HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-09-28; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; Resolution 491HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 491
A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
A TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT RP 05-03 TO
DEMOLISH A HOTEL, RESTAURANT, AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
AND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THREE-STORY, 104-ROOM HOTEL
PROJECT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
CARLSBAD BOULEVARD BETWEEN PINE AVENUE AND OAK AVENUE
IN THE MELLO II SEGMENT OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AND
IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1.
CASE NAME: SPRINGHILL SUITES CARLSBAD
CASE NO: RP 05-03x1
9 WHEREAS, SC HOTELS LLC, "Developer" and "Owner", has filed a verified
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as
Portion of Block 18, Town of Carlsbad per Map No. 775,
12 Recorded 2-15-1894 and Portion of Tract 100, Carlsbad Lands
per Map 1661, Recorded 3-1-1915, all in the City of Carlsbad,
13 County of San Diego, State of California. APN 203-250-08 and
26-00
14
("the Property"); and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for an extension of a Major16
Redevelopment Permit, known as RP 05-03 for the Springhill Suites Carlsbad project originally
approved by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission on May 1, 2007; and
19 WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission did hold a duly noticed public
20 hearing as prescribed by law to consider said permit extension request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
22 arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Board considered all factors related to the
23 extension of Major Redevelopment Permit 05-03.
24
25
26
27
28
HRC RESO NO.
1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Housing and Redevelopment
2 Commission as follows:
3 A. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
4
B. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, Housing and
5 Redevelopment Commission hereby APPROVES an additional two (2) year
extension of Major Redevelopment Permit 05-03 for the Springhill Suites Carlsbad
6 project, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
7 GENERAL AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY FINDINGS:
8 1. The Housing and Redevelopment Commission, as a responsible agency under CEQA, has
considered and concurs with the findings of the Negative Declaration.
2. The project remains consistent with the land use plan, development standards, design
guidelines and other applicable regulations set forth within the Village Master Plan and
j j Design Guidelines, with approval of the findings set forth in Design Review Board Resolution
No. 319 dated March 7, 2007 and approved by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission
12 on May 1,2007.
13 CONDITIONS:
14 1. The Housing and Redevelopment Commission does hereby APPROVE a two (2) year
extension of Major Redevelopment Permit 05-03 for the Springhill Suites Carlsbad project to
allow the applicant additional time to apply for and receive approval of the building permits
for the subject project, subject to the conditions set forth in Design Review Board Resolution
No. 319 dated March 7, 2007 and approved by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission
17 on May 1, 2007. The permit shall be extended two (2) years from the date of the first permit
expiration which is August 7, 2010. The new expiration date for the permit shall be August 7,
18 2012.
19 2. All conditions contained in Design Review Board Resolution No. 319 dated March 7, 2007,
for RP 05-03 are incorporated herein by reference and remain in effect, except Condition Nos.
20 36 and 37 which are superseded by Conditions 3-8 below.
71 Engineering
22 3. Developer shall cause property owner to process, execute and submit an executed copy to the
23 City Engineer for recordation a City standard Permanent Stormwater Quality Best
Management Practice Maintenance Agreement for the perpetual maintenance of all treatment
24 control, applicable site design and source control, post-construction permanent Best
Management Practices prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever
25 occurs first for this project.
26 4. Developer shall comply with the City's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall
implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include but are
27 not limited to: pollution control practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff
during construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational2o
HRC RESO NO.
1 practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or
reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water or stormwater conveyance
2 system to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify prospective owners and
tenants of the above requirements.
~. Developer shall complete and submit to the City Engineer a Project Threat Assessment Form
(PTAF) pursuant to City Engineering Standards. Concurrent with the PTAF, Developer shall
5 also submit the appropriate Tier level Storm Water Compliance form and appropriate Tier
level Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as determined by the completed PTAF
6 all to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
7 6. This project is subject to 'Priority Development Project' requirements. Developer shall
prepare and process a Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP), subject to City Engineer
approval, to demonstrate how this project meets new/current storm water treatment
requirements per the City's Standard Urban Storm Water Management Plan (SUSMP), latest
9 version. In addition to new treatment control BMP selection criteria in the SUSMP, the
Developer shall use low impact development (site design) approaches to ensure that runoff
from impervious areas (roofs, pavement, etc) are drained through landscaped (pervious) areas
11 prior to discharge. Developer shall pay all applicable SWMP plan review and inspection fees
per the City's latest fee schedule.
12
7. Developer acknowledges upcoming hydromodification (runoff reduction) requirements may
13 impact how this project treats and/or retains storm runoff. Hydromodification involves
detailed site design and analysis to reduce the amount of post-development run-off by
14 mimicking the natural hydrologic function of the site, preserving natural open-spaces and
natural drainage channels, minimizing use of new impervious surfaces, and promoting onsite
infiltration and evaporation of run-off. During final design, Developer shall demonstrate
compliance with storm water requirements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
17 8. Developer shall incorporate measures with this project to comply with Standard Stormwater
Requirements per the City's Standard Urban Stormwater Management Plan (SUSMP). These
18 measures include, but are not limited to: 1) reducing the use of new impervious surfaces
(paving), 2) designing drainage from impervious surfaces to discharge over pervious areas
19 (e.g.: turf, landscape areas), 3) and designing trash enclosures to avoid contact with storm
runoff, all to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HRC RESO NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as
"fees/exactions."
You have 90 days from the date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning,
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a
NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a Special Meeting of the Housing and
Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 28th day of
September, 2010 by the following vote to wit:
AYES: Commission Members Lewis, Hall, Packard and Blackburn.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ATTEST:
LISA HILDABRAND, SECRETARY
£ <r/ESTABUSHED\^
HRC RESO NO.