HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-08-01; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; Resolution 3311
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 331
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT (RP 99-11) FOR A
106-SUITE “EXTENDED STAY” HOTEL, INCLUDING VARIANCES
TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT AND EXCEED
THE MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS, ON PROPERTY LOCATED
IMMEDIATELY WEST OF INTERSTATE 5 BETWEEN THE
TERMINUS OF GRAND AVENUE AND THE TERMINUS OF LAGUNA
DRIVE IN LAND USE DISTRICT 3 OF THE VILLAGE
REDEVELOPMENT AREA AND IN LOCAL FACILITIES ZONE 1.
APPLICANT: CARLSBAD VILLAGE SUITES, LLC
CASE NO: RP 99-l 1
WHEREAS, on June 26, 2000, the City of Carlsbad Design Review Board held a duly
noticed public hearing to consider a Major Redevelopment Permit (RP 99- 11) for construction of a
106-suite “extended stay” hotel on property located immediately west of Interstate 5 between the
terminus of Grand Avenue and the terminus of Laguna Drive, and adopted Design Review Board
Resolutions No. 274 and 275 recommending to the Housing and Redevelopment Commission that
Major Redevelopment Permit (RP 99-l 1) be approved; and
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, on the
date of this resolution held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the recommendation and heard
all persons interested in or opposed to Major Redevelopment Permit (RP 99-11); and
WHEREAS, the recommended approval includes findings granting variances for the front,
side, and rear yard setbacks which exceed the standard range; and
WHEREAS, the recommended approval includes findings granting a variance for an increase
in maximum building height from 35’-0” to 40’-5”; and
WHEREAS, as a result of an environmental review of the subject project conducted pursuant
to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the
Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was
issued for the subject project by the Planning Department on April 24, 2000 and recommended for
approval along with the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program by Design Review Board
HRC RESO NO. 331
PAGE 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
h
Resolution No. 274 on June 26,200O.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California as follows:
1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
2. That Major Redevelopment Permit (RP 99-11) is APPROVED and that the findings and
conditions of the Design Review Board contained in Resolution No. 275 on file in the City Clerk’s
Office and incorporated herein by reference, are the findings and conditions of the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission with the added condition that the wall generally located along Hope
Avenue between Laguna and Grand Avenues be constructed as soon as practicable and no later than
the actual commencement of construction of any buildings.
3. That the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad has reviewed,
analyzed and considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration (RP 99-l l), the environmental impacts
therein identified for this project and any comments thereon. The Housing and Redevelopment
Commission fmds there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the
environment and hereby approves the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program. The Housing and Redevelopment Commission finds that the Mitigated Negative
Declaration (RP 99-11) reflects the independent judgment of the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission of the City of Carlsbad.
4. That the City Council, acting as the Housing and Redevelopment Commission, hereby
grants a waiver from the moratorium on the issuance of building permits per NS-516 for the subject
project based on the following findings:
a. The subject project is located in an area where all public improvements, including
curb, gutter, and sidewalk are highly desirable and necessary for the enhancement of
a pedestrian-oriented environment;
b. The project is required to construct public improvements along that portion of the
property fronting Laguna Drive and Grand Avenue and the required improvements
HRC RESO NO. 331
PAGE 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2s
27
will not he incompatible with the neighborhood; and
c. The applicant agrees to construct the subject improvements.
5. That this action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission. The provision of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code,
“Time Limits for Judicial Review” shall apply:
II NOTICE TO APPLICANT:
“The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought, or other exactions
hereafter collectively referred to, is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6,
which has been made applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code
Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the
appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day following the date on which this decision
becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision becomes final a request for the
record of the proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an amount sufficient to
cover the estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which such petition
may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on
which the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or his/her attorney of
record, if he/she has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the
proceedings shall be filed with the City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive,
Car&bad, California, 92008.”
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the Ist day of August ,
2000 by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Hall, Finnila, Nygaard and Kulchin.
NOES: Commissioner Lewis.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
HRC Rl?SO NO. 331
PAGE 3