Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-09-28; Housing & Redevelopment Commission; Resolution 491HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 491 A RESOLUTION OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF REDEVELOPMENT PERMIT RP 05-03 TO DEMOLISH A HOTEL, RESTAURANT, AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THREE-STORY, 104-ROOM HOTEL PROJECT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD BETWEEN PINE AVENUE AND OAK AVENUE IN THE MELLO II SEGMENT OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM AND IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1. CASE NAME: SPRINGHILL SUITES CARLSBAD CASE NO: RP 05-03x1 9 WHEREAS, SC HOTELS LLC, "Developer" and "Owner", has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as Portion of Block 18, Town of Carlsbad per Map No. 775, 12 Recorded 2-15-1894 and Portion of Tract 100, Carlsbad Lands per Map 1661, Recorded 3-1-1915, all in the City of Carlsbad, 13 County of San Diego, State of California. APN 203-250-08 and 26-00 14 ("the Property"); and WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for an extension of a Major16 Redevelopment Permit, known as RP 05-03 for the Springhill Suites Carlsbad project originally approved by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission on May 1, 2007; and 19 WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Commission did hold a duly noticed public 20 hearing as prescribed by law to consider said permit extension request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and 22 arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Board considered all factors related to the 23 extension of Major Redevelopment Permit 05-03. 24 25 26 27 28 HRC RESO NO. 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the Housing and Redevelopment 2 Commission as follows: 3 A. That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 4 B. That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, Housing and 5 Redevelopment Commission hereby APPROVES an additional two (2) year extension of Major Redevelopment Permit 05-03 for the Springhill Suites Carlsbad 6 project, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: 7 GENERAL AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY FINDINGS: 8 1. The Housing and Redevelopment Commission, as a responsible agency under CEQA, has considered and concurs with the findings of the Negative Declaration. 2. The project remains consistent with the land use plan, development standards, design guidelines and other applicable regulations set forth within the Village Master Plan and j j Design Guidelines, with approval of the findings set forth in Design Review Board Resolution No. 319 dated March 7, 2007 and approved by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission 12 on May 1,2007. 13 CONDITIONS: 14 1. The Housing and Redevelopment Commission does hereby APPROVE a two (2) year extension of Major Redevelopment Permit 05-03 for the Springhill Suites Carlsbad project to allow the applicant additional time to apply for and receive approval of the building permits for the subject project, subject to the conditions set forth in Design Review Board Resolution No. 319 dated March 7, 2007 and approved by the Housing and Redevelopment Commission 17 on May 1, 2007. The permit shall be extended two (2) years from the date of the first permit expiration which is August 7, 2010. The new expiration date for the permit shall be August 7, 18 2012. 19 2. All conditions contained in Design Review Board Resolution No. 319 dated March 7, 2007, for RP 05-03 are incorporated herein by reference and remain in effect, except Condition Nos. 20 36 and 37 which are superseded by Conditions 3-8 below. 71 Engineering 22 3. Developer shall cause property owner to process, execute and submit an executed copy to the 23 City Engineer for recordation a City standard Permanent Stormwater Quality Best Management Practice Maintenance Agreement for the perpetual maintenance of all treatment 24 control, applicable site design and source control, post-construction permanent Best Management Practices prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever 25 occurs first for this project. 26 4. Developer shall comply with the City's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include but are 27 not limited to: pollution control practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff during construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational2o HRC RESO NO. 1 practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water or stormwater conveyance 2 system to the maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify prospective owners and tenants of the above requirements. ~. Developer shall complete and submit to the City Engineer a Project Threat Assessment Form (PTAF) pursuant to City Engineering Standards. Concurrent with the PTAF, Developer shall 5 also submit the appropriate Tier level Storm Water Compliance form and appropriate Tier level Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as determined by the completed PTAF 6 all to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 7 6. This project is subject to 'Priority Development Project' requirements. Developer shall prepare and process a Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP), subject to City Engineer approval, to demonstrate how this project meets new/current storm water treatment requirements per the City's Standard Urban Storm Water Management Plan (SUSMP), latest 9 version. In addition to new treatment control BMP selection criteria in the SUSMP, the Developer shall use low impact development (site design) approaches to ensure that runoff from impervious areas (roofs, pavement, etc) are drained through landscaped (pervious) areas 11 prior to discharge. Developer shall pay all applicable SWMP plan review and inspection fees per the City's latest fee schedule. 12 7. Developer acknowledges upcoming hydromodification (runoff reduction) requirements may 13 impact how this project treats and/or retains storm runoff. Hydromodification involves detailed site design and analysis to reduce the amount of post-development run-off by 14 mimicking the natural hydrologic function of the site, preserving natural open-spaces and natural drainage channels, minimizing use of new impervious surfaces, and promoting onsite infiltration and evaporation of run-off. During final design, Developer shall demonstrate compliance with storm water requirements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 17 8. Developer shall incorporate measures with this project to comply with Standard Stormwater Requirements per the City's Standard Urban Stormwater Management Plan (SUSMP). These 18 measures include, but are not limited to: 1) reducing the use of new impervious surfaces (paving), 2) designing drainage from impervious surfaces to discharge over pervious areas 19 (e.g.: turf, landscape areas), 3) and designing trash enclosures to avoid contact with storm runoff, all to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HRC RESO NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a Special Meeting of the Housing and Redevelopment Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 28th day of September, 2010 by the following vote to wit: AYES: Commission Members Lewis, Hall, Packard and Blackburn. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. ATTEST: LISA HILDABRAND, SECRETARY £ <r/ESTABUSHED\^ HRC RESO NO.