HomeMy WebLinkAbout1957-10-08; Planning Commission; Resolution 33r
e
il c a
1
2
3
4
5
el 7
RESOLUTION NO. 33
A RESOLUTION OF THE CARLSBAD CITY PLAMNWG GOMMISSIQN REGQMMENDING
ZONE R-3 OF CERTAIN DESIGNATED PRCFERTY IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD.
RECLASSIFICATION .FROM ZONE R-1 to
RESOLVED, that in the matter of the application of WM. A. SAW
AND NELLE M. SAWYERS, for a reclassification from R-1 to R-3 tha
8
10
from the northerly right-of-way line of Chinquapin Avenue extending nc 9
certain property described as all that property fronting on Pi0 Pic0 Dr
finds and notes as follows: 11
to the southerly right-of-way 'line of Elm A.venue , the Planning Cornmi;
12 1. Subject property is classified'by Ordinance No. 9060 as R-P t
13
2. Ordinance No. 9060 provides that a potential designation may 14
also indicated by the zoning map as "Potential 2-3".
(a) The adoption of a precise plan, as defined by law, and 16
activated and made the applicable classification by two concurrent actii 15
17 containing accurate design of possible physical features sucl
18 as streets, alleys, loading areas, building sites, etc. , as
19 provided for by state law and with particular respect to bein;
20
21
22
related to a prior adopted Master Plan.
(b) The adoption of an amendment to the zoning map to the
extent that the changed uses are permitted as modified by
23
make permissible the authorized uses which conform to both 24
the precise plan which, superimposed on the zoning map
THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in view of the 32
to Elm Avenue, " 31
has, pursuant to law, approved Precise Plan No. 1 "Pi0 Pic0 Drive, C 30
4. Under separate concurrent proceedings the Planning Commis 29
ordinance defined policies if alleys are provided. 28
of subject property from R-1 to R-3 would be fully in conformity to agI 27
or any "6" use shall be served by an alley for which reason the reclas 26
3. Ordinance No. 9050 requires that properties to be utilized fo 25
I
I/ @ e
1.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
that the reclassification is part of a dual proceeding on both of which pt
hearings produced no major object, and because both proceedings will 1
effect of carrying out the intent of the zoning ordinance as represented
'iPotential" designation applicable to subject property, the requested re
ification be approved and recommended to the City Council for its consj
and approval and adoption in the manner prescribed by law.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted b~
City Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on the 8t'n day of C
1957 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Jarvie, Swirsky, Yourell, Stringer, Bar
and Engelmann.
NO E S.: No ne
ABSENT: Commissioner FemeL
17
18 %'I. 8. EWALD, Secretary
%.4.3, E?-&/&(
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
/I
-2 -