HomeMy WebLinkAbout1959-05-12; Planning Commission; Resolution 115r 0 e ...
3. RESOLUTION NO. 115
2l al
4
51
~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CaRLsBAD CITY PLAIUING COMMISSION RECOBGNDING RECLASSIFICKIION
NATED PROPBTY fp.T THZ CITY OF CARLSBAD. FROH ZOAiE Ll TO ZONE R3 OF CERTaIN DESIG-
The Carlsbad City Planning Cormnission does resolve as follows:
6' WWS, there was filed with this Commission on Wch 18, 1959, an
7
' 8
plication from John D, Angel0 requesting a change sf zone classification
under the provisions of Ordinance Ho. 9060; and
9 tdKETzEaS, the Carlsbad City Planning Commission did on the 14th day a
10
ast 12
eonsider reclassification from Zone R-1 to Zone R-P of that property desc 11
April, 1959, hold a duly advertised public hearing as prescribed by law i
13
14
15
A portion sf Lot 1, Section 1, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, in the City of Carlsbad,
being Tax Assessor's Parcels 16, 17, 18, 19,
20 and 21, Book 35, Page 171, of the Assessor's m3 of. San Diego County;
16 and
17 WHEZFAS, the Carlsbad City Planning Conmission continued the heark
18
No, 8 to include in the public hearing contiguous property described as : 19
from April 14, 1959, to May 12 , 1959, and adopted Resolution of Intentioj
20
21 1
A portion of Lot 1, Section 1, Township 12
. Assessor's Map of San Bego County; 22
24 1 WHEREAS, the Carlsbad City Planning Commission did on the 12th day
South, Range 5 Wesk, in the City of Carlsbad,
being Tax Assessor's Parcels 22U, 22A, 23A, I 23Xl., Z4A and 24x1, Book 35, Page 171, of the
23 and
I
2 5 11 May, 195y0 hold a duly advertised public hearing as prescribed by law tc
26
2'7
1 consider reclassification from 'Zone R-1 to Zone RP of the above descrik
I property; and
28 I
34
WHEXEASO the Commission has found the following facts to exist:
29 ' 1, Zn the interest of good planning and due to the topographic loc
it would be more logical to rezone the property to R-3, being a mol
31
32
ll
restrictive zone than RP.
2, There is a sufficient amount of RP zoning in the area, but no
- I1 0 0 e
1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BSOLVED, that the reclassification of the ab01 4
income. 3
3. The highest and best use of the property would be for residentid 2
buffer zone between R-1 and RP,
5
APJD FINALLY RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to 7
approved: 6
described property from Zone R-1 to Zone R-3 is hereby recommended to be
8 the City Council for its attention in the manner prescribed by law.
9'
1 vote, to wit: 11
Planning Commission held on the 12th day of Hay, 1959, by the following 20
PASSED, .APPROVED AMD ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad Ci
3.2
13
AYES: Chairman Swirsky, Commissioners Netka, Zahler, Fennel, String
Clisbe and Jarvie,
NOES : None. 14
15 ABSENT : None,
..
..I . ....
16
17
3.8 1 ATTEST: I Igp- 20 PRICE& Secretary
21 I
22 i
25 )I
23 I /I
24 I'
25
27
28
29
30
31
32
1
I i
i
I I
1
-2-