific sites have been identified where parking facilities will be constructed; and 3) detailed criteria and procedures have been established for the annual assessment of parking utilization subject to the completion of a parking study or other technical information," as shown on the attached replacement page number 3-17. 8. Page 3-22 is revised to eliminate the reference to timeshares from the following paragraph to read as follows: "The boundaries of District 9 are shown in the map provided in Figure 14. District 9 will continue to provide a wide mix of uses with an emphasis upon facilities, goods and services to tourists and regional visitors traveling along the coast. High quality hotels, restaurants and retail shops will be emphasized," as shown on the attached replacement page number 3-22. 9. Page 3-23 is revised to delete the following paragraph from the section entitled Parking Requirements: "District is located within Zone 2 of the In-Lieu Fee Parking Program which means that properties within the District may be allowed to meet a portion of their on-site parking requirements by paying a fee". The deleted paragraph shall be replaced with the following paragraph: "Properties within this District will be allowed to meet a portion of their on-site parking requirements by paying an in-lieu fee until the CitylRedevelopment Agency can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the California Coastal Commission that 1) a bonafide fee has been established to implement such a program; 2) specific sites have been identified where parking facilities will be constructed; and 3) detailed criteria and procedures have been established for the annual assessment of parking utilization subject to the completion of a parking study or other technical information. A local coastal program amendment must be approved by the Coastal Commission before the Parking In-Lieu Fee Program may be implemented within this District, as shown on the attached replacement page number 3-23. .... .... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HRC Reso. No 280 Page 5 10. Page 6-1 is revised to add a statement that the Parking In-Lieu Fee Program will be effective for all properties east of the railroad right-of-way. The following paragraph under the section entitled Minimum Parking Requirements is revised to read as follows: "The parking standards for on-site parking for the properties located within the Village Redevelopment Area are set forth in the charts which follow this page. The requirements set forth within the following charts reflect the shared trip and high turnover characteristics of parking in a neighborhood-oriented commercial district, such as the Village Redevelopment Area. The applicant for a project or a land use change shall be required to satisfy the on-site parking requirements as set forth within this Chapter. The applicant may satisfy the parking obligation by providing the parking on- site or by receiving approval to implement one of the options noted in the "Parking Options" section of this Chapter, provided, however, that the in-lieu fee option shall only be permitted for those properties located east of the AT&SF Railroad Right-of-way," as shown on the attached replacement page number 6-1. .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 " _. / +. 34- y. 25. -_ 2& -- 37 28 1 -_ .: " ~- "- -_ - -. " - i_ - - # ~ ~ _- I e HRC Reso. No 280 Page 6 11. Page 6-5 is revised to add implementing language for the Parking In-Lieu Fee Program. The following paragraph which serves as No. 3 under the Parking Options section is revised to read as follows: "In-Lieu Fee may be paid toward maintenance of existing or development of future, public parking facilities for properties in areas of the Village Redevelopment Area which are located east of the AT&SF railroad right-of-way. An in lieu fee parking program shall only be permitted in the remaining redevelopment area west of the railroad right-of-way when it can be demonstrated that 1) a bonafide fee has been established to implement such a program; 2) specific sites have been identified where parking facilities will be constructed; and, 3) detailed criteria and procedures have been established for the annual assessment of parking utilization subject to the completion of a parking study or other technical information. The broader program must be first reviewed and approved by the Coastal Commission as a separate LCP amendment for areas of the Village west of the AT&SF railroad right-of-way. (See Page 6-6 for full description of the Agency's proposed In- Lieu Fee Program for the Village Redevelopment Area), " as shown on the attached replacement page number 6-5. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a Special meeting of the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 13th day of August , 1996 by the following vote to wit: AYES: Commissioners Lewis, Nygaard, Kulchin, Hall and Finnila NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None .~ SECMTARY TO THE COMMISSION "