HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-08-06; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; Resolution 3561
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 356
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. CDPO1-16, AND TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. CTOl-IO, FOR A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT CONSISTING OF SIXTY-FIVE (65) CONDOMINIUM UNITS
AND 8,662 SQ. FT. OF RETAIL SHOPS ON PROPERTY LOCATED
BETWEEN CARLSBAD BLVD., WASHINGTON ST., CHRISTIANSEN
WAY, AND BEECH AVE. IN LAND USE DISTRICT 1 OF THE
CARLSBAD VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT AREA AND IN LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1.
APPLICANT: ANASTASI DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
CASE NO: RP 01-06/CDP 01-16/CT 01-10
APPROVING MAJOR REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. RPO1-06,
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2002, the City of Carlsbad Design Review Board held a duly noticed
public hearing to consider a Major Redevelopment Permit (RP 01-06), Coastal Development Permit
(CDP 01-16), and Tentative Tract Map (CT 01-10) for a mixed-use development project consisting of
sixty-five (65) condominium units and 8,662 square feet of retail shops on property located between
Carlsbad Blvd., Washington St., Christiansen Way, and Beech Ave., and adopted Design Review
Board Resolutions No. 285, 286, 287, and 288 recommending to the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission that Major Redevelopment Permit (RP 01-06), Coastal Development Permit (CDP 01-16),
and Tentative Tract Map (CT 01-10) be approved; and
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, on the date
of this resolution held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the recommendation and heard all
persons interested in or opposed to Major Redevelopment Permit (RP 01-06), Coastal Development
Permit (CDP 01-16), and Tentative Tract Map (CT 01-10); and
WHEREAS, the recommended approval includes findings establishing the High Residential
(RH) density range of 15-23 dwelling units per acre for the subject property; and
WHEREAS, the recommended approval includes findings granting a density bonus of no more
than 25% over the Growth Management Control Point in exchange for 20% of the total units being
restricted and affordable to low income households; and
WHEREAS, the recommended approval includes findings granting modifications to the
HRC RES0 NO. 356
PAGE 1
~
1
1
1
1,
1,
l!
11
1:
11
l!
2(
2'
2;
2:
2r
2E
2E
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
3
1
I
?
3
1
)
i
-
planned development standards as an additional economic incentive (permitted under the density
bonus regulations) to make the provision of affordable units feasible; and
WHEREAS, as a result of an environmental review of the subject project conducted pursuant
to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the
Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad, aNegative Declaration was issued for the
subject project by the Planning Department on June 5,2002 and recommended for approval by Design
Review Board Resolution No. 285 on June 24,2002.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California as follows:
1. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
2. That Major Redevelopment Permit (RI' 01-06), Coastal Development Permit (CDP
01-16), and Tentative Tract Map (CT 01-10) are APPROVED and that the findings and
conditions of the Design Review Board contained in Resolutions No. 285, 286,287, and 288,
on file in the City Clerk's Office and incorporated herein by reference, are the findings and
conditions of the Housing and Redevelopment Commission with the added condition that
the street facing walls of Buildings 1 and 10 shall include additional articulations or other
architectural features to enhance their aesthetic appeal to the satisfaction of the Housing and
Redevelopment Director.
3. That the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad has
reviewed, analyzed and considered the Negative Declaration (RI'01-06/CDI'O1-16/CTOl-lO),
the environmental impacts therein identified for this project and any comments thereon. The
Housing and Redevelopment Commission finds there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect on the environment and hereby approves the Negative
Declaration. The Housing and Redevelopment Commission finds that the Negative
Declaration (RP01-06/CDl'Ol-16/CTOl-10) reflects the independent judgment of the Housing
and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad.
HRC RES0 NO. 356
PAGE 2
~~ ~~
1
C
f
I
E
E
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4. That this action is final the date this resolution is adopted by the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission. The provision of Chapter 1.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, “Time
Limits for Judicial Review” shall apply:
NOTICE TO APPLICANT:
“The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought, or other exactions hereafter
collectively referred to, is governed by Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, which has been made
applicable in the City of Carlsbad by Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 1.16. Any petition or other
paper seeking judicial review must be filed in the appropriate court not later than the ninetieth day
following the date on which this decision becomes final; however, if within ten days after the decision
becomes final a request for the record of the proceedings accompanied by the required deposit in an
amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of preparation of such record, the time within which such
petition may be filed in court is extended to not later than the thirtieth day following the date on which
the record is either personally delivered or mailed to the party, or hisher attorney of record, if he/she
has one. A written request for the preparation of the record of the proceedings shall be filed with the
City Clerk, City of Carlsbad, 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, California, 92008.”
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 61h day of August, 2002 by
the following vote to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Lewis, Kulchin, Finnila, Nygaard, and Hall
NOES: None
ATTEST:
7dL
RAYMOND R. PATCHETT, SECRETARY
HRC RES0 NO. 356
PAGE 3