HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-05-02; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; Resolution 3241 1 0 e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 374
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPME
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA DENY1
FOR A TEN UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT, INCLUDING SET BP
VARIANCES, THE ESTABLISHMENT OF RH GENERAL PLAN DENS
INCREASE TO EXCEED THE ESTABLISHED GROWTH MANAGEME
CONTROL POINT (19 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) ON PROPEF
LOCATED AT 2530 STATE STREET IN LAND USE DISTRICT 4 OF 1
VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN
APPLICANT: PARK LAGUNA LLC
CASE NO: RP 99-03
MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT (RP 99-03) WITHOUT PREJUDI
DESIGNATION (15-23 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND A DENS
WHEREAS, on January 24, 2000, the City of Carlsbad Desi{
Board held a duly noticed public hearing to consider a Major Redevelopment F
I9 II 1L
9m
m> .Jzm 13 99-03) for construction of a new ten (1 0) unit apartment project on property
2530 State Street and adopted Design Review Board Resolution No. 272 reco oug
$055 14
Si+
LS pz 17 WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of t
mu!
a08
. c d2
jL,
u->a gooB 15 to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission that Major Redevelopment F
g g $ x- 16 99-03) be approved; and
0
aoJ
00 -
l8
19
Carlsbad, held duly noticed public hearings on March 21, 2000 and April 18, 2C
20
and consider the recommendations of all persons interested in or opposed to th
21 and
22 ll WHEREAS, Housing and Redevelopment Commission of tt-
23
26
25
Board and received public testimony; and 24
Carlsbad received the report and recommendation from its staff and the Desi1
28
27
WHEREAS, after careful consideration of all issues and af
exercise of its discretion, balancing all of the competing factors in the Villa
Manual, the Carlsbad General Plan and zoning ordinances, recognizing t
character of this site and its special topographical and locational character
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
considering the present character of development and redevelopmer
neighborhood; and
WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented at the public he:
application and reports and all other evidence relevant to this matter the Ho
Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, finds as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the project, as presented on March 21,2000 and April 1 i
out of character with the existing development in the neighborhood and the
redevelopment for the neighborhood.
3. The proposed project is too massive, too tall and overwhelmi
12
Do,
Yr aah 13
*a8
AlLU 14
&J;
vug s:2s
4. That because of its special location a proposed project for it st-
including a reduction in the density and intensity of this land use, should be pre! O z -I o. 16
special site, which is the entryway to the Village Area.
eeyur OoB 15 pleasing focal point in the neighborhood in the future and that other alternativc :;sz zwv) arras 03,. 5s~ 17
gq consideration or approval.
G
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5. There is an inadequate justification for density exceeding tt-
control point of 19 dwelling units per acre and, in order to exceed th:
management control point, additional public facilities or additional architectural
should be included to make the project more compatible with the neighbor1
aesthetically pleasing.
6. The pedestrian spaces and circulation have not been de:
relationship to the land use at this location in order to provide a pedestriar
building design, landscaping and hardscape.
- L
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
7. The proposed project will have an adverse impact on open SF
the surrounding area and it should be developed to reduce the impacts on thc
of open space within the surrounding area.
8. Neighboring properties have existing or proposed set backs g
that which are proposed for the subject property.
9. Although variances to increase the set back distances
appropriate, they are insufficient to mitigate the public views of the project, the
orientation of the project and the harmony and character of this special locatic
sensitive because of the existing and proposed redevelopment and its acc
special entryway views into the Village and the views from the site across exi
12
om SU? space, parks and lagoons.
m> &Em 13
_IOU;
608
&LC 14 m,iz rrt5n: qvo9 15 and inconsistent with the views expressed herein in that a reduced standard w
6>Q
8 Z $ 2 16 adverse impact on surrounding properties and will not meet the goals and ob
c : E 17 the Village Redevelopment Area and it will not result in an interesting ar
IO. In light of the above, a reduced front yard set back is in:
zuv)
E:;
5 5
<a1
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
appealing project which reinforces the village character of the area.
Therefore, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission d
proposed project without prejudice.
This action is final on the date this resolution is adopted by the Hc
Redevelopment Commission. The provisions of Chapter 1 .I6 of the Carlsbad
Code, "Time Limits for Judicial Review" shall apply:
A 3
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
no,
Y?
ALL, ow,N
$035
ORU.
Zwmo 021 - ==$a
50 >25
SU$
zgg
&$E
?;$?
FS aoA
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
"NOTICE TO APPLICANT"
"The time within which judicial review of this decision must be
sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has
been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code
Chapter 1 .I 6. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed
in the appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following the date on
which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the
decision becomes final a request for the record of the proceedings
accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to cover the
estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which such
petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day
following the date on which the record is either personally delivered or mailed
to the party, or his attorney of record, if he has one. A written request for the
preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk,
City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California 92008."
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meetir
Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad on the 2nd
of May 2000, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Lewis, Hall, Nygaard and Kulchin
NOES: Commissioner Ramona Finnila
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
I
~
4